Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

OHADA

The Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa (OHADA; French: Organisation pour l'Harmonisation en Afrique du Droit des Affaires) is an intergovernmental legal integration organization established by a treaty signed on 17 October 1993 in Port Louis, Mauritius, and entering into force on 18 September 1995. Comprising 17 member states primarily in West and Central Africa, including Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal, and Togo, OHADA aims to harmonize business laws to provide legal and judicial security for investors and promote economic development. Its uniform acts, which take precedence over inconsistent national laws, cover key areas such as general commercial law, company law, securities, debt recovery, arbitration, and cooperative societies, with nine such acts adopted and periodically revised since inception. OHADA's defining institutions include the Permanent Secretariat in , , responsible for coordination; the Common Court of Justice and (CCJA) in , Côte d'Ivoire, which serves as the supranational judicial body; and the Regional Training School for the Judiciary (ERSUMA) for . Notable achievements encompass the modernization of business frameworks, facilitating cross-border trade, and establishing a reliable system that has handled thousands of cases, thereby enhancing investor confidence in a region historically plagued by legal fragmentation. While implementation faces challenges such as resource constraints, institutional gaps, and linguistic barriers (primarily operating in ), empirical assessments indicate progress in , though full efficacy requires sustained national reforms.

History

Founding Treaty and Initial Adoption

The , establishing the Organisation pour l'Harmonisation en Afrique du Droit des Affaires (OHADA), was signed on 17 October 1993 in Port-Louis, , by fourteen primarily francophone West and Central African states. This initiative responded to widespread economic crises and legal fragmentation that deterred , aiming to create uniform, modern business laws to ensure legal and judicial security for enterprises across the region. The outlined OHADA's structure, including a for adopting Uniform Acts, a Permanent headquartered in , , and provisions for a Common Court of Justice and Arbitration. It required by member states, entering into force sixty days after the seventh instrument of was deposited, which occurred on 18 1995. Initial adoption proceeded through ratifications, with the treaty becoming binding in the founding states upon entry into force, enabling the subsequent development and adoption of harmonized legal instruments starting in 1997. The fourteen original signatories formed the core of OHADA's membership, focused on francophone countries to facilitate rapid harmonization amid shared colonial legal heritage and economic interdependence.

Expansion and Key Milestones

OHADA's membership expanded progressively following the signing of its founding treaty on October 17, 1993, by initial states, with ratifications beginning in 1995 and culminating in 17 member states by 2012. The of the Congo's accession on September 12, 2012, marked the latest addition, extending the organization's reach across West and and enhancing regional business law harmonization. This growth from core Francophone nations to a broader coalition underscores OHADA's role in fostering legal predictability amid diverse national systems. Key milestones include the treaty's entry into force after sufficient ratifications in 1995, enabling the adoption of foundational Uniform Acts starting in 1997, such as those on General Commercial Law, Commercial Companies and Economic Interest Groups, and Securities on April 17, 1997. The treaty revision on October 17, 2008, in strengthened supranational institutions like the Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA) and opened membership to any state, promoting wider adoption. Subsequent developments featured targeted reforms, including revisions to the Uniform Act on Securities and General Commercial Law on December 15, 2010, which boosted secured lending and unlocked $3.82 billion in private sector credit across seven states by 2019. The Uniform Act on Commercial Companies was overhauled on January 30, 2014, modernizing corporate structures, while arbitration rules were updated on November 23, 2017, aligning with international standards to expedite . These milestones reflect OHADA's adaptive evolution, prioritizing empirical improvements in legal security and investment facilitation.

Organizational Structure and Institutions

Core Institutions

The core institutions of OHADA, established by the Treaty on the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa signed on October 17, 1993, in , and revised on October 17, 2008, in , include the Conference of Heads of State and Government, the , the Permanent Secretariat, the Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA), and the Higher Regional School of Magistracy (ERSUMA). These supranational bodies ensure the organization's legislative, executive, judicial, and training functions to promote uniform business law application across 17 member states. Conference of Heads of State and Government functions as the supreme political organ, offering strategic guidance and impetus for business law harmonization while addressing member states' political concerns related to OHADA objectives. It meets irregularly to deliberate on high-level issues, such as treaty revisions or expansion, and appoints key officials like the Secretary General. , comprising Ministers of , , or equivalent from each member state, serves as the primary deliberative and legislative authority. It adopts Uniform Acts—binding harmonized laws on topics like and securities—approves budgets, regulates institution operations, and elects judges to the CCJA. Sessions occur annually or as convened, with decisions requiring a two-thirds majority. Permanent Secretariat, the executive body headquartered in , , coordinates overall OHADA activities, prepares draft Uniform Acts and annual work programs, monitors implementation in member states, and represents the organization in international forums. Led by a Secretary General appointed for a five-year term, it employs around 50 staff and manages the Official Gazette for publishing legal texts. Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA), seated in , d’Ivoire, operates as the supreme judicial institution with exclusive jurisdiction over OHADA law disputes. It reviews national court decisions for uniformity, renders advisory opinions, and administers arbitrations via its integrated center, handling over 100 cases annually as of recent reports; rulings are directly enforceable in member states without further appeal. The court consists of 16 judges, nominated by member states and elected by the for seven-year renewable terms. Higher Regional School of Magistracy (ERSUMA), based in , , focuses on through training programs, seminars, and research for judges, lawyers, notaries, and business professionals on OHADA-specific laws. Established to address implementation gaps, it has trained thousands since , emphasizing practical application and doctrinal development to enhance legal expertise across the region.

Governance and Operations

The governance of OHADA is outlined in its founding of October 17, 1993, as amended in 2008, establishing a supranational framework with five primary institutions to ensure harmonized business law application across member states. The Conference of Heads of State and Government serves as the highest political body, convening irregularly to provide strategic guidelines and resolve major impasses, though it has met infrequently since inception, deferring operational authority to subordinate organs. The , comprising the Ministers of Justice and Finance from each of the 17 member states, functions as the principal deliberative and normative organ, holding at least annual sessions to adopt Acts by unanimous vote, allocate budgets, and supervise institutional activities. For instance, at its 59th ordinary session on September 12, 2025, the Council adopted regulations governing its own operations, the powers and organization of the Permanent Secretariat, and enhancements to institutional frameworks. Decisions on matters require a two-thirds of members present, while Acts—directly applicable and overriding inconsistent national laws—demand full among voting states. Day-to-day operations are executed by the Permanent Secretariat, headquartered in , , and led by a Secretary General appointed by the for a five-year renewable term. This executive body coordinates harmonization efforts, drafts Uniform Acts for review, organizes ministerial sessions, publishes official gazettes, and oversees the ERSUMA training school, ensuring uniform implementation through and monitoring. Judicial oversight and dispute resolution fall under the Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA), based in , Côte d'Ivoire, with 13 judges elected by the for seven-year terms. The CCJA exercises final appellate over OHADA interpretations, reviews national court decisions for uniformity, and administers arbitrations under its rules, with recent reforms in updating internal procedures to address procedural challenges. Complementing these, the Higher Regional School of Magistracy (ERSUMA) in , , conducts training for judges, lawyers, and administrators on OHADA law, while National Committees in each member state facilitate local adaptation, consultation, and enforcement monitoring by bridging regional directives with domestic realities. This structure promotes operational efficiency through centralized norm-setting and decentralized application, with the Council's supervisory role ensuring accountability across organs.

Membership

Current Member States

OHADA comprises 17 member states, all located in West and Central , as of October 2025. These countries have adopted the organization's uniform business laws to facilitate regional and investment. The member states are: , , , , , , (Republic of the ), Côte d'Ivoire, , , , , , , , , and . This membership covers a population exceeding 300 million people and represents a significant portion of francophone 's economic space.

Accession Process and Regional Coverage

The accession process to OHADA is governed by Article 55 of the revised of 17 October 1993, as amended in 2008, which stipulates that membership is open to any African state—regardless of membership—that formally expresses its intent to join. A prospective member must sign the and complete domestic procedures, after which it deposits its instrument of ratification with the depositary authority in . This ratification phase often spans one to three years or longer, depending on national legislative processes and any required adaptations to domestic laws, as seen in Burundi's ongoing efforts as of 2024. Upon effective accession, the state is immediately bound by all existing Uniform Acts, institutional decisions, and the 's obligations, with no transitional provisions unless specified. OHADA's regional coverage encompasses 17 member states concentrated in and , facilitating cross-border business harmonization across a exceeding 300 million. These include , , , , , , (Republic of), Côte d'Ivoire, , , , , , , , , and . The organization primarily aligns with francophone jurisdictions but extends to lusophone () and hispanophone () states, as well as insular in the , thereby bridging () and Economic and Monetary Community of Central Africa (CEMAC) zones for enhanced regional economic integration. No accessions have occurred since the 's entry on 12 September 2012, though interest persists from non-members like and .

Uniform Acts and Harmonized Laws

The Uniform Acts constitute the core legislative instruments of OHADA, serving as directly applicable supranational laws that supersede conflicting national legislation within member states on covered business law matters. Adopted by the OHADA , these acts aim to standardize commercial practices, enhance legal predictability, and facilitate cross-border and across the 17 member states. Upon publication in the OHADA Official Journal, they enter into force 90 days after adoption unless otherwise specified, with member states required to repeal or amend inconsistent domestic laws. As of 2023, OHADA has adopted 11 primary Uniform Acts, spanning general , corporate structures, , , , securities, cooperatives, , and enforcement procedures, with several undergoing revisions to address evolving economic needs. These acts do not encompass all business law areas—such as labor or —but focus on harmonization in domains critical to operations. Revisions reflect adaptations to global standards, such as incorporating modern frameworks or digital enforcement mechanisms, while preserving the principle of uniformity.
Uniform Act TitleAdoption DateKey Coverage
General Commercial Law17 April 1997Merchant status, commercial acts, and obligations.
Commercial Companies and Economic Interest Groupings17 April 1997 (revised 2014)Formation, governance, and dissolution of companies and groupings.
Organization of Securities17 April 1997 (revised 15 December 2010)Real and personal security interests, including pledges and mortgages.
Simplified Recovery Procedures and Enforcement Measures10 April 1998 (revised 17 October 2023)Debt collection, attachments, and execution of judgments.
Collective Procedures for Wiping Off Debts (Insolvency)10 April 1998 (revised 10 April 2015)Bankruptcy, reorganization, and creditor protections.
Arbitration11 March 1999 (revised 23 November 2017)Arbitral proceedings, awards, and enforcement.
Organization and Harmonization of Company Accounting23 March 2000 (revised 26 January 2017)Financial reporting standards and audits.
Contracts for the Carriage of Goods by Road22 March 2003Transport contracts, liabilities, and documentation.
Cooperative Societies15 December 2010Formation, management, and operations of cooperatives.
Mediation23 November 2017Amicable dispute resolution processes.
Accounting System for Not-for-Profit Entities23 November 2021Reporting requirements for NGOs and similar entities.
These acts are interpreted and enforced uniformly by the Common Court of Justice and (CCJA), ensuring consistent application despite national variations in implementation. While effective in reducing legal fragmentation, their success depends on domestic judicial capacity and compliance, with ongoing revisions addressing gaps like digital commerce and prevention.

Arbitration and Judicial Mechanisms

The Common Court of Justice and (CCJA), established in 1998 and headquartered in , Côte d'Ivoire, serves as OHADA's primary judicial institution, functioning as the for disputes involving the uniform application of OHADA laws across member states. Composed of 13 judges appointed by member states, the CCJA ensures consistent interpretation and enforcement of Uniform Acts by reviewing appeals from national courts, issuing cassation judgments, and providing advisory opinions on legal questions referred by national tribunals or the OHADA . It also verifies the legal consistency of draft Uniform Acts prior to adoption, thereby safeguarding the harmonized business law framework without direct over disputes. In its judicial capacity, the CCJA prioritizes uniformity, overturning national decisions that deviate from OHADA texts, as evidenced by its handling of over 1,000 cassation s since inception, focusing on procedural and substantive errors in commercial matters like company and securities. Decisions are binding supranationally, enforceable directly in member states without further review, which strengthens legal predictability but has raised concerns about limited grounds for , confined to OHADA violations rather than factual reexamination. courts retain primary competence for first-instance proceedings, with the CCJA intervening only on points of , a structure designed to balance supranational oversight with local judicial autonomy. OHADA's arbitration mechanisms are governed by the Uniform Act on (UAA), first adopted on March 11, 1999, and revised on November 23, 2017, to modernize procedures and align with international standards like the UNCITRAL Model Law. The UAA applies to any arbitration seated in an OHADA , covering disputes over disposable rights via , and explicitly recognizes arbitration clauses in treaties or codes as valid bases for proceedings. It permits both and institutional arbitration, with awards enforceable across all 17 s akin to judgments, subject to limited CCJA review for violations or procedural irregularities. The CCJA doubles as the arbitral authority, administering proceedings under its revised rules (updated post-2017 UAA), including arbitrator appointments, challenge decisions, and of awards, while recent reforms introduced a dedicated division to separate these functions from its cassation role, enhancing perceived independence. This dual role allows the CCJA to supervise without intervening in merits, supporting over 200 administered cases annually by streamlining and reducing risks, though critics note potential conflicts from the court's institutional overlap. The framework promotes investor confidence by guaranteeing award recognition without re-litigation in national courts, with the 2017 revisions expanding scope to provisional measures and third-party funding disclosures.

Economic and Developmental Impact

Achievements in Business Environment

The harmonization of business laws under OHADA has notably enhanced access to across member states through reforms like the revised Uniform Act on Secured Transactions, effective January 2011, which expanded eligible and improved mechanisms, resulting in $3.82 billion in additional domestic to the in seven countries (, , , , Côte d'Ivoire, , and ) between 2011 and 2015. This act facilitated movable asset financing, previously limited, by allowing non-possessory pledges and prioritizing secured creditors in , thereby reducing lender risks and encouraging extension to . Reforms to , including the revised Uniform Act on Commercial Companies and Economic Interest Groups, streamlined registration by reducing procedures, time, and costs, with approximately 56 of 227 OHADA-wide reforms over a decade targeting startup processes, leading to dramatic efficiency gains such as fewer required documents and online registries in multiple states. These changes generated measurable cost savings in six implementing countries in , making incorporation more affordable and predictable, which supported higher rates of formal enterprise formation. OHADA's uniform framework has bolstered enforcement and , with 95 regulatory reforms since 2011 across key areas, positioning member states as among the most active reformers globally in 2015–2016 per assessments. Countries like Côte d'Ivoire demonstrated superior performance in these indicators compared to peers, with simplified procedures for creditor recovery and under the Common Court of Justice and Arbitration, enhancing judicial predictability and investor confidence. This legal uniformity has facilitated cross-border trade and by mitigating risks associated with disparate national laws, as evidenced by increased engagement in harmonized zones.

Empirical Evidence and Studies

A 2019 impact assessment by the (IFC) and OHADA, analyzing reforms to four Uniform Acts between 2010 and 2015, employed synthetic control methods (SCM) and case studies to evaluate effects on the business environment across 17 member states. The study found significant improvements in business registration following the 2014 Uniform Act on Commercial Companies and Economic Interest Groupings, which reduced minimum capital requirements for limited liability companies (SARLs) to 100,000 CFA francs and made notarial deeds optional; for instance, registered approximately 700 additional SARLs per year, representing a 30% increase, while saw about 400 more annually. In Côte d’Ivoire, total new business registrations rose from 2,698 in 2013 to 14,784 in 2016, with cost savings from simplified procedures totaling $7.8 million across six countries from 2015 to mid-2017. On access to , the attributed an additional $3.82 billion in domestic between 2011 and 2015 to the 2010 Uniform Act on Security Interests in Movable Property (effective 2011), with notable gains in seven of ten analyzed countries; gained $1.1 billion, Burkina Faso $894 million, $729 million, and $607 million. SCM comparisons indicated that OHADA member states outperformed synthetic controls of non-member African economies in expansion and registration volumes, supporting causal links to the reforms, though conflicts in countries like and the Central African Republic likely understated full effects. Evidence for under the 2015 Uniform Act remained limited, with low filing rates for simplified procedures among in countries like and Côte d’Ivoire, partly due to implementation delays. A 2022 economic impact study commissioned by OHADA and conducted by IDEA Consult International from 2021 to 2022 affirmed positive contributions to business creation, private sector financing, investment, employment, and growth, based on analysis of Uniform Acts' legal effectiveness and institutional coherence. However, it highlighted needs for better professional assimilation of laws and targeted improvements in certain institutions, without disclosing granular quantitative metrics in public summaries. Earlier analyses, such as a 2011 World Bank policy research working paper, noted OHADA's potential to enhance legal certainty for investors through harmonization but lacked direct quantitative comparisons of foreign direct investment or growth rates between member and non-member states, emphasizing instead structural challenges like judicial backlogs. These studies collectively demonstrate targeted gains in procedural efficiency and credit access attributable to specific OHADA reforms, with SCM providing evidence of relative to counterfactuals, though broader developmental outcomes like sustained FDI inflows or GDP acceleration remain underexplored due to data limitations and confounding factors such as regional instability.

Criticisms and Challenges

Implementation and Enforcement Issues

Despite the direct applicability of OHADA's Uniform Acts in member states, enforcement remains inconsistent due to variations in national judicial capacities and procedures, leading to divergent practical outcomes across the 17 countries. For instance, while Uniform Acts mandate simplified recovery procedures, some states impose additional local requirements, such as mandatory court deposits for initiating measures, which undermine the intended uniformity and efficiency. The Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA) faces significant hurdles in ensuring uniform enforcement of its decisions, as national courts bear primary responsibility for implementation but often lack the resources or training to align fully with OHADA standards. This results in delays, resistance during execution, and improper handling of notifications, particularly in debt recovery and arbitral award enforcement, where procedural non-uniformity across member states complicates processes. Critics highlight that these enforcement gaps stem from inadequate national judicial infrastructure and insufficient sensitization of local practitioners, perpetuating legal uncertainty despite OHADA's supranational framework. Empirical assessments indicate that while reforms have improved formal access to , actual enforcement efficacy varies widely, with weaker institutions in smaller or less developed member states exacerbating disparities. Ongoing challenges include reconciling OHADA rules with entrenched national practices, which can lead to selective application and reduced investor confidence in cross-border transactions.

Sovereignty and Cultural Concerns

OHADA's supranational framework has elicited concerns regarding the erosion of national , as member states cede authority over business law harmonization to the organization's institutions. Uniform Acts, once adopted by the OHADA , become directly applicable across member states and prevail over inconsistent domestic laws, effectively limiting legislative autonomy in commercial matters. This transfer is viewed by some scholars as a deliberate pooling of to foster , yet it has been criticized for enabling top-down imposition without sufficient national parliamentary , contributing to a perceived . Judicial sovereignty faces particular scrutiny due to the supremacy of the Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA), whose rulings are final and enforceable without recourse to national courts, potentially overriding local judicial interpretations. In Cameroon, for instance, analyses have argued that Articles 42 and 63 of the OHADA Treaty conflict with constitutional provisions affirming the supremacy of national law, rendering the treaty's application unconstitutional unless amended domestically. Common law-oriented critiques further highlight how this civil law-dominant disrupts established legal traditions in anglophone member states, such as and , by prioritizing CCJA jurisdiction over national courts accustomed to precedent-based systems. Cultural concerns arise from OHADA's origins in French models, which some observers contend inadequately accommodate Africa's diverse customary business practices and communal systems prevalent in rural economies. The regime's emphasis on formalized, investor-friendly rules—designed to appeal to global Northern capital—has been faulted for marginalizing indigenous mechanisms, such as through elders or networks, in favor of and codified uniformity. Expansion efforts into anglophone and lusophone regions have amplified these tensions, as harmonization challenges reconciling abstractions with contractualism and local socio-economic norms, potentially alienating stakeholders reliant on context-specific customs. Despite such critiques, of widespread cultural backlash remains limited, with accessions like Burundi's in 2024 framed by proponents as voluntary enhancements to legal predictability rather than impositions.

Recent Developments

Reforms and Modernization Efforts

In October 2023, the OHADA adopted a new Uniform Act organizing simplified recovery procedures and enforcement measures, published in the Official Journal on November 15, 2023, and entering into force on February 16, 2024. This reform introduces streamlined processes for and execution of judgments, including automated registration of public entity debts and expedited auctions limited to 60 days, aiming to reduce delays in enforcement that have historically hindered commercial transactions across member states. The act addresses longstanding implementation gaps by prioritizing efficiency in judicial and extrajudicial mechanisms, with provisions for pursuing creditors to request new auction dates if initial bids fail, thereby enhancing creditor confidence and facilitating faster resolution of disputes valued up to specified thresholds without full court proceedings. Complementing this, OHADA has pursued capacity-building initiatives, including seminars and training programs funded by partners like the , to ensure effective adoption of revised frameworks. For instance, in March 2024, the Union Internationale des Huissiers de Justice et Officiers Judiciaires (UIHJ) hosted a seminar in on the new enforcement act, focusing on practical application for judicial officers to modernize debt recovery practices. These efforts build on prior revisions, such as the 2017 mediation act, but emphasize post-2020 priorities like digital integration and cross-border coordination, as highlighted in OHADA's 2023 30th-anniversary assessment, which called for adaptive reforms to sustain amid evolving regional challenges. Under Senegal's chairmanship, OHADA has intensified modernization through inclusive enhancements, including updates to accounting standards via the revised SYSCOHADA system, which mandates transitions to improved financial reporting for better transparency and investor appeal. Independent evaluations, such as those by the , underscore these reforms' role in boosting private sector credit—evidenced by prior secured transactions updates yielding $3.82 billion in domestic lending across seven states—while ongoing prospects involve harmonizing with standards like UNCITRAL models to address disparities.

Ongoing Economic Impact Assessments

In 2022, OHADA commissioned a comprehensive economic impact study, approved by the on December 21-22 and published in April 2023, evaluating the organization's contributions across its 17 member states. The analysis, covering data primarily from 2015-2019, attributed positive effects to uniform acts in areas such as creation, with 149,065 enterprises registered in 2019 across 10 sampled countries (representing 89% of the population and 82% of GDP), marking a 40% increase from 106,456 in 2015 and an 8.7% annual growth rate. It also linked OHADA frameworks to enhanced credit access, rising to 17.2% of GDP in 2019 from 10.4% in 2010, alongside higher rates at 26.2% of GDP in 2019 compared to 20% in the rest of . The study further documented GDP growth at 4.0% annually from 2015-2019 in OHADA states, outperforming 1.9% in excluding OHADA members, and (FDI) growth at 7% annually over the same period, with FDI as a share of GDP rising 3.7 percentage points from 1991-1995 to 2016-2019. Enterprises per million inhabitants reached 611 by 2019, up from 477 in 2015, while Doing Business scores improved by 8.9 points from 2010-2020, exceeding the 3.1-point gain in other countries. However, the concluded that OHADA's overall impact remains "certain but insufficient" relative to regional challenges, citing inconsistent , low informal sector integration, and varying effectiveness of specific uniform acts. Complementing this, a 2019 International Finance Corporation (IFC) report on OHADA reforms from 2007-2017 quantified impacts from uniform acts on secured transactions, company law, and , estimating a $3.82 billion increase in domestic credit across seven countries from 2011-2015 due to secured transactions reforms, alongside surges in simplified (SARL) registrations—such as a 30% rise in —and $7.8 million in business cost savings from company law changes in six countries between 2015 and mid-2017. These evaluations underscore OHADA's role in fostering legal predictability but highlight gaps in resolution and broader FDI attribution. To sustain evaluations, the 2023 OHADA study recommends establishing a continuous monitoring system with 68 indicators, annual reports from national commissions, and triennial professional surveys to track effectiveness, alongside enhanced and best-practice sharing via institutions like ERSUMA. Such mechanisms aim to address implementation variances and measure causal links more robustly, though persistent structural barriers in member states may limit attribution of macroeconomic outcomes solely to OHADA .

References

  1. [1]
    History of OHADA
    OHADA is an intergovernmental organization for legal integration. It was established by the Treaty of 17 October 1993 signed in Port Louis (Mauritius).
  2. [2]
    General overview - OHADA
    History of OHADA · Achievements · Terms of Membership · State Members. General overview. OHADA's Mission: To harmonize business Law in Africa in order to ...
  3. [3]
    Portail du droit OHADA - Droit-Afrique
    L'Organisation pour l'Harmonisation en Afrique du Droit des Affaires (OHADA) regroupe les pays suivants : Bénin, Burkina Faso, Cameroun, Comores, Congo, Congo ...
  4. [4]
    Achievements - OHADA
    History of OHADA · Achievements · Terms of Membership · State Members. Achievements. As from the entry into force of the Treaty (September 1995), the activities ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Can OHADA Increase Legal Certainty in Africa?
    The authors conclude that in making OHADA law effective, Member States face continuing and substantial resource deficits, institutional deficiencies, language ...
  6. [6]
    The Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa ...
    Jan 15, 2024 · The Treaty that established it has profoundly changed the face of trade between the so-called “OHADA zone” and the rest of the world.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  7. [7]
    INTRODUCING OHADA
    INTRODUCING OHADA. OHADA, the Organisation for the Harmonisation of Business Law in Africa is an organisation created on October 17, 1993 in Port-Louis, ...<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    [PDF] TREATY ON THE HARMONISATION OF BUSINESS LAW IN AFRICA
    The realisation of the tasks planned in the present Treaty shall be implemented by an organisation called the Organisation for the Harmonisation of Business Law ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] THE ATTITUDE OF OHADA LAW COUNTRIES TOWARDS THE CISG*
    To this end, they adopted the treaty creating OHADA in Port Louis, Mauritius, on 17. October 1993. That treaty entered into force on 18 September 1995 after a ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa (OHADA)
    The OHADA Treaty is made up today of 16 Africans states. Initially fourteen African countries signed the treaty, with two countries (Comoros and Guinea) ...
  11. [11]
    OHADA Reforms Show Significant Impact on Private Sector ...
    Jan 30, 2019 · Most notably, the OHADA Uniform Act on Secured Transactions led to $3.82 billion domestic credit to the private sector in seven member states ...
  12. [12]
    OHADA's Organization
    The Permanent Secretariat is the executive body of OHADA. Its headquarters are located in Yaoundé (Cameroon). It ensures the overall coordination of the ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
  13. [13]
    Les institutions de l'OHADA
    Aug 8, 2024 · Organe exécutif de l'OHADA, le Secrétariat Permanent a son siège à Yaoundé au Cameroun. Il assure la coordination générale du fonctionnement ...
  14. [14]
    Stakeholders - OHADA
    At the regional level. The Conference of Heads of State and Government: It is a political body that meets when necessary to give general guidelines and ...
  15. [15]
    Regulations and decisions - OHADA
    OHADA regulations include the OHADA Treaty, Uniform Acts, and decisions like the 2010-2015 strategic direction. The CCJA is the supreme court for OHADA law.
  16. [16]
    Final Communiqué of the Fifty-Ninth Session of the Council of ...
    Sep 12, 2025 · In the area of law-making activities, the Council of Ministers adopted a number of important decisions aimed at enhancing OHADA's institutional ...Missing: operations | Show results with:operations
  17. [17]
    Permanent Secretariat in a nutshell - OHADA
    The Permanent Secretariat is OHADA's executive body, assisting the Council of Ministers, preparing Uniform Acts, publishing them, and supervising ERSUMA.
  18. [18]
    The new configuration of the CCJA arbitration & Immunity from ...
    Mar 21, 2024 · In response, the OHADA Council of Minister has approved the new internal rules of the CCJA arbitration on 17 October 2024; according to these ...
  19. [19]
    State Members - OHADA
    State Members · Benin · Burkina Faso · Cameroon · Central African Republic · Comoros · Congo · Cote d'Ivoire · Gabon ...Missing: current | Show results with:current
  20. [20]
    OHADA – Organisation pour l'harmonisation en Afrique du droit des ...
    Official newspaper. OHADA Law. Uniform Acts · Law case · CCJA Doctrine · Bibliography · Etudes · Publications · Pratique professionnelle · OHADA Treaty revised ...OHADA news and announcements · Ohada news · Official Gazette · News
  21. [21]
    Terms of Membership - OHADA
    The OHADA Organization is open to any state, member or not of the African Union (AU) that expresses the wish to join.Missing: amendments | Show results with:amendments<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Relevant questions on the presentation: “Burundi's Accession ...
    Oct 18, 2024 · The accession process could take between one and three years, depending on how swiftly the Burundian government ratifies the OHADA treaty and ...
  23. [23]
    Accession of Democratic Republic of Congo to OHADA - HG.org
    On September 12, 2012, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) became party to the community law, Treaty, Decisions and Uniform Acts of the Organization for the ...
  24. [24]
    What on Earth is OHADA? - LinkedIn
    Apr 25, 2025 · Today, 17 countries are part of OHADA: Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Republic of Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    One Market, One Law - OHADA.com
    Sep 29, 2025 · Madagascar and Burundi are expected, hopefully soon, to be the next new members of OHADA.
  26. [26]
    Chronology - OHADA
    Tableau chronologique d'adoption des Actes uniformes de l'OHADA par le Conseil des Ministres de la Justice et des Finances ; Acte uniforme relatif aux contrats ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] COMPILATION OF TREATIES AND UNIFORM ACTS - OHADA.com
    Nov 24, 2016 · I - TREATY OF 17 OCTOBER 1993 ON THE HARMONIZATION. OF BUSINESS LAW IN AFRICA ...................................................3 - 20.
  28. [28]
    Current Uniform Acts - OHADA
    ... Uniform act on Cooperatives Date and place of adoption: 15 December 2010. Read more » · Organizing simplified recovery procedures and measures of execution.
  29. [29]
    Publication in the OHADA Official Gazette of the Uniform Act ...
    Oct 17, 2023 · The new Uniform Act organizing simplified recovery procedures and enforcement measures was published in the OHADA Official Journal on the 15 th of November ...Missing: liste | Show results with:liste
  30. [30]
    Arbitration law – OHADA
    Date of entry into force: March 15, 2018. Adopted on 23 November 2017 to ... OHADA Treaty revised · Regulations & Decisions. Quick access. Latest News ...
  31. [31]
    Uniform Act on Mediation - OHADA
    The Uniform Act on Mediation (UAM) is the tenth uniform text adopted by OHADA. The new text fills the legislative void that existed in most OHADA Member States.
  32. [32]
    Availability of the Uniform Act on the Accounting System for Not-for ...
    This text, which enriches the OHADA's normative arsenal, is the 11th Uniform Act. It is a useful complement to the Uniform Act of 26 January 2017 on ...
  33. [33]
    CCJA at a glance - OHADA
    The CCJA is the key institution of OHADA, installed in 1998, with 13 judges, and headquartered in Abidjan, but can sit in any member state.
  34. [34]
    CCJA Tasks and Responsibilities - OHADA
    The main function of the CCJA islegal. As such, itis of Cassation judge in any dispute regardingmatterswithin the laws of OHADA.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] The OHADA Common Court of Justice and Arbitration
    Jan 16, 2016 · The CCJA has three principal roles. The first entails review of draft. Uniform Acts: the CCJA verifies the drafts' consistency with the OHADA.
  36. [36]
    [PDF] council of ministers uniform act on arbitration - New York Convention
    The Uniform Act applies to arbitrations in member states, allowing any person to use it for rights they can freely dispose of, and the agreement is independent ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] UNIFORM ACT ON ARBITRATION - Aceris Law LLC
    This Uniform Act shall apply to any arbitration when the seat of the Arbitral Tribunal is in one of the Member States. ARTICLE 2. Any natural person or ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] OHADA - Uniform Act on arbitration (www.droit-afrique.com)
    This Uniform Act shall apply to any arbitration when the seat of the arbitral tribunal is in one of the States Parties. ARTICLE 2. Any natural or legal person ...
  39. [39]
    Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook 2024-2025
    Jan 1, 2025 · The CCJA applied the principle of the autonomy of the arbitration clause, considering that as such a clause was independent from the Management ...Missing: governance | Show results with:governance
  40. [40]
    A Step Back for OHADA Arbitrations? - Wolters Kluwer
    Feb 10, 2016 · The criticism focusses on two key points: the treatment of the arbitrators; and the treatment of the award.
  41. [41]
    [PDF] An Impact Assessment of OHADA Reforms - World Bank Document
    Dec 31, 2018 · Looking at four OHADA Uniform Act reforms, this report finds that they have had significant success in improving access to finance, business ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Strong FIAS Results in OHADA
    For more than a decade, the World Bank. Group, with the support of FIAS and the government of France, has helped develop a consistent and modern set of business.
  43. [43]
    Business Regulations Across OHADA
    This second edition tracks regulatory reforms since 2011 in five Doing Business indicator areas covered by the OHADA Uniform Acts and regulations.
  44. [44]
    [PDF] BUSINESS IN WEST AND CENTRAL AFRICA: - Baker McKenzie
    The Organisation for the Harmonization of Business. Law in Africa ("OHADA“) was established in 1993 to increase legal certainty and facilitate foreign in-.
  45. [45]
    [PDF] ETUDE DE L'IMPACT ÉCONOMIQUE DE L'OHADA : EFFECTIVITÉ ...
    L'OHADA a procédé en 2010 à une révision du cadre juridique des garanties des crédits et sa modernisation de manière à renforcer la confiance des acteurs é ...
  46. [46]
    Publication of OHADA's economic impact study
    The study measures the economic efficiency of OHADA's contribution to business creation, access to credit, insolvency resolution, investment and growth.Missing: research papers
  47. [47]
    [PDF] OHADA and the Harmonization Process – Global Market Briefings
    OHADA represents a significant step towards modernizing and harmonizing business law in Africa. While challenges remain, the organization's efforts are ...
  48. [48]
    The practicability of simplified recovery procedures and enforcement ...
    Nov 15, 2022 · In some OHADA states, there is the local requirement to pay a court deposit to initiate some of these enforcement measures and recovery ...
  49. [49]
    OHADA arbitration at the crossroads - Norton Rose Fulbright
    The enforcement of awards rendered under the Uniform Act regime is complicated by a lack of uniformity of procedure across all OHADA Member States. To enforce a ...Missing: implementation | Show results with:implementation
  50. [50]
    SIMPLIFIED RECOVERY OF DEBTS & ENFORCEMENT OF ...
    Any one or more factors may occasion a litigation on the enforcement of a court decision, including: difficulties or resistance faced during execution, improper ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] OHADA vs. English Corporate Law
    Sep 3, 2024 · In tandem with the foregoing, this paper explores challenges in the practical enforcement of these remedies, including differences in legal ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] for the harmonization of business laws in africa (ohada)
    However, the decisions related to the adoption of the Uniform Acts are taken by unanimous vote of the states present and voting. 3 - Duties of the Council of ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Book Reviews - Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository
    Apr 1, 2010 · The authors criticize certain aspects of OHADA. First, several point out the “democratic deficit” of enacting uniform laws. The Council of.<|control11|><|separator|>
  54. [54]
    View of The Constitutional Validity of the Ohada Treaty in Cameroon
    A summary of articles 42 and 63 of the OHADA treaty reveals that the treaty is unconstitutional and therefore cannot be applied in Cameroon, because the ...Missing: concerns criticisms
  55. [55]
    Corporate purpose and governance in Africa: French-influenced ...
    The analysis is based on two premises: a criticism of OHADA company law and a relatively absent corporate-related human rights and environmental litigation ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Uniform Act of 17 October 2023 organizing simplified recovery ...
    Nov 15, 2023 · ... new date for the auction sale which shall not be more than sixty (60) days from the date of the court session. The pursuing creditor shall ...
  57. [57]
    Blog | Understanding the Uniform Act of 17 October 2023 - Ferdsilinks
    Oct 17, 2023 · The Uniform Act of 17 October 2023 introduces simplified procedures for the recovery of debts and the enforcement of court judgments and arbitral awards.<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Ohada African Development Bank
    Legal Reforms and Capacity Building Programs: AfDB funds training and technical assistance to ensure effective implementation of OHADA laws.
  59. [59]
    1st Ufohja Seminar on the New Ohada Uniform Act on Enforcement ...
    Mar 21, 2024 · ... new Uniform Act relating to the Organization of Simplified Recovery Procedures and Enforcement Measures of Ohada. On 13 March 2024, the UIHJ ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] OHADA, THIRTY (30) YEARS ON : ASSESSMENT AND PROSPECTS
    It's almost thirty (30) years since the founding treaty of the Organization for the. Harmonization of Business Law in Africa (OHADA) was signed on October ...Missing: key timeline
  61. [61]
    OHADA and Its Entire Staff Wish You an Excellent and Successful ...
    During the Year 2024 marked by Senegal's chairmanship of our Organisation, OHADA intends to pursue its efforts towards strengthening inclusive governance, ...Missing: 2025 | Show results with:2025
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Note de concept Projet de réunion conjointe CNUDCI – OHADA
    May 11, 2021 · Ainsi, les standards élaborés par la CNUDCI se retrouvent dans plusieurs actes uniformes adoptés par l'OHADA (Acte uniforme sur la médiation, ...