Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Perfect field

In , particularly in the of , a perfect field is defined as a K in which every is separable, meaning that the minimal polynomial of every element in the extension over K has distinct roots. Equivalently, K is perfect if every over K is separable, or if K has characteristic zero, or if K has positive p and the (raising elements to the p-th power) is surjective, i.e., every element of K is a p-th power. This property ensures that there are no purely inseparable extensions of K, simplifying the structure of field extensions and over such fields. Fields of characteristic zero, such as the rational numbers \mathbb{Q}, the real numbers \mathbb{R}, and the complex numbers \mathbb{C}, are always perfect, as separability holds automatically in characteristic zero due to the nonzero of polynomials. In characteristic p > 0, s like \mathbb{F}_p (the prime field of p elements) are perfect because the Frobenius map is bijective on finite sets. Algebraically closed fields and algebraic extensions of perfect fields are also perfect. However, not all fields of positive characteristic are perfect; for instance, the field of rational functions \mathbb{F}_p(t) over a is imperfect, as it admits inseparable extensions like the extension adjoining a p-th root of t. The concept of perfect fields plays a crucial role in and , where imperfect fields lead to complications such as non-reduced schemes or inseparable morphisms; over perfect fields, reduced algebras remain geometrically reduced after base change. For any field K, there exists a unique minimal perfect extension called the perfect closure K^{perf}, obtained by iteratively adjoining p-th roots in characteristic p, which is purely inseparable over K. This closure is essential for studying properties invariant under perfection, such as or the behavior of algebraic varieties.

Definition

Formal Definition

A field k is perfect if every algebraic extension L/k is separable. An L/k is separable if every element \alpha \in L is separable over k, meaning that the minimal polynomial of \alpha over k has distinct roots in an of k. In a perfect , every finite extension is separable and thus Galois if .

Equivalent Characterizations

A k is perfect if and only if every over k has distinct , or equivalently, is separable. This condition ensures that the of any such does not share with it, as separability requires \gcd(f, f') = 1 for irreducible f. This characterization is equivalent to the statement that every of k is separable. To see this, suppose every over k is separable; then for any algebraic extension L/k, the minimal of any \alpha \in L over k is separable, implying \alpha is separable over k, and thus L/k is separable (since every element is separable over k). Conversely, if an f over k were inseparable, adjoining a \alpha would yield a separable extension only if f splits into distinct linear factors, but inseparability implies multiple , contradicting the assumption that all algebraic extensions are separable. In characteristic p > 0, k is perfect the F: k \to k, defined by F(x) = x^p, is surjective, meaning every element of k is a p-th power. Equivalently, for every a \in k, there exists b \in k such that b^p = a. This surjectivity holds the of the Frobenius map equals k, i.e., k = k^p. If k^p \neq k, then for a \notin k^p, the T^p - a is irreducible (by Eisenstein or direct verification) but inseparable, as its derivative vanishes and it factors as (T - \alpha)^p in a , violating the separability condition.

Properties

In Characteristic Zero

In fields of characteristic zero, every such is perfect. This follows from the fact that the formal of any non-constant over such a field is itself a non-zero . Specifically, for a f(x) = \sum_{i=0}^n a_i x^i with a_n \neq 0 and n \geq 1, the is f'(x) = \sum_{i=1}^n i a_i x^{i-1}; since the characteristic is zero, the coefficients i a_i are non-zero for at least the leading term (where i = n), ensuring \deg f' = n-1 \geq 0. A key theorem states that every irreducible polynomial over a field of characteristic zero is separable. To see this, suppose f(x) is irreducible of degree n \geq 1. If f(x) had a multiple root in some extension, then f(x) and f'(x) would share a common root, implying \gcd(f, f') \neq 1. However, since f'(x) \neq 0 and \deg f' < \deg f, the only possible non-constant common divisor would be f(x) itself, which would require f(x) to divide f'(x); this is impossible because \deg f' < \deg f. Thus, \gcd(f, f') = 1, so f(x) has distinct roots in its splitting field and is separable. As a consequence, there are no inseparable extensions of fields of characteristic zero, meaning every algebraic extension is separable. This absence of inseparability simplifies the structure of Galois theory over such fields, as finite normal extensions coincide with Galois extensions without additional separability conditions.

In Characteristic p

In fields of characteristic p > 0, a field k is perfect if and only if the Frobenius endomorphism F: k \to k, defined by F(x) = x^p, is an automorphism. This map is always a ring homomorphism in characteristic p, and for fields, it is injective because the kernel of a nonzero field homomorphism must be trivial. Surjectivity of F is equivalent to k = k^p, the condition that every element of k is a p-th power in k. A key consequence is that perfect fields of characteristic p admit no nontrivial purely inseparable extensions. In such fields, every algebraic extension is separable, as the separability of irreducible polynomials over k follows from the surjectivity of the Frobenius map, ensuring that derivatives and multiple do not arise in the expected manner. Purely inseparable extensions, which rely on elements whose minimal polynomials have repeated , thus reduce to the trivial case over perfect k. Moreover, the automorphism property extends iteratively: the n-th iterate F^n: k \to k, given by x \mapsto x^{p^n}, is also an automorphism for every positive integer n, implying k^{p^n} = k. This allows the extraction of p^n-th roots within algebraic closures of k. For imperfect fields, the perfect closure is obtained by iteratively adjoining all p^n-th roots over increasing n, yielding the minimal perfect extension.

Examples

Perfect Fields

Finite fields provide fundamental examples of perfect fields in positive characteristic. Every finite field \mathbb{F}_q, where q = p^n for a prime p and positive integer n, is perfect because the x \mapsto x^p is an injective field automorphism, and injectivity on a implies surjectivity. This surjectivity ensures that every element has a p-th root in the field, satisfying the criterion for perfection in characteristic p. Fields of characteristic zero are perfect by definition, as the Frobenius map is irrelevant and all algebraic extensions are separable due to the absence of inseparable polynomials. The rational numbers \mathbb{Q}, real numbers \mathbb{R}, and complex numbers \mathbb{C} exemplify this, with every irreducible polynomial over them having distinct roots in any extension. Similarly, p-adic fields such as the field of p-adic numbers \mathbb{Q}_p and its finite extensions are perfect, inheriting the characteristic zero property from \mathbb{Q}. Number fields, which are finite extensions of \mathbb{Q}, are also perfect for the same reason. For instance, quadratic extensions like \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}) or \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-3}) exhibit this perfection, as their characteristic zero nature guarantees separability of all extensions. Algebraically closed fields offer another class of perfect fields, independent of characteristic. Any algebraically closed field, such as the algebraic closure \overline{\mathbb{Q}} of , is perfect because every over it is linear, hence separable, ensuring all algebraic extensions are separable. In characteristic p > 0, examples include the algebraic closure of \mathbb{F}_p, where the surjectivity of the Frobenius map holds due to the field's properties.

Imperfect Fields

A prototypical example of an imperfect field is the rational function field \mathbb{F}_p(t) over the prime field \mathbb{F}_p of characteristic p > 0. In this field, the transcendental element t is not a p-th power of any element, and the polynomial x^p - t \in \mathbb{F}_p(t) is irreducible but inseparable, as it has a multiple root in its splitting field. This inseparability demonstrates that \mathbb{F}_p(t) admits purely inseparable algebraic extensions, violating the condition for perfection. The imperfection of \mathbb{F}_p(t) can also be seen through the Frobenius endomorphism \phi: a \mapsto a^p, which fails to be surjective, as t does not lie in the image \mathbb{F}_p(t)^p. More generally, this non-surjectivity aligns with the characterization that fields of characteristic p are imperfect precisely when the Frobenius map is not onto. Function fields of curves over finite fields provide further examples of imperfect fields in positive characteristic. For a smooth projective curve C over a finite field k = \mathbb{F}_q with q = p^n, the function field k(C) is imperfect, as it contains transcendental elements over k that are not p-th powers, leading to inseparable polynomials analogous to x^p - t. Unless the base field is algebraically closed, such global fields typically exhibit this behavior due to their transcendental nature over the perfect finite base. Certain local fields constructed as fields of formal Laurent series in characteristic p over an imperfect coefficient field, such as \mathbb{F}_p(t)((u)), are also imperfect. Here, the residue field \mathbb{F}_p(t) being imperfect ensures that the Frobenius map on the series field remains non-surjective, propagating inseparability. A key implication of imperfection in these fields is the existence of non-trivial purely inseparable extensions. For instance, adjoining a p-th root of t to \mathbb{F}_p(t) yields a degree-p extension that is purely inseparable, as the minimal polynomial x^p - t has no roots in the base but splits with multiplicity p in the extension.

Extensions

Separability of Extensions

A fundamental consequence of a field k being perfect is that every algebraic extension L/k is separable. For finite extensions, this follows because every over a perfect has distinct roots in its , ensuring that the extension is generated by separable elements. Infinite algebraic extensions are then separable as unions (or direct limits) of finite separable subextensions. A key corollary is that every finite extension of a perfect field is separable, and thus every finite normal extension is Galois. In particular, the separable closure of a perfect field k coincides with its algebraic closure, as all algebraic elements are separable. This guaranteed separability simplifies the study of Galois groups over perfect fields in positive characteristic, eliminating the need to handle inseparable extensions separately.

Perfect Closure

For an imperfect field k of characteristic p > 0, the perfect closure k^{\mathrm{perf}} is defined as the minimal perfect field extension of k. It can be characterized as the direct limit of the directed system obtained by iteratively applying the Frobenius endomorphism F: k \to k^p, a \mapsto a^p, yielding k^{\mathrm{perf}} = \varinjlim (k \xrightarrow{F} k^p \xrightarrow{F} k^{p^2} \xrightarrow{F} \cdots), where elements are equivalence classes of sequences (a_n)_{n \geq 0} satisfying a_{n+1}^p = a_n for all n. Equivalently, k^{\mathrm{perf}} is obtained by adjoining all p^n-th roots of elements of k iteratively for n \geq 0. The explicit construction of k^{\mathrm{perf}} proceeds as the ascending union k^{\mathrm{perf}} = \bigcup_{n=0}^\infty k^{1/p^n}, where k^{1/p^0} = k and, for each n \geq 1, k^{1/p^n} is the unique of k^{1/p^{n-1}} obtained by adjoining a p^n-th for every of k^{1/p^{n-1}}, ensuring that every of k^{1/p^n} raised to the p^n-th power lies in k. This tower of extensions is purely inseparable. The natural map k \to k^{\mathrm{perf}} is injective, as the on a is injective. The perfect closure k^{\mathrm{perf}} enjoys several key properties: it is perfect by construction, as every element admits a p-th root within it; it is flat as a k-algebra; and it is the maximal purely inseparable extension of k, containing every algebraic purely inseparable extension of k. Moreover, k^{\mathrm{perf}} is unique up to unique over k, and any perfect extension of k contains k^{\mathrm{perf}} as an intermediate . If k is , such as the \mathbb{F}_p(t) of rational functions over the prime , then [k^{\mathrm{perf}} : k] = \infty.

References

  1. [1]
    Section 10.45 (05DU): Perfect fields—The Stacks project
    A field k is perfect if and only if it is a field of characteristic 0 or a field of characteristic p > 0 such that every element has a pth root. Proof. The ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] perfect fields - keith conrad
    Definition 1. A field K is called perfect if every irreducible polynomial in K[T] is separable. Every field of characteristic 0 is perfect. We will see that ...
  3. [3]
    perfect field in nLab
    ### Definition and Key Facts about Perfect Fields
  4. [4]
    perfect field - PlanetMath.org
    Mar 22, 2013 · All fields of characteristic 0 are perfect, so in particular the fields R ℝ , C ℂ and Q ℚ are perfect. If K K is a field of characteristic p ...
  5. [5]
    Definition 9.12.2 (09H1)—The Stacks project
    If K is an algebraic extension of F, we say K is separable over F if every element of K is separable over F. [1] For nonalgebraic extensions this definition ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Fields and Galois Theory - James Milne
    irreducible algebraic variety of dimension d over a perfect field F is birationally equivalent with a hypersurface H in A. d+1 for which the projection ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Chapter 1 Field Extensions
    Theorem 4.4 A field of characteristic p > 0 is perfect if and only if every element of it is a pth power (if and only if the Frobenius map is surjective). Proof ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Math 210B. Inseparable extensions
    ... non-separable algebraic extensions is only non-trivial in positive characteristic, for this handout we shall assume all fields have positive characteristic p.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] An Introduction to Perfectoid Fields - arXiv
    Dec 28, 2021 · A ring of characteristic p is called perfect (resp. semiperfect) if its Frobenius endomorphism is bijective (resp. surjective). An example ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Lecture 9 - Math 5111 (Algebra 1)
    Definition. If F is a field of characteristic p, and every element of F is a pth power (i.e., Fp = F) then we say F is a perfect field. (Fields of.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] fields - UChicago Math
    Definition 1.1. A field is a commutative ring in which every non-zero element has a multiplicative inverse. Definition 1.2. The characteristic of a field ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  12. [12]
    [PDF] 3 Finite field arithmetic - MIT Mathematics
    Sep 14, 2022 · Fields of characteristic zero are always perfect, since there is no way for the derivative of a nonconstant polynomial to be zero in such fields ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] 1. introduction to finite fields
    A field K is perfect if every finite field extension L/K is separable. Exercise C.8. Verify that all characteristic 0 fields are perfect. Page 16. 16.Missing: zero | Show results with:zero
  14. [14]
    [PDF] [15.1] Let k be a field of characteristic 0. Let f be an irreducible ...
    Jan 14, 2009 · [15.5] Show that all finite fields Fpn with p prime and 1 ≤ n ∈ Z are perfect. Again because the inner binomial coefficients p!/i!( p − i)! are ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Field Extensions - UC Berkeley math
    A field F is called perfect if every irreducible polynomial from F[x] is separable. Thus, all fields of characteristic 0 are perfect. Any al- gebraically closed ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    [PDF] 4 Étale algebras, norm and trace - 4.1 Separability - MIT Mathematics
    Sep 20, 2021 · A field K is perfect if every algebraic extension of K is separable. All fields of characteristic zero are perfect. Perfect fields of positive ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] F-INJECTIVITY AND FROBENIUS CLOSURE OF IDEALS ... - VIASM
    R∞ is the perfect closure of R; R∞ is the direct limit of {R → R → R →···}, where R → R is the. Frobenius map. Let φ : R → R∞ be the natural ring map ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] elliptic curves over the perfect closure of a function field
    For this paper we fix a prime number p and denote by Fp the finite field with p elements. The perfect closure Kper of a field K of characteristic p is defined ...
  19. [19]
    110.44 Flat and formally unramified is not formally étale
    Let A_{perf} denote the perfect closure of A. Then A \rightarrow A_{perf} is flat and formally unramified, but not formally étale. Proof. Note that under ...