Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Looting

Looting is the act of stealing goods or property, typically by force or during periods of chaos such as emergencies, riots, wars, or natural disasters, distinguishing it from routine theft through the context of disrupted law enforcement.^[1]^[2] In most jurisdictions, it constitutes a serious criminal offense, often penalized more harshly than standard larceny due to the associated risks to public safety and order, with examples including misdemeanor or felony charges carrying jail time ranging from months to years.^[3]^[4] Historically, looting has manifested in military conquests where victorious forces seized assets from defeated populations, as seen in events like the sack of cities during conflicts, though international laws such as the Hague Conventions now classify it as a war crime when targeting civilian property.^[5] Empirically, systematic reviews of post-disaster behavior reveal that organized or widespread looting is rare in natural calamities characterized by community cooperation, occurring more frequently in scenarios of civil unrest or violent conflict where social norms erode and enforcement weakens.^[6]^[7] Key characteristics include its opportunistic nature, driven by perceived low risks of apprehension, often escalating to vandalism or violence that inflicts broader economic losses—estimated in billions during major urban disturbances—and undermines recovery efforts by deterring investment and eroding trust in institutions.^[8] Controversies frequently surround looting during protests or upheavals, where causal analyses point to breakdowns in deterrence rather than underlying grievances alone, challenging narratives that downplay it as incidental or justified redistribution.^[9]^[10]

Definition and Terminology

Core Definition and Distinctions

Looting constitutes the unlawful seizure of property without compensation, typically occurring amid disruptions to public order such as riots, natural disasters, or emergencies, where the act exploits a temporary breakdown in enforcement of laws protecting ownership.^[1] This offense centers on the direct infringement of property rights, as recognized in legal frameworks that uphold private ownership against unauthorized dispossession, often involving force, intimidation, or stealth to overcome resistance.^[2] Unlike isolated criminal acts, looting frequently manifests in group settings, with perpetrators capitalizing on collective disorder to target commercial or private assets indiscriminately.^[11] Looting differs from ordinary theft primarily in its contextual dependence on crisis conditions that erode immediate legal oversight, whereas theft encompasses any unauthorized taking irrespective of surrounding stability.^[12] Standard theft lacks the opportunistic escalation tied to widespread chaos, where looters may vandalize non-targeted items or escalate to violence beyond mere acquisition, amplifying the harm to societal order and individual security.^[11] In contrast to pillage, which involves organized appropriation of goods as wartime spoils often under military command and codified as a potential war crime in international law, looting remains unauthorized and sporadic, lacking formal belligerent privileges.^[13] Requisition, meanwhile, denotes state-sanctioned temporary seizure for imperative public needs, such as military logistics, subject to legal protocols including potential compensation, thereby preserving a veneer of legitimacy absent in looting.^[13] These distinctions hinge on authority and intent: looting erodes property norms through ad hoc predation, while pillage and requisition operate within hierarchies of command or necessity.^[14]

Etymology and Evolving Usage

The term "loot" entered the English language in the late 18th century, derived from the Hindi word lūṭ (लूट), meaning "plunder" or "booty," which traces back to the Sanskrit root luṇṭh- or loptram, denoting robbery or seizure of goods.^[15] ^[16] This borrowing occurred through Anglo-Indian usage during British colonial expansion in India, where British soldiers and administrators adopted the word to describe the seizure of valuables, often in military contexts akin to spoils of war.^[15] ^[17] The noun form first appeared around 1788, initially referring to stolen goods or prizes taken by force, while the verb "to loot" emerged shortly thereafter, emphasizing the act itself.^[16] By the mid-19th century, "looting" as a verbal noun solidified around 1842, extending beyond strictly colonial military applications to denote plundering in various chaotic scenarios, reflecting a semantic broadening from organized wartime acquisition to opportunistic seizure amid disorder.^[18] This shift aligned with evolving European attitudes toward property rights, where "loot" carried connotations of illegitimate taking, distinct from sanctioned spoils, influenced by post-Napoleonic legal norms that increasingly stigmatized indiscriminate pillage.^[15] In the 20th century, particularly after 1945, the term's usage intensified in international legal discourse, such as under the Geneva Conventions, which explicitly prohibited pillage in armed conflicts and extended prohibitions to civilian acts during occupations, framing looting as a war crime rather than a mere incidental gain. Contemporary English usage retains the core sense of forcible, unauthorized taking of property, often during breakdowns in social order, as codified in legal definitions distinguishing it from theft by its association with violence or crisis— for instance, U.S. statutes like California's Penal Code § 463 define looting as theft amid declared emergencies.^[19] While metaphorical extensions exist, such as "corporate looting" for asset-stripping in business failures, the primary denotation prioritizes the literal act of seizing goods without consent in tumultuous conditions, underscoring cultural emphasis on order and property inviolability.^[16]

Historical Overview

Ancient and Pre-Modern Looting

In ancient Mesopotamia, the Assyrian king Sennacherib orchestrated the sack of Babylon in 689 BCE, during which his forces systematically looted the city's treasures, including temple valuables, as part of a punitive campaign to reassert dominance after Babylonian revolts.^[20] This act not only enriched the Assyrian military but also aimed to demoralize the population by destroying symbols of Babylonian power, such as partial devastation of religious sites, though wholesale structural ruin of major edifices like the Etemenanki ziggurat is deemed implausible given the scale of operations.^[20] Archaeological evidence from cuneiform records and reliefs corroborates the extraction of gold, silver, and cult objects, which were transported back to Nineveh to fund further conquests and adorn Assyrian palaces.^[21] Roman legions institutionalized looting as a core incentive in warfare from the Republic through the Empire, with spoils divided among soldiers after a city's fall to compensate for modest salaries and sustain campaign logistics.^[22] Upon breaching defenses, commanders often permitted controlled pillage—typically by half the force while the other maintained security—targeting portable wealth like coinage, slaves, and artworks to motivate troops and weaken enemy resolve by incentivizing rapid surrender.^[23] Historical accounts, such as those of Polybius, detail how this practice funded professional armies, with examples including the sack of Corinth in 146 BCE yielding vast booty auctioned to enrich the state treasury and legionaries alike.^[24] Such tactics reflected the era's low external enforcement of restraints, where plunder served as both economic necessity and psychological warfare, though internal disciplina limited indiscriminate excess to preserve unit cohesion. During the Viking Age (c. 793–1066 CE), Norse raiders conducted targeted coastal assaults across Europe, looting monasteries and settlements for silver, slaves, and livestock, as evidenced by contemporary annals like the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle recording the 793 CE Lindisfarne raid that stripped the island priory of its ecclesiastical treasures.^[25] Archaeological finds, including hacked silver hoards from Ireland and England totaling thousands of coins and ingots, quantify the scale, with sites like the Vale of York hoard (c. 900 CE) comprising over 600 items indicative of systematic plunder redistribution.^[26] These operations funded long-distance voyages and kin-based warbands, exploiting weak centralized defenses, yet reciprocity norms in Scandinavian tribal structures often curbed total annihilation to allow future trades or alliances, as over-raiding risked retaliatory coalitions. The Mongol invasions of the 13th century exemplified looting on a continental scale, with armies under Genghis Khan and successors extracting immense wealth from sacked cities like the Khwarazmian capitals in 1219–1221 CE, where chroniclers report the seizure of silks, gems, and metalwork sufficient to pay warriors for years.^[27] Persian and Chinese sources, corroborated by dispersed artifacts in Eurasian hoards, describe the systematic melting of looted gold and silver to finance nomadic hordes, demoralizing foes through terror tactics that prompted preemptive submissions.^[28] In low-accountability steppe warfare, this plunder incentivized mobility and loyalty, though eventual empire-building introduced self-limits via administrative integration to sustain tribute flows over one-off depredations.^[29]

Looting in Colonial, Imperial, and World War Eras

During the colonial period, European powers institutionalized looting as a mechanism for empire-building and revenue extraction. The British East India Company, following its victory at the Battle of Plassey on June 23, 1757, seized control of Bengal's revenues through the 1765 diwani grant, enabling systematic transfers of wealth that funded Company operations and British trade.^[30] Economic analyses estimate that Britain extracted resources equivalent to tens of trillions in present-day value from India over nearly two centuries, though such figures derive from tax and trade data interpretations contested for overstating unilateral plunder versus market dynamics.^[31]^[32] In the Belgian Congo, King Leopold II's regime from 1885 to 1908 enforced forced labor quotas for rubber and ivory, generating personal profits of approximately 70 million Belgian francs—equivalent to over $1 billion in modern terms—through direct resource plunder and export monopolies.^[33] Imperial transitions in the early 20th century amplified looting amid collapsing empires, often rationalized as compensation for wartime losses. As the Ottoman Empire fragmented after its 1918 defeat in World War I, ethnic conflicts during the 1919–1922 Greco-Turkish War involved mutual plunder, with Greek forces seizing goods in Anatolia and Turkish nationalists confiscating Armenian and Greek properties en masse, driven by economic desperation rather than ideology alone.^[34] Similarly, Japanese occupations in Asia from the 1931 Manchurian Incident onward prioritized resource extraction to alleviate domestic shortages, with the Imperial Army seizing Chinese industrial assets, bank reserves, and raw materials during the 1937 invasion, yielding billions in yen-equivalent value to support wartime industry.^[35]^[36] In the World Wars, industrialized scale elevated looting to state policy, with victors justifying reprisals as reparations. Nazi Germany plundered around 650,000 artworks and vast cultural assets across occupied Europe from 1939 to 1945, systematically cataloged by units like the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg for ideological and economic gain.^[37] Archival records confirm Allied participation, including American troops' appropriation of German artworks from castles in 1945—later partially restituted—and British line-of-communication units' small-scale seizures in Normandy towns like Bayeux and Caen during 1944 advances, reflecting opportunistic motives amid combat chaos rather than centralized directives.^[38] These actions underscore that plunder occurred across belligerents, countering portrayals of unilateral aggression by emphasizing shared economic incentives in total war.

Post-World War II Conflicts and Decolonization

In the Korean War (1950-1953), U.S. forces experienced significant theft of military supplies, with Army records documenting losses of $5,114,420.25 in goods stolen between January 1, 1951, and February 9, 1952, much of which fueled a burgeoning black market in South Korea.^[39] These thefts involved subsidized war materials redirected into local commodity exchanges, driven by economic disparities and supply chain vulnerabilities rather than systematic plunder, though individual soldiers faced courts-martial for black marketeering.^[40] North Korean and Chinese forces similarly seized resources from captured areas, but declassified U.S. military audits emphasize internal U.S. losses as a primary concern, highlighting how wartime logistics enabled opportunistic resource diversion over ideologically motivated looting. During the Vietnam War (1955-1975), black market activities proliferated among U.S. personnel, with post-exchange (PX) goods routinely sold to Vietnamese intermediaries, creating a persistent wartime economy of diversion estimated to involve billions in corrupt flows when factoring international aid and military procurement.^[41] Investigations revealed servicemen profiting from inferior goods sales and black marketeering, including watches and meat, amid broader corruption that undermined South Vietnamese governance.^[42] Viet Cong insurgents, conversely, conducted targeted seizures of U.S.-supplied rice, fuel, and weapons from villages and supply lines, using these to sustain guerrilla operations, though empirical data from military reports indicate such actions were tactical necessities in asymmetric warfare rather than gratuitous pillage. This bilateral pattern underscores looting's role as a symptom of prolonged conflict's economic pressures, with U.S. audits confirming widespread but decentralized involvement across ranks. In decolonization struggles, the Algerian War of Independence (1954-1962) saw French forces and retreating settlers loot state treasuries and cultural artifacts, including the emirate's palace in Algiers, as part of efforts to deny resources to the Front de Libération Nationale (FLN).^[43] FLN fighters responded with raids on French infrastructure, seizing arms and funds, but French colonial records and post-war Algerian claims document systematic extraction of gold and valuables estimated in millions of francs, reflecting causal incentives for victors to preempt asset transfer. Similarly, in Portugal's Colonial Wars in Angola and Mozambique (1961-1974), both Portuguese troops and independence movements like the MPLA and FRELIMO targeted plantations, mines, and ports for resource appropriation; as Portuguese forces withdrew in 1974-1975, infrastructure sabotage and looting accelerated, with rebels seizing coffee estates and diamond operations to finance operations amid collapsing colonial authority. These cases reveal looting as a dual-edged tool in power vacuums, where empirical patterns from military dispatches show both sides prioritizing economic denial over destruction, countering narratives of one-sided barbarity. The Soviet-Afghan War (1979-1989), a Cold War proxy conflict, intertwined looting with narcotics economies, as mujahideen groups expanded opium cultivation from modest pre-invasion levels to dominate global supply by the late 1980s, using proceeds to fund seizures of Soviet convoys and rural assets.^[44] Soviet forces, facing attrition, conducted punitive raids stripping villages of livestock and grain, per declassified KGB reports, while resistance funding via opium—estimated to yield hundreds of millions annually by war's end—enabled sustained resource predation, illustrating how illicit economies amplified looting's scale in ideologically driven insurgencies. This dynamic, corroborated by UN drug assessments, debunks portrayals of unilateral predation by highlighting mutual incentives in resource-scarce terrains.

Looting in Armed Conflicts

International Legal Prohibitions

The prohibition against pillage in armed conflict originated with the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, which explicitly banned the looting of towns or places, even when captured by assault. Article 28 of the Regulations annexed to the 1907 Hague Convention IV states: "The pillage of a town or place, even when taken by assault, is prohibited," codifying a customary norm against the appropriation of private property for personal gain.^[45] This provision built on earlier efforts to limit wartime depredations, reflecting recognition that unchecked looting undermines civilian protections and prolongs hostilities by incentivizing indiscipline among troops.^[46] These rules were reinforced and expanded by the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols of 1977. Article 33(2) of the Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits "pillage" outright, defining it as the violent taking of property without legal basis, while common Article 3 extends basic safeguards against such acts in non-international conflicts.^[47] Additional Protocol I (Article 52) protects objects indispensable to civilian survival from seizure or destruction, and Additional Protocol II (Article 4(2)(g)) explicitly bans pillage against non-combatants in internal armed conflicts. These instruments, ratified by nearly all states, integrate pillage into broader prohibitions on reprisals and collective punishments, emphasizing individual accountability over collective military necessity.^[48] The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, adopted in 1998 and entering into force in 2002, classifies pillaging as a war crime under Article 8(2)(b)(xvi) for international conflicts and Article 8(2)(e)(v) for non-international ones, encompassing both public and private property appropriations without military justification.^[49] The ICC has pursued prosecutions incorporating this charge, such as in the Democratic Republic of Congo cases following conflicts post-2000, where systematic looting of minerals and goods fueled rebel groups; convictions have hinged on evidence of organized appropriation rather than incidental theft.^[50] However, enforcement remains empirically limited, as prohibitions are frequently disregarded in asymmetric warfare where weaker parties lack means or incentives for compliance, and victorious forces—often shielded by sovereignty or geopolitical alliances—face negligible prosecution risks.^[46] Historical patterns, including post-colonial insurgencies and recent interventions, demonstrate that legal norms deter only marginally without robust monitoring and impartial adjudication, underscoring the causal primacy of power imbalances over treaty adherence.^[51]

Motivations and Tactics in Warfare

In historical warfare, a primary motivation for looting has been to compensate soldiers for the risks of combat, serving as an informal wage system when formal pay was unreliable or insufficient. Armies from ancient Rome to medieval Europe often relied on spoils of war to incentivize enlistment and sustain morale, with loot distributed among ranks after victories to offset low or delayed salaries.^[52]^[53] This practice aligned individual incentives with military objectives, as soldiers bore the direct costs of battle while governments minimized fiscal burdens.^[54] Strategic motivations include disrupting enemy logistics and demoralizing populations, transforming looting into a tool for resource denial. By seizing or destroying supplies, invading forces aimed to weaken adversaries' sustainment capabilities, as seen in tactics that targeted granaries and livestock to force capitulation through starvation. Revenge also drove indiscriminate sacking after prolonged sieges, where exhausted troops exacted retribution on civilian holdings to recoup losses and deter future resistance.^[55] Such actions, while providing short-term gains, could prolong conflicts by fostering guerrilla warfare and hardening enemy resolve through perceived injustices.^[56] Tactics varied between targeted extraction and wholesale pillage, depending on operational context. In rural campaigns, forces focused on mobile assets like herds and provisions to maintain their own supply lines while denying the enemy's, enhancing mobility without encumbering advances.^[57] Urban assaults often employed indiscriminate looting to accelerate surrenders, with commanders granting "sack rights" for fixed durations—typically three days—to motivate assaults on fortified positions.^[53] This approach exploited anarchy post-breach, allowing rapid wealth transfer at low enforcement cost, though it risked operational inefficiency if troops prioritized plunder over pursuit. From a rational actor perspective, looting emerges as a low-risk mechanism for personal enrichment amid wartime uncertainty, where state enforcement of contracts weakens and property rights dissolve. Soldiers, facing high mortality risks without guaranteed pay, rationally prioritize immediate gains, viewing spoils as deferred compensation for hazard.^[58] However, unchecked looting undermines unit cohesion by diverting focus from collective goals, fostering infighting over shares and eroding discipline, which historically led to mutinies or defeats when armies fragmented into plunder-seeking bands.^[55]^[59] Commanders mitigated this by regulating distribution, balancing incentives to prevent cohesion collapse while harnessing looting's motivational power.

Case Studies from 20th and 21st Century Wars

In the Iraq War, following the U.S.-led invasion and the fall of Baghdad on April 9, 2003, looters targeted the National Museum of Iraq starting April 10, with an estimated 15,000 artifacts stolen over 48 hours amid the collapse of state security.^[60]^[61] Museum staff and international archaeologists reported that the thefts included cuneiform tablets, cylinder seals, and statues from Mesopotamian civilizations, facilitated by insiders who provided access to storage vaults.^[62] Concurrently, oil infrastructure suffered extensive looting and sabotage, with pipelines punctured, pump stations stripped of valves and cables, and control rooms ransacked, reducing exports by up to 50% in the immediate aftermath.^[63]^[64] These acts were primarily opportunistic, exploiting the power vacuum, though later insurgent groups escalated targeted attacks on pipelines, with nearly 300 bombings recorded by mid-2006.^[65] The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), controlling territories from 2014 to 2019, systematized antiquities looting as a revenue stream, taxing illicit digs and auctioning artifacts through intermediaries in Turkey and Europe.^[66]^[67] In Syria and Iraq, ISIS oversaw excavations at sites like Apamea and Dura-Europos, destroying some heritage while profiting from sales estimated at tens of millions of dollars, with U.S. government assessments highlighting the trade's role in funding weapons and operations.^[68]^[69] The group's propaganda even documented controlled demolitions juxtaposed with licensed looting, underscoring a dual strategy of cultural erasure and economic exploitation.^[70] In the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian War since February 2022, Russian forces in occupied regions have seized Ukrainian grain stocks, with satellite imagery from May 2022 capturing Russian-flagged ships loading suspected stolen harvests at Crimean ports like Sevastopol.^[71]^[72] Eyewitness accounts from farmers and local officials, corroborated by export data discrepancies, indicate systematic appropriation of millions of tons from silos in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia oblasts, redirecting them to Russian markets or allies.^[71] Reports also document looting of industrial technology, including machinery from factories in Mariupol and Kharkiv, though grain theft predominates due to Ukraine's role as a global exporter, with volumes exceeding 1 million tons by mid-2022 per agricultural ministry tracking.^[73] These seizures reflect state-directed resource extraction to bolster Russia's economy amid sanctions, distinct from ad hoc civilian looting.^[74]

Looting in Civil Unrest

Dynamics in Riots and Protests

Looting frequently intensifies during riots and protests triggered by perceived social or political grievances, manifesting as spikes in theft amid crowd dispersal and reduced enforcement. In the 1965 Watts riots in Los Angeles, triggered by a traffic stop, participants caused over $40 million in property damage, with extensive looting of stores alongside arson and violence over six days.^[75] Similar dynamics appeared in multiple U.S. urban disturbances of the 1960s, where looting targeted consumer goods in commercial districts, contributing to billions in cumulative damages adjusted for inflation.^[76] The 2020 unrest following George Floyd's death in Minneapolis exemplified these patterns nationally, with insured property losses exceeding $1 billion—the highest for civil disorder in U.S. insurance history—concentrated in cities like Minneapolis-Saint Paul, where damages reached at least $500 million from widespread store break-ins and theft.^[77] ^[78] Crowd dynamics play a central role, as initial gatherings erode into copycat looting when authority wanes, with empirical analyses of protest violence showing that only a minority—around 5% or less of demonstrations—involve destructive acts like theft, yet these amplify overall chaos.^[79] Psychological factors, including deindividuation in large groups, facilitate this shift, where participants rationalize theft as normalized amid the disorder.^[80] Arrest records distinguish looting from core protest aims, revealing opportunism as the primary driver: many detained for theft were individuals with prior non-political criminal histories, rather than organized ideologues, as confirmed by federal assessments attributing violence to ad-hoc actors exploiting unrest.^[81] ^[82] In Minneapolis, over 2,000 looting incidents occurred, often by repeat offenders unrelated to initial grievances, underscoring how riots create windows for personal gain over collective expression.^[83] This pattern holds across events, where looting correlates more with accessible targets and low deterrence than with protest ideology, per analyses of participant behaviors.^[84]

Opportunistic vs. Ideologically Motivated Looting

Opportunistic looting during civil unrest primarily involves individuals exploiting disorder for personal gain, such as acquiring goods or seeking thrills, rather than advancing a coherent political agenda. Empirical assessments, including those from U.S. intelligence agencies in 2020, identify "violent opportunists" as the main drivers of looting amid protests, distinguishing them from organized ideological actors.^[81] Similarly, Department of Homeland Security warnings highlighted infiltrators motivated by chaos rather than extremism.^[85] In the 2011 England riots, surveys of young participants revealed motivations centered on perceived opportunities for gain, with many citing the chance to obtain free items amid weak immediate enforcement.^[86] A study by DMSS Research found that decisions to loot hinged on anticipated personal benefits, such as consumer goods, rather than structured ideological grievances, though some expressed general dissatisfaction with policing.^[87] Arrest records from the events showed widespread targeting of retail outlets for electronics and clothing, indicative of self-interested behavior over symbolic political targets.^[88] Claims of ideologically motivated looting, such as "reparations" for historical injustices during 2020 U.S. unrest, often rely on post-hoc justifications from activists or media narratives but lack support from looter actions or self-reports. Evidence from court records and federal investigations in cities like Minneapolis revealed many arrestees as repeat offenders focused on high-value thefts from unrelated businesses, including pharmacies and supermarkets, rather than institutions emblematic of systemic oppression.^[89] Opportunistic patterns persisted despite ideological rhetoric, with protesters themselves condemning looting as disconnected from core demands for police accountability.^[90] Causal analysis points to breakdowns in law enforcement as the primary enabler of looting, enabling self-interested actors to act with impunity, rather than pervasive ideological fervor or systemic inequities alone. Cross-event comparisons, such as rapid arrests curbing escalation in some 2020 locales versus unchecked spread elsewhere, underscore deterrence's role over abstract injustices.^[91] This aligns with patterns in unrest where initial police restraint or overload creates vacuums filled by opportunists, as seen in both U.S. and U.K. cases, prioritizing immediate incentives over long-term political narratives.^[86]

Looting After Natural Disasters

Empirical Patterns and Rarity

Empirical research from disaster sociology, including field studies by the Disaster Research Center (DRC) at the University of Delaware, consistently demonstrates that looting is rare following natural disasters, often limited to isolated incidents or misinterpretations of survival-oriented scavenging. Across dozens of events examined since the 1950s, such as floods, earthquakes, and hurricanes, verified cases involve fewer than 1% of evacuees or displaced persons, with most reports stemming from rumors amplified by media and officials rather than systematic observation.^[92]^[93] A systematic review of 28 studies on antisocial behavior post-disaster, published in 2025, reinforces this pattern, finding scant evidence of widespread looting in natural events; where it occurs, it is typically opportunistic and small-scale, contrasting sharply with the extensive, organized property crimes seen in civil disturbances.^[7] In civil unrest, historical analyses document looting participation rates of 15-30% among crowds in major urban events, driven by group dynamics absent in disaster contexts.^[93]^[6] The 2005 Hurricane Katrina provides a prominent case: initial media narratives of chaos and mass looting in New Orleans were debunked by DRC post-event surveys and on-site verifications, revealing most "looting" as residents accessing abandoned stores for food, water, and medicine amid delayed aid, with deliberate theft confined to a tiny fraction of the population.^[94]^[95] This aligns with broader patterns where disaster-induced community solidarity—manifesting in mutual aid and norm enforcement—suppresses predation, unlike the factional animosities that incite it during social conflicts.^[96]^[97]

Triggers and Exaggerated Narratives

Looting following natural disasters typically arises in isolated instances amid significant power vacuums, such as the breakdown of law enforcement and infrastructure collapse, rather than as a widespread response to the event itself. In the 2010 Haiti earthquake, for example, the destruction of the Civil Prison in Port-au-Prince released thousands of inmates, contributing to sporadic looting in commercial districts where damaged warehouses exposed goods, though these acts were opportunistic and limited to specific urban pockets delayed by aid bottlenecks.^[98] Systematic reviews of disaster behavior confirm that such triggers are rare, with looting confined to small groups exploiting temporary anarchy rather than emerging from disaster-induced desperation among the general population.^[7] Media and preemptive rumors often exaggerate these incidents, fostering narratives of imminent chaos through confirmation bias that prioritizes anecdotal reports over aggregate data. For instance, following Hurricane Harvey in 2017, social media amplified unsubstantiated claims of widespread looting and armed criminals in Houston, despite official records showing minimal verified cases, which distorted public perception and echoed patterns seen in prior events like the minimal actual disorder in New York City post-9/11 despite heightened fears of breakdown.^[99] Empirical analyses highlight how such amplification stems from selective framing, where isolated acts are portrayed as harbingers of societal collapse, overlooking evidence of community pro-sociality that suppresses opportunism.^[100] These distorted perceptions causally influence policy, prompting over-policing or resource diversion that can hinder effective response and erode institutional trust when realities diverge from hyped threats. Fears of looting have led to fortified aid convoys and delayed distributions in scenarios like Haiti, where security preoccupations slowed humanitarian access amid sparse actual threats, per post-event assessments.^[101] Policy reviews recommend integrating behavioral data into planning to counter such biases, avoiding knee-jerk militarization that alienates survivors and undermines confidence in governance when exaggerated risks prove unfounded.^[7]

Specialized Forms

Archaeological and Cultural Heritage Looting

Archaeological and cultural heritage looting involves the systematic illicit excavation and removal of artifacts from unprotected sites, primarily driven by profit motives within global black markets. This activity destroys archaeological context, rendering artifacts scientifically valueless by severing them from stratigraphic layers, associated remains, and provenience data essential for historical reconstruction. Estimates of the annual value of this trade vary widely, with upper figures from organizations like UNESCO reaching $10 billion, though academic critiques highlight these as inflated and unsubstantiated, with more conservative assessments placing it in the hundreds of millions based on seizure data and market analyses.^[102]^[103] The irreplaceable loss extends beyond monetary terms, as looted sites like ancient Mesopotamian tells in Iraq suffer irreversible damage to cumulative human knowledge, far outweighing any localized economic gains claimed by participants. Methods typically include subsurface digging with basic tools such as shovels and picks, often conducted at night to evade detection, followed by rapid smuggling networks that launder artifacts through intermediaries. In Peru, organized huaqueros (tomb robbers) target huacas—pre-Columbian temple mounds—employing teams with dynamite or mechanical diggers for efficiency, as seen in the extensive raids on sites like Batán Grande since the early 1900s, where gold artifacts fueled transnational trade.^[104] Similarly, post-2003 Iraq witnessed opportunistic yet widespread pit-digging across unprotected southern sites following the collapse of state control, devastating areas like Umma and contributing to the dispersal of thousands of cuneiform tablets and cylinder seals into private collections.^[105] These operations, frequently coordinated by local syndicates linked to international buyers, prioritize high-value portable items, leaving behind fragmented remains that preclude future scholarly recovery. In Syria during the 2010s civil war, looting escalated to industrial scales at sites like Apamea, where satellite imagery documented thousands of fresh craters from mechanized excavations between 2011 and 2012, generating funds for armed groups through artifact sales estimated in millions.^[106] This contrasts with historical cases like the Elgin Marbles, removed from the Parthenon in the early 1800s under an Ottoman firman permitting export, which some view as legally sanctioned acquisition rather than theft, preserving pieces now at risk in origin contexts.^[107] Modern repatriation demands often overlook market dynamics, where prohibiting trade drives artifacts underground without curbing demand, potentially endangering holdings in unstable source nations prone to further destruction or neglect, as evidenced by repeated thefts from under-resourced local museums.^[108] Such critiques emphasize that retention in secure institutions better safeguards universal access against ongoing illicit incentives.

Economic Looting in Industry and Finance

Economic looting in industry and finance refers to the systematic extraction of value by insiders or controlling parties from firms or assets, often eroding the underlying enterprise's viability through mechanisms like excessive risk-taking, fraudulent accounting, or exploitative privatization, ultimately shifting losses to external stakeholders such as taxpayers, shareholders, or the public. This phenomenon arises from moral hazards in systems with limited liability, weak oversight, or incentives misaligned with long-term value preservation, where actors prioritize short-term gains over sustainable operations. Unlike overt physical seizure, it frequently operates under legal pretexts, masking the violation of implicit contracts with investors and society.^[109] A foundational model of this process was articulated by economists George Akerlof and Paul Romer in their 1993 analysis, which posits that looting thrives when firms can profit from bankruptcy via high-risk strategies, particularly under government-backed insurance that socializes downside risks while privatizing upside gains. They illustrate this with the U.S. savings and loan (S&L) crisis of the 1980s, where deregulation in 1982 allowed thrifts to pursue speculative commercial real estate loans and insider transactions; over 1,000 institutions failed, necessitating a federal bailout estimated at $160 billion, with $132 billion borne by taxpayers through the Resolution Trust Corporation established in 1989. Empirical evidence from the crisis, including cases of executives siphoning funds via related-party loans and asset flips, demonstrated how deposit insurance decoupled prudent management from survival incentives, enabling widespread value extraction.^[110]^[111]^[109] The Enron Corporation's collapse in December 2001 exemplifies looting through accounting manipulation, where executives Jeffrey Skilling and Kenneth Lay authorized the creation of over 3,000 special purpose entities to hide approximately $13 billion in debt off-balance-sheet, inflating reported profits via mark-to-market valuation of projected future revenues. This enabled insiders to sell $1.2 billion in stock between 1999 and 2001 while reassuring investors, culminating in bankruptcy with $63.4 billion in assets against $31.8 billion in liabilities revealed; Skilling and Lay were later convicted in 2006 on charges including fraud and conspiracy, underscoring how such schemes prioritize executive enrichment over firm integrity.^[112]^[113] In post-Soviet Russia, the 1990s privatization drive, particularly the 1995 "loans-for-shares" program under President Boris Yeltsin, facilitated oligarchic looting by collateralizing state shares in lucrative enterprises—like oil giant Yukos and nickel producer Norilsk Nickel—for loans from select banks controlled by insiders, who acquired controlling stakes at auctions rigged with minimal competition when the government defaulted on repayments. Valued at billions, these assets were obtained for pennies on the dollar, concentrating control over 70% of Russia's natural resource wealth among seven oligarchs by 1996 and contributing to economic contraction of 40% in GDP from 1991 to 1998, as public holdings were effectively seized under the veneer of market transition.^[114]^[115] These cases highlight a core distinction from forcible takings: economic looting leverages institutional asymmetries—such as regulatory forbearance or opaque transactions—to legitimize transfers that diminish collective value, fostering systemic distrust and calls for stricter governance without addressing root incentives for opportunism.^[109]

Causes and Rationales

Economic Incentives and Rational Choice

In economic terms, looting represents a rational decision by individuals when the expected utility of appropriation exceeds that of lawful alternatives, particularly in environments of diminished enforcement. This framework draws from Gary Becker's 1968 model of crime, which treats criminal acts as utility-maximizing choices where offenders compare the monetary and psychic benefits of gains—such as the resale or consumption value of looted items—against the expected costs of detection and punishment.^[116]^[117] The probability of apprehension multiplies the severity of penalties (fines, incarceration, or injury), but in low-accountability settings like riots or conflict zones, this probability plummets due to overwhelmed authorities and diffused responsibility, tilting the calculus toward participation.^[118] The expected value of looting can be formalized as EV = p_s \cdot V - p_c \cdot C, where p_s is the probability of successful seizure, V is the net value of the loot (after any resale discount), p_c is the probability of capture, and C is the cost of consequences. Chaos maximizes p_s by exposing unguarded assets while minimizing p_c through overcrowding and evasion opportunities, often rendering EV > 0 even for modest V. For consumer goods in urban riots, V includes immediate personal utility or quick fencing at 20-50% of retail value, sufficient incentive when p_c approaches zero.^[119] In specialized cases like cultural property looting, V escalates due to black-market demand; the global illicit trade in antiquities generates billions annually, with organized networks absorbing high-value items despite traceability risks.^[120]^[121] This individual-level optimization ignores externalities, such as depleted community resources or heightened future enforcement, as actors focus on private returns absent collective deterrents. Empirical observations align: looting surges correlate with enforcement breakdowns, as in urban disturbances where property crimes detached from protests exploit the risk-reward imbalance.^[122]^[9] Without elevating detection probabilities or penalties, such incentives persist, explaining looting's recurrence in transient anarchy over sustained equilibrium.^[123]

Psychological and Sociological Explanations

Deindividuation theory posits that immersion in a crowd fosters anonymity and diffuses personal responsibility, diminishing self-awareness and inhibitions, thereby enabling behaviors such as looting that individuals typically restrain in isolation.^[124] Psychologist Philip Zimbardo identified key antecedents including group arousal, altered time perspectives, and reduced accountability, which align with riot conditions where participants don masks or blend into masses, lowering the perceived risk of identification and punishment.^[125] This process explains why ordinarily law-abiding persons engage in theft during unrest, as the collective setting erodes internal moral constraints and amplifies impulsive contagion over deliberate choice.^[126] Parallels exist with obedience dynamics observed in Stanley Milgram's experiments, where ordinary subjects administered simulated lethal shocks under authority cues, mirroring how mob participants conform to emergent group imperatives during looting episodes.^[127] In crowds, the authority shifts from formal figures to the collective momentum or peer signals, compelling adherence to antisocial norms like property seizure, as diffusion of responsibility absolves individuals of culpability.^[128] Empirical reviews of crowd psychology underscore this, noting that hypnotic-like spread of behavior in riots overrides personal ethics, distinct from premeditated crime.^[129] Sociologically, Émile Durkheim's concept of anomie describes a deregulation of norms amid rapid societal shifts or crises, fostering deviance including riotous looting as actors navigate unclear moral boundaries.^[130] Yet, this framework highlights looting's empirical scarcity in tightly knit communities, where enduring social bonds and shared expectations sustain order even under strain, contrasting with fragmented urban settings prone to norm collapse.^[131] Analyses of events like the 2011 UK riots apply anomie to explain outbursts, but emphasize that cohesion in stable groups mitigates such breakdowns, prioritizing relational ties over abstract deregulation.^[132] Critiques of poverty-centric interpretations note their inadequacy, as riot data reveal participants from middle-class origins, underscoring situational contagion—via deindividuation—over chronic deprivation as the proximal driver.^[133] For instance, UK riot inquiries documented looters from affluent suburbs, challenging dispositional explanations and affirming group dynamics' causal primacy in drawing diverse actors into theft.^[10] This evidence counters bias toward victimhood narratives in academic accounts, which often amplify structural excuses while underplaying empirical patterns of broad socioeconomic involvement.^[134]

Contested Justifications and Critiques

Proponents of looting in the aftermath of natural disasters have argued that it constitutes a necessary act of survival when official aid is delayed or insufficient, citing instances where individuals sought food, water, or medical supplies from abandoned stores. Empirical reviews, however, indicate such behavior is rare and often overstated in media narratives, with field studies post-Hurricane Katrina revealing that most reported "looting" involved communal sharing or procurement of essentials rather than widespread predation.^[6]^[7]^[100] In contexts of civil unrest, such as the 2020 protests following George Floyd's death, certain activists framed looting as a form of redistribution or reparations, with Black Lives Matter organizer Ariel Atkins describing it as "reparations" and affirming support for those who engaged in it during Chicago disturbances. Writer Vicky Osterweil, in her 2020 book In Defense of Looting, contended that the act disrupts capitalist property norms and serves as a revolutionary tactic against systemic inequality, drawing parallels to historical rebellions where seizure of goods challenged elite control.^[135]^[136]^[137] Critics counter that these justifications fail under scrutiny of causal mechanisms and evidence, as looting erodes the foundational incentives for productive labor and societal cooperation. John Locke's labor theory of property, articulated in his Second Treatise of Government (1689), posits that individuals acquire rightful ownership by mixing their labor with unowned resources, making unconsented seizure a direct violation of personal extension into material goods and undermining the mutual trust required for economic order.^[138] This entitlement-based defense overlooks how such acts disincentivize investment and innovation, as owners anticipate predation rather than reward for effort, leading to reduced overall wealth creation without achieving equitable redistribution. Empirically, areas affected by 2020 unrest experienced measurable economic fallout, with St. Paul, Minnesota, reporting that one year post-riots, 35 of 270 impacted businesses remained shuttered, reflecting approximately 13% permanent closure amid looting and arson damages estimated in billions nationwide. Studies on prior disturbances, including the 2011 London riots, demonstrate elevated post-event crime rates, including property offenses, as weakened enforcement norms persist and signal permissiveness for future violations.^[139]^[140]^[141] Analyses of protest-linked spikes confirm that while immediate violence may subside, underlying antisocial patterns endure, contradicting claims of net societal benefit from "revolutionary" looting.^[142]^[143] Thus, rather than redressing grievances, looting perpetuates cycles of deprivation by deterring commerce and amplifying disorder, with no verifiable causal pathway to systemic reform.

Impacts and Consequences

Direct Economic and Material Losses

![Graffiti outside looted Aldi store on May 28, 2020 in Minneapolis (51237052782](./assets/Graffiti_outside_looted_Aldi_store_on_May_28%252C_2020_in_Minneapolis_(51237052782) Looting during civil unrest imposes immediate economic burdens through property damage and stolen goods, often captured partially via insurance claims. In the United States, the riots following George Floyd's death in May 2020 generated insured losses exceeding $1 billion, marking the costliest civil disorder event in the nation's history and surpassing the 1992 Los Angeles riots.^[77] Estimates place total insured damages up to $2 billion, though uninsured losses—prevalent among small businesses—and underreported claims likely inflate the full figure substantially.^[144] ^[145] Wartime looting amplifies these direct costs to national scales, with assets seized en masse contributing to war financing and economic disruption. During World War II, Nazi forces plundered gold reserves from occupied European countries, valued at approximately $19 billion in contemporary dollars, excluding broader seizures of art, businesses, and cultural property estimated in the hundreds of thousands of items.^[146] Such appropriations represented immediate transfers of material wealth, often liquidated to fund military efforts, while physical destruction during looting rendered recovery impossible for significant portions of targeted inventories. Material losses from looting frequently involve irreversible destruction beyond mere theft, as goods are vandalized, consumed, or dispersed into black markets. In conflict zones, up to 30% or more of looted artifacts from sites may suffer permanent damage or vanish entirely due to hasty extraction techniques, complicating valuation but underscoring the non-recoverable nature of these assets. Opportunity costs compound the impact, as resources earmarked for reconstruction—such as labor, capital, and materials—are diverted to remediation and heightened security, delaying productive reinvestment in affected economies.^[147] Looting episodes precipitate acute social disruptions, including psychological trauma among victims who report elevated levels of fear, anger, depression, and loss of security, comparable to effects observed in domestic burglary studies.^[148] In the 1992 Los Angeles riots, triggered by the acquittal of officers in the Rodney King beating on April 29, Korean-American merchants—facing overwhelmed police response—resorted to armed vigilantism, stationing themselves on rooftops with rifles to safeguard stores in Koreatown from arson and theft over six days of unrest.^[149] This self-organized defense, involving thousands of participants, underscored a rapid erosion of reliance on state protection, compelling communities to enforce order independently amid institutional failure.^[150] Visible looting fosters moral hazards by normalizing antisocial behavior, aligning with broken windows theory's premise that unchecked minor disorders signal permissiveness, escalating broader criminality.^[151] Empirical sequences in civil unrest reveal copycat dynamics, as in the 2011 England riots originating in Tottenham on August 6 and propagating nationwide through imitation, with police noting waves of opportunistic theft detached from initial grievances.^[152] Similarly, during 2020 U.S. disturbances following George Floyd's death on May 25, criminals exploited protests as cover for premeditated looting in distant commercial districts, amplifying disorder beyond protest zones.^[153] These patterns erode interpersonal trust and reciprocal norms, as pervasive crime in affected areas diminishes community cohesion and incentivizes further deviance through diminished expectations of mutual restraint.^[7] Social proximity amplifies this decay, where witnessed violations prompt conformity to breaches rather than adherence to standards, perpetuating cycles of noncompliance.^[154] Consequently, recurrent disruptions shift societal preferences toward coercive enforcement by strong authorities, supplanting voluntary cooperation with enforced deterrence to reimpose stability.^[155]

Broader Societal and Long-Term Effects

Looting episodes contribute to sustained capital disinvestment and economic stagnation in affected urban areas, as evidenced by longitudinal analyses of 1960s U.S. riots, which showed depressed property values for black-owned homes persisting into the 1970s and beyond, alongside reduced employment opportunities for black workers due to firm relocations and household flight.^[156] These disturbances prompted white suburban migration and business exodus, amplifying racial segregation and hindering central-city recovery, with cities like Detroit experiencing decades of population decline and fiscal strain traceable to riot-induced capital outflows.^[157]^[158] Post-2020 civil unrest in U.S. cities led to double-digit increases in commercial insurance premiums for riot and civil commotion coverage, elevating operational costs for businesses and deterring reinvestment in high-risk zones, as insurers recalibrated rates based on escalated claims exceeding $1 billion in insured losses.^[159]^[77] Such hikes, compounded by heightened perceived fragility, signal broader investor aversion; empirical reviews indicate social unrest prompts negative stock market responses and reduced foreign direct investment, as conflicts elevate risk premiums and erode confidence in institutional stability.^[160]^[161] Archaeological looting inflicts enduring cultural deficits by obliterating contextual data essential for historical reconstruction, yielding no scholarly record while financing transnational crime networks that perpetuate instability.^[162]^[163] This irrecoverable loss severs societal ties to heritage, diminishing collective identity and sustainable tourism potential in source regions, with global illicit trade sustaining organized groups beyond immediate conflict zones.^[164] Recurrent looting erodes deterrence mechanisms, fostering cycles of urban decay where initial impunity correlates with elevated future crime and unrest incidence, as observed in riot-affected cities exhibiting prolonged poverty traps and diminished civic trust.^[165]^[166] These patterns underscore causal links from unchecked disorder to institutional skepticism, where populations anticipate inefficacy in governance, further impeding long-term social cohesion and economic revitalization.^[167]

Legal Frameworks and Prevention

Domestic Laws, Penalties, and Enforcement

In the United States, looting is typically prosecuted under state laws governing theft, burglary, or specific emergency statutes, with penalties varying by jurisdiction and circumstances such as the value of stolen goods or occurrence during declared emergencies. In California, Penal Code § 463 defines looting as entering an inhabited structure without consent to commit theft or any felony during a natural disaster, state of emergency, or riot, punishable as a misdemeanor with up to one year in county jail and fines up to $1,000, or as a felony with up to three years in state prison, fines up to $10,000, and potential enhancements for aggravating factors like firearm involvement.^[168]^[169] Similar enhancements apply nationally; for instance, during states of emergency, theft can escalate to first-degree felonies in states like Florida, carrying sentences of up to 30 years.^[170] Federal involvement may occur under statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 2112 for interstate robberies, with penalties up to 10 years imprisonment for high-value thefts.^[171] Enforcement in the U.S. often intensifies during mass unrest, with the Department of Justice pursuing federal charges for coordinated looting amid riots, as seen in over 300 indictments related to 2020 nationwide demonstrations involving arson and property destruction.^[172] However, conviction rates remain challenged by evidentiary hurdles in chaotic events, prosecutorial discretion prioritizing violent crimes, and resource constraints; Department of Justice data from civil unrest cases indicate that while charges are filed aggressively, sustained convictions frequently fall below 50% due to plea bargains, dismissals for insufficient identification, or overwhelmed local courts.^[173] In the United Kingdom, looting falls under the Theft Act 1968, which criminalizes dishonest appropriation of property with intent to permanently deprive the owner, triable as an either-way offense with maximum penalties of seven years' imprisonment and unlimited fines for theft or burglary.^[174] Post-disaster or riot-specific applications, such as during the 2011 England riots, invoke burglary provisions under Section 9, escalating sentences for aggravated cases, though no standalone "looting" statute exists; enforcement post-2011 resulted in over 3,000 arrests but highlighted variable outcomes, with conviction rates around 70-80% for charged offenses due to CCTV evidence, contrasted by lower rates in less-documented disasters.^[175] Sentencing guidelines emphasize deterrence, with custodial terms for repeat or commercial-scale looting, yet critics note lenient dispositions in under-resourced areas undermine efficacy.^[176] Across jurisdictions, enforcement efficacy is hampered by systemic issues like delayed prosecutions and political influences on charging decisions, particularly in weak institutional contexts where conviction rates drop below 40% during widespread disorder, per comparative analyses of riot responses; this underscores deterrence limits when rapid identification and resource allocation falter.^[177]

International Conventions and Challenges

The 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, adopted on May 14, 1954, and entering into force on August 7, 1956, represents the first international treaty dedicated exclusively to safeguarding cultural heritage during wartime, obligating signatories to respect and protect such property from pillage, theft, or destruction.^[178] Its two protocols, from 1954 and 1999, extend protections to peacetime precautions and enhanced criminalization of violations, respectively, with 137 states parties as of recent records. Complementing this, the 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, adopted November 14, 1970, and effective from April 24, 1972, targets peacetime illicit trafficking by requiring states to prevent transfers promoting illegal trade, control exports, and promote restitution, ratified by 147 states as of 2025.^[179] Enforcement mechanisms include cooperation via Interpol's Stolen Works of Art database, which facilitates international alerts and recoveries, though empirical data indicate recoveries remain limited, with illegal excavations driving much of the supply undetected by such systems.^[180] Implementation faces systemic challenges rooted in national sovereignty and divergent incentives. Numerous countries, including several in Africa and major market nations with delayed or partial adherence like the United States (implemented via domestic law in 1983 without full ratification), have not fully ratified or enforced these instruments, undermining uniform application.^[181] Economic drivers exacerbate gaps, as black market profits—estimated in billions annually—often exceed penalties, with traffickers exploiting porous borders and weak institutional capacity in source countries. Non-compliance persists in conflict zones, where looting funds insurgencies despite convention prohibitions, as seen in ongoing illicit flows from regions like the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa.^[182] Overall effectiveness remains marginal, with post-1970 artifact trafficking enduring at scale, driven by clandestine excavations that evade inventories and international monitoring. While Interpol operations recover thousands of items annually—such as over 6,400 in a 2024 Europol-led effort—systemic underreporting and the predominance of untraceable looted goods suggest recovery rates below 10% for documented cases, highlighting causal failures in deterrence over prohibition.^[183] These conventions provide frameworks but falter against entrenched incentives, necessitating stronger bilateral enforcement absent binding supranational authority.^[184]

Strategies for Mitigation and Response

Immediate responses to outbreaks of looting emphasize rapid deployment of law enforcement reinforcements and imposition of curfews to curtail opportunistic crime during civil unrest. In the 2020 disturbances across U.S. cities following George Floyd's death on May 25, governors activated the National Guard in over 20 states, mobilizing thousands of troops to protect property and disperse crowds amid widespread arson, vandalism, and theft; for instance, Minnesota deployed 700 personnel specifically trained for such scenarios to address rioting in Minneapolis.^[185] Curfews, enacted in cities including New York, Los Angeles, and Atlanta starting late May 2020, restricted nighttime movement after initial looting surges, with enforcement targeting violations that exacerbated disorder.^[186] ^[187] These measures prioritize physical presence to disrupt ongoing criminal acts, as empirical patterns from unrest events indicate that unchecked escalation correlates with prolonged property damage. Preventive tactics leverage technology and private initiatives to elevate perceived risks for potential looters. Closed-circuit television (CCTV) systems yield consistent reductions in property offenses, including theft and burglary; a systematic review of 40 years of studies found modest overall crime drops, with effects strongest for vehicle-related property crimes (up to 51% in monitored parking areas) due to enhanced detection and evidence collection.^[188] ^[189] Private security deployments, such as perimeter patrols and visible guards, deter intrusions by signaling active defense, as evidenced in 2020 riot preparations where businesses fortified sites against vandalism and theft through uniformed presence.^[190] Community watch programs further bolster vigilance, with program evaluations reporting 16% average declines in neighborhood property crimes via resident reporting and informal surveillance.^[191] Long-term deterrence hinges on bolstering the certainty of apprehension over mere penalty harshness, aligning with criminological consensus from meta-analyses that perceived risk of detection—rather than punishment severity—most reliably suppresses opportunistic crimes like looting.^[192] ^[193] Strategies amplifying enforcement reliability, including sustained surveillance integration and proactive policing, thus exhibit greater causal impact than escalatory sentencing alone, as uncertainty in capture undermines rational avoidance of high-reward, low-risk predation.^[194]

References

[1]
What is Looting? - FindLaw
Mar 21, 2019 · Looting, generally, is the crime of stealing during a state of emergency or natural disaster caused by earthquake, hurricane, tornado, fire, or storm.
[2]
Looting Laws - LegalMatch
Looting is defined as taking valuables during a catastrophe, war, or a natural disaster. It is best to contact a criminal defense lawyer right away if you ...
[3]
California Penal Code Section 463 PC: Looting - Kraut Law Group
Looting involving petty theft is a misdemeanor offense that can be punished by up to six months in jail and a minimum sentence of 90 days in jail.
[4]
Looting Defense Attorney In Los Angeles | Perliss Law Firm
Looting is a form of theft that occurs during a state of emergency, such as a natural disaster or riot. It is defined under California Penal Code Section 463.
[5]
loot Definition, Meaning & Usage - Justia Legal Dictionary
The act of stealing on a grand scale, often involving violence or dishonest practices How to use "loot" in a sentence.
[6]
Conflict or consensus? Re-examining crime and disaster - PMC - NIH
Veteran disaster scholars argue that widespread looting only happens during a civil disturbance (riot), because it is a social conflict situation. Conversely, ...
[7]
Looting and antisocial behavior after disasters: a systematic review
Jan 24, 2025 · The purpose of this systematic review is to explore the literature regarding looting after disasters, its different dimensions, and to examine coping ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[8]
The Psychology of Rioting and Looting
Sep 1, 2020 · There are a lot of opinions of what causes rioting and looting. Some are based on the morality of the group, some on the emotional control of ...
[9]
Looting in the context of violent conflict: a conceptualisation and ...
Looting, we are led to believe, constitutes both a cause and a component of contemporary armed conflict and has substantial human costs. Despite the currency of ...
[10]
Shame and the City – 'Looting', Emotions and Social Structure
Feb 1, 2014 · This article develops a theoretical framework that specifies the links between structures, spaces, affects and public violence.
[11]
What Happens if I Get Caught Looting?
May 15, 2020 · Though both involving stealing, looting is unique in the sense that its thievery occurs amidst riots or political, social, or military disasters ...
[12]
Difference between Looting and Stealing | Looting vs Stealing
Stealing generally refers to the activity to take away belongings of the other without permission or legal right, whereas looting is a kind of stealing ...
[13]
Pillage - The Practical Guide to Humanitarian Law
e.v NIAC). It is important to distinguish between pillage, which is always prohibited, and requisition, which is an authorized form of appropriating property.
[14]
Stop Pillage: What is looting? - TRIAL International
May 31, 2016 · International law condemns looting in the context of an armed conflict and considers pillage a war crime. Nevertheless, looting and the ...Missing: requisition | Show results with:requisition
[15]
Loot - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Loot (from Hindi lut, Sanskrit loptram) means "goods taken from an enemy" and "to plunder," originating in Anglo-Indian use, derived from PIE root *reup- ...
[16]
LOOT Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Word History. Etymology. Noun and Verb. Hindi & Urdu lūṭ; akin to Sanskrit luṇṭati he plunders. First Known Use. Noun. circa 1788, in the meaning defined at ...
[17]
Tracing The History Of The Word Loot - Madras Courier
Jun 10, 2022 · The word loot comes from the Hindi word “Lut,” meaning the spoils of war. The Hindi word Lut's origins can be further traced back to the Sanskrit word lotram ...
[18]
Looting - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating in 1842 as a verbal noun from the verb "loot," it means the act or process of stealing or plundering.
[19]
Penal Code 463 PC - California Legislative Information
No information is available for this page. · Learn why
[20]
Etemenanki (the "Tower of Babel") - Livius.org
Oct 12, 2020 · Although he certainly sacked Babylon, it is impossible that his looting soldiers destroyed the Etemenanki. The wholesale destruction of large- ...
[21]
Destruction of Art in War: Fire and Water - ARCAblog
Jan 9, 2014 · He exclaimed that in order to avenge the destruction of Babylon he would reclaim the looted temple treasures taken by the Assyrians.[24] ...
[22]
Attitude of Romans towards defeated - IMPERIUM ROMANUM
Looting. There were rules for plundering in the Roman army. When the city was stormed, all the spoils were divided among the legionaries ...
[23]
Ten Things You Did Not Know About The Roman Legions
Jul 28, 2016 · Once the order was given to stop the massacre, the looting would begin. Half the force would be allowed to loot the town freely while the other ...
[24]
Collections: Logistics, How Did They Do It, Part II: Foraging
Jul 29, 2022 · Sadly we must also note that very frequently the valuables that soldiers looted were people, either to be sold into slavery, held for ransom, ...
[25]
https://www.history.org.uk/primary/resource/3867/the-vikings-in-britain-a-brief-history
[26]
Written sources shed light on Viking travels
Many of the written sources mention plundering and attacks. For example ... They also carried out violent raids in various parts of Europe from the first half of ...
[27]
How Violent Were The Mongols, Really? | by Eric Olaizola - Medium
Jul 21, 2020 · Their many, many conquests provide ample opportunities to see it play out, but the conquest of Khwarezm in 1219 provides a particularly clear ...
[28]
Where are all the riches that were stolen during the Mongol ... - Quora
Nov 30, 2017 · most Mongol loot is in banks in Switzerland. ... But if you're asking about the Mongols in particular, they did invade but after almost a century.
[29]
5. The Mongol Khanates - Open Book Publishers
... Mongols never again bothered with a large-scale invasion. Read more ... In the first part of the thirteenth century, the Mongols invaded almost the ...Missing: 13th artifacts
[30]
The East India Company: The original corporate raiders
Mar 4, 2015 · The long read: For a century, the East India Company conquered, subjugated and plundered vast tracts of south Asia.<|separator|>
[31]
How Britain stole $45 trillion from India | Conflict - Al Jazeera
Dec 19, 2018 · Drawing on nearly two centuries of detailed data on tax and trade, Patnaik calculated that Britain drained a total of nearly $45 trillion from India during the ...
[32]
Did the British loot India? - History Reclaimed
Nov 2, 2022 · The Marxist economist Utsa Patnaik is one of those reviving long-discredited theories for an audience eager to believe that the British 'stole' $45 trillion ...
[33]
DR Congo: King Leopold's legacy – DW – 06/29/2020
Jun 29, 2020 · ... exploitation and violence that Leopold II and colonial ... More than a century of looting and terror began in 1885 when King Leopold II ...Missing: profits quantified
[34]
Did the Ottoman Turks sack and loot Constantinople like they did ...
Jan 5, 2024 · Of course they sacked and looted Constantinople. Those Ottoman soldiers had to be monetarily rewarded for their job.
[35]
Japan's Quest for Power and World War II in Asia
Economic Background Their commitment to the military effort to expand Japanese territory to achieve economic security can be understood partly in these terms. ...
[36]
Japan - Militarism, Imperialism, WWII | Britannica
The notion that expansion through military conquest would solve Japan's economic problems gained currency during the Great Depression of the 1930s.
[37]
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2014/04/degenerate-art-cornelius-gurlitt-munich-apartment
[38]
Returning the Spoils of World War II, Taken by Americans
The thefts from German castles and storage vaults in no way match the scale of Nazi looting, and were undertaken by men who had witnessed the ...
[39]
ARMY SAYS THEFTS IN KOREA WERE BIG - The New York Times
Between Jan. 1, 1951, and last Feb. 9, $5,114,420.25 worth of Army goods were stolen in Korea, according to a report prepared by the Army at the request of ...
[40]
From Military Supplies to Wartime Commodities: The Black Market ...
Jan 1, 2019 · This article examines the global and social processes that turned subsidized US war supplies into South Korean black market commodities during the Korean War.Abstract · The Arrival of Goods as... · Intimate Economy of Wartime...Missing: looting | Show results with:looting
[41]
'A Billion Dollar Racket': the United States, South Vietnam, and ... - jstor
While most historians have discussed corruption as a key factor leading to South Vietnam's downfall, they have not fully analysed the. US and international ...
[42]
Servicemen' Clubs, Black-Marketeering Investigated - CQ Press
Investigators charged the Evanses made thousands of dollars in the Vietnamese black market, sold inferior and overpriced watches and meat to the Army, pocketed ...
[43]
France's little-known history of looting in Algeria - Anadolu Ajansı
Apr 16, 2021 · According to Talilani, looting by colonial France extended to the emirate's palace in the Bab al-Jadid area of Algiers, estimated by historical ...
[44]
[PDF] AFGHANISTAN - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
During the 1990's Afghanistan became the world's largest producer of illicit opium. In 1999, it pro- duced 79% of global illicit opium.
[45]
Laws and Customs of War on Land (Hague IV); October 18, 1907
The pillage of a town or place, even when taken by assault, is prohibited. CHAPTER II Spies. Art. 29. A person can only be considered a spy when, acting ...
[46]
Pillage - Oxford Public International Law
If one turns to legal terminology, and specifically to international law, pillage is often used as a synonym for 'looting' or 'plunder'. A fundamental ...Missing: requisition | Show results with:requisition
[47]
https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e294
[48]
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 ...
This Protocol, which develops and supplements Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 without modifying its existing conditions of ...Missing: looting | Show results with:looting
[49]
[PDF] Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
Article 8 bis4. Crime of aggression. 1. For the purpose of this Statute, “crime of aggression” means the planning, preparation, initiation or execution, by a ...
[50]
[PDF] Elements of Crimes - | International Criminal Court
The perpetrator was aware of factual circumstances that established the existence of an armed conflict. Article 8 (2) (b) (xvi). War crime of pillaging.
[51]
[PDF] Prosecuting Plunder and Pillage Within the Framework of Internal ...
Nov 22, 2022 · 155 There is no doubt pillaging, plunder, looting, banditry, and like crimes are prohibited by domestic law in Rwanda. Moreover, the government ...Missing: requisition | Show results with:requisition
[52]
A Historical and Cultural View of Many Lives of Looting
Nov 27, 2023 · Looting in ancient times was an established and partially legal method of compensating one's army and establishing one's dominance over the ...
[53]
TO THE VICTOR BELONG THE SPOILS - Key Military
Feb 23, 2021 · LEGACY OF EMPIRE. For millennia, pillage by victorious invading armies was accepted as part of warfare. Fiona Keating explores an ongoing ...
[54]
Spoils of war | TheArticle
Mar 16, 2022 · The idea of women as spoils of war is not a 20th-century invention. History is full of them, although very few of these women left written testimonies.
[55]
Economic warfare - Wikipedia
Policies and measures in economic warfare may include blockade, blacklisting, preclusive purchasing, rewards and the capturing or the control of enemy assets or ...
[56]
THE HISTORY OF THE EMERGENCE OF LOOTING AND ITS ...
Aug 7, 2025 · Throughout its history, looting has had a negative effect on all opposing sides in war - an army where looting reigns, is prone to a massive ...
[57]
From Loss to Looting? Battlefield Costs and Rebel Incentives for ...
Aug 13, 2014 · On the one hand, heavy conflict costs may suppress rebel violence; on the other, losses may create short-term incentives for civilian ...
[58]
Foraging and Looting | Encyclopedia.com
Looting involved taking non-food items for non-military uses, and was sanctioned neither by the laws and customs of war nor by officers on either side. This ...
[59]
In war, incentives matter more than courage - The Economist
Jul 10, 2025 · Economists think a lot about incentives—as do soldiers. When Italian cities hired mercenaries to fight their wars in the 15th century, the ...Missing: loot | Show results with:loot
[60]
How would looting work as payment for an army? - Reddit
Feb 2, 2025 · Such looting will probably lead to a breakdown in discipline, so there has to be some sort of rules as to who can take what, and how much can be looted.I need some advice on war tactic - medieval setting : r/WarCollegeWhat exactly was done to 'secure supply lines' during a war? - RedditMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: tactics disrupt
[61]
Iraq museum looting: 15 years on - The University of Sydney
Apr 10, 2018 · On April 10 2003, the first looters broke into the National Museum of Iraq. ... The Baghdad looting has shown that in times of conflict ...
[62]
National Museum Baghdad 10 Years Later - Andrew Lawler
Dec 21, 2024 · The looting of the museum was over less than 48 hours after it began on April 10, 2003. But it was only the start of a decade of disaster for Iraq's cultural ...
[63]
Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago to Examine the Looting ...
As the 2003 invasion of Iraq drew near, excavations were halted and looters drove site guards away. Without adequate weaponry and manpower, guards were unable ...
[64]
Looting Slows the Flow of Iraqi Oil - Los Angeles Times
May 25, 2003 · Across Iraq's once-prolific fields, pipelines have been shot full of holes, pump stations and gas separators stripped of parts, control rooms ...
[65]
Iraq's Oil Sector One Year After Liberation - Brookings Institution
... Iraq: the failure to secure Iraq's oil infrastructure against insurgent attack. A sabotage campaign against Iraq's 4,300-mile pipeline system has crippled ...
[66]
Iraq's Oil Shock - Global Policy Forum
Jan 17, 2006 · ... Iraq's pipelines have been attacked nearly 300 times since mid-2003. Repeated insurgent attacks are preventing Iraq's oil ministry from ...Missing: seizures | Show results with:seizures
[67]
Inside ISIS' looted antiquities trade - The Conversation
May 30, 2016 · For excavators – archaeologists, but also looters like the Islamic State, or ISIS – the opportunity for discovery in modern Iraq and Syria ...Missing: organized 2014-2019
[68]
[PDF] Antiquities Destruction and Illicit Sales as Sources of ISIS Funding ...
Apr 3, 2017 · The work may also be useful in considering future conflicts beyond Iraq and Syria where antiquities loot- ing and terrorist financing and ...Missing: 2014-2019 | Show results with:2014-2019
[69]
[PDF] CULTURAL PROPERTY: Protection of Iraqi and Syrian Antiquities
Aug 15, 2016 · For more information, contact Thomas Melito at (202) 512-9601 or melitot@gao.gov. Why GAO Did This Study. The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. ( ...
[70]
ISIS Looting and Destroying Cultural Artifacts on 'Unprecedented ...
Apr 19, 2016 · The Financial Services Task Force to Investigate Terror Financing held a hearing today to examine the best ways to counter the plunder and sale of priceless ...Missing: 2014-2019 credible
[71]
[PDF] IS and Cultural Genocide: Antiquities Trafficking in the Terrorist State
The authors describe trafficking and destruction of antiquities for dual purpose: to fund armed groups and organized crime, but also wanton destruction that ...Missing: 2014-2019 | Show results with:2014-2019<|separator|>
[72]
Tracking where Russia is taking Ukraine's stolen grain - BBC
Jun 26, 2022 · There's mounting evidence that Russian forces in occupied areas of Ukraine have been systematically stealing grain and other produce from ...Missing: looting | Show results with:looting
[73]
Satellite images appear to show Russian ships loading up ... - CNN
May 23, 2022 · Two Russia-flagged bulk carrier ships are shown docking and loading up with what is believed to be stolen Ukrainian grain in the images.Missing: looting eyewitness
[74]
Satellite photos appear to show Russian ships stealing Ukrainian ...
May 26, 2022 · Satellites in space have caught Russian ships allegedly stealing Ukrainian grain through Crimea, Ukraine Business News reported on May 25.
[75]
Satellite images of Russian theft of Ukrainian grain emerge - Insajderi
ISatellite images from Crimea show Russian ships suspected of loading stolen grain from Ukraine. The images were captured using Maxar Technologies ...
[76]
https://daily.jstor.org/did-the-1965-watts-riots-change-anything/
[77]
Did The 1965 Watts Riots Change Anything? - JSTOR Daily
Jul 13, 2016 · ... Watts neighborhood of Los Angeles exploded into urban unrest. Six days later, 34 people were dead and property damage totaled $40 million.<|separator|>
[78]
Exclusive: $1 billion-plus riot damage is most expensive in ... - Axios
eclipsing the record ...
[79]
How 2020 protests changed insurance forever
Feb 22, 2021 · In 2020, the George Floyd protests became the first civil disorder catastrophe event to exceed $1 billion in losses to the insurance industry.
[80]
Demonstrations and Political Violence in America: New Data for ...
or approximately 5% — involve demonstrators engaging in violence. Well over 80% of all demonstrations are connected to the ...
[81]
[PDF] Crowd psychology, policing and interactional dynamics - Seattle.gov
May 13, 2022 · These interactional dynamics also appear to have underpinned the emergence of periodic opportunist looting and destruction. • Thus, during the ...
[82]
U.S. assessment finds opportunists drive protest violence ... - Reuters
Jun 3, 2020 · An intelligence assessment offers limited evidence that organized extremists are behind the turmoil.
[83]
AP analysis: Most arrested in US protests aren't leftist radicals
Oct 30, 2020 · They scrutinized the arrest records of every person charged in federal court with protest-related crimes, delivering an important accountability story.
[84]
[PDF] MCCA Report on the 2020 Protests and Civil Unrest
Figure 7 - Percentage of Agencies that Experienced Looting, Arson, and Rioting. Looting was also a common occurrence (2,385 instances), with 62% of major ...
[85]
Why People Are Looting at George Floyd Protests - The Atlantic
Jun 2, 2020 · Still, “the looting that takes place in these situations is usually interpreted as evidence of human depravity,” the sociologists Russell Dynes ...
[86]
Feds warn 'violent opportunists' infiltrating George Floyd protests ...
Jun 3, 2020 · The Department of Homeland Security is warning "violent opportunists" are infiltrating George Floyd protests, targeting police.<|separator|>
[87]
Opportunism and dissatisfaction with police drove rioters, study finds
Nov 3, 2011 · The report studied the motivations of young people in five riot-affected areas and two areas in which there was no disorder, seeking to ...Missing: survey | Show results with:survey
[88]
[PDF] Understanding the involvement of young people - DMSS Research
Young people were motivated to get involved in rioting or looting by what they thought they might gain, but whether they chose to get involved or not was.
[89]
[PDF] Shopping for free?: looting, consumerism and the 2011 England riots
Our core argument is that there is more to understanding the motivations of those involved in the 2011 riots than can be captured by consumer culture. That said ...
[90]
Court records, FBI contradict Trump's claims of organized 'antifa-led ...
Dec 20, 2020 · When the riots began, Rupert posted on Facebook his intentions to travel to Minneapolis to "start a riot," inviting any "goons" who wanted to ...
[91]
George Floyd protesters condemn 'opportunistic' looting and violence
May 31, 2020 · George Floyd protesters condemn 'opportunistic' looting and violence ... “I don't think the looting and rioting is being done in George Floyd's ...Missing: data | Show results with:data
[92]
Trump Calls Governors Weak, Urging Them To 'Dominate' To Quell ...
Jun 1, 2020 · Trump Calls Governors Weak, Urging Them To 'Dominate' To Quell Violence ... Attorney General Steps Up Federal Law Enforcement Response To Protests.
[93]
[PDF] DRC Working Paper #71 LOOTING IN DISASTER - UDSpace
Aug 28, 1984 · a fascinating change at the present time in who loots and how they loot!) Nonetheless, the theme of widespread looting is still advanced. Thus, ...
[94]
[PDF] Looting After a Disaster: A Myth or Reality? - Natural Hazards Center
Mar 4, 2007 · An argument in the disaster literature contends that looting does not occur after natural disasters, such as hurricanes or earthquakes, but that ...
[95]
Disaster Realities in the Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina - UDSpace
Issues regarding instances of looting or appropriating behavior that occurred in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina are discussed.
[96]
Disaster Mythology and Fact: Hurricane Katrina and Social Attachment
Myth #4: Disasters bring out the worst in people (e.g., looting, rioting). Fact: While there are isolated cases of antisocial behavior, which tend to be ...
[97]
https://crhnet.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/AufderHeide.2004.Common_misconceptions_about_disasters.pdf
[98]
[PDF] Panic, the “Disaster Syndrome,” and Looting
Common Misconceptions about Disasters: Panic, the “Disaster Syndrome,” and Looting. 343. Rarity of Panic. Because this combination of conditions is so uncommon ...
[99]
Looting Flares Where Authority Breaks Down - The New York Times
Jan 16, 2010 · The looting took place a few blocks from the Civil Prison, which had collapsed in the quake, freeing all the inmates who were not killed. But no ...
[100]
Looting rumors and fear of crime often exaggerated after natural ...
Sep 1, 2017 · Tales of looting and gun-toting criminals in Houston have spread on social media in the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey, often false.
[101]
Looting or Community Solidarity? Reconciling Distorted Post ...
Mar 2, 2023 · Field studies have shown that when looting does occur after a hurricane, it is often perpetrated by people looking for emergency survival needs.Missing: riots | Show results with:riots
[102]
Haiti's Chaos: Running with the Looters in Port-au-Prince
Jan 19, 2010 · After the earthquake, Port-au-Prince was in ruins with looting and violence, including police shots, slowing aid delivery. Police are ...
[103]
These Art Sleuths Are Taking on Traffickers in a $10 Billion Black ...
Apr 19, 2022 · The illicit trade of cultural goods is big business. Upper estimates of the market's annual value reach nearly $10 billion. That number ...
[104]
The illicit trade in antiquities is not the world's third-largest illicit trade
Jun 29, 2023 · The claim that the illicit trade in antiquities is the third largest, second only to arms and narcotics, is widely repeated.
[105]
Batán Grande - Trafficking Culture
May 20, 2014 · The looting of the huacas at Batán Grande appears to have started in earnest in the early 1900s when the hacienda was owned by Juan José Aurich ...
[106]
[PDF] Catastrophe! The Looting and Destruction of Iraq's Past
It documents looting of sites with a series of aerial photos as well as photos of looters at work. A central section illustrates the importance of ...
[107]
Detecting Looting Activity through Earth Observation Multi-Temporal ...
Aug 11, 2020 · In this study, we focus on the archaeological site of Apamea (Syria) during the period 2011–2012, aiming to capture (known) looting activity ...
[108]
https://roosevelt-group.org/quick-takes/should-we-repatriate-museum-artefacts-ethics-and-concerns
[109]
Should we repatriate museum artefacts?: Ethics and Concerns
May 25, 2020 · Critics of repatriation debate have cited is the security risks associated with returning colonial artefacts. Many source communities demanding ...
[110]
Looting: The Economic Underworld of Bankruptcy for Profit | Brookings
In the United States, large numbers of government-insured savings and loans became insolvent-and the government picked up the tab. In Dallas, Texas, real estate ...
[111]
[PDF] Looting: The Economic Underworld of Bankruptcy for Profit
Jun 21, 1993 · Second, we examine detailed accounts of the savings and loan crisis for indications that looting did indeed take place. ... Street Journal, and, ...
[112]
[PDF] The Savings and Loan Crisis and Its Relationship to Banking - FDIC
The final cost of resolving failed S&Ls is estimated at just over $160 billion, in- cluding $132 billion from federal taxpayers67Šand much of this cost could ...
[113]
Enron scandal | Summary, Explained, History, & Facts | Britannica
Sep 26, 2025 · Transferring those assets to SPEs meant that they were kept off Enron's books, making its losses look less severe than they really were.Missing: looting stripping
[114]
Enron Scandal and Accounting Fraud: What Happened?
Enron's Bankruptcy and Criminal Charges · In June 2002, Arthur Andersen LLP was found guilty of obstructing justice for shredding Enron's financial documents.Missing: looting stripping
[115]
How 'shock therapy' created Russian oligarchs and paved the path ...
Mar 22, 2022 · In the 1990s, reformers adopted a radical economic program in Russia. It devastated ordinary Russians and created a new class of oligarchs.
[116]
The 1990s to Today: How Privatization Shaped Modern-day Russia
The government “loaned” Russia's wealthy shares in 12 major state-owned businesses in exchange for money, around $800 million in total. The loans for shares ...
[117]
[PDF] Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach
They are willful homicide, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, and auto theft. Page 10. GARY S. BECKER.
[118]
Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach Gary S. Becker - jstor
A Theory of Collusion. The theory developed in this essay can be applied to any effort to preclude certain kinds of behavior, regardless of whether the ...
[119]
[PDF] Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach
The method used formulates a measure of the social loss from offenses and finds those expenditures of resources and punishments that minimize this loss. The ...
[120]
[PDF] Opportunity Makes the Thief: A Practical Theory for Crime Prevention
Rational choice theory has an image of the offender who thinks before he acts, even if only for a moment, taking into account some benefits and costs in ...
[121]
The issues – cultural property - Interpol
There is a lucrative black market in cultural property with strong links to organized crime.
[122]
Scrolling Through Antiquities: INTERPOL ID-Art App
Aug 9, 2021 · In 2020, UNESCO estimated that the illicit trade in cultural goods was worth approximately 10 billion dollars, though it is hard to assign ...
[123]
An Economic Approach to Riot Analysis - jstor
these urban riots apparently consisted of a large number of almost entirely unrelated events such as the willful destruction of property, looting, beatings, and.
[124]
[PDF] Justice-Seeking and Loot-Seeking in Civil War
In Section 2 we develop a simple rational choice model of loot-motivated rebellion in which private costs are equated with private benefits, and propose ...
[125]
Deindividuation in Psychology: Definition & Examples
Oct 24, 2023 · Deindividuation refers to a psychological state where one feels anonymity and a diminished sense of self-awareness and evaluation apprehension.
[126]
Deindividuation - The Decision Lab
American psychologist Philip Zimbardo argued that anonymity, emotional arousal, and a diffusion of personal responsibility could work together to erode self- ...Start Your Behavior Change... · Controversies · The Stanford Prison...
[127]
Deindividualization Definition, History & Examples - Study.com
Deindividuation that transgresses social norms, such as rioting and looting, impedes conformity. Prosocial instances of deindividuation, such as helping ...
[128]
Crowds, obedience, and the psychology of group behavior
What can we learn from reexamining some of the classic psychology studies on obedience and authority, such as the Milgram shock experiments and the Stanford ...Missing: looting parallels
[129]
The six forms of resistance shown by participants in Milgram's ...
Feb 25, 2015 · Comparing participants who ultimately obeyed all the way to the highest shock, and those who refused to complete the experiment, there are some ...
[130]
Mob Mentality & The Psychology of Crowd Behavior
Three psychological theories address crowd behavior. First is Contagion Theory, proposes that crowds exert a hypnotic influence on their members.
[131]
Anomie Theory in Sociology - Simply Psychology
Oct 9, 2025 · Durkheim famously explored anomie in his study Suicide (1897). He argued that suicide rates are influenced by social forces, not just personal ...
[132]
Concept of Anomie (Durkheim) - SozTheo
Theory. Durkheim developed the concept of anomie to explain the social pathologies associated with early industrialization, particularly rising suicide rates.
[133]
Anomie - Durkheim - Studocu
Rating 5.0 (3) The London riots of 2011 are a prime example of anomie in modern society. ... riots such as looting shops and violence. However, the explanation for the ...
[134]
Rethinking the Riots; How Do We Really See Class? (UPDATE)
Aug 16, 2011 · The sociologist in me fantasizes of a post-riot 10 question survey to be distributed to all rioters immediately after completion of law breaking ...
[135]
[PDF] the precariat: outbursts of crime, such as the 2011 london riots, can ...
Criminology should perhaps reconsider structural inequality and its effect, an argument which was first advanced by Durkheim (1982). Riots remain complex ...
[136]
BLM organizer who called looting 'reparations' doubles down
Aug 13, 2020 · Ariel Atkins told WBEZ that her group "100 percent" supports the violent looters who trashed chunks of Chicago.
[137]
One Author's Controversial View: 'In Defense Of Looting' - NPR
Aug 27, 2020 · In her provocative book, writer Vicky Osterweil argues that looting is a tool to bring about change in society.
[138]
In Defense of Looting | The Anarchist Library
... looting” I am committing an anachronism. As we saw, loot does not appear as an English word until 1845, and the word looter first appeared in 1858.
[139]
Property-Based Ethics - Dissent Magazine
Dec 10, 2014 · John Locke's 1689 discussion of property in his ... The intense distress over looting and property destruction follow in this same vein.
[140]
A year after riots, 35 of 270 impacted St. Paul businesses remain ...
May 30, 2021 · The Midway has seen its share of all of the above since the riots, but few real estate investors can say they watched the looting of their ...
[141]
[PDF] The effect of the 2011 London riots on crime, policing and ...
Mar 9, 2013 · The riots lasted from August 6 to August 10 and led to frequent looting, arson and rioting in several boroughs in London as well as in ...
[142]
Why do people riot? Examining rioter motivations and the role of the ...
Nov 18, 2024 · ... civil unrest and rioting of the past, appear to be converging. The most recent riots in Britian are therefore somewhat unsurprising given ...
[143]
Spatiotemporal Patterns and Driving Factors on Crime Changing ...
Oct 27, 2020 · In summary, protests are likely to trigger rises in crime while those rises depend on crime type. Locations where protests occur are more prone ...Missing: riots | Show results with:riots
[144]
[PDF] Pandemic, Social Unrest, and Crime in U.S. Cities
2020. 'Peaceful protests got hijacked': Some criminals used George Floyd protests as cover for looting, police say. USA Today (June 15).
[145]
Riots following George Floyd's death could cost up to $2B
Sep 16, 2020 · The potentially record-setting insured losses piled up as the demonstrations sometimes descended into looting, arson and vandalism in more than ...
[146]
Civil Unrest Who Was Prepared for This? - AM Best News
... George Floyd's death on May 25. Floyd died while being restrained by ... The French “yellow vest” protests caused roughly $90 million in insured losses ...
[147]
The Epic Gold Heists that Financed the War for Hitler
Feb 11, 2016 · ... Europe's Bullion, what Hitler looted from several countries would be worth $19 billion today. Taber, a former business editor of Time ...Missing: economic | Show results with:economic
[148]
Coverage Dispute over 2020 Civil Unrest Shows "Occurrence ...
Sep 1, 2021 · According to a recent report, the civil unrest in the summer of 2020 following the murder of George Floyd cost insurers around $2 billion, and ...<|separator|>
[149]
Psychological Distress Among Domestic Burglary Victims - NIH
Based on these studies, we know that many domestic burglary victims experience feelings of anger, annoyance, fear, and depression in response to the burglary, ...
[150]
A 'Rooftop Korean' reveals what it was really like during the '92 riots
Jun 22, 2025 · “When you're up on the roof, every Korean thinks differently.” Read More. Filed under. california · LA riots 2025 · los angeles · protests ...
[151]
Korean American-Black conflict during L.A. riots was ... - NBC News
Apr 29, 2022 · As Korean immigrants began to occupy many of the businesses in South Central left by Jewish owners in the aftermath of the Watts riots of 1965 — ...
[152]
The spread of disorder – a repost in wake of London's riot cleanup
Aug 9, 2011 · Yesterday, I watched as hundreds of Londoners took to the streets in a heroic attempt to clean up the mess caused by rioters and looters the
[153]
Riots 10 years on: The five summer nights when London burned - BBC
Aug 5, 2021 · ... civil unrest in decades ... Police have condemned a wave of "copycat criminal activity" across London in a second night of looting and disorder.
[154]
Criminals used George Floyd protests as cover for looting, police say
Jun 15, 2020 · Luxury stores ransacked, some miles from demonstrations · What spurred the looting? · Can looting be an act of protest? · 'They need to hear our ...
[155]
Social proximity and the erosion of norm compliance - ScienceDirect
Without social proximity, norm compliance erodes quickly. With social proximity, people conform to both norm violations and compliance, halting the erosion.
[156]
[PDF] Crime and Erosion of Trust - IDB Publications
Widespread crime weakens trust between citizens and institutions, undermining government reform and development. It also increases fear and distrust, and ...<|separator|>
[157]
How the 1960s' Riots Hurt African-Americans | NBER
These damaging aspects of riots, the authors find, apparently outweighed outside assistance directed toward the riot areas in the wake of the disturbances. -- ...
[158]
(PDF) The Economic Aftermath of the 1960s Riots in American Cities
Aug 6, 2025 · Both OLS and IV estimates indicate that the riots depressed the median value of black-owned property between 1960 and 1970, with little or no ...
[159]
The Labor Market Effects of the 1960s Riots - Project MUSE
But other, and potentially much larger, effects may be indirect. A riot might alter the course of a city's economy by influencing the economic decisions of ...
[160]
Rates rise following surge in civil unrest - Business Insurance
Feb 5, 2024 · Rates rise following surge in civil unrest ... The market for strike, riot and civil commotion insurance has seen double-digit rate increases and ...
[161]
How Stock Markets Respond to Social Unrest
May 10, 2021 · What happens to stock markets when social unrest—such as mass protests and riots—occurs? Are investors scared-off by the disorder?Missing: capital flight studies
[162]
Relative strength and foreign direct investment in civil conflicts
Oct 16, 2023 · ... investors face significant risks in areas impacted by conflict and violence. ... deterring effects of violence on foreign investments ...
[163]
Expedition Magazine | Archaeological Looting - Penn Museum
Rather, our very strong concern is because the looting of archaeological remains destroys those sites without any record whatsoever, let alone any record of the ...
[164]
Ancient Archaeology: How We All Lose from Looting - theGIST
Apr 14, 2018 · In this way, local communities suffer from looting and even lose their chance to engage with their heritage in a sustainable way. Criminal ...
[165]
“The looting of cultural heritage has been happening since ... - WCO
The looting of cultural heritage has been happening since the very existence of cultural heritage, it is not anything new, but what we see now is that looting ...
[166]
[PDF] The long-run impact of the 1968 Washington, DC civil disturbance
Jul 9, 2020 · This paper studies the urban development impacts of the civil disturbances that took place in Wash- ington, DC following the assassination ...
[167]
Large-Scale Urban Riots and Residential Segregation: A Case ...
Mar 3, 2016 · For segregation, the findings reveal that riots have largely short-term effects, with the longer-term effects concentrated in the suburbs of ...
[168]
After riots: Toward a research agenda on the long-term effects of ...
Apr 15, 2021 · One youth worker described how the 1985 riots live on in the present as “mythic.” This mythical nature of riot memories allows for political and ...
[169]
California Penal Code § 463 (2024) - Justia Law
... looting, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for one year or pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170. Any person convicted under this ...
[170]
Penal Code § 463 PC - California "Looting" Laws - Shouse Law Group
Oct 9, 2025 · Looting can be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony and is punishable by up to 3 years in jail. 463 PC states that “…Every person who violates ...What is the legal definition of... · What are the penalties under...
[171]
What Happens If You're Accused of Looting During a State of ...
Jun 13, 2025 · However, under CS/HB 549, any theft during a State of Emergency can be charged as a first-degree felony. This is known as an enhancement. An ...Missing: United | Show results with:United
[172]
Federal Criminal Theft Laws | Congress.gov
Feb 20, 2025 · Offenses involving property of greater value may be punished by fines and up to 10 years of imprisonment. Another statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2112, ...
[173]
Over 300 People Facing Federal Charges For Crimes Committed ...
Sep 24, 2020 · Over 300 people facing federal charges for crimes committed during nationwide demonstrations. Thursday, September 24, 2020.
[174]
DOJ accelerates federal crackdown on looting and vandalism - Politico
Jun 4, 2020 · Having charged more than two dozen people already, DOJ is following through on a vow to go after crimes committed amid the peaceful protests.
[175]
Theft Act 1968 - Legislation.gov.uk
(2)A person guilty of robbery, or of an assault with intent to rob, shall on conviction on indictment be liable to imprisonment for life.Cookies on Legislation.gov.uk · Open Act without Schedules · Section 12 · Section 9
[176]
Theft Act Offences | The Crown Prosecution Service
Sep 9, 2022 · Allocation and Penalty Robbery is indictable only, punishable with life imprisonment or an unlimited fine or both.Missing: enforcement | Show results with:enforcement
[177]
Theft from a shop or stall - Sentencing Council
Triable either way. Maximum: 7 years' custody (except for an offence of low-value shoplifting which is treated as a summary only offence in accordance with ...
[178]
What Are the Penalties for Looting? - FindLaw
Mar 21, 2019 · Generally, the penalties for looting in any given state will be the same or similar to the penalties for stealing.
[179]
Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of
The High Contracting Parties undertake to prepare in time of peace for the safeguarding of cultural property situated within their own territory against the ...Text · Opened for signature · States Parties · Declarations and Reservations
[180]
Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit
(a) To prevent by all appropriate means transfers of ownership of cultural property likely to promote the illicit import or export of such property; (b) To ...Text · States Parties · Declarations and Reservations · Territorial Application
[181]
Stolen Works of Art Database - Interpol
The Stolen Works of Art database is our main tool to tackle the traffic in cultural property. Our database of stolen works of art combines descriptions and ...
[182]
UNTC - UN.org.
Convention on the means of prohibiting and preventing the illicit import, export and transfer of ownership of cultural property ... 14/11/1970. EIF ...
[183]
[PDF] uncovering the scale and scope of trafficking in cultural property
Oct 14, 2022 · The closest is Interpol's Stolen Works of Art database. ... The data highlight a limitation of databases based on reported stolen objects.
[184]
85 arrests and over 6 400 objects recovered during annual ... - Europol
Jul 19, 2024 · Led by Spain (Guardia Civil), with the support of Europol and INTERPOL, the operation led to the arrest of 85 persons and recovery of over 6 400 cultural goods.Missing: looted statistics
[185]
Why There is Still an Illicit Trade in Cultural Objects and What We ...
Nov 7, 2021 · The illicit trade in cultural objects endures, with harmful consequences to local communities, knowledge acquisition, and archaeological landscapes and objects.<|separator|>
[186]
[PDF] The National Guard's Response to COVID-19 - HHS.gov
For instance, in Minnesota at the time of the George Floyd protests, 700 troops had been trained for civil unrest, and all of them were deployed to respond in ...
[187]
Curfews go into effect in cities around the country as George Floyd ...
May 30, 2020 · The news comes after the city declared the protest an "unlawful assembly" and police reported "rioting and looting" throughout downtown, telling ...
[188]
George Floyd protest updates: Cities impose curfews - CNBC
Jun 1, 2020 · Atlanta mayor imposes overnight curfew. Riot police hold a line near a damaged Atlanta Police cars as people protest against the death in ...
[189]
CCTV Surveillance for Crime Prevention: A 40-Year Systematic ...
The findings show that CCTV is associated with a significant and modest decrease in crime. The largest and most consistent effects of CCTV were observed in car ...
[190]
https://www.securitymagazine.com/articles/94143-security-tactics-for-protecting-businesses-during-riots
[191]
Security tactics for protecting businesses during riots | 2020-12-11
Dec 11, 2020 · Positioning your security team around the perimeter of the property and having them present themselves to rioters in an authoritative manner can ...Missing: preventing | Show results with:preventing
[192]
The Effect of Neighborhood Watch Programs on ... - Scholars' Bank
between neighborhood watch programs and crime. The mean effect size of this analysis showed that crime decreased by 16 percent in the experimental area.
[193]
Can criminology sway the public? How empirical findings about ...
Dec 18, 2024 · ... summary of key findings from criminology on deterrence theory and the severity and certainty of punishment. More specifically, this summary ...
[194]
[PDF] Deterrence in Criminal Justice - Antonio Casella
General Deterrence: Theory and Evidence,” Criminology, 39(4), 2001. Page 7. DETERRENCE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE |EVALUATING CERTAINTY VERSUS SEVERITY OF PUNISHMENT.
[195]
https://oxfordre.com/criminology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264079-e-248