Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Proper noun

A proper noun is a noun that refers to a specific, unique , such as a particular , place, , or thing, functioning as an identifier without describing a general or category. Unlike common nouns, which denote classes of entities sharing certain properties (e.g., dog or city), proper nouns point directly to individuals or specifics, often lacking additional semantic content beyond their referential role. In English, proper nouns are conventionally capitalized at the beginning of each component word, regardless of sentence position, to distinguish them from common nouns. Proper nouns encompass a range of categories, including names of people (e.g., ), geographical locations (e.g., or ), organizations (e.g., Apple Inc.), and specific events or titles (e.g., ). They can be singular or plural and may appear with or without determiners like "the," depending on convention (e.g., versus the Bronx). This specificity ensures precise reference in language, aiding clarity in communication, though proper nouns are not always unique—multiple entities may share the same name (e.g., several people named ). In linguistic theory, proper nouns are analyzed as rigid designators that maintain their reference across possible worlds, contrasting with descriptive common nouns. Capitalization rules for proper nouns vary across languages; for instance, English capitalizes them consistently, while capitalizes all nouns. Misuse, such as failing to capitalize, can lead to , underscoring their role in grammatical structure and syntax.

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Definition

A proper noun is a that designates a particular being or thing, such as a specific , place, , or , and does not take a limiting modifier. Examples include "" for a person, "" for a place, "" for an organization, and "" for an event. This distinguishes proper nouns as referential terms for unique entities rather than classes of objects. The term "proper noun" originates from the Latin word proprius, meaning "one's own" or "particular," reflecting its role in denoting something specific and individual. It entered around the mid-15th century, marking a formal distinction in linguistic classification. Key attributes of proper nouns include their specificity and ness, as they refer to a single entity at the level of the , often without the need for additional descriptors. Proper nouns typically omit articles and do not pluralize when denoting unique singular entities but can take them in specific contexts (e.g., "" for families, "" with article). These characteristics hold across s; for instance, "" (or Tōkyō in ) denotes the same in both English and , while in , "Sofía" uses an to signal its status as a proper name for a person. In many languages, serves as a common orthographic marker for proper nouns.

Distinction from Common Nouns

Proper nouns differ from common nouns in several key grammatical and functional ways, allowing linguists to distinguish them through specific tests. One primary criterion is the article test: proper nouns typically do not require indefinite or definite articles when referring to a unique entity, as in " is the capital of ," whereas common nouns generally do, such as "The is large." Similarly, proper nouns resist pluralization without additional determiners, since they denote singular, unique referents; for example, one says "the " rather than "*Smiths live nearby," in contrast to common nouns like "cities," which pluralize freely as "the cities are crowded." Additionally, proper nouns often appear without attributive adjectives, as their specificity precludes further description; " runs quickly" uses the proper noun "John" bare, while a common noun requires modification like "The boy runs quickly." Functionally, proper nouns serve as rigid designators in the , referring to the same unique entity across all possible worlds, regardless of descriptive variations, as articulated by . This contrasts with common nouns, which describe classes or properties that may vary contextually, such as "" denoting H₂O in every world but potentially different substances in hypothetical scenarios. Kripke's framework, developed in his seminal lectures, emphasizes that proper names like "" fix reference directly to an individual, not through contingent attributes. However, boundaries between proper and common nouns can blur in edge cases, particularly through processes like genericization, where a proper noun evolves into a common one denoting a . For instance, "," originally a for cleaners, has become the generic "hoover" in for any vacuuming action, risking loss of status—a phenomenon known as genericide. Conversely, common nouns can shift to proper status via contextual specificity and capitalization, as with "apple" (the fruit) versus "Apple" (the company), where the latter uniquely identifies the brand. Analyses of large corpora like the British National Corpus highlight the distribution of proper nouns, with proper nouns often appearing in written genres to anchor references precisely.

Usage in Naming and Grammar

Proper Names and the Definite Article

In English, the definite article "the" is generally omitted before proper names denoting individuals, such as personal names like "John" or "Mary," reflecting their inherent uniqueness and definiteness without need for additional specification. However, inclusion is standard for certain categories of proper names, including geographical features like rivers ("the Amazon River"), mountain ranges ("the Alps"), groups of islands ("the Maldives"), deserts ("the Sahara"), and collective entities such as musical groups ("the Beatles") or families ("the Clintons"), where the article serves to classify or pluralize the referent. Historically, the use of the definite with proper names in English was more frequent in , where the demonstrative form "se" (inflected for gender, number, and case) commonly preceded proper nouns, as in "se cyning" meaning "the king," functioning similarly to a definite before evolving into the modern invariant "the." This broader application persisted into but gradually shifted toward omission for most personal and place names by the , with 18th-century grammarians promoting selectivity to distinguish proper nouns' specificity, leading to the contemporary convention where articles are reserved for non-individual or classificatory contexts. Cross-linguistically, patterns vary significantly: in like , definite articles are mandatory with many proper names, particularly geographical ones, as in "el Río Amazonas" for "the ," to agree in and number with the . In contrast, such as lack articles altogether, rendering proper names like "Moskva" () article-free by default, with definiteness inferred from context or . Other languages exhibit obligatory article use with personal names, such as ("o Yannis" for "") or optional pragmatic effects in colloquial ("der Hans"), highlighting how article integration depends on the language's grammatical system for marking . Semantically, adding a definite to a proper name can enhance specificity or impose a classificatory reading, shifting the from a unique entity to one within a set, as in "the Mona Lisa" emphasizing the artifact over the bare name "Mona Lisa," which stands alone as an identifier. This adjustment may also convey expressivity or nuance in some contexts, though in English, such uses remain lexically restricted to avoid redundancy with the name's inherent definiteness.

Variants of Proper Names

Proper names often exhibit orthographic variants due to regional spelling differences or historical transliterations, reflecting adaptations to local linguistic conventions or colonial influences. For instance, the city formerly known as Bombay in English was officially renamed in 1995 by the to align with its indigenous name derived from the goddess Mumbadevi, marking a shift away from British-era nomenclature. Similarly, place names may vary across dialects or scripts, such as the Welsh city of Caerdydd rendered as in English, illustrating how orthographic forms prioritize phonetic approximation in the target language while preserving the original's essence. These variants maintain referential consistency but can lead to ambiguity in without contextual clarification. Morphological changes in proper names occur prominently in inflected languages, where names adapt through declension to fit grammatical cases, gender, or number agreements. In English, a weakly inflected language, proper names typically form the genitive case via the possessive 's suffix, as in "John's car," indicating ownership or association without altering the base form significantly. In more highly inflected languages like French, proper names serve as bases for derived forms; for example, the city name "Paris" generates the adjective "parisien" (masculine singular) or "parisienne" (feminine singular), which declines according to agreement rules, such as "un habitant parisien" (a Parisian resident). These adaptations ensure syntactic integration while retaining the name's identificatory function, though proper names themselves often resist full declension to avoid phonetic distortion. Temporal evolution of proper names frequently results from political, cultural, or efforts, leading to official redesignations over time. The capital, long transliterated as Peking in Wade-Giles , was standardized as following the adoption of the Hanyu system by the in 1958, promoting a more accurate phonetic representation of . Likewise, the of Petrograd, previously St. Petersburg, was renamed Leningrad on January 26, 1924, shortly after Vladimir Lenin's death, as a Soviet decree honored the revolutionary leader; it reverted to St. Petersburg in 1991 after the USSR's dissolution. Such changes encapsulate ideological shifts and reforms. Cultural adaptations of proper names often involve transliteration challenges when moving between scripts, particularly from non-Latin alphabets like to Romanized forms. The Egyptian capital, written as الْقَاهِرَة (al-Qāhira, meaning "the Victorious") in , is commonly transliterated as in English, a simplified form derived from historical European usage that omits the definite article and diacritics for ease of pronunciation. This process balances fidelity to the source with accessibility in the target language, though variations like "al-Qāhira" in scholarly contexts preserve more orthographic detail. Transliteration standards, such as those from the International Journal of Studies, guide these adaptations to minimize distortion while respecting cultural nuances.

Capitalization Conventions

Historical Development of Capitalization

In ancient Latin scripts, such as the prevalent from the 4th to 8th centuries , there was no distinction between uppercase and lowercase letters; the entire text was written in majuscule forms derived from earlier scripts, making capitalization as a marker for proper nouns nonexistent. This all-caps approach persisted in early codices, including Christian and pagan texts, where emphasis was achieved through letter size or spacing rather than case variation. By the medieval period, from the 8th to 15th centuries, scribes began enlarging initial letters in manuscripts to denote the start of sections, sentences, or significant terms, including proper nouns; these enlarged initials, often decorated with colors, vines, or figures, served as visual cues for hierarchy without relying on case shifts. Such practices evolved into illuminated initials, which marked textual divisions and emphasized proper names in religious and literary works, transitioning from simple enlargement to elaborate historiated designs by the . The advent of printing in the mid-15th century introduced mechanical standardization to these traditions. Johannes Gutenberg's Bible, printed around 1455, employed a gothic typeface with spaces left for hand-illuminated capitals, but proper names and initials were often rubricated in red or set in larger majuscule forms to mimic manuscript emphasis. This all-caps treatment for key terms, including proper nouns, reflected the German printing influence, where uppercase letters highlighted importance in the absence of widespread lowercase usage. By the 1490s, Venetian printers like Nicolas Jenson and Aldus Manutius advanced roman typefaces, standardizing the integration of uppercase and lowercase letters; title-case conventions emerged, capitalizing major words in headings and proper nouns to enhance readability in secular and classical texts. In English printing, the saw widespread adoption of universal , influenced by continental practices; William Caxton's late-15th-century works, continued by successors like , routinely capitalized all nouns, including common ones alongside proper names, creating a dense, emphatic akin to . This "promiscuous capitalization" persisted into the but began declining by the early 18th, as grammarians advocated selective use; Robert Lowth's influential A Short Introduction to English Grammar (1762) exemplified this shift by capitalizing only proper nouns and sentence initials, promoting clarity over ornamental excess. Continental European languages developed parallel but divergent paths. German printing from the onward institutionalized the of all nouns, including proper ones, as a syntactic aid unique to the language, a convention retained through orthographic reforms like the 1996 Rechtschreibreform, which focused on spelling simplification without altering noun . In contrast, adopted a minimalist approach by the during the standardization of printing; proper nouns were capitalized sparingly, limited to names of people, places, and deities, while common nouns and adjectives remained lowercase, reflecting a preference for syntactic subtlety over emphatic marking.

Modern English Capitalization Rules

In modern English, the primary rule for capitalization of proper nouns is to capitalize the first letter of the specific names of people, places, organizations, or things, such as John Smith, Paris, or United Nations. This extends to adjectives derived from proper nouns when they retain a direct connection to the original name, as in French cuisine derived from France or Shakespearean tragedy from the playwright William Shakespeare. However, when a derived term becomes a common noun denoting a material, style, or generic item, it is typically not capitalized, exemplified by french fries or china cabinet, where the words no longer specifically reference the country or person. Variations exist across major style guides, particularly in how proper nouns appear in titles and headings. The Chicago Manual of Style (CMOS) recommends title case for headings and titles of works, capitalizing the first and last words along with all major words (nouns, pronouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs), while lowercasing articles, prepositions, and coordinating conjunctions unless they are the first or last word, as in "The Capitalization of Proper Nouns in English". In contrast, the Associated Press (AP) Stylebook employs sentence case for headlines, capitalizing only the first word and any proper nouns within them, such as "The capitalization of proper nouns in English". For possessives involving proper nouns, both guides maintain capitalization, as in New York's skyline or the city's parks, where the apostrophe does not affect the initial capital. Several exceptions apply to avoid over-capitalization of words that function as common nouns despite occasional proper noun associations. Directions like north, , east, and remain lowercase when indicating points or general movement (e.g., "Travel for five miles"), but are capitalized when denoting specific regions or proper names (e.g., "the during the " or "the "). Seasons such as summer, winter, spring, and fall (or autumn) are not capitalized as common nouns (e.g., "We vacation in summer"), though they may be if part of a proper noun like Summer Solstice Festival. Diseases generally follow common noun treatment and are lowercase (e.g., ), but eponyms named after individuals capitalize the proper name portion, as in or . In the digital era, style guides have adapted rules for emerging elements like hashtags and emojis, treating certain instances as pseudo-proper nouns. The advises rendering hashtags as they appear on social platforms for accuracy, while recommending camel case capitalization within them for readability and accessibility (e.g., #MeToo, recognized as a proper noun for the since its prominence in ). Similarly, the suggests capitalizing names of specific emojis when referenced (e.g., Thumbs Up Emoji), aligning them with proper noun conventions to enhance clarity in descriptive text. These updates reflect evolving usage in online communication while preserving traditional distinctions.

Capitalization of Brand Names

Brand names, as proper nouns, often employ distinctive capitalization styles to enhance memorability and reinforce . Common conventions include all-caps formatting, such as in "KFC," where the acronym is rendered entirely in uppercase letters using a bold font to convey strength and uniformity across global materials. , blending lowercase and uppercase letters within a word, appears in names like "iPhone," with a lowercase "i" followed by a capitalized "P" to signify and with Apple's , as specified in official usage guidelines. Lowercase styling, as seen in "eBay" since its 1997 rebrand from AuctionWeb, uses minimal capitalization—lowercase "e," uppercase "B," and lowercase "ay"—to project a casual, approachable internet-era identity reflective of mid-1990s digital trends. Under the of 1946, which governs federal registration in the United States, and stylization play a critical role in brand names as proper nouns by ensuring they remain distinctive and non-generic. For special form , consistent use of the exact , font, and design is required to maintain legal , as deviations can lead to challenges in or loss of rights due to perceived abandonment or dilution. This uniformity helps prevent consumer confusion and upholds the mark's source-identifying function, with courts emphasizing that inconsistent styling may narrow the scope of compared to standard character marks, which offer broader coverage regardless of case. The evolution of brand capitalization often mirrors corporate rebranding efforts tied to market shifts. For instance, "" originated in 1997 as a misspelling of "," a mathematical term for 10^100, and was stylized with initial capitalization to emphasize its tech-forward identity while distinguishing it from the common . Similarly, in 2023, the platform formerly known as underwent a rebrand to "X," shifting from title-case "Twitter" to a single uppercase "X" in a minimalist style, symbolizing a broader "everything app" vision under new ownership. Genericization poses significant risks to capitalized brand names, potentially leading to lowercase adoption in everyday language and erosion of trademark status. Xerox Corporation has actively combated this since the late 20th century, issuing warnings and campaigns—intensified around 2000 and continuing through efforts like 2010 Hollywood advisories—to prevent "xerox" from becoming a lowercase verb synonymous with photocopying, insisting instead on its use as a capitalized adjective (e.g., "Xerox copier") to preserve distinctiveness under law. Such proactive measures align with protections against genericide, where failure to enforce proper capitalization can result in the mark entering the as a common term.

Alternative Identifiers for Proper Names

Non-Capitalization Markings

In languages and writing systems lacking case distinctions, such as certain non-Latin scripts, or in stylistic contexts where is avoided, alternative typographic markers serve to identify proper nouns and distinguish them from common ones. These methods rely on visual cues like font variations or to signal specificity, ensuring clarity without altering letter forms. For instance, italics are commonly used for titles of books, films, and other standalone works, as in , to denote their proper status as unique entities. Similarly, according to , names of ships and , such as the , are italicized to highlight their individuality, though some style guides permit quotation marks in informal contexts. In scripts without inherent capitalization, such as Chinese, proper names are typically conveyed through contextual positioning and conventional character selection rather than dedicated markers. In Arabic, where diacritics (tashkīl) are frequently omitted in everyday writing, they are applied to proper nouns for precise pronunciation and disambiguation, as seen in place names like madīnat al-nūr ("city of light"), where vowel markers clarify the unique referent amid homographic forms. These approaches leverage phonetic or structural elements inherent to the script to maintain the distinctiveness of proper nouns without relying on uppercase shifts. Historically, medieval manuscripts employed non-capitalization techniques to highlight proper names, particularly in Latin texts. Rubrication, the use of red ink derived from materials like red lead or minium, marked significant elements such as headings, initials, and divine proper names () to draw attention and denote importance, a practice spanning from the Carolingian period onward. Additionally, scribal abbreviations, including suspensions and contractions, were applied to sacred proper nouns like "" for Iesus or "DNS" for Dominus, reducing space while preserving recognizability through standardized symbols. In modern digital environments, Unicode special characters, including emojis introduced in version 6.0 in 2010, function as unique visual identifiers for proper nouns, such as brand logos or cultural icons (e.g., the 🍎 for Apple Inc.), enabling compact, context-independent representation across platforms. These adaptations extend the principle of non-capitalization markings into interactive media, where graphical elements substitute for textual emphasis. While capitalization remains the primary method in English, such alternatives ensure accessibility in diverse typographic traditions.

Markings in Non-English Languages

In logographic writing systems such as , proper nouns are distinguished primarily through script selection and contextual positioning rather than capitalization, as the language lacks case distinctions. Foreign-derived proper nouns, including names of people, places, and brands, are conventionally rendered in to highlight their non-native origin and ; for instance, the country name "" is written as アメリカ (). Native proper nouns, such as personal or place names, typically employ characters, with hiragana used for grammatical particles or readings, and overall identification depends on syntactic role and discourse context to avoid ambiguity. Alphabetic scripts without inherent case marking, like Hebrew, rely on diacritical aids and orthographic conventions for proper noun clarity. In Hebrew, the system omits full representation in everyday writing, but ( points) may be applied to proper nouns for disambiguation, especially in formal, educational, or religious contexts to specify —such as distinguishing homographic forms in biblical names. Similarly, in Turkish, which adapts the with unique letters to accommodate , proper nouns like İstanbul incorporate the dotted İ (uppercase) and undotted I (lowercase) to maintain phonological consistency, ensuring the name aligns with the language's front-back rules even under capitalization. Abjad-based languages such as Arabic and Urdu employ grammatical prefixes and contextual cues to mark proper nouns, compensating for the absence of case. In Arabic, the definite article "al-" functions as a key identifier for many proper nouns, transforming potentially indefinite forms into specific references, as seen in al-Qur'ān (the Qur'an), where the prefix assimilates phonetically based on the following consonant while denoting uniqueness. Urdu, sharing the Perso-Arabic script, follows suit with the izāfat construction or "al-" for some proper nouns, but relies heavily on lexical uniqueness and sentence position for distinction, as the script's cursive flow and optional vowel diacritics (zer, zabar) provide limited visual separation. Orthographic reforms in languages like Russian and Hindi have standardized proper noun conventions with minimal disruption to identification markers. The 1918 Russian Cyrillic reform eliminated obsolete letters (e.g., ѣ, і) and simplified word endings but preserved capitalization as the primary visual cue for proper nouns, leaving name spellings largely intact except for phonetic adjustments. In Hindi's Devanagari script, an abugida without case, proper nouns use matras (dependent vowel signs) sparingly—only when essential for pronunciation—prioritizing conventional kanji-like conjuncts and contextual inference over elaborate diacritics, as standardized in post-independence linguistic policies.

Linguistic Acquisition and Processing

Child Acquisition of Proper Nouns

Children acquire proper nouns as part of their early lexical development, typically integrating them into their vocabulary alongside common nouns to refer to unique entities such as people, places, and pets. This process begins in the toddler years and involves rote learning, followed by more abstract understanding of their referential properties. Seminal research demonstrates that young children distinguish proper nouns from common nouns based on their function in identifying specific individuals rather than categories. Between ages 2 and 3 years, children primarily learn proper nouns through rote memorization, often starting with familiar referents like family members. For instance, terms such as "Mommy" or "Daddy" emerge as high-frequency proper nouns in early speech, reflecting direct imitation from caregivers without initial grasp of broader grammatical rules. By ages 4 to 5 years, children begin distinguishing proper nouns from common nouns, but this phase frequently involves overgeneralization errors, where a specific name is extended to similar objects or individuals. Empirical studies have illuminated these patterns. Cross-linguistic data further reveal that English-speaking children typically master the capitalization of proper nouns by around age 7, achieving consistent application in writing tasks as they internalize orthographic conventions, with recent research (as of 2024) showing cue-based learning improves accuracy in cloze tasks. For example, in cloze tasks, primary school children (ages 6–11) capitalize proper nouns with 60%–80% accuracy, approaching mastery by the end of early elementary years. Common errors in proper noun acquisition include misuse of definite articles, as children overextend article rules from common nouns to proper ones during the 2–4-year stage. Cultural factors, including bilingualism, can influence this process by delaying the acquisition due to cross-linguistic interference and divided input. Longitudinal studies indicate key milestones, with children reaching approximately 90% accuracy in proper noun recognition and appropriate use by age 6, as evidenced in tasks distinguishing unique referents from categories. This proficiency builds on earlier comprehension, where even 2-year-olds interpret proper nouns as labels for single entities rather than classes.

Cognitive Processing of Proper Nouns

Proper nouns are processed in the brain through specialized neural mechanisms that distinguish them from common nouns, primarily involving activation in the left temporal lobe. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have demonstrated heightened activity in the left anterior temporal pole during the retrieval of proper names for unique entities, such as persons and landmarks, compared to common nouns, which rely more broadly on distributed semantic networks across the temporal and frontal regions. This specialization is supported by lesion studies in brain-damaged patients, where damage to the left temporal lobe, particularly the rostral portion, leads to selective proper name anomia—a profound difficulty in retrieving proper names—while sparing the retrieval of common nouns and verbs. For instance, in a comprehensive analysis of 139 patients with unilateral brain lesions, impairments in proper name retrieval were most frequently associated with damage to the left temporal lobe, underscoring its role as a for linking conceptual to unique lexical labels. Retrieval of proper nouns follows models that emphasize their function as "pointers" to encyclopedic knowledge rather than descriptive semantics, making them particularly vulnerable to partial access states. The tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) phenomenon, where a word is sensed but cannot be produced, occurs disproportionately for proper names, accounting for approximately 67% of TOT incidents in both younger and older adults, far exceeding rates for common nouns or abstract terms. This frequency arises because proper names lack the rich semantic redundancy of common nouns, relying instead on direct phonological-lexical links that are more susceptible to temporary retrieval failures. In computational and cognitive models, proper nouns are represented as arbitrary labels indexing stored biographical or contextual information, which explains their sensitivity to interference and the persistence of TOT states without partial semantic cues. In bilingual individuals, cognitive processing of proper nouns exhibits cross-linguistic effects, including retrieval delays and heightened error rates due to language competition. Code-switching errors are more common for proper nouns than common nouns, reflecting interference from parallel activation of translation equivalents and the arbitrary nature of names across languages. Pathological conditions further highlight the distinct neural underpinnings of proper noun processing, with disproportionate deficits observed in neurodegenerative diseases like (AD). In AD patients, proper name retrieval is impaired early in the disease progression, with naming accuracy for famous faces dropping to around 50-60% in mild stages, compared to 80-90% preservation for common nouns, due to atrophy in the left temporal regions critical for unique entity labeling. This selective anomia persists even when general semantic knowledge remains intact, as evidenced in longitudinal studies of AD where proper name failures contrasted sharply with relatively spared object naming, linking the deficit to disrupted executive-semantic integration rather than global lexical decay. Such patterns inform diagnostic models, positioning proper name tasks as sensitive markers for early AD detection.

References

  1. [1]
    Nouns - Penn Linguistics
    First, although proper nouns in English typically appear without a determiner, certain proper nouns must be accompanied by the definite article. Some examples ...
  2. [2]
    Nouns - TIP Sheets - Butte College
    Every noun is either proper or common. A proper noun identifies a particular person, animal, place, thing, or idea--Roger Rabbit, for example. The first letter ...
  3. [3]
    Proper Nouns - Excelsior OWL
    A proper noun refers to a specific person, place, organization, etc. Proper nouns are capitalized because they are specific nouns.
  4. [4]
    Definition of PROPER NOUN
    - **Definition**: A proper noun is a noun (e.g., Seattle, Joyce, Empire State Building) that designates a particular being or thing, does not take a limiting modifier, and is usually capitalized in English. Also called a proper name.
  5. [5]
    Proper name theory and implications for second language reading
    May 21, 2021 · A proper name is a word or groups of words used to refer to an individual person (actual or potential), place, or organisation.
  6. [6]
    Proper - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Proper originates from Latin proprius meaning "one's own," via Old ... Proper noun is from mid-15c. also from c. 1300. Advertisement Close. Want to ...
  7. [7]
    Entry | Proper nouns - AIETI
    Orthographic criterion: Names are written with a capital letter. · Morphosyntactic criterion: names do not admit plural, articles or restrictive modification.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] ARTICLES - Idaho State University
    Singular proper nouns do not usually require an article or any kind of determiner, although an exception is made for some vast areas: the Pacific Ocean, the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Common names and proper nouns: Morphosyntactic evidence of a ...
    As a working definition, I suggest that what [NAME] encodes as a feature is membership in a set that is identified by a shared name, not by shared properties.
  10. [10]
    Rigid Designators - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Oct 24, 2006 · A rigid designator designates the same object in all possible worlds in which that object exists and never designates anything else.A Basic Characterization of... · Names, Ordinary Descriptions...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] NAMING AND NECESSITY Saul A. Kripke - neuroself
    Since names are rigid de jure-see p. 78 below-I say that a proper name rigidly designates its referent even when we speak of counterfactual· situations where ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] A Linguistics Approach to Genericide in Trademark Law
    Dec 10, 2024 · Genericide is when brand names lose legal status by becoming synonymous with product categories. This article uses corpus linguistics to assess ...
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English - UCREL
    Companion Website for: Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: based on the British National Corpus. Geoffrey Leech, Paul Rayson, Andrew Wilson.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Why Rose is the Rose: On the use of definite articles in proper names
    The goal of this paper is to examine the use of definite articles with proper names, both cross-linguistically and intra-linguistically and provide a ...
  16. [16]
    Articles and Proper Nouns - MIT
    Section 11.8.3.4. Articles and Proper Nouns. In general, do not use an article with a proper noun unless the noun contains a prepositional phrase.
  17. [17]
    Old English – an overview - Oxford English Dictionary
    The forms of the definite article agree with these nouns, but you will note that they are different in each instance, þone wætan 'the moisture' (direct ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Names and grammar - HAL-SHS
    Apr 17, 2017 · Dealing with names and grammar concerns establishing the grammar of proper names, which are nominal expressions denoting a unique entity.Missing: shift | Show results with:shift
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Proper names with and without definite articles
    Languages may combine proper names with definite articles obligatorily, or never, or optionally with certain pragmatic effects. In addition, there will be ...Missing: linguistics | Show results with:linguistics
  20. [20]
    [PDF] The Proper Name - Princeton University
    IN NOVEMBER 1995 the city of Bombay was officially renamed Mumbai. The government of India finally gave in to the request by the state govern- ment of ...Missing: variants | Show results with:variants
  21. [21]
    Genitive case - Wikipedia
    The genitive case (abbreviated gen) [2] is the grammatical case that marks a word, usually a noun, as modifying another word, also usually a noun.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] The Progress of Pinyin - CIA
    May 8, 2007 · National conferences held in Peking in October 1955 and February 1956 drafted the Pinyin program, and it was finally approved by the National ...
  23. [23]
    Russia (07/08) - state.gov
    The city was called Petrograd during World War I and Leningrad after 1924. In 1991, as the result of a city referendum, it was renamed St. Petersburg. Under ...<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Transliterating Proper Nouns: Facts and Implications
    Similarly, names with Arabic /θ/ are to be transliterated as pronounced in. Egyptian Arabic, namely, as [s] like the name of the renowned singer موثلك ما ...
  25. [25]
    7.1 Use and characteristics of uncial | Latin Paleography
    Uncial has been considered substantially a capital script because most of its letters derive from the forms of those from the Capital script.
  26. [26]
    Uncial and Half-Uncial - The History of Scripts - Ad fontes
    Capitalis and Uncial were continued to be used in the Medieval period after the transition to the minuscule as markers for headings, incipits, explicits, and ...
  27. [27]
    The Decorated Letter (Getty Center Exhibitions)
    Nov 13, 2007 · Decorated letters in medieval manuscripts use vines, leaves, and figures to form letters, initially to mark text beginnings, later for ...
  28. [28]
    Make the Letter Bigger - I Love Typography
    Aug 20, 2020 · A brief history of the drop-cap: Decorated or illuminated initials were an important part of medieval manuscripts for a thousand years.
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    The Venetian origins of roman type | by Riccardo Olocco - CAST
    Dec 19, 2017 · The general idea that roman type as we know it was derived from the humanistic script developed in Florence in the early 15th century, notably from Poggio ...
  31. [31]
    Eighteenth-Century Grammars | British Literature Wiki
    English grammars have changed significantly from the eighteenth century to the present. In eighteenth-century writing, sentence construction involved periodic ...Missing: definite article
  32. [32]
    A "Conspiracy of Colons and Capital Letters": A Brief Discourse on ...
    See ROBERT LOWTH, A SHORT INTRODUCTION TO ENGLISH GRAMMAR 22 (1767) ... Note that Lowth does not follow the practice of capitalizing all nouns and ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    The Influence of the German Capitalization Rules on Reading
    Mar 19, 2020 · This principle was even strengthened in the last orthography reform (1996–2006). German readers are, since nominalization is very common in ...
  34. [34]
    French Capitalization - Lawless French Writing - Les majuscules
    The use of capital letters (les majuscules) is much less common in French than in English. Take a look at this summary of words that are capitalized in English ...Missing: history 16th century minimal
  35. [35]
    Capitalization Rules in English | Quick Guide & Examples - Scribbr
    Rating 5.0 (613) Apr 19, 2019 · Directions and regions. North, east, south, and west are not capitalized when they refer to a direction or general area. This also applies to ...Missing: diseases | Show results with:diseases
  36. [36]
    FAQ: Capitalization #87 - The Chicago Manual of Style
    AP further distinguishes between titles mentioned in text and headlines for news stories, prescribing sentence style for the latter.
  37. [37]
    Here's what the AP Stylebook says about when to capitalize names ...
    Jun 1, 2016 · Proper and Common Nouns​​ Capitalize common nouns such as party, river and street when part of a proper name: Democratic Party, Ohio River, ...
  38. [38]
    Capitalization Rules and Examples | Grammarly
    Oct 24, 2024 · The seasons—spring, summer, autumn (fall), and winter—are not capitalized. They use lowercase letters just like other common nouns. Last winter ...Missing: diseases | Show results with:diseases
  39. [39]
    When to Capitalize Disease Names - Quick and Dirty Tips
    May 20, 2023 · Some disease names are capitalized because they are named after the person who discovered them. For example, Alzheimer's disease is named after ...
  40. [40]
    AP Style Updates: Social Media - PRNEWS
    Sep 21, 2021 · In stories, write the hashtag as it would appear on a social network. For accessibility, capitalize words within a tweet such as # ...
  41. [41]
    FAQ: Special Characters #16 - The Chicago Manual of Style
    Capitalizing provides clarity, but it also does an end run around the issue of whether to hyphenate something like “winking-face emoji.” If it's capitalized, no ...
  42. [42]
    The History and Evolution Behind the KFC Logo: What Changed ...
    May 23, 2025 · Typography: The “KFC” wordmark is bold, black, and in an all-caps serif font, placed beneath the Colonel's head. It's clean, balanced, and ...
  43. [43]
    Guidelines for Using Apple Trademarks and Copyrights
    Use of Apple trademarks may be prohibited, unless expressly authorized. If you are a licensee of an Apple trademark or logo and have been provided with special ...Trademark List · Legal · Legais · Juridisk
  44. [44]
    eBay Logo and symbol, meaning, history, PNG, brand - 1000 Logos
    Sep 24, 2025 · The very first redesign of eBay's visual identity was held in 1997 after the name of the platform was changed from Auction Web to eBay. The ...Missing: rebrand | Show results with:rebrand
  45. [45]
    Lanham Act | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
    Two basic requirements must be met for a mark to be eligible for trademark protection: it must be in use in commerce and it must be distinctive. ... This is what ...
  46. [46]
    Trademark examples
    ### Summary of Trademark Stylization and Legal Requirements
  47. [47]
    ARE TRADEMARKS CAPITALIZED? Sometimes YES - TrademarKraft
    Jul 11, 2018 · Trademarks can be capitalized in stylized forms, or in standard form to maintain broad protection. Capitalization impacts the scope of ...
  48. [48]
    Origin of the name "Google" - Stanford Computer Graphics Laboratory
    Sean verbally suggested the word "googolplex," and Larry responded verbally with the shortened form, "googol" (both words refer to specific large numbers).
  49. [49]
    Elon Musk reveals new Twitter logo X - The Guardian
    Jul 24, 2023 · Elon Musk has revealed a new logo for Twitter, choosing a “minimalist art deco” X as part of a rebrand of the platform. The Twitter owner ...
  50. [50]
    Xerox asks Hollywood to stop saying 'Xerox' (picture)
    Dec 21, 2010 · A Xerox spokesman tells us the ads are part of a larger campaign to remind people in influential industries about the nuances of trademark law.
  51. [51]
    When to Use Italics, With Examples | Grammarly Blog
    Dec 30, 2022 · In typography, italics are a typeface, along with bold, and the standard roman. ... For emphasis, italics are preferable to quotation marks around ...
  52. [52]
    Italics and Quotation Marks - Topic Q&A List
    Q. I am the managing editor of a business journal. Many of the authors I edit put the word “learn” in quotation marks when it applies to AI.
  53. [53]
    How to Add Emphasis to Your Writing - DAILY WRITING TIPS
    1. Italics. Italics, based on handwriting script, serve several functions. · 2. Boldface. Boldface lettering is best reserved for display type (chapter and ...Missing: typographic | Show results with:typographic
  54. [54]
    A handy list of all 214 Chinese radicals, and what they mean - Berlitz
    Dec 7, 2022 · For example, the Chinese radical 女(nǚ) means woman. If you spot that radical in another character, it generally means that the character is ...
  55. [55]
    Proper Name Diacritization for Arabic Wikipedia: A Benchmark Dataset
    May 5, 2025 · In this paper, we focus on a particular limitation rooted in Arabic's abjad orthography, where diacritics are typically omitted Elgamal et al. ( ...
  56. [56]
    Inks and Colourings - Medieval Writing
    Jun 21, 2011 · Red lead was the basis for the red ink used throughout the medieval period for rubric headings. Blue and green inks also sometimes appeared in ...
  57. [57]
    Deciphering scribal abbreviations - Medieval and Renaissance ...
    Jul 7, 2025 · A brief overview of the types of abbreviations one will most frequently encounter in manuscripts from the Middle Ages.
  58. [58]
    Unicode 6.0 Emoji List - Emojipedia
    Unicode 6.0, released in October 2010, was the first version to support emoji, introducing new characters for compatibility with Japanese emojis.
  59. [59]
    Use of italics - APA Style - American Psychological Association
    This page addresses when to use italics, when to avoid italics, how to use italics for emphasis, and when to use reverse italics.Missing: typographic | Show results with:typographic
  60. [60]
    [PDF] STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF JAPANESE CHARACTERS
    KATAKANA appear near Y=X, because. KATAKANA are mainly used for writing proper nouns of foreign words. The same words of such a category do not appear.
  61. [61]
    Japanese Language Basics: Katakana | KCP International
    Jul 8, 2011 · Katakana is also used for proper nouns that aren't in Kanji. Western names like Phillip, Mark, Lauren, James, and Louise are written in ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] How to Pronounce Hebrew Names
    Jun 2, 2010 · First, the consonants are written in the form of letters while the vowels written as diatritics (dots–niqqud, דוקינ). The common modern Hebrew.
  63. [63]
    Proper Nouns in Turkish Grammar - Talkpal
    They can be modified with the plural marker “-lar/-ler” depending on vowel harmony rules. On the other hand, proper nouns generally do not have a plural form in ...
  64. [64]
    Arabic definite and indefinite nouns - Guide for learners
    May 16, 2024 · Definite nouns, known as “المعرفة” (al-ma'rifah) in Arabic, refer to specific or known entities. They are marked by the definite article “ال” (al).
  65. [65]
    Reforms of Russian orthography - Languages on the Web
    The most recent large reform of the Russian spelling was prepared by Aleksey Shakhmatov and carried out shortly after the 1917 Revolution.Missing: capitalization | Show results with:capitalization<|control11|><|separator|>
  66. [66]
    Hindi orthography notes - r12a.io
    Devanagari represents standalone vowels using a set of independent vowel letters. The set contains a character to represent the inherent vowel sound.
  67. [67]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Language Development - MacWhinney - Major Reference Works
    Mar 23, 2015 · A study of how children learn common and proper names. Child Development, 45, 469–473. 10.2307/1127970. Web of Science® Google Scholar. Kay, P ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Overextension in Early Language Development
    This research explored overextension in the early vocabularies of six children, followed in a language diary study from I; 0 to I; 8. , Results.
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Jean Berko Gleason Curriculum Vitae - Boston University
    Gleason, J. Berko (2014). Parent-child interaction and lexical acquisition in two domains: color words and animal names. Psychology of Language and ...
  71. [71]
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Toddlers' Use of Articles to Access Noun Information - ERIC
    Jan 24, 2012 · The study explores if toddlers use feminine/masculine articles to infer noun gender, as in Spanish, where gender helps track referents. ...
  73. [73]
    Why bilingual development is not easy - PMC - NIH
    We conclude that two languages are more difficult to acquire than one because language acquisition requires substantial and continued environmental support.
  74. [74]
    A role for left temporal pole in the retrieval of words for unique entities
    We found significant activation of the left temporal polar region for both unique naming tasks (persons and landmarks) when compared to the baseline tasks.
  75. [75]
    Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval - PubMed - NIH
    Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval. Cognition. 2004 May-Jun;92 ... H Damasio , D Tranel, T Grabowski, R Adolphs, A Damasio. Affiliation. 1 ...
  76. [76]
    A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience. - APA PsycNet
    TOTs (1) are a nearly universal experience, (2) occur about once a week, (3) increase with age, (4) are frequently elicited by proper names, (5) often enable ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
  77. [77]
    Why is Lexical Retrieval Slower for Bilinguals? Evidence from ...
    Proficient bilinguals demonstrate slower lexical retrieval than comparable monolinguals. The present study tested predictions from two main accounts of this ...
  78. [78]
    Deficits of semantic memory and executive control - APA PsycNet
    Deficits of semantic memory and executive control: Evidence for differing effects upon naming in dementia. Citation. Funnell, E., & Hodges, J. R. (1996).