Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Species richness

Species richness refers to the total number of different species present within a defined ecological community, landscape, or region, serving as the simplest and most direct measure of biological diversity.^[1] This metric captures the variety of life forms in a given area without considering the abundance or evenness of individual species, making it a foundational component for assessing biodiversity patterns and ecosystem health.^[2] Estimating species richness often requires sampling techniques rather than complete censuses, as exhaustive inventories are rarely feasible in complex ecosystems. Common methods include species accumulation curves, which plot the cumulative number of species against sampling effort, and non-parametric estimators like Chao 1, which predict total richness based on the frequency of rare species (e.g., those observed only once or twice).^[1] These approaches account for sampling biases and heterogeneity, enabling ecologists to extrapolate unseen species and compare richness across sites. Factors influencing species richness include habitat area, environmental heterogeneity, climate, and disturbance regimes; for instance, larger areas typically support more species due to greater resource availability and reduced extinction risk.^[3] A hallmark pattern in species richness is the species-area relationship (SAR), described by the power law S = cA^z, where S is species richness, A is area, c is a constant, and z (typically 0.1–0.3) reflects the rate of increase—demonstrating that richness scales predictably with habitat size across islands, fragments, and continents.^[4] Another prominent global trend is the latitudinal diversity gradient, with species richness peaking at the equator and declining toward the poles, attributed to higher energy availability, stable climates, and evolutionary time in tropical regions.^[5] This gradient holds across taxa, from plants to invertebrates, underscoring historical and contemporary processes like speciation rates and dispersal limitations.^[6] The ecological significance of species richness extends to ecosystem functioning and resilience, where higher richness enhances processes like productivity, nutrient cycling, and resistance to perturbations—often more so than species turnover or composition alone.^[7] For example, in diverse grasslands and forests, increased species numbers stabilize biomass production and support multifaceted services such as pollination and water regulation.^[7] Conservation efforts prioritize maintaining species richness to mitigate biodiversity loss, as declines can cascade through food webs and impair ecosystem services vital for human well-being. Recent assessments indicate global species richness has declined by 2–11% over the 20th century due to land-use change, with climate change projected to become the primary driver by mid-century.^[8]^[9]^[10]

Fundamentals

Definition

Species richness, denoted as S, refers to the total number of distinct species present within a defined area, ecological community, or sample, making it the simplest and most straightforward metric for quantifying biodiversity.^[2] This measure captures only the variety of species identities without considering their relative abundances or evenness, providing an intuitive baseline for assessing biological diversity in various contexts, from local habitats to broader ecosystems.^[11] The term "species richness" was coined by ecologist Robert P. McIntosh in 1967, building on longstanding practices in community ecology where the enumeration of species had been a core descriptive tool since the early 20th century.^[11] McIntosh's introduction of the term formalized its use in quantitative analyses, distinguishing it from broader notions of diversity while emphasizing its foundational role in understanding community structure.^[12] Mathematically, it is expressed as S, the raw count of unique species observed, without adjustments for sampling effort or other factors.^[11] Within the framework of biodiversity, species richness is often partitioned into hierarchical components to address different spatial scales, as outlined by R. H. Whittaker in 1960.^[13] Alpha richness (\alpha) represents the species count at a local scale, such as within a single habitat or plot, while gamma richness (\gamma) denotes the total species count across a larger regional landscape or biome. Beta richness (\beta), in turn, serves as a measure of the partitioning or turnover of species composition between local sites, linking alpha and gamma levels without quantifying abundances. Unlike composite diversity indices such as Shannon entropy, which integrate both richness and evenness, species richness prioritizes species counts alone for its direct interpretability.^[11] Species richness, defined as the number of species in a given area or sample, serves as a fundamental metric of biodiversity but differs markedly from abundance-based indices that incorporate the distribution of individuals among species. Evenness, for instance, quantifies how evenly individuals are distributed across species, revealing imbalances where dominant species overshadow others, whereas species richness ignores such disparities and focuses solely on species count.^[14] Functional diversity, by contrast, emphasizes trait-based variation among species, assessing the range and distribution of functional roles they fulfill in ecosystems, such as resource use or trophic interactions, rather than mere taxonomic presence.^[15] This trait-oriented approach highlights ecological complementarity, which species richness overlooks by treating all species equally regardless of their functional contributions.^[16] Diversity indices like Simpson's and Shannon's provide alternatives that integrate both richness and abundance, offering a more nuanced view of community structure compared to the species-count focus of richness. Simpson's index, originally formulated as the probability that two randomly selected individuals belong to the same species, is calculated as $1 - \sum p_i^2, where p_i is the proportion of individuals in species i; higher values indicate greater diversity by penalizing dominance. The Shannon index, derived from information theory, measures entropy as -\sum p_i \ln p_i, weighting rare species more heavily and thus capturing both richness and evenness in a logarithmic scale. These indices contrast with species richness by accounting for relative abundances, making them less sensitive to the mere addition of rare species without altering community composition significantly.^[17] Evenness metrics further illustrate the gaps in species richness by explicitly addressing abundance distributions. Pielou's evenness index, J = H / \ln(S), where H is the Shannon index and S is species richness, normalizes diversity to assess how close a community is to maximum evenness, with values approaching 1 indicating equitable abundance shares.^[18] This highlights species richness's key limitation: it disregards relative abundances, potentially overvaluing communities with many rare species while underrepresenting those with balanced but fewer taxa.^[19] Despite these shortcomings, species richness remains sensitive to the presence of rare species, which can signal ecosystem health, but its failure to consider population sizes limits its ability to detect dominance or functional redundancy.^[20] In conservation contexts, such as IUCN assessments, it often functions as a baseline metric for more complex evaluations, providing a simple proxy for overall biodiversity before incorporating abundance or threat data.^[21]

Measurement and Estimation

Sampling Approaches

Sampling approaches in ecology are essential for quantifying observed species richness, which represents the number of species detected in a given area or sample. These methods involve systematic field techniques to collect presence-absence or abundance data, tailored to the habitat type and target taxa. Terrestrial environments often employ plot-based surveys, while aquatic systems require adaptations like nets or grabs to account for mobility and depth variations. Common sampling units include quadrats, transects, and fixed plots, each designed to standardize spatial coverage. Quadrats are square or circular fixed-area units, typically 1 m² for herbaceous plants or larger (e.g., 10 m × 10 m) for trees, where all individuals are counted or identified within the boundary. Transects involve linear paths, such as belt transects (e.g., 2 m wide × 50 m long) for mobile species like birds or reptiles, allowing enumeration along a corridor to capture linear habitat gradients. In aquatic environments, these translate to kick nets or electrofishing transects in streams, where organisms are collected over a defined length to estimate richness in flowing water. Plot-based surveys, like nested plots, scale from small herb layers to canopy trees, providing hierarchical data for multi-strata communities.083[2091:ASUFSV]2.0.CO;2) Standardizing sampling effort is crucial to ensure comparability across studies and minimize underestimation of richness due to insufficient intensity. Fixed-area plots control for space, such as 1 m² quadrats for vascular plants where exhaustive searches yield reliable counts, while time-based methods like 30-minute point counts for birds standardize observer effort, recording vocalizations or sightings from a fixed point. In heterogeneous landscapes, multiple replicates (e.g., 10–20 plots per site) are recommended to capture variability, with total effort often calibrated to asymptote in rarefaction curves, though raw collection protocols precede such analyses. Aquatic sampling similarly standardizes volume or time, as in 1 m³ ponar grabs for benthic invertebrates. Failure to standardize can inflate apparent richness differences between sites by orders of magnitude. Biases in sampling arise primarily from variations in detection probability, where some species are overlooked due to behavior, size, or habitat camouflage. Cryptic species, such as nocturnal insects or fossorial mammals, have low detectability (often <0.2 probability), leading to systematic undersampling compared to conspicuous taxa like diurnal birds. To mitigate this, stratified sampling divides heterogeneous habitats into homogeneous strata (e.g., by elevation or vegetation type) and allocates effort proportionally, reducing variance and bias by up to 50% in diverse forests. Rare or patchily distributed species further exacerbate undersampling, necessitating targeted protocols like baited traps for small mammals.079[0239:TEOSRD]2.0.CO;2) Modern tools have enhanced efficiency for vertebrate sampling without invasive handling. Camera traps, deployed in grids (e.g., 1–2 km spacing in tropical forests), passively record images triggered by motion, capturing elusive species like jaguars with detection rates exceeding 80% for medium-sized mammals over 1,000 trap-nights. Acoustic monitoring uses automated recorders to detect vocalizations, such as bat echolocation calls or frog choruses, enabling 24-hour coverage in remote areas and identifying species richness from sound libraries with accuracies >90% for trained classifiers. These non-lethal methods are particularly valuable in protected areas, though they require post-processing to confirm identifications.

Estimation Methods

Non-parametric estimators provide unbiased assessments of species richness by extrapolating from observed data, particularly addressing the bias introduced by rare species that are likely missed in samples. One of the most widely adopted is the Chao1 estimator, originally developed for abundance data but adaptable to incidence data, which calculates total richness as the sum of observed species (S_obs) and an estimate of unseen species based on the frequencies of rare taxa. The formula is given by:

\hat{S}_{Chao1} = S_{obs} + \frac{f_1^2}{2 f_2}

where f_1 represents the number of species observed exactly once (singletons) and f_2 the number observed exactly twice (doubletons); this approach assumes that singletons are more likely to indicate undiscovered species than more common ones.^[22] The estimator performs well when rare species constitute a significant portion of the community, providing a lower bound that is robust to heterogeneous abundances, though it can underestimate in highly even communities.^[23] Rarefaction techniques standardize species richness estimates across samples of unequal effort by simulating reduced sample sizes, enabling fair comparisons of alpha diversity. Hurlbert's individual-based rarefaction, a foundational method, computes the expected number of species in a subsample of size n drawn from a larger collection of N individuals with n_i individuals per species i, using the hypergeometric-like formula:

E(S_n) = \sum_{i=1}^{S_{obs}} \left[ 1 - \left( \frac{N - n_i}{N} \right)^n \right]

This interpolation generates rarefaction curves that asymptote toward true richness as sampling effort increases, while sample-based rarefaction extends the concept to incidence data by treating samples as units rather than individuals.^[24] These methods are particularly useful for visualizing sampling completeness and identifying effort thresholds beyond which additional sampling yields diminishing returns in richness discovery.^[25] Coverage-based approaches complement these by evaluating the proportion of the community represented in a sample, allowing extrapolation to full richness once completeness is assessed. Good's coverage estimator, a seminal metric, quantifies sample completeness as C = 1 - \frac{f_1}{N}, where f_1 is the number of singletons and N the total number of observations; values close to 1 indicate high coverage, signaling that observed richness approximates the true total.^[26] This framework underpins modern extrapolation methods, such as coverage-based rarefaction, which standardize comparisons at equivalent coverage levels rather than sample sizes, reducing bias from uneven detection probabilities.^[27] Recent advancements integrate environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding with these estimators, enhancing accuracy in complex communities like microbial assemblages where traditional morphological surveys often fail to capture cryptic or low-abundance taxa. By sequencing genetic material from environmental samples, eDNA reveals a more complete inventory, with studies demonstrating that traditional methods underestimate microbial species richness by 20-50% compared to metabarcoding approaches, particularly in diverse habitats such as soils and aquatic sediments.^[28] For instance, applying Chao1 or rarefaction to eDNA data has yielded 30% higher richness estimates in marine microbial communities, underscoring the method's potential to refine estimates in under-sampled domains.^[29]

Spatial and Temporal Patterns

Global Distribution Patterns

Species richness exhibits pronounced spatial variations across the globe, with one of the most consistent patterns being the latitudinal diversity gradient (LDG), where species richness increases from the poles toward the equator. This gradient is observed across numerous taxa, including plants, animals, and microbes, with tropical regions hosting the majority of global biodiversity. For instance, the Amazon basin supports approximately 40,000 vascular plant species, in stark contrast to the Arctic tundra, which harbors approximately 2,200 vascular plant species across its expanse.^[30] The LDG has been documented as a general phenomenon in meta-analyses of over 600 datasets spanning marine, freshwater, and terrestrial ecosystems. On islands, species richness follows principles outlined in the equilibrium theory of island biogeography, which posits that the number of species on an island reaches a dynamic balance between immigration and extinction rates. The model predicts species richness S as S = c A^{z}, where A is island area, c is a constant reflecting habitat suitability and propagule supply, and the exponent z typically ranges from 0.2 to 0.3 across various taxa and archipelagos. Isolation from mainland sources further modulates this pattern by reducing immigration rates, leading to lower richness on more remote islands, as evidenced in studies of oceanic archipelagos like the Galápagos and Hawaiian Islands. Certain habitats stand out as global biodiversity hotspots where species richness is exceptionally high relative to their area. Tropical rainforests, such as those in the Amazon and Congo basins, exemplify this, containing up to 10% of the world's known species despite covering only 6% of Earth's land surface. Similarly, coral reefs, often termed the "rainforests of the sea," occupy less than 1% of the ocean floor but support at least 25% of all marine species, including over 4,000 fish species and thousands of invertebrates. Recent analyses from the 2020s have also revealed mid-elevation peaks in species richness along mountain gradients, attributed to the greater available area at intermediate altitudes; for example, evolutionary diversity in trees peaks at mid-elevations along an Amazon-to-Andes transect, contrasting with monotonic declines in some highland systems.^[31]^[32] Patterns of species richness are inherently scale-dependent, varying between local (alpha diversity), which measures richness within a homogeneous habitat patch, and regional (gamma diversity), which encompasses the total richness across a larger landscape or biome. Beta diversity, representing the turnover of species composition between local sites, bridges these scales and often increases with geographic distance, contributing substantially to gamma diversity in heterogeneous environments like archipelagos or mountain ranges. This scale dependence underscores that global patterns emerge from the interplay of local assemblages and regional processes, as seen in vascular plant distributions where alpha richness is highest in tropical lowlands but gamma richness integrates broader turnover.^[33]

Trends Over Time

The fossil record reveals significant fluctuations in species richness over geological time scales. Following the Cambrian explosion around 541 million years ago, which marked a rapid diversification of animal phyla, the Paleozoic era saw continued marine biodiversification, culminating in the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (GOBE) approximately 485 to 443 million years ago, when global marine species richness peaked due to increased origination rates across major taxa.^[34] This period represented one of the most profound radiations in Earth's history, with genus-level diversity increasing stepwise after a Late Cambrian bottleneck.^[34] However, major mass extinctions punctuated these trends, notably the end-Permian event around 252 million years ago, which eliminated approximately 95-96% of marine species, severely resetting global richness and delaying recovery for millions of years.^[35] In more recent history, anthropogenic pressures have driven accelerated declines in species richness since the mid-20th century. Recent IPBES assessments, including the 2024 Nexus Assessment, indicate that biodiversity across multiple indicators has declined by around 2-6% per decade globally over the past 30-50 years, with land-based habitats experiencing at least a 20% reduction in native species abundance since 1900, intensifying post-1950 due to habitat loss and overexploitation.^[36]^[37] Complementing this, the WWF Living Planet Report 2024 documents an average 73% decline in the abundance of monitored vertebrate populations (mammals, birds, fish, amphibians, and reptiles) since 1970, reflecting broader losses in species richness driven by human activities.^[38] These trends are particularly acute in freshwater and terrestrial systems, underscoring a "system in peril" with implications for ecosystem stability.^[38] Despite widespread declines, some regions show recoveries in species richness through targeted restoration. In Europe, rewilding initiatives have facilitated the return of multiple bird species to restored wetlands, increasing local richness; for instance, habitat management and reintroductions have supported population growths exceeding 600% for species like the Eurasian spoonbill, contributing to overall avian diversity gains in protected wetland areas.^[39] Similarly, beaver reintroductions in wetland ecosystems have enhanced habitat heterogeneity, benefiting over 50 rare bird species and leading to documented increases in breeding bird richness by up to 68% in mature restored sites compared to younger ones.^[39] Looking forward, climate change poses additional threats to species richness, particularly in the tropics. Projections indicate that under the high-emission RCP8.5 scenario, up to 67% of plant species in regions like Central America and southern Mexico may be threatened, while many tropical marine systems could experience local extinctions exceeding 50%, amplifying extinction risks in biodiversity hotspots.^[40]^[41]

Influencing Factors

Biotic Drivers

Biotic drivers encompass a range of biological interactions among organisms that shape species richness by influencing coexistence, resource use, and community structure. These processes operate through direct and indirect mechanisms, such as interspecific competition, predation dynamics, mutualistic relationships, and disturbance events mediated by living organisms. Competition among species can limit richness by driving exclusion, but niche partitioning allows coexistence when species differentiate their resource use. The competitive exclusion principle, articulated by Gause in 1934, posits that two species occupying the same ecological niche cannot coexist indefinitely without one being displaced, as the superior competitor will dominate shared resources.^[42] This principle underscores how identical resource demands lead to competitive displacement, reducing local diversity unless niches diverge. Niche partitioning mitigates this by enabling species to exploit subsets of resources, such as different temporal, spatial, or trophic dimensions, thereby promoting coexistence and elevating species richness in heterogeneous environments. For instance, in resource-limited habitats, subtle differences in foraging times or prey sizes among similar species prevent exclusion and sustain higher diversity levels.^[43] Predation exerts top-down control on communities, often enhancing richness by preventing any single species from dominating through trophic cascades. Keystone predators, which disproportionately influence community structure relative to their abundance, maintain diversity by suppressing dominant herbivores or competitors. In coastal ecosystems, sea otters (Enhydra lutris) serve as a classic example, preying on sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus spp.) to curb overgrazing of kelp (Macrocystis spp.), thereby preserving kelp forests that support a broader array of invertebrate species.^[44] This predation-induced habitat complexity fosters higher invertebrate richness, as kelp provides refuge and food for diverse macroinvertebrates, illustrating how trophic cascades propagate positive effects on biodiversity. Broader studies confirm that such predator-mediated dynamics increase overall species richness by alleviating competitive pressures on lower trophic levels.^[45] Mutualistic interactions, particularly those involving symbionts and pollinators, actively promote species richness by enhancing establishment and reproduction. Pollinator networks, comprising diverse insects and their plant partners, facilitate gene flow and reproductive success, allowing rarer plant species to persist and increasing overall plant diversity in communities. Complex network structures, where generalist pollinators connect multiple plant species, buffer against local extinctions and support higher richness by ensuring pollination services across varied floral resources.^[46] Similarly, mycorrhizal fungi form symbiotic associations with tree roots, influencing diversity through nutrient exchange and soil feedback mechanisms. Ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi weaken negative conspecific density dependence in host trees compared to arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, facilitating greater tree species coexistence and contributing to elevated diversity in EM-dominated forests, particularly at higher latitudes.^[47] Disturbance regimes driven by biotic agents, such as herbivory or pathogen outbreaks, can modulate richness by resetting successional stages and creating opportunities for colonization. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis, proposed by Connell in 1978, argues that species richness peaks under moderate disturbance frequencies and intensities, as low disturbance allows competitive dominants to exclude others, while high disturbance favors only resilient pioneers. In tropical rainforests and coral reefs, periodic biotic disturbances like treefalls from lianas or grazing outbreaks prevent monodominance, allowing subordinate species to recruit and maximizing diversity at intermediate scales. This hypothesis highlights how biotic disturbances maintain heterogeneous patch dynamics, sustaining higher richness than stable or highly perturbed conditions.

Abiotic Drivers

Abiotic drivers of species richness encompass non-living environmental factors that influence the number of species in an ecosystem by shaping resource availability, habitat structure, and evolutionary opportunities. Among these, climate and temperature play a pivotal role through the energy-richness hypothesis, which posits that higher levels of available energy support greater species richness by allowing more individuals to persist, thereby increasing opportunities for speciation and reducing extinction risk. This hypothesis, originally formalized as an extension of species-area theory, suggests that energy constraints limit population sizes and thus the potential for diversity. For instance, in models of bird species richness across North America, solar energy inputs, often measured via potential evapotranspiration, explain 80-93% of the variation (r² = 0.80-0.93), highlighting the strong predictive power of energy metrics in temperate and tropical gradients.^[48] Habitat heterogeneity, driven by abiotic features like topography and geomorphology, further modulates species richness by creating diverse niches that facilitate coexistence. Topographic complexity, such as varied elevations and slopes, increases environmental variation, allowing species to partition resources along gradients of light, water, and soil exposure. Seminal analyses of mammal distributions in North America demonstrated that topographic heterogeneity outperforms other variables in predicting species richness, with complex terrains supporting higher species numbers compared to uniform lowlands. In urban contexts, however, habitat fragmentation induced by abiotic alterations like land development disrupts this heterogeneity; meta-analyses using experimental and satellite-derived data indicate that such fragmentation can reduce species richness by 13-75%, with edge effects contributing to these declines due to increased exposure to stressors like altered microclimates.^[49]^[50] These patterns underscore how abiotic structural diversity promotes richness, while its disruption diminishes it.^[51] Soil and water quality represent additional abiotic controls, where nutrient gradients influence productivity and, consequently, species richness. According to the resource ratio hypothesis, species diversity peaks at intermediate levels of resource supply, such as soil fertility, because extreme nutrient scarcity limits populations, while high fertility favors dominant competitors, reducing coexistence. Tilman's framework explains this unimodal pattern by emphasizing how varying ratios of limiting resources (e.g., nitrogen and light) allow multiple species to specialize, with empirical studies confirming higher plant richness on soils of moderate fertility compared to oligotrophic or eutrophic extremes. Water quality factors, including pH and salinity gradients, similarly structure aquatic and terrestrial assemblages, though their effects often interact with climate to amplify or dampen richness peaks.^[52] Geological history provides a long-term abiotic driver, with plate tectonics and resultant isolation profoundly affecting speciation rates and contemporary richness patterns. Continental drift and mountain-building events create barriers that promote allopatric speciation, elevating diversity in regions with dynamic tectonic histories. For example, the separation of landmasses has been linked to higher marine animal richness in tectonically active zones, where isolation fosters endemicity and diversification over millions of years. Terrestrial hotspots, such as those in Southeast Asia and the Andes, owe much of their elevated species richness to tectonic isolation, with models showing that plate movements explain up to 20-30% of variance in global diversity gradients independent of climate. These historical processes thus imprint lasting abiotic legacies on current biodiversity distributions.^[53]^[54]

Applications and Implications

Conservation Strategies

Species richness plays a central role in identifying biodiversity hotspots, which are prioritized regions for conservation due to their exceptional concentrations of endemic species facing high habitat loss. Norman Myers and colleagues defined these hotspots as areas harboring at least 1,500 endemic vascular plant species and having lost at least 70% of their original habitat, initially identifying 25 such regions that collectively support over 50% of the world's endemic plants despite covering only about 12% of Earth's land surface at the time. Subsequent updates by Conservation International expanded this to 36 hotspots, which as of 2024 encompass just 2.5% of global terrestrial land but host more than 50% of the planet's endemic plant species and 42% of endemic vertebrates, underscoring their disproportionate importance for safeguarding biodiversity.^[55]^[56] The 2022 Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), adopted under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), builds on this approach by targeting the effective conservation of at least 30% of terrestrial, inland water, coastal, and marine areas by 2030, with explicit emphasis on regions of high biodiversity importance such as those with elevated species richness to maximize protection of endemic and threatened species.^[57] In designing protected area networks, gamma richness—the total species diversity across landscapes—is prioritized to ensure connectivity and representation of regional biodiversity, allowing for gene flow and resilience against fragmentation. This landscape-scale metric guides the selection of sites that complement local (alpha) diversity by capturing beta diversity turnover, thereby optimizing network efficiency in conserving overall species pools. For instance, UNESCO World Heritage sites, designated for their outstanding universal value including biodiversity criteria, collectively harbor over 20% of mapped global species richness within only 1% of Earth's surface, demonstrating how richness thresholds inform international protection efforts.^[58] Restoration initiatives increasingly use species richness recovery as a key metric of success, tracking the return of native taxa to gauge ecosystem functionality and health. In mangrove replanting projects, for example, restored areas have shown macrobenthos species richness exceeding that of adjacent natural stands by approximately 12.5%, with restored sites achieving 18 species compared to 16 in unrestored ones after five years, highlighting rapid biodiversity gains that enhance habitat services like carbon sequestration and fisheries support.^[59] Species richness informs policy integration in frameworks like the Aichi Biodiversity Targets (2011–2020), where Target 11 aimed to conserve at least 17% of terrestrial areas through ecologically representative systems that include high-richness zones to safeguard ecosystems and genetic diversity. The post-2020 GBF extends this by establishing monitoring baselines for species status, including trends in richness and extinction risk, to evaluate progress toward halting biodiversity loss and ensuring sustainable use, with indicators tracking changes in species populations and habitats as proxies for overall richness dynamics.^[60]^[61]

Ecological and Management Uses

Species richness serves as a key bioindicator for assessing ecosystem health, particularly in aquatic environments where declines in richness often signal pollution or habitat degradation. For instance, in streams, the species richness of benthic macroinvertebrates, such as insects, is widely used to detect organic pollution levels, with higher richness indicating cleaner water conditions and lower richness correlating with elevated contaminants like nutrients or sediments.^[62] This approach is integrated into biological monitoring programs, where macroinvertebrate richness provides a reliable proxy for overall stream integrity because these organisms are sensitive to environmental stressors and reflect long-term water quality trends.^[63] In agricultural and forestry contexts, maintaining species richness associated with crops and forests enhances system resilience against pests, diseases, and environmental variability. A 2022 meta-analysis of pollinator-dependent crops demonstrated that greater pollinator species richness contributes to yield increases of approximately 20% on average, by improving pollination efficiency and stability across diverse taxa like bees and flies.^[64] Similarly, in forestry, higher tree species richness bolsters resistance to disturbances such as drought, as shown in a global analysis where diverse stands exhibited reduced mortality during drought compared to monocultures, though resilience to recovery may be affected differently.^[65] These applications underscore the role of richness in promoting sustainable practices that buffer against biotic and abiotic threats, such as invasive pests or climate extremes. Environmental impact assessments (EIAs) routinely incorporate species richness metrics to evaluate potential biodiversity losses from development projects, comparing baseline richness to predicted post-development levels. Protocols often require pre- and post-impact surveys of richness in affected habitats, such as wetlands or forests, to quantify changes and inform mitigation strategies, ensuring compliance with regulations that prioritize ecosystem integrity.^[66] For example, in infrastructure projects, richness data from floral or faunal communities help assess cumulative effects, with thresholds for significant impacts triggering compensatory measures like habitat restoration. In ecological research, species richness is a fundamental tool in metacommunity ecology to study dispersal dynamics, where variations in local and regional richness reveal how connectivity influences community assembly. Seminal work has shown that dispersal rates positively affect alpha-richness in patchy habitats, providing insights into how barriers or corridors shape biodiversity patterns across landscapes.^[67] Additionally, in network analysis, richness informs invasion risk modeling by examining interaction webs, such as plant-pollinator networks, where higher native richness often reduces invader success through competitive exclusion or resource partitioning.^[68] These applications highlight richness as a scalable metric for predicting ecological processes beyond site-specific assessments.

References

[1]
[PDF] How many species are there? Determining species richness.
The exercise is written for estimating the species richness of trees in forests but could easily be adapted for other plant or animal communities. KEYWORD ...
[2]
Species Richness - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Species richness (S) is the number of species within a defined region. The species richness of a region is obtained through sampling or via a census.
[3]
Species-Area Relationships Are Controlled by Species Traits - PMC
May 21, 2012 · The species-area relationship (SAR) is one of the most thoroughly investigated empirical relationships in ecology.
[4]
the species‐area relationship - Wiley Online Library
Dec 24, 2001 · The species-area relationship is often referred to as the closest thing to a rule in ecology ( Schoener, 1976).
[5]
Latitudinal Diversity Gradient in the Changing World - MDPI
Apr 25, 2022 · Although several explanations for the LDG have been proposed, these hypotheses are only based on species richness, evolution and the ecosystems.
[6]
On the processes generating latitudinal richness gradients - Frontiers
Dec 1, 2014 · We use a simulation model to examine four of the most common hypotheses for the latitudinal richness gradient and identify patterns that ...<|separator|>
[7]
Species richness is more important for ecosystem functioning than ...
Sep 20, 2021 · Our findings reveal that environmental heterogeneity strengthens the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and that species richness is a ...
[8]
Assessing the importance of species and their assemblages for the ...
May 19, 2023 · Biodiversity changes, such as decline in species richness and biotic homogenization, can have grave consequences for ecosystem functionality ...
[9]
An Index of Diversity and the Relation of Certain Concepts to Diversity
The uses in ecology of the terms richness, diversity, homogeneity, and similarity are considered in the context of recent studies of plant and animal ...
[10]
[PDF] How relevant are the concepts of species diversity and species ...
Species richness McIntosh (1967) was the first to coin the term species richness, but the concept itself is the oldest and most fundamental concept of ...
[11]
Diversity analysis: Richness versus evenness - PMC - NIH
Richness and evenness are two important components of any measure of diversity. This article presents a simple graphical method showing the tradeoff.
[12]
Species diversity and functional diversity relationship varies with ...
Apr 28, 2011 · We examined the relationship between taxonomy-based species diversity (in terms of richness and evenness) and trait-based functional diversity ...Introduction · Methods · Results · Discussion
[13]
The primary components of functional diversity - ResearchGate
Aug 7, 2025 · We present a definition based on the analogy of the components of species diversity – richness, evenness and divergence.
[14]
A conceptual guide to measuring species diversity - Roswell - 2021
Feb 9, 2021 · Because species richness, the Shannon index and the Gini–Simpson index do not measure the same quantities, justifying the choice of one of them ...Diversity metrics · Which Hill diversity to use? · Standardizing samples, then...
[15]
The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections
The diversity of small collections, all of whose members can be identified and counted, is defined by Brillouin's measure of information.Missing: evenness | Show results with:evenness
[16]
Choosing and using diversity indices: insights for ecological ...
Richness (S), or the number of species or attributes present, is the simplest metric used to represent diversity (Whittaker 1972), and it remains the most ...
[17]
The utility and limitations of species richness metrics in conservation
Aug 6, 2025 · Challenges arise because estimates of species richness are affected by area, scale and intensity of sampling, taxonomic grouping, estimation ...
[18]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022519366900130
[19]
Non-parametric estimation of the classes in a population
Aug 6, 2025 · PDF | On Jan 1, 1984, Anne Chao published Non-parametric estimation of the classes in a population | Find, read and cite all the research ...
[20]
Nonparametric Estimation and Comparison of Species Richness
May 16, 2016 · This approach aims to compare species richness estimates across assemblages. We focus on the nonparametric estimators that are universally valid for all ...
[21]
The Nonconcept of Species Diversity - ESA Journals
Species richness curves rise rapidly at first and then flatten out, so at sufficiently large sample sizes, the results of species richness comparisons tend to.
[22]
[PDF] a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies
Any proper species richness estimator can be used. Colwell et al. (2012) suggested using the Chao1 estimator (Chao. 1984) or abundance-based coverage ...
[23]
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470015902.a0026329
[24]
Sample coverage estimation, rarefaction, and extrapolation based ...
May 11, 2023 · A new analytical approach is introduced for enabling smooth coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation to compare richness among assemblages.
[25]
Assessing the efficacy of eDNA metabarcoding for measuring ...
Jan 15, 2021 · We demonstrate the utility and potential of this method for measuring microbial communities and forest biodiversity. We collected pure rainwater ...Missing: traditional | Show results with:traditional
[26]
Environmental DNA Metabarcoding in Marine Ecosystems - MDPI
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has transformed marine biodiversity monitoring by allowing non-invasive, cost-effective detection of species with ...
[27]
Plants (chapter 9) - Arctic Biodiversity Assessment
The vascular plant flora of the Arctic is relatively poor. Approximately 2,218 vascular plant species (including subspecies, apomictic aggregates and some ...
[28]
Tropical rainforests: Earth's richest ecosystems
The Amazon rainforest is a biodiversity hotspot. It's thought to be home to 10% of the world's known plant and animal species – and new ones are being ...
[29]
Coral reefs | UNEP - UN Environment Programme
Jan 20, 2025 · Coral reefs cover less than 1 per cent of the seafloor, but they support at least 25 per cent of marine species · Coral reefs are the most ...
[30]
Global patterns of vascular plant alpha diversity - Nature
Sep 1, 2022 · An exploration of alpha diversity patterns at multiple grain sizes can discriminate between areas where species richness is consistently high or ...
[31]
Cascading trend of Early Paleozoic marine radiations paused by ...
Mar 25, 2019 · Our method reveals a stepwise biodiversity increase with distinct Cambrian and Ordovician radiation events that are clearly separated by a 50-million-year-long ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[32]
The end-Permian mass extinction: a still unexplained catastrophe
Oct 6, 2014 · The end-Permian mass extinction is widely regarded as the largest mass extinction in the past 542 million years with loss of about 95% of marine species and 75 ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[33]
[PDF] BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES - IPBES
The IPBES' 2019 Global. Assessment Report on. Biodiversity and. Ecosystem Services comes at a critical time for the planet and all its peoples. The report's ...Missing: 1950 | Show results with:1950
[34]
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1821123116
[35]
[PDF] Wildlife comeback in Europe: The recovery of selected mammal and ...
Although the total biodiversity in Europe is still decreasing, many of the larger wildlife and bird species are coming back or show the first signs of that.
[36]
Climate change increases threat to plant diversity in tropical forests ...
Feb 29, 2024 · Our results show a high proportion (58–67%) of threatened species among the four experimental scenarios, with the highest proportion under RCP8.
[37]
Future marine ecosystem drivers, biodiversity, and fisheries ...
With the progress of climate change, species richness is projected to decrease in tropical regions and increase in mid-to high-latitude oceans (Worm and ...<|separator|>
[38]
The Competitive Exclusion Principle - Science
The Competitive Exclusion Principle: An idea that took a century to be born has implications in ecology, economics, and genetics.Missing: original | Show results with:original
[39]
Resource Partitioning and Why It Matters | Learn Science at Scitable
Resource partitioning helps to explain how seemingly similar species can coexist in the same ecological community without one pushing the others to extinction ...<|separator|>
[40]
Sea Otters: Their Role in Structuring Nearshore Communities
Sea otters control herbivorous invertebrate populations. Removal of sea otters causes increased herbivory and ultimately results in the destruction of ...
[41]
Trophic Cascades Across Diverse Plant Ecosystems - Nature
When ecosystems are green, predators are often holding grazers in check, while, when they are overgrazed, predator loss or removal is often responsible for ...
[42]
Pollinator richness, pollination networks, and diet adjustment along ...
Apr 11, 2022 · The best model of total wild pollinator richness showed that the number of pollinator species also increased with flower richness, while it ...
[43]
Mycorrhizal feedbacks influence global forest structure and diversity
Oct 19, 2023 · These findings indicate that mycorrhizal interactions likely play a foundational role in global forest diversity patterns and structure.
[44]
Predicting continental-scale patterns of bird species richness ... - NIH
In each table cell, the first entry is the simple r2 value for the correlation between observed and predicted species richness. The second entry is the slope of ...
[45]
Habitat heterogeneity as a determinant of mammal species richness ...
Jan 16, 1997 · We find that mammal species richness is best predicted by topographic heterogeneity and local variation in energy availability.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[46]
Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth's ecosystems
Mar 20, 2015 · Habitat fragmentation reduces biodiversity by 13 to 75% and impairs key ecosystem functions by decreasing biomass and altering nutrient cycles.
[47]
Global impacts of future urban expansion on terrestrial vertebrate ...
Mar 25, 2022 · Moreover, the urban land conversion will reduce local within-site species richness by 34% and species abundance by 52% per 1 km grid cell, and 7 ...Missing: satellite | Show results with:satellite
[48]
The Resource-Ratio Hypothesis of Plant Succession
The resource-ratio hypothesis assumes that each plant species is a superior competitor for a particular proportion of the limiting resources.
[49]
Plate tectonic regulation of global marine animal diversity - PNAS
May 15, 2017 · It has been hypothesized that global biodiversity is influenced by tectonically driven shifts in the arrangement of continental crust.
[50]
Plate tectonics drive tropical reef biodiversity dynamics - PMC
May 6, 2016 · We demonstrate that plate tectonics played a major role in driving tropical marine shallow reef biodiversity dynamics.
[51]
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities - Nature
Feb 24, 2000 · This article is a qualitative as well as a quantitative advance on a preliminary effort, which limited itself to vascular plants in 18 hotspots.
[52]
Target 3 - Convention on Biological Diversity
Target 3. Conserve 30% of Land, Waters and Seas. Ensure and enable that by 2030 at least 30 per cent of terrestrial, inland water, and of coastal and marine ...
[53]
Options for prioritizing sites for biodiversity conservation with ...
Protecting biodiversity requires consideration of alpha diversity to evaluate which species occur in which sites, gamma diversity to know whether all species ...
[54]
New research underscores the vital role played by the World ...
Aug 31, 2023 · UNESCO World Heritage sites harbour over 20% of mapped global species richness within just 1% of the Earth's surface.
[55]
Mangrove restoration reinstates similar macrobenthos communities ...
Dec 11, 2024 · The restored mangrove areas (S = 18) had higher species richness than the natural mangroves (S = 16) (Table S1). The 5-year-old restored ...Mangrove Restoration... · Results · Macrobenthos Species...
[56]
[PDF] Aichi Biodiversity Target 11
Aichi Biodiversity Targets ... include areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, such as areas high in species richness or.
[57]
Understanding and achieving species elements in the Kunming ...
Aug 8, 2024 · The framework states outcomes for species to be achieved by 2050 in goal A and establishes a range of targets to reduce pressures on biodiversity and halt ...Abstract · The Kunming–Montreal Global... · Goal A: Outcomes for species
[58]
Stream Biomonitoring Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates - Publications
With these surveys you know the number of individuals per sample (abundance), how many species are present in the stream (“species richness”), and how many ...
[59]
Benthic Macroinvertebrates as Ecological Indicators - Frontiers
Macroinvertebrate metrics are helpful tools for the assessment of water quality and overall aquatic ecosystem health. However, their degree of sensitivity and ...
[60]
A meta-analysis of their effect on crop productivity - ScienceDirect
Dec 1, 2022 · The productivity of pollinator-dependent crops improves with greater abundance and/or diversity of pollinators through several potential ...
[61]
Enhanced effects of species richness on resistance and resilience of ...
Sep 20, 2024 · We found that species richness enhanced resistance but weakened resilience of trees to drought globally.
[62]
[PDF] Biodiversity in EIA and SEA - Convention on Biological Diversity
Biodiversity is relevant to all types of impact assessment and should be addressed at all levels, from environmental impact assessment carried out for ...
[63]
Dispersal and Species Diversity: A Meta‐Analysis
I conducted meta‐analyses on experimental studies that manipulated species dispersal and measured this effect on species richness or diversity. In June 2005, I ...
[64]
Species traits and network structure predict the success and impacts ...
May 31, 2018 · We introduce pollinator species with different foraging traits into network models with different levels of species richness, connectance, and nestedness.