Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Transparency

Transparency is the physical property of a material or medium that permits the transmission of light or other electromagnetic waves with negligible absorption or scattering, allowing clear visibility through it, as exemplified by substances like glass, pure water, and air.^[1]^[2] In perceptual and metaphorical senses, it denotes the quality of openness where internal structures, processes, or information are accessible for scrutiny without distortion or concealment, extending to institutional contexts such as governance, science, and business where it facilitates evaluation and reduces hidden asymmetries.^[3]^[4] In scientific research, transparency encompasses detailed disclosure of methodologies, data, and decision-making steps, which empirical evidence links to enhanced reproducibility, efficiency in building upon prior work, and greater trust in findings, though implementation varies widely across disciplines.^[5]^[6]^[7] Governance advocates promote it as a mechanism to curb corruption and enable accountability by making public decisions and data openly available, timely, and comprehensive, yet rigorous assessments reveal that mere disclosure often fails to drive behavioral change or improved outcomes without complementary enforcement or public engagement.^[8]^[9]^[10] Notable controversies arise from transparency's potential downsides, including security vulnerabilities from excessive openness, overload of unprocessed information that overwhelms users, and exploitation by adversaries who weaponize revealed flaws without constructive response; these limitations underscore that transparency, while causally tied to trust in controlled settings, does not universally yield net benefits and requires contextual calibration against privacy, strategic needs, and cognitive capacities.^[11]^[12]^[13]^[14]

Physical Transparency

In Materials Science and Optics

In materials science and optics, transparency denotes the property of a material permitting the transmission of electromagnetic radiation, particularly visible light, with negligible absorption or scattering, enabling clear visibility of objects behind it.^[15] This characteristic arises primarily from the material's electronic structure, where the energy bandgap exceeds the photon energies of incident light (typically 1.65–3.1 eV for visible wavelengths), preventing electronic excitations that would lead to absorption.^[15] Scattering, caused by refractive index variations at microscopic irregularities such as defects or grain boundaries, must also be minimized for high transparency, often achieved in amorphous or highly ordered crystalline structures.^[16] Applications span optical components like lenses, prisms, and waveguides, where materials with transmittance exceeding 90% are essential for minimal signal loss.^[17] The physical mechanisms governing transparency in solids involve both absorption and scattering processes. Absorption occurs when photons match the energy difference between valence and conduction bands; in wide-bandgap dielectrics like fused silica (bandgap ≈9 eV), visible photons pass through without promoting electrons, as their energy is insufficient for interband transitions.^[15] Scattering, conversely, stems from inhomogeneities—Rayleigh scattering dominates for wavelengths much larger than scatterers, scaling inversely with the fourth power of wavelength, which explains why materials appear clearer in longer wavelengths.^[15] In polycrystalline materials, grain boundaries enhance scattering, reducing transparency unless grains are sub-wavelength sized or the structure is monocrystalline, as in diamond (refractive index 2.42, transmittance >70% over visible range).^[16] These principles underpin the design of low-loss optical fibers, where ultrapure silica achieves attenuation below 0.2 dB/km at 1550 nm.^[15] Exemplary transparent materials include borosilicate glass (transmittance ~92% in 0.4–2.5 μm range), polycarbonate polymers (used in impact-resistant optics, refractive index 1.58), and alkali halides like NaCl (for infrared optics).^[18] ^[19] Diamond exemplifies extreme transparency due to its rigid covalent lattice and purity, transmitting from UV to mid-IR with minimal loss absent impurities.^[20] In contrast, metals exhibit opacity from free-electron absorption, while semiconductors like silicon (bandgap 1.1 eV) are opaque to visible light but transparent beyond 1.1 μm.^[15] Factors influencing optical transparency encompass material composition, microstructure, and processing. High purity minimizes absorption centers from impurities or dopants; for instance, trace iron in glass reduces transmittance by absorbing in the green-yellow spectrum.^[16] Crystallinity affects scattering—amorphous polymers like acrylic outperform semicrystalline ones by lacking ordered domains that refract light differently.^[18] Defects such as voids or cracks introduce diffuse scattering, quantifiable via Beer-Lambert law deviations, where transmittance T = e^{-\alpha d} (α absorption coefficient, d thickness) drops with increasing defect density.^[21] Thickness plays a role, as cumulative scattering over distance can render thin films transparent while bulk samples appear translucent; engineering controls like polishing or doping optimize these for specific wavelengths.^[16]

In Biology and Nature

In biology, transparency refers to the optical property in certain organisms where light passes through tissues with minimal scattering or absorption, enabling camouflage against visual predators or facilitating light penetration for physiological functions. This phenomenon is prevalent in aquatic environments, where organisms such as jellyfish, siphonophores, certain crustaceans, pteropods, squids, and fish have evolved translucent bodies to blend into surrounding water columns, reducing detection by predators that rely on silhouette or contrast cues.^[22] Mechanisms include low refractive index mismatches between cellular components and surrounding fluids, sparse pigmentation, and nanostructured proteins or gels that minimize photon deflection, as observed in the gelatinous mesoglea of cnidarians.^[23] Terrestrial examples are rarer but notable in amphibians like glass frogs (family Centrolenidae), which achieve imperfect transparency by aggregating red blood cells into their liver during rest, reducing visible absorbance and scattering to evade diurnal predators; this dynamic process reverses upon movement, with liver opacity increasing up to 61% to match skin translucency.^[24]^[23] In insects, such as certain butterflies, wing transparency arises from specialized scale nanostructures that suppress iridescence and reflection, serving roles beyond camouflage, including thermoregulation or mate signaling, though evolutionary pressures favor anti-predator functions in open habitats.^[25] While primarily adaptive for survival, transparency imposes costs like increased ultraviolet exposure vulnerability, limiting its prevalence to specific ecological niches.^[26] In plants, natural transparency is less common but occurs in thin leaves or algal structures where minimal cell wall scattering allows deeper light penetration for photosynthesis; for instance, some aquatic macrophytes exhibit translucency via air lacunae that reduce refractive contrasts, enhancing photon capture in low-light depths without compromising structural integrity. Empirical studies confirm these traits evolve under selective pressures for optical efficiency rather than concealment, contrasting animal cases.^[27]

Informational and Technical Transparency

In Computing and Software Systems

Transparency in computing and software systems primarily entails the openness of source code and system internals, allowing users, developers, and auditors to inspect, verify, and modify components for security, reliability, and functionality. This is most prominently realized through open-source software (OSS), where code is released under permissive or copyleft licenses that mandate or permit public access. For instance, the GNU General Public License (GPL), version 1 released on February 25, 1989, by the Free Software Foundation, requires derivative works to remain open, fostering collaborative scrutiny. Open-source models enable "Linus's Law," articulated by Linux creator Linus Torvalds in 1999, positing that widespread peer review exposes flaws more effectively than isolated proprietary development. The benefits of code transparency include enhanced security through community-driven auditing, which identifies vulnerabilities faster than in closed systems. A 2024 CISA white paper on software transparency in SaaS environments highlights how public code and Software Bills of Materials (SBOMs) reveal third-party dependencies, mitigating supply chain risks like the 2020 SolarWinds attack that compromised opaque proprietary components.^[28] Empirical evidence supports this: a 2023 analysis by the Open Source Security Foundation found that OSS projects with active contributor bases resolve critical vulnerabilities 2-3 times quicker than proprietary equivalents due to distributed expertise. Transparency also drives innovation; the Linux kernel, initiated by Torvalds on September 17, 1991, powers over 96% of the world's top one million supercomputers as of November 2023, owing to its modifiable architecture that integrates contributions from thousands of developers globally. In distributed systems, transparency refers to abstractions that conceal underlying complexities from applications and users, such as location transparency (hiding resource locations) and failure transparency (automatic recovery masking faults). These concepts, formalized in foundational texts like Andrew S. Tanenbaum's 1987 book Distributed Operating Systems, enable scalable architectures without altering application logic. However, excessive abstraction can impede debugging; thus, modern systems like Kubernetes incorporate logging and observability tools to balance usability with inspectability. Proprietary systems often limit transparency to protect intellectual property, but initiatives like Microsoft's partial open-sourcing of .NET components since 2014 demonstrate hybrid approaches that release audited code subsets to build trust without full disclosure. Partial transparency risks incomplete audits, as evidenced by persistent zero-day exploits in closed ecosystems, underscoring the causal link between full openness and robust verification.

In Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Transparency in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) encompasses the disclosure of system components, decision-making processes, and underlying data to enable scrutiny, auditing, and trust. This includes algorithmic interpretability, where models reveal how inputs lead to outputs; data provenance, detailing training datasets and potential biases; and operational governance, such as logging predictions for accountability. Proponents argue that such transparency mitigates risks like erroneous decisions in high-stakes applications, such as autonomous vehicles or medical diagnostics, by allowing stakeholders to identify flaws empirically rather than relying on opaque "black-box" outcomes.^[29] ^[30] Empirical studies indicate that transparent systems facilitate bias detection, as evidenced by audits of ML models in credit scoring revealing disparate impacts on protected groups when training data sources are disclosed.^[31] Explainable AI (XAI) techniques, such as SHAP values for feature attribution or LIME for local approximations, aim to approximate the reasoning of complex models like deep neural networks. These methods provide post-hoc explanations, but rigorous evaluations show limited causal impact on user decision-making; for instance, a 2020 benchmark across image, text, and time-series data found that while XAI methods highlight influential features, they often fail to align with human causal intuitions, potentially eroding trust when explanations contradict outcomes.^[32] In medical imaging, Class Activation Maps (CAMs) have demonstrated modest improvements in radiologist accuracy (up to 5-10% in controlled tasks), yet broader meta-analyses reveal inconsistent empirical benefits, with explanations sometimes introducing new errors due to model approximations.^[33] Trade-offs persist: inherently interpretable models like decision trees sacrifice predictive accuracy compared to opaque ensembles, as quantified in benchmarks where transparent alternatives underperform by 10-20% on datasets like ImageNet.^[34] Regulatory frameworks increasingly mandate transparency to enforce causal accountability. The EU AI Act, entering force on August 1, 2024, classifies systems by risk and requires high-risk AI providers to document training data, algorithms, and bias mitigation, with general-purpose models like large language models obligated to publish technical summaries by 2025.^[35] Complementing this, the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (released January 2023) promotes voluntary transparency measures, such as mapping data lineages and evaluation metrics, to quantify risks empirically rather than through unsubstantiated claims.^[36] Open-source models enhance inspectability; xAI released the base weights and architecture of Grok-1 (a 314 billion parameter mixture-of-experts model) on March 17, 2024, enabling independent verification of its Mixture-of-Experts structure, while Meta's Llama series (e.g., Llama 3.1, July 2024) discloses hyperparameters and permits fine-tuning scrutiny, contrasting proprietary systems like those from OpenAI, where internals remain undisclosed to safeguard intellectual property.^[37] However, open models introduce risks, as adversarial analyses have exploited released code to amplify biases present in training corpora.^[38] Challenges arise from systemic biases in source data and institutional incentives; academic literature, often from environments with documented ideological skews, overemphasizes transparency's benefits while underreporting performance costs, as cross-validation studies show explainable models requiring 2-5x more parameters for parity with opaque counterparts.^[39] In practice, full transparency demands resource-intensive logging—e.g., retaining all inference traces—which scales poorly for production systems processing billions of queries daily, leading to selective disclosures that may obscure causal failures.^[40] Despite these hurdles, transparency enables first-principles validation, where discrepancies between predicted and observed behaviors reveal ground-truth causal mechanisms, as demonstrated in ML fairness audits tracing discriminatory outputs to unrepresentative sampling in datasets like COMPAS recidivism predictors.^[41]

In Data Management and Privacy

Transparency in data management refers to the obligation of organizations to clearly disclose how personal data is collected, processed, stored, shared, and protected, enabling individuals to understand and exercise control over their information. This principle underpins modern privacy frameworks by reducing information asymmetry between data controllers and subjects, fostering accountability, and mitigating risks of misuse. In practice, it manifests through privacy notices, data processing records, and rights mechanisms like access requests, which require entities to provide intelligible details on data flows without obfuscation.^[42]^[43] Major regulations enforce such transparency as a core requirement. The European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), effective May 25, 2018, mandates under Article 5 that processing be lawful, fair, and transparent, with Article 12 specifying that information to data subjects must be concise, intelligible, and easily accessible, including details on processing purposes, recipients, and retention periods. Similarly, California's Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), enacted June 28, 2018, and expanded by the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) effective January 1, 2023, grants consumers rights to know categories of personal information collected, sources, purposes, and third-party disclosures, requiring businesses to maintain verifiable records of compliance. The U.S. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), amended in 2003 via the Privacy Rule, compels covered entities to provide individuals with notice of privacy practices detailing uses and disclosures of protected health information, with updates required for material changes. These laws impose penalties for non-compliance, such as GDPR's fines up to 4% of global annual turnover or €20 million, incentivizing robust disclosure practices.^[42]^[44]^[45] Empirical evidence links transparency to enhanced user trust and behavioral outcomes in data sharing. A 2019 study on health apps found that perceived transparency in privacy policies positively influenced users' trust in providers and reduced privacy concerns, leading to higher acceptance of data disclosure for cognitive beliefs about benefits. Research on open data applications, published in 2020, demonstrated that explicit transparency about data sourcing and processing increased user trust by 15-20% in experimental settings, as measured by survey responses on perceived reliability. In AI contexts, a 2024 analysis showed that disclosing data-processing transparency boosted willingness to share personal information by addressing trust deficits, with participants 25% more likely to disclose to transparent entities versus opaque ones. However, these effects vary by context; for instance, overly detailed disclosures can overwhelm users, eroding trust if not layered effectively.^[46]^[47]^[48] Despite benefits, transparency introduces trade-offs with privacy protections, as full disclosure of data handling methods can inadvertently reveal vulnerabilities exploitable by adversaries, such as detailing encryption weaknesses or access logs. Structured transparency approaches, like differential privacy or audited summaries, aim to resolve this by providing verifiable insights without exposing raw details, allowing aggregate benefits like improved auditing while preserving individual anonymity. In platform moderation, conflicts arise where user privacy limits systemic transparency into algorithmic decisions, potentially hindering external accountability; a 2022 policy analysis argued that resolving these requires prioritizing causal oversight over absolute secrecy, though empirical quantification remains limited. Organizations must thus balance disclosure mandates with security-by-obscurity principles, where excessive transparency could enable targeted attacks, as evidenced by post-disclosure breaches in regulated sectors.^[49]^[50]

Institutional Transparency

In Government and Public Policy

Transparency in government and public policy refers to the systematic disclosure of information regarding decision-making processes, public expenditures, policy rationales, and administrative actions to enable public scrutiny and accountability.^[51] This practice is operationalized through legal frameworks such as Freedom of Information Acts (FOIAs), which mandate government agencies to release records upon request, subject to exemptions for national security or privacy. In the United States, the federal FOIA was enacted on July 4, 1966, and has been strengthened by amendments like the 1996 Electronic FOIA Amendments and the 2016 FOIA Improvement Act, requiring proactive disclosure of frequently requested records. Similar laws exist globally, with over 120 countries adopting FOI legislation by 2023, often influenced by models from Sweden's 1766 Freedom of the Press Act or the U.S. framework.^[52] Open government initiatives further promote transparency by emphasizing proactive data release and public participation. The Open Government Partnership (OGP), launched in 2011 by eight founding governments including the U.S. and U.K., now encompasses 78 national and 76 local governments committed to action plans on open data, anti-corruption, and civic engagement.^[53] Examples include the U.S. Open Government Directive issued by President Obama on December 8, 2009, which led to the creation of Data.gov in 2009, hosting over 300,000 datasets by 2023 to facilitate public analysis of federal spending and performance.^[54] Outcomes vary: evaluations of OGP commitments show improvements in fiscal transparency in participating countries, with a 2019 World Bank study finding that open budget data correlates with better public financial management in low- and middle-income nations.^[55] Empirical evidence on transparency's causal effects reveals mixed results, underscoring the importance of institutional context over mere disclosure. A 2014 study of U.S. state FOIA laws found they reduce public sector corruption convictions by approximately 15% post-implementation, attributing this to heightened deterrence from expected scrutiny, though this effect offsets increased detection rates that could elevate observed corruption metrics.^[56] Internationally, a cross-country analysis indicated no overall significant reduction in corruption levels following FOI adoption, with effectiveness hinging on complementary factors like free media and judicial independence; for instance, FOI laws interact positively with media freedom to lower perceived corruption scores in Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI).^[57]^[58] The 2023 CPI, scoring countries from 0 (highly corrupt) to 100, ranked Denmark at 90 and Somalia at 11, with higher transparency rankings associating with lower perceived corruption, though the index relies on expert perceptions rather than direct measures.^[59] Surveys link active information provision to elevated public trust, as in a Latin American experiment where transparency interventions boosted perceptions of government responsiveness by 10-15 percentage points.^[10] Challenges include implementation gaps and unintended consequences. Exemptions for sensitive information can undermine access, as seen in delays averaging 20 months for U.S. FOIA requests in 2022, per the Department of Justice. Moreover, transparency may exacerbate information overload or enable adversarial exploitation without yielding proportional accountability gains, particularly in weak institutions where disclosures fail to translate into enforcement.^[9] Despite these, causal mechanisms like reduced principal-agent asymmetries support transparency's role in aligning policy with public interest, evidenced by higher voter turnout in districts with accessible government data portals.^[55]

In Business and Financial Markets

Transparency in business refers to the disclosure of material information regarding operations, finances, risks, and governance to stakeholders such as investors, regulators, and employees, aimed at reducing information asymmetry and enabling informed decision-making.^[60] In financial markets, it encompasses pre-trade disclosures like bid-ask quotes and order sizes, as well as post-trade reporting of executed transaction prices and volumes, which facilitate price discovery and market efficiency.^[61] Empirical studies indicate that higher corporate transparency correlates with improved firm performance, including enhanced firm value and reduced cost of external financing, particularly in competitive environments.^[62] ^[63] Key regulatory frameworks have driven transparency mandates. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002, enacted in response to scandals like Enron, requires public companies to establish internal controls over financial reporting and mandates CEO and CFO certification of annual reports, significantly improving audit quality and reducing material financial restatements.^[64] ^[65] Post-SOX implementation, corporate financial reporting reliability increased, with fewer instances of fraud and restored investor confidence, though compliance costs rose for smaller firms.^[66] In the European Union, the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II), effective January 3, 2018, extended pre- and post-trade transparency requirements to non-equity instruments such as bonds and derivatives, mandating real-time disclosure of quotes for liquid instruments and deferred reporting for illiquid ones to balance transparency with market-making incentives.^[67] ^[68] In financial markets, transparency mitigates risks like insider trading and market manipulation by promoting fair access to information. Post-trade transparency under MiFID II has enhanced liquidity in some segments by improving price formation, though challenges persist in over-the-counter markets where dark pools limit visibility to avoid information leakage.^[69] Regulations like SOX have empirically linked greater disclosure to lower capital costs, as investors demand less risk premium for transparent firms.^[60] Lack of transparency, as seen in the 2008 financial crisis with opaque structured finance products, amplified systemic risks, prompting calls for standardized reporting.^[70] Overall, while transparency fosters trust and efficiency, excessive requirements can impose compliance burdens, potentially deterring innovation in smaller entities.^[71]

In Media, Journalism, and NGOs

In media and journalism, transparency entails the disclosure of ownership, funding, editorial methodologies, and conflicts of interest to allow audiences to evaluate potential influences on reporting. The European Media Freedom Act of 2024 requires media service providers to publicly reveal ownership structures under Article 6, promoting accountability and mitigating risks like foreign interference in information flows.^[72] ^[73] Similarly, initiatives like Access Info Europe's 2021 recommendations advocate for accessible, free-of-charge data on media controllers to prevent concentration and undue influence.^[74] Journalistic ethics codes emphasize source verification and process openness; the Society of Professional Journalists' Code, revised in 2014, mandates explaining decisions to the public and balancing transparency with source protection to uphold accuracy.^[75] The Radio Television Digital News Association's guidelines further require reflection on errors and honest disclosure to rebuild trust.^[76] Failures in this area, such as The New York Times' heavy reliance on anonymous sources in pre-2003 Iraq War reporting, have eroded credibility by obscuring unverifiable claims and enabling bias amplification.^[77] Pew Research Center data from 2024 links such opacity to rising mistrust, with 36-49% of respondents across political groups citing perceived bias from undisclosed influences, exacerbating news avoidance.^[78] ^[79] Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) prioritize financial and operational transparency to demonstrate mission fidelity and efficient resource use. In the United States, federal law compels nonprofits to submit IRS Form 990 annually, detailing revenues, expenditures, salaries, and grants, with public access required upon request.^[80] ^[81] Evaluators like CharityWatch assign grades based on metrics including program spending ratios, requiring at least 75% of expenses on mission-related activities for top ratings like A.^[82] Best practices, per industry analyses, involve disseminating audited statements, donor lists where feasible, and impact metrics to counter risks of hidden ideological or donor-driven agendas that could skew advocacy.^[83] ^[84] Noncompliance, such as delayed filings, correlates with lower donor confidence and regulatory scrutiny, underscoring transparency's role in sustaining legitimacy.^[85]

In Scientific Research and Academia

Transparency in scientific research and academia refers to the open disclosure of methodologies, data, code, funding sources, and potential conflicts of interest to enable independent verification and replication of findings. This practice aims to mitigate issues like the replication crisis, where large-scale efforts have shown that only about 36-64% of studies in fields such as psychology and cancer biology successfully replicate original results, often due to selective reporting, p-hacking, or undisclosed questionable research practices.^[86]^[87] The open science movement, spurred by these reproducibility failures documented since the mid-2010s, promotes preregistration of studies, mandatory data sharing, and transparent peer review to enhance causal validity and reduce publication bias favoring positive results.^[88]^[89] Key mechanisms include data management and sharing policies enforced by major funders and journals. The U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) implemented its Data Management and Sharing Policy on January 25, 2023, requiring researchers to create data management plans for all funded projects and make scientific data publicly accessible, with exceptions only for ethical or legal constraints, to foster reusability under FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable).^[90] Over 5,000 journals adhere to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' data sharing statements since 2014, increasingly mandating raw data deposition in repositories like Dryad or Figshare by 2023-2025.^[91] Tools like the Research Transparency Index evaluate manuscripts on disclosure of materials, analysis code, and hypotheses, providing scores that correlate with higher reproducibility rates in validated studies.^[5] In peer review, transparency varies, with traditional single- or double-blind processes criticized for enabling unaccountable biases and low replication incentives, as reviewers' confidential comments often diverge from public feedback, potentially suppressing innovative or dissenting work.^[92] Open peer review models, adopted by journals like eLife and BMJ Open, publish reviewer identities and reports alongside articles, which simulations suggest can deter strategic withholding but may exacerbate competition-driven sabotage if status concerns dominate.^[93]^[94] Despite benefits, adoption remains limited, with only a minority of journals fully transparent by 2025, partly due to reviewer reluctance amid overburdened workloads.^[95] Challenges persist from institutional incentives prioritizing novel publications over replication, compounded by ideological biases in academia that gatekeep controversial findings, such as those challenging prevailing narratives in social sciences or public health.^[96]^[97] For instance, elite faculty networks amplify selective censoring, undermining credibility when viewpoints misalign with dominant academic leanings, as evidenced in hiring and review disparities.^[98] Funding transparency requirements, like those from the NIH, mandate conflict disclosures, yet corporate-academic partnerships often face scrutiny for potential influence on results, with calls for proactive public registries to counter such risks.^[99] Empirical evidence from six-year replication projects indicates that transparent practices, including badges for open data in journals, boost success rates to over 80% for preregistered studies, affirming causal links to improved scientific reliability.^[100]

Philosophical and Ethical Dimensions

Historical Development and Core Principles

The philosophical concept of transparency emerged in early modern epistemology, particularly through René Descartes' (1596–1650) metaphor of clear and distinct perceptions akin to transparent glass, enabling unmediated access to truth and distinguishing genuine knowledge from illusion.^[101] This laid groundwork for viewing transparency as a condition for intellectual and ethical clarity, prioritizing direct, undistorted apprehension of reality over opaque mediation. In the Enlightenment era, Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778) idealized pre-civilizational societies as realms of "total transparency," where absence of artifice fostered authentic human relations, contrasting them with modern opacity bred by inequality and deception.^[102] Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) operationalized transparency ethically in political theory around 1787, inventing the panopticon—a circular prison design ensuring inmates' constant visibility to guards—as a utilitarian mechanism to induce self-disciplined moral behavior through perpetual observability, thereby minimizing secrecy's corrupting potential.^[103]^[104] These developments shifted transparency from mere perceptual metaphor to an active ethical imperative for accountability in social institutions. In 19th- and 20th-century ethics, Immanuel Kant's (1724–1804) deontological framework implicitly embedded transparency in the categorical imperative's demand for treating persons as ends, manifesting as openness in communication to respect human dignity and avoid manipulative concealment.^[105] Postwar political philosophy, influenced by figures like John Rawls (1921–2002), Bernard Williams (1929–2003), and Christine Korsgaard, introduced a "transparency condition" for evaluating ethical theories: principles must withstand public scrutiny without reliance on veiled motives, ensuring coherence between avowed rules and actual justifications.^[106] By the late 20th century, information ethics formalized transparency as a meta-principle, not inherently ethical but a "pro-ethical condition" that either enables virtues like autonomy and justice—via access to relevant data—or impairs them through withheld information, as analyzed in works on digital and institutional opacity.^[107]^[108] Core principles of philosophical transparency emphasize openness as instrumental to causal accountability: agents and institutions must render decision processes visible to allow rational evaluation of outcomes against intentions, preventing untraceable errors or abuses. This entails non-deception in disclosure, where withholding material facts equates to ethical failure by obstructing informed consent and reciprocal trust, grounded in first-person verifiability rather than unverifiable assurances.^[109] Unlike absolute virtues, transparency admits calibrated application—full visibility in public spheres like governance, but bounded in private domains to preserve agency—avoiding Benthamite extremes that could invert into coercive surveillance.^[110] Ethically, it prioritizes empirical verifiability over subjective opacity, aligning with causal realism by linking observable actions to predictable consequences, thus fostering legitimacy without presuming inherent benevolence.^[111]

Empirical Benefits and Causal Mechanisms

Empirical studies demonstrate that transparency reduces corruption by facilitating external monitoring and accountability. A meta-analysis of 56 studies found that transparency initiatives, such as public disclosure of government contracts and budgets, correlate with a statistically significant decrease in corruption perceptions and incidents, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to strong in contexts with independent media and civil society oversight.^[112] Another meta-analysis synthesizing data from over 100 empirical tests confirmed that mechanisms like freedom of information laws and audit disclosures curb administrative corruption by increasing the perceived risk of detection for officials.^[113] Transparency also enhances trust in institutions through verifiable information flows. Field experiments in Latin America showed that proactive government disclosure of fiscal data improved citizens' perceptions of transparency by 10-15% and boosted overall trust by up to 8%, particularly among those with lower baseline trust levels.^[10] Similarly, a meta-analysis of 38 studies on open government data initiatives revealed a positive association between transparency and public trust, with causal evidence from randomized interventions indicating that accessible information reduces mistrust by enabling citizens to cross-verify claims against outcomes.^[114] In ethical contexts, such as scientific research, transparency fosters reproducibility and integrity. Surveys of over 1,500 studies across disciplines found that mandatory disclosure of methods and data increased replication success rates by 20-30%, as it allows peer scrutiny to identify errors or biases that opaque processes conceal.^[6] This benefit extends to organizational ethics, where performance transparency—such as public reporting of metrics—has been linked to higher compliance with ethical standards, evidenced by reduced internal fraud in firms adopting such practices post-2008 financial regulations.^[115] Causal mechanisms underlying these benefits operate through deterrence and incentive alignment. Visibility of actions raises the expected costs of unethical behavior, as potential wrongdoers anticipate sanctions from monitors like journalists or auditors; econometric models from corruption studies estimate this deterrence effect accounts for 40-60% of transparency's impact in high-enforcement environments.^[116] Transparency mitigates principal-agent problems by reducing information asymmetries, enabling principals (e.g., citizens or shareholders) to evaluate agents' fidelity to ethical norms, which experimental evidence shows strengthens reciprocal trust and cooperative equilibria.^[60] Additionally, it cultivates normative pressures: repeated exposure to open processes reinforces social expectations of honesty, as game-theoretic analyses indicate that transparency amplifies reputational costs in iterated interactions, though this requires supportive institutions to translate visibility into enforcement.^[117] These mechanisms are most effective when transparency is coupled with capacity for response, as isolated disclosure without follow-through yields diminishing returns.^[118]

Criticisms, Paradoxes, and Trade-offs

Criticisms of transparency in philosophical and ethical discourse often center on its potential to erode trust and expertise rather than enhance them. Philosopher Onora O'Neill argues that transparency demands can foster deception by pressuring individuals and institutions to craft publicly palatable justifications that obscure genuine reasoning, leading to a culture of "intelligent accountability" through documentation rather than substantive reliability.^[119] This view posits that transparency, while intuitively linked to trustworthiness, frequently opposes trust by inviting constant scrutiny that highlights imperfections without context, thereby breeding cynicism.^[120] Ethicist C. Thi Nguyen extends this by framing transparency as a form of surveillance, where requirements for public explicability intrude on expert practices, compelling decisions to align with layperson expectations and potentially degrading epistemic quality through simplified or withheld rationales.^[121] A key paradox arises in the tension between transparency's promise of clarity and its capacity to obscure deeper truths or inhibit performance. The transparency paradox, as articulated in organizational learning theory, suggests that heightened observability of processes can counterintuitively reduce productivity and candor, as actors self-censor to avoid judgment, hiding authentic deliberations behind formalized outputs.^[122] In scientific contexts, full disclosure of methodological limitations—intended to build credibility—paradoxically undermines public confidence, as audiences without specialized knowledge misinterpret uncertainties as systemic flaws, per empirical studies on trust in expertise.^[123] Philosopher Thomas Metzinger describes this as transparency concealing its own "deepest secrets," where the illusion of openness masks the inherent opacity of complex mental or institutional processes, fostering a false sense of comprehension.^[110] Trade-offs manifest prominently between transparency and values like competence, privacy, and efficiency. Ethically, transparency clashes with confidentiality norms in professions, where revealing client details could violate autonomy and cause harm, necessitating judgments on when disclosure serves greater goods like accountability.^[124] In decision-making, transparent procedures may yield suboptimal outcomes by discouraging risk-taking and honest disagreement; research shows that visible deliberations lead to conformity and less information sharing than confidential ones, as participants prioritize defensible positions over truth-seeking.^[125] Jimmy Licon critiques this as prioritizing accountability over effectiveness, where leaders withhold strategic actions to evade backlash, ultimately deterring innovation and competent governance.^[13] These tensions underscore a broader ethical realism: transparency's benefits hinge on contextual calibration, as unbridled application risks amplifying flaws without resolving underlying causal mechanisms of distrust or inefficiency.

Cultural and Artistic Representations

In Literature, Visual Arts, and Philosophy

In philosophy of mind, the transparency thesis posits that introspecting one's perceptual experiences yields awareness primarily of external objects and their properties, rendering the qualitative aspects of experience itself seemingly inaccessible or "transparent" to direct attention.^[126] This idea, prominent since the 1990s through works by philosophers like Alex Byrne and Thomas Metzinger, challenges representationalist accounts of consciousness by suggesting that phenomenal character is not an opaque mental property but dissolves under scrutiny, influencing debates on qualia and the hard problem of consciousness.^[110] Critics, however, argue that transparency overlooks cases of afterimages or hallucinations where non-external features become introspectable, questioning its universality.^[127] In ethical and political philosophy, transparency emerges as a normative ideal, exemplified by Jeremy Bentham's Panopticon design (1787), where architectural openness enables constant visibility to enforce behavior, prefiguring modern surveillance critiques.^[110] Byung-Chul Han's The Transparency Society (2012) extends this, contending that enforced transparency erodes privacy and fosters performative authenticity rather than genuine freedom.^[128] In visual arts, transparency has been rendered through techniques adhering to optical principles, such as interreflections at overlapping edges and chromatic shifts to simulate refraction, as seen in historical depictions from ancient frescoes to Renaissance paintings like those by Leonardo da Vinci, who studied light passage through media.^[129] These methods create illusions of depth and layering, distinguishing transparent from translucent or opaque forms by minimizing scattering while preserving visibility of underlying structures.^[130] Symbolically, transparency evokes purity and enlightenment, particularly in glassworks where light transmission signifies spiritual clarity, as in medieval stained glass or contemporary installations that interact with environments to blur boundaries between object and viewer.^[131] Modern explorations, including 20th-century architecture and design, leverage transparency for aesthetic openness—evident in exhibits like MoMA's 2021 survey—while highlighting pitfalls like vulnerability or illusion, using materials to manipulate perception of space and interiority.^[132] In two-dimensional design, partial transparency adds mood, suggesting mystery or access to alternate realms without full revelation.^[133] Literature often employs transparency as a stylistic device, favoring plain prose that minimizes figurative interference to convey unmediated reality, contrasting with opaque narratives that embed form and content inseparably for interpretive depth.^[134] Peter Lamarque distinguishes narrative opacity, where literary truth inheres in the work's holistic structure rather than transparent propositional content, from realist modes aiming for direct event portrayal.^[135] Thematically, transparency critiques societal overreach, as in Dave Eggers' The Circle (2013), where a tech firm's "transparent" ideology mandates total visibility via surveillance, eroding autonomy and fostering conformity under the guise of communal honesty.^[136] This mirrors philosophical concerns, portraying transparency not as liberating but as a coercive force that flattens human opacity essential for privacy and selfhood.^[137]

In Music, Film, and Entertainment

In the music industry, transparency concerns primarily revolve around royalty payments from streaming platforms, where artists often receive opaque statements that obscure revenue distribution. Streaming services retain approximately 30% of collected revenues, with record labels claiming about 55% of the remaining artists' share, leaving performers with minimal insight into per-stream earnings or deductions for advances and production costs.^[138] Initiatives like Spotify's Loud & Clear platform, launched to disclose global royalty data, aim to address this by providing breakdowns of payments, though critics argue it falls short of full auditability.^[139] In August 2025, musician David Byrne advocated in an op-ed for mandatory transparency from labels and streamers, highlighting how non-disclosure agreements and complex calculations hinder artists' understanding of earnings.^[140] The United Kingdom's Code of Practice on Transparency in Music Streaming, effective from August 2024, mandates clearer contracts, detailed royalty calculations, and auditable reporting to benefit songwriters and composers, marking a regulatory push amid ongoing artist campaigns.^[141] Emerging technologies, such as real-time royalty systems introduced in platforms like BitSong by February 2025, enable immediate payouts and verifiable tracking, potentially reducing delays inherent in quarterly statements.^[142] Despite these advances, systemic issues persist, with record labels sometimes reclassifying royalties to defer payments, exacerbating inequities for independent artists.^[143] In film and television, "Hollywood accounting" exemplifies opacity, employing creative budgeting to report losses on profitable projects, thereby minimizing backend profit shares for talent. For instance, despite grossing over $2 billion worldwide, films like Return of the Jedi (1983) were accounted as unprofitable due to inflated overhead allocations exceeding 100% of budgets.^[144] This practice, rooted in studio practices since the industry's founding, has prompted recommendations for audit clauses in contracts, allowing creators to independently verify financials as of February 2025.^[145] Recent shifts in backend deals have further reduced visibility, with streaming-era agreements obscuring true profitability amid the 2023 Writers Guild strike demands for revenue disclosure.^[146] Broader entertainment transparency efforts include blockchain applications for tracking ownership and contributions, reducing disputes in production financing as piloted in select projects by August 2022.^[147] Independent ecosystems in music and film emphasize ethical disclosure to counter major label and studio dominance, generating billions while prioritizing fair revenue splits.^[148] Hollywood labor actions, including the 2023 strikes, elevated revenue transparency as a core demand, influencing negotiations for verifiable data on viewer metrics and ad revenues.^[149] These developments reflect a gradual industry-wide reckoning, though entrenched financial complexities continue to challenge full accountability.

References

[1]
Transparent, Opaque and Translucent Objects - Physics - CK-12
Jun 26, 2023 · Transparent matter is matter that transmits light without scattering it. Examples of transparent matter include air, pure water, and clear glass ...
[2]
Transparent Translucent And Opaque Objects - BYJU'S
Therefore, we can say that transparent objects are those which allow almost all light rays to pass through them. For example, glass surfaces, water, and even ...
[3]
What is transparency and why is it important? – TechTarget Definition
Nov 23, 2022 · Transparency is the quality of being easily seen through, while transparency in a business or governance context refers to being open and honest.
[4]
(PDF) What Is Transparency? - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · The definition of transparency reveals three metaphors: transparency as a public value embraced by society to counter corruption, transparency synonymous with ...
[5]
The research transparency index - ScienceDirect.com
Specifically, methodological transparency refers to “the degree of detail and disclosure about the specific steps, decisions, and judgment calls made during a ...
[6]
An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related ...
Feb 19, 2020 · Transparency and reproducibility are core scientific principles and their pursuit can be important for improving efficiency [1], facilitating ...
[7]
A Taxonomy of Transparency in Science | Canadian Journal of ...
Jun 16, 2020 · For scientists, transparency is a way to promote reproducibility, progress, and trust in research. For philosophers of science, transparency can ...
[8]
Transparency - Open Government Partnership
Transparency occurs when government-held information (including on activities and decisions) is open, comprehensive, timely, freely available to the pub
[9]
Does transparency improve governance? | Harvard Kennedy School
THE IDEA THAT TRANSPARENCY can make institutions more effective and provide greater accountability and better results for the public seems uncontroversial ...Missing: key physics<|separator|>
[10]
Transparency and Trust in Government. Evidence from a Survey ...
Active provision of information improves perceptions about government transparency. •. Increasing transparency helps to improve trust in the government.
[11]
Transparency and the risks of openness - Ethics of AI - MOOC.fi
Transparency can create security risks. Too much transparency may lead to leaking of privacy-sensitive data into the wrong hands.
[12]
Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its ...
Dec 13, 2016 · Full transparency can do great harm. If implemented without a notion of why some part of a system should be revealed, transparency can threaten ...
[13]
The Dark Sides of Transparency | Jimmy Alfonso Licon
Transparency in government activities leads to reduced corruption, better government and stronger democracies. All governments can benefit from increased ...
[14]
The Limits of Transparency | SpringerLink
Jun 22, 2018 · Hence, most times that transparency reveals the defects of a given policy, such information cannot be converted into action that affects that ...
[15]
Transparency – light, absorption, scattering, dielectric materials ...
Transparency is a material's property to transmit light without strong absorption and scattering, allowing light to pass through without substantial ...
[16]
Optical Transparency - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Optical transparency is defined as the ability of a material to allow light to pass through with minimal scattering, which is essential for various optical ...
[17]
Transparent vs Opaque: Unveiling the Differences in Materials ...
Jun 13, 2025 · A material is considered transparent if its transmittance is above 90%. In contrast, opacity is often characterized by measuring the reflectance ...
[18]
Transparency of Polymers: Exploring the See-through Science
Jul 11, 2025 · The transparency of plastics refers to their ability to allow light to pass through them. As a result, the objects behind them are distinctly seen.
[19]
The Clear Choice: How to Choose the Best Transparent Material
Nov 12, 2015 · Borosilicate glasses, polycarbonates, and optical silicones all exhibit excellent light transmission throughout the visible region. When ...
[20]
Transparence - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Transparence is defined as the property of a material that allows light to pass through it, enabling the analysis of samples using techniques such as infrared ...
[21]
Transparency Measurement - BYK Instruments
Transparency is the interaction between light and physical material properties. Visual perception of transparency is influenced by the observer's judgement. It ...<|separator|>
[22]
Staring into a crystal ball: understanding evolution and development ...
Nov 14, 2024 · Organismal transparency is commonly seen in aquatic animals such as jellyfish, siphonophores, some crustaceans, pteropods, some squids, fish ...
[23]
Imperfect transparency and camouflage in glass frogs - PNAS
May 26, 2020 · Transparency is one of the most intuitive forms of camouflage, where predators see straight through their prey as if it were not there.
[24]
Glassfrogs conceal blood in their liver to maintain transparency
Dec 22, 2022 · Transparency in animals is a complex form of camouflage involving mechanisms that reduce light scattering and absorption throughout the organism ...
[25]
Transparency in Butterflies, from A-Z: It's More of a Superpower than ...
Jan 21, 2022 · WOODS HOLE, Mass. -- Like invisibility in legends, transparency in nature is a powerful tool. Most transparent animals live in the ocean, ...
[26]
Animal transparency: How should we define form and function?
Mar 6, 2025 · Animal transparency has long been understood as a form of camouflage, allowing predators to see straight through their prey as if it were not ...
[27]
Improved clearing method contributes to deep imaging of plant organs
Jan 10, 2022 · ScaleS uses the hyperhydration effect of urea to make animal tissues transparent, CUBIC and PACT employ effective detergents to remove obstacles ...
[28]
[PDF] Software Transparency in SaaS Environments - CISA
May 16, 2024 · This community-drafted white paper1 argues for the value of SBOM-driven transparency, while identifying four key differences: (1) the frequency ...
[29]
What Is AI Transparency? - IBM
AI transparency helps people access information to better understand how an artificial intelligence (AI) system was created and how it makes decisions.
[30]
AI transparency: What is it and why do we need it? - TechTarget
Sep 10, 2024 · AI transparency is the broad ability to understand how AI systems work, encompassing concepts such as AI explainability, governance and accountability.<|separator|>
[31]
Transparency, Explainability, and Interpretability in AI/ML Credit ...
Mar 22, 2024 · Transparency is about understanding how a model is working. But what users also require is the ability to change how a model works in order to ...
[32]
An Empirical Study of Explainable AI Techniques on Deep Learning ...
Dec 8, 2020 · We propose an empirical study and benchmark framework to apply attribution methods for neural networks developed for images and text data on time series.Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
[33]
Evidence-based XAI: An empirical approach to design more ...
This paper proposes a user study aimed at evaluating the impact of Class Activation Maps (CAMs) as an eXplainable AI (XAI) method in a radiological diagnostic ...
[34]
An Overview of the Empirical Evaluation of Explainable AI (XAI) - MDPI
Overall, the methodological-driven research explores various evaluation approaches to understand how well an explainable system made the behavior of an AI ...
[35]
High-level summary of the AI Act | EU Artificial Intelligence Act
The AI Act classifies AI by risk, prohibits unacceptable risk, regulates high-risk, and has lighter obligations for limited-risk AI. Most obligations fall on ...Prohibited Ai Systems... · High Risk Ai Systems... · General Purpose Ai (gpai)Missing: NIST | Show results with:NIST
[36]
AI Risk Management Framework | NIST
The NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) is for voluntary use to manage AI risks and improve trustworthiness in AI design, development, use, and ...
[37]
Top 10 open source LLMs for 2025 - Instaclustr
Unlike proprietary models developed by companies like OpenAI and Google, open source LLMs are licensed to be freely used, modified, and distributed by anyone. ...
[38]
Open-Source LLMs vs Closed: Unbiased Guide for Innovative ...
Open-source LLMs are publicly accessible and collaborative, while closed-source LLMs are proprietary with restricted access to code and training data.Evolution Of Llms · Open Source Llms Vs Closed... · Why The Choice Matters
[39]
Transparency in artificial intelligence - Internet Policy Review
May 5, 2020 · Transparency in AI plays a very important role in the overall strive to develop more trustworthy AI as applied to markets and in society. It is ...
[40]
Transparency of artificial intelligence/machine learning-enabled ...
Jan 26, 2024 · Transparency for AI/ML medical devices includes clear communication of intended use, development, performance, logic, data used, and bias ...
[41]
Transparency and accountability in AI systems - Frontiers
This review aims to provide an overview of the key legal and ethical challenges associated with implementing transparency and accountability in AI systems.
[42]
Art. 12 GDPR – Transparent information, communication and ...
Rating 4.6 (9,855) Article 12 requires controllers to provide transparent, easily accessible information, facilitate data subject rights, and respond to requests within one month ...
[43]
What is GDPR, the EU's new data protection law?
Processing must be lawful, fair, and transparent to the data subject. Purpose limitation — You must process data for the ...Does the GDPR apply to... · GDPR and Email · Article 5.1-2
[44]
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
Mar 13, 2024 · The California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA) gives consumers more control over the personal information that businesses collect about them.
[45]
How GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, and Other Data Privacy Standards ...
May 31, 2024 · These laws aim to give individuals control over their personal information and hold organizations accountable for protecting that data.
[46]
The Impacts of the Perceived Transparency of Privacy Policies ... - NIH
Nov 26, 2019 · As our study shows the significant role of the perceived transparency of privacy policy in building cognitive trust in competence and ...
[47]
Trust in open data applications through transparency - Sage Journals
Dec 19, 2020 · In the following study, we analyzed whether transparency about the application of open data promotes trust. Furthermore, we formulated guidelines on how to ...
[48]
The Impact of Transparency in AI Systems on Users' Data-Sharing ...
We investigated the influence of trust on participants' willingness to disclose personal information across different data-processing entities. We used two ...
[49]
Beyond Privacy Trade-offs with Structured Transparency | GovAI
This is often posed as an inherent privacy trade-off: we can benefit from data analysis or retain data privacy, but not both.
[50]
User Privacy vs. Platform Transparency: The Conflicts Are Real and ...
Apr 6, 2022 · A strongly pro-research answer will limit users' privacy rights. In between lie a lot of difficult calls and complex trade-offs. Few of the ...
[51]
The Economic and Social Impact of Open Government - OECD
This report assesses the economic and social impact of open government based on experiences and good practices in OECD and Arab countries.
[52]
[PDF] FOIA as an Anti-Corruption Tool
This paper tests, explores and exemplifies the role of freedom of information legislation as an anti- corruption tool. In the first part, its tests freedom ...
[53]
OGP Vital Signs – 10 Years of Data in Review
The Open Government Partnership (OGP) has grown rapidly since its founding 10 years ago. OGP today includes 78 countries, 76 local governments, and thousands of ...Missing: initiatives | Show results with:initiatives
[54]
Fact Sheet: Open Government Flagship Initiatives | The White House
Below are summaries of selected open government flagship initiatives that Federal departments and agencies are undertaking to make the government more ...
[55]
[PDF] Evidence on the Impact of Transparency - The World Bank
Aug 6, 2025 · Transparency can increase voter turnout or shift the distribution of vote shares in a variety of institutional contexts. A smaller but growing ...
[56]
[PDF] Cordis-Warren-Corruption.pdf - Clemson University
We assess the effect of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) laws on public corruption in the United States. Specif- ically, we investigate the impact of ...
[57]
(PDF) Freedom of information acts and public sector corruption
Aug 9, 2025 · Overall, we find no significant relationship between the implementation of a FOI act and corruption. ... corruption in the public sector. Keywords ...
[58]
Do FOI laws and open government data deliver as anti-corruption ...
The key findings suggest that both FOI laws and open government data are significantly associated with corruption only in the interaction with media and ...
[59]
2023 Corruption Perceptions Index: Explore the… - Transparency.org
Corruption Perceptions Index 2023 · 90. Denmark1 · 87. Finland2 · 85. New Zealand3 · 84. Norway4 · 83. Singapore5 · 82. Sweden6 · 82. Switzerland6 · 79. Netherlands8.
[60]
The Benefits of Transparency | Chicago Booth Review
Regulators argue that increasing corporate transparency ultimately benefits firms, with one potential benefit being a lower cost of capital for firms.The Benefits Of Transparency · Disclosure Regulation And... · The Link Between Information...
[61]
Manual on post-trade transparency under MiFID II/ MiFIR
Manual on post-trade transparency under MiFID II/ MiFIR. Reference ESMA74-2134169708-6870. Section Trading. Type Reference. Main Document.
[62]
Corporate transparency and firm value: Does market competition ...
The results show that stronger transparency enhances firm value, and market competition has a significantly positive effect on that relationship.
[63]
Corporate Transparency and Externally Financed Firm Growth
Jun 1, 2022 · The study also provides empirical evidence to support Stein's (2003) prediction that transparency can reduce the cost of external financing ...
[64]
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act: A Comprehensive Overview - AuditBoard
Aug 9, 2024 · The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, otherwise known as “SOX”, was a major overhaul of corporate financial reporting for public companies.
[65]
From Crisis to Confidence: How SOX Reshaped Audit Quality
Jul 24, 2025 · SOX reshaped the culture of the profession itself, embedding transparency, responsibility, and trust into the DNA of audit firms and the financial reporting ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
[66]
Sarbanes Oxley Act 22 Years Later | Positive Impact of SOX
Aug 26, 2024 · 1. Enhanced Corporate Governance · 2. Improved Financial Reporting and Transparency · 3. Restored Investor Confidence · 4. Increased Accountability.
[67]
[PDF] MiFID 2: Pre- and post-trade transparency - Freshfields
This briefing provides a refresher on the principal changes introduced in MiFID 2 and. MiFIR in relation to pre- and post-trade transparency in financial ...
[68]
[PDF] Manual - | European Securities and Markets Authority
Jul 10, 2023 · On pre-trade and post-trade transparency under MiFID II/ MiFIR. Page ... Post-trade transparency requirements are, in general, applicable to ...
[69]
MiFID II | Transparency and reporting obligations | Global law firm
Firstly, there are general transparency requirements which can be separated into pre-trade and post-trade disclosure of the details of orders submitted to and ...
[70]
Enhancing Transparency in the Structured Finance Market | FDIC.gov
Jun 21, 2023 · The paper contains a number of recommendations that we believe policymakers should consider to improve the transparency of these products.
[71]
[PDF] Economic Consequences of Transparency Regulation: Evidence
We contribute to this literature by showing that transparency regulation designed to benefit consumers may induce firms to take actions to offset their costs ...<|separator|>
[72]
Ownership transparency obligations under Article 6 of the European ...
Nov 15, 2024 · The European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) included ownership transparency obligations among the duties of media service providers under Article 6.
[73]
Media ownership transparency as a shield against foreign interference
Mar 26, 2025 · Transparency of media ownership is a significant factor in fostering trust in the media and ensuring fair economic competition.
[74]
Media Ownership Transparency - Access Info Europe
Aug 30, 2021 · THE TEN RECOMMENDATIONS ON TRANSPARENCY OF MEDIA OWNERSHIP · 1. Disclosure of essential basic information · 2. Information is findable and free · 3 ...
[75]
SPJ's Code of Ethics | Society of Professional Journalists
Sep 6, 2014 · Be Accountable and Transparent Ethical journalism means taking responsibility for one's work and explaining one's decisions to the public. The ...
[76]
Ethics - Radio Television Digital News Association - RTDNA
Transparency requires reflection, reconsideration and honest openness to the possibility that an action, however well intended, was wrong. Ethical journalism ...
[77]
Media Literacy Guide: How to Detect Bias in News Media - FAIR.org
Misuse of anonymous sourcing can compromise transparency and truth. In the lead-up to the Iraq War in 2003, the New York Times relied crucially on anonymous “ ...
[78]
Media Mistrust Has Been Growing for Decades—Does It Matter?
Oct 17, 2024 · Research has found that social media use has led to burnout and news avoidance, fueled general mistrust of all media, and introduced an ...
[79]
Indicators of news media trust - Knight Foundation
Sep 11, 2018 · Republicans (36%) are somewhat less likely than Democrats (43%) and independents (49%) to raise the bias issue in general terms, though 17% of ...Missing: failures | Show results with:failures
[80]
Financial Transparency and Public Disclosure Requirements
Nonprofits are required to disclose certain financial information to the public upon request, and board members must have access to financial information.
[81]
Financial Transparency for Non-Profits: Best Practices for Building ...
Jan 4, 2025 · File your IRS Form 990 annually and make it publicly available. · Stay up to date on state and federal nonprofit reporting requirements. · Ensure ...
[82]
Our Charity Rating Process
Specific criteria include: a. A charity must earn a grade of B+ or higher, as calculated by CharityWatch, for the financial year rated. See the section on How ...
[83]
Nonprofit Transparency Best Practices: Building Donor & Public Trust
There are five key elements of a successful nonprofit financial page: charity ratings, audited financial statements, IRS Form 990s, annual reports, and a ...
[84]
4 Pillars of Nonprofit Financial Transparency - Brady Ware
Apr 1, 2024 · The foundation of this transparency lies in four key financial statements: the Statement of Financial Position, the Statement of Activities, the ...
[85]
Nonprofit Financial Transparency: Best Ways to Build Donor Trust
Nonprofit financial transparency is essential, both legally and ethically, for building trust and accountability to funding sources.
[86]
The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and ...
Jul 25, 2023 · Pooling the Open Science Collaboration replications with 207 other replications from recent years resulted in a higher estimate; 64% of effects ...
[87]
Amid White House claims of a research 'replication crisis,' scientists ...
Jun 17, 2025 · In a 2021 study, a collection of researchers from the nonprofit Center for Open Science attempted to replicate 53 different cancer research ...
[88]
How the Replication Crisis Led to Open Science - Aging Well Lab
Feb 21, 2022 · This issue, referred to as the replication crisis, likely stems from the widespread use of questionable research practices (QRPs). Lemonade vs.
[89]
Open science, the replication crisis, and environmental public health
Concerns about a crisis of mass irreplicability across scientific fields ("the replication crisis") have stimulated a movement for open science, encouraging ...
[90]
Data Management & Sharing Policy Overview - NIH Grants & Funding
Aug 5, 2025 · This page provides information about NIH's scientific data management and sharing policies and repositories, previously available on the NIH ...
[91]
Journal data-sharing policies and its impact in publications: A cross ...
Since 2024, more than 5,000 journals have adhered to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Data Sharing Statement (DSS) to promote data ...
[92]
Transparency in peer review: Exploring the content and tone of ... - NIH
Our study explores 1) how reviewers use the confidential comments section and 2) alignment between comments to the editor and comments to authors with respect ...
[93]
Editorial: It's about time for transparency in peer review - C&EN
Jul 28, 2025 · The lack of suitable incentives for doing peer review, combined with the benefits of anonymity and privacy for reviewers, creates an environment ...
[94]
Can transparency undermine peer review? A simulation model of ...
Jun 2, 2022 · The results would suggest that if referees are sensitive to competition and status, the transparency achieved by open peer review could backfire ...
[95]
Moving peer review transparency from process to praxis | Insights
Oct 2, 2019 · This article argues that scholarly publications should move from peer-review process transparency to a praxis of transparency in peer review.<|separator|>
[96]
The Gatekeepers of Academia: Investigating Bias in Journal ...
Aug 22, 2025 · Academic publishing has been criticised for potential bias in the review process that may have a “gatekeeper” effect on publishing controversial ...
[97]
Open science, the replication crisis, and environmental public health
Aug 17, 2021 · The aims of this paper are to assess (1) whether the replication crisis extends to fields of environmental public health; and (2) in general whether open ...
[98]
Scientific Integrity and Transparency in Academic Writing - NIH
Sep 29, 2024 · Selective censoring, the practice of only including studies that support a particular viewpoint, undermines the credibility of the research.
[99]
Push for transparency in research: Corporations and academic ...
Mar 21, 2025 · To counter concerns about the potential for sponsorships to bias knowledge production, universities have established conflict of interest ...
[100]
Amid a replication crisis in social science research, six-year study ...
Nov 13, 2023 · Amid a replication crisis in social science research, six-year study validates open science methods · Replicating 16 new discoveries · More ...
[101]
THE CONCEPT OF TRANSPARENCY, ITS HISTORY, AND ... - jstor
between transparency and vision so that other meanings can be introduced. The metaphor of transparency has a rich philosophical history, especially for French.
[102]
The idea of total transparency in society clashes with the most ...
Feb 12, 2020 · In the history of philosophy there are those who thought that humanity, in its early days, lived in a kind of society of “total transparency”.
[103]
Transparency in Historical Perspective - The British Academy - DOI
The English philosopher Jeremy Bentham seems to have been the first to use 'transparency' in its modern governance-related sense in English. The chapter also ...
[104]
The Era of Transparency - Oxford Academic
Sep 22, 2022 · The chapter discusses the intellectual roots of transparency, extending to the Enlightenment philosophers, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and Jeremy Bentham.
[105]
Transparency: An Assessment of the Kantian Roots of a Key ...
Transparency, rooted in Kant's human dignity, concerns the form of interaction, not just content, and is defined as openness in communication.
[106]
Johan Brännmark, Ethical Theories and the Transparency Condition
Following John Rawls, writers like Bernard Williams and Christine Korsgaard have suggested that a transparency condition should be put on ethical theories.Missing: origins principle
[107]
[PDF] The ethics of information transparency
Mar 10, 2009 · Recall how transparency can enable (or impair) ethical principles (Fig. 1) and consider the schematisation of the production process of ...
[108]
(PDF) The ethics of information transparency - ResearchGate
Mar 10, 2009 · It argues that transparency is not an ethical principle in itself but a pro-ethical condition for enabling or impairing other ethical practices ...
[109]
The ethics of information transparency - ACM Digital Library
It argues that transparency is not an ethical principle in itself but a pro-ethical condition for enabling or impairing other ethical practices or principles.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[110]
Seeing Through Transparency | Issue 158 - Philosophy Now
My point is that as it turns out, total transparency is the best manner of being hidden. Transparency is not hypervisiblity, it is invisibility. Transparency ...
[111]
The Principle of Transparency | Good Governance - Oxford Academic
The most fundamental reason to have a principle of transparency is the need for legitimacy of the government. But transparency also assists internal ...
[112]
[PDF] Is Transparency the Best Disinfectant? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect ...
We conducted a meta-analysis of. 56 empirical studies to estimate the overall effect size of transparency on corruption. The analysis shows that that ...
[113]
Do transparency mechanisms reduce government corruption? A ...
Aug 31, 2021 · This article presents a meta-analysis of empirical studies to examine the role of transparency mechanisms for curbing corruption.
[114]
https://academic.oup.com/jpart/article/33/3/453/6712384
[115]
The benefits and implementation of performance transparency
This article provides convincing empirical evidence for the benefits of performance transparency and the ways in which management may implement it successfully.Abstract · Transparency On The Rise · References (22)<|separator|>
[116]
Transparency to curb corruption? Concepts, measures and ...
Jul 15, 2017 · Policymakers and researchers often cite the importance of government transparency for strengthening accountability, reducing corruption, ...
[117]
Transparency and Corruption: A General Analysis
Monitoring deters corruption just as patrol cars deter speeding. But sunlight does something else too. It lowers the transaction costs of corrupt bargaining. II ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[118]
Making Transparency Effective in Reducing Corruption
Aug 5, 2025 · Transparency is presumed to lower corruption. However, research shows that transparency promotion is ineffective in the absence of free media ...
[119]
[PDF] Onora O'Neill Reith Lectures 2002: A Question of Trust ... - BBC
This high road is built on new technologies that are ideal for achieving transparency and openness. It has become cheap and easy to spread information, indeed.
[120]
The Reith Lectures, Onora O'Neill - Trust and Transparency - BBC
Onora O'Neill discusses the issue of transparency. She argues as well as improving trust, it can also add to the ways in which the public can be deceived.
[121]
Transparency is Surveillance - Nguyen - 2022 - Wiley Online Library
Aug 2, 2021 · People think that trust and transparency go together but in reality, says O'Neill, they are deeply opposed.
[122]
The Transparency Paradox: A Role for Privacy in Organizational ...
I introduce the notion of a transparency paradox, whereby maintaining observability of workers may counterintuitively reduce their performance.
[123]
Lying increases trust in science | Theory and Society
Jul 9, 2025 · It's commonly thought that opacity negatively affects authority and that transparency increases public trust in experts, professionals, science, ...
[124]
[PDF] A Question of Trust - Assets - Cambridge University Press
Although we cannot curse those who breach trust, let alone expel them from paradise, we take elaborate steps to deter and prevent deception and fraud: we set.
[125]
The Downside of Transparent Decision Making - Kellogg Insight
Jan 4, 2018 · According to a recent analysis by a pair of Kellogg School researchers, requiring transparency may actually yield less information than allowing deliberations ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[126]
[PDF] Seeing through Transparency - PhilPapers
Transparency, in philosophy of mind, means that when introspecting an experience, you are only aware of external objects and their properties, not the ...
[127]
Everything is Clear: All Perceptual Experiences are Transparent
Sep 24, 2016 · According to the transparency claim, when we introspect our perceptual experiences we do not seem to be aware of qualities of our experience.
[128]
The Transparency Society | Stanford University Press
Transparency is the order of the day. It is a term, a slogan, that dominates public discourse about corruption and freedom of information.
[129]
The art of transparency - PMC - PubMed Central
Oct 27, 2011 · Artists throughout the ages have discovered a number of techniques to depict transparency. With only a few exceptions, these techniques follow closely the ...
[130]
(PDF) The Art of Transparency - ResearchGate
Artists throughout the ages have discovered a number of techniques to depict transparency. With only a few exceptions, these techniques follow closely the ...
[131]
Transparency & Light in Glass & Art | Corning Museum of Glass
Feb 18, 2015 · Crystal clarity in an art object might indicate purity or enlightenment. When glass is clear light will be transmitted through it. This means ...Missing: symbolism | Show results with:symbolism
[132]
417: Transparency in Architecture and Beyond - MoMA
Oct 25, 2021 · Architects and artists engaged with the aesthetic potentials and symbolic pitfalls of transparency throughout the 20th century.
[133]
Transparency and Opacity - University of Alaska Fairbanks
Transparency in 2D design is simply the quality of being able to see through (or partially see through) one or more layers in an artwork. Like texture, ...
[134]
Transparency, Translucency, Opacity - MINDFUL PLEASURES
Jun 2, 2012 · The transparent is a plain style, eschewing complex sentence structures and figurative language, but not all plain styles are transparent.
[135]
[PDF] On Narrative Opacity and Literary Truth
In this way, the more general or vague the reader's approach to a text is, the more transparent the text will be, making it easier for a bookseller to recommend ...
[136]
Surveillance and Transparency Theme in The Circle - LitCharts
The Circle explores surveillance, which damages human interaction, and the idea of "transparency" as a dangerous, slippery slope that violates freedom.<|separator|>
[137]
The Opacity of Narrative - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
Jul 31, 2015 · Transparency is the converse of opacity: it is a way of reading that construes the events and characters as though they were part of a ...
[138]
Economics of Streaming & the Rise of the Music Artists' Rights and ...
Feb 24, 2025 · The streaming services keep approximately 30% of the money collected whilst record labels keep about 55% of artists' revenues, leaving the ...
[139]
Loud & Clear
This site aims to increase transparency by sharing new data on Spotify's royalty payments and breaking down the global streaming economy.
[140]
David Byrne calls for transparency from labels and streaming services
Aug 5, 2025 · In a new op-ed for The New York Times, he's calling for transparency in how streaming revenues are divided. Byrne's piece, titled "Open the ...
[141]
What the streaming transparency code means for songwriters and ...
Aug 6, 2024 · What the UK's Code on Transparency in Music Streaming means for songwriters and composers · Clear contracts · Detailed royalty calculations ...<|separator|>
[142]
How Real-Time Royalties Are Revolutionizing the Music Industry
Feb 25, 2025 · The advent of real-time royalties is transforming this landscape, offering immediate compensation and greater transparency.
[143]
Music Has a Transparency Problem - The Bona Venture
Nov 15, 2024 · By manipulating royalty classifications, record labels can potentially delay payments, claiming that past advances or production costs are still ...
[144]
How Hollywood gaslights WGA strikers, Uncle Sam and Darth Vader ...
May 11, 2023 · Hollywood expects WGA strikers, along with everyone else, to believe that some of the most successful movies in history made no profit.
[145]
Hollywood Accounting: Why Every Creator Needs an Audit Clause
Feb 19, 2025 · This small but mighty clause is a proactive tool that seeks to increase transparency and accountability, giving creators the right to review and verify the ...
[146]
The New Hollywood Is Making Backend Deals Less Transparent ...
Aug 1, 2024 · For decades, the entertainment industry has complained that so-called “Hollywood accounting” has been used to hide movie and TV profits as ...<|separator|>
[147]
Breaking The Chain; How Blockchain Is Sponsoring More Equity ...
Aug 24, 2022 · Transparency in Ownership and Contributions. At every given time in Hollywood, there are court disputes between producers and directors or ...<|separator|>
[148]
The Power of the Independent Ecosystem: Freedom, Ethics, and ...
Built on core values like creative freedom, fairness, sustainability, and transparency, the indie ecosystem is driving real change and generating billions in ...Missing: entertainment | Show results with:entertainment
[149]
Show Me the Money: The Battle Over Streaming Royalties and ...
Aug 11, 2025 · Artists are calling for: Clear, auditable reporting of streams and views. Simplified royalty statements showing exactly where the money goes.