Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Hopf–Rinow theorem

The Hopf–Rinow theorem is a result in that characterizes the completeness of connected through several equivalent conditions. It asserts that for a connected Riemannian manifold (M, g), the following properties are equivalent: (M, d) is a , where d is the distance function induced by the Riemannian metric g; the manifold is geodesically complete, meaning every can be extended to all real time parameters; the at some point p \in M is defined on the entire T_p M; and every closed and bounded subset of M is compact, embodying the Heine-Borel property. Additionally, under any of these conditions, any two points in M can be joined by a of length exactly equal to their distance d(p, q). Originally established by and his student Willi Rinow in 1931 for surfaces, the theorem extends naturally to higher-dimensional manifolds with proofs that follow similar lines. The result bridges , geodesic, and topological aspects of Riemannian manifolds, highlighting how completeness ensures the existence of minimizing s between points, analogous to straight lines in . This equivalence is pivotal for understanding global properties of manifolds, such as , and has implications in areas like and optimization on curved spaces. Key corollaries include the fact that complete Riemannian manifolds behave like spaces in terms of bounded sets being compact, and that the injectivity at points can be analyzed via the . Examples illustrate the theorem's sharpness: the open unit in \mathbb{R}^n with the is geodesically incomplete despite being connected, as Cauchy sequences may converge outside the , violating . In contrast, compact manifolds without are always complete. The theorem's proof typically involves showing that geodesic incompleteness implies a missing in the , using compactness arguments on minimizing sequences of curves.

Prerequisites

Riemannian geometry basics

A is a smooth manifold M equipped with a Riemannian metric, which is a smooth assignment of a positive-definite inner product to each T_p M at every point p \in M. This metric is typically denoted by a g, where g_p: T_p M \times T_p M \to \mathbb{R} satisfies g_p(v, v) > 0 for all nonzero v \in T_p M, and varies smoothly across the manifold. The inner product induced by g on each enables the measurement of lengths and angles intrinsically on the manifold. Specifically, the length of a v \in T_p M is given by \|v\|_p = \sqrt{g_p(v, v)}, and the angle between two vectors v, w \in T_p M is \theta = \cos^{-1} \left( \frac{g_p(v, w)}{\|v\|_p \|w\|_p} \right). This structure allows for local geometric computations analogous to those in , but adapted to the curved nature of the manifold. From the Riemannian metric, one defines a distance function d: M \times M \to [0, \infty) between points p, q \in M as the infimum of the lengths of all smooth curves \gamma: [a, b] \to M connecting them, where the length L(\gamma) = \int_a^b \sqrt{g_{\gamma(t)}(\dot{\gamma}(t), \dot{\gamma}(t))} \, dt. Thus, d(p, q) = \inf \{ L(\gamma) \mid \gamma(a) = p, \gamma(b) = q \}, which induces a topology on M compatible with its . Classic examples of Riemannian manifolds include Euclidean space \mathbb{R}^n with the standard flat metric g = \delta_{ij}, the sphere S^n endowed with the round metric of constant positive curvature, and hyperbolic space \mathbb{H}^n with its metric of constant negative curvature, each illustrating how the metric tensor shapes local and global geometry.

Geodesics and completeness

In a Riemannian manifold (M, g), the Riemannian metric g induces a notion of length for smooth curves, allowing the definition of geodesics as curves that locally minimize this length. A smooth curve \gamma: I \to M, where I \subseteq \mathbb{R} is an interval, is a geodesic if it satisfies the geodesic equation \nabla_{\gamma'(t)} \gamma'(t) = 0 for all t \in I, meaning the covariant derivative of its velocity field along itself vanishes. This condition ensures that the acceleration of the curve is zero with respect to the Levi-Civita connection, analogous to straight lines in Euclidean space. The exponential map at a point p \in M, denoted \exp_p: T_p M \to M, provides a way to parameterize emanating from p. For a v \in T_p M, \exp_p(v) is defined as the endpoint \gamma(1), where \gamma: [0,1] \to M is the unique maximal segment satisfying \gamma(0) = p and \gamma'(0) = v, provided such a segment exists within its domain of definition. The image of \exp_p traces points reachable by of unit speed from p. The metric g further induces a distance function d: M \times M \to [0, \infty) on the manifold, defined as the infimum of lengths of smooth curves connecting points. A Riemannian manifold (M, g) is metrically complete if the metric space (M, d) is complete, meaning every Cauchy sequence in d converges to a point in M. Geodesic completeness concerns the extendability of geodesics themselves. A is geodesically complete if every \gamma: I \to M admits a reparameterization to a defined on the entire real line \mathbb{R}, or equivalently, if the domain of \exp_p is the entire T_p M for every p \in M. In the context of Riemannian manifolds, properness relates to topological compactness properties induced by the metric. A Riemannian manifold M is proper if it is a proper , meaning every closed and bounded subset of (M, d) is compact.

The Theorem

Formal statement

The Hopf–Rinow theorem provides a characterization of completeness for connected s. Let (M, g) be a connected smooth equipped with the induced distance function d: M \times M \to [0, \infty), where d(p, q) denotes the infimum of lengths of piecewise smooth curves connecting p and q. The exponential map \exp_p: T_p M \to M at a point p \in M$ is defined on a domain D_p \subseteq T_p M$ consisting of all initial velocities for which the corresponding geodesic is defined on some maximal interval. The following conditions are equivalent:
(1) (M, d) is a , meaning every in M converges to a point in M;
(2) M is geodesically complete, meaning that for every p \in M and v \in T_p M, the \gamma_v(t) with \gamma_v(0) = p and \dot{\gamma}_v(0) = v is defined for all t \in \mathbb{R} (equivalently, D_p = T_p M for every p);
(3) every closed and bounded subset of M is compact (the Heine–Borel property holds for the metric d).
This equivalence holds for finite-dimensional smooth connected Riemannian manifolds.

Key implications

One of the central implications of the Hopf–Rinow theorem is that a connected M satisfying the theorem's conditions—such as metric completeness—admits a minimizing between any two points p, q \in M. Specifically, there exists a \gamma: [0, L] \to M with \gamma(0) = p, \gamma(L) = q, and length \ell(\gamma) = L = d(p, q), where d is the induced distance function. This follows directly from the equivalence between metric completeness and the existence of geodesic segments of length exactly d(p, q), ensuring global paths that realize the infimum distance without shortcuts. The theorem also establishes a compactness criterion for M: it is complete if and only if every closed and bounded subset is compact, embodying the Heine–Borel property in the Riemannian setting. This equivalence is instrumental in embedding theorems, where completeness guarantees compact immersions under bounded geometry conditions, and in variational , where it aids the Palais–Smale condition by ensuring compactness of sublevel sets in energy functionals on the manifold. For example, the \mathbb{R}^n with the standard metric is complete and features unique minimizing geodesics between any two points globally, as straight lines realize distances without obstruction. In the hyperbolic plane, also complete with constant negative , minimizing geodesics are unique between all pairs of points due to the strict convexity of the distance function, though in general complete manifolds like (compact hence complete), uniqueness fails globally for points near , with multiple geodesics achieving the minimal length.

Proof Outline

Preliminary lemmas

The proof of the Hopf–Rinow theorem relies on several key lemmas that provide the foundational tools for handling geodesics, compactness, and metric properties in Riemannian manifolds. Local existence and uniqueness of geodesics follow from the applied to the geodesic equation. Given a point p \in M and v \in T_p M, the geodesic equation \frac{D}{dt} \dot{\gamma}(t) = 0, \quad \gamma(0) = p, \quad \dot{\gamma}(0) = v, defines a second-order system of ordinary differential equations with locally Lipschitz coefficients (due to the smoothness of the ). Thus, there exists a unique maximal interval I \subset \mathbb{R} containing 0 and a unique C^\infty curve \gamma: I \to M solving the . The Ascoli–Arzelà theorem ensures compactness in the space of curves, which is essential for convergence arguments in complete metric spaces. Consider the set of all piecewise smooth curves of length at most L > 0 between fixed points p, q \in M in a complete . This set is equicontinuous (by bounded length) and pointwise relatively compact (by completeness), so Ascoli–Arzelà implies it is precompact in the C^0 topology, allowing subsequential convergence to a limit curve of equal or shorter length. Hopf's lemma addresses the behavior of non-extendable in locally compact metric spaces. Let (X, d) be a locally compact length space and \gamma: [0, b) \to X a geodesic that cannot be extended beyond b. Let q = \lim_{t \to b^-} \gamma(t). Then there exists a neighborhood U of q such that no point in U lies at a distance greater than b from \gamma(0); equivalently, the distance function x \mapsto d(\gamma(0), x) attains a local maximum at q. This property implies that non-extendable geodesics cannot "escape" into the interior without violating minimality. In proper Riemannian manifolds, bounded sets are precompact. A Riemannian manifold is proper if every bounded subset has compact closure, which holds because the exponential map \exp_p: T_p M \to M is proper (preimages of compact sets are compact) and any bounded set K \subset M is contained in \exp_p(B_R(0)) for some R > 0, whose closure is compact. This ensures that sequences in bounded sets have convergent subsequences, linking properness to completeness in the theorem.

Main argument

The proof of the Hopf–Rinow theorem establishes the equivalence between geodesic completeness and metric completeness on a connected M, along with related conditions such as the properness of the manifold as a . One direction proceeds by showing that geodesic completeness implies metric completeness. Specifically, if every on M can be extended to all real numbers, then the \exp_p: T_p M \to M at any point p \in M is defined on the entire T_p M. The smoothness of \exp_p ensures its on compact subsets of T_p M, such as closed balls. For any \{q_n\} in M, the corresponding preimages under \exp_p form a bounded sequence in T_p M, which has a convergent subsequence by compactness; the limit yields a point in M to which \{q_n\} converges, establishing metric completeness. Conversely, metric completeness implies that M is proper as a metric space, meaning closed and bounded subsets are compact. In a complete metric space, every Cauchy sequence converges to a point in M. Bounded sets in the induced distance metric d_g have finite diameter, and since M is locally compact, such sets are totally bounded, ensuring compactness of their closures. This properness is crucial for the subsequent implications. Properness in turn implies geodesic completeness. Consider a geodesic \gamma: (a, b) \to M defined on a maximal interval, where b < \infty. The image \gamma((a, b)) is bounded, hence its closure is compact by properness. Hopf's lemma guarantees that if the geodesic can be continuously extended to b, it admits a geodesic extension beyond b, contradicting maximality unless b = \infty. Thus, all geodesics extend to the entire real line, yielding geodesic completeness. The proof implicitly relies on the finite dimensionality of the manifold, which underpins the compactness arguments via the Heine–Borel theorem in finite-dimensional spaces. A key component supporting these equivalences is the existence of minimizing geodesics between any two points p, q \in M when the manifold is complete. To establish this, approximate the infimum length between p and q by a minimizing sequence of polygonal paths, each consisting of finitely many segments within normal neighborhoods where radial geodesics minimize length. These paths form an equicontinuous and uniformly bounded family in the space of curves, and by the , a subsequence converges uniformly to a limiting curve that is a geodesic of minimal length.

Historical Context

Publication and authors

The Hopf–Rinow theorem originated from a collaborative effort by two German mathematicians, Heinz Hopf and Willi Rinow, who published their seminal paper in 1931. Titled "Ueber den Begriff der vollständigen differentialgeometrischen Fläche," the work appeared in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, volume 3, pages 209–225. Heinz Hopf (1894–1971), a leading figure in topology and geometry, brought his expertise in topological properties, such as compactness, to the theorem's development. Willi Rinow (1907–1979), Hopf's doctoral student and a specialist in differential geometry, concentrated on the metric and geodesic elements of the result. Their publication built directly on foundational late-19th-century investigations into geodesics, including contributions from and contemporaries who advanced the understanding of shortest paths on surfaces.

Subsequent developments

In 1935, Stefan Cohn-Vossen extended the to length spaces, defined as metric spaces in which the distance between any two points is the infimum of the lengths of all paths connecting them. This generalization asserts that a complete and locally compact length space is proper—meaning every closed and bounded subset is compact—and that any two points in such a space can be joined by a minimizing geodesic. The Hopf–Rinow theorem influenced subsequent results in , notably S. B. Myers' 1941 theorem, which establishes an upper bound on the diameter of a complete whose Ricci curvature is bounded below by a positive constant (n-1)H > 0, where n is the dimension and H > 0. This bound, π/√H, implies the manifold is compact, with the proof invoking Hopf–Rinow to link metric completeness to properties under curvature constraints. The theorem contributed significantly to the foundations of global during the 1970s, as seen in the of J. Cheeger and D. Gromoll, which shows that a complete, open of nonnegative admits a compact totally (the ) such that the manifold is diffeomorphic to the normal bundle over the soul, with the providing a retraction onto it. In modern contexts, the Hopf–Rinow theorem informs studies of completeness in , where extensions to semi-Riemannian manifolds help characterize behavior in geometries relevant to theorems and . Recent developments as of 2025 include conformal versions for semi-Riemannian spacetimes and applications to magnetic geodesics on Lie groups. It continues to be a cornerstone in pedagogical texts, such as Manfredo P. do Carmo's (1992), which presents it as a fundamental tool for understanding completeness in curved spaces.

Extensions and Limitations

Generalizations to metric spaces

The Hopf–Rinow theorem extends beyond Riemannian manifolds to more general spaces, particularly length spaces, where the between points is defined as the infimum of lengths of curves connecting them. In 1935, S. Cohn-Vossen provided an early generalization for connected, locally compact length spaces, stating that metric completeness implies the existence of curves realizing the between any two points. A fuller version of the Hopf–Rinow theorem for length spaces, as developed in subsequent literature, asserts that for a connected length space, the following properties are equivalent: metric completeness, properness (closed balls are compact), and geodesic completeness (every geodesic can be extended indefinitely). Here, geodesics are defined as locally length-minimizing curves. This equivalence holds under the assumption of local compactness, mirroring the Riemannian case but in a purely setting. Similar equivalences apply to Finsler manifolds, where the arises from a Minkowski on rather than a . For a connected Finsler manifold that is and locally compact, is equivalent to the being defined on the entire at some (equivalently, every) point, ensuring the existence of minimizing between points. In sub-Riemannian geometry, which generalizes Finsler structures by restricting to horizontal distributions, a Hopf–Rinow-type holds for , locally compact sub-Finsler manifolds, linking to geodesic via the sub-Riemannian . Complete CAT(0) spaces provide a concrete example of this generalization. These are length spaces with non-positive curvature in the sense of Alexandrov, where completeness implies properness and the existence of unique geodesics between any two points, facilitating strong convexity properties.

Cases where it fails

The Hopf–Rinow theorem, which establishes equivalences between metric completeness, geodesic completeness, and the existence of minimizing geodesics in connected Riemannian manifolds, fails in infinite-dimensional settings due to the absence of local compactness. A prominent counterexample is the unit sphere in a separable infinite-dimensional Hilbert space, endowed with the induced Riemannian metric from the Hilbert manifold structure. This space is metrically complete as a length space, yet it is not proper—meaning closed bounded sets are not compact—and consequently, there are no minimizing geodesics connecting antipodal points, as any potential geodesic path would require infinite length or fail to achieve the infimum distance. This failure extends to broader classes of infinite-dimensional manifolds, such as those modeled on Banach spaces, where the lack of local prevents the equivalence between and the existence of length-minimizing geodesics between arbitrary points. In such spaces, even though the manifold may be geodesically complete in the sense that geodesics can be extended indefinitely, the metric structure does not guarantee minimizers for all pairs of points, highlighting the theorem's reliance on finite-dimensional assumptions. In the Lorentzian setting, the Hopf–Rinow theorem also does not hold, as the indefinite metric disrupts the that ensures compactness implies completeness in the Riemannian case. The Clifton–Pohl provides a classic counterexample: this compact 3-dimensional Lorentzian manifold, constructed by deforming the flat metric on the to have (2,1), is compact but incomplete, with timelike geodesics escaping the manifold in finite affine despite the bounded topology. This illustrates that global topological constraints like fail to enforce geodesic completeness in Lorentzian geometry, unlike in the Riemannian context. Beyond semi-Riemannian structures, the theorem's equivalences break down in non-locally compact spaces more generally, including certain Banach manifolds where does not imply properness or the of minimizing paths. For instance, infinite-dimensional Hilbert or Banach spaces themselves serve as counterexamples, being complete spaces without compactness, thus lacking the geodesic connectivity assured by the theorem in finite dimensions. In quasi-metric spaces—where the distance function satisfies the but not necessarily symmetry—and incomplete length spaces, further counterexamples arise where metric completeness does not ensure the existence of minimizing curves. For example, certain quasi-metric structures on infinite-dimensional spaces can be complete in the symmetrized metric yet fail to admit length-minimizing paths between points, as the asymmetry prevents the standard variational arguments from yielding global minimizers. These cases underscore the theorem's dependence on symmetric, positive-definite metrics and local compactness for its core implications.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] LECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS 1. The Hopf-Rinow Theorem
    Apr 20, 2024 · Now we state Hopf-Rinow theorem, which contains two parts: the first part claims that for Riemannian manifolds, the two notions of completeness ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] THE HOPF-RINOW THEOREM Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Tensors ...
    Aug 3, 2016 · Abstract. This paper is an introduction to Riemannian geometry, with an aim towards proving the Hopf-Rinow theorem on complete Riemannian ...
  3. [3]
    Ueber den Begriff der vollständigen differentialgeometrischen Fläche.
    Ueber den Begriff der vollständigen differentialgeometrischen Fläche. H. Hopf; W. Rinow · Commentarii mathematici Helvetici (1931). Volume: 3, page 209-225 ...Missing: Mannigfaltigkeit pdf
  4. [4]
    Riemannian Manifold -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    A manifold possessing a metric tensor. For a complete Riemannian manifold, the metric d(x,y) is defined as the length of the shortest curve (geodesic) ...
  5. [5]
    Riemannian manifold - PlanetMath
    Mar 22, 2013 · A manifold M M together with a Riemannian metric tensor g g is called a Riemannian manifold. Note: A Riemannian metric tensor on M M ...
  6. [6]
    Riemannian Distance - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Riemannian distance is defined as the minimum length among curves connecting two points in a connected Riemannian manifold, calculated using the Riemannian ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature
    This book is a textbook for a graduate course on Riemannian geometry, focusing on the geometric meaning of curvature and the main technical tools.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Riemannian Geometry
    Manfredo Perdigao do Carmo. Riemannian Geometry. Translated by Francis Flaherty. Birkhauser. Boston • Basel • Berlin. Page 2. CONTENTS. Preface to the first ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] PROPER (or HEINE-BOREL) METRIC SPACES - UTK Math
    PROPER (or HEINE-BOREL) METRIC SPACES. Def. (X, d) is proper (or HB) if closed bounded sets are compact. Ex.1 Rn is HB. (Since bounded sets are totally bounded.).
  10. [10]
    [PDF] COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY 1. The Hopf-Rinow Theorem ...
    A geodesic ball satisfying the assertion of the previous lemma is called locally convex. Recall that a region in Rn is convex if for any point in the boundary.
  11. [11]
    Compact Sobolev Embeddings on Non-Compact Manifolds
    Jun 25, 2021 · Compact Sobolev embeddings turn out to be fundamental tools in the study of variational problems, being frequently used to study the existence ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] The Palais-Smale Condition and Mane's Critical Values - SciSpace
    This condition ensures that the minimax principle holds and from the latter many standard properties of geodesics easily follow, namely, The Hopf-Rinow theorem,.
  13. [13]
    Geodesic Uniqueness in the Hyperbolic Plane - Math Stack Exchange
    May 21, 2011 · I am studying Hyperbolic Geometry. At this part, I have proved that semicircles and straight lines orthogonals to the real axis are geodesics in the hyperbolic ...The existence of a larger compact set containing all minimising ...A question about unique minimal geodesic - Math Stack ExchangeMore results from math.stackexchange.com
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Riemannian Geometry
    We now start to study one of the two central tools in Riemannian geometry: geodesics. Definition 1.14. A curve γ is called a geodesic if. ∇ dt γ. 0. = 0 along ...
  15. [15]
    Ueber den Begriff der vollständigen differentialgeometrischen Fläche
    Cite this article. Hopf, H., Rinow, W. Ueber den Begriff der vollständigen ... December 1931. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01601813. Share this article.
  16. [16]
    Heinz Hopf - Biography - MacTutor - University of St Andrews
    Heinz Hopf was one of the most distinguished mathematicians of the twentieth century. His work is closely linked with the emergence of algebraic topology.
  17. [17]
    Willi Ludwig August Rinow - The Mathematics Genealogy Project
    Willi Ludwig August Rinow. Dr. phil. Universität Berlin 1932 Germany. Dissertation: Über Zusammenhänge zwischen der ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  18. [18]
    A contribution to the history of geodesics during the nineteenth century
    The equations for geodesics, however, were generally unamenable to easy resolution; and direct methods of treatment yielded but little of interest, as regards ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Length Spaces - ETH Zurich
    2.4 Theorem (Hopf–Rinow, Cohn-Vossen 1935). Let X be a length space. If X is complete and locally compact, then. (1) X is proper, i.e. every closed bounded ...
  20. [20]
    [2301.13438] Hopf-Rinow Theorem of sub-Finslerian geometry - arXiv
    Jan 31, 2023 · A version of the Hopf-Rinow theorem is proved in the case of sub-Finslerian manifolds, which relates the properties of completeness, geodesically completeness, ...
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    [PDF] arXiv:math/0305427v1 [math.DG] 29 May 2003
    As is well known, the Hopf-Rinow theorem fails when M is infinite-dimensional, but Ekeland [31] proved (by using his celebrated variational principle) that ...
  23. [23]