Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Shiban

Shiban (also Sheiban or Shayban; fl. 13th century), a Mongol prince and grandson of , was the fifth son of , founder of the Ulus of Jochi (later known as the ). As one of the younger Left Wing princes, he inherited appanages positioned between the western territories of his elder brother (the ) and the eastern domains of (the ), forming a northern segment of the Jochid inheritance east of the and in the Kipchak . Though too young to lead during Jochi's lifetime and the initial western campaigns, Shiban's ulus laid the foundation for the Shaibanid lineage, Turkic-Mongol descendants who later established dominance in , including the under in the early 16th century.

Origins and Family Background

Parentage and Lineage

Shiban was the fifth son of Jochi, the eldest son of Genghis Khan, positioning him within the senior branch of the Mongol imperial family known as the Jochids. Jochi, born circa 1182 to Genghis Khan's wife Börte, faced early rumors of uncertain paternity due to her abduction by Merkits prior to his conception, yet Genghis Khan unequivocally recognized and treated Jochi as his firstborn son, granting him authority over western conquests and an expansive ulus by 1207. This acceptance extended to Jochi's descendants, including Shiban, whose lineage was affirmed in Persian chronicles as integral to the Jochid succession despite the foundational controversy. Historical records, such as those compiled by the Ilkhanid vizier al-Din in the early , list Jochi's sons in approximate as Orda, Batu, , and then Shiban, among others, reflecting the nomadic Mongol emphasis on patrilineal descent and elder sons' precedence in inheritance. Shiban, born in the early —likely around the 1210s, following his brothers' births amid Jochi's campaigns—benefited from this structure, though his position junior to Batu limited direct claims to primacy within the ulus. al-Din's genealogical accounts, drawn from Mongol oral traditions and imperial archives, prioritize such Jochid lines for their role in the empire's western appanages, underscoring Shiban's embeddedness in the clan's hierarchical kinship despite the pastoral, tent-based tribal dynamics that often favored proven warriors over strict .

Position Among Jochi's Sons

Shiban, the fifth son of Jochi among at least thirteen sons, occupied a subordinate yet notable position within the Jochid lineage, trailing his elder brothers Orda (the eldest) and Batu (the second-born). This birth order, documented in primary Mongol chronicles such as Rashid al-Din's Compendium of Chronicles, placed Shiban outside the primary succession line dominated by Orda and Batu, who emerged as the ulus's co-rulers following Jochi's death on approximately February 9, 1227. In the Mongol appanage (ulus) system, Jochi's western territories—initially granted by around 1207–1224—underwent division among his sons after 1227, with elder brothers Batu and Orda assuming leadership and apportioning shares based on seniority and merit under the oversight of Great Khan Ögedei (r. 1229–1241). Shiban's junior status confined him to a lesser , reflecting the hierarchical norms where favored Orda's (eastern wing) and Batu's (western core), yet preserved his status as a (prince) with influence in familial councils. Historical accounts, including Rashid al-Din's genealogy and Juvayni's History of the World Conqueror, portray Shiban as consistently loyal to Batu, eschewing the succession disputes that later fragmented other Mongol branches, such as those between Ögedeid and Toluid lines. This allegiance, evidenced by his inclusion among Batu's inner kin without recorded challenges, secured Shiban's role as a stabilizing secondary figure amid the ulus's early consolidation, contrasting with intra-family conflicts that undermined rivals like Chagatai descendants.

Military Role in Mongol Conquests

Participation in the Invasion of Europe

Shiban, as a son of , participated in the Mongol campaigns westward under the overall command of his elder brother , leading a tumen of approximately 10,000 warriors as part of the army dispatched by in 1235. This force initiated operations with the conquest of in 1236, where Mongol tumens systematically overran Bulgar cities such as Bilär and , subjugating the region after initial raids in 1223 had probed defenses. The campaigns extended into the Rus' principalities from late 1237, with Shiban's tumen contributing to the devastation of key centers including (sacked December 1237), (February 1238), and Kiev (December 1240), resulting in widespread destruction and the imposition of Mongol overlordship. These operations involved coordinated assaults by multiple princely tumens, leveraging Mongol mobility and tactics to dismantle fragmented Rus' resistance, though individual engagements attributed directly to Shiban remain undocumented in surviving and chronicles. In 1241, Batu's army, including Shiban's contingent, advanced into and , securing victories at (April 9) and Mohi (April 11), which facilitated temporary Mongol dominance in . However, the death of on December 11, 1241, prompted a strategic withdrawal by early 1242, as Mongol tradition required senior princes like Batu—and by extension his brothers—to return for the to select a successor, halting further penetration despite tactical successes. This retreat preserved forces for internal consolidation rather than risking division amid dynastic imperatives. ![Battle of Mohi, 1241][float-right]

Other Military Engagements

Following the campaigns in , Shiban's military activities are sparsely recorded in contemporary sources, with primary emphasis placed on his supportive role within the ulus of rather than independent conquests. Rashid al-Din, in his , notes Shiban's loyalty to Batu during the western expeditions but attributes no distinct campaigns to him in or against Persianate forces, portraying him instead as securing territories north and east of the core Jochid domains, including areas beyond the Urals inhabited by forest- tribes. This consolidation likely involved subduing resistant Kipchak remnants and local Bashkir or Siberian groups to prevent flanking threats, ensuring the stability of the corridors vital for Jochid mobility and extraction. Unlike Batu's prominent leadership in offensive operations or Berke's later confrontations with the Ilkhanate, Shiban's recorded martial contributions post-1242 centered on defensive coordination among Jochid princes, maintaining dominance over nomadic confederations without evidence of large-scale invasions. Dynastic chronicles, such as those drawing from Mongol oral traditions preserved in Rashid al-Din, highlight this pattern: Shiban received appanages requiring ongoing patrols and skirmishes against dissident tribes, but these lacked the scale or documentation of major battles, reflecting his position as a mid-tier commander in the family hierarchy. The absence of detailed accounts in sources like the Secret History of the Mongols—which focuses on earlier Jochid exploits under Jochi—further indicates that Shiban's efforts were integral to Horde formation yet not independently lionized, prioritizing causal security over expansionist glory.

Administration in the Golden Horde

Territorial Grants and Ulus

Shiban's territorial allocation within the Jochid ulus occurred after his father Jochi's death around 1227, when the primary divisions favored elder brothers Batu and Orda due to Shiban's youth; he received his appanage later, positioned north of their respective uluses. This grant encompassed regions east of the , including the southern Ural foothills—potentially incorporating Bashkir tribal lands—and extending into the western Siberian steppes toward the Ob and river basins. These areas formed the Ulus of Shiban, a distinct but subordinate domain under the overarching authority of Batu's , reflecting the Mongol system's hierarchical structure where junior princes managed local administration while acknowledging senior khanal primacy. As a semi-autonomous , Shiban's ulus granted him rights to extract from sedentary and nomadic populations, including Turkic and Finno-Ugric groups in the steppes and forest edges, without independent powers. The allocation aligned with post-conquest redistributions following the 1230s-1240s campaigns, prioritizing strategic buffer zones between Batu's Kipchak core and Orda's eastern flanks. Chronicle accounts, such as those in sources detailing Jochid subdivisions, confirm this northward orientation, emphasizing control over transitional zones from open grasslands to fringes. The economic foundation of the ulus rested on pastoral nomadism, with Mongol and allied tribes herding sheep, , and across the steppes, yielding surplus for internal trade and khanal levies. Tribute systems targeted local resources like furs from Siberian forests and from Ural deposits, integrated into broader fiscal mechanisms evidenced by numismatic finds of Jochid silver dirhams and administrative tamgas in excavated sites from the southern Urals to the valley. These structures facilitated revenue flow to the central Horde while allowing holders like Shiban to sustain military retinues.

Governance and Relations with Kin

Shiban administered his ulus through decentralized oversight of nomadic Turkic and Mongol tribes, enforcing tribute in the form of , labor, and military levies as per Mongol , which emphasized yarliq decrees for and . His domain, situated between Batu's core territories and Orda's eastern , relied on tumens of allied warriors to maintain order among Kipchak and other pastoralists, with tribute flows supporting Horde-wide campaigns rather than centralized taxation of sedentary populations. The scarcity of recorded uprisings during his tenure—spanning from the early 1230s until his death circa 1250—indicates a pragmatic of , likely sustained by kin-based networks and the threat of , though primary accounts provide no granular details on judicial or fiscal mechanisms. Shiban's relations with kin exemplified strategic fraternal solidarity amid the Jochid ulus's expansion. He forged a close alliance with elder brother , jointly commanding forces in the 1236 conquest of the Qipchaq , Bulghar, and Bashghird, where Shiban led a of against Bulgar strongholds. Rashid al-Din recounts their coordination without rivalry, contrasting with internecine conflicts in the Ögödeid and Toluid lines; Shiban further deferred to Batu's authority by attending quriltais under his summons, including the 1245 assembly for Güyük's accession and the post-1251 gathering affirming . Similarly, ties with Orda remained cooperative, evident in shared campaigns and the contiguous positioning of their uluses, fostering mutual defense against external threats like the . After Batu's death in 1255, Shiban's successors oriented toward Orda's , integrating into its nomadic confederation through marriage alliances and tribute-sharing protocols that preserved Jochid autonomy. This shift underscored causal priorities of territorial contiguity and kinship over ideological schisms, as Orda's deference to imperial kurultais avoided the succession vacuums that destabilized Batu's western domains under Sartaq and . No evidence suggests Shiban or his immediate kin pursued independent bids for supremacy, prioritizing ulus cohesion amid the empire's fragmenting appanages.

Descendants and Dynastic Legacy

Immediate Offspring

Shiban's direct children are poorly attested in contemporary Mongol chronicles, such as those of al-Din, which prioritize ruling lineages over comprehensive genealogies. One son, Balagha (also rendered as Balagha Bey or Prince Balagha), is explicitly named in later Jochid accounts for his military service under Hulagu Khan during the 1258 sack of , after which he perished amid the campaign's uncertainties. Following Jochid inheritance norms, Shiban's ulus—territories east of the main domains—was subdivided among his sons, promoting lateral distribution rather than to sustain kin-based alliances and prevent consolidation under a single heir. This fragmentation, evident in the persistence of multiple appanages into the , underscores the causal role of Mongol in favoring dispersed holdings over centralized states. While some secondary genealogies, drawing from Timurid-era compilations like those of Khondemir, suggest up to twelve sons (including variants like Bainal, Behadur, and Kadak alongside Balagha), primary evidence confirms only sparse details, limiting verifiable links to early Shibbanid progenitors. These immediate heirs maintained the ulus's stability amid inter-Jochid rivalries, with their holdings serving as buffers against Chagatai pressures, though records emphasize continuity over individual exploits. Empirical genealogical chains in Abul-Ghazi Bahadur's 17th-century history trace the Shibbanid male line through such divisions, affirming descent without specifying further names.

Later Descendant Dynasties and Influence

The Shaibanid dynasty, descending from Shiban through the Abū al-Khayrids, consolidated power in the eastern territories of the former following its fragmentation in the mid-15th century. Abū al-Khayr Khan (r. 1428–1468), a direct patrilineal descendant, unified disparate Uzbek tribes originating from Shiban's ulus and established a nomadic confederation that projected influence into . This laid the groundwork for southward expansions, culminating in Khan's (r. 1500–1510) conquest of Mawarannahr from the Timurids, including in 1500 and in 1501, thereby founding the as a Shaibanid stronghold. A collateral branch extended Shaibanid rule to , where Ilbars Khan (r. 1511–1524), claiming descent from the line, established the in 1511, securing control over oases and caravan routes amid the Horde's collapse. By the 16th century, Shaibanid rulers had undergone significant Turkicization, adopting Chagatai Turkic as their primary and integrating into the Uzbek ethnogenesis, which fused Mongol elite lineages with local Turkic pastoralists and sedentary populations. Linguistic from Shaibanid chronicles and inscriptions reflects this shift, with terms and nomenclature evolving from Mongolic roots to Turkic forms prevalent in Central Asian successor states. Genetic analyses corroborate this fusion, revealing that modern , as heirs to Shaibanid polities, carry substantial East Eurasian (Mongol-derived) uniparental markers—ranging from 9% to 76% in Y-chromosome haplogroups like C2-M217—alongside West Eurasian and South Asian components from intermarriage with Iranic and Turkic groups. In the context of post-Horde fragmentation, the Shaibanids countered the vacuum left by Jochid decline by forging resilient khanates that perpetuated Mongol administrative practices, such as divisions and tribal assemblies, while adapting to Persianate Islamic governance. The endured under Shaibanid and successor lines until 1785, fostering patronage of Timurid-style arts and madrasas, and repelling Safavid incursions from Persia through campaigns like the Battle of (1511). Similarly, Khiva's Shaibanid foundations enabled it to withstand nomadic incursions and maintain autonomy until Russian military pressures in the , with the dynasty's emphasis on Uzbek tribal confederations ensuring cultural continuity in despite external threats. This sustained regional hegemony underscores a trajectory of adaptive influence rather than mere disintegration, as Shaibanid states bridged nomadic traditions with urban Islamic polities for over three centuries.

Historical Assessment

Primary Sources and Accounts

The primary historical records concerning Shiban, the fifth son of Jochi, are drawn from Persian chronicles authored under the patronage of the Ilkhanate, a rival branch of the Mongol Empire to the Jochid ulus. Rashid al-Din's Jami' al-tawarikh, completed around 1307–1316, provides the most detailed account, naming Shiban explicitly as Jochi's fifth son, describing his numerous wives and concubines, and noting his territorial inheritance east of Batu's domain following the division of the ulus circa 1227. These texts, compiled from oral testimonies, imperial archives, and earlier Mongol records accessed by the author as a court vizier, emphasize Shiban's role in supporting Batu's campaigns without ascribing him independent ambitions. Cross-verification with The Secret History of the Mongols, an anonymous vernacular composition dated to approximately 1240, confirms Jochi's lineage including sons like Shiban (rendered as variants such as Šiban or Sinkur in some transcriptions) but offers scant narrative detail beyond genealogical lists, focusing instead on Genghis Khan's era. ʿAṭā-Malik Juvāynī's Tarīkh-i Jahāngushāy, written circa 1252–1260, references Jochid military contingents in broader conquests but omits specific mentions of Shiban, prioritizing Ilkhanid perspectives on central Asian events. No autobiographical Mongol texts or contemporary Jochid inscriptions survive, creating evidentiary gaps in Shiban's personal agency or internal ulus dynamics, which archaeologists partially address through excavations in the Siberian and steppes yielding 13th-century artifacts linked to Jochid elites, such as horse gear and weaponry consistent with campaign participation. These sources, produced by administrators amid Ilkhanid-Jochid tensions post-1260s civil wars, reflect a favoring central Mongol authority, potentially understating western ulus ; nonetheless, their convergence on Shiban's portrayal as a loyal subordinate to Batu in invasions and —without contradictory variants in preserved manuscripts—suggests underlying factual consistency derived from shared imperial records.

Scholarly Debates and Interpretations

Scholars debate the precise extent and autonomy of Shiban's ulus within the Jochid inheritance, with Russian-influenced historiography often subordinating it to Batu's western domains to emphasize a unified "Golden Horde" narrative centered on the Volga and Russian principalities, thereby minimizing Shiban's eastern territories beyond the Ural River as peripheral or integrated appendages. In contrast, Central Asian and Ming Chinese sources portray Shiban's holdings—encompassing the Kazakh steppes, Syr Darya basin, and nomadic appanages—as a semi-independent "White Horde" with distinct administrative vitality, evidenced by genealogical chronicles like the Shibannama that trace enduring Jochid legitimacy through Shibanid lines rather than Batu's direct successors. This divergence reflects broader historiographical tensions, where Russian accounts prioritize conquest dynamics over eastern pastoral economies, while indigenous traditions underscore Shiban's role in sustaining Jochid pluralism against centralizing Ilkhanid or Yuan influences. The shadow of Jochi's contested paternity—stemming from rumors of his conception during Börte's prior to Temüjin's full consolidation of power—has percolated into assessments of Shiban's dynastic legitimacy, with some interpretations questioning the "purity" of the eastern ulus's claims to Altan Urug authority and portraying Shiban as a sidelined figure in core Mongol imperial narratives. However, empirical validation arises from Shibanid rulers' self-identification and unchallenged succession in entities like the (1511–1920), where genealogies explicitly link back to Shiban as Jochi's fifth son, corroborated by genetic and epigraphic evidence affirming Jochid continuity without Genghisid disavowal in contemporary records. Such debates underscore that while paternity whispers fueled intra-family rivalries, they did not erode practical , as later dynasties leveraged the lineage for amid fragmenting uluses. Critiques of portrayals depicting Shiban and the Jochids as agents of unmitigated "" emphasize instead a pragmatic approach to empire-building, wherein extraction—quantified at around 10–20% of agricultural yields from principalities and fixed levies from nomadic subjects—facilitated across , including hubs like that processed annual silk and fur volumes exceeding 1,000 camel-loads by the 1260s. Economic analyses reveal the Golden Horde's systems, inclusive of Shiban's domains, as adaptive hybrids of nomadic mobility and sedentary taxation, yielding sustained revenues that funded military stability rather than wholesale destruction, countering romanticized narratives of nomadic hordes as irrational devastators with data on urban growth and interregional commerce under Jochid oversight. This view aligns with assessments highlighting administrative flexibility, such as delegated basqaq oversight and currency standardization, as hallmarks of fiscal realism over ideological conquest.

References

  1. [1]
    Central Asian History - Keller: Turko-Mongol descendants - Academics
    The Shibanid tribes lived just east of the Urals and north of Timurid Transoxiana, in an area called the Desht-i Qipchaq, or Kipchak Steppe.
  2. [2]
    Kingdoms of Central Asia - Grey Horde (Shaibanids)
    The Shaibanids were Özbegs (Uzbeks or Uzbegs), a Turkic tribal people whose Mongol leaders were descended from Shiban, son of Jochi Khan of the Golden Horde.
  3. [3]
    Kingdoms of Central Asia - White Horde (Golden Horde)
    Orda's khanate, located to the east of the Blue Horde, becomes known as the White Horde, while Shiban's khanate is the relatively obscure Shaibanids. Although ...
  4. [4]
    Genghis Khan, the Golden Horde and an 842-year-old paternity test
    Jul 13, 2025 · The fact that all indications are that Genghis Khan always treated Jochi as his flesh and blood offspring may be because he had information we' ...
  5. [5]
    Rashid al-din. Shu'ab-i Panjganah. 2. The Mongols and the Turks (2)
    The genealogy of the descendants of Jochi in “Shu'ab-i panjganah” contains fifteen of his sons. In fact, there are 10 genealogical lines, since five of them did ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] The Successors of Genghis Khan - Pax Mongolica
    It is based on first-hand information and native sources, much of which is now lost. The second section of Rashid al-DIn's history represents the author's.
  7. [7]
    Jochi Ulus in 1227-1255 - KIPCHAKS
    Aug 19, 2025 · After Jochi's death, his two sons Batu and Orda-edgen began to rule in the ulus, which actually divided Jochi's possessions among themselves. ...
  8. [8]
    The golden horde (Mongolian: Züchi-iin Ulus) - Nouah's Ark
    Shortly before that, Batu and Orda's younger brother Shiban was given his own enormous ulus east of the Ural Mountains along the Ob and Irtysh Rivers. While ...
  9. [9]
    Jochid elites in the 'Time of Troubles' (1359 to circa 1380)
    Dec 6, 2024 · The Jochid ulus was ruled by the descendants of Jochi Khan's eldest son, Batu, throughout the majority of the thirteenth and first half of the fourteenth ...
  10. [10]
    2.60. History of the Mongols: Golden Horde #1
    Dec 13, 2021 · And Chinggis, or perhaps Ögedai, made Jochi's second son Batu the head of the lineage. It was then that the division of the Jochid lands into ...
  11. [11]
    The Mongols' western campaign: - The ravage of Rus' - jstor
    Twelve to fourteen of Genghis Khan's descendants participated in Batu's. Russian campaign, each usually commanding a tumen (10,000 men). So, Batu's army.Missing: Shiban | Show results with:Shiban<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    The Mongols in the West - De Re Militari
    Jul 15, 2014 · The Mongol punitive expedition set in motion that same year led first to the conquest of Transoxiana, then expanded to include Afghanistan and Eastern Iran.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] The Mongols And Russia (vol-iii)
    ... tumen; in Russian, t'ma), was created When the units of thousandswere ... Shiban and Tuka-Timur, also receivedshares in the area. While Batu's brothers ...
  14. [14]
    To the Great Sea: The Death of Ögedei Khan
    Nov 18, 2024 · In that year, the Mongols instead withdrew eastward, pulling their forces out of Europe entirely. Batu's uncle, Ögedei Khan, had died on ...
  15. [15]
    The First Mongol Invasion of Europe: Goals and Results
    Jun 28, 2021 · However, after their landmark victory in the Battle on the Kalka River, the conquerors came to believe in their exceptional strength and luck.
  16. [16]
    The Mongols and Siberia (Chapter 18) - The Cambridge History of ...
    Jan 1, 2024 · Its eastern wing, the domains of the descendants of Jochi's sons Shiban, located just east of the Urals, and Orda, centered on the upper ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Rashīd al-Dīn and the making of history in Mongol Iran
    which further names Jochi's fifth son, Shiban, as the successor of Qungqiran ... of Mongol rule in Central Asia and India in later centuries.49 While ...
  18. [18]
    The Great Town – Man Kermen in The Secret History of the Mongols
    In The Secret History of the Mongols, three chapters deal with the Mongols' western campaigns ... from the Persian of Rashid al-Din by ~. New York: Columbia ...
  19. [19]
    The last Timurids and the first Uzbeks (Chapter 10) - A History of ...
    ... Shiban. Shiban too had received an ulus, but farther north, near the southern outcroppings of the Ural Mountains. His descendants benefited from events ...
  20. [20]
    Khanate of the Golden Horde - Podgorski Family Archives
    Shortly before that, Batu and Orda's younger brother Shiban was given his own enormous ulus east of the Ural Mountains along the Ob and Irtysh Rivers. While ...
  21. [21]
    The Golden Horde, c. 1260–1502 (Chapter 4)
    Jan 1, 2024 · The Jochids did not only assert dominance over their territories; they also projected power far beyond their borders. From the 1260s onward, ...
  22. [22]
    (PDF) Formation and Changes of Uluses in the Mongol Empire
    ... Ulus → Left Wing (Toqta) → Right Wing (Noqai) → Berke Ulus (probably merged with Batu Ulus after his death) → Shiban Ulus 74 G. Fedorov-Davidov ...
  23. [23]
    Uzbeks, Qazaqs and Turkmens (Chapter 12)
    East of the Manghïts, the nomadic population of the Ulus of Shiban became known under the collective name Uzbek (actually, Özbek) apparently already in the ...
  24. [24]
    (PDF) “Russian ulus” of the Golden Horde - Academia.edu
    ... Shiban “came to the Moskau vilayat. They stayed there for several months ... Ulus on the rights of ulus rulers”, as Seleznev rightly pointed out66.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Intra-Mongol Diplomacy and Witch-Hunt during the Dissolution of ...
    3 Balagha was son of Shiban, Tutar was the grandson of Jochi's seventh son Buval, and Quli was son of Orda (the orthography of their names often varies in ...
  26. [26]
    MONGOLS - Foundation for Medieval Genealogy
    DESCENDANTS of JOCHI, son of JENGHIZ KHAN. A. KHANS of the GOLDEN HORDE. JOCHI, son of JENGHIZ Khan ([1184]-[Jan/Feb] 1227). Abul-Ghazi Bahadur names “Djoudji ...Missing: Shiban | Show results with:Shiban
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    The Shaybanids, Central Asia's last great dynasty - Blue Domes
    Feb 13, 2020 · The Shaybanids established the Khanate of Bukhara in the 16h century and were the last of the great Central Asian dynasties.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SHAYBANID RULE IN MAWARANNAHR
    Sep 6, 2025 · In a decisive battle near Akhsi in 1503, Shaybani Khan crushed the combined forces of the Mongol Khans of Moghulistan, who were Babur's ...
  30. [30]
    History of Uzbekistan | Discover Central Asia - Turkestan Travel
    In 1499 the steppes of Desht-i-Kipchak were conquered by the troops of Muhammad Shaybani Khan, an Uzbek Khan, the founder of the Bukhara Khanate. He was the son ...
  31. [31]
    The Genetic Legacy of the Expansion of Turkic-Speaking Nomads ...
    Apr 21, 2015 · Expectedly, the Central Asian Turkic speakers (Kyrgyz, Kazakhs, Uzbeks, and Turkmens), share more of their uniparental gene pool (9–76% of Y ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] The Secret History of the Mongols: The Life and Times of Chinggis ...
    Chinggis Qahan's ancestors belonged to the Kiyad group of the Borjigin clan of the. Mongol tribe. Tribal feuds and struggles for power continued for many.
  33. [33]
    [PDF] The Ta&#39;ríkh-i-Jahán-gushá
    TARIKH-I-JAHAN-GUSHÁ. OF. 'ALA'U 'D-DÍN 'ATÁ MALIK-I-. JUWAYNÍ. (COMPOSED IN A. H. ... History of Ghazan Khan from the Tarikh-i mubarak-i. Ghāzāni (Jami' al ...Missing: Juvayni Shiban
  34. [34]
    (PDF) An Overview of the Golden Horde Studies and the Place of ...
    AI. The text examines the significance of Genghizname and Shibannames in Golden Horde studies. Genghis Khan's empire shaped historical relations across Eurasia ...Missing: debates Shiban
  35. [35]
    [PDF] The Tūqmāq (Golden Horde), the Qazaq Khanate, the Shībānid ...
    This monograph is the first attempt to understanding historical and political relations between the Ming dynasty (1368-1644), the Tūqmāq,, the Qazaq Khanate, ...
  36. [36]
    (PDF) An Analysis of Joči's Debated Paternity and His Role in the ...
    Dec 29, 2021 · This article discusses Joči's military-political role and status in the Mongol Empire (Yeke Mongol Ulus), beginning in the early thirteenth century.Missing: Shiban | Show results with:Shiban
  37. [37]
    [PDF] RJGG of The Genetic Legacy of the Mongols.
    Sep 12, 2012 · The predecessor of this royal house is Shiban, Jochi's fifth son (Fig- ure 1). The Shibanids were once the rulers of the Khanate of Khiva ( ...
  38. [38]
    Russia and the Golden Horde: The Mongol Impact on Medieval ...
    Though he died before the Russian conquest, the figure of the World-Conqueror looms large in any consideration of the Mongol impact in history. Evaluations of ...
  39. [39]
    Economy of the Golden Horde (1240-1480) - MIWI Institute –
    The Golden Horde was a relatively highly developed Eurasian economy, and rather a beneficial factor for Russia's subsequent socio-economic development.Missing: pragmatic | Show results with:pragmatic
  40. [40]
    The Golden Horde - Mongol Empires - University of Oregon
    Golden Horde granted local officials administrative and economic power and closely monitored them; So did the Muscovite state; Yasak (tribute or taxes imposed ...Missing: Shiban tribes