Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Siege

A siege is a in which an attacking force encircles a fortified position, such as a or fortress, to isolate it from external support and compel through blockade-induced , , or storming the defenses. This tactic exploits the defender's dependence on supplies and reinforcements by severing lines of communication, often requiring extensive and efforts from the besiegers to maintain the against potential relief forces. Sieges have been a dominant form of warfare since , with records of organized blockades appearing in Mesopotamian and campaigns, where attackers used ramps, battering , and to breach walls. Historically, sieges outnumbered pitched battles in pre-modern eras, particularly in medieval where they constituted the primary means of territorial , demanding mastery of siege engines like trebuchets and counter-defensive measures such as and boiling oil from the besieged. The advent of in the shifted tactics toward artillery-dominated bombardments and trace italienne fortifications, prolonging contests but increasing destructive potential against both and targets. Defining characteristics include the asymmetry between attacker and defender, with success often hinging on the besieger's ability to outlast the garrison's provisions—typically measured in weeks or months—while mitigating , desertion, and counterattacks. Notable sieges, such as those at in 1683 or Leningrad during , highlight the tactic's role in decisive campaigns, though they also underscore causal realities like mass and psychological strain as instruments of rather than incidental effects. In contemporary contexts, sieges persist in , adapted to asymmetric conflicts where mobility challenges traditional , yet the core principle of remains empirically effective for forcing capitulation. Controversies arise from the indiscriminate hardship imposed on non-combatants, but first-principles reveals sieges as rational responses to fortified , prioritizing operational efficacy over humanitarian concerns that emerged later in normative frameworks.

Fundamentals of Siege Warfare

Definition and Core Principles

A siege is a prolonged military operation in which an attacking force surrounds and isolates a fortified position, such as a city, castle, or fortress, to compel surrender by cutting off external supplies, reinforcements, and communication lines, often combining blockade with the threat or execution of assault. This method contrasts with open-field battles by emphasizing attrition over decisive engagement, exploiting the defender's dependence on finite resources within enclosed defenses. Historically, sieges have predominated in warfare when capturing strongholds proved necessary for territorial control, as attackers could not reliably breach fortifications through rapid maneuvers alone. The core principles of siege warfare center on logistical dominance and temporal pressure. Besiegers must achieve complete —known as —to deny ingress and egress, thereby inducing , , or demoralization among s, while positioning forces to repel relief armies through entrenched lines or counter-sieges. This requires superior manpower, to construct camps and siege works, and sustained supply chains, as prolonged operations amplify risks of , weather exposure, and counterattacks. operates on causal logic: enclosed populations deplete stored foodstuffs at predictable rates, with historical analyses estimating at weeks to months based on reserves and , forcing capitulation without full-scale in many cases. Defensive principles emphasize and , prioritizing the fortification's inherent advantages—high walls, moats, and elevated positions—to multiply against numerical inferiority. provisions, maintaining through , and conducting sorties to disrupt besieger form the of resistance, with success often depending on awaiting or exploiting attacker overextension. Empirical patterns from pre-modern conflicts reveal that sieges favored defenders when provisions exceeded 30-60 days' supply , underscoring the asymmetry where time erodes the aggressor's initiative if not balanced by breaches or psychological inducements like offers of quarter. These principles reflect causal in warfare: fortified amplifies scarcity's compounding effects, rendering sieges a calculated gamble on resource asymmetry rather than .

Strategic Advantages and Costs

Sieges offered attackers the strategic advantage of bypassing the inherent defensive superiority of fortified positions, where direct assaults historically incurred disproportionate due to elevated , prepared defenses, and concentrated . By establishing a , besiegers could sever supply lines and external reinforcements, compelling defenders to expend resources over time through , , or internal discord, often yielding capitulation without a decisive . This method preserved the attacker's combat strength by minimizing exposure to or ranged engagements, allowing control of the operational tempo and surrounding territory while psychologically pressuring the enemy to negotiate terms favorable to the aggressor. In resource terms, sieges enabled efficient allocation of forces against immobilized targets, reducing the need for constant vigilance across fluid fronts and permitting the besieger to feign offensive pressure while conserving manpower for potential escalations elsewhere. Historical analyses indicate that this isolation tactic was particularly effective against urban centers reliant on , as prolonged amplified logistical vulnerabilities within the walls, often leading to rates exceeding those of stormed breaches in pre-gunpowder eras. Despite these benefits, sieges exacted heavy costs on the attacking force, primarily through extended timelines that immobilized large armies—sometimes numbering tens of thousands—for months or years, diverting them from decisive maneuvers against enemy field armies. Logistical sustainment posed acute challenges, as besiegers required vast quantities of food, , and to maintain , often straining imperial or feudal supply chains and exposing camps to epidemics that claimed more lives than . Financial burdens were immense, with medieval records showing expenditures on wages, equipment, and entrenchments that could bankrupt lesser powers, while vulnerability to relieving forces frequently turned the siege into a race against external intervention. from boredom, , and weather further eroded , rendering many sieges pyrrhic even in victory, as the opportunity costs of tied-down resources allowed adversaries to regroup or strike elsewhere.

Basic Offensive and Defensive Tactics

In siege warfare, offensive tactics fundamentally revolve around two strategies: attrition through to induce via or , and direct to fortifications. entails encircling the target to sever supply lines and prevent forces, often supplemented by constructing circumvallation lines of forts and ditches for against counterattacks. Direct assaults seek immediate entry via , using ladders under covering fire from archers or , though this incurred high casualties from defender . Breaching methods include battering rams, typically heavy logs with metal heads swung against under protective sheds, and siege such as mangonels or counterpoise trebuchets capable of hurling stones weighing up to a metric to batter walls. involves digging tunnels beneath walls, packing them with combustibles like to sections, as demonstrated at in 1215. Siege towers, wheeled multi-story structures, enabled attackers to reach height shielded from missiles, facilitating on battlements. Defensive tactics emphasize preparation and active repulsion to prolong until relief arrives or attackers withdraw due to strain. Defenders stockpiled food, , arrows, stones, and flammables like or for extended endurance, while high walls, moats, and gates deterred easy access. Against escalades, they employed poles or cranes to topple ladders, brattices for overhead , and hurled boiling substances, arrows, or stones to repel climbers. To counter , defenders dug countermine shafts to intercept tunnels, and sorties—sudden armed sallies—disrupted enemy engineers or supply lines. Psychological elements, such as displaying captured attackers, aimed to demoralize besiegers, mirroring offensive intimidation tactics.

Ancient Sieges

Role of City Walls and Fortifications

City walls and fortifications constituted the primary defensive mechanism in ancient sieges, transforming urban centers into resilient strongholds that compelled attackers to shift from rapid assaults to resource-intensive encirclement and engineering efforts. Emerging as early as the Neolithic period, these structures, exemplified by Jericho's circa 8000 BCE walls—3.6 meters high, 1.5–2 meters thick, augmented by an 8.5-meter tower and 2.7-meter-deep ditch—deterred scaling and direct breaches, forcing besiegers to contend with elevated positions and prepared defenders. In the Bronze Age Near East, walls of mudbrick on stone foundations, often incorporating glacis slopes and fosses, resisted undermining and rams, as seen in Levantine Middle Bronze Age (circa 1900–1500 BCE) examples where preserved sections reached 4.4 meters in height and 2 meters in thickness. These fortifications influenced siege dynamics by enabling stockpiling of supplies, thereby prolonging resistance and exploiting attackers' logistical vulnerabilities, such as extended supply lines prone to disruption. Mesopotamian cities like , with baked-brick s enclosing over three square miles by 2900–2700 BCE, underscored this role, serving both as physical barriers and symbols of that psychologically deterred opportunistic raids. In the Iron Age , innovations like casemate walls (parallel walls with interconnecting rooms, circa 1000–920 BCE) and offset-inset designs at sites such as Hazor, , and provided enfilading fire positions for archers, countering ladders and rams while minimizing material use. The effectiveness of walls lay in their capacity to impose high costs on besiegers, often leading to through , , or abandonment rather than decisive breaches; reliefs from Tiglath-Pileser III's reign (745–727 BCE) depict ramps and towers necessitated by such defenses during campaigns like the siege of Lachish (701 BCE). However, mudbrick's vulnerability to erosion required periodic rebuilding, and breaches via betrayal or superior engineering, as in Neo-Assyrian tactics, highlighted limits when defenders could not sustain isolation. Overall, walls elevated sieges to tests of endurance and ingenuity, distinguishing from field battles and preserving city autonomy amid conquest-driven eras.

Archaeological and Depictive Evidence

Archaeological investigations in the ancient Near East have uncovered tangible remnants of siege warfare, particularly from Assyrian campaigns. At Tel Lachish in southern Israel, excavations revealed a massive siege ramp constructed by Assyrian forces under King Sennacherib during the 701 BCE assault on the Judean city. Composed primarily of small boulders averaging 6.5 kilograms each, the ramp facilitated the movement of battering rams and infantry to breach the fortified walls, with physical evidence of wall breaches and scattered Assyrian arrowheads confirming the intensity of the engagement. This structure represents the sole preserved example of an Assyrian siege ramp in the region, underscoring the engineering scale required to overcome elevated defenses. Further findings include military encampments linked to Sennacherib's campaigns, identified through surface surveys and geophysical analysis. Sites near exhibit elliptical enclosures divided into internal sectors, consistent with descriptions in Assyrian reliefs and , housing troops and siege equipment during prolonged operations. These camps, often positioned on hilltops for strategic oversight, reflect the logistical demands of ancient sieges, including provisions for large armies sustained over months. Depictive evidence from provides complementary insights into siege tactics and technologies. Neo-Assyrian palace reliefs, such as those from Sennacherib's Southwest Palace at (ca. 700 BCE), illustrate the siege of Lachish with spearmen scaling ladders, archers providing covering fire, and battering rams undermining gates amid defensive counterattacks. These carvings, recovered from the site, depict organized assault formations and the psychological impact of massed , aligning with archaeological traces of the event. Earlier Mesopotamian glyptic art from the Early features cylinder seals showing battering rams and rudimentary siege towers assaulting walled settlements, evidencing the conceptual origins of such machinery by the third millennium BCE. In Egyptian contexts, reliefs at the mortuary temple of (ca. 1274 BCE) portray the siege of Dapur, with scenes of troops constructing earthen ramps to elevate battering rams against double-walled fortifications on a rocky outcrop. These carvings emphasize pharaonic oversight from chariots and the deployment of scaling equipment, mirroring Hittite-influenced defensive designs prevalent in the Late Bronze Age . Such artistic records, while propagandistic, corroborate the of sieges through consistent portrayal of ramps, rams, and fortified responses observed across contemporaneous sites.

Key Tactics and Technologies

In ancient Near Eastern sieges, particularly during the Bronze and Iron Ages, attackers primarily employed encirclement to isolate defenders, cutting off food supplies and reinforcements to induce surrender through starvation, a tactic evident in Assyrian campaigns where prolonged blockades forced capitulation without assault. Direct assaults involved scaling walls using ladders or constructed earthen ramps, allowing infantry to overrun parapets while archers and slingers suppressed defenders from below. Breaching fortifications through engineering methods, such as undermining walls or deploying battering rams against gates, represented advanced offensive strategies, with the Assyrians integrating these in coordinated operations post the military reforms of Tiglath-Pileser III around 745–727 BCE. Key technologies included wooden , often capped with metal heads and maneuvered by teams under protective roofing or shields to dismantle gates and weaker wall sections, as depicted in palace reliefs from dating to 745–727 BCE. Sappers utilized iron tools—enabled by metallurgy—to dig tunnels beneath walls, collapsing them via props removal or fire-setting, a method refined by Neo- engineers for efficiency against mud-brick and stone defenses. Earthen ramps, piled with , , and timber, facilitated access for rams or troops, as seen in reliefs of Ramesses II's circa 1274 BCE, where such inclines bypassed height advantages. Defensive countermeasures shaped offensive adaptations; for instance, Hittite and fortifications featured sloped bases to deter , prompting attackers to combine with volleys for cover, achieving breaches in campaigns like the conquests of the BCE. While early sieges relied on bronze-tipped spears and basic ladders, the transition introduced durable iron implements for faster ramp construction and tunneling, reducing siege durations from months to weeks in successful cases. Archaeological evidence, including tool fragments and ramp remnants at sites like Lachish (sieged by in 701 BCE), corroborates these methods' prevalence and effectiveness.

Notable Ancient Sieges

The Battle and Siege of in 1457 BC marked the first detailed recorded military engagement involving siege tactics, conducted by against a coalition of rulers led by the king of Kadesh. Egyptian forces, numbering around 20,000 infantry and 2,000 chariots, executed a risky flanking march through the Aruna Pass to surprise the enemy positioned north of , achieving a decisive victory that trapped the coalition's remnants within the city's walls. The subsequent siege lasted seven months, with the defenders capitulating due to famine, allowing Egyptians to plunder 340 living prisoners, 83 ships, 924 chariots, and extensive livestock and grain stores, thereby establishing Egyptian hegemony in the for centuries. The Siege of Dapur circa 1269 BC, part of Ramesses II's sixth Syrian campaign against Hittite vassals, targeted the fortified city in the Orontes Valley allied with the Amurru kingdom. Egyptian troops deployed assault ladders, battering rams, and infantry to scale and breach the defenses, as illustrated in temple reliefs showing the pharaoh personally leading the attack. The city's swift capture enabled Ramesses to install an Egyptian garrison and advance further into Hittite territory, though it did not prevent later concessions in the peace treaty with the Hittites, highlighting the limits of Egyptian projection in Syria. In 701 BC, King of laid siege to Lachish, a major Judean fortress city, employing massive earthen ramps—up to 25 meters high—to position battering rams and archers against the walls, corroborated by palace reliefs at and excavated ramp remnants at the site. Assyrian forces overwhelmed the defenders after prolonged assault, deporting an estimated 200,150 captives from overall, with graphic depictions of impalements and flayings underscoring the terror tactics used to subdue resistance. This secured Assyrian control over key trade routes, though Sennacherib's subsequent failed encirclement of demonstrated vulnerabilities in overextended campaigns.

Classical Antiquity Sieges

Greek Innovations in Siegecraft

Greek military engineers, particularly under , pioneered the around 399 BCE as a response to Carthaginian threats, marking a shift from manual projection devices to mechanically powered . This involved gathering skilled craftsmen to develop tension-based launchers using sinew or hair bundles, enabling more accurate and forceful of fortifications from a distance. Initial designs were non-torsion catapults, but they laid the groundwork for subsequent advancements in warfare, allowing besiegers to weaken walls and defenders without direct exposure to . Macedonian kings Philip II and his son further revolutionized siegecraft by integrating torsion technology into catapults and organizing dedicated engineering corps around 350 BCE. Philip's mobile siege train, including torsion artillery and battering rams, facilitated rapid assaults, as demonstrated at the siege of in 357 BCE and Byzantion in 340 BCE, where catapults hurled stones to breach defenses. These machines exploited twisted skeins of sinew for , achieving greater range and power than earlier systems, and were transported with field armies to exploit weaknesses in city walls. Engineers like Polyidus refined these into and lithoboloi, combining them with protective sheds and rams for coordinated assaults. In the Hellenistic era, epitomized Greek engineering prowess with the helepolis, a massive wheeled constructed by Epimachus of for of Rhodes in 305–304 BCE. Standing approximately 40 meters tall with multiple levels armed with catapults and protected by iron plating and hides against incendiaries, it allowed troops to approach and scale walls under cover while below targeted gates. Though ultimately countered by Rhodian ingenuity—such as undermining and fire attacks—this innovation underscored the Greeks' emphasis on scale and integration of , , and , influencing later siege doctrines despite the era's preference for maneuver over prolonged blockades. Battering , often bronze-tipped logs suspended from frames, complemented these by focusing kinetic force on specific wall vulnerabilities, with evidence of their use dating to the BCE.

Roman Engineering and Discipline

Roman legions excelled in siege warfare through systematic engineering, leveraging soldiers trained as skilled laborers to construct fortifications and machinery under combat conditions. Each carried tools for rapid earthworks, enabling the erection of fortified camps nightly during campaigns, which evolved into elaborate siege lines during prolonged engagements. This capability stemmed from institutional emphasis on polyvalent training, where troops mastered both combat and , allowing for feats like the dual circumvallation and contravallation at the Siege of Alesia in 52 BCE. At Alesia, Julius Caesar's approximately 60,000 troops completed over 18 kilometers of fortifications in three weeks, featuring 4-meter-high walls, multiple ditches up to 6 yards wide and 5 yards deep, palisades, watchtowers at 80-yard intervals, and anti-personnel traps including lilia (pits with sharpened stakes). The inner circumvallation, spanning about 11 miles, sealed Vercingetorix's 80,000 defenders, while the outer line, an additional 13 miles, repelled a of 250,000, demonstrating engineering's role in neutralizing numerical inferiority through layered defenses. Such works required precise labor division, with soldiers excavating, timbering, and arming barriers amid harassment, underscoring the army's logistical prowess in supplying materials via foraging and pre-positioned stores. Siege engines further amplified Roman offensive capabilities, including torsion-powered ballistae for bolt projection, onagers for stone-throwing, and mobile towers up to four stories high for scaling walls. , a , detailed these in , describing ballistae with sinew-wound arms achieving ranges exceeding 400 meters, while battering rams with iron-clad heads breached gates under testudo formations for protection. Innovations like covered galleries for mining under walls minimized exposure, as employed at in 73 , where ramps ascended 130 meters to overcome natural cliffs. Military discipline was pivotal, enforced through hierarchical command, daily drills, and severe penalties to sustain and during sieges' . Legionaries marched 20 miles (about 30 km) in five hours under 45-pound loads, fostering endurance for engineering tasks, while infractions like desertion incurred flogging, —executing every tenth man in delinquent units—or . Rewards such as corona civica for saving comrades incentivized valor, ensuring troops maintained order even when starved or outnumbered, as at Alesia where relief failure stemmed from disciplined resistance. This regimen, rooted in traditions, allowed Romans to outlast foes psychologically, converting sieges into attritional victories via sustained operational tempo.

Eastern Influences and Examples

The Assyrian Empire, spanning the 9th to 7th centuries BCE, pioneered systematic siege warfare in the ancient Near East, employing combined tactics of battering rams, earthen ramps, and escalade to overcome fortified cities. Assyrian engineers constructed massive siege ramps to elevate battering rams and troops to wall heights, while protected rams with iron-clad heads and wheeled bases breached gates and walls. Siege towers shielded archers and ladders, allowing infantry to scale defenses under cover. These innovations, refined under kings like Tiglath-Pileser III (r. 745–727 BCE), enabled the conquest of over 100 cities through relentless engineering and logistics, including tunnel mining and supply lines. Assyrian reliefs from palaces at and depict these operations in detail, showing soldiers pushing into breaches amid arrow fire, with defenders countering from towers. The siege of Lachish in 701 BCE by Sennacherib's forces exemplifies this approach: ramps facilitated direct assaults, leading to the city's fall after two years, followed by mass deportations of 200,000 inhabitants as a tactic. Such methods emphasized overwhelming force over starvation, contrasting with later preferences for . These Eastern techniques influenced early Greek siegecraft, particularly after contacts via trade and conflict in the Aegean and during the 8th–6th centuries BCE. Walled poleis reemerged in eastern and islands, likely spurred by and Babylonian demonstrations of siege efficacy, prompting adoption of and basic engines by tyrants like (r. 405–367 BCE), who drew from Phoenician (Carthaginian-Eastern) models. Greek engineers, facing Persian threats, integrated ramp-building and protected assaults, as seen in the development of helepolis towers. The Achaemenid Persians (550–330 BCE) adapted Assyrian-Babylonian siegecraft into their vast empire's arsenal, though prioritizing mobility and submission over prolonged assaults. Persian forces under (r. 559–530 BCE) captured in 539 BCE by diverting the to lower water levels, enabling entry through river gates—a feat combining intelligence and minimal direct combat. Later, Darius I (r. 522–486 BCE) employed Greek and Phoenician mercenaries for specialized engines during Ionian campaigns, but Persian sieges often succeeded through and rather than innovation, reflecting logistical strengths over technological leaps. This pragmatic approach influenced Hellenistic successors, blending Eastern engineering with Western discipline.

Medieval Sieges

Evolution of Castles and Defenses

The earliest medieval castles in Europe, particularly following the Norman Conquest of England in 1066, were motte-and-bailey designs constructed primarily from earth and timber. These featured an artificial mound (motte) topped with a wooden keep for the lord's residence and oversight, adjacent to a defended enclosure (bailey) surrounded by a ditch and palisade, exploiting natural elevations for strategic advantage. This form allowed rapid construction—often in days—to secure conquered territories against rebellion and siege, though vulnerable to fire and undermining. By the late 11th to 12th centuries, vulnerabilities exposed during sieges prompted a shift to stone construction, beginning with shell keeps—circular stone walls encircling the motte's summit—and evolving into freestanding square keeps like the White Tower at the , completed around 1100. Stone keeps boasted walls up to 6 meters thick, as at , providing resistance to battering rams, catapults, and incendiary attacks that readily destroyed wood. Curtain walls with integrated towers enabled (enfilade) on attackers, while arrow slits optimized defensive archery without exposing defenders. The 13th century saw the pinnacle of pre-gunpowder defenses in concentric castles, featuring multiple overlapping rings of towered walls rather than a dominant central keep, allowing successive fallback positions during assaults. Originating in around 1168 (e.g., ) and adopted in , exemplified by Edward I's Welsh fortresses like (1295) and (1268), these designs incorporated vast moats, barbicans with layered gates, and round towers to deflect and . Such fortifications demanded massive resources but proved highly effective against prolonged sieges, as layered defenses forced attackers to breach multiple barriers under constant fire. Defensive innovations continually adapted to siege tactics: machicolations—overhanging projections with floor openings—emerged in the for dropping stones or boiling substances on assailants below walls or at gates; gatehouses evolved into fortified complexes with portcullises, drawbridges, and murder holes to counter and rushes; while moats, often less than 1 meter deep but staked, impeded approaches and . Round towers, replacing vulnerable square corners by the late medieval period, distributed impact from siege engines more evenly, reflecting empirical responses to observed failures in earlier designs.

Siege Engines, Mining, and Countermeasures

Siege engines in medieval primarily included stone-throwing machines such as mangonels and , which evolved from earlier traction-powered designs to more efficient mechanisms by the . Traction trebuchets, reliant on teams of pullers to launch projectiles up to 90-180 kg, were common in early medieval sieges but limited by manpower. The trebuchet, featuring a pivoting with a heavy counterbalance—often a box of earth or stone—weighed up to several tons and could propel stones of 50-200 kg over 200-300 meters, enabling bombardment of walls and defenders from afar. These engines, constructed from timber and requiring skilled engineers, were deployed en masse during major campaigns, as seen in the where multiple trebuchets assaulted fortified cities. Battering rams, often protected by wheeled sheds or "sows," targeted gates and weaker wall sections by repeated impacts, sometimes augmented with metal heads or internal fires to weaken stone. Siege towers, multi-story wooden structures on wheels exceeding 20 meters in height, facilitated protected assaults by aligning drawbridges with battlements for infantry advances, though vulnerable to fire and enemy artillery. Ballistae and springalds provided precision bolt fire against machinery and personnel, bridging the gap between hand-held weapons and heavy artillery. Mining, or sapping, involved attackers excavating tunnels beneath fortress walls to remove supports and induce collapse, a refined from precedents and widely used in 11th-13th century conflicts. Sappers, working in shifts under cover of siege works, shored tunnels with timber props soaked in pitch, then ignited them to burn out supports, causing ; successful mines could fell wall sections 10-20 meters wide. Notable applications include the 1216 siege of , where French forces undermined the outer bailey, though English defenders detected and countered the effort. Countermeasures against engines emphasized both passive and active defenses: walls were buttressed with earthen ramps or "" to absorb impacts, while wet hides, screens, or iron plates shielded vulnerable points from incendiaries. Defenders deployed their own for , using mangonels or large crossbows to dismantle enemy machines from afar, and sallied forth to burn or dismantle them under cover of sorties. Against , countermines allowed defenders to intercept tunnels, leading to skirmishes with swords and fire; auditory vigilance, smoke detection, or flooding with water pinpointed enemy diggers. Castle designs incorporated deep foundations and rounded bastions to complicate undermining, reducing the efficacy of both tactics as fortifications advanced.

Mongol, Chinese, and Islamic Contributions

The (960–1279) advanced siege warfare through the integration of into offensive weaponry, developing explosive devices such as the huo pao (thunder crash bombs) that combined with for hurling from trebuchets or hand-throwing during assaults. These iron-cased bombs, documented in Song military texts like the (1044), produced shattering blasts capable of breaching walls or demoralizing defenders, marking an early shift from incendiary to high-explosive effects in sieges. Chinese engineers also refined traction trebuchets, powered by human crews pulling ropes to launch stones up to 100–200 meters, which were deployed en masse during defenses against Jurchen invaders in the , though these proved insufficient against later Mongol adaptations. Mongol forces, traditionally reliant on open-field mobility, transformed siege capabilities by systematically incorporating engineers and technologies from conquered and specialists, enabling the reduction of fortified cities across from 1211 onward. Under and his successors, they deployed wagon- or animal-mounted catapults for rapid assembly and used conscripted labor to construct massive counterweight , as seen in the six-year siege of (1268–1273), where Persian-designed engines hurled 100-kg projectiles to breach Song defenses and pave the way for the conquest of southern . This synthesis emphasized logistical encirclement, starvation tactics, and psychological terror—such as catapulting plague-ridden corpses over walls—allowing nomadic armies to overcome static fortifications, with over 100 cities captured in the 13th century through such methods. Islamic military engineers during the Abbasid (750–1258) and Ayyubid (1171–1260) eras contributed refinements to counterweight trebuchets (manjaniq), enhancing range and payload for sieges against and strongholds, with devices capable of launching 90-kg stones over 300 meters by the . Under , Ayyubid forces employed , , and coordinated in operations like the 1187 , where earthworks and rams facilitated breaches after initial softened defenses, recapturing the city with minimal direct assault. These innovations, drawing from Hellenistic traditions preserved in Islamic scholarship, influenced cross-cultural exchanges, as Abbasid technicians later aided Mongol sieges, underscoring a focus on modular, high-precision engines that prioritized structural vulnerability over brute force.

Famous Medieval Sieges

The Siege of Antioch from October 20, 1097, to June 28, 1098, during the involved approximately 40,000 Crusader troops besieging a city defended by Seljuk forces under Yaghi-Siyan, who commanded around 6,000 men. The attackers endured severe starvation and disease, with many knights dying, yet persisted by constructing makeshift fortifications and foraging parties. A turning point occurred when a traitor, Firouz, allowed Bohemond of Taranto's forces entry through a tower on June 2, 1098, leading to the city's capture and the slaughter of much of the Muslim and Armenian population. Subsequently, the Crusaders repelled a massive relief army of 35,000–75,000 led by on June 28, 1098, through a desperate sally inspired by the discovery of the , securing their hold on the city. The Siege of Jerusalem, commencing on June 7, 1099, pitted about 12,000–15,000 fatigued Crusaders against Fatimid defenders numbering 1,000–20,000 within the city's formidable walls. Lacking sufficient siege equipment initially, the attackers built two large siege towers and rams over five weeks, enduring thirst and dysentery that halved their effective strength. On July 15, 1099, coordinated assaults from north and south breached the walls, resulting in the city's capture and the massacre of nearly all Muslim and Jewish inhabitants, estimated at 10,000–70,000 killed, with streets running with blood. This victory established the Kingdom of Jerusalem, fulfilling the Crusade's primary objective. In the , the lasted from October 12, 1428, to May 8, 1429, with English forces under the and Thomas Montagu besieging the city held by 2,400 French troops and civilians. The English constructed bastilles around the perimeter, controlling river access and bombarding with , reducing the city to near starvation by early 1429. Joan of Arc's arrival on April 29, 1429, with reinforcements and supplies boosted morale; she led assaults that captured key English forts, culminating in the abandonment of the siege on May 8 after the fall of the Tourelles bastion. This reversal marked a turning point, enabling French reconquest of northern territories. The Fall of Constantinople on May 29, 1453, concluded a 53-day siege starting April 6, where Sultan II's army of 50,000–80,000, supported by massive bombards casting 500–600 kg stone balls, overwhelmed 7,000 defenders led by Emperor Constantine XI. Innovations like ship portage over land to blockade the and mining under walls, countered by and chains, preceded the final breach via ladders and cannon fire at the Lycus Valley gate. The city's capture ended the , with widespread looting and enslavement, though exaggerated claims of total population massacre lack substantiation; repurposed the as a , integrating the city into the realm.

Early Modern Sieges

Gunpowder and Artillery Revolution

The advent of fundamentally altered siege warfare in the early , shifting the balance from defenders' high walls and mechanical countermeasures to attackers' ability to deliver devastating explosive impacts over distance. Introduced to via Mongol invasions and Islamic intermediaries in the 13th century, gunpowder's application evolved from primitive pot-de-fer bombs to sophisticated s by the mid-14th century. Early siege uses, such as Castilian bombards at the 1344 Siege of , demonstrated limited breaching power due to wrought-iron construction, inaccurate stone projectiles, and slow reloading times exceeding 30 minutes per shot. By the , advancements in corned —granulated for consistent burn rates—and cast-bronze barrels enabled larger, more reliable pieces capable of firing iron or stone balls weighing 100 to 1,500 pounds. These bombards, often 20 feet long and weighing up to 20 tons, rendered traditional perpendicular curtain walls vulnerable to , as from high-velocity impacts could fracture masonry and create rubble-strewn breaches for assaults. The 1453 Siege of exemplified this revolution: deployed over 70 cannons, including a 27-foot supergun designed by engineer that fired 1,200-pound projectiles at velocities sufficient to penetrate the 2,000-year-old Theodosian Walls after sustained barrages, culminating in the city's fall on May 29 following a 53-day investment. In , artillery's siege dominance accelerated during the late and (1494–1559), where batteries of 20–50 guns reduced fortresses like those at the 1495 through parallel trenches and enfilading fire, minimizing exposure to sorties. English forces at the 1429 employed early bombards alongside traditional engines, but by the 1460s , specialized siege trains with demi-cannons and culverins shortened assaults by creating practicable breaches within days rather than months. This offensive edge demanded logistical innovations, including oxen-drawn caissons for powder and shot, as a single large bombard required 500 pounds of powder per volley, straining supply lines but enabling rapid dominance over static defenses. The revolution's causal impact stemmed from 's physics: unlike trebuchets limited to 300-pound counterweight-launched stones at speeds, propulsion achieved muzzle velocities over 300 meters per second, concentrating force to shatter rather than merely dent fortifications. However, limitations persisted— guns overheated after 3–5 shots, necessitating cooling periods, and immobility confined major impacts to prepared sieges—yet these spurred tactical evolutions like and approaches. By 1500, accounted for over 60% of siege outcomes in major campaigns, obsoleting unadapted medieval castles and compelling a defensive redesign, though empirical records show hybrid tactics persisted until widespread adoption of mobile field pieces in the .

Development of Trace Italienne Fortresses

The trace italienne, also known as the or Italian school of , developed in during the mid-15th century as a direct response to the destructive capabilities of , which rendered high medieval walls and towers highly vulnerable to breaching. Engineers shifted from vertical stone defenses to low, thick earthen ramparts revetted with stone, designed to deflect or absorb cannonballs through sloped profiles and wide moats, while incorporating projecting bastions to enable overlapping fields of defensive fire and eliminate dead angles for attackers. This geometric approach emphasized precise angles and lines of sight, transforming into a mathematical rather than . Francesco di Giorgio Martini (1439–1501), often regarded as the father of the angled , pioneered key elements through commissions for , Duke of , constructing or redesigning nearly 70 fortifications between the 1470s and 1490s, including the Rocca di San Leo (completed 1479) with early bastion-like projections for placement. Martini's treatises and designs integrated Roman engineering principles with geometry, advocating for bastions that allowed guns to enfilade approaching forces from multiple angles, a causal that prioritized defensive over sheer height. His work marked the from late medieval angular towers to true bastioned traces, though initial implementations were experimental and varied in execution. The French invasion of Italy in 1494 under Charles VIII, deploying over 40 mobile cannons that rapidly dismantled traditional defenses like those at Fornovo, catalyzed widespread adoption and refinement of the trace italienne by exposing the inadequacy of pre-artillery designs. By the early , engineers like Buonarroti contributed advanced polygonal bastions, as in his 1520s proposals for , incorporating counterguards and tenaille traces to further complicate siege approaches. These innovations spread from —such as Venice's fortifications and Verona's bastioned gates—emphasizing a continuous trace with orillons (shoulders) on bastions to shield from , and extensive outworks like ravelins added later for layered defense. The system's effectiveness was empirically validated in prolonged sieges, where attackers faced methodical under enfilade, increasing costs and time for assaults.

Vauban, Coehoorn, and Theoretical Advances

Sébastien Le Prestre de Vauban (1633–1707), chief military engineer under , systematized siege warfare by codifying disparate 17th-century practices into a cohesive emphasizing parallel trenches, coordinated placement, and infantry protection to minimize casualties and optimize resource use. His approach integrated offensive and defensive doctrines, treating sieges as predictable engineering operations rather than haphazard assaults, with fortifications designed via geometric bastions, lunettes, and mutual supporting angles to deflect fire. Vauban authored unpublished manuals on siegecraft and fortifications, later disseminated across , which prescribed a standard 48-day timetable for capturing a major fortress, balancing time, cost, and lives lost. At the in 1673, Vauban first applied his method of parallels—successive trenches dug parallel to the fortress walls under cover of night and artillery fire—capturing the city in 13 days with notably low French losses compared to prior chaotic sieges. This technique allowed safe massing of siege guns and sappers, reducing exposure to defensive enfilade fire and counterattacks, and marked a shift toward empirical efficiency in attrition-based warfare. Vauban's defensive innovations, including over 300 fortified sites like the northern "Fence of Iron" belt of 100 mutually supporting fortresses, forced attackers into prolonged, costly engagements, underscoring that no fortress was impregnable but delays could summon relief forces. Menno van Coehoorn (1641–1704), the Dutch "Vauban," countered with a rival system prioritizing simpler, cheaper fortifications featuring denser clusters of smaller bastions for rapid construction and defense with fewer troops, emphasizing speed and economy over Vauban's elaborate, terrain-adapted designs. Coehoorn modernized Dutch strongholds like Coevorden (captured by him in 1680) and Nijmegen, incorporating aggressive countermeasures such as countermines and portable mortars he invented, which remained in use into the 20th century. His offensive tactics focused on swift breaches, as demonstrated in recapturing Namur in 1695 after its loss, highlighting a doctrinal preference for mobility and lower material investment in an era of fiscal strain. The rivalry peaked during the at (1692), where Vauban's methodical parallels overwhelmed Coehoorn's defenses in 11 days, though Coehoorn inflicted heavy casualties via sallies and mines before . This exchange spurred mutual refinements: Vauban adopted elements of Dutch efficiency, while Coehoorn's writings, like New Method of Fortification, advocated geometric precision and integrated infantry-artillery roles, professionalizing across Europe. Together, their advances elevated sieges to a science of angles, , and attrition, diminishing reliance on numerical superiority and fostering specialized engineer corps that dominated warfare until gunpowder's further evolution.

Strategic and Industrial Aspects of Sieges

In early modern warfare, sieges served as the primary strategic mechanism for territorial expansion and control, often supplanting open field battles due to the high risks and uncertainties of the latter. Commanders prioritized the methodical capture of fortified positions to secure supply lines, disrupt enemy logistics, and claim sovereignty over disputed regions, as exemplified in the campaigns of from 1667 to 1714, where French forces under Vauban systematically reduced over 30 barrier fortresses in the and to establish a defensive perimeter. This approach minimized casualties from pitched engagements while leveraging expertise to compel surrenders through and , rendering sieges a form of attritional warfare that dictated the pace and outcome of multi-year conflicts. The industrial dimensions of these operations underscored the era's transition toward state-sponsored mass production and logistical coordination. Besieging armies required vast quantities of gunpowder—often exceeding 100 tons per major siege for sustained barrages—produced in royal mills using imported saltpeter, charcoal, and sulfur, with France under Colbert establishing centralized arsenals like those at Maubeuge to standardize output. Cannon founding demanded specialized foundries casting bronze or iron pieces weighing up to 5 tons each, with a single siege deploying 30-50 heavy guns supported by batteries of mortars and howitzers, necessitating thousands of projectiles manufactured in advance. Transport logistics further amplified resource strain, as artillery trains comprising hundreds of wagons and oxen teams consumed immense forage and manpower, limiting operations to navigable rivers or prepared roads and confining campaigns to frost-free months. Vauban's methodologies exemplified this industrial-strategic fusion, employing parallel systems that integrated massed fire with advances, as seen in the 1697 Siege of Ath, where 40,000 troops and 20,000 laborers supported 114 pieces, reducing the fortress in 10 days while conserving ammunition through precise enfilading. Such sieges compelled states to mobilize proto-industrial capacities, including labor for entrenchments and supply depots, fostering administrative innovations that prefigured modern military . Yet, the economic toll was profound, with prolonged efforts like the 1601-1604 draining Dutch resources equivalent to half their annual budget, highlighting sieges' role in exhausting adversaries through sustained material superiority rather than decisive combat.

Modern Sieges

19th-Century Industrial Enhancements

The enabled the of through mechanized factories and improved foundry techniques, allowing armies to field hundreds of guns simultaneously in sieges rather than relying on limited artisanal output. This shift, evident from the onward, supported sustained bombardments that overwhelmed traditional fortifications. Enhanced , including the use of and early alloys, permitted lighter yet more durable barrels capable of firing higher-velocity projectiles without bursting. Rifled artillery emerged as a pivotal enhancement, with spiral grooves in the barrel imparting spin to shells for greater accuracy and range—often doubling effective distance to over 5,000 yards compared to predecessors. In the Civil War's sieges, such as Petersburg in 1864-1865, forces employed rifled Parrott guns and Rodman smoothbores industrially produced in northern factories, delivering precise fire that breached earthworks and inflicted heavy casualties. These weapons fired explosive shells, whose destructive power was amplified by improved propellants and fuzes, shifting siege tactics from close assaults to remote . Breech-loading mechanisms, tested in the 1860s but widespread by the 1880s, further accelerated reloading rates during prolonged engagements. Railways transformed siege by facilitating the swift movement of heavy , troops, and millions of rounds, sustaining operations that previously faltered due to supply bottlenecks. Prussian mobilization in the 1870-1871 relied on over 4,000 trains to position 1.5 million men and siege trains around , encircling the city from September 19, 1870, to January 28, 1871, while maintaining barrages with factory-supplied shells. In the Crimean War's Siege of (1854-1855), Allied industrial output supported the deployment of approximately 800 guns by early 1855, complemented by steam-powered shipping for resupply, though rudimentary rail links highlighted the technology's nascent role in enabling 11 months of continuous pressure. These enhancements extended siege durations but favored attackers with superior industrial bases, as defenders struggled against relentless, mechanized firepower.

World War I Trench and Fortified Sieges

World War I transformed traditional sieges into prolonged trench stalemates, primarily due to the interplay of rapid-firing artillery, machine guns, and , which favored defenders and halted after initial 1914 offensives. On the Western Front, trenches emerged following the , with the first systematic digging occurring on September 15, 1914, evolving into a continuous line from the to the Swiss border by late 1914. This network featured front-line trenches backed by support and reserve lines, interconnected communication trenches, and protected by entanglements across no-man's-land, rendering frontal assaults extraordinarily costly. The resulting resembled mutual sieges, with both sides bombarding fortified positions, tunneling for mines, and conducting raids, as seen in battles like and the , where gains measured in yards incurred hundreds of thousands of casualties. Fortified sieges persisted in key positions, exemplified by the from September 28 to October 10, 1914, where Belgium's ring of 48 forts and redoubts, part of a 95 km defensive belt, initially repelled assaults but succumbed to heavy siege including 420 mm howitzers. The delayed the German advance by 12 days, allowing Allied forces time to reposition, though the forts' structures proved inadequate against shells, highlighting the obsolescence of pre-war fortifications without integrated trenches. Similarly, on the Eastern Front, the dual sieges of (September 1914–October 1914 and November 1914–March 22, 1915) involved Austro-Hungarian forces holding a fortress ringed by 41 forts against Russian , incorporating trench extensions and . The second siege ended with the surrender of 117,000 defenders after rations depleted, amid over 1 million total casualties in the surrounding Carpathian campaigns, underscoring logistical vulnerabilities in isolated fortified zones. In peripheral theaters, trench elements amplified siege rigors, as in the Siege of Kut-al-Amara from December 7, 1915, to April 29, 1916, where 8,000 and troops, entrenched in the Mesopotamian town, endured Ottoman and , suffering 30,000 including before surrendering 13,000 men. Relief attempts failed amid flooded terrain and supply failures, totaling 23,000 losses. These engagements revealed causal factors: defensive entrenchments multiplied attacker by factors of 10 or more, per empirical battle data, while dominance—exemplified by guns like the —shifted sieges toward material attrition over maneuver. Innovations such as poison gas (first used April 1915 at ) and creeping barrages attempted breakthroughs but often entrenched the deadlock further, with the Western Front alone claiming over 2 million lives in positional fighting by 1918.

World War II Extended Sieges and Air Support

Extended sieges during often featured air power as a critical element, enabling besiegers to conduct bombardment, interdict supplies, and attempt resupply operations from afar, though outcomes varied due to logistical constraints, weather, and defender countermeasures. Unlike prior eras, aircraft allowed sustained pressure without constant ground commitment, but overreliance on air support exposed limitations in tonnage delivery and vulnerability to anti-aircraft fire and enemy fighters. The , in particular, played a central role in sieges on the Eastern and Mediterranean fronts, where integrated air-ground tactics sometimes succeeded but frequently faltered under attrition. The Siege of Leningrad, lasting from September 8, 1941, to January 27, 1944, exemplified prolonged aerial harassment amid ground blockade. German forces initiated intense raids, with 80 percent occurring between September and November 1941, targeting infrastructure and food stores; a raid alone destroyed over 5,000 tons of provisions in the Badayev warehouses. Artillery and air attacks compounded civilian suffering, yet Soviet anti-aircraft defenses and harsh winters curtailed effectiveness, preventing decisive breaching as ground advances stalled. The failure to neutralize the city via air power highlighted causal limits: without total air superiority or invasion, alone could not overcome entrenched defenses and supply resilience via . In the , the German 6th Army's from November 23, 1942, to February 2, 1943, tested airlift viability when ground relief failed. pledged transport of 500 tons daily, later revised to 300, against a required 750 tons for sustenance and evacuation, but operations averaged under 100 tons amid Soviet flak, fighters, and winter storms disrupting Ju-52 flights from forward bases. This shortfall, exacerbated by inadequate airfield infrastructure and pilot fatigue, accelerated starvation and surrender of 91,000 troops, demonstrating empirically that air resupply could not substitute for secure land lines in large-scale encirclements. The air campaign against from June 1940 to December 1942 aimed to starve and bomb the island into submission as a Mediterranean base. and raids exceeded London's intensity in 1941, dropping thousands of tons to disrupt convoys and infrastructure, yet British fighters and submarines maintained viability, with relief convoys like delivering vital fuel in August 1942 despite heavy losses. Air power's inability to enforce total without amphibious assault underscored interdiction's limits against determined naval reinforcement. Conversely, the from June 7 to July 4, 1942, showcased successful air integration. VIII Air Corps under delivered over 20,000 tons of bombs—more than on in —coordinating with 1,600 pieces to shatter Soviet fortifications, enabling Manstein's 11th to capture the after eight months of prior pressure. This empirical success stemmed from concentrated softening defenses prior to assaults, contrasting failures elsewhere where dispersed commitments diluted impact.

Post-World War II Urban and Guerrilla Sieges

Post-World War II urban sieges frequently arose in asymmetric conflicts where insurgent or guerrilla forces controlled densely populated cities, compelling conventional armies to employ , , and assaults amid civilian populations. Guerrilla defenders exploited urban terrain for ambushes, fire, and improvised explosive devices, prolonging engagements and elevating civilian risks through tactics like human shielding and booby-trapping structures. These sieges deviated from earlier linear warfare, emphasizing in built environments that amplified destruction and complicated logistics for besiegers. Empirical outcomes revealed sieges' efficacy in dislodging entrenched fighters but at prohibitive human costs, with attackers often prioritizing over despite international norms. The (January 31–March 2, 1968) during the Vietnam War's Têt Offensive marked an early prototype of post-war urban siege warfare. and forces, numbering around 7,500, overran the , seizing and much of its 140,000-resident area in a surprise assault. U.S. Marines, Army units, and Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) troops—totaling about 11,000—counterattacked with house-to-house clearing operations, , and air strikes, facing fortified positions and urban guerrilla tactics. The fighting demolished 80% of Huế's structures, killed approximately 5,113 / fighters, and resulted in 216 U.S. fatalities and 1,364 wounded, alongside heavy ARVN losses; post-battle mass graves revealed over 2,800 executed civilians. In the Siege of Sarajevo (April 5, 1992–February 2, 1996), Bosnian Serb Army forces under encircled the Bosnian capital, held by Bosnian government troops and civilians, using from surrounding hills to shell the city daily. The 1,425-day blockade restricted food, water, and medical supplies, while snipers targeted civilians in "," causing widespread and . An estimated 11,541 civilians perished, including 1,601 children, with over 50,000 wounded; Bosnian forces mounted limited counterattacks but relied on defenses and UN-monitored safe passages for survival. The siege ended with the , underscoring how guerrilla-style harassment from elevated positions could sustain a besieger's advantage against a trapped defender. The First Battle of (December 1994–March 1995) in the Chechen Wars pitted Russian Federation forces against Chechen separatists employing classic urban guerrilla methods. Approximately 40,000 Russian troops, including armored columns, assaulted the Chechen capital defended by 5,000–15,000 fighters who mined streets, occupied high-rises for anti-tank fire, and ambushed invaders in . Initial Russian advances faltered due to poor coordination and urban traps, leading to thousands of military casualties; the city fell only after indiscriminate shelling that estimates place at 25,000–30,000 civilian deaths and near-total urban devastation. Chechen resilience via mobility and terrain knowledge inflicted disproportionate losses, forcing Russia to adapt with infantry-heavy clearances. The Second (November 7–December 23, 2004) saw U.S.-led coalition forces, numbering 10,000–12,000, besiege and clear the Iraqi city dominated by insurgents using fortified houses and foreign fighters. After a preparatory , and Army units conducted systematic block-by-block assaults against booby-trapped buildings and suicide bombers, evacuating 90% of civilians beforehand. The operation killed 1,200–2,000 insurgents, captured 1,000, and cost 95 U.S. deaths with over 500 wounded, while destroying 30–50% of the city; it exemplified in urban sieges but highlighted insurgents' guerrilla adaptation to static defense for propaganda gains. The Battle of Mosul (October 2016–July 2017) represented a protracted urban siege against the (), with , Kurdish Peshmerga, and coalition air support—totaling over 100,000 troops—encircling the ISIS-held metropolis of 1.5 million. ISIS defenders, 8,000–12,000 strong, utilized underground tunnels, vehicle-borne IEDs, and civilian-held positions for guerrilla , resisting for nine months amid collapsed buildings and chemical attacks. The campaign liberated the city at the cost of 1,000–10,000 Iraqi/allied fatalities, 8,000–11,000 ISIS killed, and 9,000–40,000 civilian deaths from , rubble entrapment, and deliberate executions, displacing nearly one million and razing 70% of the Old City. This siege illustrated the causal trade-offs of overwhelming firepower in megacity environments, where guerrilla embedding maximized besieger dilemmas under civilian proximity constraints.

Contemporary Sieges

21st-Century Hybrid Warfare Contexts

In 21st-century , sieges have adapted to integrate conventional military with non-kinetic tools such as campaigns, operations, militias, and economic , aiming to isolate targets, erode civilian , and compel surrender without solely relying on direct assaults. This evolution reflects the blurring of , where besiegers leverage information dominance to amplify psychological effects and justify actions internationally, often portraying encircled populations as threats or . Empirical analyses indicate that such tactics prolong while minimizing the besieger's exposure to high-casualty urban combat, though they frequently result in disproportionate civilian suffering due to restricted and targeting. The provides a prominent case, where the Assad regime employed sieges as part of a coercive strategy, combining ground s with airstrikes and Iranian-backed militias to sever supply lines into rebel-held enclaves. In the siege of eastern from July to December 2016, government forces and allies restricted food, medicine, and evacuations, leading to acute humanitarian crises that pressured opposition fighters to capitulate; this was synchronized with state-controlled narratives framing rebels as terrorists to legitimize the domestically and deflect global criticism. operational art integrated precision strikes with ground operations, demonstrating how elements like foreign mercenaries and information control extended siege efficacy beyond kinetic means, ultimately recapturing the city after four years of broader fighting that killed over 31,000 combatants and civilians combined. Russia's 2022 during the invasion exemplifies hybrid integration on a larger scale, where by ground forces and naval was paired with massive barrages, disruptions to communications, and efforts claiming forces used civilians as shields. From to May 2022, Russian troops isolated the port city, destroying key infrastructure like the Azovstal steel plant, which served as a final defender stronghold; this resulted in an estimated 20,000 civilian deaths from and , with indiscriminate attacks exacerbating the toll. The broader Russo- context incorporated hybrid tools like "" and farms to undermine Western support, though the siege's success hinged on overwhelming firepower rather than non-kinetic dominance alone, highlighting limits when hybrid narratives fail to sway international resolve. The 2022-2023 Azerbaijani of Nagorno-Karabakh's further illustrates siege tactics in disputes, using military checkpoints and territorial seizures to halt supplies into the Armenian-held enclave, combined with portraying the blockade as a measure against . Initiated on December 12, 2022, this nine-month caused severe shortages of , , and medicine for 120,000 ethnic , prompting mass and the dissolution of the self-declared Artsakh on September 19, 2023, without a full-scale . Azerbaijan's strategy drew on 2020 lessons, incorporating for enforcement and diplomatic maneuvering to frame as the aggressor, though humanitarian reports documented over 200 blockade-related deaths, underscoring how economic strangulation can achieve territorial aims with reduced kinetic risk.

Technological Integrations: Drones and Precision Strikes

In contemporary sieges, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones, have revolutionized tactical approaches by providing persistent surveillance, real-time targeting data, and direct kinetic effects against fortified positions, often obviating the need for costly ground assaults. Azerbaijan's employment of Turkish drones and Israeli loitering munitions like the Harop during the 2020 demonstrated this integration, where over 200 Armenian systems and armored vehicles were destroyed from standoff ranges, eroding defensive lines around key heights and supply routes without initial infantry penetration. These platforms fused intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) with precision delivery, allowing commanders to identify and neutralize strongpoints in a manner that accelerated territorial gains while minimizing Azeri casualties in what amounted to a series of besieged defensive enclaves. Precision-guided munitions (PGMs), including laser-guided rockets and GPS-enabled bombs, complement drones by enabling accurate strikes on fortifications and bunkers, though their in dense environments is constrained by risks and defensive countermeasures. In the , particularly during the 2022-2023 siege of , Ukrainian forces integrated commercial quadcopters modified for grenade drops with Western-supplied PGMs like the U.S. GMLRS rockets fired from HIMARS systems, targeting Russian trench networks and command nodes to inflict attrition without exposing troops to . Russian counterparts employed Lancet loitering munitions for similar precision hits on Ukrainian positions in by early 2024, where drone feeds guided artillery and missile strikes to breach outer defenses, though jamming often degraded accuracy, underscoring that technological edges depend on operational rather than hardware alone. This synergy has shifted siege dynamics toward remote degradation of defender morale and logistics, as seen in drone-disrupted resupply convoys, but empirical outcomes reveal limitations: PGMs reduce indiscriminate bombardment yet amplify destruction when defenders embed in civilian infrastructure. The proliferation of low-cost, attritable drones—often commercial models adapted for use—has democratized effects, enabling non-state actors and smaller forces to contest sieges asymmetrically, though state actors maintain advantages in scale and countermeasures. By , Ukraine's production of over 1 million first-person-view (FPV) drones annually facilitated tactics against besieged advances, combining with strikes to impose a "death by a thousand cuts" on fortified lines, per analyses. However, causal factors like Armenia's outdated air defenses in 2020 and mutual vulnerabilities in highlight that success stems from doctrinal adaptation and electronic spectrum dominance, not technology in isolation; biases in narratives often overstate decisiveness while underplaying ground maneuver's role. Overall, these integrations have lengthened siege durations by enabling defenders to inflict costs remotely but hastened resolutions when attackers achieve air denial, as evidenced by Azerbaijan's 44-day campaign yielding territorial reconquest.

Key Examples from 2000-2025

The Second , conducted from November 7 to December 23, 2004, by U.S.-led coalition forces against Sunni in , exemplified urban siege tactics in warfare. Approximately 10,000-12,000 U.S. and soldiers, supported by Iraqi forces, encircled and assaulted the city after insurgents had fortified positions amid areas, using improvised explosive devices and sniper fire. The operation resulted in 95 U.S. military deaths and over 560 wounded, with estimates of 1,200-2,000 insurgents killed; casualties numbered in the hundreds, with 581-670 documented deaths across affected neighborhoods due to and . The Battle of Aleppo, spanning 2012 to December 2016 in the , involved Syrian government forces, backed by air support and allied militias, besieging rebel-held eastern districts of Syria's second-largest city. Initial rebel advances in July 2012 fragmented control, but by July 2016, government troops fully encircled eastern Aleppo, trapping up to 250,000 civilians and rebels amid intermittent aid blockades and intensified bombing campaigns that destroyed hospitals and markets. The offensive from November to December 2016 reclaimed all eastern areas, displacing 130,000 civilians and contributing to tens of thousands of total deaths, including over 300 in the initial days from airstrikes and shelling; the prolonged attrition highlighted siege efficacy in denying resupply but at high civilian cost. From October 2016 to July 2017, , Kurdish , and coalition air support conducted the Battle of to dislodge from Iraq's second-largest city, employing siege around the Old City stronghold. Over 100,000 troops faced 8,000-12,000 fighters using tunnels, booby-trapped buildings, and human shields, leading to nine months of grueling urban combat that leveled swaths of the city. Casualties included thousands of Iraqi forces killed or wounded, up to 2,500-4,000 fighters eliminated, and an estimated 10,000+ civilian deaths from , airstrikes, and executions, underscoring the challenges of sieges against entrenched non-state actors in dense populations. The Siege of Mariupol, from early February to May 20, 2022, during Russia's invasion of Ukraine, saw Russian forces encircle and bombard the Azov Sea port city held by Ukrainian marines and national guard units. Initial strikes severed power and water on February 27, followed by weeks of shelling that trapped 200,000 civilians in basements without utilities, leading to starvation and disease amid failed evacuations. Russian victory came after Ukrainian defenders surrendered from the Azovstal steel plant, with at least 8,000 excess deaths from combat and war-related causes, far exceeding peacetime norms, and widespread destruction of infrastructure; Ukrainian estimates placed civilian tolls higher, at over 10,000. The , from August 2022 to May 2023 in , pitted Russian mercenaries—bolstered by convicts and regular forces—against Ukrainian defenders in a protracted urban siege marked by . Russian assaults, often involving mass infantry waves under drone and artillery cover, reduced the city to rubble over ten months, with Wagner claiming control by May 20, 2023, after Ukrainian withdrawal. Casualties were exceptionally high, with tens of thousands dead on both sides—Wagner losses estimated at 20,000+, Ukrainian at similar scales—making it Ukraine's bloodiest engagement and a symbol of grinding positional sieges in hybrid conflicts.

Ethics, Legality, and Military Effectiveness

Historical Ethical Views and Realities

In , sieges operated under a realist ethic where the strong imposed terms without formal prohibitions on or civilian targeting, as evidenced by practices of mass and to induce terror and submission. from ancient similarly permitted siege tactics including leading to , viewing them as aligned with rather than ethical transgression. Greek accounts, such as ' depiction of the Melian siege in 416 BCE, underscored a power-based : defenders who resisted faced , with no obligation for absent . Roman siege customs formed a distinct moral framework, where attackers typically offered surrender terms upon arrival; acceptance spared the city from sack, but refusal and breach of walls invoked a customary right to plunder and slaughter, as in the Third Punic War's destruction of in 146 BCE, where over 50,000 inhabitants were killed or enslaved following prolonged resistance. During the siege of in 70 CE, forces under blockaded the city for five months, resulting in widespread famine and an estimated 600,000 to 1.1 million deaths from starvation, disease, and combat before the walls fell and the Second Temple was razed. This reflected a pragmatic ethic prioritizing decisive victory over sparing non-combatants, justified by the besieged's defiance. Medieval European chivalry introduced conditional ethics: defenders granting "honorable surrender" before walls were breached could expect ransom for elites and mercy for commoners, but delay invited sack, with attackers entitled to three days of unrestrained looting and killing, as practiced in sieges like Constantinople's fall in 1204 during the Fourth Crusade. Islamic jurists, drawing from early caliphal practices, restricted warfare to necessity under jihad rules prohibiting wanton destruction but permitting encirclement if combatants were targeted, though historical sieges like those by the Umayyads often involved civilian hardship without explicit bans on induced famine. These norms stemmed from elite reciprocity rather than universal humanity, frequently breached in reality. Empirical realities of pre-modern sieges reveal high civilian tolls, with starvation and disease claiming 70-90% of victims before assaults; for instance, the 146 BCE siege reduced a population of 200,000-400,000 to enslavement or death after three years of . assaults amplified brutality, as defenders fought to the death knowing quarter was unlikely post-, leading to systematic sacking that served as deterrence. By the early modern era, in (1625) affirmed sieges as lawful but urged , critiquing excessive civilian harm while upholding attackers' rights upon . Such views evolved from custom, not , with violations common when strategic gains outweighed reputational costs.

International Humanitarian Law Constraints

International humanitarian law (IHL) does not explicitly prohibit sieges as a method of warfare, provided they target military objectives rather than civilians. Customary IHL, reflected in sources like the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) database, permits isolation of enemy forces to impede movement of weapons, supplies, and personnel when aimed at compelling surrender through deprivation of military resources. However, sieges must comply with core IHL principles, including distinction between combatants and civilians, proportionality in attacks, and precautions to minimize civilian harm, as codified in the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols. Violations occur when siege tactics indiscriminately endanger non-combatants or exceed military necessity. A primary constraint is the prohibition on starvation of civilians as a method of warfare, enshrined in Article 54(1) of Additional (), which states that " of s as a method of warfare is prohibited." This rule, considered customary and binding on all states even if not party to the Protocol (such as the ), forbids intentional deprivation of foodstuffs, water, or other objects indispensable to civilian survival for coercive purposes. The ICRC clarifies that while sieges may lawfully starve combatants by cutting supply lines, they cannot extend to civilians if the intent or foreseeable effect is societal weakening through rather than defeat of armed forces. Destruction or removal of such indispensable objects is also banned unless imperatively demanded by . Besieging parties bear obligations to facilitate humanitarian relief when civilian needs become acute. Under Article 70 of Additional Protocol I and , impartial humanitarian assistance must be allowed passage if the civilian faces or severe hardship, subject to security checks but without arbitrary denial. The defending side must not impede relief distribution within besieged areas, and both parties must cooperate to evacuate wounded, sick, or trapped . Failure to permit such access, as seen in documented cases like the siege of (1992–1996) where relief convoys were blocked despite UN facilitation, can constitute a violation if it foreseeably leads to civilian deaths from deprivation. Attacks integral to sieges, such as bombardments, remain governed by proportionality and precautions under Articles 51 and 57 of Additional Protocol I. Expected civilian casualties or damage to civilian objects must not be excessive relative to the concrete military advantage anticipated, with feasible warnings required before assaults on populated areas. Cultural property and medical facilities within besieged zones enjoy special protection, prohibiting their use as targets unless militarily necessary and after all precautions. These rules underscore that while sieges exploit logistical vulnerabilities, IHL demands empirical assessment of civilian impacts to prevent their devolution into collective punishment, prohibited under Article 50 of the Hague Regulations (1907).

Controversies: Starvation, Proportionality, and Civilian Impact

(IHL), particularly Additional Protocol I to the (Article 54), prohibits the of civilians as a method of warfare, deeming it a war crime under the when intentional. Sieges, however, are not explicitly banned, creating controversy over whether restricting food, water, and medical supplies to pressure defenders constitutes prohibited or permissible aimed at combatants. Critics argue that in urban settings, where civilians comprise most of the population, such restrictions inevitably target non-combatants, as evidenced by historical cases like the Siege of Leningrad (1941–1944), where German forces' blockade led to approximately 1 million civilian deaths from and before in January 1943. Proponents of sieges counter that intent matters— is unlawful only if civilians are the primary object, not incidental to denying supplies to fighters—and that alternatives like direct assault would cause higher immediate casualties on both sides. The principle of , requiring that anticipated harm not be excessive relative to concrete advantage (Additional , Article 51(5)(b)), poses unique challenges in sieges due to their prolonged, anticipatory nature rather than discrete attacks. itself may qualify as an "attack" under Article 49(1), obligating attackers to assess cumulative effects like resource denial, but debates persist on feasibility: and defender use of human shields complicate predictions, potentially rendering sieges inherently disproportionate without real-time adjustments. In modern conflicts, such as the 2016–2017 Battle of Mosul, coalition forces' siege tactics against resulted in estimates of 10,000–40,000 deaths from and deprivation, prompting accusations of excess despite evacuation warnings, while defenders argued proportionality favored sieges over riskier advances. Empirical analyses indicate sieges amplify proportionality risks when combatants embed in areas, as separation is often impossible without . Civilian impacts in sieges extend beyond direct casualties to widespread , , and collapse, with data showing elevated mortality rates from indirect causes like and . Studies of 20th–21st century conflicts estimate fatalities at 65–70% of deaths, rising in sieges due to trapped populations; for instance, Syrian government sieges in Eastern Ghouta (2013–2018) caused over 10,000 deaths, per UN documentation, from shelling, airstrikes, and enforced . Long-term effects include cycles and , as in the Siege of (1992–1996), where Bosnian Serb forces' blockade killed about 5,000 civilians through sniping, artillery, and shortages, exacerbating ethnic tensions post-conflict. While IHL mandates humanitarian corridors, compliance varies, with besiegers often rejecting them citing security risks and besieged parties sometimes blocking evacuations to maintain or shields, underscoring causal links between siege duration and civilian tolls independent of isolated violations. These fuel debates on siege efficacy, as empirical reviews question claims of 90% civilian victimization rates, attributing variability to defender tactics rather than attacker intent alone.

Empirical Assessments of Siege Efficacy vs. Alternatives

A survey of 60 urban sieges since the end of the reveals that aggressors achieved victory in 60 percent of cases, compared to 30 percent for defenders and 10 percent resulting in stalemates, ceasefires, or ongoing contests. These outcomes reflect sieges' capacity to exploit defenders' logistical exhaustion over time, with state actors securing wins in 82 percent of engagements lasting 6-12 months, though non-state actors fared better in short tactical sieges under 30 days (80 percent success). Duration data underscores this: 47 percent of sieges exceeded six months, enabling sustained pressure but amplifying infrastructure damage and resource demands on besiegers. In historical contexts, such as sieges in the from 1097 to 1291, empirical analysis using instrumental variables demonstrates that deployment of siege , including catapults and , substantially elevated attackers' success probabilities by overcoming fortified defenses that resisted direct assaults. Without such technologies, besiegers faced prolonged stalemates or failures due to high walls and defender advantages in prepared positions, whereas enabled breaches or demoralization, shifting outcomes in favor of over immediate storming. Compared to alternatives like direct urban assaults, sieges empirically conserve besieger casualties by minimizing , as evidenced in cases where outside-in isolation tactics reduced direct engagements but required external support for resolution—such as Russian airpower enabling Syrian forces to capture in 2016 after over three years of . Assaults, by contrast, often yield defender casualty ratios of 1:3 to 1:5 or higher in urban terrain due to and ambushes, though they permit faster operational tempos when supported by overwhelming , as in Grozny's 2000 fall via combined siege and scorched-earth advances. In , unsupported sieges risk failure through defender adaptation, including black-market sustainment, prolonging conflicts beyond 12 months on average and eroding strategic gains. Overall, sieges excel in attrition-based objectives against isolated foes but underperform against maneuverable alternatives in mobile campaigns, where bypassing fortifications proves more decisive.

Non-Military Sieges

Police and Hostage Sieges

and hostage sieges encompass operations in which authorities surround a perpetrator who has barricaded themselves in a structure, often holding civilians captive, with the primary objective of de-escalating the situation through to secure the safe release of and the suspect's surrender. These incidents typically involve small-scale —such as individual criminals or small groups—contrasting with larger military engagements, and emphasize minimizing harm to all parties, including the perpetrator, under domestic legal frameworks that prioritize and proportionality in force application. Tactics prioritize containment of the area to prevent escape or additional victims, intelligence collection via and communication intercepts, and prolonged to build and address the suspect's grievances or demands. The modern framework for these sieges emerged during the early , following high-fatality failures in prior responses, such as the 1971 Queens bank robbery where an assault by police resulted in the death of a and the robber. officers Frank Bolz and Harvey Schlossberg developed pioneering negotiation protocols, shifting from immediate tactical assaults to a "contain and negotiate" strategy that incorporates psychological profiling and phased behavioral influence, including , empathy-building, and problem-solving to reduce tension. The formalized this approach in 1973, establishing the and teams that have since trained thousands of officers nationwide; by 2024, the FBI reported over 50 years of refinement, crediting the method with preventing officer injuries and deaths in the majority of cases. Notable examples illustrate both successes and challenges. In the 1973 sporting goods store incident, four armed robbers held 11 s for 47 hours, marking one of the longest Police Department standoffs and prompting further tactical evolution toward non-lethal resolutions. The 2014 café siege, involving a lone gunman holding 18 s for 16 hours, ended with police intervention after demands escalated, resulting in the deaths of the perpetrator and one , highlighting risks when stalls amid ideological motives. Statistically, fewer than 20% of U.S. critical incidents involve true hostage-taking, with most situations resolving peacefully via surrender or ; predictive tools developed from FBI data accurately forecast violent escalation in 80% of cases and successful non-violent outcomes in similar rates. Annual U.S. estimates exceed 10,000 such incidents, with failing in approximately 18%, often due to suspect irrationality or external pressures rather than tactical shortcomings. Empirical assessments underscore the efficacy of these sieges when executed with specialized teams: hostage survival rates approach 95% in negotiated resolutions, far exceeding historical assault-based approaches that risked mass casualties. However, failures, such as delayed intelligence or misjudged threats, can lead to lethal entries by units, as seen in isolated cases where perpetrators executed hostages during breaches. Training emphasizes the "behavioral change stairway," progressing from to influence via , which data shows correlates with voluntary surrenders in over 80% of prolonged standoffs.

Distinctions from Conventional Warfare

Siege warfare fundamentally differs from in its strategic orientation toward isolation and gradual rather than mobility, direct confrontation, and decisive . In a siege, the attacker encircles a fortified or to sever external supplies, reinforcements, and communications, compelling through , , or psychological collapse without necessarily engaging in large-scale assaults. This contrasts with conventional field battles or operations, where forces prioritize rapid across open to exploit weaknesses, envelop enemies, and achieve quick destruction of combat power via and concentrated . Sieges thus represent a form of positional warfare, emphasizing control of access routes over fluid tactical engagements. A core distinction lies in risk allocation and casualty patterns. Sieges enable attackers to retain operational initiative by dictating the tempo—forcing defenders into reactive postures—while minimizing exposure to , where urban or fortified terrain favors the defender. For instance, during the Siege of from September 1870 to January 1871, German forces encircled 400,000 defenders, relying on blockade-induced starvation supplemented by sporadic bombardment, which avoided the high of storming walls and kept German losses low compared to potential assault casualties. In conventional , by contrast, attackers accept higher immediate risks to shatter enemy cohesion through penetration and dislocation, as in operations where speed and surprise targeted vulnerabilities to preclude prolonged defense. Siege durations often extend weeks to years, amplifying non-combat losses like among the besieged, whereas conventional battles seek resolution in days via overwhelming force application. Logistically and tactically, sieges demand sustained attacker supply lines to maintain , inverting the typical dynamic where defenders bear the burden of immobility. This static investment contrasts with the decentralized, adaptive command structures of maneuver doctrine, which emphasize exploiting temporal and spatial gaps rather than methodical . While measures success by terrain gained or enemy units destroyed in pitched fights, sieges gauge efficacy by denial of resources and erosion of will, often blending or as alternatives to —though prolonged sieges risk external forces or internal collapse of besieger . Empirical analyses indicate sieges reduce attacker fatalities in contexts but heighten civilian exposure to indirect effects like , distinguishing them from maneuver's focus on combatant-targeted disruption.

References

  1. [1]
    Siege - Oxford Public International Law
    Siege warfare is an operational strategy to capture a fortified place by isolating it from relief, using methods like starvation or bombardment.
  2. [2]
    Fortification and siege warfare (Chapter 8) - The Cambridge History ...
    Jul 18, 2025 · The operations at Ostend illustrate the developing tactics of siege warfare; in particular, the use of artillery to enfilade defences. Here can ...
  3. [3]
    The Siege Warfare That Shaped Ancient Greece & Rome
    Jul 4, 2025 · Sieges were an important warfare tactic in ancient Greece and Rome. It took time and ingenuity to breach city walls.
  4. [4]
    Medieval siege warfare | English Heritage
    Sieges were a common means of taking over land, resources and trade but also required huge amounts of money, time and manpower to be successful.<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Siege Warfare 1500-1830 - War History
    Dec 14, 2024 · This created the characteristic star-like shape of fortifications, hundreds of which were to dot the European countryside. Naturally, the new ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Medieval siege warfare: A reconnaissance - De Re Militari
    Nov 4, 2013 · Bradbury's argument for continuity is developed by identifying the basic characteristics of siege tactics. He calls attention to a series of ...
  7. [7]
    The 7 Most Incredible Sieges In Military History
    Mar 4, 2022 · The Siege of Vicksburg, Battle of Vienna and Battle of Sadr City are among the most notable sieges in military history.
  8. [8]
    Urban Siege Warfare: A Workshop Report - Lieber Institute West Point
    Aug 19, 2022 · Siege warfare is an aspect of urban warfare on the modern battlefield, which creates various legal issues with strategic consequences.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  9. [9]
    https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004395695/BP000011.xml
  10. [10]
    Siege Law - Lieber Institute - West Point
    Mar 4, 2022 · Siege refers generally to a military effort to surround and cut off an area, often but not always a city, to deny external access or egress.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] The Strategic Logic of Sieges in Counterinsurgencies - USAWC Press
    Sieges do allow the besieging side to conserve its military resources, avoid direct contact with the enemy, and minimize a rapid escalation of civilian ...
  12. [12]
    Siege Warfare in Medieval Europe - World History Encyclopedia
    May 24, 2018 · Siege tactics were a crucial part of medieval warfare, especially from the 11th century CE when castles became more widespread in Europe and sieges outnumbered ...
  13. [13]
    Siege warfare in the Middle Ages - The History Press
    Aug 15, 2023 · For this you might attack the wooden gate with a battering ram, or you might construct siege machinery to throw a barrage of stones at the walls ...Missing: fundamental analysis
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Siege Operations for 21st Century Warfare - DTIC
    Mar 31, 2021 · The case study analysis suggests that, at the operational level, a siege enables an attacker to hold the initiative, to reduce risks, and to ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] 1 Conceptualizing Military Siege Warfare Strategy
    Laying siege to a region looks to be a low-cost tactic for seeming to be on the attack whilst also saving resources for future conflicts and making sure they do ...
  16. [16]
    Collections: Fortification, Part I: The Besieger's Playbook
    Oct 29, 2021 · While it is clear that siege warfare must have been an important part of not only bronze age warfare but even pre-bronze age warfare, sources ...
  17. [17]
    Five Ways to Defend an Ancient City - Biblical Archaeology Society
    Feb 11, 2022 · While the wall was the basic defense structure, it needed protection against scaling by ladders, undermining, or breaching by battering rams.<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    How to Date a City Wall? The Case Study of Middle Bronze Age ...
    Jun 17, 2024 · This is one of the best exposed Middle Bronze Age fortifications in the Levant. ... walls up to 2 m thick and up to 4.4 m in height. It was ...
  19. [19]
    Wall - World History Encyclopedia
    Sep 2, 2009 · The walls of Uruk were thought to have been built by the great king Gilgamesh upon which he inscribed his heroic deeds which formed the basis ...
  20. [20]
    Siege ramps and breached walls: Ancient warfare and the Assyrian ...
    Nov 9, 2021 · Constructed in Israel, the Assyrian siege ramp at Lachish is the only surviving physical example of their military prowess in the entire Near ...
  21. [21]
    Sennacherib's Siege of Lachish - Biblical Archaeology Society
    Jan 28, 2022 · The siege of Lachish is documented in multiple Assyrian texts and reliefs and is also clearly visible in the site's archaeology.
  22. [22]
    Siege ramps and breached walls: Ancient warfare and the Assyrian ...
    Nov 9, 2021 · In 701 BCE Lachish was attacked by the Assyrian army, led by King Sennacherib. Garfinkel's analysis provides a vivid account of the construction ...
  23. [23]
    Assyrian military camp found, potentially supporting biblical account ...
    Jun 19, 2024 · Researchers have identified ancient military camps that correspond with the narrative of King Sennacherib's siege, potentially verifying parts of the Biblical ...
  24. [24]
    Long-lost Assyrian military camp devastated by 'the angel of the ...
    Jun 19, 2024 · At the British Museum in London, there is a relief depicting the siege of Lachish, and it shows the Assyrian camp. Stephen Compton, an ...
  25. [25]
    First-Ever Discovery of Ancient Assyrian Military Camps Includes ...
    Jun 4, 2024 · Hilltop site near Jerusalem shows features consistent with the campsite of the Assyrian King Sennacherib's infamous siege of Jerusalem in 701 BC.
  26. [26]
    Relief fragment: siege of a city by Assyrian troops
    The fragment depicts Assyrian spearmen climbing a ladder while archers fire, showing the army's siege tactics. The original relief was in Sennacherib's palace, ...
  27. [27]
    Representations of battering rams and siege towers in early Bronze ...
    PDF | On Jan 1, 2009, Davide Nadali published Representations of battering rams and siege towers in early Bronze Age Glyptic Art | Find, read and cite all ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Egypt and the Origin of Assyrian Wall Reliefs - DiVA portal
    Describing the scene above, Ramesses II is depicted in his chariot while shooting an arrow at the besieged city of Dapur. Meanwhile, enemy soldiers are driven ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Warfare | Siege of Dapur - Egypt History
    The Egyptian army employed siege tactics such as building siege ramps, battering rams, and siege towers to breach the city's defenses and gain access to its ...
  30. [30]
    Assyrian Siege Warfare in Antiquity - SOFREP
    May 5, 2023 · Siege warfare was commonplace in the Bronze and Iron Ages as empires looked to extend their hegemony, such as the Assyrians. The ancient ...
  31. [31]
    Ancient Siege Warfare - History on the Net
    The Assyrians besieged cities using three main methods simultaneously: battering rams for gates and walls, escalade, using earthen ramps and ladders to get over ...
  32. [32]
    The Defence Strategies and Tactics of the Syro-Hittite City-States ...
    The study reveals that the Neo-Assyrians improved siege engines and tactical unit formations significantly after the military reforms of Tiglath-Pileser III, ...
  33. [33]
    The Art of Assyrian Siegecraft - Ingenia
    Nov 18, 2022 · The Assyrians were the first to use battering rams to break down the gates of enemy cities, making them vulnerable.
  34. [34]
    Warfare in the Bronze Age: Tactics, Weapons, Battles | TheCollector
    Nov 16, 2023 · The technology evolved during the Bronze Age, involving bronze weapons, chariots, bows, and combined arms tactics.
  35. [35]
    Thutmose III at The Battle of Megiddo - World History Encyclopedia
    Jul 24, 2017 · Thutmose III wasted no time in mobilizing his forces and marching from Thebes toward the city. The army covered 150 miles in 10 days and rested ...
  36. [36]
    Battle of Megiddo: Pharaoh Thutmose III vs. Canaanites - TheCollector
    Jan 12, 2022 · At the time of the Battle of Megiddo (1457 BCE), Egypt was ruled by the Pharaoh Thutmose III, who had recently become the empire's sole ruler.
  37. [37]
    Siege of Lachish, 701 B.C. - HistoryNet
    Apr 12, 2017 · The ensuing siege of Lachish is unique in the history of antiquity in that it is recounted in multiple sources: the Old Testament; Sennacherib's ...
  38. [38]
    Smith College Museum of Ancient Inventions: Stone-Hurling Catapult
    The Greek Dionysius the Elder of Syracuse, who was looking to develop a new type of weapon, invented the catapult about 400 BCE. Thereafter, it became a key ...
  39. [39]
    The Sinews of War: Ancient Catapults - Science
    Let us go back to Sicily, 399 B.C., Dionysius, tyrant of Syracuse,. gathered skilled craftsmen, commandeering them from the cities under his control and ...
  40. [40]
    The Tyrant Who Changed Ancient Warfare: Dionysius I of Syracuse
    Jul 11, 2025 · The key breakthrough was the application of torsion power, using twisted bundles of sinew, horsehair, or plant fibers to store and release ...
  41. [41]
    The Important Role of Siege Engines in the Ancient Macedonian Army
    Jun 6, 2023 · Philip had a keen interest in the use of siege machinery to aid him in capturing cities – most notably at Amphipolis in 357 BC.
  42. [42]
    How Philip II Turned Macedon Into Greece's Superpower
    Sep 21, 2025 · Lastly, Philip innovated with the use of siege equipment. He pioneered the use of catapults against the town of Byzantion in 340 BCE and ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] What were Philip II's Reforms of the Macedonian Military and how ...
    We can conclude that although Philip utilized siege engines from early in his reign, he financed the establishment of a team of military engineers in 350 which ...
  44. [44]
    The “helepolis” of Epimachus (4th c. B.C.)
    It was a giant siege tower of roughly 40 metres in height that was constructed by Epimachus the Athenian and was utilised by Demetrius Poliorcetes in the siege ...
  45. [45]
    Rhodes 305–304 BC - War History
    Dec 23, 2015 · The famous helepolis built by Epimachus of Athens for Demetrius “Poliorcetes” (the Besieger) in 304 BC. This was the largest siege-tower of ancient times.
  46. [46]
    Roman Siege Warfare - Bryn Mawr Classical Review
    Jun 11, 2014 · Roman sieges of this type either utilised heavy siege towers, battering rams and a large earthen ramp ( agger) that allowed troops to directly ...
  47. [47]
    Roman Siege Warfare - World History Encyclopedia
    Jun 24, 2016 · Five factors enabled the Romans to be remarkably successful at sieges: sophisticated artillery weapons, formidable siege towers, the engineering ...
  48. [48]
    Walls at Alesia | TheCivilEngineer.org - Civil Engineers
    The details are known from Caesar's Commentaries. About 18 kilometres of 4 metre high fortifications were constructed in about three weeks (Wikipedia).
  49. [49]
    Caesar's Grand Siege at Alesia - Warfare History Network
    The fortified line was protected by a six-yard-wide outer ditch 437 yards from the double ditch in front of the palisade. Each of those ditches was five yards ...
  50. [50]
    Battle of Alesia - World History Encyclopedia
    Apr 26, 2021 · In an impressive feat of Roman siege warfare, Caesar's army built dual fortification lines around the fort, cutting off the besieged Gauls from ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Siege machines of ancient Romans - IMPERIUM ROMANUM
    One of the most momentous innovations was the dissemination and inclusion in the legion of various types of neurobalistic propellants. Due to the constructions, ...
  52. [52]
    What methods were used to enforce military discipline in the ancient ...
    Nov 4, 2024 · The Roman were first taught marching skills. They first had to walk 20 Roman miles (~30 km) in 5 hours loaded with ~45 pounds of equipment. Then ...What discipline did the Roman army have? - QuoraCan you tell me about the training and discipline of the Roman army ...More results from www.quora.com
  53. [53]
    Penalties and rewards in Roman army - IMPERIUM ROMANUM
    The legionary in the Roman army was subjected to extremely strict discipline. Each attempt to defect or even a small mistake was severely punished.
  54. [54]
    Assyrian Warfare - World History Encyclopedia
    May 2, 2018 · He increased trade and the production of iron weapons and acquisition of horses as well as the construction of war chariots and siege engines.
  55. [55]
    Sieges in the Ancient Mediterranean - A new Companion published ...
    Jun 23, 2020 · This book, based on a workshop on fortifications and sieges, features a collection of papers that deal with siegecraft among the ancient ...
  56. [56]
    https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004413740/BP000007.xml
  57. [57]
    Ancient Persian Warfare - World History Encyclopedia
    Nov 25, 2019 · The Achaemenid Empire (c. 550-330 BCE) took the best aspects of these earlier models to create one of the most effective military forces in the ...
  58. [58]
    Castles Through Time | English Heritage
    Motte and bailey designs were very common, and had a mound (the 'motte') topped by a wooden tower or keep and a defended enclosure (the 'bailey') alongside.
  59. [59]
    Medieval Castles: Function, Design, and Significance
    Oct 7, 2024 · Castles, with their thicker walls and traditional defensive features, became increasingly vulnerable to artillery attacks.What are Medieval Castles? · What are the 4 Types of... · Of Cultures and Castles
  60. [60]
    Types and History of Castles - Concentric Castles and Crusader ...
    The concentric design may well have originated in the Crusader states. The earliest example of a concentric castle is the crusader castle of Belvoir (c 1168), ...
  61. [61]
    Concentric Castles: Advantages and Disadvantages of the Design
    Concentric castles represent the 'high point' of medieval castle design. ... The best examples of concentric castles were built by Edward I, in North Wales.
  62. [62]
    Medieval Castle Defence: Defending a Castle
    People defending a castle could hurl items – like rocks, arrows or even animal dung – through these holes at an attacker below. Clearly visible, overhanging ...
  63. [63]
    The Trebuchet - De Re Militari
    Feb 11, 2014 · The trebuchet, invented in China between the fifth and third centuries BCE, reached the Mediterranean by the sixth century CE.
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Building The Medieval Trebuchet - DigitalCommons@USU
    A counterweight trebuchet is a mechanical artillery engine that operates mainly on the principles of leverage and gravity. A long lever, called the throwing arm ...
  65. [65]
    The Trebuchet - USC Viterbi School of Engineering
    The trebuchet was king. This massive weapon was eventually capable of throwing massive boulders over 250 meters, but it did not start that way.
  66. [66]
    NPS Interpretive Series: Artillery Through the Ages - NPS History
    Sep 11, 2003 · The trebuchet was another war machine used extensively during the Middle Ages. Essentially, it was a seesaw. Weights on the short arm swung the ...
  67. [67]
    Siege Machines in the Crusades – Science Technology and Society ...
    In earlier siege engines, like the Roman-era onagers, energy was provided by twisted cord or sinew; by the time of the later Crusades, gravity and ...
  68. [68]
    Medieval Warfare: How to Capture a Castle with Siegecraft
    Jun 12, 2006 · During the Middle Ages, a besieging army needed manpower, siege engines, and, more often than not, patience in order to carry a fortress.Onager And Mangonel · Battering Rams And Bores · Siege Tower Or Belfry
  69. [69]
    The Warfare Underground - A Brief History of Siege Tunnels
    Jun 11, 2012 · In the era of the medieval castle, armies frequently tunneled beneath enemy fortifications to 'mine'(shorthand for 'undermine') the walls.
  70. [70]
    Siege Mining - Legio I Lynx Fulminata
    Dec 13, 2016 · The third way was called sapping, which was digging directly around the walls and collapsing them. The least popular of the 3 types of mining ...
  71. [71]
    Gunpowder in Medieval China – Science Technology and Society a ...
    Gunpowder, one of the most transformative inventions in military history, was first developed in China during the medieval period.
  72. [72]
    Gunpowder - Song Dynasty China | Asia for Educators
    Song military engineers used gunpowder for siege warfare, developing rockets, cannons, bombs, and mines. It was first used as an incendiary on arrows. Bombs ...Missing: engines tactics
  73. [73]
    Military Technology
    Song period military tech included crossbows, catapults, spears, clubs, swords, armor, and warships. Warfare focused on capturing cities.
  74. [74]
    Technological Developments in the Mongol Empire
    Genghis Khan's siege warfare involved missile engines mounted on animals or wagons, and utilized Chinese engineers, weapons, and technology. This method was ...
  75. [75]
    The Mongol Siege of Xiangyang and Fan-ch'eng and the Song military
    May 11, 2014 · Siege weapons were created for various uses and the Song developed the well known traction trebuchet. Yet, these technological advantages did ...
  76. [76]
    How Saladin Became A Successful War Leader - HistoryNet
    Feb 20, 2024 · How Saladin, Egypt's first Sultan, unified his allies and won the admiration of his foes.
  77. [77]
    Siege of Antioch (1097–98) | First Crusade, Description, & Significance
    Oct 13, 2025 · It was carried out from October 20, 1097, to June 28, 1098. The Siege of Antioch marked the arrival of the First Crusade in the Holy Land.
  78. [78]
    The Siege of Antioch, 1097-98 CE - World History Encyclopedia
    Jul 12, 2018 · The siege of Antioch in 1097-1098 CE occurred during the First Crusade (1095-1102 CE) when the western Crusader knights were on their way to retake Jerusalem.
  79. [79]
    The Capture of Jerusalem, 1099 CE - World History Encyclopedia
    Jul 16, 2018 · After a brief siege, the city was captured on 15 July 1099 CE and the population massacred. A Muslim relief army was defeated three weeks later.
  80. [80]
    Siege, Jerusalem, 1099 - Crusades - Britannica
    Sep 22, 2025 · A successful surprise attack on the Egyptian relief army ensured the Crusaders' occupation of Palestine. Having fulfilled their vows of ...
  81. [81]
    The Siege of Jerusalem During the First Crusade - ThoughtCo
    On January 13, 1099, having concluded the Siege of Maarat, Raymond of Toulouse began moving south towards Jerusalem assisted by Tancred and Robert of Normandy.
  82. [82]
    Siege of Orléans | Joan of Arc, Hundred Years' War, Charles VII
    Oct 11, 2025 · Diversionary action against one of the English forts enabled Joan, from Chézy, five miles upstream, to enter Orléans with supplies on April 30.
  83. [83]
    Joan of Arc relieves Orleans | April 29, 1429 - History.com
    During the Hundred Years' War, the 17-year-old French peasant Joan of Arc leads a French force in relieving the city of Orleans, besieged by the English since ...
  84. [84]
    Fall of Constantinople (1453): The Siege That Changed the World
    Aug 15, 2024 · In 1453, Sultan Mehmed II's formidable army and groundbreaking artillery ended over a thousand years of Byzantine history with the fall of Constantinople.
  85. [85]
    The Fall of Constantinople: Relentless Ottoman Fire Power Finally ...
    The fall of Constantinople in May 1453 was the end of an age for much of Europe and the Near East. After the big guns did their work, Ottoman troops plundered ...
  86. [86]
    Artillery in Medieval Europe - World History Encyclopedia
    May 28, 2018 · When in the 15th century CE batteries of huge cannons were being more widely used, which fired balls weighing over 100 kilos (220 lbs), the days ...
  87. [87]
    Military technology - Gunpowder, Revolution, 1300-1650 | Britannica
    Late medieval and early modern gunners preferred large-grained powder for cannon, medium-grained powder for shoulder arms, and fine-grained powder for pistols ...
  88. [88]
    The Guns of Constantinople - HistoryNet
    Jul 30, 2007 · The guns included a 27-foot supergun, smaller cannons, and a "bear with cubs" battery, with stone balls up to 1,500 pounds.
  89. [89]
    Medieval Bombards at the Siege of Constantinople.
    Bombards were massive guns, some 20+ tons, used to batter walls. The largest at the siege was 27-foot long, firing 1,500-pound stone balls. 70 were made for ...
  90. [90]
    Medieval Siege Artillery - Warfare History Network
    In the 15th century the great powers of medieval Europe paid talented gunsmiths to build massive bombards to batter walls and shorten the length of sieges.
  91. [91]
    Chapter 8 – Cannon and Fortresses in Early Modern Europe
    Iron cannonballs combined with corned powder and improved metallurgy were more effective at penetrating fortress walls than stone cannonballs.[8] By the end of ...
  92. [92]
    [PDF] Fortification Renaissance: The Roman Origins of the Trace Italienne
    the development of the trace italienne angled bastion and the fortifications of the Roman empire (+40° 38' 39.18", +22° 57' 23.36"). Thessaloniki was a very ...
  93. [93]
    Collections: Fortification, Part IV: French Guns and Italian Lines
    Dec 17, 2021 · Trace italienne fortresses, designed to project firepower, were difficult to conquer, and their design was an exercise in mathematics. They ...<|separator|>
  94. [94]
    Geometry of bastion fortifications magistral line: influences ... - Nature
    Feb 11, 2025 · This paper spotlights the principles of bastion fortress design based on geometry, offering a way to identify markers of influence in observed examples.
  95. [95]
    The Military Architecture of Francesco di Giorgio in Southern Italy
    Jun 1, 1990 · The role of Francesco di Giorgio (1439-1501) in developing the forms of artillery fortification marking the transition from late medieval ...
  96. [96]
    Renaissance Fortifications - War History
    Dec 13, 2024 · Development of the bastion design in Italy was a direct response to the 1494 invasion by the troops of Charles VIII and the superior ...
  97. [97]
    [PDF] The Marquis de Vauban
    Vauban's actual contributions to siege tactics are debatable. What he did mainly was to pull together and codify various 17th century practices into a single.
  98. [98]
    Sébastien Le Prestre de Vauban: Father of the Fortress - HistoryNet
    Aug 29, 2017 · Vauban, France's master engineer of the 17th Century, designed nearly 100 fortress for Louis XIV—and defined the form for the ages.<|separator|>
  99. [99]
    Menno Baron van Coehoorn (1641 - 1704) - FORTE CULTURA
    In 1692, he was defeated by the attacking Vauban in the defence of the fortress of Namur. In 1695, he led the siege to recapture Namur and planned the ...Missing: rivalry | Show results with:rivalry
  100. [100]
    The Strategy of Louis XIV (Chapter 23) - The Cambridge History of ...
    Jan 6, 2025 · The strategies of Louis XIV were shaped both by France's position as one of the largest powers in Europe and by the Sun King's domineering personality.
  101. [101]
    [PDF] Vauban and the French military under Louis XIV - Castells catalans
    Daniel Specklin (an Alsatian fortification expert) and Menno van Coehoorn (creator of the new Dutch bastioned system) were radically opposed to their employ ...
  102. [102]
    2 - Sieges and the Laws of War in Europe's Long Eighteenth Century
    Jan 11, 2024 · Sieges were central to the evolution of customary laws of war in early modern Europe and represented the most regularised form of warfare.
  103. [103]
    [PDF] Introduction: firearms and armaments industries
    Apart from paying and feeding the troops, arms production and shipbuilding constituted the most burdensome challenge for early modern states, for “gunpowder ...
  104. [104]
    https://brill.com/downloadpdf/display/title/12180.pdf
  105. [105]
    (PDF) VAUBAN'S SIEGE LEGACY IN THE WAR OF THE SPANISH ...
    Vauban revolutionized siege warfare, reducing costs and casualties during the War of Spanish Succession. The study quantitatively analyzes 115 sieges from 1701- ...
  106. [106]
    For Your Enlightenment: Pre-industrial gunpowder warfare for ...
    Jan 22, 2022 · Let's look at what war looked like in the gunpowder era before the Industrial Revolution. This will focus on European warfare at the end of the period.
  107. [107]
    Gunpowder Weaponry and the Rise of the Early Modern State - jstor
    reinforcing cycle, which continued to spiral upwards at least until the advent of the Artillery Fortress Revolution of the early sixteenth century. It went ...
  108. [108]
    [PDF] The Impact of the Industrial Revolution on Warfare
    The Industrial Revolution in the nineteenth century had an incredible impact on the conduct of war. Historians often call the American Civil War the first ...Missing: siege | Show results with:siege
  109. [109]
    The Development of Artillery - Gibraltar National Museum
    Early cannons used metal staves, later metal was poured into molds. Early designs were loaded from the front, and later rifling increased range and accuracy.Missing: advancements 1800-1900
  110. [110]
    RIFLING - NPS Interpretive Series: Artillery Through the Ages
    Sep 11, 2003 · The United States rifle that was most effective in siege work was the invention of Robert P. Parrott. His cast-iron guns (fig. 13), many of ...Missing: 19th | Show results with:19th
  111. [111]
    The Development of Artillery from the Napoleon Period to the ...
    Jan 25, 2017 · Most of the improvements in artillery design between the Napoleonic era and the Civil War were on focused on lightening the weight of the tube, ...
  112. [112]
    The railways and war - Christian Wolmar
    Nov 2, 2010 · The railways remained by far the most efficient way of transporting men and materiel over long distances and there were many examples where the lack of railway ...
  113. [113]
    The Crimean War as a technological enterprise - PMC
    The war generated a boom in steamers and the steam navigation industry. The British government hired most of the newly built ships for the Crimean service, and ...
  114. [114]
    Railways at War 1870 Part I - Military History - WarHistory.org
    Dec 13, 2024 · Armour-plated railway trucks used in 1870 during the Franco-Prussian War. Railways At War 1870 Part I. Those in France emanated, fan-like, ...
  115. [115]
    First trenches are dug on the Western Front | September 15, 1914
    The first trenches on the Western Front were dug on September 15, 1914, after the Battle of the Marne, and the system stretched from Belgium to the Swiss ...
  116. [116]
    Trench Warfare | National WWI Museum and Memorial
    After the early war of movement in the late summer of 1914, artillery and machine guns forced the armies on the Western Front to dig trenches to protect ...
  117. [117]
    Battles - The Siege of Antwerp, 1914 - First World War.com
    Together with 80,000 garrison troops, Antwerp's ring of 48 outer and inner forts presented formidable opposition to von Kluck's German First Amy's flank. Von ...
  118. [118]
    How Winston Churchill Prolonged the Defense of Antwerp in World ...
    Sep 9, 2020 · The primary German targets were Forts Waelhem and Wavre St. Catherine, two of the main posts in the city's outer defense line. It was time for ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  119. [119]
    The Siege of Przemysl - Warfare History Network
    Approximately 117,000 soldiers, including nine generals, went into captivity. No one predicted that fighting around the city could be so costly. The loss of ...
  120. [120]
    World War I's Stalingrad: The Siege of Przemyśl and Europe's ...
    Jul 22, 2020 · The casualties on both sides together numbered well over a million men. Army horses, here shown in a military slaughterhouse, were nearly all ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  121. [121]
    Kut al-Amara - 1914-1918 Online
    Dec 18, 2017 · The Siege of Kut al-Amara between 3 December 1915 and 29 April 1916 is an important episode of the war between the Ottoman Empire and Great Britain.
  122. [122]
    Ottomans' World War I victory at Kut al-Amara, Iraq - Anadolu Ajansı
    Apr 28, 2022 · The historic siege of Kut al-Amara, a key World War I battle, ended on April 29, 1916, with the victory of the Ottoman forces against British-Indian forces.<|separator|>
  123. [123]
    1915: Early trench battles | National Army Museum
    During 1915, the British and French undertook a series of unsuccessful attacks against the Germans on the Western Front.
  124. [124]
    Germans bombard Leningrad | September 19, 1941 - History.com
    The halt of the German land attack and the withdrawal of the panzer divisions to be used elsewhere did not stop the Luftwaffe from continuing to raid the city.
  125. [125]
    Sturgeon Catch 1942: The Siege of Sevastopol
    In one month the Eighth Air Corps dropped more bombs on Sevastopol than the Luftwaffe dropped on Britain during entire air war of 1941. The Soviets were ...
  126. [126]
    The City That Would Not Die: Siege of Leningrad
    The Luftwaffe increased its attacks and, during one of the first air raids, set alight and destroyed more than 5,000 tons of food stored within the Badayev ...
  127. [127]
    The Siege of Leningrad, 1941 - 1944 - EyeWitness to History
    To compound the misery, the Germans incessantly bombarded the city with air and artillery attacks. The Russian winter had one positive effect. It froze Lake ...
  128. [128]
    Stalingrad airlift - the reason for Germans defeat at Stalingrad
    After the Germans lost all airfields, they made an attempt to supply the 6th army with packages dropped from the air, but it failed. Quite a big part of cargos ...
  129. [129]
    Stalingrad: Was the German Airlift Defeated by the Weather, or by ...
    Apr 30, 2023 · ... failure of the air supply effort to the size of the force to be ... The Stalingrad campaign and the Luftwaffe's failed airlift marked ...
  130. [130]
    How Malta Survived The Second World War
    Between 1940 and 1942 the British colony of Malta in the central Mediterranean faced relentless aerial attacks by the Luftwaffe and Italian Air Force.
  131. [131]
    The Siege of Malta in WWII: Holding on to the Island Fortress
    Air attacks on Malta became less fierce as Axis planes were diverted to help Rommel, but on October 11 the blitz resumed in an attempt to protect Axis shipping.
  132. [132]
    Battle of Sevastopol - World War II Database
    At 0600, the German air force, the Luftwaffe, joined in and dropped 570 tons of bombs on the first day. Over the next few days, the bombardment continued, with ...
  133. [133]
    Urban Warfare Project Case Study #3: Battle of Hue
    Nov 4, 2021 · The Battle of Hue, from Jan 31 to March 2, 1968, involved NVA/VC forces against US and South Vietnamese forces in New and Old Hue, and villages ...
  134. [134]
    The Battle for Hué City | Proceedings - U.S. Naval Institute
    On 31 January 1968, the second day of the Tet Offensive, Hue came under siege by two regiments of the North Vietnamese Army. The streets of Hue—in both the ...
  135. [135]
    Siege of Sarajevo (1992−96) | Summary, Description & Facts
    Broadly accepted independent estimates today put the death toll at about 100,000 people. More than 2,000,000 people were displaced during the conflict. Who was ...
  136. [136]
    Civilians bore the brunt of 1,425-day Sarajevo siege - Anadolu Ajansı
    Feb 4, 2023 · During the nearly four-year siege, 11,541 civilians, 1,601 of whom were children, were killed, while more than 50,000 were injured, records ...
  137. [137]
    The Battle Of Grozny And The First Chechen War - RFE/RL
    Jan 4, 2020 · On December 31, 1994, Russian troops began bombing Grozny and sent four armored columns toward the city's center. The initial street battles ...
  138. [138]
    https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/grozny-1994-battle-changed-post-soviet-russia-forever-181529
  139. [139]
    Second Battle of Fallujah (November−December 2004) | Iraq War ...
    Sep 17, 2025 · Second Battle of Fallujah, joint American, Iraqi, and British military campaign from November 7 to December 23, 2004, during the Iraq War that crushed the ...
  140. [140]
    Marines Recall Fallujah Combat, Iraq War's Bloodiest Battle
    Nov 14, 2024 · By the end of the battle, about 110 members of coalition forces were killed, and more than 600 were wounded. Roughly 2,000 enemy fighters died, ...
  141. [141]
    Urban Warfare Project Case Study #2: Battle of Mosul
    Sep 15, 2021 · The battle occurred between fighters from the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) on one side and Iraqi security forces, supported by ...
  142. [142]
    Five Operational Lessons from the Battle for Mosul
    Four key aspects of the battle foreshadow the most likely future of urban warfare for the US Army: corps-sized formations conducting multi-domain operations as ...
  143. [143]
    Back To The Future: The Return Of Sieges To Modern Warfare
    Jul 2, 2018 · He cites the siege of Sarajevo (1992-1996) as the first example of the modern phenomenon. Other cases include Grozny (1999-2000); Aleppo, Ghouta ...<|separator|>
  144. [144]
    Full article: Neither peace nor democracy: the role of siege and ...
    Mar 30, 2022 · This article examines the role of siege warfare and population control in the coercive counterinsurgency strategy used by the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad.
  145. [145]
    [PDF] Superpower Hybrid Warfare in Syria - DTIC
    Abstract: This article examines superpower hybrid warfare in four parts. First, it provides an overview of hybrid warfare and its tactical, if controversial ...Missing: siege | Show results with:siege
  146. [146]
    A Logic All Its Own Russian Operational Art in the Syrian Campaign
    The Russians planned for Syria by using five elements of the Russian military thought process: (1) historic analysis, (2) trends, (3) foresight and forecasting.
  147. [147]
    War in Ukraine | Global Conflict Tracker - Council on Foreign Relations
    Sep 15, 2025 · By May, Russian forces took control of Mariupol, a major and highly strategic southeastern port city. Indiscriminate and targeted attacks ...
  148. [148]
    The Russia-Ukraine Conflict From a Hybrid Warfare Cognitive ...
    Apr 25, 2024 · This paper analyses how hybrid and non-hybrid, cyber and information warfare have worked in Russia's favour, and where these tools and techniques might have ...<|separator|>
  149. [149]
    Azerbaijan's Hybrid War Against Artsakh – DOAJ
    The paper argues that after the Third Artsakh war of 2020 Azerbaijan has launched a full scale hybrid operation to provide ethnic cleansing of Artsakh and ...
  150. [150]
    Transformation of Modern Wars in the South Caucasus: Azerbaijan's ...
    The paper argues that after the Third Artsakh war of 2020 Azerbaijan has launched a full scale hybrid operation to provide ethnic cleansing of Artsakh and ...Missing: siege | Show results with:siege
  151. [151]
    Drones in the Nagorno-Karabakh War: Analyzing the Data
    The Azeris had used Israel-made suicide drones in a number of previous skirmishes since 2016. However, apparently the Armenians believed they were protected.
  152. [152]
    Bayraktars and Grenade-Dropping Quadcopters
    The 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war between Armenia and Azerbaijan saw widespread use of UAS but also the weaponization of information about that use. The ongoing war ...
  153. [153]
    Beyond the Drone Hype: Unpacking Nagorno-Karabakh's Real ...
    Mar 27, 2024 · Drones played a pivotal role, but the war was not solely won by them. Armenia failed to adapt, and the victory was a combination of factors.Missing: sieges | Show results with:sieges
  154. [154]
    The war in Ukraine shows the game-changing effect of drones ...
    Mar 12, 2023 · The Russian invasion of Ukraine has led to the first large-scale, high intensity war where both sides have extensively deployed military and commercial drones.Missing: sieges | Show results with:sieges
  155. [155]
    Military History: A Guide to 21st Century Urban Warfare - Canada.ca
    Oct 30, 2024 · Precision munitions dramatically change the ability of fires to influence close combat in urban terrain. Conventional aviation operations can ...
  156. [156]
    [PDF] The war in Ukraine shows the game-changing effect of drones ...
    The war in Ukraine shows drones' impact depends on the game, with small drones providing eyes and empowering soldiers, and the effect depends on how one ...
  157. [157]
    Urban Warfare Project - Modern War Institute
    ... in the twenty-first century. ... This threat doesn't come from multibillion-dollar next-generation aircraft dropping precision-guided bombs on open battlefields.
  158. [158]
    Drones and the Death of Deterrence: Lessons from Nagorno ...
    Aug 26, 2025 · Drones lowered the cost of engagement and shattered the old logic of deterrence. Military planners who once relied on large arsenals and ...Missing: sieges Ukraine<|separator|>
  159. [159]
    Besieged: Living and Dying in Fallujah - Iraq Body Count
    Jun 19, 2016 · In this battle, 581–670 civilians were killed in nine neighbourhoods of Fallujah. The only well-sourced number to have appeared in mainstream ...
  160. [160]
    Timeline: The battle for Aleppo | Reuters
    Dec 14, 2016 · On July 27 government forces fully encircle eastern Aleppo for the first time, but the siege is broken 10 days later by a rebel counterattack ...
  161. [161]
    The Destruction of Aleppo | Cultural Heritage and Mass Atrocities
    By mid-2016, most of the population of eastern Aleppo had fled, but an estimated 250,000 people still remained under siege. Aerial bombing became particularly ...
  162. [162]
    Syria, the Battle for Aleppo | How does law protect in war? - ICRC
    When pro-Government forces gained control of the Castello road on 17 July, eastern Aleppo city was effectively besieged. In August, armed groups broke the siege ...Missing: hybrid | Show results with:hybrid
  163. [163]
    The Living and the Dead - The New York Times
    Jul 19, 2017 · In October, Iraqi forces set out to retake Mosul, one of Iraq's largest cities and ISIS's biggest stronghold in the country. It would take them nine months and ...Missing: aspects | Show results with:aspects
  164. [164]
    More than 8,000 killed during 2022 Mariupol siege - Reuters
    Feb 8, 2024 · At least 8000 people were killed by fighting or war-related causes in Russia's months-long conquest of Mariupol, one of the biggest battles ...
  165. [165]
    Counting the Dead - Human Rights Watch
    We estimate that around 2,250 people would have died naturally in Mariupol during that time, meaning the city had at least 8,034 excess deaths above a peacetime ...
  166. [166]
    Mariupol mayor says siege has killed more than 10K civilians
    Apr 11, 2022 · The mayor of the Ukrainian port city of Mariupol says more than 10000 civilians have died in the Russian siege of his city and the full ...<|separator|>
  167. [167]
    The battle for Ukraine's Bakhmut: A timeline - Al Jazeera
    May 20, 2023 · Wagner claims control of Bakhmut but Kyiv says fighting continues. Here are some key moments in the battle for the city.
  168. [168]
    With Bakhmut in Ruins, Ukraine Shifts Focus to City's Outskirts
    May 24, 2025 · The city of Bakhmut became a center of the fighting in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine, and the site of one of the longest and deadliest ...
  169. [169]
    Sieges: Ancient Strategy, Modern Application - Kol Hamevaser
    Feb 7, 2012 · These ethical codes of acceptable wartime conduct require that all attempts be made by military personnel to protect civilians from damage and ...
  170. [170]
    SIEGE WARFARE AND THE PROHIBITION OF INTENTIONAL ...
    Aug 11, 2022 · Siege and starvation tactics were historically used in ancient India and not prohibited by Hindu ethics of war.
  171. [171]
    war - When and why did it become frowned upon to win a siege by ...
    Mar 11, 2022 · We do not know enough about ancient attitudes to siege defenses, ancient politics or moral values in order to give a definitive answer.
  172. [172]
    How can anyone respect the Romans after what they did to Carthage?
    Aug 30, 2020 · The sack of Carthage was a horrifically brutal act and would absolutely be considered a war crime by modern international law. At least 100,000 ...How did the Romans justify the Siege of Carthage to themselves?Why were the Romans so vicious against the Jews during ... - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com
  173. [173]
    The Great Jewish Revolt and the Siege of Jerusalem in 70 CE
    Nov 11, 2022 · The Siege of Jerusalem in 70 CE was the high watermark in the First Jewish-Roman War (66-73 CE) regarding the tension between the two forces.
  174. [174]
    How to Conduct a Legal Siege | A Writer's Perspective
    May 1, 2016 · The poor were usually butchered. Knights would normally only surrender to another knight for fear of being killed by commoners.
  175. [175]
    [PDF] Islamic Law and International Humanitarian Law - ICRC
    May 28, 2025 · Islamic law limits the methods and means of warfare to the limits of military necessity. All this is in full compliance with the provisions of ...
  176. [176]
    2 - The Invention of European Honorable Surrender during the Age ...
    Mar 1, 2025 · The recourse to honorable surrender was limited to the elites; common soldiers could be overwhelmed or killed outright in battle or siege.
  177. [177]
    Siege Warfare and the Early Modern Law of War - SSRN
    Aug 24, 2006 · In this paper, the evolution of the laws of war in relation to siege warfare are examined. Both doctrine and legal practice are discussed.
  178. [178]
    [PDF] the law of war and peace - in three books (1625) - LONANG Institute
    MDCXXV. Page 7. Hugo Grotius: The Law of War and Peace (1625). Page 3 ... siege threatens, unless the national is prepared to furnish an equally capable ...
  179. [179]
    Customary IHL - Rule 53. Starvation as a Method of Warfare
    The prohibition of starvation as a method of warfare does not prohibit siege warfare as long as the purpose is to achieve a military objective and not to ...
  180. [180]
    Sieges, the Law and Protecting Civilians | III. Rules of international ...
    Jun 27, 2019 · a. The principle of distinction ... Besieging forces are entitled to direct attacks against enemy forces and other military objectives in besieged ...<|separator|>
  181. [181]
    https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.34_AP-I-EN.pdf
  182. [182]
    IHL on the protection of the civilian population during sieges - ICRC
    Feb 5, 2024 · A siege can be described as a tactic to encircle an enemy's armed forces, in order to prevent their movement or cut them off from support and ...
  183. [183]
    Seventy Years of the Geneva Conventions | Sieges, starvation of ...
    Mar 24, 2020 · Article 54 AP I suggests a narrow interpretation that only prohibits conduct whose purpose is to starve civilians. Paragraph (1) only ...Missing: Protocol | Show results with:Protocol
  184. [184]
    Starvation Crimes and International Law: A New Era - CSIS
    Dec 4, 2024 · It does not state that individuals using starvation as a method of war should be held criminally responsible, nor does it reference Article 8 of ...
  185. [185]
    Humanizing siege warfare: Applying the principle of proportionality ...
    Dec 1, 2021 · Although the anticipatory nature of the principle of proportionality poses distinct challenges when applied in the context of siege warfare, ...
  186. [186]
    [PDF] Humanizing siege warfare: Applying the principle of proportionality ...
    The article examines applying the principle of proportionality to sieges, analyzing if encirclement is an attack under Article 49(1) of Additional Protocol I.
  187. [187]
    Joint Blog Series on International Law and Armed Conflict - EJIL: Talk!
    Jan 30, 2019 · Sieges are not per se an explicitly prohibited method of warfare under IHL. On the contrary, one could say that IHL implicitly allow sieges by merely ...
  188. [188]
    Israel – Hamas 2023 Symposium – Siege Law and Military Necessity
    Oct 13, 2023 · The legality of siege tactics and cutting of resources for the civilian population have become the basis for assertions that Israel is committing a war crime.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  189. [189]
    Global resurgence of siege warfare traps civilian populations on the ...
    Mar 31, 2022 · ... sieges leading to tens of thousands of civilian casualties and massive destruction to civilian infrastructure. 'Protecting civilians in siege ...
  190. [190]
    Estimating the Number of Civilian Casualties in Modern Armed ... - NIH
    Oct 28, 2021 · Previous studies have reported a civilian casualty rate of 65 to 70% of the total casualties in a war (13, 32–35, 49). The number of deaths and ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  191. [191]
    Under Siege: LOAC Obligations of the Besieged Party - Lieber Institute
    Jul 5, 2024 · Yet, the legal obligations the parties shoulder during sieges ... In treaty law, the 1977 Additional Protocol I to the 1949 Geneva Conventions ...
  192. [192]
    Lives and Statistics: Are 90% of War Victims Civilians? - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · In this review, the rate of civilian mortality varies from 13 to 87%. Previous studies have reported a civilian casualty rate of 65 to 70% of ...
  193. [193]
    Urban Warfare, Sieges, and Israel's Looming Invasion of Gaza
    Oct 27, 2023 · A survey of armed conflict finds that 60 sieges of various sizes and duration have accompanied conflict since the end of the Cold War. Moreover, ...
  194. [194]
    <span>The Impact of Siege Artillery: Evidence from the Eastern Mediterranean, 1097-1291</span>
    ### Summary of Key Findings on Siege Artillery Impact (1097-1291)
  195. [195]
    Fifty Years of FBI Crisis (Hostage) Negotiation - LEB
    Aug 6, 2024 · This impactful and important discipline has proved crucial in keeping police officers out of harm's way and in rescuing hostages and victims.
  196. [196]
    Tactical response to barricaded gunman and hostage situations
    Sep 16, 2024 · Responding to a barricaded gunman or a hostage situation requires a tactical approach from the first responder to ensure the safety of all involved.<|separator|>
  197. [197]
    Stockholm Syndrome and the art of hostage negotiation - BBC
    Aug 19, 2024 · The art of police hostage negotiation was pioneered in the 1970s by New York cops Frank Bolz and Harvey Schlossberg. The idea came out of the ...
  198. [198]
    A 1973 Hostage Crisis Changed Police Methods—And a Film About ...
    Oct 20, 2020 · The gunmen held 11 hostages inside the store. The 47-hour crisis was one of the longest hostage sieges in NYPD history. Advertisement.
  199. [199]
    Police Strategy: A review of Police tactics in the Martin Place Siege
    Feb 24, 2015 · The most favoured Police option in a hostage situation is the Contain and Negotiate. This has been a very successful tactic for domestic related criminal type ...Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
  200. [200]
    Hostage negotiations: Psychological strategies for resolving crises
    May 22, 2007 · Fewer than 20% of law enforcement critical incidents deal with actual hostage-taking, and most crises are successfully resolved without loss of ...
  201. [201]
    A PILOT STUDY OF NATURALLY OCCURRING HIGH ...
    Hostage negotiation is estimated to be unsuccessful in 18% of the over 10,000 estimated hostage-taking incidents annually in the United States (Van Hasselt et ...
  202. [202]
    Leveraging Data to Predict Outcomes in Hostage and Barricade ...
    Jul 7, 2022 · Tool 1 correctly predicts violence after onset in 4 out of every 5 incidents, and tool 2 correctly predicts successful resolution by negotiation or surrender ...
  203. [203]
    None
    Summary of each segment: