Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Partial permutation

A partial permutation on a X is a between two subsets of X of equal , generalizing the notion of a full , which is a from X to itself. The and of such a are denoted \operatorname{dom}(p) and \operatorname{ran}(p), respectively, and may be empty or proper subsets. In , partial permutations are enumerated by considering the size k of the subsets involved; the total number of partial permutations on a set of n elements is \sum_{k=0}^{n} \binom{n}{k}^2 k!, which counts the ways to choose the domain and subsets of size k and then pair them bijectively. Special cases include monotonic partial permutations, numbering \binom{2n}{n}, and decreasing partial permutations, numbering the (n+1)-th B_{n+1}. of partial permutations is defined where possible, as (p \circ q)(x) = p(q(x)) for x in the appropriate overlapping , forming structures like inverse semigroups when closed under this operation and including the . Any partial permutation can be extended to a full of X. Partial permutations play a key role in theory and computational algebra, where they represent elements in systems like the software for handling symmetric groups and their extensions. They also arise in applications such as comparing sequences in bioinformatics, for via color transformations, and solving parameterized dictionary matching problems in string algorithms. Problems involving agreement or extension of sets of partial permutations are studied for their , often linking to conjectures like the .

Definition and Basics

Formal Definition

A partial permutation on a finite set S is defined as a \pi: A \to B, where A and B are subsets of S such that |A| = |B| = k \leq |S|. This structure ensures that \pi is one-to-one and onto between the specified subsets, capturing a matching of k elements from S to itself without requiring full coverage of S. The of \pi, denoted \dom(\pi), is the A \subseteq S on which \pi is defined, while the range, denoted \ran(\pi), is the B \subseteq S that serves as the of A under \pi. The size of the partial permutation is given by k = |\dom(\pi)| = |\ran(\pi)|, representing the number of elements actively mapped by \pi. For instance, consider S = \{1, 2, 3\} and the mapping \pi that sends $1 to $3 while leaving $2 and $3 undefined in the domain; here, \dom(\pi) = \{1\}, \ran(\pi) = \{3\}, and the size is k=1. Partial permutations are frequently studied in the context of the set = \{1, 2, \dots, n\}, where S = . Unlike a general injection from a subset of S into S, a partial permutation specifically requires the mapping to be a bijection onto its range subset, ensuring an exact correspondence between domain and range. Full permutations arise as the special case where \dom(\pi) = \ran(\pi) = S.

Relation to Permutations

Partial permutations generalize the concept of full permutations by allowing the mapping to apply only to a proper of the elements, rather than the entire set. Specifically, a full permutation of a set S of size n is equivalent to an n-partial permutation on S, where the and both coincide with S. Note that in some combinatorial contexts, particularly in pattern avoidance, "partial permutations" alternatively refer to injections from to, which are ordered selections of k distinct elements from $$ (counted by P(n,k) = \frac{n!}{(n-k)!}). This differs from the bijection-between-subsets used here.

Properties

Structural Properties

A partial permutation on a X is defined as a \pi: \dom(\pi) \to \ran(\pi), where \dom(\pi) and \ran(\pi) are subsets of X with equal k = |\dom(\pi)| = |\ran(\pi)|. By this definition, \pi is injective on its , meaning distinct in \dom(\pi) map to distinct in \ran(\pi), and surjective onto its range, meaning every in \ran(\pi) is the image of exactly one in \dom(\pi). The support of a partial permutation \pi, denoted \supp(\pi), is the union \dom(\pi) \cup \ran(\pi), which captures all elements of X involved in the mapping. The size of the support satisfies k \leq |\supp(\pi)| \leq 2k, since |\supp(\pi)| = 2k - |\dom(\pi) \cap \ran(\pi)|, with equality to k occurring when \dom(\pi) = \ran(\pi). For a partial permutation of size k on the set = \{1, 2, \dots, n\} with n \geq 2k, the possible supports are subsets of $$ of size between k and $2k, chosen such that there exist subsets A, B \subseteq S (not necessarily disjoint) with |A| = |B| = k and A \cup B = S. For example, on {{grok:render&&&type=render_inline_citation&&&citation_id=5&&&citation_type=wikipedia}} with k=2, a possible support is \{1,2,3\}, where \dom(\pi) = \{1,2\} and \ran(\pi) = \{2,3\}, allowing mappings like \pi(1)=2, \pi(2)=3. Fixed points of \pi are elements x \in \dom(\pi) \cap \ran(\pi) such that \pi(x) = x. These arise naturally when the domain and range overlap, and the number of fixed points is the size of the set \{x \in \dom(\pi) \cap \ran(\pi) \mid \pi(x) = x\}. In the identity partial permutation on a subset A \subseteq X with \dom(\pi) = \ran(\pi) = A, every element of A is a fixed point. A fundamental structural states that any on a can be extended to a full of the entire set. Specifically, given \pi: A \to B with A, B \subseteq X and |A| = |B| = k < |X|, there exists a permutation \sigma of X such that \sigma extends \pi, meaning A \subseteq \dom(\sigma) and \sigma(a) = \pi(a) for all a \in A. This extension is not unique in general but always exists, for example by choosing any bijection from X \setminus \dom(\pi) to X \setminus \ran(\pi). Conversely, any injective mapping f: S \to T between finite subsets S, T \subseteq X with |S| = |T| uniquely defines a partial permutation with \dom(f) = S and \ran(f) = T, as the bijectivity follows directly from the injectivity and equal cardinalities.

Operations on Partial Permutations

Partial permutations, as bijections between subsets of a finite set, support several key operations that preserve their bijective nature. The primary operation is composition, which combines two partial permutations \pi_1 and \pi_2 on a set X. The composition \pi_1 \circ \pi_2 is defined on the subset of \dom(\pi_1) where \pi_1(x) \in \dom(\pi_2), with (\pi_1 \circ \pi_2)(x) = \pi_2(\pi_1(x)) for such x. Thus, \dom(\pi_1 \circ \pi_2) = \pi_1^{-1}(\dom(\pi_2) \cap \ran(\pi_1)) and \ran(\pi_1 \circ \pi_2) = \pi_2(\dom(\pi_2) \cap \ran(\pi_1)), ensuring the result remains a partial permutation with rank at most the minimum of the ranks of \pi_1 and \pi_2. If \ran(\pi_1) \cap \dom(\pi_2) = \emptyset, standard composition yields the empty partial permutation unless the domains and ranges are structured to allow partial overlap; however, in cases of disjoint supports (where \dom(\pi_1) \cap \dom(\pi_2) = \emptyset and \ran(\pi_1) \cap \ran(\pi_2) = \emptyset), the disjoint union operation defines a new partial permutation as the union of their graphs, resulting in a larger bijection with rank equal to the sum of the individual ranks. Another fundamental operation is inversion. For a partial permutation \pi, its inverse \pi^{-1} is the unique partial permutation satisfying \pi \circ \pi^{-1} = \id_{\ran(\pi)} and \pi^{-1} \circ \pi = \id_{\dom(\pi)}, where \id denotes the identity on the respective subsets. Here, \dom(\pi^{-1}) = \ran(\pi) and \ran(\pi^{-1}) = \dom(\pi), with \pi^{-1}(y) = x if \pi(x) = y. This operation swaps the domain and range while preserving bijectivity. Extension provides a way to enlarge a partial permutation while maintaining its properties. Given a partial permutation \pi of rank k on a set X with |X| > k, an extension to rank k+1 is obtained by selecting an element i \in X \setminus \dom(\pi) for the domain and j \in X \setminus \ran(\pi) for the range, then adding the mapping i \mapsto j to \pi. The resulting function remains a bijection between the enlarged subsets. This process can be repeated until the rank reaches |X|, potentially yielding a full . For example, consider X = \{1,2,3,4\} and \pi_1: 1 \mapsto 2, a . Composing with \pi_2: 2 \mapsto 3 (, with overlap) gives \pi_1 \circ \pi_2: 1 \mapsto 3 (). If instead \pi_3: 3 \mapsto 4 (disjoint support), their is $1 \mapsto 2, 3 \mapsto 4 (). Extending \pi_1 by adding $3 \mapsto 4 yields the same rank-2 partial permutation. In non-disjoint cases, such as composing \pi_1 with \pi_4: 2 \mapsto 1 (overlap but ), the result is the empty partial permutation since \ran(\pi_1) \cap \dom(\pi_4) = \{2\} but the preimage domain is non-empty only if compatible, here reducing rank to 0. The collection of all partial permutations on a X with |X| = n, denoted I_n, forms an inverse monoid under the above composition operation, including the identity partial permutation (full on X) as the unit and the empty map as a . This structure is closed under composition and inversion, with every element idempotent in its local sense, and |I_n| = \sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k}^2 k!.

Representations

Bijection Representation

A partial permutation can be viewed as a \pi: A \to B, where A, B \subseteq S for a S = \{1, 2, \dots, n\} and |A| = |B|, with \pi being one-to-one and onto between these subsets. This representation emphasizes the injective mapping property while allowing elements outside A and B to remain unmapped, distinguishing it from full permutations where A = B = S. Graphically, a partial permutation is often depicted as a with partite sets corresponding to two copies of S, say the domain side and range side, where edges connect i \in A to \pi(i) \in B, ensuring no two edges share a . Alternatively, it can be shown in a , similar to full permutations, with horizontal lines for unmatched elements in A or B to highlight the partial nature of the matching. In matrix form, a partial permutation is represented by a , an n \times n (0,1)-matrix with at most one 1 in each row and each column, where the positions of the 1s indicate the : a 1 at entry (i, j) means \pi(i) = j. This differs from a full , which has exactly one 1 per row and column, by permitting zero rows and columns for unmatched elements. For example, consider S = \{1,2,3,4\} and \pi(1)=3, \pi(2)=4; the corresponding matrix is \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} with 1s at positions (1,3) and (2,4), and 0s elsewhere. This bijection and matrix representations facilitate algebraic manipulations, such as composition of partial permutations via matrix multiplication (adjusted for partial domains), and are implemented in software systems like GAP for computational group theory applications.

Sequence Representation

A partial permutation can be represented in sequence form as an ordered (a_1, a_2, \dots, a_k) consisting of k distinct elements from the S = \{1, 2, \dots, n\} with k \leq n, where this implies a \pi: \{1, 2, \dots, k\} \to \{a_1, a_2, \dots, a_k\} defined by \pi(i) = a_i for each i \in \{1, 2, \dots, k\}. This view treats the positions in the as an ordered , mapping consecutively from 1 to k, while the values a_i form the corresponding image . For instance, given S = \{1, 2, 3\}, the sequence (2, 1) represents the partial permutation where \pi(1) = 2 and \pi(2) = 1, leaving 3 unmapped. This representation highlights the injective nature of the mapping, ensuring no repetitions in the sequence, which aligns with the total number of such partial permutations being P(n, k) = n! / (n - k)!. To convert a general bijection representation—where the domain is an arbitrary D \subseteq S of size k—to this form, one orders the elements of D in increasing natural order (or another fixed ordering) to relabel them as 1 through k, then lists the corresponding images in that . This process facilitates systematic enumeration and generation of partial permutations, as lend themselves to lexicographic ordering or recursive construction algorithms for listing all possibilities without duplication. However, this sequence representation assumes an implicitly ordered domain as the initial segment \{1, 2, \dots, k\}, making it less flexible for cases where the domain subset requires preservation of its original structure or non-consecutive labeling, in contrast to the more general bijection view that directly specifies arbitrary subsets.

Enumeration

Counting Formulas

The number of partial permutations of order k (i.e., with |\operatorname{dom}(p)| = |\operatorname{ran}(p)| = k) on an n-element set is
\binom{n}{k}^2 k!.
This counts the ways to choose the domain subset in \binom{n}{k} ways, the range subset in \binom{n}{k} ways, and then k! bijections between them. Note that \binom{n}{k}^2 k! = \binom{n}{k} P(n,k), where P(n,k) = \frac{n!}{(n-k)!} is the falling factorial, corresponding to fixing the domain subset and counting injections to the range.
The total number of partial permutations on the set = \{1, 2, \dots, n\} is then
\sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k}^2 k!.
This sum includes the case k=0, corresponding to the unique empty partial permutation.
For example, with n=3, the values are 1 (k=0), 9 (k=1), 18 (k=2), 6 (k=3), for a total of 34.
This counting aligns with the bijection representation of partial permutations.

Generating Functions and Asymptotics

For fixed n, the exponential generating function in the order k for the number of k-partial permutations is
\sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k}^2 k! \frac{x^k}{k!} = \sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k}^2 x^k = {}_2F_1(-n, -n; 1; x),
where {}_2F_1 is the Gaussian hypergeometric function. This follows from the known generating function for squares of binomial coefficients.
The bivariate exponential generating function enumerating partial permutations over all n and k is
\sum_{n,k \geq 0} \binom{n}{k}^2 k! \frac{x^n}{n!} \frac{y^k}{k!} = \sum_{n \geq 0} \frac{x^n}{n!} \sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k}^2 y^k.
The inner sum is the hypergeometric function as above, and no simpler closed form is standard.
The total number of partial permutations on n elements, a_n = \sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k}^2 k! (sequence A002720 in OEIS), has a more complex asymptotic expansion for large n. The is dominated by terms where kn - √n, and detailed analysis requires advanced methods like the saddle-point approximation; the leading behavior grows faster than n! but subexponentially relative to double factorials or similar structures.

Applications

In Combinatorics and Probability

Partial permutations play a central role in rook theory, where they model the placement of non-attacking on a with restricted positions. The of a board enumerates the number of ways to place k non-attacking rooks, which directly corresponds to the number of partial permutations of size k avoiding forbidden positions on the board. This connection was established in the foundational work of Kaplansky and Riordan, who unified various combinatorial counting problems using rook placements to represent partial matchings and permutations with restrictions. The coefficients of the are computed via inclusion-exclusion principles, providing exact counts for these partial permutations by accounting for overplacements on restricted squares. In probabilistic models, random partial permutations arise in matching problems, such as assigning k distinct items to n slots without conflicts. For instance, the probability of fixed points in a of a k-subset of —where a fixed point occurs if an element maps to itself—can be analyzed using linearity of , yielding an expected number of approximately k/n fixed points for large n. This extends classical probabilities to partial settings, informing models in random allocations and bipartite matchings. The enumeration of partial permutations by cycle structure on their support connects to unsigned Stirling numbers of the first kind. Specifically, the number of partial permutations of with support size k and exactly m cycles equals \binom{n}{k} times the unsigned of the first kind c(k, m), which counts the permutations of k elements into m s. This relation facilitates the study of cycle distributions in random partial permutations, with applications in analyzing the structure of random injections. A practical example appears in variants of the , where partial permutations count the number of collision-free assignments of to people. For n people and d=365 days, the number of ways to assign distinct is the falling factorial d^{\underline{n}} = P(d, n), equivalent to the number of partial permutations of size n on d elements, yielding the probability of no shared birthday as P(d, n)/d^n. This framework extends to generalized collision problems in hashing and .

In Algorithms and Computer Science

In string algorithms, partial permutations facilitate efficient dictionary matching by representing partial bijections between symbol sets, enabling the identification of common subsequences or patterns in multiple texts over a shared . This approach supports querying whether a set of partial permutations agrees on a of symbols, with applications in tasks where only partial mappings are known. Maintenance of dynamic partial permutations involves data structures that support insertions and deletions while preserving the properties. One such structure uses O(n · |Σ|) to handle updates in O(|Σ|) time and queries for in O(n · |Σ| · log |Σ| / 2^{Ω(√log |Σ|)}) time, allowing efficient management of evolving mappings in applications like real-time . For nearly full partial permutations, specialized structures achieve O(poly(|Σ|) · n) with O(poly(|Σ|)) time for both updates and queries. Representations such as adjacency lists or sorted arrays enable these operations by tracking domain and range sets efficiently. Comparison of partial permutations often relies on lexicographic ordering, where sequences are sorted by comparing domain-range pairs iteratively from the smallest undefined positions. Algorithms for this use domain-range matching to determine agreement or order, achieving O(|Σ|) time per comparison with compact representations like bitvectors for symbol presence. Sorting a set of partial permutations can then proceed via comparison-based methods, such as adapted for partial bijections, in O(k · |Σ| · log k) time for k permutations. In , partial permutations underpin energy-efficient encryption schemes for network-coded wireless sensor networks, where only global encoding vectors are permuted to secure transmissions without full message rearrangement, reducing computational overhead while maintaining security against eavesdroppers. In , partial permutation decoding enhances error correction in linear codes like Reed-Muller or abelian codes by applying sets of automorphisms to shift errors out of information sets, correcting up to s errors with a PD-set of size s+1. This method improves decoding efficiency for t-error-correcting codes by focusing on partial rather than full permutations. In computational , the software implements partial permutations as injective functions between finite sets of positive integers, supporting operations like and inversion for tasks such as analyzing permutation groups or monoids in algebraic computations. These implementations aid in exploring structures like transformation semigroups, where partial permutations model incomplete mappings in .

Variants and Extensions

Restricted Partial Permutations

Restricted partial permutations are injections from a subset of size k of the to the [codomain](/page/Codomain) that avoid specified forbidden domain-range pairs (i,j), meaning \pi(i) \neq j for each such pair. These structures are modeled combinatorially as partial matchings in a with partite sets corresponding to the domain and codomain, where edges represent allowed assignments. Equivalently, they correspond to placements of k non-attacking rooks on an n \times n board B whose cells indicate permitted positions, excluding the forbidden ones. The number of restricted partial permutations of size k, denoted r_k(B), is the k-th rook number of the board B. These are generated by the rook polynomial R(B, x) = \sum_{k=0}^n r_k(B) x^k, which encapsulates the enumeration across all possible sizes and facilitates asymptotic analysis for large n. For boards with m forbidden positions, r_k(B) approximates the unrestricted falling factorial P(n,k) = n(n-1)\cdots(n-k+1) with subtractions for configurations violating restrictions, though exact counts require board-specific adjustments. Enumeration proceeds via rook polynomials, computable by the deletion-involution recursion: for a cell c \in B, r_k(B) = r_k(B \setminus c) + r_{k-1}(B / c), where B \setminus c removes the cell c, and B / c removes the row and column of c. Inclusion-exclusion also applies, particularly for sparse restrictions, by overcounting and correcting for intersections of forbidden sets. A example arises on an n \times n board with certain squares removed to represent forbidden positions; here, r_k(B) counts the ways to place k non-attacking on the surviving board, directly yielding the restricted partial permutations. For a board with m isolated forbidden squares, the count begins as P(n,k) and subtracts terms for rooks landing on each forbidden square, with higher-order inclusions for multiple overlaps. Computing these enumerations connects to matrix permanents: for the 0-1 A of B (with 1s on allowed positions), the full case r_n(B) equals \operatorname{per}(A), the number of perfect matchings avoiding forbiddens. For partial size k, r_k(B) equals the sum of permanents over all k \times k principal submatrices of A, linking restricted partial permutations to bipartite matching theory. The framework for restricted partial permutations originated in rook theory, pioneered by Kaplansky and Riordan in 1946 to enumerate non-attacking configurations under positional constraints. This approach underpins variants of the problème des ménages, extending to partial seating arrangements that avoid specific adjacencies modeled as forbidden positions on a circular board.

Pattern-Avoiding Partial Permutations

A partial permutation, represented as a sequence of length n with entries from \{0, 1, \dots, n\} where non-zero entries are distinct and at most one per row and column, avoids a pattern \sigma \in S_m if there is no increasing sequence of indices i_1 < i_2 < \dots < i_m such that the non-zero values \pi_{i_1}, \pi_{i_2}, \dots, \pi_{i_m} are order-isomorphic to \sigma (i.e., their relative order matches \sigma). This definition focuses on the subsequence formed by the non-hole positions, ignoring the gaps introduced by zeros. The enumeration of pattern-avoiding partial permutations often leverages based on the induced on the non-hole entries. For avoiding length-2 patterns, such as 12 (no increasing pair of non-zero entries, yielding a decreasing induced ), or 21 (no decreasing pair, yielding an increasing induced ), the count for partial permutations with exactly k non-holes is \binom{n}{k}^2. This arises from choosing k positions for the non-holes and k distinct values, assigning them in strictly decreasing (for 12-avoidance) or increasing (for 21-avoidance) order along the positions. The over k for fixed n is \sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k}^2 x^k. A representative example is partial permutations avoiding the pattern 132. Here, the induced permutation on the non-hole entries must avoid 132, which is enumerated by the C_k = \frac{1}{k+1} \binom{2k}{k}. Thus, for exactly k non-holes, the number is \binom{n}{k}^2 C_k. These counts connect to lattice paths via the standard between 132-avoiding permutations of $$ and Dyck paths of semilength k (non-intersecting lattice paths from (0,0) to (2k,0) with steps (1,1) and (1,-1) staying non-negative), extended by choosing positions and values independently. Extensions consider holes explicitly as gaps in the sequence representation, where pattern avoidance applies solely to the order of non-gap entries, preserving the injection property while allowing arbitrary gap placements. This framework naturally accommodates varying numbers of holes without altering the avoidance condition on the filled .

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Extending partial permtations
    A partial permutation on a set X is a bijection between two subsets of X. The domain and range of a partial permutation p will be denoted by dom(p) and ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Notes on Counting: An Introduction to Enumerative Combinatorics
    A partial permutation on a set X is a bijection between subsets of X. We allow the subsets to be empty or to be the whole of X. We denote the domain and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  3. [3]
    GAP (ref) - Chapter 54: Partial permutations
    The product of a permutation and a partial permutation is returned as a partial permutation. ... Permutation groups. If S is a permutation group, then ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Partial Permutations Comparison, Maintenance and Applications
    A partial permutation over Σ is a bijection πpar : Σ1 7→ Σ2 mapping a subset Σ1 ⊂ Σ to a subset Σ2 ⊂ Σ, where |Σ1| = |Σ2| (|Σ| denotes the size of a set Σ).
  5. [5]
    [PDF] pattern avoidance in partial permutations - SPIDER-V
    To define pattern-avoidance for partial fillings, we first introduce the concept of substitution into a -column, which is analogous to substituting a number for ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] arXiv:2207.10252v1 [math.CO] 21 Jul 2022
    Jul 21, 2022 · The notion of partial permutations is a natural extension of ordinary permutations. They have been studied in various settings such as ...
  7. [7]
    Permutation -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    A permutation, also called an "arrangement number" or "order," is a rearrangement of the elements of an ordered list S into a one-to-one correspondence with S ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] On the Algebraic Combinatorics of Injections
    1Note that an isolated vertex is an even path of length 0. 2More precisely, the (k, n)-injection scheme, also dubbed the (k, n)-partial permutation scheme.
  9. [9]
    Chance Combinatorics: The Theory that History Forgot
    Nov 1, 2023 · The existence of the theory was recognized by Pierre-Simon Laplace (1902, p. 185) as part of a remark of historical importance: Long ago ...
  10. [10]
    Why are permutations (nPr) called variations in non-English ...
    Dec 2, 2018 · Variations without repetition, an archaic term in combinatorics still commonly used by non-English authors for k-permutations of n ...Notation about n choose k permutations - Math Stack ExchangeThe intuition behind the formula for counting distinct permutations ...More results from math.stackexchange.com
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Symmetric Group Gauge Theories and Simple Gauge/String Dualities
    Jan 29, 2025 · where ψd1,d2 augments the support of a partial permutation to d1 ∪ d2 and inserts an identity operator for every unmarked colour: ψd1,d2 :A ...
  12. [12]
    GAP (ref) - Chapter 54: Partial permutations
    In the context of the symmetric inverse monoid, a partial permutation f is less than or equal to a partial permutation g in the natural partial order if and ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] 1 Inverse semigroups and orders
    An inverse semigroup of partial permutations on X is a non-empty set of partial permutations (bijections between subsets) of X, closed under composition and ...
  14. [14]
    On the Extension Problem for Partial Permutations - jstor
    Jan 28, 2003 · For the pseudovariety G of all finite groups, the problem is trivial since one can always take Y = X and extend the partial permutations to ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] arXiv:2107.05024v1 [math.CO] 11 Jul 2021
    Jul 11, 2021 · A partial permutation of [n] is a pair (d, ω) consisting of an arbitrary subset d of [n] and an arbitrary bijection ω : d −→ d. The notion of ...
  16. [16]
    Permutation represented as a bipartite graph. - ResearchGate
    Graphically, a permutation of integers 1 to n can be represented as a bipartite graph, e.g. the permutation (2 4 1 3 6 7 5) of 1 to 7 will have the ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Pattern avoidance in partial permutations (extended ... - HAL Inria
    Abstract. Motivated by the concept of partial words, we introduce an analogous concept of partial permutations. A partial permutation of length n with k ...Missing: inverse | Show results with:inverse<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Filtered RSK and matrix Schubert varieties
    A partial permutation matrix Mw ∈ Matm,n is a matrix with at most one 1 in each row and column and 0s everywhere else. The indexing partial permutation is a.
  19. [19]
    A partial permutation matrix representing a particular selection and...
    A partial permutation matrix representing a particular selection and permutation of rows of Y.
  20. [20]
    GAP (ref) - Chapter 42: Permutations
    GAP offers a data type permutation to describe the elements of permutation groups. ... If the partial permutation f is a permutation of its image, then ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] LECTURE 2 Counting Techniques §2.3 - UMD MATH
    Definition. An ordered sequence of k distinct objects taken from a set of n elements is called a k-permutation of the n objects. The number of k-permutations ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] arXiv:2503.17552v1 [math.CO] 21 Mar 2025
    Mar 21, 2025 · As in the introduction, a partial permutation of [n] is an ordered pair (I,J) where I and J are sequences of elements of [n] of the same length ...
  23. [23]
    1.3 Combinations and Permutations
    A permutation is a (possible) rearrangement of objects. For example, there are 6 permutations of the letters a, b, c.Missing: surjectivity | Show results with:surjectivity<|control11|><|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Counting Permutations | Brilliant Math & Science Wiki
    Permutations of a Subset of Distinct Objects. Consider the following problem ... n, and is denoted by P k n P_k ^n Pkn​. How many 3-digit numbers can be ...
  25. [25]
    A000522 - OEIS
    Total number of ordered k-tuples (k=0..n) of distinct elements from an n-element set: a(n) = Sum_{k=0..n} n!/k!. (Formerly M1497 N0589). 290. 1, 2, 5, 16, 65 ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Combinatorics: The Art of Counting - Michigan State University
    ... exponential generating function. 117. 𝐹𝒮(𝑥) exponential generating function ... injections, and surjections. We will also permit the domain 𝐷 and ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] AC.pdf - Analytic Combinatorics
    Analytic combinatorics aims to enable precise quantitative predictions of the proper- ties of large combinatorial structures. The theory has emerged over ...
  28. [28]
    The problem of the rooks and its applications - Project Euclid
    June 1946 The problem of the rooks and its applications. Irving Kaplansky, John Riordan · DOWNLOAD PDF + SAVE TO MY LIBRARY. Duke Math.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Rook Theory Notes - UCSD Math
    Figure 2: Rook placements associated with permutations and functions. Kaplansky and Riordan [38] proved the following fundamental relationship between the rook.
  30. [30]
    [PDF] 1 S.-D. Poisson Researches into the Probabilities of Judgements in ...
    The precise aim of the theory is to calculate for a jury panel composed of a certain number of people and judging a very large number of cases by an also known ...
  31. [31]
    Energy Efficient Partial Permutation Encryption on Network Coded ...
    Apr 6, 2017 · The basic idea is that source permutes only global encoding vectors (GEVs) without permuting the whole message symbols which significantly ...
  32. [32]
    Partial permutation decoding for codes from finite planes
    We define the notion of partial permutation decoding using sets of automorphisms that can correct up to s errors, where s is some number less than t, the full ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Improved partial permutation decoding for Reed-Muller codes
    Nov 28, 2016 · Definition 1. If C is a t-error-correcting code with information set I and check set C, then a PD-set for C is a set S of automorphisms of C ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Notes on Rook Polynomials F. Butler J. Haglund J. B. Remmel
    Rook polynomials count ways to place k rooks on a board, no two in the same row or column. rk(B) denotes this number.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Pattern Avoidance in the Rook Monoid
    Sep 12, 2014 · Similarly, the rook placement in Figure 1 has word encoding 5470203. Superficially, a rook placement may look like a partial permutation in the ...