Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

HMS Incomparable

HMS Incomparable was the name given by John Arbuthnot Fisher to a proposed large for the Royal Navy, envisioned during as a revolutionary fast warship emphasizing superior speed, massive firepower, and oil-fueled efficiency to maintain British naval dominance, but never constructed after Fisher's resignation from the in 1915. Conceived initially in 1912 and refined through 1914–1915, the design represented Fisher's bold vision for naval innovation, shifting from coal to internal combustion engines for greater endurance and performance without the vulnerabilities of funnels or boilers. Designed by Major Hadcock of Elswick Ordnance, the ship was planned with a length of up to 1,000 feet and a beam of 86 feet, powered by 150,000 horsepower on quadruple screws to achieve speeds of 32 to 35 knots, far exceeding contemporary capital ships. Armament focused on overwhelming offensive capability, with ten 16-inch guns upgradable to 20-inch weapons (each weighing approximately 200 tons in proposals), supplemented by eight broadside 21-inch torpedo tubes, anti-submarine guns, and a dozen 60-foot motor boats armed with torpedoes. Armor included a 16-inch belt and diamond-shaped citadel amidships with a curved deck, though the overall structure was intentionally light and "flimsy" for a 10-year wartime lifespan, prioritizing disposability in an era of rapid technological change. The proposal emerged amid Fisher's return to the Admiralty in October 1914, driven by the need to counter battlecruisers and through aggressive, high-speed designs integrated with oil fuel (over 6,000 tons capacity, equivalent to 24,000 tons of ) for without refueling. A detailed model was nearly ready for construction—requiring just three more days—when political tensions led to Fisher's abrupt departure in May 1915, halting the project alongside other ambitious schemes. With an estimated displacement around 48,000 tons—nearly double that of standard battleships like the Revenge class—the design's immense cost and doubts about its vulnerability ensured its rejection in favor of practical alternatives. Though unrealized, Incomparable exemplified Fisher's advocacy for "big gun" supremacy and speed over traditional armor, influencing interwar naval thought despite its impracticality; lessons from the later (1916) further underscored concerns about vulnerability.

Background

Admiral John Fisher's Role

Admiral John Arbuthnot Fisher, born on 25 January 1841 in Rambodde, Ceylon, rose through the ranks of the Royal Navy to become one of its most influential reformers. Joining the service in 1854, he developed expertise in gunnery and torpedoes before serving as First Sea Lord from 1904 to 1910 and again from 30 October 1914 to 15 May 1915. During his first term, Fisher orchestrated the "Dreadnought revolution" by championing the construction of HMS Dreadnought in 1906, the world's first all-big-gun battleship that rendered previous designs obsolete. He also pioneered the battlecruiser concept, exemplified by the HMS Invincible class, which integrated heavy armament with cruiser-like speed. Fisher's naval philosophy centered on innovation and efficiency, prioritizing speed and firepower over traditional heavy armor. He famously articulated that "speed was armor when associated with big guns," arguing it allowed ships to engage enemies at ranges where they could strike without being hit, effectively substituting mobility for impenetrable protection. This approach advocated for capital ships equipped with the largest-caliber guns possible, enabling them to outmaneuver and overwhelm slower, more heavily armored opponents through superior range and velocity. Fisher's emphasis on high-speed vessels stemmed from his belief that such designs would maintain British naval supremacy by allowing the fleet to concentrate forces rapidly and dictate battle conditions. Upon his return to the as in October 1914, immediately pushed for wartime innovations to address emerging threats, including the conceptual design of HMS Incomparable. This proposal, detailed in his personal records and nearly advancing to construction by May 1915, reflected his drive for "super ships" that embodied extreme speed and armament to achieve decisive strategic advantages. Fisher's eccentricity and relentless advocacy shaped these ideas, often expressed through voluminous letter-writing campaigns to political leaders like , whom he urged to support bold naval projects during his 1914–1915 tenure. Known for his controversial and outspoken style, Fisher bypassed conventional channels to promote his vision of transformative vessels, influencing debates despite resistance from traditionalists.

World War I Naval Context

The outbreak of in intensified the pre-war Anglo-German naval rivalry, which had escalated through a fierce driven by 's pursuit of global influence via its fleet expansion under Admiral Alfred von Tirpitz's Navy Laws of 1898 and 1900. This competition positioned the Royal Navy as the defender of 's maritime supremacy and trade routes against the Imperial German Navy's , leading to a strategic standoff in the where imposed a to starve of resources. By August 1914, the Royal Navy's numerical superiority—maintaining a fleet roughly twice the size of 's—ensured control of the seas but highlighted the need for innovative designs to counter emerging threats. Technological advancements reshaped naval warfare following the launch of HMS Dreadnought in 1906, which introduced an all-big-gun armament of ten 12-inch guns and steam turbine propulsion, achieving 21 knots and rendering all previous battleships obsolete overnight. This shift prompted a global race to build "dreadnought"-style capital ships, with battlecruisers emerging as fast, heavily armed variants optimized for scouting, raiding, and long-range engagements rather than line-of-battle durability. The German High Seas Fleet, bolstered by this trend, posed a direct challenge, culminating in the Battle of Jutland on May 31–June 1, 1916, where British battlecruisers suffered catastrophic losses—three sunk, including HMS Indefatigable, Queen Mary, and Invincible—due to thinner armor (6–9 inches versus German 9.8–12 inches), unsafe cordite storage in silk bags that propagated magazine explosions, and tactical errors like delayed firing. These vulnerabilities exposed the risks of speed-over-protection designs in fleet actions, though the battle ultimately affirmed British numerical dominance with a broader broadside weight of 464,500 pounds against Germany's 176,500 pounds. Strategically, the war demanded versatile vessels for amphibious operations, such as proposed assaults on the Pomeranian coast—90 miles from —to sever German supply lines, requiring control of the to land forces and neutralize defenses via monitors and mines. Fast ships were essential to counter German s, which sank over 5,000 Allied merchant vessels by 1918, and surface raiders like the armed merchant cruisers that disrupted trade routes, necessitating swift escorts for convoys and patrols. However, resource constraints shifted priorities toward ; by war's end, the commissioned around 500 destroyers and expanded its fleet to over 100 vessels, diverting steel and labor from construction to address the immediate threat and maintain enforcement.

Development

Initial Proposals (1912–1914)

Following his retirement as in January 1910, Admiral continued to develop innovative naval concepts privately, beginning sketches for advanced warships in 1912 that incorporated emerging technologies and ideas for large, fast battleships or capable of extended operations. These early efforts were influenced by ongoing experiments with propulsion, which promised greater and range compared to traditional steam systems, allowing ships to operate without frequent coaling stops. Fisher's designs drew from his longstanding philosophy of prioritizing speed and offensive power, echoing his "Uncatchable" concepts from the early that emphasized vessels too swift for traditional battleships to engage effectively. In a series of letters to First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill between 1912 and 1914, Fisher proposed the "Incomparable"—initially referred to as "Non Pareil"—as a revolutionary vessel that would redefine naval warfare through superior speed and endurance, powered primarily by oil or diesel engines to achieve unprecedented operational range. A key document was his November 17, 1912, letter, in which he enclosed sketches of a motor battleship design, remarking, "These pictures will make your mouth water!" These communications advocated shifting the Royal Navy toward an all-battlecruiser fleet, building on conceptual precursors to the Renown-class battlecruisers, which shared Fisher's vision of lightly protected, high-speed ships for scouting and raiding roles. The proposals highlighted diesel's potential for global circumnavigation without refueling, aligning with Fisher's broader push for oil-fired navies amid Anglo-German naval rivalry. Early challenges to the Incomparable project included debates over practical feasibility, as the designs relied on unproven large-scale engines and diverged from preferences for balanced armor and . Cost concerns were prominent, with preliminary estimates suggesting expenses far exceeding those of contemporary battleships, prompting discussions on whether such radical innovations justified the financial and technical risks. These issues reflected broader tensions in pre-war naval , where Fisher's aggressive ideas often clashed with conservative elements in the naval .

Design Iterations and Variants (1915)

The design of HMS Incomparable progressed through multiple iterations in 1915, refining concepts originally sketched in to meet wartime demands for superior speed and firepower. Proposals evolved to emphasize speeds of to 35 knots, with options for hybrid steam-diesel propulsion, refined armor against , and a of up to 1,000 feet. The culminating concepts featured 20-inch guns. These developments were part of a broader series of fast ideas, including related proposals like "." Key modifications across these iterations included a shift from 16-inch or 18-inch to 20-inch guns, each firing 2-ton projectiles, to ensure dominance over Bayern-class battleships armed with 15-inch weapons. Additionally, the incorporation of eight 21-inch tubes added versatility for offensive operations at close quarters, complementing the primary armament. These changes reflected evolving priorities for a fast, multi-role capable of both fleet actions and amphibious support. The evaluation process entailed rigorous reviews of hand-sketched proposals by Admiral John , incorporating technical input from key designers including Major A. G. Hadcock, who developed the 20-inch gun, and Director of Naval Construction Sir Eustace Tennyson d'Eyncourt. Intended primarily to facilitate British-Russian landings on the Pomeranian coast in the —thereby menacing —the design bypassed conventional trials and gunnery consultations to accelerate development. advocated for multiple such fast warships, though Incomparable was envisioned as a . A of the final 35-knot configuration was completed by May 1915, but work ceased upon 's resignation from the .

Design Characteristics

Hull and General Specifications

A proposed late variant of HMS Incomparable featured an immense intended to accommodate its revolutionary armament configuration while prioritizing high-speed stability and long-range endurance. The ship's overall length was planned at 1,000 feet (305 m), with a of 86 feet ( m) and a light draught, making it one of the largest proposals of its era. Displacement was estimated at around 48,000 long tons, reflecting the substantial internal volume required for fuel storage to enable without refueling. The layout incorporated a design with a triple turret arrangement—two forward and one —to optimize weight distribution and enhance stability during high-speed maneuvers. The design evolved from 1912 proposals featuring hybrid diesel propulsion to 1915 internal combustion variants emphasizing speed and endurance. Crew accommodations were designed for standard operations. In scale, Incomparable would have exceeded HMS Hood—the largest British warship built at the time, with a length of 860 feet (262 m) and displacement of approximately 42,100 long tons standard—while sharing conceptual similarities with the unbuilt G3-class battlecruisers, which measured 856 feet (261 m) in length and displaced 48,400 long tons standard.

Armament

The proposed armament of HMS Incomparable centered on an unprecedented of six 20-inch (508 mm) mounted in three twin turrets, representing the largest ever proposed for a . These were envisioned as 45- weapons designed to fire shells weighing over 2 tons with an exceeding contemporary designs, prioritizing long-range gunnery capability. The turret layout was optimized for maximum broadside fire, enabling four to bear on each side simultaneously to overwhelm enemy capital ships. Each weighed 200 tons. For offensive versatility in a raiding , the design included eight submerged 21-inch torpedo tubes. The design also incorporated a dozen 60-foot motor boats armed with 21-inch torpedoes for additional offensive capability.

Armour Protection

The scheme for HMS Incomparable was designed to balance protection with the emphasis on high speed and shallow draught, reflecting John Fisher's preference for offensive capabilities over heavy defensive layering. The main belt consisted of 16-inch (406 mm) plates amidships, thinning towards the ends, extending along the to cover the machinery spaces and magazines. This formed a diamond-shaped with a curved thick . The forward and ends beyond the citadel were unarmoured or lightly protected to save weight. The overall structure was intentionally light for a 10-year wartime lifespan, prioritizing disposability. Underwater protection included anti-torpedo measures, but details were minimal compared to contemporary battleships, as the design's focus on speed and shallow draught limited extensive features.

Propulsion and Performance

The propulsion system proposed for HMS Incomparable centered on oil-powered internal combustion engines delivering 150,000 horsepower on quadruple screws, enabling high-speed operations essential for Fisher's vision of a fast capable of dictating engagements. This arrangement represented a refinement from earlier variants, which explored hybrid diesel-auxiliary propulsion for economical cruising to support extended patrols without frequent refueling. Performance targets emphasized superior speed and endurance, with a designed top speed of 35 knots (65 km/h) to outpace contemporary battleships and even most destroyers, facilitating in contested waters. The oil-fueled system enhanced efficiency over , allowing a capacity of 5,000–6,000 tons sufficient for circumnavigating the world without refueling. Engineering choices prioritized a 10-year through robust, low-maintenance components, underscoring the design's focus on sustained wartime utility. Maneuverability was projected to suit high-speed handling in the , ensuring operational effectiveness in confined or adverse conditions.

Cancellation and Legacy

Reasons for Non-Construction

The proposal for HMS Incomparable emerged in from Admiral John "Jackie" Fisher's ambitious vision for a super tailored to operations in the shallow waters of the , with a detailed model prepared and nearly underway by the time Fisher resigned as on 15 May ; the project was immediately suspended following his departure, which removed its primary advocate within the . Fisher's exit stemmed from political tensions, including clashes over the and broader wartime strategy, leading to a shift in naval priorities away from his unconventional designs toward more conventional fast battleships that balanced speed, armament, and protection. Financial considerations were paramount in the Admiralty's rejection, as the estimated construction cost—roughly equivalent to that of two Renown-class battlecruisers, or around £6 million—would have strained wartime budgets already stretched by urgent demands for escorts, anti-submarine vessels, and repairs to counter the threat. This diversion of resources was deemed impractical amid the escalating economic pressures of , where every pound was needed for immediate operational needs rather than experimental capital ships. Tactical doubts further undermined the design, particularly after the on 31 May 1916, which revealed the fatal vulnerabilities of lightly armored battlecruisers like HMS , sunk by a single magazine explosion from German shellfire; Incomparable's relatively thin armor scheme, optimized for speed over all-around protection, was criticized as inadequate for sustained fleet engagements and potentially useless as a "" in the confined theater where maneuverability and enemy minefields posed additional risks. Industrial limitations sealed the fate of the project, as British dockyards in 1915 lacked the infrastructure to handle a 1,000-foot (305-meter) hull, and the proposed 20-inch guns faced insurmountable development delays due to wartime shortages of skilled labor—over 20,000 workers had been reassigned from naval construction to munitions production—and the absence of proven manufacturing techniques for such oversized weaponry. These constraints, combined with the Admiralty's post-resignation review, ensured the design was quietly abandoned by late 1915 without further iteration.

Influence on Subsequent Naval Designs

The radical concepts of high speed and massive armament in the HMS Incomparable proposal directly informed the development of the Admiral-class battlecruisers, authorized in as a bridge between battlecruisers and fast battleships. Retaining reliable 15-inch guns while aiming for 31 knots on 42,000 tons displacement, the class addressed Jutland's lessons on armor vulnerability by increasing belt protection to 12 inches in the lead ship, HMS , the only vessel completed in 1920. Incomparable's vision of a fast, heavily gunned capital ship also inspired the 1921 G3-class battlecruisers and accompanying N3-class battleships, representing the pinnacle of pre-treaty British design ambition at 48,000 tons standard displacement. The G3 featured nine 16-inch/45 Mark I guns in triple turrets, 32 knots speed, and 14-inch belt armor for balanced protection, while the slower N3 emphasized firepower with nine 18-inch/45 Mark II guns and comparable armor; both classes were cancelled under the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty to curb escalating naval costs. The proposal advanced British research into large-caliber guns, including the unbuilt 18-inch weapons intended for the N3, which influenced interwar naval thinking on despite not entering service; similar escalation pressures contributed to the U.S. Navy's adoption of powerful 16-inch guns on the Iowa-class battleships completed in the . Incomparable's emphasis on speed over heavy armor echoed in World War II designs like HMS Vanguard, Britain's last battleship laid down in 1941, which combined 15-inch guns with 30 knots speed on 44,500 tons to modernize the fast capital ship role. Internationally, Incomparable's parameters paralleled Japan's cancelled Amagi-class battlecruisers of 1920, with 41,200 tons, 30 knots, and ten 16-inch guns, and the U.S. Lexington-class, originally battlecruisers at 43,500 tons and 33.5 knots with eight 16-inch guns before conversion to carriers in 1922—both reflecting a global trend toward fast, gun-heavy vessels spurred by pre-war innovations. Historians assess Incomparable as visionary in prioritizing speed and offensive power, aligning with Admiral Fisher's doctrine, yet impractical due to inadequate armor exposing vulnerabilities seen in battlecruiser losses at . In contemporary culture, the design appears in simulations like , where it is modeled as a Tier X premium battleship with 20-inch guns, introduced in 2021 to explore its hypothetical performance. Although no Incomparable-like ships were constructed, her advanced integration of speed and armament highlighted the unsustainable trajectory of escalation, contributing to the diplomatic momentum for interwar treaties that capped and sizes to prevent a renewed .

References

  1. [1]
    Records, by John Arbuthnot Fisher—A Project Gutenberg eBook
    Lord Fisher's Proposed Ship, H.M.S. “Incomparable,” shown alongside H.M.S. “Dreadnought” ... plan as my delicious old Admiral in China. This Admiral's ...
  2. [2]
    WW1 British Battlecruisers - Naval Encyclopedia
    Based on Admiral Fisher's idea, Great Britain built 12 battlecruisers, the last completed after WW1. Here is this complete saga.
  3. [3]
    John Arbuthnot Fisher, First Baron Fisher - The Dreadnought Project
    His first term as First Sea Lord from 1904 to 1910 is widely credited with having materially prepared the fleet for war, having introduced the world's first all ...
  4. [4]
    The Speed of Battleships | Proceedings - April 1929 Vol. 55/4/314
    As Fisher stated it: . . . . speed was armor when associated with big guns because the speed enabled you to put your ship at such a distance that she couldn ...
  5. [5]
    Evolution of Naval Weapons - Naval History and Heritage Command
    Apr 1, 2021 · Fisher though that with guns of the largest caliber and superior speed, the battle-cruiser could run away from any ship whose guns out ...
  6. [6]
    Admiral Lord Fisher to Churchill: OMG
    Aug 7, 2012 · It has emerged that the British admiral John Arbuthnot Fisher first penned the acronym in a letter to Winston Churchill as far back as 1917.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Tirpitz's Trap - U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons
    May 9, 2023 · It was clear, even to Tirpitz in his more clearheaded moments, that Germany had not won, and could not win, the naval arms race with Britain.
  8. [8]
    The Results And Effects Of The Battle Of Jutland - U.S. Naval Institute
    In other words, the losses were in proportion to the forces engaged. Thus, at the end of the battle the British still held the superiority over the Germans ...
  9. [9]
    Fisher And The Genesis Of The Dreadnought - U.S. Naval Institute
    The keel-plate of HMS Dreadnought had been laid on October 2, 1905, the ship went to sea for trials on October 3, 1906, and was completed in December, 1906.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Battlecruisers at Jutland: A Comparative Analysis of British and ...
    The capabilities and weaknesses of both the British and German battlecruisers, most importantly the power and range of their guns and the quality of their armor ...
  11. [11]
    Churchill's Grand Strategy
    Jan 1, 2018 · In particular, they looked to the Baltic Sea, where British control would cut Germany off from vital shipments of iron ore from Sweden.
  12. [12]
    The German U-Boat Campaign Of WW1 That Almost Broke Britain
    During the First World War, Britain intended to use its powerful navy to starve Germany and Austria-Hungary into submission. By maintaining a blockade of enemy ...Missing: fast counter surface raiders
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Defeating the U-Boat - U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons
    The U-boats would soon take their toll among patrolling cruisers and destroyers, but the prize targets, the Grand. Fleet's battleships and battle cruisers, ...
  14. [14]
    Eggshells and hammers: Fisher's last battlecruisers
    Apr 5, 2025 · Between July 1913 and May 1914 the Admiralty ordered 16 Mk I 15-inch twin mountings for the last of the 1913-14 programme and the upcoming 1914-15 programme.Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  15. [15]
    The Loss of H.M.S. Hood: A Re-Examination - NavWeaps
    Oct 5, 2025 · Displacement, 36,300 tons, 41,200 tons. Length overall, 860.0'-0" (262.13m), 860.0'-0" (262.13m). Beam, 104'-0" (31.70m), 104'-0" (31.70m). Mean ...
  16. [16]
    Machine of the Month feature on super battleships of world war one
    Displacement. 48,400 tons (standard), 53,909 tons (deep load) ; Dimensions. Length: 856ft (260.9m) overall. Beam: 106ft (32.3m). Draught: 35ft 8in (10.9m).
  17. [17]
    Review: [Untitled] on JSTOR
    among them such vessels as H.M.S. INCOMPARABLE, a monster battlecruiser over 900 feet long, carrying six 20-inch ... Admiral Fisher in 1915. There are ...
  18. [18]
    Memories by Admiral Fisher - Naval-History.net
    Churchill and Lord Fisher, and when, on October 20th, 1914, Mr. Churchill asked Lord Fisher to become First Sea Lord he gladly assented to co-operating with ...
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    United Kingdom / Britain 16"/45 (40.6 cm) Mark I - NavWeaps
    ### Summary of 16-inch Gun for G3 Class and Mentions of Incomparable or Influence
  21. [21]
    18"/45 (45.7 cm) Mark II and other Proposed Guns 1920-1922
    Dec 9, 2023 · The 18"/45 (45.7 cm) Mark II was the most powerful gun ever seriously proposed for a British warship.
  22. [22]
    Incomparable - Global wiki. Wargaming.net
    Mar 26, 2024 · Designed as a “large light cruiser,” Incomparable was to represent the absolute extreme in battlecruiser design. The design never had a ...