Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Zero element

In mathematics, the zero element is the additive identity in an algebraic structure such as a group, ring, or vector space, defined as an element $0 such that for every element a in the structure, a + 0 = 0 + a = a. This property ensures that the zero element acts as a neutral point for the addition operation, generalizing the role of the number zero in the integers or real numbers. The extends beyond basic to various settings, including modules and categories, where the zero element facilitates proofs and constructions by providing a baseline for operations. In rings, for instance, the zero element is central to the definition of zero divisors—nonzero elements whose product with another nonzero element yields zero—highlighting structures without such elements as integral domains. Its uniqueness follows from the structure's axioms: if another element z satisfies the property, then z = z + 0 = 0. The zero element's role underscores the foundational principles of modern algebra, enabling the study of symmetries, linear transformations, and more complex systems while maintaining operational consistency.

General Concepts in Algebraic Structures

Additive Identity

In algebraic structures equipped with a binary operation denoted by +, the additive identity is an element e (often denoted 0) such that for every element a in the structure, a + e = e + a = a. This neutral element preserves the value of any operand under the operation, distinguishing it from absorbing elements that may force a fixed result in other contexts, such as multiplication. The defining property can be stated formally as \forall a, \quad a + 0 = 0 + a = a. In any , the two-sided , if it exists, is : if e and f are both two-sided identities, then e = e * f = f. For instance, in the \mathbb{Z} under , the element 0 serves as the , satisfying n + 0 = 0 + n = n for any integer n. Similarly, in free abelian groups generated by a basis, the is the empty formal sum, representing the neutral element in the of cyclic groups. In groups and abelian groups with addition as the operation, the functions as the required , enabling the existence of inverses and ensuring the operation's invertibility while maintaining structural coherence. This role underscores its foundational importance in , where it anchors definitions of , , and other derived concepts. The term and axiomatic treatment of the were formalized in the early amid the rise of , with key contributions from in developing modern and theory, where such identities are central axioms.

Absorbing Element

In algebraic structures equipped with a *, an absorbing element z (also called an annihilating element) is defined as an satisfying z * a = a * z = z for every a in the set. This property distinguishes absorbing elements from other special elements, as the operation with z always yields z itself, regardless of the other . The concept applies to various structures, including magmas and more specific ones like semirings and lattices, where captures a form of "total dominance" under the operation. Absorbing elements appear commonly in semirings, where the zero element serves as the additive identity and is absorbing under multiplication, satisfying the distributive laws without requiring additive inverses. In lattices, particularly bounded ones, the bottom element \bot acts as an absorbing element for the meet operation (\wedge), such that a \wedge \bot = \bot \wedge a = \bot for all a, while dually the top element \top absorbs under join (\vee). Although absorbing elements are unique when they exist in structures admitting two-sided absorption—since if w is another such element, then w = z * w = z—some generalized or one-sided contexts may allow non-uniqueness. A representative example is the number 0 under multiplication in the real numbers \mathbb{R} or integers \mathbb{Z}, where it absorbs all operands: \forall a \in \mathbb{R}, \quad a \cdot 0 = 0 \cdot a = 0. In ring theory, the zero element frequently serves dual roles, functioning as the additive identity while also being the multiplicative absorbing element, a property derived from the ring axioms ensuring compatibility between addition and multiplication. Absorbing elements differ from idempotent elements, which satisfy only e * e = e. While every absorbing element is idempotent (z * z = z), the reverse does not hold; idempotents preserve themselves under self-operation but do not necessarily collapse interactions with other elements to themselves, thus avoiding the structural simplification imposed by absorbers.

Zero Object

In , a zero object is defined as an object $0 that is simultaneously both an object and a object in the . This means that for every object A in the , there exists a $0 \to A and a A \to 0. Such an object possesses several key properties. If a zero object exists, it is unique up to a unique , as share this uniqueness characteristic. Moreover, the hom-sets satisfy the condition that they are singletons for all objects A: \left| \Hom(0, A) \right| = \left| \Hom(A, 0) \right| = 1. Zero objects typically exist in pointed categories, which are categories equipped with a distinguished zero object, facilitating structures like abelian categories in . Examples of zero objects abound in familiar categories. In the category \Grp of groups and group homomorphisms, the trivial group \{e\} (containing only the identity element) serves as the zero object, with unique homomorphisms to and from any group. Similarly, in the category \Vect_k of vector spaces over a field k and linear maps, the zero vector space (with only the zero vector) acts as the zero object. The zero object plays a crucial role by enabling the construction of zero morphisms: for any objects A and B, the unique morphism A \to 0 \to B provides a canonical "zero" arrow between them, allowing compositions that behave like zeros in algebraic settings. This zero morphism is the unique arrow factoring through the zero object. The concept of the zero object developed as part of the foundational work in category theory during the 1940s and 1950s by Samuel Eilenberg and Saunders Mac Lane.

Zero Morphism

In a pointed category, which is a category equipped with a zero object serving both as initial and terminal object, the zero morphism $0_{A,B}: A \to B between any two objects A and B is the unique arrow that factors through the zero object $0, composed as the unique morphism !^A: A \to 0 followed by the unique morphism !^B_*: 0 \to B, so $0_{A,B} = !^B_* \circ !^A. This ensures the existence of a distinguished "null" arrow in every hom-set, enriching the category over pointed sets. The zero morphisms satisfy key absorption properties under composition: for any morphism f: A' \to A, $0_{A,B} \circ f = 0_{A',B}, and for any g: B \to B', g \circ 0_{A,B} = 0_{A,B'}. More generally, the composition of any morphism with a zero morphism yields another zero morphism, making zero morphisms the additive identities in the abelian group structure on hom-sets when the category is preadditive. These properties extend to the equation: for any morphism f: A \to B, f \circ 0_{X,A} = 0_{X,B} = 0_{B,Y} \circ f, where X and Y are arbitrary objects, reflecting the universal null behavior. Concrete examples arise in familiar pointed categories. In the category \mathbf{Ab} of abelian groups, the zero morphism $0_{G,H}: G \to H is the trivial homomorphism sending every element of G to the identity in H. Similarly, in the category \mathbf{Vect}_k of vector spaces over a field k, it is the zero linear map that sends every vector to the zero vector. In , zero morphisms play a central role in defining and derived structures within abelian categories, which are pointed. For instance, in a short exact sequence $0 \to K \xrightarrow{i} A \xrightarrow{f} B \to 0, the initial map from the zero object to K and the terminal map from B to the zero object are zero morphisms, with K = \ker f and B \cong \operatorname{coker} i, ensuring the sequence's exactness at each term. Although zero morphisms are canonically defined in pointed categories, the concept extends to certain non-pointed categories lacking a zero object but possessing additional structure, such as finite biproducts; in these settings, zero morphisms can be characterized via the canonical maps induced by biproducts with "empty" summands, preserving composition properties without requiring a global zero object.

Order Theory

Least Element

In a (poset) (P, \leq), a least element, often denoted by \bot or $0, is an element such that \bot \leq a for every a \in P. This condition implies that \bot is a lower bound for the entire poset P, and in fact, it is the greatest lower bound of P, or the infimum \inf P. If a least element exists in a poset, it is unique, as the antisymmetry of the partial order ensures that any two such elements must be equal. The least element is necessarily a minimal element, though the converse does not hold in general posets. In the context of lattices, the least element coincides with the meet (greatest lower bound) of the empty subset, providing a foundational role in the structure's completeness properties. Classic examples illustrate this concept clearly. In the power set of any nonempty set X, ordered by inclusion \subseteq, the empty set \emptyset serves as the least element, since \emptyset \subseteq A for every subset A \subseteq X. Similarly, in the set of non-negative real numbers \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0} under the standard order \leq, the number $0 is the least element, as $0 \leq r for all r \geq 0. The least element plays a key role in extending algebraic notions to ordered structures. For instance, in the non-negative cone of an ordered abelian group, the zero element serves as the least element under the compatible order. In join-semilattices, it functions as an absorbing element for the join operation, satisfying a \vee \bot = a for all a in the poset. This absorption property highlights its neutral behavior in suprema computations. In Hasse diagrams of posets, the least element is depicted at the bottom, with edges connecting upward to elements immediately above it, emphasizing its foundational position. Within bounded posets, the least element embodies a "zero" for order operations, particularly as the infimum of the full poset, enabling consistent definitions of meets and joins across the structure. This zero-like role facilitates analogies to absorbing or elements in algebraic contexts, though tailored to the relational framework of orders.

Modules and Ideals

Zero Module

In , the zero module over a R, denoted \{0\}, is the trivial module consisting solely of the zero element, where the only module operation is satisfying r \cdot 0 = 0 for all r \in R. This structure forms an under addition with $0 + 0 = 0, and it is closed under the ring action, making it a in the standard sense. The zero module serves as both the initial and terminal object in the category of left R-modules, denoted R-Mod. As such, for any R-module M, the Hom-set \Hom_R(M, 0) consists of exactly one element, the zero homomorphism sending every element of M to $0; similarly, \Hom_R(0, M) is a singleton containing the zero map from $0 to M. These unique morphisms arise from the universal properties: any morphism into the zero module must factor through the zero map, and any morphism out of it is uniquely determined. In the category of R-modules, the zero module thus acts as a zero object, enabling the definition of zero morphisms between arbitrary modules via the composite M \to 0 \to N. Examples of the zero module include the trivial \{0\} as a \mathbb{[Z](/page/Z)}-module, where multiplication acts trivially. When R is a , the zero module corresponds to the zero-dimensional , with basis the and all linear maps to or from it being unique. The zero module plays a central role in sequences of s, where short sequences of the form $0 \to A \to B \to C \to 0 indicate that A is the of the B \to C and C is the of A \to B, with the initial and terminal zeros ensuring exactness at those positions. Injective and projective s frequently terminate or commence with the zero module; for instance, a projective of a M ends as \cdots \to P_1 \to P_0 \to M \to 0, where the final map to zero captures the augmented complex. Explicitly, the zero homomorphism $0: M \to 0 is defined by $0(m) = 0 for all m \in M, and the zero map $0: 0 \to M sends the single $0 to $0 \in M. These are the only R-linear maps possible, underscoring the triviality of the Hom-spaces. Up to , there is a unique zero over any given R, as any two such modules admit a unique between them, preserving the zero and scalar actions.

Zero Ideal

In , the zero ideal of a ring R, denoted (0) or simply $0, is the principal ideal generated by the zero element, consisting solely of the additive identity \{0\}. This subset is an ideal because it forms an additive of R and is closed under by any element of R, as r \cdot 0 = 0 for all r \in R. The zero ideal is the smallest ideal in R, obtained as the intersection of all ideals of R, since every ideal contains $0 and no smaller nonempty subset satisfies the ideal axioms. In commutative rings with identity, the zero ideal is prime if and only if R is an , meaning R/(0) \cong R has no zero divisors. Examples include the zero ideal \{0\} in the ring of integers \mathbb{Z}, which is prime but not maximal, as \mathbb{Z}/\{0\} \cong \mathbb{Z} is a but not a . Similarly, in the ring of n \times n matrices over a , the zero ideal consists of the zero matrix alone and shares these absorption properties under ring multiplication. The zero ideal plays a key role in quotient constructions, where the quotient ring R/(0) is isomorphic to R itself via the natural projection map. It also absorbs products with any other ideal I of R, satisfying I \cdot (0) = (0), since products involving elements of (0) yield only zero. This absorption stems from the zero element acting as an absorbing generator for the ideal. For any r \in R and a \in (0), r a = 0, which holds trivially as a = 0. The zero ideal is proper (i.e., strictly contained in R) unless R is the zero ring, where \{0\} = R.

Matrices and Tensors

Zero Matrix

In linear algebra, the zero matrix of size n \times m is defined as the rectangular array where every entry is the additive identity (typically 0) of the underlying commutative ring or field, often denoted as \mathbf{0}_{n \times m} or simply \mathbf{0}. This matrix belongs to the set M_{n \times m}(R) of all n \times m matrices over the ring R. The zero matrix functions as the unique additive identity within M_{n \times m}(R), satisfying \mathbf{A} + \mathbf{0} = \mathbf{0} + \mathbf{A} = \mathbf{A} for any matrix \mathbf{A} of the same dimensions, where addition is performed entry-wise. This property ensures that adding the zero matrix to any compatible matrix leaves the original unchanged. For instance, the $2 \times 2 zero matrix over the real numbers is \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, which when added to any $2 \times 2 matrix \mathbf{A} = \begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{pmatrix} yields \mathbf{A} itself. Entry-wise, the addition operation with the zero matrix preserves the structure: (\mathbf{A} + \mathbf{0})_{ij} = A_{ij} + 0 = A_{ij} for all indices i = 1, \dots, n and j = 1, \dots, m. In matrix multiplication, the zero matrix acts absorbingly: if \mathbf{B} is an n \times p zero matrix and \mathbf{A} is a compatible q \times n matrix, then \mathbf{A} \mathbf{B} = \mathbf{0} and \mathbf{B} \mathbf{C} = \mathbf{0} for any compatible \mathbf{C}, due to the summation of products involving zero entries. The zero matrix represents the zero linear transformation between vector spaces of appropriate dimensions, mapping every vector to the zero vector in the context of endomorphisms. For square zero matrices of order n \geq 1, the —defined as the sum of the diagonal entries—is 0. Similarly, the is 0, as the matrix is singular with linearly dependent rows (or columns). Addition and scalar multiplication operations preserve the zero matrix: \mathbf{0} + \mathbf{0} = \mathbf{0}, and for any scalar c \in R, c \mathbf{0} = \mathbf{0}, reflecting its role as the zero element in the matrix ring.

Zero Tensor

In tensor algebra, the zero tensor is defined as the additive identity element in the tensor product space V \otimes W of two vector spaces over a field, satisfying T + 0 = 0 + T = T for any tensor T \in V \otimes W, and more specifically, u \otimes 0_W = 0_V \otimes v = 0 for all vectors u \in V and v \in W, where the resulting zero is in the appropriate tensor space. This follows from the bilinearity of the tensor product, as u \otimes 0_W = u \otimes (0_W + 0_W) = u \otimes 0_W + u \otimes 0_W, implying u \otimes 0_W = 0 by cancellation in the vector space structure (e.g., subtracting u \otimes 0_W from both sides). A similar argument applies to $0_V \otimes v = 0. A key property of the zero tensor is that all its components are zero in any chosen basis, making it the unique serving as the zero in the tensor over a . It is also closed under , so \alpha \cdot 0 = 0 for any scalar \alpha in the . For instance, the equation (u \otimes v) + 0 = u \otimes v holds, preserving the outer structure without alteration. In examples from , the zero (0,2)-tensor in corresponds to the trivial that maps any pair of tangent vectors to zero, representing a covariant tensor field on a manifold. Similarly, in the k-fold tensor power \otimes^k V, the zero tensor is the trivial element that annihilates under further tensor products or contractions. The zero tensor plays a crucial role in tensor fields by embodying null multilinear maps, where applying it in compositions or always yields the zero result, such as in the contraction of a nonzero tensor with the zero tensor producing zero. It relates to outer products as the zero , where no nonzero vectors produce a nontrivial . Zero matrices arise as special cases of zero tensors of rank 2 with mixed .

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Chapter 3, Rings Definitions and examples. We now have several ...
    (3) Addition is commutative: a + b = b + a. (4) R contains an additive identity element, called zero and usually denoted by 0 or. 0R: a +0=0+ ...
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Algebra Definitions 1
    A zero-divisor in a ring R is an element a = 0 such that a • b = 0 for some b ∈ R . A domain is a commutative ring with no zero-divisors. • A Euclidean ...
  4. [4]
    Sets, Groups, Rings and Algebras - UMBC CSEE
    Jan 7, 1999 · Set. A set is a collection of unique elements. The definition of a specific set determines which elements are members of the set. ... element zero ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Additive Identity -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    The identity element of an additive group G, usually denoted 0. In the additive group of vectors, the additive identity is the zero vector 0.Missing: definition abstract source
  6. [6]
    uniqueness of additive identity in a ring - PlanetMath
    Mar 22, 2013 · Lemma 1. Let R R be a ring. There exists a unique element 0 0 in R R such that for all a a in R R : 0+a=a+0=a.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] binary opera- tions, magmas, monoids, g - UMD MATH
    Suppose M is a magma having a left identity l and a right identity r. ... Note that, by Proposition 6.10, if m is invertible then m has a unique inverse.
  8. [8]
    Additive Group -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    An additive group is a group where the operation is called addition and is denoted +. In an additive group, the identity element is called zero.
  9. [9]
    Group -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    ### Summary on Identity Element in Groups
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Why all rings should have a 1 - MIT Mathematics
    Jun 15, 2018 · Should the definition of ring require the existence of a multiplicative iden- tity 1? Emmy Noether, when giving the modern axiomatic ...
  11. [11]
    absorbing element - PlanetMath
    Mar 22, 2013 · An element ζ ζ of a groupoid Planetmath (G,*) ( G , * ) is called an absorbing element (in French un élément absorbant) for the operation ...Missing: algebra | Show results with:algebra
  12. [12]
    Semirings :: Jens Zumbrägel
    We also assume the existence of a 0-element, which is neutral in (R,+) and absorbing in (R,*). Every ring is also a semiring, and we call a semiring that is not ...
  13. [13]
    Zero Element -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    The name and the symbol are borrowed from the ring of integers whose additive identity is, of course, number 0. The zero element of a ring R has the property ...Missing: absorbing reference<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Category Theory in Context Emily Riehl
    Mar 1, 2014 · Homological algebra is the subject whose development induced Eilenberg and Mac ... zero object—an object that is both initial and terminal, which ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    [PDF] maclane-categories.pdf - MIT Mathematics
    Theory. 43 GILLMAN/JERISON. Rings of Continuous. 11 CONWAY. Functions of One ... General Relativity for. 15 BERBERIAN. Lectures in Functional.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Category theory - Jakob Scholbach
    Jan 27, 2022 · 0 (the trivial group, monoid, vector space) 0. Ring, CRing. Z. 0. Most ... dimensional vector spaces are compact objects in Vect (Example 4.48).
  17. [17]
    GENERAL THEORY OF NATURAL EQUIVALENCES
    GENERAL THEORY OF NATURAL EQUIVALENCES. 233. A discussion of the ... homology theory (Eilenberg and MacLane, Group extensions and homology, Ann.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Contents
    This category has a zero morphism, but no initial or terminal objects. ... over Set• which has a zero object is a pointed category. /. A remarkable property ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] The CRing Project
    Jan 26, 2023 · ... pointed category. The common object is called the zero object. In a ... zero morphism. One can easily show that the composition (on the ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Tensor categories lecture notes - MIT OpenCourseWare
    The category Vecω is a pointed category. If G is. G a p-group and k has ... phism is zero then there is a non-zero morphism (V ⊗V ∗)/1 → 1 which.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Homological Algebra - Stacks Project
    zero. The composition Coim(f) → y → Coker(f) is zero, because it is the unique morphism which gives rise to the morphism x → y → Coker(f) which is zero (the ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] BIPRODUCTS WITHOUT POINTEDNESS
    As zero morphisms are closed under composition, the category C0(A) has zero morphisms and hence is enriched in pointed sets by 2.3. Moreover. - 234 -. Page 7. M ...
  23. [23]
    Partially ordered set - Encyclopedia of Mathematics
    Jul 29, 2025 · A partially ordered set, or poset, is said to satisfy the maximum condition if every chain of increasing elements stabilizes, i.e. if a1≤a2≤…, ...
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    Introduction to Lattices and Order
    This new edition of Introduction to Lattices and Order presents a radical reorganization and updating, though its primary aim is unchanged.
  26. [26]
    Zero Module -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    Every module over a ring R contains a so-called "zero element" which fulfils the properties suggested by its name with respect to addition, 0+0=0, and with ...
  27. [27]
    Zero module - AoPS Wiki
    ### Summary of Zero Module (AoPS Wiki)
  28. [28]
    zero object in nLab
    ### Summary of Zero Object in Category of Modules over a Ring
  29. [29]
    Exact Sequence -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    0->A->B->C->0,. (4). beginning and ending with zero, meaning the zero module {0} , is called a short exact sequence. An infinite exact sequence is called a ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] 1. Rings: definitions, examples, and basic properties - UCSD Math
    Mar 13, 2021 · Since 0a has an additive inverse −(0a), adding it to both sides gives 0 = 0a. Similarly, 0 = a0. Other easy consequences of the definition are ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] NOTES ON IDEALS 1. Introduction Let R be a commutative ring ...
    Example 3.3. For rings R and S, the ideals R × {0} and {0} × S in R × S are the kernels of the projection homomorphisms R × S → S given by (r, s) 7→ s and R × ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Contents 3 Homomorphisms, Ideals, and Quotients - Evan Dummit
    Example: If R is any ring, the quotient ring of R by the zero ideal, namely R/0, is (isomorphic to) R itself, while the quotient ring of R by itself, namely R/R ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Lecture 21 - Math 4527 (Number Theory 2)
    We define the ideal generated by A, denoted (A), to be the intersection of all ideals of R containing A. ... If R is any ring, the quotient ring of R by the zero ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Lecture #21 of 38 ∼ March 10, 2021 - Math 4527 (Number Theory 2)
    A commutative ring with 1 is an integral domain if and only if (0) is a prime ideal. Proof: Note that (0) is prime if and only if the quotient ring. R/0. ∼.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] MATH 304, Fall 2014 [3mm] Linear Algebra
    The m×n zero matrix (all entries are zeros) is denoted Omn or simply O. Negative of a matrix: −A is defined as (−1)A. Matrix difference: A − B is defined as A + ...
  36. [36]
    Matrix Operations - A First Course in Linear Algebra
    a matrix full of zeros. Definition ZM Zero Matrix. The m× ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] MAT 260 LINEAR ALGEBRA LECTURE 18 1.4
    The zero matrix, i.e. a matrix with all the entries 0, is often denoted by O. It is the additive identity for matrix addition. By that, we mean. A + O = A.
  38. [38]
    160 Linear Systems: Matrix Algebra
    The matrix of all zeros added to any other matrix is the original matrix, that is, A + [0] = A and this is the only such matrix. Thus there is unique additive ...
  39. [39]
    Matrix Arithmetic, Part 4
    A matrix of any size with all zero entries is called a zero matrix. Some examples of each type are defined in the worksheet. Compute each of the following ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  40. [40]
    [PDF] A Primer on Matrices - EE263
    Sep 17, 2012 · A matrix is a rectangular array of numbers, written between square brackets, and its size is given as rows × columns.
  41. [41]
    [PDF] A First Course in Linear Algebra
    The m × n zero matrix is written as O = Om×n and defined by [O]ij = 0, for ... Then T is diagonalizable if and only. T is the zero linear transformation.
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Math 334: Midterm Solutions
    First, the trace of the zero matrix is 0 + 0 +···+ 0 = 0, so the zero matrix ... If such a linear combination equals the zero matrix we get... a b c.Missing: algebra | Show results with:algebra
  43. [43]
    Determinants: Definition
    We also recover the fact that a matrix with a row or column of zeros has determinant zero. Example. The proofs of the multiplicativity property and the ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Notes on tensor products Robert Harron
    Lemma 1.6. In any tensor product M ⊗R N, the pure tensors m⊗0 and 0⊗n are 0 for all m ∈ M and all n ∈ N. Proof. For m ∈ M, m ⊗ 0 = m ⊗ (0 + 0). = m ⊗ 0 + m ⊗ 0,.
  45. [45]
    Zero Tensor -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    A zero tensor is a tensor of any rank and with any pattern of covariant and contravariant indices all of whose components are equal to 0.
  46. [46]
    [PDF] A Gentle Introduction to Tensors - Electrical & Systems Engineering
    May 27, 2014 · The tensor 0 can be defined as a tensor of any rank whose coordinates are all 0. Therefore, 0 is not a uniquely defined tensor, but if we accept.