Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Heavy Press Program

The Heavy Press Program was a United States Air Force initiative initiated in 1950 and completed by 1957 to construct four massive hydraulic forging presses and six extrusion presses, the largest of their kind globally at the time, aimed at achieving domestic self-sufficiency in forging large, complex titanium and high-strength steel components for supersonic military aircraft. Driven by the demands of aviation advancements, particularly for projects like the B-70 Valkyrie bomber requiring unprecedented structural integrity in airframes, the program addressed the limitations of existing U.S. capacity, which relied on smaller presses and captured German equipment from . Key facilities included 50,000-ton presses built by Mesta Machine Company for and , capable of exerting forces equivalent to compressing a of by over 50,000 pounds per , enabling the production of monolithic forgings up to 100 feet long for critical parts like bulkheads and engine mounts. These presses revolutionized by reducing weld joints—potential failure points—through near-net-shape , enhancing resistance and performance in high-stress environments, and their enduring utility is evidenced by ongoing use in producing components for modern fighters like the F-15. The program's success stemmed from targeted government investment in , yielding capabilities that supported U.S. air superiority without dependency on foreign , though it highlighted the challenges of scaling such specialized machinery amid post-war industrial shifts.

Historical Context

Pre-Program Developments

During , analysis of aircraft in 1942 revealed large-scale forgings that surpassed production capabilities, prompting initial efforts to expand domestic heavy forging technology. Examination of captured planes demonstrated the to produce significantly larger and more complex magnesium s than Allied counterparts, achieved through presses exceeding sizes previously considered feasible; magnesium's tendency to rupture under traditional hammer necessitated such hydraulic systems. In response, the US commissioned an 18,000-ton press at Wyman-Gordon Company, completed in 1946 to address these gaps. Germany had developed multiple large presses despite post-World War I restrictions, including a 7,000-ton press, three 16,500-ton models, and a 33,000-ton press— the latter seized by the after the war, along with designs for a planned 55,000-ton unit. Postwar provided the with several presses, enabling advancements in the domestic industry through reverse-engineering and operational experience. personnel, including Lt. Gen. K.B. Wolfe, inspected these facilities, confirming the strategic value of heavy presses for aircraft components. In the late , the transition to and supersonic designs amplified requirements for lightweight, high-strength parts from alloys like and magnesium, where US capabilities remained limited to smaller forgings reliant on extensive riveting and fasteners, increasing aircraft weight and vulnerability. The Soviet acquisition of advanced German press technology heightened concerns over matching adversary production rates for strategic bombers and fighters. The Korean War's outbreak in further underscored these deficiencies, as demands surged for integral, large-scale forgings to enhance structural efficiency in . studies that year quantified the benefits of massive presses, projecting substantial reductions in part count and assembly complexity for next-generation airframes.

World War II and Immediate Postwar Motivations

During , examination of captured revealed significant advantages in technology, particularly the use of large integral forgings for engine disks, turbine wheels, and components that enhanced structural integrity and performance under high stress. These capabilities stemmed from Germany's interwar development of presses exceeding 20,000 tons, such as the Loewy-Rudolf press installed in 1937, which allowed production of complex, lightweight parts from alloys like aluminum and magnesium—advances the U.S. could not match with its prevailing presses limited to around 12,000-15,000 tons capacity. The disparity highlighted how heavy contributed to superior designs, including the jet fighter, underscoring a vulnerability in American industrial capacity for large-scale aviation components. Postwar assessments amplified these concerns, as U.S. intelligence reports noted the Soviet Union's acquisition of German presses and expertise through in 1946, potentially enabling rapid advancements in heavy forgings for . With the onset of the by 1947 and the 1949 Soviet atomic test signaling escalating threats, U.S. military planners anticipated demands for massive, high-strength forgings in emerging jet engines, supersonic airframes, and strategic bombers like the B-52, which required single-piece components weighing up to 10,000 pounds to minimize weight and joints. Existing domestic facilities, even after wartime expansions, lacked the —needing 35,000 to 50,000 tons for and high-temperature alloys—to forge such parts without compromising safety or efficiency, as demonstrated by prototype failures in early jet programs. The Korean War's outbreak on June 25, 1950, provided immediate impetus, exposing ongoing bottlenecks for parts and reinforcing the strategic necessity of self-reliant heavy to maintain air superiority against numerically superior adversaries. leaders, drawing from WWII analyses, argued that without dedicated large presses, the U.S. risked dependency on foreign or inadequate suppliers, potentially delaying production of critical systems like blades and bulkheads essential for high-thrust engines. This calculus prioritized over commercial viability, justifying government investment in presses capable of handling billets up to 40 inches in diameter, as smaller alternatives led to multi-piece assemblies prone to failure under operational stresses observed in combat testing.

Program Execution

Initiation and Timeline

The U.S. Department of Defense initiated the Heavy Press Program in 1950 to establish domestic manufacturing capacity for large-scale forgings and extrusions essential for advanced and structures, addressing postwar shortages in heavy metalforming equipment previously reliant on foreign suppliers. The effort stemmed from assessments that existing U.S. presses lacked the tonnage and precision for components in jet bombers like the B-52 and emerging intercontinental ballistic missiles, prompting a push for self-sufficiency amid tensions. Originally scoped for 17 presses—nine die-forging and eight extrusion units—at an estimated $389 million, the program faced revisions due to fiscal constraints and technological evaluations, scaling back to 10 presses by 1953. Construction commenced in 1951, with key facilities including the Mesta 35,000-ton forging press operational by the early 1950s. The two landmark 50,000-ton closed-die forging presses followed: the Alcoa press in Cleveland, Ohio, completed in 1955, and the in North , also in 1955, each capable of handling billets up to 100 tons for integral parts. The program wrapped up in after delivering four forging presses and six extrusion presses, totaling around $235–279 million in expenditures, enabling production of complex and aluminum components previously unfeasible at scale. This timeline aligned with accelerated procurement for strategic bombers and nuclear deterrence systems, marking a pivotal shift in U.S. toward high-tonnage capabilities.

Funding and Cost Analysis

The Heavy Press Program was funded exclusively by the U.S. Department of Defense, administered through the , after approved the necessary appropriations in 1950 to address gaps in domestic capacity for advanced components. An initial outlay of $200 million was designated for constructing multiple large-scale forging presses and extrusion machines, reflecting the program's strategic priority amid Cold War technological competition. Upon completion in 1957, the total expenditure reached $239 million in then-current dollars, equivalent to roughly $2.8 billion adjusted for to 2024 values. This government investment bypassed standard norms, as no viable commercial market existed for presses of such scale, which private industry deemed too specialized and risky without assured defense demand; instead, the facilities were built for and operated by contractors under rental terms requiring them to assume ongoing maintenance and overhead costs. Economic justifications centered on long-term defense efficiencies, with the presses enabling forged components that reduced part counts (e.g., four large forgings replacing 272 smaller assemblies), eliminated thousands of fasteners, and cut requirements, yielding per-part cost reductions of up to 30% and weight savings of 6%. By the , cumulative savings exceeded $500 million across programs like the B-52 bomber, where benefits alone offset the entire program cost, underscoring the investment's causal role in enhancing structural integrity, production speed, and lifecycle economies for .

Press Construction and Specifications

The Heavy Press Program facilitated the construction of four large hydraulic presses between 1952 and 1956, comprising two 50,000-ton units and two 35,000-ton units, at a total program cost of $239 million. These presses were engineered with robust frames supported by deep foundations, often exceeding 100 feet in depth with 13-foot-thick walls, to withstand immense forces during operation. Key structural elements included 200-ton cross beams, 90-ton cylinder supports, and tie rods extending up to 108 feet in length, with the overall structures reaching approximately 10 stories in height. Hydraulic systems operated at pressures up to 7,000 psi, drawing from large water reservoirs to power the rams. The 50,000-ton press at in , constructed by Loewy Construction Company, became operational in October 1955 and featured a pull-down design with a laminated plate frame, a of 12 by 32.5 feet, 14 feet of daylight, a 6-foot stroke, and approach/pressing speeds of 480 and 120 inches per minute, respectively. Similarly, the 50,000-ton press in , , built by Machine Company from 1952 to 1955, employed a push-down configuration with eight cylinders, a 12 by 24-foot bed, 15 feet of daylight, a 6-foot stroke, and speeds of 180 and 120 inches per minute. The 35,000-ton presses included one at Wyman-Gordon, built by Loewy with two side rams each rated at 3,000 tons, a 12 by 30.5-foot bed, 12 feet of daylight, a 6-foot stroke, and speeds of 480 and 150 inches per minute. The Alcoa unit, constructed by United Engineering, mirrored the push-down design of its larger counterpart, with a 12 by 24-foot bed, 15 feet of daylight, an 8-foot stroke, and speeds of 300 and 150 inches per minute. These specifications enabled closed-die forging of large, complex components from materials like titanium and magnesium, critical for aerospace applications. The program also funded six 12,000-ton extrusion presses, though these featured elongated 120-foot structures optimized for extrusion rather than forging.
Press LocationTonnageBuilderBed Size (ft)Daylight (ft)Stroke (ft)Approach Speed (in/min)Pressing Speed (in/min)
50,000Loewy12 x 32.5146480120
50,00012 x 24156180120
35,000Loewy12 x 30.5126480150
35,00012 x 24158300150

Technical and Operational Aspects

Types of Presses Built

The Heavy Press Program funded the construction of four hydraulic forging presses, primarily for closed-die and open-die operations to produce large structural components from high-strength alloys such as and aluminum. These included two 50,000-short-ton closed-die presses, designed to exert immense force for shaping complex aircraft forgings with minimal waste and high integrity. The first, built by Mesta Machine Company, was installed at Alcoa's facility in , , and became operational in 1957, standing 141 feet tall with a of 25 by 52 feet. The second 50,000-ton closed-die press, engineered by Loewy Construction, was erected at Wyman-Gordon's plant and entered service in 1955, featuring similar dimensions and powered by high-pressure hydraulic systems using steel-reinforced concrete frames for stability. Complementing these were two 35,000-ton presses, also hydraulic, focused on open-die for initial rough shaping of billets into slabs or bars before final closed-die processing. One such press was constructed at 's Grafton site in 1952, enabling preliminary deformation of ingots up to 40 feet long. These presses incorporated innovations like four-column designs and steam-hydraulic intensification to achieve pressures exceeding 10,000 , allowing for the handling of materials previously limited by smaller machinery. The program also built six extrusion presses to complement by producing seamless tubular and structural shapes from lightweight metals. These ranged in capacity from 5,000 to 14,000 tons, with diameters accommodating billets up to 15 inches, located at facilities like Alcoa's plant for a 14,000-ton unit specialized in aluminum s. presses operated via indirect or direct methods, forcing heated metal through dies to form profiles essential for skins and casings, with the largest capable of extruding sections over 100 feet long in a single pass. These press types—dominated by vertical hydraulic configurations—were engineered for precision control over deformation rates, minimizing defects like cracks in heat-treated alloys, and represented a shift from mechanical hammers to sustained hydraulic force for aerospace-scale production.

Engineering Innovations and Capabilities

The Heavy Press Program's forging presses pioneered hydraulic engineering at unprecedented scales, with the two 50,000-ton units—built by Mesta for Alcoa and Loewy for Wyman-Gordon—capable of applying forces equivalent to 100 million pounds, far exceeding prior industrial capabilities. These presses utilized closed-die forging techniques to shape light alloys like aluminum and magnesium into intricate, high-strength components, addressing limitations in pre-program machinery that relied on smaller, less efficient presses or imported British technology. Structural innovations included colossal steel castings, some exceeding 350 tons, assembled into frames rising 87 feet high with subterranean foundations penetrating 100 feet into to absorb vibrational loads and ensure precision under extreme . Hydraulic systems featured multiple high-capacity pumps and cylinders, enabling controlled ram strokes up to several feet, while platens supported dies weighing up to 50 tons each, accommodating workpieces large enough to fit multiple automobiles. These designs mitigated risks of distortion, a common failure in earlier large presses, through reinforced uprights and side-loading mechanisms for efficient die handling. In terms of capabilities, the presses enabled the fabrication of monolithic structural elements, such as wing spars and bulkheads, in single pieces weighing tens of tons, which minimized welds—potential weak points—and improved critical for high-stress applications. For instance, they produced s for nearly every U.S. since the 1950s, with die areas supporting parts up to 10 by 26 feet, fostering self-sufficiency in complex geometries from heat-treatable alloys. Subsequent engineering enhancements, including automated controls and rebuilt hydraulic circuits in the , extended operational life and precision, allowing integration with advanced alloys for modern jets while preserving the core capacity for oversized s unattainable by conventional methods. This enduring capability underscores the program's foundational advancements in scaling hydraulic to industrial extremes, influencing global standards for heavy .

Applications and Impact

Military and Aerospace Contributions

The Heavy Press Program enabled the to domestically produce large-scale forgings critical for advanced structures, addressing vulnerabilities exposed by the Soviet Union's acquisition of a captured 30,000-ton German press after . By funding 50,000-ton hydraulic forging presses, the program facilitated the creation of high-strength components from , aluminum, and other alloys, essential for supersonic and high-altitude performance in Cold War-era defense systems. These capabilities ensured self-sufficiency in forging technology, preventing reliance on potentially adversarial foreign suppliers for strategic aviation needs. Presses like the 50,000-ton unit, operational since 1955, became dominant in advanced programs by producing integral forgings that replaced assemblies of hundreds of smaller parts, significantly reducing weight and counts. For instance, in the F-102A interceptor, the use of such forgings achieved cost savings of approximately $20,000 per aircraft through streamlined . Similarly, the B-52 Stratofortress benefited from these technologies, with overall program savings exceeding the Heavy Press Program's total cost, enhancing structural efficiency and reliability in strategic bombers. The 50,000-ton press specifically contributed to the Rockwell B-1B Lancer bomber by forging fuselage airframe structural components in , supporting low-observable and high-speed requirements. These large monolithic parts improved fatigue resistance and load-bearing capacity compared to riveted assemblies, enabling designs with fewer joints vulnerable to failure under extreme operational stresses. Overall, the program's outputs underpinned the structural integrity of supersonic fighters and bombers, fostering innovations in that prioritized performance over peacetime commercial viability.

Broader Industrial Spillovers

The Heavy Press Program facilitated significant technological spillovers to commercial aerospace by enabling the of large, intricate and components unattainable with prior equipment. These presses produced structural elements for civilian , including a 4,000-pound beam for the during the 1960s, enhancing strength-to-weight ratios and . The 50,000-ton press, in particular, played a key role in advancing U.S. leadership in through its capacity for high-precision, closed-die of massive parts. Beyond , the program's innovations supported civilian space applications, such as forging the for the Mercury space capsule and structural anchors for the rocket, demonstrating transfer of heavy forging expertise to non-military rocketry. Advancements in hydraulic controls, material processing, and die design from the presses represented a rapid evolution in techniques, applicable to broader heavy but most prominently realized in sectors. Economically, the program's $239 million investment (equivalent to approximately $2.8 billion in dollars) generated returns exceeding double that amount within a through reduced scrap rates, faster production cycles, and elimination of multi-piece assemblies. By the , these efficiencies had cumulatively saved $500 million in costs across and operations. Such spillovers underscored the program's role as a foundational enabler of integrated military-civilian industrial capabilities in high-stress component production.

Recognition and Legacy

Engineering Landmarks

The 50,000-ton hydraulic presses constructed under the Heavy Press Program represent pivotal engineering achievements, designated as Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmarks by the (ASME). These machines, among the largest of their kind ever built, enabled the production of massive, high-strength essential for advanced structures, surpassing previous capabilities limited by smaller presses and reliance on multiple parts. The Alcoa 50,000-ton hydraulic closed-die forging press, designed and built by the Mesta Machine Company for the U.S. Air Force between 1952 and 1955, became operational in 1954 at Alcoa's Cleveland facility. With a capacity of 50,000 tons, it was inspired by a captured German 30,000-ton press from World War II but scaled up to meet demands for larger aluminum and titanium components in military aircraft. Its designation as an ASME landmark in October 1981 recognizes its dominance in commercial and military aviation development, facilitating self-sustaining U.S. industrial capacity for large-scale forgings. Similarly, the 50,000-ton hydraulic closed-die press, designed by the Loewy Company and completed by 1954, began operations in October 1955 at the company's North plant. Matching the press in capacity, it advanced closed-die techniques, proving their practicality and economy for producing integral components that reduced aircraft weight and enhanced structural integrity. ASME designated it a in October 1983 for its contributions to commercial aircraft like the and military projects including the Rockwell B-1B bomber's . These landmarks underscored the program's success in bridging critical gaps in heavy , enabling the U.S. to forge single-piece bulkheads and other parts up to 180 inches in diameter, as demonstrated in applications like F-15 fighter components. Their enduring operation highlights innovations in hydraulic systems and press design that influenced global standards.

Modern Relevance and Recent Investments

The presses constructed under the Heavy Press Program continue to underpin U.S. manufacturing, producing large, high-strength forgings essential for modern where alternatives like or fall short in resistance and structural integrity. The (now ) 50,000-ton press in , , forges bulkheads and aluminum main spars for the F-35 Lightning II, enabling one-piece components that reduce weight and assembly complexity compared to multi-part designs. Similarly, these facilities support production for the F-15 Eagle upgrades and other platforms, demonstrating the enduring value of closed-die forging for load-bearing elements. No new presses of comparable scale have been built since the program's completion in the , owing to costs exceeding $100 million in adjusted terms and the specialized required, leaving the existing assets as unique national capabilities critical for supply chains. The 50,000-ton press in , remains active for and forgings used in engines and airframes, serving both and demands. Recent investments focus on maintenance and incremental upgrades to sustain output amid rising demand from geopolitical tensions and defense budgets. In 2012, completed a redesign of the Cleveland press, incorporating structural enhancements to a 92-foot-tall facility while preserving its core 50,000-ton capacity for wing and fuselage components. The Mesta-built press underwent a full rebuild in 2008 to restore operational reliability after decades of service. Broader efforts include a September 2024 Department of Defense award of $15 million to a U.S. forger for a new manipulator on a 10,000-ton press, aimed at expanding heavy capacity for munitions and parts, signaling sustained federal prioritization of domestic production over foreign reliance. These upgrades align with forging market growth, projected to exceed $20 billion globally by 2030, driven by demand increases of 8% annually for high-performance alloys in next-generation aircraft like the B-21 Raider. Such investments underscore the program's legacy in enabling U.S. technological edge, as disruptions like the 2009 press outage forced costly workarounds for F-35 parts, highlighting vulnerabilities without redundant heavy infrastructure.

Criticisms and Controversies

Economic and Free-Market Critiques

The Heavy Press Program, which expended approximately $279 million in public funds between 1950 and 1957 to construct four massive presses and six presses, exemplifies government-directed that free-market economists criticize for overriding voluntary exchange and market-driven investment decisions. Proponents of principles argue that private enterprises, facing genuine profit-and-loss tests, would have either developed such capabilities if commercially viable or pursued alternative technologies better aligned with broader economic needs, avoiding the distortions introduced by taxpayer subsidies that insulated firms from full risk exposure. Critics contend that the program's focus on military-specified equipment for and magnesium created path dependencies, channeling resources into niche defense applications at the potential expense of diversified industrial innovation. For example, analysts have observed that state-led initiatives like this, modeled partly on centralized precedents, contributed to inefficiencies in U.S. by prioritizing strategic imperatives over cost-effective, consumer-oriented , ultimately eroding competitive adaptability in global . Such interventions, they assert, exemplify the knowledge problem in central , where bureaucrats lack the dispersed information necessary for optimal compared to decentralized market signals. From a causal standpoint, the opportunity costs of diverting funds equivalent to about $2.6 billion in 2023 dollars included foregone investments in areas like consumer goods or general upgrades, potentially hampering overall productivity growth. While the presses enabled key advancements, free-market perspectives emphasize that genuine scarcity of capital under government monopoly procurement—rather than true —justified the intervention only in a context of nationalized demand, not free enterprise, raising concerns about long-term fiscal burdens and reduced incentives for efficiency among subsidized recipients.

Political and Strategic Debates

The Heavy Press Program was initiated in 1950 amid escalating Cold War tensions, including the Soviet Union's first atomic bomb test in August 1949 and North Korea's invasion of South Korea in June 1950, which underscored vulnerabilities in U.S. strategic air power production. U.S. Air Force leaders identified a critical shortfall in domestic capacity to forge large, high-strength components—such as turbine disks and bulkheads—for advanced jet engines and airframes, relying instead on a handful of presses captured from Germany after World War II. Strategically, the program aimed to achieve manufacturing autonomy, preventing supply chain disruptions that could hamper deterrence against Soviet bomber fleets and enabling scaled production for aircraft like the Boeing B-52 Stratofortress, whose engines required forgings beyond existing capabilities. Politically, the initiative aligned with bipartisan consensus on defense buildup under Presidents and Eisenhower, funded through appropriations totaling approximately $200 million in 1950s dollars (over $2 billion adjusted for inflation), despite postwar fiscal restraint. Proponents justified direct government sponsorship—contracting private firms like and to build the presses—as essential, arguing that commercial markets lacked incentives to amortize the immense upfront costs over low-volume needs, a view supported by the absence of pre-program private equivalents. This state-directed approach mirrored broader industrial policies under the , prioritizing national security over pure market allocation. Retrospective strategic debates center on the program's long-term efficacy versus risks of overreliance on subsidized capacity. While it demonstrably resolved immediate forging bottlenecks and facilitated aviation advances, some analysts contend it fostered inefficiencies by tailoring infrastructure to defense specifications, potentially hindering adaptable commercial evolution and contributing to later U.S. challenges through distorted signals. Free-market critiques the HPP as an early instance of -industrial complex dynamics, echoing President Eisenhower's 1961 against undue influence of defense contractors on policy, where government funding may have preempted organic innovation spurred by procurement demands alone. Empirical outcomes counterbalance these views: at least eight presses remain operational as of 2012, supporting both (e.g., F-35 components) and civilian applications (e.g., and parts), with the flagship 50,000-ton press projected to endure until 2064. This longevity affirms the causal realism of targeted intervention in securing , though it fuels ongoing discourse on balancing strategic imperatives with economic liberty in high-barrier technologies.

References

  1. [1]
    How to Build a 50000 Ton Forging Press - Construction Physics
    Aug 21, 2024 · Known as the Heavy Press Program, it funded the construction of four large forging presses and six extrusion presses. Upon completion, the ...
  2. [2]
    The world's largest hydraulic presses | Gasparini Industries
    Aug 30, 2019 · The Heavy Press Program. Begun in 1950 and completed in 1957, this US aviation plan led to the production of six extrusion and four stamping ...
  3. [3]
    The Air Force's 50,000 Ton Press - PlaneHistoria
    Oct 7, 2023 · With the backing of the US Air Force, the US started the Heavy Press Program in 1950. This program… well it produced heavy presses, but it also ...<|separator|>
  4. [4]
    ALCOA 50,000-ton Hydraulic Forging Press - ASME
    It was designed and built for the U.S. Air Force by the Mesta Machine ... By 1950, a Heavy Press Program was organized to establish a self-sustaining ...
  5. [5]
    ASME-Landmark:Wyman-Gordon 50,000-Ton Hydraulic Forging Press
    Nov 23, 2017 · An early indication that advances were needed in forging technology came during World War II, when examination of captured German planes ...<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    [PDF] U.S. FORGING INDUSTRY - DOE Office of Science
    Aug 2, 2022 · The United States forging industry advanced greatly after World War II, having learned much from the three presses they received from Germany as ...
  7. [7]
    PRODUCTION AND USE OF METALFORMING MACHINERY ... - CIA
    Heavy Presses Constructed Under the Heavy Press Program of the US Air Force, 1951-57 51 in the UK by the USSR Appendix H. Extent of Removals of Metalforming ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
  8. [8]
    [PDF] 50000 Ton Closed Die Forging Press - ASME
    Sep 24, 1981 · The 50,000 ton closed die forging press is the largest forging machine in the US, producing the largest light metal forgings, and is the 64th ...
  9. [9]
    Alcoa Forging Division, Mesta 50,000-Ton Closed Die Forging Press ...
    ... Heavy Press Program" during the early 1950's. The program aimed to create presses large enough to make complex castings needed for new aircraft designs.
  10. [10]
    BIG AIR FORCE PROGRAM; $200,000,000 to Be Spent for Giant ...
    BIG AIR FORCE PROGRAM; $200,000,000 to Be Spent for Giant Presses for Forging Parts. Share full article. Oct. 25, 1950. BIG AIR FORCE PROGRAM; $200,000,000 to ...
  11. [11]
    Wyman-Gordon 50,000-ton Hydraulic Forging Press - ASME
    As part of the same Heavy Press Program that created the Mesta press, the Wyman-Gordon press was designed by the Loewy Construction Company and began operating ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Feasibility of Using a Large Press (80000 - DTIC
    Consequently, the load and velocity specifications, listed in Table 3-1, give only the nominal range. The press bed sizes of the world's four largest presses ...Missing: construction | Show results with:construction
  13. [13]
    Wyman-Gordon Grafton
    In 1953, the facility was expanded to include the 35,000 and 50,000 ton presses in what was referred to as the “Air Force Heavy Press Program”. From this ...
  14. [14]
    Heavy Press Program | Military Wiki - Fandom
    The Heavy Press Program was a Cold War-era program of the United States Air Force to build the largest forging presses and extrusion presses in the world.
  15. [15]
    Heavy Press Program – Monster Machines for Forging Light Metal ...
    Feb 16, 2012 · The Heavy Press Program was run by the US government in the 1950s, to give us the ability to forge metals like magnesium into large but light component parts.
  16. [16]
    The Wyman Gordon 50000 ton forging press - AutoSpeed
    Oct 29, 2013 · The Heavy Press Program confirmed that the closed-die forging technique was practical and economical. Heavy presses made it possible to forge ...
  17. [17]
    History in the Making | New Equipment Digest
    With federal sponsorship, the Heavy Press Program built four machines in order to produce the components needed for an adequate air-defense program through the ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    How one company uses commercial tech to make larger, less ...
    Sep 29, 2017 · Arconic forges the bulkheads in one piece out of aluminum or titanium using a 50,000-ton machine at its facility in Cleveland, Ohio. ... The F-35 ...
  19. [19]
    Alcoa Celebrates the Redesign of Iconic Forging Press in Cleveland
    Feb 13, 2012 · part of the Air Force Heavy Press program following World War II and has been used to build parts for nearly every military aircraft ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  20. [20]
    50,000 Ton Press Anyone? | The Garage Journal
    Feb 27, 2020 · There is a MESTA 50,000 ton press in Cleveland. It was installed in the 1950's and in 2008 was rebuilt. Here's a great video on it.
  21. [21]
    Department of Defense Awards $15 Million to Increase Heavy Forge ...
    Sep 30, 2024 · Specifically, the award will fund a new forging manipulator that improves the capacity of their 10,000-ton open die forging press, heat ...Missing: aerospace contributions<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Metal Forging Market to Hit Valuation of US$ 188.57 Billion by 2033
    Aug 4, 2025 · The demand for specialized materials is soaring, with projections indicating an 8% increase in the demand for titanium forgings in the aerospace ...
  23. [23]
    Precision's F-35 Work May Rise on Alcoa's Breakdown - Bloomberg
    Feb 26, 2009 · Alcoa's 50,000-ton press in Cleveland has been out of service since September and the company has resorted to a “work-around plan” of forging F ...<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Industrial Policy: A Bad Idea Is Back | Cato Institute
    American policymakers on both sides of the aisle have once again embraced “industrial policy” to fix perceived market failures and counter China's growing ...Missing: forging presses
  25. [25]
    The Heavy Press program and the decline of US heavy industry.
    Mar 12, 2012 · These types of programs are a dangerous violation of democratic principles. When tax dollars are used to capitalize certain specific companies ...Air Force Heavy Press Program | Practical MachinistThe machines that made the Jet Age (Heavy Press Program)More results from www.practicalmachinist.com
  26. [26]
    U.S. Industrial Policy: Inevitable and Ineffective
    Throughout the 1980s, liberals and conservatives debated the promise and the perils of a government-led industrial policy. Proponents called for strategic ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  27. [27]
    Start the Presses - by Rian Chad Whitton - Doctor Syn
    Aug 14, 2023 · The U.S. government subsequently undertook the heavy press program. The air force led the procurement of 4 forging presses and 6 extrusion ...Missing: WWII | Show results with:WWII
  28. [28]
    Iron Giant - The Atlantic
    Mar 15, 2012 · The now-forgotten Heavy Press Program, inaugurated in 1950 and completed in 1957, would ultimately result in 10 forges built with taxpayer ...
  29. [29]
    “The Heavy Press Program was a Cold War-era ... - Hacker News
    $$279mm in 1957 dollars is about $3.2bn today [2]. A public cluster of GPUs provided for free to American universities, companies and non-profits might not be a ...
  30. [30]
    For Replicator to work, the Pentagon needs to directly help with ...
    Sep 7, 2023 · As an example, the Department spent over $2 billion adjusted for inflation as part of the Heavy Press Program during the 1950s. This ...Missing: political debates
  31. [31]
    Eisenhower's Military-Industry Complex Warning, 50 Years Later
    Jan 17, 2011 · On Jan. 17, 1961, President Dwight Eisenhower gave the nation a dire warning about what he described as a threat to democratic government.