Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Kutha

Kutha, also known as Cuthah or Cutha (Sumerian: Gú.Dù.Aki; Akkadian: Kûtu), was an ancient Mesopotamian situated on the right bank of the eastern branch of the Upper River, north of and approximately 25 miles (40 km) northeast of , in present-day Babil Governorate, , at the of Tell . This minor urban center served as a key religious hub dedicated primarily to the worship of , the , death, and the underworld, with its main temple, E-Meslam, honoring Meslamtaea, an aspect of Nergal. The history of Kutha spans from the Early through the Seleucid period, reflecting the broader dynamics of Mesopotamian civilization. During the (c. 2334–2154 BC), the city participated in the Great Revolt against imperial rule around 2254 BC, highlighting its involvement in regional power struggles. In the subsequent Ur III dynasty (c. 2112–2004 BC), King built the E-Meslam temple circa 2094 BC to strengthen ties with the city's cult. By the Old Babylonian period (c. 2000–1600 BC), Kutha fell under Babylonian influence, becoming a tributary or conquered territory during the reign of (c. 1812–1793 BC), with local rulers like Ilum-nāsir documented around the 1800s BC. Kutha's fortunes continued into the Neo-Assyrian era, when it was captured by in 651 BC amid conflicts with his brother . The site remained occupied into the Neo-Babylonian and later periods, though its prominence waned after the Achaemenid conquest. In biblical tradition, Cuthah is referenced in 2 Kings 17:24 as one of the cities from which the Assyrian king deported inhabitants to repopulate following its fall in 721 BC, introducing foreign religious practices to the region. Archaeological investigations at Tell Ibrahim, consisting of two tells, began in the late with excavations led by between 1879 and 1882, uncovering artifacts such as Parthian coins, tablets, and evidence of Neo-Babylonian occupation that illuminate the site's layered history. These findings, together with sources like the Laws of that mention , underscore Kutha's enduring role in Mesopotamian religious and administrative life, though limited modern digs have left much of its urban layout unexplored.

Geography and Archaeology

Location and Site Layout

Kutha was an ancient Mesopotamian city situated on the right bank of the eastern branch of the Upper River, positioned north of and approximately 25 miles (40 km) northeast of in what is now the Babil Governorate of . This strategic location within the fertile alluvial plains of southern facilitated its development as a settlement reliant on riverine resources. The modern archaeological site is identified as Tell Ibrahim, comprising two distinct mounds: a larger main tell and a smaller secondary one to the west, separated by the remnants of an ancient canal bed. The site's coordinates are 32°45′36.1″N 44°36′46.3″E, with the main mound forming a shape approximately 1.2 kilometers in length. The urban structure included defensive city walls enclosing settlement areas and the prominent complex known as E-Meslam, dedicated to the Meslamtaea, an aspect of ; these features supported continuous occupation from the period (c. 2334–2154 BC) through to Hellenistic times (c. 312–63 BC). The city's proximity to the and its tributaries provided essential for , enabling the of crops such as and dates, while also serving as a conduit for regional networks. As a minor , Kutha maintained local canals and boundary markers that defined its territory amid the interconnected urban landscape of ancient .

Excavations and Artifacts

The archaeological site of Kutha, identified as Tell Ibrahim, was first examined in 1845 by Henry Rawlinson, who noted fired clay bricks stamped with a cuneiform inscription of Nebuchadnezzar II (r. 605–562 BCE) that explicitly mentioned the city name Kutha, linking it to ancient textual references. The primary systematic excavation occurred in 1881 under Hormuzd Rassam, working on behalf of the British Museum, and lasted approximately four weeks; however, the operation produced limited results owing to the site's heavily disturbed state, attributed to prior informal digging, erosion, and agricultural activity that had scattered or destroyed potential stratigraphic layers. Rassam's team employed basic trenching and sounding methods across the main mound, focusing on areas with visible surface pottery and brick scatters, but documentation was inconsistent, with many finds registered post-excavation based on informal notes rather than precise provenience records. Among the key artifacts recovered were several pottery incantation bowls inscribed in Hebrew and Aramaic scripts, dating to the late antique period (ca. 3rd–7th centuries ), used for protective against demons; examples include a hemispherical bowl with spiral Mandaic text (BM 1980,0415.17) and another with inscriptions (BM 1881,0714.3), both wheel-thrown from local clay. tablets formed another significant category, encompassing administrative records such as ration lists and economic accounts from the Old Babylonian period, alongside foundation deposits like inscribed cylinders. Approximately 1,200 Parthian coins were also recovered, indicating continued occupation into the Parthian period. Since Rassam's work, Kutha has seen no major excavations, with only sporadic surface surveys conducted in the late revealing evidence of two principal settlement phases: an earlier mound associated with pre-Sargonic and occupations, and a larger crescent-shaped mound linked to Neo-Babylonian and later Parthian/Sasanian activity. The site's modern status remains precarious, threatened by illegal —exacerbated by post-2003 instability in —and the absence of comprehensive geophysical or systematic surveys, leaving much of its stratigraphic potential unexplored and underscoring gaps in 19th-century scholarship.

Historical Development

Akkadian and Ur III Periods

During the period (c. 2334–2154 BC), Kutha was incorporated into the as a key settlement in central , benefiting from the empire's expansive administrative network that unified previously independent city-states under centralized rule. The city's strategic location near major canals and trade routes facilitated its integration, supporting imperial efforts in resource extraction and . Under Naram-Sin (c. 2254–2218 BC), Kutha emerged as a focal point for propaganda, exemplified by the Cuthean Legend of Naram-Sin, which preserved narratives of his self-deification and divine kingship to legitimize dominance over diverse regions. The Ur III period (c. 2112–2004 BC) elevated Kutha's status within the Third Dynasty of Ur's tightly controlled empire, where it functioned as a provincial hub under royal oversight. King (c. 2094–2046 BC) notably rebuilt and dedicated the E-Meslam temple to the god Meslamtaea (an aspect of ), as recorded in an Akkadian inscription on a foundation tablet later found in , underscoring the dynasty's investment in religious infrastructure to reinforce loyalty. This construction aligned with broader Ur III policies of monumental building to symbolize imperial renewal following the collapse. As a minor city-state, Kutha played a supportive socio-economic role in the Ur III system, contributing agricultural surpluses—primarily and other cereals—from its irrigated fields to the state's redistribution networks via the obligation. economies, including that of E-Meslam, managed rents, , and labor allocations, as evidenced by standardized bureaucratic tablets that tracked yields, rations, and provincial governors' accounts, integrating Kutha into the empire's vast archival apparatus. This era reflected a profound transition from city-state autonomy, characterized by local priest-kings and decentralized , to the and Ur III models of centralized imperial control, where Kutha served as a regional center to propagate dynastic ideology and economic uniformity across .

Old Babylonian and Kassite Periods

During the Old Babylonian period (c. 2000–1600 BC), Kutha underwent notable fortifications and military engagements as expanded its influence in central . Sumu-la-El, the fourth king of the First Babylonian Dynasty (r. c. 1880–1845 BC), rebuilt the city's walls, as documented in his 27th name, which records the construction of defenses at Kutha alongside those at Anzagar-urgi. This rebuilding effort likely aimed to strengthen Kutha as a defensive amid rising Amorite tribal dynamics and inter-city rivalries in the region. The Amorite elements introduced through Babylonian rule influenced local , integrating tribal administrative practices with established Mesopotamian bureaucratic traditions. Further consolidation occurred under Hammurabi (r. c. 1792–1750 BC), who defeated Kutha in his 39th regnal year, as proclaimed in the corresponding year name celebrating the victory with the aid of the gods Anu and Enlil, thereby incorporating the city into Babylonian territory. This conquest positioned Kutha as a secondary urban center within the Babylonian state, involved in ongoing regional power struggles, particularly along routes connecting Babylon to eastern territories like Eshnunna. Economically, the period saw shifts toward Amorite-influenced agriculture and trade, with Kutha benefiting from Babylonian canal systems that enhanced irrigation and connectivity. In the subsequent Kassite period (c. 1600–1155 BC), Kutha maintained its relevance under the foreign , which preserved much of the prior Babylonian administrative framework while introducing elements of their own culture. King Adad-shuma-usur (r. c. 1216–1187 BC) expressed personal attachment to the city in a fragmentary inscription (BM 34104+), describing Kutha as "the city of his heart's desire" and noting activities such as offerings or repairs there, underscoring its enduring cultic and symbolic importance. As a or peripheral in the Kassite realm, Kutha participated in the dynasty's efforts to stabilize southern against external threats, including Assyrian incursions. Kassite influences manifested in governance through a feudal-like system of land grants and in cultural practices, such as the adoption of horse-related technologies that impacted local economy and possibly temple rituals at Kutha's Meslam .

Neo-Babylonian to Hellenistic Periods

Following the Kassite period, Kutha came under Neo-Assyrian control during the empire's expansion into southern (c. 911–609 BC). The city served as a provincial center under Assyrian administration, with its and resources integrated into the imperial system. In 651 BC, amid the Babylonian revolt against Assyrian dominance, , king of and brother of Assyrian ruler , captured Kutha as part of the conflict, highlighting the city's strategic role in struggles. During the Neo-Babylonian period (626–539 BC), Kutha experienced a revival under the , which emphasized the restoration of traditional cult centers across . (r. 605–562 BC), a prolific builder, contributed significantly to the city's E-meslam dedicated to , as evidenced by his inscribed bricks and cylinder inscriptions that describe renovations and dedications to the gods of E-meslam and Kutha. These efforts included increasing offerings to the temple deities, thereby enhancing Kutha's cultic status within the empire's religious landscape. Under Achaemenid rule (539–330 BC), Kutha maintained a degree of local as part of the Babylonian administrative structure, with appointed governors overseeing the city. Several such officials are attested from the early phase of Persian control under (r. 559–530 BC), including Nergal-tabni-uṣur, Nergal-šarru-uṣur, and Nabû-kešir, who managed local affairs including temple administration and taxation. This continuity in governance reflected the Achaemenid policy of integrating Babylonian elites into provincial roles, though the city's role diminished compared to major centers like . In the (312–63 BC), following the Great's conquest, Kutha appears in historical records as a minor administrative or strategic point amid the conflicts of the . The Chronicle records that in 309 BC, during the campaigns of , his forces plundered Cutha (Kutha), including the storehouses of the temple, highlighting the city's vulnerability in the power struggles after 's death. Archaeological evidence from Tell Ibrahim indicates ongoing but limited occupation through these periods, with Neo-Babylonian bricks and sparse Achaemenid artifacts suggesting population resettlements—possibly including groups from deportations—and a gradual economic decline, as the site shows no signs of major prosperity or expansion by the late Hellenistic era.

Religion and Mythology

Cult of Nergal and Meslamtaea

The cult of and his aspect Meslamtaea formed the core of Kutha's religious identity in ancient , with Meslamtaea serving as the city's primary deity before syncretizing with , the , , , and the . This association positioned as a multifaceted figure, embodying both destructive forces and protective elements in local worship, distinct from his broader pantheon role. The E-Meslam temple in Kutha stood as the central cult site, named after Meslamtaea ("he who comes forth from Meslam"), reflecting the deity's emergence from the . The temple's history traces back to the Early Dynastic period, with its formal dedication occurring during the Ur III period under King (c. 2094–2046 BCE), who built and inscribed offerings to -Meslamtaea there. Subsequent rulers, including those from the Old Babylonian and Neo-Babylonian periods, maintained the site through renovations and dedications, such as Nebuchadnezzar II's rebuilding efforts, ensuring continuous offerings of , , and votive objects. As a major religious hub, E-Meslam hosted festivals honoring 's seasonal returns from the and served as a center for oracular consultations, where priests interpreted divine will for protection against calamities. Ritual practices at E-Meslam emphasized Nergal's dual role in the Mesopotamian pantheon, featuring regular sacrifices of animals and libations to appease his wrathful aspects and invoke aid against demons and . Texts from the site reveal incantations and apotropaic rites, including the burial of figurines at doorways to ward off evil spirits, with a local focus on communal protection from and war. These ceremonies, often led by high priests, incorporated hymns praising 's might, blending destructive power with appeals for safeguarding the city's prosperity. Symbolically, Kutha's cult linked to the broader Mesopotamian underworld mythology, portraying him as the consort and co-ruler of , the queen of the dead, following his descent and marriage in ancient myths. This narrative underscored the temple's role as a gateway to the netherworld, with rituals reinforcing themes of , renewal, and cosmic balance, elevating Kutha as a pivotal site for understanding mortality in Sumerian-Akkadian beliefs.

Kutha in Biblical and Islamic Traditions

In the , Kutha is referenced as Cuthah in 2 Kings 17:24–30, describing the Assyrian resettlement policy following the conquest of the Northern Kingdom of Israel around 722 BCE. The Assyrian king, identified historically as (r. 722–705 BCE), deported populations from various regions, including Cuthah, and relocated them to to repopulate the area and suppress rebellion. The text portrays these Cuthaeans (people from Cuthah) as introducing foreign deities, with the men of Cuthah specifically establishing worship of , while Babylonians adopted Succoth-benoth; this with local Israelite practices is depicted as idolatrous and contributing to the religious impurity of the region. Islamic historical traditions associate Kutha with the early life of the prophet Abraham (), portraying it as a center of pre-Islamic that he rejected in favor of . According to the ninth-century historian in his Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk, Abraham was born in or near Cuthah (referred to as Kutha or Cuthah-Rabba) in the land of , where idol worship prevailed before his call to (divine unity). Similarly, the biographer in his Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir links Abraham's origins to Kutha as the domain of , emphasizing it as a site of overcome by prophetic mission. These accounts frame Kutha as a symbolic cradle of contrasting Abraham's faith, though no archaeological evidence supports this connection to Abraham, which remains a matter of religious tradition rather than historical verification. Post-biblical Jewish and Christian interpretations often viewed Cuthah and its people through a lens of , associating the term "Cutheans" (Kutim in Hebrew) with the as foreign interlopers and religious deviants. In Jewish sources like the and , —traced to the Cuthaean resettlements—are labeled Cutheans to underscore their perceived from , portraying their worship as a heretical blend of and Israelite elements. Early Christian texts similarly treated as a schismatic or idolatrous offshoot, reinforcing the biblical narrative of impurity. This legacy influenced post-biblical , where deities like and Succoth-benoth were reimagined as demonic entities; for instance, the Babylonian ( 63b) describes Succoth-benoth as a hen-shaped idol and as a rooster form, integrating them into Jewish lore as symbols of forbidden cults.

The Cuthean Legend of Naram-Sin

The Cuthean Legend of Naram-Sin, also known as "Naram-Sin and the Enemy Hordes," is an ancient Mesopotamian historiographic poem composed during the Old Babylonian period, around the 18th century BCE. This work presents itself as a first-person inscription by Naram-Sin, the king of from the late BCE, purportedly engraved on a erected in the temple E-Meslam at Kutha. It serves as a didactic narrative warning future rulers against engaging in warfare without divine approval, emphasizing the perils of and the necessity of heeding oracles. The legend portrays Naram-Sin's downfall as divine punishment for neglecting ominous signs from Kutha's sanctuary, which functioned as a key oracular center in Mesopotamian tradition. In the plot, Naram-Sin initially consults the gods Shamash and Adad after experiencing troubling dreams and omens, including a vision of destructive hordes emerging from the Zagros Mountains. Despite warnings from extispicy (divination by entrails) performed at Kutha indicating defeat, the king's overconfidence leads him to mobilize his army against the invaders, depicted as fierce warriors from the Zagros Mountains, reminiscent of the historical Gutians, in a horde sent by the gods. The ensuing battles result in catastrophic losses for Akkad, with Naram-Sin suffering repeated defeats over eight years, his forces decimated by the enemies' ferocity and divine disfavor. After repeated defeats, Naram-Sin consults Ishtar, who reveals the gods' anger due to neglected cults and advises him to lay down arms and rebuild temples; the enemies subsequently turn on each other and are annihilated through divine will. The narrative concludes with Naram-Sin's reflective advice to posterity, underscoring themes of kingship, fate, and the restoration of cosmic order after transgression. The text survives in fragmented manuscripts spanning multiple periods and regions, with the earliest copies dating to the 17th century BCE from Old Babylonian sources, followed by Middle Babylonian versions and a Hittite from the 14th–13th centuries BCE. The most complete recensions come from the Neo-Assyrian library at (8th–7th centuries BCE), including tablets from Ashurbanipal's collection, alongside fragments from Sultantepe, Kish, and Babylonian sites extending into the 1st–2nd centuries . These attest to its enduring popularity in scribal education, cataloged under the "Open the Tablet Box" in ancient libraries. Classified as part of the broader "Naram-Sin legends" cycle—alongside tales like the Curse of Agade—this composition blends historical elements with fiction to explore royal legitimacy and . The legend highlights Kutha's mythic prominence as a prophetic hub, where omens from the foretold crises, reinforcing the city's religious in Mesopotamian . Its themes of by eastern barbarians echo broader motifs of Gutian incursions in , serving to legitimize later rulers' claims against similar threats. scholarship, including editions post-1997, connects it to didactic naru-literature without evidence of new fragments since the mid-20th century excavations, emphasizing its role in shaping perceptions of imperial and . No major post-2021 studies have altered its interpretation, though analyses continue to link it to Gutian narratives in first-millennium BCE texts.

References

  1. [1]
    Kingdoms of Mesopotamia - Kutha / Kutu - The History Files
    The minor Sumerian city of Kutha or Kutu (the modern archaeological site of Tell Ibrahim) was situated on the right bank of the eastern branch of the Upper ...Missing: encyclopedia | Show results with:encyclopedia
  2. [2]
    Cuth, Cuthah - Jewish Virtual Library
    The city of Cuthah is known in cuneiform sources chiefly as the cult center of the god Nergal; his central shrine, É-MES-LAM, stood in Cuthah (cf. e.g., Laws of ...
  3. [3]
    Rassam's Excavations at Borsippa and Kutha, 1879–82 | IRAQ
    Aug 7, 2014 · This paper makes available some of the main results of Hormuzd Rassam's excavations at Borsippa (Birs Nimrud and Ibrahim al-Khalil) and ...
  4. [4]
    Cutha: a Pleiades place resource
    Aug 8, 2025 · Kutha or Cutha (modern Tell Ibrahim) is located on the Upper Euphrates, north of Nippur and northeast of Babylon. The archaeological site consists of two tells.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] MESOPOTAMIAN HISTORY AND ENVIRONMENT MEMOIRS
    ... Kutha (Tell Ibrahim) is located for some 15 km 121 before again turning south toward Kish (see Map 8). In our reconstruction we will call this channel the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    [PDF] UR EXCAVATIONS ROYAL INSCRIPTIONS - ETANA
    His temple, E-meslam, in Kutha was built by Shulgi (S.A.K.I. p. I90o, f and g), and an inscribed tablet was dedicated to the god for the same king (S.A.K.I. ...
  7. [7]
    (PDF) 1986. Rassam's excavations at Borsippa and Kutha, 1879-82
    Rassam's excavations (1879-82) at Borsippa and Kutha revealed significant artifacts, enriching Mesopotamian archaeology. · Key finds include 1,200 Parthian coins ...
  8. [8]
    incantation bowl | British Museum
    Excavated by: Hormuzd Rassam. Findspot: Excavated/Findspot: Tell Ibrahim (Kutha) (most probable). Asia: Middle East: Iraq: Iraq, South: Tell Ibrahim (Kutha).
  9. [9]
    incantation bowl | British Museum
    Excavated by: Hormuzd Rassam. Findspot: Excavated/Findspot: Tell Ibrahim (Kutha). Asia: Middle East: Iraq: Iraq, South: Tell Ibrahim (Kutha). Materials: pottery.
  10. [10]
    tablet | British Museum
    Excavated by: Hormuzd Rassam. Findspot: Excavated/Findspot: Tell Ibrahim (Kutha). Asia: Middle East: Iraq: Iraq, South: Tell Ibrahim (Kutha). Materials: clay.
  11. [11]
    Looting, the Antiquities Trade, and Competing Valuations of the Past
    Because looting represents a threat to the material Annu. Rev. Anthropol ... 'Looting' unveiled, archaeology revealed: case studies from western Greece.
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    Tracing the Lost City of Akkad: Integrating Historical Records, Canal ...
    The study explores Akkad's role as a strategic political, economic, and religious center, examining its connections to nearby cities such as Sippar, Kish, Kutha ...
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
    [PDF] No. 46 - Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures
    The Administrative and Economic Organization of the Ur III State: The Core and the ... is certainly true for a large part of the economy of the temple during the ...
  16. [16]
    Year Names of Sumu-la-el - CDLI Wiki
    Apr 18, 2016 · Year Names of Sumu-la-el ; 27, mu bad3 gu2-du8-a{ki} u3 an-za-gar3-ur-gi7{ki} ba-du3, Year the city walls of Kutha and Anzagar-urgi were built ...
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
    HAMMURABI AND THE END OF HIS DYNASTY (CHAPTER V)
    ... Kutha, sometimes Kish, which however at other times was independent. In the date-formulae occur as conquests some more distant towns such as Kazallu, Akuz ...
  19. [19]
    BEGINNINGS OF OLD BABYLONIAN BABYLON: SUMU-ABUM ...
    This article studies the lives of two men pivotal in the history of (Old Babylonian) Babylon: Sumu-abum and Sumu- la-El. Sumu-abum was an Amorite tribal and ...
  20. [20]
    The Middle Babylonian / Kassite Period (ca. 1595–1155 B.C.) in ...
    Jun 1, 2016 · Cities in the deep south broke off from the Babylonian state (they became known as the First Sealand Dynasty), and the Kassites, a non- ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Nebuchadnezzar II 011 - Oracc
    This Neo-Babylonian king's work on this temple, however, can be confirmed from brick inscriptions; see the B10 texts. This important religious structure is ...Missing: Kutha | Show results with:Kutha
  22. [22]
    Inscription of Nebuchadnezzar, Variants of an Unpublished ...
    INSCRIPTION OF NEBUCHADNEZZAR, VARIANTS OF AN. UNPUBLISHED DUPLICATE OF ... dean cities, at Cutha, Sippara, Larsam, Ur, Nipur, Uruk, in honor of Nergal ...
  23. [23]
    (PDF) Local Administration. Babylonia. - Academia.edu
    ... city-based Babylonian elite. Late Achaemenid archives occasionally mention traditional administrative titles, such as city governors (the šākin ṭēmi of ...
  24. [24]
    A Judgment of Darius the King - jstor
    This suggests that if the case did revolve around fiefs, the estates had connections with Babylon as well as Sippar and Cutha. This is not in itself improbable.
  25. [25]
    BCHP 3 (Diadochi Chronicle) - Livius.org
    Oct 4, 2020 · The Babylonian Diadochi Chronicle (BCHP 3; a.k.a. ABC 10, Chronicle 10) is one of the Mesopotamian chronicles written in ancient Babylonia, ...Missing: oracc | Show results with:oracc
  26. [26]
    Ancient Mesopotamian Gods and Goddesses - Nergal (god) - Oracc
    Kutha [~/images/Kutha.jpg] was the main cult centre of Nergal (Wiggermann 1998-2001d: 217), who also enjoyed patronage over Maškan-Šapir (Stone and ...
  27. [27]
    Lugalirra and Meslamtaea (a pair of gods) - Oracc
    Underworld deities that often occur together, also called the 'Divine Twins'. They are associated with the underworld god Nergal.Missing: Nebuchadnezzar | Show results with:Nebuchadnezzar
  28. [28]
    Nergal - World History Encyclopedia
    Jan 17, 2017 · His main cult center was Kutha, but from there, his worship spread and temples were built to honor him throughout southern Mesopotamia at Ur, ...
  29. [29]
    Nergal in Ancient Mesopotamian Mythology - World History Edu
    Nergal's main cult center was Kutha, where he was worshipped in the E-Meslam temple. Other cities, such as Apak and Tarbishu, also had temples dedicated to ...
  30. [30]
    (PDF) The people of Cuth made Nergal (2 Kings 17:30).The ...
    The historicity and cult of Nergal in the Ancient Middle East. December 2019 ... The cult of Nergal was not only presented in the Mesopotamian region.
  31. [31]
    Assyrian Deportation and Resettlement: The Story of Samaria
    Aug 8, 2019 · The king of Assyria brought people from Babylon, Cuthah, Avva, Hamath, and Sepharvaim, and he settled them in the towns of Samaria in place of ...
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    The History of al-Tabarl 02 - Prophets and Patriarchs - Academia.edu
    The former account places it in the city of Cuthah- Rabba (transliteration of Thackston). ... Abraham was born in Hurmuzjird, then moved to Kutha in the land of ...
  34. [34]
    the problem of abraham and sarah's kinship relationship and - jstor
    The story of Abraham hiding his marital relationship with Sarah from a threatening authority in a foreign land occurs twice in Genesis and is.
  35. [35]
  36. [36]
    Josephus on Samaritan Origins | Bible Interp
    The first story Josephus records focuses upon the name “Cutheans” for the Samaritans. ... Samaritans as heretics (apostates/deserters) within Israel but not ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Daf Ditty Gittin 68: Ἀσµοδαῖος, אַשְמְדּאָי
    The Babylonian. Talmud (Sanhedrin 63b) relates that Succoth Benoth was an idol in the shape of a hen, while Nergal was a rooster-shaped idol. Based on this, ...
  38. [38]
    I.12 Cuthaean Legend of Narām-Sîn - electronic Babylonian Library
    The Cuthaean Legend of Narām-Sîn presents itself as an inscription of Narām-Sîn, a 23ʳᵈ-century king of Akkad. The text claims to have been engraved on a ...Missing: Kutha historical
  39. [39]
    Cuthean Legend of Narām-Sîn - Zenodo
    Sep 3, 2025 · The Cuthean Legend of Narām-Sîn is a poem that narrates the war between Narām-Sîn, a king of the Old Akkadian dynasty, and the nomadic ...Missing: AnSt | Show results with:AnSt