Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Red Sticks

The Red Sticks were a nativist and militant faction within the Upper (Muscogee) Confederacy during the early 19th century, deriving their name from the red-painted ceremonial clubs they carried as symbols of and traditional declarations of . Composed primarily of traditionalists from Upper towns who rejected into Euro-American economic and cultural practices, the Red Sticks advocated a return to ancestral lifeways and opposed accommodationist Lower leaders who cooperated with U.S. expansionist policies under agents like . Inspired by Shawnee leader Tecumseh's pan-Indian resistance movement during his 1811 visit to Creek country, the Red Sticks escalated internal divisions into civil strife, enforcing ideological conformity through violence against perceived traitors and engaging in raids that drew U.S. military intervention amid the War of 1812. Their most notorious action was the August 30, 1813, assault on Fort Mims near , where approximately 1,000 warriors massacred soldiers, settlers, and mixed-blood s, killing hundreds and igniting widespread American retaliation. Led by figures such as war chief of Okfuskee and , the faction fortified positions like the Horseshoe Bend on the , but suffered catastrophic defeat there on March 27, 1814, under Andrew Jackson's forces, with over 800 Red Stick warriors killed in a single day—the heaviest loss ever inflicted on Native American combatants by U.S. troops. The Red Sticks' defeat fragmented Creek resistance, culminating in the 1814 , which compelled the entire —regardless of faction—to cede over 20 million acres of land to the , accelerating southeastern despite the Red Sticks' initial intent to preserve sovereignty through traditionalism and warfare. This internal Creek schism, intertwined with broader Anglo-American imperial dynamics, exemplified causal tensions between cultural preservation and inexorable territorial pressures, underscoring the Red Sticks' role as defenders of autonomy amid encroaching federal authority.

Origins

Creek Societal Divisions

The Creek Confederacy, or Muskogee, was geographically and culturally divided into Upper Towns, primarily along the Coosa and Tallapoosa rivers in present-day , and Lower Towns along the Chattahoochee and Alabama rivers nearer settlements. Upper Town inhabitants maintained traditionalist agrarian economies centered on communal corn cultivation, hunting, and matrilineal social structures, viewing European-style plowing and individual land ownership as degrading to warrior status and antithetical to ancestral practices. Lower Towns, by contrast, experienced greater exposure to Anglo-American trade and missionary influences, fostering partial among mixed-descent elites who adopted livestock herding and commercial exchanges, though full remained limited. These disparities bred resentment, as Upper Creeks perceived Lower leaders as prioritizing personal gain over collective . Economic pressures exacerbated these fractures, as post-Revolutionary overhunting depleted deerskin exports—once yielding thousands of pelts annually—while white settler influxes onto ceded lands restricted foraging territories. Creeks accrued substantial debts to and trading houses, such as Panton, Leslie & Forbes, which supplied guns, cloth, and liquor on credit; by the early 1800s, outstanding obligations exceeded tens of thousands of dollars, pressuring national councils to authorize land sales for repayment. Treaties like the 1802 agreement, which ceded over 2 million acres in and , disproportionately benefited accommodationist signatories in Lower Towns, who received annuities and goods, while Upper traditionalists bore the brunt of resulting and cultural erosion without equivalent gains. This unequal burden fueled accusations of , undermining centralized authority in the talwa () system. Internal extremism manifested in escalating violence against perceived collaborators, as traditionalist militants rejected diplomatic overtures that compromised autonomy. In May , a band led by Little Warrior raided settlements, killing settlers and prompting retaliatory demands on leaders for justice, which accommodationists endorsed but Upper hardliners defied. By late , emerging prophets in Upper Towns preached nativist purification, inciting warriors to execute traders and friendly chiefs who enforced Benjamin Hawkins's civilization program, including bans on communal ball games and whiskey; such killings, numbering at least a dozen documented incidents, highlighted how economic desperation and cultural defiance prioritized intra-tribal purges over unified resistance to external threats. These acts underscored the causal primacy of endogenous factionalism in fracturing the , rather than solely reactive to settler aggression.

External Influences and Spark

In the autumn of 1811, leader visited key towns, including Tukabatchee in present-day , to advocate for a pan-Indian confederacy aimed at resisting American expansion and assimilation pressures. Accompanied by his brother , known as the Shawnee Prophet, emphasized unity among tribes to counter U.S. land encroachments and cultural impositions, drawing on 's visions that urged rejection of European-American influences such as alcohol, trade goods, and firearms in favor of traditional practices. These messages resonated with nativist elements among the Upper , fostering resistance to ongoing U.S. treaty demands for land cessions, though they did not immediately unify the Nation. Geopolitical tensions escalated with the outbreak of the between the and , which encouraged Native alliances against American forces; British agents, leveraging Spanish-held Pensacola as a supply point in , provided arms and ammunition to dissidents seeking to bolster their position. In early 1813, groups of Upper warriors traveled to Pensacola to obtain these munitions from Spanish officials and British intermediaries, directly tying the factional conflict to broader Anglo-American hostilities and enabling militarization of nativist sentiments. This external arming catalyzed the formal schism within the Nation around early , as militants adopted the "red stick"—a traditional emblem symbolizing and painted clubs or poles raised to declare hostility—contrasting with white sticks denoting peace, thereby igniting the internal against accommodationist Creeks and U.S. interests. The red stick declaration marked the spark for organized resistance, transforming ideological agitation into active conflict amid these foreign entanglements.

Ideology and Structure

Nativistic and Prophetic Motivations

The Red Sticks' ideology was profoundly shaped by nativistic prophecies that demanded a return to traditional practices through violent purification, viewing European-American influences as existential threats to their spiritual and cultural integrity. prophets, drawing inspiration from the Shawnee siblings and , interpreted natural disasters such as the 1811 New Madrid earthquakes as divine omens signaling the need for war to expel corrupting elements and restore ancestral harmony. These visions emphasized rejecting European trade goods—like metal tools, firearms, and cloth—as symbols of moral decay that eroded self-sufficiency and invited supernatural retribution. Central to this fervor was an oath-bound commitment to prophetic mandates, symbolized by the red-painted war clubs from which the faction derived its name, signifying an irrevocable against . Adherents swore loyalty to these visions, enforcing compliance through internal purges that targeted individuals perceived as collaborators, including the destruction of and execution of dissenters who retained contacts or advocated compromise. This rejection extended to , seen as a foreign undermining traditional , and to intermarriages that blurred cultural boundaries and facilitated land encroachments. In contrast, accommodationist Creeks, often from lower towns, pragmatically adopted European agricultural techniques, livestock, and trade networks to bolster economic resilience amid territorial pressures, viewing such adaptations as survival strategies rather than betrayals. The Red Sticks' uncompromising ideology thus precipitated a Creek civil war, prioritizing prophetic purification over unified defense, as militants from upper towns attacked assimilated kin and chiefs to impose doctrinal unity. This internal schism, rooted in causal beliefs about spiritual renewal through conflict, fragmented Creek society more severely than external threats alone could have.

Leadership and Alliances

The Red Sticks were primarily led by a cadre of Upper Creek chiefs who mobilized warriors from towns such as Tallassee, Okfuskee, and Fanachta. , known as Red Eagle (ca. 1781–1824), son of a Scottish trader and a Creek woman from the prominent Wind Clan, commanded raiding parties and coordinated strikes from his base in the Upper Towns, drawing on kinship ties and warrior prestige to assemble forces exceeding 1,000 at key moments. (ca. 1765–after 1837), chief of Okfuskee on the , served as a principal war leader, leveraging his status as a seasoned fighter to rally traditionalist bands committed to resistance. (ca. 1780–1820), also of mixed Scottish-Creek descent and chief among the Tallassee, acted as both and coordinator, organizing expeditions for and directing mobile warrior groups. These leaders operated within a pragmatic network that sought external support to offset shortages in firearms and powder, forging alliances with agents and officials in . Delegations, often led by McQueen, procured arms from Pensacola, where traders supplied muskets, ammunition, and even scalping knives after the fall of in 1813 rendered it the primary conduit. neutrality facilitated these transactions, though direct commitment remained limited to opportunistic provisioning amid the War of 1812. Efforts to build a broader intertribal confederacy, inspired by calls for unity against American expansion, yielded loose affiliations with Seminoles and scattered influences but failed to coalesce into coordinated operations due to geographic dispersal and competing loyalties. Internally, the Red Sticks lacked a centralized command, functioning as autonomous bands clustered around temporary rally points and fortified encampments outside traditional town structures (talwas). This decentralized model, rooted in matrilineal clans and voluntary warrior societies, enabled rapid mobilization from Upper Towns but fostered tactical inflexibility, as leaders like Weatherford and coordinated through consensus rather than hierarchy, complicating sustained campaigns against disciplined U.S. and Lower forces.

Key Military Engagements

Burnt Corn Creek Skirmish

On July 27, 1813, a force of approximately 180 Mississippi Territory militia under Colonel James Caller intercepted a Red Stick Creek pack train returning from Pensacola, Florida, laden with munitions supplied by Spanish authorities, including around 300 pounds of gunpowder and lead shot. The militiamen, motivated to prevent the hostile faction from arming further, ambushed the Red Sticks—led by Peter McQueen—while they paused for a meal near a bend in Burnt Corn Creek in present-day Escambia or Conecuh County, Alabama. Initially, the surprise attack scattered the Red Sticks into nearby swamps, allowing the militia to loot the packs and claim a temporary rout. The Red Sticks quickly regrouped and launched a counter-ambush against the disorganized men, who were preoccupied with plundering the captured supplies. This reversal forced Caller’s men to retreat uphill, where a small including Major Samuel Dale, Captain Dixon Bailey, and Jeremiah Austill held off pursuers, enabling the main force to escape on foot or horseback. The Red Sticks pursued briefly but failed to overtake the fleeing militia, securing a by regaining control of the field despite the initial seizure of some munitions by the attackers. Casualties were lopsided in the counter-engagement: the suffered two killed and 10 to wounded, while Red Stick losses totaled approximately 10 dead. This skirmish demonstrated the Red Sticks' resilience and combat effectiveness, providing early momentum that helped consolidate their warring factions amid internal Creek divisions and propelled the from sporadic violence into open warfare.

Fort Mims Attack

On August 30, 1813, approximately 700 to 1,000 Red Stick warriors, led by and , assaulted Fort Mims, a stockaded in the (present-day ) that sheltered around 300-400 settlers, including militia, civilians, slaves, and mixed-blood Creek families perceived as collaborators with American interests. The attackers, motivated by retribution against these groups for opposing Red Stick nativism and aiding U.S. forces following the Burnt Corn skirmish, exploited a partially open east gate clogged with sand to rush the compound around noon during the midday meal. The assault quickly overwhelmed the garrison commanded by Major Daniel Beasley, who was killed early, though Captain Dixon Bailey and about 45 militiamen mounted a prolonged defense from barricades, holding out for several hours against volleys and close assaults. used burning arrows to ignite structures, forcing defenders into the open where most were killed in hand-to-hand fighting; survivors, numbering perhaps a few dozen, fled to nearby swamps, while at least 100 others were taken captive. The fort was thoroughly burned, leaving little intact. Casualties among the defenders totaled approximately 250-275 killed, including militiamen, white settlers, women, children, enslaved individuals, and métis Creeks, with the violence marked by indiscriminate slaughter that extended beyond combatants. Red Stick losses were estimated at 100-300 warriors. Contemporary accounts often inflated defender deaths to around 500, a figure disseminated in newspapers and official reports to amplify outrage and rally support, though modern historical analysis, informed by archaeological evidence and survivor tallies, supports the lower range as more accurate. The event's brutality, particularly the killing of non-combatants, provoked widespread panic across frontier settlements and prompted governors in , , and to mobilize thousands of militiamen, framing the response under cries of "Remember Fort Mims" and escalating the conflict into full U.S. military intervention against the Red Sticks. This tactical success for the warriors proved a strategic error, as it unified American forces and justified a approach that the faction could not sustain.

Escalation to Horseshoe Bend

In November 1813, following the Fort Mims attack, Major General launched retaliatory campaigns into territory, supported by militia, U.S. regulars, and allied and Lower forces under leaders like . On November 3, Coffee's cavalry detachment attacked the Red Stick settlement at Tallushatchee, killing 186 warriors along with women and children who resisted, while capturing approximately 84 women and children as prisoners; U.S. casualties were limited to five killed and 41 wounded. This engagement marked the first major U.S. victory in the , disrupting Red Stick concentrations in the region. Six days later, on , Jackson's main force relieved a besieged friendly town at Talladega, routing a larger Red Stick contingent through a charge and disciplined volleys; while Red Stick losses are unquantified, the survivors fled in disarray, with U.S. forces reporting 15 killed and 85 wounded. These successes, aided by warriors under and Lower allies, fragmented Red Stick cohesion but did not end resistance, as warriors adopted guerrilla tactics and fortified strongholds like the Horseshoe Bend on the , leveraging natural barriers and log breastworks. However, supply shortages plagued the Red Sticks, exacerbated by disrupted trade networks, limited British and Spanish munitions, and intelligence leaks from internal divisions favoring accommodation with the U.S. Over the ensuing months, Jackson established Fort Strother as a forward supply base, enduring mutinies and harsh winter conditions while replenishing forces with allied Native auxiliaries numbering around 500 Cherokees and 100 Lower Creeks. Red Stick resilience persisted through hit-and-run ambushes, but eroding manpower and provisions weakened their positions. In March 1814, Jackson advanced southward with approximately 3,000 troops, converging on Horseshoe Bend, where Chief commanded about 1,000 warriors entrenched in a 100-acre fortified against . On March 27, 1814, the unfolded as Jackson's artillery bombarded the breastworks, followed by a and Coffee's across the river with allied and forces; the Red Sticks mounted fierce counterattacks but were overwhelmed by superior numbers and firepower, resulting in over 800 warriors killed—557 counted on the field and an estimated 300 in the river—representing nearly their entire garrison with minimal escapes. U.S. and allied casualties totaled around 276, predominantly wounded, underscoring the battle's decisiveness in shattering Red Stick military capacity. This engagement, the Creek War's bloodiest, highlighted the Red Sticks' tenacious defense amid mounting defeats, yet sealed their collapse through cumulative attrition.

Defeat and Immediate Aftermath

Major Defeats and Dissolution

Following the on March 27, 1814, in which U.S. forces and allied Native warriors killed an estimated 800 Red Stick fighters—representing nearly the entire garrison—the faction's military cohesion shattered, with survivors scattering amid leadership losses and logistical collapse. This engagement alone accounted for the largest single-day loss of Native American warriors in U.S. history up to that point, depleting the Red Sticks' remaining combat strength after prior defeats at Tallushatchee and Talladega. William Weatherford, a key Red Stick leader also known as Red Eagle, surrendered unconditionally to at Fort Jackson in early April 1814, an act that underscored the erosion of command authority as principal chiefs lay dead or dispersed. Weatherford's submission, coupled with his appeals for others to follow, prompted additional defections, as he leveraged personal influence to avert further bloodshed among holdouts facing inevitable encirclement. Concurrently, hundreds of demoralized Red Stick warriors fled eastward to , where they integrated with communities, bolstering anti-U.S. elements but fragmenting the faction's unity beyond recovery. This reflected not resilient defiance but desperate evasion, as pursuing U.S. columns under Jackson razed abandoned Upper towns like Tuckabatchee and Hillabee, torching granaries and fields to induce famine and compel capitulation. Such scorched-earth tactics amplified desertions, with starvation ravaging non-combatants and eroding warrior morale, as internal Creek divisions—exacerbated by Red Stick attacks on Lower Creek settlements—had already inflicted heavy self-destructive tolls. Overall Red Stick losses, encompassing battle dead exceeding 2,000 warriors alongside civilian fatalities from privation and , totaled around 3,000, a figure attesting to the war's cataclysmic unraveling of the faction through combined external pressure and endogenous collapse.

Treaty of Fort Jackson

The , signed on August 9, 1814, concluded the by formalizing the capitulation of the Nation to forces under . The agreement compelled the Creeks to cede approximately 23 million acres of territory—roughly half of their claimed lands in present-day and parts of —defined by a boundary line running from the mouth of the to points south and west, with provisions for surveys and maps to verify the cessions. This punitive measure extended to lands held by neutral and allied factions, despite their cooperation with U.S. forces against the Red Sticks, as Jackson argued that the entire nation bore collective responsibility for failing to suppress the warring faction's aggression. Jackson justified the treaty's severity as compensation for the costs of an "unprovoked, inhuman, and sanguinary" war initiated by the Red Sticks, emphasizing security imperatives to prevent recurrence through decisive territorial reduction. The preamble invoked Creek violations of the 1790 Treaty of and external incitements by and agents, framing the conflict as a breach warranting broad retribution rather than targeted penalties solely on belligerents. Approximately 8 million acres were taken from friendly Creeks, including border regions along , which U.S. agent criticized as excessive overreach. Allied chiefs, such as Big Warrior of the Lower Creeks, protested the terms, contending that loyal factions should not forfeit ancestral hunting grounds for the Red Sticks' actions, yet acquiesced under threat of continued military at Fort Jackson. The treaty allowed limited 1-square-mile reservations for select friendly headmen but provided no immediate monetary redress, fostering resentment among neutrals whose losses included prime territories without equivalent restitution. Additional clauses reinforced U.S. dominance by requiring the surrender of war prisoners, stolen property (including slaves and livestock), and instigators like prophets or foreign agents; prohibiting future communications or alliances with or posts; and granting the U.S. perpetual rights to military fortifications, roads, trading houses, and river navigation within lands. The U.S. pledged to guarantee the integrity of remaining territory east and north of the cession line, alongside nominal aid like food rations for displaced Upper towns, while mandating permanent peace with neighboring tribes such as the , , and . These provisions, verified through joint surveys, effectively subordinated sovereignty to federal oversight, curtailing external influences that had fueled the Red Stick insurgency.

Long-Term Consequences and Legacy

Impact on Creek Nation and Territory

The Treaty of Fort Jackson, signed on August 9, 1814, compelled the Nation to cede approximately 22 million acres of land—primarily in central and southern —to the , a loss that encompassed more than half of their remaining territory in the region and far exceeded the lands directly affected by Red Stick militancy. This cession, demanded by despite alliances between many Creek towns and U.S. forces, stemmed directly from the Red Sticks' provocations, which invited military retaliation and enabled punitive terms imposed on the entire confederacy rather than solely the warring faction. Pre-war, the controlled an estimated 35-40 million acres across and , secured through prior treaties like those of (1790) and Colerain (1796); post-treaty holdings shrank to a narrow corridor in central , amplifying vulnerability to subsequent encroachments. The war exacerbated internal divisions between Red Stick adherents and accommodationist Lower Creeks, fractures that endured beyond 1814 and eroded unified resistance to American expansion. Casualties, including over 800 killed at Horseshoe Bend alone and an estimated 2,000-3,000 total Creek deaths from combat, disease, and starvation, contributed to population declines that weakened social cohesion and bargaining power. These rifts, rooted in the Red Sticks' nativist against , prevented collective recovery and facilitated further land treaties in 1818 and 1821, reducing Creek autonomy and setting the stage for the of 1830. Economically, U.S. forces' scorched-earth tactics destroyed dozens of Creek villages, cornfields, and livestock herds, disrupting the agrarian economy reliant on maize cultivation, hunting, and trade networks that had sustained the nation for generations. This devastation, combined with the loss of fertile bottomlands via the , impoverished surviving communities and hindered agricultural rebuilding, as displaced families faced and reliance on diminished annuities. The resulting instability not only accelerated the erosion of Creek self-sufficiency but also intensified pressures leading to forced removals and the in the 1830s, where approximately 23,000 Creeks were displaced westward amid high mortality.

Historiographical Perspectives and Controversies

Early historiography often framed the Red Sticks' as a heroic nativist defense of against inexorable U.S. territorial ambitions, aligning with broader narratives of Native during the early . This perspective, evident in 19th-century accounts and echoed in some mid-20th-century works, portrayed the faction's militancy as a rational response to encroachments and federal pressures, minimizing internal divisions. However, such views have been critiqued for overlooking of the Red Sticks' proactive aggression, including their adoption of Tecumseh's pan-Indian ideology and prophetic exhortations from figures like the Glass, which prioritized and war clubs over diplomatic accommodation. Contemporary scholarship increasingly interprets the Red Stick War as an intra-Creek ignited by the faction's extremist rejection of , which inflicted disproportionate casualties on fellow Creeks through purges and raids before significant U.S. involvement. Historians like those analyzing internecine dynamics argue that Red Stick forces executed or killed an estimated several hundred opposing Creeks in enforcement of their nativist creed, data drawn from archaeological and documentary records that challenge romanticized heroism tropes. This causal emphasis on prophetic fanaticism—rooted in visions demanding the expulsion of trade goods and influences—positions the conflict's escalation as self-inflicted, rather than solely provoked by external aggression, with U.S. intervention allying opportunistic Lower Towns against the Upper Towns' militants. Debates over specific events underscore these tensions, particularly the Fort Mims assault on August 30, 1813, where Red Sticks killed roughly 500 defenders including noncombatants, prompting accusations of barbarity versus claims of retaliatory justice for prior settler and Lower Creek hostilities. While some sources attribute the attack's ferocity to unmitigated fanaticism, others invoke contextual provocations like arms seizures at Burnt Corn Creek, yet primary casualty data and timelines reveal Red Stick initiation of the violence cycle, including intra-tribal slayings that exceeded settler deaths initially. Andrew Jackson's subsequent operations, notably at Horseshoe Bend on March 27, 1814, where over 800 Red Stick warriors perished, similarly divide opinion: critiques in progressive-leaning academia decry them as disproportionate retribution verging on , but military analyses justify the force as empirically required to neutralize a faction that spurned peace councils and persisted in raids amid the War of 1812. These viewpoints highlight systemic biases in source interpretation, where left-influenced in institutions often privileges U.S. culpability narratives, underweighting verifiable Red Stick agency in mass violence and diplomatic intransigence as the conflict's proximate causes.

Modern Commemorations

Horseshoe Bend National Military Park, authorized by Congress on August 10, 1956, encompasses 2,040 acres along the in and maintains trails, a , and monuments detailing the March 27, 1814, battle where U.S. forces under defeated entrenched Red Stick warriors. The park hosts annual anniversary events, including demonstrations and ranger-led programs; for instance, the 210th commemoration on March 22-23, 2024, featured battle reenactments and educational talks on the Creek War's military dynamics. The Fort Mims Historic Site, managed by the Historical Commission, preserves the location of the August 30, 1813, Red Stick assault and offers interpretive markers, reconstructed stockades, and guided tours highlighting fortifications and settler defenses. Annual reenactments occur the last weekend of August, drawing participants in period attire for simulated battles, firings, and craft demonstrations; the 2025 event marks the 212th with two days of activities focused on tactical recreations. The 200th anniversary of the Fort Mims engagement in 2013 prompted expanded commemorations, including large-scale reenactments attended by hundreds, scholarly panels, and media coverage emphasizing the event's role in escalating the . Archaeological efforts at these sites have mapped fortifications, recovered balls, arrowheads, and structural remnants, clarifying Red Stick defensive strategies and U.S. assault patterns without altering core historical accounts. Peter Cozzens' 2023 publication A Brutal Reckoning: Andrew Jackson, the Indians, and the Epic War for the South draws on primary sources to analyze the conflict's brutality and motivations, integrating factional divisions with military operations for a balanced tactical assessment.

References

  1. [1]
    Spring 1814: The Battle of Horseshoe Bend (U.S. National Park ...
    Aug 14, 2017 · The Red Sticks, who derived their name from their red ceremonial war clubs, were a nativist or conservative faction of Creeks, predominantly ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  2. [2]
    Creek War of 1813-14 - Encyclopedia of Alabama
    These dissidents were soon called Red Sticks because they had raised the "red stick of war," a favored weapon and symbolic Creek war declaration. The brutal ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  3. [3]
    The Creek War of 1813-1814 | American Battlefield Trust
    Oct 26, 2021 · On August 30, 1813, about 1,000 Red Sticks attacked Fort Mims, northeast of Mobile and killed all the inhabitants. The event sent shockwaves ...
  4. [4]
    Creek War in the Southeast: A civil war and an enemy occupation ...
    Aug 15, 2017 · The Creek civil war became a war of American conquest. The war ended with a decisive victory by Andrew Jackson at Horseshoe Bend in late March 1814.
  5. [5]
    Menawa (U.S. National Park Service)
    Sep 14, 2017 · Red Stick War Chief. Date of Birth: c. 1765. Date of Death: unknown (after 1836). Menawa, a war chief from the Creek village of Okfuskee, led ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] The African American Experience and the Creek War, 1813-14
    Aug 8, 2017 · The decisive defeat of the Red. Sticks, and the loss of over 800 warriors, marks the battle as a pivotal moment in the history of the Creek ...<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Reflecting on Justice 200 Years after the Creek Civil War | Origins
    Sep 1, 2013 · Nationalist Creek leaders countered by requesting help from the American army. Andrew Jackson led his force into Creek country, ending Red Stick ...
  8. [8]
    The rise and fall of the Creek Confederacy - Engelsberg Ideas
    Sep 22, 2023 · From this trade emerged a division between the Lower Creeks, who embraced it, and the Upper Creeks, who remained remote from it. Creeks also ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] The Creek War, 1813-1814 - U.S. Army Center of Military History
    Fighting quickly escalated between the opposing factions as did the danger posed by the Red. Sticks to whites traveling through or living near Creek lands. The.
  10. [10]
    economics, politics, and the subjugation of the creek indians
    Oct 6, 1975 · This study attempts to identify and delineate the under- lying dynamics of change affecting the course of Creek Indian.
  11. [11]
    Crockett and the Creek War: 'We Now Shot Them Like Dogs'
    Sep 26, 2019 · In May 1812 a party of Red Sticks under Little Warrior murdered ... Creek warriors at Tohopeka before darkness stopped the killing. Most ...
  12. [12]
    Tecumseh - Encyclopedia of Alabama
    Feb 4, 2025 · On September 19, 1811, Tecumseh, Tenskwatawa, and their cousin, Seekaboo, arrived in Tukabatchee. The next day, they introduced themselves and ...
  13. [13]
    Tenskwatawa - Encyclopedia of Alabama
    The Red Stick faction of the Creeks that carried out the Fort Mims Massacre included followers of Tenskwatawa and Tecumseh.
  14. [14]
    Horseshoe Bend Battle Facts and Summary
    ... Red Sticks returning from Pensacola with British firearms and ammunition. The ensuing conflict came to be known as the Battle of Burnt Corn Creek. The event ...
  15. [15]
    The Creek War of 1813 and 1814 - Digital Library of Georgia
    According to Indian symbol ism, the white feather was an emblem of peace, peace among the various Indian tribes. The red feather was a war emblem, war to their ...
  16. [16]
    (PDF) The Creek Civil War: A Military History - Academia.edu
    After cleansing their towns of European goods, nativist prophets and their supporters started executing those who disagreed with the revivalist movement. In the ...
  17. [17]
    When moral economies and capitalism meet: Creek factionalism ...
    ... accommodationists" or White Sticks) and those choosing war with them (traditionalists or Red Sticks) split Creek society into two sociopolitical factions.
  18. [18]
    William Weatherford (U.S. National Park Service)
    Sep 14, 2017 · William Weatherford led the Red Stick Creek attack against Fort Mims on August 30, 1813, thereby transforming a civil war among the Creek Indians into an ...
  19. [19]
    Menawa | American Battlefield Trust
    Born in 1765, Menawa was a polarizing political figure amongst the Creek Indians during the tribal disintegration of the early nineteenth century.
  20. [20]
    Major Participants in the Creek War - National Park Service
    Apr 11, 2025 · During the Creek War of 1813-1814, Hawkins organized the friendly Creeks under Major William McIntosh to aid the Georgia and Tennessee militias ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  21. [21]
    A Brutal Reckoning: Andrew Jackson, the Creek Indians, and the ...
    Dec 28, 2024 · Hawkins tried to keep the friendly miccos in power and to prevent their assassination by the Red Sticks, sometimes successfully, sometimes not. ...
  22. [22]
    Battle of Burnt Corn Creek - Encyclopedia of Alabama
    Jun 2, 2011 · The Red Sticks pursued the men for a short way but were unable to overtake them. Caller and one of his officers became lost in the swampy woods ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  23. [23]
    The Battle of Burnt Corn Creek - Clio
    Nov 28, 2020 · The militia suffered at least two dead and a dozen wounded; the Red Sticks suffered perhaps 10 killed and wounded. Though a relatively small ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  24. [24]
    Fort Mims Battle and Massacre - Encyclopedia of Alabama
    The Creek attack on Fort Mims, and particularly the killing of civilian men, women, and children at the end of the battle, outraged the U.S. public, thus ...Missing: casualties | Show results with:casualties
  25. [25]
    [PDF] ARCHEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION AT FORT MIMS - NPS History
    This ended the events that led to one of the largest death tolls of Whites in frontier Indian warfare. The Fort Mims Massacre and the rallying point "Remember ...
  26. [26]
    Fort Mims Battle Facts and Summary | American Battlefield Trust
    ... Aug 30, 1813 ... Red Sticks attack at the fortified farmstead of Samuel Mims. Despite the aid of troops from Mississippi, the fort was attacked by Red Sticks.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  27. [27]
    Massacre at Fort Mims - The War of 1812
    On August 30, 1813, an outpost known as Fort Mims, about forty miles north of Mobile, Alabama, was attacked by the Red Sticks, the warring faction of the Creek ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] 2012 04 echoes.pub - FORT MIMS
    Apr 24, 2012 · By the time the battle was over, more than 250 of them were dead. The Battle of Fort Mims, also known as the Fort. Mims Massacre, began as the ...
  29. [29]
    Tallussahatchee Battle Facts and Summary | American Battlefield Trust
    Related Battles. Battle Facts. Calhoun County, AL | November 3, 1813. Result: United States Victory. Commanders. Estimated Casualties. 232. United States 46.
  30. [30]
    Battle of Tallushatchee - Encyclopedia of Alabama
    Jul 22, 2009 · Fighting lasted until the last warrior fell. In all, 186 Red Sticks were killed, including a number of women and children. The remaining women ...
  31. [31]
    Battle of Talladega - Encyclopedia of Alabama
    American casualties were limited to 15 killed and approximately 85 wounded. Battle of Talladega The Creek War arose during a time of economic hardships and ...
  32. [32]
    Battle of Horseshoe Bend - Encyclopedia of Alabama
    ... Creek, located near the border of what is now Conecuh and Escambia Counties. One month later, on August 30, the Red Sticks retaliated by killing 250 Creek ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] the Creek Nation, the United States, and the Life of James Moore by ...
    May 5, 2019 · ... estimated 900 Red Stick warriors died, in what is still the largest number of American Indian deaths in a single battle in American history.<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    The Surrender of William Weatherford to Andrew Jackson
    Feb 27, 2025 · At least 30 battles followed, fought between Andrew Jackson's American forces and the Creek Warriors, known as the Red Sticks. Those battles had ...
  35. [35]
    Hindsight: 1814, the end of the Redsticks - Columbia Daily Herald
    Mar 29, 2014 · Weatherford not only offered to surrender, but also offered his own life in case that Jackson was intending to execute any of the Red Sticks due ...
  36. [36]
    William Weatherford - Encyclopedia of Alabama
    Jun 3, 2010 · William Weatherford (ca. 1781-1824), arguably the best known Red Stick war leader in the Creek War of 1813-14, was born around 1781 near the town of Coosada.
  37. [37]
    “Wild People in the Woods”: General Jackson, Savannah Jack, and ...
    Jul 17, 2017 · ... Red Sticks at Horseshoe Bend. He then used that victory as leverage ... ”2 Indeed, the Red Stick flight to West and East Florida meant ...
  38. [38]
    Creek War of 1813 and 1814 - Tennessee Encyclopedia
    The executions sparked a long-simmering revolt by nativist Creeks. The nativists, known as Red Sticks, sought to wrest control of the Creek Nation from the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Creek War | Bicentennialpark - Alabama Bicentennial Park
    Forces led by Andrew Jackson destroyed Red Stick towns and faced them in a final great battle at Horseshoe Bend on March 27, 1814. American artillery was ...Missing: villages | Show results with:villages
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Cultural Landscape Report - NPS History
    at Burnt Corn Creek on July 26-27, 1813, brought a surprise attack by waiting settlers angry over the unjustified killings. Colonel James Caller and a ...
  41. [41]
    Summer 1814: The Treaty of Ft. Jackson ends the Creek War (U.S. ...
    Nov 30, 2022 · The Creeks protested that some of the ceded land was specifically claimed by towns that had remained “friendly” to the United States. This land, ...
  42. [42]
    Treaty of Fort Jackson, 1814 - Ruhr-Universität Bochum
    2nd – The United States will guarantee to the Creek nation, the integrity of all their territory eastwardly and northwardly of the said line to be run and ...Missing: terms | Show results with:terms
  43. [43]
    Treaty of Fort Jackson - Encyclopedia of Alabama
    Feb 28, 2011 · The Treaty of Fort Jackson, or more properly the Treaty with the Creeks, 1814, was signed on August 9, 1814, and concluded the Creek War of 1813-1814.<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Indian removal - PBS
    ... Creek nation. In their defeat, the Creeks lost 22 million acres of land in southern Georgia and central Alabama. The U.S. acquired more land in 1818 when ...
  45. [45]
    No Good Feelings: Native Americans and the Outcomes of the War ...
    Jun 7, 2024 · The War of 1812 led to land loss, broken treaties, and forced removal for Native Americans, despite hopes for protection, and they faced a ...
  46. [46]
    Indian Treaties and the Removal Act of 1830 - Office of the Historian
    With the Act in place, Jackson and his followers were free to persuade, bribe, and threaten tribes into signing removal treaties and leaving the Southeast. In ...
  47. [47]
    Creek War | Mississippi Encyclopedia
    Jan 31, 2018 · The Creek War was a part of the larger War of 1812 fought between a faction of the Creek tribe and US forces in 1813–14.
  48. [48]
    [PDF] The Removal of the Creek Indians from the Southeast, 1825-1838
    Aug 10, 2009 · A vast majority of the Creeks opposed the Treaty of Indian Springs and although they were able to nullify the document with a revised version in ...
  49. [49]
  50. [50]
    The Creek War, 1813–1814 - U.S. Army Center of Military History
    The Creek War (1813-1814) was a conflict between Red Stick Creeks and those seeking assimilation, part of the War of 1812, leading to a treaty and land cession.
  51. [51]
    [PDF] A Conquering Spirit: Fort Mims and the Redstick War of 1813-1814 ...
    Internecine Creek conflict expanded into the Redstick War and spilled into the Mississippi Territory within the backdrop of the War of 1812. The. British and ...
  52. [52]
    Horseshoe Bend National Military Park Administrative History
    establishment of Horseshoe Bend National Military Park in 1956. Three years ... established traditions that surrounded Independence Day commemorations.
  53. [53]
    Horseshoe Bend National Military Park (U.S. National Park Service)
    Apr 11, 2025 · On March 27, 1814, Major General Andrew Jackson 's army of 3,300 men attacked Chief Menawa's 1,000 Red Stick Creek warriors fortified in a ...Missing: commemorations | Show results with:commemorations
  54. [54]
    Commemoration of the 210th Anniversary of the Battle of Horseshoe ...
    Mar 1, 2024 · Horseshoe Bend National Military Park will host the 210th Anniversary of the Battle of the Horseshoe on Friday and Saturday, March 22-23, 2024.Missing: establishment | Show results with:establishment
  55. [55]
    Alabama Historical Commission - Celebrate 50 Years of Impact
    The Fort Mims site commemorates the battle that led to the Creek War of 1813-14. On August 30, 1813 over 700 Creek Indians destroyed Fort Mims.Missing: commemorations | Show results with:commemorations
  56. [56]
    FORT MIMS
    213th Anniversary of Fort Mims. The annual reenactment of the Battle of Fort Mims is scheduled on the date shown below. See the flyer for details. &nbpsp; ...Missing: commemorations | Show results with:commemorations
  57. [57]
    2025 Fort Mims Reenactment & Living History - Alabama Travel
    Aug 30, 2025 · During the commemorative event set for August 30-31, 2025, volunteers will dress in period clothing to re-enact the Battle of Burnt Corn ...
  58. [58]
    Fort Mims set to relive 1813 battle during anniversary reenactment ...
    Aug 28, 2025 · The event takes place Saturday, Aug. 30, and Sunday, Aug. 31, marking the 212th anniversary of the 1813 Fort Mims Massacre. The two-day program ...Missing: commemorations | Show results with:commemorations
  59. [59]
    Fort Mims 200th anniversary commemoration wows spectators ...
    Aug 30, 2013 · The Battle of Fort Mims is re-enacted Friday, Aug. 30, 2013, marking the 200th anniversary of the historic event, in the Tensaw community of ...Missing: massacre bicentennial
  60. [60]
    200th Anniversary of the Fall of Fort Mims - Explore Southern History
    Aug 30, 2013 · He survived his run, but was struck by a bullet and injured on his third loop around the fort. Artist's Rendering of Fort Mims Massacre. One ...
  61. [61]
    Archeological Identification of Creek War Sites, Part 2 (Public version
    Identified four key archeological battle sites: Fort Mims, Talladega, Horseshoe Bend, and Holy Ground. ... Creek War sites in lower Alabama, including Fort Mims.
  62. [62]
    A Brutal Reckoning by Peter Cozzens - Penguin Random House
    In stock Free deliveryIn A Brutal Reckoning, Peter Cozzens vividly captures the young Jackson, describing a brilliant but harsh military commander with unbridled ambition, a taste ...
  63. [63]
    Brutal Reckoning in the Creek War - AMERICAN HERITAGE
    In language colorful and obscene, English-speaking Red Sticks taunted the soldiers to attack. Most were painted for battle. The colors black and red ...