Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Labial fusion

Labial fusion, also known as labial adhesion or synechia vulvae, is a benign condition characterized by the partial or complete adherence of the , often near the , which may cover the vaginal and urethral openings. It primarily affects prepubertal girls aged 3 months to 6 years, with peak incidence between 1 and 2 years, occurring in up to 2% of this population due to low levels that make vulvar tissues more prone to and sticking. The condition is rarer in adults but can occur postpartum or postmenopause in hypoestrogenic states. The involves of the vulvar mucosa in the absence of sufficient , leading to the fusion of delicate, moist surfaces; factors such as poor , irritant exposure (e.g., perfumed soaps), or underlying may contribute by causing initial irritation. Most cases are and discovered incidentally during routine exams, but symptomatic presentations include post-void urinary dribbling, , recurrent urinary tract s, or vaginal spotting from trapped discharge. relies on clinical , with no need for imaging or laboratory tests unless complications like are suspected. Treatment is conservative for cases, as approximately 80% resolve spontaneously within a year and nearly all by with rising levels. Symptomatic adhesions are managed with topical cream applied twice daily for 1-2 weeks, achieving separation in about 90% of cases, or alternatively with mild ointments; manual separation under or surgical is reserved for refractory or severe fusions. Recurrence affects 11-14% of treated cases, often prevented by ongoing practices like gentle cleaning with water and application of . Complications are uncommon but include or infections if untreated.

Overview

Definition

Labial fusion, also referred to as labial , is defined as the partial or complete of the , the inner lips of the , which may seal the vaginal introitus to varying degrees and typically occurs in the midline, often extending from the posterior toward the but sparing the clitoris itself; involvement of the is uncommon. In normal vulvar anatomy, the consist of thin, delicate folds of mucosal tissue that lie medial to the and flank the vaginal opening and urethral meatus, serving to protect these structures. The in labial fusion generally occurs as a midline fusion in the vulvar region, often mediated by a thin layer of fibrotic tissue that bridges the opposed mucosal surfaces. Common synonyms for labial fusion include synechia vulvae, labial agglutination, and fused labia. The term "synechia" originates from the Greek word synécheia, meaning "holding together" or "adhesion," reflecting the pathological union of tissues. Labial fusion is classified as partial when it forms a thin membranous covering over only a portion of the introitus, or complete when it results in a full seal across the vaginal opening, resembling a zipper-like closure. It can further be categorized as primary, occurring without prior episodes of separation, or recurrent, where adhesions reform after initial resolution. This condition primarily affects prepubertal girls, particularly those aged 3 months to 6 years, but it also occurs in postmenopausal women associated with .

Epidemiology

Labial fusion, also known as labial adhesion, has a reported ranging from 0.6% to 5% among prepubertal s, with some studies estimating it at up to 2%. The condition is exclusively observed in s, as it involves the fusion of the , a structure unique to . Incidence data indicate an overall rate of approximately 1-2% in pediatric populations, with a peak incidence of 1.8% to 3.3% occurring between 13 and 23 months of age. The condition is most common in infants and toddlers aged 3 months to 6 years, becoming rare in adolescents due to the rise in endogenous levels that promote spontaneous resolution. It also occurs in postmenopausal women, where exact rates remain unclear but are linked to estrogen deficiency states; however, such cases are notably rarer than in prepubertal girls. No significant geographic or ethnic variations have been reported in the literature, with worldwide incidence presumed similar to that in the United States, though underdiagnosis may occur in resource-limited settings due to limited access to pediatric examinations. Recurrence rates following range from 11.6% to 14%, with the potential for higher rates in the absence of adequate follow-up. Epidemiological trends for labial fusion have remained stable over recent decades, with post-2000 studies reporting consistent and incidence figures comparable to earlier data.

Clinical features

Signs and symptoms

Labial fusion is most commonly , with the majority of cases discovered incidentally during routine physical examinations in prepubertal girls. In these instances, the condition presents without noticeable discomfort or functional impairment, with estimated at less than 2% among girls before . Physically, labial fusion manifests as a thin, translucent or fibrotic adhering the together, often in the midline, starting at the posterior and potentially obscuring the vaginal opening or urethral to varying degrees. The may appear as a fine line or bridge of , ranging from partial coverage (30-50% of the ) in mild cases to near-complete in severe ones, without upon unless is present. When symptomatic, labial fusion can lead to urinary issues such as , , or urine pooling behind the adhesion, resulting in frequent urinary tract infections. Vulvar symptoms may include irritation, spotting from friction, recurrent vulvovaginitis, or soreness, particularly if urine becomes trapped. In severe cases, complete fusion may cause acute or . Severity influences symptom likelihood, with mild fusions often remaining asymptomatic while complete fusions more frequently produce obstructive urinary symptoms or discomfort. Age-specific presentations vary: in toddlers aged 3 months to 6 years, parents may notice a "sealed" vulvar appearance during or changes, potentially with ; in postmenopausal women, symptoms can include vulvar discomfort, urinary incontinence-like leakage, or during due to dryness and .

Complications

Labial fusion can lead to (UTIs) due to urine pooling behind the adhesions, which creates an environment conducive to . In symptomatic cases, with a history of urinary tract infection in approximately 33% of affected girls, with higher rates observed in those with complete or thick adhesions compared to partial or thin ones. Vulvovaginitis is another common complication, resulting from trapped moisture and bacterial proliferation in the adhered area, often manifesting as vulvar redness, irritation, and abnormal discharge. Urinary obstruction represents a rare but serious complication, particularly in cases of complete labial fusion, where it can cause acute , bladder distention, or even due to impaired outflow. Such obstructions are more likely in severe adhesions that fully occlude the vaginal or urethral introitus, potentially leading to backpressure on the upper urinary tract if untreated. In rare adult cases of labial fusion, may arise, including from painful intercourse or challenges with personal hygiene due to the fused . Postmenopausal women are particularly susceptible to increased risk, exacerbated by atrophic vulvar changes and low levels, which can worsen adhesions and promote recurrent infections. The psychological impact of labial fusion is generally minimal in asymptomatic but can include parental anxiety over the appearance or potential health issues, as well as occasional in symptomatic cases. Long-term risks involve that may lead to further scarring and, very rarely, progression to more extensive adhesions if underlying factors like poor persist.

Etiology and pathophysiology

Causes

Labial fusion, also known as labial adhesions, primarily arises from , a state of low levels that predisposes the vulvar s to thinning and reduced , making them vulnerable to adhesion formation. In prepubertal girls, this occurs following the postnatal decline in maternal shortly after birth, leading to a hypoestrogenic environment that persists until . Similarly, in postmenopausal women, the sharp drop in endogenous production contributes to atrophic changes in the , often manifesting as , which heightens the risk of fusion. This deficiency subtly alters vulvar integrity, facilitating adherence when combined with other irritants. Irritation and inflammation of the vulvar play a central role in precipitating labial fusion by causing of the surface layers, allowing the opposed to adhere during . Common sources include , which exposes the area to constant moisture and from , and poor practices that permit fecal or residue buildup. Diaper rash in infants and toddlers further exacerbates this through chronic moisture and , while vulvovaginitis—often nonspecific in prepubertal children—promotes inflammatory microtrauma. Mechanical factors, such as from tight clothing, aggressive wiping, or exposure to irritating substances like bubble baths and harsh soaps, can similarly denude the delicate skin and initiate the process. Infectious contributors, including bacterial or yeast infections, intensify vulvar and are frequently implicated in recurrent cases, particularly when is suboptimal or in the presence of predisposing factors like use. Other associated risks encompass dermatological conditions like , a rare but notable inflammatory disorder that can lead to scarring and fusion, especially in postmenopausal women. Conditions like diabetes mellitus may also heighten susceptibility by promoting infections and poor tissue healing. Labial fusion is multifactorial, involving an interplay of and local irritants rather than any single . In postmenopausal cases, additional factors like diminished sexual activity may contribute by reducing natural and increasing friction-related irritation.

Pathophysiological mechanisms

Labial fusion, also known as labial adhesions, primarily develops in a hypoestrogenic state where deficiency plays a central role in altering vulvar tissue integrity. The exact remains unknown, and while hypoestrogenism is widely implicated, a 2007 study found no significant differences in serum levels between affected prepubertal girls and controls, suggesting other factors may play a primary role. normally maintains the thickness of the vulvar and promotes , preventing fragility and microtears in the labia minora mucosa. In its absence, such as during the prepubertal or postmenopausal periods, the epithelium becomes thin and prone to irritation-induced damage, facilitating the initial pathological changes. The formation process begins with vulvar , often triggered by irritants, leading to of the superficial epithelial layer and exposure of underlying raw surfaces. These denuded areas, particularly on the opposing , become apposed due to the natural anatomical positioning in a relaxed state, promoting direct contact along the midline. During healing, an inflammatory cascade ensues, involving release and activation of fibroblasts that drive excessive deposition and , resulting in the fusion of tissues without intervening . The hypoestrogenic environment further impairs normal and epithelial regeneration, perpetuating the . Adhesions typically initiate as partial synechiae, forming a thin membrane that may thicken over time if untreated, potentially progressing to complete occlusion of the vaginal introitus. In prepubertal cases, this progression is influenced by ongoing low estrogen levels, but the condition often resolves spontaneously with the pubertal estrogen surge, which restores epithelial health and disrupts the fibrotic bonds. In postmenopausal women, a similar hypoestrogenic atrophy contributes to adhesion development. Histologically, labial fusions exhibit a thin layer of overlying fibrotic adhesions, characterized by collagen-rich without evidence of neoplastic changes or . The midline predominance arises from the anatomical apposition of the , where pressure and contact are maximal in hypoestrogenic states, favoring symmetric fusion.

Diagnosis

Clinical evaluation

The clinical evaluation of labial fusion begins with a detailed history-taking, where parental reports often highlight urinary symptoms such as post-void dribbling, recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs), or difficulties with hygiene, though many cases are discovered incidentally during routine well-child visits. The age of onset is typically between 3 months and 6 years, with a peak incidence around 13 to 23 months, and a history of recurrence may be noted if prior episodes were untreated or resolved spontaneously. Physical examination is the cornerstone of diagnosis and should be performed gently to minimize discomfort, particularly in young children. In toddlers and preschool-aged girls, the exam may be conducted during , with distraction techniques, or in positions such as frog-leg or prone knee-chest to facilitate visualization of the . The are carefully separated to reveal a thin, avascular, translucent fusing the , often starting posteriorly; the extent of fusion—partial or complete of the introitus—along with any signs of inflammation or , is assessed to confirm the . In older children or adults, where labial fusion is rarer, a full may be warranted, though the approach remains non-invasive. Supportive tests are not routinely required, as the condition is diagnosed clinically, but or urine culture may be indicated if UTI symptoms are present to rule out associated complications. Red flags during evaluation include asymmetry in the fusion, involvement of the , interlabial masses, or , which may suggest an alternative pathology and necessitate further investigation. Diagnostic criteria are based solely on clinical findings: adhesion of the in a hypoestrogenic state, without evidence of acute or as the primary , distinguishing it from other vulvar conditions. Pediatricians or gynecologists typically perform the evaluation, prioritizing a reassuring, non-traumatic approach to alleviate parental and child anxiety.

Differential diagnosis

Labial fusion, also known as labial adhesions, must be differentiated from several conditions that can present with similar vulvar or perineal abnormalities, particularly in prepubertal girls or postmenopausal women, to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. The primary distinction often relies on findings, such as the presence of a thin midline covering the introitus in labial fusion, absence of significant or , and response to topical therapy. Vulvovaginitis is a common mimic in prepubertal girls, characterized by of the vulvar and vaginal tissues leading to symptoms like mucoid or purulent , , and itchiness, but without the adhesive membrane typical of labial fusion. It is distinguished by the absence of labial adhesion and the presence of infectious or irritative etiologies, such as poor or bacterial overgrowth, confirmed via clinical exam and cultures if is purulent. Lichen sclerosus presents with white, atrophic, "cigarette paper"-like patches on the , often accompanied by intense pruritus, soreness, and potential scarring, differing from the smooth, fused membrane of labial fusion. is primarily clinical, but may be required if neoplastic changes are suspected or to confirm the chronic autoimmune , which can lead to architectural distortion but not isolated . Imperforate hymen is a congenital involving a complete membranous seal over the vaginal introitus, which may mimic partial labial fusion but is differentiated by its location at the hymenal ring and potential for cyclic or in adolescents, detectable via pelvic . Urethral prolapse appears as a bright red, circumferential mass protruding from the urethral meatus, without involvement of the , and is distinguished by its vascular, donut-shaped appearance on exam rather than midline fusion. Trauma or can cause localized irritation, , or foul-smelling mimicking symptomatic labial fusion, but is identified through a history of , such as accidents or retained objects like , leading to acute symptoms without chronic . is a rare mimicker and does not typically cause labial adhesions, though voiding dysfunction or may raise suspicion; differentiation involves comprehensive history and exam for acute or inconsistencies, as alone are insufficient for . In postmenopausal women, atrophic vaginitis may resemble labial fusion due to deficiency-induced thinning and fragility of vulvar tissues, but it is differentiated by diffuse , pH changes, and rapid improvement with systemic or topical , unlike the more adhesive presentation of true fusion. Overall, labial fusion is distinguished from these conditions by the lack of systemic symptoms, inflammatory , or congenital anomalies, with most cases resolving spontaneously or with therapy, emphasizing the importance of gentle separation during to avoid iatrogenic trauma.

Management

Treatment options

Treatment of labial fusion typically begins with conservative approaches, escalating to more invasive options based on symptom severity and response to initial therapy. For cases involving thin adhesions, observation is recommended, as most cases resolve spontaneously by due to rising endogenous levels. This approach avoids unnecessary interventions while monitoring for complications such as urinary tract infections. Topical estrogen cream serves as the first-line treatment for symptomatic labial fusion, particularly in prepubertal girls. Conjugated estrogen cream at a concentration of 0.01% is applied twice daily for 2-4 weeks, with a dosage of 0.5-1 g per application directly to the adhesion line using gentle pressure. Success rates reach approximately 90%, with separation often occurring within weeks; side effects, such as breast budding or local pigmentation changes, are rare and reversible upon discontinuation. Application frequency is gradually reduced once separation begins, followed by a maintenance emollient to prevent re-adhesion. Topical corticosteroids, such as betamethasone 0.05% ointment, offer an alternative to estrogen therapy, applied twice daily for 4-6 weeks, with success rates of 68-90% and potential side effects including skin thinning or irritation. If topical therapy fails or adhesions are thick, manual separation under (e.g., EMLA cream) may be performed, achieving high success rates. Post-procedure, topical is applied for 2-4 weeks to promote and reduce recurrence risk, which occurs in 7-14% of cases. Surgical options, such as lysis of adhesions, are reserved for rare instances of thick, recurrent fusions unresponsive to conservative measures, typically under general in children to minimize discomfort. Supportive hygiene measures complement all treatments, including gentle cleaning with plain water, avoidance of irritants like bubble baths or perfumed soaps, and application of a barrier to maintain separation. In postmenopausal women, where contributes to fusion, low-dose vaginal cream is preferred to restore local tissue integrity, with systemic considered if broader menopausal symptoms are present. Recurrence is managed by repeating topical and addressing underlying irritants or infections to break the cycle of . Contraindications include active vulvar , for which should be delayed until to avoid exacerbating or spreading during separation.

Prognosis and prevention

The prognosis for labial fusion is generally excellent, with most cases resolving spontaneously by due to rising endogenous levels, and achieving in up to 90% of affected individuals. Morbidity remains low when identified and addressed early, though chronic untreated cases may rarely lead to scarring. Long-term outcomes are favorable, with no impact on or in resolved cases. Recurrence occurs in 10-15% of cases following , with higher rates in severe adhesions or instances of poor ; for 3-6 months post-treatment is recommended to detect and manage any re-adhesion promptly. Follow-up typically includes an initial evaluation 2 weeks after intervention, followed by assessments as needed, as self-resolution remains common in milder or untreated cases. Prevention strategies emphasize maintaining good vulvar , such as wiping from front to back, wearing cotton underwear, and promptly treating irritants like diaper dermatitis to minimize that contributes to . Avoidance of bubble baths, scented soaps, and other irritants is advised to reduce the risk of vulvovaginitis, a common precursor. Parental education plays a key role, reassuring families of the benign nature of most cases while advising them to seek medical care if urinary symptoms, such as retention or , arise. In postmenopausal women, where increases risk, topical therapy can prevent recurrence following separation, alongside regular gynecologic examinations to monitor for adhesions associated with genitourinary of .

References

  1. [1]
    Labial Adhesions - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Labial adhesion is the fusion of the labia minora or majora, and it is mostly located near the clitoris. It also may be known as synechia vulvae or labial ...Continuing Education Activity · Etiology · Treatment / Management
  2. [2]
    Labial Adhesion: Causes, Diagnosis & Treatment - Cleveland Clinic
    Labial adhesions occur when the inner lips of the vulva stick together. This generally occurs when estrogen levels are low, and can affect infants, toddlers ...
  3. [3]
    Labial fusion - NHS
    Labial fusion, or labial adhesion, is when the small inner lips around the entrance to the vagina become sealed together.
  4. [4]
    Synechiae | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.org
    Oct 16, 2019 · History and etymology. While adhesions have a Latin origin meaning 'sticking to' (compare the common English word 'adhesive'), synechiae are ...
  5. [5]
    Labial Adhesions | European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
    Oct 9, 2023 · It may be primary or secondary. Primary labial adhesions usually occur in young girls before puberty.
  6. [6]
    Labial Adhesions | Pediatric Care Online - AAP Publications
    Oct 26, 2023 · Labial adhesion is the midline fusion of adjacent mucosal surfaces of the labia minora. · It is typically asymptomatic and self-limited and ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  7. [7]
    Labial Adhesions - Medscape Reference
    May 31, 2024 · Recurrence of labial adhesions is common and has been reported in as many as 11.6-14% of cases ; however, the true recurrence rate may be higher ...Missing: prevalence | Show results with:prevalence
  8. [8]
    The Incidence of Labial Fusion in Children - PubMed
    Thirty-five children (1.8%) assessed at the paediatric outpatient clinic were found to have labial fusion with a peak incidence at 13-23 months of age (3.3%).Missing: prevalence | Show results with:prevalence
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Labial Adhesion: Evaluation and Management
    Risk factors for recurrent adhesions are younger age, thicker adhesions, poor vulvar hygiene, recurrent genital infections, trauma and dermatologic conditions.
  10. [10]
    Surgical management of complete labial fusion in a ...
    Labial adhesions are primarily observed in prepubescent girls, with an incidence of approximately 2 % [2]. Similar incidence rates in postmenopausal women, ...Missing: prevalence | Show results with:prevalence
  11. [11]
    Labial Adhesions | Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    Signs and symptoms​​ Labial adhesions often have no symptoms and are uncovered during a routine physical exam. Older girls may report urinary dribbling. This is ...
  12. [12]
    Labial adhesions in adult women. Labial fusion - DermNet
    Labial adhesion means that the labia minora are stuck together or fused. Adhesion rarely results in complete labial fusion; more often it is partial.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  13. [13]
    Labial adhesion and bacteriuria - PMC - NIH
    The most prevalent symptom among patients was dysuria and restlessness while voiding. Twenty-one (33.3%) patients had a history of urinary tract infection. 17 ( ...Missing: 20-30% | Show results with:20-30%
  14. [14]
    Labial adhesion and urinary tract problems - ScienceDirect.com
    In the present study, girls with complete and thick LA had a greater tendency towards having UTIs than those with partial and thin LA, respectively. After ...
  15. [15]
    Labial fusion causing upper urinary tract obstruction - PubMed
    An infant with dense and nearly complete labial fusion had marked hydroureteronephrosis which resolved after incision of the adherent labia.
  16. [16]
    Labial adhesion and urinary tract problems
    Oct 23, 2015 · It was reported in the literature that there is a 1.8% prevalence of LA, and it has a peak incidence between 13 and 23 months of age. [1e5].
  17. [17]
    Labial Adhesions Causing Recurrent Urinary-Tract Infections ... - NIH
    Dec 16, 2019 · Labial adhesions are usually caused by a combination of inflammation and estrogen deficiency. Prepubertal girls and postmenopausal women are ...
  18. [18]
    Labial Adhesion in a Pubertal Girl—A Commonly Misdiagnosed Entity
    It is commonly seen in the prepubertal age group, causing parental anxiety, rarely seen in postmenopausal women, and very rarely seen in the reproductive age ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  19. [19]
    The risk factors for negative emotions in parents of children with ...
    Apr 29, 2023 · The furuncle of vulvar ulcer and the adhesion of labia minora were independent factors causing anxiety of parents (P<0.05; Table 2, Figure 3A); ...
  20. [20]
    Pediatric and adolescent gynecology- a current overview - PMC - NIH
    The etiology, clinical characteristics, treatment and prognosis of the following diseases will be addressed in detail: vulvovaginitis, lichen sclerosus, labial ...Missing: rash | Show results with:rash
  21. [21]
    Labial adhesion in a postmenopausal female: A case report - PMC
    Jun 26, 2020 · ... vulvovaginitis or other inflammatory symptoms were not seen. Labial ... Surgical division of labial adhesions in vulvar lichen ...
  22. [22]
    Treatment of Prepubertal Labial Adhesions with Topical Estriol ... - NIH
    Jul 12, 2024 · Traditionally, considering hypoestrogenism and chronic inflammation as causatives, the first-line therapy for labial adhesion has been topical ...
  23. [23]
    Labial Adhesions - Causes, Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment
    Apr 25, 2025 · In some cases, labial adhesions can be triggered by infections or environmental factors. Conditions such as vulvovaginitis, which is ...
  24. [24]
    The Labial Adhesion in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic ...
    The primary etiology of labial fusion is still unknown. However, there is a shred of evidence that low estrogen levels and sexual inactivity might play a role.
  25. [25]
    Kids Health Info : Labial fusion - The Royal Children's Hospital
    If your child has labial fusion, instead of two separate labia, you will be able to see the labia joined together. There are not usually any other symptoms.
  26. [26]
    Labial Adhesions | Children's Hospital Colorado
    Labial adhesion or labial agglutination occurs when the small, inner lips (labia minora) of the outside of the vagina (vulva) get stuck or fused together and ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Labial adhesion Vulvovaginitis Lichen sclerosis Acute genital ulcers
    Labial adhesions (aka labial fusion, labial agglutination). Definition ... Atypical extragenital presentations. Differential diagnosis. ▫ Vulvovaginitis.
  28. [28]
    Labial Adhesions Differential Diagnoses - Medscape Reference
    May 31, 2024 · Differential Diagnoses · Imperforate Hymen · Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome · Ureterocele · Urethral Prolapse · Vaginal Atresia.
  29. [29]
    Common Conditions That Mimic Findings of Sexual Abuse
    Vaginal Foreign Body. A foreign body in the vagina, often toilet tissue, can result in vaginal discharge and bleeding, which can be mistaken for sexual abuse.
  30. [30]
    Vaginal Foreign Bodies in the Pediatric and Adolescent Age Group
    Nov 25, 2023 · We should note that the insertion of foreign objects into a child's vagina by another person (ie, sexual abuse or body packing) and the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  31. [31]
    Labial adhesions and posterior fourchette injuries in childhood ...
    ... misconduct with the children. Although labial adhesions alone are not reason enough to make a report of sexual abuse, the physician is obligated to inquire ...Missing: foreign body differential
  32. [32]
    Vulvovaginal health in post-menopausal women - bpac NZ
    Chronic lichen sclerosus can cause distortion of the genital anatomy, including adhesions, resorption or partial fusion of the labia minora, and narrowing of ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    Labial Adhesions Treatment & Management - Medscape Reference
    May 31, 2024 · Primary treatment of labial adhesions consists of applying topical estrogen cream (conjugated estrogen cream or estradiol vaginal cream 0.01%) ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Labial adhesions | Better Health Channel
    The cause of labial adhesions is thought to be irritation to the labia minora: for example, poor hygiene, strongly perfumed soaps and inflammatory ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Labial Adhesions | Nemours KidsHealth
    Labial adhesions happen when the inner folds of skin surrounding the vaginal opening become fused together. They will go away on their own during puberty if ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  36. [36]
    Vaginal Symptoms - St. Louis Children's Hospital
    Prevention - Do Not Use Soaps: Do not use bubble bath, soap and shampoo in the bath water. They can cause the genitals to be red, sore or itchy. Only use warm ...
  37. [37]
    What the paediatrician should know about paediatric and ... - NIH
    The most common causes of vulvitis are poor hygiene, irritation caused by ... Vaginal organisms in prepubertal children with and without vulvovaginitis.Missing: rash | Show results with:rash
  38. [38]
    Vaginal Discharge: Signs of Infection, Treatment and Prevention
    Take a shower or bath regularly using a plain, mild soap or just water. Do not use bubble bath. Avoid using vaginal sprays and scented products. Use plain ...
  39. [39]
    Reconstruction for labial adhesion in postmenopausal woman using ...
    Recurrence is often a problem in the treatment of labial adhesions, and its recurrence rate after surgical or manual procedure is 14%–20% [4].
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: AUA/SUFU/AUGS Guideline
    Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) describes the spectrum of symptoms and physical changes resulting from declining estrogen and androgen concentrations ...<|control11|><|separator|>