Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Pythagorean tuning

Pythagorean tuning is a system of musical tuning based on the ratios of small whole numbers, primarily the octave (2:1) and the perfect fifth (3:2), which generates a diatonic scale through successive stacking of these intervals adjusted by octaves. Attributed to the ancient Greek philosopher Pythagoras in the 6th century BCE, it forms the foundation of early Western music theory by aligning tones with simple harmonic relationships derived from string lengths or frequencies. This tuning system constructs the using seven distinct notes, with ratios such as the (9/8), (81/64), (4/3), (3/2), (27/16), and (243/128). By repeatedly applying the for fifths—starting from a base tone and reducing by s when exceeding the next octave—it produces perfect fifths and fourths that closely match the natural of vibrating strings. However, stacking twelve perfect fifths results in a slight discrepancy known as the (approximately 23.46 cents), where the total span exceeds seven octaves by a small 531441:524288), preventing the circle of fifths from closing perfectly. Historically, Pythagorean tuning influenced medieval and Renaissance music, emphasizing melodic purity in monophonic and early polyphonic contexts, though its wide major thirds (81/64, about 407.8 cents) were considered dissonant compared to the just intonation major third (5/4, 386 cents). Its advantages include mathematical simplicity and strong fifths that support modal music, but limitations such as the comma and uneven semitones (e.g., 256/243 for the diatonic semitone) led to the development of alternative systems like meantone temperament and equal temperament for greater harmonic flexibility in later Western music. Today, it remains relevant in historical performance practice, microtonal exploration, and as a pedagogical tool for understanding the mathematical basis of consonance.

Fundamentals

Definition and principles

Pythagorean tuning is a system of musical intonation in which intervals are derived from simple integer frequency ratios, primarily using the perfect fifth (3:2) and the octave (2:1) to generate a diatonic scale with pure, consonant sounds. In this approach, musical intervals represent ratios of the frequencies of vibrating sounds, where the octave serves as the foundational interval with a ratio of 2:1, corresponding to a pitch doubling that the human ear perceives as the same note at a higher register, measured as exactly 1200 cents in logarithmic terms. The perfect fifth, with its 3:2 ratio, approximates 702 cents and forms the basis for stacking intervals to approximate the octave, yielding consonant harmonies rooted in natural acoustic principles. The key principles of Pythagorean tuning emphasize reliance on small prime integers—chiefly 2 and 3—to create intervals that align with the harmonic series, promoting stability in monophonic and early polyphonic music without equal temperament's compromises. This method divides the through successive approximations via the fifth, resulting in a where most intervals, such as the fourth (4:3), are pure and free of beats when performed on instruments like the monochord. Unlike later systems, it prioritizes fifths over thirds, reflecting an acoustic focus on vertical sonorities that sound naturally harmonious due to their low-integer ratios. Historically, is named after the philosopher (c. 570–495 BCE), who discovered the correspondence between simple integer ratios and musical concords through experiments with vibrating strings on a monochord, identifying the (2:1), fifth (), and fourth (4:3) as fundamental. Although laid the groundwork by linking to acoustics, the complete tuning system as a emerged later among his followers and in subsequent Greek theory, influencing Western music for centuries.

Ratio-based construction

Pythagorean tuning builds the scale through a systematic process of stacking perfect fifths, each with a frequency ratio of , starting from a base note and adjusting for octaves by dividing by powers of 2 to confine the pitches within a single range. This method generates the notes sequentially via the circle of fifths, where each step ascends by a fifth, forming a spiral rather than a closed circle due to the incommensurability of the ratios. The construction begins with the base note, conventionally assigned the ratio 1:1 (for example, C). To derive the next note (G), multiply by 3:2, yielding 3:2. For the following note (D), multiply the current ratio by 3:2 again (9:4), then divide by 2 to reduce the octave, resulting in 9:8. This process continues: A is obtained by 9:8 × 3:2 = 27:16; E by 27:16 × 3:2 = 81:32, then ÷2 = 81:64; B by 81:64 × 3:2 = 243:128. The seventh note, F, is typically derived as the pure fourth from the base (inverse of the fifth, adjusted by an octave: 1 ÷ 3:2 × 2 = 4:3), completing the diatonic scale within one octave. The ratios for the notes in the scale, generated by stacking perfect fifths with F derived as a from C, are as follows:
NoteRatio
C1:1
D9:8
E81:64
F4:3
G3:2
A27:16
B243:128
C2:1
Extending the process to twelve fifths reveals the circle's spiral nature: successive multiplications by yield (3/2)^{12} = 531441/4096 \approx 129.746, which approximates but exceeds seven octaves ($2^7 = 128) by a factor of approximately 1.0136. This discrepancy means the twelfth fifth, such as from B to F♯, lands sharp relative to a pure closing , necessitating a "wolf fifth" in practical tunings—a narrowed fifth to accommodate the full without further adjustments.

Interval Structure

Perfect fifths and octaves

In Pythagorean tuning, the is the foundational , defined by a frequency ratio of , where the higher note's is one-and-a-half times that of the lower note. This ratio yields an acoustically pure that is highly , producing a smooth, stable sound without perceptible beats when performed on instruments like strings or voices. In the , the spans seven semitones, serving as the primary generator for constructing the tuning system's pitches. The , with a of 2:1, acts as the tuning's bounding interval, representing the perceptual equivalence of notes differing by a doubling or halving of . It normalizes all generated pitches to a single range, ensuring the remains within a practical perceptual span while maintaining the purity of the underlying . Pythagorean tuning builds its through the stacking of pure perfect fifths, where six such intervals—each at 3:2—produce all seven distinct pitches of the . The provides closure by reducing these stacked fifths modulo powers of 2. Acoustically, the perfect fifth's consonance arises from its early appearance in the series, as the third of the fundamental aligns closely with the second of the fifth, minimizing dissonance and enabling beat-free intervals in performance. This alignment, rooted in the physics of vibrating strings and air columns, underpins the tuning's emphasis on natural resonance.

Derived major and minor intervals

In Pythagorean tuning, intervals beyond the and are derived by stacking multiple perfect fifths (ratio 3:2) and adjusting by (ratio 2:1) to reduce the result within a single , ensuring all are powers of 2 and 3. This process generates the composite intervals of the through successive multiplications and divisions, prioritizing the purity of fifths while accepting approximations for other intervals. The is obtained by two stacked fifths reduced by one : \frac{(3/2) \times (3/2)}{2} = \frac{9}{8} The arises from four fifths reduced by two s: \frac{(3/2)^4}{2^2} = \frac{81}{64} The comes from three fifths reduced by one : \frac{(3/2)^3}{2} = \frac{27}{16} The is derived from five fifths reduced by two s: \frac{(3/2)^5}{2^2} = \frac{243}{128} These ratios reflect the "wide" whole tones and thirds characteristic of Pythagorean intonation. Minor intervals in Pythagorean tuning are typically obtained as complements to major intervals within the or through the circle of fifths, yielding narrower approximations compared to other tunings. The , or limma, is the complement of the : \frac{2}{243/128} = \frac{256}{243} The is the complement of the : \frac{2}{27/16} = \frac{32}{27} The is the complement of the : \frac{2}{81/64} = \frac{128}{81} The minor seventh is the complement of the major second: \frac{2}{9/8} = \frac{16}{9} These derivations ensure the intervals fit the 3-limit constraint of Pythagorean tuning. The following table summarizes the key derived intervals with their ratios:
IntervalRatio
Major second9:8
Major third81:64
Major sixth27:16
Major seventh243:128
Minor second256:243
Minor third32:27
Minor sixth128:81
Minor seventh16:9
In the , these intervals integrate to form the white keys of a , starting from a (e.g., C): the to D (9:8), to E (81:64), to F (4:3, derived as the complement of a fifth), to G (3:2), to A (27:16), and to B (243:128), with minor intervals appearing between non-adjacent notes such as the from D to F (32:27). This structure emphasizes the chain of pure fifths while producing the characteristic "sweet" major thirds and "tense" minor thirds of the system.

Mathematical Properties

Interval sizes in cents

In Pythagorean tuning, intervals are quantified using cents, a logarithmic unit that divides the into 1200 equal parts, allowing precise comparison across systems. The size of any in cents is calculated as $1200 \times \log_2(r), where r is the frequency ratio of the interval. This formula applies uniformly to all Pythagorean intervals, which are derived from stacking perfect fifths ( ratio) and adjusting for octaves, resulting in a characteristic "" fifth in the full due to the . The following table lists the approximate sizes in cents for the 12 chromatic intervals in Pythagorean tuning, starting from unison, based on standard ratios. These values highlight deviations from (where all s are 100 cents), such as the diatonic semitone at about 90 cents and the chromatic semitone at about 114 cents. Notably, the Pythagorean measures approximately 408 cents, which is wider than the of 386 cents, while the is narrower at 294 cents compared to just intonation's 316 cents.
IntervalCents
Unison0.00
Minor second90.22
Major second203.91
Minor third294.13
Major third407.82
Perfect fourth498.04
Augmented fourth (tritone)611.73
Perfect fifth701.96
Minor sixth792.18
Major sixth905.87
Minor seventh996.09
Major seventh1109.78
Octave1200.00
For practical approximations, the perfect fifth is often taken as 702 cents, calculated as $1200 \log_2(3/2) \approx 701.96 cents. These measurements underscore the tuning's emphasis on pure fifths at the expense of thirds, influencing its sound in historical contexts.

The Pythagorean comma

The Pythagorean comma is the small representing the discrepancy between twelve successive perfect fifths and seven octaves in Pythagorean tuning. Its frequency ratio is exactly \frac{3^{12}}{2^{19}} = \frac{531441}{524288}, which simplifies to approximately 1.01364326477. This interval measures 23.46 cents, computed as the difference between the cumulative size of twelve Pythagorean fifths and seven octaves: $12 \times 1200 \log_2(3/2) - 7 \times 1200 \approx 12 \times 701.96 - 8400 = 23.46 cents, where the Pythagorean fifth is $1200 \log_2(3/2) cents. The comma arises because \log_2 3 is , meaning no finite stack of powers of 2 and 3 can exactly close the circle of fifths without a residual mismatch, as proven by the fact that assuming \log_2 3 = m/n (with integers m, n > 0) implies $3^n = 2^m, which is impossible since the left side is odd and the right even for n, m \geq 1. In practical terms, this discrepancy forces one "" fifth—typically between G♯ and E♭—to be narrowed by the full (about 678 cents instead of 702), creating a dissonant , while enharmonic equivalents like D♯ and E♭ differ by exactly this rather than coinciding.

Historical Development

Ancient origins

Pythagorean tuning traces its roots to ancient Near Eastern cultures, where early knowledge of musical s existed, though systematic mathematical formulations are attributed to later developments. In ancient , featured a diatonic heptachord system based on ratios such as 9:8 for whole tones and 16:15 for semitones, derived from reciprocal tables, with tuning procedures that alternated fifths and fourths to construct scales. This approach, evidenced in tablets from around 1800 BCE, suggests a sophisticated empirical understanding of s but lacked the explicit cosmological integration seen in adaptations. Ancient Egyptian , by contrast, shows limited evidence of theoretical systematization; while instruments like harps imply familiarity with relative pitches and possible enharmonic tunings akin to scales, no records confirm ratio-based calculations or formal , with practices developing independently from principles. The foundational discoveries of key intervals in Pythagorean tuning are traditionally credited to the philosopher (c. 570–495 BCE), who reportedly identified the (2:1 ratio), (3:2), and (4:3) through experiments involving the monochord—a single-string instrument divided to produce proportional vibrations—or alternatively, resonating objects like hammers and bells. These ratios, derived from simple integer proportions, formed the basis of a mathematical approach to music, emphasizing the inherent in numerical order. Although contemporaneous evidence for Pythagoras's direct use of the monochord is absent, and the instrument's earliest secure description dates to the late 4th century BCE, the attribution underscores his role in linking acoustics to , influenced possibly by Babylonian precedents. Members of the Pythagorean school, including figures like and in the 5th–4th centuries BCE, expanded these principles to construct a complete by stacking tetrachords—four-note segments spanning a (4:3)—and applying ratios such as 9:8 for whole tones and 256:243 for the limma (). This process generated the full scale through successive applications of the , integrating music into broader Pythagorean that viewed numerical ratios as the essence of cosmic , with the (a triangular arrangement of the first ten integers) symbolizing universal structure. , in particular, refined tetrachord divisions using , geometric, and harmonic means to correlate pitch perception with mathematical precision, establishing music as a quadrivium science alongside , , and astronomy. A key text formalizing these calculations is Euclid's Sectio Canonis (c. 300 BCE), a concise treatise presenting twenty propositions that demonstrate the division of the monochord to yield Pythagorean concords and the through geometric proofs of ratios. The work begins with acoustical axioms, such as the encompassing two tones plus a fifth, and proceeds to theorems proving the indivisibility of the tone into equal parts, solidifying the theoretical foundations laid by the Pythagoreans. This Euclidean synthesis, drawing on earlier Pythagorean traditions, provided a rigorous mathematical framework for interval construction without empirical measurement, influencing subsequent harmonic science.

Medieval and Renaissance adoption

During the Medieval period (c. 500–1400 ), Pythagorean tuning was transmitted and adapted through key theoretical works that shaped musical practice. ' De institutione musica (c. 500 ), the most influential musical treatise of the , presented Pythagorean ratios as the foundation of musical consonance, emphasizing the numerical harmony of intervals like the (3:2) and fourth (4:3) derived from string lengths on the monochord. This framework influenced subsequent theorists by integrating Pythagorean principles into the , positioning music as a liberal art rooted in arithmetic. By the , d'Arezzo's system—dividing the into overlapping six-note segments (e.g., C-D-E-F-G-A with intervals of whole, whole, half, whole, whole)—implicitly relied on Pythagorean ratios for its tone-semitone structure, facilitating sight-singing and modal composition in . In early , such as the of the 9th–12th centuries, Pythagorean tuning favored pure fifths and octaves to create parallel intervals, enhancing the consonance of added voices against chant melodies, as seen in the Notre-Dame school's practices. Organ builders in the 9th–10th centuries documented tunings based on stacked perfect fifths, adjusting pipes to approximate these ratios despite the limitations of fixed-pitch instruments. The (c. 1400–1600 CE) saw continued prevalence of Pythagorean tuning in stringed instruments, particularly the and , where movable frets allowed precise realization of fifth-based scalings. tunings, often in fourths (e.g., G-c-f-a-d'-g' for an 8-course instrument), followed Pythagorean progressions to ensure pure fifths across courses, supporting the era's intabulated and fantasias. Similarly, tuning adhered to hexachordal deductions from Guido's system, stacking fourths and fifths in Pythagorean ratios (e.g., G-c-f-a-d-g), as described by theorists like Fray Juan Bermudo, to accommodate vihuelistas' chordal and contrapuntal styles. ' treatise, reprinted in 1492, reinforced these practices by reviving theory for humanists. Fixed-pitch keyboards like organs presented challenges, as Pythagorean stacking led to the —a discrepancy of about 23.46 cents after 12 fifths—resulting in a "wolf fifth" (e.g., G♯ to E♭ at 678.49 cents), which sounded dissonant and limited . Gothic organs often approximated Pythagorean tuning but relocated the wolf interval (e.g., to B-F♯ by c. 1400) to favor common keys. By the late , these comma-related issues prompted a shift toward meantone temperaments, which tempered fifths slightly to purify major thirds (), as proposed by Bartolomé Ramos de Pareja in 1482, enabling broader harmonic exploration in emerging chromatic polyphony.

Applications and Usage

In historical music

Pythagorean tuning found natural application in and early of the 9th to 12th centuries, where monophonic melodies emphasized pure perfect fifths ( ratio) for their resonant clarity in unaccompanied singing. This system's reliance on stacked fifths aligned seamlessly with the diatonic modes of plainchant, allowing singers to intone intervals with acoustic purity that enhanced the ethereal quality of the music without harmonic complexity. In , composers such as and employed pure consonances, including perfect fifths (3:2) and fourths (4:3), within a framework to guide and create smooth harmonic progressions in sacred works like masses and motets. These intervals provided a foundation for the imitative characteristic of the era, ensuring tonal stability across multiple voices, though instrumental tunings began to yield to meantone by the mid-16th century. For instance, Josquin's motets often featured progressions that prioritized the acoustic consonance of these ratios to evoke spiritual depth. Instrumental music of the period also utilized Pythagorean tuning, as seen in tablatures by , where fretting systems were calibrated to produce pure fifths for polyphonic accompaniment in ayres and fantasies. Similarly, and hurdy-gurdies relied on strings tuned in pure fifths and octaves, creating a backdrop that reinforced melodies with stable, resonant in and courtly settings. This emphasis, inherent to Pythagorean principles, amplified the instrument's buzzing and sustained the purity of relationships during extended performances. Regional variations preserved pure ratios from ancient systems in modal frameworks, notably in Byzantine chant, where the oktōēchos incorporated stacked fifths to define modes for . Arabic maqam traditions drew theoretical influences from ancient ratios like but adapted them into distinct microtonal structures for intervallic variety in melodic improvisation and treatises, reflecting shared heritage in diverse contexts.

Modern and experimental contexts

In the 20th century, Pythagorean tuning experienced revivals through innovative systems that incorporated its 3-limit ratios as foundational elements. Composer developed his 43-tone scale as an extension of , explicitly referencing Pythagorean tuning as the 3-limit basis for pure fifths and octaves in his custom instruments like the Chromelodeon, enabling microtonal explorations rooted in ancient harmonic principles. Similarly, Easley Blackwood's theoretical work analyzed Pythagorean tuning's diatonic structure, using it as a benchmark for recognizable scales in his microtonal etudes and compositions, highlighting its mathematical properties for modern experimental applications. Electronic music production has integrated Pythagorean tuning via software tools that facilitate its use in digital audio workstations (DAWs) for ambient and experimental genres. The Scala software, a standard for scale experimentation, allows users to generate and export Pythagorean scales—based on stacked fifths—directly to synthesizers and DAWs like or , supporting real-time retuning of tracks for non-tempered harmonies in contemporary . This enables producers to explore the tuning's pure intervals in electronic compositions, often blending them with microtonal extensions for immersive ambient textures. Notable works have employed Pythagorean elements through detuned pure fifths to achieve resonant, otherworldly effects. Glenn Branca's guitar symphonies, such as Symphony No. 6 (Devil Choirs at the Gates of Heaven), feature ensembles of electric guitars tuned to approximate Pythagorean fifths, creating dense clusters that emphasize the tuning's purity over . incorporated ratios inspired by historical systems, extending them into custom scales like alpha and beta for works on Beauty in the Beast, where pure fifths and related harmonics produce novel timbres in synthesized performances. Current trends in fusions revive Pythagorean tuning by integrating its ancient ratios into cross-cultural compositions, such as blending them with non-Western scales for hybrid ensembles that evoke cosmic . As of 2024, it is applied in sound therapy using Pythagorean tuning forks to restore balance through ancient ratios. In AI-generated music, algorithms draw on Pythagorean principles to model progressions, enabling algorithmically composed pieces that prioritize simple ratios for innovative soundscapes.

Comparisons to Other Systems

Versus equal temperament

Pythagorean tuning produces pure perfect fifths at approximately 702 cents, derived from the frequency , whereas divides the into 12 equal semitones, resulting in fifths of 700 cents that are slightly flat by comparison. The in Pythagorean tuning measures about 408 cents (from the 81:64 ), making it sharper and more tense than the 400-cent in . These differences arise because Pythagorean tuning prioritizes fifths generated by successive ratios, while evenly distributes the slight discrepancies to fit within the . In practice, enables full chromatic modulation and transposition to any key without introducing dissonant "" intervals, as it tempers all fifths equally to absorb the of roughly 23.46 cents across the circle of fifths. Pythagorean tuning, however, accumulates this after 12 fifths, creating a narrowed fifth (about 678.5 cents) that sounds harsh and limits usable keys to those avoiding the comma's accumulation, restricting versatility in polyphonic or modulating music. The historical shift toward equal temperament accelerated in the late 18th century, replacing Pythagorean and other unequal systems to allow keyboard instruments greater flexibility across all keys, as exemplified by J.S. Bach's The Well-Tempered Clavier (1722 and 1742), composed in a well-tempered system that foreshadowed equal temperament's adoption. By the early 19th century, equal temperament had become standard in Western music, driven by the need for instruments like the piano to handle complex modulations without retuning. Sonically, Pythagorean tuning's sharper major thirds contribute a brighter, more lively quality to triads, enhancing their in contexts, but the comma's effects produce muddier dissonances in remote keys. , by contrast, yields a more uniform throughout the , though its tempered intervals are generally less pure and than Pythagorean fifths.

Versus just intonation

Pythagorean tuning and both rely on simple integer frequency ratios to achieve consonant intervals, drawing from the natural harmonics of vibrating strings or air columns. However, Pythagorean tuning forms its scale exclusively through successive stacking of with a ratio, resulting in a subset of just intervals such as the (2:1) and (3:2), but diverging notably in other intervals. For instance, the in Pythagorean tuning is 81:64, approximately 407.8 cents, which contrasts with the purer just of , measuring about 386.3 cents. The primary divergence arises from just intonation's inclusion of the prime number 5 in its ratios, enabling sweeter thirds and sixths derived from the harmonic series, while Pythagorean tuning adheres strictly to powers of 2 and 3, excluding 5 and thus producing "wide" or dissonant thirds. This difference manifests as the syntonic comma, a small interval of roughly 21.5 cents (81:80 ratio), which separates the Pythagorean major third from its just counterpart and contributes to the characteristic tension in Pythagorean triads. In practice, just intonation yields major chords in the simple 4:5:6 ratio for enhanced consonance, a purity unattainable in Pythagorean tuning where such chords incorporate the less harmonious 81:64 third. Just intonation offers greater flexibility for modulation and key changes, as performers or instruments can adjust intervals to maintain pure ratios tailored to each harmonic context, often using thirds alongside fifths to derive notes. In contrast, Pythagorean tuning is rigidly fixed to its fifth-generated , limiting adaptability and resulting in intervals when closing the . Philosophically, Pythagorean tuning emphasizes a mathematical purity rooted in the of 3/2 ratios, reflecting ancient numerological ideals, whereas prioritizes acoustic consonance from the series, aligning more closely with perceptual in isolated chords or melodies.

References

  1. [1]
    Pythagorean Tuning
    Pythagorus discovered a remarkably simple way to generate pleasing sounds: First, take two strings of equal thickness and place them under equal tension.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] The Pythagorean Scale and Just Intonation
    Mar 22, 2018 · A power of 3 is always an odd number, while a power of 2 is even. The circle of fifths does not close up using Pythagorean tuning; it is more ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Pythagorean Tuning - SMU Physics
    Pythagorean Tuning. All tones found by pure 5ths. Relationship in ratios: OCTAVE: 2/1. FIFTH: 3/2. FOURTH: 4/3. Or. 1. 2. 3. 4. 4/3 3/2. 2/1. C. D. E. F. G. A.
  4. [4]
    Sound and Music - Tuning
    Pythagorean tuning has wider major thirds and sixths and narrower minor ... Pythagorean tuning obtains a major third by ascending 4 perfect fifths. If ...
  5. [5]
    Geometric Construction of Pythagorean and Just Musical Scales ...
    Mar 16, 2023 · The Pythagorean Scale. The diatonic scale of the Pythagorean tuning system may be found by proceeding upward from F by perfect fifths, i.e. ...
  6. [6]
    Pythagorean Tuning - Just Intonation Context
    We have focused on Pythagorean tuning as a system of just intonation well suited to the complex Gothic polyphony of the 13th and 14th centuries.
  7. [7]
    MTO 4.4: Scholtz, Algorithms for Tunings and Temperaments
    [3.1] Tuning the diatonic scale with pure fifths, now known as Pythagorean tuning, was the norm for nearly 2,000 years. The Pythagorean tuning of twelve notes ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  8. [8]
    (PDF) Pythagorean Music Theory - ResearchGate
    Jun 20, 2025 · Thus, it was Pythagoras who discovered the numerical ratios of the basic concords. But, although the sources are silent about that, these ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  9. [9]
    [PDF] MUSICAL SCALES, A NEVER-ENDING STORY - KSU Math
    Apr 25, 2024 · Construction of a Pythagorean scale: We start with a reference note. We obtain new notes by adding fifths to the reference note. If we exceed ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Topic 5 - Interactive Audio Lab
    Therefore, one definition of the perfect 5th is defined as the ratio 3:2. • Pythagorean tuning builds a scale by using the circle of. 5ths and this ratio of 3:2.
  11. [11]
    Pythagorean Tuning - Basic concepts
    Pythagorean tuning defines all notes and intervals of a scale from a series of pure fifths with a ratio of 3:2.
  12. [12]
    The Perfect Fifth: The Basis of All Harmony? - Hub Guitar
    However, the perfect fifth we hear when we are tuning corresponds to a ratio of 3:2, which equals a difference of 702 cent. In most cases, two notes are ...Missing: source | Show results with:source
  13. [13]
    perfect 5th / perfect fifth / p5 - diatonic musical interval - Tonalsoft
    In the usual 12-edo tuning, the perfect 5th encompasses 7 semitones, and is thus exactly 700 cents. This is the precise dividing point between tunings of ...
  14. [14]
    A biological rationale for musical consonance - PMC - PubMed Central
    He asserted that all physical objects capable of producing tonal sounds generate harmonic vibrations, the most prominent being the octave, perfect fifth, and ...
  15. [15]
    Pythagorean Tuning | Azimuth - WordPress.com
    Oct 7, 2023 · An important early tuning system is Pythagorean tuning, where we force all frequency ratios to involve only powers of 2 and 3.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] TUNING THE SCALE TO OBTAIN RATIONAL INTERVALS We will ...
    The Pythagorean Scale. This scale, deriving its name from Pythagoras' high regard for the just fifth (ratio 3 : 2), tunes the scale so that all intervals ...
  17. [17]
    Pythagorean_Scale
    In this scale, the ratios between successive steps are either the whole tone 9/8 (204 cents) or the diatonic semitone 256/243 (90 cents).<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Pythagorean Tuning
    Pythagorean tuning is a system of musical tuning in which the frequency ratios of all intervals are based on the ratio ... Pythagorean comma: 1.0136 (+23.46 cents) ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] More scales and temperaments - LPTHE
    Since log2(3=2) and log2(3) dif- fer by one, this is the same as asking whether log2(3) is rational. Lemma 6.2.1. The number log2(3) is irrational. Proof.Missing: cause | Show results with:cause
  20. [20]
    [PDF] NEW LIGHT ON THE BABYLONIAN TONAL SYSTEM Leon Crickmore
    The Babylonian tonal system was diatonic, based on seven heptachords, using Just tuning, and possibly a cyclic procedure for correcting tritones.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] MUSIC HISTORY NOTES ANCIENT EGYPT - The Reel Score
    • Musical theory of Ancient Egypt developed independently. • Little evidence ... • Only assumptions can be made about relative pitch and intervals. • No ...
  22. [22]
    MEANS, MEANING, AND MUSIC: PYTHAGORAS, ARCHYTAS ...
    In this paper will attempt a parallel description of the development of certain elements of numerical tuning theory from Pythagoras through Archytas and Plato.Missing: school | Show results with:school
  23. [23]
    The Science of Harmonics in Classical Greece
    This section treats the harmonic work of the Pythagoreans, Philolaus and Archytas, the harmonic passages of Plato and Aristotle, a full analysis of the ...
  24. [24]
    The Euclidean Sectio Canonis (Chapter 8) - Greek Musical Writings
    The little treatise called the Sectio Canonis consists of a short introduction and twenty propositions presented and argued in the manner of theorems.Missing: translation | Show results with:translation
  25. [25]
    History of Western Philosophy of Music: Antiquity to 1800
    Jul 13, 2021 · While his view of harmonics is indebted to Aristoxenus, his philosophy of music bears a strong Pythagorean influence. Book III of his De Musica ...
  26. [26]
    Boethius's Concept of Related Quantity in Music - jstor
    The Role of Boethius as Transmitter. De institutione musica is the primary vehicle by which Pythagorean num- ber theory is brought into the medieval world.Missing: tuning | Show results with:tuning
  27. [27]
    Medieval Musical Tuning Theory - Peter Frazer
    Medieval musical tuning was based on the Pythagorean circle of fifths and a system of modal scales later influenced by the hexachord system of Guido of ...
  28. [28]
    Pythagorean Tuning and Medieval Polyphony - Table of Contents
    This FAQ article is intended to explain the system of tuning in perfect fifths commonly known as Pythagorean intonation, its interaction with the stylistic ...Missing: organum | Show results with:organum
  29. [29]
    Pythagorean temperament for lute | David van Ooijen
    In this article I will explain about Pythagorean temperament and show you how to reposition your frets and tune your courses.
  30. [30]
    Frank Koonce Vihuela y Guit Renacentista PDF - Scribd
    Rating 1.0 (1) ... Pythagorean tuning.” The Pythagorean system produces pure fifths and fourths, but also produces semitones that are not equal.® Therefore, to sixteenth ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  31. [31]
    Renaissance science – XLIII
    Sep 15, 2022 · Boethius' Musica, Arithmetica, and Geometria were all printed for the first time in 1492 making the Pythagorean arithmetical theory of music ...
  32. [32]
    Musical Tuning for a Polyphonic Era - Peter Frazer
    Pythagorean tuning was still in use and the logical way to tune the new notes was as a fifth from existing notes, so Bb may be tuned as fifth down from the ...
  33. [33]
    You Cannot Just Say: “I am Singing the Right Note”'…
    Pythagorean tuning became common during the Middle Ages, the system being well suited to colour the melodies of Gregorian chants, and even when harmony was ...
  34. [34]
    10 Scales and Intervals - MIT Press Direct
    Feb 12, 2024 · Some theorists have proposed that. Pythagorean tuning is ideal for Gregorian chant on the assumption that dia- tonic scales are created most ...
  35. [35]
    MTO 12.3: Duffin, Just Intonation in Renaissance Theory and Practice
    ... Pythagorean tuning)--comprised the almost universal theoretical model. The ... Renaissance polyphony generally. Since he was aware of where the system ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] the concept of the renaissance - University of Notre Dame
    To say that the High Renaissance in music ended with the death of Josquin des Prez (1521) ... By the mid 16th century Pythagorean tuning was all but abandoned by ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Lute Tuning and Temperament in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth ...
    The first major break with Pythagorean systems of tuning for lute came from Hans Gerle, a lutenist and composer who published his treatise in 1533. In ...
  38. [38]
    Harmonics and drone tuning - Bagpipe News
    Apr 3, 2021 · The drones form the basis for the harmonics produced by the interplay between themselves and the chanter, making it an instrument unsuited for ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Byzantine church chant and Islamic art music on the English recorder
    43 Often this scale, which is a pure Pythagorean F major, is seen in theory books extending down by an extra “trichord” to D / πα. That is because the Ēchos ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  40. [40]
    [PDF] The Pythagorean Shift In The Ottoman Musical Writings - DergiPark
    Dec 5, 2019 · Early Ottomans and the Muslim philosophers before them, were greatly aware of the Pythagorean doctrines such as ethos and the Harmony of the ...
  41. [41]
    Maqam Harmony: Compositional Techniques and Tuning Methods ...
    Aug 4, 2025 · Pythagorean tuning, which derives all musical intervals of a ... For these tones the main clue for the discrimination of pure intervals ...
  42. [42]
    The tuning of Harry Partch's 43 tones‐to‐the‐octave just intonation ...
    Aug 12, 2005 · This system features a “micro” tuned scale of 43 tones‐to‐the‐octave, and just harmonic relationships in ratios of successive integers 4‐5‐6‐7‐9‐11.
  43. [43]
    [PDF] On the Notation and Performance Practice of Extended Just Intonation
    To organize this expanded pitch system Partch introduced the concept of various prime limits: he referred to Pythagorean tuning as 3-Limit, Ptolemaic tuning as ...
  44. [44]
    The Structure of Recognizable Diatonic Tunings - Project MUSE
    In a comprehensive work with important implications for tuning theory and musicology, Easley Blackwood ... The Diatonic Scale in Pythagorean Tuning. pp. 22 ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] The Structure of Recognizable Diatonic Tunings
    The two modalities of diatonic intervals. 40. 6. The conventional names of notes and intervals. 43. 7. Pythagorean thirds and the syntonic comma.
  46. [46]
    Scala Home Page - Huygens-Fokker
    Scala is a software tool for experimenting with musical tunings, including just intonation, equal, and historical temperaments, and non-Western scales.Scala Downloads · Scala References · Scala ExamplesMissing: DAWs ambient
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Just Guitar - John Schneider
    produce the pure fifths of Pythagorean temperament for the six & seven ... master of multiple electric guitars is Glenn Branca, whose. Symphonies for ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Investigate the mathematics behind the tuning systems of Wendy ...
    Nov 10, 2011 · Wendy. Carlos is an electronic musician and composer very interested in exotic sounds and alternative tunings. She is famous for having composed ...
  49. [49]
    Alpha, Beta, Gamma: Trying out Wendy Carlos's tunings ⋅ Plume
    Mar 29, 2019 · I casually mentioned in part 2 that Wendy Carlos had invented some innovative tuning systems. ... This difference is known as the Pythagorean ...
  50. [50]
    Should Neural Networks Compose Music By The Same Logic ...
    Sep 2, 2021 · The study of the science of harmony can be traced back to the times of Pythagoras. The development of the Pythagorean tuning system is ...
  51. [51]
    MTO 4.4: Scholtz, Algorithms for Tunings and Temperaments
    ... Pythagorean tuning and equal temperament have been related only by the Pythagorean ... The difference, the Pythagorean comma, is therefore equal to 24 cents.<|control11|><|separator|>
  52. [52]
    Pythagorean Temperament - HyperPhysics
    Expressed in cents notation, the natural whole tone is 204¢, compared to 200¢ for the equal tempered whole tone, just within the accepted 5¢ just noticeable ...
  53. [53]
    An Introduction to Historical Tunings - Kyle Gann
    Meantone tuning appeared sometime around the late 15th century, and was used widely through the early 18th century.
  54. [54]
    [PDF] An Exploration of the Evolution of Tuning in Western Music
    Despite the predominance of 12-tone equal temperament in music of the 20th and 21st centuries, the history of tuning certainly did not end with the widespread ...
  55. [55]
  56. [56]
    Just Temperament and Others - HyperPhysics
    Pythagorean temperament maintains just intervals for the fifth and fourth but departs for some other intervals. Equal temperament does not contain any just ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] The Battle Between Impeccable Intonation and Maximized Modulation
    Oct 3, 2018 · Because of this 24-cent difference, known as the Pythagorean comma, the musical “circle” cannot be completed. Note that a 24-cent difference.Missing: implications | Show results with:implications
  58. [58]
    Theoretical Background – Dr. Ross W. Duffin
    One characteristic of the differences between Pythagorean-derived notes and notes in Just intonation is that they are separated by a syntonic comma. The ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Math and Music Comparing the Three Tuning Systems
    Pythagorean tuning and just intonation use rational numbers while equal temperament uses irrational multipliers (except for unison or the 2:1 octave). Example ...Missing: differences | Show results with:differences
  60. [60]
    The Solution -- Different Tunings
    Just intonation is based solely on pure octaves, fifths, and thirds ... Thus, any note can be obtained from any other by tuning pure fifths and/or thirds.
  61. [61]
    [PDF] The Search for Pure Intonation
    Different intonations emphasize aspects of different intervals (for example, Pythagorean intonation emphasizes pure fifths while just intonation emphasizes ...