Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Hadadezer

Hadadezer ben Rehob was an Aramaean ruler of the kingdom of (also called Aram-Zobah), a in the region between the and the during the early BCE, known chiefly for his defeats at the hands of King of . According to biblical records, Hadadezer sought to extend his dominion toward the but was intercepted and vanquished by , who captured 1,700 horsemen, 20,000 foot soldiers, and chariots from his army, hamstrung most of the horses, and seized from cities like Betah and Berotai. This victory expanded Israelite control northward and prompted tributary alliances, such as from Toi of Hamath, while Hadadezer's realm supplied forces for subsequent coalitions against , including Syrian reinforcements for the Ammonites, which were also routed. The name Hadadezer, incorporating the storm-god , aligns with Aramaean onomastic patterns attested in Near Eastern inscriptions, lending contextual plausibility to the accounts amid the era's Aramaean and Israelite-Aramaean rivalries, though no extra-biblical inscription directly names him.

Identity and Name

Etymology and Variants

The name Hadadezer (Hebrew: הֲדַדְעֶזֶר, romanized Ḥăḏaḏʿezer) derives from Northwest roots, combining Hadad—the name of a and linked to thunder and , stemming from the hdd ("to thunder" or "to rage")—with ʿezer, from the root ʿzr ("to help" or "to aid"). This theophoric construction translates to "Hadad [is] help" or "Hadad helps," reflecting invocation of the god , widely worshiped in Aramean and contexts during the late second millennium BCE. Biblical manuscripts exhibit variants such as Hadarezer (Hebrew: הֲדַרְעֶזֶר), attested in certain readings of 2 Samuel 8–10 and 1 Chronicles 18–19, where hadar may substitute for Hadad, potentially connoting "majesty helps" from a root meaning "splendor" or "glory." This alternation likely arose from scribal harmonization or regional phonetic shifts, as Hadad (Akkadian Adad) appears in analogous Assyrian royal names like Adad-idri ("Adad has given"), though no direct epigraphic match exists for Zobah's ruler. The form Hadadezer predominates in the Masoretic Text, emphasizing the king's ties to Aramean cultural spheres north of Israel.

Distinction from Other Rulers

Hadadezer, identified in biblical texts as the son of Rehob and king of , is chronologically and geographically distinct from later Aramean rulers sharing the name, such as the 9th-century BCE king of known in Assyrian inscriptions as Adad-idri. The latter led a coalition of twelve kings, including forces from Damascus, Hamath, and under , against at the in 853 BCE, and is often equated by scholars with Ben-Hadad II due to the titular use of "Ben-Hadad" ("son of ") among Syrian monarchs. This Adad-idri/Hadadezer operated over 140 years after the Hadadezer of , whose defeats by are dated to approximately 1000 BCE based on the conventional chronology of David's reign (c. 1010–970 BCE). The name Hadadezer, a theophoric compound meaning "Hadad is help" (with as the Aramean storm god), was common in the region, facilitating confusion but not equivalence among distinct kings. , Hadadezer's domain, comprised an Aramean kingdom extending toward the but centered nearer to Israelite borders, likely in the or vicinity of modern Lebanon-Syria borderlands, predating Damascus's rise as a dominant power. No extra-biblical inscriptions equate the Zobah ruler with later figures, and attempts to harmonize them overlook the intervening generations and shifting alliances, such as 's early versus Damascus's anti-Assyrian coalitions.

Kingdom of Zobah

Geographical Extent

The Kingdom of , under King , was an Aramean state centered in the northern , primarily encompassing the between the Mountains to the west and the Anti- range to the east. This region, in modern-day central and adjacent western , formed the core territory, with biblical accounts indicating control over cities such as Tibhath (likely Tubihah) and Berothai (possibly Beruy), situated in the central and southern . The kingdom's position placed it north of and south of Hamath, facilitating trade routes and strategic access to the Syrian interior. Hadadezer's reign saw ambitions to expand eastward toward the River, as described in accounts of his campaign to "restore his rule ," suggesting claimed influence over intermediate Aramean territories in the Syrian , though effective control likely remained confined to the western highlands and valleys rather than the full extent to the . Northern boundaries may have approached Emesa (modern ) along the eastern Anti-Lebanon slopes, while southern limits abutted Israelite holdings near the during periods of conflict. Exact demarcations remain debated due to sparse extra-biblical attestation, but archaeological correlations with Aramean settlements in the Beqaa support a compact domain oriented toward highland agriculture and pastoralism rather than vast desert expanses.

Political and Cultural Context

The Kingdom of , identified as Aram-Zobah in biblical texts, operated within the broader framework of emerging Aramaean polities in the during the early , circa 11th–10th centuries BCE, following the power vacuum left by the of Hittite and dominance. Politically, Zobah represented one of several tribal confederacies that transitioned into monarchic states, controlling territories potentially in the and extending northward into Syrian uplands, which facilitated control over caravan routes linking to the Mediterranean. This positioning pitted Zobah against southern neighbors like and , as well as eastern powers such as , fostering alliances and conflicts over borderlands and tribute, with Hadadezer's reign marked by expansionist campaigns toward the . Aramaean states like Zobah achieved peak influence in the BCE due to Assyria's temporary weakness, enabling localized hegemony through militarized forces and fortified centers, though lacking the bureaucratic centralization of later empires. Culturally, Zobah's society reflected the pastoral-sedentary hybrid of Aramaean groups, who originated as nomadic Semites but adopted urban agrarian practices, evidenced by pottery and settlement patterns akin to contemporaneous Levantine sites. The population spoke proto-Aramaic dialects, a Northwest Semitic language that would later standardize as a regional lingua franca, facilitating trade and diplomacy across ethnic lines. Religiously, the kingdom centered on a pantheon led by Hadad, the storm and warrior deity, as indicated by royal names incorporating "Hadad" (e.g., Hadadezer, meaning "Hadad is help"), with rituals likely involving high places and sacrifices similar to Canaanite traditions, though direct archaeological attestation remains sparse. Social structures emphasized kinship-based tribal loyalties under kings, with elites deriving wealth from bronze production and horse breeding, integrating influences from Hittite remnants and Mesopotamian motifs in art and administration without subordinating local identities.

Reign and Military Campaigns

Expansion Toward the Euphrates

Hadadezer, king of , pursued expansion eastward toward the River, aiming to restore or establish dominion in that region. Biblical accounts record that defeated him during this campaign, specifically as Hadadezer advanced to recover his control along the river. This objective positioned , an Aramean kingdom north of , in competition with regional powers seeking influence over Syrian territories extending to the . The kingdom of under Hadadezer reportedly spanned from southern northward to the , reflecting prior territorial reach that his restoration efforts sought to reclaim. Such ambitions aligned with broader Near Eastern patterns, where Aramean states vied for control of trade routes and fertile lands bordering the upper , though direct extra-biblical evidence for Hadadezer's specific incursions remains limited. His campaign at the , referenced in parallel narratives, underscores Zobah's strategic orientation toward Syrian expansion before disruptions from Israelite forces.

Conflicts with Israel Under David

David engaged Hadadezer, king of , in a major campaign aimed at extending Israelite influence toward the River, defeating him decisively and capturing 1,000 s, 7,000 horsemen, and 20,000 foot soldiers. hamstrung all but 100 of the chariot horses to limit Zobah's cavalry recovery. When from intervened to aid Hadadezer, inflicted 22,000 casualties on them, establishing garrisons in their territory and securing tribute. From Hadadezer's cities of Betah and Berothai, seized substantial quantities of , later used for vessels under . A subsequent conflict arose during the Ammonite War, when Hadadezer dispatched reinforcements—including chariots and infantry from territories under his influence—to support the Ammonites against Israel after they humiliated David's envoys. The Aramean forces, led by Shobach (or Shophach in parallel accounts), mustered from beyond the Euphrates and clashed with David's army at Helam, suffering heavy losses: 700 charioteers and 40,000 footmen slain, with Shobach killed in battle. The routed Arameans prompted allied kings to sue for peace, submitting to David and halting further hostilities from Hadadezer's coalition. These engagements, occurring during David's consolidation of power circa 1000 BCE, weakened Zobah's regional dominance and facilitated Israelite control over trade routes and tribute flows from and beyond. Biblical accounts portray the victories as divinely aided, with David dedicating spoils to , though numerical discrepancies between and Chronicles (e.g., horsemen vs. charioteers) suggest traditions or scribal adjustments in . Scholarly analysis views the campaigns as plausible expansions against Aramean pressure, aligning with broader patterns of power struggles, though direct extra-biblical attestation remains sparse.

Alliance with Ammon and Subsequent Defeats

Following the death of King of , his son Hanun ascended the throne, prompting King of to send envoys to express condolences and strengthen diplomatic ties, as Nahash had previously shown loyalty to David. However, Hanun's advisors suspected the envoys of , leading him to humiliate them by shaving off half their beards, cutting their garments at the hips, and sending them away, which escalated tensions into open conflict. Fearing Israelite reprisal, the Ammonites assembled their forces at the capital city of Rabbah and hired mercenaries, including 32,000 chariots and horsemen from , Aram Maacah, and under Hadadezer's domain, alongside troops from Beth Rehob and Tob, forming a to bolster their defenses. This alliance positioned Hadadezer's Aramean forces as key auxiliaries to Ammon, drawing Zobah into the fray against around the late BCE during David's reign. David dispatched his commander with the full Israelite army to confront the coalition near Rabbah. divided his forces, assigning his brother Abishai to engage the Ammonites while he targeted the , achieving a decisive victory that routed both groups and forced the Arameans to flee across the . The Ammonites retreated to their fortified city, but the Arameans regrouped under Hadadezer, who reinforced them by summoning additional troops from beyond the River, mustering an army led by his commander Shobach (or Shophach in parallel accounts). David personally commanded the subsequent battle at Helam, where Israelite forces killed Shobach, 700 (or 7,000 per Chronicles) charioteers, and 40,000 foot soldiers or horsemen, shattering the Aramean contingent and compelling the survivors to sue for peace. The defeats culminated in the vassalage of Hadadezer's subordinate kings and Aramean forces to , who pledged tribute and ceased aiding , effectively isolating the Ammonites and marking a strategic setback for Hadadezer's regional influence. This two-phase campaign highlighted the tactical coordination of Israelite leadership against numerically superior but fragmented opponents, with Aramean chariotry—central to Hadadezer's military strength—proving vulnerable to David's and . Parallel narratives in 1 Chronicles 19 affirm the outcomes but vary in troop figures, reflecting possible scribal or differing source traditions, though both emphasize the cessation of Aramean-Ammonite . Archaeological contexts, such as iron weaponry from 10th-century BCE sites like , align with the era's capacity for such chariot-based warfare, though direct evidence for these specific engagements remains absent.

Biblical Portrayal and Events

Accounts in Samuel and Chronicles

The accounts of Hadadezer appear primarily in 2 Samuel 8:3–12 and its parallel in 1 Chronicles 18:3–8, where defeats him during an expedition to reassert control near the River. In 2 Samuel, Hadadezer is identified as the son of Rehob and of ; captures 1,700 horsemen and 20,000 foot soldiers from his forces, hamstrings all but 100 horses for chariots, and seizes chariots along with bronze vessels from the cities of Betah and Berothai. The of intervene on Hadadezer's behalf, but slays 22,000 of them and installs garrisons in their territory, extracting tribute; this victory contributes to subduing neighboring regions including , , , and the . The Chronicler's version in 1 Chronicles specifies David's defeat of Hadadezer "as he went to establish his dominion by the river " toward Hamath, capturing 1,000 chariots, 7,000 horsemen, and 20,000 foot soldiers, with similar of horses except for those needed for 100 chariots. Additional spoils include gold shields dedicated to the and from Tibhath and Chun, cities of Hadadezer; the Aramean intervention and defeat mirror , resulting in tribute and garrisons. These passages frame the encounter as part of David's broader conquests, emphasizing divine favor and material gains repurposed for the . A subsequent narrative in 2 Samuel 10:6–19 and 1 Chronicles 19:6–19 describes Ammon hiring Aramean mercenaries from Hadadezer's realm after humiliating David's envoys, leading to a coalition battle where David's forces, led by , rout the allies. Hadadezer dispatches reinforcements under Shobach (or Shophach in Chronicles), but they suffer heavy losses, with Shobach slain; the Arameans sue for peace and cease aiding . Numerical variances exist between the texts, such as 1,700 versus 7,000 horsemen in the initial campaign, potentially reflecting distinct source traditions or scribal variations in transmission. Both books portray Hadadezer as a pivotal whose defeats expand Israelite influence without detailing his internal reign or personal fate.

Specific Battles and Outcomes

defeated Hadadezer, king of , during an expedition in which Hadadezer sought to extend his influence toward the River, with the engagement occurring near Hamath. In this battle, 's forces captured 1,000 s, 7,000 charioteers, and 20,000 foot soldiers from Hadadezer's army, after which hamstrung all but 100 of the chariot horses to render them unusable. Reinforcements from , allies of Hadadezer, arrived to support him, but struck down 22,000 Aramean soldiers, established garrisons in , and subjected the Arameans to payments. As a result of these victories, seized large quantities of from Hadadezer's cities of Betah and Berothai, along with shields from Hadadezer's officers, which were later used in the construction of vessels. King Tou of Hamath, perceiving the extent of Hadadezer's defeat, sent his son Joram (or Hadoram) to with gifts of , silver, and to congratulate him and form an against the common foe. A subsequent conflict arose during the Ammonite war, when Hadadezer mobilized mercenaries from beyond the , assembling them at Helam under the command of Shobak (or Shophak). advanced against this force and routed them, killing 7,000 charioteers and 40,000 foot soldiers, while slaying Shobak on the . The surviving sued for peace with and ceased aiding the Ammonites, marking Hadadezer's final recorded defeat and contributing to the broader subjugation of Aramean territories under Israelite oversight.

Historical Corroboration

Extra-Biblical References

No direct extra-biblical textual references to Hadadezer, son of Rehob, king of , survive in ancient Near Eastern records from the late 11th or early BCE. The absence of such attestations is typical for many minor regional rulers of the period, whose activities are primarily documented in local or biblical sources rather than expansive imperial annals like those of or . The name Hadadezer (Akkadian Adad-idri, meaning "Hadad [the storm god] has given aid") follows standard Aramean theophoric conventions prevalent among Northwest kings, as seen in royal names from Syrian and Mesopotamian inscriptions spanning the . For instance, Shalmaneser III's Black Obelisk and other Assyrian annals from 853 BCE record a king of named Adad-idri leading a against at the , illustrating the name's use for a distinct later Aramean but confirming its authenticity in the regional onomasticon. This later Adad-idri, however, ruled roughly a century after the biblical Hadadezer of and cannot be equated with him, given chronological and geographical discrepancies. Zobah as a toponym receives earlier indirect attestation in an Old Babylonian cuneiform letter from (ca. 18th century BCE), which mentions a location named Ṣūbat or similar in the context of regional campaigns, suggesting the area's long-standing significance in Syrian geography predating Aramean dominance. Such references underscore 's plausibility as a historical Aramean but do not corroborate the specific reign or conflicts of its biblical .

Archaeological Evidence

No direct epigraphic or artifactual , such as inscriptions or royal seals naming Hadadezer, has been uncovered to date, reflecting the limited corpus of 10th-century BCE texts from Aramean regions. The proposed heartland of Aram-Zobah lies in areas like the or along the middle Orontes, where archaeological surveys indicate I-II (ca. 1200–900 BCE) settlements with fortifications, administrative buildings, and ceramics linking to broader Syro-Aramean . Excavations at Tell Kamid el-Loz in the , for instance, yielded evidence of a stratified society with elite residences and imported goods during this period, consistent with the emergence of Aramean kingdoms capable of fielding large forces as described in biblical accounts of Hadadezer's military. Destruction layers and weapon caches at Levantine sites, including potential northern frontiers like Abel-beth-maacah, align temporally with campaigns against Aramean coalitions, though attribution to specific conflicts remains inferential without named indicators. These findings corroborate the regional dynamics of Aramean expansion and Israelite counteroffensives circa 1000 BCE, supporting the plausibility of a like Hadadezer without confirming his personal existence.

Scholarly Debates

Location of Zobah

The kingdom of , also known as Aram-Zobah, is described in biblical accounts as an Aramaean polity north of that engaged in conflicts with around the late 11th or early BCE. Scholarly consensus favors its placement in or the Beqaʿ Valley (modern Lebanon's Biqaʿa region), interpreting it as a southern extension of Aramaean influence during the early . This positioning aligns with references to Zobah's proximity to Israelite territories and routes toward the , as well as its interactions with neighboring entities like and Hamath. Alternative proposals situate Zobah farther north or east, such as northeast of extending into modern and , or even toward the upper , based on broader interpretations of Aramaean expansions in 2 Samuel 8 and 1 Chronicles 18. These views draw from mentioning related sites like Subiti (possibly linked to Zobah post-10th century BCE) but lack direct archaeological ties. Some earlier identifications, such as with the ruins at in the Amuq plain (modern ), have been largely discounted due to chronological and cultural mismatches with Iron Age Aramaean . Archaeological evidence for remains elusive, with no inscriptions or fortified sites definitively attributed to it, complicating precise mapping. Surveys in the Beqaʿ Valley reveal settlements consistent with a regional power but without epigraphic confirmation of the name Zobah. This scarcity underscores reliance on biblical topography, where Zobah's domain included cities like Berothai (possibly in ) and extended influence toward the , suggesting a strategic position controlling trans-Lebanon trade routes. Scholars caution against overinterpreting these texts without corroboration, noting potential telescoping of events or anachronisms in the Samuel-Chronicles narratives. Debates persist due to variant spellings (e.g., Ṣobah) and phonetic links to later toponyms, but the Beqaʿ hypothesis predominates for its fit with Aramaean patterns—migratory groups settling in fertile valleys amid declining Late powers around 1200–1000 BCE. Northern Syrian alternatives, while appealing for proximity to Hittite-Aramaean transitions, falter against biblical itineraries emphasizing 's southern frontier with . Ongoing excavations in and may yield clarifying artifacts, but current data prioritizes a compact kingdom in the Beqaʿ over expansive northern models.

Historicity of Conflicts

The conflicts attributed to Hadadezer in the biblical accounts, including David's victories at the River and subsequent Aramean coalitions, lack direct corroboration from contemporary extra-biblical inscriptions or artifacts. No , , or records from the circa 1000 BCE period explicitly mention engagements between an Israelite king and the ruler of , reflecting the sparse monumental evidence typical for peripheral powers in the early . The authenticity of Hadadezer's name—"Hadad has given" or similar—conforms to Aramean theophoric conventions attested in later 9th-century BCE annals, where variants like Adad-idri appear for kings of , though these refer to successors separated by roughly a century and thus represent distinct individuals rather than the biblical figure. Aram-Zobah itself, described as a kingdom extending toward the with chariot forces, fits the emerging pattern of Aramean states consolidating in during the transition from Late Bronze to , as indicated by shifts in settlement patterns and pottery distributions signaling militarized polities north of . Scholarly assessments vary, with proponents of biblical historicity, such as Kenneth Kitchen, positing that the detailed logistics—like the capture of 1,000 chariots and shields of bronze—align with feasible warfare scales and the era's bronze-working capabilities, evidenced by regional hoards and dedications, without necessitating fabrication. Critics, including , contend that the absence of widespread destruction layers or imported Syrian artifacts in Judahite sites undermines claims of decisive Israelite dominance, interpreting the narratives as later ideological constructs amplifying a modest tribal chieftain's raids into imperial conquests. Recent excavations in northwestern and southern , revealing epigraphic hints of rival coalitions, bolster the plausibility of the described geopolitical tensions without resolving the evidential gap for David's specific role. Overall, while unverified archaeologically, the conflicts cohere with the documented volatility of Aramean-Israeli border dynamics, where small-scale victories could yield tribute without leaving enduring traces.

Relation to Later Aramean Kings

The subjugation of Hadadezer's kingdom of by around 1000 BCE created a among Aramean states, enabling the rise of as the dominant Aramean polity in subsequent centuries. A key figure in this transition was Rezon son of Eliada, identified as a former officer or servant under Hadadezer who deserted during the Israelite campaigns. According to the biblical account in 1 Kings 11:23-25, Rezon fled after David's forces defeated Hadadezer's army, assembled a band of followers, seized , and established himself as its ruler, initiating a dynasty that opposed Solomon's kingdom. Rezon's establishment of Aramean kingship in Damascus provided the foundational leadership for later rulers who expanded influence across the region, including conflicts with and . This lineage or political succession is evident in the sequence of Damascus kings such as Hezion (possibly Rezon's immediate successor), Ben-Hadad I (who allied with against circa 900 BCE), Ben-Hadad II (active in wars with around 850 BCE), and (who usurped power circa 842-800 BCE and subjugated Israelite territories). While no direct familial traces Hadadezer's bloodline to these figures beyond Rezon's documented service, the biblical narrative portrays 's emergence as a direct consequence of Zobah's fragmentation, with Rezon leveraging remnants of Hadadezer's defeated forces to consolidate power. Scholars note that this connection underscores a of Aramean state fragmentation and reconfiguration in the early , where Zobah's eclipse by shifted hegemony to , fostering enduring rivalries. Extra-biblical records corroborate the later Damascus kings' activities but do not explicitly reference Hadadezer or Rezon, leaving the linkage primarily to biblical testimony, which aligns with the broader historical context of Aramean tribal consolidations in .

References

  1. [1]
    David's Wars with Israel's Neighbours - jstor
    David's rival in his wars with the Aramaeans is called 'Hadadezer ben Rehob king ... It seems to me that the figure of Hadadezer 'ben Rehob, king of Zobah' was.
  2. [2]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Chronicles+18&version=NRSVCE
  3. [3]
    The amazing name Hadadezer: meaning and etymology
    Aug 12, 2014 · Meaning: Hadad Is A Help; Etymology: From (1) the name Hadad, from the verb הדד (hadad), to thunder, and (2) the verb עזר (azar), ...
  4. [4]
    Who is Hadadezer in the Bible? | GotQuestions.org
    Aug 7, 2025 · Hadadezer is a king mentioned in the Old Testament, specifically in the books of 2 Samuel, 1 Kings, and 1 Chronicles. He is labeled as “the ...
  5. [5]
    HADAD - JewishEncyclopedia.com
    Name of an Aramaic, and possibly of an Edomitish, deity. It occurs as an element in personal names, for instance, in "Hadadezer," "Benhadad."
  6. [6]
    Topical Bible: Hadadezer or Hadarezer
    Name and Variants: The name Hadadezer means "Hadad is my help," with Hadad being a prominent deity in the ancient Near East, often associated with storms and ...
  7. [7]
    The amazing name Hadarezer: meaning and etymology
    Aug 12, 2014 · The name Hadarezer in the Bible. According to some Hebrew manuscripts, the name Hadarezer belongs to Aramean king of Zobah who was defeated ...
  8. [8]
    Hadadezer Meaning - Bible Definition and References
    Hadadezer [N] [H] [S]. Hadad is help; called also Hadarezer, Adod is his help, the king of Zobah. Hanun, the king of the Ammonites, hired among others the ...
  9. [9]
    Benhadad and Hadadezer - The University of Chicago Press: Journals
    ilu IM, including the well-known variant names of the west-Semitic weather-god Adad (Hebrew Hadad), Addu, Dadu, as well as. Amurru (MAR-TU). As already ...
  10. [10]
    Who was Ben-Hadad in the Bible? | GotQuestions.org
    Aug 7, 2025 · Ben-Hadad seems to have been the title of the reigning king of Aram (Syria). Ben-Hadad means “son of Hadad.” Hadad or Adad was the god of storm and thunder.
  11. [11]
    Hadadezer - Bible History
    Hadadezer bar Rehob) was king of the Aramaean kingdom of Zobah during the early tenth century BCE. According to II Samuel, Hadadezer allied with the Ammonites ...
  12. [12]
    Hadadezer - Encyclopedia of The Bible - Bible Gateway
    KJV HADAREZER, hā' derē' zer. A king of Zobah in Syria, whose kingdom in David's time extended as far eastward as the Euphrates and as far southward as Ammon.
  13. [13]
    Hadadezer - Hastings' Dictionary of the Bible - StudyLight.org
    HADADEZER . The name of a king of Zobah (wh. see) in the time of David, 2 Samuel 8:3 ff., 1 Kings 11:23 . In 1 Chronicles 18:3 ff. the same king is called ...
  14. [14]
    ARAM-ZOBAH - JewishEncyclopedia.com
    xlvii. 16), which was between Hamath and Damascus. Zobah was probably located near this city, though Halévy claims to have identified Zobah with Chalkis.
  15. [15]
    Zobah (Zedad) - Bible Map
    Zobah was an Aramean kingdom of which we have the first notice in Saul's wars (1 Samuel 14:47). (1) David's First War. When David sought to extend his boundary ...
  16. [16]
    Zobah - Search results provided by BiblicalTraining
    ZOBAH, ZOBA (zō'ba, Heb. tsôvâh). A region in central Syria, sometimes under one king (2Sam.8.3); but in its first occurrence (1Sam.14.47) we read that Saul ...Missing: ancient | Show results with:ancient
  17. [17]
    https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004398535/BP000013.xml
  18. [18]
    Aram, Aramaeans - Search results provided by BiblicalTraining
    The Aramaeans attained their highest degree of political importance in the 11th and 10th centuries b.c., thanks to the decline of the Assyrian empire during ...
  19. [19]
    Some Historical and Methodological Consideration Regarding the ...
    Israel and Aram shared complex socio-political interactions that shaped territorial kingdoms in the Iron Age. State formation in the Iron Age Levant involved ...Missing: Zobah | Show results with:Zobah
  20. [20]
    Arameans Emerge in Syria and Mesopotamia | Research Starters
    The Aramean states that emerged were separate tribal entities, often known by their patronyms. The political structures of the states evolved into monarchies.
  21. [21]
    https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/edcoll/9789047430735/Bej.9789004177291.i-712_016.pdf
  22. [22]
    2 Samuel 8:3 David also defeated Hadadezer son of Rehob, king of ...
    And David struck Hadadezer, the son of Rehob, the king of Zobah, when he set out to rule over the river Euphrates.
  23. [23]
    The Kingdom of David & Solomon in Its Contact with Egypt and ...
    (s. v. Hadadezer). 27. It would thus appear that Hadadezer conquered the Euphrates area in the period between the be- ginning of Ashurrabi's reign in 1012 ...
  24. [24]
    Translation commentary on 1 Chronicles 18:3 – TIPs
    While King Hadadezer of Zobah was trying to gain control of the territory near the Euphrates River, David met him in battle at Hamath and defeated him.
  25. [25]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%208%3A3-4&version=ESV
  26. [26]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Chronicles%2018%3A4&version=ESV
  27. [27]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%208%3A4&version=ESV
  28. [28]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%208%3A5-6&version=ESV
  29. [29]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%208%3A8&version=ESV
  30. [30]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%2010%3A6-8&version=ESV
  31. [31]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%2010%3A15-18&version=ESV
  32. [32]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Chronicles%2019%3A16-18&version=ESV
  33. [33]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%2010%3A19&version=ESV
  34. [34]
    The History of King David | Newswise
    Dec 15, 2014 · At this stage the Arameans' advance led by Hadadezer king of Zobah, results in an alliance between David and Toi king of Hamath, in the sense ...Missing: differences | Show results with:differences
  35. [35]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%208%3A7-12&version=ESV
  36. [36]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Chronicles%2018%3A7-11&version=ESV
  37. [37]
    In Search of Reality Behind the Account of David's Wars with Israel's ...
    The paper investigates the historical reality behind the biblical accounts of David's wars with Israel's neighbors, challenging the prevailing scholarly ...
  38. [38]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%2010%3A1-2&version=ESV
  39. [39]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%2010%3A3-5&version=ESV
  40. [40]
    2 Samuel 10 Commentary | Precept Austin
    Mar 15, 2023 · "When the sons of Ammon saw that they had made themselves odious to David, Hanun and the sons of Ammon sent 1,000 talents of silver to hire for ...Missing: alliance | Show results with:alliance
  41. [41]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%2010%3A7&version=ESV
  42. [42]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%2010%3A9-14&version=ESV
  43. [43]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%2010%3A15-16&version=ESV
  44. [44]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Chronicles%2019%3A16&version=ESV
  45. [45]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%2010%3A17-18&version=ESV
  46. [46]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Chronicles%2019%3A18&version=ESV
  47. [47]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Chronicles%2019&version=ESV
  48. [48]
    What historical evidence supports the events described in 2 Samuel ...
    Metallurgical digs at Khirbet Qeiyafa and 'Ain Dara demonstrate Israelite and Aramean access to iron weapons circa 1000 BC, consistent with large-scale warfare.
  49. [49]
    Hadadezer - Search results provided by BiblicalTraining
    KJV HADAREZER, hā' derē' zer. A king of Zobah in Syria, whose kingdom in David's time extended as far eastward as the Euphrates and as far southward as Ammon.
  50. [50]
    Is there a Bible contradiction in 2 Samuel 8:4? - Defending Inerrancy
    Problem: After David had defeated Hadadezer, he took prisoners from Hadadezer's army. According to 2 Samuel 8:4, David captured “one thousand, seven hundred ...
  51. [51]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%208&version=NIV
  52. [52]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Chronicles%2018&version=NIV
  53. [53]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%208:4&version=NIV
  54. [54]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Chronicles%2018:4&version=NIV
  55. [55]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%208:5-6&version=NIV
  56. [56]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Chronicles%2018:5-6&version=NIV
  57. [57]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%208:7-8&version=NIV
  58. [58]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Chronicles%2018:7-8&version=NIV
  59. [59]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%208:9-10&version=NIV
  60. [60]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Chronicles%2018:9-10&version=NIV
  61. [61]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%2010:15-16&version=NIV
  62. [62]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Chronicles%2019:16&version=NIV
  63. [63]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%2010:18&version=NIV
  64. [64]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Chronicles%2019:18&version=NIV
  65. [65]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Samuel%2010:19&version=NIV
  66. [66]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Chronicles%2019:19&version=NIV
  67. [67]
    53 People in the Bible Confirmed Archaeologically
    Mar 3, 2014 · FREE ebook: Ten Top Biblical Archaeology Discoveries. Finds like the Pool of Siloam in Israel, where the Gospel of John says Jesus miraculously ...
  68. [68]
    (PDF) Aram-Maacah? Aramaeans and Israelites on the Border
    Jul 7, 2017 · ... Iron Age I context, just above substantial Late Bronze IIB remains. Its typology suggests it to be a product from the reign of Ramses II's ...
  69. [69]
    Evidence for Saul, David, and Solomon · Creation.com
    Jul 9, 2023 · This is possibly a reference to the biblical Hadadezer, who is also said to have once controlled territory on the Euphrates (2 Samuel 8:3). On ...
  70. [70]
    New Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible Volume 5: S-Z page 1023
    ZOBAH zoh´buh [hbfwOc ]. A powerful Aramean kingdom of southern Syria during the 11th cent. BCE, also called Aram-Zobah. Zobah was located in the north
  71. [71]
    Zobah - Bible History
    1Sa 14:47 Some forty years later than this we find Zobah under a single ruler Hadadezer son of Rehob. He had wars with Toi king of Hamath, 2Sa 8:10 and held ...Missing: attestation | Show results with:attestation<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    Topical Bible: Zobah: A Kingdom in the North of Palestine - Bible Hub
    Zobah is believed to have been situated to the northeast of Israel, possibly extending into parts of modern-day Lebanon and Syria. The exact boundaries of Zobah ...
  73. [73]
    Kingdoms of Syria - Zobah (Syria) - The History Files
    King of Zobah. fl c.970? BC. Hadadezer ... The changes mean that Damas also replaces the eclipsed Zobah as the main centre of Aramaean power in the Levant.
  74. [74]
    Zobah, Beqaa, LEBANON - Aramean-Dem.Org
    Sep 19, 2011 · Aram-zobah was located in the central and northern Beqaa. Although some consider the territory to be east of the anti-Lebanese, this makes no ...
  75. [75]
    Meaning of Zobah in Christianity
    May 27, 2025 · In Christianity, Zobah is identified as a location east of Hamath, serving as one of the smaller kingdoms within Syria.Missing: extent | Show results with:extent
  76. [76]
    King David: An Archaeological Biography
    Jan 17, 2020 · Prior to 1993, there was very little archaeological evidence to support the historicity of King David. ... ” Biblical Archaeology Society. April ...
  77. [77]
    The Old Testament in Light of the Archaeological Evidence
    If Arumu is Aram, a likely possibility, then this king may be Hadadezer of Aram-Zobah who drew upon this area for troops for his army in his struggles with ...
  78. [78]
    The history of King David - ScienceDaily
    Dec 20, 2014 · At this stage the Arameans' advance led by Hadadezer king of Zobah, results in an alliance between David and Toi king of Hamath, in the sense of ...
  79. [79]
    Rulers of Aram-Damascus - Swartzentrover.com
    This Ben-Hadad is clearly the king of Aram-Damascus known to the Assyrians as Adad-idri, Hebraized as Hadadezer. More details below.<|separator|>
  80. [80]
    1 Kings 11:23 Commentaries - Bible Hub
    A second adversary of Solomon was Rezon, the son of Eliadah (for the name see at 1 Kings 15:18), who had fled from his lord Hadadezer, king of Zobah, and who ...
  81. [81]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Kings%2011%3A23-25&version=ESV
  82. [82]
    Rezon - Watchtower ONLINE LIBRARY - JW.ORG
    This son of Eliada had been in the service of Hadadezer the king of Zobah, from whom David took over Damascus. Rezon abandoned Hadadezer, however, and ...