Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Survival function

The survival function, denoted as S(t), is a fundamental function in and , defined as the probability that a subject, system, or process survives or remains functional beyond a specified time t, mathematically expressed as S(t) = P(T > t) = 1 - F(t), where T represents the for the time until an event (such as failure or ) occurs and F(t) is the of T. This function is inherently non-increasing, starting at S(0) = 1 (certain survival at time zero) and approaching S(∞) = 0 (inevitable event occurrence), and for continuous distributions, it is right-continuous and differentiable where the density exists. Closely related to other key components of survival models, the survival function connects to the hazard function h(t)—which measures the instantaneous rate of event occurrence given survival to t—through the relation h(t) = f(t) / S(t), where f(t) is the , and to the cumulative hazard function H(t) via S(t) = (-H(t)), with H(t) = ∫_0^t h(u) du. These interconnections enable the modeling of diverse failure patterns, such as constant hazards in exponential distributions (S(t) = (-λt)) or increasing hazards in Weibull distributions (S(t) = (-(λt)^p) for p > 1). In practice, the survival function is pivotal for analyzing time-to-event data, particularly when observations are subject to right-censoring (e.g., study end before event occurrence), and it underpins estimation methods like the Kaplan-Meier estimator for non-parametric survival curves. Applications span multiple fields: in and , it quantifies patient , treatment efficacy, and disease progression by modeling survival times from clinical trials or observational studies. In and reliability, it serves as the reliability function to predict component or lifetimes, optimize schedules, and assess failure risks in like or machinery. Additionally, it informs econometric and research on durations such as spells or .

Basic Concepts

Definition

In survival analysis, the survival function describes the probability distribution of a non-negative random variable T, which represents the time until the occurrence of a specified event, such as death, failure, or disease onset. The survival function, denoted S(t), is mathematically defined as S(t) = P(T > t) for t \geq 0, where P denotes probability. This function quantifies the probability that the event has not yet occurred by time t. For proper probability distributions of T, the survival function satisfies the boundary conditions S(0) = 1 and \lim_{t \to \infty} S(t) = 0. It is the complement of the F(t) = P(T \leq t), so S(t) = 1 - F(t). The form of S(t) depends on whether T is continuous or : in the continuous case, S(t) is a right-continuous, non-increasing approaching zero asymptotically; in the case, it is a with jumps at the possible event times.

Relation to Other Probability Functions

The survival function S(t) = P(T > t) is directly related to the cumulative distribution function (CDF) F(t) = P(T \leq t) of the T, representing the time until an event occurs, through the equation S(t) = 1 - F(t). This relationship holds for both discrete and continuous distributions, ensuring that the survival probability complements the probability of the event having occurred by time t. For continuous random variables T, the survival function connects to the (PDF) f(t), which describes the distribution of event times. Specifically, f(t) = -\frac{dS(t)}{dt}, as the density at t equals the negative rate of change of the survival probability. This derivative relationship arises because a decrease in S(t) corresponds to the instantaneous probability of the event occurring at t. The hazard function h(t), also known as the or , provides the instantaneous rate of occurrence of given up to time t, defined as h(t) = \frac{f(t)}{S(t)}. To derive this, consider the : the hazard is the limit h(t) = \lim_{\Delta t \to 0} \frac{P(t \leq T < t + \Delta t \mid T \geq t)}{\Delta t}, which approximates the probability of in a small interval [t, t + \Delta t) divided by the interval length, conditional on survival to t. Substituting the PDF and survival function yields h(t) = \frac{f(t)}{S(t)}. Alternatively, using the logarithmic derivative, h(t) = -\frac{d}{dt} \ln S(t), because \frac{d}{dt} \ln S(t) = \frac{1}{S(t)} \frac{dS(t)}{dt} = -\frac{f(t)}{S(t)}, confirming the equivalence and emphasizing the hazard as the rate of exponential decay in . In engineering and reliability theory, the survival function is equivalently termed the reliability function R(t), denoting the probability that a system or component functions without failure beyond time t. This interpretation bridges survival analysis with reliability engineering, where R(t) = S(t) models the dependability of mechanical or electronic systems under stress or usage.

Examples and Applications

Illustrative Examples

To illustrate the survival function in a continuous setting, consider a random variable T following a distribution on the interval [0, a], where a > 0. The survival function is S(t) = 1 - \frac{t}{a}, \quad 0 \leq t \leq a, with S(t) = 1 for t < 0 and S(t) = [0](/page/0) for t > a. This form demonstrates a linear decline in the probability of surviving beyond time t, reflecting constant over the support. For example, if a = 10, then S(5) = 0.5, indicating that the probability of past halfway through the interval is exactly half. Graphically, S(t) appears as a straight line decreasing monotonically from S(0) = 1 to S(a) = [0](/page/0), highlighting the function's non-increasing property from certainty of at t = 0 to impossibility beyond the maximum lifetime. In discrete time, the geometric distribution offers a simple example, where T represents the number of periods until the first event occurs in a of independent trials, each with success (event) probability p where $0 < p < 1. The survival function is S(t) = (1 - p)^t, \quad t = 0, 1, 2, \dots, representing the probability of no event in the first t periods. This exhibits exponential decay in discrete steps, with survival probability halving (or more) as t increases depending on p. For instance, if p = 0.1, then S(5) = 0.9^5 \approx 0.5905, showing about 59% chance of surviving the first five periods. Graphically, S(t) forms a step function, constant between integers and dropping abruptly at each t, decreasing from S(0) = 1 toward 0 as t \to \infty, which underscores the right-continuous and non-increasing behavior required of survival functions. The serves as the discrete analogue to the exponential distribution in continuous survival analysis, both characterized by the memoryless property.

Practical Applications

In medicine, survival functions are widely applied to estimate patient survival probabilities following treatments, particularly in oncology where 5-year survival rates provide critical prognostic information for clinical decision-making and patient counseling. For instance, these functions help quantify the likelihood of disease-free survival after interventions like chemotherapy or surgery, enabling comparisons across patient cohorts and informing public health strategies. Empirical survival curves, such as those derived from the , are routinely used to visualize these probabilities in clinical trials. In engineering reliability, survival functions predict the time-to-failure for components, aiding in the design and maintenance of systems to minimize downtime and costs. For example, they assess the probability that items like light bulbs or industrial machines will operate without failure beyond a specified duration, supporting warranty predictions and preventive replacement schedules. This interpretive framework allows engineers to evaluate system robustness under varying operational stresses. Actuarial science employs survival functions in constructing life tables, which underpin insurance premium calculations by estimating future mortality risks. These functions determine the probability of survival to various ages, enabling actuaries to price life insurance policies and annuities accurately while accounting for demographic trends. Such applications ensure financial products remain viable amid uncertainties in lifespan distributions. Right-censoring poses challenges in these applications by introducing incomplete observations, such as when study participants drop out before an event occurs, potentially biasing survival probability estimates if not properly addressed. This issue is common in longitudinal medical studies or reliability tests where follow-up ends prematurely, requiring careful interpretation to maintain accuracy.

Parametric Survival Functions

Exponential Survival Function

The exponential survival function arises from the , a parametric model commonly used in survival analysis to describe lifetimes or durations where the hazard rate remains constant over time. It assumes that the probability of an event occurring in the next instant does not depend on how much time has already passed, making it suitable for modeling processes without aging or wear-out effects. The survival function for the exponential distribution is given by
S(t) = e^{-\lambda t},
where t \geq 0 is the time and \lambda > 0 is the constant rate parameter representing the instantaneous hazard. This formula implies that the probability of surviving beyond time t decreases exponentially with \lambda t.
A defining characteristic of the exponential distribution is its memoryless property, which states that the conditional probability of surviving an additional time t given survival up to time s equals the unconditional probability of surviving time t:
P(T > t + s \mid T > s) = P(T > t) = S(t)
for all t, s > 0. To prove this via conditional probability, note that
P(T > t + s \mid T > s) = \frac{P(T > t + s)}{P(T > s)} = \frac{e^{-\lambda (t + s)}}{e^{-\lambda s}} = e^{-\lambda t} = S(t),
demonstrating independence from prior survival time. This property uniquely identifies the exponential among continuous distributions with positive support.
The corresponding hazard function is constant:
h(t) = \lambda,
indicating a uniform risk of failure at any point, with no increase or decrease due to aging.
For parameter estimation with uncensored data consisting of n observed failure times t_1, \dots, t_n, the maximum likelihood estimator of \lambda is
\hat{\lambda} = \frac{n}{\sum_{i=1}^n t_i},
which is the reciprocal of the sample mean lifetime and maximizes the likelihood function L(\lambda) = \prod_{i=1}^n \lambda e^{-\lambda t_i}. This estimator provides an efficient point estimate under the exponential assumption. The exponential model serves as a foundational case, generalized by distributions like the Weibull for time-varying hazards.

Weibull Survival Function

The Weibull survival function is a form widely used in due to its flexibility in modeling diverse failure time behaviors. It is defined as
S(t) = \exp\left\{ -\left(\frac{t}{\alpha}\right)^\beta \right\},
where t \geq 0, \alpha > 0 is the representing the characteristic life, and \beta > 0 is the that governs the form of the . This two-parameter model arises from and is particularly suited for analyzing time-to-failure data in and medical contexts.
The corresponding hazard function for the Weibull distribution is
h(t) = \frac{\beta}{\alpha} \left( \frac{t}{\alpha} \right)^{\beta - 1},
which allows it to capture a range of hazard shapes depending on \beta. When \beta > 1, the hazard increases with time, reflecting wear-out processes; when $0 < \beta < 1, it decreases, indicating early failures like infant mortality; and when \beta = 1, the hazard is constant, simplifying to the exponential case. This versatility makes the Weibull distribution a cornerstone for modeling non-constant hazards in survival data.
In reliability engineering, the Weibull distribution is widely used to model the phases of bathtub-shaped failure rate curves, which characterize the three s of product life—a decreasing hazard (\beta < 1) for infant mortality or initial defects, a constant hazard (\beta = 1) during useful life, and an increasing hazard (\beta > 1) due to wear-out—often in combination to describe the full curve. Specifically, values of \beta > 1 model the wear-out , where material degradation leads to accelerating failures, as seen in components like capacitors or systems. For instance, in , Weibull parameters are estimated to predict long-term reliability under normal conditions. The model reduces to the survival function when \beta = 1, highlighting its generalization of memoryless processes.

Other Parametric Survival Functions

The log-normal survival function models lifetimes where the logarithm of the survival time follows a normal distribution, making it suitable for processes involving multiplicative effects, such as biological growth or degradation over time. Its survival function is given by S(t) = 1 - \Phi\left(\frac{\ln t - \mu}{\sigma}\right), where \Phi is the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution, \mu is the mean of the log-lifetimes, and \sigma > 0 is the standard deviation. This distribution is particularly common in biological applications, including the analysis of survival times in clinical studies like hemodialysis outcomes, where data exhibit right-skewness and heavy tails reflective of variable physiological responses. The Gompertz survival function is widely used to describe age-related mortality, capturing the increase in rates observed in aging populations across species. It is expressed as S(t) = \exp\left\{-\frac{c}{\lambda}(e^{\lambda t} - 1)\right\}, where c > 0 represents the initial and \lambda > 0 governs the rate of increase in mortality. This model has been foundational in for quantifying aging processes, as it aligns with empirical observations of accelerating death rates in adult lifespans, distinguishing it from more flexible shapes like those in the . Other parametric families, such as the , extend modeling capabilities to scenarios with non-monotonic . The accommodates unimodal hazard shapes, rising to a peak before declining, which is useful for failure times in reliability or medical contexts where risks initially increase and then wane.
DistributionHazard Shape Characteristics
Log-normalUnimodal, typically increasing to a maximum then decreasing; heavy-tailed, suitable for skewed .
GompertzStrictly increasing and convex (); ideal for monotonically accelerating mortality in aging.
Log-logisticFlexible: monotone increasing/decreasing or unimodal (inverted-U); supports bathtub-like patterns in later tails.
Selection among these functions often hinges on the observed behavior of the , as it reveals underlying dynamics. For instance, heavy-ed distributions like the log-normal are preferred when times show prolonged persistence in the upper quantiles, common in heterogeneous biological processes, whereas the Gompertz excels for with rapidly escalating s indicative of deterministic aging trajectories; the log-logistic is chosen for datasets exhibiting crossover or declining risks after an initial peak. Model fit can be assessed via quantiles or criteria to ensure alignment with empirical heaviness.

Non-Parametric Survival Functions

Kaplan-Meier Estimator

The Kaplan-Meier estimator, also known as the product-limit estimator, is a non-parametric method for estimating the survival function S(t) from lifetime data subject to right-censoring. It provides a step function that jumps at each observed event time, remaining constant between events, and is widely used in survival analysis to describe the probability of survival beyond time t without assuming a specific parametric form for the underlying distribution. Introduced in 1958, this estimator is particularly valuable in medical research, reliability engineering, and other fields where follow-up data may be incomplete due to censoring. The estimator is defined as \hat{S}(t) = \prod_{t_i \leq t} \left(1 - \frac{d_i}{n_i}\right), where the product is taken over the distinct event times t_i, d_i is the number of events (such as deaths or failures) observed at time t_i, and n_i is the number of individuals at risk just prior to time t_i. The at-risk set n_i includes all subjects who have not yet experienced an event or been censored before t_i. At t = 0, \hat{S}(0) = 1, and the estimate decreases stepwise at each event time by the factor (n_i - d_i)/n_i, which represents the conditional survival probability at that instant given survival up to that point. If there are no events by time t, \hat{S}(t) = 1; beyond the last event, the estimate is undefined or held constant, depending on the context. Right-censoring occurs when the event time for some subjects is unknown because observation ends before the event (e.g., due to study withdrawal or loss to follow-up), but the censoring time and the fact that the event has not occurred by then are known. The Kaplan-Meier method handles this by including censored subjects in the at-risk set n_i up to their censoring time, thereby contributing to the denominator for all event times prior to their censoring, but they do not contribute to any d_i since no event is observed for them. Once censored, they are removed from subsequent at-risk sets. This approach assumes that censoring provides partial information about , allowing the to adjust the survival probabilities accordingly without biasing the estimate under the model's assumptions. The method relies on several key assumptions for its validity. Censoring must be independent of times, meaning the probability of censoring does not depend on the underlying survival time (non-informative censoring), which ensures that censored observations are representative of the full . Additionally, the model assumes continuous time, implying no tied event times; in practice, ties are handled by treating them as occurring in rapid succession or using adjustments, but the basic formulation presumes distinct times to avoid complications in the product. Violations of these assumptions, such as informative censoring, can lead to biased estimates. To quantify uncertainty in the Kaplan-Meier estimate, confidence intervals are typically constructed using the asymptotic variance provided by Greenwood's formula: \text{Var}(\hat{S}(t)) \approx \hat{S}(t)^2 \sum_{t_i \leq t} \frac{d_i}{n_i (n_i - d_i)}, where the sum is over event times up to t. This variance estimator, derived from the applied to the log of the product-limit, accounts for the variability at each event time and is asymptotically normal for large samples. Approximate (1 - \alpha) \times 100\% confidence intervals can then be obtained as \hat{S}(t) \pm z_{1 - \alpha/2} \sqrt{\text{Var}(\hat{S}(t))}, or more accurately on the log scale to ensure positivity, such as \hat{S}(t) \exp\left( \pm z_{1 - \alpha/2} \sqrt{\sum_{t_i \leq t} \frac{d_i}{n_i^2 (1 - d_i/n_i)}} \right). Greenwood's formula tends to perform well even in moderate sample sizes but may underestimate variance when events are clustered or sample sizes are small.

Nelson-Aalen Estimator

The Nelson-Aalen estimator provides a non-parametric estimate of the cumulative function H(t) from right-censored survival data, where H(t) = \int_0^t h(u) \, du and h(u) denotes the rate at time u. Introduced independently by in the context of hazard plotting for censored failure data and by Odd Aalen using counting process theory, it aggregates incremental hazard contributions at observed event times. The estimator is defined as \hat{H}(t) = \sum_{t_i \leq t} \frac{d_i}{n_i}, where the sum is over distinct event times t_i, d_i is the number of events occurring at t_i, and n_i is the number of individuals at risk immediately prior to t_i. This formulation treats each event increment as d_i / n_i, approximating the hazard at tied event times. In , the Nelson-Aalen indirectly yields an estimate of the survival function S(t) through the relationship S(t) = \exp\{-H(t)\}. The corresponding \hat{S}(t) = \exp\{-\hat{H}(t)\} follows the Breslow approximation, which simplifies the product-integral form of the survival function for practical computation and plotting, or for on hazard accumulation. The variance of \hat{H}(t) is estimated non-parametrically as \widehat{\Var}(\hat{H}(t)) = \sum_{t_i \leq t} \frac{d_i}{n_i^2}, derived from martingale properties of the counting process, enabling construction of pointwise confidence bands via normal approximation \hat{H}(t) \pm z_{\alpha/2} \sqrt{\widehat{\Var}(\hat{H}(t))}. This variance supports asymptotic normality under mild conditions, facilitating hypothesis tests on the cumulative hazard. Compared to the Kaplan-Meier estimator, the Nelson-Aalen approach excels in small samples by delivering slightly superior estimates of survival fractions and direct cumulative assessment, making it preferable when emphasis lies on buildup rather than survival probabilities alone.

Properties and Estimation

Key Properties

The survival function S(t) = P(T > t), where T is a non-negative representing time to an , possesses several mathematical properties that hold regardless of its specific form. It is non-increasing in t, reflecting that the probability of surviving beyond a later time cannot exceed that of an earlier time, and right-continuous with left-hand limits, ensuring consistency in the definition of probabilities at discontinuity points. Additionally, S(0+) = 1, as the event time T is assumed to satisfy T \geq 0 , and for proper distributions where the event is certain to occur eventually, \lim_{t \to \infty} S(t) = 0. A key integral relation connects the survival function to the expected lifetime: for a non-negative T, the E[T] = \int_0^\infty S(t) \, dt. This follows from the general formula for the of non-negative random variables and provides a direct way to compute mean survival times from the survival curve. The survival function relates to the function h(t), which represents the instantaneous at time t given survival to t, through the cumulative hazard H(t) = \int_0^t h(u) \, du, with S(t) = \exp(-H(t)) in continuous time. In some scenarios, the survival function may be improper, meaning \lim_{t \to \infty} S(t) > 0, indicating a positive probability that the event never occurs. This arises in contexts like cure models in medical studies, where a fraction of the population remains event-free indefinitely, such as long-term survivors of certain cancers.

Estimation Methods

Estimating functions from observed requires careful consideration of the 's structure, particularly in the presence of incomplete observations. often include right-censored observations, where the event time is known only to exceed the observed time due to study termination or loss to follow-up; left-censored cases, where the event occurred before observation began; and -censored , where the event is known to occur within a specific time , such as from periodic . Truncated further complicate , as certain observations are excluded if they do not meet entry criteria, potentially biasing results if not accounted for, such as in left-truncation where individuals entering after the study start are missed. Methods for handling these must incorporate censoring indicators and truncation times into the likelihood framework to avoid underestimation of probabilities. In parametric estimation, the survival function's form is assumed known, such as or Weibull, allowing parameters to be estimated via (MLE) that accounts for censoring. The likelihood is constructed from the observed times and event indicators, with contributions from the for uncensored and the function for censored ones; for the with rate λ, the MLE is the number of divided by the total observed time. This approach provides efficient estimates when the distributional assumption holds, enabling extrapolation beyond observed data. Semi-parametric methods, such as the , estimate the hazard function as h(t \mid X) = h_0(t) \exp(\beta' X) without assuming a parametric form for the baseline hazard h_0(t), allowing derivation of survival functions while accommodating covariates. Non-parametric estimation avoids distributional assumptions, using methods like the (e.g., ) to directly compute survival probabilities from event times or hazard-based approaches (e.g., ) to cumulatively sum incremental hazards. The multiplies conditional survival probabilities at observed events, while hazard-based estimation integrates the estimated hazard function; in small samples, the product-limit estimator exhibits less bias than approximations suggest, though both can show upward bias in survival estimates with heavy censoring. Model diagnostics assess the adequacy of estimated survival functions, often through goodness-of-fit tests that compare observed events to those expected under the model. The log-rank test, a non-parametric procedure, evaluates differences between estimated survival functions across groups by comparing observed and expected events in stratified time intervals, providing a statistic to test for equality; it is widely used to validate assumptions or compare parametric fits to non-parametric benchmarks.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Survival Distributions, Hazard Functions, Cumulative Hazards
    This means that the chances of failure in the next short time interval, given that failure hasn't yet occurred, does not change with t; e.g., a 1-month old bulb.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] 23.0 Survival Analysis - Stat@Duke
    The survival function is S(t)=1 − F(t), or the probability that a person or machine or a business lasts longer than t time units. Here F(t) is the usual.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Lecture 5: Survival Analysis 5.1 Survival Function
    The survival function S(t) of this population is defined as S(t) = P(T1 > t)=1 − F(t). Namely, it is just one minus the corresponding CDF.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Chapter 4: Probability Models in Survival Analysis
    Definition 4.1 The survivor function for a nonnegative random variable T is. S(t) = P(T ≥ t) t ≥ 0, where S(t) = 1 for all t < 0. A survivor function is also ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Survival Analysis - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Survival analysis is widely used in evidence-based medicine to examine the time-to-event series.[1] Often used for survival/death events, time-to-event ...
  6. [6]
    What Is Survival Analysis? - MATLAB & Simulink - MathWorks
    Survival analysis is time-to-event analysis, focusing on the time until an event occurs, such as infection or failure.
  7. [7]
    Survivor Function - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The survivor function, also known as the survival probability, is a statistical concept that represents the probability of an individual not experiencing an ...
  8. [8]
    Survival Analysis Part I: Basic concepts and first analyses - PMC - NIH
    The survival probability (which is also called the survivor function) S(t) is the probability that an individual survives from the time origin (e.g. diagnosis ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Hazard functions - MyWeb
    Functions of survival time. Special case: Constant hazard. Survival function. The survival function of T, denoted S(t), is defined as. S(t) = P(T >t) for t > 0.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Survival Analysis
    Jul 6, 2018 · Survival analysis traditionally focuses on the analysis of time duration until one or more events happen and, more generally, ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Survival Analysis - STAT 7780 - Auburn University
    S(x) is called the reliability function in engineering applications. S(x) is a monotone, non-increasing function. S(0) = 1 and S(∞) = 0. Peng Zeng (Auburn ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Uniform distribution
    The survivor function on the support of X is S(x) = P(X ≥ x) = b−x b−a a < x < b. The hazard function on the support of X is h(x) = f(x) S(x) = 1 b−x a < x < b.Missing: citation | Show results with:citation
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Geometric distribution
    The cumulative distribution function on the support of X is. F(x) = P(X ≤ x) = 1−(1− p)x+1 x = 0,1,2,.... The survivor function is. S(x) = P(X ≥ x)=(1− p)x x = ...
  14. [14]
    Cancer Survival: An Overview of Measures, Uses, and Interpretation
    Nov 19, 2014 · The two commonly used methods to estimate cancer prognosis, relative survival (2,3) and cause-specific survival (4), are described here.
  15. [15]
    Survival Analysis of Oncological Patients Using Machine Learning ...
    Dec 27, 2022 · For instance, cervical cancer that is detected early has a 92% relative 5-year survival rate.
  16. [16]
    8.1.2.2. Reliability or survival function
    The reliability function, also known as the survival function, is the probability a unit survives beyond time t, defined as R(t) = S(t).<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Overview of reliability engineering
    Reliability: definitions. ▷ If X is a random variable representing time to failure of an item, the survival function (or reliability function) R(t) is. R ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Hazard and Reliability Functions, Failure Rates
    The Reliability Function​​ Let the random variable X be the lifetime or the time to failure of a component. The probability that the component survives until ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Definitions of Life Table Functions
    Definitions of Life Table Functions. The following are definitions of the standard actuarial life table functions. The life table represents a hypothetical ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] 4. Life Insurance
    – In this text, life tables are used to build models for insurance systems designed to assist individuals facing uncertainty about the time of their death. s(x ...
  21. [21]
    Survival and hazard functions | Actuarial Mathematics Class Notes
    Life insurance pricing · Survival functions are used to calculate the probability of death and survival for individuals covered by life insurance policies ...
  22. [22]
    Survival analysis - ScienceDirect
    Right censoring occurs when an individual is followed up from a time origin t 0 up to some later time point t C and he/she has not had the event of interest, ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Theorem The exponential distribution has the memoryless ...
    Proof A variable X with positive support is memoryless if for all t > 0 and s > 0. P(X>s + t | X>t) = P(X>s) or, using the definition of conditional probability ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Chapter 5: Statistical Methods in Survival Analysis
    The most common technique for determining a point estimator for an unknown parameter is maximum likelihood estimation, which involves finding the parameter ...
  25. [25]
    1.3.6.6.8. Weibull Distribution - Information Technology Laboratory
    The following is the plot of the Weibull inverse survival function with the same values of γ as the pdf plots above. The formulas below are with the location ...
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
    [PDF] The Weibull Distribution and Parameter Estimation
    The “Bathtub” Curve. Time. Failure Rate. Constant failure rate. R(t)=e-λt ... See Ushakov,1994, Handbook of Reliability Engineering. 30 Sep. 1975. 31 Mar.
  28. [28]
    Application of Parametric Models to a Survival Analysis of ... - NIH
    The aim of the present study was to compare a number of parametric models (Weibull, exponential, and log-normal) to determine the best model for analyzing the ...
  29. [29]
    Biological Implications of the Weibull and Gompertz Models of Aging
    In the Gompertz model, aging-related mortality increases exponentially as a multiple of the initial mortality m0. In the Weibull model, the aging-related ...
  30. [30]
    Generalized log-logistic proportional hazard model with applications ...
    Nov 29, 2016 · The hazard function is increasing, decreasing and unimodal if the plot of (v/n,ϕ(v/n)) is concave, convex, and concave followed by convex, ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Parametric Models
    The log-logistic allows for non-monotonic unimodal hazards - in this case inverted ... To get the hazard function, simply switch SURVIVAL with HAZARD.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] On Parametric Survival Analysis - The Open University
    Parametric survival analysis uses a flexible framework with various hazard shapes and distributions, using parameters like φ, λ, and γ to control hazard ...
  33. [33]
    Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
    Apr 12, 2012 · Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations. E. L. Kaplan University of California Radiation Laboratory. &. Paul Meier University of ...
  34. [34]
    Theory and Applications of Hazard Plotting for Censored Failure Data
    Apr 9, 2012 · This paper presents theory and applications of a simple graphical method, called hazard plotting, for the analysis of multiply censored life data.
  35. [35]
    Nonparametric Inference for a Family of Counting Processes
    A statistical model is defined by letting Λi(t)=αi(t)Yi(t),i=1,⋯,k, Λ i ( t ) = α i ( t ) Y i ( t ) , i = 1 , ⋯ , k , where α=(α1,⋯,αk) α = ( α 1 , ⋯ , α k ) is ...
  36. [36]
    Empirical comparisons between Kaplan-Meier and Nelson-Aalen ...
    The Kaplan-Meier is the most commonly used estimator of the survival function, while the Nelson-Aalen is an alternative estimator for the same function.Missing: advantages | Show results with:advantages
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Chapter 2 - Survival Models
    Either of the functions fx (t) or Fx (t) are used to describe the future lifetime distribution beyond age x. Clearly, Fx (t) = P[Tx ≤ t] is the.
  38. [38]
    [PDF] The Expected Value - Arizona Math
    Let X be a nonnegative random variable with distribution function FX and density fX . Then the survival function FX (x) = P{X > x} = 1 − FX (x). P{X > x} dx. ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Survival Analysis - Stanford University
    The distribution of T could be discrete, continuous or a mixture of both. We will focus on the continuous distribution. 1. Survival function: S(t) = pr(T >t).
  40. [40]
    Estimating Cure Rates From Survival Data: An Alternative to ... - NIH
    Whenever p > 0 the underlying survival time distribution is said to be improper. Clearly, λ(u) → 0 as u → ∞ if p > 0 and the limit of λ(u) (as u → ∞) ...3.1 Mixture Models And... · 3.2 Estimation Procedures · 4. Bayesian Inference
  41. [41]
    Handling Censoring and Censored Data in Survival Analysis: A ...
    Sep 24, 2021 · With noninformative censoring, participants who drop out of the study must not do so due to reasons unrelated to the study. Noninformative ...
  42. [42]
    Interval censoring - PMC - NIH
    Interval censoring means a random variable is known only to lie within an interval, not observed exactly, like in periodic follow-up studies.
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Survival Analysis: Left-Truncated Data Introduction
    Useful data will be excluded when data is censored but not accounted for, and biases can be introduced when data is truncated. Since censoring and truncation ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Likelihood Construction, Inference for Parametric Survival Distributions
    In this section we obtain the likelihood function for noninformatively right- censored survival data and indicate how to make an inference when a para-.
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Parametric Survival Models
    S0(t) = 1 1+(λt)p , 1 − S0(t) = (λt)p 1+(λt)p , 1 − S0(t) S0(t) = (λt)p. Multiplying the odds by exp{x0β} yields another log-logistic model, this time with λ∗ ...Missing: comparison selection tail behavior
  46. [46]
    Hazard-Based Nonparametric Survivor Function Estimation - jstor
    The empirical survivor function estimator FE showed little indication of bias in these sim- ulations in spite of the small number of uncensored observations ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Small Sample Properties of Two Survival Function Estimators ... - DTIC
    For estimating an underlying survival distribution, we consider two estimators based on a randomly right-censored sample: The traditional Product Limit.
  48. [48]
    Biostatistics Series Module 9: Survival Analysis - PMC - NIH
    Several techniques are available for comparing the survival experience in two or more groups – the log-rank test is popularly used.Missing: formula | Show results with:formula