Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Opus number

An opus number (from the Latin opus, meaning "work") is a sequential numbering system employed in classical music to catalog a composer's compositions or groups of works, typically assigned by the composer or publisher to denote the approximate order of publication or composition.^[1]^[2] These numbers serve as a primary means of identification and reference for musical pieces, distinguishing them from others with similar titles, forms, or keys, such as multiple symphonies or sonatas by the same composer.^[3]^[4] The convention emerged in the early 17th century amid the rise of music printing, when publishers began assigning numbers to printed works to facilitate organization and sales, though it became more standardized and commonly used by composers themselves in the 18th century.^[4] Prior to 1800, opus numbers were more frequently applied to instrumental music than to vocal or stage works, reflecting the era's publication practices.^[1] Composers like Joseph Haydn adopted the system systematically, often grouping related pieces under a single opus (e.g., his six string quartets as Op. 76), which helped establish it as a key tool for scholarly and performance reference.^[3] Despite their utility, opus numbers have limitations: they do not always correspond strictly to the chronological order of creation, as publishers sometimes prioritized market demand over composition date, and many works—especially minor or unpublished ones—lack them entirely, leading to designations like WoO ("works without opus number") for Beethoven's uncataloged pieces.^[3]^[5] To address these gaps, musicologists rely on thematic catalogs, which provide comprehensive listings based on incipits, keys, and other identifiers beyond opus sequencing.^[1]^[6] In modern scholarship, opus numbers remain essential for indexing and accessing vast repertoires, though digital databases increasingly integrate them with more precise dating and metadata.^[7]

Fundamentals

Definition

An opus number is a numerical designation assigned by a composer or publisher to a musical composition or set of compositions, typically indicating the sequence of publication.^[3] The term derives from the Latin word opus, meaning "work."^[8] The primary purpose of an opus number is to systematically organize and identify a composer's output, allowing works to be distinguished from one another, especially when titles, keys, or genres overlap.^[3] Unlike identifiers based on musical characteristics such as key signatures, genres, or estimated composition dates, opus numbers prioritize a publication-based chronology, though composers may occasionally align them with the order of creation.^[3] For instance, Ludwig van Beethoven's Symphony No. 5 in C minor is cataloged as Op. 67, reflecting its place in his published oeuvre.^[3] Not all composers employed opus numbers consistently or at all during their lifetimes. Johann Sebastian Bach's works, for example, received no opus designations contemporaneously and were later organized using the Bach-Werke-Verzeichnis (BWV) system, a thematic catalog compiled in the 20th century.^[9] In contrast, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart used an incomplete opus numbering for some published pieces, with the majority of his compositions identified through the posthumously assigned Köchel (K.) catalog, which arranges works by approximate date of composition.^[10]

Etymology

The term "opus" originates from the Latin noun opus, meaning "work," "labor," or "task," a word rooted in Proto-Indo-European op-, denoting "to work" or "produce in abundance," and employed since classical antiquity to describe creative or intellectual outputs across disciplines.^[11] In ancient Roman usage, it broadly signified any constructed achievement, from architectural endeavors to literary compositions, establishing a foundational connotation of a completed artistic product.^[8] Within music, "opus" entered usage in the 16th and 17th centuries through the burgeoning practices of Italian and German music printing, where publishers labeled collections or sets of pieces with the term to organize and market them as cohesive "works."^[12] This application reflected the era's expanding print culture, which sought systematic ways to distinguish composers' outputs amid increasing commercial dissemination of sheet music.^[3] The modern "opus number"—abbreviated as Op. or Opp. followed by a sequential numeral—emerged in the 18th century as a formalized cataloguing mechanism, enabling chronological or publication-based ordering of compositions in European musical notation.^[3]

Historical Evolution

Early Usage

The practice of assigning opus numbers to musical works emerged in the mid-16th century, primarily in printed collections of vocal and instrumental music published in Italy. Publishers, particularly in Venice, used the term to organize and market sets of compositions, such as madrigals and motets, distinguishing them from earlier manuscript traditions. A notable early example is Orlande de Lassus's Opus 1 (1555), a collection of 12 madrigals alongside villanellas, chansons, and motets, issued by the Venetian firm of Antonio Gardano; this publication marked one of the first systematic uses of sequential numbering for a composer's output in print.^[13] Similar conventions appeared in organ and instrumental works, though vocal collections dominated, reflecting the era's emphasis on polyphonic church and secular music. By the 17th century, the use of opus numbers expanded across Italy and Germany, driven by burgeoning music publishing houses that catered to a growing market for instrumental and ensemble music. Venetian publishers like the Gardano press continued to issue numbered sets of madrigals and sonatas, while German firms in cities like Nuremberg adopted the system for keyboard and chamber works, aiding composers in establishing their reputations amid increasing commercial activity. This period saw opus numbers applied more frequently to instrumental genres, such as suites and canzonas, as printing techniques improved and facilitated wider dissemination.^[14] In the 18th century, composers like Arcangelo Corelli, George Frideric Handel, and Joseph Haydn refined opus numbering for published instrumental collections, assigning sequential identifiers to violin sonatas, trio sonatas, concerti grossi, and string quartets, though application remained sporadic and publisher-influenced. Haydn adopted the system systematically, often grouping related pieces under a single opus, such as his six string quartets as Op. 76 (1796–1797).^[15] Corelli's output, for instance, comprised six opus groups from Opus 1 (12 trio sonatas, 1681) to Opus 6 (12 concerti grossi, 1714), providing a model for structured cataloging of chamber music. Handel similarly employed opus numbers for sets like Opus 1 (12 sonatas, 1730), but inconsistencies arose due to multiple publishers and revisions.^[16]^[17] Despite these developments, opus numbers were far from universal in the early period; many compositions, especially those under patronage or remaining unpublished, lacked them, leading to numerous lost or unnumbered works. The patronage system, prevalent through the 18th century, prioritized private circulation over public printing, delaying formal cataloging and contributing to gaps in composers' documented outputs. Instrumental music received opus designations more readily than vocal or operatic works until the late 18th century.^[1]

19th Century Developments

In the early 19th century, the adoption of opus numbers gained momentum amid a burgeoning music publishing industry in Vienna and Paris, where technological advances in printing and rising middle-class demand facilitated wider dissemination of sheet music. Composers increasingly took control over numbering, assigning sequential opus designations to works or sets upon publication to organize their output and signal progression. Ludwig van Beethoven exemplified this shift, beginning with his Op. 1—three piano trios published in Vienna in 1795—and continuing methodically through to Op. 135, a string quartet completed in 1827, thereby treating opus numbers as a personal catalog of his creative evolution.^[18]^[19]^[20] By the mid-19th century, this practice had solidified among Romantic composers, who reserved opus numbers for significant publications while often omitting them for lesser or unpublished pieces, allowing flexibility in curating their public image. Felix Mendelssohn, Robert Schumann, and Johannes Brahms followed suit, applying numbers to symphonies, concertos, and chamber works but bypassing them for songs or sketches deemed preliminary. The Leipzig-based firm Breitkopf & Härtel exerted considerable influence, serving as a primary publisher for these figures and standardizing opus assignments through high-quality editions that enhanced the works' market appeal. For instance, the firm issued Brahms's early Opp. 1–4, including his piano sonatas and songs, at Schumann's recommendation, while also handling Mendelssohn's and Schumann's major outputs.^[21]^[22]^[23] Toward the late 19th century, challenges emerged from inconsistent application, including over-assignment by publishers that created gaps in sequencing and disrupted chronological alignment. Frédéric Chopin's opus catalog, spanning Op. 1 to 65, illustrates this: while numbered sequentially for publication, the order often diverged from composition dates, as seen in Op. 4 (a sonata completed around 1828 but published posthumously in 1851) appearing after later works like the E minor concerto (Op. 11, composed 1830). Similarly, posthumous numbering addressed unfinished legacies, with Franz Schubert's extensive oeuvre receiving additional opus designations up to Op. post. 173 as late as 1867, filling gaps from his 1828 death and enabling ongoing commercial releases.^[24]^[25] This era marked a cultural transformation wherein the opus number transcended mere cataloging to symbolize a composer's artistic maturation and market worth, aligning with Romantic ideals that elevated personal genius and emotional depth as commodities in an expanding print culture. A composer's Op. 1, in particular, announced their professional debut and first substantial achievement, distinguishing mature output from juvenilia and boosting sales through perceived progression.^[12]^[26]

Modern Usage

In the early 20th century, some composers continued the sequential use of opus numbers established in the previous era, while others began to deviate from strict adherence. Sergei Rachmaninoff, for instance, systematically numbered his published compositions from Op. 1 to Op. 45, encompassing symphonies, concertos, and piano works that reflected his Romantic style.^[27] Igor Stravinsky, however, limited opus assignments to his initial efforts, such as the Symphony in E-flat Major, Op. 1 (1907), and increasingly favored composition dates to denote chronology in his later ballets and orchestral pieces.^[28] This variation arose from the era's fragmented publishing practices, where multiple outlets often resulted in inconsistent or duplicated numbering across a composer's oeuvre.^[12] By the mid-20th century, opus numbers persisted among serialist composers navigating twelve-tone techniques, but their role as primary identifiers waned. Arnold Schoenberg, a pioneer of atonality, applied opus designations to key works like the Zwei Klavierstücke, Op. 33 (1928–1931), which exemplify his structured serial approach. The proliferation of phonograph recordings and widely available scores further reduced reliance on opus numbers, as audiences and performers increasingly referenced pieces by titles, genres, or recording catalogs rather than publisher sequences. This technological shift emphasized accessibility over traditional cataloging, contributing to a broader decline in sequential opus use. In the 21st century, fresh opus assignments have become uncommon among prominent composers, though isolated examples persist in niche styles. The minimalist Hanne Darboven, for example, employed opus numbers in her mathematically derived works, such as Opus 17a (1984), an extended piece for solo instrument highlighting repetitive structures.^[29] Digital platforms like the International Music Score Library Project (IMSLP) support hybrid cataloging by integrating opus numbers with supplementary systems, such as I-Catalogue identifiers, to organize vast, incomplete repertoires. Posthumous editions often involve revisions to opus schemes for unfinished compositions, as seen in the complete works of Anton Webern, where Series I covers opus-numbered pieces and Series II addresses unnumbered posthumous fragments.^[30]^[31] Today, opus numbers endure in academic editions and historical references but are routinely augmented by timestamps, metadata in digital scores, and thematic indices for precision. Contemporary minimalists may retain them for structural clarity in repetitive forms, whereas avant-garde practitioners often eschew them entirely, opting for evocative titles or non-hierarchical labels to align with experimental aesthetics.

Cataloguing Conventions

Numbering Practices

Opus numbers are typically assigned sequentially by publishers, beginning with Op. 1 for a composer's first published work and increasing numerically thereafter to reflect the order of publication, with major or later works receiving higher numbers.^[3]^[32] This numbering prioritizes the date of publication over the order of composition, meaning some works may receive opus numbers years after their creation. For instance, Ludwig van Beethoven's three piano sonatas comprising Op. 10 were composed between late 1795 and early 1798 but published in Vienna in 1798.^[33]^[34] Opus numbers often encompass sets or groups of related compositions, treated as a single unit under one designation, while individual pieces within the set are distinguished by sub-numbering. Beethoven's six early string quartets, for example, form Op. 18 as a cohesive collection, with each quartet identified as Op. 18 No. 1 through No. 6; similarly, his Symphony No. 5 in C minor receives the designation Op. 67, where "No. 5" indicates its position in his symphonic output rather than a subdivision of the opus itself.^[35] Internationally, opus numbers adhere to standardized conventions, using the abbreviation "Op." (or "Opp." for plural) followed by Arabic numerals without leading zeros or negative values, a practice maintained in modern scholarly editions. Publishers such as G. Henle Verlag and Bärenreiter consistently employ these opus designations in their Urtext editions to ensure precise identification and fidelity to historical sources.^[36]^[37]^[38]

Exceptions and Variations

While standard opus numbering aims for sequential assignment based on publication order, composers frequently deviated from this practice by skipping numbers to accommodate lost or unpublished works or to reserve slots for anticipated future pieces. For instance, Antonín Dvořák's opus numbers extend from 1 to 115, but gaps appear due to delayed publications, revisions, or works that remained unpublished during his lifetime, such as certain early chamber pieces that disrupted the sequence.^[39] These skips highlight how publishers and composers negotiated incomplete catalogs, prioritizing perceived maturity of works over strict chronology. Posthumous opus assignments represent another key variation, where editors or publishers retroactively numbered unfinished or previously overlooked compositions to integrate them into a composer's catalog. A notable example is the publication of many works by Felix Mendelssohn after his death in 1847 as Op. posth., despite some of his symphonies having been assigned opus numbers during his lifetime.^[40] This practice allowed incomplete scores to gain formal recognition, though it often led to debates over authenticity and placement. Many composers employed multiple numbering series to organize diverse outputs, particularly distinguishing major published works from minor or unpublished ones. Ludwig van Beethoven, for example, reserved opus numbers for his primary published compositions while designating over 200 additional pieces—such as bagatelles, folk song arrangements, and sketches—as WoO (Werke ohne Opuszahl, or "works without opus number") in the 1955 thematic catalog by Georg Kinsky and Hans Halm.^[41] Similarly, Max Reger cataloged his prolific output (spanning 146 opus numbers) across genres like organ suites (e.g., Op. 79) and chamber music (e.g., Op. 77), but relied on a separate WoO list for around 80 unpublished or minor works, as documented by the Max-Reger-Institut.^[42] Cultural and regional variations further adapted opus conventions, often reflecting differing publication norms. Russian composers like Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky used opus numbers sequentially for major works but applied them less rigidly to incidental or folk-inspired pieces, sometimes omitting them entirely in favor of descriptive titles. In the 20th century, complete editions prompted re-numbering to establish accurate chronologies, superseding original opus assignments; Franz Schubert's Neue Schubert-Ausgabe (1978 onward), for instance, revises publisher-assigned opuses with Deutsch (D) numbers based on composition dates, reordering pieces like the piano sonatas to reflect their true sequence despite scattered posthumous publications.^[43]

Alternative Systems

Thematic Catalogues

Thematic catalogues serve as comprehensive inventories of a composer's oeuvre, typically organizing works chronologically or by genre and theme rather than publication date, and often include musical incipits—the opening notations of each piece—to aid identification. These catalogues, frequently compiled posthumously by musicologists, provide detailed information on manuscripts, early editions, instrumentation, and historical context, making them indispensable for scholarly research and performance preparation. For instance, the Köchel catalogue (K.) for Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart lists his compositions from K. 1 to K. 626 in an initial chronological framework, though subsequent editions have expanded this to encompass additional works.^[10]^[44]^[45]^[46] The development of thematic catalogues gained momentum in the 19th century amid growing musicological interest in systematic documentation, particularly for prolific composers whose opus numbering systems were incomplete or inconsistent. Ludwig Ritter von Köchel pioneered this approach with his 1862 Chronologisch-thematisches Verzeichnis aller musikalischen Werke Wolfgang Amade Mozarts, which prioritized chronological ordering to establish authenticity and resolve attribution issues, offering greater accuracy than opus-based systems reliant on publishers' timelines. This scholarly initiative addressed gaps in opus catalogues, especially for Baroque and Classical composers like Mozart, whose works were often published out of sequence or anonymously.^[47]^[48] Prominent examples include the Bach-Werke-Verzeichnis (BWV) for Johann Sebastian Bach, compiled by Wolfgang Schmieder in 1950 and numbering over 1,128 works organized thematically by genre—such as cantatas (BWV 1–224) followed by orchestral and keyboard pieces—rather than strict chronology. Similarly, Anthony van Hoboken's catalogue (Ho.) for Joseph Haydn, published between 1957 and 1971, enumerates more than 1,000 entries sorted by musical category, including symphonies (Ho. I/1–104) and string quartets (Ho. III/1–83), to clarify Haydn's extensive output amid fragmented opus assignments. These systems emphasize stylistic and compositional progression over commercial publication orders.^[49]^[50]^[51]^[52] Modern revisions to these catalogues incorporate digital tools and new archival discoveries, ensuring ongoing relevance; for example, the Köchel catalogue reached its sixth edition in 1964 under Alfred Einstein and saw a comprehensive overhaul in 2024 by Breitkopf & Härtel, integrating international research to add arrangements, cadenzas, and 95 previously undocumented works. The BWV received an extended third edition in 2022 from the Bach-Archiv Leipzig, refining classifications based on recent source studies. Such updates are frequently referenced in authoritative databases like Grove Music Online, which lists thematic catalogues under composer entries to facilitate cross-referencing and verification.^[53]^[54]^[55]^[56]

Other Cataloguing Methods

Incipit-based systems identify musical works by transcribing their opening melodic phrases, known as incipits, which consist of the first few notes or measures; this method is essential for cataloguing anonymous or fragmentary manuscripts where composer or title information is lacking. The Répertoire International des Sources Musicales (RISM) database exemplifies this approach, enabling searches via note names, transposition, or rhythmic patterns to match incipits across global collections of over 1.5 million records from libraries worldwide.^[57] By prioritizing musical content over textual metadata, incipit systems facilitate precise identification in scholarly research and digital archives, often serving as precursors to more comprehensive thematic catalogues.^[58] Performance catalogues assign identifiers based on the dates and details of a work's premiere, emphasizing historical context and dissemination rather than composition order. These systems prove invaluable for performers and historians tracing interpretive histories, distinct from opus sequencing by focusing on live execution milestones. Archival and institutional methods rely on physical or organizational identifiers assigned by libraries and publishers to track manuscripts and editions within collections. Shelf marks, such as the British Library's "Add. MS" designation for Additional Manuscripts, uniquely locate items like medieval songbooks or 17th-century scores in vast holdings, often including provenance details for authentication. Publisher codes, exemplified by those in Durand editions, use plate numbers (e.g., D. & F. followed by a sequence) to date and distinguish print runs of works by composers like Debussy, aiding bibliographers in verifying editions and variants. These alphanumeric systems ensure traceability in research libraries, where they support conservation and access without relying on artistic numbering. Emerging digital systems introduce standardized identifiers tailored to online and multimedia music dissemination, enhancing discoverability in virtual environments. The International Standard Music Number (ISMN), governed by ISO 10957, assigns a 13-digit code (beginning with 979-0) to notated music publications, including scores and parts, to streamline global inventory and sales tracking.^[59] Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) extend this to online publications, providing persistent links for scholarly articles, digital scores, and recordings hosted on platforms like JSTOR or IMSLP. Additionally, AI-assisted tagging in tools like MuseScore automates metadata assignment—such as genre, instrumentation, and tempo—during score conversion and upload, improving searchability in user-generated content libraries.^[60] These innovations bridge traditional cataloguing with computational efficiency, supporting collaborative editing and AI-driven analysis in contemporary music ecosystems.

References

[1]
Thematic catalogs | Yale University Library
Opus numbers. An opus number is a unique number assigned by a composer or by publishers to some or all of that composer's work or group of works. According ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[2]
Numeric designation of musical work or expression (MARC 383)
Opus number: a numeric designation of musical work that is assigned from a list of works of a composer indicating the chronological order of composition ...
[3]
Why Do We Use 'Opus' in Composition Titles? An Explanation - WQXR
Jun 8, 2017 · Music publishers usually assigned opus numbers to compositions or groups of compositions to indicate the chronological order of a composer's works.Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
[4]
Composer Data - Thematic Catalogs - Classical Net
Usually, but certainly not always, the opus number indicates the chronological order of composition or publication. Beginning in the early 17th century, as ...
[5]
Please explain how classical music is named. - Piano World Forum
Sep 27, 2007 · The multiple-set opus numbers best-known today are those of the string quartets of Joseph Haydn. Haydn's Op. 76, for instance, consists of six ...
[6]
[PDF] On the Usage of Musical Keys: A Descriptive Statistical Perspective
For example, Beethoven has 137 works with unique Opus numbers, but there are many works without an opus number (denoted with the symbol “WoO” for “Without Opus”) ...
[7]
Music Guide: Find Collected Editions and Thematic Catalogues
Thematic Catalogs are catalogs of all a single composer's works, usually organized by opus number, chronology, or music type. Many times an incipit is ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[8]
Opus and composer catalogue numbers - DDEX - Apply for a DPID
A classical composer's works are numbered using Opus numbers (opus being the Latin expression for “work” or “labour”) in, usually, chronological order.
[9]
OPUS Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Oct 11, 2025 · opus numbers are meant to indicate the chronological order of musical pieces, although sometimes they indicate the order of publication ...Magnum opus · Scopus · Lagopus · Rhizopus
[10]
Classical Music Cataloging Systems Explained - Electricka
An opus number is a unique number assigned to a composer's work or group of works, usually in the chronological order of publication. (Opus is Latin for the ...<|separator|>
[11]
Thematic catalogues - Symphony Orchestra Library
Selected Thematic Indices ; Bach, Johann Sebastian, BWV ; Bach, Wilhelm Friedemann, F. ; Beethoven, Ludwig van, WoO, Beethoven works without an opus number ...
[12]
Advanced Classical Music Research Guide: Thematic Catalogs
Mar 27, 2025 · What's the opus number or standard number of this piece? What was the original instrumentation, key? Did the composer revise it, take parts ...
[13]
Opus - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating from Latin opus meaning "a work, labor," this word denotes a work or composition, especially musical, linking to Proto-Italic and PIE roots for ...Missing: literature | Show results with:literature
[14]
Opus One - Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center
Feb 28, 2020 · Around 1600 publishers began adding numbers to sets of works by one composer. In the Baroque and early Classical periods, one opus was often a ...
[15]
List of Orlando di Lasso publications - ChoralWiki
Apr 22, 2025 · Lasso's first publication, commonly referred to as Opus 1. Contains 12 madrigals and 6 each of villanelles, chansons, and motets. Contents ...
[16]
II— Italy and the Beginnings of Music Printing
II— Italy and the Beginnings of Music Printing. Italy played an important role in early music printing in both quantity and quality of production While ...Missing: opus Palestrina Froberger Corelli
[17]
Arcangelo Corelli: a concise biography - Baroque Music
All of his creations are included in six opus numbers, most of them being devoted to serious and popular sonatas and trio sonatas. In the Sonatas Opus 5 is ...Missing: 18th | Show results with:18th
[18]
George Frideric Handel - Biography & Compositions - Classicals.de
Among the works with opus numbers published and popularised in his lifetime are the Organ concertos Op. 4 and Op. 7, together with the Opus 3 and Opus 6 ...
[19]
Dominique PRÉVOT - Ludwig van Beethoven's Opus
There are 138 pieces of music composed by Beethoven and numbered by himself or his publishers. These numbers are called Opus numbers. There are also 205 works ...
[20]
Brief notes on the development of music publishing - tiboresque
Sep 18, 2013 · The main centres of music publishing were initially Leipzig, Antwerp, Frankfurt, London, Paris, Florence, Rome, and other important cities.
[21]
The history of music printing and publishing - Popular Beethoven
The earliest musical notation found so far is from ancient Babylonia from about 1400 BCE, engraved into a stone tablet. In ancient Greece manuscripts containing ...
[22]
Breitkopf & Härtel: Famous Music Publishers - Interlude.HK
Jun 18, 2018 · On the recommendation of Robert Schumann, Breitkopf issued the first substantial publication by Johannes Brahms. Johannes Brahms: Scherzo, Op.
[23]
Brahms and Breitkopf | Bibliolore
Jun 27, 2012 · Responding to enthusiastic recommendations from Robert and Clara Schumann, Breitkopf & Härtel published several of Brahms's early works.
[24]
Johannes Brahms - Biography & Compositions - Classicals.de
Schumann's accolade led to the first publication of Brahms's works under his own name. Brahms went to Leipzig where Breitkopf & Härtel published his Opp. 1–4 ( ...
[25]
On the Chronology of Chopin Works - Polish Music Center
Little is known about the circumstances in which the Sonata in C Minor was completed. It was later given opus number 4 and published after the composer's death.
[26]
[PDF] Franz Schubert: Thematisches Verzeichnis seiner Werke in ...
Most of Schubert's compositions were not published during his lifetime. Opus numbers go from 1 to 173. Schubert dated most of his manuscripts.
[27]
Music publishing up to 1900 | Jim Mennell Music
Additionally the rise of the middle-classes, technological advances in printing music, and the massive increase in demand for published music in the 19th ...
[28]
Basic Repertoire List - Rachmaninoff (Rachmaninov) - Classical Net
There are some forty-five opus numbers, including symphonies, piano concerti, orchestral tone poems, operas, chamber works, solo piano collections, ...Missing: 20th | Show results with:20th
[29]
Stravinsky - Symphony No. 1 in E-flat Major, op. 1
Sep 30, 2011 · The Symphony in Eb was to be Stravinsky's first official opus number but the work shows as much of Rimsky-Korsakov's hand as his own.
[30]
Performing Hanne Darboven's Opus 17a and long duration ...
This text deals with my experiences with Hanne Darboven's Opus 17a: a 70-minute large-scale minimalist composition for solo double bass, which presents some ...
[31]
IMSLP:Cataloging Methods
This is a quick reference guide to the cataloging systems employed in order to organize works. A huge collection of cataloging systems can be found here.
[32]
Anton Webern Complete Edition - Universal Edition
Anton Webern Complete Edition · Work editions · Text editions · Sketch editions · Series I Works with opus numbers · Series II Posthumous compositions and fragments.
[33]
Opus and Köchel, Fitzpatrick and Deutsch - The Cross-Eyed Pianist
Apr 28, 2012 · To help us identify and organise pieces of music by a particular composer, individual compositions or sets are usually given an “Opus” number.Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
[34]
Beethoven: Piano Sonatas, op. 10 - early music review
Jan 9, 2023 · The three sonatas that constitute opus 10 were published in 1798 with a dedication to Countess von Browne-Camus, the wife of one of Beethoven's ...
[35]
Piano Sonata no. 5 c minor op. 10 no. 1 | HN1128 - G. Henle Verlag
10, published in Vienna in 1798, forms the sole basis for the revised Urtext edition of the Sonata in c minor. Yet another jewel stemming from the collaboration ...
[36]
1798–1800 Six String Quartets, op. 18 (chapter 10)
However, when the quartets were published by Tranquillo Mollo in two instalments in June and October 1801, duly dedicated to Prince Lobkowitz, Beethoven ...
[37]
Opus - OnMusic Dictionary - Term
Feb 14, 2013 · Abbreviated as "Op." (work) or "Opp." (works), compositions are typically given an opus number in chronological order (i.e. "Op. 1", "Op. 2 ...
[38]
Recording numeric designation for musical works (RDA 6.16)
A numeric designation is a serial, opus, or thematic index number. Record as many as ascertainable, including serial, opus, and thematic index numbers.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
[39]
Complete Editions - G. Henle Verlag
The following lists scholarly editions of the complete musical works of a composer, edited down to the last detail and with comments.Missing: Bärenreiter opus numbers
[40]
List of works by Antonín Dvořák
Opus number. –. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 12/1. 12/2. 13. 14. 15/1. 16. 17. 19a. 19b ... 82, B157 Gypsy Songs (also Gypsy Melodies), Op. 55, B104 ...Symphony No. 7 in D minor · Symphony No. 8 in G major · Rusalka, Op. 114, B203Missing: gaps | Show results with:gaps
[41]
Dominique PRÉVOT - Ludwig van Beethoven's WoO
There are 205 works without opus numbers (WoO: Werke ohne Opuszahl - Work without Opus number). Many were published during his lifetime, but he did not deem ...<|separator|>
[42]
REGER Complete Organ Works - Gramophone
221 individual pieces contained within 28 opus numbers and part four of the list of Works Without Opus Numbers compiled by the Max-Reger-Institut.
[43]
Classification and Status of Edition - Neue Schubert-Ausgabe
The New Schubert Edition is subdivided by genre and is generally arranged in chronological order within each genre.<|control11|><|separator|>
[44]
Thematic Catalogues | MusRef | BYU Library
Thematic catalogue refers to catalogues of an individual composer's complete works, which basically lists all of a composer's work and provides detailed ...
[45]
Thematic Catalogs - Music - Library at UNC School of the Arts
Oct 15, 2025 · Thematic Catalog Arrangement The catalog of a composer's works may be arranged in chronological order by opus or work number or by some other ...Missing: cataloguing | Show results with:cataloguing<|separator|>
[46]
Ludwig Ritter von Köchel Issues the Köchel-Verzeichnis of Mozart's ...
The Köchel-Verzeichnis of the compositions of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Offsite Link was the first comprehensive chronological and thematic catalogue of the ...
[47]
The Köchel Catalogue (Chapter 31) - Mozart in Context
The 'K.' stands for 'Köchel', perpetuating the name of the author of the 'authoritative' catalogue of Mozart's works, first published in 1862.
[48]
A Tale of Thematic Catalogues - jstor
In the nineteenth century, the cult of individuality furthered the use of chronologically ordered opus numbers, Beethoven being the first great composer to do ...
[49]
BWV Numbering System - Discussions Part 1 - Bach Cantatas Website
The BWV numbers assign a unique identifying tag to each of JS Bach's compositions. Compare the Köchel Verzeichnis for WA Mozart's works (the K numbers). >
[50]
Recataloguing Bach | Early Music - Oxford Academic
Mar 26, 2023 · This famous catalogue was first compiled and published by Wolfgang Schmieder (BWV1) in 1950, using the Bach-Gesellschaft Ausgabe (1851–99) as ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[51]
Works by the Hoboken catalogue - Joseph Haydn - Piano Library
The catalogue also includes throughout many contemporary arrangements of Haydn's works, for example, piano arrangements of symphony movements, which are listed ...
[52]
Hoboken-Verzeichnis - MusicBrainz
May 20, 2014 · The Hoboken catalogue is a catalogue of the musical compositions by Joseph Haydn compiled by Anthony van Hoboken.
[53]
The New Köchel Catalog - RISM
Sep 19, 2024 · The new Köchel Catalog integrates the latest results of international Mozart research. The composer's arrangements, cadenzas and studies are presented in newly ...
[54]
The new Bach-Werke-Verzeichnis (BWV) is here!
On 13 June 2022, the third, extended new edition of the BWV was presented to the public for the first time at the Leipzig Bachfest.Missing: details | Show results with:details
[55]
Thematic catalogue | Grove Music - Oxford Music Online
Musicology and Music History · Organology · Peoples and Music Cultures · Performance ... 19th Century Music. Page of. Vienna, Stadt- und Landesbibliothek ...
[56]
Thematic Catalogs - Music History
Often this is by opus number or chronology. Well-known examples are Otto ... "Editions, historical." Grove Music Online. Oxford Music Online. 25 Aug ...
[57]
New Projects with RISM's Music Incipts
Feb 4, 2019 · Jacek Salamon has built a tool, launched at the end of 2018, for RISM's music incipits that searches for melodic similarity and also offers a search by rhythm.Missing: based systems
[58]
RISM Series A/II: Music Manuscripts after 1600 | EBSCO
RISM Series A/II is an annotated index of music manuscripts after 1600, with 615,000 records, 22,500 composers, and 780,000+ incipits, from 800+ libraries and ...
[59]
Music Incipit Search(es) - RISM
Nov 10, 2016 · In RISM, search incipits by note names in the Advanced Search, or use the on-screen piano keyboard. You can also search with transposition.Missing: based systems
[60]
[PDF] ECOLM III
Electronic Corpus of Lute Music. • 1999-‐2001 ECOLM (I) King's College, London. Laurence Dreyfus (Music) AHRC Research grant. • 2002-‐2006 ECOLM II City ...
[61]
International Standard Music Number - International ISMN Agency
The International Standard Music Number (ISMN) is a unique number for the identification of all notated music publications from all over the world.
[62]
https://www.mu.se/post/ai-powered-score-converter