Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Trigonal pyramidal molecular geometry

Trigonal pyramidal molecular geometry describes a molecular shape in which a central atom is bonded to three peripheral atoms while also possessing one of electrons, forming a three-dimensional pyramid-like structure with the lone pair occupying the apex position. This geometry arises from the valence shell repulsion (, where the electron pair arrangement around the central atom is —comprising four electron domains—but the lone pair repels the bonding pairs more strongly, distorting the shape from a regular tetrahedron. The resulting bond angles are typically compressed to about 107°, slightly less than the ideal tetrahedral angle of 109.5°, due to this enhanced repulsion from the lone pair. In VSEPR terms, trigonal pyramidal geometry corresponds to the AX₃E notation, where A is the central atom, X represents each bonding pair to a , and E denotes the . This configuration is common in molecules where the central atom has five valence electrons, forming three single bonds and retaining one , as seen in (NH₃), where is the central atom bonded to three atoms. Other notable examples include the hydronium ion (H₃O⁺), with oxygen as the central atom, and the sulfite ion (SO₃²⁻), where sulfur exhibits this geometry despite some double bonding character. The of such molecules is often significant, as the contributes to an uneven charge distribution, making trigonal pyramidal structures key in understanding the reactivity and physical properties of compounds like , which serves as a and in coordination .

Definition and Overview

Molecular shape description

The trigonal pyramidal molecular geometry consists of a central atom located at the apex of a three-dimensional , connected by bonds to three peripheral atoms that constitute an equilateral triangular base. This configuration yields a structure possessing symmetry, defined by a principal threefold passing through the central atom and the of the base, along with three vertical mirror planes each containing the rotation axis and one of the peripheral atoms. Visually, the trigonal pyramidal shape resembles a tetrahedron in which one vertex position is occupied by a lone pair of electrons on the central atom, rather than a fourth bonding pair, thereby compressing the arrangement into a pyramidal form with the lone pair directing away from the base. This geometry arises from a central atom surrounded by three sigma bonds to the peripheral atoms and one lone electron pair in its valence shell. The valence shell electron pair repulsion (VSEPR) model serves as the foundational framework for predicting this molecular shape.

Relation to electron pair geometry

In trigonal pyramidal molecular geometry, the underlying electron pair geometry is tetrahedral, arising from four electron domains surrounding the central atom—specifically, three bonding pairs to surrounding atoms and one . This arrangement follows from the valence shell electron pair repulsion () theory, which posits that electron pairs in the valence shell of the central atom repel each other and adopt a configuration that minimizes these repulsions, with four domains naturally forming a . The distinction between electron pair geometry and molecular geometry is fundamental: the former accounts for the spatial arrangement of all valence electron pairs (bonding and non-bonding), while the latter refers solely to the positions of the atomic nuclei, excluding lone pairs from the visible structure. In this framework, the tetrahedral electron pair geometry serves as the scaffold for predicting atomic positions, but the presence of the lone pair alters the observable shape by influencing the distribution of the bonding pairs. The , being part of the tetrahedral electron domain, occupies one vertex of the and exerts repulsive forces on the adjacent bonding pairs, effectively compressing them toward the opposite base and resulting in the three bonded atoms forming a pyramidal configuration relative to the central atom. This spatial occupation by the ensures that the overall electron arrangement remains tetrahedral, but it is the exclusion of the from considerations that yields the characteristic trigonal pyramidal form.

VSEPR Theory Explanation

AX3E notation

The Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion () theory, developed by Ronald J. Gillespie and Ronald S. Nyholm, posits that the geometry around a central atom in a is determined by the repulsion between pairs in its valence shell, which arrange themselves to minimize these repulsive interactions and achieve maximum separation. This model treats both bonding pairs (shared between atoms) and lone pairs (non-bonding pairs) on the central atom as occupying regions of space that repel one another, with the overall arrangement influenced by the total number of such domains. In the VSEPR classification system, molecular geometries are denoted using the AXnEm notation, where "A" represents the central atom, "X" indicates each bonding pair or group attached to it, and "E" denotes each on the central atom. For trigonal pyramidal geometry, the specific designation is AX3E, signifying a central atom bonded to three surrounding atoms (or groups) while also bearing one . This notation distinguishes the electron pair geometry (which includes the ) from the (observed only among the bonded atoms), providing a systematic framework to predict shapes based on electron domain counts. To contextualize AX3E within the broader VSEPR model, the following table outlines related notations for common geometries, including the three-domain trigonal planar case for contrast and the four-domain cases relevant to AX3E:
NotationElectron Domains Geometry
AX33 bonding, 0 loneTrigonal planarTrigonal planar
AX3E3 bonding, 1 loneTetrahedralTrigonal pyramidal
AX2E22 bonding, 2 loneTetrahedralBent
AX44 bonding, 0 loneTetrahedralTetrahedral
The AX3E arrangement results in a trigonal pyramidal molecular shape due to the positioning of the lone pair, which occupies one vertex of the tetrahedral electron pair geometry.

Lone pair effects on bond angles

In the AX3E classification of , which describes trigonal pyramidal molecular geometry, the single on the central atom plays a dominant role in determining the observed bond angles by exerting enhanced repulsive forces on the surrounding bonding pairs. The VSEPR model posits a hierarchy of repulsions among electron pairs in the valence shell, ordered as lone pair-lone pair > -bond pair > bond pair-bond pair; in AX3E systems, only the lone pair-bond pair repulsion is pertinent due to the presence of a single . This stronger lone pair-bond pair interaction arises because lone pairs occupy a larger effective volume in the valence shell compared to bonding pairs, as they are not shared between atoms and thus experience less delocalization. Consequently, the repels the three bonding pairs more forcefully than the bonding pairs repel each other, distorting the arrangement away from the ideal electron pair geometry. The electron pair geometry for AX3E is tetrahedral, with an ideal bond angle of 109.5° if all pairs were equivalent; however, the enhanced repulsion compresses the angles between the bonding pairs to approximately 107°. Positioned at the of the pyramidal , the effectively "pushes" the bonding pairs toward the base, resulting in a more compact arrangement that minimizes the total repulsive while maintaining the overall tetrahedral electron domain configuration. This qualitative "squishing" effect underscores the predictive power of VSEPR in accounting for such deviations without requiring detailed quantum mechanical calculations.

Structural Characteristics

Typical bond angles

In trigonal pyramidal molecular geometry, the observed bond angles between the three peripheral bonds typically range from approximately 90° to 107°, deviating below the ideal tetrahedral geometry angle of 109.5° due to the compressive influence of the on the bonding pairs. This range reflects general empirical observations across various AX3E systems, where the occupies more effective space, leading to angular compression; for example, NH₃ has H–N–H angles of ≈107°, while PH₃ and AsH₃ have ≈93° and ≈92°, respectively. Slight variations within this range are influenced by the electronegativity of the central atom and the size of the ligands. Higher central atom electronegativity promotes greater s-character in the bonding orbitals, resulting in bond angles closer to 109°, while lower electronegativity shifts them toward the lower end of the range. Larger ligands tend to increase bond angles slightly beyond what would be expected from lone pair effects alone, as steric repulsion encourages wider separation of the bonds. The following table compares the ideal angle from the underlying electron pair geometry to typical observed values in trigonal pyramidal structures:
Geometry AspectAngle (degrees)Notes
Ideal tetrahedral (AX4)109.5No lone pair; maximum separation of four s.
Observed trigonal pyramidal (AX3E)90–107Compressed by ; varies with central atom (e.g., NH₃ ≈107°, PH₃ ≈93°) and properties.

Bond lengths and distortions

In trigonal pyramidal molecules, bond lengths are primarily influenced by the size of the central atom and the electronegativity difference between the central atom and the surrounding ligands. As the central atom increases in size down a group in the periodic table, the bond lengths generally lengthen due to reduced orbital overlap and weaker bonding interactions. For instance, in the group 15 hydrides, the N-H bond length in ammonia (NH₃) is 1.008 Å, while the P-H bond in phosphine (PH₃) is 1.421 Å, and the As-H bond in arsine (AsH₃) is approximately 1.52 Å. These trends reflect the increasing atomic radius of the central atom (N: 70 pm, P: 110 pm, As: 120 pm), which expands the bonding region and results in longer bonds. Electronegativity differences further modulate bond lengths by affecting distribution and bond polarity. A greater electronegativity difference typically shortens the bond due to increased ionic character and stronger electrostatic attraction. In NH₃, the high of (3.04 on the Pauling scale) compared to (2.20) contributes to the relatively short N-H bond, whereas in PH₃, phosphorus's lower (2.19) leads to a more covalent, longer P-H bond despite the size effect dominating. This interplay is evident in comparative studies of pnictogen hydrides, where bond lengths correlate inversely with central atom after accounting for size. Unlike trigonal bipyramidal geometries, trigonal pyramidal structures exhibit no significant distinction between axial and equatorial bonds, as the three bonding pairs occupy equivalent positions derived from tetrahedral electron geometry. All bonds remain symmetrically equivalent in ideal cases, with minimal length variation (typically <0.01 Å) observed experimentally in symmetric molecules like or . Minor distortions can arise from in molecules with bulkier ligands, leading to slight asymmetry in bond lengths. For example, in substituted trigonal pyramidal compounds like P(CH₃)₃, crowding from methyl groups causes marginal elongation (up to 0.02 ) in certain P-C bonds due to repulsive interactions, deviating from perfect equivalence. Hypervalency in heavier central atoms, such as in SbCl₃, may introduce subtle distortions from lone pair-bonding pair repulsions, resulting in variations of ~0.05 , though these are less pronounced than in octahedral hypervalent species.

Examples

Ammonia (NH3)

Ammonia (NH₃) exemplifies trigonal pyramidal molecular geometry as its prototypical case. The structure features a central atom covalently bonded to three atoms, accompanied by one of electrons on the , which aligns with the AX₃E classification under and imparts the characteristic pyramidal shape. This configuration yields C_{3v} symmetry, defined by a principal C₃ rotation axis passing through the and the midpoint of the opposite H-H edge, along with three σ_v mirror planes each containing the and one . Experimentally determined structural parameters confirm the geometry: the H-N-H bond angle measures 106.7°, compressed from the tetrahedral ideal of 109.5° owing to lone pair-bond pair repulsion, while the N-H bond length is 1.012 Å. The trigonal pyramidal arrangement in NH₃ was first identified through spectroscopic investigations by early 20th-century researchers, with infrared and Raman analyses in the 1920s and 1930s—such as those by E.F. Barker establishing pyramidal dimensions by 1929—providing foundational evidence that preceded formal VSEPR theory.

Other common molecules

Beyond ammonia, several other molecules and ions adopt trigonal pyramidal geometry due to their AX3E arrangement, where the central atom is bonded to three atoms and possesses one . The hydronium ion (H₃O⁺) features oxygen as the central atom bonded to three hydrogen atoms with one , resulting in a trigonal pyramidal shape and H-O-H bond angles of approximately 107°. Phosphorus trichloride (PCl3) exemplifies this in , with the atom at the apex bonded to three atoms; the Cl-P-Cl bond angle measures approximately 100°, smaller than the ideal tetrahedral value owing to the larger atomic size of , which adjusts bond pair-bond pair repulsions. (PH3), a simple phosphine analog, also displays trigonal pyramidal structure, featuring a H-P-H bond angle of about 93.3°, reflecting similar size-induced variations in repulsion compared to nitrogen hydrides. In ionic contexts, the sulfite ion (SO3^2-) has sulfur as the central atom surrounded by three oxygen atoms, resulting in trigonal pyramidal shape with O-S-O bond angles around 107° from influences. The ion (ClO3^-) follows suit, with bonded to three oxygens in a trigonal pyramidal arrangement, where the on compresses the O-Cl-O angles to about 107°. trioxide (XeO3) represents a with this geometry, the xenon atom linked to three oxygens, exhibiting O-Xe-O bond angles near 103° due to the 's .

Physical Properties

Polarity and dipole moment

Trigonal pyramidal molecules exhibit inherent arising from the asymmetry introduced by the on the central atom, which disrupts the of the three dipoles and results in a net directed along the axis from the center of the base formed by the three surrounding atoms to the apex (central atom). This asymmetry stems from the 's greater spatial repulsion compared to bonding pairs, causing the bonds to bend away and preventing complete cancellation of individual dipoles. The overall emerges from the addition of the three dipoles, each pointing from the less electronegative peripheral atoms toward the more electronegative central atom; in a symmetric trigonal planar arrangement, these vectors would sum to zero, but the pyramidal tilts them such that their aligns with the molecular axis, pointing toward the central atom. Qualitatively, this can be visualized as three arrows of equal magnitude converging at the central atom from the base vertices, with their combined tail-to-head summation yielding a single net arrow from the base center upward to the apex. The magnitude of this net depends significantly on the of the central atom, with greater differences between the central atom and the bonded atoms leading to stronger individual bond and thus a larger overall moment; for instance, molecules with as the central atom display stronger compared to those with due to nitrogen's higher , which enhances the polarity of the bonds.

Implications for reactivity

The trigonal pyramidal geometry of molecules like (NH3) and (PH3) positions the on the central atom in an sp3-hybrid orbital directed away from the three substituents, enhancing its availability for donation to acids and thereby conferring Lewis basicity. This donation enables coordination to metal centers, forming stable complexes such as ammine ligands in [Co(NH3)6]3+ or ligands in [(Ph3P)3RhCl]. exhibits stronger Lewis basicity than due to nitrogen's higher , which increases the electron density on the lone pair, as evidenced by bond dissociation energies in main-group and complexes where NH3 forms stronger bonds than PH3. Steric hindrance from the three substituents in the pyramidal base can impede the approach of electrophiles to the , reducing reactivity in reactions where the acts as a . For instance, in nucleophilic attacks on alkyl halides, primary amines are more reactive than secondary or tertiary ones due to less steric crowding around the , a trend that also applies to phosphines where bulkier substituents further diminish nucleophilicity despite phosphorus's inherently lower steric demand compared to analogs. Reactivity trends in these molecules are further influenced by differences in pyramidal inversion barriers, which determine configurational stability. In , the low inversion barrier of approximately 5.8 kcal/mol allows rapid interconversion between enantiomers at , precluding isolation of chiral forms and affecting dynamic processes like proton . In contrast, phosphines have significantly higher barriers (around 34 kcal/mol for PH3), enabling the of stable chiral phosphines that exhibit distinct reactivity in asymmetric synthesis, such as enantioselective .

References

  1. [1]
    Trigonal Pyramidal Molecular Geometry - Chemistry LibreTexts
    Jun 30, 2023 · The lone electron pairs exerts a little extra repulsion on the three bonding hydrogen atoms to create a slight compression to a 107o bond angle.
  2. [2]
    Electron-Pair Geometry vs. Molecular Shape - UCalgary Chemistry ...
    The ideal bond angles in a trigonal pyramid are based on the tetrahedral electron pair geometry. Again, there are slight deviations from the ideal because lone ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] The Shapes of Molecules
    If there is one lone pair of electrons and three bond pairs the resulting molecular geometry is trigonal pyramidal (e.g. NH3).
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    Point Group C3v - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The C3v point group is defined as a molecular symmetry group characterized by a principal axis of rotation (C3) and three vertical planes of symmetry (σv), ...
  6. [6]
    7.6 Molecular Structure and Polarity - Chemistry 2e | OpenStax
    Feb 14, 2019 · The ideal bond angles in a trigonal pyramid are based on the tetrahedral electron pair geometry. Again, there are slight deviations from the ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  7. [7]
    Inorganic stereochemistry - Quarterly Reviews, Chemical Society ...
    Inorganic stereochemistry. R. J. Gillespie and R. S. Nyholm, Q. Rev. Chem. Soc., 1957, 11, 339 DOI: 10.1039/QR9571100339. To request permission to reproduce ...
  8. [8]
    Lecture 12: The Shapes of Molecules: VSEPR Theory | Chemistry
    The theory is based on Lewis structures and the simple idea that that the preferred geometry around a central atom is the one that minimizes electron repulsion.
  9. [9]
  10. [10]
    vsepr - FSU Chemistry & Biochemistry
    There is one central atom (Cl) and 3 peripheral Oxygen atoms and one lone pair of electrons so the VSEPR code would be AX3E.Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  11. [11]
    [PDF] The Shapes of Molecules: VSEPR Theory - MIT OpenCourseWare
    Oct 3, 2014 · Rationalization of shapes based on VSEPR theory​​ electron pairs strongly, whereas an equatorial lone pair repels only strongly. AX3E2 molecules ...Missing: notation | Show results with:notation
  12. [12]
    Review Fifty years of the VSEPR model - ScienceDirect.com
    It is 50 years since the ideas of the VSEPR model were first introduced in an article by Ron Nyholm and myself entitled Inorganic Stereochemistry.<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    Molecular Parameters - Nitrogen Compounds - Wired Chemist
    Molecular Parameters - Nitrogen Compounds. Molecular Formula, Name, Structure, Bond Length (Å), Bond Angle (°), Symmetry ...
  15. [15]
    High pressure synthesis of phosphine from the elements ... - Nature
    Nov 30, 2020 · The size of the spheres has been drawn by estimating their radius as the sum of the P–H bond length (1.421 Å) and H van der Waals radius (1.20 Å) ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Absolute local mode vibrational band intensities of AsH3
    optimized As–H bond length and H–As–H bond angle in equilibrium configuration are 1.5218 A and 92.0474°, which agree well with the experi- mental values [23] ...
  17. [17]
    Listing of experimental geometry data for NH 3 (Ammonia) - CCCBDB
    Experimental Geometries · Internal Coordinates by type · Bond angles · Rotational Constants · Point Groups · Diatomic bond lengths. Vibrations. Vibrational ...Missing: PH3 | Show results with:PH3
  18. [18]
    Listing of experimental geometry data for PH 3 (Phosphine) - CCCBDB
    Bond length · Rotational Constant · Moment of Inertia · Dipole and Quadrupole ... Listing of experimental geometry data for PH3 (Phosphine). Rotational ...
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Sulfite Ion Lewis Structure
    The lone pair on sulfur occupies one position, exerting repulsive forces that slightly. 2. compress the bond angles. The bond angles are approximately 107°, ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Second Hour Exam - MIT OpenCourseWare
    (c) (i) (6 points) Draw the Lewis structure of (SO3)-2. Include any ... bond angle in (SO3)-2. < 90°; 90°; > 90°; < 109.5°; 109.5°; > 109.5°; < 120 ...
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Comparison of P···N interaction with hydrogen and halogen bonds
    Mar 7, 2011 · in electronegativity between P and N, which accounts for the larger magnitude of the dipole moment of NH3, more than twice that of PH3. The ...
  24. [24]
    Chemical Bonding in Phosphane and Amine Complexes of Main Group Elements and Transition Metals†
    ### Summary of Lewis Basicity of NH₃ and PH₃ in Coordination to Metals or Lewis Acids
  25. [25]
    The Nucleophilicity of Phosphines
    ### Summary of Nucleophilicity of Phosphines vs. Amines (Steric Effects)
  26. [26]
    a fresh perspective on the ammonia pyramidal inversion and bond ...
    Oct 4, 2023 · This work offers a comprehensive and fresh perspective on the bonding evolution theory (BET) framework, originally proposed by Silvi and collaborators.
  27. [27]
    Trends in inversion barriers. I. Group15 hydrides - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · Inversion barriers for the group-15 hydrides NH3, PH3, AsH3, SbH3 and BiH3 have been studied using abinitio self-consistent-field methods including electron ...