Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Team orders

Team orders in refer to strategic instructions issued by a team to its drivers during a , directing them to prioritize the team's overall championship objectives over individual competition, such as yielding position to a teammate to maximize points or conserve resources. This practice, while aimed at optimizing team performance in constructors' and drivers' championships, often involves one driver slowing down, avoiding aggressive maneuvers against a teammate, or adjusting pace to facilitate a position swap, and is particularly prominent in . While most prominent in , team orders are also employed and regulated in series such as and MotoGP. The use of team orders has been a contentious element of since the sport's early decades, with roots tracing back to the when teams occasionally shared cars or coordinated finishes to secure better results. Controversy intensified in modern F1 following the , where Ferrari instructed to cede victory to on the final straight, sparking fan booing and podium protests that embarrassed the sport. In response, the FIA introduced a ban on team orders in 2003 via Article 39.1 of the Sporting Regulations, which prohibited "Team orders which interfere with a race result are prohibited." Enforcement proved challenging, as teams often used coded language like "save fuel" or "box, box" to disguise instructions, exemplified by Ferrari's $100,000 fine in for the German Grand Prix incident where was told "Fernando is faster than you" to let pass. Recognizing the rule's ineffectiveness, the FIA repealed the ban at the end of , removing Article 39.1 effective for the season, while retaining provisions under the against actions bringing the sport into disrepute. As of 2025, team orders are legal and increasingly common in tight title battles, though they continue to provoke over fairness, driver autonomy, and entertainment value, with high-profile cases including McLaren's team orders in the 2024 where yielded position to teammate .

General Concepts

Definition and Rationale

Team orders in motorsports refer to directives issued by a team to its drivers, instructing them to alter their on-track behavior relative to teammates in order to influence race outcomes, rather than competing freely against one another. These instructions typically involve actions such as maintaining a specific position, yielding the lead, or coordinating overall strategy to favor collective team interests over individual achievements. The primary rationale for team orders stems from the need to optimize team performance in championship standings, where points are awarded to both or teams. By preventing intra-team rivalries, these orders help maximize overall points haul, conserve critical resources like fuel and tires, minimize the risk of collisions between teammates, and safeguard mechanical components from excessive stress during aggressive maneuvers. This approach prioritizes the broader team's success, a principle rooted in early 20th-century racing when wealthy entrants and manufacturers, such as in , emphasized collective glory over individual driver autonomy to secure victories and prestige. Implementation methods vary but commonly include direct radio communications from the pit wall to drivers, often using coded phrases to convey instructions discreetly, such as "Multi-21" to denote maintaining predefined positions between teammates. Subtler tactics encompass varying timings to adjust relative positions or pre-race agreements on scenarios like position swaps or defensive blocking of external rivals to protect a teammate's lead. These approaches allow teams to execute orders without overt disruption to the race flow. The evolution of team orders traces from informal practices in the , where drivers might yield positions or even swap cars mid-race to share points under early scoring systems, to more structured strategies in contemporary series. This shift was propelled by the widespread of points-based championships in the , which incentivized teams to strategically allocate results among drivers for maximum cumulative gains, transforming ad-hoc decisions into integral components of race planning.

Ethical and Strategic Debates

Team orders in motorsports have sparked intense ethical debates, primarily centered on their potential to undermine the merit-based nature of racing by subordinating individual driver skill to collective team directives. Critics argue that such instructions prioritize strategic outcomes over pure competition, diminishing the sport's integrity and excitement for spectators who expect unscripted battles on the track. This tension was notably highlighted in Formula One's , where Ferrari's directive for to yield to ignited widespread scrutiny of team tactics as manipulative rather than sporting. Fan backlash against team orders has been pronounced, with incidents often leading to booing, protests, and discussions revealing opposition due to perceived reductions in race unpredictability and fairness. For instance, high-profile cases have prompted fans to view orders as robbing deserving drivers of victories, underscoring broader concerns that team orders erode the individualistic heroism central to motorsport's appeal. Strategically, proponents defend team orders as essential for maximizing constructors' points, enabling teams to consolidate resources and secure long-term financial benefits through enhanced sponsorship appeal. Analyses show that coordinated driver efforts can yield substantial points gains in multi-car lineups, bolstering overall team standings and stability. Such practices are seen as rational in a high-stakes environment where constructors' titles directly influence budgets and viability. Debates on fairness often revolve around the establishment of hierarchies, such as "" and "number two" designations, where lead s receive preferential treatment to protect leads. This dynamic can strain teammate relationships, fostering resentment and impacting driver morale, sometimes resulting in career-altering team switches as secondary drivers seek equitable opportunities. Examples illustrate how overt prioritization leads to interpersonal conflicts, potentially shortening careers for those consistently sidelined.

Team Orders in Formula One

Historical Development

Team orders in emerged in the sport's formative years as a practical for maximizing points in an era dominated by manufacturer-backed teams. In 1950, demonstrated early coordinated tactics during their sweeping dominance of the inaugural , with drivers , , and employing teamwork to secure all six race victories and the drivers' title for Farina, leveraging the superior 158 Alfetta's performance while conserving resources across the squad. This approach was facilitated by rules allowing mid-race driver-car swaps, a tactic exemplified in 1951 when teams like instructed teammates to exchange vehicles to optimize points allocation, as seen in the where Fangio and Fagioli switched to ensure the stronger driver finished higher, a practice permitted until banned in 1957. The 1960s and 1970s saw team orders evolve alongside the introduction of the Constructors' Championship in , which awarded points based on the finishing positions of teams' cars, with revisions in the early limiting it to the best five results per team and encouraging broader participation but also intensified internal rivalries. Ferrari epitomized this shift with their informal "number one" driver policy, notably in 1976 when the team favored over during the , instructing Regazzoni to yield position to help Lauda secure vital championship points amid his battle with . By the , such strategies became more implicit yet effective, as evidenced by McLaren's 1988 partnership between and , where the duo's coordinated efforts—despite on-track battles—delivered 15 wins from 16 races, clinching both the Drivers' and Constructors' titles through mutual support in key moments without overt directives. Entering the 1990s, team orders normalized further as constructors prioritized collective success under the evolving points system, which by then rewarded both cars' finishes to boost team standings. Williams exemplified this in , designating Senna as the lead driver over teammate to challenge for the title, with tactical decisions aimed at protecting Senna's position in early-season races despite the FW16's handling challenges. This period marked a cultural transition from the privateer-dominated eras of the , where orders were quietly accepted, to heightened public scrutiny in the as globalized through expanded television coverage and international races, amplifying fan expectations for uncompromised competition and sparking ethical debates over .

Notable Controversies

One of the most infamous instances of team orders in occurred at the , where Ferrari instructed to yield the lead to teammate on the final lap. Barrichello, who had led the race comfortably, slowed dramatically entering the final corner, allowing Schumacher to take the victory and secure crucial championship points. The move provoked immediate outrage from fans, who booed both drivers on the podium and pelted them with beer cans, while media coverage highlighted the perceived manipulation of the race result. Barrichello later expressed visible discomfort during the podium ceremony, refusing to accept the winner's and insisting Schumacher take it, underscoring the personal toll on drivers. The , dubbed "Crashgate," represented an even more egregious scandal when Renault directed to deliberately crash his car on lap 14 at Turn 17. The intentional incident deployed the , which benefited teammate by bunching the field and allowing him to pit for fresh tires under neutralized conditions, ultimately leading to his victory—the first night race in F1 history. Exposed in September 2009 by Piquet Jr. after his dismissal from the team, the plot involved team principal and engineer , prompting an FIA investigation that confirmed the orchestration. Consequences included a two-year suspended ban on from F1, a $500,000 fine, a lifetime ban for Briatore (later overturned by a French court), and a five-year ban for Symonds. In more recent years, team orders and strategic decisions perceived as favoring one driver have continued to stir controversy. At the , Mercedes opted for a strategy that kept on older tires during a late virtual period, aiming to maintain his lead over despite the risk of losing track position. Although not an explicit order between teammates, the decision was criticized as prioritizing Hamilton's title bid in the , contributing to the race's chaotic and disputed outcome where Verstappen overtook on fresh tires after a controversial restart. Similarly, during the 2024 Hungarian Grand Prix, instructed to relinquish the lead to in the final laps after a pit strategy swap positioned Norris ahead unfairly, allowing Piastri to secure his maiden win. Norris complied reluctantly after radio exchanges, but the episode drew scrutiny for overriding on-track racing. In the 2013 Malaysian Grand Prix, Red Bull's "Multi-21" strategy instructed to hold second position behind him for teammate to conserve tires, but Vettel ignored the order and overtook Webber late in the race to finish second, securing valuable points in the championship fight. The incident led to public team discord, with Webber accusing Vettel of betrayal, though no FIA penalties were imposed. Tensions escalated further at the 2025 in , where again invoked team orders amid intra-team rivalry between Norris and Piastri. After a slow dropped Norris behind Piastri during their final stops, the team directed Piastri to yield second place to restore the pre-pit order, a move Piastri initially resisted over radio before complying. The incident highlighted ongoing frictions, with Piastri later admitting the order lingered in his mind during subsequent races, exacerbating championship pressures and near-misses in positioning that risked collision. 's interventions, while aimed at fairness, fueled debates over driver autonomy. These controversies have profoundly impacted , eroding perceptions of race purity by prioritizing team strategy over individual merit and prompting driver protests, such as Barrichello's podium reluctance. Fan backlash, including boos and declining viewership in affected events, has underscored a love-hate dynamic with team orders, while FIA probes—like those into 2002's overt instruction and 2008's deliberate crash—have exposed ethical lapses and led to disciplinary actions. Overall, such incidents have intensified on intra-team dynamics, with drivers voicing frustration over lost opportunities and the sport grappling with balancing competition and constructor interests.

Regulatory Evolution

Following the controversial team orders employed by Ferrari at the , where was instructed to yield victory to , the FIA informally prohibited such practices that could compromise race results, leading to a formal ban in the 2003 Sporting Regulations under Article 39.1, which stated that teams must not "prearrange the finishing order of their cars." This rule aimed to preserve competitive integrity but was often circumvented through coded radio messages, such as ambiguous instructions about pace or position, allowing teams to subtly influence outcomes without explicit violations. The ban's enforcement intensified in 2010, when the maximum penalty for breaches was set at a $100,000 fine, as demonstrated by Ferrari's punishment after the , where a radio message—" is faster than you"—was interpreted as directing to let teammate pass, resulting in the full fine but no further sanctions after review. This incident, alongside the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix "Crashgate" scandal involving , where deliberate crashing aided Alonso's win and prompted lifetime bans for team principals, catalyzed stricter oversight on manipulative tactics. In response, the FIA repealed the explicit ban at the end of 2010, effective for the 2011 season, permitting overt team orders provided they did not mislead officials or spectators. Post-2011, team orders became explicitly allowed under the Sporting Regulations, though subject to scrutiny for actions deemed "manipulative" or contrary to , as outlined in broader provisions against conduct bringing the sport into disrepute. The 2021 regulations reinforced this by emphasizing compliance with general driving standards in Article 27, prohibiting unnecessary while allowing strategic instructions, without reinstating a outright . Updates in 2023 and 2024 heightened focus on transparency, mandating that all radio communications be audible to the FIA for monitoring potential misleading tactics, with 2025 regulations maintaining this via Article 20 on communications to ensure accountability in real-time strategy calls. Enforcement has varied, with the 2013 Malaysian Grand Prix "Multi-21" incident at —where ignored instructions to hold position behind , securing victory—resulting in no FIA fine but internal team reprimands, highlighting that while orders are permissible, non-compliance alone does not trigger penalties unless it violates broader fairness rules. In 2024, the FIA closely monitored McLaren's strategic decisions, such as position swaps between and during the , but took no action, affirming the legality of such maneuvers when transparently executed. As of 2025, team orders remain legal in , provided they adhere to sporting principles, with the FIA conducting post-race reviews to assess impacts on championship fairness, particularly in scenarios affecting title contenders, to balance team with competitive equity.

Team Orders in

Regulatory Framework

's regulatory framework on team orders is primarily governed by rules prohibiting race manipulation rather than an explicit ban on all forms of intra-team or alliance coordination. This approach reflects the series' emphasis on manufacturer alliances, where teams affiliated with the same (OEM)—such as Chevrolet, , or —may collaborate on strategies like assistance at superspeedways to enhance safety and competitiveness, provided it does not alter race outcomes unfairly. The alliance system structures teams into OEM groups, facilitating permissible "" such as positioning for aerodynamic aid during pack , which is particularly prevalent at restrictor-plate tracks like and Talladega. A 2019 post-season review following the Ford EcoBoost 400 led to penalties for four teams accused of manipulating the championship finale but also clarified that legitimate alliance-based cooperation, like non-aggressive blocking of non-allied competitors, would not be penalized if it prioritized on-track competition over contrived results. The agreement, signed in 2023 and effective from 2025 through 2031, incorporates provisions limiting aggressive orders outside alliances, tying compliance to guaranteed race entries and to maintain competitive balance. As of November 2025, the agreement faces challenges from an ongoing antitrust lawsuit filed by and , though a has allowed them to compete as chartered teams for the 2025 season. Penalties for violations focus on "manipulative" actions that compromise race integrity, with sanctions including fines up to $100,000, point deductions of 50 to 100 for drivers and owners, and potential suspensions for crew chiefs. For instance, in the 2022 , Stewart-Haas Racing's No. 41 team was fined $100,000 and docked 50 points for intentionally slowing to influence finishing positions, underscoring NASCAR's prioritization of safety and over absolute competitive purity in high-stakes scenarios. Updates in 2024 and 2025 have intensified enforcement through enhanced radio monitoring during playoff races to detect coded instructions that could facilitate manipulation, prompted by controversies like suspicious communications at the 2025 Charlotte Roval. These measures integrate with Next Gen car regulations, which promote closer pack racing and strategic OEM cooperation while explicitly warning against actions that endanger participants or distort results. This permissive yet monitored stance on alliances contrasts with stricter individual-team prohibitions in series like Formula One, influenced by broader motorsport debates on ethics versus strategy.

Notable Incidents

A prominent example of race manipulation occurred during the at Richmond International Raceway, the regular-season finale. Michael Waltrip Racing teams, including drivers and , intentionally spun their cars to bring out a caution and alter the finishing order, aiming to secure a Chase spot for teammate . This led to penalties for MWR, including 50-point deductions and fines, and NASCAR expanding the Chase field to 13 drivers by adding , who was disadvantaged by the chaos. The incident drew widespread criticism for undermining race integrity. The 2020 at featured a team orders controversy during the playoff elimination race. instructed (#20) not to pass teammate (#11) in the closing laps, ensuring Hamlin's advancement to the 4 via despite finishing 10th. This occurred amid a tight battle for spots, with crashing while trying to advance from 10th, ultimately finishing 17th and eliminated despite leading the points standings entering the race. reviewed the radio communications but issued no penalties, citing insufficient evidence of manipulation, though the incident reignited discussions on enforcing stricter guidelines for intra-team assistance in . During the 2022 Bank of America Roval 400 at , a playoff Round of 12 elimination event, executed a broader strategy where Austin Cindric's positioning aided against drivers. Cindric, running mid-pack, used his No. 2 Ford to disrupt passing attempts by Hendrick's William Byron and others in the section, helping Logano maintain track position and finish second behind winner to advance to the Round of 8. This tactical support underscored Penske's playoff emphasis on collective manufacturer alliances, with no infractions noted by officials despite post-race scrutiny from rival teams. As of 2024-2025, no major team orders scandals have emerged in , but superspeedway races continue to showcase informal alliances, such as the 2025 where Chevrolet-affiliated drivers, including those from and , protected William Byron during the final-lap chaos. Byron advanced from ninth to first amid a multi-car incident, benefiting from blocking by Chevy teammates that shielded him from and challengers, securing his second consecutive victory without prompting official investigations. These ongoing tactics reflect 's regulatory allowances for manufacturer-based cooperation at restrictor-plate tracks, where pack racing inherently encourages such strategies.

Team Orders in MotoGP

Historical Examples

In the formative years of from 1949 to 1972, team orders emerged as essential tactics in intense manufacturer rivalries, notably between and , where factory teams coordinated rider efforts, bike setups, and race strategies to outmaneuver European competitors like and in the quest for championships across classes including the 500cc category. During the 1950s, MV Agusta's factory team in the 500cc exemplified coordinated multi-rider efforts, with riders such as , Umberto Masetti, and Gilera defectors strategically managed to deliver 18 world titles through the era, leveraging shared data on and track positioning to dominate against rivals like and Gilera. A pivotal controversy arose in 1968 within the factory team, where Phil Read was instructed to focus on securing the 125cc title while allowing teammate Bill Ivy to claim the 250cc ; however, after clinching the 125cc crown, Read disregarded these orders and aggressively challenged Ivy at the Nations in , winning the race by 1 minute and 50 seconds to tie the points standings. The 250cc title was ultimately awarded to Read via an FIM tie-breaker rule based on cumulative finishing times across the season, giving him a 2 minutes and 5 seconds advantage—a decision that strained team relations and underscored the perils of intra-team competition—Ivy tragically perished in a testing crash at the following year. In the and , Honda's approach highlighted favoritism within its ranks, particularly in 1983 when the factory prioritized over other riders by channeling advanced NS500 development and testing resources toward his bid for the 500cc title amid a fierce duel with Yamaha's , enabling Spencer to secure Honda's first premier-class championship with eight victories. The saw a pronounced evolution in team orders under , where strategies were devised to shield Mick Doohan's championship leads in the fuel-thirsty two-stroke 500cc era, including directives for second riders like Alex Crivillé to conserve energy and block rivals during key races; this tactical framework, emphasizing positioning and , propelled Doohan to five straight titles from to 1998, amassing 54 wins.

Modern Applications and Challenges

In the 2000s, team orders in MotoGP gained prominence as manufacturers fielded competitive two-rider factory teams, with strategies often favoring the lead rider to secure championships. Ducati's 2007 campaign exemplified this approach, where the factory team prioritized support for rookie , enabling him to clinch the constructors' title with 10 wins while teammate provided developmental and strategic backing in a less competitive role. Similarly, Yamaha's handling of and rookie from 2008 to 2010 involved managing intense intra-team rivalries without explicit directives, though Rossi's veteran status positioned him as the de facto leader, leading to tense battles like the 2009 Catalunya clash and 2010 Motegi duel where no favoritism was enforced. Entering the 2010s and 2020s, manufacturer strategies increasingly emphasized hierarchy, particularly at , where received clear favoritism from 2013 to 2019. focused development and resources on Márquez's championship bids, sidelining input from teammate and test rider to prioritize Márquez's six consecutive titles. By 2024, faced acute enforcement challenges with eight riders across its factory and satellite squads, culminating in the Valencia Grand Prix finale where , trailing by 19 points, received no coordinated support from teammates like or Pramac's Martín, allowing Martín to secure the riders' title. team manager explicitly refused team orders within the factory lineup, citing the difficulty of coordinating across multiple teams. These incidents highlight persistent challenges in MotoGP, where riders' independent contractor status—often with personal sponsorships and multi-year deals tied to performance clauses—renders with team directives voluntary rather than mandatory. For instance, Pramac rider publicly stated he would ignore any Ducati-issued orders during his title fight, prioritizing individual results over manufacturer loyalty. This autonomy was exacerbated in 2024-2025 by the Pramac-Ducati split, announced in June 2024 after 20 years of partnership; as Pramac transitioned to a satellite role for 2025, its riders reportedly disregarded late-season directives, contributing to Bagnaia's unsupported effort and underscoring fractured alliances. In 2025, with Pramac now operating as a satellite team, manufacturer strategies continue to evolve amid the ongoing season. Regulatory oversight adds further complexity, as MotoGP imposes no formal ban on team orders, unlike Formula 1's historical prohibitions, allowing manufacturers discretion while , the series promoter, emphasizes "clean racing" through rider codes of conduct to prevent dangerous interference. Controversies like the 2015 Sepang clash between Rossi and —where Rossi accused of aiding rival Lorenzo, indirectly implicating team influences—illustrate how such strategies can fuel ethical debates on hierarchy in two-rider teams, balancing manufacturer goals against fair competition.

Team Orders in Other Motorsports

IndyCar Series

In the IndyCar Series, team orders have historically been infrequent, particularly before 2000, when the sport was dominated by independent and single-car entries during the CART era, limiting opportunities for intra-team coordination to maximize championship points in a single-series format. The 2008 merger of Champ Car and the Indy Racing League consolidated the field, enabling multi-car teams like Chip Ganassi Racing and Team Penske to employ strategic team orders more effectively, as seen in instances where teammates positioned to support the points leader without overt interference. For example, in the 2010 Honda Indy Edmonton, Ganassi's Scott Dixon secured victory amid a controversial penalty on a rival, allowing teammate Dario Franchitti to finish third and bolster the team's championship standing. In modern racing, team orders remain strategic but subtle, often focused on oval and road course events to protect title contenders. During the 2024 250s doubleheader, Palou's mechanical issues in —an electrical failure that left him 29 laps down—rendered explicit orders unnecessary, with the team emphasizing clean racing to maintain points. -saving directives in the exemplify coordinated team tactics, where trailing teammates lift and coast to conserve for the leader, enabling fewer stops and position gains, as demonstrated in multiple editions where such strategies decided the outcome. IndyCar regulations prohibit team orders under Rule 9.3.4 of the NTT Rulebook if they involve "actions or omissions by one or more Members to artificially influence, affect, alter or manipulate the outcome of a or ," with penalties assessed for unnatural conduct such as deliberate yielding. A notable enforcement occurred in 2025, when teams including were fined $100,000 each for technical violations under related rules, underscoring the series' balance between strategic cooperation and fair competition. The 2025 hybrid era, featuring full-season deployment of the energy recovery system since its 2024 debut, amplifies strategic coordination by adding layers of and deployment, potentially increasing reliance on team orders for optimal across multi-car entries—such as observed in and tactics at the 2025 Indianapolis 500. Challenges in implementing team orders persist due to IndyCar's spec chassis design, which standardizes all vehicles and reduces performance disparities between teammates, resulting in lower frequency compared to Formula 1's bespoke machinery. Multi-car teams like , which fielded up to four entries in recent seasons, must navigate conflicting individual sponsorship obligations that prioritize driver-specific branding over collective team goals, complicating directives in high-stakes scenarios.

Endurance Racing and Rally

In endurance racing and rally series, team orders emphasize strategic over direct on-track yielding, given the prolonged formats that demand reliability, , and multi-driver coordination. Unlike sprint events, these disciplines allow teams to issue instructions for , pit strategy synchronization, and position protection to maximize championship points for manufacturers and drivers alike. This approach is particularly prevalent in hybrid-powered categories, where (BoP) adjustments by the FIA help equalize capabilities across prototypes, indirectly supporting tactical decisions without compromising fairness. In the World Endurance Championship (), team orders are integral to hybrid class management, focusing on optimizing energy deployment and avoiding mechanical strain during races up to 24 hours. A prime example is Porsche's 2015-2017 dominance, exemplified at the 2015 , where the team coordinated pit stops across its #19 and #18 919 Hybrids to secure a 1-2 finish; the #18 car adjusted its strategy to support the leaders, minimizing time loss through synchronized refueling and driver changes totaling 90 stops across the fleet. The FIA's regulations permit such orders for safety, fuel efficiency, and reliability, with no blanket prohibition as long as they adhere to fair play principles; 2025 updates for (LMH) vehicles further refine BoP to balance hybrid systems, ensuring strategic maneuvers do not unfairly advantage one team. The () employs stage-specific team orders to safeguard points in variable-terrain events, often prioritizing manufacturer titles amid unpredictable conditions. In 1998, strategically allowed to pursue victory in over teammates Freddy Loix and , despite considerations to prioritize points consolidation, which helped secure key results amid internal tensions. More contemporarily, at the 2024 , weighed orders for and to support ' title challenge by maintaining close proximity to rivals, potentially blocking advances after Evans' early setback. faced notable 2022 conflicts, as at the when was instructed to hold station behind for a 1-2 finish, prompting Tänak's public criticism of the "unfair" directive that denied him a fair fight for victory. WRC regulations, governed by the FIA and a 2022 promoter , ban aggressive intra-team —such as deliberate collisions—but explicitly permit strategic orders to protect overall team interests, reflecting the series' emphasis on over . These formats distinguish themselves by their duration and structure: WEC's continuous circuits demand holistic strategies like driver rotations and fuel mapping across hours or days, fostering high acceptance of orders to prevent attrition; in contrast, WRC's discrete stages enable reactive, event-specific directives for points optimization, yet both prioritize team survival in high-stakes, reliability-focused environments over individual spectacle.

References

  1. [1]
    Ranked: Five of the most infamous team orders calls in F1 history
    Sep 10, 2025 · Team orders sometimes rally an organisation on to a better result. Other times they result in turmoil, controversy, and heartache.
  2. [2]
    What Are Team Orders in Motorsport? Definition & Examples
    Team orders are instructions given by a racing team to its drivers that tell them how to race against their own teammates, often asking one driver to let ...
  3. [3]
    Austria 2002: When unnecessary team orders rocked F1
    May 12, 2021 · On May 12 2002 Ferrari was the centre of controversy at the Austrian Grand Prix with team orders between Michael Schumacher and Rubens ...
  4. [4]
    Austria '02: How Ferrari team orders controversy embarrassed F1
    May 12, 2022 · Fans were so outraged when Rubens Barrichello slowed within sight of the finish line to let Michael Schumacher through and win the 2002 Austrian ...
  5. [5]
    Team orders ban scrapped for 2011 - RaceFans
    Dec 10, 2010 · The FIA has scrapped the rule banning team orders from the FIA Sporting Regulations for the 2011 season.
  6. [6]
    FIA removes ban on team orders from Formula One regulations
    Dec 10, 2010 · The FIA has deleted the rule prohibiting teams from ordering their drivers what to do, among several changes for next season.Missing: 1 | Show results with:1
  7. [7]
    FIA lifts 'team orders' ban | F1 News - Sky Sports
    Dec 11, 2010 · The FIA has lifted the ban on team orders from their rulebook following this years controversy in Germany.Missing: repeal | Show results with:repeal
  8. [8]
    TEAM ORDERS: Brawn and Coulthard on the strategy that's in F1's ...
    Oct 4, 2018 · Team orders have been around for about as long as Formula 1 has, be that Tony Brooks handing over his Vanwall to Stirling Moss at Aintree in ...
  9. [9]
    News Feature - A history of team orders - Grandprix.com
    May 14, 2002 · Team orders have existed in motor racing as long as there have been teams involved. Originally they were based on the very simple principle ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    'Multi 21': How the Red Bull RB9 spawned a famous F1 saying
    May 3, 2024 · 'Multi 2-1' served as Milton Keynes code to hold station in the order of cars No2 (Webber) and No1 (Vettel) – but the then-three time champion ...Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  11. [11]
    https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/articles/single-seaters/f1/multi-21-how-the-red-bull-rb9-spawned-a-famous-f1-saying/
  12. [12]
    Team Orders in Formula 1 and in Business - LinkedIn
    Nov 4, 2025 · In Formula 1, team orders refer to situations where the team gives drivers instructions on how to behave during the race – often against their ...
  13. [13]
    Six times team orders decided a race - PlanetF1
    Oct 3, 2018 · As was common in the 1950s, team-mates could be ordered to switch cars with half points given to both drivers. It decided plenty of races and ...
  14. [14]
    Formula 1 Team Orders: A Necessary Evil? - FanAmp
    Nov 2, 2024 · Teams routinely instructed their drivers to yield to teammates in pursuit of the best possible overall outcome even with LARGE gaps or using ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Teammates That Are Destined to Become Rivals
    Title: Teammates that are destined to become rivals - A discourse analysis of team dynamics and performance in the pinnacle of motorsport.
  16. [16]
    F1's balance of power: Does each team have a clear-cut No. 1?
    Mar 5, 2025 · Every driver pairing has a power dynamic that shifts over time. Some teams have a clear leader from day one, others let the results decide.Missing: effects | Show results with:effects
  17. [17]
    Why are the European and American sports worlds so different ...
    Mar 10, 2019 · In the nineteenth and twentieth century, the European and American sports formations and cultures developed along quite different paths.
  18. [18]
    Alfa Romeo's Dominance: A Look Back at the 1950 Championship ...
    Discover how Alfa Romeo dominated the inaugural season of Formula 1 in 1950 through innovation, teamwork, and resilience. Learn valuable lessons for modern ...
  19. [19]
    Controversy Swirls Around Team Orders and Formula 1
    Jan 10, 2025 · Team orders in Formula 1 have a wide and varied history. One of the earliest incidents of team orders occurred in 1951.
  20. [20]
    Ferrari team orders: From 'may the best man win' to number one and ...
    Aug 21, 2017 · By and large, Ferrari let his drivers go racing and sort superiority among themselves. Niki Lauda was never officially accorded Number 1 ...
  21. [21]
    McLaren MP4:4 - A success with "many fathers" - Revs Automedia
    Together with his then two-time World Champion teammate, Alain Prost, Senna managed to win fifteen out of a possible sixteen Grands Prix, making the McLaren MP4 ...Missing: partnership implicit
  22. [22]
    Hill: Real deal Senna changed the sport - grandprix247
    May 1, 2019 · Damon Hill was Ayrton Senna's last teammate, sharing a pit garage for the first two races of the 1994 Formula 1 season at Williams before the race at Imola ...Missing: prioritization | Show results with:prioritization
  23. [23]
    A brief history of the long tradition of team orders in F1 - grandprix247
    Oct 3, 2018 · Team orders obliging drivers to cede the lead to their teammates – as Valtteri Bottas was ordered to do with Hamilton at the Russian Grand Prix ...
  24. [24]
    https://www.racingnews365.com/revisited-f1-world-disgusted-after-shocking-ferrari-team-orders
  25. [25]
    Singapore Grand Prix: Still in F1 10 years after 'crashgate' - BBC Sport
    Sep 12, 2018 · The facts remain the same: there was a deliberate crash executed by Nelson Piquet Jr, by driving into a wall after turn 17 during lap 14, to ...
  26. [26]
    F1 Crashgate: What happened and why Felipe Massa has reignited ...
    Oct 27, 2025 · Crashgate's greatest impact wasn't in keeping Renault in F1 (Alonso went on to win the following race fairly) but in seemingly altering the ...
  27. [27]
    EXPLAINED: Understanding one of the most chaotic, controversial ...
    Dec 13, 2021 · After a strong Saturday for Verstappen, Sunday started in the best possible fashion for Hamilton. Taking the lead on the medium tyre – and ...Missing: favoring | Show results with:favoring
  28. [28]
    Hamilton 'at peace' with controversial 2021 Abu Dhabi GP - ESPN
    Apr 3, 2024 · At that year's Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, FIA race director Michael Masi incorrectly applied F1's rulebook to force a restart on the final lap.
  29. [29]
    Piastri admits McLaren team orders made him 'a bit nervous' as ... - F1
    Jul 21, 2024 · Piastri admits McLaren team orders made him 'a bit nervous' as he reflects on 'very special' maiden win in Hungary. July 21, 2024. BUDAPEST, ...
  30. [30]
    Lando Norris explains Hungarian Grand Prix controversy with ...
    Jul 22, 2024 · Lando Norris insisted he was always going to surrender the lead of the Hungarian Grand Prix to Oscar Piastri despite 20 controversial laps of wrangling over ...
  31. [31]
    Was McLaren's comparison of Italy 2025 to Hungary 2024 in team ...
    Sep 18, 2025 · Almost two weeks on from McLaren's decision to ask Oscar Piastri to wave Lando Norris through in Monza, following the Briton's slow pitstop in ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/was-mclarens-comparison-of-italy-2025-to-hungary-2024-in-team-orders-clarification-accurate/10760416/
  33. [33]
    Miami GP radio controversies are latest in F1's complex history with ...
    May 8, 2025 · Any direct team orders could not be handed out on the radio, per the FIA's regulations after Austria 2002. Instead of stamping out the practice, ...
  34. [34]
    FIA: Ferrari did use illegal team orders - Autosport
    Sep 9, 2010 · The FIA remains convinced that Ferrari did use illegal team orders at the German Grand Prix - but it decided not to push the team further at its disciplinary ...Missing: repeal 2011
  35. [35]
    Ferrari fined $100,000 for illegal team orders - Reuters
    Jul 25, 2010 · Ferrari were fined $100000 (64, 765 pounds) by stewards on Sunday for the use of illegal 'team orders' in winning the German Formula One ...Missing: ban fine
  36. [36]
    Ferrari escape further punishment over Hockenheim team orders
    Sep 8, 2010 · The team were fined a maximum US$100,000 (£65,100) in July for appearing to give Felipe Massa a coded message to allow Fernando Alonso through ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] 2021 FORMULA ONE SPORTING REGULATIONS - FIA
    Dec 8, 2021 · In order that an FIA observer may be appointed, Competitors must inform the FIA of any planned TCC, PE or DE at least 72 hours before it is due ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] 2025 FORMULA ONE SPORTING REGULATIONS - FIA
    Jul 31, 2024 · Cars at these tests must have been designed and constructed in order to comply with the Technical. Regulations of the calendar year falling ...
  39. [39]
    Multi 21: Flash back to Red Bull's most controversial race
    As the race neared its conclusion, Red Bull ordered both its drivers to maintain position with the now infamous 'Multi 21' instruction: the driver in car #2 ( ...Missing: code | Show results with:code
  40. [40]
    McLaren team orders: Why now and how they will work - The Race
    Sep 12, 2024 · McLaren's decision to bias its handling of races towards Lando Norris and aid his outside Formula 1 title bid will be managed on a case-by-case basis.
  41. [41]
    McLaren: Team orders would have "destroyed" future chances
    Oct 24, 2024 · McLaren team principal Andrea Stella has insisted he was not prepared to 'destroy' the balance within the squad by employing team orders for Oscar Piastri to ...
  42. [42]
    NASCAR defines potential manufacturer penalty structure
    Feb 5, 2025 · NASCAR officials introduced specific penalty options for manufacturers in an update to the NASCAR Rule Book on Wednesday.
  43. [43]
    Understanding Team Orders in NASCAR - The Daily Downforce
    Sep 14, 2024 · Team orders refer to when a driver does something in a race to benefit their teammate or manufacturer at the request of their team. · Team orders ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    NASCAR: 4 teams manipulated the results of the season finale
    Nov 28, 2019 · Four teams attempted to manipulate the outcome of the 2019 NASCAR Cup Series season finale and have been penalized accordingly.
  45. [45]
    Complete statements from ten NASCAR team owners defending ...
    Oct 3, 2025 · NASCAR and the teams ultimately agreed to the system now known as the Charter agreement, which went into effect for the 2016 Cup Series season.
  46. [46]
    NASCAR, teams extend charter negotiations UPDATES - Jayski
    Feb 24, 2024 · Sources say NASCAR's offer is to extend the system from 2025 through 2031. Teams want the system locked into NASCAR's rules in perpetuity, along ...
  47. [47]
    Nascar Penalizes Cup Team, Suspends Crew Chief For ... - Forbes
    Oct 11, 2022 · That review was completed Tuesday. Cole Custer was fined $100,000, while crew chief Mike Shiplett fined $100,000 and suspended indefinitely. ...
  48. [48]
    SHR No. 41 team's penalty appeal to be heard Thursday | NASCAR
    Oct 21, 2022 · Custer and No. 41 crew chief Michael Shiplett were each fined $100,000. Shiplett was also suspended indefinitely, and the team was docked 50 ...<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    Hauler Talk: NASCAR beefs up race control
    Oct 22, 2025 · Crew chiefs also have been warned about improper radio communication during the playoffs.
  50. [50]
    NASCAR Warns Crew Chiefs: What Teams Can't Say to Drivers
    Oct 12, 2025 · NASCAR's Brad Moran reminds crew chiefs of strict radio rules. One wrong word could cost teams big penalties during the playoffs.
  51. [51]
    NASCAR warned two Xfinity teams about discussing points on the ...
    Oct 8, 2025 · NASCAR warned two Xfinity teams about discussing the points situation on the radio with their drivers early in last weekend's cutoff race at ...
  52. [52]
    How a Spinout Destroyed the Michael Waltrip Racing NASCAR ...
    Jan 26, 2023 · Clint Bowyer's late spin at Richmond in 2013 led to race-fixing accusations and an episode that would come to be known as “Spingate,” a ...
  53. [53]
    Kyle Busch wins NASCAR title race at Miami
    along with his second Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series title ...
  54. [54]
    NASCAR announces verdict after Martinsville controversy
    Nov 3, 2020 · NASCAR will not be penalizing anybody over the “team orders” used late in the Martinsville Speedway playoff race which ultimately played into ...
  55. [55]
    Playoff Pulse: Round of 8 set after Charlotte Roval - NASCAR.com
    Oct 9, 2022 · Logano has been stellar at the Nevada track, leading the series with an 8.9 average finish to go along with a pair of wins (spring 2019 and ...<|separator|>
  56. [56]
    'Not all luck': William Byron enters Daytona ether - NASCAR.com
    Feb 17, 2025 · The No. 24 Chevrolet that William Byron drove to victory in the 2024 Daytona 500 back to its rightful owner after a year of ceremonial display.
  57. [57]
    Challenges Carving Our Name into Racing History
    The 1960s were when Yamaha began to throw itself deep into motorsports culture, learning and studying, training staff and engineers, and refining its technology ...
  58. [58]
    Ex-works MV Agusta 500/4 going under the hammer
    Jul 11, 2007 · Ex-John Surtees 500cc MV Agusta is expected to fetch upwards of $350,000 at auction. From the early 1950s to the late 1960s, MV Agusta won every ...
  59. [59]
    Bonhams to Sell Ex-Works MV Agusta 500 'four' at The ... - Motorcyclist
    Feb 20, 2009 · This genuine, ex-works machine, purchased directly from John Surtees by the current owner, accords with the specification employed by the MV Agusta factory ...Missing: orders | Show results with:orders
  60. [60]
    Retro: The tragic story of Bill Ivy - Paddock GP
    Jun 4, 2023 · For two minutes and five seconds, Phil Read is crowned despite Bill's two complaints. Terrible scenario, which almost amounts to betrayal. At ...
  61. [61]
    8W - Who? - Bill Ivy - Forix
    Mar 14, 2012 · 1968 wouldn't be so fun for Bill. It centred over team-orders in Yamaha with Phil Read. Francis said: "They had a understanding between them ...
  62. [62]
    Phil Read MBE - A Tribute - Isle of Man TT Races
    Oct 10, 2022 · It was even closer in 1968 when he battled for both the 125cc and 250cc Championships with Yamaha team-mate Ivy. With Honda having already ...
  63. [63]
    Freddie Spencer - Motorsports Hall of Fame
    Also in 1983 Spencer had been warned that it would be Honda's last year in 500 GP unless he triumphed. Spencer responded with his first world championship. And ...Missing: team orders
  64. [64]
    HRC's History - Honda.Racing
    1983. The wondrously talented Freddie Spencer won Honda's first 500 World Championship with the NS500, a beautifully balanced motorcycle that encapsulates HRC's ...
  65. [65]
    The Stories of HRC's 40years - Honda.Racing
    Freddie Spencer WGP 1983,1985(500cc,250cc) · Wayne Gardner WGP 1987 · Eddie Lawson WGP 1989 · Àlex Crivillé WGP 1999 · Mick Doohan WGP 1994-1998 · Valentino Rossi ...
  66. [66]
    Archives: Criville's Place in MotoGP History - Cycle News
    Aug 8, 2018 · By 1994 Criville was in the factory Honda team alongside fellow MotoGP Legend Mick Doohan. From 1995 to 1998 Criville would take seven wins ...Missing: orders | Show results with:orders
  67. [67]
    Capirossi wins, Stoner takes title - Autosport
    Sep 22, 2007 · Ducati rider Loris Capirossi took a comfortable victory in changing conditions as his teammate Casey Stoner secured the 2007 MotoGP title.<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    No 'keep it clean' order for Fiat Yamaha duo - Motorcycle News
    Nov 24, 2014 · Yamaha has insisted it doesn't need to remind Valentino Rossi and Jorge Lorenzo to keep their expected fierce battle in 2010 a clean scrap.
  69. [69]
    Rossi vs Lorenzo: Motegi MotoGP Battle - Ultimate Motorcycling
    Oct 5, 2010 · It was quite obvious that if there were any team orders to favor Lorenzo's championship lead Rossi was having none of it. It came down to ...
  70. [70]
    Ducati refuses team orders to help Bagnaia retain MotoGP title
    Oct 31, 2024 · Team manager Tardozzi announced the factory squad will not resort to team orders to help Bagnaia, while Borsoi underlines Ducati is “helping” ...
  71. [71]
    Jorge Martin interjects into Ducati 'team orders' debate: “I wouldn't ...
    Oct 8, 2023 · Jorge Martin claims he would ignore any team orders if Ducati dish out instructions for his battle with Francesco Bagnaia.<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    Pramac announces Ducati split, move to Yamaha MotoGP structure
    Jun 28, 2024 · Pramac has announced that it will part ways with Ducati at the end of the current MotoGP season to become a satellite Yamaha team in 2025.Missing: ignored directives
  73. [73]
    Pramac says Ducati support in MotoGP title fight has never wavered
    Oct 31, 2024 · Pramac team boss Gino Borsoi says Ducati “never fought against us” in terms of continued support amid the 2024 MotoGP title battle between Jorge Martin and ...
  74. [74]
    Top Stories of 2015; #2: Accusations fly in Rossi vs Marquez feud
    Dec 31, 2015 · Nobody was accused of foul play, until Rossi revealed in the pre-event press conference at Sepang that he felt Marquez could have won easily.
  75. [75]
    Grand Prix racing explained: How the MotoGP™ championship ...
    Jan 28, 2025 · The riders in MotoGP™ are expected to follow a code of conduct and stick to the rules to protect their own safety and that of their rivals, ...
  76. [76]
    Everything worth knowing about Prema's new IndyCar team
    Apr 9, 2024 · The Race goes in-depth to find out why Prema has chosen now to enter IndyCar, how it will avoid previous failed teams making the switch and ...
  77. [77]
    A decade after unification, INDYCAR racing rising to new heights
    Feb 27, 2018 · By 2008, the two biggest players in American open-wheel racing, Team Penske and Chip Ganassi Racing, had completed the transition from Champ ...Missing: post- examples
  78. [78]
    Scott Dixon wins Honda Edmonton Indy - ESPN
    Power ended up 2.67 seconds behind Dixon but retained the lead in the overall points race. Dixon's teammate Dario Franchitti was third, 3.28 seconds behind. It ...
  79. [79]
    McLaughlin fends off charging Dixon to win at Milwaukee - RACER
    Sep 1, 2024 · And that was the most boring part of the contest. Ganassi's Alex Palou had something close to an insurmountable lead in the championship ...
  80. [80]
    IndyCar fuel save secrets explained: The science behind Dixon's ...
    Aug 31, 2023 · IndyCar fuel save secrets explained: The science behind Dixon's magic. Scott Dixon has produced two of the greatest comeback performances in ...
  81. [81]
    [PDF] ntt indycar series | rulebook
    Team Tactics and/or Team Orders – Team tactics and/or Team orders are actions or omissions by one or more Members to artificially influence, affect, alter ...
  82. [82]
    INDYCAR Issues Post-Race Technical Violations and Penalties
    May 26, 2025 · Rule 9.3.1. Improper Conduct – Any member attempting to or engaging in unsportsmanlike conduct, unsafe conduct, or conduct detrimental to racing ...Paddock Buzz: David Malukas... · 109th Indianapolis 500...
  83. [83]
    Hybrid Power Unit Overview - INDYCAR.com
    The new power unit features additional horsepower and overtake ("push-to-pass") options generating opportunities for additional passing.Missing: coordination orders
  84. [84]
    F1 vs IndyCar: Which is faster, horsepower, assists and more
    IndyCar has a big emphasis on creating a level playing field with all teams using the same Dallara chassis and the choice between Honda and Chevrolet engines.
  85. [85]
    Andretti IndyCar line-up set as it shrinks to three cars for 2024
    Nov 10, 2023 · Andretti's IndyCar line-up is set, a team spokesperson has told The Race - meaning it will shrink from four entries to three for 2024.
  86. [86]
    Balance Of Performance Explained: Why Endurance Racing Is ...
    Oct 19, 2025 · The WEC pulls it all together by defining a "performance window" for each race that defines the range of performance the organizers would prefer ...
  87. [87]
    One-two for Porsche in Le Mans
    Two pit stops for repairs, however, cost the trio more than 30 minutes and the chance of a possiblethird place. For their team colleagues Patrick Pilet ...
  88. [88]
    Le Mans 2015: facts and figures - Porsche Newsroom
    Jun 22, 2015 · The Porsche Team made 90 pit stops, 30 per car. At 26 of these stops tyres and drivers were also changed. The longest distance covered with ...Missing: strategy | Show results with:strategy
  89. [89]
    https://newsroom.porsche.com/en/motorsports/le-mans-2015-porsche-one-two-facts-figures-11135.html
  90. [90]
    [PDF] 2025 SEASON - the FIA WEC Press Area
    May 10, 2025 · Replacing the long-standing LMGTE regulations, LMGT3 joined the FIA World Endurance. Championship package in 2024 and proved to be an immediate ...Missing: orders | Show results with:orders
  91. [91]
    When WRC team orders work for driver and team - DirtFish
    Jan 8, 2023 · WRC – Hyundai had team orders trouble last season but Toyota got it right back in 1998. ... His team-mate, fellow world champion, Didier Auriol ...
  92. [92]
    Toyota considering team orders to help Evans in Finland - DirtFish
    Aug 3, 2024 · The question on Friday night had been whether Kalle Rovanperä and Sébastien Ogier should help Elfyn Evans, with the Welshman sandwiched between ...
  93. [93]
    Toyota may consider team orders to help WRC title contender Evans
    Aug 3, 2024 · Toyota could consider team orders to help Elfyn Evans' World Rally Championship bid in Rally Finland after the title contender suffered an ...
  94. [94]
    Tanak critical of Hyundai WRC team orders that denied “fair fight”
    Sep 27, 2022 · Ott Tanak says it was a shame to be denied a “fair fight” for the Acropolis Rally Greece victory after criticising Hyundai Motorsport's decision to deploy team ...Missing: conflicts | Show results with:conflicts
  95. [95]
    Tänak backs off Neuville as Hyundai issues team orders - DirtFish
    Sep 11, 2022 · Tänak backs off Neuville as Hyundai issues team orders. After a big push on SS14, Ott Tänak has been told to hold position to preserve Hyundai's ...Missing: conflicts | Show results with:conflicts
  96. [96]
    Regulations - FIA World Rally Championship
    This section contains the wide range of FIA Sporting and Technical Regulations in an easily downloadable format.Missing: rivalry | Show results with:rivalry
  97. [97]
    Winners + losers from Monte Carlo Rally 2023 - DirtFish
    Jan 22, 2023 · Thierry Neuville was Toyota's closest challenger, but although he was third he was 44.6 seconds off the lead. Hyundai and M-Sport better ...Missing: support | Show results with:support
  98. [98]
    The World of WEC: A Beginner's Guide to Endurance Racing
    Sep 1, 2023 · Unlike typical racing formats where drivers attempt to race a pre-determined distance over the fastest time period, endurance racing is flipped.
  99. [99]
    ABOUT WRC
    Established in 1973, the WRC is an epic battle against the elements and the clock. It is spread across multiple rallies covering four continents and 13 ...<|control11|><|separator|>