Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Pilate stone

The Pilate stone is a fragmentary block bearing a Latin dedicatory inscription that mentions as the Roman prefect of , discovered during archaeological excavations at in 1961. Measuring 82 cm in height, 65 cm in width, and 20 cm in depth, the artifact was originally part of a monument dedicated to , likely a Tiberieum—a structure honoring the emperor—and was later reused as a step in a Roman theater. The inscription, partially damaged, reconstructs to reference ([PONTIVS] PILATVS), his title as of ([PRAEF]ECTVS IVDA[EA]E), and a dedication such as "[To the Divine Augusti this] Tiberieum ... [Pontius Pilate, pr]efect of Jud[aea, made/dedicated]". Dating to Pilate's tenure around 26–36 CE, it constitutes the only contemporary epigraphic evidence of his name and administrative role, confirming details from historical sources like and while clarifying his precise title as rather than the anachronistic "procurator" used by later writers such as . Unearthed by Italian archaeologists under Antonio Frova near the ancient theater at —the provincial capital where Pilate maintained his residence—the stone's authenticity is undisputed among scholars due to its provenance, material, paleography, and alignment with known administrative practices in the region. Now housed in the , it serves as a key archaeological corroboration of Pilate's historical existence, bridging biblical narratives of his governorship with tangible imperial evidence.

Discovery and Provenance

Archaeological Excavation

The Pilate stone was discovered in June 1961 by an archaeological expedition led by Antonio Frova, during the third season of excavations at the Roman theater in on Israel's Mediterranean coast. The team, operating under the Superintendency of Antiquities of , systematically uncovered structures from the site's Roman imperial phase, employing standard stratigraphic techniques to document layers and artifact contexts. The block was found reused as a step in a fourth-century within the theater , indicating secondary deposition after its primary installation. Stratigraphic examination of surrounding deposits, including associated and architectural fragments, placed the stone's original context in a first-century CE public building, aligning with the prefecture of from approximately 26 to 36 CE. Caesarea Maritima, founded as a major port by circa 22–10 BCE, functioned as the Roman provincial capital of , facilitating administrative and military operations. The theater excavations formed part of wider efforts to delineate urban layout and subsequent Roman overlays, yielding evidence of continuous occupation from the late Hellenistic through Byzantine periods, with the Pilate stone's recovery underscoring the site's role in preserving epigraphic material from early imperial governance.

Initial Documentation

Upon its discovery in June 1961 during excavations at the ancient theater in , the limestone block bearing the inscription was carefully extracted from its reused position in the staircase steps. The artifact was photographed to record its archaeological context prior to removal, ensuring documentation of its secondary deposition in later strata. The stone was subsequently transported to the in for safekeeping and detailed examination, establishing an unbroken from the Italian excavation team led by Antonio Frova. Frova issued early reports in 1961 through Italian archaeological channels, emphasizing the block's incorporation into Byzantine or post-Roman layers while attributing its original placement to the first century CE based on epigraphic features and historical correlations. Preliminary evaluations engaged specialist epigraphists for cautious transcription of the legible portions, prioritizing factual recording over interpretive analysis to maintain scholarly rigor in initial assessments.

Physical Characteristics

Material and Dimensions

The Pilate stone consists of sourced locally from quarries near , a prevalent in the Judean coastal region and favored for Roman provincial inscriptions owing to its workability and relative abundance. The block measures 82 cm in height, 65 cm in width, and approximately 20 cm in depth, forming a rectangular slab consistent with dedicatory elements in Roman architecture. This limestone's fine-grained texture provided a stable medium for work, as evidenced by the even surface preparation on the inscribed face, suggesting original installation as a or base component in a public edifice. Comparable artifacts from first-century CE Judean sites, such as other dedications at , exhibit analogous material properties, including moderate that endures Mediterranean exposure through binding, though susceptible to without protective measures.

Condition and Damage

The Pilate stone, a block measuring 82 cm by 65 cm, displays notable damage characterized by a break along its right edge, which has resulted in the truncation of the Latin inscription across six lines. The upper two lines remain predominantly intact, preserving substantial portions of the dedicatory text, whereas the lower lines are increasingly fragmented, with lacunae affecting readability. Epigraphic examination enables the reconstruction of roughly 70% of the original inscription, sufficient to identify key terms despite the losses. This pattern of breakage stems from the artifact's secondary use as a building component in a post-Roman structure at , followed by structural collapse that fractured the block without obliterating the carved surface entirely. Burial in stratified debris subsequently shielded the inscription from further degradation, mitigating exposure-related and maintaining legibility of critical elements such as "[PON]TIUS PILATUS" and "[PRAEF]ECTUS IUDA[EA]E." While minor surface is evident from post-excavation handling and display, the core lettering shows no indications of artificial enhancement or modern intervention. High-resolution photography from the 1961 discovery and subsequent scholarly imaging corroborates the stone's patina and tooling marks as consistent with 1st-century Roman , reinforcing assessments of its unadulterated ancient among archaeologists. No evidence of or post-antique alteration has been identified in these visual records, aligning with the artifact's contextual fit within the excavation layers.

Inscription Details

Textual Content

The inscription on the Pilate stone is composed in Latin using monumental capital letters typical of from the early . The text survives in four lines across a damaged block, with the right portion preserved while the left sides feature lacunae due to breakage. Visible letters include, in the first line, the sequence ending in "S TIBERIÉUM"; the second line preserves "[...PO]NTIVS PILATVS"; the third line shows "[...PRAEF]ECTVS IVDA[EAE]"; and the fourth line contains fragmentary elements consistent with "DE[DICAVIT]" or "FECIT DE[DICAVIT]", with only partial letters like "E" discernible amid erosion. Letter forms exhibit standard features of official dedications, including ligatures and serifs, with heights averaging 6 , facilitating readability on monuments. Gaps in the text are denoted by brackets in epigraphic transcriptions to indicate scholarly restorations based on and historical parallels, ensuring to the physical artifact. The inscription's raw form underscores its role as a for analyzing provincial administrative terminology without reliance on literary accounts.

Translation and Linguistic Analysis

The inscription is composed in Latin, featuring a dedicatory formula typical of provincial . The surviving text spans four lines: the first includes "TIBERIEUM," referring to a structure honoring ; the second preserves "[PO]NTIUS PILATUS"; and the third contains "[PRAEF]ECTUS IU[DA]E[A]," denoting Pilate's official position. Scholars such as Antonio Frova and Géza Alföldy have reconstructed the inscription as "[...] Tiberieum / [Pon]tius Pilatus / [praef]ectus Iudaa / [...fe]cit [de]dica[vit]" or a variant emphasizing restoration, "[nautis?] Tiberieum / [Po]ntius Pilatus / [praef]ectus Iudaa / [re]fecit." A conventional translation renders it as: "[To the Divine Augusti...] Tiberieum, , of , [dedicated/built this]." The language employs standard epigraphic abbreviations, such as "PRAEF" for (), and the genitive form "Iudaeae" to specify the , consistent with 1st-century Latin inscriptional conventions for official titles and dedications. The title praefectus Iudaeae underscores Pilate's equestrian military rank as governor from 26 to 36 under , aligning with Roman administrative practices for minor provinces subordinated to the legate of . This designation differs from the later "procurator," a civilian procuratorial title introduced by Emperor (41–54 ), reflecting an evolution in imperial governance terminology post-Tiberius. Stylistic elements, including monumental capital letter forms (6–7 cm high) and line spacing (3–4 cm), parallel other Julio-Claudian-era Latin dedications from eastern provinces, such as those naming structures like the Caesareum or Augustaeum, thereby corroborating adherence to norms for prefectural inscriptions and bolstering paleographic .

Historical Context

Pontius Pilate's Role

Pontius Pilate served as the equestrian prefect (praefectus) of the of from 26 to 36 CE, appointed by Emperor Tiberius to administer the territory on his behalf. In this capacity, Pilate held authority over taxation, commanding the auxiliary military forces stationed in to maintain order, and exercising supreme judicial power, including capital cases involving non-citizens. The Pilate stone, discovered at , bears the Latin inscription identifying him explicitly as "[Pon]tius Pilatus [Praef]ectus Iuda[ea]e," providing the sole surviving contemporary epigraphic attestation of his official title and tenure. The inscription records that Pilate "[fecit d]edicavit," meaning he constructed and dedicated a structure referred to as the Tiberieum, likely a public building or monument honoring Caesar as the son of the divine . This act demonstrates Pilate's direct involvement in provincial , aligning with Roman administrative practices that emphasized infrastructure development and the propagation of the through dedications to the emperor. Such initiatives served to reinforce Rome's political and religious authority in the provinces, with prefects like Pilate tasked with overseeing construction projects funded by local revenues. While literary accounts by and portray Pilate's exercise of authority as frequently contentious, involving clashes over Roman symbols and resource allocation that provoked Jewish unrest, the stone's inscription presents an unadorned official record focused on administrative achievement rather than conflict. As a primary artifact from Pilate's era, it offers direct evidence of his role in standard Roman governance protocols, independent of the interpretive lenses applied by later historians.

Roman Judea in the Early 1st Century

Following the deposition of Herod Archelaus in 6 AD, the territory of Judea was annexed as a Roman province of the second rank, governed directly by equestrian prefects appointed by the emperor and subordinate to the legate of Syria. These prefects, tasked with tax collection, judicial oversight, and military maintenance using auxiliary cohorts, resided primarily at Caesarea Maritima, Herod the Great's engineered port city on the Mediterranean coast, which served as the provincial administrative seat rather than Jerusalem to minimize friction with Jewish religious sensitivities. This arrangement reflected Rome's pragmatic approach to a restive region, prioritizing fiscal extraction and order over full integration, with Caesarea functioning as a hub for dedications affirming imperial authority. Public infrastructure projects, such as amphitheaters and basilicas, were constructed to symbolize presence and facilitate local economic activity, often funded through provincial revenues or treasuries amid Tiberius's (r. 14–37 AD) emphasis on fiscal restraint—he famously advised governors to "shear the flock, not flay it" to avoid excessive taxation that could provoke unrest. In , such buildings underscored loyalty to the , with dedications like the Tiberieum serving as causal mechanisms to embed elements without mandating direct worship among , who were exempt from emperor veneration but expected to honor sovereignty through oaths and monuments. This policy aligned with Tiberius's broader avoidance of lavish expenditures, promoting self-sufficiency in provinces by leveraging local elites and resources for stability. Archaeological evidence, including bronze prutah coins minted during the prefecture of (26–36 AD), reveals underlying tensions from Roman symbolic impositions—such as simpula and lituus emblems evoking pagan —contrasting with Jewish , yet these artifacts confirm routine administrative continuity rather than outright . The Pilate stone itself exemplifies a neutral bureaucratic inscription, recording a dedication to amid these dynamics, without evidencing the era's sporadic disturbances like protests over aqueduct funding, which stemmed from resource allocation rather than doctrinal conflict alone. Such records highlight how Roman governance causally relied on visible affirmations of hierarchy to deter challenges, integrating economically through trade via while containing messianic aspirations through prefectural vigilance.

Significance and Interpretations

Archaeological Corroboration of Biblical Accounts

The Pilate Stone, unearthed in 1961 at the site of Caesarea Maritima, features a Latin inscription attributing a dedicatory structure to "[Pon]tius Pilatus, Praefectus Iuda[ea]," confirming Pontius Pilate's tenure as the Roman prefect of Judea under Emperor Tiberius around AD 26-36. This direct epigraphic evidence verifies Pilate's existence and official capacity, precisely matching the New Testament's portrayal of him as the Judean governor presiding over judicial proceedings, including the trial and sentencing of Jesus as described in Matthew 27:11-26, Mark 15:1-15, Luke 23:1-25, and John 18:28-19:16. Although ancient texts by and had previously attested to Pilate's role, providing literary corroboration, the absence of contemporary archaeological artifacts prior to 1961 allowed some skeptics to question the evidential solidity of biblical details concerning provincial figures. The stone's tangible inscription dispels such doubts by offering material proof of Pilate's authority to adjudicate capital cases, as exercised in narratives, thereby privileging direct empirical data over interpretive reliance on secondary historical accounts. The inscription's designation of Pilate as "" aligns with the administrative hierarchy implied in the , where his decisions carry imperial weight, and corrects later historiographical usages like Tacitus's "procurator" in 15.44, which reflected post-Claudian titular shifts rather than Pilate's era-specific rank. This precision underscores the artifact's role in authenticating the Gospels' depiction of Roman governance in , providing first-hand inscriptional validation that outweighs anachronistic or conjectural critiques.

Implications for Roman Provincial Administration

The Pilate stone's inscription, which records Pontius Pilate's dedication of a structure to Caesar, illustrates the administrative autonomy afforded to equestrian prefects in managing and civic dedications within their provinces. Such acts served as mechanisms for embedding imperial propaganda at the local level, where governors like Pilate could independently allocate resources for constructions that symbolized authority and loyalty to the emperor, without requiring direct senatorial or higher imperial oversight. The explicit designation of Pilate as praefectus Iudaeae on the stone verifies the pre-Claudian titular convention for Judea's governors, distinguishing it from the later "procurator" title adopted after 41 under Emperor , following the brief restoration of client kingship under I. This shift, implemented upon Agrippa's death in 44 , emphasized enhanced fiscal procuratorial responsibilities in imperial provinces, reflecting Rome's evolving administrative priorities toward direct revenue management amid provincial unrest. By attesting to an equestrian's tenure in a minor province like , the inscription highlights the typical career path for knights, who progressed from military tribunates to prefectural governorships of fiscal outposts, ensuring 's integration into the empire's economy through tax enforcement and that facilitated tribute flows to . Prefects maintained operational independence under the Syrian legate's strategic umbrella, balancing local order with the extraction of revenues that funded broader imperial expenditures.

Scholarly Debates on Historicity

The enjoys broad scholarly as authentic epigraphic evidence confirming Pontius Pilate's tenure as praefectus Iudaeae under , dated to 26–36 based on the inscription's to and alignment with known Roman prefectural terms. This limestone block, measuring 82 cm by 65 cm, provides the sole surviving contemporary inscription naming Pilate, supplementing literary attestations from ( 18.3.1–2), (Embassy to 301–303), and (Annals 15.44), which were composed decades later. Its discovery in 1961 during excavations at Maritima's Roman theater by Antonio Frova's team addressed a prior evidential lacuna, as no direct archaeological traces of Pilate existed before, thereby strengthening causal inferences about his administrative role in without reliance on potentially biased historiographical narratives. Interpretive debates center on the fragmentary text's reconstruction, particularly the term TIBERIÉUM and preceding elements like [DIS AUGUSTI]S, which most epigraphers restore as denoting a (fecit dedit) of a structure honoring . Standard readings posit it as a public building or (Tiberieum) promoting the , consistent with Roman provincial practices evidenced in similar inscriptions from Asia Minor and , though adapted to Judea's monotheistic sensitivities to avoid overt deification. Alternative proposals, advanced by over twenty scholars since 1963, suggest Tiberieum might signify a or honorary rather than a literal , arguing that incomplete phrasing (e.g., possible [...]TIBERIÉUM as part of a larger ) precludes definitive architectural identification and cautions against assuming unchecked emperor worship under Pilate, given Josephus's accounts of his iconoclastic missteps ( 18.3.1). These disputes highlight the stone's incompleteness—only about two-thirds legible—limiting precise contextual mapping to Caesarea's urban layout, yet empirical paleographic analysis favors the dedicatory over speculative overhauls. While the artifact robustly corroborates Pilate's office and era, filling a direct evidentiary gap absent in pre-1961 archaeology, critics emphasize its singularity precludes exhaustive biographical reconstruction, such as verifying specific actions like aqueduct funding or standard bearers incidents reported in Josephus. Minority positions question overemphasis on imperial cult promotion, positing the inscription reflects routine administrative patronage (euergetism) rather than cultic innovation, grounded in comparative data from equestrian prefects' dedications elsewhere, which prioritize loyalty signaling over religious imposition. Nonetheless, the stone's verifiable Latin formula and prosopographical fit with Pilate's known career trajectory—transitioning from equestrian military roles to Judean governance—outweigh interpretive variances, establishing a baseline for causal realism in assessing his historicity beyond literary amplification or diminution.

Authenticity and Verification

Methods of Authentication

The Pilate Stone's authenticity was initially assessed through its archaeological context during the 1961 excavations at , where it was recovered from the steps of the Roman theater, embedded in a associated with and early Roman imperial construction layers dating to the late 1st century BCE through the , indicating reuse but original deposition consistent with the inscription's purported era. Stratigraphic analysis confirmed no anachronistic disturbances or modern intrusions in the surrounding matrix, supporting the block's ancient provenance without evidence of post-depositional forgery insertion. Epigraphic examination focused on the inscription's paleography, with the Latin letter forms—employing square monumental capitals (capitalis quadrata) typical of official Roman dedications—aligning precisely with 1st-century imperial , as seen in comparanda like the Titus Arch inscriptions in (dedicated 81 ) and other Judean provincial stones. Scholars such as Jerry Vardaman noted the precise spacing, ligatures (e.g., in "PRAEFECTVS"), and abbreviations ("IVDAEAE") as hallmarks of authentic 1st-century provincial administration script, incompatible with later medieval or modern imitations due to serifs and proportions absent in post-2nd-century examples. Material analysis of the block revealed tool marks from chisels and abrasives consistent with carving techniques, lacking microscopic evidence of modern steel implements or chemical residues indicative of forgery; the surface patina, erosion patterns, and recrystallization further corroborated extended exposure since antiquity, as verified in post-discovery conservation evaluations by the . Comparative petrographic studies matched the stone's composition to local kurkar quarried near , ruling out imported or synthetic substitutes. Subsequent scholarly reviews, including and in the 2010s and 2020s, detected no subsurface alterations, pigments, or repairs suggestive of fabrication, reinforcing the inscription's integrity through non-destructive spectroscopic methods that confirmed uniform mineralogical aging across the carved and uncarved surfaces. These multidisciplinary approaches—integrating , paleography, and —have yielded consensus among epigraphers and archaeologists on the stone's genuineness as a 1st-century artifact.

Challenges and Counterarguments

Skepticism toward the Pilate stone's authenticity remains marginal, confined largely to non-scholarly or fringe sources that question its provenance or epigraphic features. One such claim, advanced by blogger Jef Demolder, posits the inscription as a modern fabrication designed to bolster historicity, citing the "convenient" preservation of key terms like "Pontius Pilatus," "praefectus Iudaeae," and "Tiberie," alongside alleged inconsistencies with Josephus's use of "epitropos" rather than "praefectus." These arguments are undermined by the artifact's in June 1961 during stratified excavations at Caesarea Maritima's ancient theater, led by archaeologist Antonio Frova, where the limestone block—measuring 82 cm by 65 cm—was found reused in a flight of steps consistent with first-century construction layers. The controlled dig context, involving multiple team members and subsequent stratigraphic verification, precludes modern planting, as does the absence of religious or ideological motive for by the secular expedition. Initial scholarly publication in the Journal of Biblical Literature in 1962, including photographic documentation and , further attests to expert consensus on its genuineness, with letter forms aligning to Julio-Claudian Roman epigraphy. Prior to 1961, occasional doubts about Pilate's historical role stemmed from the scarcity of extrabiblical archaeological attestation, occasionally leveraged by biblical minimalists to question New Testament details. However, such arguments overlooked contemporary literary references in Josephus (Antiquities 18.3.1–3; Jewish War 2.9.2–4), Philo (Embassy to Gaius 299–305), and Tacitus (Annals 15.44), which independently affirm Pilate's prefecture from AD 26–36 under Tiberius. The stone refutes any evidential gap by providing direct inscriptional proof of his title and jurisdiction, aligning precisely with the Gospel accounts' "governor" (hegemon) rendering while clarifying the Latin "praefectus" over later anachronistic "procurator" usages. Critics occasionally caution against overinterpreting the artifact as unequivocal validation of specific biblical events, such as ' trial, given its dedication context—a likely or public structure honor—to without reference to judicial acts or Christian figures. This perspective rightly emphasizes that the inscription corroborates foundational elements—Pilate's administrative authority in during the relevant period—without extending to theological claims or unmentioned incidents, thereby grounding historical analysis in the artifact's limited but verifiable scope rather than speculative linkages. Such restraint counters revisionist tendencies in certain academic quarters to dismiss textual traditions wholesale, as the stone empirically reinforces the reliability of ancient sources against unsubstantiated denials of Pilate's role.

Preservation and Current Status

Location and Display

The Pilate stone, a block measuring 82 cm by 65 cm, is housed in the permanent collection of the in , where it has been on display since its transfer following authentication in 1963. The artifact is exhibited in the museum's archaeology section, presented alongside other Roman-era inscriptions and Judean provincial finds to contextualize its historical origins. Viewing is controlled to minimize exposure to environmental factors, ensuring accessibility for researchers and the public under institutional oversight. A plaster-cast replica of the inscription is installed at the , near the original discovery location in the theater, to facilitate on-site educational interpretation without risking the fragile original. This duplication allows visitors to engage with the artifact's significance while the authentic stone remains securely in . No relocations or changes in custody have occurred since its initial placement, maintaining stability in its institutional housing.

Conservation Measures

The Pilate stone, a artifact susceptible to , is housed under the management of the and protected at the in to prevent further erosion and physical damage. This preservation approach aligns with standard protocols for ancient stone inscriptions, emphasizing stable environmental conditions to minimize chemical and mechanical breakdown over time.

References

  1. [1]
    Pilate Inscription Stone - Madain Project (en)
    Pilate stone or Pilate Inscription Stone is a carved limestone bearing the ... It was discovered at the archaeological site of Caesarea Maritima in 1961.
  2. [2]
    Dedication by Pontius Pilate in Judea (CIIP II, 1277)
    This inscription was discovered during the Italian excavations of Caesarea Maritima in 1961; it had been moved from its original location (which is unknown) ...
  3. [3]
    Pontius Pilate: An Archaeological Biography
    Oct 11, 2019 · The Pilate Stone ... Archaeological evidence for Pontius Pilate was discovered in 1961, when an inscribed stone was unearthed in excavations near ...
  4. [4]
    Pontius Pilate and the Caesarea Inscription - Ministry Magazine
    Pontius Pilate, prefect of Judea, has given (or has dedicated) to the people of Caesarea a public building (or temple) in honor of Tiberius.
  5. [5]
    Pontius Pilate Cornerstone - MC 0379 - Metzger Collection
    In June 1961 Italian archaeologists led by Dr. Antonio Frova were excavating an ancient Roman amphitheatre near Caesarea Maritima and uncovered this interesting ...
  6. [6]
    Pilate Stone - Caesarea Maritima - Vici.org
    The limestone block was discovered in June 1961 by Italian archaeologists led by Dr. Antonio Frova reused in the IVth century as a building block for a set ...
  7. [7]
    Pilate Inscription - Bible Lands Museum, Sandy, Oregon
    Discovered at the city of Caesarea in June 1961 by archaeologists team of Dr. Antonio Frova near the area of an ancient theater built by Herod the Great around ...<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    Pontius Pilate Inscription – Caesarea Maritima — c. 26–36 C.E.
    Oct 18, 2025 · The Pilate inscription was found embedded in the seating area of the theater, suggesting that the stone had been re-purposed during a renovation ...
  9. [9]
    Pilate Inscription - Bible History
    Does this stone contain an inscription from Pontius Pilate? In June 1961 Italian archaeologists led by Dr. Frova were excavating an ancient Roman theater ...Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
  10. [10]
    Bonus 77 - Pontius Pilate Inscription - Biblical Archaeology
    Dec 21, 2014 · Discovered in 1961 and now on display in the Israel Museum in Jerusalem with a replica at Caesarea Maritima (AE 1963 no. 104). During the 1961 ...
  11. [11]
    https://www.raydowning.com/blog/2016/2/8/pontius-pilate-prefect-not-procurator
  12. [12]
    Pontius Pilate: Recalled and Recycled - The BAS Library
    Measuring 32 by 27 inches, it was embedded in a staircase. To everyone's surprise, the stone bore a neatly engraved four-line inscription containing the name of ...Missing: material | Show results with:material
  13. [13]
    [PDF] PILATE'S TIBERIÉUM; A NEW APPROACH
    Summary: The exact meaning of Tiberiéum in the first line of Pontius Pilate's inscription has been studied since 1961. Epigraphists have generally explained ...
  14. [14]
    The Episode of the Golden Roman Shields at Jerusalem
    Jun 10, 2011 · “Praefectus Iudaeae” was Pilate's official title rather than “procurator. ... Claudius first changed their title to procurator. The NT very ...
  15. [15]
    Pontius Pilate | Biography, Facts, Religion, Jesus, & Death - Britannica
    Oct 11, 2025 · Pontius Pilate was the Roman prefect (governor) of Judaea (26–36 CE) who presided at the trial of Jesus and gave the order for his crucifixion.
  16. [16]
    Pontius Pilate (2) - Livius.org
    Oct 10, 2020 · He was responsible for the taxes. As the emperor's personal financial agent, he had to supervise the local authorities and the private tax ...
  17. [17]
    Judea as a Roman Province, AD 6-66 | Religious Studies Center
    Each Roman governor was given command of the military forces stationed in the province and was charged with maintaining peace and collecting taxes throughout ...
  18. [18]
    Caesarea Maritima - Livius.org
    Apr 29, 2020 · Caesarea Maritima: Roman city, capital of of the province Judaea/Palaestina. ... 6 CE Seat of the prefect (later procurator); Governor's ...Missing: Judea | Show results with:Judea
  19. [19]
    The Roman Province of Judea - BYU Studies
    In 63 B.C., the territory of Judea for the first time came under the direct administration of Rome. While Rome had been for nearly a century an important ...Missing: 1st | Show results with:1st
  20. [20]
    Pontius Pilate and the Imperial Cult in Roman Judaea
    Oct 18, 2006 · Unlike his predecessors, in the coinage Pilate used peculiarly Roman iconographic elements appropriate to the imperial cult. In the inscription ...Missing: stone Judea
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Pontius Pilate and the Imperial Cult in Roman Judaea
    Gradel, Emperor Worship and Roman Religion (Oxford: Oxford University, 2002). 5–7, prefers the usage of 'emperor worship' lest 'Roman imperial cult' give the ...
  22. [22]
    A Brief Sample of Archaeology Corroborating the Claims of the New ...
    In 1961, however, a piece of limestone was discovered bearing an inscription with Pilate's name. The inscription was discovered in Caesarea, a provincial ...
  23. [23]
    The archaeological evidence of Pontius Pilate - Aleteia
    Jun 15, 2018 · In 1961, Italian Archaeologists found a limestone inscribed with the name and station of Pontius Pilate.Missing: date | Show results with:date<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    https://uasvbible.org/2024/12/31/what-does-the-pilate-stone-reveal-about-the-historical-accuracy-of-the-new-testament/
  25. [25]
    Top Ten Discoveries in Biblical Archaeology Relating to the New ...
    Jan 19, 2019 · The Pilate stone confirms that Pilate was indeed the Prefect of Judea. More recently, a second artifact with Pilate's name on it came to ...
  26. [26]
    Biblical Archaeology 40: The Pilate Stone - Thinking to Believe
    Sep 20, 2011 · Secondly, the title ascribed to this Pilate is “prefect.” This is interesting because the title Tacitus gave to Pilate was “procurator.” We ...
  27. [27]
    Inscription with name of Pontius Pilate - IMPERIUM ROMANUM
    Jun 28, 2022 · It is the only surviving inscription bearing the famous name of a Roman prefect. The inscribed stone was part of the building dedicated to Emperor Tiberius.Missing: linguistic analysis abbreviations
  28. [28]
    Procurator - Jewish Virtual Library
    Procurator, title of the governors (first over Judea, later over most of Palestine) appointed by Rome during the years 6–41 and 44–66 CE.<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Pontius Pilate (3) - Livius.org
    Apr 21, 2020 · Pontius Pilate: Roman prefect of Judaea from 26 CE to 36 CE, best known for the execution of Jesus of Nazareth.
  30. [30]
    PILATE'S TIBERIEUM: A NEW APPROACH. - Document - Gale
    The key to the explanation of the Pilate inscription is the way we interpret Tiberieum and complete the word that stands before. Tentamens published in the ...Missing: debate | Show results with:debate
  31. [31]
    Archaeology and the New Testament - Apologetics Press
    Oct 3, 2004 · An enormous cache of amazing archaeological evidence that testifies to the exactitude of the various historical references in the New Testament.The Pilate Inscription · Sergius Paulus The Proconsul... · A Word About Ossuaries
  32. [32]
    The Pilate Stone is fake - Abyss of Time
    Oct 9, 2018 · The Pilate Stone was discovered at the archeological site of Caesarea Maritima in 1961. It is a damaged block of carved limestone of 82 x 65 cm, with a partial ...
  33. [33]
    A New Inscription Which Mentions Pilate as Prefect
    Research Article| March 01 1962. A New Inscription Which Mentions Pilate as "Prefect" Available.Missing: discovery report
  34. [34]
    Historical Notes: Pontius Pilate: a name set in stone | The Independent
    Apr 3, 1999 · In the summer of 1961, however, Italian archaeologists found a piece of limestone, 82cm wide by 68cm high, in the ruins of a sports stadium in Caesarea, beside ...
  35. [35]
    What are the main arguments used by those who doubt the ... - Quora
    Sep 29, 2025 · The historical existence of Pontius Pilate was never really in doubt, so the Pilate Stone does not address doubts about other people mentioned ...
  36. [36]
    A Challenge To Prove By Evidence That Anything In the Bible Is Not ...
    Jul 21, 2025 · Pontius Pilate: Once considered fictional; now confirmed by the Pilate Stone found in 1961 in Caesarea Maritima. ... Literary authenticity of the ...
  37. [37]
    Latin dedicatory inscription mentioning Pontius Pilate, the procurator ...
    It was found reused in the staircase of the Roman theater of Caesarea, the provincial capital; it was probably originally set into a temple built in the city in ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Pilate erected a Tiberium in Caesarea Maritima | Ferrell's Travel Blog
    Feb 25, 2015 · An inscription bearing the name of Pontius Pilate was found at Caesarea Maritima June 15, 1961 during the excavation of the Roman theater.
  39. [39]
    The Pilate Inscription at Caesarea - leonmauldin.blog
    Mar 21, 2011 · This inscribed stone mentioning Pontius Pilate. Found in a step of the theater, it was originally part of a nearby temple honoring the emperor Tiberius.<|control11|><|separator|>
  40. [40]
    The 'Pilate Stone' in Israel's Caesarea-by-the-Sea - Deseret News
    May 3, 2018 · The inscription identifies Pontius Pilate as the “prefect” of Judea, a title that seems to connote not only a governmental or administrative ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Stone Conservation - Getty Museum
    The unsuitability of many of these treatments encouraged research efforts to develop new materials and procedures for the preservation of stone.