Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Incremental capital-output ratio

The incremental capital-output ratio (ICOR) is an economic metric that quantifies the additional in required to produce one additional unit of output, typically expressed in terms of (GDP). It is formally defined as the ratio of the incremental input to the incremental output generated over a specific period, serving as a measure of the with which investments translate into . The concept of ICOR emerged from the Harrod-Domar model of economic growth, initially developed by Roy Harrod in his 1939 paper "An Essay in Dynamic Theory" and further elaborated by Evsey Domar in 1946 and 1947. In this framework, ICOR—denoted as v or σ—represents the capital coefficient, where the warranted growth rate of the economy (g) is given by the formula g = s / v, with s being the savings rate as a proportion of income. Harrod emphasized the role of ICOR in maintaining between and output expansion, while Domar viewed it as a passive outcome influenced by technological progress and savings behavior, rather than a fixed . This model, though originally focused on instability in advanced economies, was later adapted for long-term growth planning in developing countries during the mid-20th century. ICOR is calculated practically as the annual divided by the annual increase in GDP, often expressed as ICOR = (ΔK / ΔY), where ΔK is the change in stock and ΔY is the change in output. A lower ICOR indicates higher , meaning less is needed per unit of growth, which is particularly crucial for resource-constrained economies aiming to optimize allocation. For instance, in India's Five-Year Plans from 1951 to 2017, ICOR was used to target growth rates by estimating required levels, with values around 4-5 suggesting moderate in transforming into output. The metric has been widely applied in to forecast needs, though it assumes a constant ratio and overlooks factors like or sectoral differences. Despite its utility, ICOR has faced criticisms for oversimplifying growth dynamics, as highlighted in post-1950s analyses that noted its "passive" nature and limited causal power in explaining actual economic performance. In modern contexts, variations in ICOR across countries—such as higher ratios in capital-intensive sectors—underscore its role in policy evaluation, but economists increasingly supplement it with broader models incorporating and gains. Overall, ICOR remains a foundational tool for assessing productivity and guiding strategies.

Definition and Measurement

Conceptual Definition

The incremental capital-output ratio (ICOR) measures the amount of additional investment required to produce one unit of additional output, typically expressed in terms of (GDP). It serves as a critical indicator of in , helping policymakers evaluate how effectively new contributes to economic expansion. A lower ICOR signifies higher , meaning less is needed to achieve , while a higher value indicates or inefficiencies in capital utilization. Unlike the average capital-output ratio, which provides a static snapshot by dividing the total existing by total output at a given time, the ICOR is dynamic and focuses on marginal changes—specifically, the of incremental to incremental output over a period. This distinction allows the ICOR to capture the of new investments rather than the overall , making it particularly useful for analyzing growth in transitioning economies. The concept of ICOR emerged prominently in post-World War II , as development economists sought tools to guide strategies in newly and underdeveloped countries aiming for rapid industrialization. It became a staple in assessing financing needs and growth potential during this era, influencing allocation and national plans. For example, if $5 of new generates $1 of additional GDP, the ICOR is 5, suggesting moderate in use.

Mathematical Formulation

The incremental capital-output ratio (ICOR) is fundamentally defined as the ratio of the change in capital stock to the change in output, expressed mathematically as \text{ICOR} = \frac{\Delta K}{\Delta Y}, where \Delta K represents the increment in capital stock, often approximated by or net , and \Delta Y denotes the increment in output, typically measured as (GDP). This formulation captures the additional required to produce an additional unit of output, serving as a measure of efficiency in production processes. An alternative expression derives from relating investment shares to growth rates, given by \text{ICOR} = \frac{I / Y}{g} = \frac{s}{g}, where I is gross , Y is the level of GDP, s = I / Y is the savings or investment rate, and g = \Delta Y / Y is the GDP rate. This form highlights how ICOR links aggregate investment to economic expansion, assuming that increments in capital directly translate to proportional output changes over the period analyzed. Theoretically, ICOR relates inversely to the (MPK), the additional output generated by one unit of additional , such that \text{MPK} = \frac{\Delta Y}{\Delta K} = \frac{1}{\text{ICOR}}. This positions ICOR as a for the of 's marginal , where a lower ICOR implies higher MPK and thus greater in capital utilization. The formulation relies on key assumptions, including constant returns to scale in the , which ensures that proportional increases in inputs yield proportional output increases, facilitating the linear relationship between capital increments and output. In the short run, ICOR may fluctuate due to cyclical factors or temporary inefficiencies, whereas long-run applications average over periods to reflect stable technological and structural conditions. Computationally, it requires annual data on investment flows (to proxy \Delta K) and GDP figures (for \Delta Y), often sourced from , with adjustments for in net capital measures.

Calculation Methods

The calculation of the incremental capital-output ratio (ICOR) requires assembling time-series data on and (GDP) from , typically spanning multiple years to ensure reliability. The process starts by collecting annual figures for (as a for , denoted as I) and GDP (denoted as Y), both preferably in real terms to reflect constant prices. The annual change in output is then determined: \Delta Y = Y_t - Y_{t-1}, where t represents the current year. The basic ICOR is computed as the ratio I_t / \Delta Y, measuring the additional capital needed per of output . To address short-term fluctuations in economic activity, such as effects, the ICOR is frequently estimated using multi-year averages rather than single-year changes. For instance, average over a 3- to 5-year period is divided by the corresponding average GDP increment, yielding a smoothed indicator that better captures underlying trends. This approach is particularly useful in volatile economies where one-off events can distort annual ratios. Several adjustments are essential for accuracy in ICOR computation. First, distinguish between gross and net : gross includes total capital spending without subtracting , while net deducts capital to focus on additions to the productive , often resulting in a lower ICOR value. The choice depends on the analysis context, with net measures preferred for assessing sustainable growth as they account for capital . Second, calculations should use real (inflation-adjusted) values rather than nominal figures to avoid distortions from changes; this involves deflating both and GDP using a suitable , such as the , ensuring the ratio reflects true volume changes. Third, for sector-specific ICORs, such as in , apply the same ratio method but to sectoral and value-added output , which can reveal varying capital efficiencies across industries like or . Data for these computations primarily come from official national accounts compiled by bodies like the , (IMF), or national statistical offices, including indicators such as as a share of GDP. However, challenges arise in economies with significant informal sectors, where investment activities are often underreported or excluded from , leading to underestimated I and potentially inflated ICOR values. Efforts to incorporate estimates, such as through household surveys or multiple-indicator-multiple-cause models, help mitigate these biases but require careful methodological alignment with GDP frameworks. As an illustrative example, consider a period from 2020 to 2023 where totals $100 billion and GDP increases by $25 billion in real terms; the ICOR would be $100 / 25 = 4, signifying that $4 in generates $1 in extra output. This hypothetical computation highlights how ICOR quantifies efficiency in practical policy scenarios.

Theoretical Foundations

Origins in Economic Growth Models

The incremental capital-output ratio (ICOR) emerged as a central concept in the Harrod-Domar model of economic growth during the 1940s, developed independently by Roy Harrod in 1939 and Evsey Domar in 1946. In this framework, ICOR, denoted as v, represents the fixed amount of additional required to produce an additional of output, assuming rigid proportions between and output with no substitution between factors. The model posits that the economy's growth rate g is determined by the savings rate s divided by the ICOR, expressed as g = \frac{s}{v}, highlighting how , financed by savings, drives output expansion under conditions. Following , the ICOR gained prominence in as a tool for planning in underdeveloped countries, notably through the work of Paul Rosenstein-Rodan and initiatives. Rosenstein-Rodan's "" theory, outlined in his 1943 analysis of Eastern and South-Eastern European industrialization, estimated the scale of coordinated investments needed to overcome market failures and initiate self-sustaining growth, such as requiring a 12% investment rate to achieve viable industrialization. Similarly, in UN development plans, economists like applied a stable ICOR of around 3 in 1960 projections to calculate capital requirements for achieving target growth rates in low-income nations, assuming technical progress would mitigate . The concept evolved in the 1950s with the advent of neoclassical theory, particularly Robert Solow's 1956 model, which relaxed the Harrod-Domar assumption of fixed ICOR by introducing factor substitutability and exogenous . In Solow's framework, ICOR becomes variable over time, reflecting adjustments in and allowing long-run to depend primarily on technological progress rather than savings alone, thus addressing instabilities in the earlier fixed-proportions approach. A key milestone in ICOR's application occurred in the 1950s and 1960s through reports, which standardized its use for and investment planning in and . For instance, a 1955 study by Dragoslav Avramovic employed ICOR to assess financing needs in Southeast Asian economies, integrating it into broader evaluations of development viability and .

Relation to Productivity Concepts

The incremental capital-output ratio (ICOR) serves as the inverse of the (MPK), where MPK represents the additional output generated by an extra unit of investment. Mathematically, this relationship is expressed as ICOR = 1 / MPK, implying that a lower ICOR indicates a higher MPK and thus more efficient utilization in producing incremental output. This connection underscores ICOR's role in assessing the productivity of new investments, as opposed to existing stock, highlighting how effectively economies translate inflows into . ICOR variations are closely linked to (TFP), which captures the portion of output growth not explained by increases in capital or labor inputs, often termed the . In growth accounting frameworks, fluctuations in ICOR frequently reflect underlying TFP changes rather than mere capital deepening, as inefficient capital allocation can mask or amplify TFP effects on overall productivity. For instance, persistent high ICOR values may signal TFP stagnation, where technological or organizational inefficiencies hinder the marginal productivity of capital, thereby tying ICOR dynamics to the unexplained component of growth in neoclassical models. In comparison to the average capital-output ratio (ACOR), which measures the total stock relative to existing output and reflects historical accumulation patterns, ICOR focuses on marginal efficiency by evaluating the additional required for output increments. This distinction is crucial, as ACOR may remain stable even amid declining marginal returns, whereas ICOR directly probes current productivity. Similarly, ICOR relates to the accelerator principle, which posits that levels respond proportionally to changes in output, with ICOR determining the scale of needed to sustain accelerated growth induced by demand shifts. Unlike the fixed-coefficient assumptions in basic accelerator models, ICOR allows for variability in responsiveness, providing a more nuanced view of -output linkages. A high ICOR often signals to or resource misallocation, which can constrain long-run potential by reducing the overall of the process. In this context, ICOR not only benchmarks productivity but also informs policy efforts to enhance TFP through better allocation, thereby mitigating risks to sustained economic expansion.

Empirical Evidence

Global and Historical Trends

The incremental capital-output ratio (ICOR) in developing countries averaged approximately 3 to 4 during the 1950s to 1970s, reflecting relatively efficient capital use in early post-colonial growth phases. This period saw steady investment in basic infrastructure and industry, with aggregate data from United Nations surveys indicating stable productivity in output per unit of capital invested. By the 1980s, amid debt crises and commodity price volatility, ICOR rose to 5 or higher across many developing economies, as evidenced by median values exceeding 5 in regions like Eastern Africa where investment yields diminished due to external shocks. Post-2000, globalization and supply chain integration contributed to a decline in ICOR to around 2.5-3.5 in emerging markets, signaling improved capital efficiency through technology diffusion and trade openness. During the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-21), ICOR temporarily increased in many economies due to disrupted growth and sustained investment, with partial recovery by 2023-24 as per World Bank data. Regionally, exhibited notably low ICOR values of 2 to 3 during the 1960s to 1990s , driven by high-output manufacturing and export-led strategies that maximized returns on incremental capital. In contrast, recorded higher ICORs averaging 5 to 7 over similar periods, attributable to persistent deficiencies that reduced the productivity of investments in and basic services. OECD countries maintained relatively stable ICOR averages near 3 throughout the late , supported by mature capital markets and incremental upgrades rather than large-scale expansions. Long-term shifts in advanced economies show a decline in ICOR from around 4 in the to approximately 2.5 by the , largely due to technological advancements that enhanced output without proportional capital increases. Fluctuations were evident during the 1970s oil shocks, when ICOR spiked temporarily in energy-importing nations, and the , which elevated ratios amid reduced efficacy before partial recovery. World Bank datasets illustrate these trends, highlighting convergence in ICOR among emerging markets as global integration accelerated capital reallocation.

Country-Specific Variations

In , the incremental capital-output ratio (ICOR) averaged between 3.5 and 4.5 during much of the , reflecting moderate efficiency in capital utilization amid structural reforms and . The 2016 demonetization disrupted economic activity and slowed GDP growth to 7.1% in 2016-17 from 8.0% the prior year. By the late and into the , the ICOR declined to an average of 3.6 based on from 2014-15 to 2022-23, supported by enhanced digital that improved capital productivity. China's ICOR remained relatively low at 4-5 during the and , facilitating rapid export-led growth through efficient allocation of capital in and . Post-2008 , it increased to 6-7 on average through the early , as investment shifted toward less productive sectors. After 2015, the ICOR rose further to approximately 9 by 2019, exacerbated by overinvestment in and diminishing returns on capital amid slowing productivity growth. In the United States, high capital efficiency has been maintained through service-sector dominance, technological innovation, and flexible labor markets that enhance output per unit of . Nigeria's ICOR has been notably high, exceeding 10 during the 2000s and 2010s, attributable to heavy reliance on revenues, which led to volatile and inefficient project execution in non-oil sectors. A brief decline occurred in the mid-2010s amid economic diversification reforms, including agricultural incentives and sector improvements, though gains were temporary due to persistent price shocks and challenges. Cross-country panel analyses reveal that differences in ICOR account for 20-30% of variations in long-term differentials, as lower ICORs in efficient economies amplify the impact of on output compared to high-ICOR contexts marked by misallocation.

Determinants and Influences

Economic and Structural Factors

The composition of plays a significant role in determining the incremental capital-output ratio (ICOR), with allocations toward often yielding lower ICOR values in certain contexts, as like roads can enhance by facilitating broader economic activity. In labor-abundant economies, the complementarity between labor and influences ICOR through factors such as skill mismatches, where inadequate workforce skills relative to capital-intensive investments lead to higher ICOR by underutilizing resources. Structural shifts from to during economic transformation can temporarily elevate ICOR, as capital reallocation requires time to align with new sectoral demands, resulting in diminished short-term gains. Financial development critically affects ICOR by shaping credit access; limited availability of credit in underdeveloped systems increases ICOR, as firms face higher borrowing costs and suboptimal scales. Additionally, crowding-out effects from elevated public debt exacerbate this by diverting scarce financial resources from projects, further inflating the capital required per unit of output. Greater trade openness, particularly through export-oriented strategies, has been found to reduce ICOR in high-performing economies via enhanced technology spillovers and competitive pressures that boost investment efficiency. This effect is evident in the experiences of the , where outward-oriented trade policies facilitated capital reallocation toward more productive uses. In dual economies as described by the , rural-urban migration drives ICOR dynamics by enabling capital reallocation from low-productivity agriculture to urban industry, though initial phases may see elevated ratios due to transitional frictions.

Technological and Policy Influences

Technological progress significantly influences the incremental capital-output ratio (ICOR) by enhancing capital productivity, allowing economies to generate more output from additional investments. Advancements in and streamline production processes, reducing the amount of capital required per unit of output and thereby lowering ICOR. For instance, the adoption of (AI) has been shown to boost by up to 14.2% for every 1% increase in AI penetration, which indirectly improves capital efficiency and contributes to a reduced ICOR over time. Policy frameworks play a pivotal role in modulating ICOR through targeted interventions that promote efficient . Investment incentives, such as tax credits for (R&D), lower the effective , encouraging higher and thus reducing ICOR by facilitating more output per unit of . Conversely, corruption elevates ICOR by distorting decisions and causing inefficient allocation of resources; in , for example, corrupt practices and bureaucratic inefficiencies have contributed to an ICOR of around 6.33%, well above the efficient target of 3-4, as they hinder optimal capital utilization. Investments in and R&D enhance , which over time lowers ICOR by improving the productivity of capital through and skilled labor. In during the , aggressive policies expanding education access and R&D spending—such as increasing enrollment in and elevating R&D as a share of GDP—helped reverse earlier rises in ICOR from about 2.0 in the 1960s-1970s to 4.8 by the late , stabilizing and gradually reducing it through heightened technological capabilities and export-oriented growth. Environmental regulations and green investments present a mixed impact on ICOR, often raising it initially due to the capital-intensive nature of transitioning to renewables but lowering it in the long term through improved . The shift to sources requires substantial upfront investments in , potentially increasing the capital-output ratio during the transition phase, yet it fosters sustainable productivity gains by reducing and operational costs over time. A notable example of policy influence is China's 2008 fiscal stimulus package, valued at RMB 4 trillion, which temporarily boosted to over 10% in 2009-2010 and appeared to lower ICOR in the short term by accelerating infrastructure investment. However, the emphasis on state-controlled projects led to overcapacity and inefficient allocation, causing ICOR to more than double in subsequent years and contributing to long-term economic imbalances.

Limitations and Criticisms

Methodological Challenges

One major methodological challenge in estimating the incremental capital-output ratio (ICOR) stems from data inaccuracies, particularly in low-income and developing countries where the informal sector dominates economic activity. Underreporting of investments in informal sectors, such as small-scale and unregistered enterprises, often leads to an inflated ICOR because official statistics capture only formal while growth metrics partially reflect informal contributions. This underreporting can bias estimates upward, with studies suggesting that adjusted figures for informal investments might lower apparent ICOR values, though exact adjustments vary by country context. ICOR calculations also face biases from violated assumptions inherent in underlying growth models, such as the Harrod-Domar framework, which presumes a fixed-coefficient without or factor substitutability. When technological progress occurs, it enhances output beyond capital increments alone, leading to an overestimation of the required capital per unit of growth and thus a higher ICOR. Additionally, estimations over short time periods amplify cyclical noise from business fluctuations, making ICOR appear unstable as temporary economic shocks distort the investment-growth relationship without capturing long-term trends. Aggregation at the level further complicates ICOR estimation by masking significant sectoral differences in capital efficiency. For instance, in , agriculture typically exhibits ICOR values ranging from 2.5 to 3.5 due to land-intensive and weather-dependent investments, while the services sector shows lower ratios of 2 to 3, reflecting minimal capital needs for knowledge-based activities; infrastructure sectors can have higher ratios of 6 to 8. These disparities mean that economy-wide ICOR averages obscure inefficiencies in capital allocation across sectors, particularly in developing countries where agriculture still dominates but services drive . Endogeneity poses another critical issue, as investment levels and output are mutually interdependent—higher expected spurs , while investments directly influence —creating reverse that biases standard ICOR regressions. To address this, econometric techniques like instrumental variable () methods are employed, using exogenous instruments such as shocks or historical capital stocks to isolate causal effects and mitigate the between explanatory variables and error terms. Without such adjustments, ICOR estimates suffer from inconsistent parameters, undermining their reliability for . A seminal critique highlighting these measurement errors came from van Rijckeghem's 1969 study, which empirically demonstrated the instability of national ICOR over short periods, attributing wide year-to-year variations primarily to inaccuracies in and output rather than economic shifts. This work underscored how even minor errors in propagate through ICOR computations, emphasizing the need for robust in empirical applications.

Interpretive and Policy Limitations

The incremental capital-output ratio (ICOR) faces significant interpretive challenges due to its reliance on that often obscure underlying economic dynamics. Precise measurement of capital stock and output increments is fraught with difficulties, including index number problems and ambiguities in distinguishing capital from non-capital goods, which can lead to inconsistent estimates across periods or sectors. Furthermore, ICOR tends to be unstable, fluctuating widely year-to-year due to short-term factors like business cycles or data revisions, though variability diminishes over longer horizons such as five-year periods; this instability complicates its use as a reliable indicator of . In advanced economies, ICOR particularly struggles to capture intangible assets, such as software and , or the impacts of and R&D, which contribute substantially to growth without corresponding increases in . Interpretive limitations also stem from ICOR's origins in the Harrod-Domar model, where it is often misconstrued as a fixed technological rather than a passive outcome of interactions between savings, , and other variables. Evsey Domar noted that ICOR is more likely a result of economic processes than an explanatory driver, challenging causal interpretations in accounting. Additionally, the ratio overlooks structural factors like labor quality, institutional constraints, and technological progress, leading to oversimplifications; for instance, Leibenstein's analysis revealed a negative between ICOR and rates, suggesting higher ratios may reflect inefficiencies elsewhere rather than capital productivity alone. These issues render ICOR less suitable for nuanced analysis in diverse economic contexts, such as those involving natural resource depletion or enhancements, which it fails to quantify adequately. On the policy front, ICOR's interpretive ambiguities can result in misguided decisions, as assuming a stable ratio for planning may exaggerate the role of while underestimating complementary factors like or . In , its application in financing gap models—popularized by the and UN in the mid-20th century—has been criticized for severe limitations, particularly in advanced or transitioning economies where growth stems more from gains than volume. William Easterly highlights how such models, reliant on ICOR to estimate needs, often fail because the ratio does not account for policy distortions or institutional barriers, leading to ineffective in recipient countries. Policy use of ICOR is further limited by its aggregate nature, which masks sectoral imbalances, income distribution effects, or welfare outcomes, potentially prioritizing GDP growth over . For example, in planning frameworks like India's Five-Year Plans, a rising ICOR signaled inefficiencies but overlooked non-capital drivers, prompting overinvestment without addressing labor market rigidities. Roy Harrod and Evsey Domar themselves cautioned against overreliance on capital ratios for policy, emphasizing the need for balanced approaches incorporating technical progress and skilled labor to avoid instability. Consequently, while useful for long-term benchmarks in capital-scarce developing economies, ICOR's adoption requires caution to prevent hazardous prescriptions that ignore broader socioeconomic interdependencies.

References

  1. [1]
    Understanding Incremental Capital Output Ratio (ICOR) and Its Impact
    ### Summary of Incremental Capital Output Ratio (ICOR)
  2. [2]
    Understanding economic efficiency – the importance of the ICOR
    Feb 9, 2024 · It shows the amount of incremental capital required to produce one additional unit of output, offering insight on the efficiency and ...
  3. [3]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Harrod, Domar and the history of development economics - EconStor
    Domar observed that the incremental capital-output ratio was more likely a passive result of the interaction between the propensity to save and technological ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] The Ghost of Financing Gap The qhost of a nq-dead
    Jul 1, 1997 · They called this ratio the Incremental Capital. Output Ratio (ICOR), and thought it was somewhere between 2 and 5.5 Lewis said "the central fact ...
  6. [6]
    Incremental Capital Output Ratio (ICOR) - Economics Discussion
    If G = s/v where g is the growth rate and s the savings ratio and v the incremental capital-output ratio (ICOR), the lower the v the higher the g. So, the first ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Rebalancing in China––Progress and Prospects
    1/ The incremental capital output ratio (ICOR) is a proxy of the inverse marginal product of capital. The higher the index, the less productive the capital.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Chapter 2. Growth, Productivity, and Income
    The ICOR is proportional to the inverse of the marginal product of capital. In the Cobb-. Douglas production function Q=AKαL1–α, the marginal product of ...
  9. [9]
    Harrod-Domar Model | Economics 428 - The Middlebury Sites Network
    The incremental capital-output ratio, or ICOR, is equal to 1 divided by the marginal product of capital. The higher the ICOR, the lower the productivity of ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] A NEW APPROACH TO GROWTH IN WESTERN BALKANS
    Where, ∆K represents the change in capital stock or new net investment and as such equals gross investment – capital depreciation, whereas ∆Y/Y the real rate of ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] An analysis of Capital - Output ratios with special reference to South ...
    The incremental capital output ratio (ICOR). The ICOR has been calculated for the following sectors: - Agriculture, forestry and fishing;. - I'1ining;.Missing: specific | Show results with:specific
  12. [12]
    Do you have data for informal sectors? - World Bank Data Help Desk
    Data for informal sectors is sometimes misestimated due to lack of source data, but some countries include it in national accounts. IMF metadata and UNECE ...
  13. [13]
    Measuring the Informal Economy in: Policy Papers ... - IMF eLibrary
    Feb 2, 2021 · This paper proposes a framework for measuring the informal economy that is consistent with internationally agreed concepts and methodology for measuring GDP.Missing: ICOR | Show results with:ICOR
  14. [14]
    [PDF] An Essay in Dynamic Theory Author(s): R. F. Harrod Source
    Author(s): R. F. Harrod. Source: The Economic Journal, Vol. 49, No. 193 (Mar., 1939), pp. 14-33. Published by: Blackwell Publishing for the Royal Economic ...Missing: ICOR | Show results with:ICOR
  15. [15]
    Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Employment - jstor
    The central theme of the paper was the rate of growth, a concept which has been little used in economic theory, and in which I put much faith as an ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Problems of Industrialisation of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe
    Author(s): P. N. Rosenstein-Rodan. Source: The Economic Journal, Vol. 53, No. 210/211 (Jun. - Sep., 1943), pp. 202-211. Published by: Blackwell Publishing for ...Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
  17. [17]
    [PDF] A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth Author(s)
    The bulk of this paper is devoted to a model of long-run growth which accepts all the Harrod-Domar assumptions except that of fixed proportions. Instead I ...Missing: ICOR | Show results with:ICOR
  18. [18]
    IV Issues in the Design of Growth Exercises - IMF eLibrary
    This type of fixed-coefficient production function—sometimes referred to as the “ICOR model” or incremental capital/output ratio model—is often expressed in the ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] The Determinants of Growth - LSE
    where v is the incremental capital-output ratio (ICOR, equal to K/Y) ... Why Growth Rates Differ: Post-War Experience in Nine Western Countries, Washington:.
  20. [20]
    [PDF] An economical approach to estimate a benchmark capital stock
    incremental capital-output ratio. That is, k0 = K/Y. (5) k1 = ∆K/∆Y. (6) where k0 is the average capital-output ratio and k1 is the incremental capital-output.<|control11|><|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Investment and Growth in the Middle East and North Africa in
    Nov 1, 1996 · Average ICOR for Selected Countries; 1980-95. Citation: IMF Working ... accelerator principle, the neoclassical approach, the cash flow ...
  22. [22]
    International Variations in the Incremental Capital-Output Ratio
    VALUES OF INVESTMENT RATIO AND GROSS AND NET ICORs PREDICTED. BY (R.2) AND (R ... Then, the ICOR is 3.2 gross and 1.6 net. Suppose that this economy.Missing: calculation | Show results with:calculation
  23. [23]
    A NOTE ON THE INCREMENTAL CAPITAL OUTPUT RATIO AND ...
    3 to 4. Source: Derived from the data in United Nations, WorldEconornic Survey ... ning in the developing countries. Among these, some may be measurable ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] THE PROBLEMS AND POLICIES OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
    The final chapter examines recent progress in economic reforms in eastern Europe. The World Economic Survey is prepared in the. Centre for Development Planning, ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Capital Accumulation in Eastern and Southern Africa
    The contribution of each sector to the change in overall ICOR can be identified according to the following breakdown given in "Capital and Growth in India, 1950 ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] MOVING INDIA TO A NEW GROWTH TRAJECTORY
    Jun 10, 2019 · The growth in demand for manufactured products will be subdued in the foreseeable future due to the stagnating growth in advanced economies.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] The East Asian Miracle: Four Lessons for Development Policy
    The East Asian Miracle refers to rapid growth in eight high-performing economies, including Japan, the "four tigers," and three NIEs, with four public policy ...Missing: ICOR | Show results with:ICOR
  28. [28]
    [PDF] OECD Economic Surveys: China 2022 (EN)
    Mar 8, 2022 · ... (ICOR), i.e. the amount of capital needed per extra unit of output, ... transformation and stressed the need to accelerate the momentum (OECD, 2009 ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Economic Growth in East Asia: Accumulation versus Assimilation
    For Korea, the capital inflow averaged 6 percent of GDP throughout the 1960s and. 1970s. Singapore relied even more on capital inflows, until the mid-. 1980s ...Missing: ICOR | Show results with:ICOR
  30. [30]
    Gross capital formation (% of GDP) - World Bank Open Data
    Gross capital formation (% of GDP) data is from country official statistics, OECD, and World Bank, covering 1960-2024.
  31. [31]
    Road to growth is paved with low Icor - Mint
    Apr 19, 2017 · India's slowing investment rate and rising incremental capital output ratio, or Icor, have led to low economic growth.
  32. [32]
    None
    ### Summary of ICOR Values for India from NITI Working Paper (December 2023)
  33. [33]
    The Political Economy of the U.S.-China Technology War
    As shown in Chart 1, during the last decade or so, China's incremental capital-output ratio rose dramatically from 4.9 in 2008 to 9.2 in 2019, reflecting the ...
  34. [34]
    Joyless growth in China, India, and the United States | Brookings
    Jan 22, 2019 · Since 2007, the incremental capital-output ratio (ICOR) in China has tripled from 3 to 9, while the growth rate of GDP has fallen by half. The ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Political Economy of the Petroleum Sector in Nigeria
    incremental capital output ratio at 12.7% ―was very high, more than double that of a better managed oil economy such as Indonesia.‖ Nigeria's low average ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Public Infrastructure and Growth: New Channels and Policy ...
    a measure of the efficiency of investment. They apply this idea to public infrastructure, by calculating an ICOR coefficient defined as public capital.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Honduras - World Bank Document
    a mismatch between the supply of skills and the demand for workers. The ... high ICOR (Incremental Capital-Output Ratio), which is an index that ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] 3. Investment Efficiency and Capital Allocation
    high and rising incremental capital–output ratio (ICOR), consistent with a greater decline in returns. Allocative efficiency of capital also worsened, with ...
  39. [39]
    STUDY OF ICOR IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES - jstor
    Since it is difficult to obtain data on capital stock, it is necessary in practice to work with a derived relationship, the incremental capital-output ratio ( ...
  40. [40]
    Incremental capital-output ratio: Explained - TIOmarkets
    Jul 29, 2024 · The ICOR is a ratio that compares the incremental amount of capital needed to achieve an additional unit of output.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  41. [41]
    AI-Driven Productivity Gains: Artificial Intelligence and Firm ... - MDPI
    The study finds that every 1% increase in artificial intelligence penetration can lead to a 14.2% increase in total factor productivity.
  42. [42]
    Modeling R&D spillovers to productivity: The effects of tax credits
    We find that a tax credit scheme that lowers the user cost of R&D capital, leads to a gradual increase in aggregate productivity.Missing: ICOR | Show results with:ICOR
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Hexahelix Strategy to Reduce ICOR by Enhancing Investment ...
    The condition is exacerbated by corrupt practices, inefficient bureaucracy, declining labor productivity, and inadequate immigration governance, which overall ...
  44. [44]
    Excelsior: The Korean Innovation Story
    Korea's innovation success stems from massive investments in human resources and R&D, a strong human resource base, and an outward-looking strategy.
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Policy and Economic Performance in Divided Korea
    Between 1965 and. 1970, South Korea's incremental capital output ratio was about 2.0; in. 1975–80, it was about 4.8—almost two and one-half times as high.244 ...
  46. [46]
    Nexus between energy intensity and capital-output ratio: A holistic ...
    Aug 7, 2022 · We aim to empirically assess the linkage between energy intensity and incremental capital-output ratio from a holistic point of view, the first of its kind.
  47. [47]
    Breaking China's Investment Addiction by Zhang Monan
    Feb 14, 2013 · Since then, China's ICOR has more than doubled, demonstrating the need for significantly more investment to generate an additional unit of ...<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Where China's Stimulus Program Went Wrong - Chicago Booth
    Mar 15, 2017 · Most of the money in China's Great Recession stimulus plan went to state-controlled companies that were less productive than privately owned ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  49. [49]
    Economic Insights Beyond GDP: ICOR - Drishti IAS
    Sep 13, 2023 · ICOR is based on nominal values of investment and output, which are affected by price changes over time.<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Trends and Challenges in Infrastructure Investment in Low-Income ...
    This paper examines trends in infrastructure investment and its financing in low-income developing countries (LIDCs). Following an acceleration of public ...
  51. [51]
    The instability of the incremental capital-output ratio - ScienceDirect
    The empirical part of this study reveals that the national incremental capital-output ratios do in fact vary from year to year over a wide range. Between five- ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  52. [52]
    Understanding India's Incremental Capital Output Ratio (ICOR) and ...
    Services sector. The services sector has maintained the lowest ICOR (typically 2-3), reflecting its relatively low capital requirements. IT services ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] A Stab at Identifying the Causes of Economic Growth, WP/18/117 ...
    The standard technique used in the literature to tackle the endogeneity problem is to use an instrumental variable (IV) estimation. This technique relies on ...
  54. [54]
    How to use instrumental variables in addressing endogeneity? A ...
    In this paper, we discuss the use of instrumental variables (IVs) in business and marketing research, with a particular focus on its implementation in STATA.
  55. [55]
    Determining Factors and Limitations of Capital-Output Ratio
    The lower the incremental capital-output ratio, the more accelerated is economic growth. A low capital-ratio is, thus, as significant as large capital ...