Element is a free and open-source client application for the Matrix protocol, designed for secure, decentralized real-time communication including end-to-end encrypted text messaging, voice calls, video conferencing, and collaborative tools.[1] It emphasizes user control through federation across independent servers, enabling self-hosting and interoperability without reliance on centralized providers, which distinguishes it from proprietary alternatives.[2] Originally launched as Riot.im in 2016 and later rebranded from Vector, Element has been developed by the creators of the Matrix standard to prioritize digital sovereignty, privacy, and extensibility for both individual users and large-scale enterprise deployments.[3] Notable for its cross-platform availability on web, desktop, and mobile, the software supports features like spaces for organized group interactions and integrations with third-party bridges to legacy networks, fostering resilient communication infrastructures resistant to single points of failure or censorship.[4] While praised for advancing open standards in an era dominated by closed ecosystems, Element's adoption has been driven by privacy advocates, open-source communities, and institutions requiring verifiable security over vendor lock-in.[5]
Etymology and Core Concepts
Linguistic origins
The English word element derives from Middle Englishelement, denoting fundamental constituents of the world or celestial bodies, borrowed from Old Frenchelement.[6] This Old French term, in turn, stems directly from Latin elementum, which signified "a first principle, rudiment, or basic component" and served as a calque for the Greek stoicheîon (στοιχεῖον), meaning "one of a series" or a primary constituent in philosophical contexts such as the building blocks of matter.[7][8] The Latin elementum first appears in texts around the 3rd century BCE in works by authors like Lucretius, where it described indivisible principles akin to atoms or letters of the alphabet, reflecting influences from Epicurean and Stoic thought.[8]The precise etymology of Latin elementum remains uncertain, with no consensus among linguists on its root formation; proposed derivations include a compound from ele- (possibly akin to el-, relating to origins or emergence) and -mentum (a suffix denoting instrument or product), or a connection to the sequence of letters L-M-N in the alphabet, as elementa could refer to basic letters or rudiments in early education.[8][9] Less supported theories link it to verbs like alo ("to nourish" or "sustain"), implying elements as sustaining principles, though this lacks direct philological evidence.[10] By the late Roman period, elementum had extended to denote the classical four elements—earth, air, fire, and water—as articulated by Empedocles and systematized by Aristotle, influencing its semantic shift toward natural and cosmic fundamentals.[8]In English, the term entered usage by the 14th century, initially in theological and alchemical writings to describe essential principles or sacraments, before broadening in scientific discourse during the Renaissance to encompass chemical substances.[7] This evolution preserved the core connotation of simplicity and primacy, distinguishing element from related terms like principium (principle) by emphasizing indivisibility and foundational status.[8] Modern lexicographical analyses, such as those in the Oxford English Dictionary, underscore the term's persistence in denoting irreducible components across linguistics, chemistry, and mathematics, without alteration in its Indo-European lineage.[7]
Fundamental definitions across disciplines
In philosophy, an element is conceptualized as a primary, indivisible constituent from which composite entities are formed, incapable of further division into another form without altering its essential nature. Aristotle articulated this in his Metaphysics, stating: "That from which something is composed, as a primary constituent that is in form indivisible into another form, is called an element," with examples including letters as elements of syllables or the four classical substances (earth, air, fire, water) as elements of physical bodies.[11][12]In chemistry, an element is defined as a species of atoms—or a pure substance—wherein all atoms share the identical number of protons in their nuclei, corresponding to a unique atomic number. This definition, formalized by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), underscores the indivisibility of elements by chemical means into simpler substances, distinguishing them from compounds.[13][14]In mathematics, particularly set theory, an element denotes a distinct object or member belonging to a set, which is a well-determined collection of such objects; sets themselves may serve as elements of other sets. This foundational notion, primitive in axiomatic frameworks like Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory, enables the construction of mathematical structures without presupposing further decomposition of elements.[15][16]In physics, fundamental elements are identified as elementary particles, defined as subatomic entities not composed of other particles, serving as the basic building blocks of matter and forces within the Standard Model. These include quarks, leptons, and gauge bosons, with their indivisibility verified through high-energy experiments excluding observable substructure as of 2023.[17][18]
Philosophy and Religion
Ancient elemental theories
Pre-Socratic philosophers in ancient Greece sought a single arche (originating principle) underlying the cosmos, marking an early shift toward naturalistic explanations of matter. Thales of Miletus, active circa 585 BCE, identified water as the fundamental substance, arguing it could transform into other forms through processes like evaporation and condensation, based on observations of moisture's ubiquity in life and nature.[19] His student Anaximander, around 546 BCE, proposed the apeiron—an eternal, indefinite, and boundless material—as the source to avoid privileging one observable substance, positing it generates opposites like hot and cold through separation.[20]Anaximenes of Miletus, circa 546–528 BCE, refined this by naming air as the primary element, compressible into denser forms like wind, cloud, water, earth, and fire.[19]Heraclitus of Ephesus, active around 500 BCE, elevated fire as the arche, emphasizing its transformative and unifying role in perpetual flux, where "all things are an exchange for fire, and fire for all things, like goods for gold and gold for goods."[20]Empedocles of Acragas, circa 495–435 BCE, advanced a pluralistic theory by introducing four eternal "roots" (rhizomata)—earth, water, air, and fire—as the indivisible building blocks of matter, combined and separated by cosmic forces of Love (attraction and unity) and Strife (repulsion and division).[21] This framework explained change without invoking a single mutable principle, positing cycles of cosmic unification and fragmentation; for instance, Love gathers the roots into a spherical god-like unity, while Strife disperses them into diversity, including living beings formed by elemental mixtures. Aristotle later credited Empedocles as the first to clearly articulate these four material elements, though he critiqued the theory for lacking qualitative distinctions.Aristotle, in works like On Generation and Corruption circa 350 BCE, systematized the four elements into a comprehensive framework, assigning each paired opposites: fire (hot and dry), air (hot and moist), water (cold and moist), and earth (cold and dry).[22] These qualities enabled transmutation—e.g., heating water (cold-moist) yields air (hot-moist)—while natural places dictated motion: earth and water toward the center, fire and air outward.[23] He introduced a fifth element, aether (quintessence), incorruptible and circularly moving, composing the celestial spheres beyond the sublunary realm of changing elements.[22] This theory dominated Western cosmology for over two millennia, influencing alchemy and medieval science by providing a causal mechanism for mixture and change rooted in observable properties rather than mere aggregation.Parallel elemental schemes emerged independently in other ancient civilizations. In Indian philosophy, the pancha mahabhuta (five great elements)—earth (prithvi), water (ap), fire (agni), air (vayu), and space (akasha)—appear in Vedic texts like the Upanishads (circa 800–500 BCE) and Samkhya school, where they constitute gross matter (sthula bhuta) from subtler tanmatras, emphasizing hierarchical evolution from subtle to manifest without strict transformative cycles.[24] Chinese cosmology developed wuxing (five phases)—wood, fire, earth, metal, water—during the Spring and Autumn Period (770–476 BCE), not as static substances but dynamic processes governing interactions via generation (e.g., wood fuels fire) and conquest (e.g., water extinguishes fire), applied to politics, medicine, and seasons rather than fundamental particles.[25] These non-Greek systems prioritized relational cycles over qualitative mixtures, reflecting cultural emphases on harmony and change absent in Aristotelian permanence.
Religious and symbolic uses
In ancient Greek philosophy, which influenced subsequent religious traditions, the four classical elements—earth, water, air, and fire—were conceptualized by Empedocles around 450 BCE as fundamental building blocks of the cosmos, each associated with qualities like hot, cold, wet, and dry, and linked to divine forces or gods. These elements symbolized stability (earth), fluidity (water), intellect (air), and transformation (fire), appearing in religious rituals such as Pythagorean mysticism, where they represented cosmic harmony and were invoked in purification rites.In Hellenistic and Roman religions, the elements extended to symbolic correspondences with the four humors (black bile for earth, phlegm for water, blood for air, yellow bile for fire), underpinning medical and divinatory practices in texts like those of Hippocrates (c. 400 BCE), where imbalances were seen as causes of illness requiring ritual balancing through offerings or elemental meditations. The Stoics, including Zeno of Citium (c. 300 BCE), integrated elements into a pantheistic worldview, viewing fire as the primal element from which others derived, symbolizing divine logos or reason permeating the universe.Hinduism's Pancha Mahabhuta framework, outlined in texts like the Upanishads (c. 800–200 BCE), posits five elements—earth (prithvi), water (ap), fire (tejas), air (vayu), and ether (akasha)—as manifestations of Brahman, the ultimate reality, with symbolic roles in yoga and Ayurveda for balancing doshas and achieving spiritual enlightenment through practices like pranayama (breath control for air) or agnihotra (fire rituals). Ether, as the subtlest element, symbolized infinite space and consciousness, influencing temple architecture where elements were spatially arranged to mirror cosmic order.Chinese Taoism and cosmology feature the Wu Xing (five phases)—wood, fire, earth, metal, and water—dating to the Warring States period (475–221 BCE), not as static substances but dynamic processes symbolizing cyclical change and harmony, used in religious divination, feng shui, and rituals to align human actions with natural forces, as detailed in the Huainanzi (c. 139 BCE).[26] These phases governed sacrificial offerings and imperial ceremonies, with imbalances believed to provoke ancestral spirits or cosmic disharmony.In Western esoteric traditions, including medieval alchemy and Hermeticism, elements served as archetypes for spiritual transmutation, with Paracelsus (1493–1541) expanding them to include salt (earthly body), sulfur (soul), and mercury (spirit), symbolizing the philosopher's stone's creation through elemental purification rituals. Such symbolism persisted in Freemasonry and Rosicrucianism, where elements represented moral virtues—earth for temperance, fire for fortitude—invoked in initiatory rites for personal enlightenment, though these frameworks lack empirical validation and reflect pre-modern analogical reasoning rather than causal mechanisms. Modern neopagan movements, like Wicca (formalized by Gerald Gardner in 1954), ritually invoke elements in quartered circles for protection and manifestation, drawing from these historical precedents but adapted without scientific substantiation.
Empirical critiques and supersession by science
Empirical investigations beginning in the 17th century exposed fundamental flaws in the classical theory of four elements—earth, water, air, and fire—as proposed by Empedocles around 450 BCE and systematized by Aristotle in the 4th century BCE. These elements were posited as indivisible substances combining through qualitative changes to form all matter, but lacked quantitative experimental validation, relying instead on observational analogies without controlled testing.[12] Robert Boyle's The Sceptical Chymist (1661) provided one of the earliest rigorous critiques, arguing through experimental demonstrations that the four elements failed to account for chemical compositions and decompositions, such as the variability in "air" and "fire" across substances. Boyle advocated a corpuscular (proto-atomic) view, emphasizing that true elements must be identified via repeatable mechanical experiments rather than philosophical deduction, thus undermining the Aristotelian framework's explanatory power.[27][28]By the 18th century, Antoine Lavoisier's quantitative experiments further dismantled elemental theories, including successors like phlogiston, which retained fire-like principles akin to ancient fire. Lavoisier's precise measurements of mass conservation in reactions, detailed in his 1789 Traité élémentaire de chimie, showed water as a compound of hydrogen and oxygen rather than a primordial element, directly refuting its status in classical schemes. He identified 33 substances as provisional elements based on failure to decompose further via combustion analysis and gravimetric methods, shifting chemistry toward empirical verifiability over speculative qualities like hot/cold or wet/dry.[29][30]The advent of atomic theory in John Dalton's 1808 A New System of Chemical Philosophy completed the supersession, positing atoms of distinct elements combining in fixed ratios, supported by laws of definite and multiple proportions derived from analytical data on gases and salts. This framework, refined by Dmitri Mendeleev's 1869 periodic table organizing 63 known elements by atomic weight and properties, revealed patterns inexplicable by four-element theory, such as recurring chemical behaviors across hundreds of substances. Modern science, grounded in spectroscopy, X-ray crystallography, and particle accelerators, confirms over 118 elements as fundamental building blocks, each with unique nuclear and electronic structures, rendering ancient elemental models obsolete for causal explanations of matter.[31][32]
Natural Sciences
Chemical elements
A chemical element is a pure substance composed of atoms that all possess the same atomic number, defined as the number of protons in the nucleus of those atoms.[13] This atomic number uniquely identifies the element and determines its position in the periodic table, where elements are arranged in order of increasing atomic number to reveal recurring patterns in chemical and physical properties, such as electronegativity, ionization energy, and reactivity.[33] The periodic table currently lists 118 confirmed elements, ranging from hydrogen (atomic number 1) to oganesson (118), with no new elements officially recognized as of 2025.[34]Elements are broadly classified into metals (e.g., iron, copper), which typically exhibit luster, malleability, and conductivity; nonmetals (e.g., oxygen, nitrogen), which are often gases or brittle solids with poor conductivity; and metalloids (e.g., silicon, arsenic), displaying intermediate properties.[14] Approximately 94 elements occur naturally on Earth, primarily through primordial nucleosynthesis in stars and subsequent cosmic processes, while the remaining 24 (from neptunium, atomic number 93, onward) are synthetic, created via particle accelerators and nuclear reactors and exhibiting extreme instability with half-lives often measured in seconds.[35][36]Technetium (43) and promethium (61) are exceptions among lighter elements, as they have no stable isotopes and occur only in trace amounts from fission or decay, rendering them effectively synthetic for practical purposes.[37]In Earth's crust, elemental abundances reflect geological processes like differentiation and weathering, with oxygen dominating due to its role in silicate minerals and oxides.[38] The table below summarizes the most abundant elements by mass percentage:
Chemically, elements cannot be decomposed into simpler substances by chemical means but can form compounds through electron transfer or sharing, governed by valence electrons in outer shells, which align with periodic table groups.[13] Isotopes, variants with differing neutron counts but identical proton numbers, minimally affect chemical behavior due to near-identical electron configurations, though they influence nuclear stability and applications like radiometric dating.[14] Synthetic elements, lacking natural abundance, enable studies of relativistic effects and superheavy nuclei, advancing nuclear chemistry despite their fleeting existence.[36]
Physical components
Chemical elements are constituted by atoms, the fundamental units sharing identical atomic numbers, defined as the count of protons in the atomic nucleus.[39] Protons, positively charged subatomic particles with a mass of approximately 1.6726 × 10^{-27} kg, reside in the nucleus alongside neutrons, which are electrically neutral particles of similar mass (about 1.6749 × 10^{-27} kg) that contribute to nuclear stability via the strong nuclear force.[40][41] The nucleus, comprising protons and neutrons (collectively nucleons), occupies a minuscule volume—roughly 10^{-15} meters in diameter—while the overall atomic radius spans about 10^{-10} meters, rendering most of the atom empty space.[42]Electrons, negatively charged particles with negligible mass (9.1094 × 10^{-31} kg), orbit the nucleus in probabilistic electron clouds or shells governed by quantum mechanics, balancing the positive nuclear charge in neutral atoms.[43] The number of electrons in a neutral atom equals the number of protons, determining chemical reactivity through valence electrons in outer shells.[44] Variations in neutron count yield isotopes: atoms of the same element (fixed protons) but differing mass numbers (protons + neutrons), such as hydrogen-1 (protium, no neutrons) and hydrogen-2 (deuterium, one neutron), which exhibit near-identical chemical properties but distinct nuclear stabilities and physical masses.[42][45]Stable elements typically feature balanced proton-neutron ratios, with lighter elements (e.g., up to calcium-40) approximating 1:1 and heavier ones requiring more neutrons for stability against electrostatic repulsion; beyond bismuth-209, all known isotopes are radioactive, decaying via processes like alpha emission.[41] Synthetic elements, such as oganesson (atomic number 118), consist of unstable isotopes with lifetimes under milliseconds, synthesized in particle accelerators by fusing lighter nuclei.[39] These components underpin elemental identity and behavior, with protons dictating periodicity and electron configurations explaining bonding trends across the periodic table.[40]
Earth and biological contexts
The Earth's crust, comprising the outermost layer approximately 5–70 km thick, consists primarily of oxygen (46.6 wt%), silicon (27.7 wt%), aluminum (8.1 wt%), iron (5.0 wt%), calcium (3.6 wt%), sodium (2.8 wt%), potassium (2.6 wt%), and magnesium (2.1 wt%), with these elements forming the bulk of silicate minerals and oxides.[46] The mantle, extending to about 2,900 km depth, is dominated by oxygen (44.33 wt%), magnesium (22.17 wt%), silicon (21.22 wt%), and iron (6.30 wt%), reflecting peridotite-like compositions rich in olivine and pyroxene.[47] The core, divided into outer liquid and inner solid regions, is mainly an iron-nickel alloy, with iron comprising roughly 85–90% and nickel 5–10%, alongside lighter elements such as sulfur or oxygen potentially alloyed at 5–10% to account for density and seismic properties.[48][49]In biological systems, a subset of elements cycles between Earth's reservoirs and organisms via biogeochemical processes, with carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur (CHNOPS) forming over 99% of living biomass by mass.[50] In the human body, oxygen constitutes about 65%, carbon 18.5%, hydrogen 9.5%, nitrogen 3.2%, phosphorus 1%, and sulfur 0.25%, primarily incorporated into water, proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, and carbohydrates.[51] These macronutrients enable core functions: carbon provides structural backbones, hydrogen and oxygen facilitate energy transfer and hydration, nitrogen supports genetic and enzymatic roles, phosphorus enables energy storage (ATP) and membranes, and sulfur aids protein folding and redox reactions.[50]Essential trace elements, required in parts per million or less, include iron (for oxygen transport in hemoglobin and electron transfer), zinc (cofactor in ~9% of eukaryotic proteins for catalysis and DNA binding), magnesium (chlorophyll and enzymatic activation), and others like copper, manganese, and molybdenum for redox and metabolic processes.[50] Biogeochemical cycles—such as the carbon cycle (fixation via photosynthesis, release by respiration/decomposition) and nitrogen cycle (fixation by bacteria, assimilation into amino acids)—transfer these elements from lithospheric, atmospheric, and oceanic pools into biomass, with human activities altering fluxes (e.g., phosphorus mining for fertilizers disrupting sedimentary cycles).[52] Biological selectivity favors bioavailable forms, concentrating rare crustal elements like phosphorus (0.13 wt% in crust but 1% in biomass) through evolutionary adaptations, while limiting toxic uptake of abundant ones like aluminum.[46][50]
Mathematics
Elements in sets and structures
In set theory, an element, also termed a member, is a primitive object that belongs to a set, with the membership relation denoted by the symbol ∈, such that for a set A and object x, x \in A asserts that x is an element of A, while x \notin A denotes the negation.[53] This relation forms the foundational predicate of set theory, where sets are collections of distinct elements treated as entities, and elements themselves may be sets, enabling hierarchical constructions like the von Neumann ordinals.[54] Axiomatic frameworks, such as Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory, treat both sets and their elements as undefined primitives, with membership axioms like extensionality ensuring sets are determined by their elements: two sets are equal if they share exactly the same elements.[55]Mathematical structures build upon sets by equipping a set of elements with operations and relations satisfying specific axioms. In a group, the elements form a non-empty set G paired with a binary operation \cdot: G \times G \to G that is associative, admits an identity element e \in G such that e \cdot g = g = g \cdot e for all g \in G, and provides inverses g^{-1} \in G with g \cdot g^{-1} = g^{-1} \cdot g = e.[56] Examples include the integers under addition, where elements are integers and the identity is 0. Rings extend this by requiring the elements to form an abelian group under addition, with a second distributive multiplication operation; for instance, the ring of integers has elements \mathbb{Z}, addition as group operation, and multiplication satisfying distributivity.[57]Fields represent a further refinement, comprising a commutative ring with unity (multiplicative identity $1 \neq 0) where every non-zero element has a multiplicative inverse, enabling division except by zero. The rational numbers \mathbb{Q} exemplify a field, with elements as fractions p/q ( p, q \in \mathbb{Z}, q \neq 0 ), addition and multiplication inherited from rationals, and inverses q/p for non-zero elements.[58] Finite fields, such as \mathbb{F}_p for prime p, consist of elements \{0, 1, \dots, p-1\} under modular arithmetic, underpinning applications in coding theory and cryptography. In these structures, elements serve as the carriers, with axioms constraining operations to preserve properties like closure, ensuring the structure's coherence and enabling theorems such as Lagrange's in groups or the fundamental theorem of fields.[59]
Applications in algebra and geometry
In algebraic structures, elements function as the indivisible components upon which binary operations such as addition and multiplication are defined, facilitating the resolution of polynomial equations over fields like the real numbers. For instance, in ring theory, elements of polynomial rings enable factorization algorithms that underpin computer algebra systems for symbolic computation, as demonstrated in applications to Gröbner bases for solving systems of equations.[60] These structures extend to modules over rings, where elements represent vectors in abstract vector spaces, allowing generalizations of geometric concepts like linear independence to non-Euclidean settings.[61]Linear algebra exemplifies the interplay between algebraic elements and geometry, with vectors as elements of finite-dimensional vector spaces over a field modeling displacements and forces in Euclidean space. Matrices, composed of scalar field elements, encode linear transformations that preserve geometric properties such as parallelism and ratios of areas, essential for coordinate geometry and computer graphics rendering. Eigenvalues and eigenvectors, derived from characteristic polynomials whose coefficients are matrix elements, quantify scaling factors along principal axes, applied in stability analysis of dynamical systems and principal component analysis for dimensionality reduction in data geometry.[62]Geometric algebra further integrates these domains by constructing a Clifford algebra where basis elements generate multivectors representing oriented geometric objects, such as lines as bivector elements and planes as trivectors. The geometric product of elements unifies inner and outer products, enabling conformal mappings for rotations and translations without matrices, with applications in ray tracing for realistic lighting in 3D modeling and kinematic chains in robotics. This framework resolves ambiguities in vector cross products by treating intersections and projections as algebraic operations on elements, as utilized in computer vision for pose estimation from image correspondences.[63][64]
Technology and Engineering
Electrical and circuit elements
Electrical circuit elements constitute the foundational components in the analysis and design of electrical circuits, modeling the relationships between voltage, current, and energy under the lumped element approximation, where circuit dimensions are small compared to signal wavelengths. These elements are classified primarily as passive or active: passive elements neither generate nor amplify electrical power but instead dissipate or store energy, while active elements can supply power to the circuit. The three canonical passive elements—resistor, capacitor, and inductor—form the basis for linear circuit theory, enabling the representation of real-world devices through idealized behaviors governed by differential equations.[65][66]The resistor opposes the flow of electric current, converting electrical energy into heat via Joule heating, with its behavior defined by Ohm's law: V = I R, where V is voltage, I is current, and R is resistance in ohms. This principle was quantified by Georg Simon Ohm in 1827 through experiments demonstrating proportionality between current and voltage across conductors of uniform composition. Resistors are essential for current limiting, voltage division, and signal attenuation in circuits, with practical implementations ranging from carbon compositions developed in the 19th century to modern precision thin-film types.[67][65]The capacitor stores electrical energy in an electric field between two conductive plates separated by a dielectric, characterized by Q = C V, where Q is charge and C is capacitance in farads; its current-voltage relation is I = C \frac{dV}{dt}, allowing it to block DC while passing AC signals. The device originated with the Leyden jar, independently invented by Ewald Georg von Kleist in November 1745 and Pieter van Musschenbroek in 1746, which stored charge in water-filled glass jars and delivered shocks upon discharge, laying groundwork for electrostatic experiments. Modern capacitors, including electrolytic types patented by Warren de la Rue in 1866, are used for filtering, timing, and energy storage in power supplies.[68][65]The inductor, or coil, stores energy in a magnetic field, opposing changes in current per V = L \frac{dI}{dt}, where L is inductance in henries; it passes DC but impedes high-frequency AC. Its principle stems from Michael Faraday's 1831 discovery of electromagnetic induction, where a changing magnetic field induces voltage in a nearby coil, formalized as Faraday's law. Inductors enable applications in filters, transformers, and oscillators, with early demonstrations using iron-core coils to produce continuous currents.[69][65]Active elements, such as independent voltage or current sources, provide fixed power regardless of circuit conditions, modeling batteries or generators that inject energy into the system. Dependent sources, like those in transistors invented in 1947 by Bardeen, Shockley, and Brattain, amplify signals by controlling output based on input variations, enabling amplification and switching. These elements extend passive networks to realize complex functions, but their analysis requires consideration of non-linearities absent in ideal passives. In circuit simulation, tools like SPICE solve networks of these elements using Kirchhoff's laws and constitutive relations, validating designs against empirical measurements.[66][70]
Computing and software elements
In computer programming, an element denotes a single constituent item within a data structure, such as an array or list, where each element holds a value identifiable by an index or position.[71][72]Arrays, for instance, consist of elements of uniform data type stored in contiguous memory locations, enabling efficient access via indexing starting typically from zero.[73] This usage facilitates operations like traversal, insertion, and deletion, with performance characteristics depending on the structure's implementation; for example, array access averages O(1) time complexity in constant-time retrieval.[74]In web development, particularly with markup languages like HTML, an element comprises a start tag, optional attributes, content, and an end tag, forming the foundational units that structure and render webpage content.[75][76] Examples include the <p> element for paragraphs or <img> for images, where elements can nest hierarchically to represent semantic relationships, influencing browser parsing and Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) application.[77] As of HTML5 standards finalized in 2014, over 100 defined elements exist, categorized by function such as metadata (<head>), sectioning (<article>), or interactive forms (<input>), ensuring consistent interoperability across browsers.[78]User interface (UI) elements in software applications refer to interactive or display components, such as buttons, text fields, and sliders, that enable user input and feedback within graphical environments.[79][80] These elements, often termed widgets or controls, adhere to platform-specific guidelines—for instance, Material Design for Android specifies button elevations and ripple effects for tactile response—prioritizing accessibility standards like WCAG 2.1, which mandate sufficient contrast ratios (at least 4.5:1 for normal text) to accommodate diverse users.[81] In software engineering, UI elements integrate with event-handling systems, where user actions trigger callbacks, supporting modular design patterns like Model-View-Controller (MVC) to separate logic from presentation.[82]Data elements, as defined in standards like those from NIST, represent atomic units of information with unique semantics, such as a field for "date of birth" in a database schema, underpinning data interchange formats like XML or JSON.[83] This concept extends to software requirements modeling, where elements delineate behavioral specifications, ensuring traceability from user needs to implementation.[84] Empirical studies, including those on code maintainability, highlight that precise element definitions reduce defect rates by up to 20% in large-scale systems through improved modularity.[85]
Materials and design elements
In materials engineering, design elements encompass the discrete structural units and modeling primitives used to fabricate and analyze components for technological applications, often leveraging the properties of constituent chemical elements to achieve desired performance characteristics such as strength-to-weight ratio and durability. Engineers classify materials into categories including metals (e.g., aluminum alloys with elements like magnesium for enhanced stiffness), polymers (incorporating carbon-based chains for flexibility), ceramics (utilizing silicon and oxygen for high-temperature resistance), and composites (combining fibers like carbon with matrices for tailored anisotropy). These selections prioritize empirical metrics: for instance, steel's iron-carbon base yields tensile strengths exceeding 400 MPa in high-strength variants, enabling load-bearing in aerospace structures.[86][87]A cornerstone of modern materials design is the finite element method (FEM), which discretizes complex material geometries into finite elements—simple shapes like triangles or tetrahedra—to solve partial differential equations governing stress, strain, and heat transfer. Developed in the 1940s and refined through computational advances, FEM allows simulation of material behavior under real-world conditions, such as predicting fatigue in titanium alloys (containing elements like vanadium for aerospace durability) subjected to cyclic loads up to 10^6 cycles. This approach reduces reliance on costly prototypes; for example, in automotive design, FEM models optimize polymer composites to cut weight by 20-30% while maintaining crash resistance.[88][89]Advanced applications integrate multiscale modeling within FEM frameworks to bridge atomic-level elemental interactions (e.g., dislocationdynamics in metallic crystals) with macroscopic design outcomes, enabling the development of metamaterials with negative Poisson's ratios for vibration damping. Data-driven FEM variants, incorporating machine learning, further accelerate material discovery by predicting properties of novel alloys, as demonstrated in simulations achieving 95% accuracy for elastic moduli in untested compositions. Such methods underscore causal links between elemental composition, processing parameters (e.g., heat treatment at 900-1200°C for phase transformations), and functional performance, informing designs in sectors like renewable energy where silicon-based ceramics withstand photovoltaic thermal stresses exceeding 500°C.[90][91]
Arts, Culture, and Entertainment
Literary and symbolic elements
Literary elements constitute the foundational components of narrative works, enabling authors to construct coherent and engaging stories. These include plot, which structures the sequence of events including exposition, rising action, climax, falling action, and resolution; characters, encompassing protagonists, antagonists, and supporting figures developed through traits, motivations, and arcs; setting, detailing the temporal and spatial context that influences events; and theme, the central ideas or messages explored, such as love, power, or mortality.[92][93] Additional elements like point of view, which determines narrative perspective (e.g., first-person or omniscient third-person), and conflict, the driving tension between forces (internal or external), further shape reader interpretation and emotional impact.[94][92]Symbolically, natural elements—earth, water, air, and fire—serve as archetypes in literature to evoke deeper meanings beyond their physical properties, rooted in ancient philosophical traditions and persisting in modern works. Earth typically represents stability, fertility, or groundedness, as in agrarian myths where it embodies nurturing yet unyielding permanence.[95] Water symbolizes fluidity, emotions, or purification, often depicting change or subconscious depths, evident in flood narratives across cultures signifying renewal or destruction.[96] Air conveys intellect, freedom, or ephemerality, linked to breath, wind, and inspiration in poetic motifs of aspiration or chaos.[97] Fire, denoting transformation, passion, or peril, appears in alchemical and heroic tales to signify enlightenment or consuming force, such as in Prometheus myths where it ignites human progress amid risk.[98] These symbols layer abstract themes onto concrete imagery, enhancing thematic resonance without explicit exposition, though interpretations vary by cultural context and author intent.[99][100]
Music and performing arts
In music, the core elements comprise rhythm, which organizes sounds in time through patterns of duration and accent; melody, a linear succession of pitches that forms recognizable tunes; and harmony, the vertical arrangement of pitches into chords and progressions that support or contrast the melody.[101]Timbre distinguishes sounds by their unique tonal quality, as produced by specific instruments or voices, while dynamics regulate intensity through variations in loudness, from piano (soft) to fortissimo (very loud).[102]Texture refers to the interplay of musical lines, categorized as monophonic (single line), homophonic (melody with accompaniment), or polyphonic (multiple independent lines).[103]Form provides the structural framework for compositions, such as binary (AB), ternary (ABA), or sonata form, which organizes thematic development and repetition to convey narrative progression.[104]Tempo dictates the speed of the beat, measured in beats per minute, influencing emotional impact, while meter establishes recurring pulse groups, like duple or triple, underpinning rhythmic stability.[105]In performing arts, theater relies on Aristotle's six elements: plot, the sequence of events driving action; character, the agents enacting the plot through motivations and traits; thought or theme, the underlying ideas expressed; diction, the language and style of dialogue; song or music, integrating vocal or instrumental elements; and spectacle, the visual aspects including staging and effects.[106] Modern productions expand this to include technical components like lighting, which shapes mood via color and intensity, and sound design, amplifying dialogue, effects, and underscoring to enhance immersion.[107]Dance performance centers on four primary elements: body, the instrument of movement using limbs, torso, and gestures; energy, the dynamic force conveyed through sustained, percussive, or swinging qualities; space, the pathways, levels, and shapes navigated onstage; and time, encompassing tempo, rhythm, duration, and phrasing to synchronize motion.[108] These elements interrelate with music in interdisciplinary works, where choreographers align dance phrasing to rhythmic structures, as in ballet's adherence to metric pulses or contemporary pieces exploiting harmonic tension for expressive release.[109] Across both music and performing arts, elements function causally: rhythm and time propel momentum, while spatial and textural choices dictate perceptual focus, enabling audiences to discern coherence amid complexity.[110]
Visual and media elements
In visual arts and design, the fundamental building blocks known as the elements of art include line, shape, form, space, color, value, and texture. Line is defined as a mark made by a moving point, varying in direction, width, and intensity to guide the viewer's eye or convey movement. Shape refers to two-dimensional areas enclosed by lines or defined by color contrasts, categorized as geometric (regular, like circles or squares) or organic (irregular, like natural forms). Form extends shape into three dimensions, creating the illusion of volume through shading or actual sculptural depth. Space encompasses positive areas occupied by objects and negative surrounding areas, manipulated via perspective or overlap to suggest depth. Color involves hue, saturation, and brightness, influencing mood and focal points through properties like complementary contrasts. Value denotes lightness or darkness of tones, essential for creating contrast and three-dimensional effects via chiaroscuro techniques. Texture describes surface quality, either tactile (actual feel) or visual (implied through patterns), adding realism or emphasis. These elements, as outlined in art education frameworks, form the vocabulary artists use to compose works across painting, sculpture, and digital media.[111][112]In graphic design and visual communication, these elements integrate with principles like balance and hierarchy to structure layouts, where line and shape define boundaries, color and value establish emphasis, and space prevents overcrowding for clarity. For instance, in poster design, high-contrast value shifts draw attention to key text or imagery, while texture overlays simulate materiality in digital renders. Empirical studies in design cognition confirm that mastery of these elements correlates with viewer comprehension and aesthetic preference, as measured by eye-tracking and preference surveys in controlled experiments.[113][114]Within media production for film and television, visual elements extend to mise-en-scène—encompassing sets, props, lighting, costumes, and actor positioning—which collectively construct narrative space and character psychology before the camera. Lighting, as a core element, manipulates shadows and highlights to denote time, emotion, or realism, with techniques like three-point lighting standardizing illumination since the 1930s Hollywood era. Cinematographic choices in shots (wide for context, close for intimacy) and angles (low for power dynamics) further these elements, while color gradingpost-production adjusts palettes for thematic consistency, as in desaturated tones for dystopian settings. Editing sequences integrate these by juxtaposing visual motifs, creating rhythm through cuts measured in milliseconds for tension, per analyses of classical montage theory. These components, verified through production breakdowns of films like Citizen Kane (1941), demonstrate causal links between visual orchestration and audience immersion, supported by perceptual psychology research on visual storytelling efficacy.[115][116]
Business and Society
Corporate entities
Element Solutions Inc. is a specialty chemicals company headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, with operations focused on providing formulations for electronics, industrial coatings, and energy infrastructure applications. Originally established in 2013 as Platform Specialty Products Corporation, it rebranded to Element Solutions Inc. in 2019 while tracing operational roots to pioneering metal finishing chemistry developed as early as 1785. The firm reported $2.18 billion in net sales for fiscal year 2023, serving end-markets including printed circuit boards and consumer packaging.[117]Element Materials Technology, a London-based provider of testing, inspection, and certification services for materials and products, was formed in 2010 through a management buyout of Stork B.V.'s testing division. Specializing in destructive and non-destructive testing for sectors like aerospace, defense, and energy, the company operates over 200 facilities worldwide and employs approximately 7,000 people. Temasek Holdings acquired a majority stake in 2022, valuing the business at around $7 billion. Its historical origins extend to 19th-century industrial testing practices in the UK.[118][119]Element Fleet Management Corp., founded in 2007 and headquartered in Toronto, Canada, offers leasing, financing, and management services for commercial vehicle fleets, including maintenance, accident management, and electric vehicle integration. Listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX: EFN), it manages over 1.2 million vehicles globally and reported $1.74 billion in revenue for 2023, emphasizing cost reduction through data-driven analytics. The company evolved from earlier fleet operations, including acquisitions like GE Capital Fleet Services Canada in 2013.Other notable entities include Element Electronics, established in 2007 in South Carolina as a manufacturer of affordable consumer electronics like televisions and soundbars, targeting budget-conscious markets with products assembled in North America. Element Resources LLC operates as a major U.S. lead-acid battery recycler, processing over 250,000 tons annually through smelting and polymer separation at facilities in Pennsylvania and Missouri. These firms illustrate diverse applications of the "Element" branding in manufacturing, recycling, and services, often evoking reliability and foundational components.[120]
Legal and military elements
In legal contexts, an "element" refers to a constituent part of a crime, tort, or other cause of action that must be proven to establish liability. For criminal offenses, these typically include actus reus (a voluntary criminal act or omission), mens rea (a culpable mental state, such as intent or recklessness), concurrence between the act and intent, causation, and sometimes attendant circumstances or a specified result.[121][122] All elements must be established beyond a reasonable doubt by the prosecution in criminal trials; failure to prove any one defeats the case.[123] For instance, in a charge of larceny, elements encompass the taking and carrying away of another's personal property, with intent to permanently deprive the owner.[124]Civil claims similarly require proof of specific elements by a preponderance of the evidence. In negligence suits, these comprise duty of care, breach of that duty, causation, and resulting damages.[125] Statutory definitions delineate elements precisely to ensure due process, as affirmed in cases interpreting the Sixth Amendment.[126] Legal scholars emphasize that elements serve as analytical tools for courts to dissect claims, preventing overreach by requiring factual specificity rather than generalized allegations.[127]In military doctrine and organization, an "element" denotes a functional subunit within a larger formation, often the smallest tactical building block in task-organized forces. It is typically formed around a specific role, such as a security element, fire support element, or command element, enabling flexible mission adaptation.[128] U.S. joint doctrine, for example, integrates elements into operational graphics and planning, where they represent discrete capabilities like aviation or logistics detachments subordinated to a headquarters.[129] This structure facilitates command and control, with elements scalable from teams of a few personnel to specialized groups in joint operations.[130]Force structure analyses highlight elements as core to assessing military readiness, encompassing personnel, equipment, and sustainment components across services.[131] In combat, elements emphasize cohesion and maneuver; historical doctrines, such as those from World War II task forces, underscore their role in decentralized execution under unified intent.[132] Unlike rigid hierarchies, modern usage prioritizes ad hoc elements to counter asymmetric threats, as seen in counterinsurgency operations where intelligence elements integrate with maneuver units.[133]
Modern Developments and Interdisciplinary Uses
Recent scientific advancements
In 2024, researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory successfully synthesized livermorium (element 116) using a beam of titanium-50 ions accelerated at the 88-Inch Cyclotron, marking the first use of this isotope for superheavy element production and offering a pathway to attempt element 120 by fusing titanium-50 with californium-249 targets.[134] This method bypasses limitations of the traditional calcium-48 beams, which have been central to discoveries of elements 114–118, by providing higher reaction cross-sections for heavier targets.[135]By April2025, a collaborative effort at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research produced two atoms of livermorium via a novel vanadium-51 beam on curium-243, demonstrating viability for pursuing elements beyond 118 and advancing toward the predicted "island of stability" where superheavy nuclei might exhibit enhanced longevity.[136] In July 2025, new isotopes livermorium-288, livermorium-289, and copernicium-280 were identified through experiments at superheavy element factories, expanding knowledge of decay chains and nuclear shell structures in this regime.[137]A June 2025 experiment yielded a new isotope of seaborgium (element 106), providing insights into alpha-decay patterns and nuclear stability for transactinides, while August 2025 saw the development of an advanced atom-at-a-time chemistry technique at Berkeley Lab, enabling gas-phase reactions with superheavy elements like flerovium to probe relativistic effects on bonding.[138][139] In March 2025, scientists characterized berkelocene, the first stable organometallic complex featuring berkelium (element 97), revealing unexpected five-coordinate geometry due to the actinide's 5f-electron influence.[140] These developments underscore ongoing refinements in accelerator technology and detection, though no new elements have been officially verified since oganesson in 2016, with efforts focused on overcoming fusion barriers for Z > 118.[141]
Emerging technological applications
In the transition to renewable energy systems, rare earth elements such as neodymium and dysprosium are increasingly vital for fabricating high-strength permanent magnets used in electric vehicle motors and offshore wind turbines, with demand expected to rise fourfold by 2040 in net-zero emission scenarios due to their superior magnetic properties enabling compact, efficient designs.[142] Lithium, nickel, cobalt, and graphite underpin advanced battery chemistries, including nickel-manganese-cobalt cathodes in high-energy-density lithium-ion cells, while emerging solid-state batteries incorporating lithium metal anodes and sulfide electrolytes demonstrate prototypes with over 1,000 cycles and energy densities exceeding 400 Wh/kg as of 2024, addressing limitations in liquid electrolytes like flammability and dendrite formation.[142][143]Advanced semiconductors rely on compound materials involving gallium, indium, and germanium for high-electron-mobility transistors in 5G base stations and power electronics, where gallium nitride devices operate at frequencies up to 100 GHz and handle voltages over 600 V, outperforming silicon in efficiency for data centers and electric grids; the U.S. Department of Energy identified gallium as short-term critical through 2025 due to its role in these applications.[143][144]Yttrium, a rare earth, enhances semiconductor doping to improve electrical and magnetic properties in compounds like yttrium iron garnet for microwave filters.[145]In quantum computing and photonics, rare earth ions such as erbium and ytterbium are doped into host crystals like yttrium orthosilicate for qubits exhibiting coherence times exceeding 1 second at cryogenic temperatures, enabling scalable quantum networks via telecom-compatible wavelengths around 1,550 nm; recent 2025 analyses highlight their foundational role amid supply vulnerabilities, as China controls over 90% of global rare earth processing.[146][147] Two-dimensional MXenes, composed of transition metals like titanium and carbon or nitrogen, show promise in flexible supercapacitors with capacitances up to 1,500 F/g and electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness over 90 dB, positioning them for wearable electronics and energy harvesting as recognized in IUPAC's 2024 emerging technologies list.[148]Carbon dots, nanoscale zero-dimensional allotropes of carbon, facilitate optoelectronic applications in LEDs and sensors with quantum yields above 80%, leveraging their biocompatibility and tunability for biomedical imaging without heavy metals like cadmium.[149]