Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Open and closed maps

In , an open map is a between topological spaces that maps open sets to open sets, while a closed map maps closed sets to closed sets; these properties highlight how certain preserve the openness or closedness of subsets without necessarily requiring or bijectivity. Formally, given topological spaces X and Y, a f: X \to Y is open if for every open subset U \subseteq X, the f(U) is open in Y, and it is closed if for every closed subset C \subseteq X, the f(C) is closed in Y. These definitions do not imply , as there are no general relationships between openness, closedness, and for arbitrary . A key application arises in the characterization of homeomorphisms: a continuous bijection f: X \to Y is a homeomorphism if and only if it is open (or equivalently, closed), ensuring it preserves all topological properties. Classic examples include the inclusion map (0,1) \hookrightarrow \mathbb{R}, which is open but not closed, since open sets in the subspace map to open sets in \mathbb{R}, but for example, the set \{1/n \mid n = 2,3,\dots \} is closed in (0,1) but its image is not closed in \mathbb{R}; conversely, the inclusion [0,1] \hookrightarrow \mathbb{R} is closed but not open. Projection maps, such as \pi_1: \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} given by (x,y) \mapsto x, are open but not closed, as they map open sets like open balls to open intervals while sending some closed sets, like lines parallel to the y-axis, to non-closed images. In quotient topology, open or closed surjective continuous maps yield quotient maps, which define the finest topology on the codomain making the map continuous; however, not all quotient maps are open or closed.

Definitions

Open maps

In , an open map is a function between topological spaces that preserves the openness of sets under direct images. Specifically, a map f: X \to Y between topological spaces X and Y is defined to be open if, for every open set U \subseteq X, the image f(U) is an open set in Y. Formally, this condition can be stated as: for all U \in \tau_X, where \tau_X denotes the topology on X, it holds that f(U) \in \tau_Y, with \tau_Y the topology on Y. This definition appears in standard treatments of and underscores the map's behavior with respect to the open sets of the codomain. The role of an open map lies in its preservation of structural openness from the to the , ensuring that the topological features of open subsets in X translate directly into open subsets in Y. Unlike continuous maps, which focus on preimages of open sets, open maps emphasize the direct images f(U), thereby highlighting how the \tau_Y on Y interacts with the mapping process. This preservation is crucial in contexts where the openness in the codomain must align with the mapped structure from the domain, without requiring surjectivity or other additional properties.

Closed maps

A map f: X \to Y between topological spaces is called a closed map if the image under f of every closed subset of X is closed in Y. Formally, f is closed if for every C \subseteq X, f(C) belongs to the family of closed sets in Y, denoted \tau_Y^c, which consists of the complements of open sets in the \tau_Y on Y. This property ensures that closed maps preserve the "closedness" of subsets under the function's action, distinguishing them from the dual concept of open maps, which instead map open sets to open sets. In particular, the focus on closed sets—defined as complements of open sets—avoids direct overlap with conditions, emphasizing instead the behavior of boundaries and limits in the . Closed maps are useful for controlling the closure of images of subsets.

Characterizations and variants

Equivalent conditions

A map f: X \to Y between topological spaces is open if and only if f(A^\circ) \subseteq [f(A)]^\circ for every subset A \subseteq X, where \circ denotes the interior operator. Dually, a map f: X \to Y is closed if and only if \overline{f(A)} \subseteq f(\overline{A}) for every subset A \subseteq X, where the bar denotes the closure operator. This condition ensures that the image under f respects closures in a manner symmetric to how the interior condition characterizes openness. For surjective maps, additional equivalences arise in terms of preimages and : a surjective f is open if the saturation of every open set in X (with respect to the fibers of f) is open. A bijective map f: X \to Y is a if and only if it is open; equivalently, if and only if it is closed. This holds because openness of a bijection implies bicontinuity, as the inverse maps open sets to open sets via the direct images under f.

Strong and relative versions

In , the usual notion of an open map requires that the image of every in the is open in the entire . Specifically, for a f: X \to Y between topological spaces X and Y, f is open if for every U \subseteq X, the set f(U) is open in Y. Analogously, a closed map is one where the image of every closed set in X is closed in Y. To address non-surjective maps, relative versions of these concepts are defined with respect to the subspace topology on the image f(X) \subseteq Y. A map f: X \to Y is a relative open map if for every open set U \subseteq X, the set f(U) is open in the subspace f(X), meaning there exists an open set V \subseteq Y such that f(U) = V \cap f(X). Similarly, f is a relative closed map if the image of every closed set in X is closed in the subspace f(X), i.e., there exists a closed set W \subseteq Y such that f(C) = W \cap f(X) for every closed C \subseteq X. These relative notions weaken the usual versions by focusing openness or closedness locally within the image rather than the full codomain. When f is surjective, so that f(X) = Y, the subspace topology on f(X) coincides with the topology on Y, and thus the usual and relative versions of openness (or closedness) are equivalent. In non-surjective cases, the relative condition is strictly weaker than the usual one; for instance, any inclusion map i: A \hookrightarrow Y of a subspace A \subseteq Y is relative open (and relative closed) onto its image by the definition of the subspace topology, but it is open only if A itself is open in Y. These variants emerged in the development of quotient topology, where the standard constructions assume surjective maps to ensure the quotient map is both continuous and open (or closed), but extensions to non-surjective settings, such as in general identification spaces or momentum maps, necessitated the relative notions to preserve topological properties within the image.

Examples

Continuous maps that are open or closed

A fundamental example of a continuous open map arises in product spaces. Consider the projection map \pi_X: X \times Y \to X defined by \pi_X(x, y) = x, where X and Y are topological spaces equipped with the product topology on X \times Y. This map is continuous by the definition of the product topology, as the preimage of any open set U \subseteq X is U \times Y, which is open in the product space. Moreover, \pi_X is open: the image of a basic open set U \times V \subseteq X \times Y (with U open in X and V open in Y) is U, which is open in X. This holds more generally for arbitrary open sets in the product, as they are unions of such basic opens, and images preserve unions. To verify explicitly, suppose W \subseteq X \times Y is open; then W = \bigcup_i (U_i \times V_i) for opens U_i \subseteq X and V_i \subseteq Y, so \pi_X(W) = \bigcup_i U_i, which is open in X. Thus, projections illustrate how continuity and openness combine in coordinate extractions from products. Another illustrative case is the inclusion map i: A \to X where A is a closed subset of a X. The map i(a) = a is always continuous when A inherits the from X. Furthermore, i is a closed map precisely when A is closed in X: for any closed set C \subseteq A, C is closed in X (as the intersection of a closed set in X with the closed A), and i(C) = C is thus closed in X. This property highlights how embeddings of closed subsets preserve closedness under continuous inclusion, preserving the topological structure in a restrictive yet faithful manner.

Maps that are open or closed but not continuous

A classic example of a map that is open but not continuous is the identity on a set X with at least two elements, where the is equipped with the indiscrete topology (also known as the trivial topology, in which the only open sets are \emptyset and X) and the is equipped with the discrete topology (in which every subset is open). The images of the open sets in the are \emptyset (which is open in the discrete topology) and X (which is open in the discrete topology), so the is open. However, it is not continuous, because the preimage of a \{x\} (which is open in the discrete ) is \{x\}, and singletons are not open in the indiscrete unless |X| = 1. This example also illustrates that the is closed, since the closed sets in the indiscrete are \emptyset and X, whose images are closed in the discrete . Another example of an open map that is not continuous arises in the cofinite topology on an X, where the open sets are \emptyset and the complements of finite subsets of X. Consider the identity map \mathrm{id}: (X, \tau_\mathrm{cofinite}) \to (X, \tau_\mathrm{discrete}), where the codomain has the topology. The image of any nonempty open set in the domain is cofinite in X, and every subset (including cofinite sets) is open in the discrete codomain, so the map is open. It is not continuous, however, because the preimage of a singleton \{x\} (open in the discrete codomain) is \{x\}, which has uncountable complement and thus is not open in the cofinite topology. For a closed map that is not continuous, consider the identity map \mathrm{id}: (\mathbb{R}, \tau_\mathrm{cofinite}) \to (\mathbb{R}, \tau_\mathrm{standard}), where the domain has the cofinite topology and the codomain has the standard Euclidean topology. The closed sets in the cofinite topology are the finite subsets and \mathbb{R} itself; their images under the identity are finite (hence closed in the standard topology) or \mathbb{R} (closed), so the map is closed. The map is not continuous, as the preimage of the open interval (0,1) (open in the standard codomain) is (0,1), whose complement in \mathbb{R} is (-\infty,0] \cup [1,\infty) (uncountable, hence not finite), so (0,1) is not open in the cofinite domain. A further illustration of a closed but discontinuous map is found in the countable Fort space, a on a countable X = \{p\} \cup Y where Y is countably infinite and p \notin Y: the open sets are all subsets of Y and all cofinite subsets of X. The projection \pi: X \to Y (sending p to some fixed point in Y and fixing points in Y) to Y equipped with the discrete topology is closed, as the images of closed sets (which include the finite subsets of Y and all subsets containing p) are finite or all of Y, both closed in the discrete topology. It is not continuous, because the preimage of a singleton \{y\} \subset Y (open in the discrete codomain) is \{y\} if y \neq \pi(p), which does not contain p and is not all of X, hence not open in the Fort space .

Sufficient conditions

Conditions involving continuity

In topology, a fundamental result concerning closed maps involves continuous bijections between specific types of spaces. Specifically, if X is a and Y is a , then any continuous f: X \to Y is a closed map. Moreover, such a bijection is in fact a , as its inverse is also continuous. This theorem highlights how , combined with compactness of the domain and Hausdorff separation in the codomain, suffices to ensure the map is closed and thus a topological in the bijective case. Another key condition arises in the context of quotient maps, which are surjective continuous that identify the topology of the via saturation of preimages. A continuous surjective f: X \to Y that is also open is necessarily a quotient map. This follows because the openness ensures that the preimage condition for open sets in Y aligns precisely with the quotient definition. Such maps are particularly useful in constructing new spaces by gluing or identification while preserving topological structure. For injective continuous maps, openness provides a sufficient condition for the map to be an , meaning it is a onto its image equipped with the . If f: X \to Y is a continuous injection and open (onto its image), then f embeds X as an open of Y. This is essential in and manifold theory, where embeddings distinguish submanifolds from mere immersions. Continuous maps inherently preserve connectedness: if X is a and f: X \to Y is continuous, then f(X) is connected in Y. When the continuous map is additionally open, this preservation extends to ensuring the image is an open connected subset, reinforcing the map's role in maintaining global connectivity properties under openness.

Conditions from topological properties

A fundamental sufficient condition for a continuous map f: X \to Y to be closed arises from compactness in the domain and the Hausdorff property in the codomain. Specifically, if X is compact and Y is Hausdorff, then f maps closed subsets of X to closed subsets of Y. This follows because the continuous image of a closed subset of X—which is compact—is closed in the Y. Local provide a condition for openness independent of global . A f: X \to Y is a if every point in X has an open neighborhood on which f restricts to a onto its image, which is open in Y. Consequently, f is an open , as the image of any in X is a union of such open images. Covering maps, being surjective local homeomorphisms between topological spaces (typically with path-connected and locally path-connected base), inherit this openness property. Proper maps offer another intrinsic condition for closedness, particularly in settings involving locally compact spaces. A continuous f: X \to Y is proper if the preimage of every compact of Y is compact in X. When Y is Hausdorff, such a proper map is closed, since the of a closed of X has compact preimages under the , ensuring closure in Y. This generalizes the compact-to-Hausdorff case, where compactness makes every continuous proper. In the context of linearly ordered topological spaces (LOTS), known as chains with the , strictly maps—strictly order-preserving functions—satisfy closedness under surjectivity. A surjective strictly map f: X \to Y between chains maps closed sets to closed sets, as the order preservation ensures that intervals and their complements behave accordingly under the map. In fact, such surjections are homeomorphisms, reinforcing their closed (and open) nature.

Properties and relations

Preservation under composition

In topology, the composition of two open maps is open. If f: X \to Y and g: Y \to Z are open maps between topological spaces, then for any open set U \subseteq X, f(U) is open in Y, and thus g(f(U)) is open in Z. Similarly, the composition of two closed maps is closed: if C \subseteq X is closed, then f(C) is closed in Y, and g(f(C)) is closed in Z. However, the of an open map with a closed map (in either order) need not be open or closed. When the maps are surjective, the preservation of openness or closedness under composition holds without additional conditions, as the property relies only on the images of open or closed sets, and surjectivity ensures the images cover the but is not required for the basic result. At a higher level, the classes of open and closed maps are closed under , enabling the definition of categories where the objects are topological spaces and the morphisms are open maps (or closed maps). Such categories have been studied, though they lack certain limits, such as binary products in the case of open maps. This structure relates to monoidal or enriched category theory in , where open maps play a role in models of spatial processes.

Connections to quotient maps and homeomorphisms

A continuous surjective map p: X \to Y between topological spaces is a quotient map if it endows Y with the quotient topology, meaning a subset U \subseteq Y is open precisely when p^{-1}(U) is open in X. Since p is continuous and surjective, the forward direction holds automatically, but the converse requires additional structure. If p is also an open map, then for any U \subseteq Y with p^{-1}(U) open, set V = p^{-1}(U), which is open, and U = p(V); openness of p ensures U is open in Y. Similarly, if p is closed, the argument uses closed complements: if p^{-1}(U) is open, its complement is closed, and surjectivity with closedness of p implies the complement of U is closed, so U is open. Homeomorphisms, which are topological isomorphisms, can be characterized using or closedness for bijective continuous maps. Specifically, a bijective continuous map f: X \to Y is a it is open, meaning it maps s to s; equivalently, if it is closed. This follows because for a , the inverse f^{-1} is continuous f is open: the preimage under f^{-1} of an open set in X is the image under f of that set in Y, so of f ensures continuity of f^{-1}. The closed characterization is analogous, using closed sets. In , covering maps provide a key connection, as the universal of a path-connected, locally path-connected space is a covering map, which is a and hence an open map. A p: \tilde{X} \to X means every point in \tilde{X} has a neighborhood homeomorphic via p to a neighborhood in X, implying since local images of open sets are open. Universal covers, being simply connected covering spaces, thus identify discrete fibers evenly while preserving , facilitating computations of fundamental groups via the Galois correspondence between subgroups and covers. Open quotient maps play a crucial role in algebraic topology for constructing spaces by identifying fibers, such as in group actions where orbits form fibers. When a group G acts continuously on a space X satisfying suitable conditions (e.g., freely and properly), the quotient map p: X \to X/G is a covering map, hence open, ensuring the quotient topology respects local Euclidean structure and allows lifting of paths and homotopies through the fibers. This identification of fibers via openness preserves key invariants like homotopy groups above the base dimension, enabling applications in bundle theory and classification of manifolds.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Homeomorphisms
    Such a map is called an open map. Similarly, a closed map takes closed sets to closed sets. Proposition 11.2. Let f : X ! Y be a continuous bijection.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] SUMMARY OF POINT-SET TOPOLOGY These notes are not meant ...
    Open and closed maps. A function f : X → Y is called open if f(U) is open for all U ⊂ X open. Likewise f is called closed if the image of every closed ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Section 22. The Quotient Topology
    Jan 5, 2015 · If p : X → Y is continuous and surjective and p is either open or closed, then p is a quotient map. However, there are quotient maps that are ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Riemann Surfaces - UChicago Math
    Sep 12, 2007 · Definition 1.1.1 (Open Map). Let X and Y be topological spaces. A map f : X → Y is called open if for all open ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] topology, dr. block, fall 2015, notes, part 4 - People
    Definition. Let X and Y be topological spaces, and let f : X → Y. We say f is an open map if and only if for every open subset V of X, f(V ) is open in.
  6. [6]
    Closed mapping - Encyclopedia of Mathematics
    Jun 4, 2020 · A closed mapping is a mapping where the image of every closed set is a closed set. Continuous closed mappings are important in topology.
  7. [7]
    Open Mapping and Closed Mapping | eMathZone
    A mapping $$f$$ from one topological space $$X$$ into another topological space $$Y$$ is said to be a closed mapping if for every closed set $$G$$ in $$X$$, $$f ...
  8. [8]
    closed map in nLab
    May 12, 2017 · A closed map is a continuous function where the image of a closed subset of the domain is a closed subset of the codomain.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Topology (H) Lecture 5
    Mar 7, 2021 · a closed map if for any closed set F in X, f(F) is closed in Y . Although it seems that open/closed maps are “more natural”, they are not as.
  10. [10]
    Some Characterizations of Open, Closed, and Continuous Mappings
    Apr 30, 2008 · We obtain new characterizations of open maps in terms of closures, of closed maps in terms of interiors, and of continuous maps in terms of interiors.
  11. [11]
    Locally open maps are open - any reference, and/or applications?
    May 31, 2015 · A map f:X→Y between topological spaces is open if and only if each point of X has a neighbourhood on which (the restriction of) f is open.Missing: "topology
  12. [12]
    A bijective continuous map is a homeomorphism iff it is open, or ...
    Jun 25, 2015 · Wikipedia states that a bijective continuous map is a homeomorphism if and only if it is open, or equivalently, if and only if it is closed.$f$ is a homeomorphism iff $f$ is bijective, continuous and openA bijection f is a homeomorphism iff f maps open sets to open setsMore results from math.stackexchange.com
  13. [13]
    [PDF] INTRODUCTION TO TOPOLOGY Contents 1. Basic concepts 1 2 ...
    Definition 2.1. Let X be a topological space, A ⊆ X an arbitrary subset. The relative or subspace topology on A is the collection of intersections with open ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    [math/0511576] Openness and convexity for momentum maps - arXiv
    Nov 23, 2005 · It is shown that they are of topological nature; more specifically, we show that convexity follows if the map is open onto its image and has the ...
  15. [15]
    open map in nLab
    Jun 30, 2022 · 1. Definition · an open map if the image under f f of an open subset of X X is an open subset of Y Y ; · a closed map if the image under f f of a ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] QUOTIENT SPACES – MATH 446 Marc Culler - Spring 2011
    Jan 10, 2011 · Suppose that f : X → Y is a surjective map between topological spaces. If f is an open map or if f is a closed map, then f is a quotient map.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Cartesian product of two sets X ×Y - UCLA Mathematics
    The projections π1 and π2 are continuous and open. (A map is called open if the image of every open set is open; it's like continuity, but in reverse).
  18. [18]
    2.2 Product Spaces - Math 581: Topology 1
    The projections pX:Z→X and pY:Z→Y are continuous and open. Moreover, the product topology on X×Y is the smallest topology for which both pX and pY are ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] MA651 Topology. Lecture 4. Topological spaces 2
    ”open map”, ”closed map”, and ”continuous map” are therefore independent. Example 26.1. Let A ⊂ X and let i : A → X be the inclusion map a → a. By ...
  20. [20]
    Continuous maps that are not closed or not open
    Jan 4, 2015 · In topology an open map is a function between two topological spaces which maps open sets to open sets. Likewise, a closed map is a function ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  21. [21]
    A function that is both open and closed but not continuous
    Mar 16, 2015 · Let X and Y be topological spaces on the same underlying set (with at least two elements), where Y carries the discrete topology and x the indiscrete topology.
  22. [22]
    Open maps which are not continuous - Math Stack Exchange
    Oct 25, 2011 · The simplest example I've been able to think of is the map e1/z from C to C (filled in to be 0 at 0). There must be a simpler example, using the ...Explicit/constructive example of open maps that are not continuous ...Open and closed mapping are not necessarily continuousMore results from math.stackexchange.com
  23. [23]
    [PDF] 14 | Compact Spaces
    Let f : X → Y be a continuous function, where X is a compact space and Y is a. Hausdorff space. For any closed set A ⊆ X the set f(A) is closed in Y. Proof. Let ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] configuration spaces in algebraic topology: lecture 2
    Sep 1, 2017 · Recall that a continuous map is said to be an open embedding if it is both injective and open. Proposition. If f : X → Y is an open embedding, ...
  25. [25]
    Section 5.7 (004R): Connected components—The Stacks project
    Let f : X \to Y be a continuous map of topological spaces. If E \subset X is a connected subset, then f(E) \subset Y is connected as well.
  26. [26]
    maps from compact spaces to Hausdorff spaces are closed ... - nLab
    Feb 3, 2021 · A compact Hausdorff space has both “enough” and “not too many”. This theorem says that both conditions are at their limit: if we try to have more open sets, we ...Missing: munkres | Show results with:munkres
  27. [27]
    [PDF] topbook.pdf - Topology Without Tears by Sidney A. Morris
    Jan 6, 2021 · There is a Facebook group, called Topology Without Tears Readers, where readers discuss the book and exercises in the book. As of August 2024 ...
  28. [28]
    Section 5.17 (005M): Characterizing proper maps—The Stacks project
    We define a continuous map of topological spaces to be proper if it is universally closed and separated.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] General Topology
    Any strictly monotone surjection f : [a, b] → [c, d] is a ... A restriction of a closed map to a closed subset is a also closed map.) §16x ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] INVERSE FUNCTION THEOREM and SURFACES IN Rn Let f ∈ C k(U
    Homeomorphisms are clearly open maps, and the composition of open maps is open. 8. Page 9. Proposition 2. Let f : U → Rn be C1 (U ⊂ Rn open, m>n). (i) If df ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] FINAL EXAM MATH 190A, UCSD, WINTER 25 You have three hours ...
    As p is closed and the composition of closed maps is closed it follows that g is closed. The two functions iX : X −→ X and f : X −→ Y give a function. X ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Functions between topological spaces in Joyal's CatLab
    ### Summary of Open and Closed Maps from https://ncatlab.org/joyalscatlab/published/Functions+between+topological+spaces
  33. [33]
    The category of topological spaces and open maps does not ... - arXiv
    Jul 19, 2024 · We prove that the category of topological spaces and open maps does not have binary products, thus resolving the Esakia problem in the negative.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Section 22. The Quotient Topology
    Jun 6, 2015 · The map f : X → Y is a closed map if for each closed set. A ⊆ X the set f(A) is closed in Y . Note. If p : X → Y is continuous and ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Algebraic Topology - Cornell Mathematics
    This book covers geometric notions, the fundamental group, homology, cohomology, and homotopy theory, with a classical approach.