Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Standard error

The standard error (SE) is a fundamental statistical concept defined as the estimated standard deviation of the sampling distribution of a statistic, such as the sample mean, which quantifies the precision with which the statistic estimates the corresponding population parameter.^[1] It measures the variability expected in the statistic across repeated random samples from the same population, providing an indication of how closely a sample-based estimate approximates the true value.^[2] Distinct from the standard deviation (SD), which describes the dispersion of individual data points within a single sample, the standard error focuses on inferential uncertainty and decreases as sample size increases, reflecting greater reliability in larger samples.^[1] For the standard error of the mean (SEM), the most commonly used form, the formula is SEM = s / √n, where s is the sample standard deviation and n is the sample size; this relationship demonstrates that precision improves with the square root of the number of observations.^[2]^[1] The standard error plays a central role in statistical inference, enabling the construction of confidence intervals—such as the 95% interval approximated by the sample mean ± 1.96 × SEM—and hypothesis testing, where test statistics like the t-value are computed as (observed value - hypothesized value) / SE to evaluate significance.^[1] It is widely applied in fields like clinical research, survey sampling, and regression analysis to assess uncertainty in estimates, such as polling results or experimental outcomes, ensuring robust generalizations from data.^[2]

Definition and Fundamentals

Definition

The standard error (SE) of a statistic is the standard deviation of its sampling distribution, which quantifies the precision of the estimate derived from a sample drawn from a population.^[3] This measure focuses on sampling variability rather than the inherent variability within the population data itself, as it describes how much the statistic would fluctuate if repeated samples of the same size were drawn from the population multiple times.^[4] A smaller standard error indicates a more precise estimate, typically achieved with larger sample sizes or reduced population variance.^[3] The general formula for the standard error of an estimator \hat{\theta} of a population parameter \theta is

\text{SE}(\hat{\theta}) = \sqrt{\text{Var}(\hat{\theta})}

where \text{Var}(\hat{\theta}) is the variance of the sampling distribution of \hat{\theta}.^[4]

Relation to Sampling Distribution

The sampling distribution of a statistic is the probability distribution that describes the possible values of that statistic across all possible random samples of a fixed size drawn from a population. It provides a theoretical framework for understanding the variability in estimates obtained from samples. The standard error of a statistic is precisely the standard deviation of its sampling distribution, quantifying the expected variability or precision of the statistic as an estimator of the population parameter.^[5]^[6] The Central Limit Theorem (CLT) plays a pivotal role in characterizing the sampling distribution, stating that for sufficiently large sample sizes, the distribution of the sample mean (or other linear statistics) will approximate a normal distribution, regardless of the underlying population distribution, provided the samples are independent and identically distributed. Under the CLT, this normal sampling distribution is centered at the true population parameter, with its spread determined by the standard error. This convergence to normality holds asymptotically as the sample size increases, enabling reliable inferences even from non-normal populations.^[7]^[8] This asymptotic normality facilitated by the standard error underpins key inferential procedures in statistics. For large samples, the standard error allows for the construction of confidence intervals around the statistic using z-scores from the standard normal distribution, where the interval captures the population parameter with a specified probability. Similarly, it supports hypothesis testing by standardizing the statistic to assess deviations from a null hypothesis value. These applications rely on the standard error's role in scaling the sampling distribution to reflect precision.^[9]^[10] A conceptual illustration of these ideas can be seen in estimating the proportion of heads from coin flips, assuming a fair coin with a true population proportion of 0.5. If one repeatedly draws samples of, say, 100 flips and computes the sample proportion each time, the resulting sampling distribution of these proportions would center around 0.5, with variability measured by the standard error, becoming increasingly normal-shaped for larger sample sizes due to the CLT. This setup demonstrates how the standard error captures the typical deviation of sample proportions from the true value across hypothetical repeated sampling.^[5]

Standard Error of the Sample Mean

Exact Formula

The standard error of the sample mean, denoted as SE(\bar{x}), quantifies the precision with which the sample mean \bar{x} estimates the population mean \mu when the population standard deviation \sigma is known. For a sample of n independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables drawn from the population, the exact formula is given by

\text{SE}(\bar{x}) = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}.

This formula applies under the assumptions that \sigma is known and the random variables are i.i.d., with the population distribution being normal or the sample size n sufficiently large to invoke the central limit theorem for approximate normality of the sampling distribution.^[11]^[12] The standard error decreases proportionally to $1/\sqrt{n}, illustrating the law of large numbers: as the sample size increases, the sample mean becomes a more precise estimator of the population mean, with variability shrinking at the square root rate.^[11]^[12] A brief proof sketch derives this from the variance of the sample mean. Since the variables are i.i.d. with variance \sigma^2, the variance of \bar{x} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n X_i is \text{Var}(\bar{x}) = \frac{\sigma^2}{n}, and the standard error is the square root: \sqrt{\text{Var}(\bar{x})} = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}.^[11]

Estimation from Sample

When the population standard deviation \sigma is unknown, the standard error of the sample mean \bar{x} is estimated using the sample standard deviation s, given by

\hat{SE}(\bar{x}) = \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}},

where n is the sample size and

s = \sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \bar{x})^2}{n-1}}.

^[13]^[14] The denominator n-1 in the formula for s incorporates Bessel's correction, ensuring that the sample variance s^2 = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \bar{x})^2}{n-1} provides an unbiased estimate of the population variance \sigma^2, as E[s^2] = \sigma^2.^[15]^[16] Although s^2 is unbiased for \sigma^2, the square root operation introduces bias in s, such that E < \sigma, making \hat{SE}(\bar{x}) a slightly biased downward estimator of the true standard error \sigma / \sqrt{n}.^[15] Despite this bias, \hat{SE}(\bar{x}) is consistent: as n \to \infty, it converges in probability to \sigma / \sqrt{n}.^[15] For data from a normal distribution, the expected value of the estimator is E[\hat{SE}(\bar{x})] \approx \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}} \sqrt{\frac{n-1}{n}}, reflecting the downward bias which diminishes with larger n.^[15] The root mean squared error (RMSE) of \hat{SE}(\bar{x}) quantifies its overall accuracy and exceeds the true standard error due to both bias and variance, but approaches \sigma / \sqrt{n} asymptotically; specifically, RMSE(\hat{SE}(\bar{x})) = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}} \sqrt{2(1 - c_4(n))}, where c_4(n) = \sqrt{2/(n-1)} \cdot \Gamma(n/2) / \Gamma((n-1)/2) is the bias correction factor with c_4(n) \to 1 as n increases.^[15]

Derivation

The standard error of the sample mean, denoted as \text{SE}(\bar{x}), is the square root of the variance of the sample mean \bar{x}. To derive this variance for a fixed sample size n, consider a random sample X_1, X_2, \dots, X_n drawn from a population with mean \mu and finite variance \sigma^2, where the X_i are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.). The sample mean is defined as

\bar{X} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n X_i.

The variance of \bar{X} follows from the properties of variance for linear combinations of random variables. Specifically, the variance of a constant multiple of a sum is the constant squared times the variance of the sum, and for independent variables, the variance of the sum is the sum of the variances.^[17] Applying these properties step by step:

\text{Var}(\bar{X}) = \text{Var}\left( \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n X_i \right) = \frac{1}{n^2} \text{Var}\left( \sum_{i=1}^n X_i \right).

Since the X_i are independent,

\text{Var}\left( \sum_{i=1}^n X_i \right) = \sum_{i=1}^n \text{Var}(X_i).

Under the i.i.d. assumption, each \text{Var}(X_i) = \sigma^2, so

\sum_{i=1}^n \text{Var}(X_i) = n \sigma^2.

Substituting back yields

\text{Var}(\bar{X}) = \frac{1}{n^2} \cdot n \sigma^2 = \frac{\sigma^2}{n}.

Thus, the standard error is \text{SE}(\bar{X}) = \sqrt{\text{Var}(\bar{X})} = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}. This result relies on the linearity of variance and the independence of the observations.^[17] For i.i.d. variables that are not normally distributed but have finite mean and variance, the Central Limit Theorem (CLT) ensures that the distribution of the standardized sample mean Z_n = \frac{\bar{X} - \mu}{\sigma / \sqrt{n}} converges to a standard normal distribution as n \to \infty. This approximate normality underpins the use of the standard error in inference procedures, such as confidence intervals and hypothesis tests, even when the population distribution is non-normal.^[18] In cases where the sample size n is itself random but independent of the observations, the variance of \bar{X} becomes E[\sigma^2 / n], though the focus here remains on the fixed-n scenario for the core derivation.^[17]

Handling Unknown Population Variance

Student's t-Distribution Approximation

When the population standard deviation \sigma is unknown, the standard error of the mean is estimated using the sample standard deviation s, leading to additional uncertainty in statistical inference. In this scenario, the t-statistic is employed:

t = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu}{s / \sqrt{n}},

where \bar{x} is the sample mean, \mu is the population mean, s is the sample standard deviation, and n is the sample size. Under the assumption of normally distributed population data, this t-statistic follows a Student's t-distribution with n-1 degrees of freedom.^[19]^[20] The Student's t-distribution is preferred over the standard normal (z) distribution because the estimation of s introduces extra variability into the denominator of the t-statistic, resulting in heavier tails compared to the normal distribution, especially for small sample sizes. This adjustment provides more accurate probability statements for small samples by accounting for the sampling variability in s. As the sample size n increases, the t-distribution converges to the standard normal distribution, since s becomes a more precise estimate of \sigma, allowing the z-approximation to suffice for large n.^[20]^[21] For constructing confidence intervals around the population mean when \sigma is unknown, the formula is

\bar{x} \pm t_{\alpha/2, n-1} \cdot \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}},

where t_{\alpha/2, n-1} is the critical value from the t-distribution for a (1 - \alpha) \times 100\% confidence level and n-1 degrees of freedom. Critical values are typically obtained from t-distribution tables or statistical software, with the interval widening for smaller n due to the heavier tails of the t-distribution.^[22] This approach was pioneered by William Sealy Gosset, who published under the pseudonym "Student" in 1908 while working as a brewer at the Guinness company, developing it specifically to handle inference from small samples in quality control processes.^[23]

Degrees of Freedom Adjustment

In the standard case of estimating the standard error of the sample mean with unknown population variance under equal-variance assumptions, the degrees of freedom (df) is defined as n - 1, where n is the sample size. This value arises because one degree of freedom is lost when the sample mean is estimated and subtracted from the data to compute the sample variance, reducing the number of independent pieces of information available for variance estimation.^[24]^[25] The degrees of freedom parameter shapes the Student's t-distribution, which is used for inference involving the standard error. For small df (e.g., small sample sizes), the t-distribution exhibits heavier tails compared to the standard normal distribution, accounting for the additional uncertainty in the estimated standard error; as df increases, the t-distribution converges to the normal distribution. The variance of a t-distributed random variable T with \nu > 2 degrees of freedom is given by

\operatorname{Var}(T) = \frac{\nu}{\nu - 2},

which exceeds 1 for finite \nu and approaches 1 as \nu \to \infty, reflecting the progressive reduction in tail heaviness.^[26]^[27] In the equal-variance case, this df adjustment ensures appropriate critical values for t-tests and confidence intervals based on the standard error. For scenarios with unequal variances, such as in two-sample comparisons, Welch's t-test modifies the degrees of freedom via the Welch-Satterthwaite equation, which approximates df as a non-integer value to better control error rates without assuming variance equality.^[28] Simulation studies demonstrate the practical importance of this adjustment: applying the z-distribution (normal approximation) instead of the t-distribution when using the estimated standard error with small samples inflates the Type I error rate, as the z-test's narrower critical regions lead to excessive null hypothesis rejections under the true null. For instance, in multilevel regression contexts with small effective sample sizes, the z-approach can yield Type I error rates substantially above the nominal 5% level, whereas the t-test maintains better control.^[29]

Assumptions and Practical Usage

Core Assumptions

The calculation and valid use of the standard error of the sample mean rely on several core statistical assumptions to ensure that it accurately reflects the variability of the sample mean as an estimator of the population mean. Primarily, the observations in the sample must be independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.), meaning each observation is drawn independently of the others with no correlation or dependence structure, and all share the same probability distribution with a common mean and finite variance. Violations of independence, such as in clustered or time-series data where observations are correlated, typically lead to an underestimation of the standard error, resulting in overly narrow confidence intervals and inflated Type I error rates in inference. Similarly, the identical distribution assumption encompasses homoscedasticity (constant variance across the population) and a shared population mean; deviations, like heteroscedasticity, can distort the standard error by misrepresenting the true spread of the sampling distribution. For exact inference using the standard error—such as in t-tests or confidence intervals—the population from which the sample is drawn is assumed to be normally distributed, allowing the sampling distribution of the mean to also be normal regardless of sample size. However, this normality requirement can be relaxed for approximate inference when the sample size is sufficiently large (typically n ≥ 30), invoking the central limit theorem (CLT), which states that the sampling distribution of the mean approaches normality under i.i.d. conditions with finite variance, even if the underlying population is not normal. The CLT thus provides asymptotic justification for using the standard error in large samples, prioritizing the precision of the approximation over strict normality. Additionally, the sample must be obtained via random sampling from an infinite or well-defined finite population to ensure representativeness and unbiased estimation of population parameters. This assumption underpins the standard error's role in quantifying sampling variability; non-random processes, such as convenience sampling, can introduce selection bias that invalidates the standard error. In practice, issues like non-response in surveys can exacerbate this by creating systematic differences between respondents and non-respondents, leading to biased means and potentially unreliable standard errors that fail to capture the true uncertainty.

Distinction from Standard Deviation

The standard deviation (SD) quantifies the dispersion of individual data points around the mean in a sample or population, serving as a fixed measure of variability for that specific dataset.^[30] It describes how much the observations typically deviate from the average, providing insight into the inherent spread of the data without reference to sampling processes.^[6] For instance, in a study of human heights, the SD would capture the variability among individual measurements in the group, remaining constant regardless of how the sample is drawn or its size.^[1] In contrast, the standard error (SE) assesses the precision of a sample statistic, such as the mean, as an estimate of the corresponding population parameter, reflecting variability across repeated samples from the same population.^[30] Unlike the SD, the SE decreases as the sample size increases, because larger samples yield more reliable estimates of the population value—often shrinking proportionally to the square root of the sample size.^[6] This makes the SE a tool for inference, highlighting the uncertainty in using the sample mean to infer the true population mean, rather than describing the data's internal spread.^[31] A common source of confusion arises from the similar terminology and the fact that the SE is derived from the SD, leading researchers to interchangeably report them in descriptive contexts.^[30] For example, while the SD is appropriate for summarizing the variability in individual heights within a sample (descriptive purpose), the SE is used for evaluating the reliability of the average height as an estimate for the broader population (inferential purpose).^[1] This distinction is critical in statistical reporting to avoid misinterpretation of data precision.^[6] In visualizations such as graphs, this difference manifests in the choice of error bars: those based on SD illustrate the spread of the raw data points, emphasizing individual variability, whereas error bars using SE depict the uncertainty surrounding the mean, aiding in the assessment of statistical reliability across samples.^[32]

Extensions to Other Scenarios

Finite Population Correction

When sampling without replacement from a finite population of size N, the standard error of the sample mean must be adjusted to account for the reduced variability compared to sampling from an infinite population. This adjustment, known as the finite population correction (FPC), modifies the standard formula for the standard error \text{SE}(\bar{x}) = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}, where \sigma is the population standard deviation and n is the sample size, by multiplying it by the factor \sqrt{\frac{N - n}{N - 1}}. Thus, the corrected standard error is \text{SE}(\bar{x}) = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}} \sqrt{\frac{N - n}{N - 1}}.^[33] The FPC is applied when the sample represents a substantial portion of the population, typically when the sampling fraction \frac{n}{N} > 0.05 (or 5%), as this is when the correction meaningfully reduces the standard error; for larger N relative to n, the factor approaches 1 and the adjustment becomes negligible.^[34]^[35] This correction arises from the exact variance of the sample mean under simple random sampling without replacement, which is \text{Var}(\bar{x}) = \frac{\sigma^2}{n} \cdot \frac{N - n}{N - 1}, reflecting the dependence introduced by depleting the population and the hypergeometric-like nature of the sampling process that limits the possible range of sample outcomes. (Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley, Section 2.6.) For example, consider a survey estimating the mean income from a finite population of 1,000 employees, drawing a sample of 100 without replacement; assuming \sigma = 500, the uncorrected SE is $500 / \sqrt{100} = 50, but applying the FPC gives $50 \times \sqrt{(1000 - 100)/(1000 - 1)} \approx 50 \times 0.949 = 47.45, illustrating a modest reduction in estimated precision due to the finite size.^[36]

Adjustments for Correlated Data

When observations within a sample exhibit correlation, such as in paired designs, clustered sampling, or repeated measures on the same units, the assumption of independence underlying the standard formula for the standard error of the mean no longer holds. This correlation reduces the effective sample size and inflates the variance of estimators like the sample mean. The impact is quantified through the intraclass correlation coefficient \rho, which measures the proportion of total variance attributable to similarities within clusters or pairs. For clustered or paired data, the variance of the sample mean \bar{x} adjusts to account for this dependence. Specifically,

\operatorname{Var}(\bar{x}) = \frac{\sigma^2}{N} \left[1 + (\bar{n}-1)\rho \right],

where \sigma^2 is the marginal variance of the observations, N = m \bar{n} is the total sample size, m is the number of clusters, \bar{n} is the average cluster size, and the term [1 + (\bar{n}-1)\rho] is the design effect that scales up the variance relative to independent sampling. This adjustment, originally derived in the context of survey sampling, demonstrates that even modest positive \rho (e.g., 0.05) can substantially increase the standard error when \bar{n} is large, necessitating larger samples to achieve the same precision.^[37] In regression analyses with correlated errors due to clustering, cluster-robust standard errors address both intra-cluster correlation and heteroscedasticity using the sandwich estimator. This approach estimates the covariance matrix as (\mathbf{X}^\top \mathbf{X})^{-1} (\sum_{g=1}^G \mathbf{X}_g^\top \mathbf{e}_g \mathbf{e}_g^\top \mathbf{X}_g) (\mathbf{X}^\top \mathbf{X})^{-1}, where g indexes clusters, \mathbf{X}_g are the regressors for cluster g, and \mathbf{e}_g are the residuals; it provides consistent inference without specifying the correlation structure within clusters. The method was extended for use in generalized estimating equations by Liang and Zeger (1986), making it widely applicable in longitudinal and clustered designs. For time series data exhibiting autocorrelation, standard errors require adjustment to capture serial dependence. The Newey-West estimator constructs a heteroskedasticity- and autocorrelation-consistent covariance matrix by incorporating a Bartlett-weighted sum of sample autocovariances up to a truncation lag l, ensuring positive semi-definiteness and consistency under mild conditions on the lag selection. Proposed by Newey and West (1987), this kernel-based approach is particularly useful in econometric applications where observations are ordered and correlated over time, preventing underestimation of uncertainty in coefficient inferences.^[38] An illustrative example arises in repeated measures studies, where multiple observations per subject induce positive intraclass correlation. Suppose a study collects 10 blood pressure readings per participant across 50 subjects, with \rho = 0.3; the design effect is then $1 + 9 \times 0.3 = 3.7, inflating the standard error of the mean by \sqrt{3.7} \approx 1.92 relative to treating all 500 readings as independent. Failing to adjust for this correlation, as in naive analyses, can lead to overly narrow confidence intervals and inflated Type I error rates, underscoring the need for these corrections in designs with within-unit dependence.^[39]

Standard Errors for Other Statistics

The standard error of a sample proportion \hat{p}, which estimates the population proportion p in a binomial setting, is given by \sqrt{\frac{\hat{p}(1 - \hat{p})}{n}}, where n is the sample size; this approximation relies on the normal distribution for large n (typically n\hat{p} \geq 5 and n(1 - \hat{p}) \geq 5)./06%3A_Sampling_Distributions/6.03%3A_The_Sample_Proportion) For more complex proportions or when exact binomial inference is needed, the delta method provides asymptotic approximations by linearizing the variance around the estimate.^[40] In linear regression, the standard error of an estimated coefficient \hat{\beta}_j is derived from the variance-covariance matrix of the estimators, specifically \sqrt{\hat{\sigma}^2 \left( (X^T X)^{-1} \right)_{jj} }, where \hat{\sigma}^2 is the estimated residual variance and (X^T X)^{-1}_{jj} is the j-th diagonal element of the inverse design matrix; this quantifies the precision of \hat{\beta}_j under ordinary least squares assumptions of homoscedasticity and independence.^[41] This formula extends to multiple regression, where off-diagonal elements capture correlations among coefficients, aiding inference via t-tests. For the sample variance s^2 from a normal distribution with population variance \sigma^2, the standard error is approximately \sqrt{\frac{2\sigma^4}{n-1}}, or more precisely using the estimated \hat{\sigma}^4 in practice; this arises from the chi-squared distribution of (n-1)s^2 / \sigma^2, which has variance $2(n-1).^[42] This measure is crucial for confidence intervals on variance components in ANOVA or quality control. The delta method generalizes standard error estimation for a function g(\hat{\theta}) of an asymptotically normal estimator \hat{\theta}, yielding \text{SE}[g(\hat{\theta})] \approx |g'(\theta)| \cdot \text{SE}(\hat{\theta}), based on a first-order Taylor expansion; it is widely used for nonlinear transformations like ratios or logs in econometric and biostatistical models.^[40] Recent advancements in the 2020s include robust variants for non-i.i.d. data, such as the implicit delta method, which regularizes predictive models to improve uncertainty quantification in machine learning contexts, and equivalences shown between delta approximations and cluster-robust covariance matrices in panel data, enhancing reliability under heteroscedasticity or dependence.^[43]^[44]

References

[1]
Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Understanding standard ...
Nov 12, 2013 · A standard error is defined as "a standard deviation of the sampling distribution of a statistic" as mentioned above. Size of a standard error ...
[2]
What is a standard error? - PMC - NIH
In statistics, the standard error has a clear technical definition: it is the estimated standard deviation of a parameter estimate.
[3]
6.2 The Sampling Distribution of the Sample Mean (σ Known)
Standard deviation is the square root of variance, so the standard deviation of the sampling distribution (aka standard error) is the standard deviation of ...
[4]
Sampling distributions & Central Limit Theorem - Stat@Duke
The standard error is the standard deviation of the sampling distribution, calculated using sample statistics (since we don't know the population parameters ...
[5]
4.1 - Sampling Distributions - STAT ONLINE
An important aspect of a sampling distribution is the standard error (SE). The standard error is the standard deviation of a sampling distribution. For a single ...
[6]
Standard deviations and standard errors - PMC - NIH
Oct 15, 2005 · The standard error of the sample mean depends on both the standard deviation and the sample size, by the simple relation SE = SD/√(sample size).
[7]
7.1 The Central Limit Theorem for Sample Means (Averages)
Dec 13, 2023 · As sample sizes increase, the distribution of means more closely follows the normal distribution. The normal distribution has the same mean as ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[8]
5.3: Using the Central Limit Theorem - Statistics LibreTexts
Jun 24, 2024 · The Central Limit Theorem provides more than the proof that the sampling distribution of the sample mean is normally distributed.
[9]
Central Limit Theorem & Standard Error | CFA Level 1 - AnalystPrep
The standard error of the sample mean gives analysts an idea of how precisely the sample mean estimates the population mean. A lower standard error value ...
[10]
Central Limit Theorem | Formula, Definition & Examples - Scribbr
Jul 6, 2022 · The central limit theorem states that if you take sufficiently large samples from a population, the samples' means will be normally distributed.
[11]
Fisher (1925) Chapter 5 - Classics in the History of Psychology
Standard error of mean of differences. -- The following table gives the ... meaning given to it by mathematical definition. In certain cases both ...
[12]
https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.3.220
[13]
What Is Standard Error? | How to Calculate (Guide with Examples)
Dec 11, 2020 · Standard error indicates how different a population mean is likely to be from a sample mean, and is a measure of sampling error.Why standard error matters · Standard error formula · How should you report the...
[14]
Standard Error of the Mean (SEM) - Statistics By Jim
In this post the standard error of the mean is calculated from a single sample by using the formula (standard deviation obtained from a single sample divided by ...
[15]
None
**Summary of Estimators of σ from a Normal Population**
[16]
8.2.2 Point Estimators for Mean and Variance - Probability Course
Although the sample standard deviation is usually used as an estimator for the standard deviation, it is a biased estimator. To see this, note that S is random, ...
[17]
24.4 - Mean and Variance of Sample Mean | STAT 414
We'll finally accomplish what we set out to do in this lesson, namely to determine the theoretical mean and variance of the continuous random variable.
[18]
Central Limit Theorem - Probability Course
The central limit theorem (CLT) states that the sum of a large number of random variables is approximately normal under certain conditions.
[19]
7.2.2. Are the data consistent with the assumed process mean?
The more typical case is where the standard deviation must be estimated from the data, and the test statistic is t = Y ¯ − μ 0 s / N , where the sample mean is ...
[20]
10.2 - T-Test: When Population Variance is Unknown | STAT 415
Let's turn our attention to the realistic situation in which both the population mean and population variance are unknown.
[21]
[PDF] pdf
In the present context, degrees of freedom = sample size -1 = n – 1. As n goes to infinity, the t-distribution converges to the standard normal distribution.
[22]
2.5 - A t-Interval for a Mean | STAT 415
So far, we have shown that the formula: x ¯ ± z α / 2 ( σ n ). is appropriate for finding a confidence interval for a population mean if two conditions are ...
[23]
THE PROBABLE ERROR OF A MEAN | Biometrika - Oxford Academic
STUDENT; THE PROBABLE ERROR OF A MEAN, Biometrika, Volume 6, Issue 1, 1 March 1908, Pages 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/6.1.1.
[24]
A Single Population Mean using the Student t Distribution
For example, if we have a sample of size n = 20 items, then we calculate the degrees of freedom as df = n – 1 = 20 – 1 = 19 and we write the distribution as T ~ ...
[25]
Stats: Estimating the Mean
A degree of freedom occurs for every data value which is allowed to vary once a statistic has been fixed. For a single mean, there are n-1 degrees of freedom.
[26]
R: The Student t Distribution
It has mean 0 (for n > 1) and variance n/(n-2) (for n > 2). The general non-central t with parameters (df,Del) = (df, ncp) is defined as a the distribution of T ...
[27]
[PDF] STAT 515 -- Chapter 6: Sampling Distributions - Definition ...
The fewer the degrees of freedom, the more spread out the t-distribution is. As the d.f. increase, the t-distribution gets closer to the standard normal.<|control11|><|separator|>
[28]
t-Tests
There is also a widely used modification of the t-test, known as Welch's t-test that adjusts the number of degrees of freedom when the variances are thought ...
[29]
[PDF] Degrees Of Freedom Statistics
Two-Sample t-Test (Unequal Variances - Welch's Test): Degrees of freedom. 3. are estimated using the Welch–Satterthwaite equation, which can yield non-integer.
[30]
[PDF] Significance Testing in Multilevel Regression
regularly but with smaller sample sizes the z-test approach will suffer from inflated Type I errors (van der. Leeden, Busing & Meijer. 1997). A safer ...
[31]
In Brief: Standard Deviation and Standard Error - PMC
When the standard error relates to a mean it is called the standard error of the mean; otherwise only the term standard error is used. For instance, in the ...
[32]
[PDF] Differences between the Standard Deviation and Standard Error ...
Oct 1, 1996 · The SD is an index of the variability of the original data points and should be reported in all studies. The SE reflects the variability of the ...
[33]
Using Error Bars in your Graph
The standard error is calculated by dividing the standard deviation by the square root of number of measurements that make up the mean (often represented by N).
[34]
Introduction to Survey Data Analysis with Stata 9 - OARC Stats - UCLA
The formula for calculating the FPC is ((N-n)/(N-1))1/2, where N is the number of elements in the population and n is the number of elements in the sample. To ...Simple Random Sample · Stratified Random Sampling · Systematic Sampling
[35]
Finite Population Correction Factor FPC: Formula, Examples
The Finite Population Correction Factor (FPC) is used when you sample without replacement from more than 5% of a finite population.
[36]
What is the Finite Population Correction Factor? - Statology
Nov 27, 2020 · To apply a finite population correction, simply multiply it by the standard error that you would have originally used. For example, the standard ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[37]
[PDF] Finite Population Correction Methods
May 5, 2017 · The central limit, the standard error of the sample mean and traditional bootstrap methods are based on the principle that samples are selected ...
[38]
[PDF] survey sampling
Sep 21, 2007 · Throughout the book the reader's attention is called to possible frame defects and their effects on sample design. Problems invite the reader to ...
[39]
A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and ... - jstor
3 (May, 1987), 703-708. A SIMPLE, POSITIVE SEMI-DEFINITE, HETEROSKEDASTICITY AND. AUTOCORRELATION CONSISTENT COVARIANCE MATRIX. BY WHITNEY K. NEWEY AND KENNETH ...
[40]
The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient in Mixed Models
The ratio of the between-cluster variance to the total variance is the Intraclass Correlation. It tells you the proportion of the total variance in Y that the ...
[41]
What is the Delta Method? - CRAN
Nov 21, 2020 · The delta method is a general method for deriving the variance of a function of asymptotically normal random variables with known variance.
[42]
[PDF] Standard errors for regression coefficients; Multicollinearity
The first formula uses the standard error of the estimate. The second formula makes it clearer how standard errors are related to R. 2 .<|separator|>
[43]
[PDF] Standard Errors of Mean, Variance, and Standard Deviation Estimators
Jul 24, 2003 · A standard error of a statistic (or estimator) is the (estimated) standard deviation of the statistic. An error bar is, in a plot, a line.
[44]
[PDF] The Implicit Delta Method
In this paper, we propose an alternative, the implicit delta method, which works by in- finitesimally regularizing the training loss of the predictive model to ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[45]
The equivalence of the Delta method and the cluster-robust variance ...
May 31, 2021 · In this paper we prove they are equivalent and in the canonical implementation they should give exactly the same result.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s