Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Pivot to video

The pivot to video refers to a strategic shift undertaken by numerous digital media publishers starting in 2015, reallocating budgets and personnel from text-based journalism toward video content creation, predicated on projections of exponential growth in viewer engagement and ad monetization via social platforms like Facebook.^[1]^[2] This trend, epitomized by outlets such as BuzzFeed and Vice Media, involved aggressive hiring of video production teams and infrastructure investments, fueled by platform announcements touting video's dominance in user time spent—such as Facebook's 2015 claim that video views had surged 75% year-over-year.^[3]^[4] The initiative's core rationale hinged on platforms' algorithmic favoritism for native video uploads, which promised higher distribution than linked articles or third-party embeds, alongside inflated metrics like counting three-second glimpses as full "views" to simulate blockbuster performance.^[2]^[5] However, causal factors undermining its viability included exorbitant production costs—often 10 to 20 times those of text articles—coupled with platforms' subsequent algorithm tweaks that deprioritized publisher content and withheld promised ad revenue shares, rendering video units unprofitable despite initial hype.^[2]^[6] By 2017–2018, stark underperformance materialized: BuzzFeed's video revenue fell short of targets by hundreds of millions, prompting layoffs and content cuts at affected firms, while the phrase "pivot to video" evolved into industry shorthand for misguided platform dependency and operational overreach.^[3]^[4] Controversies surrounding the pivot spotlighted platform accountability, including a 2018 lawsuit against Facebook alleging deliberate metric manipulation to lure publishers into costly shifts, masking stagnant actual consumption patterns where users preferred established video giants like YouTube over nascent publisher efforts.^[1]^[5] Empirical post-mortems revealed systemic miscalculations, such as overreliance on short-form "snackable" clips ill-suited for deep reporting or brand loyalty, exacerbating financial strain amid broader ad market fragmentation.^[2]^[7] Though some publishers salvaged niche successes in premium or long-form video, the episode underscored the perils of exogenous platform signals dictating internal strategies, prompting a mid-2020s reevaluation toward diversified, self-hosted models rather than reactive pivots.^[6]^[8]

Origins and Drivers

Facebook's Strategic Announcements

In January 2016, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced that users were watching 100 million hours of video content daily on the platform, a milestone that highlighted video's explosive growth and positioned it as a fundamental element of user engagement.^[9] This update followed rapid expansion in 2015, when daily video views surged from 4 billion in June to 8 billion by November, involving 500 million users.^[10]^[11] Zuckerberg further projected in 2016 that video would dominate online consumption, stating that "within five years most of what people consume online will be video," subsuming traditional text and images as primary content forms.^[12] These announcements emphasized empirical metrics of user behavior, with Facebook reporting substantial year-over-year increases in video interactions to justify algorithm adjustments favoring video over static posts. The strategic push was underpinned by advertising economics, as video ads consistently commanded higher cost-per-thousand-impressions (CPM) rates than text or image ads due to enhanced user engagement and dwell time, incentivizing Facebook to reorient its ecosystem toward video to maximize revenue.^[13]^[14] Executives framed this as a data-driven response to observed trends, promising publishers scalable growth in reach and monetization through video prioritization.

Broader Industry Incentives

Publishers experienced eroding ad revenues from desktop newsfeeds amid the surge in ad blockers and audience fragmentation during the mid-2010s. Ad blocking alone was forecasted to deprive publishers of $21.8 billion in global revenue in 2015, representing a significant portion of display ad income previously reliant on uninterrupted site traffic.^[15] Concurrently, audience fragmentation—driven by shifts to mobile devices and social platforms—dispersed users away from centralized publisher sites, reducing per-visit ad exposure and compelling exploration of content formats promising greater stickiness to recapture monetization opportunities.^[16] Video platforms posed competitive threats that reinforced these incentives, as they captured disproportionate shares of user time and ad budgets. YouTube, by 2015, amassed billions of daily video views, underscoring video's scalability for engagement and advertiser appeal beyond text-heavy newsfeeds.^[17] Snapchat's ascent similarly highlighted short-form video's viral dynamics, with the platform achieving 6 billion daily video views by November 2015 via publisher-integrated features like Discover, signaling untapped revenue streams for adaptable content producers.^[18] Empirical evidence on user attention bolstered the rationale for video prioritization, revealing higher retention rates for dynamic visuals over static text. Research documented up to 95% message retention from video exposure compared to 10% from text, attributing this to video's multimodal processing of auditory, visual, and narrative elements.^[19] While such advantages manifested most robustly in entertainment scenarios, they implied broader applicability for news publishers seeking to combat fragmentation by extending session durations and ad viewability, thereby aligning with core monetization imperatives of sustained user interaction.^[20]

Implementation and Scale

Adoption by Digital Publishers

In 2016, digital publishers accelerated commitments to video production in response to platform signals favoring the format, with BuzzFeed exemplifying aggressive internal directives. CEO Jonah Peretti announced a company-wide restructuring in August to embed video expertise across all operations, stating the goal of expressing "every major initiative at BuzzFeed around the world... as video."^[21]^[22] This built on earlier video traction, where 27% of BuzzFeed's monthly views derived from Facebook native video by May.^[23] Vice Media similarly invested in infrastructure for video-centric content, expanding production capabilities through new facilities. Beginning in 2015 with Williamsburg waterfront development, Vice completed a Brooklyn headquarters by mid-2016 featuring advanced sound stages and production spaces to support scaled video output, including partnerships for millennial-targeted libraries.^[24]^[25] These efforts aligned with Vice's broader 2015-2016 growth phase, emphasizing in-house studios in Brooklyn and international outposts like London to produce short-form and branded video.^[26] Vox Media pursued video integration more selectively amid its multi-platform strategy, reallocating resources to enhance video across brands like The Verge and Polygon during 2016's hiring expansions.^[27] While not matching the volume of pure-play pivoters, Vox emphasized mixed-media formats for news delivery, hiring producers to capitalize on emerging social video opportunities without fully deprioritizing text.^[28] The adoption peaked in 2016 among nimble digital natives, contrasting with legacy outlets like The New York Times and The Washington Post, which conducted targeted video experiments—such as NYT's early visual journalism units—but prioritized subscription models over wholesale scaling.^[29]^[30] These publishers tested short-form clips and investigations in video but maintained slower resource shifts, reflecting diversified revenue pursuits beyond platform-dependent video traffic.^[31]

Resource Reallocation and Investments

Digital publishers reallocated personnel by dismissing writers and editors focused on text-based content to bolster video production teams. In 2017, BuzzFeed conducted layoffs affecting text-oriented roles as part of its strategic emphasis on video formats.^[32] Similarly, Vice Media and Mic announced staff reductions that year following commitments to expand video operations.^[33] These cuts enabled the redirection of budgets toward hiring videographers, producers, and technicians, with over half a dozen major outlets undertaking such editorial staff reductions to prioritize video resources.^[34] Investments extended to physical and operational infrastructure for video creation. Publishers developed in-house studios equipped with cameras, lighting, and editing suites to support on-site production, departing from reliance on outsourced or ad-hoc filming.^[35] Training initiatives retrained remaining staff or onboarded new hires for video scripting and optimization, aligning content calendars with platform preferences for visual storytelling over search-engine-optimized articles.^[36] Content strategies shifted to high-volume video output tailored for social media, emphasizing brief clips suited to mobile consumption. Publishers increased production of short-form videos, typically 3 to 15 seconds in length, to maximize engagement in algorithmic feeds.^[37] This reorientation involved reallocating editorial time from long-form writing to rapid video assembly and distribution across platforms.^[38]

Key Controversies

Inflated Video Metrics

Facebook's video view methodology from 2015 to 2017 counted plays lasting at least three seconds—or the full duration for videos shorter than three seconds—as complete views, a threshold far more permissive than industry standards requiring viewers to watch 95 percent or more of the content for it to qualify.^[39]^[40] This discrepancy systematically overstated view totals, as fleeting interactions were equated with substantive engagement, diverging from benchmarks like those used by measurement bodies emphasizing high completion rates to reflect meaningful consumption.^[41] In September 2016, Facebook publicly admitted that its average video watch time metric had been inflated by 60 to 80 percent for approximately two years, stemming from a calculation error that averaged duration solely over views exceeding three seconds while omitting shorter plays from the baseline.^[42]^[43] The company restated affected metrics to incorporate all video initiations, yielding figures indicative of markedly lower sustained viewer interest than previously reported.^[44] Subsequent legal disclosures revealed internal awareness of these flaws as early as 2015, with delays in correction exacerbating the misrepresentation.^[45] These metric distortions directly fueled overstated platform claims, such as the January 2016 assertion that 500 million people watched videos on Facebook daily alongside 100 million hours of daily video consumption, projections predicated on the lenient counting that misled publishers into anticipating robust video-driven revenues.^[46]^[47] Reliance on such data prompted erroneous shifts in advertising allocation away from text formats with verified performance, as publishers calibrated strategies against artificially elevated engagement signals.^[48]^[5] The episode culminated in a 2019 $40 million settlement with advertisers alleging fraudulent inflation of video metrics by up to 900 percent in extreme cases.^[49]^[50]

Algorithmic Shifts and De-Prioritization

In January 2018, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced a significant overhaul of the News Feed algorithm, redirecting prioritization from "relevant content"—including posts from public pages and publishers—to "meaningful social interactions" generated by friends and family members.^[51]^[52] This pivot emphasized content sparking comments, reactions, and replies among personal networks, explicitly de-emphasizing passive consumption of branded videos and articles to promote user well-being and relational depth over broad engagement metrics.^[53] The change marked a causal departure from the platform's prior incentives, which had amplified video content from publishers to compete with YouTube, toward algorithms reinforcing social bonds amid growing concerns over platform-induced isolation.^[54] The update triggered immediate and pronounced de-prioritization of publisher content, with organic reach for news pages and similar entities falling by 50-80% in many cases, as public posts competed poorly against interaction-heavy personal shares.^[55] Aggregate data from publisher analytics networks confirmed a broader 28% decline in Facebook-referred traffic throughout 2018 relative to 2017, disproportionately affecting video formats that had surged under earlier algorithmic favoritism.^[56] Video views on news pages plummeted post-implementation, reversing distribution gains from the 2016-2017 video push where publishers had been incentivized to produce short-form clips for native playback and monetization.^[57] This empirical reversal stemmed from the algorithm's new weighting of "time well-spent" signals, which personal videos inherently outperformed due to higher relational engagement, leaving institutional content sidelined without compensatory mechanisms. Causally, the shift responded to intensified scrutiny following the 2016 U.S. election, where algorithmic amplification of sensational publisher videos—often laced with misinformation—had been implicated in exacerbating polarization and foreign interference.^[58] Platforms faced congressional inquiries and public backlash for prioritizing virality over veracity, prompting Facebook to recalibrate toward content presumed more trustworthy from known contacts, even as this reduced overall news visibility by design.^[59] In contrast to the video era's promises of symbiotic growth—where publishers chased hyped metrics like three-second views for ad revenue splits—Facebook internalized value capture through user-centric features, such as enhanced in-feed video recommendations for private shares, eroding publishers' fallback traffic without refunds on prior investments.^[60] This realignment privileged platform retention over external ecosystem dependency, exposing how initial video incentives had overpromised sustainable reach amid underlying tensions between engagement algorithms and societal harms.

Immediate Consequences

Financial Losses and Layoffs

The pivot to video prompted widespread layoffs as publishers redirected budgets from text-based journalism to video production, often without commensurate revenue gains. A Columbia Journalism Review analysis estimated that between 2014 and 2017, at least 483 journalists lost their jobs industry-wide to fund video initiatives driven by platform incentives.^[61] Vice Media exemplified these cuts after ramping up video output; in November 2018, the company planned to reduce its staff by 10-15%, impacting roughly 250-350 employees, amid flat revenues of about $625 million and a failure to meet financial targets tied to its video-heavy strategy.^[62]^[63] Monetary losses materialized through investment impairments reflecting overcommitment to video assets. Disney, a major Vice backer focused on its digital video expansion, recorded a $157 million write-down on its stake in September 2018 and fully impaired its over $400 million investment as worthless by May 2019, underscoring the shortfall in returns from video-centric media ventures.^[64] These outcomes stemmed partly from video ad revenues underperforming expectations, as journalistic videos exhibited lower viewer completion rates than entertainment formats, yielding inferior monetization relative to text content despite initial platform hype.^[65]

Operational Disruptions

Media companies undertaking the pivot to video reallocated budgets by dismissing reporters and editors to hire video production specialists, resulting in understaffed newsrooms ill-equipped for balanced content strategies. From 2016 to 2018, this approach led to over 350 journalist layoffs, including 70 at Fusion in November 2016 due to insufficient video revenue returns, 60 at Vice in July 2017 to emphasize video expansion, and 50 at Vox Media in February 2018 amid scaling back video ambitions.^[61] Such decisions created skill mismatches, as outlets like Fusion curtailed field reporting and investigative work traditionally handled by text-focused staff, prioritizing instead hires versed in short-form video over journalistic depth.^[61] Video production demands often spurred rushed outputs emphasizing volume over quality, with newsrooms churning simplistic clips to chase platform engagement metrics rather than fostering rigorous analysis. Resource constraints yielded bland, low-effort videos—such as reporters delivering against unadorned backdrops—lacking the polish or substance of well-resourced formats, as production for even brief segments consumed disproportionate time without commensurate audience or revenue gains.^[2] This metric-driven haste, reliant on inflated platform view counts like Facebook's three-second metrics overstated by 60-80%, undermined content standards and contributed to operational inefficiencies across outlets including Mic, which saw its traffic plummet 60% by August 2017 after similar reallocations in 2016.^[2]^[42] The pivot exacerbated internal cultural tensions, dividing newsrooms between traditionalists committed to text and those aligned with video optimism, while relentless algorithm optimization fostered burnout from perpetual strategic pivots.^[2] These rifts, evident in regrets over hasty hiring shifts, strained cohesion as staff grappled with platform dependencies that eroded native audience trust.^[61] Heavy reliance on Facebook for video distribution, without parallel investments in owned channels, rendered operations vulnerable to abrupt traffic interruptions. The January 2018 algorithm update prioritizing personal content over publisher posts triggered severe declines, such as Mic's monthly unique visitors dropping from 17 million in April 2017 to 5 million by April 2018, and Fox Sports losing 88% of traffic between June and September 2017, exposing newsrooms to supply chain fragility absent diversified alternatives.^[61]^[2]

Long-Term Impact and Analysis

Evolution of the Euphemism

The term "pivot to video" initially described media companies' strategic shift toward video content production, prompted by platforms like Facebook signaling video's growth potential around 2015–2017.^[66] By late 2017, however, articles began framing it as a flawed bet, with The Atlantic noting its emergence as "an object of ridicule" amid widespread layoffs and unmet revenue expectations.^[67] This mocking tone intensified in 2018, as publications highlighted how the rush to video—often at the expense of text-based journalism—yielded poor returns, exemplified in The Atlantic's analysis of job losses tied to the trend.^[61] Over time, the phrase underwent a semantic evolution from denoting an optimistic platform-driven strategy to serving as a euphemism for denial or mismanagement in confronting the decline of print and early digital text models.^[7] By 2019, it had permeated media discourse as shorthand for reactive, trend-chasing decisions that prioritized ephemeral platform signals over sustainable audience needs, appearing in critiques of the "pivot-to-video bloodbath."^[68] This shift reflected broader recognition that the pivot masked underlying failures in adapting to audience preferences for in-depth written content rather than short-form videos.^[69] In the 2020s, the term persisted in discussions of ongoing media instability, invoked during Vice Media's 2023 bankruptcy filing to critique "bad management choices in the 'pivot-to-video' era."^[70] Similarly, coverage of BuzzFeed News's 2023 shutdown referenced the pivot's "infamy" as a cautionary emblem of platform-dependent miscalculations.^[71] ^[72] This usage extended to narratives of "pivot fatigue," where repeated invocations underscored weariness with serial strategic overhauls lacking empirical grounding.^[8]

Causal Lessons and Market Corrections

Publishers' pivot to video exemplified a fundamental error in outsourcing core distribution to intermediary platforms whose incentives diverged from sustainable journalism, as platforms like Facebook promoted inflated video metrics to capture ad revenue while deprioritizing publisher content. Internal documents revealed in a 2018 lawsuit indicated Facebook knowingly overstated video views by up to 80% in some cases, prompting publishers to reallocate resources toward video despite evidence of limited audience demand for news in that format.^[1]^[4] This dependency masked platforms' algorithmic shifts, which later reduced traffic to external sites, exposing publishers to exogenous control over audience access without building proprietary channels.^[5] Overlooking direct-to-consumer models compounded the miscalculation, as alternatives like subscription newsletters demonstrated viability through owned distribution and aligned incentives. Substack, for instance, grew from approximately 11,000 paying subscribers in July 2018 to over 500,000 by February 2021, with top publications generating more than $25 million annually by 2024 via reader-supported content that bypassed platform intermediaries.^[73]^[74] Such platforms rewarded text-based, high-density information delivery, underscoring how publishers could have prioritized loyal, paying audiences over transient algorithmic traffic. Empirical data on consumption habits further debunks the video pivot's premise, revealing news audiences' preference for text's efficiency in conveying dense, skimmable information over video's immersive but lower-retention format suited to entertainment. Surveys indicate that 75-80% of users primarily consume news via text for its speed and control, with younger demographics similarly favoring reading over watching despite video's prevalence in social feeds.^[75]^[76] Journalistic video incurred high production costs—often exceeding $3,000 for short professional clips—yielding suboptimal returns compared to influencers' lower-barrier, personality-driven content that better monetized through sponsorships and viral engagement.^[77] Market corrections have since emphasized diversification into owned platforms and direct revenue streams, critiquing prior "algorithm addiction" that subordinated editorial decisions to platform signals over audience loyalty. Publishers increasingly invest in newsletters, apps, and paywalls to recapture control, recognizing free-market indicators like stagnant video ad rates and subscriber growth in text formats as signals to de-risk intermediary reliance. Left-leaning outlets, which often amplified video hype amid broader institutional optimism, proved particularly susceptible by underweighting these signals in favor of projected digital mimicry of broadcast models.^[78]^[79]

References

[1]
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/10/was-the-medias-big-pivot-to-video-all-based-on-a-lie
[2]
The secret cost of pivoting to video - Columbia Journalism Review
Sep 26, 2017 · There are four reasons the pivot to video has failed: faulty metrics for measuring the audience; trusting other platforms, like Facebook, to ...
[3]
Here's An Abridged Timeline Of Digital Media's Pivot To Video
Feb 21, 2018 · Both BuzzFeed and Vice missed key targets in 2017, indicating that efforts to double down on social and video weren't getting the ROI the ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
[4]
Did Facebook's faulty data push news publishers to make terrible ...
Oct 17, 2018 · Publishers' “pivot to video” was driven largely by a belief that if Facebook was seeing users, in massive numbers, shift to video from text, the trend must be ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
[5]
The big lie behind pivoting to video.
Oct 18, 2018 · The false metrics that Facebook is being sued over masked a deeper dishonesty: that users actually wanted more video.
[6]
The state of publisher video strategies - The Rebooting
Nov 14, 2024 · Our findings show an industry in transition. Media companies have shaken off the hangover from the "pivot to video" mid-2010s and are ready to ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[7]
We learned the wrong lessons from the "pivot to video"
Jun 21, 2024 · Many media executives use the phrase “pivot to video” as a shorthand to refer to the industry's tendencies to chase ephemeral business models ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[8]
Is the news industry ready for another pivot to video? - Nieman Lab
Jun 20, 2024 · Seven or eight years ago much of the news industry lost its head over a supposed “pivot to video” after Facebook pushed live and other ...
[9]
Facebook Hits 100M Hours Of Video Watched A Day, 1B Users On ...
Jan 27, 2016 · Facebook now sees 100 million hours of daily video watch time. There are 1 billion monthly users now users on Groups, up from 925 million at the close of Q3.
[10]
How Facebook's video-traffic explosion is shaking up advertising
Jun 3, 2015 · Facebook's video traffic has reached 4 billion daily views, making the social network YouTube's first real rival in online video.
[11]
Facebook Hits 8 Billion Daily Video Views, Doubling ... - TechCrunch
Nov 4, 2015 · Facebook video viewership is growing by leaps and bounds. It now sees 8 billion average daily video views from 500 million users.Missing: January | Show results with:January
[12]
Mark Zuckerberg talks up Facebook's 'video first' strategy - USA Today
Nov 2, 2016 · Zuckerberg believes that within five years most of what people consume online will be video, subsuming words and photographs.Missing: 80-85% future traffic
[13]
Facebook Ads CPM - Metric Definition - Databox
For example, video ads tend to have higher CPM rates compared to display or text ads, as they often offer a more engaging experience for users. Ad quality: Ads ...Missing: 2015-2016 | Show results with:2015-2016
[14]
Video advertising on Facebook and other social media on the rise
Aug 12, 2016 · In 2014, the average CPM of a network prime time television ad was $24.76, according to estimates by investment banking firm Peter J. Solomon.
[15]
PageFair and Adobe 2015 Ad Blocking Report - Business Insider
Aug 10, 2015 · While that figure may only represent 6% of the global web population, ad blocking is expected to cost publishers more than $21.8 billion in 2015 ...
[16]
Are News Audiences Increasingly Fragmented? A Cross‐National ...
Jul 25, 2017 · We find surprisingly high levels of news audience duplication, but also that cross-platform audiences vary from country to country.
[17]
How many views does YouTube have per day? - Quora
Dec 17, 2015 · According to YouTube themselves, over a billion hours of videos are viewed daily. Some other stats. There are 5 billion videos watched per day.
[18]
Snapchat getting 6 billion video views daily, but how does it ...
Nov 9, 2015 · In just three months, Snapchat has doubled the number of video views it gets per day to 4 billion, a spokeswoman for the social media app said.
[19]
Looking at the Facts-Why Video Content Has the Highest Retention ...
Mar 7, 2016 · Viewers retain 95% of a message in video, compared to 10% in text. 90% of information is visual, and visuals are processed 60,000x faster than ...Missing: source | Show results with:source
[20]
The power of video in news media: how increased audience ...
Sep 23, 2024 · Video content's ability to engage audiences is rooted in its multi-sensory appeal. Unlike text, which relies solely on visual processing, video ...
[21]
BuzzFeed Says Changes Are About Expanding Video, Not ... - Fortune
Aug 24, 2016 · One of the main purposes of the restructuring, Peretti explained, was to try and move video expertise into all areas of the organization, ...Missing: strategy | Show results with:strategy
[22]
BuzzFeed Regroups as Media Turns Video-Centric
Sep 5, 2016 · Peretti wrote in the memo announcing the change, “every major initiative at BuzzFeed around the world will find an expression as video.” For ...Missing: traffic | Show results with:traffic<|separator|>
[23]
BuzzFeed CEO Touts 7 Billion Monthly Views - Variety
May 2, 2016 · BuzzFeed revealed that 27% of its monthly views come from Facebook native video, followed by 23% on its own properties and apps, which execs ...
[24]
Vice Media vs. Brooklyn Indie Music Clubs - The New York Times
Feb 23, 2015 · The company's expansion on the Williamsburg waterfront has angered supporters of displaced performance spaces.Missing: pivot | Show results with:pivot
[25]
An Inside Look at Vice's New Brooklyn Headquarters
Jul 15, 2016 · Vice Media employs more than 1,000 employees, many of whom live in Brooklyn. The offices boast a commercial-grade kitchen. A complex sound ...
[26]
How Vice Grew to a $4 Billion Media Powerhouse This Year
Nov 18, 2015 · How Vice Grew to a $4 Billion Media Powerhouse This Year. The Brooklyn-based media company officially left its alt-monthly origins in the dust.Missing: studios London
[27]
2016 Year in Review Vox Media
Vox Media thrives on change, which in 2016 meant deploying smart growth strategies to reach millions of people on dozens of platforms.Missing: reallocating budgets
[28]
We're in the early stages of a visual revolution in journalism | Vox
Aug 7, 2017 · The new mixed-media formats in social video (primarily short- and mid-form) offer a rich opportunity to deliver complicated news in compelling ways.Missing: hiring 2016-2017
[29]
The year of The Washington Post - Nieman Lab
Dec 20, 2017 · The contemporary newspaper war between The Washington Post and The New York Times began as a traffic war, with the Post topping the Times in ...
[30]
The Bezos Effect: How Amazon's Founder Is Reinventing The ...
Jun 8, 2016 · As of March 2016, the Post employed about 700 full-time journalists, an expansion of about 140* positions from the time that Bezos bought the ...
[31]
Here's why publishers won't stop pivoting to video - Vox
Aug 17, 2017 · Time for another round of “pivoting to video” chatter, promoted by yet another story about a digital publisher “pivoting to video” by laying ...Missing: hiring 2016-2017
[32]
At BuzzFeed, a Pivot to Movies and Television - The New York Times
a term sometimes used to cover layoffs of text-oriented staff members — swept the industry. Increasingly wary ...
[33]
Pivoting to video is the biggest trend in media — but it may not prove ...
Dec 26, 2017 · In 2015, BuzzFeed tasked five employees with a single objective: Craft the perfect viral Facebook video. To ensure maximum share-ability, ...
[34]
How The New York Times, BuzzFeed and others stack up in video
Oct 11, 2017 · For good or ill, 2017 will be synonymous with the pivot to video. Over half a dozen publishers laid off editorial staff this year to free up ...
[35]
Full article: Investing in Online Video News
Jun 13, 2017 · In this paper, we analyse how a purposive sample of 19 news organizations across three different countries approach online video news.
[36]
Platform Configuration and Digital Materiality: How News Publishers ...
Aug 24, 2023 · Despite significant investments in videos, publishers have been found to be struggling to monetise their platform-related commitments and ...
[37]
Publishers are going vertical to reach new audiences on short-form ...
Oct 16, 2025 · To stay ahead, news organizations are repackaging their reporting into short-form videos formatted for mobile phone screens. And while some have ...Missing: pivot peak 2016
[38]
News companies respond as TikTok's short-form video format ... - INMA
Jan 6, 2025 · News consumers' appetite for short-form video is growing fast, and many publishers are adapting their output to the new format.
[39]
3-Second Video Plays | Meta Business Help Center - Facebook
The number of times your video played for at least 3 seconds, or for nearly its total length if it's shorter than 3 seconds.Missing: inflated 2015-2017
[40]
What counts as a video view? A refresher on how social platforms ...
Mar 29, 2019 · For Facebook and Instagram, viewing just 3 seconds of a video of any length is considered a view. For YouTube Trueview ads, it's around 30 seconds.
[41]
Facebook 'overestimated' video viewing time - BBC News
Sep 23, 2016 · One advertiser suggested that, in some cases, video viewing statistics had been overestimated by up to 80%. Facebook's analytics are an ...
[42]
https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-overestimated-key-video-metric-for-two-years-1474586951
[43]
Facebook overestimated key video advertising metric: WSJ - CNBC
Sep 22, 2016 · ... inflated the average viewing time by between 60 percent to 80 percent, because it only counted video views of more than three seconds.Missing: 2015-2017 | Show results with:2015-2017
[44]
Facebook Apologizes for Overstating Video Metrics
Sep 23, 2016 · The social media network was leaving out videos viewed for less than three seconds, which greatly inflated the figures presented to ...Missing: 2015-2017 | Show results with:2015-2017
[45]
Facebook's Inflated Video Metrics Problem Began Much Earlier
Oct 17, 2018 · In September 2016, Facebook admitted inflating its average video viewing figures by only counting views that lasted longer than three seconds.
[46]
More Than 500 Million People Watch Facebook Videos Each Day
Jan 27, 2016 · CEO Mark Zuckerberg says 100 million hours of video are watched daily on the social network.Missing: 2015 | Show results with:2015
[47]
Facebook Says Video Is Huge -- 100-Million-Hours-Per-Day Huge
Jan 27, 2016 · Users watch 100 million hours of video per day on Facebook, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said. Also this one: 500 million people watch Facebook video ...Missing: 2015 | Show results with:2015
[48]
Facebook's bogus video claims just cost it $40 million, but they ...
Oct 10, 2019 · Facebook's video viewer statistics were false, but led to disastrously bad decisions by advertisers and media companies.
[49]
Facebook to Settle Advertiser Lawsuits Over Inflated Video Views for ...
Oct 7, 2019 · Facebook Will Pay $40 Million to Settle Advertiser Lawsuits Claiming It Inflated Video Views By Up to 900%. By Chris Morris. By Chris Morris ...
[50]
Facebook lawsuit alleges it knew measurement discrepancies for a ...
Oct 17, 2018 · The plaintiffs claim that Facebook inflated ad viewing time averages by 150 percent to 900 percent, much higher than reported. When Facebook ...
[51]
Bringing People Closer Together - About Meta
Jan 11, 2018 · Facebook was built to bring people closer together and build relationships. One of the ways we do this is by connecting people to meaningful posts from their ...
[52]
One of our big focus areas for 2018 is making sure the ... - Facebook
Jan 11, 2018 · I'm changing the goal I give our product teams from focusing on helping you find relevant content to helping you have more meaningful social ...<|separator|>
[53]
Major change to Facebook news feed to improve well-being - CNBC
Jan 11, 2018 · CEO Mark Zuckerberg said that the platform's News Feed will start prioritizing "meaningful social interactions" versus "relevant content."
[54]
Facebook Rolls Out New Plan For News Feed: More Posts ... - NPR
Jan 12, 2018 · Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced Thursday that the social media giant would begin emphasizing more "meaningful" content on users' feeds ...
[55]
One year in, Facebook's big algorithm change has spurred an angry ...
Mar 15, 2019 · It's been a little over a year since Facebook announced major algorithm changes that would decrease the amount of news in News Feed, instead prioritizing non- ...
[56]
How Much Have Facebook Algorithm Changes Impacted Publishers?
Apr 4, 2019 · On average, publishers in Parse.ly's network suffered a 28% overall decrease in traffic from Facebook during 2018 compared to the previous year.Missing: reduction | Show results with:reduction
[57]
Facebook's biggest losers: Content hurt by the last product strategy ...
From 2017-2018, the overall change in traffic from Facebook to our network decreased by 28%. But that decrease wasn't even across every category of content.Missing: reduction | Show results with:reduction
[58]
Facebook's failure: did fake news and polarized politics get Trump ...
Nov 10, 2016 · The company is being accused of abdicating its responsibility to clamp down on fake news stories and counter the echo chamber that defined this election.
[59]
Facebook Overhauls News Feed to Focus on What Friends and ...
Jan 11, 2018 · Facebook is making changes to its News Feed in an attempt to favor interactions with friends over what it calls “passive content.”
[60]
Facebook Friends? The Impact of Facebook's News Feed Algorithm ...
Oct 26, 2018 · In Digiday, Lucia Moses wrote that “Chartbeat data showed Facebook traffic to publishers declined 6 percent since the beginning of January.” ...
[61]
The Facebook-Driven Video Push May Have Cost 483 Journalists ...
Oct 18, 2018 · As media companies desperately tried to do what Facebook wanted, many made the disastrous decision to “pivot to video,” laying off reporters and ...
[62]
Vice Hiring Freeze: 15% of Staff Axed, Lower Revenue, Traffic Slump
Nov 7, 2018 · The Brooklyn, New York-based company is reportedly shedding 10% to 15% of its workforce and is on track to miss its revenue goals for this year.Missing: pivot | Show results with:pivot
[63]
Vice To Reduce Staff By 15%, Slash Number Of Content Verticals In ...
Nov 8, 2018 · Amid roughly flat revenues of $625 million in 2018, Vice will seek to reduce its overall headcount by 15% over the next year, and also slash ...Missing: pivot | Show results with:pivot
[64]
Disney says its more than $400 million Vice investment is now ... - Vox
Disney put more than $400 million into Vice Media. Now it says that investment is worthless. A now-familiar story: Investors say they overvalued ...
[65]
Video might be the future, but text is the present for digital news
Jun 16, 2016 · But not only is video expensive and hard to do, a lot of people still prefer to get their news in text.Missing: lower | Show results with:lower
[66]
Facebook's pivot to video didn't just burn publishers. It ... - Nieman Lab
Sep 15, 2021 · The phrase “pivot to video” has become a joke, shorthand for a media company's last-ditch effort to turn things around before the layoffs begin.
[67]
Why 2017 Feels Like a Media Apocalypse - The Atlantic
Nov 29, 2017 · So many media companies in 2017 have reoriented their budgets around the production of videos that the so-called “pivot to video” has became an ...Missing: completion | Show results with:completion
[68]
For Publishers, the Biggest Branded Content Challenge Isn't Scale
Mar 5, 2019 · Some have even described the last couple years as a “pivot-to-video bloodbath,” in which new investments in video teams aren't able to generate ...
[69]
What “Pivoting to Video” Really Means - The Ringer
Jul 3, 2017 · Moreover, any of us who attempt to write about the “pivot to video” do so from inside the same new-media vortex that swallowed our comrades.
[70]
After a 29-year run, Vice files for bankruptcy - TechCrunch
May 15, 2023 · A combination of bad management choices in the “pivot-to-video” era ... According to Vice's financial reporting, the company has about $834 ...Missing: woes | Show results with:woes
[71]
BuzzFeed News Defined the 2010s - The Atlantic
Apr 20, 2023 · ... pivot to video” infamy. And for an offshoot of a place (somewhat unfairly) known as a listicle and cat-video factory, BuzzFeed News had an ...<|separator|>
[72]
Facebook Made BuzzFeed, Then Killed It - WIRED
Apr 24, 2023 · In May 2022, Meta pushed publishers to pivot back to video, this time its short-form Reels feature, a direct competitor to TikTok. At the same ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin<|control11|><|separator|>
[73]
Timeline of Substack
As of February 2021, Substack has over 500,000 paying subscribers, with notable growth since July 2018, when it had only 11,000 subscribers. Despite this ...
[74]
Substack User and Revenue Statistics (2024) - Backlinko
Mar 4, 2024 · The top 10 authors on Substack collectively make more than $25 million a year. An increase from $15 million in February 2021, and $10 million in ...
[75]
Blowing up some myths about online news video - WAN-IFRA
Apr 27, 2017 · In fact, it turns out that most people still prefer text to video. “Something like around three-quarters to 80 percent said they mostly consume ...Missing: preference | Show results with:preference
[76]
Younger adults prefer to get their news in text, not video, according ...
Oct 6, 2016 · New data from Pew Research finds that, when it comes to the news, younger adults still prefer words over moving images. While 46 percent of ...
[77]
Unveiling 2025: A Complete Guide to The Cost of Video Production
Rating 5.0 (126) · Free · Business/ProductivityThe average minimum cost for a professionally produced 3-minute video requiring original footage typically starts around $3,000. However, with thoughtful ...Missing: revenue journalism
[78]
The digital media rollup dream is dead for the moment - CNBC
Mar 26, 2023 · Executives are split on whether the digital media industry will have another wave of significant consolidation, especially as companies look ...
[79]
Overview and key findings of the 2023 Digital News Report
Jun 14, 2023 · Across countries the majority of online users say they still prefer to read the news rather than watch or listen to it. Text provides more speed ...