Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Propaganda

![I Want You for U.S. Army by James Montgomery Flagg][float-right] Propaganda is a deliberate form of communication designed to influence the perceptions, emotions, and behaviors of targeted audiences toward objectives set by the communicator, frequently employing selective truths, omissions, or fabrications to achieve ideological, political, or military aims, and differing from persuasion in its one-directional structure, lack of emphasis on rational dialogue, and prioritization of the propagandist's intent over audience autonomy. The term derives from the Latin propagare, meaning "to propagate" or "to spread," originally applied to the 1622 Congregatio de Propaganda Fide, a Vatican committee established by Pope Gregory XV to oversee the global dissemination of Catholic doctrine through missionary work. Historically, have been employed since for religious proselytizing and political mobilization, but the concept crystallized in its modern pejorative sense during the , particularly amid the mass media revolutions of , where state-directed campaigns shaped , justified , and vilified adversaries through posters, films, and pamphlets. In totalitarian regimes, such as and the , it served as a core instrument of , integrating , repetitive messaging, and cult-of-personality narratives to enforce ideological conformity and suppress dissent. Democracies have also relied on it during conflicts, as seen in Allied efforts to sustain morale and demonize enemies, revealing its utility beyond overt when aligned with national interests. Central to propaganda are techniques like name-calling to discredit opponents, bandwagon appeals to exploit , card-stacking to present lopsided , and glittering generalities invoking vague virtues, which exploit cognitive biases such as tendencies and emotional priming over empirical scrutiny. Its efficacy stems from causal mechanisms including repetition fostering illusory truth, heuristics, and , though outcomes vary with audience predispositions and counter-narratives; empirically, wartime propaganda has demonstrably boosted enlistment and resource allocation but also prolonged conflicts by entrenching dehumanizing stereotypes. Controversies arise from its ethical dual-use—capable of unifying against existential threats or inciting atrocities—and definitional ambiguity, wherein prevailing powers often designate adversaries' efforts as propaganda while framing their own as legitimate , underscoring systemic biases in source evaluation across and academic institutions. In contemporary contexts, digital platforms amplify its reach, blending state-sponsored operations with algorithmic echo chambers that simulate consensus, challenging distinctions between organic and orchestrated influence.

Etymology and Terminology

Origins of the Term

The term "propaganda" derives from the Latin propaganda, the neuter plural of propagare, meaning "to propagate" or "to spread," referring to things that ought to be propagated, such as doctrines or ideas. This linguistic root entered common usage through the Catholic Church's institutional efforts to disseminate its faith during the . In response to the Protestant Reformation's gains and the need to coordinate missionary activities amid expanding European exploration, established the Sacra Congregatio de Propaganda Fide (Sacred Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith) on January 6, 1622, formalized by the Inscrutabili Divinae Providentiae Arcano issued on June 22, 1622. The congregation served as the central body overseeing global , including training missionaries, printing materials in languages, and countering non-Catholic influences in regions like the , , and . The name's "propaganda" element directly reflected its mandate to propagate (propagare) , particularly among non-believers and lapsed faithful, without the implications it later acquired. At , the term connoted organized dissemination of religious truth, akin to in or —systematic extension rather than —and was viewed positively within contexts as essential for the Church's survival and expansion. This ecclesiastical origin marked the term's formal institutionalization, distinguishing it from earlier informal uses of related Latin concepts in classical texts, such as Cicero's references to spreading ideas. By the late , "propaganda" began appearing in European vernaculars to describe the congregation's activities, initially retaining neutrality but gradually broadening to secular contexts by the 18th century Enlightenment, where it started shifting toward critiques of manipulative influence.

Evolution in Modern Usage

In the early , "propaganda" largely retained its historical neutrality as organized efforts to disseminate ideas or ideologies, but its application expanded into secular political contexts amid mass media's rise. During , the U.S. government formed the (CPI) in April 1917, led by , to mobilize public support for the war through pamphlets, posters, films, and speeches reaching an estimated 75 million Americans. Creel explicitly rejected the label "propaganda" for his initiatives, citing its association with German deception, and instead framed them as "educational and informative" campaigns, reflecting the term's still-ambivalent status even as it described systematic opinion-shaping. Postwar disillusionment accelerated a pejorative shift, as revelations of wartime exaggerations—such as unverified atrocity claims against Germans—fostered distrust of state-managed messaging. By the , the term connoted manipulation and excess, prompting rebranding in professional circles; , a CPI veteran and nephew of , titled his 1928 book Propaganda to advocate "engineering consent" via psychological insights, yet acknowledged the word's growing stigma and pivoted to "" to sanitize similar practices for commercial and political use. This evolution mirrored broader causal dynamics: mass democracy's demands for public buy-in clashed with ideals, rendering overt suspect. World War II and the Cold War solidified "propaganda" as predominantly derogatory, evoking totalitarian control rather than mere advocacy. Nazi Germany's Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, established in 1933 under , centralized media to enforce , producing over 1,300 newspapers and films that distorted facts for regime loyalty, which postwar analyses framed as paradigmatic . In Allied and democratic contexts, the term increasingly delegitimized opponents' narratives—e.g., Soviet —while one's own efforts were rephrased as "information" or "," highlighting its weaponized asymmetry. By the late into the present, modern usage broadened to encompass , , and digital campaigns perceived as ideologically skewed, often without requiring outright falsehoods but implying selective framing or emotional appeals over evidence. This reflects causal realism in ecosystems: amid fragmented , the label critiques systemic biases, such as in authoritarian regimes (e.g., China's global broadcasting via CGTN since 2016) or Western outlets' narrative alignment, though accusations remain subjective and rarely self-applied. Scholarly distinctions persist—e.g., propaganda as intentional versus neutral —but colloquial deployment prioritizes intent, underscoring source credibility's role in evaluation.

Definitions and Core Characteristics

Essential Elements

Propaganda fundamentally entails a deliberate, organized effort to influence the attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors of a , typically through the selective presentation of information via channels. This distinguishes it from casual by its systematic nature and aim to advance ideological, political, or institutional agendas, often prioritizing emotional resonance over comprehensive factual disclosure. defined propaganda as the "manipulation of collective attitudes by the use of significant symbols (words, pictures, tunes) rather than , a 'peaceful' of words." further characterized it as a sociological inherent to technological mass societies, where it functions continuously to integrate individuals into prevailing social norms, rendering it unavoidable and total in scope. Key elements include intentionality and secrecy regarding sources or ultimate goals, ensuring the message appears authoritative or spontaneous while concealing manipulative objectives. Ellul, drawing on earlier analyses like Albig's, identified core definitional components: the covert nature of propaganda's origins and aims; a explicit intention to alter opinions or actions; broad to mass publics; unrelenting continuity rather than episodic bursts; and structured involving specialized personnel and resources. These features enable propaganda to exploit pre-existing narratives, amplifying them through repetition and simplification to foster or agitation without requiring overt . Psychological targeting forms another essential pillar, leveraging symbols, slogans, and emotional appeals—such as fear, pride, or enmity—to bypass rational scrutiny and embed ideas subconsciously. Lasswell's examination of efforts highlighted techniques like stereotyping enemies and glorifying national virtues to unify publics, demonstrating propaganda's reliance on manipulation over empirical debate. Unlike neutral , propaganda often omits counterevidence or distorts to attribute outcomes to favored narratives, as seen in its historical adaptation to scales from to platforms. Ellul noted that while falsehoods occur, propaganda's efficacy stems more from contextual orchestration of truths, fostering dependency on mediated realities. In practice, these elements converge in orchestrated campaigns, where audience segmentation—via Lasswell's "who says what to whom" —tailors messages for maximum effect, such as reinforcing in-group solidarity against out-groups. This causal mechanism, rooted in human predispositions to processing, underscores propaganda's distinction from : the latter seeks autonomous understanding, while the former engineers compliance through perpetual exposure. Empirical analyses confirm that without reach and sustained application, such efforts devolve into mere , lacking propaganda's transformative potency.

Distinctions from Persuasion and Influence

Propaganda differs from primarily in its intent, methods, and scope. encompasses a broad range of communicative efforts to alter attitudes or behaviors through appeals to reason, , or mutual interest, often in or contexts. In contrast, propaganda constitutes a deliberate, systematic subcategory of persuasion aimed at advancing a predetermined ideological or , frequently employing selective truths, omissions, or distortions to manipulate rather than inform. This distinction hinges on propaganda's covert asymmetry: it prioritizes the propagandist's objectives over audience , using techniques like and emotional priming to foster uncritical acceptance, as opposed to persuasion's potential for verifiable . Jacques Ellul further delineates propaganda from mere by emphasizing its totalizing effect in modern technological societies, where it integrates individuals into a comprehensive through pervasive, non-rational conditioning rather than isolated argumentative influence. , while framing propaganda as an essential mechanism for "establishing reciprocal understanding" between leaders and publics, acknowledged its manipulative underpinnings in mass-scale opinion engineering, blurring lines with but underscoring its departure from transparent advocacy. Empirical analyses, such as those by Jowett and O'Donnell, quantify this through propaganda's reliance on ideological intent—measured by the communicator's exclusion of counter-evidence—versus 's openness to scrutiny, with historical cases like atrocity stories illustrating propaganda's willingness to fabricate for mobilization. Influence, broader than both, refers to any process—intentional or incidental—by which external factors shape or action, including cultural or personal example without structured messaging. Propaganda qualifies as a targeted form of only when it involves organized dissemination of biased information to predefined ends, distinguishing it from diffuse social pressures; for instance, campaigns during the systematically propagated narratives to sway alliances, unlike organic cultural shifts. This causal realism reveals propaganda's efficacy in overriding individual reasoning via scale and repetition, as evidenced by studies showing higher susceptibility in low-information environments, whereas neutral lacks such engineered deceit.

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Modern Instances

In ancient , kings disseminated propaganda through royal annals and reliefs to exaggerate military victories and instill fear in subjects and enemies. (r. 883–859 BCE), for instance, inscribed detailed accounts of campaigns involving mass executions and impalements, claiming to have built a with materials from 50 enemy cities while thousands, thereby projecting unassailable power and divine favor. Ancient Egyptian pharaohs similarly employed temple inscriptions and monumental art to fabricate narratives of triumph and god-like supremacy. Ramesses II's reliefs at the and temples (circa 1270s BCE) portrayed the against the (1274 BCE) as a personal rout of the enemy, omitting the battle's inconclusive outcome and subsequent , to affirm his role as protector of ma'at (cosmic order) and deter internal dissent. In , strategic deception served propagandistic ends during conflicts. Athenian general in 480 BCE spread false rumors via a "trusted" defector to mislead Persian king into deploying his fleet at the narrow Salamis straits, enabling a Greek victory that orators like later mythologized in works such as to exalt Athenian heroism and democracy. Roman emperors systematized visual and epigraphic propaganda to consolidate imperial legitimacy across diverse provinces. (r. 27 BCE–14 CE) commissioned the , an autobiographical inscription erected posthumously at key sites like , enumerating 35 specific achievements—including closing temple doors signaling peace after 200 years of war—to frame his rule as a restoration of republican virtues rather than . Coins bearing his image alongside motifs of victory and circulated empire-wide, reinforcing loyalty among illiterate masses. During the medieval period, the propagated crusading ideology through papal decrees and sermons to mobilize European knights against perceived Islamic threats. Pope Urban II's 1095 CE Council of Clermont address promised spiritual rewards for reclaiming , framing the as a penitential divinely sanctioned, which chronicles like amplified by emphasizing miraculous signs and enemy atrocities to sustain fervor amid high casualties. Secular rulers, such as England's , used illuminated manuscripts and charters to justify expansion, depicting conquests as rightful inheritance while vilifying rivals like post-1170 assassination to mitigate rebellion.

Enlightenment to World War I

The facilitated the expansion of print media, enabling the dissemination of political ideas beyond elite circles and foreshadowing systematic propaganda through appeals to reason and public sentiment. Pamphlets and essays critiqued , promoting concepts of and that influenced revolutionary movements. This period's emphasis on and debate shifted persuasion from oral traditions to reproducible texts, amplifying reach amid rising circulation in and . In the , Thomas Paine's , published January 10, 1776, served as a pivotal propagandistic tool, framing British rule as tyrannical and advocating republican independence through accessible, emotive language that resonated with colonists. The 47-page pamphlet sold approximately 120,000 copies in its first three months, equivalent to reaching about one in five free Americans, and galvanized support for the Continental Congress's on July 4, 1776. Paine's subsequent series, beginning December 23, 1776, further boosted morale, with its opening line—"These are the times that try men's souls"—reportedly read aloud to troops before the . The French Revolution intensified pamphlet warfare, with an estimated 100,000 distinct titles produced between 1788 and 1795, targeting the monarchy's legitimacy and rallying support for radical change through satirical caricatures, accusations of corruption, and visions of egalitarian utopias. Prints and engravings depicted figures like Marie Antoinette as decadent, fueling public outrage that contributed to events such as the storming of the Bastille on July 14, 1789. Revolutionary leaders, including the Jacobins, leveraged these materials to consolidate power, though their hyperbolic claims often distorted facts to justify purges like the Reign of Terror from September 1793 to July 1794. Throughout the , drove propagandistic campaigns in Europe, particularly in fragmented states seeking unification. In German territories after the , authorities promoted national identity via patriotic festivals, monuments, and school curricula emphasizing shared language and history, as seen in the 1817 where students burned foreign symbols to assert cultural purity. Similar efforts in during the Risorgimento, led by figures like , used writings and secret societies to evoke romanticized past glories against Austrian dominance, culminating in unification by 1870. The rise of cheap newspapers, such as Britain's Daily Telegraph reaching 240,000 circulation by 1877, allowed governments and movements to shape on imperial expansion and domestic reforms. World War I elevated propaganda to a state-orchestrated industry, with belligerents deploying agencies to sustain recruitment, morale, and resource mobilization amid . Britain's , operational from September 1914, circulated reports of German atrocities in —such as the alleged execution of 6,000 civilians in on August 23, 1914—to vilify the and justify Allied intervention, though subsequent inquiries revealed exaggerations in claims like widespread bayoneting of babies. In the United States, the , formed April 13, 1917, under , distributed over 75 million pamphlets and produced 6,000 reels of film, employing slogans like "The Hun Within" to stoke fears of subversion and enforce loyalty via the , which prosecuted over 2,000 dissenters. Techniques emphasized enemy , patriotic symbolism, and atrocity narratives, but post-war revelations, including the 1920 Bryce Committee disavowals, exposed fabricated elements designed to override rational skepticism for causal support of aims.

Interwar and World War II Totalitarian Regimes

Totalitarian regimes in the and elevated propaganda to a core mechanism of governance, centralizing control over information to indoctrinate populations, legitimize leaders, and mobilize societies for ideological conformity and conflict. In , , Stalinist , and Imperial , state apparatuses systematically deployed media monopolies, mass events, and repetitive messaging to demonize enemies, exalt rulers, and suppress dissent, achieving unprecedented penetration into daily life. These efforts relied on modern technologies like radio and , enabling regimes to bypass traditional elites and directly influence the masses. Nazi Germany's propaganda machine, directed by after his appointment as Reich Minister for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda on March 13, 1933, achieved total dominance over print, broadcast, and visual media within months of Hitler's rise. Goebbels insisted that effective propaganda required a single authoritative source to prevent contradictory messages, subordinating all cultural and informational outlets to the Ministry. Key techniques included the "big lie" strategy—coined in Hitler's but operationalized through ceaseless repetition of falsehoods, such as Jewish conspiracies orchestrating Germany's defeat—and orchestration of spectacles like the annual , attended by over 400,000 in 1938, to instill fervor. Radio broadcasts reached 70% of households by 1939, with cheap "People's Receivers" designed for one-purpose listening to state content. Anti-Semitic campaigns, via outlets like , escalated from 1933 boycotts to justifying by portraying Jews as existential threats. In the under , the Communist Party's (Agitation and Propaganda) Department, formalized in the 1920s and intensified during the 1930s Great Purges, coordinated indoctrination across newspapers like , films, posters, and theater troupes targeting workers. Propaganda glorified collectivization and industrialization as triumphs over "kulaks" and saboteurs, with depicted in over 5,000 statues by and films like Lenin in October (1937) rewriting history to center his role. Techniques emphasized "agitpoints"—mobile units disseminating simplified Bolshevik ideology—and suppression of facts, such as the 1932-1933 famine killing 3-5 million, reframed as capitalist slander. By , renamed the Propaganda Department in 1946 but active earlier, it mobilized 20 million recruits partly through patriotic narratives blending with . Fascist Italy under Mussolini centralized propaganda through the Ministry of Popular Culture, established in 1937, which censored press and cinema while promoting imperial revival via youth groups like Balilla and grandiose architecture emulating Rome. Mussolini's persona as Il Duce was propagated through 3,000+ speeches broadcast on radio from 1924 onward, emphasizing virility and anti-Bolshevism, with campaigns like the 1935 Ethiopia invasion framed as civilizing missions. Despite early successes in consolidating power post-1922 March on Rome, propaganda faltered in sustaining war enthusiasm, as battlefield defeats in 1940-1943 exposed regime boasts, contributing to Mussolini's 1943 ouster. Film production, under state control from 1922, produced over 1,000 features by 1943, often embedding fascist values subtly to evade public resistance. Imperial Japan's Cabinet Information Bureau, created in 1936 and expanded during WWII, enforced media compliance to propagate the "" as liberation from Western imperialism, censoring dissent under the Peace Preservation Law. Techniques involved school indoctrination, radio scripts reaching 80% coverage by 1941, and posters depicting Allied forces as barbaric, sustaining mobilization despite defeats like in 1942. The military police augmented this with terror, arresting 70,000 for "thought crimes" by 1945, ensuring propaganda's coercive efficacy. These regimes' propaganda not only facilitated internal purges—Nazi (1934), Soviet Great Terror (1936-1938)—but also wartime atrocities, with dehumanizing narratives enabling events like the Nazi killings of 1.5 million Jews by 1943 and Japanese (1937, 200,000+ deaths). Postwar analyses reveal propaganda's limits against empirical failures, as Allied victories eroded credibility, underscoring its dependence on perceived successes for sustained belief.

Cold War and Decolonization Era

The Cold War (1947–1991) featured intense ideological propaganda between the United States and the Soviet Union, each seeking to portray its system as superior while demonizing the opponent. The United States initiated the "Campaign of Truth" on April 20, 1950, when President Harry Truman called for expanded information efforts to combat "the big lie" of Soviet propaganda, emphasizing factual broadcasting over deception. This initiative boosted funding for outlets like Voice of America (VOA), which by the 1950s transmitted news in over 40 languages to counter Soviet narratives in Europe, Asia, and beyond. Complementing VOA, Radio Free Europe (RFE) commenced operations on July 4, 1950, delivering uncensored news and cultural programming to Soviet-occupied Eastern Europe from Munich, initially under covert CIA funding to undermine communist regimes without direct U.S. government attribution. The Soviet Union responded with state-controlled media such as Radio Moscow, which broadcast anti-capitalist messages globally, often exaggerating Western imperialism and U.S. racial inequalities to erode American credibility. Soviet propaganda also glorified proletarian internationalism through posters, films, and literature, depicting the USSR as the vanguard against fascism and exploitation, though these efforts relied on centralized censorship that suppressed dissenting views. In 1953, the U.S. formalized its propaganda apparatus by creating the (USIA), tasked with disseminating American values like and free enterprise via libraries, films, and exchanges in over 100 countries, reaching millions annually during the era's peak. USIA materials highlighted economic successes under , such as post-Marshall Plan recoveries in , contrasting them with Soviet famines and purges. The Soviets, through agencies like the and (until 1956), propagated narratives of inevitable communist victory, using in occupied territories and allied states to foster loyalty. This bilateral contest extended to psychological operations; for instance, U.S. leaflet drops and broadcasts during the (1950–1953) urged North Korean defections by promising humane treatment, while Soviet counterparts accused the U.S. of bacteriological warfare without evidence. Decolonization from the late to the amplified superpower propaganda as over 50 African and Asian nations gained independence, becoming battlegrounds for influence. The positioned itself as an anti-colonial champion, supporting liberation movements with rhetoric and material aid; for example, it backed the Algerian Front de Libération Nationale (FLN) during the 1954–1962 war against through propaganda framing as a partner in dismantling . Soviet posters and broadcasts in the – celebrated African decolonization waves, such as Ghana's independence in 1957, while critiquing Western neocolonialism to attract leaders like . This approach yielded alliances, including Cuba's 1959 revolution and Soviet arms to Angola's in the civil war, where propaganda portrayed interventions as solidarity against "reactionary" forces. The countered with development-focused messaging via USIA and AID programs, promoting non-communist paths to modernity; in the (–), U.S. operations, including CIA-backed propaganda, supported Joseph Mobutu against Soviet-favored , emphasizing stability and to prevent Soviet footholds. U.S. efforts often involved covert , such as funding anti-communist outlets in during the 1965 coup, though these prioritized geopolitical over unvarnished truth. Both powers exploited local grievances—Soviets via class struggle appeals, Americans via modernization promises—but Soviet state monopoly on information enabled more uniform narratives, while U.S. initiatives faced domestic scrutiny over covert elements. In non-aligned forums like the , propaganda clashes highlighted third-world leaders' navigation of bipolar pressures, with Soviet denunciations of contrasting U.S. portrayals of partnership.

Post-Cold War to Digital Age

The in 1991 reduced the scale of global ideological propaganda contests, yet propaganda persisted in regional ethnic conflicts and Western-led interventions. In the of the 1990s, Serbian state-controlled media under propagated narratives of Serb victimhood and demonized other ethnic groups, inciting violence through broadcasts that exaggerated threats and historical grievances. Similarly, during the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of , administration officials cited intelligence on weapons of mass destruction—later revealed as erroneous—to justify preemptive action, shaping and media coverage to emphasize imminent threats from Saddam Hussein's regime. The rise of the and platforms in the 2000s marked a pivotal shift toward decentralized, rapid dissemination of propaganda, enabling both grassroots mobilization and state countermeasures. The Arab Spring protests from 2010 to 2012 demonstrated this duality: activists in , , and elsewhere used and to organize demonstrations and share uncensored footage, circumventing regime monopolies on , though participation remained limited to digitally connected urban elites. Authoritarian governments responded by enhancing , deploying pro-regime bots, and fabricating counter-narratives to discredit protesters as foreign agents. State actors adapted legacy tactics to , with and exemplifying hybrid approaches blending official outlets and covert operations. 's , a St. Petersburg-based entity operational by 2013, ran troll farms employing hundreds to post divisive content on platforms like and , including efforts to exacerbate U.S. racial tensions and influence the 2016 presidential election through and targeted ads reaching millions. , meanwhile, orchestrates vast campaigns, generating approximately 448 million fabricated social media comments yearly to amplify positive state narratives, distract from criticisms, and promote policies like the via state media and influencers. Advancements in have further amplified digital propaganda's potency since the mid-2010s, facilitating s and automated content generation. Russian operations during the 2022 incorporated AI-generated s and sham websites to spread false narratives, such as fabricated atrocities to undermine Western support. Chinese state-linked actors have used AI for similar ends, including videos targeting Taiwanese elections to erode trust in democratic institutions. These tools extend Cold War-era —rooted in KGB ""—into algorithmic precision, allowing precise targeting while challenging attribution and verification.

Techniques and Methodologies

Psychological Manipulation Tactics

Psychological manipulation tactics in propaganda target cognitive and emotional vulnerabilities to shape perceptions and induce compliance, often circumventing rational evaluation. These tactics draw on principles of , including the exploitation of heuristics, biases, and , to foster uncritical acceptance of messages. Unlike transparent , they prioritize subconscious influence through repetition, emotional priming, and selective framing, as outlined in his 1928 book Propaganda, where he emphasized manipulating "organized habits and opinions" via psychological stimuli to form habits without conscious resistance. Empirical studies confirm their efficacy; for instance, repeated exposure to claims increases perceived truthfulness via the , regardless of factual accuracy, as demonstrated in experiments where subjects rated statements as more valid after multiple viewings. A seminal classification comes from the Institute for Propaganda Analysis, established in 1937, which identified seven core devices based on observed patterns in during the . These devices systematically exploit emotional responses and cognitive shortcuts:
  • Name-calling: Propagandists attach loaded, negative labels (e.g., "traitor" or "extremist") to opponents or ideas to provoke instinctive aversion and , bypassing evidence-based scrutiny. This tactic leverages affective , where emotional disgust overrides factual assessment.
  • Glittering generalities: Positive, vague terms like "" or ""—linked to cherished values but devoid of specifics—are invoked to evoke uncritical approval, exploiting the where association with ideals transfers unearned credibility.
  • : Symbols of , sanctity, or prestige (e.g., flags, religious icons) are borrowed to lend legitimacy to unrelated claims, capitalizing on conditioned respect to manipulate associations.
  • : Endorsements from ostensibly credible figures (celebrities, experts) are used to sway audiences, invoking the even when the endorser's expertise is irrelevant or fabricated.
  • : Propagandists present themselves or their messages as relatable to ordinary people, fostering trust through feigned commonality and reducing perceived , which appeals to in-group identification.
  • Card stacking: Selective presentation of facts—omitting contradictions or unfavorable data—creates a skewed , exploiting by reinforcing desired interpretations while ignoring disconfirming evidence.
  • Bandwagon: Urging adoption of a position by claiming "everyone" supports it, this preys on and pressures, as individuals conform to perceived majorities to avoid , a dynamic amplified in group settings.
Beyond these, propaganda frequently employs fear appeals, which heighten perceived threats to trigger fight-or-flight responses and compliance, as seen in historical wartime campaigns where exaggerated dangers prompted ; neuroimaging studies show such appeals activate amygdala-driven processing over rationality. further sustains manipulation, as audiences favor and retain propaganda aligning with prior beliefs, filtering out dissonant information—a pattern observed in political where partisan sources reinforce echo chambers. compounds this, with Bernays noting its role in habit formation through reaction , where frequent exposure embeds ideas subconsciously, a validated in research showing diminished skepticism after 3–5 iterations. In digital contexts, algorithmic amplification exacerbates these tactics by prioritizing engaging (often manipulative) content, exploiting availability to make skewed views seem normative. Countering requires meta-cognitive awareness, as unexamined es enable sustained influence without overt .

Rhetorical and Narrative Devices

Propaganda frequently employs rhetorical devices to manipulate emotions and bypass rational scrutiny, drawing from classical appeals to , , and but distorting them for ideological ends. The Institute for Propaganda Analysis, founded in 1937 by educators including Clyde Miller, systematically outlined seven key devices in its publications to educate the public on detecting manipulative amid rising totalitarian influences in . These include name-calling, which substitutes derogatory labels for substantive debate, such as branding political opponents as "traitors" or "enemies of the people" to incite visceral rejection without evidence; for instance, Soviet propaganda under routinely applied such terms to purge rivals, contributing to the execution of over 680,000 individuals deemed disloyal between 1937 and 1938. Glittering generalities invoke vague, emotionally charged virtues like "" or "honor" to link ideas to unassailable ideals, evading specific scrutiny; Nazi propaganda exalted the "" community in this manner to foster uncritical loyalty, as seen in speeches by emphasizing abstract "Aryan purity" without empirical backing. Transfer associates a cause with respected symbols, such as draping policies in religious or national icons to borrow their prestige—British posters transferred imperial glory to recruitment drives, portraying enlistment as a sacred duty akin to historical heroism. Testimonial leverages endorsements from admired figures, often out of context; for example, during the 1930s, fascist regimes secured quotes from intellectuals to legitimize , despite the endorsers' limited expertise in . Plain folks portrays leaders as ordinary people to build relatability and trust, masking elite agendas; American politicians in the 20th century, including , used radio "fireside chats" starting in 1933 to project approachable personas amid economic crisis. Card stacking selectively presents facts while omitting counterevidence, creating a skewed ; tobacco industry campaigns in the mid-20th century highlighted isolated studies on mildness to downplay health risks, influencing public perception until epidemiological data from the 1950s exposed the deception. Bandwagon exploits by implying widespread support, urging individuals to join the "winning side"; this was evident in Cold War-era McCarthyist rhetoric claiming inevitable communist takeover unless opposed en masse, amplifying fears documented in congressional hearings from 1950 to 1954. Narrative devices in propaganda construct overarching stories that simplify complex realities into digestible, emotionally resonant plots, often employing binary oppositions of protagonists versus antagonists to foster group cohesion. Demonization narratives frame adversaries as existential threats embodying pure evil, as in Imperial Japanese propaganda during depicting Americans as barbaric "devils" to justify aggression, a tactic analyzed in postwar declassified materials revealing its role in sustaining troop morale. Hero-villain archetypes glorify in-group figures while vilifying out-groups, evident in Bolshevik narratives post-1917 Revolution portraying Lenin as a against "bourgeois villains," which omitted internal famines like the 1921-1922 Volga crisis that killed over 5 million. Framing techniques selectively emphasize attributes to shape interpretation, such as portraying economic policies as "rescue missions" during crises while ignoring causal failures; this was critiqued in analyses of interwar fascist media, where recovery claims under Mussolini ignored persistent rates exceeding 20% in by 1939. reinforces narratives through redundancy, embedding them subconsciously—Goebbels' principle that a repeated becomes truth underpinned Nazi radio broadcasts from onward, which aired anti-Semitic tropes daily to normalize them among the populace. These devices, while rooted in universal cognitive biases toward , enable propagandists to engineer consent by prioritizing causal narratives that align with power interests over verifiable data, as empirical studies in have since corroborated through experiments on susceptibility.

Technological and Media Strategies

The advent of technologies has amplified the reach and precision of propaganda efforts by enabling rapid, scalable dissemination of targeted messages to large audiences. The , invented by around 1440, marked an early technological milestone, allowing for the inexpensive production of pamphlets and books that spread ideological narratives, such as those during the Protestant Reformation where Martin Luther's writings reached broad European readerships within months. This shift from manuscript copying to mechanized printing reduced costs and barriers, facilitating state and religious authorities' control over information flows while enabling dissident voices to challenge orthodoxies through vernacular translations. Broadcast media, particularly radio, revolutionized propaganda during the 20th century by providing one-to-many communication that bypassed literacy requirements and penetrated private homes. In , ' Propaganda Ministry, established in 1933, centralized radio control, distributing 70-80% of households with affordable "Volk receivers" by 1939 to broadcast speeches and ideological content, fostering national unity and demonizing enemies in real-time during events like the 1936 Olympics. Similarly, Allied forces employed radio for morale-boosting broadcasts and psychological operations, such as the BBC's wartime programming that reached millions across . complemented radio's auditory focus with visual symbolism; Leni Riefenstahl's (1935) used innovative cinematography to glorify , screening to over 10 million Germans and influencing cinematic worldwide. These media allowed propagandists to synchronize messages across formats, exploiting emotional appeals through synchronized sound and imagery for greater persuasive impact. In the post-World War II era, television extended these strategies by combining motion pictures with live broadcasting, enabling immersive narratives that shaped public perceptions during conflicts like the . State broadcasters, such as the Soviet Union's , aired scripted content promoting collectivism, while Western networks like disseminated anti-communist footage, with viewership spiking to 90% of U.S. households by 1960 for events like the Kennedy-Nixon debates, which highlighted television's role in image-based persuasion. The digital revolution from the 1990s onward introduced algorithmic amplification and micro-targeting, where platforms like and (now X) use data analytics to tailor content, creating filter bubbles that reinforce biases; a 2021 study documented over 80 countries employing computational propaganda, including bots generating 20-30% of certain political discussions to sway elections. Social media's virality, driven by engagement metrics favoring sensationalism, has enabled state actors like Russia's to deploy troll farms, disseminating 2016 U.S. election interference content viewed by millions, while non-state groups leverage encrypted apps for decentralized coordination. Emerging technologies such as deepfakes and AI-generated content further refine media strategies by fabricating hyper-realistic audiovisual deceptions, with instances like 2023 videos mimicking Ukrainian President surrendering, viewed over 10 million times before removal, illustrating risks of eroded trust in visual evidence. These tools exploit cognitive heuristics, prioritizing speed over , and underscore how technological advancements prioritize virality and personalization over factual accuracy, often amplifying propaganda in low-gatekeeper environments.

Categories of Propaganda

Political and Ideological Forms


Political propaganda involves systematic campaigns by governments, parties, or movements to influence toward specific policies, leaders, or electoral outcomes, often employing biased narratives to mobilize support or discredit opponents. Ideological forms extend this by promoting overarching belief systems, such as racial hierarchies or class struggle doctrines, framing them as inevitable truths while suppressing contradictory evidence. These efforts typically rely on state-controlled in authoritarian contexts to achieve saturation, contrasting with more fragmented applications in democracies where outlets limit total dominance. In , ideological propaganda under ' Ministry of Enlightenment and Propaganda centralized control over radio, film, and press to inculcate Aryan supremacy and anti-Semitism as core tenets, portraying Jews as existential threats to the Volk through posters, newsreels like Der Ewige Jude, and school curricula revised by 1933 to exclude "degenerate" influences. This apparatus facilitated the regime's shift from electoral gains in —when Nazis became Germany's largest party—to dictatorial consolidation, with propaganda deceiving the public on events like the staged to justify invading on September 1, 1939. Academic analyses note that while such propaganda exploited economic despair post-Versailles Treaty, its effectiveness stemmed from repetitive demonization rather than empirical validation, as evidenced by sustained support amid military setbacks after 1943. Fascist Italy under similarly harnessed propaganda to forge a mythic , using posters and rallies to exalt the Duce's against Bolshevik threats and glorify imperial revival, with like the Istituto Luce producing films that reached millions by . Official manifestos in voting stations listed Mussolini atop candidate slates, embedding party loyalty into electoral processes from 1924 onward, while events like the 1932 Exhibition of the Fascist Revolution reinforced ideological continuity from . This approach, blending antiquity motifs with modern , sustained regime stability until Allied invasions in 1943, though sources from Western archives highlight its role in masking economic stagnation under corporatist policies. Soviet communist propaganda propagated Marxist-Leninist ideology through historical revisionism, such as the 1938 Short Course on the History of the All-Union Communist Party that airbrushed rivals like Trotsky and reframed events to depict the Bolshevik Revolution as predestined proletarian triumph, disseminated via posters and Pravda to over 100 million citizens by Stalin's death in 1953. It emphasized class enemies as saboteurs, justifying purges that executed 681,692 in 1937-1938 alone, while glorifying Five-Year Plans despite famines like the 1932-1933 Holodomor killing 3-5 million Ukrainians, which propaganda attributed to kulak resistance rather than collectivization failures. Post-WWII, it pivoted to anti-fascist narratives while promoting global revolution, with continuity in Russian state media tactics observed into the 2020s. In democracies, political propaganda often surfaces in wartime mobilization or elections, as with the U.S. Committee on Public Information's 1917-1919 posters urging enlistment against German "Huns," which reached 20 million via 3,000 speakers but faced postwar backlash for exaggerating atrocity claims. Modern instances include partisan ads card-stacking facts, yet pluralistic media and fact-checking mitigate totalitarian-style indoctrination, though studies indicate vulnerability to echo chambers in digital eras. Sources from military academies emphasize that while authoritarian regimes integrate propaganda into governance for ideological hegemony, democratic variants prioritize persuasion over coercion, reflecting causal differences in institutional accountability.

Wartime and Conflict-Related

![I Want You for U.S. Army by James Montgomery Flagg][float-right] Wartime propaganda encompasses government-led campaigns to mobilize populations, sustain morale, recruit personnel, and delegitimize adversaries during armed conflicts. These efforts often employ posters, films, leaflets, and media broadcasts to foster unity and portray the enemy as barbaric or existential threats. In , the established the (CPI) in April 1917 under to coordinate propaganda, producing over 2,000 titles in posters, pamphlets, and films that emphasized and German atrocities. The CPI's "Four Minute Men" initiative deployed 75,000 volunteers to deliver short speeches in theaters and public spaces, reaching an estimated 400 million Americans and contributing to war bond sales exceeding $18 billion. British propaganda similarly amplified reports of German crimes in , as detailed in the 1915 Bryce Report, which, while based on witness accounts, included unverified claims of bayoneting babies to incite Allied support. During , propaganda intensified with state-controlled apparatuses on both sides. Nazi Germany's Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, headed by since March 1933, monopolized media to glorify the regime, demonize Jews and Allies, and justify expansionism through films like Triumph of the Will (1935) and radio broadcasts reaching millions. The ministry orchestrated the 1933 book burnings and censored dissent, fostering a around that sustained domestic support until late 1944. In response, the U.S. Office of War Information (OWI), created in June 1942, disseminated posters such as "" to encourage women's workforce participation, boosting female employment from 12 million in 1940 to 18 million by 1944, while films and cartoons depicted as monstrous aggressors. Allied campaigns also included leaflet drops over enemy territories, with the U.S. distributing over 6 billion leaflets in alone to undermine morale and promote . In later conflicts, propaganda adapted to and media landscapes. During the (1955–1975), North Vietnamese forces used posters and radio to frame the U.S. as imperial invaders, portraying downed American aircraft as victories to rally domestic support and international sympathy. U.S. efforts, including over 20 billion leaflets via psychological operations, aimed to induce defections but largely failed amid graphic media coverage of events like the in January 1968, which shifted American public opinion against the war despite tactical U.S. successes. In the 2003 , U.S. administration claims of weapons of mass destruction and Saddam Hussein's alleged 9/11 ties, echoed uncritically by major media, facilitated initial invasion support but eroded credibility post-invasion when no such stockpiles were found, as confirmed by the 2004 report. and "" framing further shaped perceptions, though insurgent videos via early internet platforms countered official narratives. These cases illustrate propaganda's dual role in short-term and long-term risks of backlash when discrepancies emerge.

Commercial and Economic

Commercial propaganda adapts systematic persuasion methods, originally refined during , to commercial ends, fostering by linking products to emotional desires, , and cultural narratives rather than mere utility. This approach treats consumers as malleable audiences whose behaviors can be directed toward , often prioritizing over factual product attributes. Edward Bernays, leveraging insights from uncle Freud's theories on the unconscious, pioneered these tactics in the by reorienting wartime propaganda toward private enterprise. In his 1928 book Propaganda, Bernays argued that an "invisible government" of experts must organize to avert chaos, explicitly applying to boost sales for industries like and appliances. A landmark example was his breakfast campaign for Beech-Nut Packing, where he commissioned surveys of 5,000 physicians endorsing as a health-promoting food, resulting in widespread adoption of "bacon and eggs" as the ideal meal and a sales surge. Similarly, the 1929 "" effort for American staged a march of hired women cigarettes during New York's , framing the act as a symbol of and normalizing female consumption, which correlated with a rise in women smokers from 5% in 1924 to 12% by 1929. Common techniques mirror political propaganda: bandwagon appeals urge purchases by implying universal participation, as in ads claiming "everyone's switching to [brand]"; testimonials deploy celebrities or experts for endorsement, like athlete-backed energy drinks; and transfer associates products with aspirational values, such as luxury cars evoking freedom or prestige. These methods, while effective in driving revenue—U.S. advertising spending rose from $1.3 billion in 1920 to $3.4 billion by 1930—have drawn scrutiny for cultivating artificial needs and debt-driven economies, with Bernays himself acknowledging the deliberate creation of demand to sustain growth. Economic propaganda, distinct yet overlapping, deploys similar tools by states or institutions to legitimize policies, obscure failures, or rally support for resource distribution amid scarcity or ideology. In the , Joseph Stalin's (1928–1932) was propagandized via posters, films, and rallies depicting steel mills and collective farms as engines of proletarian triumph, with slogans like "Fulfill the in Four!" mobilizing labor quotas under threat of . Official claims touted industrial output growth—steel production jumped from 4 million tons in 1928 to 5.9 million in 1932—but concealed inefficiencies, forced collectivization, and the famine killing millions, using metrics selectively to project socialist superiority. Such campaigns sustained regime control by equating economic sacrifice with ideological destiny, influencing subsequent plans through 1941. In the United States, the Roosevelt administration's (1933–1939) employed posters and radio broadcasts to portray programs like the as collective salvation from the , with symbols of unity and recovery encouraging compliance despite mixed empirical outcomes, such as temporary unemployment spikes from codes. During , Treasury Department efforts sold $185 billion in war bonds via celebrity drives and ads framing purchases as economic , while campaigns justified shortages by emphasizing shared burden, achieving 85 million participants by 1945. These instances highlight economic propaganda's role in aligning public action with policy imperatives, often amplifying successes while downplaying causal trade-offs like inflation or .

Religious and Cultural

Religious propaganda refers to organized efforts by religious authorities to disseminate doctrines, inspire devotion, and expand influence through persuasive narratives, symbols, and media. The term "propaganda" originated with the Roman Catholic Church's Sacra Congregatio de Propaganda Fide, founded on June 22, 1622, by Pope Gregory XV through the bull Inscrutabili Divinae Divinae Providentiae, to oversee missionary propagation amid the Protestant Reformation and European colonial ventures. This congregation standardized training at the Urban College, funded expeditions, and produced vernacular texts, contributing to Catholicism's growth in regions like Latin America, where by 1700, millions had been baptized, often blending evangelization with colonial administration. Early Christianity employed similar tactics; the Apostle Paul's epistles, circulated from approximately 50-60 CE, adapted Jewish messianic claims to Gentile contexts, using rhetoric to counter Roman paganism and foster communities across the empire. In , da'wah—the call to faith—has functioned as a core propagation strategy since the , with the Muhammad's Meccan preaching (610-622 CE) emphasizing through public recitation and treaties, later expanding via conquests that integrated persuasion with territorial control. By the (661-750 CE), da'wah incorporated administrative policies favoring converts, such as tax incentives, leading to rapid demographic shifts in the , where non-Muslim populations declined from majorities to minorities over centuries. Modern Islamist groups, including those affiliated with the since 1928, have digitized da'wah via , reaching billions while framing it as defensive against , though critics note its selective emphasis on appealing verses over doctrinal rigor. Cultural propaganda promotes or defends shared identities, norms, and aesthetics to foster cohesion or superiority, often intersecting with religious elements. During British colonialism in (1858-1947), officials deployed and exhibitions to portray indigenous customs as primitive, justifying "civilizing" interventions; for instance, images of or practices, captured post-1857 , were exhibited in to garner public support for empire, despite selective framing that ignored adaptive reforms. In (1933-1945), ' Ministry of Propaganda synchronized culture via the , purging over 16,000 "degenerate" artworks in 1937 exhibitions while glorifying Nordic myths in films like Triumph of the Will (1935), which drew 500,000 viewers to instill racial purity as cultural destiny. Post-World War II, U.S. cultural exports— films averaging 200 annual releases by the —projected democratic individualism abroad, influencing global tastes but critiqued for eroding local traditions, as evidenced by European quotas limiting American imports to counter "Coca-Colonization." Such efforts highlight propaganda's dual role in preservation, as seen in indigenous resistance media, and imposition, where dominant narratives marginalize alternatives through institutional control.

State-Sponsored and Institutional

State-sponsored propaganda refers to efforts by governments to systematically produce and distribute information aimed at shaping in favor of official policies, ideologies, or wartime objectives, often through dedicated ministries or agencies. In , the Ministry of Propaganda and Public Enlightenment, established in 1933 under , centralized control over media, arts, and public communications to promote supremacy and anti-Semitism, achieving near-total domination of information flow by 1939. Similarly, during , the government created the Office of War Information in 1942 to coordinate propaganda campaigns, producing posters, films, and radio broadcasts that mobilized public support for the war effort, with over 200,000 posters distributed to encourage enlistment and resource conservation. Institutional propaganda extends to state-controlled media outlets and educational systems designed to indoctrinate populations. In authoritarian regimes, such as the , government directives integrate propaganda into , with posters and curricula emphasizing loyalty to the ruling family and anti-Western narratives, fostering generational adherence to state ideology. China's , employing over 8,000 staff and operating 105 branches worldwide as of 2005, functions as the primary conduit for official narratives, blending news with ideological messaging to project Beijing's global influence while suppressing dissenting views domestically. Russia's RT (formerly Russia Today), funded by the state since its 2005 launch, broadcasts content challenging Western narratives on issues like , reaching millions internationally through multilingual platforms. Contemporary state-sponsored efforts increasingly incorporate digital tools, with at least 62 countries employing agencies for computational propaganda as of 2021, including automated accounts to amplify official positions. In , state media like CGTN extends this through strategies that promote governance models portraying authoritarian efficiency over democratic alternatives, targeting global audiences amid U.S.-China tensions. These institutional mechanisms often operate under the guise of , but their alignment with directives raises questions of credibility, particularly when Western analyses highlight adversarial propaganda while domestic efforts, such as U.S. historical wartime , are retrospectively framed as patriotic information campaigns rather than equivalent . Empirical studies indicate that such propaganda's effectiveness depends on audience predispositions and repetition, underscoring the causal role of institutional on information in sustaining regime legitimacy.

Theoretical Frameworks

Models from Social Psychology

Social psychology examines propaganda through models that highlight mechanisms of influence on individual cognition, group dynamics, and attitude formation. These frameworks reveal how propaganda exploits innate tendencies toward conformity, obedience, and identity-based biases to shape beliefs and behaviors without necessitating rational scrutiny. Empirical studies, such as those on conformity and authority, demonstrate that ordinary individuals can adopt propagated views under social pressure, often prioritizing group harmony or hierarchical cues over personal judgment. Conformity and Social Proof. Solomon Asch's 1951 line judgment experiments illustrated how individuals conform to erroneous group consensus, with about 75% of participants yielding at least once to a unanimous , even when aware of the inaccuracy. Propaganda leverages this by fabricating perceived support through repeated messaging or staged endorsements, creating an illusion of normative behavior that pressures dissenters to align. Robert Cialdini's principle of , derived from observational studies, posits that people look to others' actions in ambiguous situations to guide their own, a tactic evident in propaganda campaigns that amplify testimonials or crowd simulations to imply widespread acceptance. For instance, wartime posters depicting unified public enthusiasm exploit this to foster compliance. Obedience to . Stanley Milgram's 1961-1962 obedience studies found that 65% of participants administered what they believed were lethal electric shocks to a learner when instructed by an experimenter in a white lab coat, underscoring the potency of perceived in overriding inhibitions. In propaganda contexts, this model explains adherence to directives from leaders or institutions portrayed as legitimate experts, where cues like uniforms, titles, or official reduce personal . Theoretical extensions link authority propagation to evolutionary adaptations for hierarchical coordination, enabling rapid belief shifts in populations via top-down inculcation. Cognitive Dissonance. Leon Festinger's 1957 theory describes the psychological discomfort from holding conflicting cognitions, prompting individuals to resolve it by altering beliefs or rationalizing actions. Propaganda induces dissonance by juxtaposing new narratives against existing views—such as portraying out-groups as threats—motivating acceptance to restore consistency, particularly when commitment to initial actions (e.g., public endorsements) entrenches the shift. Empirical applications show this in disinformation campaigns, where repeated exposure amplifies selective reinforcement, biasing information processing toward propagated ideologies. Social Identity Theory. and John Turner's 1979 framework argues that self-concept derives from group memberships, fostering and out-group discrimination via minimal cues alone, as shown in Tajfel's 1970s experiments where arbitrary groupings led to biased . Propaganda amplifies this by emphasizing collective identities (e.g., national or ideological) to heighten perceived intergroup threats, justifying or exclusion; studies confirm stronger effects under , where identity-affirming messages solidify loyalty. This model underscores propaganda's role in sustaining divisions, as individuals derogate contrary evidence to protect group-derived esteem.

Sociological and Educational Theories

Sociological theories frame propaganda as an embedded mechanism for maintaining social cohesion and control in mass societies. Jacques Ellul's 1965 analysis posits propaganda not merely as deliberate persuasion but as a pervasive sociological process in technological civilizations, where individuals are continuously integrated into collective attitudes through "pre-propaganda" mechanisms like education, media, and group affiliations. This horizontal propaganda operates subtly, fostering conformity by aligning personal needs with societal norms, distinct from vertical political directives that impose top-down ideology. Ellul argued that modern efficiency demands total propaganda, rendering it inevitable and inescapable, as it exploits the individual's isolation in urban, industrialized settings to manufacture unanimous public opinion. Harold Lasswell's foundational work in the 1920s and 1930s examined propaganda as a tool of elite influence over mass behavior, emphasizing the strategic dissemination of symbols to mobilize support during conflicts. In Propaganda Technique in the World War (1927), Lasswell documented how belligerents used repetitive messaging across s to sustain morale and demonize enemies, laying groundwork for viewing propaganda as a rational instrument of power in democratic and authoritarian contexts alike. His communication model—who says what, through which , to whom, with what effect—highlights propaganda's causal role in shaping perceptions and actions within stratified societies. Educational theories distinguish propaganda from genuine by its intent to suppress in favor of ideological uniformity. In autocratic systems, state-controlled curricula function as propaganda vectors, embedding ruling narratives to deter and justify authority, as evidenced by models showing how such indoctrination correlates with reduced political opposition and sustained regime stability. For instance, North Korean integrates propaganda posters and texts promoting leader worship from early grades, conditioning obedience over empirical inquiry. Conversely, democratic educational responses, such as programs developed since the 1930s, treat propaganda as a teachable , training students to evaluate sources and biases through frameworks like public , which views learning as a battleground for competing narratives. These approaches underscore propaganda's epistemological threat, where deliberate falsehoods erode fact-based discourse, prompting curricula reforms to prioritize verification skills amid rising digital manipulation.

Cognitive and Self-Propaganda Mechanisms

Propaganda exploits cognitive biases that shape human judgment and decision-making, notably , whereby individuals preferentially process and retain information aligning with preexisting beliefs, thereby amplifying receptivity to ideologically congruent messages while discounting disconfirming evidence. This bias operates through selective and interpretation, as empirical studies show people gravitate toward sources reinforcing their views, fostering echo chambers that entrench propagandistic claims. Complementing this, the renders vivid or recent propagandistic imagery more persuasive, as repeated elevates perceived plausibility independent of factual accuracy. Emotional mechanisms further underpin cognitive susceptibility, with reliance on affective cues over deliberative reasoning correlating with heightened belief in deceptive narratives; for instance, experimental data indicate that emotion-driven processing increases endorsement of false claims by up to 20-30% compared to analytical approaches. , triggered when propaganda contradicts held convictions, prompts rationalization or selective reinterpretation to alleviate discomfort, as individuals adjust attitudes to align with authoritative or group-endorsed messages. Group dynamics exacerbate these effects via and , where pressures lead to uncritical acceptance of collective narratives, as modeled in experiments. Self-propaganda manifests through internalized processes, where individuals actively construct arguments supporting external propaganda, thereby deepening personal commitment; field experiments at deliberative forums reveal that self-articulation of positions boosts perceived factual and moral validity by 15-25%, simulating voluntary endorsement. This self- hinges on effort , with greater anticipated cognitive investment yielding stronger attitudinal shifts, as demonstrated in controlled studies varying assumptions. Recursive contributes by equating narrative coherence with truth, enabling absurd or ideologically extreme claims to gain traction through iterative self-reinforcement, particularly in isolated informational environments. Such mechanisms sustain long-term adherence, as habitual rumination on aligned content overrides metacognitive scrutiny, per psychological models of .

Empirical Applications and Examples

Major Historical Case Studies

One prominent historical case study of propaganda involves the efforts of the during , where the , established on April 13, 1917, under , produced over 20 million posters, 75 million pamphlets, and thousands of films to mobilize public support for the war. These materials emphasized enlistment, bond purchases, and conservation, with iconic posters like 's "I Want You" depicting directly addressing viewers to boost recruitment, contributing to over 4 million American troops mobilized by 1918. The campaign also fostered , leading to suppression of German-language publications and cultural elements, as evidenced by the closure of over 500 German newspapers and the renaming of to "liberty cabbage." In , propaganda was centralized under the Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, created on March 13, 1933, and led by , who controlled media, film, radio, and arts to promote supremacy and . Films like The Eternal Jew (1940) and posters depicted Jews as vermin or economic parasites, facilitating the of September 15, 1935, and escalating to the , where propaganda justified the deportation and extermination of 6 million Jews by portraying them as threats to national purity. This apparatus reached broad audiences via mandatory radio ownership initiatives, with 70% of households equipped by , sustaining support for the regime until late in despite military setbacks. Soviet propaganda under exemplified state control through the department of the , which from the 1920s onward used posters, newspapers like , and films to glorify collectivization and industrialization, such as the Five-Year Plans starting in 1928 that claimed to transform the USSR into an industrial power, though at the cost of millions in the famine of 1932-1933. During , after the German invasion on June 22, 1941, propaganda shifted to nationalism, producing over 200,000 posters depicting the "Great Patriotic War" and Stalin as a defender, which helped mobilize 34 million Soviet soldiers and maintain civilian resolve amid 27 million deaths. Postwar, it falsified history, such as rewriting the 1939 to emphasize Soviet victimhood. Allied propaganda in World War II, particularly by the Office of War Information formed in June 1942, utilized emotional appeals in posters to promote sales totaling $185 billion and rationing compliance, with designs focusing on fear of brutality rather than abstract ideals for greater impact. efforts, including BBC broadcasts and leaflets dropped over , aimed to undermine morale, with studies indicating limited but measurable effects on desertions in occupied . These campaigns contrasted with efforts by emphasizing democratic values and unity, contributing to sustained home-front production that outpaced enemies, as U.S. industrial output rose 96% from 1941 to 1945.

Contemporary Instances in Media and Politics

In the digital era, propaganda in media and politics has proliferated through algorithms and state-sponsored campaigns, enabling rapid dissemination of tailored narratives to influence and electoral outcomes. During the 2020 U.S. presidential election, false claims of widespread voter fraud propagated by former President and supporters were amplified across platforms, contributing to the , 2021, riot, though subsequent investigations found no evidence of fraud sufficient to alter results. outlets, often characterized by left-leaning institutional biases, framed these claims uniformly as , potentially suppressing debate on verifiable irregularities like ballot harvesting in states such as , where over 1 million mail-in ballots were processed amid chain-of-custody concerns raised in filings. The 2024 U.S. saw further define narratives, with foreign actors like and deploying bots and fake accounts to exacerbate divisions on issues such as and economic policy, reaching millions via platforms like X and . A Stanford study revealed that loyalty overrides factual accuracy, with both Democrats and Republicans accepting misleading information aligning with their views—e.g., conservatives endorsing unverified claims, while liberals dismissed documented border security data as exaggerated. This echoes patterns in media coverage, where outlets like and allocated 90% negative airtime to in 2024, per analysis, fostering perceptions of coordinated anti-conservative propaganda rather than objective . In international conflicts, Russia's invasion of on February 24, 2022, prompted extensive state propaganda via outlets like and Sputnik, reframing the operation as "" and denying atrocities such as the , where over 400 civilian bodies were documented by and eyewitness accounts. Western media, while countering Russian narratives, has been critiqued for selective emphasis on successes—e.g., underreporting Russian territorial gains in , which controlled 20% of by mid-2023—potentially serving alliance-building propaganda amid aid totaling $100 billion by 2024. analysis showed Russian extremist content reaching 500 million impressions globally via proxies, manipulating data like casualty figures to claim losses at 1 million versus official estimates of 500,000 combined. During the , governments and media propagated unified messaging on measures like mask mandates and , with the U.S. CDC reporting over 1 million excess deaths linked to hesitancy fueled by counter-narratives, though suppression of lab-leak hypotheses—later deemed plausible by FBI assessments in 2023—exemplified institutional alignment over empirical inquiry. disseminated propaganda minimizing origins and efficacy of lockdowns, promoting unsubstantiated claims of Western bioweapon development, which garnered billions of views on and influenced global skepticism toward WHO data. A NIH review linked such to 20-30% refusal rates in low-trust populations, underscoring propaganda's role in eroding compliance.

Emerging AI-Driven and Digital Propaganda

The integration of into propaganda has enabled the rapid generation of , including deepfakes, text, and images, allowing actors to disseminate tailored at unprecedented scale and low cost. Tools like generative adversarial networks and large models facilitate the creation of convincing content that mimics real events or personas, often evading initial detection by reviewers. For instance, benchmarks indicate that AI-driven "fake news" sites proliferated tenfold between 2023 and 2024, flooding online ecosystems with algorithmically optimized . State and non-state actors exploit these capabilities to amplify influence operations, with Russia's government-directed campaigns employing to produce election-related content targeting Western democracies as early as 2024. Similarly, Iranian and Chinese entities have leveraged generative , such as Google's , to accelerate narrative dissemination, though empirical assessments reveal limited behavioral sway compared to traditional methods. In the 2024 U.S. presidential election, AI-generated visuals emerged as a vector for partisan messaging, with posting at least 19 such images or videos on to rally supporters and critique opponents, including depictions of fabricated scenarios like immigrants invading suburbs. audio and video, hyped as a existential threat, appeared in scattered instances—such as a mimicking President Biden's voice urging voters to abstain—but analyses of 78 election-related deepfakes found they were no more persuasive than conventional , with detection rates improving via forensic tools and public skepticism. Foreign malign influence compounded this, as U.S. intelligence reported and deploying AI to generate divisive content, including synthetic endorsements and scandal fabrications, though platforms like disrupted several state-affiliated attempts by revoking access to models. Digital platforms exacerbate AI-driven propaganda through algorithmic amplification, where prioritizes engaging—often polarizing—content, creating echo chambers that reinforce preconceptions rather than convert skeptics. Chinese state-aligned firms, such as GoLaxy, have pioneered AI for multilingual propaganda bots that simulate grassroots discourse on , targeting diasporas and international audiences with narratives aligned to Beijing's interests. Despite these advances, causal evaluations underscore that AI's propaganda efficacy hinges on audience priors; synthetic media reinforces biases but rarely shifts entrenched views, as evidenced by post-election studies showing minimal vote impact from deepfakes in contests like Slovakia's 2023 ballot. Countermeasures, including watermarking standards and AI detection classifiers, are proliferating, yet lag behind generative tools' evolution, posing ongoing risks to informational integrity in hybrid analog-digital environments.

Societal Perceptions and Debates

Contested Legitimacy and Bias Claims

The term "propaganda" carries contested legitimacy due to its evolving and ambiguous definitions, originally denoting the neutral propagation of faith by the Catholic Church's Congregatio de Propaganda Fide established in , but increasingly connoting deliberate manipulation since the early . Scholars debate whether propaganda encompasses all organized or requires intent to deceive, with some arguing its inherent power renders it illegitimate in open societies, while others view distinctions as subjective and ideologically driven. This definitional fluidity allows actors to label disfavored communications as propaganda while exempting aligned efforts, undermining claims of objective legitimacy. Bias accusations frequently frame and institutional outputs as propagandistic, with empirical patterns showing partisan asymmetry: political conservatives issue such claims more often than liberals, correlating with documented disparities in news coverage favoring left-leaning perspectives on issues like and . For instance, a analysis of 2024 data found that extreme views and one-sided consumption predict biased perceptions, yet objective metrics reveal mainstream outlets underrepresenting conservative viewpoints relative to distributions. Public trust metrics reinforce these contests, as Gallup polls indicate only 31% of held a "great deal" or "fair amount" of confidence in in 2024, with Republicans at 14% versus Democrats at 54%, reflecting perceptions of systemic institutional rather than mere ideological disagreement. In academic and journalistic institutions, claims of propaganda arise from evidence of overrepresentation of left-leaning viewpoints, with surveys showing faculty political donations skewing 96% Democratic in social sciences as of recent cycles, potentially causal in shaping narratives presented as neutral scholarship. These biases manifest in selective emphasis or omission, as seen in coverage of events like the 2020 U.S. election disputes, where outlets accused of right-wing propaganda faced counter-claims of left-driven suppression. Such mutual delegitimization highlights how propaganda labels often prioritize causal self-interest over empirical verification, with higher-frequency accusations from marginalized ideological groups signaling genuine distortions rather than symmetric equivalence.

Cross-Ideological Accusations

Accusations of propaganda frequently traverse ideological divides, as partisans on both the left and right attribute manipulative to opponents' communications, often framing them as deliberate distortions to advance agendas. Studies indicate that both U.S. political affiliations routinely accuse the opposing party of conspiratorial behavior, including spreading propaganda, which reinforces mutual distrust and contributes to affective . For instance, conservatives have long charged outlets with left-leaning , labeling coverage of issues like , , and elections as propagandistic efforts to undermine traditional values and ; a 2024 analysis of discourse found that claims of "leftist " predominate in such accusations, though they do not span a broad ideological spectrum among accusers. Conversely, liberals and left-leaning commentators accuse conservative media and figures of deploying propaganda to stoke division, such as portraying right-wing narratives on election fraud or cultural issues as echoes of foreign tactics. Notable examples include Democratic-aligned critics labeling former President Trump's rhetoric and appointees' statements as parroting propaganda, as seen in 2024 objections to Tulsi Gabbard's intelligence role nomination for allegedly promoting narratives aligned with adversarial states. This bidirectional pattern extends to entertainment and education, where right-leaning voices decry left-influenced content in television and schools as —evident in critiques of programs like for embedding progressive ideologies—while left-leaning sources counter that conservative outlets amplify misinformation on topics like during the . Such cross-accusations are amplified in digital echo chambers, where partisan sharing of "fake news" claims correlates with ideological affiliation, yet empirical reviews reveal asymmetry in vulnerability: right-leaning users show higher rates of sharing misleading content, though both sides perceive the other's information ecosystem as propagandistic. This dynamic not only mirrors historical propaganda rivalries but also sustains polarization, as each side's claims of victimhood to the other's tactics discourage cross-ideological dialogue and bolster in-group cohesion. Mainstream academic and media analyses, often from left-leaning institutions, tend to emphasize right-wing propaganda risks while downplaying equivalent left-wing efforts, highlighting credibility concerns in source selection for these debates.

Resistance and Counter-Propaganda

Resistance to propaganda encompasses both individual psychological mechanisms that mitigate susceptibility and organized societal efforts to debunk or neutralize propagandistic messaging. Empirical studies identify cognitive factors such as prior knowledge, analytical thinking, and emotional regulation as key barriers to by misleading narratives. For instance, individuals with higher cognitive reflection tendencies are less prone to endorsing , as they engage in effortful scrutiny rather than acceptance. influences, including exposure to diverse viewpoints, further bolster resistance by fostering toward uniform echo chambers. Inoculation theory, developed in the 1960s and validated through decades of experimentation, provides a structured approach to building attitudinal resistance by preemptively exposing individuals to weakened forms of propagandistic arguments, enabling them to generate refutations. This "vaccination" analogy has demonstrated efficacy in reducing susceptibility to conspiracy theories, such as those surrounding the 9/11 attacks, where inoculated participants showed sustained motivational defenses against subsequent exposure. Meta-analyses confirm inoculation's robustness across domains, outperforming post-hoc corrections by activating threat recognition and counterarguing prior to full confrontation. Recent applications, including social media campaigns, have scaled this method to confer resilience against misinformation tactics like discrediting sources or false dichotomies, with prebunking videos increasing resistance by up to 20% in controlled trials. Counter-propaganda involves deliberate state or non-state initiatives to expose and dismantle adversarial messaging, often through revelation of origins, factual rebuttals, or amplification of alternative narratives. Historically, the in the 1980s systematically debunked Soviet disinformation campaigns, such as fabricated atrocity claims, by disseminating evidence of orchestration to targeted audiences in and beyond. During , Allied psychological operations countered Axis propaganda by airdropping leaflets that highlighted inconsistencies in Nazi claims, such as exaggerated military successes, thereby eroding enemy and civilian compliance. Similar tactics were employed against propaganda in the 2010s, combining content takedowns with counter-narratives emphasizing ideological contradictions, though cyber disruptions proved more immediately disruptive than persuasive rebuttals. Fact-checking represents a common modern counter-strategy, verifying claims against to undermine propagandistic assertions; however, its impact is limited, primarily enhancing factual recall without consistently altering deeply held beliefs or . Studies indicate that while fact-checks correct specific inaccuracies, they can trigger backfire effects among audiences ideologically aligned with the original message, particularly when checkers are perceived as biased—a substantiated by analyses revealing selective in outlets like . In contrast, inoculation and media literacy programs, which train recognition of manipulative techniques rather than disputing content, yield more durable resistance, as evidenced by reduced polarization in experimental groups exposed to propaganda simulations. Overall, effective counter-propaganda prioritizes preempting over reactive correction, aligning with causal pathways where early disrupts belief formation more reliably than ex post interventions.

Differentiations from Adjacent Concepts

Propaganda vs. Disinformation and Misinformation

Propaganda involves the deliberate and systematic dissemination of information—facts, arguments, rumors, half-truths, or lies—to advance a specific political, ideological, or organizational agenda, often by or institutional . Unlike mere , it employs techniques such as selective emphasis, emotional appeals, and to shape public attitudes or behaviors in alignment with the propagator's interests. This distinguishes it from neutral information-sharing, as propaganda prioritizes over comprehensive truth, though it may incorporate verifiable facts when they serve the . In contrast, misinformation refers to false or inaccurate information circulated without deliberate intent to deceive, often resulting from errors, misunderstandings, or careless sharing. For instance, an individual might unwittingly spread outdated statistics due to reliance on unverified sources, lacking awareness of their inaccuracy. Disinformation, however, entails the intentional creation and distribution of fabricated or manipulated falsehoods to mislead audiences, typically for strategic gains like sowing discord or undermining trust. The core differentiator here is : disinformation requires purposeful deception, as seen in coordinated campaigns fabricating events, whereas misinformation arises from or . Key variances emerge in veracity, structure, and objectives. Propaganda can be truthful in parts but is inherently biased through omission or framing, aiming to mobilize support rather than merely confuse. Disinformation and , by definition, involve untruths, but propaganda's organized, agenda-driven nature—often involving media control or mass campaigns—sets it apart from the potentially sporadic spread of dis/ via social networks. Overlaps exist, as propaganda may incorporate (e.g., state-sponsored fabrications during wartime), yet not all qualifies as propaganda without a broader persuasive framework. Empirical analyses highlight that while proliferates virally through cognitive biases like confirmation seeking, propaganda leverages institutional resources for sustained influence, as evidenced in historical cases like broadcasts.
AspectPropagandaMisinformationDisinformation
Truth ContentCan include facts, but selectively biasedAlways false or inaccurateDeliberately false or misleading
Intent for specific agendaNone; unintentional error and harm
OrganizationSystematic, often institutional, individual or viralCoordinated, often covert
ExamplesGovernment posters rallying supportShared based on mistakeFabricated stories to incite panic
This table summarizes distinctions drawn from communication , underscoring propaganda's potential legitimacy in contexts versus the inherent unreliability of dis/. Such delineations aid in assessing ecosystems, where conflating terms risks overlooking propaganda's role in shaping narratives through truthful but partial disclosures.

Relations to Public Relations, Education, and Journalism

Public relations emerged in the early 20th century as a professionalized extension of , with , often called the father of , explicitly framing it as "" in his 1928 book Propaganda, where he described propaganda as an essential tool for managing through and media influence. , nephew of , applied to corporate and government campaigns, such as promoting women's smoking in 1929 by linking it to , demonstrating how uses selective facts and emotional appeals akin to wartime propaganda but rebranded for commercial and policy goals. While practitioners emphasize and mutual understanding—distinguishing it from one-sided propaganda—critics argue this distinction is semantic, as both prioritize over unfiltered truth, with often serving elite interests through staged events and narrative control rather than empirical scrutiny. In education, propaganda manifests through curricula designed to instill ideological conformity, as seen in historical regimes where state-controlled schooling propagated or ; for instance, Nazi Germany's 1933 curriculum reforms under the Reich Ministry of Education integrated racial into textbooks, reaching 11 million students by 1939 to foster loyalty to Hitler and via mandatory youth organizations like the , which enrolled over 7.7 million members by 1939. Similarly, Soviet indoctrination under Stalin from the 1930s emphasized Marxist-Leninist doctrine in schools, with history texts rewritten to glorify the regime, affecting generations through purges of dissenting educators and compulsory ideological training. Even in democracies, educational materials have served propagandistic ends, such as U.S. War-era films from 1945-1965 produced by the government to counter , blending factual instruction with anti-Soviet messaging to shape student perceptions without overt labeling as propaganda. These cases illustrate how education systems, by controlling narratives under the guise of patriotism or civic duty, can prioritize causal engineering of beliefs over critical inquiry, with long-term effects measurable in surveys showing heightened regime support among exposed youth. ![Propaganda poster in a North Korean primary school][float-right] Journalism intersects with propaganda when reporting systematically favors certain viewpoints, often through source selection and framing that aligns with institutional biases rather than balanced empiricism; the , proposed by and in 1988, posits five filters—ownership, advertising, sourcing, flak, and (later adapted to other ideologies)—that produce content serving dominant power structures, as evidenced by U.S. coverage of Central American conflicts in the 1980s, where elite sources dominated 80-90% of quotes in major outlets like The New York Times. Empirical studies confirm systematic left-leaning bias in , with a 2013 analysis of U.S. finding 28.6% liberal vs. 7.1% conservative opinion pieces in prestige papers, correlating with underreporting of facts challenging progressive narratives, such as or failures. In authoritarian contexts, like North Korea's KCNA functions as overt propaganda, fabricating events to sustain regime legitimacy, while in free societies, overlaps arise from advertiser pressures and ideological in newsrooms, where 2022 surveys indicated 90% of U.S. journalists identify as Democrats or independents leaning left, leading to selective emphasis that propagandizes by omission. Distinguishing from propaganda requires assessing intent and verifiability: true verifies claims against primary data, whereas propaganda subordinates facts to agenda, though blurred lines persist when bias distorts causal reality.

Impacts, Effectiveness, and Measurement

Quantifiable Effects on Behavior and Belief

Empirical research on propaganda's effects, often studied under operations or campaigns, indicates measurable but typically small impacts on beliefs and attitudes, with effects varying by medium, duration, and audience predispositions. A of 82 studies from 1995 to 2020 found that 41% reported small effects, 16% medium effects, and 5% large effects on outcomes such as political opinions, behaviors, and social norms, with traditional showing persistence over periods from days to decades. These findings challenge early minimal-effects theories, such as those from the limited-effects paradigm, by demonstrating causal links through field experiments and , though toward positive results may inflate estimates. In political contexts, propaganda has shifted intentions and policy support in controlled settings. For instance, randomized field experiments on voter mobilization, akin to , showed nonpartisan door-to-door increased turnout by 8-10 percentage points in U.S. elections, with effects lasting up to eight months, though messaging yielded smaller shifts of 1-2 points due to of existing views rather than . Long-term media campaigns, such as radio broadcasts in post-World War I U.S. elections, weakened biracial coalitions and boosted Democratic vote shares by an estimated 2-5% in targeted areas, as evidenced by archival on propaganda exposure correlating with reduced cross-racial . Social media influence operations, like Twitter bots countering hate speech, reduced racist language usage by 10-20% over two months in experimental groups. Health propaganda campaigns provide clearer quantifiable behavioral changes. In , radio-based messaging on child health increased clinic consultations for under-5s by 35-56% for symptoms following sustained exposure, with effects sustained for months via repeated reinforcement. Short exposures to misleading health claims, simulating propaganda, altered behaviors in lab settings; for example, articles viewed for under 5 minutes modified unconscious donation preferences toward affected causes by 15-25% in implicit association tests. Meta-analyses of fear-based appeals, common in propaganda, confirm average increases of 0.2-0.3 standard deviations in intentions and behaviors, such as uptake, when paired with messages, though effects diminish without audience vulnerability. Limitations persist: effects often fail against strong priors, with meta-analyses of political field experiments showing average zero persuasion for oppositional audiences, and backfiring in 3-5% of cases, such as increased from cross-ideological exposure. The "sleeper effect," where discounted propaganda gains persuasiveness over time, occurs in 20-30% of cases per meta-review, amplifying delayed behavioral shifts by decoupling from message content. Overall, while propaganda reliably nudges marginal beliefs and actions—e.g., 5-10% shifts in aggregate surveys—large-scale transformations require institutional authority and repetition, not isolated efforts.

Factors Influencing Success or Failure

The effectiveness of propaganda hinges on audience predispositions, including pre-existing beliefs and cognitive biases that make individuals more receptive to messages aligning with their worldview; empirical studies indicate that propaganda reinforcing succeeds by exploiting intuitive rather than analytical thinking, as people are less likely to scrutinize familiar narratives. Social influences, such as reliance on group norms or figures, further amplify success, with research showing that perceived —rooted in trust or expertise—can override factual inaccuracies, as demonstrated in behavioral coevolution models where cues drive even against material self-interest. Conversely, failure occurs when propaganda clashes with deeply held values or evident realities, leading to or dismissal, particularly among audiences with high or exposure to counter-narratives. Message design plays a pivotal role, with emotional appeals—targeting fear, anger, or hope—proving more potent than rational arguments, as psychological analyses reveal that affective content bypasses critical evaluation and fosters behavioral change through heightened arousal. Repetition enhances perceived truthfulness via the "illusory truth effect," where familiar statements are rated as more credible regardless of veracity, supported by experiments showing increased belief after mere exposure. Simplicity and vivid imagery further boost efficacy, as complex or abstract propaganda demands greater cognitive resources, reducing persuasion under low-motivation conditions; historical cases, such as World War II posters leveraging stark visuals to drive enlistment, illustrate how concise, emotive formats achieved measurable upticks in voluntary participation. Failure ensues from overly nuanced or contradictory messaging, which invites scrutiny and erodes impact, as seen in analyses of state propaganda undermined by internal inconsistencies. Contextual elements, including media saturation and societal conditions, determine propagation scale; total control over information channels, as in authoritarian regimes, correlates with higher success rates by limiting alternatives, whereas fragmented digital environments dilute effects through competing voices. Crises or economic distress heighten vulnerability, enabling propaganda to frame events favorably—Nazi Germany's exploitation of post-Versailles Treaty resentment, for instance, mobilized support via scapegoating narratives that resonated amid and peaking at 30% in 1932. In contrast, stable or prosperous contexts foster skepticism, contributing to failures like Iran's military propaganda, which persists despite inefficacy due to audience awareness of discrepancies between claims and outcomes, such as unfulfilled regional dominance promises. Empirical reviews of influence operations underscore that while short-term attitude shifts occur, sustained behavioral change requires alignment with audience motivations, with quantification challenges highlighting overestimation in uncontrolled settings.

Long-Term Societal Consequences

Sustained exposure to propaganda over generations can entrench distorted beliefs, fostering societal that persists beyond the initial campaign. Empirical reviews of influence operations indicate that long-term efforts measurably alter public beliefs and behaviors, such as patterns, by reinforcing ideological divides. In democratic contexts, this contributes to affective , where animosity intensifies, eroding interpersonal trust across group lines. Historical cases demonstrate propaganda's capacity to imprint biases that endure for decades. In , indoctrination through state-controlled media and education correlated with a persistent elevation in anti-Semitic attitudes; individuals born in the 1920s and exposed to intensive propaganda during youth exhibited significantly higher anti-Semitism levels in surveys conducted post-World War II, even after regime collapse. This effect stemmed from the regime's monopolization of information channels, which suppressed counter-narratives and normalized dehumanizing rhetoric, leading to societal complicity in atrocities like . In autocratic settings, prolonged propaganda diminishes public support for democratic reforms by cultivating perceptions of external threats and internal stability under authoritarian rule. Analysis of autocratic propaganda campaigns shows they reduce collective protest inclinations and bolster legitimacy across generations, perpetuating cycles of conformity over critical . Post-regime transitions, such as in former Soviet s, reveal lingering distrust in institutions and , attributable to decades of state narratives that prioritized ideological purity over empirical reality, hindering economic and social adaptation. These dynamics undermine societal resilience, as populations habituated to manipulated information exhibit lower adaptability to factual challenges, amplifying vulnerability to future manipulations. Studies link chronic exposure—often propagandistic—to generalized declines in trust and heightened reliance on partisan sources, which in turn sustains echo chambers and impedes on shared facts. Over time, this fosters fragmented , elevating risks of instability, as polarized societies prove less capable of collective problem-solving.

Ethical, Legal, and Philosophical Dimensions

Moral Critiques and Justifications

Moral critiques of propaganda frequently invoke deontological principles, asserting that its manipulative techniques inherently violate duties to truthfulness and respect for rational autonomy. Immanuel Kant's , which prohibits treating individuals as mere , condemns propaganda for deploying deception or selective emphasis to engineer consent rather than foster informed judgment. Similarly, critiques, echoed in modern moralist philosophy, view propaganda as a form of aimed at domination over truth-seeking, eroding personal agency and societal freedom by systematically distorting reality. further argued that propaganda constitutes a total assault on human personality, substituting conditioned responses for critical thought, which undermines ethical responsibility. Consequentialist objections highlight propaganda's empirical harms, such as fostering division, justifying atrocities, or breeding long-term cynicism toward institutions. For instance, Nazi wartime campaigns, while effective in mobilizing support, contributed to and by amplifying ethnic stereotypes, illustrating how unchecked propaganda can cascade into irreversible societal damage. Utilitarian analyses sometimes weigh against it when short-term gains, like boosted , yield net losses through distorted or backlash, as seen in revelations eroding public trust in Allied efforts. Justifications for propaganda often adopt a realist or utilitarian stance, portraying it as a morally neutral instrument whose ethics depend on context and ends rather than intrinsic qualities. Harold Lasswell described it as akin to a tool like a "pump handle," analyzable scientifically without presuming immorality, applicable for defensive or unifying purposes in crises. In wartime, utilitarian defenses argue that even deceptive elements—such as exaggerated threat portrayals—can maximize welfare by sustaining troop morale and civilian resolve, potentially shortening conflicts and averting greater casualties, as evidenced by World War I efforts that maintained home-front support amid attrition. Some ethicists propose conditional criteria for "just" use, including transparency where feasible, proportionality to threats, and avoidance of exploiting vulnerabilities, allowing counter-hegemonic applications against dominant ideologies without descending into pure manipulation. These views acknowledge propaganda's inevitability in mass societies, prioritizing regulated application over outright prohibition to harness its persuasive power for survival or equity.

Regulatory Approaches and Free Speech Tensions

In the United States, the (FARA) of 1938 mandates public disclosure by individuals or entities acting on behalf of foreign principals to influence U.S. policy or , primarily targeting foreign propaganda dissemination without prohibiting the content itself. Enacted amid concerns over Nazi and communist influence, FARA emphasizes transparency over censorship, requiring agents to label materials and report activities quarterly, with over 700 active registrations reported by the Department of Justice as of 2023. This approach aligns with First Amendment protections, which courts have interpreted to safeguard even deceptive or propagandistic speech absent direct incitement to imminent harm, as affirmed in cases like (2012), where the struck down the Act for punishing false statements without sufficient justification. The Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 originally barred the U.S. government from disseminating its international broadcasting materials domestically to prevent state propaganda targeting citizens, but the 2012 modernization amendment lifted this restriction, allowing access to programs like Voice of America content within the U.S. Critics argue this enables covert government influence on public discourse, prompting legislative pushes such as H.R. 5704 in 2025 to repeal the modernization and reinstate the ban, citing risks of "apple pie propaganda" that normalizes federal narrative control. Empirical analyses indicate limited abuse post-2013, with domestic viewership remaining low—under 1% of U.S. audiences for such content—but tensions persist over whether disclosure suffices or if outright prohibitions are needed to preserve an independent marketplace of ideas. In the , the (DSA), enforced from August 2023 for large platforms, imposes obligations on intermediaries to mitigate systemic risks from propaganda and , including rapid removal of illegal content and algorithmic transparency to curb amplification. The accompanying 2018 on , strengthened in 2022, commits signatories like and to and ad labeling, with 83% of Europeans perceiving as a democratic threat per EU surveys. However, these measures have sparked free expression concerns, as platforms' overcompliance—such as preemptive content demotion—can chill legitimate debate, evidenced by a 2023 Center for International Media Assistance report documenting in 20+ countries under similar "" laws. Internationally, the International Covenant on (ICCPR) Article 20(1), ratified by 173 states as of 2023, explicitly prohibits "propaganda for war," while restricts subversive propaganda aimed at destabilizing governments through violence, though non-violent advocacy for remains protected. Enforcement is sporadic, with bodies like the UN Committee critiquing broad applications that suppress , as in Russia's 2012 foreign agent law mirroring FARA but extending to domestic NGOs labeled as propagandists. These regulatory frameworks engender profound tensions with free speech principles, rooted in the causal reality that content-based restrictions invite favoring incumbents, as historical precedents like interwar propaganda bans demonstrate evasion via proxies and underground channels. Proponents of regulation invoke prevention, citing studies linking unchecked propaganda to polarized beliefs and reduced —e.g., a 2022 analysis showing disinformation's role in electoral interference—but skeptics, drawing from first-amendment absolutism, warn of viewpoint , where defining "propaganda" subjectively erodes the epistemic competition essential for truth discernment. In practice, disclosure regimes like FARA prove less intrusive than outright bans, fostering accountability without preempting speech, though global trends toward platform liability risk privatized , as platforms err toward removal to evade fines exceeding 6% of global revenue under DSA rules. Empirical evidence from counter-disinformation efforts underscores that and yield behavioral shifts without legal coercion, contrasting with 's potential to amplify biases in enforcement institutions.

Truth-Seeking Alternatives and Debunking

Truth-seeking alternatives to propaganda emphasize empirical verification, logical scrutiny, and decentralized evaluation over centralized narrative control. skills, such as assessing evidence quality, identifying logical fallacies, and cross-referencing multiple independent sources, enable individuals to resist manipulative messaging by prioritizing falsifiable claims testable against observable reality. These methods draw from philosophical traditions like Karl Popper's emphasis on and refutation, where hypotheses are rigorously challenged rather than accepted on . Unlike propaganda, which often relies on emotional appeals and repetition, truth-seeking fosters —acknowledging uncertainty and updating beliefs based on new data—reducing susceptibility to coordinated influence campaigns. Debunking propaganda involves targeted corrections that provide accurate alternatives while avoiding reinforcement of falsehoods. Empirical studies indicate that simple fact-checks can reduce belief in by 10-20% on average, though effects diminish over time without reinforcement. Prebunking, or application, proves more proactive: exposing individuals to weakened forms of deceptive arguments beforehand builds cognitive resistance, akin to , with meta-analyses showing sustained reductions in persuasion by misleading claims up to months later. For instance, online games teaching recognition of manipulation tactics like false dichotomies or have lowered acceptance of propaganda narratives by alerting users to common rhetorical ploys. However, debunking carries risks, including the "backfire effect," where entrench false beliefs among those with strong prior convictions, particularly if the source lacks perceived credibility. Recent replications find this effect rare and mostly tied to low-reliability or conflicts, occurring in fewer than 5% of cases under controlled conditions, but it underscores the need for source-neutral delivery and emphasis on facts over . Effective strategies mitigate this by with a "truth sandwich"—stating facts first, addressing the briefly, then reiterating truth—which preserves accuracy without undue repetition that could foster illusory truth via familiarity. Independent verification tools, such as blockchain-based tracking or crowdsourced , offer scalable alternatives, though their adoption remains limited by technical barriers and institutional resistance. Long-term societal resilience requires institutional reforms, like incentivizing transparent and adversarial collaboration in , to counter propaganda's entrenchment. While organizations provide utility, their outputs must be scrutinized for ideological skew, as studies reveal selective application that amplifies certain narratives over others. Truth-seeking thrives through open platforms where claims compete on evidentiary merit, not , yielding higher discernment than top-down debunking alone.

References

  1. [1]
    What Is Propaganda, and How Does It Differ From Persuasion?
    Nov 7, 2005 · Propaganda is a form of communication that attempts to achieve a response that furthers the desired intent of the propagandist.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Propaganda & Persuasion
    Propaganda is a form of communication that attempts to achieve a response that furthers the desired intent of the propagandist. Persuasion is interactive ...
  3. [3]
    Propaganda - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Originating from Latin propagare meaning "to spread," the word refers to a committee of cardinals established in 1622 to oversee Catholic foreign missions.
  4. [4]
    What Does the Word "Propaganda" Mean? - JSTOR Daily
    Nov 20, 2015 · Beginning in the 16th century, the Latin, which essentially means “that which ought to be propagated” was adapted by the Catholic Church for the ...
  5. [5]
    The Story of Propaganda – AHA - American Historical Association
    In its origins “propaganda” is an ancient and honorable word. Religious activities which were associated with propaganda commanded the respectful attention of ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Propaganda - ERIC
    That is, propaganda was originally defined as a form of religious indoctrination. By early in the twentieth century, around the time of the First World War, the ...Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    History of American Propaganda Posters - Norwich University - Online
    Propaganda became a common term around America during World War I when posters and films were leveraged against enemies to rally troop enlistment and garner ...
  8. [8]
    Political Propaganda History, Techniques & Examples - Study.com
    Political propaganda techniques include, but are not limited to: the bandwagon, card-stacking, glittering generalities, name-calling, plain folks, testimonials, ...
  9. [9]
    Propaganda, misinformation, and histories of media techniques
    Apr 15, 2021 · This essay argues that the recent scholarship on misinformation and fake news suffers from a lack of historical contextualization.
  10. [10]
    https://oxfordre.com/communication/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-1384
  11. [11]
    The Techniques of Propaganda - CSUN Digital Library
    Jan 14, 2025 · The techniques of name-calling, guilt by association, card-stacking, scapegoating and smear campaigning made it difficult to distinguish truth from fallacy.
  12. [12]
    PROPAGANDA Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
    The word propaganda is from the ablative singular feminine of propogandus, which is the gerundive of the Latin propagare, meaning “to propagate.” The first use ...
  13. [13]
    On January 6, 1622, Pope Gregory XV founded the Congregation ...
    Jan 3, 2022 · On January 6, 1622, Pope Gregory XV founded the Sacred Congregation “de Propaganda Fide” as the supreme organ for the propagation of the faith.Missing: Congregatio | Show results with:Congregatio<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    On this day 400 years ago, the Vatican founded Propaganda Fide
    Jan 6, 2022 · “The establishment of the Sacred Congregation De Propaganda Fide in 1622 was motivated by the desire to promote the missionary mandate in ...
  15. [15]
    Congregation - Home Page Archivio Storico de Propaganda Fide
    The Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, historically known as De Propaganda Fide, is one of the Dicasteries that make up the Roman Curia.
  16. [16]
    George Creel on the Selling of the War (1920)
    We did not call it propaganda. for that word, in German hands, had come to be associated with deceit and corruption. Our effort was educational and informative ...
  17. [17]
    Master of American Propaganda | American Experience - PBS
    Creel became the mastermind behind the US government's propaganda campaign in the Great War. For two years, he rallied the American public to the cause of war.
  18. [18]
    The manipulation of the American mind: Edward Bernays and the ...
    Jul 9, 2015 · Yet propaganda had acquired a somewhat pejorative connotation (which would be further magnified during World War II), so Bernays promoted ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] 2. Harold D. Lasswell: propaganda research from the 1920s to the ...
    He defined propaganda as a 'technique', a 'manipulation of collective attitudes by the use of significant symbols (words, pictures, tunes) rather than violence ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Jacques Ellul, Propaganda - New Humanity Institute
    John Albig has named these elements of definition: the secret character of the sources and goals of propaganda; the intention to modify opinions; the dissemina-.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] PROPAGANDA JACQUES ELLUL - Monoskop
    ... essential elements of propaganda- Finally,. These laboratory experiments mean nothing because they do not reproduce the true milieu uf real propaganda or its ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Harold Lasswell Propaganda Technique World War
    His analysis shed light on the psychological mechanisms—such as fear, patriotism, and consensus-building—that propaganda exploits. Propaganda Techniques Used ...
  23. [23]
    Understanding Harold Lasswell's Propaganda Theory -
    Dec 25, 2024 · Harold Lasswell's Propaganda Theory is a framework that examines the role of communication in shaping public opinion and controlling mass behavior.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS - per Concordiam
    Sep 3, 2020 · essential elements of propaganda. PROPAGANDA PRIMER. For propaganda to function, it needs a previously existing narrative to build upon, as ...
  25. [25]
    https://worldradiohistory.com/BOOKSHELF-ARH/Education/Communications-Theories-Severing-Tankard-1979.pdf
  26. [26]
    What Is Propaganda, and How Does It Differ From Persuasion?
    Oct 7, 2024 · Furthermore, we want to clarify, as much as pos- sible, the distinction between propaganda and persuasion by examining propaganda as a ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Under the shadows of swords: propaganda of the deed in the history ...
    Aug 28, 2000 · Jowett and O'Donnell's research made a clear distinction between propaganda and persuasion based on the intent of the communication, despite ...
  28. [28]
    Propaganda by Edward Bernays (1928) - History Is A Weapon
    Propaganda is simply the establishing of reciprocal understanding between an individual and a group.
  29. [29]
    What is Propaganda? | - University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
    An expression of opinion or action by individuals or groups deliberately designed to influence opinions or actions of other individuals or groups with reference ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] THE STUDY OF PROPAGANDA - IJNRD
    Propaganda is neutrally defined as a systematic form of purposeful persuasion that attempts to influence the emotions, attitudes, opinions and actions of ...
  31. [31]
    Propaganda Through the Ages - Sage Publishing
    Nov 7, 2005 · The ancient world, prior to 500 B.C.E., provides many examples of effective propaganda techniques being used by rulers, mostly in support of war ...
  32. [32]
    5 Pieces of Propaganda from the Ancient World | TheCollector
    Mar 2, 2023 · The Ramesseum, the mortuary temple created by Egyptian king Ramesses II is an example of art as propaganda and how it can be used to change ...
  33. [33]
    Image, Strength and Power: How Strong Was Ancient Egyptian ...
    Aug 25, 2024 · Therefore, the main motif of the ancient propaganda art was the 'superiority vs. inferiority'. A 'God' Must be Perfect. Propaganda is a ...
  34. [34]
    A Very Brief History of Propaganda in Times Past - SMU Physics
    In the 20th century, propaganda reached new heights in the First World War (WWI). Propaganda in this war featured some really gross lies about German ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    The Official Truth: Propaganda in the Roman Empire - BBC
    Feb 17, 2011 · Paganism had been the living heart of Roman propaganda for a thousand years. Every significant act demanded sacrifice to appease a god. No new ...
  36. [36]
    Roman Propaganda in the Age of Augustus - Dominican Scholar
    In ancient Rome, the primary methods were literature, statues, monuments, and coins (though these are still used today as well).
  37. [37]
    On ancient and medieval “propaganda” - Jordan M. Poss
    Jan 16, 2023 · To take the examples I gave at the beginning of this post: In Asser's Life of King Alfred, Asser himself asserts authorship, openly ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] AUTHOR The Propaganda Analysis Movement since World War ...
    Begun in reaction to controls' on public opinion during the Great War, the cause of propaganda analysis enlisted journalists, academicians, and popular writers, ...
  39. [39]
    The Crisis by Thomas Paine | Research Starters - EBSCO
    His essays serve not only as powerful propaganda but also as a historical chronicle of the revolution, highlighting the complex dynamics of loyalty and dissent ...<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Propaganda of the French Revolution - ProQuest
    Jul 12, 2019 · Revolutionary-era France was inundated with pamphlets calling for a revolt. They were generally written by and for intellectuals, espousing ...
  41. [41]
    Prints and Propaganda in the French Revolution | History Today
    Popular art in the form of cartoons, caricatures and simple engravings offered great potential for political propaganda as the revolutionary leaders discovered.
  42. [42]
    On the origins of national identity: German nation-building after ...
    May 25, 2024 · This column examines the emergence of a German national identity in the early 19th century, when many of the modern tools for state propaganda were still in ...
  43. [43]
    Censorship and Propaganda in World War I: A Comprehensive ...
    Eberhard Demm discusses wartime “indoctrination” and “brainwashing” in eight Allied and four Central Powers, analyzing these from multiple angles.
  44. [44]
    World War I and the Origins of Government Manufacture of Opinion
    Mar 18, 2022 · World War I established propaganda as a systematic government tool for shaping public opinion. Nine universal laws of propaganda emerged during ...
  45. [45]
    Propaganda Experts, Intelligence, and Total War (1941–1945) | KNOW
    ... Ministry of Propaganda. As prospective propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels declaimed that “a government engaged in propaganda shall hire the brightest minds ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Propaganda and the Rise of Nazi Radio
    11. After Hitler created the RMVP, Goebbels took the reins and vowed to make the radio an active influ- ence over the listening public—something he ac- cused ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] The Rhetorical Dimensions of Radio Propaganda in Nazi Germany ...
    May 21, 2004 · Goebbels was the Minister of Propaganda, President of the Reich Chamber of Culture, and Director of the. Party Propaganda Department. Hans ...
  48. [48]
    Knowledge and Propaganda (1928) - Calvin University
    Its task is to spread the knowledge of National Socialism to the people, or to a part of the people. If propaganda does that, it is good; if not, it is bad. The ...Missing: techniques | Show results with:techniques
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Lies as Allies or Hitler at War - Digital Kenyon
    As will be shown, he believes in the big and oft-repeated lie as a means for attaining his end. He lies as to his intentions, he lies as to his achievements ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Die Kunst des Betrugs: An analysis of national socialist propaganda
    May 8, 2020 · ' Goebbels' propaganda intertwined Hitler and the role of Führer, making them inseparable. This was designed to mandate the belief that ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Agitprop in Soviet Russia - Digital Commons @ IWU
    Agitprop theatre, un like other propaganda that was inaccessible to the working class, effectively appealed to and indoctrinated Russia's lower class citizens.Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  52. [52]
    [PDF] soviet political indoctrination: mass media and propaganda in the ...
    By May, 1966, AGITPROP was renamed the Propaganda Department of ... Stalin Soviet spy film) in 1964, and the ouster of Khrush chev. ... emphasis on Soviet history, ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Soviet Propaganda in Kazakhstan, 1929-1953 - OhioLINK ETD Center
    The Party placed heavy expectations on the shoulders of agitprop workers because it expected every propagandist to possess a correct understanding and belief in ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] The Failure of Fascist Propaganda - OhioLINK ETD Center
    Mussolini used propaganda to educate Italians on key events within Fascism's recent history. Whether or not such events transpired as presented was ...<|separator|>
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Mussolini's Gladius: The Double-Edged Sword of Antiquity in Fascist ...
    Mussolini and the Fascist Party used a plethora of propaganda techniques in order to suggest the renewal of the old Roman Empire with the rise of the ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Fascism on Screen: Fascist Italy's Film Diplomacy Campaigns in the ...
    Apr 24, 2023 · on his film propaganda initiatives, if indeed Fascist diplomats viewed film as an important means of providing Americans with information ...
  57. [57]
    https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=five
  58. [58]
    [PDF] PROPAGANDA MEDIA ON JAVA UNDER THE JAPANESE 1942-1945
    Established in August 1942 it was in charge of propaganda and information concerning civil administration, and was a separate organ from the Information Section ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Intelligence in the New Japan - CIA
    May 8, 2007 · Many of the younger officers who had participated in the ultranationalist uprisings of the thirties found themselves exiled to intelligence ...
  60. [60]
    Bosnia - How Yugoslavia's Destroyers Harnessed The Media - PBS
    Between 1987 and 1989 Milosevic's media offensive was focused against Albanians, an alleged Islamic conspiracy and Tito's vision of Yugoslavia. Moreover, it ...
  61. [61]
    Propaganda War in Serbia - Committee to Protect Journalists
    State propaganda has long been an instrument of war, from Nazi Germany to Rwanda, where anti-Tutsi harangues by extremist Hutus incited genocidal massacres.
  62. [62]
    Media Propaganda in the War on Iraq: A Critique of U
    The 2003 Iraq war was a major global media event constructed very differently by varying broadcasting networks in different parts of the world.
  63. [63]
    20 Years After Iraq War Began, a Look Back at U.S. Public Opinion
    Mar 14, 2023 · The war began March 19, 2003, with an overwhelming show of American military might, described by the unforgettable phrase “shock and awe.” ...
  64. [64]
    The Role of Social Media in the Arab Uprisings | Pew Research Center
    Nov 28, 2012 · Research is emerging that reexamines in a more detailed way the role that social media played in the Arab uprisings.
  65. [65]
    The social media myth about the Arab Spring - Al Jazeera
    Jan 27, 2021 · Social media networks did not trigger the Arab revolutions, but they did contribute to the counter-revolutions.
  66. [66]
    [PDF] social media impact on government officials in arab spring
    Mar 24, 2025 · It sought to examine how state authorities used and responded to social media for surveillance, propaganda, and information control. The study.
  67. [67]
    What Is the Internet Research Agency? - The Atlantic
    Feb 16, 2018 · The Internet Research Agency is a Russian troll farm in St. ... It became what Chen called the “biggest trolling operation in history ...
  68. [68]
    Inside the Russian Troll Factory: Zombies and a Breakneck Pace
    called “Jay” around the firm — as the head of the trolls running the coverage of the ...
  69. [69]
    How the Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for ...
    We estimate that the government fabricates and posts about 448 million social media comments a year. In contrast to prior claims, we show that the Chinese ...
  70. [70]
    China's Digital Propaganda Machinery: How Beijing is Reshaping ...
    Mar 31, 2025 · Through social media manipulation, artificial intelligence, and covert influence operations, Beijing is actively shaping global public perception.
  71. [71]
    This is what Russian propaganda looks like in 2024
    Jun 6, 2024 · Covert influence campaigns based in Russia, as well as in China, Iran and Israel, have begun using AI in their attempts to manipulate public ...
  72. [72]
    The disturbing trend of state media use of deepfakes
    Apr 12, 2023 · The proliferation of deepfakes foreshadow a post-truth world, defined by a fractured geopolitical landscape, opinion echo chambers and mutual ...
  73. [73]
    What's Old Is New Again: Cold War Lessons for Countering ...
    Sep 22, 2022 · Exploiting U.S. race relations and disseminating disinformation about pandemics were major methods of Soviet disinformation during the later ...
  74. [74]
    Biases Make People Vulnerable to Misinformation Spread by Social ...
    Jun 21, 2018 · Researchers have developed tools to study the cognitive, societal and algorithmic biases that help fake news spread.
  75. [75]
    Authorship and Origins of the Seven Propaganda Devices
    Aug 6, 2025 · The analytic construct of the seven propaganda devices--name calling, glittering generalities, transfer, testimonial, plain folks, card stacking, and bandwagon ...
  76. [76]
    [PDF] 1). Name Calling 2). Glittering Generalities 3). Transfer 4 ...
    Name Calling: Propagandists use this technique to create fear and arouse prejudice by using negative words (bad names) to create an unfavorable opinion or ...
  77. [77]
    Evidence of Psychological Manipulation in the Process of Violent ...
    The evidence suggests that terrorist groups use psychological manipulation techniques to radicalize young people by creating psychological submission, political ...
  78. [78]
    Fake News/Misinformation/Disinformation: What is Confirmation Bias?
    Confirmation bias, defined as the tendency to process information by looking for, or interpreting, information that is consistent with one's existing beliefs.
  79. [79]
    Social media manipulation by political actors an industrial scale ...
    Jan 13, 2021 · Researchers examined how cyber troops use different communication strategies to manipulate public opinion, such as creating disinformation or ...
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Clyde Miller and the Institute for Propaganda Analysis
    May 14, 2021 · The IPA's legacy includes both the descriptive language and the techniques used to identify propaganda as well as the emphasis on teaching.
  81. [81]
    Institute for Propaganda Analysis - SMU Physics
    The Seven Devices · Facts or falsehoods: In propaganda, the use of truth or lie is governed only by its credibility. If you are not familiar with the subject, ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] how to detect propaganda
    "Glittering Generalities" is a device by which the propagandist identifies his program with virtue by use of "virtue words." Here he appeals to our emotions of ...
  83. [83]
    Powers of Persuasion | National Archives
    Jun 6, 2019 · It explores the strategies of persuasion as evidenced in the form and content of World War II posters.
  84. [84]
    Deception, disinformation, misinformation, propaganda
    Propaganda frequently utilizes emotional language to connect on a personal level and drive reactions. Complex issues are often reduced to simplified, binary ...
  85. [85]
    Propaganda as Communication Strategy - Allied Business Academies
    An example of white propaganda could be government communication to deter drivers from drinking and driving. Similarly, corporates promoting their products with ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  86. [86]
    A Brief History of Propaganda During Conflict - ICCT
    For millennia the evolution of propaganda strategies during conflict has been driven by three fundamental factors: (i.) developments in communication technology ...
  87. [87]
    World War II Propaganda | American Experience | Official Site - PBS
    Goebbels promoted the Nazi message through art, music, theater, films, books, radio, and the press, and censored all opposition.
  88. [88]
    Propaganda Film: "Radio in War" - Experiencing History
    The featured clip from the 1944 propaganda film Radio in War shows how Nazi leaders thought radio could be used to connect and unite the members of the Nazi ...
  89. [89]
    Film & Radio Propaganda in World War II - 1st Edition - K.R.M. Short -
    In stockThis book, first published in 1983, brings together leading world experts on film and radio propaganda in a study which deals with each of the major powers ...
  90. [90]
    Digital Propaganda: The Power of Influencers | Journal of Democracy
    Attempts to manipulate public opinion using social media and emerging information communication technologies (ICTs) continue to proliferate internationally.
  91. [91]
    Social media networks, fake news, and polarization - ScienceDirect
    ' While the concept of propaganda is not new, social media has made the spreading of ideas faster and more scalable, making it potentially easier for propaganda ...<|separator|>
  92. [92]
    Political Warfare and Propaganda - Marine Corps University
    This conceptual approach views the implicit goal of spreading propaganda, misinformation, disinformation, and so forth as shaping perceptions and influencing ...
  93. [93]
    Nazi Propaganda | Holocaust Encyclopedia
    Nazi propaganda had a key role in the persecution of Jews. Learn more about how Hitler and the Nazi Party used propaganda to facilitate war and genocide.Ministry of Propaganda · Nazi anti-Jewish propaganda · Menu<|separator|>
  94. [94]
    The Weapons of Dictatorship: Terror and Propaganda 1933-1939
    Many Germans welcomed the Nazi rise to power and cheered the return of strong central leadership. They applauded the crackdown on the Communist and Social ...
  95. [95]
    Nazi Propaganda and Censorship | Holocaust Encyclopedia
    Sep 23, 2025 · The Nazis wanted Germans to support the Nazi dictatorship and believe in Nazi ideas. To accomplish this goal, they tried to control forms of ...Missing: ideological | Show results with:ideological
  96. [96]
    Democracy | State of Deception: The Power of Nazi Propaganda
    Millions of Germans found Nazi propaganda messages to be appealing. In July 1932, the Nazi Party became the largest political party in the German parliament, or ...
  97. [97]
    Deceiving the Public | Holocaust Encyclopedia
    Hitler and the Nazi leadership engineered a phony Polish attack on a German radio station to mask and justify their invasion of Poland.
  98. [98]
    Domestic Propaganda in Wartime
    Even as German hopes of victory fell after 1943, faith in Hitler remained strong. Nazi Germany continued to wage war and terror, even as its military death toll ...
  99. [99]
    How Benito Mussolini led Italy to fascism - National Geographic
    Oct 12, 2022 · Support for fascism grows · FASCIST POSTER. A World War II propaganda poster representing the alliance between Italy and Nazi Germany. · Mussolini ...
  100. [100]
    Fascist Propaganda - UW-Madison Libraries Exhibits
    An official manifesto placed in all voting places for the election of Fascist government officials, with the list of names headed (in large type) by Mussolini.
  101. [101]
    The Falsification of Memory: History as a Tool of Communist ...
    Oct 15, 2021 · The Falsification of Memory: History as a Tool of Communist Propaganda ... Soviet Union in 1941 was followed by another turn in Soviet propaganda.
  102. [102]
    Historical Fallacies in Communist Propaganda - Hi-Story Lessons
    The rise of the Soviet Union, the first socialist state, was described as a turning point in human history. The History of the All-Union Communist Party ( ...
  103. [103]
    Russian Propaganda Efforts: Historical Continuities Accompany ...
    Feb 1, 2024 · They used propaganda to promote communist party rule, to warn against outside threats, as during World War II (which Soviet propaganda referred ...
  104. [104]
    Does Hard Propaganda (Also) Work in Democracies? Evidence ...
    Mar 3, 2025 · Although visual propaganda also has a long tradition in democracies—for example, in the form of mobilization posters for wars (Jowett and O' ...
  105. [105]
    Selling the War | How WWI Changed America
    The US used films, posters, pamphlets, and the CPI to "sell the war," including "Four Minute Men" speeches and iconic posters like "Uncle Sam Wants YOU".
  106. [106]
    War of Words: Propaganda of World War I | UGA Libraries
    Jun 14, 2018 · WWI propaganda included posters, pamphlets, and films. It used national symbols, enemy depictions, and was used for recruitment and boosting ...
  107. [107]
    Ministry of Propaganda and Public Enlightenment
    In Nazi Germany, the Ministry of Propaganda and Public Enlightenment spread ideology. It controlled the media and theater. Joseph Goebbels was its director.
  108. [108]
    Rosie the Riveter and Benny the Bungler: WWII Propaganda at Work
    May 16, 2020 · Posters were produced to encourage and inspire Americans, but also to warn, scold, and scare Americans as well. They used psychological tactics, ...
  109. [109]
    Vietnam propaganda posters give glimpse of life in war - CNN
    Jun 15, 2017 · Expelling “foreign invaders” and celebrating military action, such the shooting down of American planes, were common themes. Also regularly ...
  110. [110]
    [PDF] Propaganda in Vietnam - Troy University Journals
    As the ground war began and escalated, the United States propaganda machine continued to fail in its propaganda efforts, not only in Vietnam but also at home ...
  111. [111]
    How US propaganda won Iraq's 'battlespace' - Al Jazeera
    Mar 20, 2023 · In Iraq, propaganda did much more than dress up battlefield events in polite language. It also invented targets and set operational objectives.
  112. [112]
    Psychoanalysis shapes consumer culture
    Dec 1, 2009 · In "Propaganda" (1928), Bernays wrote about his campaign to increase bacon sales and contrasted Freud's group psychology with behaviorist ...
  113. [113]
    Edward Bernays: The Original Influencer - History Today
    Feb 6, 2019 · The 'Torches of Freedom' campaign became a legendary milestone in the history of public relations, still cited in marketing textbooks, which ...
  114. [114]
    Propaganda by Edward Bernays - Heritage History
    It was the amusement business—first the circus and the medicine show, then the theater— which taught the rudiments of advertising to industry and commerce ...
  115. [115]
    11 Types of Propaganda Techniques in Advertising (With Examples)
    Aug 18, 2020 · Below, we've listed the most common types of propaganda in advertising with relevant examples so you can see the concept in action.
  116. [116]
    https://www.orlandofiges.info/section10_RevolutionfromAbove/TheFiveYearPlan.php
  117. [117]
    What Were Stalin's Five Year Plans? | History Hit
    Between 1928 and 1932, Stalin's Five Year Plan was targeted at collectivizing agriculture and developing heavy industry. This was the first of four so-called ...
  118. [118]
    Industry and the 5-Year Plans - JohnDClare.net
    The 5-year plans were very useful propaganda – for Communism and for Stalin. ... Explain two effects of the Five-year Plans on industry in the Soviet Union.
  119. [119]
    The Sacred Congregation de Propaganda Fide (1622-1922) - jstor
    The creation of the Congregation de Propaganda Fide by the. Bull Inscrutabili of June 22, 1622, may be accepted as the com pletion of the formative stage of the ...
  120. [120]
    null Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples Profile
    Until 1982 it was known as The Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith or Propaganda Fide. The task of the Congregation has always been the transmission ...
  121. [121]
    Paul and Religious Propaganda in the First Century - jstor
    of sources, much more readily at hand and sharply etched, all examples of religious propaganda and expansion in the first century tend to become elaborated ...
  122. [122]
    [PDF] An Analytical Study of the Da'wah Movement of Prophet Muhammad ...
    Dec 24, 2024 · This study is an early exploration of the Prophet's efforts to promote Islam through da'wah movement from Makkah to Medina. This study ...
  123. [123]
    (PDF) Islamic Da'wah Through Social Media as a Means of Political ...
    One of the main aspects of the role of da'wah in changing the representation of Islam is to provide accurate and thorough information about the religion of ...
  124. [124]
    The Justification of a Nation - People.SMU
    Apr 30, 2015 · One of the strongest platforms on which the British government justified their colonization of India was photography. Photographs were used to ...
  125. [125]
    Culture in the Third Reich: Disseminating the Nazi Worldview
    In Nazi Germany, a chief role of culture was to disseminate the Nazi worldview. Arts and cultural organizations were to be synchronized with Nazi ideology ...
  126. [126]
    https://oxfordre.com/communication/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-678
  127. [127]
    Xinhua: the world's biggest propaganda agency | RSF
    Sep 30, 2005 · With more than 8000 employees and 105 branches worldwide, the official news agency, Xinhua, is at the heart of censorship and disinformation ...
  128. [128]
    Two International Propaganda Models: Comparing RT and CGTN's ...
    Jun 13, 2022 · This article conducts a comparative, mixed-method, multi-platform content analysis of RT and CGTN's 2020 US election coverage.
  129. [129]
    [PDF] Strategies of Chinese State Media on Twitter - Jennifer Pan
    How do state-controlled broadcasters reach foreign publics to engage in public diplomacy in the era of social media? Previous research.Missing: sponsored | Show results with:sponsored
  130. [130]
    Authority matters: propaganda and the coevolution of behaviour and ...
    A theoretical study of the power of inculcation, propaganda and social identity in shaping human behaviour and beliefs.
  131. [131]
    Asch Conformity Line Experiment - Simply Psychology
    May 15, 2025 · Solomon Asch experimented with investigating the extent to which social pressure from a majority group could affect a person to conform.
  132. [132]
    https://www.invaluable.com/blog/propaganda-posters/
  133. [133]
    Milgram Shock Experiment | Summary | Results - Simply Psychology
    Mar 14, 2025 · The study was designed to measure how far participants would go in obeying an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their ...
  134. [134]
    Four Psychological Mechanisms That Make Us Fall for Disinformation
    Nov 26, 2021 · Cognitive dissonance. We feel uncomfortable when confronted with two competing ideas, experiencing what psychologists call cognitive dissonance.
  135. [135]
    The Psychological Theories of Propaganda - Self-Transcendence
    Feb 23, 2025 · The Hypodermic Needle Theory suggested that media could inject ideas directly into the audience's minds, influencing public opinion and ...
  136. [136]
    Social Identity Theory In Psychology (Tajfel & Turner, 1979)
    Oct 5, 2023 · Social Identity Theory, developed by Henri Tajfel, explains how individuals define themselves based on their group memberships, such as nationality, religion, ...
  137. [137]
    (PDF) Sociological Propaganda: From Jacques Ellul to the Present
    Jan 15, 2023 · One of Ellul's greatest contributions to propaganda studies is his explanation of propaganda in the form of categories. In this context, the ...
  138. [138]
    Propaganda | The Anarchist Library
    ... essential elements of propaganda. Finally, these laboratory experiments mean nothing because they do not reproduce the true milieu of real propaganda or its ...
  139. [139]
    [PDF] Propaganda Technique In The World War Harold Lasswell
    ... theory of how international war propaganda may be conducted with success. •. It relies almost exclusively upon American, British,. French and. German ...
  140. [140]
    Education and propaganda: Tradeoffs to public education provision ...
    By deterring political opposition, propaganda can induce nondemocracies to invest in education when they otherwise would not, improving social welfare. When ...
  141. [141]
    Propaganda Education for a Digital Age
    Mar 4, 2021 · Why teaching about propaganda and all the ways it is disseminated is an important step toward understanding and strengthening our democracy.Missing: theories | Show results with:theories
  142. [142]
    Propaganda and Public Pedagogy - Oxford Research Encyclopedias
    Jul 30, 2020 · Propaganda and public pedagogy are perspectives on the most basic human needs: the need to learn, the need to know, and the need to belong.
  143. [143]
    [PDF] Education, Democracy, and Propaganda: An Epistemological Crisis
    An epistemological crisis is a blurring of facts and falsehoods where propaganda, defined as deliberately false information, holds sway, causing truth decay.
  144. [144]
    The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance ...
    Jan 12, 2022 · The drivers include cognitive factors, such as use of intuitive thinking and memory failures; social factors, such as reliance on source cues to ...
  145. [145]
    Mass media impact on opinion evolution in biased digital ...
    We study the effects of the combination of social influence and mass media influence on the dynamics of opinion evolution in a biased online environment.
  146. [146]
    Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news
    Oct 7, 2020 · We found both correlational and causal evidence that reliance on emotion increases belief in fake news: self-reported use of emotion was positively associated ...
  147. [147]
    Self-Persuasion: Evidence from Field Experiments at International ...
    Laboratory evidence shows that when people have to argue for a given position, they persuade themselves about the position's factual and moral superiority.
  148. [148]
    Self-generated Persuasion: Effects of the Target and ... - PubMed
    We found that the efficacy of self-persuasion depended on whether people believed that they would have to put more or less effort in convincing the self or ...
  149. [149]
    https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5627491
  150. [150]
    [PDF] THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SELF‐DEFENSE: SELF‐AFFIRMATION ...
    Self‐aYrmation, then, can decrease ruminative thinking, and this may be one mechanism by which it makes stressors less stressful. If self‐aYrmations can reduce ...
  151. [151]
    During World War I, U.S. Government Propaganda Erased German ...
    Apr 7, 2017 · World War I inspired an outbreak of nativism and xenophobia that targeted German immigrants, Americans of German descent and even the German language.
  152. [152]
    5 Examples of Anti-Jewish Propaganda in Nazi Germany - History Hit
    After the Nazis came to power in 1933, Adolf Hitler established the Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, to which he appointed...
  153. [153]
    The Impact of Nazi Propaganda: Visual Essay - Facing History
    Feb 5, 2024 · Propaganda was one of the most important tools the Nazis used to shape the beliefs and attitudes of the German public. Through posters, film ...
  154. [154]
    These Soviet propaganda posters once evoked heroism, pride and ...
    Jul 11, 2017 · The victory of communism is inevitable, says this 1969 propaganda poster by Konuhov. ... Soviet Union. Posters at the time showed positive images ...Missing: ideology | Show results with:ideology
  155. [155]
    The sword and the word: How Allied bombing and propaganda ...
    Nov 19, 2020 · During WWII, Allied forces used strategic bombing and radio propaganda to undermine German morale. This column compares German domestic resistance to the Nazi ...
  156. [156]
    Elections | HKS Misinformation Review
    Nowhere has this been more concerning than in the 2020 U.S. presidential election wherein Donald Trump falsely declared that it was stolen through fraud.
  157. [157]
    Partisanship sways news consumers more than the truth, new study ...
    Oct 10, 2024 · Stanford researchers upend established understanding and demonstrate bias across political and educational lines when it comes to falling ...
  158. [158]
    This Isn't Journalism, It's Propaganda! Patterns of News Media Bias ...
    Jan 30, 2025 · In countries where the news media are free and independent, and not integrated into the political system (Hallin and Mancini 2004), ...<|separator|>
  159. [159]
    How disinformation defined the 2024 election narrative | Brookings
    Nov 7, 2024 · Disinformation shaped views about the candidates, affected how voters saw leader performance, and generated widespread media attention.
  160. [160]
    Measuring the Reach of Russia's Propaganda in the Russia-Ukraine ...
    May 23, 2025 · RAND researchers examine how some of Russia's most extremist and most hate-filled narratives related to the Russia-Ukraine war have spread ...
  161. [161]
    Undermining Ukraine: How Russia widened its global information ...
    Feb 29, 2024 · Undermining Ukraine: How Russia widened its global information war in 2023. By the Digital Forensic Research Lab. All chapters. As the full- ...
  162. [162]
    How Russian disinformation manipulates data on Ukraine war
    Apr 14, 2024 · The Ukrainian Media and Communication Institute explains how disinformation campaigns manipulate data and statistics in the context of Russia's war on Ukraine.
  163. [163]
    The impact of misinformation on the COVID-19 pandemic - PMC - NIH
    Since the inception of the current pandemic, COVID-19 related misinformation has played a role in defaulting control of the situation.
  164. [164]
    Misleading a Pandemic: The Viral Effects of Chinese Propaganda ...
    Dec 29, 2021 · This article presents an analysis of China's disinformation campaign as competing narratives with the United States in the wake of the pandemic.
  165. [165]
    AI-driven disinformation: policy recommendations for democratic ...
    Jul 31, 2025 · Our benchmarks confirm that AI-driven “fake news” sites grew tenfold in one year (NewsGuard, 2024), flooding the infosphere with low-cost, ...
  166. [166]
    How Russia is using AI for its election influence efforts - NPR
    Sep 23, 2024 · Russia is the most prolific foreign influence actor using artificial intelligence to generate content targeting the 2024 presidential ...
  167. [167]
    America's Adversaries Use AI for Malign Influence, But Not to Great ...
    Feb 5, 2025 · Iran, China, and Russia all used Google's generative artificial intelligence (AI) tool Gemini to accelerate their influence operations (IO).
  168. [168]
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/10/21/business/media/trump-ai-truth-social-no-kings.html
  169. [169]
    We Looked at 78 Election Deepfakes. Political Misinformation Is Not ...
    Dec 13, 2024 · AI-generated misinformation was one of the top concerns during the 2024 U.S. presidential election. In January 2024, the World Economic ...
  170. [170]
    Political deepfake videos no more deceptive than other fake news ...
    Aug 19, 2024 · New research from Washington University in St. Louis finds deepfakes can convince the American public of scandals that never occurred at ...
  171. [171]
    Russia and Iran using AI to influence US election: DNI - ABC News
    Sep 23, 2024 · Russia and Iran are using artificial intelligence to influence the American election, US intelligence officials said on Monday.
  172. [172]
    Disrupting malicious uses of AI by state-affiliated threat actors - OpenAI
    Feb 14, 2024 · We have disrupted five state-affiliated actors that sought to use AI services in support of malicious cyber activities.
  173. [173]
    The Era of A.I. Propaganda Has Arrived, and America Must Act
    Aug 5, 2025 · ... posted deepfakes on social media. During the campaign, GoLaxy suggested ways to undermine Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party, which ...
  174. [174]
    Beyond the deepfake hype: AI, democracy, and “the Slovak case”
    Aug 22, 2024 · The first election swung by deepfakes? The potential for an election upset caused by a deepfake prompted speculation about Šimečka's loss to ...
  175. [175]
    Gauging the AI Threat to Free and Fair Elections
    Mar 6, 2025 · From deepfakes targeting high-ranking officials to misinformation campaigns designed to manipulate voters, AI-driven disinformation has exposed ...
  176. [176]
    Americans' Trust in Media Remains at Trend Low - Gallup News
    Oct 14, 2024 · Americans continue to register record-low trust in the mass media, with 31% expressing a “great deal” or “fair amount” of confidence in the media.
  177. [177]
    Trust in Media - Research and data from Pew Research Center
    Americans' trust in media varies widely by political party and whether they see the outlet in question as part of the “mainstream media.”
  178. [178]
    Are Republicans and Conservatives More Likely to Believe ...
    Finding 2: The Political Left and Right Both Accuse the Out-Party of Conspiring. Even though we considered a larger group of conspiracy theories above than ...
  179. [179]
    Trump's pick for top intel job has been accused of 'traitorous ...
    Nov 13, 2024 · Trump's pick for top intel job has been accused of 'traitorous' parroting of Russian propaganda. Tulsi Gabbard, who has never worked in the ...
  180. [180]
    The rise of left-wing, anti-Trump fake news - BBC
    Apr 15, 2017 · Since the US election presidential race, fact checking websites report what seems like an increase in anti-Trump, 'liberal fake news'.
  181. [181]
    Right and left, partisanship predicts (asymmetric) vulnerability to ...
    Feb 15, 2021 · We analyze the relationship between partisanship, echo chambers, and vulnerability to online misinformation by studying news sharing behavior on Twitter.
  182. [182]
    (PDF) Was it Polarization or Propaganda? - ResearchGate
    Aug 9, 2025 · I argue that current evidence better supports the asymmetrical propaganda story. I then diagnose the popularity of the polarization story.<|control11|><|separator|>
  183. [183]
    The Polarizing Impact of Political Disinformation and Hate Speech
    The current study employs complexity theory and a configurational approach to investigate the impact of diverse disinformation campaigns and hate speech in ...
  184. [184]
    Assessing inoculation's effectiveness in motivating resistance to ...
    Jul 30, 2024 · This study tested the motivational power of inoculation to foster resistance to conspiracy propaganda (9/11 Truth Movement)
  185. [185]
    Psychological inoculation can reduce susceptibility to ...
    Aug 10, 2022 · Recent empirical work has focused on interventions aimed at inoculating people against misinformation, yielding success on the individual level.
  186. [186]
    Psychological inoculation improves resilience against ... - Science
    Aug 24, 2022 · We show that psychological inoculation campaigns on social media are effective at improving misinformation resilience at scale.
  187. [187]
    Prebunking interventions based on “inoculation” theory can reduce ...
    Feb 3, 2020 · This study finds that the online “fake news” game, Bad News, can confer psychological resistance against common online misinformation strategies across ...
  188. [188]
    [PDF] Counter Propaganda: - LSE
    Jul 8, 2015 · An example is the work of the United States Information Agency (USIA) to expose specific Soviet disinformation rumours in the 1980s. 2.
  189. [189]
    What was done by the Western World to counter ISIS propaganda ...
    Jul 16, 2022 · These strategies included the suppression of ISIS' presence on social media, production of counter propaganda, and cyber-attacks. against the ...<|separator|>
  190. [190]
    Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics
    We find that: (i) alternative facts are highly persuasive; (ii) fact checking improves factual knowledge of voters (iii) but it does not affect policy ...
  191. [191]
    “Fact-checking” fact checkers: A data-driven approach
    Oct 26, 2023 · This study examined four fact checkers (Snopes, PolitiFact, Logically, and the Australian Associated Press FactCheck) using a data-driven approach.
  192. [192]
    Cross-checking journalistic fact-checkers: The role of sampling and ...
    The current study assessed agreement among two independent fact-checkers, The Washington Post and PolitiFact, regarding the false and misleading statements of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  193. [193]
    Psychologists are taking aim at misinformation with these powerful ...
    Jan 1, 2023 · Psychologists are ramping up efforts to fight the many-headed Hydra of misinformation, drawing on decades of psychological research to help people think more ...
  194. [194]
    Countering Disinformation Effectively: An Evidence-Based Policy ...
    Jan 31, 2024 · A high-level, evidence-informed guide to some of the major proposals for how democratic governments, platforms, and others can counter disinformation.
  195. [195]
    Propaganda, Misinformation, Disinformation & Fact Finding Resources
    Mar 19, 2024 · Disinformation refers to intentionally disseminating false information. It can be most powerful when coming from news sources. It's designed to ...
  196. [196]
    Misinformation, Disinformation, and Online Propaganda (Chapter 2)
    Aug 24, 2020 · The terms “misinformation,” “disinformation,” and “propaganda” are sometimes used interchangeably, with shifting and overlapping definitions.
  197. [197]
    Misinformation and disinformation
    Misinformation is false or inaccurate information—getting the facts wrong. Disinformation is false information which is deliberately intended to mislead— ...Why misinformation spreads · Misinformation Effect · Countering misinformation
  198. [198]
    (Why) Is Misinformation a Problem? - PMC - NIH
    Regarding what is false, many scholars define “disinformation” as intentional sharing of false information (e.g., Fallis, 2015; Hernon, 1995; Shin et al., 2018; ...
  199. [199]
    Misinformation, disinformation, and fake news: lessons from an ...
    Instead, a key difference between misinformation and disinformation is whether the false and misleading information is intended to mislead (Humprecht et al., ...
  200. [200]
    Propaganda, Misinformation, Disinformation - Evaluating Information
    Nov 15, 2024 · Political campaign speeches and party political statements are often a form of propaganda. They fit this definition when they present the ...Missing: ideology | Show results with:ideology
  201. [201]
    Misinformation, Disinformation, and Propaganda: Fake News
    Sep 5, 2025 · Fake news overlaps with other information disorders, such as misinformation (false or misleading information) and disinformation (false ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  202. [202]
    Dealing with propaganda, misinformation and fake news
    Propaganda, misinformation and fake news have the potential to polarise public opinion, to promote violent extremism and hate speech and, ultimately, to ...
  203. [203]
    Edward Bernays | Propaganda, Public Relations & Advertising
    Oct 15, 2025 · American publicist who is generally considered to have been the first to develop the idea of the professional public relations counselor.
  204. [204]
    The Invisible Government: Edward Bernays, Public Relations and ...
    In his 1928 book, Propaganda, Edward Bernays wrote of secret and ubiquitous persuasive powers at work in society.
  205. [205]
    [PDF] Education or Indoctrination? World War II Ideologies Under Leaders ...
    Apr 10, 2017 · These pieces of propaganda are just a few examples of the wide reach and depth of Hitler and Nazi Party propaganda during World War II.
  206. [206]
    [PDF] The Effect of the Cold War on the American Education System
    Apr 28, 2016 · Prior to World War II, debates related to the use of propaganda favored the belief that the role of schools was to cultivate critical thinking ...
  207. [207]
    [PDF] Cold War Educational Propaganda and Instructional Films, 1945-1965
    As propaganda appeared anathema to education, a central feature of the debate concerned attempts to distinguish propaganda from education. In attempting to ...
  208. [208]
    Why Some Dictators Build Schools — and Others Don't
    Oct 20, 2021 · History is replete with dictators from Adolf Hitler to Mao Zedong using state-controlled education and propaganda to mold young people into ...
  209. [209]
    A Propaganda Model - Chomsky.info
    A propaganda model focuses on this inequality of wealth and power and its multilevel effects on mass-media interests and choices.
  210. [210]
    On the nature of real and perceived bias in the mainstream media
    Socio-economic studies at this scale may help uncover patterns of editorial policies that show a systematic bias that favors governments' propaganda or private ...
  211. [211]
    [PDF] Individual Journalistic Bias Leads to Public Propaganda
    For example, Fox News anchor Maria Bartiromo accused journalists of the New York Times and CNN of becoming “the mouthpieces” for the Democratic Party, while she ...
  212. [212]
    A systematic review on media bias detection - ScienceDirect.com
    Mar 1, 2024 · We present a systematic review of the literature related to media bias detection, in order to characterize and classify the different types of media bias.
  213. [213]
    Review of Social Science Research on the Effects of Influence ...
    This literature provides strong evidence that long-term campaigns on mass media have measurable effects on beliefs and consequential behaviors such as voting ...Missing: quantifiable | Show results with:quantifiable
  214. [214]
    https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-psych-071620-030619
  215. [215]
    Does canvassing increase voter turnout? A field experiment - PMC
    This paper reports the results of a randomized field experiment involving registered voters in the city of New Haven. Nonpartisan get-out-the-vote messages ...
  216. [216]
    [PDF] The effect of propaganda on elections: Evidence from the post ...
    This paper analyzes new data showing that propaganda influenced election outcomes by weakening biracial political coalitions that challenged the Democratic ...
  217. [217]
    Mass Media, Propaganda, and Social Influence - Sentience Institute
    Jun 6, 2023 · Additionally, a large body of social psychological research exists on strategies to change prejudiced attitudes and discriminatory behaviors.
  218. [218]
    Would you notice if fake news changed your behavior? An ...
    It was found that even short (under 5-min) exposure to fake news was able to significantly modify the unconscious behavior of individuals.
  219. [219]
    Appealing to fear: A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeal Effectiveness and ...
    We present the results of a comprehensive meta-analysis investigating fear appeals' effectiveness for influencing attitudes, intentions, and behaviors.
  220. [220]
    The Sleeper Effect in Persuasion: A Meta-Analytic Review - PMC
    Findings from this meta-analysis indicate that recipients of discounting cues were more persuaded over time when the message arguments and the cue had a strong ...
  221. [221]
    What psychological factors make people susceptible to believe and ...
    Nov 29, 2023 · People are more likely to believe misinformation if it comes from in-group sources rather than out-group ones, or if they judge the source as credible.Missing: frameworks | Show results with:frameworks
  222. [222]
    Propaganda | Psychological defence agency
    Mar 17, 2024 · Playing on emotions. Exploiting and playing on emotions such as frustration, anger, fear, hope or sympathy is a way to succeed with propaganda.Missing: factors | Show results with:factors
  223. [223]
    The Effect of Propaganda | PSYCH 256 - Sites at Penn State
    Mar 4, 2018 · The propaganda effect is when a subject is more likely to rate statements they have read or heard before as being true.
  224. [224]
    From Panic to Policy: The Limits of Foreign Propaganda and the ...
    Mar 26, 2024 · American leaders and scholars have long feared the prospect that hostile foreign powers could subvert democracy by spreading false, misleading, and ...
  225. [225]
    Propaganda and the Nazi rise to power - The Holocaust Explained
    One of the factors that helped the Nazis rise to power was propaganda. The Nazis used propaganda throughout the late 1920's and early 1930's to boost Hitler's ...
  226. [226]
    Iran's Military Propaganda: Failures and Successes
    Sep 9, 2018 · One of the remarkable aspects of this propaganda machine is its dogged continuation despite its continuous failure to shape foreign ...
  227. [227]
    Measuring the Effects of Influence Operations: Key Findings and ...
    Jun 28, 2021 · The literature demonstrates that certain kinds of influence operations can have measurable effects on people's beliefs and behavior.
  228. [228]
    How tech platforms fuel U.S. political polarization and what ...
    Sep 27, 2021 · Widespread social media use has fueled the fire of extreme polarization, which, in turn, has contributed to the erosion of trust in democratic ...
  229. [229]
    Nazi indoctrination and anti-Semitic beliefs in Germany - PNAS
    Jun 15, 2015 · We analyze if growing up under Nazi rule had a lasting effect on attitudes later in life using cohort-specific indoctrination in the past as ...
  230. [230]
    Propaganda, Presumed Influence, and Collective Protest
    Feb 8, 2021 · Political propaganda can reduce citizens' inclinations to protest by directly influencing their preferences or beliefs about the government.
  231. [231]
    Misinformation in action: Fake news exposure is linked to lower trust ...
    Jun 2, 2020 · Our study found that online misinformation was linked to lower trust in mainstream media across party lines.
  232. [232]
    Social Trust in Polarized Times: How Perceptions of Political ... - NIH
    Mar 18, 2022 · This study examines the consequences of perceived polarization for levels of social trust in the United States.
  233. [233]
    Political Demonstration Effects: Autocratic Advantage Propaganda ...
    Oct 1, 2025 · This report examines two messaging strategies: “autocratic advantage,” which highlights positive benefits of authoritarian governance, and “ ...
  234. [234]
    [PDF] A Few Ethical Arguments against Religious Propaganda
    Dec 10, 2015 · The history of propaganda began not in the State, but in the Church. When in 1622 the Roman Catholic Church established its “Congregation for.
  235. [235]
    Two Ways of Looking At Propaganda
    Jun 29, 2006 · The moralist school argues that propaganda is intrinsically misleading and therefore morally reprehensible. This point of view, popular among ...
  236. [236]
    [PDF] The Good, The Bad, & The Unethical: The Ethics of Propaganda
    This paper looks at multiple case studies of propaganda such as Nazi propaganda during World War II and American propaganda used during the Cold War, and weighs ...<|separator|>
  237. [237]
    [PDF] Jason GJ . On the Rationality of Propaganda. Philos Int J 2024, 7(3)
    Aug 16, 2024 · Propaganda is a tool to get people to support beliefs, and can be rational, though it rarely is. It is used to spread beliefs more widely.
  238. [238]
    Full article: The Just Use of Propaganda (?): Ethical Criteria for ...
    Jul 22, 2013 · As a result it is typically oriented toward manipulation, fallacy, concealment, emotional exploitation, behavioral modification.Footnote ...Missing: justifications | Show results with:justifications
  239. [239]
    FARA.us: Your Guide to Foreign Agents Registration Act Rules
    FARA is a public-disclosure statute originally enacted in 1938 as a legislative response to extensive foreign propaganda activities in the US.
  240. [240]
    Foreign Agents Registration Act | FARA Index and Act
    Mar 14, 2023 · It shall be unlawful for any person to act as an agent of a foreign principal at any time ten days or more after receipt of such notification ...
  241. [241]
    Freedom of Speech and Regulation of Fake News - Oxford Academic
    Jun 2, 2022 · Regulation to stem the spread of misinformation must occur within the complex structure of the U.S. Constitution's free speech guarantee.
  242. [242]
    Facts About Smith-Mundt Modernization – USAGM
    The new law will let people across America see and hear the valuable news reported by the Agency's accomplished journalists.
  243. [243]
    Rep. Massie Introduces Bill to Protect Americans from Federally ...
    Oct 8, 2025 · Today, Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) introduced HR 5704, the Repeal the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2013, to protect American ...
  244. [244]
    [PDF] apple pie propaganda? the smith–mundt act before and after the ...
    However, in 2013, Congress abolished the domestic dissemination ban, which has led to a heated debate about the role of the federal government in free public ...
  245. [245]
    Sweeping EU digital misinformation law takes effect - Legal Dive
    Aug 23, 2023 · Sweeping EU digital misinformation law takes effect ... email. fake news, hoax, false information and propaganda. Disinformation media and ...
  246. [246]
    EU Code of Practice on Disinformation - European Commission
    A growing threat to European democracies ; 83%. of people. think disinformation threatens democracy ; 63%. of younger Europeans. come across fake news more than ...
  247. [247]
    Chilling Legislation: Tracking the Impact of “Fake News” Laws on ...
    Jul 19, 2023 · However, regulatory approaches that focus on criminalizing MDM can negatively impact press freedom by creating an environment that chills and ...
  248. [248]
    Propaganda for War & International Human Rights Standards
    This Essay unpacks the meaning and scope of ICCPR Article 20(1)'s prohibition on war propaganda, to help international human rights law better meet the moment.
  249. [249]
    Propaganda - Oxford Public International Law
    12 Subversive propaganda has been regulated by international law for many years. It can be described as propaganda aimed at destabilizing State institutions by ...
  250. [250]
    [PDF] A Historical Survey of the International Regulation of Propaganda
    This article traces international efforts to regulate propaganda through the pre- and post-UN periods, charting its development from a rather peripheral concern ...
  251. [251]
    How the EU combats harmful content online - Consilium
    The EU's digital services act (DSA) helps combat propaganda, misinformation and fake news online by introducing strict requirements for online platforms.
  252. [252]
    The Use of Critical Thinking to Identify Fake News - NIH
    Critical thinking, as a form of information literacy, provides a means to critically engage with online content, for example by looking for evidence to support ...
  253. [253]
    [PDF] HOW TO DETECT MEDIA BIAS & PROPAGANDA
    This guide explains how to do this and thus reduce the influence of bias and propaganda on human thinking. Richard Paul. Linda Elder. Center for Critical ...
  254. [254]
    In Search of a Better World: Karl Popper on Truth vs. Certainty and ...
    Jan 26, 2017 · Popper argues that the ability to discern truth by testing our theories against reality using critical reasoning is a distinctly human faculty — ...
  255. [255]
    Prebunking Against Misinformation in the Modern Digital Age - NCBI
    May 10, 2023 · The distinction between prebunking and debunking (post-hoc ... misinformation and fake news through inoculation and prebunking. Eur ...Beyond Fact-Checking... · Inoculation Theory: A Vaccine...
  256. [256]
    Misinformation and disinformation: both prebunking and debunking ...
    Oct 25, 2024 · Misinformation, incorrect or false information shared unintentionally, can be extremely damaging. Its climate change-denying sort can make ...<|separator|>
  257. [257]
    The backfire effect after correcting misinformation is strongly ... - NIH
    The backfire effect is when belief in a misconception is greater after a correction has been presented in comparison to a pre-correction or no-correction ...
  258. [258]
    Searching for the Backfire Effect: Measurement and Design ...
    A backfire effect is when people report believing even more in misinformation after they have seen an evidence-based correction aiming to rectify it.
  259. [259]
    Why the backfire effect does not explain the durability of political ...
    Previous research indicated that corrective information can sometimes provoke a so-called “backfire effect” in which respondents more strongly endorsed a ...
  260. [260]
    Combating Misinformation by Sharing the Truth: a Study on the ... - NIH
    Misinformation on social media has become a horrendous problem in our society. Fact-checks on information often fall behind the diffusion of misinformation, ...
  261. [261]
    Review of social science research on the impact of ...
    Sep 13, 2021 · We found few high-credibility studies which evaluated the key strategies employed by social media platforms to combat influence operations, ...