Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Quadratic equation

A quadratic equation is a second-degree of the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0, where a, b, and c are real numbers and a \neq 0. This equation represents a fundamental concept in , with solutions known as that can be real, repeated, or depending on the coefficients. The graph of the corresponding f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c is a parabola, which opens upward if a > 0 or downward if a < 0, and the roots correspond to the x-intercepts. The history of quadratic equations dates back to ancient civilizations, with the Babylonians around 1800 BC developing algorithmic methods, such as completing the square, to solve problems that translate to quadratics, often in geometric contexts like finding lengths. Euclid in approximately 300 BC employed geometrical techniques to determine roots equivalent to those of quadratic equations, though without modern algebraic notation. Significant advancements occurred in India with Brahmagupta (598–665 AD), who provided a general solution incorporating negative quantities, and in the Islamic world with al-Khwarizmi around 820 AD, who classified six cases of quadratics and offered numerical and geometric proofs, excluding negatives and zero. By the 12th century, Abraham bar Hiyya introduced complete solutions to Europe, and the modern quadratic formula was derived algebraically by Leonhard Euler in 1770. Solutions to quadratic equations can be found through methods like factoring, completing the square, or the quadratic formula x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}. The expression b^2 - 4ac, known as the discriminant, determines the nature of the roots: positive for two distinct real roots, zero for one real root (a repeated root), and negative for two complex conjugate roots. These methods build on historical geometric approaches but leverage symbolic algebra for efficiency. Quadratic equations have broad applications across fields, including physics for modeling projectile motion where distance fallen follows s = \frac{1}{2}gt^2 + v_0 t + s_0, engineering for optimization problems like maximizing area or profit, and computer graphics for calculating lines of sight to curved surfaces. In economics, they help determine break-even points, while in biology, they model population growth or enzyme kinetics under quadratic constraints. Their versatility underscores their enduring importance in mathematics and science.

Definition and Basic Properties

Standard Form

A quadratic equation is an algebraic equation of the second degree with one unknown variable, expressed in its standard form as ax^2 + bx + c = 0, where a, b, and c are real coefficients and a \neq 0. This form represents a polynomial equation where the highest power of the variable x is 2, distinguishing it from linear (degree 1) or cubic (degree 3) equations. The designation "quadratic" originates from the Latin term quadratus, the past participle of quadrare, meaning "to square," which alludes to the squared term x^2 central to the equation's structure. The coefficient a scales the quadratic term and determines the parabola's orientation when graphed, while b and c adjust the linear and constant components, respectively. Although the focus for solving quadratic equations remains the standard form, the related quadratic function can be expressed in vertex form as y = a(x - h)^2 + k, where (h, k) identifies the parabola's vertex, aiding in graphical analysis.

Coefficients and Discriminant

In the standard form of a quadratic equation, ax^2 + bx + c = 0, the coefficients a, b, and c (with a \neq 0) play distinct roles in defining the equation's graph as a parabola and its solution properties. The coefficient a determines the direction and scaling of the parabola: if a > 0, the parabola opens upward; if a < 0, it opens downward, reflecting the graph across the x-axis. The magnitude of a affects the width, with larger |a| values narrowing the parabola and smaller values widening it. The coefficient b influences the horizontal position of the parabola by setting the axis of symmetry at x = -\frac{b}{2a}, which locates the vertex and turning point. The constant term c represents the y-intercept, shifting the parabola vertically so that it crosses the y-axis at (0, c). A key property derived from these coefficients is the discriminant, defined as D = b^2 - 4ac, which appears under the square root in the quadratic formula and determines the nature of the roots without solving the equation. The value of the discriminant classifies the roots as follows: if D > 0, there are two distinct real roots, corresponding to the parabola intersecting the x-axis at two points; if D = 0, there is exactly one real root (repeated), meaning the parabola touches the x-axis at its ; if D < 0, there are two complex conjugate roots, and the parabola does not intersect the x-axis. Additionally, Vieta's formulas connect the coefficients to the : for roots r_1 and r_2, the sum r_1 + r_2 = -\frac{b}{a} and the product r_1 r_2 = \frac{c}{a}, providing symmetric relations that highlight the interplay among a, b, and c.

Algebraic Solution Methods

Factoring by Inspection

Factoring by inspection is an algebraic technique for solving quadratic equations of the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0 by expressing the quadratic as a product of two linear factors (px + q)(rx + s) = 0, where pr = a, qs = c, and ps + qr = b. This method relies on identifying suitable integer or rational factors through trial and error or systematic search, leveraging the zero-factor property to find the roots as x = -q/p and x = -s/r. When the leading coefficient a = 1, the process simplifies to finding two numbers that multiply to c and add to b. For example, in the equation x^2 + 5x + 6 = 0, the numbers 2 and 3 satisfy $2 \times 3 = 6 and $2 + 3 = 5, yielding the factorization (x + 2)(x + 3) = 0 with roots x = -2 and x = -3. For cases where a \neq 1, the AC method is commonly used: first, identify two numbers that multiply to ac and add to b, then rewrite the middle term and factor by grouping. Consider $2x^2 + 7x + 3 = 0; here, ac = 6, and the numbers 6 and 1 multiply to 6 and add to 7, so rewrite as $2x^2 + 6x + x + 3 = 0, group as (2x^2 + 6x) + (x + 3) = 0, factor to $2x(x + 3) + 1(x + 3) = 0, and obtain (2x + 1)(x + 3) = 0 with roots x = -1/2 and x = -3. A quadratic equation can be factored into linear factors over the real numbers if its discriminant b^2 - 4ac is positive, indicating two distinct real roots, or zero, indicating a repeated real root. This method works best with integer coefficients and rational roots, as the factors are typically integers in such cases. The primary advantage of factoring by inspection is that it provides exact roots directly without invoking a general formula, making it intuitive for simple polynomials and useful in educational settings as an introductory solving technique. However, it has limitations, particularly with non-integer coefficients, where finding suitable factors becomes trial-intensive or impractical, and it fails entirely for quadratics without rational roots even if real roots exist.

Completing the Square

Completing the square is an algebraic technique for solving quadratic equations of the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0 by rewriting the expression as a difference of a perfect square trinomial and a constant, facilitating the extraction of roots via square roots. This method is particularly useful when the quadratic does not factor easily over the integers and provides insight into the equation's structure by transforming it into a form equivalent to the vertex representation of a parabola. The origins of completing the square trace back to Old Babylonian mathematics around 1800 BCE, where it was employed geometrically to solve quadratic problems, such as completing L-shaped figures into squares on clay tablets like YBC 6967. In the 9th century, the Persian scholar Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi systematized the approach in his Compendium on Calculation by Completion and Balancing, presenting it as a core method for three cases of quadratics through geometric constructions, without considering negative roots. Brahmagupta's 7th-century algebraic solutions to quadratics preceded al-Khwarizmi's geometric systematization of completing the square, which together influenced later European developments, such as those by Fibonacci in the 13th century. To solve a quadratic equation using completing the square, follow these steps for the general form ax^2 + bx + c = 0, assuming a \neq 0:
  1. Divide both sides by a to obtain x^2 + \frac{b}{a}x + \frac{c}{a} = 0, making the leading coefficient 1.
  2. Move the constant term to the right side: x^2 + \frac{b}{a}x = -\frac{c}{a}.
  3. Add \left( \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2 to both sides to complete the square on the left: x^2 + \frac{b}{a}x + \left( \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2 = -\frac{c}{a} + \left( \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2. The left side factors as \left( x + \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2.
  4. Take the square root of both sides: x + \frac{b}{2a} = \pm \sqrt{ -\frac{c}{a} + \left( \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2 }.
  5. Solve for x: x = -\frac{b}{2a} \pm \sqrt{ \left( \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2 - \frac{c}{a} }.
This process yields the roots provided the discriminant \left( \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2 - \frac{c}{a} \geq 0. Results can be verified by factoring if possible. The method also derives the vertex form of a quadratic function y = ax^2 + bx + c, which is y = a(x - h)^2 + k, where (h, k) is the vertex. Start by isolating the quadratic and linear terms: y = a x^2 + b x + c Factor out a from the first two terms: y = a \left( x^2 + \frac{b}{a} x \right) + c Complete the square inside the parentheses by adding and subtracting \left( \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2: y = a \left( x^2 + \frac{b}{a} x + \left( \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2 - \left( \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2 \right) + c = a \left( \left( x + \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2 - \left( \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2 \right) + c Distribute a and simplify: y = a \left( x + \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2 - a \left( \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2 + c = a \left( x - \left( -\frac{b}{2a} \right) \right)^2 + \left( c - \frac{b^2}{4a} \right) Thus, h = -\frac{b}{2a} and k = c - \frac{b^2}{4a}, confirming the equivalence to the standard form. For example, consider solving $2x^2 + 4x - 6 = 0. Divide by 2: x^2 + 2x - 3 = 0. Move the constant: x^2 + 2x = 3. Add (1)^2 = 1 to both sides: x^2 + 2x + 1 = 4, or (x + 1)^2 = 4. Take the square root: x + 1 = \pm 2, so x = -1 + 2 = 1 or x = -1 - 2 = -3. The roots are x = 1 and x = -3. Completing the square serves as an intermediate step in deriving the , where the square root expression is further simplified to express the roots in terms of a, b, and c explicitly.

Quadratic Formula and Derivation

The provides a universal algebraic method to find the roots of any quadratic equation of the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0, where a \neq 0, b, and c are real coefficients. The solutions, or roots, are given by x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}. This closed-form expression derives from the method of completing the square and applies regardless of whether the equation factors easily over the integers. To derive the formula, begin with the general equation ax^2 + bx + c = 0. First, divide through by a to obtain the monic form: x^2 + \frac{b}{a}x + \frac{c}{a} = 0. Isolate the quadratic and linear terms: x^2 + \frac{b}{a}x = -\frac{c}{a}. $$ To complete the square, add $ \left( \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2 $ to both sides: x^2 + \frac{b}{a}x + \left( \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2 = \left( \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2 - \frac{c}{a}. \left( x + \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2 = \frac{b^2 - 4ac}{4a^2}. x + \frac{b}{2a} = \pm \sqrt{ \frac{b^2 - 4ac}{4a^2} } = \pm \frac{ \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac} }{2a}. $$ Solving for x gives the : x = \frac{ -b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac} }{2a}. This formula is equivalent to solving by factoring, as the roots it provides directly correspond to the factors in the form a(x - r_1)(x - r_2) = 0, where r_1 and r_2 are the solutions from the formula. For instance, if the roots are distinct real numbers, expanding the factored form recovers the original quadratic, confirming the methods yield identical solutions. The nature of the real roots depends on the discriminant D = b^2 - 4ac. If D > 0, there are two distinct real roots. If D = 0, there is exactly one real root (repeated). If D < 0, . As an example, consider the equation $2x^2 + 5x - 3 = 0. Here, a = 2, b = 5, c = -3, so D = 25 + 24 = 49 > 0. The roots are x = \frac{ -5 \pm \sqrt{49} }{4} = \frac{ -5 \pm 7 }{4}, yielding x = \frac{1}{2} and x = -3. These match the factored form (2x - 1)(x + 3) = 0.

Geometric and Graphical Solutions

Parabola Interpretation

The graph of a y = ax^2 + bx + c, where a \neq 0, is a parabola. If a > 0, the parabola opens upward, indicating a minimum at the ; if a < 0, it opens downward, indicating a maximum . This U-shaped curve is symmetric and extends infinitely in the direction of its opening. The vertex of the parabola represents its turning point and can be found using the formulas x = -\frac{b}{2a} for the x-coordinate and y = c - \frac{b^2}{4a} for the y-coordinate. The axis of symmetry is the vertical line x = -\frac{b}{2a}, which passes through the vertex and divides the parabola into two mirror-image halves. The y-intercept occurs at the point (0, c), where the parabola crosses the . The x-intercepts, or points where the parabola crosses the x-axis, correspond to the real roots of the quadratic equation ax^2 + bx + c = 0, obtained by setting y = 0. These intercepts lie symmetrically about the axis of symmetry if two exist, providing visual insight into the number and location of solutions. The standard parabola y = x^2 serves as the parent function, and the general form arises through transformations: a vertical stretch or compression by |a|, a reflection over the x-axis if a < 0, a horizontal shift by -\frac{b}{2a} units, and a vertical shift by c units. These transformations preserve the parabolic shape while altering its position, orientation, and scale.

Geometric Constructions

The roots of quadratic equations can be constructed geometrically using a ruler (straightedge) and compass, methods that trace their origins to ancient Greek mathematics and form the basis of Euclidean geometry. These constructions transform the algebraic problem into finding specific lengths on a plane through intersections of lines and circles, where the coefficients are represented as given lengths. In Euclid's Elements, particularly Book II, such techniques are developed through propositions that geometrically interpret completing the square and extracting square roots, allowing solutions to specific quadratic forms without symbolic algebra. For instance, Proposition II.6 provides a construction for equations of the form x^2 - ax = b^2 by erecting a perpendicular of length b at the midpoint of a segment of length a and drawing a circle of radius a/2 centered at one endpoint, with the intersection point yielding a length related to the root via the difference of squares: \left(\frac{a}{2}\right)^2 - \left(\frac{a}{2} - x\right)^2 = b^2. To address the general equation ax^2 + bx + c = 0, first reduce it to the monic depressed form x^2 + px + q = 0 by constructing the ratios p = b/a and q = c/a. This division is performed using similar triangles: draw a line segment of length a, erect a perpendicular of length b at one end, and draw a parallel line from a unit length to intersect, yielding p as the intercepted segment. The same applies for q. With p and q as lengths, construct perpendiculars to a base line to position coefficients spatially, then draw circles whose radii or diameters incorporate these lengths. Intersections with the base line or other constructed lines provide the root lengths, relying on Euclidean propositions for bisecting segments (Book I, Prop. 10), erecting perpendiculars (Book I, Prop. 11), and circle properties (Book III, Prop. 31). A specific example is the geometric solution for x^2 + px + q = 0 using a circle with a diameter determined by the coefficients, known as the . Draw a base line L and select origin O on L. Erect a perpendicular to L at O, marking point A at unit distance 1 from O. From O, along L in the negative direction, mark point B at distance |p| from O. From B, erect a perpendicular to L in the same direction as OA if q > 0 (or opposite if q < 0), marking point C at distance |q| from B. Construct the circle with diameter AC: first, find the midpoint of AC as center using bisection, then set the radius to half AC with the compass. This circle intersects L at two points R_1 and R_2 (potentially including O if a root is zero), where the directed distances from O to R_1 and R_2 are the roots of the equation. The method works because the circle's defining equation, when restricted to the base line, simplifies to the quadratic via the diameter endpoint property and the right-angle theorem in a semicircle (). For real roots, the discriminant must be non-negative, ensuring two intersections on L; complex roots do not yield real intersections. These constructions are limited to producing constructible numbers, which are real numbers obtainable from the rationals via a finite tower of quadratic field extensions using the given coefficient lengths as starting points. Roots of quadratics with constructible coefficients are always constructible, as solving x^2 + px + q = 0 involves at most one square root extraction, corresponding to a single quadratic extension. However, this restricts applicability to problems where solutions lie in such fields; for instance, roots requiring cubic or higher odd-degree extensions (as in angle trisection or cube duplication) cannot be constructed solely with ruler and compass, a result formalized in Galois theory.

Graphical Methods

Graphical methods for solving quadratic equations involve plotting the quadratic function and identifying the points where the graph intersects the x-axis, which correspond to the real roots of the equation. To apply this approach, one graphs the equation y = ax^2 + bx + c, where a, b, and c are constants, and the x-intercepts provide the approximate values of the roots by visual inspection or measurement on the graph. This method leverages the parabolic shape of the graph, allowing users to visualize the behavior of the quadratic. The vertex of the parabola and its axis of symmetry play key roles in estimating roots more effectively. The vertex represents the turning point, and the axis of symmetry is the vertical line through the vertex, which bisects the parabola; roots, if real, lie symmetric about this axis, enabling quicker approximations of their positions relative to the vertex. For instance, if the vertex is known to be at a certain x-value, one can estimate the roots by considering equal distances on either side where the graph crosses the x-axis. Digital tools enhance the precision of graphical solutions. Interactive graphing calculators like allow users to plot the quadratic function and zoom in on x-intercepts or use built-in features to detect exact intersection points, bridging the gap between visual approximation and algebraic accuracy. These tools facilitate exploration of how changes in coefficients affect root locations. This method offers advantages in building intuition, as it visually reveals the number of real roots (zero, one, or two) and their approximate locations without complex calculations, making it accessible for initial explorations. However, it has disadvantages in precision, particularly with hand-drawn graphs where scale and resolution limit accuracy, and it cannot directly identify complex roots. As an example, consider sketching y = x^2 - 5x + 6; the parabola opens upward, and visual estimation of x-intercepts around x=2 and x=3 provides a quick sense of the roots before applying algebraic methods.

Numerical and Practical Considerations

Avoiding Loss of Significance

When computing the roots of a quadratic equation ax^2 + bx + c = 0 using the quadratic formula, numerical instability arises due to catastrophic cancellation in floating-point arithmetic, particularly when |b| is much larger than \sqrt{|4ac|}, causing the terms -b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac} to be nearly equal in magnitude but opposite in sign for one root. This subtraction of closely valued large numbers leads to a severe loss of significant digits, resulting in inaccurate computation of the smaller root in absolute value, while the larger root remains reliable. The issue is exacerbated when the discriminant D = b^2 - 4ac is small relative to b^2, as the square root \sqrt{D} approximates |b|, amplifying roundoff errors in finite-precision systems like . To mitigate this loss of significance, an alternative formulation computes the problematic root by rationalizing the numerator: for the root nearer to -c/b, use x = \frac{2c}{-b - \operatorname{sign}(b) \sqrt{D}}, where the sign ensures addition rather than subtraction of large terms. The stable root (farther from zero) is calculated first via the standard formula with the sign that avoids cancellation—specifically, x_1 = \frac{-b - \operatorname{sign}(b) \sqrt{D}}{2a}—and the second root x_2 follows from the rationalized form x_2 = \frac{2c}{ -b - \operatorname{sign}(b) \sqrt{D} }, preserving full precision for both. This approach, originally highlighted by and refined by , ensures that the computed roots satisfy Vieta's formulas x_1 + x_2 = -b/a and x_1 x_2 = c/a within machine epsilon. Consider the equation $0.0001x^2 + 100000x + 0.002 = 0 in double-precision arithmetic (approximately 15 decimal digits). The exact roots are approximately -10^9 and -2 \times 10^{-8}. Using the standard formula for the smaller root yields x \approx 0 due to cancellation in -b + \sqrt{D} \approx -4 \times 10^{-12}, losing all precision beyond the first few digits. Applying the rationalized form gives x \approx -2 \times 10^{-8}, accurate to nearly full precision, while the larger root remains stable in both methods. For software implementations, normalize the equation to reduced (monic) form by dividing coefficients by a before applying the stable algorithm, which scales the problem to unit leading coefficient and reduces overflow risks. Additionally, compute the discriminant with extra precision—such as Kahan's method of representing b^2 and $4ac as sums of high- and low-order parts to avoid underflow in D—ensuring robustness across floating-point environments like MATLAB or C++. Many numerical libraries incorporate these techniques to guarantee backward stability.

Reduced Form and Vieta's Formulas

The reduced form of a quadratic equation, also known as the monic form, is obtained by dividing the general equation ax^2 + bx + c = 0 (with a \neq 0) by the leading coefficient a, yielding x^2 + px + q = 0, where p = b/a and q = c/a. This normalization simplifies the expression by setting the coefficient of x^2 to 1, facilitating comparisons and substitutions without altering the roots. Vieta's formulas, named after the French mathematician (1540–1603), establish relationships between the coefficients of a polynomial and the sums and products of its roots. For the general quadratic equation ax^2 + bx + c = 0 with roots r and s, the sum of the roots is r + s = -b/a and the product is rs = c/a. In the reduced form x^2 + px + q = 0, these relations simplify to r + s = -p and rs = q. These formulas arise from expanding the factored representation of the equation. Assuming roots r and s, the monic quadratic can be written as (x - r)(x - s) = 0, which expands to x^2 - (r + s)x + rs = 0. Comparing coefficients with x^2 + px + q = 0 gives p = -(r + s) and q = rs, directly yielding the sum and product relations. For the general case, scaling by a preserves the root symmetries. Vieta's formulas enable the construction of quadratic equations directly from known roots, which is particularly useful for substitutions in solving higher-degree equations or analyzing symmetric properties. For instance, if the roots are 2 and 3, then the sum is 5 and the product is 6, so the reduced equation is x^2 - 5x + 6 = 0. Conversely, for the equation x^2 + 4x - 5 = 0, Vieta's formulas confirm that the roots satisfy r + s = -4 and rs = -5, allowing verification without explicit solving.

Applications and Examples

Real-World Physical Examples

Quadratic equations frequently model projectile motion in physics, where the height of an object follows a parabolic trajectory under constant acceleration due to gravity. The vertical position h(t) as a function of time t is given by h(t) = h_0 + v_0 t - \frac{1}{2} g t^2, where h_0 is the initial height, v_0 is the initial vertical velocity, and g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.8 m/s² in SI units or 32 ft/s² in US customary units, yielding -4.9 t² or -16 t² respectively for the quadratic term). To find the time of flight when the object returns to the initial height (h(t) = h_0), set h(t) = h_0, simplifying to $0 = v_0 t - \frac{1}{2} g t^2, or t (v_0 - \frac{1}{2} g t) = 0, with solutions t = 0 and t = \frac{2 v_0}{g}. The discriminant of this quadratic, D = v_0^2, is always non-negative for real v_0, ensuring feasible solutions, but for queries like maximum reachable height, a negative discriminant indicates physical impossibility (e.g., no real time to exceed the vertex height). In engineering optimization, quadratic equations arise when maximizing the area of a rectangle given a fixed perimeter, such as in fencing or material allocation problems. For a perimeter P = 2(l + w), where l is length and w is width, express width as w = \frac{P}{2} - l; the area is then A(l) = l \left( \frac{P}{2} - l \right) = -\ l^2 + \frac{P}{2} l. The maximum area occurs at the vertex l = -\frac{b}{2a} = \frac{P}{4}, yielding w = l (a square) with A_{\max} = \left( \frac{P}{4} \right)^2. For P = 100 yards, dimensions are 25 yards by 25 yards, area 625 square yards; the positive discriminant D = \left( \frac{P}{2} \right)^2 > 0 confirms two real roots bounding the feasible . Units of area (e.g., square ) interpret the practical enclosure size. In electrical engineering, quadratic equations describe the behavior of RLC circuits, particularly for determining resonance frequencies in series or parallel configurations. The governing differential equation for charge q(t) is L \frac{d^2 q}{dt^2} + R \frac{d q}{dt} + \frac{1}{C} q = 0, leading to the characteristic quadratic s^2 + \frac{R}{L} s + \frac{1}{LC} = 0. The roots are s = -\frac{R}{2L} \pm \sqrt{ \left( \frac{R}{2L} \right)^2 - \frac{1}{LC} }, where the discriminant D = \left( \frac{R}{2L} \right)^2 - \frac{1}{LC} determines damping: underdamped (D < 0) yields oscillatory resonance at angular frequency \omega = \sqrt{ \frac{1}{LC} - \left( \frac{R}{2L} \right)^2 } in radians per second, feasible for real circuit oscillations. For example, with L = 33.43 mH, C = 1 μF, and low R, resonance occurs near 862 Hz.

Mathematical and Scientific Applications

In calculus, quadratic functions serve as a cornerstone for optimization problems, particularly in identifying maxima and minima through the vertex of the parabola. The vertex of a quadratic function f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c occurs at x = -\frac{b}{2a}, providing the input value where the function achieves its extreme value; if a > 0, this is a minimum, and if a < 0, it is a maximum. For instance, consider maximizing the area A of a rectangular garden enclosed by 40 meters of fencing on three sides, with the fourth side along a river. Let the width perpendicular to the river be x meters (two sides); then the length parallel to the river is y = 40 - 2x meters, yielding A(x) = x(40 - 2x) = -2x^2 + 40x. The vertex at x = -\frac{40}{2(-2)} = 10 gives dimensions of 10 m by 20 m, maximizing the area at A(10) = 200 square meters. This approach highlights how quadratics enable precise determination of optimal configurations in constrained scenarios. In economics, quadratic models are widely used to represent profit functions, where revenue typically increases linearly with quantity sold but eventually diminishes due to market saturation, resulting in a downward-opening parabola. The profit P(x) for producing x units is given by P(x) = R(x) - C(x), often simplifying to a quadratic form P(x) = ax^2 + bx + c with a < 0, whose vertex indicates the production level maximizing profit. For example, suppose a firm's profit function is P(x) = -2x^2 + 100x - 500, where x is the number of units produced. The maximum occurs at x = -\frac{100}{2(-2)} = 25 units, yielding P(25) = -2(25)^2 + 100(25) - 500 = 750 dollars. This interpretation allows economists to advise on optimal output levels to avoid overproduction losses. Quadratic equations appear in biology, particularly in population genetics, to model mean fitness as a function of allele frequencies, capturing stabilizing selection where intermediate frequencies yield optimal population viability. Under Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, for a locus with alleles A (frequency p) and S (frequency q = 1 - p), the mean fitness \bar{w}(p) is \bar{w}(p) = w_{AA} p^2 + 2 w_{AS} p q + w_{SS} q^2, a quadratic in p. In the case of sickle cell anemia, with fitness values w_{AA} = 0.76, w_{AS} = 1.0, and w_{SS} = 0.20, the function becomes \bar{w}(p) = 0.76p^2 + 2p(1-p) + 0.20(1-p)^2. Simplifying, \bar{w}(p) = -1.04p^2 + 1.6p + 0.20; the maximum at p = -\frac{1.6}{2(-1.04)} \approx 0.77 indicates the allele frequency balancing malaria resistance and anemia risks for highest population fitness. This model underscores how quadratics reveal evolutionary equilibria. In geometry, quadratic equations arise when applying the Pythagorean theorem to right triangles with variable sides, leading to equations that must be solved for unknown lengths, and in area problems where dimensions are related quadratically. For example, consider a right triangle where one leg is x units, the other leg is x + 7 units, and the hypotenuse is x + 8 units. The Pythagorean theorem gives x^2 + (x + 7)^2 = (x + 8)^2, expanding to x^2 + x^2 + 14x + 49 = x^2 + 16x + 64, or x^2 - 2x - 15 = 0. Solving via the quadratic formula, x = \frac{2 \pm \sqrt{4 + 60}}{2} = \frac{2 \pm 8}{2}, yields x = 5 or x = -3 (discarding the negative), so the sides are 5, 12, and 13 units. This extends the theorem to dynamic configurations, such as ladder problems against walls. Similarly, for areas, quadratics model trade-offs in enclosure design, as in the fencing example above, emphasizing symmetry and extrema for maximal spatial efficiency.

Historical Development

Ancient and Medieval Solutions

The earliest known solutions to quadratic equations emerged in ancient Mesopotamia around 2000 BCE, where Babylonian mathematicians employed geometric methods to address problems involving areas and dimensions of fields or structures. These solutions were recorded on cuneiform clay tablets and typically involved iterative numerical procedures or "cut-and-paste" geometric manipulations to find lengths satisfying quadratic relations, such as dividing a rectangular field into squares and rectangles. A prominent artifact is the Yale Babylonian Collection tablet (c. 1800–1600 BCE), which provides a highly accurate sexagesimal approximation of \sqrt{2} as 1;24,51,10 (equivalent to about 1.41421356), derived from solving a quadratic arising in geometric contexts like diagonal calculations. In ancient Greece, Euclid formalized geometric approaches to quadratic problems in his Elements (c. 300 BCE), particularly in Book II, where propositions demonstrate algebraic identities through constructions. Proposition II.14 constructs a square equal to a given rectilinear figure, effectively solving quadratic equations of the form x^2 + px = q via a geometric completion of the square, transforming rectangles into squares without explicit numerical computation. This method built on earlier Pythagorean traditions and emphasized deductive proofs, treating quadratics as applications of area equivalences rather than abstract equations. Euclid's work preserved and systematized these techniques, influencing subsequent European mathematics. Indian mathematicians advanced quadratic solutions algebraically in the early medieval period, with Brahmagupta's Brahmasphuṭasiddhānta (628 CE) providing verbal rules for extracting positive roots from equations like ax^2 + bx = c. Brahmagupta described a procedure akin to the , stating: "Put down twice the square root of a given square multiplied by a multiplier and increased or diminished by an arbitrary number," which generates solutions iteratively while restricting to positive values and rational coefficients, often in astronomical or inheritance contexts. This represented a shift toward symbolic manipulation, though still tied to practical problems, and excluded negative or irrational roots as non-physical. In the Islamic Golden Age, Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi's Al-Kitab al-Mukhtasar fi Hisab al-Jabr wal-Muqabala (c. 820 CE) introduced a systematic algebraic framework for quadratics, classifying them into six types based on coefficients (e.g., "squares equal to roots" or "squares plus roots equal numbers") and solving via completion of the square with geometric justifications. Al-Khwarizmi avoided negative roots, interpreting them as impossible in real-world applications like commerce or land measurement, and provided step-by-step rhetorical algorithms without symbols. His treatise, preserved through Arabic manuscripts and later Latin translations—such as Robert of Chester's 1145 version and Gerard of Cremona's 12th-century rendering—facilitated the transmission of these methods to medieval Europe, bridging ancient geometric traditions with emerging algebraic practices.

Modern Formulation

The Renaissance marked a pivotal shift in the treatment of quadratic equations, building on earlier geometric foundations to emphasize algebraic methods. In 1545, Gerolamo Cardano published Ars Magna, which, while primarily focused on solving cubic and quartic equations, included systematic approaches to quadratics as special cases, presenting solutions in radical form and introducing the use of complex quantities to handle intermediate steps. Lodovico Ferrari, Cardano's associate, contributed to the same work by developing a general method for quartics that relied on resolving associated cubics, indirectly refining quadratic techniques through the emphasis on polynomial depression and substitution. These advancements promoted a more analytic perspective, standardizing symbolic manipulation over purely geometric constructions. François Viète, in the late 16th century, further revolutionized the field by introducing systematic symbolic notation in his 1591 work , using letters to represent both unknowns and parameters, which enabled the expression of quadratic relations in a general form. Viète's formulas, articulating the sum and product of roots in terms of coefficients—for a quadratic ax^2 + bx + c = 0, the sum of roots equals -b/a and the product equals c/a—provided a foundational link between roots and coefficients, facilitating derivations without specific numerical values. Shortly thereafter, in 1594, Simon Stevin provided the first general solution to the quadratic equation covering all cases in his work or . This symbolic framework laid the groundwork for the modern . In the 17th and 18th centuries, René integrated quadratic equations with geometry through his 1637 La Géométrie, establishing coordinate systems that represented quadratic relations as conic sections, particularly parabolas, allowing algebraic solutions to be visualized and manipulated geometrically. By the 19th century, advanced the understanding of quadratic roots by proving the fundamental theorem of algebra in multiple versions starting in 1799, demonstrating that every non-constant polynomial, including quadratics, has roots in the complex plane, thus ensuring all solutions could be accounted for using complex numbers. The 20th century saw the quadratic formula adapted for computational contexts, where numerical stability became critical in digital computing due to floating-point arithmetic limitations. Early implementations highlighted issues like catastrophic cancellation in the standard formula when b^2 \gg 4ac, leading to loss of precision in one root; solutions involved recomputing the smaller root using Vieta's product relation to avoid subtraction of close values. These refinements, developed amid the rise of electronic computers, ensured reliable evaluation and contributed to the formula's universal acceptance as a staple in scientific computing and engineering applications today.

Advanced Topics

Complex and Trigonometric Solutions

When the discriminant D = b^2 - 4ac of the quadratic equation ax^2 + bx + c = 0 is negative, the roots are complex conjugates of the form \frac{-b \pm i \sqrt{|D|}}{2a}. This arises because the square root of a negative number introduces the imaginary unit i = \sqrt{-1}, ensuring the roots are non-real but come in pairs that are mirror images across the real axis in the complex plane. The conjugate property follows from the fact that the coefficients a, b, and c are real, preserving the equation's reality under conjugation. The complex roots can be expressed in polar form to highlight their magnitude and argument, which is useful for operations like multiplication or finding powers. For a root z = \alpha + \beta i, the magnitude is r = \sqrt{\alpha^2 + \beta^2} and the argument is \theta = \tan^{-1}(\beta / \alpha) (adjusted for quadrant), yielding z = r (\cos \theta + i \sin \theta). For the conjugate pair, the magnitudes are identical, while the arguments are \theta and -\theta. This trigonometric representation leverages e^{i\theta} = \cos \theta + i \sin \theta, facilitating computations in fields like signal processing or electrical engineering where quadratic equations model oscillatory systems. Consider the equation x^2 + x + 1 = 0, where a = 1, b = 1, c = 1, and D = 1 - 4 = -3 < 0. The roots are x = \frac{-1 \pm i \sqrt{3}}{2}. In polar form, the magnitude r = \sqrt{\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\right)^2} = 1, with arguments \theta = \frac{2\pi}{3} and \theta = -\frac{2\pi}{3} (or $120^\circ and -120^\circ), so the roots are \cos\frac{2\pi}{3} + i \sin\frac{2\pi}{3} and \cos\left(-\frac{2\pi}{3}\right) + i \sin\left(-\frac{2\pi}{3}\right). These are the non-real cube roots of unity, illustrating how complex quadratic roots connect to roots of higher-degree polynomials. The trigonometric form provides an alternative view of complex solutions, expressing them via cosine and sine functions for the real and imaginary parts relative to the polar angle. Specifically, for roots \frac{-b}{2a} \pm i \frac{\sqrt{|D|}}{2a}, the form aligns with r \left( \cos \theta \pm i \sin \theta \right), where the \pm captures the conjugate pair through symmetric arguments. This representation emphasizes the rotational aspect in the complex plane and is derived from the standard rectangular form without additional identities beyond . For cases with positive discriminant (D > 0), where roots are real and distinct, offer an alternative expression to enhance , particularly when |b| is large compared to \sqrt{D}. The roots can be reformulated using , such as relating \cosh^{-1} solutions to quadratics via \ln\left(x + \sqrt{x^2 - 1}\right) for x \geq 1, avoiding cancellation errors in direct computation. This approach is valuable in computational contexts like solving boundary value problems or optimizing algorithms where precision matters.

Generalizations to Other Contexts

Quadratic equations extend naturally to other algebraic structures beyond the real or complex numbers, such as finite fields, where the characteristic of the field influences the solvability and solution methods. In fields of characteristic not equal to 2, the standard quadratic formula applies, but in characteristic 2, the equation x^2 + bx + c = 0 requires alternative approaches because the discriminant b^2 - 4ac simplifies to b^2 (since $4 = 0) and division by 2 is impossible. If b = 0, the equation reduces to x^2 = c, solvable by finding square roots in the field, which exist for perfect fields like finite fields of characteristic 2. If b \neq 0, a substitution y = x/b transforms it to y^2 + y + (c/b^2) = 0, and solutions depend on the trace function: the equation has solutions if the absolute trace of c/b^2 is zero, with explicit formulas involving half-traces or iterative methods in extensions like \mathrm{GF}(2^m). In the context of quadratic forms, the homogeneous equation ax^2 + bxy + cy^2 = 0 in two variables over a represents the at infinity or sections when set to zero, but more generally, the full form ax^2 + bxy + cy^2 + dx + ey + f = 0 defines conic sections such as ellipses, parabolas, or hyperbolas in the real plane, classified by the b^2 - 4ac of the quadratic part. Over other fields, these forms retain their bilinear structure, with the associated \begin{pmatrix} a & b/2 \\ b/2 & c \end{pmatrix} determining or anisotropy via eigenvalues or Hasse invariants. In , such forms classify conics up to coordinate changes, linking to broader theory. For linear algebra over any , the characteristic equation of a $2 \times 2 A = \begin{pmatrix} p & q \\ r & s \end{pmatrix} is \det(A - \lambda I) = \lambda^2 - (p+s)\lambda + (ps - qr) = 0, a monic quadratic polynomial whose roots are the eigenvalues, enabling spectral decomposition when solvable. This arises directly from the expansion and generalizes to higher dimensions, but for n=2, it mirrors the scalar case with and as coefficients. Solutions via the hold in characteristic not 2, while in characteristic 2, eigenvalue computation adapts similarly to field-specific methods. In multivariable settings, quadratic equations generalize to hypersurfaces defined by \sum_{i,j} a_{ij} x_i x_j + \sum_i b_i x_i + c = 0 in n-dimensional , forming hypersurfaces that extend conic sections to higher dimensions, such as ellipsoids or hyperboloids in \mathbb{R}^3 and their projective analogs. These are algebraic varieties of degree 2, classified by the signature of the matrix or , with applications in optimization and geometry where the captures second-order behavior. Over finite fields, such hypersurfaces count points via zeta functions, influencing ./12:_Vectors_in_Space/12.06:_Quadric_Surfaces) A concrete example occurs in the finite field \mathrm{GF}(2), the field with two elements \{0,1\} where $1+1=0. The quadratic x^2 + x + a = 0 (noting x^2 + x = 0 for all elements) has roots x=0 and x=1 when a=0, and no solutions when a=1, actually illustrating that non-trivial quadratics may lack roots in the field. Due to the finiteness of the field, solutions can be verified by checking all elements exhaustively. This ties to coding theory, where quadratic residues over \mathrm{GF}(2^m) decode Reed-Solomon codes via solving x^2 + bx + c = 0 for error locations, using half-trace formulas for efficiency, as in Berlekamp's algorithm variants; similarly, nonlinear codes like quadratic residue codes over \mathrm{GF}(2) use such forms for parity-check matrices, achieving optimal distance properties.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] ▫ Introduction to Quadratic Equations. Definition of a quadratic ...
    Definition of a quadratic equation. A quadratic equation in x is an equation that can be written in the form. 2. 0,. , ,. 0. ax bx c where ab and care real ...
  2. [2]
    Algebra - Quadratic Equations - Part I - Pauls Online Math Notes
    Nov 16, 2022 · In this section we will start looking at solving quadratic equations. Specifically, we will concentrate on solving quadratic equations by ...
  3. [3]
    BioMath: Quadratic Functions
    A quadratic function is graphically represented by a parabola with vertex located at the origin, below the x-axis, or above the x-axis.
  4. [4]
    Quadratic, cubic and quartic equations - MacTutor
    It is often claimed that the Babylonians (about 1800 BC) were the first to solve quadratic equations. This is an over simplification, for the Babylonians ...
  5. [5]
    Completing the Square: The prehistory of the quadratic formula
    Quadratic equations have been considered and solved since Old Babylonian times (c. 1800 BC), but the quadratic formula students memorize today is an 18th ...
  6. [6]
    Algebra - Quadratic Equations : A Summary - Pauls Online Math Notes
    Nov 16, 2022 · The quantity b2−4ac b 2 − 4 a c in the quadratic formula is called the discriminant. It is the value of the discriminant that will determine ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Quadratic Functions and Equations
    We'll just look at two simple applications from mechanics. 4.2.1 Motion of a Falling Body. Classical Physics tells us that a body of any mass, falling in ...
  8. [8]
    Applications of Quadratic Equations - Pauls Online Math Notes
    Nov 16, 2022 · In this section we will revisit some of the applications we saw in the linear application section, only this time they will involve solving ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] A Real World Example of Solving a Quadratic Equation in Movie CGI
    This activity shows students an application of solving quadratic equations to computing the line of sight to spherical objects in computer graphics. The ...
  10. [10]
    Quadratic equation | Solutions, Roots & Coefficients - Britannica
    Sep 11, 2025 · In two variables, the general quadratic equation is ax2 + bxy + cy2 + dx + ey + f = 0, in which a, b, c, d, e, and f are arbitrary constants and ...Missing: standard | Show results with:standard
  11. [11]
    11.4: Solve Quadratic Equations Using the Quadratic Formula
    Aug 23, 2020 · Remember, to use the Quadratic Formula, the equation must be written in standard form, a ⁢ x 2 + b ⁢ x + c = 0 .
  12. [12]
    Question Corner -- The Origin Of The Word Quadratic
    To the best of our knowledge the origin of the term "quadratic" is Latin. It is derived from quadratus which is the past participle of quadrare which means "to ...
  13. [13]
    3.2: Quadratic Functions - Mathematics LibreTexts
    May 1, 2022 · A quadratic function is a function of degree two. The graph of a quadratic function is a parabola. The general form of a quadratic function is ...
  14. [14]
    Vertex form introduction (video) | Khan Academy
    Nov 30, 2017 · One of the common forms for quadratic functions is called vertex form, because it highlights the coordinates of the vertex of the function's graph.
  15. [15]
    None
    ### Summary of Roles of Coefficients a, b, and c in Quadratic Functions
  16. [16]
    Discriminant Formula, Rules & Solutions - Lesson | Study.com
    Nov 21, 2023 · The discriminant of a quadratic equation is b^2-4ac if the equation is f(x)=ax^2+bx+c. It tells if the solutions to the quadratic equation are real number or ...
  17. [17]
    Vieta's Formula | Brilliant Math & Science Wiki
    Vieta's formula relates the coefficients of polynomials to the sums and products of their roots, as well as the products of the roots taken in groups.
  18. [18]
    Quadratic Equations - Department of Mathematics at UTSA
    Jan 22, 2022 · A quadratic equation has at most two solutions. If there is only one solution, one says that it is a double root.
  19. [19]
    ac Method of Factoring
    ac Method of Factoring ; The polynomial can be factored if there are two factors of ac whose sum is b ; ax2 + bx + · ax2 + bx - c ; The polynomial can be factored ...
  20. [20]
    Quadratic Equations - College Algebra - West Texas A&M University
    Dec 17, 2009 · The discriminant can tell you how many solutions there are going to be and if the solutions are real numbers or complex imaginary numbers.Missing: conditions | Show results with:conditions
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Completing the square | Mathcentre
    4 Use completing the square to solve the following quadratic equations a) x2 + 4x − 12 = 0 b) x2 + 5x − 6=0 c) 10x2 + 7x − 12 = 0 d) x2 + 4x − 8=0 e) 10 ...
  22. [22]
    Completing the Square | Mathematical Association of America
    The quadratic equation, as we know it today, was first discussed and taught by Muhammed ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi (fl. 815-850). At the command of his Caliph, he ...
  23. [23]
    Vertex Form of Quadratic Equation - MathBitsNotebook(A1)
    To convert a quadratic from y = ax 2 + bx + c form to vertex form, y = a(x - h) 2 + k, you use the process of completing the square.
  24. [24]
    Algebra - Quadratic Equations - Part II - Pauls Online Math Notes
    Nov 16, 2022 · We can derive the quadratic formula by completing the square on the general quadratic formula in standard form. Let's do that and we'll take it ...
  25. [25]
    Quadratic Formula -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    The formula giving the roots of a quadratic equation ax^2+bx+c=0 as x=(-b+/-sqrt(b^2-4ac))/(2a). An alternate form is given by x=(2c)/(-b+/-
  26. [26]
    Polynomials and Factoring - Worked Examples
    The Quadratic formula. When factoring a quadratic polynomial proves difficult, we can use the following formula to find its roots: Quadratic Formula:.<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Parabolas - Algebra - Pauls Online Math Notes
    Nov 16, 2022 · In this section we will be graphing parabolas. We introduce the vertex and axis of symmetry for a parabola and give a process for graphing ...
  28. [28]
    MFG The Vertex of a Parabola
    The parabola is symmetric about a vertical line, called the axis of symmetry , that runs through the vertex. The y y -intercept is the point where the parabola ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Section 4.1 Quadratic Functions - Math@LSU
    Every quadratic function has a “u-shaped” graph called a parabola. The five basic characteristics of a parabola are its. 1. vertex. 2. axis of symmetry. 3. y- ...
  30. [30]
    Euclid's Elements, Book II, Proposition 6 - Clark University
    x(x – b) = (x – b/2)2 – (b/2)2. This equation is easily verified with modern algebra, but it's also easily verified in geometry, as done here in the proof. The ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] 3.7. Geometric Solution of Quadratic Equations
    Apr 30, 2023 · We use similar triangles, circles, and parallelograms to construct solutions to quadratics of the form x2 = ab, x2 − ax + b2 = 0, and x2 − ax − ...
  32. [32]
    Carlyle Circle -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    Consider a quadratic equation x^2-sx+p=0 where s and p denote signed lengths. The circle which has the points A=(0,1) and B=(s,p) as a diameter is then ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Constructible numbers: Euclid and beyond - CSUSB ScholarWorks
    A geometric proof that the square root of a constructible number q is constructible is obtained from Figure 1.3. Thus, E is a subfield of R. We can find an ...
  34. [34]
    3-03 Solve Quadratic Equations by Graphing and Finding Square ...
    Graphing can be used to solve any equation as long as the solutions are real numbers. It involves making the equation equal to zero and then finding the x- ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Ways To Solve Quadratic Equations
    Graphical Method. Visual learners might find the graphical method helpful. By graphing the quadratic function \( y = ax^2 + bx + c \), the roots correspond ...
  36. [36]
    Graphs of Quadratic Functions - West Texas A&M University
    Jul 10, 2010 · The graph of a quadratic function is called a parabola and has a curved shape. One of the main points of a parabola is its vertex. It is the ...Missing: methods | Show results with:methods
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Using Desmos to Support Conceptual Understanding of Quadratic ...
    Nov 25, 2020 · (Students will learn how to solve quadratic equations algebraically and discover what information we can gather from the signs of the equation.).
  38. [38]
    [PDF] 3 Quadratic Functions Big Ideas Learning
    Graphical solutions: Graphing the quadratic function and identifying the x- intercepts provide a visual approach to solving quadratic equations. This method.
  39. [39]
    [PDF] 4 Ways To Solve Quadratic Equations
    Despite its advantages, graphing has its drawbacks: Limitations: Precision depends on the graph's scale and resolution; complex roots. 1. cannot be directly ...Missing: disadvantages | Show results with:disadvantages
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Lesson 9 – Solving Quadratic Equations
    Jun 12, 2014 · Graphing is the first method you will work with to solve quadratic equations followed by factoring and then the quadratic formula. You will get ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Numerically Stable Method for Solving Quadratic Equations
    The commonly used formula for the solutions of a quadratic does not provide for the most accurate computation of both roots when faced with.
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Approximating solutions to the quadratic equation
    Feb 5, 2025 · Subtractive cancellation can cause numerical errors when solving quadratic equations. Rationalizing the numerator can help, especially for the ...
  43. [43]
  44. [44]
    [PDF] The Ins and Outs of Solving Quadratic Equations with Floating-Point ...
    Jun 3, 2023 · ... numerically stable method for solving quadratic equations. The algorithm used considers separately the various cases where either 𝑎, 𝑏, or ...
  45. [45]
    Quadratic Equations - Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute
    A non-monic quadratic equation is an equation of the form ax2 + bx + c = 0 ... quadratic, but can be reduced to a quadratic equation by a simple substitution.
  46. [46]
    [PDF] françois viète and his contribution to mathematics - arXiv
    Oct 22, 2022 · In algebra, Vieta's formulas are a set of results that relate the coefficients of a polynomial to its roots. In particular, it states that the ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Quadratic Applications - Gordon State College
    The height in feet, H, of a projectile can be approximated over time in seconds, t, using the following function: H t = v0t – 16t2 .
  48. [48]
    3.4 Projectile Motion – College Physics - UCF Pressbooks
    This expression is a quadratic equation of the form \boldsymbol{at^2+bt+c=0} ... is its direction. Analyze the motion of the projectile in the horizontal direction ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Quadratic Functions and Their Graphs
    dimensions of the rectangle that maximize the enclosed area are 25 yards by 25 yards. The rectangle that gives the maximum area is actually a square with an ...<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    4.4 Applied Optimization
    First outline a strategy for solving constrained optimization problems involving area or perimeter. ... Maximizing the area of a rectangle. Activate. 🔗. A ...
  51. [51]
    None
    ### Summary: Use of Quadratic Equation in RLC Circuits for Resonance or Frequencies
  52. [52]
    None
    ### Summary: Quadratic Equations in RLC Circuits for Frequencies or Resonance
  53. [53]
    [PDF] What Is The Discriminant In A Quadratic Equation
    Knowing the nature of the roots can inform you about the physical feasibility of solutions. For example, complex roots often suggest no real intersection ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Applications of Max & Min I Chapter 6: Quadratic Equations Page 1 ...
    This will involve finding the vertex of the quadratic equation you come up with, since the vertex will be the maximum or minimum of the graph. CASE 1: ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Applications of Linear and Quadratic Functions in Business and ...
    Total Profit (P) from the production and sale of x units = P(x): P(x) = R(x) – C(x). Total profit is the difference between the amount received from sales ( ...
  56. [56]
    Quadratic Function Applications
    Quadratic Functions Applications Population Genetics Problem 5- Find the frequency of the A allele that will maximize the mean fitness of a population.Missing: growth | Show results with:growth
  57. [57]
    Quadratic Applications - MathBitsNotebook(A1)
    Apply the Pythagorean Theorem a2 + b2 = c2 x2 + (x + 7)2 = (x + 8)2 x2 + x2 + 14x + 49 = x2 + 16x + 64 2x2+ 14x + 49 = x2 + 16x + 64 x2 - 2x + 15 = 0
  58. [58]
    How the estimate of 2 on YBC 7289 may have been calculated
    In this article I will explore how might have been estimated using solely documented mathematical practices from the Old Babylonian period.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] A brief history of quadratic equations for mathematics educators
    A map of the development of quadratic equations. The history of the solution of quadratic equations extends across the world for more than 4000 years.
  60. [60]
    Euclid's Elements, Book II, Proposition 14 - Clark University
    This proposition finishes the quadrature of rectilinear figures. The narrow meaning of the word “quadrature” is to find a square with the same area of a given ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Equation Solving in Indian Mathematics - DiVA portal
    Bhaskara I and Brahmagupta were the famous mathematicians in the early seventh century, who were ... positive roots of quadratic equations. According to Katz ( ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] A Brief History of Quadratic Equations - DiVA portal
    As such, the history of quadratic equa- tions is inexorably tied up with the history of algebra as a whole. A quadratic equation is any equation that can be ...
  63. [63]
    Girolamo Cardano - Biography - MacTutor
    Girolamo Cardano was an Italian doctor and mathematician, known for his work Ars Magna, the first Latin treatise on algebra, and for solving cubic and quartic  ...Missing: Renaissance | Show results with:Renaissance
  64. [64]
    Lodovico Ferrari (1522 - 1565) - Biography - MacTutor
    Ferrari discovered the solution of the quartic equation in 1540 with a quite beautiful argument but it relied on the solution of cubic equations so could not be ...Missing: Renaissance | Show results with:Renaissance
  65. [65]
    François Viète - Biography - MacTutor - University of St Andrews
    Viète introduced the first systematic algebraic notation in his book In artem analyticam isagoge published at Tours in 1591. The title of the work may seem ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  66. [66]
    René Descartes - Biography
    ### Summary of René Descartes' Contributions to Quadratic Equations, Coordinate Geometry, and Parabolas
  67. [67]
    Fund theorem of algebra - MacTutor History of Mathematics
    In 1849 (on the 50th anniversary of his first proof!) Gauss produced the first proof that a polynomial equation of degree n with complex coefficients has n ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Understanding Complex Numbers and Identifying Complex Roots ...
    When solving a quadratic equation, students are instructed to use the quadratic formula. The quadratic formula receives great attention in both. Algebra I and ...
  69. [69]
    4. Polar and Exponential Forms - Pauls Online Math Notes
    Nov 17, 2022 · With Euler's formula we can rewrite the polar form of a complex number into its exponential form as follows. ... where θ=argz θ = arg ⁡ z and so ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] 5.6 Quadratic and Cubic Equations
    Jun 5, 2017 · Apropos of quadratic equations, this seems a convenient place to recall that the inverse hyperbolic functions sinh. −1 and cosh. −1 are in ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] arXiv:1702.05789v2 [math.HO] 2 Aug 2019
    Aug 2, 2019 · Quadratic equations in a field of characteristic 2. We consider (1) in a field F of characteristic 2. If b = 0, then (1) is equivalent to x2 = c ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Math 4571 (Advanced Linear Algebra)
    For conics in R2, the general equation is. Ax2 + Bxy + Cy2 + Dx + Ey + F = 0. By diagonalizing, we may eliminate the xy term, and so the quadratic terms can be ...
  73. [73]
    The Characteristic Polynomial
    The characteristic polynomial of A is the function f ( λ ) given by f ( λ )= det ( A − λ I n ) . We will see below that the characteristic polynomial is in ...
  74. [74]
    [PDF] FAST DECODING OF A dmin - 6 RS CODE
    In this section we show that the well known quadratic equation over. GF(2m) can be used to decode the code described in Section I. Also we present a method of ...