Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Interrex

Interrex (plural interreges), from Latin inter ("between") + rex ("king"), denoted a provisional magistrate in ancient Rome tasked with wielding supreme authority during an interregnum, the transitional vacancy following a king's death in the monarchy or the failure to elect consuls at the year's start in the early Republic. Appointed by the Senate from among senior patricians—often former consuls—each interrex held office for five days, with powers akin to those of consuls, and could nominate up to four successors if elections stalled, their primary mandate being to convene the comitia curiata or centuriata assemblies to select permanent magistrates and restore constitutional order. This institution, rooted in traditions attributed to Rome's regal era and chronicled by Livy, exemplified the Senate's role in bridging power vacuums to avert anarchy, though its use waned after the mid-fifth century BCE as plebeian access to consulships stabilized electoral processes. The term later influenced analogous roles elsewhere, such as in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, where the Primate of Poland (Archbishop of Gniezno) assumed interrex duties to oversee royal elections during vacancies.

In Ancient Rome

Etymology and Definition

The term interrex (plural interreges) derives from Latin inter ("between" or "among") and ("king"), signifying a temporary exercising power in the interval between rulers. This reflects the office's in the , where it addressed the vacancy following a monarch's death, and its adaptation in the to manage gaps in consular leadership. In the , the interrex functioned as an extraordinary appointed by the from among its patrician members when both consuls were absent, deceased, or their terms had expired without successors being elected, thereby preventing a complete suspension of . was strictly provisional, typically limited to five days per appointee, with to summon assemblies (comitia centuriata) solely for electing new consuls and restoring annual magistracies, distinguishing it from the collegial, year-long tenure of consuls as a mechanism to maintain constitutional continuity without monarchical overtones. This role emphasized senatorial oversight in crises, ensuring no single individual held indefinite power.

Appointment and Eligibility

The interrex was appointed by the , which selected individuals from among its patrician members, often those who had previously held curule magistracies such as the consulship. This ensured senatorial oversight during periods of constitutional vacancy, with the patricians assembling under senatorial directive to formalize the choice. Eligibility was strictly limited to patricians, reflecting the office's roots in religious and imperium-bearing functions that were constitutionally barred from exercising until later reforms. Each interrex served a fixed term of five days, after which they would nominate (prodere) a successor from eligible patricians if consular elections remained uncompleted. This sequential mechanism, documented in (e.g., 4.7.7, 6.5.6), prevented any single individual from consolidating authority, distributing provisional leadership among multiple senators until the comitia could convene and elect consuls. The Senate's role in initiating and controlling these appointments underscored its function as the stabilizing institution amid magisterial absences, such as the death or incapacity of both consuls.

Powers and Duties

The interrex held a provisional imperium akin to the consular variety, granting authority to summon the for consultation and to convoke the comitia curiata or other assemblies necessary to conduct elections for successors, such as new consuls during republican interregna. This power was strictly delimited to electoral administration, excluding military command or broader jurisdiction outside Rome's , to prevent any extension of personal rule. The core duty of the interrex was to expedite the selection of permanent magistrates or a king, typically within five days per term, by proposing nominees and overseeing the voting process, with succession to another patrician if the term expired without resolution. Independent policy initiatives or legislative actions were absent, as the office prioritized constitutional restoration over governance innovation, reflecting patrician senators' collective oversight to maintain republican balance. Livy portrays the interrex fulfilling ritualized administrative roles, such as assembling the people to announce senatorial decisions on candidates, underscoring a focus on procedural continuity amid vacancy. similarly depicts the interrex as an interim facilitator who relays senatorial instructions to assemblies, emphasizing preparatory functions for elections without substantive authority.

Historical Instances and Significance

Following the overthrow of in 509 BC, Spurius Lucretius Tricipitinus served as the first republican , nominating and to inaugurate the consular system and thereby bridging the monarchical to elected annual magistracies. This instance underscored the interrex's role in stabilizing governance amid revolutionary upheaval, with successive patrician interreges—each holding for five days—coordinating senatorial consensus to avert power vacuums. In the early and mid-Republic, activated during consular vacancies caused by deaths, campaigns, or internal disruptions, as seen in its invocation around 481 BC amid escalating tensions in the Struggle of the Orders, where it managed electoral assemblies despite patrician-plebeian frictions. Such applications demonstrated the mechanism's flexibility in maintaining continuity, with the appointing ex-consuls or senior patricians to convene comitia centuriata for new elections, thereby adapting to crises without resorting to monarchy's permanence. The interrex thus reinforced patrician oversight during the patriciate's dominance, even as plebeian demands for access to magistracies pressured the system toward broader participation by the . By the late , interregna occurred more frequently amid political instability—evidenced in 82, 77, 55, 53, and 52 BC—yet the office waned as alternatives like dictatorships or ad hoc senatorial decrees supplanted it. The final documented use came in 52 BC, when Marcus Aemilius and later Servius Sulpicius , as interrex, navigated post-assassination chaos following Publius Clodius Pulcher's murder, but ultimately facilitated Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus's irregular sole consulship on January 20, bypassing standard dual elections. This episode highlighted the interrex's diminishing relevance, as mounting reliance on strongmen and tribunician vetoes eroded senatorial procedural , signaling the 's toward centralized and the eventual rise of .

List of Roman Interreges

Early Republic (509–367 BC)

In the immediate aftermath of the overthrow of Lucius Tarquinius Superbus in 509 BC, the Roman senate appointed Spurius Lucretius Tricipitinus as prefect of the city to convene the comitia curiata for electing the inaugural consuls, Lucius Junius Brutus and Lucius Tarquinius Collatinus; this role, though termed praefectus urbi in contemporary accounts, prefigured the formalized interrex function for bridging magisterial vacancies during the Republic's establishment. Lucretius, advanced in years, died before fully discharging duties, yet the assembly proceeded under senatorial oversight to install the consuls, stabilizing governance amid the transition from monarchy. Interregna recurred during consular lapses, with patrician senators sequentially assuming the role—limited to five days each—to administer the state and organize elections, ensuring continuity without concentrating power. In 462 BC, following the deaths of consuls in office, served as interrex for three days, convening the assembly to elect suffect consuls and , averting paralysis amid ongoing patricio-plebeian frictions. The practice intensified during the Struggle of the Orders, particularly around the Licinian-Sextian Rogations of 367 BC, where plebeian tribunes Gaius Licinius Stolo and Lucius Sextius Lateranus vetoed higher magistracies for five years to compel reforms, forcing reliance on lower officials until senatorial intervention triggered an . Publius Cornelius Scipio, as interrex, managed the subsequent electoral process, enabling passage of the laws capping debt interest, limiting land holdings, and opening the consulship to , thus addressing plebeian demands while patricians retained procedural control.
Year (AUC)InterrexAssociated Events and Outcomes
509 BC (245)Spurius Lucretius TricipitinusConvened of first consuls L. Junius Brutus and L. Tarquinius Collatinus post-monarchy; died in office, but process completed under senatorial auspices.
462 BC (292)P. Valerius PublicolaOversaw suffect consular s for L. Tricipitinus and T. Veturius Cicurinus after prior consuls' deaths.
389 BC (365)P. Cornelius Scipio (succeeded by M. Furius Camillus)Managed post-Gallic sack; held elections for military tribunes with consular power.
367 BC (387)P. Cornelius ScipioFacilitated consular elections amid Licinian-Sextian crisis resolution, paving for plebeian access to office.

Mid- to Late Republic (367–52 BC)

In the period following the Licinian-Sextian Rogations of 367 BC, which reformed the consular elections to include , the interrex office was activated sporadically to address magisterial vacancies, though far less frequently than in the early Republic due to the stabilization of annual elections and the patrician-only eligibility restricting its use amid growing plebeian influence. One early instance occurred in 366 BC, when an interrex—possibly Marcus Aemilius—was appointed to oversee the election of Lucius Sextius as the first plebeian , marking a transitional application amid post-reform uncertainties. Records from indicate occasional resort to interreges during the mid-Republic, including brief vacancies around the Second Punic War (218–201 BC), as in XXII.33–34, where the mechanism filled gaps without disrupting wartime command structures, though specific names like Appius appear in fragmentary accounts without full contextual detail. By the late Republic, electoral chaos from factional violence and bribery prompted more frequent but still exceptional interregna, particularly in years of delayed comitia: 82 BC (post-Sulla), 77 BC, 55 BC, 53 BC, and 52 BC, as documented in analyses of senatorial initiatives during these periods. These activations reflected causal pressures from civil unrest—such as tribunician obstructions and armed gangs—disrupting normal procedures, yet the office's patrician monopoly limited its effectiveness against optimate-popularis divides, reducing overall reliance compared to dictatorships. Livy's accounts, while primary, leave gaps in interrex sequences for years like 343, 300, and 291 BC (spilling into mid-period), underscoring incomplete senatorial records and anachronistic later interpretations. The final documented instance came in 52 BC, after Publius Clodius Pulcher's murder on January 18 sparked riots and prevented consular elections for the new year, initiating an amid anarchy between Clodian mobs and Pompeian forces. Marcus Aemilius Lepidus, a patrician ex-, served as interrex in January but refrained from convening assemblies due to violence risks, lasting only days per the late-Republican five-day norm before the bypassed tradition to name sole without full electoral process. This obsolescence stemmed from rising military , where generals like resolved crises via legions rather than senatorial rotation, rendering the interrex incompatible with the Republic's terminal factionalism.

In the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth

The office of interrex arose in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth during the precipitated by the death of the childless King on July 7, 1572, which terminated the and compelled a shift from hereditary to . In the ensuing power vacuum, the (nobility) at the Convention of Koło in October 1572 designated Primate Jakub Uchański, Archbishop of , to serve as interrex, granting him authority to convene assemblies and oversee the transition until a new king's election. This selection of the underscored the intertwined roles of church and state, prioritizing the Catholic Church's senior prelate to maintain institutional continuity amid noble factionalism. The legal foundation for the built upon the constitution enacted by the on May 31, 1505, which mandated that no novel laws or taxes could be imposed without the joint approval of the king, , and chamber of envoys, thereby vesting significant oversight in the —presided over by the —and curtailing unilateral . This framework empowered senatorial leadership during governance lapses, aligning with the Commonwealth's mixed constitutional order where noble estates checked monarchical power. The Henrician Articles, ratified on May 12, 1573, by the Electoral amid the same , further codified protocols, obligating future kings to uphold -convened processes for and restricting royal autonomy in and matters, implicitly supporting the interrex's facilitative role in vacancy management. Subsequent royal accessions incorporated pacta conventa—customary agreements negotiated per election—that reinforced the Henrician framework, requiring the interrex to summon the convocation and ensure orderly proceedings, though the office itself remained more a product of noble consensus and precedence than codified . This customary embedding privileged the Catholic , reflecting the realm's identity and the szlachta's preference for legitimacy over secular alternatives, as evidenced in the consistent designation of Gniezno's across eleven interregna until 1795.

Role and Responsibilities

In the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, the interrex, typically the Primate of who was the Archbishop of Gniezno, assumed provisional authority upon the death or of the to bridge the until a successor's and . Primary responsibilities included proclaiming the vacancy of the throne, thereby initiating the electoral process, and overseeing the convocation of the Convocation to prepare electoral regulations followed by the Election itself. The interrex managed day-to-day internal administration to maintain order, including efforts to secure borders against potential incursions during the power vacuum. The interrex held authority over , representing the diplomatically on the international stage and conducting external relations to preserve alliances and deter aggression until the new king's . In certain instances, the interrex possessed power over candidates deemed unsuitable for the , ensuring alignment with legal and customary standards. Upon , the interrex announced the results and facilitated the , formally transferring power. Unlike the Roman interrex, whose tenure lasted only five days for rapid succession, the Polish variant endured for months or even years—such as the 16-month interregnum of 1572–1573—owing to the elaborate free election process involving the nobility, which demanded extended interim governance. This prolonged role emphasized administrative continuity and diplomatic stability amid the Commonwealth's decentralized elective monarchy.

Notable Interreges and Elections

Following the death of King Sigismund II Augustus on July 7, 1572, Archbishop Jakub Uchański of Gniezno assumed the role of interrex, managing the Commonwealth's administration and convening the electoral sejm that selected Henry, Duke of Anjou (later Henry III of France), as king on May 16, 1573. This interregnum unfolded amid acute religious divisions between Catholics, Protestants, and Orthodox believers, exacerbated by the Reformation's spread, yet Uchański's oversight facilitated the Warsaw Confederation of January 28, 1573, which secured mutual tolerance and averted confessional violence that could have fragmented the realm. The election's outcome preserved short-term stability by establishing the first freely elected monarch under formalized pacta conventa rules, but Henry's flight to claim the French throne upon Charles IX's death in May 1574 necessitated a rapid follow-up election of Stephen Báthory in December 1575, underscoring the interrex system's resilience in preventing prolonged anarchy while exposing vulnerabilities to candidates' divided loyalties. After Augustus III's death on October 5, 1763, Władysław Aleksander Łubieński of served as interrex, directing preparations for the royal amid intensifying foreign pressures from , , and . The process culminated in the of on September 7, 1764, following a contentious campaign where Russian troops, numbering around 20,000 under , ensured his victory over rivals like the Czartoryski-backed candidates, reflecting the interrex's limited autonomy in countering external interference. This outcome temporarily stabilized governance by installing a reform-oriented who later initiated the Commission of National Education in 1773, yet the overt foreign orchestration eroded noble confidence in the elective process, sowing seeds of factionalism that contributed to the revolt in 1768 and accelerated the partitions beginning in 1772. In later interregnums, such as those preceding the reigns of (1674) and Augustus II (1697), primates like Mikołaj Prażmowski and others invoked the interrex authority to reaffirm foundational principles akin to the Nihil novi constitution of 1505, emphasizing senatorial oversight to mitigate noble veto () abuses and foreign meddling. Despite mounting partition threats by the 1790s, the mechanism's activation during sejm deliberations helped defer total collapse until after Stanisław August's abdication in 1795, demonstrating its causal role in enforcing procedural continuity that forestalled immediate dissolution even as geopolitical encirclement intensified instability.

Comparative Perspectives

Structural Similarities Across Contexts

In both the and the Polish-Lithuanian , the interrex served as a mechanism for elite-driven interim governance to avert institutional paralysis during executive vacancies, with selection rooted in established patrician or ecclesiastical hierarchies rather than broad popular mandate. interreges were appointed sequentially by the from among patricians, typically former consuls, to exercise limited consular authority amid consular absences, ensuring continuity until new magistrates could be elected. Similarly, in the , the —Archbishop of —assumed the interrex role by institutional precedence following a king's death, leveraging senatorial and noble consensus to manage the transitional void without disrupting administrative functions. This elite vetting process in each context prioritized verifiable seniority and ritual adherence over ad hoc innovation, reflecting a causal emphasis on preserving hierarchical stability to prevent factional deadlock or external predation. A core structural parallel lies in the interrex's delimited authority, centered on convening deliberative assemblies for legitimate succession rather than indefinite rule, thereby facilitating the transfer of executive power through formalized electoral processes. In , interreges held office for fixed five-day terms, wielding solely to organize comitia centuriata for elections, after which authority reverted to the newly installed officials. The Polish interrex mirrored this by directing the convocation of the Election Sejm, an extraordinary assembly of nobility to select the , while maintaining interim and order until . Empirical records from both systems underscore this focus on procedural legitimacy, where the interrex's role terminated upon successful election, embodying a restraint against power consolidation. Both institutions emphasized continuity through prescribed rituals and precedents, subordinating the interrex to collective validation to legitimize outcomes and mitigate disputes over . Roman procedure demanded senatorial and patrician exclusivity, with interreges adhering to augural and protocols to affirm electoral validity. In the , the Primate's interrex functions invoked pacts like the Henrician Articles, ensuring noble participation and oath-bound transitions, as documented in post-1572 conventions. This ritualistic , drawn from historical practice, prioritized causal reliability in handover, avoiding untested reforms that could erode institutional trust.

Differences in Political Function

In the , the interrex served limited terms of five days each, with appointments made sequentially by the from among patricians until consular elections could be held, ensuring minimal disruption and preventing any individual from consolidating power akin to a . This mechanism prioritized swift restoration of the dual consulship, reflecting a design to counterbalance authority through short, non-renewable interim roles focused on electoral preparation rather than governance. By contrast, in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, the interrex—exclusively the Roman Catholic , typically the Archbishop of Gniezno—held office from the monarch's death until a new king was elected by the at the , often spanning months amid protracted debates and the liberum veto's paralyzing effects. This extended tenure, embedded in an , underscored a fusion of ecclesiastical and secular authority, where the Primate's Catholic monopoly enforced confessional prerequisites for succession while navigating noble factions. These structural variances yielded divergent political outcomes: Rome's brief, patrician-restricted interreges reinforced the Republic's oligarchic checks against monarchical reversion, stabilizing transitions from the kingdom's era through repeated use until 52 BC. In , however, the prolonged interregna perpetuated elective instability, as the Primate's oversight failed to mitigate veto-induced , contributing to vacuums that weakened the against external pressures culminating in the partitions of 1772, 1793, and 1795.

References

  1. [1]
    INTERREX Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
    The meaning of INTERREX is one who exercises supreme or kingly power during an interregnum : a provisional ruler.
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    Stefan Wyszyński: Interrex in handcuffs - Polish History
    However, since the middle of the 16th century, the Primate of Poland has held the title of “interrex”, replacing the monarch during his illness or death.
  4. [4]
    Interrex | Oxford Classical Dictionary
    Dec 22, 2015 · The name interrex supports Roman assumptions that the institution derived from the regal period (see rex) and was used to effect the choice of ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  5. [5]
    The five-day interregnum in the Roman Republic, in - Academia.edu
    The interreges had the task of preparing for the elections of new consuls and hold the electoral assembly. Although the interreges had been chosen by the Senate ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Electoral Abuse in the Late Roman Republic
    Apr 2, 2008 · the event that the terms of sitting magistrates had expired without new elections to replace them, the senate could name an interrex, a ...
  7. [7]
    THE FIVE-DAY INTERREGNUM IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC
    May 6, 2016 · Although the interreges had been chosen by the Senate, rather than elected by the People, and were in power for a short period, they resembled ...
  8. [8]
    Livy, History of Rome - ToposText
    [10] At that time the 'interrex' convened the assembly and addressed it as follows: 'Quirites! elect your king, and may heaven's blessing rest on your ...
  9. [9]
    Collections: How to Roman Republic 101, Part IIIb: Imperium
    Aug 18, 2023 · ... interrex, who only had the authority to hold an election for the consulship. ... consular imperium') from 210 to 206, mostly as a product ...
  10. [10]
    The Establishment of the Roman Republic | Western Civilization
    The Roman monarchy was overthrown around 509 BCE, during a political revolution that resulted in the expulsion of Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, the last king of ...
  11. [11]
    Episode 77 - The Troubles of 481 BCE - The Partial Historians
    Dec 28, 2017 · The use of the interrex to manage the electoral process comes into play suggesting the increasing political complexity in the system. Speaking ...
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    Interregnum and Patrum Auctoritas - jstor
    Probably the term had already been fixed at five days, as the Romans were generally very conservative, so that later changes would seem improbable. But a ...
  14. [14]
    The Project Gutenberg eBook of The History of Rome: Books One to ...
    [Pg 25] Then the interrex, having called an assembly of the people, addressed them in this manner: "Do you, Romans, choose yourselves a king, and may it prove ...
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    Livy - The History of Rome - Book 7 - Swartzentrover.com
    The senate ordered two commissioners to be appointed to carry out the construction of that temple in a style commensurate with the greatness of the Roman ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Staying Relevant in the Roman Republic
    Jan 16, 2020 · Interrex became an increasingly rare office after lex Licinia Sex- tia in 367 BC because of the Patrician limitation to the office and the ...
  19. [19]
    THE FIVE-DAY INTERREGNUM IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC - jstor
    likely because he was chosen as an interrex during his staying in Rome. The p. Claudius with the title of interrex perhaps seemed to his nephew more honour.
  20. [20]
    Cicero And The Fall Of The Roman Republic/Chapter 9 - Wikisource
    Jan 13, 2022 · No election could be held, and the next year began 52 B.C.as usual with an interregnum. Milo and Clodius roamed the streets, each with his armed ...
  21. [21]
    Marcus Aemilius Lepidus - Legio X Fretensis
    In January 52 BC, he assumed the position of interrex to organize the consulship elections. Lepidus did not convene the comitia (assemblies) out of fear ...Missing: 366 | Show results with:366
  22. [22]
    How and why was Pompey Made Sole Consul in 52 BC? - jstor
    Jan 19, 2025 · ... Pompey as dictator in 52 was the absence of a consul to perform dictio.37The only way for an interrex to name Pompey dictator in 52 was to ...
  23. [23]
    History of its Elective Democracy - Info-Poland
    Wiśniowiecki, when the country was at war with Turkey. Senator Florian K. Czartoryski assumed the duties of an Interrex, as expected, but died while in office.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] fight for religious tolerance during the first polish interregnum (1572 ...
    Mar 2, 2023 · Eventually, the office of interrex was granted to Primate Uchański, which was finally confirmed at the Koło Convention in October 1572.14.<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    [PDF] History of the Polish Senate
    1505 The Nihil Novi Constitution gives equal rights to the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies to make laws. 1510 The Sejm decrees that an affront to a ...
  26. [26]
    Kingdoms of Central Europe - Kingdom of Poland - The History Files
    1505. The constitution of 31 May - the Nihil novi - eliminates royal legislative powers. The king is no longer allowed to issue laws in regard to matters ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Primate Jan Wężyk in the Role of Interrex and Senator of the Polish ...
    Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. After his ingress to the Cathedral of. Gniezno (21 June 1627), he came to live in the Castle of Łowicz, the main residence of ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  28. [28]
    Primate Jan Wężyk in the Role of Interrex and Senator of ... - CEEOL
    At last, it was also the interrex's duty to finally announce the selection of the elect and duly execute the enthronement procedure.Following the death of King ...Missing: responsibilities | Show results with:responsibilities
  29. [29]
    (PDF) Fight for Religious Tolerance During the First Polish ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · ... interrex was granted to Primate Uchański, which was. finally confirmed at the Koło Convention in October 1572. 14. This dispute did not escape ...
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
    [PDF] ACTA NUNTIATURAE POLONAE - Polska Akademia Umiejętności
    King Frederic II of Prussia to King Stanisław August Poniatowski of Poland ... Russia; interrex in 1763-1764, before the election of Stanisław August Poniatowski.
  32. [32]
    (PDF) Royal free elections in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth ...
    Royal free elections in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Political games, social communication, diplomacy. Profile image of Aleksandra Ziober ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] History of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: State – Society
    The book presents an outline of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth from the 16th to the 18th century and offers a view of the realities of political life,.<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    [PDF] ON THE SENATE
    At the election Sejm of 1573, a set of fundamental principles of state governance were enacted (the so-. -called Henrician Articles), which the elected King.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] ON THE SENATE
    The role of the Senate in the interregnum takes shape: the Primate, as interrex (act- ing monarch), substitutes the King. During the electoral assembly, the ...
  36. [36]
    Interrex | Senate, Tribunes & Consuls - Britannica
    Sep 29, 2025 · Interrex, in ancient Rome, a provisional ruler specially appointed for a period during which the normal constituted authority was in abeyance (the interregnum).Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  37. [37]
    Interrex - Historia Sejmu Akt - 550th anniversary of the Polish ...
    Out of all 25 primates of the Republic of Poland until 1795, only 10 became interrexes, although there were 11 periods of interregnum. The first interrex was ...
  38. [38]
    The Commonwealth of the Two Nations, 1572–1795 (Chapter 3)
    The decision, in 1596, by a majority of the Orthodox bishops at Brest, in Lithuania, to unite with Rome, was prompted by more than Catholic pressure or fear of ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
  40. [40]
    The Three Partitions of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (1772 ...
    Mar 14, 2023 · Poland (in fact, the Polish-Lithuanian Republic of Two Nations) became divided during the three partitions in 1772, 1793, and 1795.Missing: interrex internal