Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

W56

The W56 was a thermonuclear developed by the for deployment on the I and II intercontinental ballistic missiles. Production of the W56 began in 1963 at facilities associated with , with the design achieving a high yield-to-weight efficiency for its era. Approximately 1,100 units were produced and deployed, including 650 on Minuteman IB missiles and 450 on Minuteman II missiles. The W56 featured a selectable yield up to 1.2 megatons of , making it one of the highest-yield warheads used on American ICBMs during the . It entered operational service in 1965 but was phased out from active deployment in the early 1990s as Minuteman II missiles were retired, with the final warheads dismantled by the in 2006. Notable for its compact design enabling significant destructive power from a reentry vehicle weighing around 450 kilograms, the W56 also drew attention for shortcomings. Early variants lacked certain enhanced features implemented in later U.S. designs, and the warhead experienced failures in one-point testing, raising concerns about accidental risks. These issues contributed to its eventual and highlighted challenges in balancing efficiency with reliability in thermonuclear weapons engineering.

Development and History

Origins and Initial Design (1960-1963)

The W56 thermonuclear warhead originated in the early 1960s as part of the ' push to enhance the capabilities of its intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) force amid escalating nuclear competition with the . Development was initiated to provide a high-yield, lightweight option compatible with the evolving Minuteman missile series, addressing limitations in earlier warheads like the used on initial Minuteman I deployments. The project aligned with broader efforts to improve payload efficiency and strategic deterrence reliability. Design responsibility for the nuclear physics package fell to (LLNL), which leveraged prior thermonuclear expertise from projects such as the for missiles. Sandia National Laboratories handled non-nuclear components, arming systems, and integration with the Mk-11 reentry vehicle. The initial design emphasized a compact two-stage thermonuclear configuration to achieve a nominal yield of 1.2 megatons while minimizing weight to approximately 600 pounds, enabling single-warhead carriage on solid-fuel ICBMs. This yield-to-weight optimization was critical for maintaining missile range and accuracy under reentry stresses. From 1960 to 1963, engineering focused on resolving challenges in fission-fusion staging, management, and environmental hardening against ICBM flight conditions. Prototype development incorporated and safety features, including insensitive high explosives to reduce accidental detonation risks. By late 1962, preliminary tests validated principles, paving the way for full-scale production starting in March 1963, with initial units slated for Minuteman II integration. The W56's origins reflected first-principles advancements in symmetry and boost gas utilization, though exact technical details remain partially classified.

Production and Testing Phase (1963-1965)

Production of the initial W56 Mod 1 variant commenced in March 1963 at facilities supporting , the warhead's designer. This phase aligned with the maturation of the Minuteman IB missile, for which the W56 provided a selectable yield up to 1.2 megatons in a lightweight package optimized for ICBM reentry vehicles. Early production efforts yielded several hundred units of Mods 1 through 3 by 1965, enabling initial stockpile integration and operational familiarization. Testing during 1963-1965 encompassed non-nuclear laboratory evaluations, environmental stress simulations, and integration trials with the to validate performance under launch, flight, and reentry conditions. These assessments confirmed the warhead's physics package reliability but highlighted deficiencies in inherent one-point safety, where a single-point failure in the primary could propagate to partial yield. Rather than halting production for redesign, mechanical safing mechanisms were retrofitted to mitigate risks, allowing continued buildup. By late 1965, testing data supported the transition to Minuteman II compatibility, though early Mods 1-3 faced eventual retirement in September 1966 due to persistent safety limitations unresolved without full nuclear revalidation. This period's outputs totaled approximately 350-400 early variant warheads, forming the backbone for subsequent modifications that extended service through the .

Evolution Through Variants (1966-1993)

The initial W56 variants, designated Models 0 through 3, were phased out of production and service by September 1966 after 545 units were manufactured in 1963, primarily due to the transition to improved designs compatible with ongoing Minuteman upgrades. These early models maintained a of 1.2 megatons and weighed 600 pounds, but were superseded to address evolving requirements for reliability and integration with the Minuteman II missile. Production shifted to the W56 Mod 4 variant starting in May 1967, with 455 units completed by May 1969, featuring an increased weight of 680 pounds while retaining the 1.2-megaton yield. This modification incorporated enhancements such as a honeycomb sleeve mounting system in the Mk-11 reentry vehicle to improve structural integrity and potentially , reflecting adaptations for hardened silo-based operations and countermeasures against emerging threats like systems. The Mod 4 was exclusively paired with Minuteman II ICBMs, deploying on 450 missiles across operational wings. The W56 Mod 4 remained the standard warhead for Minuteman II through the late , undergoing routine maintenance and stockpile surveillance without major redesigns until the early . of the variant commenced in 1991 as part of President George H.W. Bush's directives to reduce strategic forces, with full dismantlement completed by 1993 amid the phase-out of Minuteman II missiles, marking the end of W56 operational service after nearly three decades. This drawdown aligned with agreements and the post- shift toward lower-yield, MIRV-capable systems like the Minuteman III.

Technical Specifications and Design

Physics Package and Yield

The W56 physics package was a two-stage thermonuclear device, consisting of a boosted fission primary and a lithium-deuteride secondary configured in the Teller-Ulam geometry. This design enabled efficient energy release from a compact assembly, with the bare physics package weighing approximately 255 kilograms. The configuration prioritized high yield-to-weight performance to meet constraints, achieving a of 4.96 kilotons per kilogram of device mass, close to theoretical limits for unboosted efficiencies of the period. Operational variants of the W56 delivered a selectable or nominal of 1.2 megatons , suitable for hard-target penetration and area denial roles. Prototype testing validated the design, with the XW-56-X2 configuration detonating at 1.27 megatons during the shot of on July 30, 1962, confirming predictive modeling accuracy within declassified margins. All production models maintained this yield class across Mod 0 through Mod 4, despite modifications for and .

Modifications and Engineering Designations

The W56 thermonuclear warhead was developed and produced in four principal modifications, designated Mod 1 through Mod 4, to address evolving integration requirements and performance enhancements for . entered production in 1963 and was deployed on the , with approximately 545 units manufactured. followed for the same platform, maintaining the 1.2 megaton yield and core design parameters. Mod 3 was introduced for the LGM-30F Minuteman II, involving retrofits of existing Mod 2 warheads to incorporate engineering improvements, likely related to reliability and reentry vehicle compatibility with the Mk-11. Mod 4, produced in limited quantities of about 50 units, featured a heavier weight of 680 pounds compared to 600 pounds for Mods 1 through 3, possibly to accommodate additional hardening against environmental stresses such as effects. Overall, around 950 W56 warheads of all modifications were built between 1963 and 1991. Engineering phases utilized experimental designations like XW-56-X series, culminating in production Mark 56 configurations.

Reentry Vehicle Integration

The W56 warhead was integrated into the (Mk-11) reentry vehicle series for deployment on both Minuteman I and Minuteman II intercontinental ballistic missiles. The Mk-11, manufactured by Avco, encapsulated the single W56 physics package, providing an ablative and structural support necessary for atmospheric reentry at hypersonic speeds. The first production unit of the Mk-11 reentry vehicle, paired with the W56 yielding approximately 1.2 megatons, was completed in March 1963. Variants of the Mk-11 were developed to match the evolving missile configurations. For Minuteman I Block B (LGM-30B), the baseline Mk-11 and Mk-11A accommodated the W56, with the 's Model 1 through 3 variants weighing under 600 pounds. Minuteman II (LGM-30F) exclusively utilized the W56 with Mk-11B or Mk-11C reentry vehicles, incorporating the heavier Model 4 at 680 pounds to optimize mass at around 1,500 pounds total for the RV assembly. These later variants included enhancements such as Tracor Mk.1 decoys to penetrate Soviet defenses by simulating multiple targets. Integration ensured compatibility with the missile's post-boost vehicle, enabling precise release and orientation for inertial guidance during reentry. The Mk-11C, specifically, supported the Mk-11C reentry vehicle configuration on Minuteman II, achieving a of approximately 0.56 kilometers over ranges up to 12,600 kilometers. Testing validated this setup, with operational deployment beginning in August 1965 following successful flights incorporating the W56/Mk-11 combination.

Deployment and Operational Role

Arming on Minuteman I and II ICBMs

The W56 warhead, deployed within the Mk-11 reentry vehicle, was integrated into both Minuteman I (LGM-30A/B) and Minuteman II (LGM-30F) ICBMs, with arming managed by the missile's Set (MGS). Launch initiation required dual authorization from launch control centers, triggering an automated flight sequence including system diagnostics, silo door operation, and ignition. During boost phase, post-thrust termination and prior to reentry vehicle separation, the MGS evaluated trajectory data and environmental parameters; only upon confirming nominal performance did it transmit pre-arm signals to the RV, enabling conditional activation of the 's electrical systems while safing mechanisms remained engaged. Final arming transpired during RV reentry into the atmosphere, where altitude, velocity, and proximity sensors interfaced with the warhead's arming, fuzing, and firing (AF&F) assembly to sequence per the mission profile, typically at a preset burst altitude for optimal delivery. Safing and arming (S&A) devices within the Mk-11 RV enforced environmental and sequential interlocks, preventing premature arming absent proper boost-phase progression and reentry dynamics, thus mitigating risks of accidental high-explosive or during ground handling, storage, or aberrant flight paths. Early W56 variants on Minuteman I, introduced around , relied on these inertial and command-based safing protocols without permissive action links (), whereas the W56-4 on Minuteman II incorporated dual enablement and high-explosive insensitive formulations like PBX-9404, though still absent PALs for arming initiation. This design prioritized rapid silo-launched response times, with the full arming sequence completing in seconds during flight, supporting the missiles' operational deployment from 1965 onward across U.S. bases.

Strategic Deployment Numbers and Locations

The W56 warhead armed approximately 650 Minuteman IB intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and 450 Minuteman II ICBMs during its operational deployment phase. These numbers reflect the peak strategic force structure, with Minuteman IB deployments occurring primarily from the mid-1960s and Minuteman II achieving full operational capability by 1967. The warheads were integrated into silo-based launch facilities as part of the U.S. Air Force's land-based nuclear deterrent component. Deployment sites were concentrated in hardened underground silos dispersed across rural areas surrounding key operational bases to enhance survivability against preemptive strikes. Primary locations included Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana, Ellsworth Air Force Base in South Dakota, Grand Forks Air Force Base in North Dakota, and Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri. Each base typically supported multiple squadrons, with 50 silos per squadron under strategic missile wings such as the 341st at Malmstrom (150 missiles), 44th at Ellsworth (150 missiles), and 321st at Grand Forks (150 missiles), totaling the 450 Minuteman II deployments. Whiteman hosted an additional 150 Minuteman II silos until their deactivation in the late 1960s. Minuteman IB silos were similarly distributed, overlapping with early Minuteman force bases before full transition to the improved Minuteman II configuration.
Base LocationAssociated WingApproximate Silos with W56-Armed Missiles
Malmstrom AFB, Montana341st Strategic Missile Wing150 (Minuteman II)
Ellsworth AFB, 44th Strategic Missile Wing150 (Minuteman II)
Grand Forks AFB, 321st Strategic Missile Wing150 (Minuteman II)
Whiteman AFB, Missouri351st Strategic Missile Wing150 (Minuteman II, deactivated early)
This distribution ensured geographic redundancy and targeting flexibility within the U.S. nuclear posture, with silos spaced to minimize correlated damage from enemy attacks. Deployment numbers remained relatively stable until the late 1980s, when agreements and force modernization began reducing the active inventory.

Operational Readiness and Maintenance

The W56 warhead achieved high operational readiness as part of the Minuteman I and II forces, with approximately 400 missiles maintained on continuous alert status and 50 rotated annually through major depot-level maintenance cycles that included reentry vehicle exchanges. These procedures ensured integration remained functional, involving removal and replacement of the Mk-11 reentry system housing the W56 at Air Force facilities, followed by inspections for environmental degradation, electrical integrity, and security features. Stockpile surveillance under the Department of Energy's program sampled W56 units for non-destructive evaluations, component disassembly, and laboratory analysis to monitor material aging, such as high-explosive stability and case integrity, with no findings identified despite over 25 years in deployment. Reliability assessments, informed by flight and laboratory , confirmed the warhead's arming, fuzing, and firing systems operated as designed, supporting its role in strategic deterrence without reported systemic readiness shortfalls during active service from 1963 to the 1980s. A key validation occurred on April 22, 1986, during , when an aged W56—first deployed in 1963 and modified without additional nuclear tests—was subjected to an underground firing, the first since 1962; all systems functioned successfully, yielding the expected performance and demonstrating sustained reliability post-maturity. Maintenance extended to targeted interventions, such as addressing potential time-dependent reactions in shared components with other warheads, though non-nuclear hydrotesting and computational modeling sufficed for certification until retirement. Overall, these efforts maintained W56 readiness at levels consistent with U.S. confidence metrics, emphasizing empirical verification over untested assumptions.

Safety, Reliability, and Incidents

One-Point Safety Deficiencies

The W56 warhead, first deployed in 1965 on Minuteman II intercontinental ballistic missiles, predated the U.S. Department of Energy's 1968 requirement that all weapons in the achieve one-point safety, defined as producing no yield exceeding the equivalent of 4 pounds of if the high-explosive components detonate at any single point. This standard aimed to prevent accidental from partial or asymmetric high-explosive , such as in fires, impacts, or mishaps. The W56 lacked inherent one-point safety in its original physics package design, stemming from insufficient developmental testing to verify performance under one-point detonation scenarios. As one of only four U.S. designs documented to exhibit such deficiencies, it relied instead on retrofit mechanical safing devices—such as environmental sensing devices and exclusion mechanisms—to interrupt the arming sequence and prevent yield in accidents. These add-ons, while providing conditional protection, introduced reliability risks, including potential jamming from aging components or environmental exposure during stockpile storage. Compounding the issue, the W56 employed conventional high explosives rather than insensitive high explosives, which are less prone to accidental detonation from shocks, fires, or punctures—a feature absent in pre-1970s designs. Surveillance data from the highlighted gaps in historical records for W56 specifications, including incomplete tooling archives and unresolved surveillance findings related to aging, which could erode margins against one-point failure modes. A minor design modification, implemented without full-scale testing, eventually addressed the core one-point vulnerability by enhancing the assembly's tolerance to asymmetric initiation. These deficiencies contributed to heightened handling precautions during maintenance and contributed to incidents like the 2005 Pantex Plant near-miss, where improper tooling risked high-explosive detonation during warhead disassembly, though inherent safing features prevented a nuclear outcome. Overall, the W56's safety profile reflected early priorities favoring rapid deployment over comprehensive accident-proofing, with one-point risks mitigated reactively rather than through foundational design.

Accidental Events and Near-Misses

On December 5, 1964, at a Minuteman I missile (Lima-02) near in , maintenance personnel inadvertently triggered an explosion during routine work on the reentry vehicle. Two airmen used an incorrect screwdriver to access a panel, which caused a in the Mk-11 reentry vehicle to fire, severing the vehicle's connections and blowing off the missile's upper section. The reentry vehicle, containing a W56 with a yield of 1.2 megatons, dislodged and fell approximately 75 feet to the silo floor, sustaining damage but remaining intact without detonating its high explosives or nuclear components. Missileer Robert Hicks devised an improvised recovery using a cargo net lowered into the silo, successfully retrieving the warhead, which was then transported to for disassembly; no personnel injuries occurred, though the incident cost about $1.85 million in damages (adjusted to 2017 values). In March 2005, during disassembly operations at the Plant in , technicians encountered a procedural abnormality while separating a W56 subassembly. A faulty tool applied excessive force to the high-explosive components, snapping a part and risking an unintended of the conventional explosives, which could have endangered workers and caused localized but was unlikely to produce a nuclear yield due to the warhead's one-point safety features. The error stemmed from inadequate adherence to disassembly protocols for the aging W56 design, which predated modern insensitive high explosives and enhanced isolation measures. The Department of Energy fined $110,000 in November 2006 for the lapse, highlighting ongoing challenges in handling legacy warheads during retirement. These events underscored vulnerabilities in W56 handling, particularly its susceptibility to accidental high-explosive initiation despite design mitigations, though no radiological releases or detonations resulted. Declassified reports and investigations confirmed the warheads' resilience in both cases, attributing avoidance of to margins and rapid response protocols.

Enhancements and Mitigation Efforts

To address deficiencies in inherent one-point safety stemming from limited developmental testing, W56 warheads were retrofitted with mechanical safing mechanisms during their service life. These devices employed physical barriers, such as coiled metal ribbons positioned to interrupt the line-of-sight path between the X-unit initiator and the tamper core, preventing from a single-point high-explosive until intentional arming sequences were completed. This retrofit, implemented as a stockpile-wide modification, elevated the W56 to compliance with Department of Defense one-point safety criteria, defined as a probability of less than 1 in 10^6 for yielding more than 4 pounds of TNT-equivalent from accidental initiation. Further mitigation focused on procedural and environmental safeguards rather than design overhauls, given the warhead's pre-1970s vintage predating insensitive high explosives and enhanced electrical isolation standards. Operational protocols emphasized ground transport over air shipment to minimize accident risks, aligning with broader U.S. nuclear safety policies enacted in the 1960s and reinforced post-incidents like the 1966 Palomares B28 mishap, though not W56-specific. Reliability enhancements included periodic surveillance testing of sampled warheads for plutonium pit integrity and high-explosive aging, with data indicating sustained performance margins through the 1980s despite no full-yield nuclear testing after 1962. During the 1986-1993 phase-out alongside Minuteman II decommissioning, dismantlement procedures incorporated the SS-21 safety protocol, which sequenced high-explosive disassembly under inert atmospheres to avert risks identified in earlier W56 handling. This process, applied to over 400 remaining units, yielded documented safety improvements without yield-affecting modifications.

, Dismantlement, and Legacy

Phase-Out from Service (1980s-1993)

The W56 warhead, deployed exclusively on I and II intercontinental ballistic missiles, remained in operational service through the despite ongoing concerns over its one-point safety deficiencies and reliability under accident conditions. No significant reductions in W56 inventory occurred during that decade, as the Minuteman II force—totaling approximately 450 missiles equipped with around 455 W56 Mod 4 warheads—continued to form a key component of the U.S. strategic deterrent amid heightened tensions. The warhead's high yield of 1.2 megatons supported single reentry vehicle targeting strategies, but its design limitations, including lack of full one-point safety, were tolerated in the absence of immediate alternatives for maintaining megaton-class capabilities on aging boosters. Phase-out accelerated following the and subsequent U.S. strategic reassessments. On September 27, 1991, President issued Presidential Nuclear Initiatives directing the retirement of the entire Minuteman II fleet, including associated W56 warheads, as part of broader post-Cold War arsenal reductions aimed at de-escalating nuclear risks without compromising deterrence. This decision reflected a shift toward MIRV-equipped Minuteman III missiles carrying safer warheads (335 kilotons each, deployable in multiples), which offered improved accuracy, reliability, and compliance with emerging frameworks like , ratified in 1991. W56 warheads were systematically removed from operational Minuteman II missiles starting in late 1991, with the process involving missile deactivation, warhead extraction at bases, and to the Department of Energy's Pantex Plant in for storage pending formal retirement. By 1993, all W56 warheads had been retired from the active and reserve stockpiles, marking the end of their 30-year service life. This timeline aligned with the progressive emptying of 449 Minuteman II silos between 1993 and 1997, though the last operational Minuteman II launch was not until August 1995 at Malmstrom Air Force Base. Retirement was driven less by the W56's documented safety shortcomings—which had prompted earlier mitigation efforts like enhanced handling protocols—than by the obsolescence of the Minuteman II platform itself, unable to incorporate modern guidance or hardening upgrades cost-effectively. The phase-out reduced high-yield single-warhead options in the U.S. arsenal, prioritizing instead lower-yield, multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles for flexible counterforce targeting, though critics noted potential gaps in megaton-class deterrence until later W87 deployments on Minuteman III. Approximately 400 W56 units entered long-term storage post-retirement, with dismantlement deferred until the 2000s due to processing backlogs at Pantex.

Final Dismantlement Process (1993-2006)

Following the phase-out of the W56 s from active and reserve stockpiles by 1993, the remaining units—totaling approximately 300—were transferred to long-term storage at secure facilities pending final dismantlement. This process aligned with U.S. nuclear posture reductions post-Cold War, including obligations under agreements like , though full dismantlement extended beyond initial treaty timelines due to logistical and processing backlogs. Dismantlement operations commenced in the mid-1990s at the Pantex Plant near , the Department of Energy's primary site for warhead assembly and disassembly. The standard procedure involved four key phases: verification and staging of stored warheads, non-nuclear disassembly (including removal of high explosives and conventional components), separation of nuclear subassemblies such as the plutonium pit and uranium secondary, and final disposition of materials. High explosives were demilitarized and disposed of as hazardous waste, while reusable or storable components like electronics were evaluated for recycling or scrapping. Plutonium pits from the W56's primary stage were transported to the in , for material separation from highly enriched uranium components, a process that spanned four years for the full inventory due to specialized handling requirements. Nuclear materials post-separation, including and , were redirected to long-term storage at sites such as the , where they remain under safeguards for potential reuse or indefinite securement. reservoirs and other limited-life components were processed at facilities like the for isotope recovery or disposal. Throughout the 1993-2006 period, annual dismantlement rates varied, influenced by funding, workforce expertise, and safety protocols, with handling an average of dozens of W56 units yearly amid a broader reduction effort that dismantled over 13,000 warheads total by 2006. The final W56 warhead was dismantled at in June 2006, as announced by deputy administrator Everet H. Beckner, completing the eradication of this 1.2-megaton design from the U.S. arsenal. This milestone reflected enhanced verification techniques, including radiographic imaging and isotopic analysis, to ensure complete component accountability and prevent proliferation risks. No major accidents were publicly reported during W56-specific operations, though general concerns over one-point safety in older pits prompted cautious handling protocols derived from prior tests confirming low yield in accidental detonations.

Technological and Strategic Impact

The W56 thermonuclear warhead incorporated advanced design principles from , achieving a yield of 1.2 megatons in a lightweight package weighing 600 to 680 pounds across its variants. This resulted in a yield-to-weight efficiency of 4.9 kilotons per , among the highest recorded for U.S. devices, enabling compact integration with the Mk-11 reentry vehicle on Minuteman I and II intercontinental ballistic missiles. The design emphasized high fission-fusion efficiency, drawing on lessons from prior thermonuclear tests to optimize explosive power relative to mass, which reduced structural demands on missile airframes and improved overall system reliability under reentry stresses. Technologically, the W56 advanced U.S. capabilities in miniaturization and performance, influencing subsequent designs by demonstrating scalable thermonuclear primaries and secondaries suitable for solid-fuel ICBMs. Production spanned 1963 to 1969, yielding approximately 1,000 units, with Model 4 variants featuring enhanced arming mechanisms for compatibility with Minuteman II's rapid-response profile. Despite initial deficiencies in one-point —later addressed through retrofits—the 's operational deployment underscored progress in integrating interlocks with high-yield physics, setting precedents for future without full-scale testing. Strategically, the W56 fortified U.S. deterrence by equipping Minuteman missiles with potent single-warhead payloads, capable of targeting hardened Soviet or centers within 30 minutes of launch. Deployed across roughly 1,100 missiles in hardened silos, it enhanced second-strike assurance under principles, complicating adversary preemptive strategies due to the system's survivability and alert posture. This high-megatonnage configuration maintained U.S. parity in land-based forces amid escalating Soviet ICBM developments, prioritizing massive retaliatory potential over early MIRV proliferation until the Minuteman III transition. The warhead's retirement in the 1990s reflected shifts, yet its legacy persisted in shaping doctrines emphasizing reliable, high-confidence delivery of strategic effects.

References

  1. [1]
    Minuteman Missile Nuclear Warheads
    The W56 warhead was deployed with 650 Minuteman IB missiles and 450 Minuteman II missiles. Based on information available to the public, the W56 possessed one ...
  2. [2]
    Minuteman II | Missile Threat - CSIS
    Mar 22, 2017 · The RV had a W56 nuclear warhead with a yield of 1.2 MT. The missile had a length of 18.2 m, a maximum body diameter of 1.8 and a launch ...
  3. [3]
    Cold War nuclear warheads scrapped, say federal officials
    Aug 17, 2016 · The warheads were taken out of service in the early 1990s. It took four years for the U.S. Department of Energy's Y-12 Complex in Oak Ridge, ...
  4. [4]
    NNSA dismantles W56 nukes - UPI.com
    Jul 3, 2006 · The top official of the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration announced last week that the last W56 nuclear warhead has been ...
  5. [5]
    W56 Safety Problem? - Arms Control Wonk
    Dec 19, 2006 · The W56 is kind of famous (or infamous) because it is one of the four nuclear weapons designs to experience problems with one-point safety.
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Nuclear Chronology
    1963 . . . W48 155mm AFAP, W50 Pershing 1A Surface-to-Surface Missile (SSM), and W56 Minuteman II ICBM are fielded. 1963 . . . U.S. IRBMs are removed from ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  7. [7]
    W56 - Military Wiki - Fandom
    The W56 is an American thermonuclear warhead produced starting in 1963 which saw service until 1993, on the Minuteman I and II ICBMs.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] 2006 Annual Report - OSTI
    The W56, an intercontinental ballistic missile warhead that saw service until the early 1990s, was designed at Livermore.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Stockpile Confidence under a Nuclear Test Ban - Steve Fetter
    May 4, 2006 · The W56 warhead was also developed without enough tests to ensure in- herent one-point safety. It too was fitted with a mechanical safing ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    7.2 Declared States - The Nuclear Weapon Archive
    As of mid-year 1998 there were approximately 1500 weapons awaiting dismantlement of three types -- the W56 (Minuteman II), the W69 (SRAM) and the W79 (203mm ...<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Historical Nuclear Weapons - GlobalSecurity.org
    Sep 17, 2021 · W56 Mod.1, LGM-30B Minuteman I, 1.2 MT, 545. W56 Mod.2, LGM-30B Minuteman I, 1.2 MT, |||. W56 Mod.3, LGM-30F Minuteman II, 1.2 MT, |||. W56 Mod.
  12. [12]
    U.S. Nuclear Warheads, 1945-2009
    The US produced 66,500 nuclear warheads of 100 types since 1945, with 5,200 remaining in the stockpile. Only 15 of 100 types remain active.<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Retiring a Minuteman Missile - The Military Standard
    In 1991, President George Bush ordered the retirement of the entire Minuteman II fleet. Between 1993 and 1997, 449 Minuteman II silos were emptied and destroyed ...
  14. [14]
    Some Details on the W67/Mark 17 - Super Octopus
    Aug 13, 2022 · For example, the W56 warhead had a bare weight of about 255 kg (564 lb) and a yield of 1.27 Mt as tested in Dominic Bluestone, for a yield to ...
  15. [15]
    What is the yield of the most powerful nuke we could theoretically ...
    Jun 8, 2020 · The device was a W56 (Minuteman I and II warhead), weighing 270kg with a yield of 1.2 Mt (4.44 kt/kg). The B41 bomb with a yield of 25 Mt was ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] NRDC (Nuclear Program Document) - Nuke
    We assume each launch complex was targeted by eight Minuteman missiles, each carrying one W56 warhead (1- megaton yield). ***Two other Hen House radars were ...
  17. [17]
    Rocket Science and Russian Spies | American Scientist
    ... 1.2 megaton nuclear warhead, called a W56. The Minuteman II also was being designed to have a range of 7,000 nautical miles with an improved second stage ...
  18. [18]
    B83 physics package weight speculation : r/nuclearweapons - Reddit
    May 31, 2025 · Edit: the W56 mod 4 supposedly weighted 310kg, not 330. That's the final extra radiation hardened variant. u/kyletsenior avatar. kyletsenior.Can anyone confirm this? : r/nuclearweapons - RedditQuase Explosão Nuclear Acidental em Pantex : r/nuclearweaponsMore results from www.reddit.com
  19. [19]
    U.S. Nuclear Warheads, 1945-2009 - Sage Journals
    Jul 1, 2009 · The last of more than 1,000 nuclear weapons tests since 1945 was conducted in 1992, and new warhead production ceased in 1992.
  20. [20]
    W56 - Wikipedia
    The W56 was an American thermonuclear warhead produced starting in 1963 which saw service until 1993, on the Minuteman I and II ICBMs. W56.History · Mods and engineering names
  21. [21]
    MMI ICBM - Association of Air Force Missileers
    First Production Unit (FPU) of the Mk-11 re-entry vehicle (W56, 1.2Mt nuclear warhead) used on the Minuteman IB is produced by the Atomic Energy Commission ...
  22. [22]
    Reentry Vehicle, Mark 11, Nose Cap | National Air and Space Museum
    This is a Mark 11 reentry vehicle nose cap, made by Avco. Mark 11s housed the single nuclear warhead on US Air Force Minuteman I and II intercontinental ...
  23. [23]
    Minuteman 2
    Standard warhead: W56. Warhead yield: 1,200 KT. CEP: 0.56 km (0.34 mi). Boost Propulsion: Solid rocket. Maximum speed: 29,030 kph (18,030 mph) ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Minuteman Weapon System: History and Description
    It also generates missile steering commands and controls staging and thrust termination. Finally, the computer determines whether or not to provide pre-arm.
  25. [25]
    U.S. Nuclear Weapons Safety and Control Features
    Specifically,. PALs initiate the arming sequence of a nuclear warhead only ... W56-4/Minuteman II*. Dual LCC. No. PBX-9404. No. No. W62/Minuteman Ill*. Dual ...
  26. [26]
    Minuteman II Missile
    The Minuteman II, LGM-30F missile, had a number of significant improvements over the Minuteman I. The LGM-30F was a foot and a half taller.
  27. [27]
    Former Minuteman II Missile Sites | Missouri Department of Natural ...
    150 Minuteman II Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) silos and 15 launch control facilities spread over 14 counties of west central Missouri.Missing: W56 | Show results with:W56
  28. [28]
    Minuteman - Association of Air Force Missileers
    400 are kept on alert and 50 periodically rotated through major depot level maintenance.
  29. [29]
    Minuteman Missile Maintenance
    The maintenance team remove and replace missiles, reentry systems (warhead) and guidance sets; they repair any security system issues, command and control, ...Missing: W56 | Show results with:W56
  30. [30]
    [PDF] defense nuclearfacilities - Department of Energy
    Jul 15, 1999 · W56 Dismantlement Issues.​​ In light of recent difficulties with stuck threads on the W56 warhead radiation case, the staff reviewed the W56 WSS ...Missing: thermonuclear timeline
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Report to Congress on Stockpile Reliability, Weapon ... - OSTI.GOV
    Oct 12, 1987 · The reliability of U.S. nuclear weapons is cur- rently very high because we have been able to sustain a balanced program of weapons physics ...
  32. [32]
    None
    ### Summary of W56 Warhead Mentions
  33. [33]
    [PDF] NUCLEAR WARH EAD SAFETY - Science & Global Security
    It follows, within the limits of a modest number (10-20) of nuclear tests, that the safety of the stockpile can be improved so that all warheads in stock- pile ...
  34. [34]
    Stockpile Confidence under a Nuclear Test Ban - jstor
    The W56 warhead was also developed without enough tests to ensure in- herent ... clear testing that can be used to assess the reliability of old weapons.
  35. [35]
    Fifty-Three Years Ago, Minuteman I Disaster Averted
    Nov 21, 2017 · Ellsworth AFB, SD, averted a disaster in 1964 when a missileer named Bob Hicks climbed down the shaft of the missile silo to disarm a missile and recover the ...
  36. [36]
    R. K. Petersen, Sandia Corporation, “Report of Minuteman Accident ...
    Nov 18, 2022 · The RV and its 1.2 megaton W-56 nuclear warhead were dislodged in the explosion and fell 75 feet to the floor. Though damaged, a preliminary ...Missing: W56 | Show results with:W56
  37. [37]
    [PDF] September 25,2000 The Honorable John T. Conway Chairman 625 ...
    In addition, the Department has made substantial investments in the programs to dismantle W56 and W79 units.
  38. [38]
    LGM-30F Minuteman-II intercontinental ballistic missile | Missilery.info
    The combat unit was equipped with a combat unit W56-4, which had increased ... The control system provided considerably higher accuracy of firing in ...
  39. [39]
    Last of Cold War-era warheads scrapped - East Bay Times
    Aug 17, 2016 · The warheads were taken out of service in the early 1990s. It took ... W56, which has been out of the arsenal more than a decade. By ...
  40. [40]
    Complete List of All U.S. Nuclear Weapons
    Mar 30, 2023 · Manufactured 8/62 - 6/65; 350 produced; retirement (early mods) began 7/67, last 50 retired from active service (but retained in stockpile) in ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Disarmament Measures Taken by NPT Nuclear Weapon States
    -Dismantled the last W56 warhead for the Minuteman II. ICBM in June 2006.14. - Cancelled W-89, W-91 nuclear warheads in 1991.15. START I counting rules.
  42. [42]
    Minuteman Missile National Historic Site: Protecting a Legacy of the ...
    Mar 29, 2023 · The Minuteman was one of the most significant strategic weapons in U.S. history. With the turn of a key, the missile could deliver its ...