Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Million years ago

Million years ago (Ma), also abbreviated as Mya (million years ago) or Ma (megaannum), is a unit of time equal to 1,000,000 (10^6) years before the present. It is commonly used in the Earth sciences, particularly geology and paleontology, to express the age of rocks, fossils, and geological events on the geologic time scale.^[1] For durations or spans of time rather than specific dates, the abbreviation Myr (million years) or m.y. (millions of years) is preferred to distinguish from point-in-time references. This notation helps standardize the representation of deep time, from the Pleistocene epoch (starting ~2.58 Ma) back to Earth's formation ~4,543 Ma. The conventions are maintained by bodies like the U.S. Geological Survey and the Geological Society of America to ensure clarity in scientific communication.^[2]

Definition and Notation

Core Meaning

"Million years ago" (mya) is a unit of time equal to one million years before the present day, commonly employed in the earth sciences to denote the age of geological events, rock formations, and fossil records that extend far beyond the scope of human historical documentation.^[3] This temporal measure anchors deep time events to a numerical chronology, facilitating the understanding of processes occurring over vast periods in Earth's 4.5-billion-year history.^[4] Unlike shorter units such as "years ago" (ya), which applies to recent timescales, or "thousand years ago" (kya), used for events within the last few tens of thousands of years, mya is specifically suited for pre-Holocene epochs where changes unfold over immense durations.^[5] The Holocene epoch, spanning approximately the last 11,700 years, marks the advent of modern human influence, rendering mya indispensable for earlier geological and evolutionary contexts. In scientific practice, mya serves as a key component of absolute dating, which assigns precise numerical ages to strata or specimens, in contrast to relative dating methods that only sequence events without quantifying their duration.^[6] This absolute framework, often derived from radiometric techniques, provides a calibrated timeline essential for correlating global geological records.

Common Abbreviations

In geological and paleontological literature, "million years ago" is commonly abbreviated as "mya" (million years ago) or "Ma" (mega-annum). The abbreviation "Myr" is also used occasionally to denote a megayear, equivalent to one million years.^[3]^[5]

Historical Context

Origins in Geological Time Scales

The concept of "million years ago" emerged in the 19th century as part of the shift toward uniformitarianism in geology, which posited that Earth's features resulted from gradual, ongoing processes rather than sudden catastrophes, implying vast timescales. Charles Lyell, in his influential Principles of Geology (1830–1833), argued for an indefinitely long Earth history, estimating its age at several hundred million years based on erosion rates and sedimentary accumulation observed in modern environments.^[7] This framework challenged biblical chronologies and laid the groundwork for expressing geological events in millions of years, emphasizing slow change over immense durations.^[8] In the late 19th century, physicists like Lord Kelvin applied thermodynamic principles to refine these estimates, calculating Earth's cooling from a molten state to yield an age of approximately 20 to 100 million years by the 1890s.^[9] Concurrently, geologists developed relative numerical timescales through fossil correlations, sequencing rock layers via index fossils to infer durations in broad millions of years, though absolute values remained elusive until radioactivity's discovery in 1896 provided initial hints of decay-based chronometers.^[10]^[11] These efforts marked the transition from qualitative stratigraphy to tentative quantitative frameworks, with fossil successions enabling correlations across continents that suggested epochs spanning tens of millions of years.^[10] A pivotal milestone came in 1911 with Arthur Holmes' pioneering application of radioactivity to geological dating, where he used uranium-lead ratios to assign absolute ages to rocks, including Precambrian samples up to 1,640 million years old.^[12] This work, published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, represented the first systematic use of million-year scales for deep-time events, dating a Devonian rock to 370 million years and recalibrating earlier estimates to extend the Precambrian far beyond prior limits.^[12] Holmes' innovations unified relative stratigraphy with radiometric evidence, establishing "million years ago" as a standard for Precambrian chronology and transforming geological time into a numerically calibrated system.

Adoption in Scientific Literature

The adoption of the "million years ago" (mya) notation gained momentum in the 1920s, coinciding with major advancements in radiometric dating techniques and stratigraphic correlation that enabled more precise numerical assignments to geological events. Prior to this, time scales relied heavily on relative dating, but the refinement of uranium-lead and other isotopic methods allowed geologists to assign absolute ages in millions of years, marking a shift toward quantitative expressions like "million years ago" in peer-reviewed literature. This terminology appeared prominently in journals such as Nature and proceedings of the Geological Society of London, where early estimates of Earth's age and stratigraphic boundaries were reported using such units, reflecting the integration of physics into earth sciences.^[13] By the mid-20th century, international collaboration further standardized mya across disciplines, culminating in the efforts of bodies like the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS). Founded in 1973 under the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS), the ICS initiated a major project in 1974 to develop a multidisciplinary global geologic time scale, explicitly incorporating numerical ages in mya to correlate chronostratigraphic units worldwide. This formalization addressed inconsistencies in earlier scales by defining boundaries with isotopic dates, promoting mya as a universal metric in stratigraphic charts and fostering its adoption in paleontology, tectonics, and related fields.^[14]^[15] A pivotal contribution to this standardization came from key compilatory works, notably the 1964 symposium volume The Phanerozoic Time-Scale edited by W. B. Harland, A. G. Smith, and B. Wilcock, published by the Geological Society of London. Dedicated to Arthur Holmes, this text synthesized over 180 radiometric age determinations for the Phanerozoic eon, presenting boundaries and durations in millions of years ago to resolve discrepancies in prior estimates. Its comprehensive numerical framework influenced subsequent global scales, embedding mya as a standard in academic texts and accelerating its use beyond geology into interdisciplinary studies.^[16]^[17]

Scientific Applications

In Earth Sciences

In Earth sciences, the notation "million years ago" (mya) serves as a fundamental unit for dating geological events, stratigraphic layers, and tectonic processes that have shaped Earth's physical history. It enables precise chronostratigraphy, allowing scientists to correlate rock formations across continents and reconstruct the planet's dynamic evolution over deep time. This timescale is essential for understanding the timing of cataclysmic events, continental configurations, and climatic shifts, providing a framework that integrates fossil evidence with physical geology. A prominent application is in marking mass extinction boundaries, such as the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) event at 66 mya, which involved an asteroid impact and massive volcanism that profoundly altered Earth's surface and led to widespread sedimentary disruptions preserved in iridium-rich layers worldwide. Similarly, the assembly of the supercontinent Pangea around 300 mya exemplifies how mya dating illuminates large-scale tectonic amalgamations, where continental collisions formed extensive mountain belts and reshaped ocean basins during the late Paleozoic.^[18]^[19] The integration of mya with rock layers and plate tectonics is crucial for tracing subduction zones and volcanic epochs. For instance, the subduction of the Farallon Plate beneath North America, initiating around 200 mya, generated the ancestral Rocky Mountains and Sierra Nevada through arc magmatism, with dated plutonic rocks revealing the progression of this convergent margin. Volcanic epochs, such as the emplacement of the Siberian Traps flood basalts approximately 252 mya, are dated using mya to link massive outpourings to environmental perturbations in the stratigraphic record.^[20] These datings, often calibrated via radiometric methods, highlight how subduction-driven volcanism recycles crustal material over tens of millions of years.^[21] In paleoclimatology, mya provides context for glacial-interglacial cycles, particularly in the Pleistocene epoch, which spanned from 2.58 mya to 11.7 thousand years ago (kya), marking the onset of recurring ice ages that sculpted continental landscapes through erosion and deposition of tillites. Deeper boundaries, like the Pliocene-Pleistocene transition at 2.58 mya, use mya to delineate the intensification of Northern Hemisphere glaciation, evidenced by oxygen isotope ratios in deep-sea cores that reflect global cooling trends. This temporal framework underscores the interplay between orbital forcings and tectonic uplift in driving Quaternary climate variability.^[22]

In Biological Evolution

In biological evolution, the notation "mya" is widely used to establish timelines for speciation, divergence of lineages, and the emergence of major groups. It allows paleontologists and evolutionary biologists to integrate fossil records with molecular data, such as DNA clocks, to reconstruct the tree of life. For example, the divergence between the human and chimpanzee lineages is estimated at 6–7 mya, based on genetic and fossil evidence from Africa.^[23] Similarly, the appearance of early hominins like Sahelanthropus tchadensis around 7 mya marks key steps in human evolution, while the origin of modern Homo sapiens traces back to approximately 0.3 mya in Africa.^[24] These dates help contextualize adaptive radiations, such as the diversification of mammals following the K-Pg extinction 66 mya, illustrating how evolutionary processes unfold over deep time.

Dating and Calibration

Radiometric Methods

Radiometric methods provide the quantitative foundation for assigning absolute ages in millions of years ago (mya) to geological materials through the measurement of radioactive decay rates. These techniques rely on the predictable decay of unstable isotopes into stable daughter products, allowing scientists to calculate elapsed time since the material formed or last crystallized. For timescales relevant to "million years ago," methods targeting parent isotopes with long half-lives are essential, as they accumulate measurable daughter products over millions to billions of years. Uranium-lead (U-Pb) dating is particularly effective for determining ages greater than 1 million years in accessory minerals like zircon crystals, which incorporate uranium during crystallization but exclude initial lead, enabling precise isochron calculations. Zircon's resistance to chemical alteration preserves the U-Pb system, making it ideal for dating igneous and metamorphic rocks from Precambrian to recent epochs. The method exploits the decay of uranium isotopes—primarily ^{238}U to ^{206}Pb and ^{235}U to ^{207}Pb—with the half-life of ^{238}U being 4.468 billion years, providing high resolution for ancient events exceeding 1 mya.^[25]^[26]^[27] Potassium-argon (K-Ar) dating measures the decay of ^{40}K to ^{40}Ar in potassium-bearing minerals within volcanic rocks, suitable for ages from hundreds of thousands to billions of years, though it is most reliable for samples older than 100,000 years to ensure sufficient argon accumulation. This method has been instrumental in dating hominid-bearing sites, such as volcanic layers at Laetoli, Tanzania, yielding ages around 3.5 million years ago that bracket early human footprints. An advanced variant, the ^{40}Ar/^{39}Ar method, improves precision by neutron irradiation to convert ^{39}K to ^{39}Ar, allowing stepwise heating of a single sample to release argon incrementally and detect contamination or excess argon, enhancing accuracy for young volcanic rocks down to 10,000 years.^[28]^[29]^[30] The general equation for calculating age in radiometric dating assumes closed-system behavior and is given by:

t = \frac{1}{\lambda} \ln\left(1 + \frac{D}{P}\right)

where t is the age, \lambda is the decay constant of the parent isotope, D is the number of daughter isotope atoms produced by decay, and P is the number of remaining parent isotope atoms. This formula derives from the exponential decay law, N = N_0 e^{-\lambda t}, rearranged to solve for time using measured isotope ratios via mass spectrometry.^[31]

Relative Dating Techniques

Relative dating techniques establish the sequence of geological events without providing precise numerical ages, instead correlating rock layers and fossils to broader time scales that can later be anchored to "million years ago" (mya) frameworks through integration with absolute methods. These approaches rely on observable patterns in the stratigraphic record, such as superposition, where older layers underlie younger ones, and faunal succession, which assumes that life forms evolve progressively over time. In the context of deep time, relative dating has been essential for constructing initial chronologies of Earth's history spanning millions to billions of years, particularly before widespread radiometric calibration. Biostratigraphy utilizes fossil assemblages to determine relative ages, with index fossils—species that are geographically widespread, short-lived, and easily identifiable—serving as markers for specific time intervals. For instance, the appearance of certain ammonite species in marine sediments helps delineate Jurassic stages, which are then correlated across continents and subsequently calibrated to mya scales using radiometric dates from volcanic ash layers within those strata. This method has been pivotal in dating Paleozoic and Mesozoic sequences, enabling geologists to assign relative positions to events like mass extinctions or evolutionary radiations before numerical refinement. A seminal application is the work of Alpheus Hyatt in the late 19th century, who formalized the use of cephalopod fossils for zoning the Triassic, influencing modern biostratigraphic charts. Magnetostratigraphy reconstructs the history of Earth's magnetic field by analyzing remanent magnetization in rocks, particularly the pattern of polarity reversals between normal and reversed states. Sedimentary and volcanic rocks preserve these reversals as striped patterns when sampled and measured using paleomagnetic techniques, allowing correlation of strata across sites. The Brunhes-Matuyama reversal, for example, marks a key boundary dated to approximately 780 thousand years ago through calibration, but the full geomagnetic polarity timescale extends back over 160 million years, aiding in relative dating of Cenozoic and Mesozoic deposits. This technique gained prominence with the development of the magnetic polarity timescale by Cox, Doell, and Dalrymple in the 1960s, who linked reversal sequences to potassium-argon dates, providing a global framework for correlating marine and continental records. Cyclostratigraphy identifies rhythmic variations in sedimentary rocks caused by periodic changes in Earth's orbit, known as Milankovitch cycles, which influence climate and sedimentation patterns over scales of 20,000 to 400,000 years. These cycles manifest as alternations in lithology, such as limestone-shale couplets, allowing geologists to count cycles and estimate relative durations of depositional episodes in deep time. For example, in the Cretaceous period, orbital forcing has been used to correlate sections across ocean basins, providing a relative chronology that approximates ages in millions of years when tuned to absolute anchors. The foundational theory stems from Milutin Milankovitch's 1920s work on astronomical climate forcing, later applied quantitatively by Hays, Imbrie, and Shackleton in their 1976 analysis of deep-sea cores, which demonstrated cycle durations matching orbital parameters.

Debates and Precision

Interpretation of "Present"

In radiocarbon dating, the term "before present" (BP) standardizes the "present" as AD 1950 to account for fluctuations in atmospheric radiocarbon levels caused by industrial emissions and nuclear testing, ensuring consistent age reporting for samples up to about 50,000 years old. This fixed reference point, established by Willard Libby, the method's developer, facilitates comparability across studies but holds no relevance for "million years ago" (Ma) scales, as radiocarbon cannot date events beyond its effective range. In deep time geological applications, such as those using Ma to denote events in Earth's history, the "present" serves as an approximate endpoint typically aligned with the current calendar year, for instance 2025, from which ages are calculated backward.^[26] Over such vast intervals, pinpointing the exact year introduces negligible discrepancy; a variation of even 75 years equates to just 0.0000075% of one million years, rendering it insignificant for scientific precision. Conventions for defining years can differ across disciplines, with standard calendar years (including a year zero at AD 1) prevailing in geology, while astronomical year numbering—employing no year zero and negative integers for pre-AD eras (e.g., year 0 as 1 BC, year -1 as 2 BC)—is adopted in astronomy and some interdisciplinary chronologies to avoid discontinuities in calculations.^[32] These distinctions primarily affect shorter timescales and have minimal bearing on Ma interpretations in deep time.^[33]

Uncertainty in Deep Time Scales

Uncertainty in deep time scales arises from analytical limitations in dating methods, incomplete stratigraphic records, and evolving calibration data, leading to error margins that increase with geological age. For relatively recent events, such as the base of the Pleistocene epoch at 2.58 Ma, uncertainties are typically small, on the order of ±0.005 Ma, reflecting high-precision radiometric dating of well-preserved volcanic ash layers. In contrast, for older Phanerozoic boundaries like the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) at 66.04 Ma, errors widen to ±0.043 Ma due to challenges in correlating global stratigraphic sections and accounting for isotopic decay variations. These margins ensure that age assignments represent statistically robust estimates, but they highlight the provisional nature of the geologic time scale.^[34] Historical revisions underscore the dynamic refinement of these timescales. A prominent example is the K-Pg boundary, initially pegged at approximately 65 Ma in mid-20th-century estimates, which was revised to 66 Ma following high-precision U-Pb dating of impact-related zircons from the Chicxulub crater, confirming the asteroid impact's timing with the mass extinction. Such updates often stem from improved analytical techniques and new fossil or isotopic evidence, compressing or expanding intervals by 1-2% in some cases. For Precambrian events, uncertainties are notably larger, reaching ±5 Ma or more for some boundaries like the base of the Ediacaran period at approximately 635 Ma, owing to sparse datable materials and metamorphic overprinting of ancient rocks.^[35] Ongoing debates center on discrepancies between independent dating approaches, particularly in evolutionary timescales. Molecular clocks, calibrated by genetic divergence rates, frequently propose origins for major clades millions of years earlier than the fossil record suggests—for instance, estimating animal diversification over 100 Ma before the Ediacaran fossils appear around 575 Ma—prompting discussions on rate heterogeneity and calibration biases. These tensions can imply timescale expansions for early life events or compressions in vertebrate evolution, resolved through integrated fossil-molecular models that prioritize high-impact calibrations. While definitions of the "present" introduce minor adjustments of up to 0.01 Ma, the primary challenges remain in harmonizing disparate data sources for precise deep-time chronologies.^[36]^[37]

References

[1]
The Pleistocene Epoch
The Pleistocene Epoch, from 2.6 million to 11,700 years ago, had large mammals, ice ages, and the expansion of Homo sapiens.
[2]
Why Did Glacial Cycles Intensify a Million Years Ago?
Nov 8, 2021 · A new study suggests that a million years ago, glaciers began sticking more persistently to their beds, triggering cycles of longer ice ...
[3]
Introduction to Human Evolution
Jul 9, 2024 · Early humans first migrated out of Africa into Asia probably between 2 million and 1.8 million years ago. They entered Europe somewhat later, ...
[4]
Pleistocene Megafauna in Beringia (U.S. National Park Service)
Feb 7, 2019 · Beringia's ice-age (Pleistocene) iconic mega-fauna (mammals >100 lbs or 45 kg) included the mastodon (Mammut americanum), woolly mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius ...
[5]
Earth History – Introduction to Earth Science
This chapter will cover briefly the origin of the universe and the 4.6 billion year history of Earth.
[6]
Quaternary Period—2.58 MYA to Today (U.S. National Park Service)
Apr 27, 2023 · During the Pleistocene, mammoths arrived in North America and mastodons, which evolved in America, appear to have spread into Eurasia.Missing: 1 | Show results with:1
[7]
[PDF] Guidance on Geologic Names Usage for Authors and Peer ...
abbreviations (ka, for kilo-annum, or thousand years ago; Ma, for mega-annum, or million years ago; and Ga, for giga-annum, or billion years ago). Note that ...
[8]
Glossary of Paleontological Terms - National Park Service
Aug 13, 2024 · ... Ma. Camelid, A member of the family Camelidae, a group of mammals ... An abbreviation for “megaannum” or “mega-annum” meaning “million years”, ...
[9]
Geologic Time Scale - Earth@Home
Jan 29, 2024 · Kya = thousand years ago. Ma: "mega anum," one-million years. Mya = million years ago. Ga: "giga anum," one-billion ...Missing: ya | Show results with:ya
[10]
Rock Dating - Utah Geological Survey
Relative dating places events or rocks in their chronologic sequence or order of occurrence. Absolute dating places events or rocks at a specific time. If a ...
[11]
Charles Lyell Publishes The Principles of Geology (1830-33), in ...
Concluding that Earth is ancient (Lyell's estimate was several hundred million years old, as compared to the currently accepted age of 4.6 billion years) ...
[12]
Uniformitarianism: Charles Lyell - Understanding Evolution
Lyell's version of geology came to be known as uniformitarianism, because of his fierce insistence that the processes that alter the Earth are uniform through ...
[13]
Kelvin, Wenner, and the Ages of the Sun and the Earth - AIP.ORG
Feb 27, 2019 · A logical estimate for the age of the earth appeared to be 20 million years, which he found more likely than 100 million and certainly not 500 ...
[14]
7 Geologic Time - OpenGeology
7.2. In the late 19th century William Thompson, a.k.a. Lord Kelvin, applied his knowledge of physics to the problem. He assumed that the Earth started as a hot ...Missing: Lyell | Show results with:Lyell
[15]
Fossils, Rocks, and Time: The Numeric Time Scale - USGS.gov
Aug 14, 1997 · The assignment of ages of rocks in thousands, millions, and billions of years was made possible by the discovery of radioactivity.
[16]
Benchmarks: March 1913: The first complete geologic timescale is published
### Summary of Arthur Holmes' 1911 Work and Early Geological Time Scales
[17]
The age of the Earth in the United States (1891–1931)
Jan 1, 2001 · By the late 1920s a fruitful alliance had developed between the Geophysical Laboratory in Washington and the Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge, ...
[18]
International Commission on Stratigraphy
The International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) is the largest and oldest constituent scientific body in the International Union of Geological Sciences ...Chronostratigraphic Chart · The 2023/06 International... · Stratigraphic Guide · LinksMissing: 1970s formalization
[19]
[PDF] The ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart
The primary objective of ICS is to define precisely a global standard set of time- correlative units (Systems, Series, and Stages) for stratigraphic ...
[20]
the panerozoic time-scale: a symposium ed. by w.b. harland, a.g. ...
Title, THE PANEROZOIC TIME-SCALE: A SYMPOSIUM ED. BY W.B. HARLAND, A.G. SMITH AND B. WILCOCK. Contributor, W. B. EDITOR. HARLAND. Published, 1964.
[21]
The Phanerozoic Time-Scale—A Symposium Dedicated to ...
The time-scale published in this volume would appear to rest on about. 180 age determinations for Tertiary and Cretaceous time and on about half that number for ...<|separator|>
[22]
Paleogene Period—66.0 to 23.0 MYA - National Park Service
Apr 27, 2023 · Paleogene Time Span · Date range: 66.0 million years ago–23.0 million years ago · Length: 43.0 million years (0.95% of geologic time) · Geologic ...
[23]
What was Pangea? | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov
From about 300-200 million years ago (late Paleozoic Era until the very late Triassic), the continent we now know as North America was contiguous with Africa, ...
[24]
Convergent Plate Boundaries—Subduction Zones - Geology (U.S. ...
Feb 11, 2020 · About 200 million years ago a large tectonic plate (called the Farallon Plate) started to subduct beneath the western edge of North America. The ...
[25]
Geologic time scale
Quaternary (2.588 mya to present). Holocene (11,700 yrs to present); Pleistocene (2.588 mya to 11,700 yrs). Neogene (23.03 to 2.588 mya).
[26]
What We Do | Isotope Geochemistry Laboratory
... dating would be a sample fo zircon with equal amounts of 238U and 206U. For zircons ... The half-life of 238U is 4.468 billion years (4,468,000,000 years).
[27]
Geologic Timescale, Geologic Dating Techniques, and Numeric ...
Jan 30, 2024 · Relative age dating determines the order in which a sequence of geologic events occurred (e.g., bottom-to-top sequential deposition of ...
[28]
[PDF] U-Pb and U-Th-Pb Geochronology
This reading focuses on ages calculated using the decay of uranium to lead. Figure 3. Decay chains of 238U (left) and 235U (right). Schematic axes represent ...
[29]
Dating | The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program
Jan 3, 2024 · The only time interval in which all three species lived is between 3.5 and 2.9 million years ago. ... Potassium-argon (40K-40Ar) dating 1 ...
[30]
A beginner's guide to dating (rocks) | U.S. Geological Survey
Apr 8, 2024 · Cosmogenic surface exposure dating determines how long the surface of a rock has been exposed to cosmic rays, which are high-energy particles ...
[31]
Going, going, argon! Determining volcanic eruption ages with argon ...
Jun 10, 2024 · Argon dating is a powerful tool for determining when volcanoes erupted in the past. This technique works on a multitude of volcanic materials.
[32]
Geologic Age: Using Radioactive Decay to Determine ... - USGS.gov
The mathematical expression that relates radioactive decay to geologic time is called the age equation and is: t=1/delta ln(1 + D/P). where: t is the age of a ...Missing: λ) | Show results with:λ)
[33]
Year Dating Conventions - NASA Eclipse
Feb 25, 2008 · The astronomical year 0 corresponds to the year 1 BCE, while the astronomical year -1 corresponds to 2 BCE. In general, any given year "x BCE" ...
[34]
[PDF] Geological Time Conventions and Symbols
According to that well-established convention, the symbols ka, Ma, and Ga refer explicitly to points in time in powers of 103 years before present. Spans of ...
[35]
[PDF] Divisions of Geologic Time— Major Chronostratigraphic and ...
definition of the base of the Quaternary and the corresponding base of the Pleistocene Series/Epoch, changing its age from 1.806 Ma to. 2.588 Ma (see box for ...
[36]
The origin of animals: Can molecular clocks and the fossil record be ...
Dec 5, 2016 · Thus, accepting their limitations, both molecular clocks and the fossil record provide an accurate, if not precise, timescale for animal ...
[37]
The evolution of methods for establishing evolutionary timescales
Jul 19, 2016 · While the molecular clock can be used to extend the time estimates from fossil species to lineages not represented in the fossil record, fossils ...