Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Leontief production function

The Leontief production function, named after economist , is a in production theory that assumes must be combined in fixed, rigid proportions with no possibility of substitution between them, reflecting processes where inputs are complementary and any excess of one input yields no additional output. It is typically expressed for two inputs as Q = \min\left( \frac{L}{a}, \frac{K}{b} \right), where Q denotes output, L is the quantity of labor, K is the quantity of , and a and b are positive fixed coefficients representing the required input ratios per unit of output; this generalizes to multiple inputs as Q = \min\left\{ \frac{X_i}{a_i} \mid i = 1, \dots, n \right\}, where X_i are input quantities. This function implies right-angled isoquants, constant under proportional input increases, and zero for any input used beyond its fixed proportion. Leontief developed this function as the core assumption underlying his input-output framework, first introducing an empirical input-output table for the U.S. economy in 1936 while at , which quantified interindustry flows using fixed technical coefficients derived from production data for 1919. Building on earlier influences from classical economists like Quesnay and Walras during his studies in and in the late 1920s, Leontief formalized the theoretical structure in 1937, linking prices, output, savings, and investment through a that capture as a closed circulatory process. His seminal book, The Structure of the American Economy, 1919–1929, published in 1941, expanded this into a comprehensive analysis of sectoral linkages over a decade, establishing input-output analysis as a tool for empirical general modeling. For these contributions, Leontief received the in Economic Sciences in 1973, recognizing the method's role in dissecting production systems into interconnected sectors. The function's fixed-proportion assumption underpins input-output models, where the economy is represented by a consumption A with entries a_{ij} indicating the amount of input from sector i needed per unit output of sector j, leading to the equation x = Ax + d, solved as x = (I - A)^{-1} d for total output x given final d, provided the of A is less than 1 to ensure economic feasibility. This framework has been widely applied in , policy impact assessment, and environmental analysis, such as tracing resource flows or abatement across industries, though it has faced for overlooking input substitutability observed in real-world . Despite such limitations, the Leontief approach remains influential in and regional modeling for its simplicity and data-driven insight into structural interdependencies.

Definition and Formulation

Mathematical Expression

The Leontief production function models production under fixed input proportions, where inputs act as perfect complements, meaning output is limited by the scarcest input relative to required ratios. For two inputs, it takes the form
Q = \min\left( \frac{X}{a}, \frac{Y}{b} \right),
where Q denotes the level of output, X and Y are the quantities of the two inputs, and a > 0, b > 0 are fixed technical coefficients specifying the minimum input amounts needed per unit of output. This formulation ensures that increasing one input beyond the proportional requirement does not raise output unless the other input is also adjusted accordingly.
For n inputs, the function generalizes to
Q = \min\left( \frac{X_1}{a_1}, \frac{X_2}{a_2}, \dots, \frac{X_n}{a_n} \right),
with X_i as the of input i and a_i > 0 as the corresponding fixed for each i = 1, \dots, n. In efficient production, all inputs must be fully utilized without excess, which occurs when \frac{X_i}{a_i} = Q for every i, or equivalently, X_i = a_i Q for all i. Any deviation results in idle resources, as output is determined solely by the binding minimum.
Graphically, the isoquants of the Leontief function are L-shaped curves with right-angle corners at the efficient points where \frac{X}{a} = \frac{Y}{b} = Q for the two-input case, reflecting the absence of substitutability between inputs along the production frontier. For multiple inputs, the isoquants form similar right-angled hypersurfaces at the proportional ray X_i = a_i Q for all i.

Economic Interpretation

The Leontief production function captures production technologies characterized by fixed input proportions, where the coefficients a and b denote the minimum quantities of inputs X and Y required to produce one unit of output Q. These coefficients reflect rigid technical requirements, such that inputs function as perfect complements without any possibility of substitution. In this framework, output is constrained by the bottleneck input—the one available in the smallest amount relative to its fixed requirement—while any surplus of the other input contributes nothing additional to production, resulting in a marginal product of zero for excess inputs. For cost minimization, the firm selects an input bundle precisely at the kink of the L-shaped , where the fixed proportions are met exactly, eliminating any between inputs along the . This structure mirrors real-world scenarios with inflexible input ratios, such as assembly lines requiring one worker per or recipes demanding exact measures to avoid .

Properties and Characteristics

Returns to Scale and Marginal Products

The Leontief production function exhibits , meaning it is homogeneous of degree 1. Specifically, scaling all inputs by a positive factor λ results in output scaling by the same factor: f(λX, λY) = λ f(X, Y). This property holds because the minimum function preserves proportionality when both arguments are scaled equally, allowing output to expand linearly with inputs. Marginal products under the Leontief production function are conditional on input proportions and reflect the fixed-coefficient structure. The with respect to input X is given by \frac{\partial Q}{\partial X} = \begin{cases} \frac{1}{a} & \text{if } \frac{X}{a} < \frac{Y}{b}, \\ 0 & \text{otherwise}, \end{cases} and similarly for Y, \frac{\partial Q}{\partial Y} = \begin{cases} \frac{1}{b} & \text{if } \frac{Y}{b} < \frac{X}{a}, \\ 0 & \text{otherwise}. \end{cases} Note that at the point of equality \frac{X}{a} = \frac{Y}{b}, the production function is not differentiable, and the partial derivatives are not defined in the classical sense; the subgradient includes values between 0 and \frac{1}{a} (or \frac{1}{b}). These expressions indicate that the marginal product of an input is positive only when it is strictly the limiting factor, contributing to output at a constant rate of 1/a (or 1/b) until the fixed proportion is approached; beyond that, excess input yields zero additional output. Along rays from the origin leading to the corner solution, the effective marginal contribution diminishes as the binding constraint shifts, dropping to zero for any excess. The average product of input X along the efficient ray—where inputs satisfy the fixed proportions X/a = Y/b—is constant at 1/a, as output Q = X/a divided by X yields this unchanging ratio. A similar constant average product of 1/b holds for Y along the same ray. This constancy highlights the absence of diminishing average returns when operating at efficient proportions. In the long run, the constant returns to scale of the Leontief function imply that production can expand proportionally without any loss in efficiency, provided inputs maintain their fixed ratios; deviations lead to idle resources and reduced .

Input Substitution and Elasticities

The Leontief production function exhibits a constant elasticity of substitution \sigma = 0, signifying perfect complementarity among inputs and the complete absence of substitutability between them. This property arises from the L-shaped isoquants, where the slope is either zero (vertical segments) or infinite (horizontal segments) except at the right-angled corner, implying that the marginal rate of technical substitution (MRTS) jumps discontinuously and does not allow for smooth adjustments in input ratios along the isoquant. As a result, producers must employ inputs in rigidly fixed proportions to achieve efficiency, with any deviation leading to idle resources and reduced output for the same input levels. Regarding output elasticities, due to the perfect complementarity and non-differentiability at efficient proportions, the partial output elasticity with respect to each individual input is zero (holding other inputs fixed), as increasing a single input does not increase output along the efficient path. However, the scale elasticity—measuring the response to a proportional increase in all inputs—is 1, reflecting the constant returns to scale. Outside efficient paths, elasticities are zero for non-binding inputs, emphasizing the all-or-nothing nature of input utilization. In cost minimization terms, the Leontief function yields conditional factor demands that are invariant to input prices, resulting in zero own-price elasticities and zero cross-price elasticities for factor demands, which highlights the lack of responsiveness to relative price changes. This inelasticity stems from the fixed-proportion requirement, where optimal input quantities remain unchanged regardless of price variations, as long as both prices are positive.

Historical Development

Origins in Input-Output Analysis

The conceptual foundations of the Leontief production function trace back to early models of economic interdependence, particularly François Quesnay's Tableau Économique published in 1758, which depicted the French economy as a circular flow of goods and services between agricultural and non-agricultural sectors using fixed proportions of inputs and outputs. This tableau served as a precursor to fixed-proportion modeling by illustrating intersectoral flows without substitutability, emphasizing how productive activities in one sector directly determine requirements in another. Quesnay's framework highlighted the rigid technical relationships in production, laying groundwork for later input-output approaches that assumed constant input coefficients across economic activities. In the 1920s and 1930s, input-output analysis emerged more formally amid efforts to quantify inter-industry flows, influenced by Léon Walras's general equilibrium theory, which modeled the economy as a system of simultaneous equations capturing mutual dependencies between production sectors. Walras's work in the late 19th century provided the theoretical basis for viewing the economy holistically, paving the way for practical models with fixed coefficients that emphasized non-substitutable inputs. Concurrently, in the Soviet Union, Leonid Kantorovich developed related ideas in the 1930s, focusing on optimal resource allocation through linear models of production planning that incorporated fixed technical coefficients for inter-industry balances. These early contributions underscored the importance of rigid input requirements in capturing economic structure, setting the stage for empirical applications. Wassily Leontief formalized these ideas in his seminal 1936 paper, "Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic Systems of the United States," where he introduced a static input-output table for the U.S. economy in 1919, assuming fixed technical coefficients that dictate the exact proportions of inputs needed per unit of output across sectors, with work on a 1929 table beginning soon after. This approach treated production as a linear process without substitution possibilities, directly embodying the in empirical form. The mathematical basis of Leontief's model is captured in the fundamental input-output equation: \mathbf{X} = \mathbf{A}\mathbf{X} + \mathbf{Y} where \mathbf{X} represents the vector of total sectoral outputs, \mathbf{A} is the matrix of fixed input coefficients (with each a_{ij} denoting the amount of input from sector i required to produce one unit of output in sector j), and \mathbf{Y} is the vector of final demand. Solving for \mathbf{X} yields \mathbf{X} = (\mathbf{I} - \mathbf{A})^{-1} \mathbf{Y}, illustrating how total output is a linear function of final demand under the constraint of fixed proportions, which inherently defines the Leontief production function for each sector. This formulation integrated theoretical interdependence with empirical data, establishing input-output analysis as a tool for tracing production flows with inflexible technical relationships.

Leontief's Contributions and Recognition

Wassily Leontief was born on August 5, 1906, in St. Petersburg, Russia (later Leningrad from 1924 to 1991), to a family with strong academic ties; his father was a professor of labor economics at the University of St. Petersburg. He earned his undergraduate degree from the University of Leningrad in 1925 and a PhD in economics from the University of Berlin in 1928, before emigrating to the United States. Leontief joined the faculty at Harvard University in 1932, where he remained for over four decades until 1975, rising to full professor in 1946 and founding the Harvard Economic Research Project in 1948, which he directed until 1973. In the 1930s, Leontief developed the first empirical input-output tables for the U.S. economy, constructing a 44-sector model using 1919 census data (published in 1936) and later expanding it to a 90-sector table based on 1939 data during World War II consultations with the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. His key innovation lay in applying fixed-coefficient production functions to empirical multi-sector models, which operationalized the quantification of interdependencies among production sectors by simplifying general equilibrium equations into computable linear systems. This approach, detailed in his seminal book The Structure of the American Economy, 1919-1929 (1941, revised 1951), enabled policymakers to trace ripple effects across industries, such as predicting post-war steel demands with notable accuracy. In recognition of these advancements, Leontief was awarded the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel in 1973 "for the development of the input-output method and for its application to important economic problems." The Nobel committee highlighted how his framework provided systematic tools for dissecting complex economic interrelations, influencing global economic analysis. Leontief's legacy endures in the foundations of national accounting systems, where input-output frameworks underpin the measurement of sectoral linkages in official statistics across more than 60 countries. His methods also laid groundwork for computable general equilibrium (CGE) models, which integrate input-output structures with market-clearing dynamics to simulate policy impacts in modern macroeconomic forecasting.

Applications

In Macroeconomic Models

The Leontief production function forms the foundation of input-output (IO) models in macroeconomics, representing sectoral production as Q_i = \min_j \frac{X_{ij}}{a_{ij}}, where Q_i is the output of sector i, X_{ij} denotes inputs from sector j to i, and a_{ij} are fixed technical coefficients specifying required input proportions per unit of output. These models aggregate sectoral outputs into economy-wide balanced growth paths by solving the system \mathbf{x} = A \mathbf{x} + \mathbf{y}, where \mathbf{x} is the gross output vector, A is the matrix of technical coefficients, and \mathbf{y} is final demand, yielding total output as \mathbf{x} = (I - A)^{-1} \mathbf{y}. This structure captures intersectoral flows, enabling analysis of how changes in one sector ripple through the economy while assuming no substitution between inputs. Dynamic extensions of Leontief IO models incorporate capital accumulation to model time-dependent growth, treating capital as a fixed-proportion input stock that evolves via investment without altering short-run technical coefficients. In these frameworks, output at time t satisfies \mathbf{x}_t = A \mathbf{x}_t + B (\mathbf{x}_{t+1} - \mathbf{x}_t) + \mathbf{y}_t, where B is the capital coefficient matrix and \mathbf{x}_{t+1} - \mathbf{x}_t represents net capital formation, allowing simulations of balanced growth paths under constant technology. Such models are particularly useful for short-run macroeconomic forecasting, where fixed coefficients reflect rigid production structures amid capital buildup. Within national income accounting, Leontief IO models ensure alignment between production and expenditure measures by using the Leontief inverse to derive gross output from final demand components like consumption, investment, and exports, reconciling total output with value added to compute . For instance, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis accounts employ this approach to benchmark , where gross output includes both intermediate and final production, totaling $14.9 trillion in the 1997 benchmark year against $8.3 trillion in value added. This integration supports consistent macroeconomic aggregates by tracing interindustry transactions in make and use tables. Leontief-based policy simulations leverage output multipliers from the inverse matrix to trace the effects of demand shocks, such as fiscal expansions, through fixed-proportion intersectoral chains, quantifying total impacts on aggregate output and employment. A unit increase in final demand generates a multiplier effect where total output exceeds the initial shock due to successive rounds of intermediate purchases, with Type I multipliers capturing direct and indirect effects (e.g., a $1 million demand increase yielding $1.5 million in total output). These simulations aid in evaluating macroeconomic policies by highlighting propagation paths without assuming input flexibility.

In Industry and Policy Analysis

The Leontief production function has been widely applied in manufacturing sectors to model fixed input proportions, particularly in assembly processes where inputs like steel and labor must be used in rigid ratios to achieve efficient output. In the automobile industry, input-output models based on Leontief's framework analyze supply chain interdependencies, revealing how disruptions in upstream suppliers—such as steel production—affect final vehicle assembly. For instance, European analyses using Leontief input-output tables demonstrate that the automotive sector's reliance on intermediate inputs, including metals and components, amplifies vulnerabilities to global shocks, with fixed coefficients highlighting the inability to substitute inputs during shortages. These models enable policymakers to quantify propagation effects, such as how a 10% reduction in steel availability could curtail automobile output by a similar proportion due to the fixed ratios inherent in assembly lines. In agriculture, the Leontief function captures scenarios with fixed requirements between land and fertilizers, where crop yields depend on precise input combinations without viable substitution. Studies in production economics illustrate this through models of integrated farming systems, where Leontief input-output structures estimate how balanced land-fertilizer allocations maximize output, such as in cereal production where excess or deficient fertilizer relative to land area yields no additional benefits. Similarly, in the energy sector, oil refining operations exemplify fixed input needs, with Leontief multiproduct cost functions estimating technical coefficients for crude oil and processing additives to predict output volumes. Empirical applications show that refineries operate under Leontief constraints, where deviations from optimal input ratios—such as specific crude blends—directly limit gasoline or diesel production without compensatory adjustments. Policy analysis leverages Leontief-based input-output tables to evaluate environmental impacts by tracing pollution emissions through production coefficients across sectors. Wassily Leontief's extensions to input-output models incorporate pollution as an additional input, allowing assessments of how sectoral outputs generate indirect emissions; for example, manufacturing activities' fixed coefficients reveal embodied pollution in supply chains, informing regulations like carbon taxes. In trade policy, these models quantify import dependencies by computing the to measure total foreign input requirements, highlighting vulnerabilities in sectors reliant on imported intermediates and guiding tariff or diversification strategies. To maintain accuracy in dynamic economies, empirical estimation of Leontief models involves updating coefficient matrices with methods like the RAS technique, which biproportionally adjusts base-year input-output tables to align with new marginal totals for row and column sums. This iterative process preserves the structural integrity of fixed proportions while incorporating time-series data, such as evolving trade patterns or technological shifts, ensuring projections reflect current intersectoral linkages without altering the core Leontief assumptions. Widely adopted in national accounts, the RAS method facilitates reliable policy simulations by recalibrating matrices at intervals, as seen in updates for environmental and trade analyses.

Comparisons and Alternatives

With Cobb-Douglas Production Function

The Cobb-Douglas production function, introduced by Charles Cobb and Paul Douglas in 1928, takes the form Q = A X^{\alpha} Y^{\beta}, where Q represents output, X and Y are inputs such as capital and labor, A > 0 is a productivity parameter, and \alpha and \beta are output elasticities with respect to each input, often assuming constant returns to scale such that \alpha + \beta = 1. This functional form permits flexible substitution between inputs, as the exponents allow for varying input proportions to achieve efficient production, contrasting sharply with the Leontief function's rigid fixed proportions. A fundamental distinction between the two functions lies in their , denoted \sigma, which measures the ease of replacing one input with another while maintaining output levels. The Leontief function exhibits \sigma = 0, implying no substitutability and resulting in L-shaped isoquants with right-angled corners at the optimal input ratio, whereas the Cobb-Douglas function has \sigma = 1, yielding smooth, isoquants that reflect unitary elasticity and allow for gradual adjustments in input mixes. This difference underscores the Leontief's assumption of perfect complementarity, where inputs must be used in strict proportions, versus the Cobb-Douglas's modeling of imperfect but feasible , as originally calibrated for aggregate U.S. data on labor and . Empirically, the Leontief function is more appropriate for production processes involving highly complementary inputs, such as infrastructure projects where capital (e.g., roads or ports) and labor must align in fixed ratios to avoid waste, as seen in input-output models of urban agglomeration and public works. In contrast, the Cobb-Douglas function better captures scenarios with flexible labor-capital mixes, such as in manufacturing or service sectors, where firms can adjust workforce sizes relative to machinery without proportional constraints, aligning with historical estimates of unitary substitution in broad economic aggregates. To distinguish between these functions empirically, economists often employ the constant (CES) production function, which generalizes both as special cases—Leontief as the limit when \sigma \to 0 and Cobb-Douglas when \sigma = 1—and estimate \sigma via statistical methods like on cross-country or time-series data. Such tests, pioneered by , Chenery, Minhas, and Solow in , reveal that while Cobb-Douglas fits many aggregate datasets well due to its simplicity, Leontief prevails in sectors with technological rigidities, informing in macroeconomic simulations.

With Linear and CES Functions

The linear production function models inputs as perfect substitutes, taking the form Q = aX + bY, where a > 0 and b > 0 denote the marginal products of inputs X and Y. This structure yields an \sigma = \infty, producing straight-line isoquants that allow complete replacement of one input by the other at a fixed rate without output reduction. In stark contrast to the Leontief function's rigid L-shaped isoquants, which mandate fixed proportions and preclude , the assumes inputs are fully interchangeable, often simplifying analysis in cases of high flexibility. A more general framework is provided by the constant elasticity of substitution (CES) production function, defined as Q = \left[ \alpha X^{\rho} + (1 - \alpha) Y^{\rho} \right]^{1/\rho}, where $0 < \alpha < 1 is a parameter reflecting input shares, and \rho \leq 1 governs the . The is given by \sigma = \frac{1}{1 - \rho}, allowing \sigma to vary from zero to depending on \rho. Notably, the Leontief function emerges as the limiting case of the CES when \rho \to -\infty (equivalently, \sigma \to 0), where isoquants become right-angled and inputs must be used in precise ratios; conversely, as \rho \to 1 (\sigma \to \infty), the CES converges to the . Regarding returns to scale, all three functions are homogeneous of degree one under standard parameterizations, implying constant returns where doubling inputs doubles output. However, the Leontief's zero elasticity uniquely enforces input complementarity, preventing efficient substitution even under relative price changes, unlike the linear's unlimited flexibility or the CES's tunable trade-offs. Empirical selection among these forms hinges on the production context: the linear function fits processes with highly interchangeable inputs, such as blending different fuels (e.g., coal and natural gas) in power generation, where cost-minimizing firms can shift entirely to the cheaper option. The CES is preferred for intermediate substitution possibilities, as in many aggregate economies with moderate factor flexibility. In opposition, the Leontief is appropriate for technical constraints demanding fixed proportions, exemplified by assembly lines in manufacturing where specific ratios of parts and labor are non-negotiable to avoid bottlenecks.

Limitations and Extensions

Key Criticisms

The assumption of fixed input coefficients in the Leontief production function posits that inputs must be used in rigid proportions without possibilities, a premise widely criticized as unrealistic, particularly over the long run where technological advancements and changes enable substitutability. This rigidity overestimates input complementarities and understates economic flexibility, leading to models that fail to capture how firms adjust production processes in response to market signals. For instance, empirical observations demonstrate that input ratios vary with cost fluctuations, contradicting the zero inherent in the Leontief framework. Leontief's seminal 1953 empirical analysis of U.S. data revealed minimal variation in capital-labor ratios across sectors despite differences, supporting the fixed-coefficient view but sparking the "" as it challenged Heckscher-Ohlin expectations. However, subsequent studies have uncovered evidence of , resolving aspects of the and highlighting the limitations of assuming coefficients. For example, using adjusted intensities and data showed that patterns align more closely with possibilities when accounting for and productivity differences, indicating that Leontief's findings reflected rather than true rigidity. Later analyses, such as those incorporating relative prices, further demonstrated that the appears intermittently but diminishes with broader measures of inputs, underscoring empirical challenges to fixed proportions. The static nature of the Leontief model represents another key limitation, as it assumes fixed input-output relationships without accounting for changes over time due to technological progress or capacity adjustments. By treating input-output relationships as timeless , the overlooks evolving processes, restricting its applicability to long-term scenarios. This oversight leads to incomplete representations of economic evolution, where initial constraints evolve with and , phenomena absent in the model's focus. Aggregation issues further undermine the Leontief production function, as sectoral-level coefficients obscure significant heterogeneity at the firm level, where technologies and input mixes vary widely. Leontief's aggregation condition requires identical functions across units for valid macroeconomic , an rarely met in diverse economies, resulting in biased estimates of overall input requirements. This masking effect distorts analyses of , as firm-specific efficiencies and substitutions are averaged out, leading to overly uniform portrayals of economic structure.

Generalized and Modern Variants

One prominent generalization of the Leontief production function arises in activity analysis, developed by as part of frameworks during the late 1940s. This extension allows for multiple production techniques or activities, each characterized by fixed input proportions, but permits the selection and scaling of activities to optimize outcomes under resource constraints, addressing the original model's rigidity by incorporating choice among discrete processes. To handle in technical coefficients, variants of the Leontief model incorporate probabilistic distributions, often using chance constraints to ensure input requirements are met with a specified probability, enabling robust planning in volatile environments. Fuzzy Leontief models further adapt this by representing coefficients as fuzzy numbers, such as trapezoidal forms, to capture imprecise data in input-output systems, solved via methods like the Gauss-Seidel algorithm for defuzzified outputs. Nonlinear generalizations expand the Leontief framework by embedding it within broader functional forms. Hanoch's CRESH (constant ratios of elasticities of substitution, homothetic) production functions generalize the CES class, where the Leontief function emerges as a limiting case with zero , allowing variable substitution elasticities across input pairs while retaining fixed proportions at extremes. Multi-stage or nested Leontief structures model hierarchical processes, combining Leontief functions at successive levels to represent sequential fixed-proportion assemblies, such as in energy-material-product chains. Dynamic input-output models, such as the temporal Leontief inverse, extend the static framework to incorporate time-dependent interindustry linkages and changes, providing insights into cumulative effects over periods. In contemporary applications, adjusted Leontief coefficients support by modeling fixed-proportion dependencies across stages, facilitating resilience analysis under disruptions through integrations. For environmental accounting, variants modify coefficients to include metrics, such as emission intensities, enabling quantification of ecological footprints and policy simulations for green transitions.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Firm's Problem - UCLA Economics
    2.2 Perfect Complements (Leontief). A Leontief production function is given by f(z1,z2) = min{αz1,βz2}. The isoquants are shown in figure 2. These are L ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Wassily Leontief and the discovery of the input-output approach
    The paper is about Wassily Leontief's path towards the discovery of input-output economics, published in the Review of Economic Statistics in 1936 and 1937 ...
  3. [3]
    The Prize in Economics 1973 - Press release - NobelPrize.org
    Professor Leontief outlined the input-output technique as early as in the 1930s. A comprehensive version of the analysis was published in 1941 in the book, The ...
  4. [4]
    Wassily Leontief – Facts - NobelPrize.org
    Wassily Leontief created the input-output analysis, which describes the interdependence in the production system as a network of deliveries between the various ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Leontief Input-Output Models - UMD MATH
    Definition 1.1.2.4. The vector ¯p is the production vector. Definition 1.1.2.5. The vector ¯d is the external demand vector. Definition 1.1.2.6. The vector ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] 6. Production of a Single Good
    Feb 9, 2023 · production functions have the form f(z) = κ m. X i=1 αiz−ρ i !−γ ... 4: The Leontief production function is f(z) = min{αizi}. We found ...
  7. [7]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
  8. [8]
    [PDF] FISKE, D.W. FIXED COEFFICIENTS PRODUCTION FUNCTION
    The fixed coefficients production function is the cor- nerstone of input-output analysis, the quantitative eco- nomic tool developed in 1936 by Leontief, who ...Missing: interpretation | Show results with:interpretation
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Examples of Cost and Production Functions
    1 von Neumann–Leontief Production Function​​ In this constant returns to scale production function, the inputs must be used in exactly the right proportions or ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Multiple Input Production Economics for Farm Management
    • Leontief Production Function. Q = min(aX,bY):. • Marginal products of inputs = 0. • Either an output quota or a cost budget, with the fixed input proportions ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Production Functions
    where x is a vector of inputs and y is a vector of outputs. The set consists of those combinations of x and y such that y can be produced from the given x.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Chapter 9 Production Functions
    Dec 18, 2020 · Russian-American economist Wassily Leontief. ○ This function clearly exhibits constant returns to scale. ○ Marginal productivities are fk = 1 + ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Elasticity of Substitution - NYU Stern
    Mar 27, 2011 · Thus, σ = 0 for Leontief isoquants. The other extreme case of perfect substitution or linear production technology is shown in Figure 5.2. This.Missing: sigma= | Show results with:sigma=<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Derivation of CES Special Cases 1 Case σ = 1: Cobb-Douglas
    In the lecture notes we defined the CES production function. Y = α. 1 σ ... Case σ = 0: perfect complements, fixed proportions, or “Leontief”. Y = min.
  15. [15]
    An Application of the Shephard Duality Theorem: A Generalized ...
    An Application of the Shephard Duality Theorem: A Generalized Leontief Production Function. W. E. Diewert. W. E. Diewert. Search for more articles by this ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Advanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 5 - Ronaldo Carpio
    ▸ This is the Leontief production function: y = min(x1, ...,xn) ... ▸ The output elasticity of input i, i.e. the percentage change in output ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Quick Reference Guide to Common Functional Forms
    Jun 16, 2003 · 1.1 Leontief. Zero elasticity of substitution; own-price elasticities are less than one; cross-price elasticities are negative; homothetic ...
  18. [18]
    FROM THE ACCOUNTS OF PHILOSOPHIE RURALE TO THE ...
    Jan 22, 2021 · The transposition of Quesnay's Tableau into input-output tables leads us to establish relations between physiocratic accounting and modern ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] 'Classical' Roots of Input-Output Analysis: A Short Account of its ...
    In this section we shall first deal with Leontief's 1928 article and then provide a summary statement of the closed and open input-output model. We shall ...
  20. [20]
    1. François Quesnay: The Circular Flow of Income and Input-Output ...
    The tables of Section 1.2 show that Quesnay's Tableau can be viewed as a precursor to modern IO economics. ... In summary, we have added to Quesnay's Tableau ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] LEONTIEF and WALRAS: INPUT-OUTPUT and REALITY - IIOA!
    In this paper the relationship between Walras' theoretical general equilibrium theory and Leontief's input-output analysis was discussed. It was shown that ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] General Equilibrium Theory - Walras versus post-Walras Economists
    Walras's model was used as the basis for the theoretical scheme of input-output by. Leontief. Leontief's input-output analysis are characterized some essential ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] The Elements of Input-Output Analysis
    Kantorovich.15. The early paper by Leontief and Kantorovich's work established the intellectual respectability of input-output analysis in the Soviet Union.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] the Development of Leontief's - Input-Output Analysis - TU Chemnitz
    In 1928 he published part of his thesis in the paper, “The. Economy as a Circular Flow" (Leontief, 1928), where he set forth a two-sector "input- output" system ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  25. [25]
    Leontief, W.W. (1936) Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the ...
    The aim of this paper is to analyze the Mexican energy system and its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the year 2012 and to estimate a baseline scenario for ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Wassily Leontief: Pioneer of Input-Output Analysis - Eugene Garfield
    Wassily Leontief was born in Lenin- grad (then St. Petersburg) on August 5,. 1906. His father was a professor of labor economics at the University of St. Pe ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  27. [27]
    Input-output economics and computable general equilibrium models
    This paper examines the broadening legacy of one of Wassily Leontief's major contributions-input-output (I-O) analysis. It identifies ways in which I-O ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Input-Output Analysis: A Primer, 2nd ed.
    Consumption dollars plus government expenditures plus export dollars minus import dollars can be used to define gross national product. Basic (export) activity ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] The Dynamic Leontief Model and the Theory of Endogenous Growth
    In Section 2 we shall briefly recall the features of. Leontief's dynamic input-output model. ... of capital accumulation. The most simple conceptualisation ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Concepts and Methods of the U.S. Input-Output Accounts
    Sep 1, 2006 · Defining output. In order to measure gross output and GDP, national economic accountants have to define “the production boundary”—that is ...
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    [PDF] The Automotive Supply Chain in Europe: An Input-Output Analysis of ...
    The analysis focuses on the four dimensions, i.e. employment, value added, profits and labour compensation, to assess the evolution of the costs of production ...
  33. [33]
    An input-output model of integrated farming system - ResearchGate
    May 29, 2021 · Leontief input-output economic model used to calculate the output of a component to meet the input of corresponding components. For the increase ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Estimation of the Leontief Multiproduct Cost Function and - Dialnet
    Abstract. The Leontief multiproduct flexible cost function aims to give an approach to the technology used by refineries and blenders. In.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Wassily Leontief - Prize Lecture
    The function of the Abatement. Industry is to eliminate pollutants generated by the productive sectors, con- sumers, and the Abatement Industry itself. The two ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] An Input-Output Model of the U.S. Economy with Pollution Externality
    The present paper proposes a conceptual structure for EEIO accounts that builds on the work of Leontief (1970) and Hendrickson, Lave, and Matthews (2006), and.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Input-Output Tables And Foreign Inputs Dependency
    Oct 20, 2021 · It gives details on each level of dependency and finish with the infinite computation using the Leontief inverse matrix.
  38. [38]
    Import Content of Turkish Production and Exports: A sectoral analysis
    Aug 18, 2020 · Originated by Leontief, the input-output analysis reveals the production-related interdependencies between different sectors within an economy ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Projecting the Leontief inverse directly by the RAS method - Inforum
    The RAS method is most commonly applied to update the technical coefficient matrix in input-output analysis. More recently, Snower(1990) has suggested including.
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Disaggregating Input–Output Tables by the Multidimensional RAS ...
    Jul 29, 2022 · Abstract: The RAS method is an iterative procedure that bi-proportionally scales an input–output table to be consistent with given row and ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] A Theory of Production - Charles W. Cobb, Paul H. Douglas
    Oct 3, 2001 · A Theory of Production. Charles W. Cobb, Paul H. Douglas. STOR. The American Economic Review, Volume 18, Issue 1, Papers and Proceedings of the.
  42. [42]
    [PDF] An Assessment of CES and Cobbs-Douglas Production Functions
    ... elasticity of substitution tends toward zero (no substitution) and when (σ−1)/σ → 1 the elasticity of substitution tends toward infinity (perfect substitutes).
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Capital-Labor Substitution and Economic Efficiency
    Sep 3, 2001 · Finally, the CES production function is ap- plied in section V to a time-series analysis of all non-farm production in the United States. The.
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Agglomeration, Urban Growth and Infrastructure in Global Climate ...
    It is calculated assuming Leontief production functions with fixed input-output coefficients. Households maximize their utility through a trade-off between.
  45. [45]
    [PDF] The normalized CES production function: theory and empirics
    Like all standard CES functions, equation (1) nests a Cobb- Douglas function when σ → 1; a Leontief function with fixed factor proportions when σ = 0; and a ...Missing: comparison | Show results with:comparison
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Beyond Cobb-Douglas: Estimation of a CES Production Function ...
    Feb 5, 2011 · A Cobb Douglas production function has two empirical implications that I show do not hold in the data: a constant cost share of capital and ...
  47. [47]
    The Leontief Production Function as a Limiting Case of the CES - jstor
    In this note we provide a derivation of the Leontief production function from the CES Our derivation is in the same spirit as the derivation of the Cobb ...
  48. [48]
    9.2 Production Functions
    Two inputs K and L are perfect substitutes in a production function f if they enter as a sum; that is, f(K, L, x 3, … , xn) = g(K + cL, x 3, … , xn), for a ...
  49. [49]
    2.6 Leontief (Fixed Proportions) Production Functions - EconGraphs
    It is also called a Leontief production function, after the influential Nobel laureate Wassily Leontief, who pioneered its use in input-output analysis.
  50. [50]
    [PDF] A Review of Input-Output Analysis
    fixed coefficients of production is by itself an objection to input-. 170. Page 36. A REVIEW OF ANALTSJS output analysis. Quite on the contrary, if input ...
  51. [51]
    International Factor Price Differences: Leontief was Right! - jstor
    In the original explanation of the Leontief paradox, Leontief maintained that the United States is labor abundant when labor is measured in productivity- ...Missing: later substitution contradicting
  52. [52]
    [PDF] International Factor Price Differences: Leontief was Right!
    This paper is devoted to examining how closely equations (4) and (5) conform to the inter- national data on trade, endowments, consumption shares, and factor.Missing: later substitution contradicting
  53. [53]
    Walras, Leontief, and the Interdependence of Economic Activities
    Criticism of the Walrasian model, 345; the static nature of the model, 345; the purely competitive nature of the model, 347; the omission of important sectors ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] AGGREGATION IN PRODUCTION FUNCTIONS: WHAT APPLIED ...
    Sep 19, 2001 · The purpose of this survey is to summarize the existing literature on the conditions under which an aggregate production function exists, and to ...
  55. [55]
    Koopmans, Dantzig, and the Wartime Origins of Activity Analysis
    Dec 1, 2024 · Activity analysis started from a model of technological possibilities rather than from a production function that was already the result of ...
  56. [56]
    Incorporating uncertainty in the coefficients and multipliers of an IO ...
    Uncertainty is contemplated in stochastic IO analysis,1 where assumptions over the probabilistic distribution of the technical coefficients are needed, in ...
  57. [57]
    Leontief input-output model with trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and ...
    Oct 30, 2014 · In this work a fuzzy linear system is used to solve Leontief input-output model with fuzzy entries. For solving this model, we assume that ...
  58. [58]
    CRESH Production Functions - jstor
    The CES function, as well as its limiting forms (the Cobb-Douglas (a = 1), Leontief. (a = 0), and linear (a = oo) functions) are special cases of CRESH. The ...
  59. [59]
    Optimizing Process-Improvement Efforts for Supply Chain ... - MDPI
    The Leontief production function assumes that the inputs are complementary to each other. The Leontief production function may also represent the settings ...
  60. [60]
    Modification of the Leontief-Ford Input-Output Model for the Green ...
    This model is proposed to consider macro-economic assessment of environmental damage, health deterioration due to environmental pollution, as well as the use ...Missing: accounting | Show results with:accounting