Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Wing wall

A wing wall is a retaining wall structure integral to bridge substructures, positioned at the ends of abutments to contain and stabilize the approach roadway embankment fill, thereby supporting the roadway while minimizing the volume of earth required and preventing soil erosion or lateral movement.^[1] These walls are typically constructed from reinforced concrete and can be either integral to the abutment or independent, depending on design needs, and they play a critical role in maintaining the structural integrity of bridges by retaining fill behind the abutment stem.^[2] Wing walls are essential components in civil engineering, particularly for highway and railway bridges, where they extend from the abutment to guide the transition from the elevated bridge deck to the ground level approach. Their primary functions include retaining soil, directing water flow away from the structure to reduce scour, and providing lateral support to the embankment, which enhances overall stability and longevity of the infrastructure.^[3] In addition to bridges, wing walls may be adapted for culverts or other retaining applications, but their most common use remains in abutment systems to balance construction costs with site-specific soil and geometric constraints.^[4] Design variations of wing walls are selected based on factors such as superstructure depth, site topography, and embankment height, with three principal types: extension wings, which project straight from the abutment parallel to the bridge centerline for simplicity but require more fill; return wings, which follow the superstructure's fascia to minimize fill volume at the expense of additional concrete; and flared wings, which angle outward to bisect the roadway berm and centerline for an optimal balance of cost and earth retention.^[1] Integral abutments often mandate extension wings to accommodate thermal movements, while flared configurations are prevalent in standard designs due to their efficiency in diverse conditions. Proper reinforcement, drainage provisions, and foundation detailing are vital to withstand lateral earth pressures, hydrostatic forces, and potential seismic loads.

Bridge Engineering

Definition and Components

A wing wall in bridge engineering is defined as a retaining wall that extends laterally from the ends of a bridge abutment, typically at an oblique angle, to support the approach roadway embankment and prevent soil erosion along the bridge approaches.^[6] These structures are essential substructure elements that transition the bridge to the surrounding terrain by containing fill material and stabilizing slopes.^[7] Wing walls originated in 19th-century bridge designs, where they were incorporated into abutments of early stone and timber structures to enhance embankment stability, as seen in numerous historic U.S. bridges from that era.^[8] The primary components of a wing wall include its connection to the abutment, which is usually integral for load transfer; the wall face, a vertical or slightly battered surface that directly retains the soil; the backfill interface, where compacted earth or granular material is placed behind the wall to distribute loads; the foundation footing, often shared with the abutment for support against settlement; and internal reinforcement, such as steel rebar embedded in concrete to resist tensile forces from earth pressure.^[9]^[10] In typical configurations, wing wall height aligns with the abutment height to ensure uniform embankment support, while lengths are determined by site-specific slope and soil conditions. For instance, in standard reinforced concrete designs, wall thickness is commonly 1 foot, with footings extending 2.5 to 3 feet in depth for foundational stability.^[9] These elements collectively form a cohesive unit that also aids in directing water flow away from the abutment.^[7]

Functions in Bridge Structures

Wing walls in bridge structures primarily function to retain the approach roadway fill material, thereby containing the embankment and preventing lateral spread of soil behind the abutments.^[11] They also direct water flow under the bridge openings, guiding stream currents away from the abutment foundations to reduce turbulence and associated erosion.^[12] Additionally, wing walls stabilize the abutments by resisting lateral earth pressures exerted by the retained fill and any surcharge from traffic loads on the approaches.^[11] These components offer several key benefits, including the reduction of settlement risks in the approach embankments by ensuring uniform compaction and load support.^[11] Wing walls enhance the overall load distribution from the bridge superstructure to the foundation by providing a rigid extension that transfers horizontal forces effectively into the soil.^[12] Furthermore, they minimize erosion at the bridge ends by channeling high-velocity flows and protecting the embankment toes from scour, particularly when combined with armoring like riprap.^[12] In skewed bridges, where the alignment crosses the waterway at an oblique angle, wing walls are typically splayed or flared to better align with the natural flow direction, thereby avoiding hydraulic issues such as increased shear stresses or localized scour hotspots.^[12] The 2015 collapse of the Tex Wash Bridge over Interstate 10 in California was partly due to inadequate wing wall design, as the perpendicular orientation to flood flows exacerbated scour and led to embankment failure during a severe storm event.^[13]

Classification

By Geometry

Wing walls in bridge engineering are classified by their geometry, which refers to their shape and orientation relative to the bridge abutment and roadway alignment, influencing how they integrate with the surrounding embankment. This classification helps engineers select designs that accommodate site-specific conditions such as skew angles and terrain constraints, ensuring structural efficiency and minimal disruption to natural flow patterns. Straight wing walls, also known as parallel wing walls, extend perpendicular to the abutment face and run parallel to the roadway direction. They are typically employed in bridges with minimal or zero skew angles, where the roadway alignment is straightforward. The primary advantage of this geometry is its simplicity in design and construction, allowing for straightforward reinforcement and formwork. However, straight wing walls can experience higher lateral earth pressures due to their direct confrontation with the embankment soil, potentially requiring thicker sections or additional reinforcement to maintain stability. Splayed or flared wing walls diverge outward from the abutment at an angle, commonly between 15 and 45 degrees relative to the abutment face. This configuration is particularly effective for directing embankment fill material away from the bridge structure and facilitating the natural diversion of surface water runoff, thereby reducing hydrostatic pressures on the wall. By angling outward, splayed walls effectively lower the retained soil height at the abutment interface, which can decrease the overall structural demands compared to straight designs. Return wing walls feature a curved or folded-back profile that bends toward the embankment, often forming a U-shape or returning parallel to the roadway after an initial flare. These are suited for bridges with sharp skew angles exceeding 30 degrees or in constrained urban environments where space is limited and direct extension might encroach on adjacent properties. The return geometry minimizes the footprint while providing a smoother transition to the natural ground, though it may introduce complexities in earth pressure distribution due to the curvature. Selection of wing wall geometry depends primarily on the bridge's skew angle and the embankment slope. Straight walls are preferred for low skew angles on moderate slopes, while splayed designs are recommended for moderate to high skews to better accommodate oblique alignments and reduce soil thrust. In cases of steep embankments or severe skews, return walls offer optimal adaptation by aligning more closely with the terrain, as outlined in standard highway design guidelines. These choices also briefly support functional benefits, such as improved water guidance along the structure.

By Construction Type

Wing walls in bridge engineering are classified by construction type based on their structural integration with the abutment, which influences load transfer, movement accommodation, and suitability for site conditions. The primary types include cantilevered, free-standing, and hybrid configurations, each addressing different requirements for support and durability.^[14]^[15] Cantilevered wing walls are constructed monolithically with the abutment, relying on a moment-resisting connection to transfer loads directly from the wing to the abutment stem. This design treats the wing as a horizontal cantilever extending from the abutment body, typically limited to lengths of 6 to 8 feet for straight or U-back configurations to prevent excessive deflection. Reinforcement layout includes vertical torsion blocks at the corners to resist high torsional moments, with additional #5 bars lap-spliced to horizontal reinforcement in the abutment and wing, alongside 5 #8 or #9 bars for tension and bi-axial bending per AASHTO LRFD specifications. Such walls are suitable for short spans and high earth pressures, providing a rigid system that settles as a unit with the abutment.^[15]^[14]^[16] Free-standing wing walls function as independent structures tied to the abutment via construction joints, allowing differential settlement and designed as nominal cantilever retaining walls with separate foundations. This approach accommodates longer extensions than cantilevered designs, and includes expansion joints—such as 1-inch preformed fillers or tooth joints—to permit thermal and seismic movements without stressing the main abutment. They are preferred in seismic zones for their flexibility, as the independent support reduces the risk of cracking from differential displacements during earthquakes, requiring seismic analysis in design categories C or D.^[14]^[15]^[17] In integral abutments, cantilevered wing walls are preferred over free-standing types to eliminate joints and simplify construction, enhancing overall structural integrity by minimizing potential leak paths and movement interfaces. Hybrid types combine elements of both, such as cantilevered sections transitioning to free-standing for extended lengths on complex sites with varying topography or load demands, allowing optimized support while balancing rigidity and flexibility.^[16]^[15]

Design and Construction

Materials and Specifications

Wing walls in bridge engineering are predominantly constructed using reinforced concrete, which provides the necessary strength and durability to withstand soil pressures and environmental loads. The concrete typically achieves a compressive strength of 4,000 to 5,000 psi, ensuring structural integrity while allowing for economical construction.^[18] This material choice aligns with standard practices outlined in state department of transportation guidelines, where 4,000 psi is commonly specified for wing walls and headwalls in reinforced concrete structures.^[18] For historic bridges, masonry—often stone or brick—is used for wing walls, offering aesthetic continuity and proven longevity in older designs. These materials were selected for their availability and resistance to weathering prior to the widespread adoption of reinforced concrete.^[19] In modern applications seeking lightweight alternatives, geosynthetic-reinforced soil systems incorporate geotextiles or geogrids within compacted soil to form wing walls, reducing material volume and construction time in geotechnically challenging sites.^[20] Key specifications for reinforced concrete wing walls follow AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 10th edition (2024), mandating a minimum concrete cover of 2 to 3 inches over reinforcement to protect against corrosion and environmental exposure. Reinforcing bars are typically Grade 60 deformed steel, providing a yield strength of 60,000 psi for adequate tensile capacity. Drainage provisions, such as weep holes spaced at maximum 3 meters horizontally and positioned to avoid reinforcement, are required to relieve hydrostatic pressure behind the walls and prevent water buildup.^[21]^[22]^[23] Precast concrete panels are increasingly employed for wing walls in urban bridge projects, enabling rapid on-site installation—often in a single day—due to their factory fabrication and modular assembly, which minimizes traffic disruptions. In coastal environments, epoxy-coated reinforcing bars are specified to enhance corrosion resistance against saltwater exposure, extending the service life of the structure by forming a barrier that inhibits chloride ingress.^[24]^[25] Thicknesses for wing walls vary depending on height, jurisdiction, and design standards; for example, Texas DOT guidelines specify thicknesses from 10 inches for heights around 3 feet to 34 inches for heights approaching 10 feet, balancing structural demands with constructability and ensuring sufficient rigidity while optimizing material use in low- to medium-height applications.^[26]

Load Analysis and Stability

Wing walls in bridge structures are subjected to various lateral and vertical loads that must be analyzed to ensure structural integrity. The primary lateral load is earth pressure from the retained soil, typically calculated using the active Rankine earth pressure theory for cohesionless backfill. This theory assumes a vertical wall face and horizontal backfill surface, with the soil reaching a state of plastic equilibrium where the lateral stress is minimized. The active earth pressure coefficient K_a is derived from Mohr's circle analysis, considering the soil's internal friction angle \phi, and is given by

K_a = \frac{1 - \sin \phi}{1 + \sin \phi}

For typical granular soils with \phi ranging from 30° to 35°, K_a values are approximately 0.3 to 0.27. The total active earth pressure force P per unit length of the wall acts triangularly, increasing linearly with depth, and is computed as

P = \frac{1}{2} K_a \gamma H^2

where \gamma is the soil unit weight and H is the height of the retained soil. This force is applied at H/3 above the base of the wing wall footing for stability evaluations. In wing wall design, H includes the abutment height plus any approach embankment, and the pressure distribution is integrated with the abutment to assess combined effects.^[27] Additional loads include surcharge from traffic, which induces extra lateral pressure on the backfill. Per AASHTO LRFD specifications, 10th edition (2024), this is modeled as an equivalent soil height or uniform pressure \Delta p = K_a \times surcharge intensity, often 2 feet of soil equivalent for highway loads (Section 3.11.6.4). Hydrostatic pressure from groundwater must also be considered if the water table rises behind the wall, adding a uniform triangular or trapezoidal load per AASHTO Section 3.11.5, with magnitude \frac{1}{2} \gamma_w h_w^2 where \gamma_w is water unit weight and h_w is submerged height; drainage systems like weep holes are typically incorporated to mitigate this. Seismic loads are evaluated using AASHTO Section 3.10, incorporating horizontal acceleration coefficients to amplify earth pressures via Mononobe-Okabe modifications to Rankine theory for dynamic cases, particularly in higher seismic zones.^[28] Stability against these loads is verified through checks for sliding, overturning, and bearing capacity at the footing level. For sliding, the factor of safety (FS) is the ratio of resisting friction (base area times soil resistance) to driving horizontal forces (earth pressure plus surcharge and seismic), required to exceed 1.5 under service loads. Overturning stability compares resisting moments (from self-weight and vertical loads) to overturning moments (from lateral forces), with FS > 2.0 mandated to prevent rotation about the toe. Bearing capacity ensures the soil beneath the footing can support eccentric vertical loads without excessive settlement or failure, using AASHTO Section 10.6.3 with ultimate capacity q_u = c N_c + \gamma D N_q + 0.5 \gamma B N_\gamma adjusted for eccentricity, typically limited to 5-10 ksf for allowable pressures. These checks are performed at strength limit states with load factors, though traditional FS criteria are applied in serviceability assessments for wing walls integrated with abutments.^[28] Integrated analysis of wing walls with abutments often employs specialized software such as FB-MultiPier, a nonlinear finite element program that models soil-structure interactions, including p-y curves for lateral soil resistance and combined loading effects, to simulate real-world behavior under static and dynamic conditions.^[29]

Other Applications

In Culverts and Retaining Systems

Wing walls in culverts serve a scaled-down role compared to their application in bridges, primarily retaining embankment fill around pipe or box culverts to prevent erosion and maintain structural integrity in low-flow waterways such as small streams or ditches. These structures are typically integrated with headwalls at the inlet and outlet ends, flaring outward to direct flow and stabilize the surrounding soil, with designs often following hydraulic optimization principles to minimize head loss and scour. For instance, box culverts commonly feature wing walls flared at 30 to 75 degrees for improved performance, as outlined in Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) hydraulic design criteria.^[30]^[31] As standalone retaining systems, wing walls are employed on slopes adjacent to roads or railways, where they absorb lateral soil pressure from embankments without supporting any superstructure, thereby providing cost-effective stabilization for earth retention in infrastructure projects. These applications are particularly suited to low-volume roads, where wing walls transition fill slopes and prevent lateral movement, often designed as cantilever or gravity types with considerations for backfill drainage and compaction to ensure long-term stability. Heights for such standalone wing walls in retaining contexts are generally limited to under 20 feet to rely on semi-empirical design methods, avoiding the need for more complex analyses.^[32] In both culvert and standalone retaining applications, geogrid reinforcement enhances wing wall performance for higher embankments, offering a cost-effective alternative by reducing material use and construction time—often by up to 50% compared to conventional concrete systems—while improving resistance to seismic and hydraulic loads. FHWA guidelines highlight geogrid-reinforced soil (GRS) wing walls in systems like the Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Integrated Bridge System (GRS-IBS), adaptable to culverts and embankments, where layers of geogrid (e.g., with tensile strengths of 2400–4800 lbs/ft) are placed at spacings of 12 inches or less to encapsulate soil and extend into slopes for erosion control. Connections in culvert wing walls vary by construction method: cast-in-place for monolithic integration in smaller installations, or bolted steel plates for precast elements to accommodate modular assembly and differential settlement.^[33]^[34]^[35]

Architectural and Landscaping Uses

In architecture, the term "wing wall" may refer more broadly to short walls that project from a main structure, such as a building facade, to define boundaries, provide privacy, or enhance aesthetics, distinct from their primary use as retaining structures in civil engineering.^[36]^[37] These are often seen flanking entryways or steps in residential designs to create a sense of enclosure and symmetry. In landscaping, wing walls can serve as low retaining elements for terracing sloped sites, managing soil retention in gardens or around patios while integrating with hardscape features for erosion control and visual appeal.^[38] They may be finished with materials like stone to blend with natural surroundings, though such applications emphasize decorative and functional harmony over structural demands.

References

[1]
[PDF] CHAPTER 3 SUBSTRUCTURES - Maine.gov
Mar 1, 2007 · 3.2.4 Wingwalls. 3.2.4.1 General Definition. The term “wingwall” (commonly expressed simply as “wing”) refers to a retaining wall that serves ...
[2]
[PDF] Glossary - nysdot
Apr 1, 2006 · hydrostatic pressure. Wingwall. A retaining wall placed adjacent to an abutment stem to retain the fill behind an abutment (see in-line ...
[3]
[PDF] Chapter 630 Wingwalls - WSdot.com
Apr 1, 2016 · The standard wingwall design utilizes pile fixity in the soil and one or more non-rigid diaphragms at the top of the reaction piles to achieve ...
[4]
[PDF] item 466 - headwalls and wingwalls
Headwalls are walls at the ends of pipe culvert structures, while wingwalls are walls at the ends of box culvert structures.
[5]
Common Bridge Terms | Missouri Department of Transportation
Wing Walls The retaining wall extension of an abutment intended to retain the side slope material of an approach roadway embankment. Missouri Department of ...
[6]
FHWA-HRT-04-098-Chapter 7. Foundations-Covered Bridge ...
Apr 23, 2012 · At the sides of each abutment (upstream and downstream), wing walls were built to retain the soil of the approach embankment. The wings may be ...
[7]
[PDF] Historic Bridges of Pennsylvania
Apr 9, 2025 · Nineteenth century bridge engineer Gustav Lindenthal discussed suspension bridge history in an 1898 “Engineering. Magazine” article:.
[8]
[PDF] CHAPTER 11.1 ABUTMENTS - Caltrans
Abutments are the substructure components at the ends of a bridge used to transfer the loads from the superstructure to foundations, support approach slabs, ...
[9]
None
### Summary of Wingwalls in Bridge Engineering
[10]
[PDF] WisDOT Bridge Manual Chapter 12 – Abutments
Wing walls are designed as retaining walls. Earth loads and surcharge loads are applied to wing walls similar to how they are applied to the stem of a ...
[11]
[PDF] Handbook of Scour Countermeasures Designs - NJ.gov
The bridge Tributary to Lamington River has vertical wall abutments with wing walls. During normal flows the west abutment extends 2 ft into the flow, but ...
[12]
[PDF] Failure Analysis of Flood Collapse of the Tex Wash Bridge - Avestia
Mar 31, 2016 · The analysis showed that all of these four design flaws contributed to the collapse. Had there been proper retaining walls, or wing walls almost ...
[13]
Wing Walls in Bridges - Structville
Sep 6, 2022 · The foundation for free-standing wing walls is independent from the main abutment and is designed as a nominal cantilever retaining wall. In ...
[14]
[PDF] ABUTMENTS CHAPTER 17 - Virginia Department of Transportation
Oct 30, 2020 · free-standing retaining wall. If not, an independent retaining wall system, which does not move, shall be considered. ABUTMENTS. FULL ...
[15]
[PDF] ATINER's Conference Paper Proceedings Series CIV2018-0094 ...
Sep 20, 2018 · Cantilever wing walls are built integral with the abutment and are much more commonly used than independent wing walls in integral abutment.
[16]
[PDF] Bridge Manual - Part 1 - Chapter 3: Bridge Design Guidelines
3.4.9.1 For wingwalls and free-standing retaining walls classified as SDC A or B a seismic analysis is not required. For walls classified as SDC C or D, the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[17]
[DOC] RSP/ 723-R-282F
The minimum design concrete compressive strength for structure sections shall be 5,000 psi (35 000 kPa) and for wingwalls, and headwalls it shall be 4,000 psi ...Missing: rebar | Show results with:rebar
[18]
Wing Walls: Importance and Repair - Stone Arch Bridges
Aug 25, 2020 · Many stone arch bridges were designed with wing walls. The wing walls are essentially retaining walls that keep the soil along the stream from slumping into ...
[19]
[PDF] Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Integrated Bridge System Synthesis ...
GRS abutment: A GRS system designed and built to support a bridge. Usually, GRS abutments have three sides: the abutment face wall and two wing walls. All GRS ...
[20]
[PDF] Chapter 5 Concrete Structures - Bridge Design Manual M 23-50
Feb 1, 2025 · Design shall be in accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Guide Specifications for GRFP-Reinforced Concrete, 2nd. Edition. Because GFRP ...
[21]
[PDF] Section 15 Concrete Reinforcement - nysdot
Jan 1, 2008 · Reinforcing Bar Guidelines. Grade 60 is the standard strength reinforcing bar to be used on Department projects. Grade 75 reinforcing bar is ...
[22]
[PDF] reinforced concrete box culvert general notes
WEEP HOLES IN WINGWALLS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL SPACING OF 3m AND SHALL. BE SPACED TO CLEAR ALL REINFORCING STEEL. THERE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWO (2).Missing: wing | Show results with:wing
[23]
Bridge, Box & Wing Walls - Lindsay Precast
Lindsay Precast concrete box culvert and arch bridge provides fast and easy installation and proven durability in a variety of shapes, sizes and treatments.Missing: rapid | Show results with:rapid
[24]
Epoxy Coated Rebar - CMC Commercial Metals
Epoxy coated rebar provides an economical solution for corrosion resistance and extended service life over standard steel rebar, and is available in A615 ...Missing: wing | Show results with:wing
[25]
[PDF] CONCRETE WINGWALLS PW
WING DIMENSION FORMULAS: = 90° - skew. 4. (Showing wing reinforcement ... 1'-0" typical. 2'-3" when the Box Culvert Rail Mounting Details (RAC) will be ...
[26]
[PDF] FHWA-NHI-10-024.pdf
Nov 1, 2009 · Rankine active earth pressure coefficient, Ka. The Rankine active earth pressure theory assumes lateral pressure is independent of backfill ...
[27]
LRFD Steel Girder SuperStructure Design Example - Structures
Jun 27, 2017 · This abutment and wingwall design example is based on AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (through 2002 interims).
[28]
Products - Bridge Software Institute - University of Florida
FB-MultiPier is a nonlinear finite element analysis program capable of analyzing multiple bridge pier structures interconnected by bridge spans.
[29]
Effects of Inlet Geometry on Hydraulic Performance of Box Culverts
RECOMMENDATIONS · Box, reinforced concrete · 30° flared wingwalls, top edge beveled at 45° · 0° flared wingwalls, extended sides.
[30]
[PDF] Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts - PDH Online
This document covers culvert design, hydrologic analysis, storage routing, inlet/outlet control, and critical depth design for highway culverts.
[31]
[PDF] Retaining Wall Design Guide
It serves as a technical reference, summarizing the fundamentals of design for retaining walls used by low volume road agencies. The design guide presents a ...
[32]
[PDF] FHWA-HRT-17-080
7.9.3 Wing Walls and Parapets. Wing walls and parapets are constructed after the superstructure is set. The CMU block in the parapet wall should be trimmed ...
[33]
[PDF] WINGWALLS AND HEADWALLS FOR PRECAST CONCRETE BOX ...
Dec 1, 2003 · Precast wingwalls shall be connected with bolted steel plates. Steel used in bolted connections of wingwalls to box culvert sections shall be in.
[34]
[PDF] HIGHWAY DESIGN MANUAL Chapter 19 Concrete Culverts ... - nysdot
May 19, 2011 · A wingwall is a retaining wall placed adjacent to a culvert to retain fill and to a lesser extent direct water. Wingwalls may be cast-in-place ...
[35]
Brick Steps with Wing Walls: 5 Best Tips for 2024 Success
Aug 29, 2024 · The wing walls, flanking the steps, create a grand entrance that improves the curb appeal of any home. They can be straight or curved, depending ...
[36]
Wing Walls and Half Walls - Redemption Brick Block Stone
Wing walls, also known as flanking walls, are short walls that extend outward from a main structure, such as a house, entrance gate, or driveway. They are often ...Missing: residential | Show results with:residential
[37]
Wing Wall Construction and Repair - Thrasher Foundation Repair
Oct 26, 2015 · The most recognizable wing walls are found on the sides of bridges that transition from the grade of the road to the grade of the pathway below.<|separator|>
[38]
Eco-Friendly Landscaping & Stone Veneer Ideas That Rock
1. Match Existing Siding to Exterior Stone · 2. Pick Plants That Complement Stone Color · 3. Opt for Water-Wise Herbs, Grasses and Succulents · 4. Use Stone Veneer ...
[39]
Retaining Walls and Sustainable Landscaping: An Eco-Friendly ...
Dec 30, 2023 · Permeable designs, however, allow water to pass through, reducing the risk of runoff and soil erosion. Incorporating permeable materials or ...Missing: wing | Show results with:wing