Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Trolleybus

A trolleybus, also known as a trolley coach or trackless trolley, is a rubber-tired electric bus that draws its power from a pair of overhead electrical wires using two trolley poles mounted on its roof, enabling zero-emission operation in urban environments without the need for onboard fuel storage.^[1] The technology originated in the late 19th century, with early experiments dating to 1882 in Berlin, Germany,^[2] and the first practical in-service use emerging between the 1880s and 1915 in Europe, where it served as a flexible alternative to rail-based streetcars.^[3] Trolleybuses gained widespread adoption in the early to mid-20th century, particularly in Europe and North America, peaking with hundreds of systems worldwide by the 1940s due to their quiet operation, rapid acceleration, and superior performance on hilly terrain compared to diesel buses.^[4] However, many networks were dismantled from the 1950s to 1970s as cities prioritized the route flexibility and lower infrastructure costs of conventional motor buses, leading to a sharp decline in global usage.^[3] In recent decades, trolleybuses have experienced a resurgence driven by environmental regulations and the push for sustainable transport, with modern systems incorporating batteries for limited off-wire operation to enhance flexibility.^[1] As of 2025, approximately 257 cities across more than 40 countries operate trolleybus networks, comprising over 22,000 vehicles and serving as a key component of low-carbon public transit in urban corridors.^[5] Notable advantages include near-zero tailpipe emissions when powered by renewable sources, reduced noise pollution, lower maintenance needs, and longer vehicle lifespans, making them particularly suitable for dense, topographically challenging cities like San Francisco and Zurich.^[1]^[6] Despite high initial costs for overhead wiring, ongoing innovations in in-motion charging and hybrid designs position trolleybuses as a viable option for decarbonizing bus fleets amid global electrification trends.^[7]

Overview

Definition and Principles

A trolleybus is an electric bus that operates on rubber tires and draws its power from a pair of overhead wires suspended above the roadway, using articulated poles or bows to maintain electrical contact. Unlike rail-based electric vehicles such as trams or light rail, trolleybuses do not require fixed tracks and can maneuver flexibly on standard streets, making them suitable for urban routes with mixed traffic. This design allows for zero-emission operation in electrified sections while providing the versatility of a conventional bus.^[8] The core principles of trolleybus operation involve collecting direct current (DC) from the overhead lines to power onboard electric motors that drive the wheels. Current collection occurs via two parallel overhead conductors—one carrying the positive supply and the other serving as the return—spaced approximately 0.6 meters apart, contacted by spring-loaded or pneumatically operated trolley poles fitted with carbon or metal shoes for continuous electrical connection during vehicle movement. The power supply is typically DC at nominal voltages of 600 V or 750 V, delivered through a catenary system that ensures stable energy transfer without onboard generation. Propulsion is achieved by converting this electrical energy into mechanical torque via series-wound DC motors or, in modern configurations, AC induction motors powered through inverters, enabling smooth acceleration and regenerative braking for efficiency.^[9]^[10]^[6] Key components include the overhead contact system, comprising a messenger wire supporting the trolley wire (for positive current) and an auxiliary return wire, which together form a complete circuit isolated from the ground due to the vehicle's rubber tires. Power conversion occurs at trackside substations, where alternating current (AC) from the utility grid is rectified to DC and stepped down to the required voltage, with substations spaced 1 to 5 kilometers apart to minimize voltage drops. Vehicle grounding is facilitated entirely through the return wire, preventing stray currents and ensuring safe operation on non-conductive road surfaces.^[11]^[6]

Global Context and Usage

As of 2025, trolleybus systems operate in 257 cities across more than 40 countries worldwide, comprising a global fleet of 22,137 vehicles that serve millions of passengers daily as a sustainable urban mobility option.^[5] These systems are most prevalent in Europe and Asia, where they account for the majority of operational networks and vehicles, driven by a focus on zero-emission public transport.^[12] In Europe, which hosts over half of the world's trolleybus systems, concentrations are highest in Eastern Europe, with Russia and Ukraine operating the most systems (dozens each as of 2021), alongside notable networks in Italy (14 systems), Czechia (13), and Switzerland (10).^[12] Revivals and modernizations have occurred in cities like Zurich, where the system integrates advanced battery-assisted technology for enhanced flexibility, and earlier efforts in Athens supported network upgrades before recent plans for partial retirement.^[5] In Asia, expansions continue in major cities such as Beijing, which maintains one of the largest fleets with over 1,250 dual-mode vehicles across 31 routes, and Tehran, where recent infrastructure improvements have extended service to key urban areas.^[13] China overall operates 13 systems, contributing significantly to the region's vehicle count through ongoing electrification initiatives.^[12] The Americas represent a smaller share, with only a handful of surviving systems in North America, including San Francisco, Philadelphia, Seattle, and Vancouver, which persist as holdouts amid a broader decline that accelerated after the 1960s due to shifting priorities toward automobiles and diesel buses.^[12]^[14] In Latin America, trolleybuses form part of emerging electric fleets, though battery-electric buses are increasingly dominant.^[15] Trolleybuses play a key role in sustainable urban transport, offering zero tailpipe emissions and supporting decarbonization goals, with notable growth in electric Bus Rapid Transit (eBRT) applications from 2020 to 2025.^[5] In Latin America, e-bus fleets, including trolleybuses, expanded at an average annual rate of 33.5% since 2017, reaching over 6,000 electric buses by 2024.^[15]^[16] Economically, trolleybus systems involve high initial infrastructure costs for overhead wiring and substations, but they can yield long-term savings through lower energy expenses compared to diesel buses, with vehicle lifespans often extended.^[16] Worldwide, these networks span thousands of kilometers of routes, enabling efficient service in densely populated areas.^[5]

History

Early Invention and Adoption

The invention of the trolleybus is credited to Ernst Werner von Siemens, who demonstrated the world's first electric trackless trolley, called the Electromote, on April 29, 1882, in the Berlin suburb of Gross-Lichterfelde. This experimental vehicle featured a 2.5-horsepower electric motor powered by overhead wires through a bow-shaped collector, marking a significant step toward electric road transport independent of rails.^[2]^[17] The transition to commercial operation occurred nearly two decades later, with the launch of the first regular passenger-carrying trolleybus service on July 10, 1901, between Königstein and Bad Königstein in Saxony, Germany. Developed by Siemens in collaboration with engineer Max Schiemann, this 3.5-kilometer line used under-running trolley poles for power collection and operated until 1904, proving the feasibility of the system for short urban and suburban routes.^[14]^[3] A similar early system ran from 1901 to 1913 between Fontainebleau and Samois in France, utilizing self-propelled vehicles by Lombard-Gerin, further validating the technology's practicality.^[18] During the 1910s and 1920s, trolleybus adoption accelerated in Europe, particularly in Germany, France, and the United Kingdom, where cities sought efficient electric alternatives to trams and horse-drawn vehicles for flexible routing. In the UK, the first permanent service commenced in Leeds on June 20, 1911, while Germany expanded with multiple lines, including extensions of Schiemann's designs.^[18]^[19] In the United States, the inaugural commercial trolleybus line debuted in Los Angeles on September 2, 1910, connecting Hollywood to the Laurel Canyon development using converted Oldsmobile buses with overhead power collection.^[20] This early American implementation highlighted the trolleybus's advantages over contemporary battery-electric vehicles, including virtually unlimited range via continuous overhead supply and high starting torque from electric motors, which proved ideal for hilly urban areas.^[3] Key technological advancements drove this initial spread, including refinements to series-wound DC electric motors for better hill-climbing capability and the development of more reliable overhead contact systems, such as spring-loaded trolley poles, which reduced wire wear and improved current collection on city streets. These innovations enabled trolleybuses to serve irregular routes without the infrastructure costs of rail tracks, fostering growth in urban centers across continents by the mid-1920s.^[3]

Expansion, Peak, and Decline

Following World War II, trolleybus systems underwent significant expansion globally, driven by the need for efficient urban transport in rebuilding cities. In the Soviet Union, where the first system had opened in Moscow in 1933, postwar development exploded, with numerous cities and towns introducing or extending passenger and cargo trolleybus networks to support industrialization and population growth. By the late 1940s, this boom contributed to a worldwide peak, with the number of trolleybus systems reaching 366 in 1949.^[21]^[4] The 1950s marked the zenith of trolleybus adoption, particularly in regions like Europe and the Americas, where low operating costs—due to electric propulsion requiring no onboard fuel—and zero tailpipe emissions made them attractive for dense urban routes. In the United States, over 60 cities operated trolleybus services by 1940, expanding further postwar to handle increased ridership, representing about 10 percent of national transit activity at the decade's peak. South America also saw notable growth, exemplified by Bogotá, Colombia, which introduced its first 20 trolleybuses in 1947 to replace damaged tram infrastructure after the 1948 Bogotazo riots, rapidly expanding to serve the city's growing population.^[14]^[22] The decline began in the 1950s and accelerated through the 1970s, primarily due to the rise of diesel buses, which offered cheaper infrastructure without extensive overhead wiring and benefited from advancing engine technology for larger, more flexible vehicles. In the US, many systems converted, such as Boston's, which phased out trolleybuses by the early 1960s amid falling ridership and economic pressures on transit operators. Globally, the number of systems halved by the 1980s, as automotive shifts prioritized road expansion and private vehicle use over fixed electric rail alternatives.^[6] Regional differences shaped the trajectory, with trolleybuses persisting longer in communist bloc countries like those in the Soviet Union, where emphasis on energy independence from imported oil sustained operations despite broader declines elsewhere. The 1970s oil crises further highlighted these advantages, prompting minor revivals and reduced shutdown rates in Eastern Europe by underscoring the reliability of electric systems amid fuel shortages.^[4]

Infrastructure

Overhead Contact System

The overhead contact system (OCS) for trolleybuses consists of twin parallel wires designed to deliver direct current power while accommodating urban street layouts. The primary trolley wire, typically made of grooved hard-drawn copper or bronze alloys such as silicon bronze with a cross-section of around 80 mm², serves as the main conductor for power transfer and is positioned at a standard height of approximately 5.2 meters above the street surface to ensure clearance for vehicles and pedestrians.^[23] A supporting messenger wire, often stranded galvanized steel, runs parallel to provide tension and stability, connected via droppers and hangers spaced at regular intervals.^[24] These components are mounted on poles spaced 30 to 50 meters apart, with span lengths not exceeding 36.6 meters to minimize sag and maintain consistent contact.^[23]^[25] Power distribution in the OCS relies on traction substations spaced every 1 to 3 kilometers, which convert high-voltage alternating current from the utility grid to 600-750 V direct current suitable for trolleybus operation.^[26] Voltage drops along the lines, which can reach significant levels due to the dual-conductor setup and urban loads, are managed through auxiliary feeder cables that connect substations directly to key points in the network, ensuring stable supply even during peak demand.^[27] Design standards for the OCS emphasize adaptability to urban constraints, including the use of flexible booms and pull-off hangers to guide wires through curves with radii as tight as 30 meters, preventing misalignment and arcing.^[23] Materials such as bronze alloys and galvanized steel provide inherent weatherproofing against snow and ice accumulation, with insulators often made of porcelain or composite to withstand environmental exposure.^[28] At intersections, specialized crossings maintain wire continuity without interrupting power flow.^[29] Maintenance practices for the OCS involve regular inspections to detect wear, corrosion, and tension issues, with walking patrols conducted biannually to examine poles, wires, and insulators, and annual aerial assessments to measure contact wire wear exceeding 30% for replacement.^[30] These protocols help mitigate downtime from weather-related damage like ice buildup. Initial installation costs average around $1.5 million per kilometer, including wiring and electrical supply, while annual upkeep typically ranges from $10,000 to $50,000 per kilometer depending on system age and traffic volume.^[31]^[32]

Switches and Terminals

In trolleybus networks, wire switches, also known as frogs in some regions, are essential mechanisms that guide the trolley poles at junctions where lines branch or merge, enabling route changes without physical intervention on the vehicle. Common types include power-on/power-off switches, where the driver toggles vehicle power to direct the pole along the desired energized wire; Selectric switches, which use solenoids activated by current draw from the pole to shift the contact; and Fahslabend switches, which are radio-controlled for precise operation via driver signals. These switches are typically designed in narrow angles of 10° or 20° to accommodate smooth pole transitions, with options for left- or right-hand configurations to suit network layouts. Crossover switches facilitate lane changes by allowing poles to transfer between parallel overhead wires, often incorporating spring-loaded guides to maintain contact during maneuvers. Terminal operations at the end of lines rely on specialized configurations to reverse direction efficiently, avoiding the need for manual pole flipping. Loop or turning loop setups route the overhead wires in a circular path, permitting the trolleybus to complete a U-turn while keeping poles attached and maintaining polarity. In constrained urban spaces, such as narrow valleys, turntables rotate the entire vehicle 180° to realign poles with the return wire. Shunt wires provide short auxiliary sections of overhead contact for brief off-wire movements during terminal maneuvers, such as repositioning or maintenance access. Modern advancements since the 2000s have introduced remote-controlled switches in systems like Vancouver's TransLink network, where drivers activate switches via onboard radio transmitters to minimize errors and speed up operations. Safety interlocks, integrated into switch mechanisms, detect pole position and vehicle approach to prevent misalignment, reducing the risk of pole damage or de-wiring incidents. These features enhance reliability in high-traffic environments. Challenges in switch and terminal design include managing electrical arcing, which occurs as poles pass through switches and can accelerate wear on contacts; arc suppression techniques, such as insulated guides and low-resistance materials, mitigate this by minimizing spark duration. Historically, manual hand-throw switches required operator intervention, leading to longer dwell times, whereas current programmable logic controller (PLC)-based automation allows seamless, driver-initiated switching, significantly streamlining operations compared to earlier methods.

Vehicle Design

Chassis, Body, and Propulsion

Trolleybus chassis are typically produced by specialized manufacturers such as Škoda Transportation, Solaris Bus & Coach, and Hess, often adapted from standard bus or truck frames to integrate electric propulsion components while maintaining robust structural integrity for urban operations.^[33] These modifications often include reinforced mounting points for motors and batteries, with articulated versions featuring a flexible joint to accommodate higher passenger capacities of up to 150 individuals in lengths around 18 meters.^[34] Such designs enhance maneuverability in congested city environments compared to rigid configurations. The body construction of trolleybuses employs lightweight materials like aluminum or steel panels to balance durability and weight reduction, facilitating efficient energy use and compliance with modern safety standards. Vehicles commonly feature 2 to 4 doors per side for rapid passenger flow, with configurations varying by model—such as three doors on standard units and four on articulated ones—to support high-volume routes. Accessibility is prioritized through integrated features like low-floor designs and deployable ramps, enabling wheelchair users and those with mobility aids to board without assistance.^[35] Propulsion in modern trolleybuses relies on AC electric motors, typically asynchronous or permanent magnet synchronous types rated at 200 to 300 kW, powered via inverters from the DC overhead supply, delivering high starting torque for smooth acceleration and effective handling of steep urban grades up to 15%, outperforming diesel buses in hilly terrain. Historical vehicles used series or compound-wound DC motors.^[36]^[37] Regenerative braking systems further enhance efficiency by converting kinetic energy during deceleration into electrical power, recovering approximately 20-30% of braking energy to reduce overall consumption.^[38] This process integrates seamlessly with the overhead power supply, minimizing wear on mechanical brakes. Trolleybuses utilize rubber tires for superior road flexibility and traction on varied surfaces, contrasting with the rigidity of rail-bound systems like trams. Independent suspension systems are standard to absorb shocks from urban potholes and uneven pavement, ensuring passenger comfort and vehicle longevity during frequent stops and starts.^[39]

Power Collection and Electrical Components

Trolleybuses employ a dual-pole system for power collection, consisting of two parallel poles mounted on the roof that contact separate overhead wires to complete the electrical circuit, one for positive and one for return current.^[6] Each pole is typically equipped with a grooved carbon shoe or wheel at the top end to maintain sliding contact with the wire, reducing wear and ensuring reliable current transfer up to 1800 A in high-demand scenarios.^[40] Pole lengths generally range from 4 to 6 meters, allowing sufficient reach for urban overhead systems while accommodating vehicle height variations.^[40] To enhance operational safety, modern trolley poles feature auto-retraction mechanisms that lower the poles automatically upon detection of wire loss or dewirement, preventing damage to the overhead infrastructure and allowing quick recovery without manual intervention.^[41] For systems requiring greater stability at higher speeds, bow-type collectors may be used instead of straight poles; these curved designs distribute contact force more evenly, minimizing vibrations and dewirement risks during acceleration or on uneven routes.^[42] Pantograph variants, while rare in trolleybuses due to the preference for simpler pole systems, occasionally appear in specialized designs for improved high-speed performance. Onboard electrical components include resistors for traditional speed control, which dissipate excess energy as heat to regulate motor acceleration, though these have largely been supplanted since the 1980s by more efficient solid-state power electronics, including thyristor choppers for DC motors and IGBT-based inverters for AC motors, enabling precise pulse-width modulation of power delivery to the traction motors.^[43]^[44]^[45] Auxiliary systems, such as lighting, doors, and control electronics, are powered by onboard batteries, typically standard lead-acid units providing short-term backup during minor disruptions.^[46] Control systems integrate solid-state accelerators and inverters to manage torque and speed, with regenerative braking feeding energy back to the overhead lines via the power electronics. Contact pressure from spring-loaded shoes on the poles is maintained at 50-100 N to ensure consistent wire engagement without excessive wear. Fault protection is provided by circuit breakers that interrupt power flow during overcurrent or short-circuit events, safeguarding onboard electronics and preventing arcing.^[47] Overall system efficiency for energy conversion in trolleybuses reaches 80-90%, benefiting from direct overhead power draw that minimizes losses associated with onboard storage. Spring-loaded shoes further aid arc minimization by maintaining firm, continuous contact, reducing electrical arcing during movement and extending component life.^[6]

Operational Aspects

Route Planning and Maintenance

Route design for trolleybus systems is inherently constrained by the fixed overhead wiring infrastructure, which restricts operational flexibility and requires routes to be aligned precisely with the wire network to ensure continuous power supply. Unlike diesel or battery-electric buses, trolleybuses cannot deviate significantly from pre-planned paths without losing propulsion, necessitating thorough urban planning to accommodate street geometries, intersections, and obstacles while minimizing visual and spatial impacts. Integration with traffic signals is a key consideration, often involving transit signal priority systems to enhance flow and reduce dwell times at intersections. Urban operating speeds for trolleybuses vary, averaging 12-18 km/h in revenue service depending on the system (e.g., around 12 km/h in Seattle), with maximum speeds typically reaching 40-50 km/h on suitable alignments; peak-hour headways commonly set at 5-10 minutes to balance capacity and efficiency.^[48]^[16]^[49] Scheduling trolleybus services emphasizes high reliability, particularly in sections covered by overhead wires, where on-time performance can exceed 75% system-wide, benefiting from the absence of refueling stops and consistent electric propulsion. Overall bus on-time metrics for operators like King County Metro, which includes trolley routes, are around 76-78% as of 2025 for regular services, though wired segments often achieve better adherence due to predictable power delivery.^[50]^[51]^[52]^[53]^[46] Contingencies for wire faults, such as pole dewirements or line disruptions, include immediate driver protocols like activating emergency flashers, engaging brakes, and isolating power, followed by deployment of tow trucks for repositioning or temporary swaps to diesel-hybrid backups in hybrid-equipped fleets to maintain service continuity; modern hybrid designs allow limited off-wire operation using batteries during disruptions, improving reliability as of 2025.^[5] Maintenance routines for trolleybuses focus on both vehicle and infrastructure components to ensure safety and longevity, with daily inspections of trolley poles, shoes, and wiring connections performed by operators to detect wear, arcing, or misalignment that could lead to dewirements. Quarterly overhauls typically cover propulsion motors, pantographs, and electrical systems, conducted in specialized depots equipped with wire simulators to replicate overhead contact conditions without live power. Trolleybus vehicles generally have a lifecycle of 15 years under Federal Transit Administration standards, reflecting their robust electric design, while energy use ranges from approximately 1.3-1.8 kWh/km, with operating costs varying by location and era (historically around $0.20-0.30 per km in the early 2010s when including maintenance and infrastructure upkeep).^[41]^[54]^[55]^[56] Safety protocols are paramount in trolleybus operations, mandating minimum overhead clearance of at least 5.4 meters (17.6 feet) for wires above roadways to prevent collisions with vehicles or structures, as enforced by utilities like San Francisco Muni. Emergency off-wire procedures require drivers to immediately secure the vehicle, notify dispatch, and use auxiliary batteries—if equipped—for limited movement to a safe reconnection point, with ground crews trained to handle live wire risks under strict lockout-tagout standards. These measures, combined with regular infrastructure patrols, help mitigate hazards from high-voltage systems operating at 600 volts DC.^[57]^[46]

Driver and Passenger Experience

Trolleybus drivers utilize accelerator pedals or, in some advanced models, joystick controllers for propulsion, similar to those in conventional electric buses, allowing precise control over the vehicle's electric motors. These controls are integrated into the driver's cabin alongside standard steering wheels and braking systems, with additional monitors displaying the alignment and status of the trolley poles to maintain continuous contact with the overhead wires. When poles dewire during operation, drivers must manually reposition them using onboard tools or by maneuvering the vehicle, a skill requiring specialized training that typically lasts 4-6 weeks to ensure safe and efficient recovery procedures.^[58]^[59]^[60]^[61] Passengers experience a notably quiet ride in trolleybuses, with interior noise levels typically ranging from 50 to 60 decibels during operation, compared to over 70 decibels in diesel buses, due to the absence of internal combustion engines. Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems are electrically powered, drawing from the overhead lines to provide consistent climate control without the vibrations associated with engine-driven units. Standard trolleybuses accommodate 80 to 120 passengers, including 40 to 60 seated and the remainder standing, depending on the vehicle's length and configuration.^[62]^[63]^[64] Accessibility features in trolleybuses have advanced significantly since the 1990s with the introduction of low-floor designs, reducing entry heights to approximately 300 millimeters to facilitate level boarding at standard curbs. Many models incorporate kneeling suspension systems that hydraulically lower the front end by several inches upon stopping, further easing access for passengers with mobility aids. Modern fleets often include braille signage on doors, handrails, and priority seating areas to assist visually impaired riders, aligning with broader transit accessibility standards.^[65]^[66]^[67] User feedback highlights the smoother acceleration provided by electric propulsion, which minimizes jerky starts and stops, potentially reducing instances of motion sickness compared to diesel vehicles with their abrupt gear shifts. Historically, passengers noted a characteristic "trolleybus swing," a gentle swaying motion caused by the arcing and rotation of the trolley poles as the vehicle navigates curves or obstacles, adding a distinctive rhythmic quality to the ride. These elements contribute to an overall comfortable experience, enhanced by the vehicle's body design that prioritizes spacious interiors and ergonomic seating.^[68]^[69]

Advantages and Disadvantages

Environmental and Efficiency Benefits

Trolleybuses generate zero tailpipe emissions, eliminating direct releases of harmful pollutants like particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide that are characteristic of diesel-powered buses.^[70] This feature significantly improves local air quality in urban areas where trolleybus systems operate. When the electricity supply draws from renewable sources, lifecycle CO2 emissions can be reduced by 29-87% compared to conventional diesel buses.^[71] Additionally, trolleybuses contribute to noise reduction of 10-15 dB(A) at typical urban speeds relative to diesel buses, fostering quieter street environments and mitigating noise pollution impacts on residents.^[72] In terms of energy efficiency, trolleybuses consume about 1.5-2 kWh per kilometer, substantially lower than the 4-6 kWh equivalent for diesel buses when accounting for fuel energy content.^[73] Regenerative braking systems in trolleybuses recover kinetic energy during deceleration, yielding savings of 15-25% in overall energy use by feeding power back into the overhead lines.^[74] The overhead contact infrastructure supporting trolleybuses has a typical lifespan of 40-50 years, enabling long-term operational reliability and reduced replacement frequency compared to vehicle-centric systems.^[31] Trolleybuses align with broader electrification objectives, such as those outlined in the European Union's Green Deal, which targets zero-emission new city buses by 2030 to curb transport-related greenhouse gases.^[75] By avoiding exhaust heat emissions, they help minimize contributions to urban heat island effects, supporting cooler cityscapes without the thermal output of internal combustion engines. In Zurich's extensive trolleybus network, the shift to electric operation on key lines has already prevented over 540 tons of CO2 emissions annually through diesel displacement. Analyses indicate that trolleybus systems achieve 10-20% lower long-term operating costs than diesel equivalents, driven by energy efficiency and reduced maintenance needs.^[76]^[77] Modern battery-assisted designs allow limited off-wire operation, partially addressing flexibility concerns in operations.

Infrastructure and Flexibility Limitations

Trolleybus systems require substantial initial investment in overhead wiring and supporting infrastructure, with construction costs typically ranging from $1 to $5 million per kilometer depending on urban density and site conditions. This is significantly higher than the approximately $0.5-1 million per kilometer for implementing bus lanes, which involve simpler road marking and minimal structural changes.^[31]^[78] Retrofitting existing cities poses additional challenges, including excavation for pole foundations, coordination with utility lines, and disruption to ongoing traffic. The fixed nature of the overhead contact system limits operational flexibility, as trolleybuses cannot deviate from wired routes during roadworks or emergencies without auxiliary power, potentially halting service on affected segments.^[79] Route expansions or modifications are constrained by urban planning regulations, where even minor adjustments—such as a 20% realignment to accommodate new developments—necessitate extensive rewiring and approvals, delaying implementation by months or years.^[80] Trolleybus infrastructure is vulnerable to weather-related disruptions, particularly in cold climates where ice accumulation on wires can cause arcing, power loss, or require specialized de-icing operations to maintain service.^[81] Traffic interference from poles and wires also elevates accident risks due to maneuvering constraints around fixed supports. Additional drawbacks include the visual clutter created by poles and catenary wires, which can detract from urban aesthetics and require careful design to minimize community opposition.^[82] Overhead components typically last 40-50 years before needing replacement, with renewal costs averaging $0.9-1.5 million per kilometer for wires and associated hardware.^[31]

Comparisons

Versus Trams

Trolleybuses and trams share a reliance on overhead catenary wires for electric power collection, but differ fundamentally in ground infrastructure: trolleybuses operate on rubber tires using standard roadways, eliminating the need for dedicated rail tracks required by trams. This avoids substantial track installation and maintenance expenses, yielding potential savings of several million dollars per kilometer depending on local conditions.^[83] In terms of operational flexibility, trolleybuses behave like conventional buses, enabling easy lane changes, overtaking, and adaptation to mixed urban traffic without the constraints of fixed rails that limit trams to predefined routes. This makes trolleybuses particularly advantageous in congested or evolving street environments where rerouting or temporary deviations are common.^[84] Trams generally offer higher passenger capacity, with vehicles accommodating 180 to 260 passengers compared to 155 for typical electric trolleybuses, and they can sustain urban speeds up to 50 km/h more reliably on dedicated alignments. However, trolleybuses produce less street-level noise, avoiding the wheel-rail contact that generates higher noise levels for trams compared to rubber-tired electric vehicles.^[85] Trolleybuses suit retrofitting in cities lacking rail infrastructure, leveraging existing roads for quicker, lower-disruption electrification, while trams excel on segregated rights-of-way where their low rolling resistance enables lower energy use per passenger-kilometer than rubber-tired systems like trolleybuses.^[86]^[87]

Versus Motor Buses

Trolleybuses demonstrate significantly higher energy efficiency compared to diesel motor buses, typically achieving 2-3 times better performance in terms of energy use per kilometer due to the direct electric propulsion system that eliminates energy losses associated with internal combustion engines. For instance, trolleybuses emit approximately 0.5-1 kg of CO2 equivalent per kilometer when powered by average grid electricity, in contrast to 1-2 kg CO2 per kilometer for diesel buses, depending on fuel quality and load factors. This efficiency translates to substantial greenhouse gas reductions; studies in urban settings like Lithuania show that replacing diesel buses with trolleybuses can decrease emissions by 0.29-0.39 kg CO2 per kilometer. Additionally, trolleybuses require no onboard fuel storage or refueling logistics, avoiding the operational disruptions and safety concerns inherent in diesel bus fleets.^[88]^[89]^[90] Maintenance requirements for trolleybuses favor lower vehicle wear compared to motor buses, as electric motors endure far longer with minimal intervention, often lasting over 1 million kilometers before major overhaul, while diesel engines typically reach 500,000-800,000 kilometers. This longevity stems from fewer moving parts and the absence of combustion-related degradation, resulting in reduced costs for brakes, transmissions, and engine rebuilds—electric bus systems, including trolleybuses, incur about 40% less maintenance expense per mile than diesel equivalents. However, these savings are partially offset by the need for ongoing upkeep of the overhead wiring and substations, which can add specialized costs not present in motor bus operations. Overall, lifecycle analyses indicate trolleybuses yield 15-20% lower total maintenance expenditures when wire infrastructure is amortized over high-utilization routes.^[91]^[92]^[93] In terms of scalability, trolleybuses are constrained to fixed routes equipped with overhead lines, limiting their adaptability across a full bus network, whereas motor buses offer complete flexibility for rerouting or expansion without infrastructure changes. Converting a bus corridor to trolleybus operation typically costs $10-20 million for a 5-10 km segment, primarily due to wiring installation at $1-1.5 million per kilometer, though this investment enables long-term operational savings in dense urban areas. Diesel and hybrid motor buses, by contrast, allow rapid deployment and network-wide coverage at lower upfront costs, making them preferable for low-density or evolving transit systems.^[31]^[31] Performance-wise, trolleybuses excel in hill-climbing and acceleration, capable of handling grades up to 25% and achieving quicker starts from stops thanks to instant torque from electric motors, outperforming traditional diesel buses on challenging topography. By 2025, hybrid motor buses have narrowed this gap with improved electric assist for better low-speed torque and reduced emissions, yet trolleybuses maintain a 15% edge in long-term operating costs due to sustained efficiency on electrified routes. This makes trolleybuses particularly advantageous in hilly cities, where motor buses may require more frequent maintenance under stress.^[94]^[95]^[96]

Technological Developments

Off-Wire and Hybrid Systems

Off-wire technologies enable trolleybuses to operate without continuous contact with overhead wires for limited distances, typically using onboard energy storage systems such as batteries or supercapacitors to bridge gaps of 1 to 10 kilometers. These systems store energy collected from the wires during normal operation, allowing the vehicle to navigate temporary deviations, construction zones, or areas where wiring installation is impractical. For instance, battery-assisted trolleybuses in European systems can achieve off-wire ranges of approximately 10 km with capacities around 45 kWh, supporting speeds suitable for urban routes while maintaining zero-emission performance.^[97] Hybrid trolleybus models, which combine overhead wire power with onboard batteries, have gained prominence since the 2010s, offering dual-mode operation for greater route flexibility. In Switzerland, cities like Fribourg and St. Gallen have deployed such systems, where battery-powered trolleybuses operate off-wire for significant portions of their routes, utilizing only about 28% of the traditional contact line infrastructure. These vehicles recharge batteries via the wires during connected segments, enabling autonomous travel for up to 10 km at typical urban speeds, which enhances operational efficiency in mixed wired and unwired environments.^[98]^[99] In-motion charging represents a key advancement in hybrid systems, where trolleybuses draw power from overhead wire segments during operation and supplement with depot-based charging for full-day service. This approach integrates short electrified overhead sections—often covering 20-30% of routes—with battery support, minimizing the need for extensive wiring while ensuring continuous energy supply. The International Union of Public Transport (UITP) highlights that in-motion charging trolleybuses can operate on rechargeable batteries off-wire, combining the reliability of wired power with battery autonomy for urban networks.^[7] Relevant standards, such as IEC 61851 for conductive charging systems, support these hybrid setups, with updates in 2023 and beyond accommodating high-power levels up to 300 kW via pantographs for efficient depot or opportunity charging. This facilitates rapid energy transfer during stops or at terminals, aligning with the power demands of heavy-duty electric buses in trolleybus applications. Pantograph systems in the 151-300 kW range are increasingly adopted for both in-motion and static charging, ensuring compatibility with evolving infrastructure.^[100]^[101] The adoption of off-wire and hybrid systems yields notable benefits, including reduced overhead wiring requirements and lower infrastructure costs compared to fully wired networks. In Beijing, over 1,250 battery-assisted trolleybuses operate across 31 routes, demonstrating large-scale implementation of hybrid technology for emission-free urban transit. Similarly, Vancouver's TransLink has ordered up to 512 new trolleybuses, with deliveries expected to begin in 2026, each with a 20 km off-wire range, which supports route adaptability and cuts maintenance expenses associated with extensive wiring. These developments underscore the role of hybrid trolleybuses in scaling zero-emission public transport while addressing traditional infrastructure limitations.^[102]^[103]

Low-Floor and Specialized Variants

The development of low-floor trolleybuses began in the 1990s, driven by the need to improve passenger accessibility and boarding efficiency through the adoption of independent suspension systems that eliminated traditional high-floor designs.^[104] These vehicles reduced floor heights to approximately 350-400 mm above the ground, compared to the 900 mm typical of earlier high-floor models, allowing level boarding from standard curbs without steps.^[105] The first low-floor trolleybus entered service in Montreux, Switzerland, in 1993, marking a significant shift in design that prioritized ergonomic benefits for passengers with mobility challenges.^[104] By the 2010s, low-floor configurations had become predominant in new trolleybus fleets worldwide, reflecting broader trends in public transit toward accessible vehicles that facilitate faster dwell times and higher ridership.^[106] This evolution addressed longstanding barriers in high-floor systems, where passengers often navigated multiple steps, but it introduced engineering challenges, particularly in weight distribution. In low-floor trolleybuses equipped with onboard batteries for hybrid operations, the placement of heavy battery packs—often offset to maintain structural integrity—can disrupt balance, leading to issues like uneven axle loading and reduced stability during turns or on inclines.^[107] Double-decker trolleybuses emerged in the 1930s as a capacity-enhancing variant, particularly in the United Kingdom, where they were integrated into London's extensive conversion from trams to trolleybuses starting in 1931.^[108] These two-story vehicles offered seating for over 100 passengers, doubling the throughput on busy urban routes compared to single-deck models. However, their height—typically exceeding 4 meters—necessitated overhead wire clearances of at least 4.5-5.6 meters to avoid contact during operation, limiting deployment in areas with low infrastructure or bridges.^[6] Outside the UK and select Commonwealth cities, double-decker trolleybuses remain rare today, comprising a small fraction of the global fleet due to these spatial constraints and a shift toward single-deck designs for versatility.^[5] Specialized variants have further expanded trolleybus applications, including articulated bi-body models for bus rapid transit (BRT) systems, which connect two chassis sections via a flexible joint to accommodate 150-200 passengers on high-demand corridors. In Quito, Ecuador, the trolleybus network employs a fleet of over 100 articulated vehicles on its 18-km central line, integrating electric overhead power with dedicated lanes to enhance urban mobility efficiency. Accessibility features, such as deployable ramps, became standard on new U.S. trolleybuses following the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, which mandated wheelchair-compatible lifts or ramps on all fixed-route transit vehicles acquired after July 1993 to ensure equitable access.^[109]

Manufacturing and Deployment

Key Manufacturers

In the early 20th century, the United States was home to several prominent trolleybus manufacturers, with the J. G. Brill Company emerging as a key player. Founded in 1868 in Philadelphia, Brill produced a range of urban transit vehicles, including trolleybuses, from the 1920s through the 1950s, supplying models like the Brill TC44 that served major cities such as Philadelphia and Boston.^[110] The company ceased trolleybus production amid declining demand for overhead wire systems in the postwar era, shifting focus to buses before its acquisition and eventual closure in 1954. Similarly, the St. Louis Car Company, established in 1887, became another major U.S. producer of trolleybuses during the same period, competing directly with Brill in building electric coaches for interurban and city routes. Known for innovative designs, St. Louis delivered over 1,000 trolleybus units in the 1930s and 1940s, including articulated models for high-capacity lines in cities like St. Louis and Cleveland, before exiting the market in the 1950s due to the rise of diesel buses.^[111] In the Soviet Union, Trolza (formerly the Uritsky Plant or ZiU) established post-1940s dominance in trolleybus manufacturing, becoming the primary supplier for the expansive Soviet network. Located in Engels, Russia, the factory began mass production of models like the ZiU-5 in 1947 and later the ZiU-9 in 1971, equipping over 90 cities across the USSR and exporting to Latin America; it produced tens of thousands of units until financial challenges led to bankruptcy in 2022.^[112] As of 2025, the global trolleybus market is led by European and Asian firms, with Solaris Bus & Coach of Poland holding approximately 30% of the market through its production of low-emission models like the Trollino series.^[113] Chinese manufacturer BYD has gained prominence with battery-hybrid trolleybuses, integrating overhead wire capability in vehicles such as the K9 variant for flexible urban deployment.^[114] Swiss company Hess AG specializes in low-floor trolleybuses, exemplified by the lighTram 25, which features advanced accessibility and energy recovery systems for alpine and urban routes.^[115] Czech firm Škoda Transportation produces articulated trolleybuses like the ForCity Smart, designed for high-capacity BRT corridors with modular electric propulsion.^[113] Key component suppliers include Vossloh Kiepe, which provides control systems, traction converters, and complete electrification packages for trolleybuses, drawing on decades of experience in e-bus technology.^[116] Schunk Transit Systems supplies pantographs and current collectors essential for reliable overhead contact, supporting both classic and off-wire operations in modern fleets.^[117] The overall trolleybus components market is valued at around $2.3 billion annually as of 2023, driven by electrification demands.^[118] Recent trends indicate a shift toward Asian production, with Chinese firms accounting for about 60% of global output since 2020, fueled by exports from companies like Yutong and Zhongtong amid Europe's push for sustainable transit.^[113] Custom builds for electric bus rapid transit (eBRT) systems highlight growing adaptation of trolleybus tech to hybrid overhead-battery formats for enhanced route flexibility.^[119]

Current Systems and Preservation Efforts

As of 2025, trolleybus networks operate in 257 cities across more than 40 countries, comprising a global fleet of 22,137 vehicles that provide sustainable urban mobility to millions of passengers daily.^[5] China dominates this landscape, hosting the majority of systems with operational networks in over 200 cities, including major expansions in Shanghai, Beijing, and Jinan, where new in-motion charging trolleybus lines integrated with bus rapid transit corridors serve growing urban populations.^[120] In Europe, Switzerland's Zurich maintains one of the continent's most extensive networks, featuring six lines spanning 54 kilometers of route length and emphasizing electrification for environmental goals.^[121] The United States preserves limited but significant operations, notably in San Francisco, where the Municipal Transportation Agency deploys approximately 300 electric trolley coaches across eight routes and is undergoing fleet modernization with battery-assisted models.^[1] Revival efforts since the 2010s have reinvigorated trolleybus adoption, driven by commitments to net-zero emissions and urban sustainability. In Mexico City, the system was revived in 2019 with the introduction of modern Yutong trolleybuses on electrified bus rapid transit corridors, marking a shift from diesel operations and enhancing zero-emission public transport in a high-density metropolis.^[122] Italy's Bologna exemplifies hybrid advancements, where a network of five urban routes operational since 1991 has incorporated dual-mode vehicles capable of off-wire running, supporting ongoing expansions amid Europe's push for greener fleets.^[123] Post-2020, global trolleybus deployments have accelerated due to net-zero targets, with new systems and modernizations in cities like Jinan emphasizing integration with existing infrastructure to reduce greenhouse gases and operational costs.^[33] Preservation initiatives worldwide focus on maintaining historical trolleybuses through dedicated museums and heritage operations, safeguarding cultural and technical legacies amid the shift to modern variants. The Trolleybus Museum at Sandtoft in the United Kingdom houses the world's largest collection of preserved trolleybuses, with over 50 vehicles from various eras, including restorations that involve thousands of volunteer hours and costs exceeding £25,000 per unit for mechanical and electrical overhauls.^[124] In North America, Vancouver's active trolleybus system includes heritage elements, such as preserved 1940s-era vehicles occasionally operated for special events. The Seashore Trolley Museum in Kennebunkport, Maine, preserves several historic U.S. trolleybuses, including examples from Philadelphia and other cities, with full restorations for operational heritage vehicles typically ranging from $250,000 to $500,000 depending on scope and materials.^[125] These efforts, often funded by nonprofits and grants, highlight the educational value of trolleybuses. Looking ahead, approximately 50 new trolleybus systems are planned or under development by 2030, primarily in Asia and Europe, fueled by advancements in in-motion charging and hybrid technologies that address flexibility concerns.^[126] Europe's trolleybus fleet is projected to grow by 120% from 2022 levels by 2030, supported by EU-funded projects promoting zero-emission corridors in cities across Switzerland, France, Italy, and Poland.^[33] In Asia, China's ongoing integrations with BRT networks signal continued expansion, though challenges from rapid urbanization, such as infrastructure conflicts and land-use pressures, may temper rollout speeds in densely populated areas.^[120]

References

[1]
Muni's Electric Trolley Buses - SFMTA
Electric trolley buses are rubber-tired vehicles with motors powered by electricity from overhead wires. “Trolley” refers to the trolley poles on the roof ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
[2]
[PDF] THE TROLLEY BUS - Transportation Research Board
The trolley bus is an electrically powered vehicle that first appeared on the scene in Europe at the turn of this century, but its technological develop-.
[3]
[PDF] Special Report 200 - The Trolley Bus: Where It Is and Where It's Going
Unlike the motor or diesel bus; the trolley vehicle oper- ates quietly, gives off no exhaust, accelerates quickly, performs well on hills, and runs on elec-.
[4]
Electric buses: Why were trolleybuses ever scrapped? - BBC
Jan 10, 2020 · Known as the "trackless trolleys" when they first appeared on UK streets in 1911, trolleybuses became the workhorses of the public transport ...Missing: definition key facts
[5]
Global Trolleybus Figures 2025 - Publication - UITP
Explore global trolleybus networks: 257 cities, 22137 vehicles, and detailed profiles from Vancouver to Athens in UITP's 2025 Figures.Missing: current | Show results with:current
[6]
[PDF] IN MOTION CHARGING TROLLEYBUS SYSTEMS - UITP
Sep 23, 2025 · The IMC trolleybus has a high potential transport capacity due to its virtually infinite autonomy, which allows for op- timised routes that ...
[7]
[PDF] Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (Part E)
overhead contact system (OCS) – the overhead electric supply system for ... trolleybus (electric trolleybus, trolley coach, trackless trolley) – an ...
[8]
[PDF] ECE-TRANS-WP29-2014-70e.pdf - UNECE
Aug 27, 2014 · "Line voltage" means the voltage provided to the trolleybus from the external power supply. Trolleybuses shall be designed to operate at a ...
[9]
https://unece.org/DAM/trans/doc/2014/wp29/ECE-TRANS-WP29-2014-70e.pdf
[10]
[PDF] Railway Electrification Systems & Engineering
For a trolleybus there are no rails to send the return current along—the vehicles use rubber tyres and the normal road surface. Trolleybuses use a second ...
[11]
Trolleybus Usage by Country 2025 - World Population Review
Since then, the use of trolleybus systems has been declining, with 276 active systems remaining in the world as of 2021. In total, over 800 trolleybus systems ...Missing: current | Show results with:current
[12]
Why Modern Cities Are Embracing Trolleybuses Again
May 14, 2025 · As of recent data, approximately 300 trolleybus systems are still in operation globally, reflecting a renewed interest in sustainable and ...Missing: current statistics
[13]
History | TROLLEYBUSES
They were manufactured by Yellow Coach Company and operated from 1935 to 1948. No trace remains of these operations, replaced by areawide bus service. By 1940, ...Missing: definition key facts
[14]
[PDF] LATIN AMERICA E-BUS MARKET MONITOR, 2024
The fleet has grown substantially since 2017—when it comprised just 801 vehicles, nearly all trolleybuses—and the average growth rate has been 33.5% per year.Missing: transit | Show results with:transit
[15]
A case study of the trolleybus system in Gdynia and Sopot (Poland)
Jan 10, 2021 · At a medium mileage, the total economic cost of a battery trolleybus (3A) is 0,30€/km lower, compared to Diesel (1A) and at high mileage – 0,39€ ...
[16]
Road transportation - Siemens Global
In 1882, Werner von Siemens presented the world's first bus that ran from a power line suspended overhead – an invention that he had been working on for decades ...
[17]
April 29, 1882: Trackless Trolley Starts Rolling | WIRED
Apr 29, 2010 · Ernst Werner von Siemens tests a demonstration “trackless trolley” in a Berlin suburb. The innovative device pulls electricity from overhead wires.
[18]
British Trolleybus history
One of the 8 installed systems, Fontainbleau to Samois, ran until 1913 and is credited as the world's first commercial trolleybus system. It could be said ...
[19]
British Trolleybus Society
The world's first commercial trolleybus operation was between Fontainbleau and Samois between 1901 and 1913 using Lombard Gerin 'Trolley Automoteurs'. Self ...
[20]
60 years of Electric Trolley Buses in seattle - MEHVA
In 1910 the nation's first commercial application of the trackless trolley started operation to the "Bungalowtown" housing development in Los Angeles. That line ...
[21]
Trolleybuses in former Soviet Union countries - Wikipedia
The first trolleybus vehicle in Russia was built in Saint Petersburg in 1902 at Frese machine-building factory. It utilised a carriage-type current collector ...Missing: commercial 1900 Bielostok
[22]
Trolleybus UK
The electric trolleybus is a long established form of urban public transportation. It had a heyday in the 1930s and 1940s as replacement for street tramways.
[23]
The Trolleybuses of Bogotá
Jan 20, 2007 · The city's first 20 trolleybuses were built in 1947 by a Brill affiliate, Canadian Car & Foundry, in Fort William, Ontario, Canada.
[24]
[PDF] CHARACTERISTICS OF CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF ...
Sep 30, 2019 · Abstract: Trolleybus transport was a very popular mode of transport in the past. Trolleybus systems have existed in more.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[25]
Overhead Construction for Trams, Trolley Buses and Railways
The span of catenary wire may be from 45 to 90 metres with a sag of from 1 to 2 metres respectively for straight track. The distance of droppers is between 3 ...
[26]
Components of an Overhead Contact System: Powering Sustainable ...
Nov 20, 2024 · Key Components of an Overhead Contact System · 1. Contact Wire · 2. Catenary Wire · 3. Droppers · 4. Poles and Masts · 5. Insulators · 6. Tensioning ...
[27]
[PDF] Reducing the Visual Impact of Overhead Contact Systems
Examples of direct-suspension span construction for trolleybus and rail systems have been shown in Figures 4-1 and 4-3. Both of these examples use steel span ...
[28]
Compensation of Voltage Drops in Trolleybus Supply System Using ...
This paper analyzes the results of a trial operation of a battery-based buffer station supporting a selected section of trolleybus power supply systems in ...
[29]
[PDF] A Complete DC Trolleybus Grid Model With Bilateral Connections ...
The voltage drop between the substation and the bus as a function of the bus power (Pbus) and distance from the substation (lb) The parallel lines in (a) ...<|separator|>
[30]
https://www.apta.com/wp-content/uploads/Standards_Documents/APTA-RT-FS-S-006-02-Rev-2.pdf
[31]
[PDF] MODERN TROLLEY BUS OVERHEAD CONTACT LINES
Kununler and Matter developed a fully elastic overhead contact line that meets the requirements of rapid transit for electric vehicles and eliminates the ...
[32]
[PDF] Traction Electrification Distribution System Inspection, Maintenance ...
The rail transit system shall develop specific inspection criteria for contact rails based on the type of contact rail in service and system requirements. The ...Missing: trolleybus | Show results with:trolleybus
[33]
Bus Electrification: A comparison of capital costs
Apr 12, 2021 · B. TROLLEYBUS ELECTRIFICATION COST ESTIMATES AND EXAMPLES · Cost of wiring including electrical supply is Euro 121m. · Network covered both wired ...Missing: practices | Show results with:practices
[34]
https://www.urban-transport-magazine.com/en/bi-articulated-trolleybuses-for-prague-and-bratislava/
[35]
https://www.skodagroup.com/reference/skoda-hcity-12
[36]
Bi-articulated trolleybuses for Prague and Bratislava
Mar 17, 2023 · The vehicles have 60 seats and a total capacity of 160 passengers. They are powered by two traction motors with an output of 160 kW each. The ...
[37]
Škoda H'CITY 12
Parameters ; Length. 12 020 mm ; Width. 2 550 mm ; Height. 3 430 mm ; Number of seats. 26 - 30 ; Number of passengers. up to 85.
[38]
[PDF] VEHICLES AND PROPULSION SYSTEMS
Small diesel engines are also used, notably in the newer French trolley buses that have an air-cooled unit rated at about 60 kW.
[39]
Energy recovery effectiveness in trolleybus transport - ScienceDirect
The article contains an analysis of raising the efficiency of regenerative braking in the trolleybus network in the city of Gdynia. The aim is to determine ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[40]
Trolley Poles | Wabtec Corporation
Rating 5.0 (1) Wabtec trolley poles: designed for green transport in cities. Our trolley poles are compatible with all network systems over the world.
[41]
Keeping our trolleys safe and reliable - Metro Matters
Oct 27, 2016 · Testing and observation revealed the system was programmed in a way that made it overly-sensitive, causing the poles to automatically retract ...
[42]
Types of traction collectors - Listenlights University
Sep 8, 2017 · And thus a bow collector has high speed than trolley collector. Pantograph collector: This type of collector consists of copper wearing strip ...Missing: stability | Show results with:stability
[43]
Pantograph (transport) - Wikipedia
A pantograph (or "pan" or "panto") is an apparatus mounted on the roof of an electric train, tram or trolley buses to collect power through contact with an ...
[44]
[PDF] Possibilities of trolleybus transportation energy demand reduction
However the true average loss power will be much lower: At the efficiency ηCAP 96 %, considering the measured energy recovery percentage A = 23.7 % (sum of all ...
[45]
Trolibusz.Budapest.Hu - Ikarus-GVM trolleybuses
The Ganz Electric Works built two prototype chopper control trolleybuses by 1980, for testing and demonstration.
[46]
[PDF] OFF-WIRE OPERATION
With the development of limited off-wire capability at Vancouver, the next step in trolley bus system technology advancement is automatic rewiring capability to ...<|separator|>
[47]
Improving the Reliability of Current Collectors in Electric Vehicles
This article presents a mathematically grounded approach to increasing the operational reliability of current collectors in electric transport systems.
[48]
The Trolley Argument - Seattle Transit Blog
Sep 22, 2009 · I think it would be poor public policy to get rid of the diesels trolleys, even if it means cutting a small number of trips elsewhere in the system.Missing: decline 1950s
[49]
Where's the bus? Here's how Metro Transit decides whether your ...
Dec 13, 2017 · Over the last 12 months, regular Metro buses have been “on time” 77 percent of the time. That figure has stayed fairly consistent over the past ...Missing: trolleybus | Show results with:trolleybus
[50]
Problems with new electric trolley buses cause delayed commutes ...
Jan 29, 2019 · POLE SEPARATION: The pole system will automatically retract the trolley poles if there is a dewirement. It checks for dewirement by monitoring ...
[51]
[PDF] ESTIMATION OF THE RUNNING COSTS OF AUTONOMOUS ...
Nov 1, 2016 · The average power con- sumption by the trolleybus is 1.8 kWh/km. Given the other assumptions as in the URSUS brand, the cost of 1 km by an 18- ...
[52]
[PDF] Trolley Bus System Evaluation - Metro
Apr 27, 2011 · ▫ Vehicle useful life (FTA, 2008). ▫ Electric Trolley Bus: 15 years. ▫ Diesel Hybrid: 12 years. ▫ 60 foot vehicle costs. ▫ Electric Trolley ...
[53]
[PDF] Section 7: TRANSIT OPERATIONS Contractor shall not ... - SFMTA
Muni overhead electric wires carry a minimum of 600 volts DC and have 17.6 feet +/- vertical clearance from the roadway. • CAL OSHA regulations require that ...
[54]
[PDF] Controls and Instruments 4-1 | Prevost TechPub
ACCELERATOR PEDAL ... driver information display to warn the driver that the ACB is disabled. In that situation, the Impact. Alert and Distance Alert ...
[55]
[PDF] PRODUCT & INFORMATION GUIDE - Mobility Innovations
The Veigel eClassic Right Hand Control is made for simple, responsive, and reliable operation. To accelerate, simply turn the ergonomic handle clockwise. To ...Missing: trolleybus pole alignment monitors
[56]
[PDF] Recommended Practice for Transit Bus Operator Training
This recommended practice provides guidance for standardized transit operator training to assist in the development of professional bus operators resulting in ...
[57]
Quieter Electric Vehicles: Great for the Environment but a Pedestrian ...
Jul 14, 2021 · An electric bus engine typically has a decibel level just below 60 DBS, which is about equal to the levels found in everyday conversation.
[58]
All Electric Bus Air Conditioner - Guchen Industry
Rating 5.0 (35) The hermetic electric scroll compressor and control system are powered by vehicle electric or battery. Tips: Customers can choose DC400-720V voltage models ...
[59]
[PDF] Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (Part B)
... bus can carry 65 seated passengers and 55 standees. However, bus operator policy often limits the number of standees to levels below this theoretically ...
[60]
Bus Stop Classics: New Flyer D40LF – North America's First Low ...
Jun 12, 2016 · The first LFS bus in North America was the New Flyer D40LF. The D40LF was developed from the European model B85 series bus built by Den Oudsten Bussen BV.
[61]
The Interurban Trolley Welcomes New Trolley Buses
Oct 6, 2016 · To enhance accessibility, the trolleys are equipped with a low-floor, kneeling suspension. This feature allows the bus to “kneel” to curb ...
[62]
TransLink Begins Installation of Braille Signage at Every Bus Stop ...
Once installed, TransLink will be the first transit system in Canada to install braille signage across its entire bus system.Missing: trolleybus | Show results with:trolleybus
[63]
Motion Sickness in Electric Cars - Page 2 - Team-BHP
Jun 30, 2025 · ... reducing the acceleration. Electric motor ... smooth sailing thereby reducing jerky behavior, which finally reduced the motion sickness.Missing: trolleybus | Show results with:trolleybus<|separator|>
[64]
Trolleybuses for comfortable road travel in the past - 1900s.org
Trolley poles rotated to allow trolleybuses to drive from side to side round parked cars and other obstacles. This made them more manoeuvable than trams which ...
[65]
[PDF] Momentum Zero emissions bus operations toolkit
The electric bus had zero tailpipe emissions. On top of improved air quality, researchers determined noise pollution was reduced due to the electric buses ...
[66]
Converting to a Greener Bus Fleet - TriMet
Since 2022, we've been using renewable diesel for all our fixed-route buses and WES vehicles. These changes reduced our emissions by nearly 70% compared to the ...<|separator|>
[67]
Modelling noise reductions using electric buses in urban traffic. A ...
An isolated comparison of the buses reveals large sound level differences of up to 14 dB(A) at low speeds. However, these differences decrease with increasing ...
[68]
[PDF] Battery capacity and recharging needs for electric buses in city ...
Clearly bus electrification improves vehicle energy saving. In the simulated electric bus, the average braking energy recovered is nearly 0.39 kWh/km (i.e. 0.63.
[69]
Energy Saving Estimation of Athens Trolleybuses Considering ...
Energy consumption/saving calculations highlight the effectiveness of incorporating regenerative braking infrastructure in trolleybuses transportation systems.
[70]
2030 zero-emissions target for new buses and trucks - EEAS
Feb 13, 2023 · European Green Deal: Commission proposes 2030 zero-emissions target for new city buses and 90% emissions reductions for new trucks by 2040.
[71]
ABB technologies help buses in Zurich become more energy efficient
Jun 2, 2022 · The switching to electric operation on this line alone allows for savings of more than 200,000 liters of diesel and 540 tons of CO2 per year.
[72]
New Toolkit Supports Bus Priority Implementation - NRDC
Aug 11, 2021 · Bus lanes are significantly cheaper than urban highway expansions (a bus lane typically cost less than $1 million per mile for a two-way ...Missing: construction km
[73]
[PDF] Bumps in the Road: Challenges to E-bus Implementation
Cities that do not already have reasonable transit frameworks and well-run bus networks will have a difficult time leapfrogging to electric buses, where ...<|separator|>
[74]
Disadvantages - TROLLEYBUSES
The need for overhead wires is the principal drawback of trolleybus systems that generates most of the specific negative features.
[75]
Saying good-bye to the trolleys - Will Brownsberger
Jan 27, 2022 · And, of course, they cannot be shared with any other route that doesn't have the necessary wires, reducing operational flexibility. With battery ...
[76]
This is how we de-ice the overhead wires that power our trolley ...
Jan 27, 2023 · TransLink uses a one-of-a-kind de-icing truck to keep the overhead wires clear of frost and ice to keep our trolley-electric buses ...
[77]
Drawbacks of Trolleybuses - A660 Joint Council -
A trolleybus with the same chassis as a diesel bus has a smaller passenger capacity. Trolleybuses require high voltages and currents which increases the risk of ...
[78]
[PDF] Evaluation of Visual Impacts of Trolleybus Overhead Catenary ...
A method for evaluating the visual impact of intersections in trolley- bus systems is presented in this paper. This approach can be used with the illustrations ...
[79]
New Trolleys for Philadelphia – The Antiplanner
May 20, 2022 · Contrary to a train or a tram, a trolleybus does not need a rail infrastructure. This not only results in huge cost and time savings, it ...
[80]
Get Wired (Again): Trolleybuses and Trolleytrucks
Jul 10, 2009 · Contrary to a train or a tram, a trolleybus does not need a rail infrastructure. This not only results in huge cost and time savings, it also ...
[81]
[PDF] Comparison between trolley-bus and tram vehicles - WIT Press
Costs include personnel, traction materials, vehicles, infrastructures and plant maintenance and amortization. Costs are calculated per vehicle km, per place km ...
[82]
Tram and trolleybus net traction energy consumption comparison
... The decision between trams and trolleybuses in public transportation is influenced by various factors, with operating costs being a pivotal consideration.
[83]
Electric trams and trolley buses - E-Mobility Engineering
In terms of energy efficiency, trams have the edge over trolley buses ... In general, infrastructure costs can be a barrier to extending tram and trolley bus ...
[84]
Fuel consumption of diesel, natural gas, hybrid, full electric and ...
FCBs could reduce GHG emissions by 87 %, while EBs could lower energy consumption by 25–38 % and emissions by 52–61 %. [24], 2022, Diesel Bus and Biodiesel Bus ...Missing: CO2 | Show results with:CO2
[85]
[PDF] Comparative analysis of bus technologies for fleet renewal
It is claimed that biogas technology produces up to 84% less greenhouse gases than diesel and can reduce fuel costs by up to 30%. (Sustainable passenger vehicle ...
[86]
(PDF) Comparative Analysis of Bus and Trolleybus Related GHGs ...
The study results show that replacement of bus by trolleybus will decrease GHG emissions by 389.69g CO 2 /km in 2009 and 287.09g CO 2 /km in 2010.
[87]
Maintenance Costs for EVs vs. ICE Vehicles - Drive Electric TN
May 18, 2022 · According to Argonne National Laboratory's data below, maintaining an ICE vehicle costs about 1.66 times the amount to maintain a BEV per mile.<|separator|>
[88]
How Long Do Diesel Engines Last? | UTI
Jul 24, 2025 · The average lifespan of a diesel engine is typically around 500,000 miles. With proper care and maintenance, they can last over 800,000 miles.
[89]
What is the life expectancy of electric motors in vehicles? - Quora
Oct 22, 2020 · While they may need the bearing changed every few hundred thousand km, there is no reason that they cannot run indefinitely.
[90]
Back to the Future on a Trolleybus - City Hikes
Jul 1, 2025 · Experience in Seattle, San Francisco, and many other parts of the world where trolleybuses are still being built with gusto would suggest ...Missing: worldwide | Show results with:worldwide
[91]
The Return of the Electric Bus You Forgot About | by Michael Barnard
Sep 16, 2025 · Trolleybus systems experienced significant growth during the 20th century, with over 800 systems established worldwide at their peak. These ...
[92]
Electric Buses vs Diesel Buses: A Comparative Analysis of Life ...
Sep 19, 2024 · Electric buses cost nearly 80% less than diesel buses, thanks to their lower energy consumption and efficient interior components.
[93]
Battery-Assisted Trolleybuses: Effect of Battery Energy Utilization ...
These BATs are equipped with batteries with a capacity of 45.4 kWh, which allows a range of approximately 10 km out of TL. Only these two vehicles are currently ...
[94]
10 Hess trolleybuses began service in Fribourg for TPF
10 battery-powered Hess trolleybuses with 66 kWh batteries began service in Fribourg, using power lines for 28% of the route, and reducing noise and pollution.Missing: hybrid Bernina range
[95]
New battery trolleybuses for the expansion plan in St. Gallen
Oct 24, 2019 · These vehicles will be hybrid battery trolleybuses, ie all have a powerful battery pack on board to allow for extensive off-wire operation.
[96]
World's First IEC 61851-23:2023 CB Certificate Issued for Electric ...
Oct 10, 2025 · We issued the first IEC 61851-23:2023 CB certificate for a DC EV charger following automated TeREES® L2 plugin testing.
[97]
High-Power Pantograph Charging for Buses Market - Dataintelo
The scalability and flexibility of 151–300 kW chargers make them suitable for both opportunity and depot charging, supporting a wide range of route lengths and ...Missing: trolleybus motion IEC 61851
[98]
Electric bus operation on Beijing's roads: Battery & trolley buses
Dec 15, 2024 · A total of more than 1,250 battery-powered trolleybuses are currently travelling on 31 routes, making Beijing the company with the largest ...Missing: pilot 2022
[99]
Up to 512 new trolleybuses for Vancouver - Urban Transport Magazine
Mar 6, 2025 · The contract specifies an off-wire range of 20km, which should be achieved in all types of weather. This is important, as HVAC demand can double ...Missing: benefits wiring reduction 20-30% 15% Beijing 2022 pilot
[100]
[PDF] Vossloh Kiepe GmbH - Trolleybus UK
1993 Delivery of the first low-floor trolleybus for Montreux. 1995/ Delivery of the first low-floor tramcars. 1996 for cologne (K 4000) and Düsseldorf. (NF6).
[101]
20.3 Vehicle Floor Height - BRT Planning Guide
Two of the most common interior floor heights are 38 to 40 centimeters (low-floor) and 90 centimeters (high-floor).Missing: trolleybus | Show results with:trolleybus
[102]
Trends in Public Transportation Vehicle Fleets - American Public ...
Low-floor buses that make it easier and more comfortable for passengers to get on and off are becoming the norm. Public transportation agencies are moving ...
[103]
[PDF] KING COUNTY TROLLEY BUS EVALUATION - Metro
May 27, 2011 · By 1970, the trolley bus system had been reduced to 32 route miles with only 57 of the 30-year-old trolley buses in operation. In 1973, the ...
[104]
London's electric trams and trolleybuses | London Transport Museum
London United Tramways (LUT) began London's first electric tram service on 10 July 1901, operating between Shepherd's Bush, Hammersmith, Acton and Kew Bridge.<|control11|><|separator|>
[105]
Trolleybuses in Quito - Wikipedia
The Quito trolleybus system is a bus rapid transit line located in Quito, Ecuador ... Service is provided by a fleet of 113 articulated trolleybuses, built ...
[106]
[PDF] Accessible Transit and The Law - PVA.org
The ADA requires that where new bus stop pads are constructed at bus stops or at bus terminal bays, they shall have a minimum clear length of 96 inches and a ...Missing: trolleybus | Show results with:trolleybus
[107]
Top stories in China's autonomous driving field in 2023 - Gasgoo
Feb 15, 2024 · 2023 is a pivotal year for the implementation of advanced autonomous driving technology in China, with progress being made by autonomous driving tech firms.Missing: trolleybus | Show results with:trolleybus
[108]
J.G. Brill & Company - Mid-Continent Railway Museum
The JG Brill Company was founded in 1869 at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania as JG Brill & Company, by John George Brill (1817-1888) and his son, George Martin Brill.Missing: trolleybus | Show results with:trolleybus
[109]
St. Louis Car Company: History, Photos, Designs
Jan 24, 2025 · The St. Louis Car Company competed with J.G. Brill as the largest builder of interurban and streetcar equipment. It was created in 1887 and ...
[110]
THE OLDEST TROLLEYBUS PLANT OF ENGELS GOES BANKRUPT
Apr 4, 2022 · Trolza CJSC acted as a supplier of environmentally friendly transport to more than 90 cities of the Russian Federation and even Latin America.Missing: Soviet | Show results with:Soviet
[111]
Trolley Bus Market Share, Growth Analysis Report 2025-2034
The global trolley bus market was valued at USD 1.35 billion in 2024 and is estimated to register a CAGR of 3.2% between 2025 and 2034.Missing: worldwide | Show results with:worldwide
[112]
European e-bus market up 41% in H1 2025: MAN and BYD expand ...
Jul 30, 2025 · Solaris registered 357 battery-electric buses, translating to a 6.7% share—up from 5.9% in 2024, but well below its 2023 share over 11%. However ...
[113]
Electric Bus Market Size, Share & Growth Trends, 2025–2032
Oct 30, 2025 · The Electric Bus Market is projected to grow from USD 23.80 billion in 2025 to USD 59.60 billion by 2032 at a CAGR of 14.0% Explore key ...
[114]
Innovative systems and components for electric buses
Components. For trolley buses, KIEPE offers various components up to the complete package. Trust KIEPE – Your Partner for E-Bus Technology. Years of experience ...Missing: Schunk | Show results with:Schunk
[115]
Schunk Transit Systems
Pioneering product and system solutions for the rail industry as well as innovative developments for battery-powered and autonomous e-vehicles from Schunk ...Missing: Vossloh Kiepe
[116]
Trolley Bus Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033
The global trolley bus market size is projected to grow significantly from USD 2.3 billion in 2023 to an anticipated USD 4.1 billion by 2032.Trolley Bus Market Outlook · Product Type Analysis · Power Source Analysis
[117]
https://www.schunk-group.com/transit-systems/en
[118]
Jinan's Electric Trolleybuses Spark A Transformation for China
Jun 13, 2025 · In 2023, the total number of buses nationwide reached an estimated 682,500, with 69% being fully electric and 11% being hybrid electric.
[119]
[Panorama Sustainable Cities] #5 How Zurich has become a ...
Jan 3, 2024 · The numbers speak for themselves: 14 tram lines serving 172 km of tracks, 14 bus lines, and 6 trolleybus lines spanning a total length of 54 km.
[120]
[PDF] Every day, people board Muni buses, trolleys, and trains ... - SFMTA
Trolley buses from the Potrero Yard serve eight trolley bus routes in San. Francisco, carrying 102,000 riders daily. That accounts for about 14 percent of Muni ...
[121]
PA Trolley Museum - History That Connects Us
The Pennsylvania Trolley Museum is focused on preserving and restoring our collection of antique streetcars. The Museum was founded in 1953 and has continued to ...
[122]
The revival of the emission-free trolleybuses in Mexico City
Aug 14, 2019 · In early February 2019, one of the Yutong trolleybuses from Marrakech, Morocco, was shipped to Mexico City for some technical test rides. It is ...
[123]
The Bologna process: More electric public transport to come
Mar 19, 2024 · Since the last trams ran in 1963, Bologna has relied on buses for many years, in some cases as electric trolleybuses. However, it has long been ...
[124]
Trolleybus. A growing demand thanks to zero emission operations
Jul 4, 2024 · Trolleybuses are reinventing themselves as vehicles that can combine zero emissions with flexibility. Hess, Iveco Bus, Skoda Electric, Solaris Bus & Coach and ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[125]
The Trolleybus Museum at Sandtoft
The Trolleybus Museum at Sandtoft a great family day out for all ages! It's not just old buses – we have a Toy Museum, a Cycle Shop Museum, a replica pre-fab ...Admission PricesVisitingHow to find usExhibitsLatest News from the ...
[126]
SEPTA working to restore trolley cars from the 1940s - PhillyVoice
Jan 19, 2023 · The multimillion dollar project, which will refurbish the historic vehicles that ran along Girard Avenue, is on track for completion in ...
[127]
6 Mobility Trends Vital to the Success of Public Transport ... - UITP
May 28, 2025 · Among surveyed members, the UITP Bus Fleet Survey 2023 shows an expected 120% increase in Europe's trolleybus fleet by 2030 compared to 2022, ...