Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Turanians

Turanians, derived from the ancient Iranian term Tūirya or Turya, originally designated the nomadic inhabitants of Turan, a region north of the Iranian plateau and beyond the Oxus River (Amu Darya), portrayed in Zoroastrian texts like the Avesta as adversaries of the Iranians, engaging in conflicts over resources and territory.^[1] These Turanians, led by figures such as Frangrasyan (Afrasiyab), are depicted as swift-moving horsemen embodying chaos against Iranian order, likely reflecting historical encounters with eastern Iranian nomads like the Saka or early Central Asian steppe groups rather than modern Turkic peoples.^[1] In Ferdowsi's Shahnameh, Turan emerges as a kingdom founded by Tur, son of the mythic king Fereydun, whose descendants wage perpetual war on Iran, symbolizing the causal tension between settled agrarian societies and mobile pastoralists.^[2] Revived in 19th-century European linguistics and ethnography, the term "Turanian" was repurposed by scholars including Friedrich Max Müller to categorize peoples and languages outside the Indo-European (Aryan) and Semitic families, specifically agglutinative tongues of the proposed Ural-Altaic phylum spanning from the Finns and Hungarians to Turks, Mongols, and Tungusic groups across Eurasia.^[3] Müller's framework, influenced by morphological typology and comparative philology, posited Turanians as a distinct "stock" with shared nomadic heritage and linguistic traits like vowel harmony and suffixation, contrasting their "inflexional" structure with Indo-European roots.^[3] This classification, rooted in early observations of areal similarities rather than proven genetic descent, fueled theories of ancient migrations from Central Asia but has been empirically refuted by subsequent comparative linguistics, which attributes parallels to prolonged contact in Eurasian steppes rather than common ancestry.^[4]^[5] The Turanian concept gained political traction in movements like Turanism, which sought ethnic unity among purported Ural-Altaic descendants to counter imperial fragmentation, notably in late Ottoman, Hungarian, and Japanese contexts, though often relying on unverified racial and linguistic bonds amid rising nationalism.^[6] Controversies arose from its pseudoscientific undertones, including overextension to non-related groups and ideological co-optation for expansionist aims, contrasting with rigorous modern genomics revealing diverse ancestries—e.g., Turkic peoples blending Central Asian steppe, East Asian, and West Eurasian components—undermining monolithic "Turanian" identity. Today, the term persists in cultural revivalism among some Turkic and Hungarian nationalists but holds little standing in anthropology, supplanted by evidence-based studies of language families and population genetics.

Etymology and Historical Origins

Mythological Roots in Avestan Tradition

In the Avestan texts, the sacred scriptures of Zoroastrianism composed primarily between approximately 1000 and 600 BCE, Turan (Avestan tūirī̆na-) designates a northern region beyond the Oxus River and its associated nomadic inhabitants, consistently portrayed as hostile adversaries to the Iranians (Avestan airya-). These texts mention Turanians (Tūirya) over twenty times, with references appearing once in the Gathas—the oldest portion attributed to Zoroaster himself—and more frequently in the Younger Avestan Yashts, where they engage in conflicts over resources, territory, and divine favor.^[7]^[1] The portrayal emphasizes repeated invasions and raids by Turanian forces against Iranian settled communities, framing the antagonism as a cosmic struggle aligned with Zoroastrian dualism, where Turanians align with chaotic, destructive forces opposed to order and cultivation.^[7] Central to this tradition is the figure of Fraŋrasyan (later rendered as Afrasiab in Persian epics drawing from Avestan motifs), the archetypal Turanian king and leader of these nomadic warriors, depicted as a deceitful, villainous (Avestan mairya-) entity endowed with magical abilities and serving as an agent of Angra Mainyu, the destructive spirit. In Yasht 19, for instance, Fraŋrasyan attempts to seize the life-giving glory (khvarənah) from the Iranians, symbolizing broader clashes between mobile pastoralists reliant on horse-mounted warfare and the agrarian, ritual-centered Iranian society.^[8]^[9] This conflict underscores a mythological binary: Turanians as swift, raiding horsemen disrupting fertility and stability, versus Iranians as defenders of asha (truth and order), without implying a singular ethnic unity among the Turanians, who represent diverse northern steppe groups rather than a cohesive polity.^[7] Etymologically, tūirī̆na- derives from Old Iranian tura-, connoting "swift" or "strong" in reference to agile, horse-dependent nomads, though later interpretations extended it to signify "hostile" or "non-Iranian" territories; the term thus evokes the martial prowess of these foes without denoting a fixed genealogy or language family. Scholarly analysis identifies the historical Turanians as Iranic-speaking steppe pastoralists north of the settled Iranian heartlands, their demonization in Avestan lore reflecting intra-Iranian tribal rivalries rather than exogenous ethnic origins.^[7]^[1]

Adoption in European Scholarship

Abraham Hyacinth Anquetil-Duperron introduced the concept of Turan to European audiences through his 1771 French translation of the Zend-Avesta, the sacred texts of Zoroastrianism, where Tūrān denoted a region and its inhabitants positioned as adversaries to the sedentary Iranian (Aryan) peoples of Airyanem Vaejah.^[10] In this framework, Turanians were portrayed as nomadic groups originating from Central Asia, drawing parallels to classical accounts of Scythians and other steppe wanderers described by ancient Greek historians like Herodotus.^[11] Anquetil-Duperron's work, based on manuscripts acquired during his travels to India in the 1760s, marked the initial scholarly bridge between ancient Iranian mythology and Enlightenment-era Orientalism, emphasizing Turan as a counterpoint to Iranian civilization.^[10] During the Romantic era, this ancient dichotomy influenced emerging comparative philology, which repurposed "Turanian" to encompass non-Indo-European linguistic and cultural elements encountered in Asian studies. Scholars contrasted the "Aryan" lineage—linked to settled agricultural societies and inflected languages—with Turanian archetypes representing mobile, pastoral nomadism and agglutinative structures.^[12] This binary served as a heuristic for classifying vast Eurasian diversity, prioritizing linguistic evidence over mythological narratives as a more empirical basis for ethnic categorization, though it often projected European racial preconceptions onto sparse historical data.^[12] By the early 19th century, linguists expanded the term's scope; Julius Klaproth, in his 1823 Asia Polyglotta, initiated groupings of disparate tongues including Finnic, Turkic, and Mongolic varieties under a proto-Turanian umbrella, reflecting systematic efforts to map non-Aryan linguistic affinities across northern Eurasia.^[12] Klaproth's classifications, derived from polyglot comparisons and fieldwork in regions like the Caucasus and Siberia, underscored agglutination as a shared trait distinguishing these from Indo-European forms, laying groundwork for subsequent philological syntheses without yet formalizing a unified family.^[13] This adoption reflected a shift toward causal linguistic reconstruction, though reliant on limited corpora and prone to overgeneralization from nomadic-sedentary stereotypes.^[12]

Linguistic and Racial Classification in the 19th Century

Max Müller's Framework

Friedrich Max Müller, a prominent philologist, proposed the Turanian category as a major language grouping in his 1855 pamphlet The Languages of the Seat of War in the East, surveying it alongside Semitic and Aryan (Indo-European) families as one of three primary divisions of human speech.^[14] He developed this framework further in Lectures on the Science of Language, first delivered at the Royal Institution in 1861, where he classified Turanian languages typologically based on their agglutinative morphology—adding distinct affixes to roots without internal modification or fusion—contrasting sharply with the inflectional fusion prevalent in Aryan tongues.^[15] This morphological criterion formed the core of his system, prioritizing structural parallels over proven genetic descent, though he presented Turanian as a cohesive "family" encompassing diverse Eurasian languages.^[16] Müller's Turanian grouping included languages from northern and southern branches, such as Finnic (e.g., Finnish), Ugric, Samoyedic, Turkic (e.g., Turkish, Tatar), Mongolic, and Tungusic varieties, which he illustrated through genealogical tables and comparative examples demonstrating suffix chaining for grammatical relations.^[17] Unlike the root-based isolation of Semitic or the synthetic compounding of Aryan, these agglutinative forms evidenced, in Müller's view, a uniform developmental stage reflecting nomadic origins and limited phonetic evolution.^[15] He drew on field reports and early grammars, like those of Finnish and Turkish, to highlight shared traits such as vowel harmony and postpositional syntax, positioning Turanian as a vast, understudied counterpoint to the civilized Aryan lineage.^[3] While Müller insisted that linguistic affiliation did not necessitate racial uniformity—explicitly stating in his lectures that "language is not the same as blood" and avoiding dogmatic ethnic origins—he nonetheless emphasized cultural corollaries, observing recurrent shamanistic elements in Turanian mythologies and folklore as indicative of a distinct, less philosophically advanced civilizational trajectory compared to Aryan traditions.^[16] This agnosticism on biological unity tempered his framework's racial implications, yet his typology implicitly reinforced hierarchical views of progress, with agglutination seen as a transitional stage toward more flexible inflectional systems.^[15] Müller's approach, rooted in comparative method rather than pure genealogy, influenced subsequent scholarship by bridging linguistics with ethnology, though it relied more on observable form than substantiated historical reconstruction.^[3]

Ural-Altaic Hypothesis

The Ural-Altaic hypothesis emerged in the mid-19th century as an attempt to unify diverse Eurasian languages under a single macro-family, often subsumed within the broader Turanian linguistic classification for non-Indo-European tongues of Central Asia and northern Eurasia. Finnish linguist and explorer Matthias Alexander Castrén (1813–1852), drawing from extensive fieldwork expeditions between 1838 and 1849 among Siberian and Arctic peoples, first articulated the concept around 1844. He grouped Uralic languages—such as Finnish, Hungarian, and Samoyedic—with Altaic languages—including Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic—based on typological similarities like agglutinative structure and vowel harmony, positing a common origin in the Altaic region as the urheimat.^[18]^[19] This framework reflected Castrén's advocacy for Pan-Turanism, envisioning cultural and linguistic kinship among these groups to bolster Finnish national identity against Germanic dominance.^[18] The hypothesis extended beyond linguistics into anthropology, where it was invoked to correlate language families with racial typologies. French diplomat and racial theorist Joseph Arthur de Gobineau (1816–1882), in his 1853–1855 Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races, associated Turanian-speaking peoples with the "yellow" race, portraying them as nomadic hordes from Northeast Asia characterized by despotic tendencies and lesser civilizational capacity compared to whites. Gobineau blended linguistic evidence with craniometric and historical data, arguing that Turanian migrations exemplified racial mixing that diluted superior Aryan stocks, though his claims relied more on speculative historical narratives than empirical linguistic reconstruction. This fusion highlighted the hypothesis's speculative nature, as shared linguistic traits were attributed to genetic inheritance without systematic sound-law comparisons akin to those in Indo-European studies. By the 1870s to 1890s, the Ural-Altaic framework peaked in influence within European ethnology, particularly in British and German scholarship classifying Asian nomads and steppe cultures. Proponents like German linguists Wilhelm Schott and Hugo Theodor Winkler refined Castrén's divisions, applying the model to ethnographic surveys of Tatar and Mongol groups, while British anthropologists adopted it for broader racial-linguistic taxonomies of Eurasian "Turanian" stocks.^[5] However, critiques emerged by the late 1890s, noting that proposed cognates often stemmed from areal diffusion rather than genetic descent, underscoring the hypothesis's reliance on superficial resemblances over verifiable proto-language evidence.^[20]

Associated Peoples and Cultures

Linguistic Affiliations

The Turanian linguistic classification, as proposed in 19th-century European scholarship, primarily grouped Uralic languages—such as Hungarian and Finnish—with Altaic subgroups encompassing Turkic (e.g., Turkish and Kazakh), Mongolic (e.g., Mongolian), and Tungusic (e.g., Manchu).^[16]^[3] This encompassed northern Eurasian languages unified typologically rather than through proven genetic kinship, reflecting efforts by linguists like Max Müller to categorize non-Indo-European tongues via morphological parallels.^[16] Key typological similarities included agglutinative structure, in which roots combine with distinct, non-fusing affixes to denote grammatical relations (e.g., Hungarian kés-em for "my knife"); vowel harmony, whereby suffix vowels assimilate to root vowels (e.g., Turkish bak-mak "to look"); pronominal suffixes on nouns and verbs; postpositions; and subject-object-verb ordering.^[16]^[3] These features, emphasized by Müller building on Matthias Castrén's Altaic framework, justified the provisional lumping despite lacking regular sound laws akin to those in Indo-European studies.^[16]^[21] Speculative inclusions occasionally extended to Japanese and Korean owing to superficial agglutinative and harmonic resemblances in broader Altaic conjectures, though without robust lexical or phonological support.^[22] Dravidian languages (e.g., Tamil), initially grouped by Müller for agglutination in his early 1850s schema, were later rejected from refined northern-focused models as typological overlap proved insufficient for affiliation.^[16]^[3]

Key Ethnic Groups and Migrations

The Scythians, also known as Saka, were nomadic pastoralists who roamed the Eurasian steppes from the 8th century BCE to the 3rd century BCE, originating in the Central Asian plains and migrating westward into the Pontic-Caspian region and southward toward Persia and India, characterized by horse archery and kurgan burials.^[23] Despite their Iranian linguistic affiliations, 19th-century scholars retroactively grouped them under the Turanian umbrella due to shared steppe nomadic traits with later groups.^[24] The Huns emerged from Central Asia around the 4th century CE, migrating into Eastern Europe by 375 CE under leaders like Attila, establishing a confederation that pressured Germanic tribes and contributed to the Migration Period's disruptions until their empire fragmented after 469 CE.^[25] Genetic evidence traces their core elite to Mongolian origins, linked to earlier Xiongnu populations, with migrations facilitating a blend of steppe warfare tactics across Eurasia.^[26] Closely following, the Avars—a multi-ethnic nomadic alliance including Turkic and Rouran elements—migrated from the Central Eurasian steppes to the Carpathian Basin between 567 and 568 CE, establishing a khaganate that dominated Pannonia and challenged Byzantine and Frankish powers until the early 8th century.^[27] Their rapid westward push preserved East Asian genetic markers, reflecting direct translocation from Mongolian-adjacent regions without significant local admixture initially.^[26] Turkic expansions originated in the Altai Mountains region around the mid-6th century CE, with the Göktürks forming a khaganate by 552 CE that controlled Central Asia and facilitated tribal dispersals eastward to Mongolia and westward toward the Caucasus.^[28] Subsequent waves included the Seljuks' 11th-century migration into Anatolia, defeating Byzantines at Manzikert in 1071 CE and establishing sultanates that reshaped the region's demographics through settlement and conversion.^[29] The Magyars, exhibiting Turkic cultural influences from steppe interactions, migrated from the Ural region to the Carpathian Basin in the late 9th century CE, founding Hungary after overcoming local Slavic and Avar remnants.^[26] Mongolic groups, unified under Genghis Khan by 1206 CE, launched conquests from the Mongolian steppes that rapidly encompassed Central Asia, Persia, and Eastern Europe by the mid-13th century, disseminating composite steppe administrative and military practices like decimal organization and relay systems.^[30] These campaigns, peaking under Ögedei Khan's invasions of Rus' principalities in 1237–1240 CE and Hungary in 1241 CE, integrated diverse nomadic traditions but halted further European penetration due to internal succession disputes and logistical limits.^[30]

Ideological Developments: Turanism

Hungarian Turanism and Nationalism

Hungarian Turanism originated in the mid-19th century amid efforts to trace Magyar roots to Central Asian nomadic peoples, countering prevailing Indo-European assimilation pressures within the Habsburg Empire. Intellectuals like Ármin Vámbéry, who conducted expeditions across Central Asia from 1862 to 1864, promoted affinities between Hungarians and Turkic-Finnic groups based on linguistic and ethnographic observations, detailed in works such as A magyarok eredete (1882). Vámbéry's advocacy framed Hungarians as part of a broader Ural-Altaic kinship, distinct from Slavic and Germanic neighbors, to bolster national distinctiveness during a period of cultural revival.^[31] The Austro-Hungarian Compromise of 1867, establishing dual sovereignty and Hungarian self-rule, intensified ethnic rivalries with substantial German and Slavic populations, spurring Turanism's growth as an ideological bulwark. Proponents envisioned Ural-Altaic solidarity to offset pan-Germanic and pan-Slavic dominance, fostering studies in linguistics, archaeology, and Orientalism that highlighted eastern migrations and cultural parallels. By the 1890s, ethnographers including Otto Herman advanced fieldwork linking Hungarian folklore and artifacts to Asian steppe traditions, institutionalizing Turanism through academic societies and publications that emphasized non-European brotherhood over regional isolation.^[32] In the interwar era, following the 1920 Treaty of Trianon—which reduced Hungary's territory by two-thirds—Turanism revived among right-wing nationalists as a revisionist tool, promoting alliances with Turkic states and Finno-Ugric kin to reclaim lost lands. Organizations like the Turanian Society intensified activities, influencing cultural policies and diplomatic overtures toward Japan and Turkey under regimes seeking Axis partnerships. Adherents anticipated World War II enabling Trianon revisions via Turanian unity, but Allied victory and subsequent Soviet occupation in 1945 led to ideological suppression, with Turanist groups dismantled and their ideas marginalized under communist orthodoxy.^[33]^[34]

Pan-Turkism in the Ottoman and Republican Eras

In the late Ottoman period, Ziya Gökalp (1876–1924), a sociologist and intellectual associated with the Committee of Union and Progress, advanced Turkism as a nationalist ideology emphasizing cultural and linguistic unity among Turkic-speaking peoples, reinterpreting the broader Turanian concept to focus primarily on Turkic groups rather than expansive Altaic affiliations.^[35] His writings in the 1910s, including poems and essays promoting Turkish national exaltation, influenced Young Turk reformers by prioritizing folk language and secular nationalism over Ottoman universalism or Pan-Islamism, laying groundwork for post-imperial identity.^[36] Gökalp's vision positioned Turkism as a philosophical and political framework for Turkic solidarity, though it remained theoretical amid World War I pressures.^[37] Following the Ottoman defeat in 1918, Enver Pasha (1881–1922), former Minister of War and a proponent of Turkic expansionism, pursued Pan-Turkist objectives in Central Asia by allying with the Basmachi rebels against Soviet forces starting in 1921.^[38] He unified disparate Basmachi bands—initially anti-colonial Muslim insurgents—under a banner combining Pan-Turkism and Pan-Islamism, aiming to establish a Turkic state in regions like Bukhara and Turkestan, but was killed in combat near Pamir in August 1922.^[39] This episode marked a practical, albeit failed, extension of Ottoman-era Pan-Turkism into irredentist action, contrasting with the empire's collapse.^[40] In the Republican era under Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (1923 onward), Pan-Turkism was subordinated to Anatolian-centric Turkish nationalism to consolidate the new state and avoid provoking the Soviet Union, with Atatürk explicitly rejecting expansive irredentism in favor of territorial integrity and modernization.^[41] By the 1930s, official rhetoric emphasized a unified "Turkish nation" within Turkey's borders, echoing Gökalp's cultural Turkism through language reforms and secular education but omitting calls for extraterritorial Turkic unification, as seen in Atatürk's 1930 Nutuk speech prioritizing national sovereignty over pan-ethnic adventures.^[42] During the Cold War, Pan-Turkism revived among anti-communist groups, notably the Grey Wolves (Bozkurtlar), the youth wing of the Nationalist Movement Party founded by Alparslan Türkeş in 1969, which fused Turkish ultranationalism with aspirations for Turkic unity against Soviet influence in Central Asia and the Caucasus.^[43] The movement, active in the 1970s amid Turkey's political violence, promoted anti-Soviet solidarity among Turkic peoples through propaganda and paramilitary activities, drawing on Turanic symbolism like the grey wolf myth while aligning with NATO's containment strategy.^[44] This iteration retained ideological echoes of earlier Pan-Turkism but adapted to geopolitical realities, emphasizing cultural and covert ties over overt expansion.^[45]

Broader Pan-Turanian Visions

In the late 19th century, Crimean Tatar intellectual Ismail Gasprinski (1851–1914) advocated for solidarity among Ural-Altaic peoples as a means of cultural and political resistance to Russian imperial rule.^[46] Through his newspaper Tergüman, founded in 1883 in Bakhchysarai, Gasprinski promoted linguistic unity across Turkic, Mongol, and Finno-Ugric groups, framing it as a shared "Turanian" heritage to foster education reform and autonomy within the Russian Empire.^[47] His Jadidist movement emphasized modernization while invoking broader Ural-Altaic kinship to counter Slavic dominance, influencing early Pan-Turanian thought among Volga Tatars and other Muslim intellectuals.^[48] During the interwar period, Japanese intellectuals adapted Turanian ideas to justify imperial expansion under the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere. Influenced by Hungarian Turanist Benedek Baráthosi Balogh's visits in the 1920s, figures like Jūichirō Imaoka integrated Turanism into Pan-Asianist propaganda, positing linguistic and cultural links between Japanese, Ainu, Tungusic (e.g., Manchu), and Turkic-Mongol peoples as evidence of a unified "Turanian" East Asian sphere.^[49] This framework, disseminated through journals like Dai Ajia Shugi (1933–1942), portrayed Japan's role in Manchuria and Inner Asia as a "liberation" of kindred Ural-Altaic groups from Western and Chinese influence, aligning with militarist aims from 1931 onward.^[50] Such visions extended Turanism eastward, claiming shared nomadic origins to legitimize the 1940s occupation of territories inhabited by Tungusic populations.^[51] In contemporary contexts, fringe proponents in Hungarian and Turkish circles have expanded Pan-Turanian claims to ancient civilizations, asserting Ural-Altaic origins for Sumerians and Etruscans without linguistic or archaeological substantiation. Hungarian pseudohistorians, drawing on 20th-century theories like those linking Magyar to Etruscan via shared agglutinative features, posit migratory Turanian roots for both Mediterranean and Mesopotamian cultures.^[52] Similarly, elements of the Turkish History Thesis, developed in the 1930s under state sponsorship, reclassified Sumerian as a proto-Turkic language, attributing cuneiform innovations around 3000 BCE to Altaic migrants.^[53] These narratives persist in nationalist literature, envisioning a primordial Turanian continuum from Central Asia to the ancient Near East and Europe, though they rely on selective etymologies rather than comparative evidence.^[54]

Scientific Scrutiny and Evidence

Linguistic Debunking

The Ural-Altaic hypothesis, positing a genetic relationship between Uralic languages (including Hungarian and Finnish) and the so-called Altaic languages (Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic), was critically examined and largely rejected by historical linguists starting in the early 20th century, after the internal coherence of the Uralic family had been demonstrated through established comparative methods such as regular sound laws and reconstructible proto-vocabulary.^[55] Proponents had initially relied on typological similarities, including agglutinative morphology and vowel harmony, but modern linguistics dismisses such traits as insufficient evidence for common descent, attributing them instead to prolonged areal convergence in a Eurasian Sprachbund where languages influenced one another through contact rather than inheritance. Central to the debunking is the absence of regular sound correspondences and a core vocabulary set that could support genetic affiliation, criteria essential under the comparative method for proving relatedness. For instance, while Uralic languages exhibit predictable shifts—such as Proto-Uralic *käte 'hand' yielding Hungarian kéz and Finnish käsi via consistent vowel and consonant changes—no equivalent systematic patterns link Uralic to Turkic or Mongolic forms beyond sporadic loanwords from historical interactions, like Turkic borrowings in Hungarian due to migrations.^[56] Critics, including Alexander Vovin, have highlighted irregularities in proposed Altaic correspondences themselves, with many exceptions undermining claims even for the narrower Turkic-Mongolic-Tungusic grouping, let alone extending to Uralic.^[57] Contemporary classification treats Uralic as a distinct family, with Hungarian firmly within its Finno-Ugric branch based on shared innovations and etymologies, while Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic are viewed as independent families or at most a loose contact zone without super-phylum unity.^[55] The 1960s debates crystallized this consensus, emphasizing that typological parallels, once mistaken for archaisms, reflect diffusion rather than divergence from a common ancestor, rendering the Turanian linguistic framework unsupported by empirical reconstruction.

Genetic and Anthropological Data

Population genetics studies of purported Turanian groups, encompassing Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic, and Uralic peoples, reveal significant admixture with regional substrates rather than a cohesive genetic cluster. Turkic populations exhibit paternal lineages tracing to Northeast Asia, such as Y-chromosome haplogroup C2 (specifically subclades like C2a1a3-F1918), which originated in the Neolithic period and spread via steppe migrations, but these are diluted by substantial West Eurasian ancestry from local Indo-European and other groups encountered during expansions into Central Asia and Anatolia.^[58]^[59] Autosomal analyses confirm this hybrid profile, with Turkic speakers showing 20–50% East Eurasian components varying by subgroup, precluding a singular "Turanian" signature.^[60] In Hungarians, associated with Uralic linguistics but linked to Turanian ideology, ancient DNA from the conquering period (9th–10th centuries CE) indicates 5–10% Central-Inner Asian admixture, primarily from elite nomadic males carrying East Eurasian haplogroups, integrated into a predominantly European maternal and autosomal base derived from Srubnaya and local substrates.^[61]^[62] Modern Hungarians retain approximately 4% East Asian ancestry, dated to the medieval conquest era, underscoring limited gene flow rather than wholesale replacement.^[63] Mongolic and Tungusic groups maintain a stronger East Asian core, with ancestries dominated by Ancient Northeast Asian (ANA) components from the Amur River Basin and Mongolia, forming distinct clusters in principal component analyses (PCA) separate from Uralic Europeans, who cluster closer to West Eurasian populations.^[64]^[65] No unified pan-Turanian autosomal cluster emerges in genome-wide PCA or admixture modeling across these groups; instead, gradients reflect serial migrations and clinal admixture along Eurasian steppes, with Mongolic/Tungusic aligning more with core East Asians and Turkic/Uralic showing progressive Western shifts.^[66] Anthropological evidence further undermines 19th-century racial typologies positing a "Turanian" or "yellow race" as discrete, with craniometric and morphological data demonstrating continuous clinal variation in traits like brachycephaly or epicanthic folds across Eurasia, attributable to gene flow rather than fixed categories.^[67] Archaeological contexts, including kurgan burials in steppe zones historically labeled "Turanian," overlap with Indo-European expansions under the Kurgan hypothesis, where Yamnaya-related groups (ca. 3000 BCE) admixed with eastern hunter-gatherers, blurring any purported ethnic boundaries and highlighting dynamic population replacements over static racial unity.^[68]^[69]

Modern Usage and Controversies

Nationalist Revivals

In Hungary, the Kurultáj festivals, launched in 2008 and held biennially since 2010 under the auspices of parliamentary vice-speaker Sándor Lezsák, have promoted cultural affinities between Hungarians and peoples of Turkic and Finno-Ugric descent by celebrating shared Eurasian steppe-nomadic traditions such as horsemanship, archery, and tribal assemblies.^[70] The events, attended by thousands including representatives from over 20 nations by the 2022 edition, feature reconstructions of ancient crafts and rituals to reinforce a collective identity rooted in Hun-Turkic heritage, with the 2024 gathering explicitly framing itself as a venue for preserving Hungarian and Turkic nomadic customs amid modern globalization.^[71] Financial backing from the Fidesz government under Prime Minister Viktor Orbán intensified from 2012, aligning these gatherings with state-supported narratives of Hungarian origins in Central Asian nomadic lineages, which have drawn 27 Hun-Turkic representatives from more than 10 countries in recent iterations to foster diplomatic and cultural exchanges.^[72]^[73] Turkey's engagement with Azerbaijan following the latter's recapture of Nagorno-Karabakh territories in November 2020 has revived neo-Pan-Turkist elements in official discourse, emphasizing an unbreakable "one nation, two states" alliance predicated on shared ethnic origins and historical conquests across the steppe.^[74] This partnership, solidified through joint military operations and the Shusha Declaration of June 2021, has included Turkish provision of drones and training that enabled Azerbaijan's 44-day campaign success, with Ankara portraying the outcome as a triumph of Turkic solidarity against external adversaries.^[75] High-level summits, such as those advancing the Organization of Turkic States, have invoked expansive visions of Turkic civilizational continuity from ancient empires to contemporary geopolitics, bolstering cultural exchanges like language programs and youth forums to cultivate a sense of inherited superiority in resilience and expansion.^[76]^[77] Fringe digital communities in the 2020s, particularly on platforms hosting ethnonationalist discussions, have sustained interest in Turanian frameworks by positing unverified connections between Sumerian civilization and proto-Turkic or Hungarian forebears, often through self-published texts and forums blending archaeology with mythic genealogy to assert primordial primacy.^[78] These efforts, while marginal, contribute to grassroots cultural preservation by circulating artifacts, runes, and folklore interpretations that enthusiasts adapt into modern identity symbols, such as custom jewelry or online manifestos tracing "Turanian" bloodlines from Mesopotamia to the Carpathians.^[79]

Criticisms of Pseudoscience and Ideology

Anthropological consensus, building on Franz Boas's early 20th-century advocacy for cultural relativism, has relegated Turanian racial classifications to the status of outdated pseudoscience, as Boas's empirical studies demonstrated that human variation stems primarily from environmental and cultural factors rather than fixed biological hierarchies.^[80] This critique extends to Turanism's foundational claims of a cohesive "Turanian" ethnic or racial supergroup encompassing Turkic, Mongol, and Uralic peoples, which lack substantiation in modern craniometric or ethnographic data and echo discredited 19th-century polygenist models. Ideologically, such theories have justified irredentist adventures, most notably Enver Pasha's 1917–1922 campaigns in Central Asia to forge a pan-Turkic empire, which collapsed amid local resistance, logistical failures, and over 100,000 Ottoman casualties, underscoring the perils of basing policy on unverified ethnic unities.^[81] Racialist elements in Turanian ideology reveal inconsistencies: early proponents drew from hierarchical frameworks positing Turanians (often aligned with "yellow" or nomadic branches) as inferior to Aryan or Semitic groups in civilizational capacity, yet 20th-century nationalists inverted this to assert Turanian primacy, including campaigns reclassifying Turks as "white" or proto-European to claim ancient supremacy over Indo-European civilizations.^[82] These reversals ignore genetic evidence of extensive admixture; for instance, Anatolian Turks exhibit 40–60% West Eurasian ancestry from pre-Turkic substrates, while Central Asian Turkics show 20–50% East Asian components, refuting notions of a discrete, unadulterated Turanian genome and highlighting gene flow as the causal driver of diversity rather than primordial purity.^[83] Proponents counter that Turanism fosters cultural continuity against homogenizing globalism, yet this defense conflates valid heritage preservation with empirically baseless racial essentialism, prioritizing ideological cohesion over causal mechanisms like migration-induced hybridization. In contemporary contexts, Turanian rhetoric exacerbates ethnic frictions, such as pan-Turkist agitation among Iran's Azerbaijani population, where symbols like the Tractor football club have been co-opted for irredentist narratives promoting separation from Persian-majority Iran, contributing to sporadic unrest and cross-border tensions since the 2006 Azerbaijani cartoon protests.^[84] Such applications demonstrate ideology's risk of inflaming zero-sum conflicts over shared regions like the South Caucasus, where claims of exclusive Turanic heritage disregard archaeological and linguistic evidence of multilayered cultural layering. While advocates frame it as resistance to hegemonic assimilation, the absence of falsifiable criteria for "Turanian" identity—coupled with failures like Enver's expeditions—reveals a pattern of overreach, where pseudoscientific premises yield pragmatic defeats and heightened intergroup animosities without advancing verifiable truths about human origins.^[81]

References

[1]
Iranians And Turanians In The Holy Avesta | CAIS©
The legend in Persian presents Iranians and Turanians as of one stock. · The Avesta shows them as the people living close to one another. · It also shows that the ...
[2]
(PDF) Tur Family in Shahname - ResearchGate
Aug 7, 2025 · In Shahname, Turanian has been regard as the opposite side of Iranians (Iraj's Family). Ferdowsi has been devoted the main part of his ...
[3]
[PDF] Friedrich Max Müller and the Development of the Turanian ... - CORE
Mar 22, 2018 · The idea of hierarchical morphological classes played a key role in how Müller formulated and justified the existence of a Turanian family of ...
[4]
A Brief Exploration of the Altaic Hypothesis
The two branches of the proposed Ural-Altaic family were originally thought to be closely related, but this theory receives little support today (Ruhlen 128).
[5]
[PDF] 3. the altaic theory
The languages called Altaic by Castrén are now called Ural-Altaic languages comprising two groups: the Uralic (Finno-Ugric-Samoyed) whose affinity was proven ...
[6]
Rethinking Turanism beyond Expansionism - Duke University Press
May 1, 2024 · Turanism is not a mystical idea, and it refers to modern practical/political concepts such as independence, territorial integrity, national sovereignty, and ...
[7]
https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/turan
[8]
https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/afrasiab-turanian-king
[9]
Afrasiab | CAIS©
In Avestan tradition, where his common epithet mairya- deceitful, villainous[2] who take the sense of an evil man. He lived in subterranean fortress made of ...
[10]
Philologies Collide | The People That Never Were - Oxford Academic
Aug 21, 2025 · The first rendering of the Avesta into a European language was by Abraham Hyacinthe Anquetil-Duperron (1771). ... Turanian or nomadic races? Or is ...
[11]
(PDF) The People That Never Were: Linguistic Scholarship and the ...
Anquetil-Duperron replied that a common origin was the most likely ... 3.2.v Turanian The term Turanian, which, like Aryan, was popularized by ...
[12]
Language and Race | The People That Never Were - Oxford Academic
Aug 21, 2025 · In his Asia Polyglotta, Julius von Klaproth (1783–1835) argued that language was more reliable evidentially than mythology, given that, in ...
[13]
https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/edcoll/9789004299061/B9789004299061_003.pdf
[14]
The languages of the seat of war in the East. With a survey of the ...
Apr 23, 2008 · With a survey of the three families of language, Semitic, Arian and Turanian. by: Müller, F. Max (Friedrich Max), 1823-1900. Publication date ...Missing: 1850s | Show results with:1850s<|separator|>
[15]
[PDF] Lectures on The Science of Language - Project Gutenberg
The Project Gutenberg EBook of Lectures on The Science of. Language by Max Müller. This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no ...Missing: 1850s | Show results with:1850s
[16]
[PDF] Friedrich Max Müller and "Agglutinating" a Family - PDXScholar
This chapter focuses on the period before Max Müller wrote about his Turanian theory at Oxford in the 1850s. Prior to him, linguists like Sámuel Gyarmathi, ...
[17]
Genealogical Table of the Turanian Family of Languages, Northern ...
Oct 5, 2014 · Lectures on the Science of Language - September 2013. ... Max Müller. Chapter. Chapter; Accessibility. Book contents. Frontmatter · PREFACE ...
[18]
Matthias Alexander Castrén | Finnish Scholar, Explorer & Ethnologist
Finnish nationalist and pioneer in the study of remote Arctic and Siberian Uralic and Altaic languages. He also championed the ideology of Pan-Turanianism.Missing: Turanian | Show results with:Turanian
[19]
A life for an idea: Matthias Alexander Castrén | Polar Record
Jul 1, 2009 · A brilliant researcher and fieldworker, the first professor of the Finnish language and prominent founder of the Ural-Altaic hypothesis.
[20]
https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/9789004492493/B9789004492493_s029.pdf
[21]
The Altaic Language Family - BYU Department of Linguistics
The Turanian languages were only nomadic languages, as Max Muller defined ... morphemes as an essential feature addition on the agglutinative grammatical ...
[22]
[PDF] Is the Turanian language family a phantom?
Jun 23, 2007 · The Turanian language family that plays a very important role in Hungarian linguistics as well as history, comprises the Finno-Ugric (or, ...
[23]
https://knowledge.uchicago.edu/record/12056/files/Final-Syllable-Reduction-in-Middle-Indic-and-Iranic.pdf
[24]
The 300 Spartans: International Scholars Identifying Turkic Roots in ...
- The early 20th century, global scholarship largely accepted that the roots of European languages lay in the Turkic or Turanian language family, in short, in ...
[25]
Barbarian Migrations, Invasions - History of Europe - Britannica
Sep 10, 2025 · In 375 the Huns from Central Asia first attacked the Ostrogoths—an event that provoked serious disturbances among the eastern Germans. The Huns ...
[26]
The genetic origin of Huns, Avars, and conquering Hungarians
Jul 11, 2022 · Our results reveal that this “immigrant core” of both Huns and Avars likely originated in present day Mongolia, and their origin can be traced back to Xiongnus ...
[27]
Ancient genomes reveal origin and rapid trans-Eurasian migration of ...
Apr 1, 2022 · The Avars, who arrived in the Carpathian Basin from the Central Eurasian steppes in 567–568 CE, are an iconic exception. Their empire, ruled by ...
[28]
Turkic Khaganate
In 552 CE, one branch of Turkic people, the Gokturk, formed the First Turkic Khaganate. They rapidly expanded their territories in Central Asia.
[29]
Part I: A Short Introduction to Pan-Turanism | CAIS©
Turkish expansions began in the 6th Century AD – important pockets such as the Huns, Avars and Khazars had already penetrated Europe a few hundred years earlier ...
[30]
https://www.britannica.com/place/Mongol-empire
[31]
[PDF] macarların kökeni - DergiPark
VÁMBÉRY, Ármin (1882): A magyarok eredete. Etnológiai tanulmány. MTA, Budapest. VÁMBÉRY, Ármin (1895): A magyarság keletkezése és gyarapodása. Franklin ...
[32]
[PDF] ottoman pan-turkism and hungarian turan
1890 was the year after which Hungarian Pan-Turanists gained a strong political hand in the Hungarian intellectual arena and started to establish Turanist ...
[33]
(PDF) Hungarian Nationalism and Hungarian Pan-Turanism until ...
Hungarian nationalism and 'Hungarian Turanism' ideology, which started to develop and transform on different grounds, especially after the Hungarian Revolution ...
[34]
[PDF] Hungarian Turanism. From the Birth of the Ideology to Modernity
Turanists hoped that the coming World War II would lead to a revision of the Treaty of Trianon. During the war, the Turanian Society again became more active ...<|separator|>
[35]
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ziya-Gokalp
[36]
[PDF] Ziya Gökalp on Modernity and Islam: The Origins of an Uneasy ...
Oct 1, 2007 · For him, the ideals of Turkish national- ism would be the major source of inspiration. "The distant ideal of. Turkish nationalism is Pan-Turkism ...
[37]
[PDF] Ziya Gökalp and Literary Turkism, 1876-1923 - OhioLINK ETD Center
The Russian Roots of Turkish Nationalism. Pan-Turkism and Turkish nationalism in the Ottoman Empire and later Turkey have their origins in the Russian Empire.
[38]
Panturkism - 1914-1918 Online
Oct 30, 2017 · In 1921, Enver Pasha joined the Basmachis in Bukhara and died while fighting against the Bolsheviks in 1922. The last significant Pan-Turkist ...
[39]
Enver Paşa | Research Starters - EBSCO
After 1918, Enver pursued his Pan-Turkist ideology in Central Asia, where he unified and led disparate Basmachi bands against the Soviets. Areas of ...
[40]
The Russian Civil War: Enver Pasha and the Basmachi
Aug 31, 2022 · Enver Pasha started his stormy career in the Ottoman Empire. He was a member of the Committee of Union and Progress, took part in the 1908 Young ...
[41]
Kemal Atatürk: Giving a New Nation a New History - jstor
Pan. Turkism and pan-Islamism had no place. History based on Islam and the Ottomans was no longer appropriate for this secular, modernizing state. A new view ...
[42]
The Rise and Role of Nationalism in Turkish Political Life
More than any other objective, Atatürk sought to unify Turkey under a regime of modernization, democracy and development.
[43]
Grey Wolves | Counter Extremism Project
The Grey Wolves is an international fascist, Turkish nationalist, and pan-Turkic organization and movement which rose to prominence in the late 1970s in Turkey.Overview · Key Leaders · History · Violent ActivitiesMissing: Turkism | Show results with:Turkism
[44]
Feeding the Grey Wolves: How the CIA sponsored Turkey's Neo ...
Oct 15, 2022 · The Grey Wolves (Bozkurtlar) is a far-right ultranationalist organization founded in Turkey during the Cold War.Missing: Turkism | Show results with:Turkism
[45]
Grey Wolves - Intelligence Resource Program
Grey Wolves. The National Movement Party ("Milliyetci Hareket Partisi", MHP, aka Nationalist Action Party), founded by Alparslan Turkes in the 1960s, like all ...Missing: Pan- Cold War
[46]
Subscriber Essay: Turanism and the Origins of Turkish Nationalism
Apr 21, 2018 · One of Turanism's more important advocates was a Crimean Tatar named Ismail Gaspirali (d. 1914), or Gasprinski as he was called by the Russians.
[47]
Pan-turkism | Encyclopedia.com
In strict terms "pan-Turanism" refers to a vague union of Ural-Altaic peoples. ... The best-known propagandist was Ismail Gasprinski, a Tatar who published a ...Missing: solidarity | Show results with:solidarity
[48]
“Socialism in One Country” Before Stalin, and the Origins of ...
Pan-Turanism had had its first exponent in Ismael Gasprinski (1841-1914), a Crimean Turk, who in 1878 founded the first newspaper in Turkish, Tergüman. (The ...
[49]
Turanism in Japan | History of Humanities: Vol 10, No 1
Turanism in Japan was instigated by the Hungarian Turanist Benedek Baráthosi Balogh and his Japanese contact Jūichirō Imaoka in the early 1920s.
[50]
Turanism in Japan from Perspective of the Pan-Asiatic Journal, Dai ...
Turanism was essentially used by a small number of people to cover the Japanese expansionism in North China, from Manchuria all the way west through Xinjiang.
[51]
[PDF] Perceptions of Japan in Hungarian Turanism - ELTE
Abstract. The lively Hungarian interest in Asian cultures and Japan before 1945 had several motifs, one of them being the idea of Turanism, which was formed ...
[52]
HUNMAGYAR.ORG - THE ANCIENT TURANIANS
Dec 3, 2021 · The Turanians (Hungarians, Uralic and Altaic peoples) are related to the ancient non-Semitic and non-Indo-European peoples speaking ...Missing: definition ethnography
[53]
Turkish Nationalism in the Young Turk Era 9004093532 ...
Almost all of the Young Turks displaying antidespotic activities in Europe held this idea too; they regarded the unity of the nation as a matter of course.10 ...
[54]
ETRUSCANS ; TURKIC/TURANIAN PEOPLE.... - PROMETHEUS
Dec 12, 2013 · Anatolia was home to Etruscans at least in 5000-6000 BC. and later in 3500 BC.to the Sumerians and the Cimmerians in later periods. Turkic ...Missing: theories | Show results with:theories
[55]
[PDF] The Unity and Diversity of Altaic Janhunen, Juha A.
Critical scholars already rejected the idea of a Ural-Altaic affinity in the early twentieth century. (Shirokogoroff 1931), after Uralic had been defined as ...
[56]
(PDF) Telling general linguists about Altaic - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · The Altaic theory holds that the Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic and Korean (and in most recent versions, also Japanese) languages are genetically related.
[57]
Origins of Turkic language family? Alternatives to Altaic?
May 18, 2015 · The so-called Ural-Altaic hypothesis is now considered dead even by Altaicists, who consider Uralic either similar due to areal convergence, or ...<|separator|>
[58]
Y chromosome evidence confirms northeast Asian origin of Xinjiang ...
Sep 17, 2023 · We found that the Y chromosome haplogroups exhibit greater diversity in Altay Kazakhs compared to Kazakhs in Kazakhstan, Russia, and other regions of China.
[59]
Genetic polymorphism of Y-chromosome in Kazakh populations ...
Oct 27, 2023 · Phylogenetic analysis of the Y-chromosome haplogroup C2b–F1067, a dominant paternal lineage in Eastern Eurasia. J Hum Genet. 2020;65(10):823 ...
[60]
Evolutionary profiles and complex admixture landscape in East Asia
May 15, 2024 · The majority of the extant East Asian paternal lineage belonged to the downstream haplogroup NO, which indicated a degree of genetic ...
[61]
Mitogenomic data indicate admixture components of Central-Inner ...
Mitogenomic data indicate admixture components of Central-Inner Asian and Srubnaya origin in the conquering Hungarians ... Copyright: © 2018 Neparáczki et al.
[62]
Y-chromosome haplogroups from Hun, Avar and conquering ...
Nov 12, 2019 · Neparáczki, E. et al. Mitogenomic data indicate admixture components of Central-Inner Asian and Srubnaya origin in the conquering Hungarians.
[63]
Genetic analysis of male Hungarian Conquerors: European and ...
Jan 14, 2020 · We used Y-STR and SNP analyses on male Hungarian Conqueror remains to determine the genetic source, composition of tribes, and kin of ancient Hungarians.
[64]
Genomic Insights Into the Admixture History of Mongolic
Jun 22, 2021 · The Altaic languages, including Mongolic, Tungusic, and Turkic, are widely distributed in northern East Asia, Siberia, and part region of ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
[65]
Genomic Insights into the Formation of Human Populations in East ...
We follow Holocene expansions from four regions. First, hunter-gatherers of Mongolia and the Amur River Basin have ancestry shared by Mongolic and Tungusic ...
[66]
A Dynamic 6,000-Year Genetic History of Eurasia's Eastern Steppe
Nov 12, 2020 · The Eastern Eurasian Steppe was home to historic empires of nomadic pastoralists, including the Xiongnu and the Mongols.
[67]
[PDF] 13. Race and Human Variation | Explorations
Human Variation Is Clinal/Continuous (Not Discrete) Human diversity cannot be broken into discrete “races,” because most physical traits vary on a continuous ...
[68]
Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language ...
The 'steppe hypothesis' posits an origin in the Pontic steppes region north of the Caspian Sea. Whilst the archaeological record provides a number of candidate ...Missing: Turanian zones
[69]
The Indo-European ancestors' tale - ScienceDirect.com
Jun 18, 2018 · Expansions from the steppe into South Asia did not happen at the time of the Yamnaya migration, but the researchers detected genetic traces of ...Missing: Turanian zones
[70]
Information - Kurultáj
Since 2010, the festival is held under the auspices of the Vice-Speaker of the Parliament of Hungary Sandor Lezsak. Those nations that share the genetic ...
[71]
Kurultaj, Hungary's Largest 'Tribal Assembly', Held Over the ...
Aug 12, 2024 · 'Today, Kurultay is a celebration of the preservation of ancient traditions. It serves to revive the ancient Hungarian and Turkic nomadic ...
[72]
https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/sr/article/download/47110/40246/122455
[73]
Kurultaj and the Heartland - Magyar Nemzet
Aug 22, 2022 · The celebration was organized for the seventh time this year bringing together 27 representatives of Hun-Turkic identities from over 10 ...
[74]
The (pan-)Turkic Caucasus. The Baku-Ankara alliance and its ...
Feb 1, 2021 · Ankara's support for Baku in the Karabakh war in autumn 2020 was a logical continuation of the strengthening of Azerbaijani-Turkish relations, ...Missing: neo- | Show results with:neo-
[75]
Turkey Announces a New Path to Communicative Integration of the ...
Jun 10, 2025 · ... Azerbaijani alliance in Nagorno-Karabakh in 2020 further energized pan-Turkic integration. On June 15, 2021, Turkey and Azerbaijan signed ...
[76]
(PDF) THE NAGORNO-KARABAKH (ARTSAKH) CONFLICT AND ...
Jan 12, 2025 · This research demonstrates that in previous decades, Turkey and Azerbaijan attempted to cast the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in a pan-Turkic light ...
[77]
On the trail of the grey wolf: pan-Turkism in Turkey's foreign policy
May 17, 2024 · Both concepts draw from a similar myth and the same legendary land, one difference being that Turanism encompasses a bigger group of peoples ...
[78]
Hungary's Growing Relationship with the Turkic World - FOMOSO
Sep 20, 2018 · Kurultaj is also supported by the Hungarian Government. The Hungarian Government has also recently paid more attention to the Turkic world and ...
[79]
Discover Kurultaj: Hungary's grandest traditional event captured in ...
Aug 11, 2024 · Fifteen years ago, the first Kurultaj was organised with the aim of uniting all Hun and Turkic nations to celebrate together in Hungary. The ...
[80]
Debunking racism scientifically - Human Biology Review
Oct 10, 2020 · Boas rejected the nineteenth century theory of scientific racism which suggested superiority of some races over the other.Missing: Turanians | Show results with:Turanians
[81]
[PDF] The Ups and Downs of lrredentism: The Case of Turkey - isamveri.org
Finally, irredentism in Turkey has evidently failed to achieve i ts objectives so far, probably due to a variety ofreasons, both internal and extemal. Among ...
[82]
'Jesus Was Turkish': the Bizarre Resurgence of Pseudo-Turkology
Jul 22, 2021 · Turkey's presidential seal and other bizarre claims are rooted in a set of outlandish and pseudoscientific theories regarding Turkic peoples ...
[83]
Genes, culture, and scientific racism - PNAS
Nov 18, 2024 · We summarize how genetic data refute the notion of racial substructure for human populations and address naive interpretations of race across the biological ...
[84]
Ethnic Tensions in Iran: Tractor as a Platform for Azerbaijani Turks ...
Government Suppression and Its Consequences https://thegeopolitics.com/ethnic-tensions ... Iran risks spilling over into the region's politics. Calls for ...