Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Snowden effect

The Snowden effect refers to the multifaceted consequences arising from Edward Snowden's 2013 disclosure of classified documents detailing the National Security Agency's (NSA) widespread surveillance programs, which exposed bulk data collection on citizens and foreign entities, igniting global discourse on privacy rights versus national security imperatives. These revelations, involving programs such as and upstream collection under Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act, prompted empirical shifts in public behavior, including a measurable "" where individuals reduced searches for sensitive terms by approximately 5% immediately following the leaks, reflecting heightened due to perceived monitoring risks. Legislatively, the effect catalyzed reforms like the of 2015, which curtailed the NSA's bulk telephony collection and introduced greater and oversight mechanisms, though critics argue these measures fell short of addressing core overreach. In the technology sector, companies accelerated adoption of —evident in platforms like —and enhanced data privacy protocols, partly to rebuild user trust eroded by revelations of government backdoor access and compelled cooperation. Internationally, the disclosures influenced policies such as the European Union's (GDPR), with direct linkages traced to heightened scrutiny of transatlantic data flows and practices. Public opinion surveys post-2013 indicate sustained increases in American concerns over government surveillance, with a majority viewing such programs as excessive despite persistent security justifications. Controversies persist regarding the net balance of harms from the leaks, including temporary operational disruptions to efforts, yet empirical analyses underscore enduring gains in and institutional .

Origins of the Revelations

Edward Snowden's Role and Disclosures

Edward Snowden served in various intelligence roles that provided him access to classified National Security Agency (NSA) materials. He worked for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) from 2007 to 2009, including a position in Geneva, Switzerland, before transitioning to private contractors supporting NSA operations. From 2009 to March 2013, Snowden was employed by Dell as a systems administrator with NSA access, followed by a role at Booz Allen Hamilton starting in March 2013, where he worked as an infrastructure analyst in Hawaii. This position granted him administrative privileges to NSA networks, enabling review of documents related to global surveillance practices. Snowden stated that his actions stemmed from concerns over what he described as unconstitutional encroachments on privacy by U.S. intelligence programs, lacking adequate congressional or judicial oversight. He expressed a duty to alert the public to activities conducted in their name, arguing that internal reporting channels had failed to address these issues. Beginning in early 2013, Snowden contacted documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras and journalist Glenn Greenwald, providing encrypted files via secure means after initial reluctance to publish. On May 20, 2013, he traveled from Hawaii to Hong Kong, where he met with Greenwald, Poitras, and Guardian journalist Ewen MacAskill to hand over documents. The disclosures commenced on June 5, 2013, when The Guardian published the first article based on Snowden's materials, detailing a secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) order requiring Verizon to provide the NSA with daily records of U.S. citizens' telephone metadata. The following day, June 6, reports emerged on the PRISM program, outlining NSA access to data from tech companies, though specifics of programs were selectively released by journalists to minimize harm. Snowden publicly identified himself as the source on June 9, 2013, via video interview from Hong Kong, amid escalating publications involving thousands of documents he had copied—estimates by U.S. officials place the total accessed files at up to 1.5 million. Booz Allen Hamilton terminated his employment on June 10, 2013, citing violations of company policy.

Key Programs and Practices Exposed

The disclosures detailed PRISM, a National Security Agency (NSA) program initiated in 2007 that compelled nine major U.S. technology companies—including Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Apple, and Yahoo—to provide user data such as emails, chats, videos, and file transfers to the NSA under court orders, targeting non-U.S. persons but incidentally capturing Americans' communications. The program enabled the collection of up to 250 million internet communications annually from these firms, with slides indicating direct access to servers for real-time data extraction. Another exposed mechanism was the bulk collection of U.S. telephony metadata under Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act, authorized by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which amassed records of nearly all domestic phone calls—including numbers dialed, call durations, and timestamps—for millions of Verizon and AT&T customers daily, spanning from 2001 onward. Documents quantified this as approximately 5 billion cell phone location records gathered worldwide each day through partnerships with telecom providers. XKeyscore, revealed as the NSA's widest-reaching system, allowed analysts to query petabytes of internet data—including emails, browser histories, and online activities—without individualized warrants, processing over 500 million records daily and enabling searches on virtually any term across global networks. Complementing this was Upstream collection, which intercepted communications directly from the internet backbone via taps on domestic fiber-optic cables and collaboration with U.S. telecom giants like AT&T, scanning transit traffic for selectors such as email addresses or IP addresses to capture full content and metadata in bulk. Internationally, the leaks uncovered Tempora, a UK Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) initiative launched in 2008 that buffered up to 30 days of internet data from transatlantic fiber-optic cables landing in Britain, sifting through 600 million telephone events and 40 billion website visits daily before sharing raw intercepts with the NSA under the Five Eyes alliance. The scale extended to allies, with documents showing NSA interception of German Chancellor Angela Merkel's mobile phone communications from at least 2002 through 2013, including encrypted calls involving her advisors. These practices encompassed billions of records annually, with one 30-day snapshot revealing 97 billion pieces of intelligence collected globally, including 13.5 billion from India and 2.3 billion from Brazil.

Immediate Global Reactions

Governmental and Official Responses

The Obama administration responded to Edward Snowden's initial disclosures on June 5, 2013, by defending the NSA's surveillance activities as lawful and essential for national security, with President Obama stating on June 11, 2013, that he welcomed public debate but condemned the leaks themselves. Officials, including Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, initially maintained that the programs did not involve unwarranted collection of Americans' data, despite Clapper's March 12, 2013, congressional testimony—predating the leaks—drawing scrutiny when he responded "no" to whether the NSA gathers data on millions of U.S. persons, a statement later deemed misleading. Clapper apologized to Congress on July 2, 2013, attributing the response to an "erroneous" interpretation of the question rather than deliberate falsehood. Congress initiated oversight hearings promptly, with the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence convening on June 12, 2013, to interrogate NSA Director General Keith Alexander on the scope and oversight of metadata collection under Section 215 of the Patriot Act. Alexander testified that the programs had thwarted over 50 terrorist threats, while lawmakers expressed concerns over potential overreach, though initial sessions focused on affirming the programs' defensive value amid damage control efforts to contain revelations of bulk data acquisition. Internationally, Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff registered sharp protest after disclosures revealed NSA targeting of her communications and Petrobras, demanding explanations from the U.S. on July 8, 2013, and postponing a planned state visit to Washington on September 17, 2013. Rousseff escalated the rebuke in a September 24, 2013, address to the UN General Assembly, labeling the surveillance a "breach of international law" and violation of sovereignty. These reactions underscored efforts to frame the disclosures as threats to diplomatic relations, prompting the UN General Assembly's Third Committee to approve, on November 26, 2013, a resolution affirming the right to privacy in the digital age and calling for states to cease mass surveillance incompatible with human rights obligations. The measure, co-sponsored by Brazil and Germany, passed the full Assembly on December 18, 2013, without U.S. opposition but highlighting global institutional pushback against unchecked electronic interception.

Public and Media Backlash

A Pew Research Center survey conducted June 12-16, 2013, shortly after the initial disclosures, revealed divided U.S. public opinion on the NSA surveillance programs exposed by Snowden, with 49% viewing the leaks as serving the public interest and 44% as harming it, though 54% favored prosecuting Snowden for his actions. The poll also showed partisan differences in approval of government data collection, with 58% of Democrats approving compared to 45% of Republicans and 42% of independents. A contemporaneous Gallup poll indicated 53% disapproval of the government's collection of telephone data from Americans, yet broad support persisted for surveillance aimed at preventing terrorism, reflecting a nuanced sentiment balancing privacy concerns against security needs. Overall, 64% of respondents reported following news of the issue very or somewhat closely, signaling a sharp spike in awareness. Media amplification began immediately with The Washington Post and The Guardian publishing stories on June 6, 2013, detailing programs like PRISM, followed by Snowden's self-identification as the source on June 9, which intensified coverage across outlets and sparked framing debates portraying him as either a whistleblower hero exposing overreach or a traitor endangering national security. This cascade contributed to public mobilization, exemplified by the "Stop Watching Us" rally on October 26, 2013, in Washington, D.C., where thousands gathered under a coalition of over 100 advocacy groups to protest mass surveillance on the 12th anniversary of the Patriot Act. A Quinnipiac University poll from June 24-July 1, 2013, captured the hero-versus-traitor divide, with 55% classifying Snowden as a whistleblower rather than a traitor by a 55-34% margin.

Policy and Legal Consequences

Domestic US Reforms and Legislation

The USA Freedom Act, signed into law on June 2, 2015, curtailed the National Security Agency's (NSA) bulk collection of domestic telephone metadata under Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act, a program directly implicated in Snowden's 2013 disclosures. The legislation required telecommunications providers to retain call records while mandating that the NSA obtain targeted court orders from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) for access, limited to specific selectors like phone numbers tied to foreign intelligence investigations. This shift aimed to balance national security with privacy by ending indiscriminate government-held databases, though implementation preserved provider obligations for data storage. Key provisions faced expiration risks, prompting reauthorization debates; the USA FREEDOM Reauthorization Act of 2020 extended FISA authorities through December 2023, including amicus curiae appointments for novel legal issues, while reinforcing prohibitions on bulk metadata sweeps under Section 215. Congressional negotiations highlighted ongoing tensions, with critics arguing the extensions inadequately addressed incidental collection of U.S. persons' data. Post-disclosure oversight expanded via the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB), statutorily empowered to review NSA programs and issue public recommendations, such as limiting backdoor searches of incidentally collected data. FISC transparency measures advanced through mandatory declassification of significant opinions and aggregate statistics on surveillance orders, responding to demands for accountability amid revelations of low denial rates (under 0.1% historically). These reforms, while causally linked to Snowden-induced scrutiny—including President Obama's 2014 review group recommendations—demonstrated empirical constraints, as they exempted authorities permitting bulk foreign collection with minimal statutory checks. The NSA shifted reliance to EO 12333 for upstream acquisition, retaining vast datasets including U.S. communications incidentally acquired without FISA warrants, underscoring adaptations that preserved expansive capabilities.

Judicial Challenges and Rulings

In ACLU v. Clapper, filed in June 2013 shortly after initial Snowden disclosures, a U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed the challenge to the NSA's bulk collection of domestic telephone metadata under Section 215 of the Patriot Act, upholding the program's legality on statutory and national security grounds. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed this in May 2015, ruling unanimously that the bulk collection exceeded Section 215's authorization, as the statute did not permit indiscriminate acquisition of records irrelevant to specific investigations. The court declined to reach the constitutional question but noted the program's scale raised serious Fourth Amendment concerns. Subsequent litigation reinforced findings of illegality. In United States v. Moalin, a September 2020 Ninth Circuit decision addressing the use of bulk metadata in a terrorism prosecution, the court held that the NSA's telephony metadata program violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act by collecting records without sufficient relevance to foreign intelligence targets, rendering the evidence derived from it inadmissible. The panel further deemed the bulk collection likely unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches, emphasizing the absence of particularized suspicion and the program's intrusion on privacy expectations. This ruling, while not halting ongoing surveillance, validated post-Snowden critiques of overreach by confirming statutory and probable constitutional barriers to mass domestic data acquisition. Challenges to upstream collection under Section 702 of FISA, which involves warrantless interception of internet communications transiting U.S. infrastructure, persisted in cases like Jewel v. NSA. Initiated in 2008 but amplified by Snowden's exposure of programs such as PRISM and XKEYSCORE, the Ninth Circuit in 2015 partially affirmed plaintiffs' standing to contest warrantless wiretapping of domestic communications, rejecting government claims of state secrets privilege in light of public disclosures. Lower court proceedings affirmed violations of the Fourth Amendment through incidental collection of Americans' data without individualized warrants, though the Supreme Court denied certiorari in June 2022, permitting dismissal on procedural grounds without resolving merits. These outcomes highlighted judicial recognition of unconstitutional practices but yielded limited remedies, as agencies shifted reliance to alternative authorities like Executive Order 12333, enabling similar bulk acquisitions outside FISA's constraints with minimal structural reform.

International Policy Shifts

The revelations by Edward Snowden in 2013 prompted significant reforms in European Union data protection policies, notably strengthening the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which was proposed in 2012 but finalized in 2016 and effective from May 25, 2018. Prior to the disclosures, debates in the European Parliament leaned toward diluting privacy standards to favor business interests, but the exposure of extensive U.S. surveillance programs shifted momentum toward robust safeguards, including mandatory data protection by design, user consent requirements, and hefty fines up to 4% of global annual turnover for violations. This causal link is evidenced by parliamentary records showing inverted positions post-revelations, prioritizing individual privacy over transatlantic data flows. Further EU-level shifts materialized in the Court of Justice of the European Union's Schrems II ruling on July 16, 2020, which invalidated the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield framework for inadequately protecting EU citizens' data from U.S. government surveillance programs like those detailed in Snowden's leaks. The decision, building on earlier Safe Harbor invalidation in 2015, required companies to conduct transfer impact assessments and highlighted deficiencies in U.S. laws such as Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act, which permit bulk collection without sufficient oversight or redress for non-U.S. persons. This ruling empirically enhanced privacy by curtailing unchecked transatlantic transfers—estimated at trillions of data points annually—but complicated compliance for over 5,000 organizations relying on the Shield. Nationally, Brazil expedited passage of the Marco Civil da Internet on April 23, 2014, establishing net neutrality, user privacy rights, and restrictions on foreign surveillance access to local data, directly in response to Snowden-exposed U.S. spying on Brazilian communications and Petrobras. The law mandates judicial warrants for data access and promotes data localization for government records, yielding privacy gains through clearer user protections but introducing enforcement challenges in a country with limited judicial resources. Similar updates occurred in EU states like Germany, where post-Snowden advocacy reinforced the Federal Data Protection Act (BDSG) alignment with GDPR in 2018, emphasizing stricter consent and breach notifications amid heightened surveillance scrutiny. At the international level, the United Nations Human Rights Council established the first Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy on March 27, 2015, explicitly in reaction to Snowden's disclosures, tasking the role with investigating mass surveillance and issuing reports like the 2014 assessment by David Kaye, which critiqued bulk data collection as disproportionate under international human rights law. These efforts advanced privacy norms by framing surveillance as a global human rights issue, influencing resolutions urging states to limit arbitrary interference. However, these policy shifts introduced trade-offs, as proliferating data localization mandates—enacted or proposed in over 50 countries post-2013—restricted cross-border intelligence sharing critical for . For instance, requirements to store data domestically fragmented global networks, reducing visibility for threat detection and potentially degrading security, as localized silos hinder real-time analysis shared via alliances like , without commensurate evidence of enhanced protection against state actors. Empirical analyses indicate such measures often serve protectionist aims over , increasing costs by 20-30% for compliance while complicating lawful intercepts.

Technological Advancements and Industry Shifts

Encryption and Security Tool Proliferation

The disclosures by Edward Snowden in 2013 catalyzed a rapid expansion in the implementation of end-to-end encryption across communication platforms, as developers prioritized protocols that prevented intermediary access to message contents. Apple's iOS 8 update, released on September 17, 2014, introduced end-to-end encryption for iMessage and device storage, explicitly designed to resist the bulk collection methods exposed in the leaks, such as those enabling the National Security Agency to exploit unencrypted data streams. This shift aligned with broader technical standards efforts, including the Internet Engineering Task Force's advocacy for "pervasive monitoring" countermeasures through opportunistic encryption in protocols like TCP. WhatsApp accelerated its adoption of the open-source Signal Protocol, achieving full end-to-end encryption rollout for voice, video, and text messages across one billion users by April 5, 2016, thereby rendering server-side interception infeasible without user device compromise. The Electronic Frontier Foundation's HTTPS Everywhere browser extension, which automatically enforces secure HTTPS connections where available, experienced heightened deployment post-2013, contributing to a measurable rise in encrypted web traffic; by 2018, it had facilitated encryption on sites lacking default HTTPS, with web traffic over HTTPS growing from under 50% to over 70% globally by 2019 as browsers integrated similar defaults. This proliferation reflected a technical ethos of "encrypt everything," as articulated by industry figures responding to the revelations' demonstration of systemic vulnerabilities in plaintext communications; Apple CEO Tim Cook, for instance, affirmed commitment to comprehensive device encryption in 2016, framing it as a direct counter to the surveillance risks highlighted by Snowden. Adoption metrics underscored efficacy: encrypted messaging apps like Signal, which Snowden publicly endorsed, integrated default end-to-end encryption and saw user bases expand from niche to mainstream, with protocol reuse in platforms like WhatsApp evidencing scalable resistance to mass data harvesting. These developments prioritized cryptographic integrity over backdoor accommodations, though efficacy depended on user enablement and resistance to endpoint attacks.

Corporate Privacy Practices and Innovations

In the wake of the 2013 Snowden disclosures revealing corporate involvement in the PRISM program—under which the NSA obtained user data from providers including Microsoft, Google, and Apple through legal processes and direct server access—tech companies shifted toward greater resistance to expansive government surveillance demands to mitigate reputational damage and compliance burdens. PRISM slides indicated that nine major U.S. internet firms participated by furnishing communications content and metadata upon court-approved requests, often under nondisclosure obligations that limited public disclosure. This prior cooperation, detailed in leaked documents, prompted firms to balance ongoing legal compliance—entailing costs for data handover and reporting—with investments aimed at restoring user trust and differentiating services in competitive markets. Major tech firms escalated legal pushback against secrecy mandates, exemplified by Microsoft's April 2016 lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice challenging perpetual gag orders on warrants for customer stored abroad, which the company argued infringed First Amendment rights and hindered . The suit highlighted how such orders imposed undue compliance costs without sufficient justification, leading to a 2017 settlement in which the DOJ committed to time limits and review criteria for gag orders, reducing indefinite secrecy in future cases. Similarly, and other providers intensified challenges to Letters (NSLs), which bundled demands with gag provisions, contributing to broader industry advocacy against expansions of frameworks like the Communications Assistance for Act (CALEA) that could mandate wiretap-friendly designs in IP networks. To offset surveillance-related risks while preserving data-driven business models, corporations ramped up R&D in privacy-preserving techniques, with security analysts estimating U.S. tech firms collectively allocated millions to billions of dollars post-2013 for enhancements like fortified encryption protocols and audit mechanisms. Innovations such as differential privacy gained traction in corporate analytics pipelines, enabling firms to derive statistical insights from user data by injecting calibrated noise to obscure individual contributions without fully anonymizing datasets—a method advanced in response to revelations of bulk data vulnerabilities. These approaches allowed companies to maintain revenue from personalized services amid heightened compliance expenses, including mandatory transparency reports on government requests that became standard industry practice after 2013. Zero-knowledge architectures also emerged in select cloud and authentication services, permitting verification of data integrity without exposing contents, as a direct counter to exposed interception risks. Overall, these adaptations reflected a pragmatic recalibration: privacy fortifications as a competitive moat, tempered by the fiscal realities of litigating and reporting on thousands of annual surveillance orders.

Consumer Technology Adaptations

Following the June 2013 disclosures by Edward Snowden regarding NSA surveillance programs, consumer demand for virtual private networks (VPNs) accelerated, transitioning the technology from a niche tool for remote access to a mainstream privacy safeguard. Interest in VPNs spiked contemporaneously with the revelations, as users sought to encrypt internet traffic and obscure IP addresses from potential monitoring. By 2024, the global VPN market had expanded to $44.6 billion, supporting an estimated 1.5 billion users worldwide, reflecting sustained growth in consumer adoption driven by privacy apprehensions. Providers such as ExpressVPN, which launched in 2012 but emphasized audited no-logs policies post-2013, capitalized on this shift by marketing directly to individuals wary of data interception, with app downloads and subscriptions correlating to heightened public scrutiny of surveillance. Hardware-based authentication devices also gained traction among privacy-conscious consumers, with from Yubico exemplifying the trend toward phishing-resistant two-factor authentication (2FA). Snowden's leaks underscored vulnerabilities in software-only 2FA, prompting recommendations for physical keys that generate one-time codes without relying on or apps susceptible to interception. Consumer sales of such devices rose alongside broader MFA adoption, enabling users to secure accounts against man-in-the-middle attacks; by 2025, Yubico reported expanded global distribution to over 175 countries to meet demand for passwordless login options in personal use cases. Privacy-oriented smartphones emerged as a direct market response, with Purism's Librem 5, released in 2019, incorporating user-facing features like physical kill switches for the microphone, camera, and wireless radios to prevent unauthorized activation. These hardware toggles address surveillance risks highlighted in Snowden documents, such as remote exploitation of device sensors, allowing consumers to enforce "air-gapped" modes without software dependencies. The device runs PureOS, a Linux-based system avoiding proprietary blobs, and integrates GPG encryption tools akin to those endorsed by Snowden for secure communication. Mainstream vendors adapted similarly, with Apple's 2021 App Tracking Transparency (ATT) feature enabling iOS users to block personalized ad tracking across apps, responding to cumulative privacy pressures including Snowden-induced skepticism toward data collection ecosystems. This opt-in prompt reduced cross-site tracking opt-outs to under 10% in some estimates, signaling consumer leverage over identifiers previously shared with advertisers and potentially accessible to authorities.

Societal and Cultural Ramifications

Heightened Privacy Awareness

Following Edward Snowden's disclosure of National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance programs on June 5, 2013, public awareness of government data collection practices in the United States rose markedly. A Pew Research Center survey conducted in May 2011 found that 34% of Americans considered it "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that the government monitored their communications, a perception that increased to 56% by August 2014 in the wake of the leaks, reflecting greater recognition of programs like PRISM and bulk metadata collection. By May 2015, 87% of respondents reported awareness of the federal surveillance programs exposed by Snowden. These revelations spurred educational initiatives aimed at informing the public about surveillance risks. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) expanded its Surveillance Self-Defense guide, a resource offering practical tools for encrypting communications and minimizing data exposure, which gained prominence as part of broader advocacy efforts post-2013 to counter mass surveillance. Such campaigns contributed to integrating privacy topics into public discourse, including workshops and online tutorials that emphasized self-protection against both government and corporate tracking. Globally, post-Snowden surveys highlighted regional differences in concern levels. In Europe, where revelations of transatlantic surveillance strained alliances, public polls indicated heightened alarm; for example, a 2013 Eurobarometer survey post-leaks showed 70% of EU citizens viewing U.S. data practices as a serious threat to privacy, fueling demands for stricter regulations. In contrast, U.S. attitudes often reflected greater tolerance for surveillance in exchange for security, with Pew data from 2015 revealing 45% of Americans favoring government access to phone data to prevent terrorism over strict privacy limits. This variance underscored cultural divergences, with Europeans prioritizing data sovereignty amid events like the 2013 Bundestag inquiries into NSA spying on allies.

Behavioral Changes and Chilling Effects

Following the June 2013 revelations by Edward Snowden about NSA surveillance programs such as PRISM, empirical analyses of Google search data revealed statistically significant declines in queries for privacy-sensitive terms. A study examining anonymized search volume trends found reductions of approximately 10-20% in searches for terms like "jihad," "porn," and "coupons" (as a control), attributing the drop to heightened user awareness of potential monitoring rather than external events. These changes were most pronounced immediately after the PRISM disclosure on June 6, 2013, with causal inference methods controlling for seasonal and topical factors confirming surveillance knowledge as a key driver. Similar patterns emerged in Wikipedia traffic to pages on terrorism-related topics. Page views for entries on groups like al-Qaeda and tools such as improvised explosive devices fell by nearly 30% in the months following the leaks, dropping from around 3 million monthly views pre-June 2013 to under 2 million by late 2013, with econometric models isolating the effect from unrelated news cycles. This decline persisted at reduced levels, indicating sustained caution in accessing potentially flagged content. Surveys of writers documented reduced engagement on social media and in personal communications due to surveillance fears. A 2013 PEN America survey of over 1,000 international writers found that 28% had avoided discussing certain topics online, including military affairs, the Middle East, and drug policies, with U.S. respondents reporting self-censorship rates approaching one in four for government surveillance concerns. By 2015, PEN's follow-up global survey reported self-censorship in written work and communications at 34% among writers in democratic countries, comparable to rates in repressive regimes, linking the trend directly to post-Snowden awareness. Longitudinal data from 2013 to 2014 showed initial sharp drops in sensitive online behaviors, with some partial rebound in search volumes by mid-2014 but volumes remaining below pre-leak baselines for high-risk queries. Subsequent analyses through the late 2010s confirmed persistent self-censorship, particularly for minority or dissenting opinions, though adaptation via tools like VPNs mitigated but did not eliminate the effect by the 2020s. These findings prioritize causal evidence from search analytics and surveys over self-reported awareness, highlighting behavioral shifts as measurable outcomes of perceived surveillance risks.

Broader Debates on Surveillance Ethics

The Snowden revelations catalyzed philosophical debates on the ethical boundaries of state surveillance, pitting absolutist defenses of individual privacy against realist justifications for collective security. Privacy advocates, emphasizing deontological principles rooted in constitutional protections like the Fourth Amendment, contend that mass data collection inherently erodes civil liberties and invites authoritarian overreach, regardless of purported benefits. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has maintained that secretive surveillance apparatuses, unmoored from targeted warrants, foster inevitable political misuse and chill free expression, as evidenced by historical precedents of domestic spying on dissenters. This absolutist stance prioritizes inherent rights over outcomes, warning that normalized bulk surveillance normalizes a panopticon state incompatible with democratic self-governance. Conversely, security realists advance consequentialist arguments, asserting that calibrated surveillance is indispensable for preempting existential threats in an era of asymmetric terrorism, where inaction risks catastrophic failures akin to September 11, 2001. National Security Agency (NSA) officials have cited contributions to thwarting over 50 potential attacks worldwide through authorized collection, including disruptions of al-Qaeda operations. Proponents argue that ethical surveillance, when subject to oversight like Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) review, aligns with utilitarian imperatives by safeguarding populations without wholesale privacy forfeiture, provided transparency mechanisms mitigate abuse. Critics of absolutism counter that empirical threat landscapes—marked by plots in 20 countries—demand probabilistic intelligence gathering, where bulk tools enable pattern detection unattainable via individualized suspicion alone. These tensions manifest in broader cultural critiques, such as Shoshana Zuboff's concept of "surveillance capitalism," which frames commercial data extraction as an extension of state-enabled behavioral modification, commodifying autonomy for profit and power. Defenders rebut this as overstated semantics, positing that market-driven data practices, when regulated, enhance efficiency and security without the dystopian overtones ascribed by detractors, who often overlook lawful intelligence's role in democratic resilience. In open societies, the debate underscores irreducible trade-offs: unchecked privacy absolutism may invite vulnerability to low-probability, high-impact events, while unbridled realism risks eroding the trust essential to liberal governance, with post-Snowden reforms like the USA Freedom Act attempting—albeit imperfectly—to calibrate this equilibrium through heightened judicial scrutiny. Empirical disputes persist, as a 2013 White House review panel found the NSA's telephony metadata program contributed to zero disrupted plots, highlighting the challenge of verifying causal efficacy amid classified operations.

Criticisms from National Security Perspectives

Intelligence Operational Disruptions

The disclosures compelled U.S. intelligence agencies, particularly the National Security Agency (NSA), to implement widespread changes to collection methods and operational protocols to mitigate exposure of techniques detailed in the leaked documents. A declassified review by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, released on September 15, 2016, concluded that these leaks inflicted "tremendous damage" to national security, requiring the NSA to expend significant resources on revising access procedures, encrypting systems, and deploying new safeguards against similar insider threats. Temporary operational pauses ensued in select programs as agencies assessed vulnerabilities and alerted partners to potential compromises, thereby disrupting ongoing surveillance streams. The revelations prompted foreign actors to alter communications patterns upon awareness of specific NSA tools, such as upstream collection under Section 702, leading to immediate evasion tactics that reduced the yield of intelligence gathering in targeted domains. Assessments from U.S. officials indicated that these adaptations eroded collection efficiency, with some capabilities experiencing notable declines due to lost access and heightened target countermeasures. Remediation efforts imposed heavy financial burdens, with the Pentagon estimating in early 2014 that billions of dollars would be needed to overhaul compromised systems, replace hardware, and retrain personnel across military and intelligence networks. These disruptions extended beyond immediate tactical losses, as the need to rebuild trust with international partners and integrate enhanced insider threat detection further strained operational tempo for years following the 2013 leaks.

Assistance to Foreign Adversaries

U.S. intelligence officials have asserted that Edward Snowden's disclosures enabled foreign adversaries, including terrorist groups and state actors, to adapt their communications and operational tactics to evade surveillance. In January 2014, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified that the leaks prompted observable shifts in adversaries' behaviors, particularly among terrorists, who began altering their communication patterns to avoid detection by U.S. agencies. Clapper described terrorists as "going to school" on exposed U.S. intelligence sources, methods, and tradecraft, enabling them to refine evasion strategies. These adaptations extended to non-state actors like ISIS, which reportedly studied the revealed telecommunications collection techniques to harden its networks against interception. Former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell stated in 2015 that ISIS had "gone to school" on U.S. intelligence practices exposed by Snowden, contributing to more resilient operational security in planning attacks. State adversaries such as China and Russia similarly benefited, as the leaks detailed U.S. targeting of their systems, allowing them to implement countermeasures like enhanced encryption and network segmentation. A 2016 House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence review concluded that Snowden specifically compromised materials of high interest to these adversaries, providing them with blueprints to counter U.S. capabilities. For instance, China's post-2013 push for "secure and controllable" domestic technology was accelerated by knowledge of NSA infiltration methods. The revelations created enduring challenges by disseminating detailed knowledge of U.S. collection techniques, forcing intelligence agencies to develop new methods without fully resetting adversary awareness. This "long-tail" effect, as described in official assessments, means adversaries retain tactical insights that complicate future operations, as techniques once covert are now anticipated and mitigated. Without comprehensive operational overhauls—processes acknowledged as resource-intensive and time-consuming—these disclosures provided a persistent advantage to entities like al-Qaeda affiliates and major powers in evading signals intelligence.

Assessments of Long-term Security Trade-offs

The Snowden disclosures prompted reforms aimed at balancing surveillance with privacy, yet assessments from national security experts reveal mixed long-term outcomes, with preserved core capabilities offset by operational constraints and adversary adaptations. The USA FREEDOM Act, enacted on June 2, 2015, prohibited bulk collection of telephony metadata under Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act, replacing it with a system requiring specific identifiers and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court approval for queries, thereby curbing one form of indiscriminate gathering while enabling targeted access deemed sufficient for counterterrorism. The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board evaluated this program as contributing to intelligence reports on terrorist threats, indicating sustained efficacy in threat analysis despite the shift. However, these changes preserved essential authorities like Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act for upstream collection, which underwent periodic reauthorizations with added transparency measures but without fundamental elimination. Intelligence officials maintain that the leaks inflicted net harm by exposing collection methods, prompting adversaries to alter communications and evade detection, thus degrading capabilities against evolving threats like ISIS-inspired attacks. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and other agency heads testified in 2014 that the disclosures represented the "most massive and most damaging" breach in U.S. intelligence history, forcing abandonment of vital programs and straining alliances. The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence's 2016 review concluded the leaks caused "tremendous damage" to national security, with over three years of fallout including lost sources and heightened insider threat mitigations that diverted resources from frontline operations. Empirical indicators include post-2013 adaptations by terrorist networks, such as increased use of encrypted platforms, which complicated monitoring amid reforms emphasizing oversight. Post-leak terror incidents illustrate potential gaps exacerbated by heightened legal scrutiny and behavioral shifts. In the June 12, 2016, Pulse nightclub shooting in Orlando, Florida, perpetrator Omar Mateen killed 49 people; the FBI had investigated him twice prior but closed cases in 2013 and 2014 due to insufficient evidence, occurring in a post-Snowden context where domestic surveillance faced stricter probable cause thresholds and public backlash against overreach. While pre-existing investigative lapses contributed, analysts note that leaks-induced caution in sustaining probes may have amplified vulnerabilities, as agencies balanced privacy mandates against proactive tracking in an era of "lone wolf" threats. Similar patterns appeared in other attacks, like San Bernardino in December 2015, where encrypted communications hindered real-time intelligence, underscoring trade-offs where privacy enhancements limited decryption access without warrants. Civil liberties organizations, such as the ACLU, argue the reforms yielded net security benefits through accountability, averting future abuses like warrantless bulk collection. Yet, national security critiques counter that such measures constituted partial adjustments rather than comprehensive overhauls, preserving bulk-like elements under different authorities while leaks eroded tactical edges against persistent threats, as evidenced by unchanged high-threat environments requiring Section 702 renewals in 2018, 2020, and beyond. Overall, empirical data on thwarted plots post-reforms shows continuity in disruptions but at elevated costs from compromised methods, highlighting unresolved tensions between curbed overcollection and sustained deterrence.

Enduring Legacy

Evaluations of Reform Efficacy

The USA Freedom Act, enacted on June 2, 2015, prohibited bulk collection of telephony metadata under Section 215 of the Patriot Act, shifting such queries to targeted requests from providers via FISA Court orders. However, this reform's scope was limited, as bulk collection persisted under Executive Order 12333, which authorizes warrantless acquisition by agencies like the NSA and CIA for foreign intelligence purposes without congressional oversight akin to FISA. Critics, including the Brennan Center for Justice, argue that EO 12333 effectively circumvented statutory restrictions, enabling continued mass data ingestion affecting Americans' communications, as evidenced by 2022 disclosures of CIA bulk programs collecting financial and biomedical data without warrants. On the positive side, the Act mandated enhanced transparency, requiring semiannual aggregate reports from the government on FISA orders and permitting tech companies greater latitude to disclose national security requests, leading to widespread adoption of such reporting post-2013. Companies like Google, Apple, and Microsoft expanded or initiated transparency reports detailing government data demands, with over 70 firms now issuing them regularly, providing empirical visibility into request volumes that was previously restricted. Additionally, FISA compliance rates improved, with the FISA Court reporting 98% adherence in recent reviews and the Justice Department noting fewer errors in Section 702 querying after reforms curbed improper U.S. person searches. Empirical metrics from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence's Annual Statistical Transparency Reports, initiated in 2014, indicate that overall surveillance volumes remained stable or expanded under alternative authorities through 2023, undermining claims of substantial curtailment. For instance, Section 702 acquisitions—targeting non-U.S. persons but incidentally capturing domestic data—rose from approximately 140,000 targets in 2015 to over 248,000 by 2022, with raw content collected in the billions annually. Bulk telephony collection ended, but the persistence of EO 12333 and growth in other FISA tools suggest reforms achieved procedural tweaks rather than systemic reductions in scale, as privacy advocates contend the net privacy protections fell short of balancing security needs.

Snowden's Personal Trajectory and Reflections

Following the public disclosure of classified National Security Agency documents in June 2013, Edward Snowden departed Hong Kong for Moscow on June 23, 2013, en route to Ecuador but became stranded at Sheremetyevo International Airport due to the revocation of his U.S. passport. Russia granted him temporary asylum on August 1, 2013, which was extended annually thereafter. In October 2020, Snowden received permanent residency in Russia, a status that facilitated his long-term stay without immediate citizenship implications. Snowden published his memoir Permanent Record on September 17, 2019, detailing his motivations and experiences without prior agency review, prompting a U.S. Department of Justice civil lawsuit that day for breaching CIA and NSA nondisclosure agreements. A federal court ruled in December 2019 that he was ineligible for proceeds from the book, ordering forfeiture of approximately $5.2 million in royalties and speaking fees by October 2020. Legally, Snowden faces an unsealed indictment from June 21, 2013, charging him with two counts under the Espionage Act of 1917 for unauthorized communication of national defense information and theft of government property, each carrying potential penalties of up to 10 years imprisonment. Discussions of a presidential pardon emerged in 2020, with President Trump stating on August 15 that he would "take a look" at the possibility following Permanent Record's release, though no pardon was granted before the term's end. In a June interview marking a decade in exile, Snowden expressed no regrets over his actions, citing advancements in public practices as a positive outcome while warning that technologies, including those enhanced by , have grown far more intrusive than the programs he exposed. He has since maintained a lower public profile, limiting speeches and media appearances.

Recent Developments Post-2020

In September 2020, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the National Security Agency's bulk collection of Americans' telephone metadata, as revealed by Snowden in 2013, violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and was illegal, marking a judicial validation of the whistleblower's disclosures seven years later. However, the decision had limited practical impact, as the program had already been curtailed by the 2015 USA Freedom Act, and no broader dismantling of related surveillance authorities followed. Section 702 of FISA, enabling warrantless surveillance of non-U.S. persons abroad but incidentally capturing Americans' communications, underwent reauthorization in April 2024 via the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, which introduced querying restrictions and mandated Attorney General oversight but preserved the core framework amid ongoing debates over incidental domestic collection. Critics argued the reforms inadequately addressed privacy incursions exposed by Snowden, while proponents cited national security needs, resulting in no fundamental overhaul despite bipartisan scrutiny. Compliance incidents persisted, prompting enhanced FBI training in 2022, yet the program's operational scope remained expansive. Edward Snowden continued commenting on surveillance evolution, warning in June 2023 that technologies had advanced far beyond 2013 capabilities, rendering prior programs comparatively primitive. In January 2024, he cautioned that institutional failures could precipitate unpredictable societal shifts, implicitly tying back to unchecked surveillance risks. By June 2025, Snowden highlighted the enduring relevance of his revelations, noting measurable privacy gains but persistent government encroachments in an era of heightened digital threats. Post-2020 privacy concerns intensified with artificial intelligence, as a October 2025 Carleton-CIGI-Ipsos global survey—tracking attitudes since Snowden's disclosures—revealed rebounding internet trust but deepened fears over AI-driven privacy erosion, framing it as "another Snowden moment" where awareness from 2013 amplified worries about data exploitation and algorithmic surveillance. The survey, covering multiple countries, linked this to Snowden-era sensitization, with respondents expressing greater anxiety than excitement about AI's societal impacts, underscoring limited U.S. reforms in curbing tech-enabled threats. Overall, while Snowden's influence persisted in policy discourse, major legislative overhauls remained elusive into 2025.

References

  1. [1]
    The Snowden Effect: definition and examples - PressThink
    Jul 5, 2013 · The Snowden effect, a definition: Direct and indirect gains in public knowledge from the cascade of events and further reporting that ...
  2. [2]
    Snowden Effect | Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
    Jun 19, 2013 · Edward Snowden, the young American who has exposed the expansive cyber espionage activities of the National Security Agency in the United States.
  3. [3]
    Chilling effects and the stock market response to the Snowden ...
    Oct 4, 2020 · We refer to the abrupt changes in individual search behavior beginning in June 2013 following Snowden's revelations as the “Snowden effect.” The ...
  4. [4]
    The Snowden disclosures, 10 years on - IAPP
    Jun 28, 2023 · The consequences of chilling effects can range from self-censorship to "making citizens more cautious, careful, and less willing to seek out ...
  5. [5]
    The Snowden Effect, Six Years On - Just Security
    Jun 6, 2019 · The Snowden Effect, Six Years On. By Patrick G. Eddington. Published ... Reform, PCLOB, Privacy, Surveillance, USA Freedom Act, Whistleblowing ...
  6. [6]
    The Snowden Effect, Six Years On | Cato Institute
    The Snowden Effect, Six Years On. The USA Freedom Act expiration ... rights and privacy of all of us. June 6, 2019 • Commentary. By Patrick G. Eddington.
  7. [7]
    Definition of Snowden Effect - IT Glossary - Capterra
    The Snowden Effect has had a massive impact on the tech industry today, causing tech companies to find ways to better address customer data privacy concerns, ...
  8. [8]
    The Snowden Effect: How Did the Leak Change Cybersecurity?
    Aug 8, 2020 · The Snowden effect is the impact of Snowden's leak on cybersecurity and society. Because of the leak by Snowden, consequences included more discussion, ...
  9. [9]
    How Americans have viewed government surveillance and privacy ...
    Jun 4, 2018 · The Snowden revelations were followed in the ensuing months and years with accounts of major data breaches affecting the government and ...
  10. [10]
    The case of Edward Snowden - National Whistleblower Center
    Nov 19, 2020 · In a 2019 interview with The Guardian, Snowden said, “we live in a better, freer and safe world because of the revelations of mass surveillance.
  11. [11]
    Internet surveillance after Snowden: A critical empirical study of ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · This study analyzes the changes in individuals' Internet search behavior and economic variables following Edward Snowden's revelation of ...
  12. [12]
    Edward Snowden: The Untold Story - WIRED
    Aug 22, 2014 · To get access to that last cache of secrets, Snowden landed a job as an infrastructure analyst with another giant NSA contractor, Booz Allen.
  13. [13]
    Edward Snowden: the whistleblower behind the NSA surveillance ...
    Jun 9, 2013 · Snowden has been working at the National Security Agency for the last four years as an employee of various outside contractors, including Booz ...
  14. [14]
    Edward Snowden: A Timeline - NBC News
    May 26, 2014 · March 2013: He seeks a new contractor job with Booz Allen Hamilton at the same NSA facility in Hawaii. He later tells the South China ...Missing: employment | Show results with:employment
  15. [15]
    Edward Snowden and the NSA files – timeline - The Guardian
    Jun 24, 2013 · 6 June A second story reveals the existence of the previously undisclosed programme Prism, which internal NSA documents claim gives the agency " ...
  16. [16]
    NSA Prism program taps in to user data of Apple, Google and others
    Jun 6, 2013 · Disclosure of the Prism program follows a leak to the Guardian on Wednesday of a top-secret court order compelling telecoms provider Verizon ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  17. [17]
    Edward Snowden: Timeline - BBC News
    Aug 20, 2013 · 9 June: Edward Snowden, 29, is named as the source of the intelligence leaks. Speaking from Hong Kong, external, he explains why he went public.
  18. [18]
    A Timeline of Edward Snowden Leaks - Business Insider
    Sep 16, 2016 · Snowden downloaded up to 1.5 million files, according to national intelligence officials, before jetting from Hawaii to Hong Kong to meet with ...
  19. [19]
    Edward Snowden NSA files: secret surveillance and our revelations ...
    Aug 21, 2013 · The first – and best known – is Prism, a system allowing the NSA easy access to the personal information of non-US persons from the databases of ...
  20. [20]
    NSA files decoded: Edward Snowden's surveillance revelations ...
    Nov 1, 2013 · The Snowden documents revealed the existence of Tempora, a program established in 2011 by GCHQ that gathers masses of phone and internet ...
  21. [21]
    Snowden documents show NSA gathering 5bn cell phone records ...
    Dec 4, 2013 · The National Security Agency is reportedly collecting almost 5 billion cell phone records a day under a program that monitors and analyses highly personal data.
  22. [22]
    Upstream vs. PRISM - Electronic Frontier Foundation
    After Edward Snowden leaked NSA slides in 2013, two names became synonymous with the agency's vast online spying powers: Upstream and PRISM.Missing: collaboration | Show results with:collaboration
  23. [23]
    The NSA's Hidden Spy Hubs in Eight U.S. Cities - The Intercept
    Jun 25, 2018 · Fortress-like AT&T buildings across the U.S. are central to an NSA program that has monitored billions of communications, documents reveal.<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    US bugged Merkel's phone from 2002 until 2013, report claims - BBC
    Oct 27, 2013 · The US has been spying on German Chancellor Angela Merkel's mobile phone since 2002, according to a report in Der Spiegel magazine.Missing: leaks | Show results with:leaks
  25. [25]
    Looking Back One Year After The Edward Snowden Disclosures
    May 15, 2014 · In a single 30 day period, the NSA has collected 500 million pieces of data from Germany, 2.3 billion from Brazil, and 13.5 billion from India.Missing: scale | Show results with:scale
  26. [26]
    Snowden speaks, Obama goes quiet - POLITICO
    Jun 11, 2013 · “I welcome this debate,” he said. Later, responding to a shouted question, he added: “I don't welcome leaks, because there's a reason why these ...
  27. [27]
    Clapper Apologizes For Answer On NSA's Data Collection - NPR
    Jul 2, 2013 · Snowden has said that Clapper's statements on the NSA's abilities and practices played a role in motivating him to reveal the classified ...Missing: controversy | Show results with:controversy
  28. [28]
    Clapper: I gave 'erroneous' answer because I forgot about Patriot Act
    Jul 2, 2013 · Intelligence chief tries to explain false Senate testimony by saying he 'simply didn't think' of NSA's efforts to collect phone data.Missing: controversy | Show results with:controversy
  29. [29]
    Senators press NSA director for answers on secret surveillance ...
    Jun 12, 2013 · Keith Alexander says surveillance programs have helped thwart attacks – but raises new questions over how they operate.
  30. [30]
    Brazil demands explanation from US over NSA spying - The Guardian
    Jul 8, 2013 · Foreign minister expresses 'deep concern' over extensive spying revealed in documents uncovered by Edward Snowden.Missing: response diplomatic
  31. [31]
    Brazil Spurns U.S. State Visit Invitation Over NSA Spying | TIME.com
    Sep 17, 2013 · President Dilma Rousseff of Brazil has postponed a planned official visit to Washington amid fallout over revelations that the U.S. has been ...Missing: response | Show results with:response
  32. [32]
    Brazilian president: US surveillance a 'breach of international law'
    Sep 24, 2013 · Dilma Rousseff's scathing speech to UN general assembly the most serious diplomatic fallout over revelations of US spying.Missing: response | Show results with:response
  33. [33]
    Third Committee Approves Text Titled 'Right to Privacy in the Digital ...
    Nov 26, 2013 · The Third Committee (Social, Humanitarian and Cultural) approved 18 draft resolutions today, including one on “The right to privacy in the digital age”.
  34. [34]
    General Assembly backs right to privacy in digital age - UN News
    Dec 19, 2013 · “Snowden's case has shown the need to protect persons disclosing information on matters that have implications for human rights, as well as the ...
  35. [35]
    Public Split over Impact of NSA Leak, But Most Want Snowden ...
    Jun 17, 2013 · Today, about as many say the leak about the NSA surveillance program serves the public interest (49%) as harms it (44%). In terms of the impact ...
  36. [36]
    Americans Disapprove of Government Surveillance Programs
    Jun 12, 2013 · Sixty-four percent of Americans are following news about this issue very or somewhat closely, which is slightly above average for all news ...Missing: revelations | Show results with:revelations<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Edward Snowden comes forward as source of NSA leaks
    Jun 9, 2013 · A 29-year-old man who says he is a former undercover CIA employee said Sunday that he was the principal source of recent disclosures about top-secret National ...
  38. [38]
    Hero or Bad Boyfriend? Edward Snowden and the Personalization ...
    Jun 11, 2013 · Edward Snowden, leaker of the NSA surveillance programs, is a hero. No, he's a narcissistic criminal. Scratch that, he's totally a hero.<|control11|><|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Thousands gather in Washington for anti-NSA 'Stop Watching Us' rally
    Billed by organizers as "the largest rally yet to protest mass surveillance", Stop Watching Us was sponsored by an unusually broad coalition of ...
  40. [40]
    U.S. Voters Say Snowden Is Whistle-Blower, Not Traitor, Quinnipiac ...
    Jul 10, 2013 · PDF format. American voters say 55 - 34 percent that Edward Snowden is a whistle-blower, rather than a traitor, according to a Quinnipiac ...
  41. [41]
    Congress passes NSA surveillance reform in vindication for Snowden
    Jun 2, 2015 · The passage of the USA Freedom Act paves the way for telecom companies to assume responsibility of the controversial phone records collection ...
  42. [42]
    The USA FREEDOM Act Explained - IAPP
    The biggest change instituted by the FREEDOM Act puts an end to the National Security Agency's (NSA) bulk collection of U.S. call metadata. This practice, ...
  43. [43]
    The USA Freedom Act: The Definition of a Compromise - RAND
    May 29, 2015 · Section 215 reforms were included in early versions of the USA Freedom Act ... U.S. surveillance activities following the Snowden disclosures.Missing: effect | Show results with:effect
  44. [44]
    The USA FREEDOM Reauthorization Act is A Good First Step, But ...
    Feb 25, 2020 · The USA Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2020, a bill that would reauthorize intelligence surveillance authorities due to sunset March 15, 2020.
  45. [45]
    USA FREEDOM Reauthorization Act of 2020 116th Congress (2019 ...
    This bill reauthorizes through December 1, 2023, provisions related to intelligence gathering under the Foreign Intelligence and Surveillance Act (FISA)<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    US: End Bulk Data Collection Program - Human Rights Watch
    Mar 5, 2020 · The USA Freedom Act prohibits the government from using Section 215 for bulk metadata collection, instead imposing a narrow set of rules for ...
  47. [47]
    What You Need to Know About the FISA Court—and How it Needs ...
    Aug 15, 2014 · Since the Snowden disclosures, hundreds of lawmakers have made it clear that they want to see more transparency in the court by supporting ...
  48. [48]
    Testimony in Support of Increased Transparency and Reform of ...
    Aug 17, 2020 · Increased intelligence community transparency occurred in response to the explosive disclosures made by Edward Snowden and the public outcry ...
  49. [49]
    New Documents Shed Light on One of the NSA's Most Powerful Tools
    Sep 29, 2014 · We're releasing several key documents about Executive Order 12333 that we obtained from the government in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
  50. [50]
    Executive Order 12333 | Electronic Frontier Foundation
    Nov 5, 2013 · What's most unnerving about these collections is that the NSA is using Executive Order 12333, which lays out guidelines for spying outside the ...Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
  51. [51]
    ACLU v. Clapper - Challenge to NSA Mass Call-Tracking Program
    Oct 29, 2015 · On June 11, 2013, the ACLU filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of the National Security Agency's mass collection of Americans' phone ...
  52. [52]
    Appeals Court Strikes Down NSA Phone Spying Program in ACLU ...
    May 7, 2015 · The ACLU filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of the National Security Agency's mass collection of Americans' phone records.
  53. [53]
    ACLU v. Clapper, No. 14-42 (2d Cir. 2015) - Justia Law
    Plaintiffs challenged, on statutory and constitutional grounds, the telephone metadata program under which the NSA collects in bulk on an ongoing daily basis ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] United States v Moalin - Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
    Sep 2, 2020 · In June 2015, Congress passed the USA FREEDOM Act, which effectively ended the NSA's bulk telephony metadata collection program. Pub. L. No ...
  55. [55]
    NSA Bulk Phone Data Collection Unlawful, Appeals Court Rules
    Sep 3, 2020 · The National Security Agency's bulk collection of Americans' phone records was unlawful, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled on Sept. 2.
  56. [56]
    Jewell v. NSA, No. 15-16133 (9th Cir. 2015) - Justia Law
    The district court dismissed a Fourth Amendment claim regarding Internet surveillance, on the grounds that plaintiffs lacked standing and that their claim was ...
  57. [57]
    EFF's Flagship Jewel v. NSA Dragnet Spying Case Rejected by the ...
    Jun 13, 2022 · The Supreme Court this week allowed our case to be dismissed because it's a “secret” that the mass spying programs that everyone has known about since at least ...
  58. [58]
    Today, a new E.U. law transforms privacy rights for everyone ...
    May 25, 2018 · The European Union's new GDPR protects privacy rights, but without Edward Snowden's revelations, it might have taken them away.
  59. [59]
    How the Snowden Revelations Saved the EU General Data ...
    Nov 13, 2018 · Snowden's global surveillance revelations inverted the direction of the European Parliament's debate on the General Data Protection ...
  60. [60]
    The Untold Story of Edward Snowden's Impact on the GDPR
    Nov 15, 2019 · The connection between Edward Snowden and the GDPR can actually be traced back to the European Parliamentary Committee on Civil Liberties, ...
  61. [61]
    EU Court of Justice Grapples with U.S. Surveillance in Schrems II
    Jul 26, 2019 · In 2013, Edward Snowden's revelations about the scope of NSA surveillance radically undermined that theory. After learning about the PRISM ...
  62. [62]
    Schrems II: Privacy Shield Invalid and Severe Challenges for ...
    Jul 17, 2020 · Yesterday the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), the EU's highest court, invalidated the EU-US Privacy Shield for cross-border ...
  63. [63]
    Brazil Leads the Efforts in Internet Governance with its Recently ...
    Apr 30, 2014 · Made a constitutional priority by the Brazilian Government following the revelations from Edward Snowden regarding American espionage, the bill ...
  64. [64]
    Brazil Enacts "Marco Civil" Internet Civil Rights Bill - Inside Privacy
    Apr 28, 2014 · The law had been in the works since 2009; it was made a priority by the Brazilian government in the wake of Edward Snowden's revelations about ...
  65. [65]
    Germany's data privacy protection laws: Everything you need to know
    Feb 22, 2023 · Germany has a rich backdrop of data protection laws evolving to keep pace with technological changes and how personal data is collected, used, and shared.Missing: Snowden | Show results with:Snowden
  66. [66]
    UN sets up privacy rapporteur role in wake of Snowden leaks
    Mar 27, 2015 · The rapporteur, who is set to be appointed in June, will have the remit to monitor, investigate and report on privacy issues and offer advice to ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy in English
    10. The current dialogue on governmental surveillance has been stimulated by people like Edward Snowden and those supporting him. Albeit controversial from a ...
  68. [68]
    The Growth of Data Localization Post-Snowden - Belfer Center
    In the wake of the Edward Snowden intelligence disclosures, governments around the world are increasingly considering enacting so-called “data localization” ...
  69. [69]
    Jonah Force Hill: The Growth of Data Localization Post-Snowden ...
    Jul 21, 2014 · Ironically, data localization policies will likely degrade—rather than improve—data security for the countries considering them, making ...
  70. [70]
    The Growth of Data Localization Post-Snowden: Analysis and ...
    May 5, 2014 · This paper analyzes the complex – and often overlooked – motivations behind the data localization movement, explains how localization policies
  71. [71]
    Signaling Post-Snowden Era, New iPhone Locks Out N.S.A.
    Sep 26, 2014 · The phone encrypts emails, photos and contacts based on a complex mathematical algorithm that uses a code created by, and unique to, the phone's user.
  72. [72]
    Reflections on Ten Years Past The Snowden Revelations - IETF
    May 20, 2023 · This memo contains the thoughts and recountings of events that transpired during and after the release of information about the NSA by Edward Snowden.
  73. [73]
    WhatsApp completes end-to-end encryption rollout - TechCrunch
    Apr 5, 2016 · Messaging giant WhatsApp has now fully implemented strong end-to-end encryption on its platform and across all mobile platforms for which it offers apps.
  74. [74]
    https://blog.whatsapp.com/end-to-end-encryption
  75. [75]
    How HTTPS Everywhere Keeps Protecting Users On An ...
    Dec 13, 2018 · HTTPS Everywhere was a novel extension. It allowed users to automatically use the secure version of websites that offered both insecure HTTP and secure, ...
  76. [76]
    Apple's Cook Picks Up Where Snowden Left Off - Bloomberg
    Feb 29, 2016 · Edward Snowden stoked the debate over mass government surveillance. Tim Cook may be the one to rein it in.<|control11|><|separator|>
  77. [77]
    Looking back at the Snowden revelations
    Sep 24, 2019 · End-to-end encrypted messaging has also taken off, largely due to adoption by WhatsApp and a host of relatively new apps.
  78. [78]
    PRISM and Microsoft: What We Know So Far
    Jun 20, 2013 · ... program revealed by Edward Snowden that allegedly operates with the cooperation of major technology companies, including Microsoft. (The ...
  79. [79]
    Revelations of N.S.A. Spying Cost U.S. Tech Companies
    Mar 21, 2014 · Security analysts say tech companies have collectively spent millions and possibly billions of dollars adding state-of-the-art encryption ...
  80. [80]
    Microsoft sues for right to tell customers when US government ...
    Apr 14, 2016 · In this case, Microsoft wants a judge to rule a statute unconstitutional that allows the government to request indefinite gag orders on warrants ...<|separator|>
  81. [81]
    Microsoft's Secrecy Order Lawsuit Archives - Microsoft & Data Law
    Microsoft will drop suit after DoJ agrees to limit use of gag orders. Microsoft said Monday it will drop a lawsuit against the federal government after the ...
  82. [82]
    Cooperation or Resistance?: The Role of Tech Companies in ...
    Apr 10, 2018 · Finally, in October 2017, the U.S. government, facing a lawsuit by Microsoft, developed strict guidelines on the use of gag orders by U.S. ...
  83. [83]
    Reengineering privacy, post-Snowden
    Jan 28, 2015 · A differentially private system would allow researchers to submit queries on a data set, up to a point. Before so much has been revealed that ...
  84. [84]
    Snowden: Dropbox is hostile to privacy, unlike 'zero knowledge ...
    Jul 17, 2014 · Edward Snowden has warned against the cloud storage service Dropbox which he says is hostile to privacy, and called for more services to offer the 'zero ...Missing: proofs post-
  85. [85]
    https://surfshark.com/blog/vpn-users
  86. [86]
    30+ VPN Statistics, Trends & Facts (2024-2027) - Exploding Topics
    Jan 26, 2024 · There are 1.5 billion VPN users in the world. · The global VPN market is worth $44.6 billion. · The global VPN market is projected to grow to ...Top Vpn Stats · Vpn Market Statistics · Vpn Usage Statistics
  87. [87]
    VPN App Revenue and Usage Statistics (2025) - Business of Apps
    Sep 5, 2025 · VPN apps made $5.9 billion in 2024, a 15.6% increase on the previous year · Close to 150 million people used VPN apps in 2025, with the most ...Top Vpn Apps · Productivity App Market... · Vpn App Users
  88. [88]
    Snowden's Leaks Have Finally Forced Companies to Enhance Their ...
    Dec 17, 2013 · Revelations about NSA surveillance have prompted Yahoo, Microsoft, and other companies to deploy long-overdue security improvements.
  89. [89]
    Yubico More than Doubles Global Reach of YubiKeys for ...
    May 20, 2025 · This expansion enables us to meet growing demand and accelerates adoption – enabling faster, more affordable delivery of pre-configured YubiKeys ...Missing: Snowden leaks
  90. [90]
    Librem 5 - Purism
    A Security and Privacy Focused Phone​​ The Librem 5 represents the opportunity for you to take back control and protect your private information, your digital ...Liberty Phone · Librem 11 · Librem Key · Librem 14Missing: Snowden effect
  91. [91]
    Purism Partners with Cryptography Pioneer Werner Koch to Create ...
    Mar 8, 2018 · Librem devices will also include Werner's GPG encryption, that Edward Snowden famously used to communicate with journalists, by default into ...
  92. [92]
    Snowden Forced Silicon Valley to Value Privacy and Transparency
    May 15, 2014 · Edward Snowden leaked NSA surveillance documents, then got branded a “traitor”: both government and tech companies began talking about transparency and user ...
  93. [93]
    NSA leaker Edward Snowden refuses to use Apple's iPhone over ...
    Jan 21, 2015 · "Apple has never worked with the NSA to create a backdoor in any of our products, including iPhone," the company said following news of the ...
  94. [94]
    Americans' Attitudes About Privacy, Security and Surveillance
    May 20, 2015 · The cascade of reports following the June 2013 government surveillance revelations by NSA contractor Edward Snowden have brought new ...
  95. [95]
    What Americans think about NSA surveillance, national security and ...
    May 29, 2015 · Fully 87% are aware of the federal surveillance programs; among those aware of the programs, 25% – and 22% of adults overall – say they have ...
  96. [96]
    3 Years Later, the Snowden Leaks Have Changed How the World ...
    Jun 5, 2016 · Our legal team has launched three cases directly challenging the legal and constitutional grounds of NSA mass surveillance—First Unitarian v.
  97. [97]
    [PDF] EUROPE'S CONFUSED RESPONSE TO SNOWDEN
    Europe's response to the Snowden revelations about US surveillance has failed to engage with some of the most important issues. Public and.
  98. [98]
    The state of privacy in post-Snowden America - Pew Research Center
    Sep 21, 2016 · After the June 2013 leaks by Edward Snowden about NSA surveillance of Americans' communications, Pew Research Center began an in-depth ...
  99. [99]
    The Privacy Mindset Of The EU Vs. The US - Forbes
    with Germany ...
  100. [100]
    Government Surveillance and Internet Search Behavior
    Mar 23, 2014 · In general, our results suggest that there is a chilling effect on search behavior ... Keywords: surveillance, Snowden, prism, chilling effects, ...
  101. [101]
    Government Surveillance and Internet Search Behavior
    Aug 7, 2025 · For example, government surveillance may exert a chilling effect on Internet search behavior (Marthews & Tucker, 2017a) . Surveillance is ...
  102. [102]
    [PDF] CHILLING EFFECTS: ONLINE SURVEILLANCE AND WIKIPEDIA USE
    This Article discusses the results of the first empirical study providing evidence of regulatory “chilling effects” of Wikipedia users associated with ...
  103. [103]
    [PDF] NSA Surveillance Drives US Writers to Self-Censor - PEN America
    Nov 12, 2013 · Fully 85% of writers responding to PEN's survey are worried about government surveillance of Americans, and 73% of writers have never been as ...
  104. [104]
    [PDF] Global Chilling | PEN America
    Jan 5, 2015 · PEN's survey asked respondents whether they had en- gaged in different types of self-censorship in their written work, personal commu- nications ...
  105. [105]
    Privacy Behaviors After Snowden - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · In a study focusing on privacy behaviours in the pre and post Snowden era [40] , found that users demonstrated increased interest in privacy ...Missing: adaptations quantifiable
  106. [106]
    Mass Surveillance Breeds Meekness, Fear, and Self-Censorship ...
    Apr 28, 2016 · A 2015 study examined Google search data and demonstrated that, post-Snowden, “users were less likely to search using search terms that they ...Missing: longitudinal | Show results with:longitudinal
  107. [107]
    NSA Surveillance | American Civil Liberties Union
    Oct 5, 2023 · Today, it continues to spy on a vast but unknown number of Americans' international calls, text messages, web-browsing activities, and emails.Missing: revelations | Show results with:revelations
  108. [108]
    NSA: 'Over 50' Terror Plots Foiled by Data Dragnets - ABC News
    Jun 18, 2013 · The director of the National Security Administration today told Congress that more than 50 potential terrorist attacks have been thwarted by ...
  109. [109]
    [PDF] 54 Attacks in 20 Countries Thwarted By NSA Collection
    In September of 2009, using authorized collection under section 702 to monitor al-. Qa'ida terrorists overseas, NSA discovered that one of the al-Qa'ida ...
  110. [110]
    "Section 702" Saves Lives, Protects the Nation and Allies
    Dec 12, 2017 · The US Intelligence Community relies on Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in the constant hunt for information about foreign adversaries.
  111. [111]
    Shoshana Zuboff: 'Surveillance capitalism is an assault on human ...
    Oct 4, 2019 · What began as advertising is now a threat to freedom and democracy argues the author and scholar. Time to wake up - and fight for a different digital future.
  112. [112]
    In Defense of 'Surveillance Capitalism' | Philosophy & Technology
    Oct 16, 2024 · Critics of Big Tech often describe 'surveillance capitalism' in grim terms, blaming it for all kinds of political and social ills.
  113. [113]
    NSA program stopped no terror attacks, says White House panel ...
    Dec 20, 2013 · A member of the White House review panel on NSA surveillance said he was “absolutely” surprised when he discovered the agency's lack of evidence.
  114. [114]
    [PDF] House Intelligence Committee Review of Edward Snowden ...
    Snowden's disclosures did tremendous damage to U.S. national security, and the Committee remains concerned that more than three years after the start of the ...
  115. [115]
    Snowden's leaks caused 'tremendous' damage to US security - CNBC
    Sep 15, 2016 · The panel accused Snowden of lying about his background, feuding with co-workers and leaking secrets that "caused tremendous damage" to U.S. ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact<|separator|>
  116. [116]
    [PDF] SURVEILLANCE AFTER SNOWDEN - Henry Jackson Society
    Intelligence Surveillance Court', Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight ... snowden-effect-the-messenger-app- backlash-and-staying-optimistic/, last ...<|separator|>
  117. [117]
    How the Edward Snowden leaks damaged security services
    Jun 5, 2018 · Five years on from the first surveillance revelation, Sky News looks at how the leaks disrupted intelligence operations.
  118. [118]
    Costs of Snowden leak still mounting 5 years later | AP News
    Jun 3, 2018 · Snowden supporters say that the government is exaggerating when it claims he took more than 1 million documents and that far fewer have ...
  119. [119]
    Snowden Leaks Could Cost Military Billions: Pentagon - NBC News
    Mar 6, 2014 · The Pentagon might need to spend billions to overcome the damage done to military security by Edward Snowden's release of classified ...Missing: millions | Show results with:millions
  120. [120]
    Top U.S. Spy Claims 'Terrorists Are Going to School' on Snowden ...
    Feb 11, 2014 · "We're beginning to see changes in the communications behavior of adversaries: particularly terrorists. A disturbing trend, which I ...
  121. [121]
    Report Puts Snowden-like Leaks as the No. 2 Threat to U.S. Security
    Jan 30, 2014 · “Terrorists and other adversaries of this country are going to school on U.S. intelligence sources, methods and tradecraft, and the insights ...
  122. [122]
    'It's All Back in Snowden's Lap' - POLITICO Magazine
    Nov 17, 2015 · Michael Morell: First, ISIS went to school on how we were collecting intelligence on terrorist organizations by using telecommunications ...Missing: adaptations post
  123. [123]
    [PDF] Executive Summary ofReview ofthe Unauthorized Disclosures ...
    Sep 15, 2016 · and intelligence programs of great interest to America,s adversaries. A review ofthe materials Snowden compromised makes clear that he ...
  124. [124]
    How Edward Snowden's Leaks Benefited China | Hudson Institute
    Feb 11, 2025 · ... House Intelligence Committee report described in 2016 as the “largest and most damaging public release of classified information in U.S..
  125. [125]
    DNI: Snowden changes hit security - POLITICO
    Jan 29, 2014 · Clapper warns that surveillance changes will make it more difficult to detect terrorist plots.
  126. [126]
    USA FREEDOM Act of 2015 - Congress.gov
    ... America by Fulfilling Rights and Ensuring Effective Discipline Over Monitoring Act of 2015. ... (b) Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004.-- ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  127. [127]
    [PDF] PCLOB USA Freedom Act Report (Unclassified)
    contacts from NSA's own metadata collection could result in additional responsive CDRs being produced to NSA automatically for counterterrorism analysis.
  128. [128]
    Snowden leaks 'most massive and most damaging' in history ...
    Jan 30, 2014 · “We're beginning to see changes in the communications behavior of adversaries.” Clapper was not alone in his assessment. Matthew Olsen, director ...
  129. [129]
    Finding the terror needles in the domestic haystack | PBS News
    Jun 13, 2016 · It would require a lowering of the bar to do surveillance in certain operations. That is out canning against the grain of the post-Snowden era.
  130. [130]
    [PDF] Mass Surveillance and Terrorism: Does PRISM Keep Americans ...
    Apr 29, 2017 · On June 12, 2016, Omar Mateen entered Pulse Nightclub in Orlando and killed 49 people, while wounding 53 more. The attack was the deadliest mass ...Missing: reforms incidents
  131. [131]
    The USA FREEDOM Act is Real Spying Reform - ACLU
    Oct 29, 2013 · Sensenbrenner was the lead author of the Patriot Act and now is the chair of the House's Subcommittee on Terrorism and Crime. A conservative ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  132. [132]
    FACT SHEET: Implementation of the USA FREEDOM Act of 2015
    Nov 28, 2015 · ... terrorist threats from telephony metadata held by U.S. ... terrorism while increasing privacy and civil liberties protections.
  133. [133]
    Intel Committee Releases Declassified Snowden Report
    Dec 22, 2016 · The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence today released a declassified version of its investigative report on Edward Snowden.Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  134. [134]
    The USA FREEDOM Act Turns Two | Lawfare
    Jun 2, 2017 · The Act greatly expands transparency and reporting, improves FISC procedures, addresses constitutional infirmities with nondisclosure procedures ...
  135. [135]
    Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (FISA Section 702, Executive ...
    In 2013, Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA was using this authority to collect Americans' telephone records in bulk. The FISA Court approved the collection, ...Missing: continued | Show results with:continued
  136. [136]
    CIA is Collecting in Bulk Certain Data Affecting Americans, Senators ...
    Feb 10, 2022 · The Central Intelligence Agency has for years been collecting in bulk, without a warrant, some kind of data that can affect Americans' privacy.Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  137. [137]
    How the CIA Is Acting Outside the Law to Spy on Americans
    it's banned under FISA but permitted under EO 12333. The FISA/EO 12333 distinction might have made ...<|separator|>
  138. [138]
    History of Transparency Reports
    ... Snowden were publicized. ... Since 2010, approximately 70 internet and telecommunication companies have voluntarily released regular transparency reports.
  139. [139]
    Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and Section 702 - FBI
    The FISA Court itself most recently found 98% compliance and commented on the reforms working. The most recent Justice Department report found the reforms ...Missing: evaluations | Show results with:evaluations
  140. [140]
    [PDF] Annual Statistical Transparency Report - DNI.gov
    Apr 4, 2024 · ODNI'S ANNUAL STATISTICAL TRANSPARENCY REPORT REGARDING USE OF NATIONAL SECURITY SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITIES. CALENDAR. YEAR. INTRODUCTION. FIGURES.Missing: 2013-2023 | Show results with:2013-2023
  141. [141]
    [PDF] Annual Statistical Transparency Report - DNI.gov
    The Annual Statistical Transparency Report Regarding the Intelligence Community's Use of National. Security Surveillance Authorities provides information ...Missing: 2013-2023 | Show results with:2013-2023
  142. [142]
    The Minimalist Surveillance Reforms of USA Freedom - Cato Institute
    Apr 29, 2015 · Passing the USA Freedom Act in its current form would effectively represent a repeat of the Protect America Act fiasco of the previous decade.Missing: efficacy evaluations
  143. [143]
    Edward Snowden timeline of events - POLITICO
    Aug 1, 2013 · Edward Snowden has been granted temporary asylum in Russian soil, ending weeks of limbo. May 20: Edward Snowden, 29, arrives in Hong Kong, just ...
  144. [144]
    Edward Snowden granted permanent residency in Russia
    Oct 23, 2020 · Snowden was able to obtain permanent residency rights because of the changes in Russia's immigration laws made in 2019, the lawyer said.
  145. [145]
    Russia gives whistleblower Edward Snowden permanent residency ...
    Oct 22, 2020 · Russia has granted U.S. whistleblower Edward Snowden permanent residency rights, his lawyer said on Thursday, a step towards Russian ...
  146. [146]
    United States Files Civil Lawsuit against Edward Snowden for ...
    Sep 17, 2019 · The lawsuit alleges that Snowden published his book without submitting it to the agencies for pre-publication review, in violation of his ...
  147. [147]
    U.S. Entitled to Edward Snowden's Proceeds From His New Memoir ...
    Dec 19, 2019 · He did not submit the book for review, and the Justice Department sued Mr. Snowden, seeking to seize his proceeds from it, the same day it was ...
  148. [148]
    United States Obtains Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction ...
    Oct 1, 2020 · The US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia entered a final judgment and permanent injunction against Edward Snowden.
  149. [149]
    US files criminal charges against NSA whistleblower Edward ...
    Jun 22, 2013 · US prosecutors have 60 days to file an indictment and can then take steps to secure Snowden's extradition from Hong Kong for a criminal trial in ...
  150. [150]
    Trump Says He'll Look Into a Pardon for Edward Snowden
    Aug 16, 2020 · President Trump said on Saturday that he would consider pardoning Edward J. Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor who faced criminal charges.
  151. [151]
    Trump says he will 'take a look' at pardon for Edward Snowden
    “I'm going to take a look at that very strongly, Edward Snowden,” Trump said. Trump's comments reflect a recent change in his attitude to a man ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  152. [152]
    'No regrets,' says Edward Snowden, after 10 years in exile
    Jun 8, 2023 · Snowden has reduced his public profile over the last two years, giving fewer speeches, and retreating from press interviews and social media.
  153. [153]
    NSA surveillance exposed by Snowden was illegal, court rules ...
    Sep 3, 2020 · Appeals court says intelligence leaders who defended dragnet – which was revealed by Snowden to the Guardian – were not telling the truth.
  154. [154]
    U.S. court: Mass surveillance program exposed by Snowden was ...
    Sep 2, 2020 · "Today's ruling is a victory for our privacy rights," the ACLU said in a statement, saying it "makes plain that the NSA's bulk collection of ...
  155. [155]
    Court rules NSA phone snooping illegal — after 7-year delay - Politico
    Sep 2, 2020 · The National Security Agency program that swept up details on billions of Americans' phone calls was illegal and possibly unconstitutional, a federal appeals ...
  156. [156]
    FISA Section 702 and the 2024 Reforming Intelligence and Securing ...
    Jul 8, 2025 · The primary changes that Congress made involved regulating the querying of Section 702 information, including requiring the AG to adopt querying ...
  157. [157]
    Reforming Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act ...
    Dec 8, 2023 · On September 28, the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB) released comprehensive recommendations to reform Section 702 for ...
  158. [158]
    Edward Snowden's Ominous Warning to the World - Newsweek
    Jan 11, 2024 · Whistleblower Edward Snowden issued an ominous yet vague warning on Thursday about how the failure of institutions will usher in a revolution with unknown ...
  159. [159]
    Snowden surveillance revelations take on added urgency 12 years ...
    Jun 5, 2025 · It's been 12 years since Edward Snowden blew the whistle on global mass surveillance. The revelations are still important.<|separator|>
  160. [160]
    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/another-snowden-moment-global-survey-130800446.html
  161. [161]
    Global Trust in the Internet Rebounds, But Fear of AI and Threats to ...
    Rising confidence in online networks contrasts with growing concerns over AI and data privacy.
  162. [162]
    https://www.policymagazine.ca/ipsos-global-survey-the-world-is-worried-about-ai/