Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Soil

Soil is the unconsolidated upper layer of the Earth's crust, composed primarily of mineral particles derived from weathered rock, organic matter from decomposed organisms, water, and air, forming a dynamic medium that interfaces the lithosphere, hydrosphere, atmosphere, and biosphere. A typical soil profile by volume comprises about 45% inorganic minerals, 5% organic material, 25% water, and 25% air, with variations depending on environmental conditions. Soil develops through pedogenic processes governed by five state factors—parent material, climate, organisms, relief (topography), and time—as quantitatively modeled by pedologist Hans Jenny in his foundational work on soil formation. Essential to terrestrial ecosystems, soil supports plant growth by supplying water, nutrients, and anchorage; regulates hydrological cycles and carbon sequestration; and sustains biodiversity through microbial and faunal communities. In agriculture, fertile soils underpin global food production, providing 98.8% of human caloric intake via crop cultivation, though intensive practices can lead to degradation if not managed sustainably.

Definition and Importance

Definition of Soil

Soil, in the discipline of , is defined as the unconsolidated or material on the immediate surface of the that has been subjected to pedogenic processes, resulting in distinct horizons or layers distinguishable from underlying through additions, losses, transfers, and transformations of and . This definition, adopted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (NRCS), emphasizes soil as a natural body capable of supporting rooted in a , occupying space on the land surface, and comprising solids ( and ), liquids, and gases. The of similarly describes soil as layers of loose and/or material affected by physical, chemical, and biological processes at or near the Earth's surface, typically to a depth of about 1 to 2 meters where roots and soil organisms are active. Fundamentally, soil forms a three-phase system: solid particles (approximately 45-50% by volume, including weathered minerals like sand, silt, and clay, and organic matter from decomposed biota), pore spaces filled with water and air (collectively 50-55%), and biotic components such as bacteria, fungi, protozoa, nematodes, and plant roots that drive nutrient cycling and decomposition. Unlike mere sediment or regolith, which lack significant biological alteration, soil exhibits pedogenic organization, with horizons reflecting differential accumulation of clays, humus, salts, or carbonates due to weathering, leaching, and biogenic activity over timescales ranging from centuries to millennia. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations defines soil as a natural body composed of layers (horizons) of mineral and organic constituents, serving as the medium for plant growth while regulating water, solute, and gas exchange in the pedosphere. This pedogenic distinction underscores soil's role as a dynamic interface between , , atmosphere, and , where physical fragmentation of by freeze-thaw cycles or root wedging, chemical via acids from organic decay, and biological contributions from collectively engender its fertility and structure. Quantitatively, fertile horizons often contain 1-6% by weight, which enhances retention (up to 20 times its weight in ) and , critical for , though this varies by climate and —arid soils may hold less than 0.5% organics, while humid soils exceed 5%. Such properties emerge not from static composition but from ongoing processes, rendering soil a rather than a uniform entity, with depth typically extending to the zone of genetic influence, often 1-2 meters, beyond which or predominates.

Ecological and Civilizational Role

Soil functions as the primary medium for growth, anchoring and facilitating uptake essential for and ecosystem productivity. It sustains a vast array of organisms, serving as for approximately 59% of global , ranging from microorganisms to larger and influencing aboveground through symbiotic interactions like mycorrhizal networks. Beyond supporting and , soil regulates hydrological cycles by infiltrating and filtering water, thereby mitigating floods, maintaining , and improving through pollutant adsorption and microbial degradation. Soils also play a critical role in biogeochemical cycles, particularly , where they store about 2,500 gigatons of organic carbon—roughly three times the amount in the atmosphere—primarily through microbial processing of residues and exudates into stable forms. This storage capacity buffers atmospheric CO2 levels, while and cycling in soil supports and prevents in downstream waters. As a dynamic interface, soil hosts decomposers that recycle , releasing nutrients for reuse and suppressing pathogens, thereby enhancing resilience against disturbances like or . In civilizational development, fertile soils underpinned the transition from societies to during the around 10,000 BCE, enabling crop domestication in regions like the and generating surpluses that supported , , and complex social structures. However, mismanagement leading to and fertility loss has precipitated declines in multiple historical societies; for instance, intensive Maya in the from 250–900 CE caused widespread soil degradation and accelerated , contributing to agricultural shortfalls amid climatic variability and eventual . Similarly, imperial expansion depleted Mediterranean soils by the 1st century CE, forcing reliance on grain imports and weakening . Today, global soil degradation affects 33% of land, eroding at rates up to 100 times natural formation in agricultural areas, threatening food production for 8 billion people and underscoring the causal link between soil stewardship and civilizational sustainability.

Formation and Pedogenic Processes

Factors Influencing Soil Formation

The formation of soil, or pedogenesis, results from the interaction of five primary state factors—, , (biota), (topography), and time—as formalized in Hans Jenny's quantitative model, which treats soil as a function of these variables: S = f(cl, o, r, p, t), where interactions among them drive , organic accumulation, translocation, and horizon differentiation. These factors operate causally through physical, chemical, and biological processes, with providing the initial substrate and the others modulating rates of transformation; for instance, empirical studies confirm that variations in these factors explain up to 70-80% of soil property differences across landscapes in controlled chronosequences. Parent material, the unweathered geologic deposit (e.g., , , or ) from which soil derives, fundamentally determines initial , , and reserves; granitic materials yield coarse, quartz-rich sands with low fertility due to slow of resistant feldspars, whereas basaltic parent rocks produce finer-textured, clay-rich soils with higher base saturation from rapid release of magnesium and calcium. Calcium-rich lithologies, such as , enhance soil carbon by 33%, total by 58%, and by 55% compared to silica-dominated materials, as they buffer and support microbial activity, though this effect diminishes over time with . Marine or lacustrine sediments often result in soils with elevated salinity and finer particles, influencing early pedogenic pathways like gleysols in waterlogged settings. Climate exerts control via temperature, which accelerates rates (doubling roughly every 10°C rise per van't Hoff rule) and , which drives and ; in tropical regions with >2000 mm annual rainfall, silicate depletes bases, forming highly acidic , while arid zones (<500 mm) favor physical disintegration and carbonate accumulation, yielding calcisols with shallow, saline profiles. Formation rates increase exponentially in warm, humid conditions—up to 0.1-1 mm/year depth gain—versus near-zero in polar deserts, with 's erosive force redistributing fines downslope and amplifying topographic effects. Observed shifts, such as 8-21% projected erosion increases under warming scenarios, underscore climate's dominant role in modulating long-term soil stability. Organisms, encompassing vegetation, microbes, and fauna, actively engineer through organic matter inputs (e.g., 1-5% annual litterfall in forests boosting humus), bioturbation (earthworms translocating 20-50 tons/ha/year), and biochemical alterations; mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria decompose recalcitrant organics, cycling 90% of nitrogen via fixation and mineralization, while conifer roots acidify profiles to pH 4-5 via organic acids, promoting podzolization. In grasslands, grazing mammals enhance aeration and nutrient turnover, fostering with granular structure, but microbial communities in early —dominated by phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria—can increase bioavailable P by 20-30% in nascent soils. These biotic influences interact with climate, as warmer conditions amplify decomposition rates by 2-3 fold, though overgrazing or deforestation can reverse gains by exposing mineral horizons. Relief, or topography, governs gravitational redistribution of water, sediments, and solutes; steep slopes (>15%) accelerate , limiting soil depth to <50 cm and favoring entisols with minimal horizonation, whereas footslopes and depressions trap colluvium, enabling argillic horizons via illuviation at rates of 0.01-0.1 mm/year. Aspect modulates insolation—south-facing slopes in the Northern Hemisphere experience 20-30% higher evapotranspiration, yielding drier, warmer microsites with accelerated organic decay—while elevation gradients alter precipitation by 10-20% per 100 m rise, influencing redox and clay migration. In zero-order watersheds, convergent topography concentrates biota and moisture, hastening pedogenesis compared to divergent crests. Time integrates these factors, permitting cumulative changes; immature soils form within decades post-disturbance (e.g., volcanic tephras developing in 100-500 years), but mature profiles require 10,000-100,000 years for B-horizon clay accumulation exceeding 20%, with equilibrium states where addition balances loss. Chronosequences reveal logarithmic development—rapid initial gains in organic matter (peaking at 5-10 ka) slow as substrates deplete—though catastrophic events like reset clocks, as seen in Holocene soils averaging 3-5 ka age in glaciated midlatitudes. Human acceleration via tillage can mimic millennia of natural mixing but often depletes structure, highlighting time's role in stable horizonation.

Key Pedogenic Processes


Pedogenic processes encompass the fundamental mechanisms driving soil development from parent material, categorized into four primary types: additions, losses, translocations, and transformations. These processes operate concurrently under the influence of environmental factors, leading to horizon differentiation and soil profile maturation over timescales ranging from centuries to millennia. Additions involve the influx of new materials, primarily at the soil surface, such as atmospheric dust deposition, organic matter from plant litter and root exudates, and precipitation-borne ions. In arid regions, aeolian dust can contribute up to 20-50% of fine soil fractions in some profiles, enhancing fertility.
Losses refer to the removal of soil constituents, occurring via surface erosion, leaching of soluble salts and bases, or volatilization of gases like nitrogen oxides. Leaching predominates in humid climates, where percolating water extracts cations such as calcium and magnesium, potentially acidifying upper horizons over 1,000-10,000 years. Erosion rates vary widely, averaging 0.1-10 tons per hectare annually in undisturbed landscapes but accelerating to over 100 tons under cultivation. Translocations entail the downward or lateral movement of particles and solutes within the profile, exemplified by eluviation—washing out of clays, iron oxides, and organic colloids from upper horizons—and subsequent illuviation, their accumulation in lower B horizons. This process forms in many temperate soils, with translocation rates of clay estimated at 0.1-1 cm per 1,000 years in moderately weathered profiles. Biological activity, including earthworm burrowing, facilitates bioturbation, mixing materials at rates up to 10-20 tons per hectare yearly in fertile grasslands. Transformations involve in situ chemical and biological alterations, such as primary mineral weathering to secondary clays (e.g., feldspar to kaolinite) and decomposition of organic matter into stable humus. Weathering intensity increases with time and moisture, releasing nutrients like potassium at rates of 1-5% annually from micas in early stages, while humification stabilizes 10-20% of annual litter inputs as recalcitrant carbon. These changes enhance soil structure and fertility but can lead to thresholds where processes shift abruptly, such as from nutrient accumulation to depletion after 10,000-100,000 years on basaltic substrates.

Physical Properties

Texture, Structure, and Porosity

Soil texture is defined by the relative proportions of sand, silt, and clay particles, which are categorized by size as sand (0.05–2.0 mm diameter), silt (0.002–0.05 mm), and clay (<0.002 mm). The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) employs a texture triangle to classify soils into 12 categories, such as sand, loam, and clay, based on percentage compositions determined via sieve analysis or the feel method. Texture profoundly influences soil behavior, with sandy soils exhibiting high permeability but low water and nutrient retention, whereas clayey soils retain more water and nutrients yet drain poorly due to smaller particle sizes. Soil structure describes the aggregation of primary particles into secondary units called peds, which form shapes including granular (crumb-like, common in surface horizons), blocky (angular or subangular, prevalent in subsoils), prismatic (vertical columns), and platy (horizontal plates). These aggregates arise from pedogenic processes involving organic matter binding via microbial exudates and fungal hyphae, root penetration, earthworm activity, and physicochemical forces like alternate wetting-drying or freezing-thawing cycles. Well-structured soils enhance root proliferation and microbial habitat compared to massive or compacted structures, which result from over-tillage or heavy traffic and impede drainage. Porosity quantifies the void spaces within soil, expressed as the fraction of total volume unoccupied by solids, typically ranging from 0.3 to 0.6 in undisturbed soils. It is calculated as n = 1 - \frac{\rho_b}{\rho_p}, where n is porosity, \rho_b is (1.0–1.8 g/cm³ for most soils), and \rho_p is particle density (approximately 2.65 g/cm³ for mineral soils). Texture governs primary pore size distribution—coarse-textured soils feature larger macropores (>0.08 diameter) favoring rapid and , while fine-textured soils have more micropores for greater but reduced permeability. modifies this by creating inter-aggregate macropores that improve connectivity, infiltration, and ; poor , such as in compacted soils, reduces effective porosity and increases bulk density, limiting oxygen diffusion and root growth.

Soil Water Dynamics

Soil water dynamics encompass the processes of infiltration, retention, movement, and depletion of within soil pores, which are critical for growth, nutrient transport, and hydrological cycling. enters the soil primarily through infiltration from or , with rates influenced by surface conditions and ; sandy soils permit rapid infiltration up to several centimeters per hour, while clay soils exhibit slower rates due to smaller pore sizes and higher forces. Once infiltrated, is retained in three forms: , which drains freely under ; , held by in smaller pores and available to ; and hygroscopic water, tightly bound to soil particles and unavailable for uptake. Retention capacity varies with soil texture and structure, as finer-textured soils like clays hold more water (up to 40% volumetric water content at saturation) due to greater microporosity, whereas coarser sands retain less (around 10-20%). The soil water retention curve describes this relationship, plotting volumetric water content against matric potential (measured in kPa), with key thresholds including field capacity—the water content after 1-3 days of drainage at approximately -10 to -33 kPa, representing the upper limit of plant-available water—and the permanent wilting point at -1500 kPa, below which plants cannot extract water sufficiently to sustain transpiration. Plant-available water capacity, the difference between field capacity and wilting point, ranges from 5-7% in sands to 15-20% in loams and silty clays, directly impacting crop productivity and irrigation needs. Water movement in soil follows under saturated conditions, expressed as discharge Q = -K A \frac{\Delta h}{\Delta L}, where K is (typically 10^{-2} to 10^{-5} m/s for sands to clays), A is cross-sectional area, \Delta h is head difference, and \Delta L is flow path length; in unsaturated zones, flow is slower and governed by moisture-dependent conductivity via Richards' equation. transports water downward beyond the root zone to aquifers, while upward fluxes occur via and (), which can deplete by 1-5 mm/day depending on and . The soil water balance equation, \Delta SW = P - AET - QS - QG (where P is , AET is actual , QS is , and QG is ), quantifies net changes, with imbalances leading to drought stress or saturation. enhances retention and infiltration by improving structure, increasing available water by 1-3% per percent added.

Soil Air and Temperature

Soil air consists of the gaseous phase occupying pore spaces within the soil matrix, typically comprising oxygen (O₂), (CO₂), (N₂), and , with compositions differing from atmospheric air due to biological and root activity. In well-aerated soils, O₂ concentrations range from 10% to 20% by volume, lower than the atmospheric 21%, while CO₂ levels are elevated at 0.25% to 5%, often 10 to 100 times higher than the atmospheric 0.04%, reflecting microbial and root that consumes O₂ and produces CO₂. These gases exchange with the atmosphere primarily through , driven by concentration gradients, with rates influenced by soil , moisture content, and structure; excessive water reduces pore connectivity, impeding O₂ influx and leading to conditions below critical thresholds of 2-5% O₂, which inhibit aerobic processes. Soil aeration, the process of gas replenishment in pores, is essential for root respiration, microbial decomposition of organic matter, and nutrient mineralization, as many soil organisms require O₂ for energy-yielding oxidation reactions that release plant-available nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus. Factors limiting aeration include soil compaction, which reduces macropores and air permeability; high water saturation, displacing air; and dense root mats or organic layers that increase CO₂ production without adequate diffusion. In agricultural contexts, poor aeration from flooding or tillage-induced compaction can reduce crop yields by 20-50% in sensitive species like corn, as roots suffer hypoxia, shifting metabolism to inefficient anaerobic fermentation. Soil temperature modulates air-related processes by affecting gas rates—higher temperatures increase molecular and thus diffusion coefficients—and biological demand for O₂, with rates doubling roughly every 10°C rise up to an optimum of 25-30°C for most microbes. classifies temperature regimes based on mean annual soil temperature () at 50 cm depth: hyperthermic (>22°C), thermic (15-22°C), mesic (8-15°C), frigid (<8°C), and others like cryic for permafrost-influenced soils, with iso- variants indicating <6°C difference between mean summer and winter temperatures. Elevated temperatures accelerate organic matter decomposition and enzyme activities, enhancing CO₂ efflux and potentially depleting soil carbon stocks by 10-30% in warming scenarios, while extremes above 35°C impair root elongation and microbial diversity, favoring heat-tolerant anaerobes in poorly aerated zones. Conversely, low temperatures (<5°C) slow gas exchange and microbial activity, preserving O₂ but limiting nutrient cycling, as seen in northern latitudes where frigid regimes constrain decomposition rates to <10% of tropical equivalents.

Chemical Properties

Soil pH, Buffering, and Reactivity

Soil pH measures the acidity or alkalinity of the soil solution, defined as the negative base-10 logarithm of the hydrogen ion (H⁺) activity, with values typically ranging from 3.5 in highly acidic soils to 9.5 in alkaline ones, and 7 indicating neutrality. It is determined by mixing soil with distilled water or a calcium chloride solution (e.g., 1:2.5 soil-to-solution ratio) and measuring with a glass electrode after equilibration, though water extracts overestimate pH in saline soils while salt extracts provide a more accurate estimate of actual soil solution pH. Soil pH profoundly affects chemical processes and biological activity; nutrient availability peaks near pH 6 to 7 for most crops, where macronutrients like , , and are optimally soluble, but drops sharply below pH 6 due to P fixation by and oxides or above pH 7.5 from P sorption onto carbonates and reduced solubility of micronutrients like , , and . In acidic soils (pH < 5.5), toxic and mobilize, inhibiting root growth, while alkaline conditions (pH > 8) promote accumulation, exacerbating sodicity in irrigated arid regions. Buffering capacity denotes the soil's resistance to pH shifts from acid or base inputs, quantified as the amount of or required to change pH by one unit (e.g., in cmolₖ₊ kg⁻¹ pH⁻¹), and stems primarily from cation exchange reactions on clay minerals, , and oxides, with carbonates providing strong buffering above pH 8.5. High-clay soils (e.g., those dominated by 2:1 layer silicates like smectites) and those with elevated (>3%) exhibit superior buffering due to greater and variable charge sites that adsorb H⁺ or OH⁻, whereas sandy soils with low (CEC < 5 cmolₖ₊ kg⁻¹) change pH rapidly—e.g., a 1-ton/ha lime application might raise pH by 0.5 units in buffered clay loams but 2 units in sands. Factors like parent material weathering (releasing bases) and decomposition (producing organic acids) modulate long-term buffering, with tropical Oxisols showing high buffering from Fe/Al oxides despite low pH. Soil reactivity encompasses pH-driven processes such as ion exchange, precipitation-dissolution, and hydrolysis; variable-charge surfaces on humus and metal oxides generate pH-dependent charges—negative at high pH via deprotonation (e.g., >-OH → >-O⁻ + H⁺) and positive at low pH via —influencing anion (e.g., ) and cation adsorption, with exchangeable increasing exponentially below 5.5 on these sites. itself varies with , rising from 10-20 cmolₖ₊ kg⁻¹ at 4 to 30-40 cmolₖ₊ kg⁻¹ at 7 in variable-charge soils due to enhanced negative sites, facilitating retention but also base cation under acidic conditions from ammonium-based fertilizers. reactions, such as Fe³⁺ reduction to Fe²⁺ in waterlogged acidic soils, further amplify reactivity by altering and profiles.

Nutrient Cycling and Availability

Nutrient cycling in soil refers to the continuous transformation and movement of essential elements, primarily through biological, chemical, and physical processes that regulate their supply to plants and microorganisms. Key macronutrients such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) cycle via mineralization of organic matter into plant-available inorganic forms, plant uptake, return through litterfall and root exudates, and microbial immobilization, with losses occurring through leaching, gaseous emissions, or fixation. These cycles maintain soil fertility but are influenced by environmental conditions; for instance, in forest ecosystems, nutrient retranslocation within plants can recycle up to 50-70% of foliar N and P before leaf abscission, reducing external inputs. Nitrogen cycling begins with atmospheric N2 fixation by in roots or free-living soil microbes, converting it to (NH4+), followed by to (NO3-) by autotrophic like and under aerobic conditions. then returns N to the atmosphere as N2 or N2O in waterlogged, soils, leading to losses estimated at 10-30% of applied fertilizers in agricultural systems. Ammonification mineralizes organic N from plant residues or into NH4+, with rates accelerated by high soil temperatures (optimal at 25-35°C) and neutral (6-7). Phosphorus availability is limited by its low mobility and tendency to form insoluble compounds; organic P mineralization by phosphatases from microbes and roots releases orthophosphate, which comprises 50-75% of total soil P, but fixation with aluminum, iron, or calcium reduces bioavailability, especially in acidic (pH <5.5) or alkaline (pH >7.5) soils. Mycorrhizal fungi enhance P uptake by extending root reach and solubilizing bound forms via organic acids, increasing acquisition by up to 80% in P-deficient soils. Cycling is slower than N, with plant uptake recycling 10-20% annually in natural systems, and erosion represents a major loss pathway in tilled fields. Potassium cycles predominantly as the exchangeable K+ ion held on surfaces via cation exchange, with total soil K exceeding 20,000 mg/kg but only 1-2% plant-available; fixation into non-exchangeable forms occurs in 2:1 clays like , while losses are higher than for P due to K+'s , reaching 50-100 kg/ha/year in sandy soils under high rainfall. absorb K+ via mass flow and , with uptake rates peaking at soil solution concentrations of 0.001-0.01 M, and through crop residues returns 90-95% in low-leach environments. Availability of these nutrients is modulated by soil properties: enhances cycling through microbial mediation, supplying 20-50% of plant N via , while low (<5.5) mobilizes toxic Al3+ and reduces P solubility by 50-70% via Al-P precipitation. Clay content correlates positively with cation retention (e.g., CEC >15 cmol/kg in loamy soils holds more K+), and influences micronutrients like and , with conditions increasing their solubility by factors of 10-100. Microbial communities drive 80-90% of mineralization, but excessive inputs can disrupt balances, leading to acidification and reduced long-term availability.

Exchange Capacity and Redox Processes

Cation exchange capacity (CEC) refers to the total quantity of negative surface charges in soil that attract and retain positively charged ions, or cations, such as calcium (Ca²⁺), magnesium (Mg²⁺), potassium (K⁺), and hydrogen (H⁺). These charges primarily arise from clay minerals and , with CEC measured in centimoles of charge per of soil (cmol/kg) or milliequivalents per 100 grams (meq/100g). Soils with higher CEC, often exceeding 20 cmol/kg, exhibit greater nutrient-holding capacity, reducing losses and supporting plant fertility, whereas low-CEC sands below 5 cmol/kg require frequent fertilization. Factors influencing CEC include the type and amount of clay minerals—such as expansive 2:1 clays like , which contribute up to 150 cmol/kg, compared to less expansive 1:1 clays like at 3–15 cmol/kg—and , which can add 200–400 cmol/kg due to carboxyl and phenolic groups. pH affects effective CEC, as aluminum (Al³⁺) saturation at low pH (<5.5) occupies exchange sites, displacing nutrient cations. Measurement typically involves saturating soil with an index cation like ammonium (NH₄⁺) at a standard pH (e.g., 7.0), displacing it with another cation, and quantifying the exchangeable amount via titration or spectroscopy. Anion exchange capacity (AEC), though generally lower than CEC in most soils, becomes significant in highly weathered, variable-charge soils like tropical and , where oxide minerals (e.g., Fe and Al oxides) develop positive charges at low pH. AEC retains anions such as (PO₄³⁻) and (SO₄²⁻), preventing their downward migration, and increases as pH decreases below 5.5, contrasting with CEC's pH dependency. In such soils, AEC values can reach 10–20 cmol/kg, enhancing retention of essential but mobile anions critical for crop nutrition. Redox processes in soil govern the oxidation states of elements through electron transfer reactions, quantified by redox potential (), typically ranging from +700 mV in aerobic conditions to below -200 mV in anaerobic flooded soils. Under oxic conditions (Eh >300 mV), oxygen serves as the primary , maintaining insoluble oxidized forms of iron (Fe³⁺) and (Mn⁴⁺); anaerobic shifts, driven by microbial of , sequentially reduce (NO₃⁻) to N₂ gas, Mn⁴⁺ to soluble Mn²⁺, Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺, and to (H₂S). These transitions alter availability: reduces nitrogen losses in waterlogged paddies, while Fe²⁺ and Mn²⁺ mobilization can induce in sensitive crops like at Eh <200 mV. Eh is influenced by soil moisture, temperature, organic carbon content, and microbial activity, with flooded soils exhibiting progressive Eh decline over days—from aerobic surface layers to reducing subsoils—evident in gleyed horizons with Fe mottles. Measurement uses platinum electrodes calibrated against a reference like Ag/AgCl, though in situ probes account for soil-specific equilibria, as disequilibria from multiple electron acceptors can yield variable readings. Redoximorphic features, such as gray reduced zones and orange oxidized mottles, signal fluctuating Eh, impacting phosphorus sorption via Fe oxide transformations and trace metal solubility.

Biological Components

Soil Microbiota and Fauna

Soil microbiota, comprising , archaea, fungi, and protozoa, dominate the microbial biomass in soil, with accounting for 70–90% of the total microbial biomass and fungi ranking second in abundance. These microorganisms exhibit high diversity, with bacterial and fungal communities influenced by factors such as soil texture, organic matter content, and land-use practices, often showing decreased richness in intensively managed agricultural soils compared to natural systems. Archaea, though less abundant, contribute to processes like methanogenesis in anaerobic microsites, while protozoa prey on , facilitating nutrient release through grazing. Bacteria and fungi play central roles in nutrient cycling, including the decomposition of organic matter into humus, mineralization of nitrogen, phosphorus, and other elements, and fixation of atmospheric nitrogen by groups such as rhizobia in symbiosis with legumes. Fungi, particularly mycorrhizal species, extend plant root systems via hyphal networks, enhancing uptake of water and immobile nutrients like phosphorus, while suppressing soil-borne pathogens through competition and antibiotic production. Microbial communities also regulate carbon sequestration by transforming plant residues into stable soil organic matter, with bacterial dominance in labile carbon turnover and fungal contributions to recalcitrant fractions. Soil fauna encompasses microfauna (e.g., nematodes and protozoa), mesofauna (e.g., mites and springtails), and macrofauna (e.g., earthworms and ants), which interact with microbiota to influence soil structure and function. Bacterivorous and fungivorous nematodes promote nitrogen mineralization by grazing on microbes, releasing excess nutrients for plant uptake and controlling microbial populations to prevent imbalances. Earthworms, as ecosystem engineers, bioturbate soil through burrowing, improving aeration, water infiltration, and root penetration while fragmenting organic residues to accelerate microbial decomposition. Arthropods like ants and termites contribute to soil mixing and organic matter incorporation, enhancing vertical transport of microbes and nutrients, though their activities can vary by soil type and climate. Interactions within the soil food web link microbiota and fauna, with predation and mutualism driving community dynamics; for instance, earthworm casts enrich microbial activity, while nematode populations respond to worm presence by shifting trophic structures. These biotic components collectively sustain soil fertility, with disruptions from tillage or monocropping reducing diversity and impairing functions like disease suppression and aggregate formation.

Organic Matter Decomposition

Organic matter decomposition in soil encompasses the microbial, enzymatic, and abiotic breakdown of plant residues, animal remains, and other organic inputs into simpler compounds, including mineral nutrients and stabilized . This process follows a continuum from fresh litter to partially decomposed detritus and ultimately recalcitrant humic substances, with rates varying by substrate quality and environmental conditions. Primary decomposition involves depolymerization of complex polymers like , , and proteins into monomers such as sugars, amino acids, and phenols, followed by mineralization to CO₂, H₂O, NH₄⁺, PO₄³⁻, and other ions. The overall rate is governed by microbial activity, where extracellular enzymes hydrolyze bonds, and intracellular metabolism assimilates products, with approximately 50-60% of carbon respired as CO₂ under aerobic conditions. Soil microorganisms dominate the decomposition process, with bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes comprising the core decomposer community. Bacteria, such as those in the phyla Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, rapidly metabolize labile substrates like sugars and amino acids, achieving turnover times of days to weeks. Fungi, particularly white-rot species like those in Basidiomycota, specialize in recalcitrant lignocellulose via lignin peroxidases and laccases, enabling access to cellulose and hemicellulose; their hyphal networks enhance substrate penetration and nutrient translocation. Archaea contribute minimally but participate in methanogenesis under anaerobic conditions, while fauna like nematodes and earthworms fragment residues, stimulating microbial activity through grazing and burrowing. Protozoa and mesofauna regulate bacterial populations, indirectly influencing decomposition efficiency. Community composition shifts with substrate; fungal dominance prevails in high C/N ratio materials (>30:1), while bacteria favor low-ratio inputs. Decomposition rates are modulated by physicochemical factors, with exerting a strong positive effect via Q₁₀ values of 1.5-3.0, doubling rates per 10°C rise up to an optimum of 25-35°C before thermal inhibition. influences oxygen availability and ; optimal decomposition occurs at 50-60% water-filled pore space, with rates declining under waterlogging (favoring ) or (halting enzymatic activity). Clay-rich textures physically protect via adsorption and aggregation, reducing decomposability by 20-50% compared to sandy soils. Chemical quality, quantified by C/N , determines net mineralization; ratios below 20-25:1 yield excess release, whereas higher ratios immobilize N, slowing decomposition until microbial is met. affects stability and , with neutral to slightly acidic conditions ( 5-7) maximizing rates; extremes inhibit key taxa, as seen in priming effects where shifts alter legacy carbon turnover by up to 30%. This sustains by mineralizing 1-5% of organic N annually into plant-available forms, enhancing through accumulation (up to 200-300 cmol/kg in humic acids), and improving aggregate stability for and water retention. Stabilized fractions resist further breakdown, sequestering carbon for centuries, while labile pools drive short-term ; disruptions, such as tillage-induced priming, can accelerate losses by 20-50% via enhanced microbial access. In agricultural contexts, balanced under grass cover versus forests yields 2-4% higher levels due to finer root inputs and exudates favoring microbial efficiency.

Soil Profiles and Horizons

Horizon Development

Soil horizon development occurs through pedogenic processes that differentiate the soil profile into distinct layers, primarily via additions, losses, translocations, and transformations of materials. Additions involve inputs such as organic matter from plant residues and atmospheric dust, which contribute to the formation of surface horizons like the O and A layers. Losses occur through leaching of soluble salts, bases, and carbonates by percolating water, often leading to acidification and depletion in upper horizons. Translocations entail the downward movement of particles like clay, iron, and aluminum oxides via illuviation, enriching subsurface B horizons. Transformations include chemical weathering, oxidation-reduction reactions, and biological decomposition that alter mineral structures and organic compounds, fostering horizon-specific properties such as structure and color. These processes are governed by five interacting factors: , organisms, (), , and time, as outlined in the CLORPT framework. influences rates and moisture regimes; for instance, high accelerates , promoting E horizon development in humid regions, while arid conditions favor calcic horizons through accumulation. Organisms, including and , drive incorporation and bioturbation, enhancing A horizon formation—roots and earthworms can mix materials up to depths of 1-2 meters over centuries. affects and deposition; slopes experience thinner, less developed profiles due to runoff, whereas depressions accumulate finer particles, accelerating horizon differentiation. provides the initial , with unconsolidated sediments forming horizons faster than resistant , which may persist as a C or R horizon for millennia. Time scales range from decades for initial A horizon darkening to thousands of years for mature B horizon illuviation, with often reached in 10,000-100,000 years under stable conditions. Horizon development progresses in stages, beginning with minimal differentiation in young soils (e.g., with A-C profiles) and advancing to complex profiles in older landscapes. Initially, within 50-500 years, organic additions darken the surface into an A horizon over the C horizon derived from . Over 500-5,000 years, eluviation may form a pale E horizon, followed by B horizon accumulation of translocated clays and sesquioxides, as seen in Alfisols or Ultisols. In forested ecosystems, O horizons accumulate slowly over hundreds of years from undecomposed litter, while agricultural disturbance can truncate development, maintaining simpler A-B-C sequences. Diagnostic features like argillic (clay-rich) B horizons require 1,000-10,000 years of translocation under temperate climates with 500-1,000 mm annual .

Diagnostic Horizons and Profiles

Diagnostic horizons are morphologically distinct layers within a soil profile that exhibit specific physical, chemical, and biological properties meeting defined criteria for soil classification, primarily as outlined in the USDA's Keys to Soil Taxonomy. These horizons reflect pedogenic processes such as organic matter accumulation, clay translocation, or redoximorphic features, enabling differentiation of soil taxa from order to series level. The presence, thickness, depth, and sequence of diagnostic horizons in a soil profile—the vertical cross-section from surface to underlying material—form the basis for taxonomic placement, with requirements for continuity across at least 50% of a pedon (a representative three-dimensional soil body). Epipedons represent the upper diagnostic horizons, typically 10–60 cm thick, influenced by , , and management, and include types such as mollic (dark, thick, high base saturation >50%, organic carbon >0.6%, in Mollisols), umbric (similar but base saturation <50%, in soils like Udults), ochric (pale, low organic carbon <0.6% or thin), and histic (organic, >20% , water-saturated). Subsurface diagnostic horizons indicate deeper alterations, including the argillic (clay accumulation, illuvial clay increase >1.2 times overlying horizon, in Alfisols and Ultisols), spodic (amorphous materials from podzolization, / oxides, in Spodosols), oxic (highly weathered, low activity clays <16 cmol/kg, in Oxisols), cambic (altered but without illuviation, weak structure, in Inceptisols), and calcic (secondary carbonates >15% by weight, in Aridisols). Additional subsurface features like natric (argillic with columnar structure and high sodium), gypsic ( accumulation >5%), and sombric (dark, low base saturation) further refine . Soil profiles must include at least one diagnostic epipedon and often a subsurface horizon to qualify for higher-order categories, with exclusions for human-altered or thin layers not meeting quantitative thresholds (e.g., argillic requires observable clay films or 3% absolute clay increase). For instance, a profile with a mollic epipedon over an argillic horizon typifies many midwestern U.S. Alfisols, supporting due to fertility, whereas a spodic horizon in sandy profiles signals acidic, low-fertility conditions in northern forests. Verification involves field morphology, lab analyses for properties like (>25 cmol/kg for some cambics) or retention (>85% for andic properties), ensuring classifications align with and function rather than arbitrary boundaries.
Diagnostic HorizonKey PropertiesAssociated Soil Orders
Mollic EpipedonThickness ≥18 cm (or ≥10 cm if overlain by ), color value ≤3 moist/≤5 dry, >0.6% OC, base saturation ≥50%Mollisols, some Alfisols
Argillic HorizonIlluvial clay increase (e.g., 8% absolute in loamy sand), clay films or skeletansAlfisols, Ultisols, some
Spodic HorizonIlluvial Fe/Al/organics, ≤5.9, <0.6% OC in lower partSpodosols
Oxic HorizonWeathered, clay activity <1.5 cmol/kg, P retention >85%, ≥30 cm thick
Cambic HorizonStructure/ color change, no illuviation, ≥15 cm thickInceptisols,
This table summarizes common horizons per Keys to Soil Taxonomy criteria, emphasizing measurable thresholds for reproducibility. Profiles lacking diagnostic horizons default to , reflecting minimal development, as seen in young alluvial or eolian deposits.

Classification and Mapping

Historical Classification Systems

Early attempts at soil classification date back to ancient civilizations, with the earliest documented system appearing in the Chinese text Yugong around 2500 years before present, which categorized based on agricultural productivity and regional characteristics across ancient . In , Roman agronomists like in the 1st century AD described soils qualitatively by color, texture, and suitability for crops, but these lacked systematic principles and treated soil primarily as a modified by and . The foundations of modern pedology emerged in the mid-19th century, spurred by advances in and chemistry. German agriculturist Friedrich Albert Fallou is credited with coining the term "" in 1862 to denote the scientific study of soil as a distinct natural body, emphasizing field observation over chemical analysis alone. However, systematic classification awaited Vasily Dokuchaev's work in during the 1880s. Dokuchaev, through expeditions mapping soils starting in 1877, proposed the first genetic in publications from 1883 to 1886, viewing soil as an independent entity formed by interactions of , organisms, , , and time—termed "soil-forming factors." His system classified Russian soils into zones (e.g., podzols in northern forests, in steppes), highlighting latitudinal zonality driven by and , which marked a shift from lithologic to ecogenetic principles. Dokuchaev's framework influenced international pedology via disciples like Nikolay Glinka, whose 1914 translations spread Russian concepts to and . In the United States, initial efforts under Milton Whitney, appointed Chief of the USDA Division of Soils in 1894, focused on practical agricultural mapping from 1899 onward, classifying soils primarily by texture, color, and geological origin into types and series by 1909—yielding over 2,000 series by the 1920s but criticized for lacking genetic depth and overemphasizing . Curtis Fletcher Marbut, exposed to Glinka's work during , reformed USDA classification in the 1920s–1930s by adopting Dokuchaevian . His 1935 atlas and text Soils: Their Genesis and divided soils into zonal (climate-dominated, e.g., pedalfers in humid regions), azonal (immature, e.g., alluvial), and intrazonal (locally influenced, e.g., bog soils) groups, enabling a 1:2,500,000-scale national map that integrated profile morphology and environmental factors. This zonal , while influential, faced critiques for oversimplifying soil variability and underweighting local . Parallel developments occurred elsewhere: in , Georges Ville's 19th-century fertility-based groupings evolved into Eugène-Melchior Péligot's texture-focused systems by the , while British surveys from the 1800s emphasized mapping over taxonomy. By the early , these historical systems laid groundwork for quantitative taxonomies, transitioning from descriptive to predictive frameworks grounded in observable soil properties and formation processes.

Modern Soil Taxonomies

The , developed by the Department of Agriculture's , establishes a system with six categories: (12 total, based on major soil-forming processes), suborder, great group, , (incorporating physical and mineralogical properties), and series (the most specific mapping unit). First outlined in 1975, it relies on diagnostic horizons and surface features defined by quantitative criteria such as depth, color, texture, structure, and chemical properties to enable interpretation and predictions. The system's 13th edition of Keys to Soil Taxonomy, released in 2022, refines these keys for precise identification, emphasizing observable and lab-measurable attributes over genetic inferences. In contrast, the World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB), endorsed by the International Union of Soil Sciences as the global standard, employs a two-tier structure with 32 Reference Soil Groups (e.g., Andosols for volcanic ash-derived soils, Chernozems for humus-rich soils) defined by key diagnostic properties, supplemented by over 120 qualifiers for substratum, , or moisture regime variations. Its fourth edition, published in December 2022, prioritizes international comparability for soil mapping and correlation, using criteria like horizon thickness (e.g., minimum 10 cm for an argic horizon with clay increase) and redoximorphic features without assuming pedogenic history. While both systems anchor classification in diagnostic horizons—such as the mollic epipedon in fertile soils or spodic horizons in podzols—they diverge in granularity and application: USDA Taxonomy supports detailed U.S.-centric surveys with finer subdivisions, whereas WRB facilitates cross-national harmonization but requires national adaptations for local precision. Direct equivalences are limited due to differing thresholds (e.g., WRB's broader ferralsol group versus USDA's with stricter content), necessitating correlation tables for global datasets. Other regional systems, like the Australian Soil Classification (with 14 orders emphasizing surface textures), draw from these but adapt to endemic conditions, underscoring modern taxonomies' role in integrating with geospatial and environmental modeling.

Human Uses and Management

Agricultural Applications

Soil functions as the primary in , supplying mechanical support for , retaining and dissolved nutrients, facilitating for root , and hosting microbial communities that cycle into bioavailable forms. These attributes enable anchorage against and , with empirical studies showing that soils with adequate structure—typically 40-50% pore space—support root penetration depths exceeding 1 meter, correlating with higher accumulation in cereals like . (SOM), comprising 1-6% of in arable lands, enhances , buffering nutrient ; meta-analyses indicate that each 1% increase in SOM can boost yields by 5-15% in temperate regions through improved water-holding capacity of up to 20,000 liters per per percent SOM. Soil texture, defined by the proportions of (0.05-2 mm), (0.002-0.05 mm), and clay (<0.002 mm) particles, dictates crop suitability by influencing drainage, compaction risk, and nutrient retention. Loamy soils, with roughly equal parts of each fraction, are optimal for diverse row crops such as wheat, soybeans, and vegetables, offering balanced permeability (infiltration rates of 1-5 cm/hour) and fertility; for instance, silt loam supports corn yields averaging 10-12 tons per hectare under irrigation. Sandy soils, prevalent in 20-30% of global arable lands, suit root vegetables like carrots and potatoes due to rapid drainage preventing rot, though they require frequent irrigation to mitigate low water-holding capacity (often <10% volumetric at field capacity). Conversely, clay-rich soils, with high shrink-swell potential, excel for water-intensive crops like rice paddies, where saturation tolerance sustains yields of 4-8 tons per hectare, but demand careful management to avoid crusting that impedes seedling emergence. Fertility management applications leverage soil testing to target amendments, with pH adjustment via (raising pH by 0.5-1 unit per 2 tons/ha) optimizing nutrient uptake; acidic soils (pH <5.5) limit phosphorus availability, reducing yields by 20-30% in unless corrected. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers, applied at rates of 100-200 kg N/ha for grains, have driven yield doublings since 1960, though site-specific application via precision tools minimizes excess; U.S. corn production data from 1990-2020 show integrated nutrient management sustaining 170 bushels/acre averages while curbing runoff. Cover cropping and reduced tillage, as in conservation systems, maintain SOM levels above 2%, stabilizing yields under variable climate—long-term trials report 21% soil health gains without yield penalties compared to conventional plowing.

Non-Agricultural Uses

Soil provides the foundational support for buildings, roads, bridges, and other infrastructure through its mechanical properties, including bearing capacity, shear strength, and permeability, which engineers evaluate to ensure structural stability and prevent settlement or failure. In geotechnical engineering, soil classification systems group materials by grain size distribution, plasticity, and compaction characteristics to predict performance under applied loads, such as those from foundations or embankments. For instance, cohesive soils like clays exhibit high plasticity but low permeability, influencing their suitability for retaining structures, while granular soils like sands offer better drainage but require compaction to achieve adequate strength. Soils contribute directly to construction materials, with clay-rich varieties fired into bricks and mixed with other components to produce cement, accounting for a significant portion of global building material production; for example, Portland cement derives from calcined limestone and clay, enabling durable concrete used in over 90% of modern infrastructure projects. Earthworks involve excavating, compacting, and stabilizing native soils for site preparation, road bases, and landfills, where mechanical stabilization techniques like dynamic compaction increase density and load-bearing capacity by up to 20-30% in loose deposits. In urban environments, soils underpin green infrastructure applications, such as bioswales, permeable pavements, and tree pits, where amended urban soils enhance stormwater infiltration, reducing runoff by 30-50% in managed systems compared to impervious surfaces. These soils support vegetation growth while providing ecosystem services like carbon storage—urban soils can sequester 0.5-2 tons of carbon per hectare annually—and water retention, mitigating flood risks in cities. Engineered soil mixes in green roofs and rain gardens filter pollutants, with studies showing removal rates of 60-90% for heavy metals and nutrients from stormwater. Recreational and landscaping uses leverage soil's ability to support turf and ornamental plants in parks and sports fields, where loamy soils with balanced texture ensure root anchorage and drainage, sustaining high-traffic areas; for example, golf course greens use sandy soils amended for optimal percolation rates exceeding 6 inches per hour. In waste management, compacted clay soils serve as liners in landfills to minimize leachate migration, with low hydraulic conductivity below 10^-7 cm/s preventing groundwater contamination. These applications highlight soil's versatility beyond agriculture, though urban compaction and contamination often necessitate remediation to restore functionality.

Soil Management Techniques

Conservation tillage practices, such as no-till or reduced-till systems that leave at least 30% of crop residue on the soil surface, minimize soil disturbance to preserve structure, reduce erosion rates by up to 90% compared to conventional tillage, and enhance organic matter accumulation, thereby improving water infiltration and microbial diversity. Long-term field studies demonstrate that these methods increase soil organic carbon by 0.2-0.5% annually in temperate regions, supporting greater crop resilience to drought, though they may elevate anaerobic conditions and nitrous oxide emissions in poorly drained soils, complicating greenhouse gas mitigation. Crop rotation, involving the sequential planting of diverse species like legumes with cereals, replenishes soil nutrients by leveraging differential root uptake and nitrogen fixation, reducing dependency on synthetic fertilizers by 20-50% in rotations including soybeans or alfalfa. This practice disrupts pest cycles and improves soil aggregation through varied root architectures, with meta-analyses confirming enhanced physical properties like reduced bulk density and increased water-holding capacity under conservation tillage integration. Empirical data from U.S. Midwest trials show yield stability increases of 10-15% over monocultures, attributed to balanced microbial communities that boost nutrient cycling efficiency. Cover cropping deploys non-cash crops like or during fallow periods to suppress weeds, scavenge residual nutrients, and build soil organic matter, with root exudates stimulating microbial activity that decomposes residues into , elevating soil carbon stocks by 0.3-1.0 Mg/ha/year. These systems cut nutrient runoff by 50% or more via improved infiltration and can suppress erosion by anchoring soil particles, as evidenced in Ohio field experiments where legume-grass mixes reduced sediment loss by 70-90%. However, termination timing is critical; delayed incorporation risks nitrogen immobilization, temporarily limiting availability for succeeding crops unless managed with balanced mixes. Organic amendments, including manure or compost applications at rates of 10-20 tons/ha, elevate cation exchange capacity and microbial biomass, with 37-year trials indicating 25-80% greater carbon inputs and partial retention fostering long-term fertility. Precision nutrient management, guided by soil testing, applies fertilizers at optimal rates (e.g., : right source, rate, time, place), minimizing leaching; USDA data link this to 15-30% efficiency gains in . Erosion control techniques on slopes, such as contour plowing and terracing, redirect runoff to reduce rill formation, with NRCS guidelines showing contour farming halves soil loss versus straight-row methods on 2-8% gradients. Riparian buffers of grasses and trees along waterways filter sediments, cutting phosphorus export by 50-90% in agricultural watersheds per Iowa monitoring. Vegetation mulching and check dams further stabilize surfaces, though efficacy depends on site-specific hydrology and maintenance to prevent undercutting.

Degradation Mechanisms

Physical Degradation

Physical degradation of soil encompasses structural alterations that diminish its capacity to support plant growth, retain water, and facilitate root development, primarily through mechanisms such as erosion, compaction, and crusting. These processes disrupt soil aggregation, increase bulk density, and reduce porosity, leading to decreased infiltration rates and heightened susceptibility to runoff. According to assessments by the (FAO), physical degradation affects approximately 25% of global land, exacerbating food insecurity and biodiversity loss by impairing soil functionality. Soil erosion, a dominant form of physical degradation, involves the detachment and transport of topsoil particles by water, wind, or tillage, often accelerated by unsustainable land management practices like excessive tillage and deforestation. Water erosion predominates in humid regions, where rainfall detaches particles and runoff transports them, while wind erosion prevails in arid areas with sparse vegetation cover. Globally, soil erosion rates average 12-15 tons per hectare per year on agricultural land, far exceeding natural soil formation rates of 1-2.5 tons per hectare annually, resulting in net topsoil loss that diminishes soil depth and nutrient-holding capacity over time. In the United States, the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) reports that cropland erosion averaged 5.9 tons per acre annually as of 2017, though conservation tillage has reduced rates from historical highs of over 12 tons per acre in the 1980s. Tillage erosion, induced by farm equipment, redistributes soil downslope, further homogenizing profiles and exposing subsoils with inferior physical properties. Compaction occurs when external pressures from heavy machinery, livestock trampling, or excessive traffic compress soil pores, elevating bulk density beyond optimal levels of 1.0-1.6 g/cm³ for most crops and restricting root elongation and water movement. This degradation is particularly acute in fine-textured soils under repeated wet-season trafficking, where penetration resistance can exceed 2 MPa, inhibiting microbial activity and aeration. Studies indicate that compacted layers persist for years without intervention, amplifying erosion risks by curtailing infiltration and promoting surface ponding. In European subsoils, up to 32% exhibit high compaction vulnerability, correlating with yield reductions of 10-50% in affected fields. Surface crusting and sealing arise from the slaking of aggregates under raindrop impact and microbial breakdown, forming a dense, impermeable layer 1-5 mm thick that impedes seedling emergence and infiltration by up to 90%. This phenomenon intensifies in soils low in organic matter or exposed after tillage, fostering anaerobic conditions and nutrient leaching during heavy rains. Crusting exacerbates erosion by channeling runoff into rills, with observed increases in sediment yields of 2-10 times on crusted versus aggregated surfaces. Remediation requires maintaining residue cover or incorporating organic amendments to stabilize structure, as mechanical disruption alone often induces further degradation.

Chemical Degradation

Chemical degradation of soil refers to the alteration of its chemical composition and properties, primarily through anthropogenic activities, leading to diminished fertility, increased toxicity, and impaired ecosystem functions. Key processes include , , , and , often exacerbated by excessive fertilizer use, irrigation practices, and industrial pollution. These changes disrupt soil pH, cation exchange capacity, and microbial activity, ultimately reducing agricultural productivity and posing risks to human health via the food chain. Soil acidification occurs when soil pH drops below optimal levels (typically <5.5), primarily due to nitrogen deposition from fertilizers and acid rain from sulfur and nitrogen oxides. This process accelerates the leaching of essential base cations like calcium and magnesium while mobilizing toxic aluminum, inhibiting root growth and nutrient uptake in plants. Globally, nitrogen addition has been shown to significantly lower soil pH, with biotic factors such as vegetation type modulating the rate; for instance, forests exhibit greater sensitivity than grasslands. In agricultural settings, acidification contributes to an average 13.7% reduction in crop yields, with vegetables experiencing higher losses (up to 20-30%) compared to cereals due to aluminum toxicity thresholds. A 2016 study highlighted that without liming, severe acidification in temperate regions can increase aluminum saturation to levels exceeding 20%, correlating with yield declines of 10-50% in sensitive crops like alfalfa. Salinization involves the accumulation of soluble salts (e.g., ) in the soil profile, often from poor irrigation management in arid regions where evaporation exceeds leaching. This raises soil electrical conductivity, osmotic stress on plants, and sodium-induced dispersion of soil aggregates, reducing permeability and aeration. Worldwide, salt-affected soils cover approximately 1,381 million hectares, or 10.7% of global land area, with over 3% of topsoils and 6% of subsoils impacted by or sodicity as of recent assessments. Primary salinization, driven by natural aridity and exacerbated by , affects vast dryland areas, while secondary salinization from irrigation impacts 20% of irrigated croplands globally, leading to yield losses of 10-50% in staples like wheat and rice. In regions like the Middle East and Central Asia, salinization has rendered millions of hectares unproductive, with projections indicating a 10-25% expansion by 2050 under current practices. Heavy metal contamination, from sources such as mining, industrial effluents, and agrochemicals (e.g., phosphate fertilizers containing ), introduces persistent toxins like lead, , and arsenic that exceed natural background levels. These metals bind to soil particles, reducing bioavailability but accumulating in crops via root uptake, with bioaccumulation factors varying by metal-soil pH interactions; for example, uptake increases at lower pH. Effects include inhibition of soil enzyme activity, microbial diversity loss (up to 50% reduction in bacterial populations at high concentrations), and phytotoxicity manifesting as chlorosis and stunted growth. Chronic exposure through contaminated produce links to human health issues, including renal dysfunction from and neurotoxicity from lead, with global hotspots in industrial belts showing soil concentrations 10-100 times above safe limits (e.g., >1 mg/kg for in arable soils). Remediation challenges persist due to metals' immobility and resistance to degradation. Nutrient imbalances and chemical pollution from pesticides and excess fertilizers further degrade soil chemistry by promoting runoff and residual toxicities. Over-application of and depletes and alters microbial communities, while persistent organics like analogs bioaccumulate, disrupting . These factors collectively contribute to a 20-40% loss in intensively farmed soils, underscoring the need for precise management to mitigate cascading effects on and .

Biological Degradation

Biological degradation of soil encompasses the diminution of soil biotic communities, including microorganisms (, fungi, actinomycetes), meso- and macrofauna (such as nematodes, , and arthropods), resulting in impaired functions like , cycling, and pathogen suppression. This process often stems from pressures intertwined with physical and chemical stressors, such as intensive that fragments habitats and disrupts fungal hyphal networks, leading to reduced microbial and . applications further exacerbate losses by directly toxic effects on non-target organisms; for instance, common insecticides negatively impact 84% of tested physiological parameters, while overall exposure harms soil invertebrates like , , and ground-nesting bees in 71% of studied cases. Declines in (SOM), frequently linked to continuous cropping without amendments, trigger cascading biological effects by limiting carbon substrates essential for microbial proliferation; historical data from long-term experiments indicate that halving SOM from 5% to 2% over 60 years can slash by up to 90%. Such reductions favor opportunistic bacterial dominance over diverse fungal communities, altering fungal-to-bacterial ratios and diminishing extracellular activities critical for mineralization. Compaction from heavy machinery, while primarily physical, indirectly curtails biological activity by restricting pore space for macrofauna burrowing and reducing mineralization rates by up to 18%, thereby constraining microbial access to substrates. The consequences manifest in diminished and ; microbial diversity losses impair efficiency, slowing carbon and turnover, which in turn elevates plant disease vulnerability due to weakened suppressive microbiomes against pathogens. populations, key engineers enhancing aeration and aggregation, decline sharply under pesticide-laden conditions, with synthetic chemicals posing severe threats via and gut disruption. Quantitatively, events like heavy metal inputs from can suppress microbial by up to 80%, while broader scenarios—encompassing and —shift community compositions, reducing functional guilds responsible for solubilization and organic pollutant breakdown. These alterations collectively undermine soil's capacity for self-regulation, amplifying susceptibility to further cycles.

Controversies and Debates

Extent of Global Soil Degradation

Global assessments of soil degradation extent reveal significant variability due to differing methodologies, definitions, and data sources, ranging from to field surveys. A 2024 review indicates that approximately 33% of the world's soils are moderately to highly degraded, primarily from , organic matter loss, imbalances, acidification, salinization, and . The (FAO) estimates that 1.66 billion hectares of land—over 10% of the global land area—are degraded due to human activities, with more than 60% impacting agricultural lands. Annual degradation rates are estimated at 100 million hectares globally by the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), exacerbating pressures on food production and ecosystems. Specific degradation types show widespread occurrence: salinity affects nearly 1.4 billion hectares (about 10% of global land), while nearly half of croplands experience varying degrees of degradation linked to agricultural practices and climate extremes. Regional disparities are pronounced, with hosting around 40% of degraded soils, often in arable areas where up to 46% of land is affected. These figures derive largely from FAO and UNCCD frameworks like GLADIS and , which integrate biophysical indicators but face challenges in uniform global application, potentially under- or over-estimating trends in data-sparse regions. Despite restoration commitments covering one billion hectares by 2030, ongoing outpaces efforts in many areas. Empirical underscore that while not all degraded soils are irretrievable, productivity losses from compaction and alone could diminish global agricultural output without intervention.

Causes: Anthropogenic vs. Natural Factors

Natural processes contributing to operate over geological timescales and include physical by and , chemical , and influenced by variability. Under undisturbed, non-agricultural conditions, average rates are typically less than 2 Mg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹, with long-term background rates often below 10 mm per thousand years. These rates are generally balanced by processes, such as mineral and accumulation, maintaining stability in the absence of external perturbations. Events like volcanic eruptions or extreme climatic shifts, such as prolonged droughts or floods, can episodically accelerate , but such occurrences are infrequent and localized, with recovery possible through natural pedogenic processes. Anthropogenic factors, however, dramatically amplify degradation rates through land use changes that disrupt vegetative cover and . Agricultural practices, including , , and , expose soil to erosive forces, resulting in rates 10 to 100 times higher than natural baselines; for instance, activities cause approximately 10 times more continental surface than all natural processes combined. and further exacerbate this by removing protective plant and compacting soil, leading to accelerated and , depletion, and from pollutants like and excess fertilizers. Chemical degradation, such as salinization from improper or acidification from intensified by industrial emissions, is predominantly human-driven, with global models attributing over 80% of current to cropland expansion and management practices. Empirical comparisons reveal that while factors set baseline , influences dominate contemporary global patterns, overriding rates by orders of magnitude—-induced changes occur over decades rather than millennia. Peer-reviewed assessments estimate that 33% of global land is moderately to highly degraded, with as the primary driver, far outpacing variability in both extent and severity. This disparity underscores causal realism: processes alone rarely lead to irreversible loss of soil productivity, whereas acceleration prevents replenishment, as evidenced by modeling studies projecting continued increases in under current trajectories.

Efficacy of Proposed Solutions

Conservation agriculture practices, such as no-till farming combined with cover crops and residue retention, have demonstrated efficacy in reducing soil erosion and improving soil organic carbon (SOC) content in meta-analyses of global field experiments. For instance, no-till practices in vulnerable areas can reduce soil loss and sediment yield by over 70% compared to conventional tillage. Similarly, strip relay cropping increased SOC by 23.7%, outperforming no-till with cover crops at 4.4%. Long-term adoption of no-till has also enhanced crop resilience to weather extremes and outyielded tilled systems after 15 years in comparative studies. However, efficacy varies by context, with debates centering on and broader degradation reversal. Some meta-analyses indicate no consistent reduction in or runoff from practices at field scales, suggesting limited impact on chemical degradation without targeted amendments. No-till systems can improve and retention but may exacerbate compaction or pressure in heavy clay soils without cover crops, leading to contrasting outcomes versus conventional methods in short-term trials. techniques like passive revegetation show promise for recovery in low-stress sites but often fail in heavily degraded or high-productivity areas due to persistent abiotic limitations such as compaction and . Overall, while empirical data affirm benefits—evidenced by a 21% average increase under even amid warming—critics argue that solutions overestimate reversal of global degradation due to scale mismatches between plot-level gains and watershed-level persistence of factors like . barriers, including initial dips and costs, further temper efficacy claims, with success hinging on site-specific integration rather than universal application.

Restoration and Conservation

Reclamation Methods

Soil reclamation involves restoring degraded land to a state capable of supporting , , or other uses, addressing issues such as , , compaction, , or depletion through targeted interventions. Physical methods include replacement and deep to alleviate compaction and reconstruct ; for instance, scraper haul and cross-pit wheel techniques have been applied in mined lands to reposition materials, achieving reclamation success rates measured by soil productivity metrics like equivalents. Decompaction via air tilling disrupts compacted layers around root zones without further disturbance, redistributing soil to enhance infiltration and root penetration in disturbed sites. Chemical amendments neutralize specific degradations, such as applying to sodic soils to replace sodium ions via cation exchange, reducing exchangeable sodium percentage () and improving ; empirical studies in Ethiopian sodic soils demonstrated that gypsum combined with organic inputs lowered ESP by up to 40% and boosted yields by 25-50% within two years. additions raise pH in acidic or metal-contaminated soils, immobilizing and decreasing their , as evidenced in post-mining reclamation where liming reduced uptake in crops by enhancing reactions. For saline soils, with low-salinity water alongside systems flushes excess salts, while organic fertilizers maintain soil organic carbon to prevent re-salinization, with field trials showing sustained productivity gains in irrigated arid zones. Biological approaches leverage organisms for remediation, including phytostabilization where metal-tolerant immobilize contaminants in and rhizospheres, effectively reducing risks in mining-impacted soils without excavation; a review of real-world applications confirmed its efficacy for long-term stabilization of legacy pollutants like lead and . employs microbial consortia to degrade organics or transform inorganics, augmented by amendments like to stimulate native , yielding up to 80% contaminant reduction in hydrocarbon-polluted sites per case studies. Revegetation with nutrient-rich amendments such as or accelerates recovery on construction-disturbed or oil/gas well sites, with trials in reporting enhanced soil microbial activity and vegetation cover exceeding 70% within five years, outperforming unamended controls. Meta-analyses across indicate that integrated restoration combining these methods increases indicators—such as by 20-30% and reduced —more effectively than single interventions, though success depends on site-specific factors like and .

Conservation Strategies and Outcomes

Conservation strategies for soil encompass practices designed to minimize , enhance , and maintain fertility, including , cover cropping, contour farming, terracing, and . These methods aim to counteract by preserving and promoting natural processes such as root reinforcement and residue cover. Empirical assessments indicate that integrated , combining reduced with cover crops and residue retention, yields an average 21% improvement in indicators like organic carbon and microbial activity after long-term adoption, while sustaining yields comparable to conventional systems. No-till farming, which avoids plowing to limit soil disturbance, substantially reduces rates by over 80% compared to conventional , thereby protecting soil aggregates and enhancing water infiltration. Long-term studies spanning 30 years demonstrate that no-till systems outperform tilled counterparts in crop resilience to weather extremes and yield stability, particularly after 15 years of continuous practice, with benefits accruing from preserved and reduced compaction. However, outcomes vary by and management; in some cases, surface compaction may intensify without complementary practices like cover cropping. Cover crops, planted between main crop seasons, bolster by increasing levels by 4% to 62% for non-legume species and improving nutrient cycling, with detectable enhancements in soil properties observable within the first few years of adoption across diverse U.S. farms. on 78 farms in nine states confirms gains in key indicators such as active carbon and stability, contributing to and moisture retention. When combined with no-till, cover crops further elevate soil organic carbon and nitrogen, fostering microbial diversity essential for long-term fertility. Contour farming and terracing, applied on , redirect water flow to curb runoff and loss; contour practices alone can halve relative to up-and-down , while terracing reduces soil loss by up to 75% and runoff by 20% within two years in untreated versus treated areas. In mountainous regions, terraced coverage exceeding 40% of area has achieved 43% to 70% , preserving and enabling sustained productivity. These structural interventions prove most effective when integrated with vegetative covers, though initial costs and demands influence adoption rates. Agroforestry systems, incorporating trees into agricultural landscapes, enhance through root networks that stabilize soil and recycle nutrients, leading to improved fertility and reduced alongside . Systematic reviews document 's role in elevating services like nutrient retention and , with field evidence showing decreased degradation on degraded lands via addition and barriers. Outcomes include heightened stocks and water-holding capacity, though benefits accrue gradually and depend on species selection and . Riparian buffers, a subset of , exemplify targeted conservation by filtering sediments and nutrients before they reach waterways, as observed in Midwest U.S. implementations.

Research History and Advances

Early Soil Fertility Studies

In the early 17th century, conducted one of the first quantitative experiments on plant growth and soil contribution, planting a 5-pound willow sapling in a tub with 200 pounds of oven-dried soil and adding only rainwater over five years. The resulting tree weighed 169 pounds, while the soil mass decreased by only about 2 ounces after accounting for dust loss, prompting van Helmont to infer that vegetation arose primarily from transmuted into matter rather than soil solids. This conclusion, while empirically grounded in , overlooked trace leaching into the water, as later analyses confirmed soil's role in supplying essential elements despite minimal net weight change. Building on such observations, mid-18th-century inquiries shifted toward mechanical soil processing. Scottish chemist Francis Home performed controlled pot experiments in 1757, testing ash solutions from burned plants and concluding that saline minerals, not , primarily nourished crops, though he still emphasized amendments for soil vitality. Independently, English agriculturist , in his 1731 treatise Horse-Hoeing Husbandry, rejected humus-based theories dominant since , arguing instead that plants derived sustenance from finely pulverized soil particles released through deep , analogous to mastication exposing nutrients. Tull advocated repeated hoeing to depths of 8-10 inches without , claiming it fermented soil internally to enhance , a view supported by his vineyard yields but later critiqued for ignoring matter's products. The late 18th and early 19th centuries marked a transition to chemical paradigms, with Humphry Davy’s 1813 lectures identifying potash and soda as key plant bases, though he retained a humoral view of soil exhaustion. Decisive progress came with Justus von Liebig's 1840 work Chemistry in Its Application to Agriculture and Physiology, which posited that soil fertility hinges on mineral salts—nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium—absorbed in ionic form, with crop yields proportional to the scarcest nutrient per his "law of the minimum," illustrated by a barrel's capacity limited by its shortest stave. Liebig's analysis of ash residues from various plants empirically validated essentiality of these elements, advocating synthetic fertilizers over organics, though he initially underestimated atmospheric nitrogen fixation, a gap addressed by concurrent Rothamsted trials. At the Rothamsted Experimental Station, founded in 1843 by John Bennet Lawes and Joseph Henry Gilbert, long-term plots like the Broadbalk wheat experiment quantified impacts, showing inorganic salts alone insufficient without sources, thus refining Liebig's mineral theory through replicated field data spanning decades. These studies collectively displaced organic-centric views, establishing empirical foundations for modern by prioritizing verifiable nutrient balances over speculative fermentation.

Evolution of Soil Science

In the early , British agriculturist advanced practical soil management through his 1731 book Horse-Hoeing Husbandry, promoting deep with a horse-drawn to pulverize soil for better and root penetration, under the theory that plants derive directly from finely divided soil particles rather than or , a view that emphasized mechanical soil preparation but underestimated nutrient cycling. This approach influenced farming practices by prioritizing over , though Tull's rejection of organic amendments limited its long-term fertility insights. The 19th century shifted toward chemical explanations of , led by German chemist , who in 1840 formulated the Law of the Minimum, stating that crop yields are controlled by the scarcest essential nutrient rather than total resources, with , , and identified as primary plant requirements derived from soil minerals. Liebig's work, detailed in publications like Organic Chemistry in Its Applications to and (1840), promoted inorganic fertilizers to replenish depleted minerals, challenging prevailing theories and laying groundwork for synthetic nutrient application, though it initially undervalued by soil organisms. Modern pedology emerged in the late 19th century through Russian geologist Vasily Dokuchaev (1846–1903), who during expeditions from 1877 to 1890 established soil as an independent natural entity distinct from mere weathered rock, formed through interactions of six factors: parent material, climate, organisms, relief, time, and human activity. Dokuchaev's 1883 monograph Russian Chernozem introduced zonal soil classification, recognizing vertical soil profiles (horizons) as evidence of genetic processes, and demonstrated in 1898 that identical parent rocks yield divergent soils under varying climates, founding soil genesis as a core discipline. His holistic, factor-based model integrated geology, biology, and climatology, elevating soil science beyond empirical agriculture. Early 20th-century expansions included the "Golden Age of Soil Microbiology" (1890–1910), where researchers like Sergei Vinogradsky identified nitrogen-fixing bacteria and fungal roles in decomposition, refining Liebig's nutrient focus by highlighting microbial mediation. In the United States, Dokuchaev's ideas influenced Curtis Marbut's translation of Russian works, spurring federal soil surveys from 1898 and culminating in the USDA's Soil Taxonomy system, developed from the 1950s to 1975 under Guy D. Smith, which formalized hierarchical classification based on diagnostic horizons and properties for global mapping. These advancements transitioned soil science from descriptive fertility studies to predictive, ecosystem-integrated pedology, enabling quantitative assessments of soil formation rates and sustainability.

Contemporary Developments

Recent research in has increasingly focused on the soil microbiome's role in functions, with studies highlighting microbial communities' contributions to nutrient cycling, , and to environmental stressors. Advances in and high-throughput sequencing have enabled detailed mapping of microbial diversity, revealing that soil bacteria and fungi mediate aggregation and carbon stabilization, potentially enhancing soil mechanical stability by up to 20-30% in managed systems. For instance, projects like the U.S. Department of Energy's "Microbes Persist" initiative, ongoing since the early , have demonstrated as a key regulator of microbial activity and mortality, influencing rates under changing patterns projected by climate models. Soil carbon sequestration has emerged as a critical area, with meta-analyses indicating that practices such as application can sequester an average of 13.0 Mg ha⁻¹ of carbon globally, though long-term efficacy varies by and climate. Recent experiments, including those published in 2025, show -amended soils not only store carbon but also actively sorb atmospheric CO₂, increasing by enhancing mineral-associated carbon formation, particularly in clay-rich profiles. However, global-scale assessments from 2025 caution that restoration's potential may offset only a fraction of emissions—estimated at less than 1 Gt CO₂-equivalent annually—due to biophysical limits like saturation in mineral stabilization and microbial priming effects that release stored carbon. These findings underscore the need for site-specific modeling, as overestimations in earlier projections ignored abiotic constraints such as interactions. Technological integrations, including AI-driven digital soil mapping and in-situ sensors, have transformed monitoring and prediction capabilities since 2020. algorithms now analyze data alongside metrics to forecast indicators like content with accuracies exceeding 85% in regional pilots, enabling precision management in . In , targeted interventions for major soil types using these tools have boosted yields by 10-20% while improving metrics, demonstrating scalable applications for sustainable intensification. Concurrently, long-term studies, such as a 30-year forest soil experiment recognized by the Soil Science Society of America in 2025, provide empirical baselines for validating models of carbon persistence and nutrient dynamics under natural succession. European initiatives like the Joint Programme for Soil (EJP SOIL, 2020-2025) have advanced integrated approaches, combining data with policy-relevant indicators to address climate-smart management, though challenges persist in scaling microbial inoculants due to context-dependent efficacy. Overall, these developments emphasize interdisciplinary synthesis, prioritizing mechanistic insights over empirical correlations to refine predictions of soil responses to pressures.

References

  1. [1]
    DOE Explains...Soil - Department of Energy
    Soil is a complex mixture of organic material, minerals, air, and water. It ranges from sandy, ocean-weathered beaches to soggy peat bogs and permafrost soils.
  2. [2]
    31.2A: Soil Composition - Biology LibreTexts
    Nov 22, 2024 · In general, soil contains 40-45% inorganic matter, 5% organic matter, 25% water, and 25% air. In order to sustain plant life, the proper mix of ...
  3. [3]
    What Makes Up a Healthy Soil? - SDSU Extension
    Mar 3, 2025 · It is commonly said that an ideal soil is 50% pore space (water + air), 5 % organic matter, and 45% minerals. The 45% of the soil that is ...
  4. [4]
    Factors of soil formation in the 21st century - ScienceDirect
    Jun 1, 2021 · The State Factor model of soils and ecosystems developed by Jenny provides us with a quantitative framework of great research importance in the 21st century.
  5. [5]
    Factors - Soils of Canada
    Jenny's model (idea) is consistent with others in that it indicates five factors of soil formation: (1) climate (cl); (2) organisms (o); (3) topography (r); (4) ...
  6. [6]
    Soil Health | Natural Resources Conservation Service
    Healthy soils cycle crop nutrients, support root growth, absorb water and sequester carbon more efficiently. Reducing Soil Erosion – Soil that is covered year- ...Soil Health Assessment · Manage for Soil Carbon · Soil Health Educators Guide
  7. [7]
    Soil and the intensification of agriculture for global food security
    Soils are the most complex and diverse ecosystem in the world. In addition to providing humanity with 98.8% of its food, soils provide a broad range of ...
  8. [8]
    The skin of the Earth: All about soil - ISRIC
    Soils provide essential nutrients, water, and physical support for most of the food we consume and wood that we use. Healthy soils are the foundation for ...
  9. [9]
    Soil Facts | Natural Resources Conservation Service
    Soil is a natural body comprised of solids (minerals and organic matter), liquid, and gases that occurs on the land surface, occupies space, and is ...Missing: pedology | Show results with:pedology
  10. [10]
    Glossary of Soil Science Terms - Browse
    soil (a) The layer(s) of generally loose mineral and/or organic material that are affected by physical, chemical, and/or biological processes at or near the ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Soils Overview
    Soils are complex mixtures of minerals, water, air, organic matter, and countless organisms that are the decaying remains of once-living things.
  12. [12]
    A New Definition of Soil - Es - 2017 - CSA News - Wiley Online Library
    Oct 5, 2017 · (i) The unconsolidated mineral or organic material on the immediate surface of the earth that serves as a natural medium for the growth of land ...
  13. [13]
    All definitions | FAO SOILS PORTAL
    Soil is the natural medium for the growth of plants. Soil has also been defined as a natural body consisting of layers (soil horizons) that are composed of ...
  14. [14]
    A simple definition of soil - ScienceDirect.com
    Soil is the loose mineral or organic material comprising three phases solid, liquid, and, gaseous, found on the surface of the earth.
  15. [15]
    Enumerating soil biodiversity - PNAS
    Aug 7, 2023 · We show that soil is likely home to 59% of life including everything from microbes to mammals, making it the singular most biodiverse habitat on Earth.
  16. [16]
    The role of soils in delivering Nature's Contributions to People - PMC
    The regulation of water quality is one of the important ecosystem service functions of soil. The pollutants entering the soil can be mitigated by ...
  17. [17]
    Soil organic carbon sequestration, the microbial carbon fee, and the ...
    Nov 12, 2024 · Current estimates indicate that the organic carbon content in soil organic matter is 1,700 gigatons (Gt) compared with 885 Gt in the atmosphere, ...
  18. [18]
    Soil Carbon Storage | Learn Science at Scitable - Nature
    Total C in terrestrial ecosystems is approximately 3170 gigatons (GT; 1 GT = 1 petagram = 1 billion metric tons). Of this amount, nearly 80% (2500 GT) is found ...
  19. [19]
    6.2 - Functions of Soil | Soil Genesis and Development, Lesson 6
    An important function of soil is to store and supply nutrients to plants. The ability to perform this function is referred to as soil fertility.
  20. [20]
    Soil: The Foundation of Agriculture | Learn Science at Scitable - Nature
    Throughout human history, our relationship with the soil has affected our ability to cultivate crops and influenced the success of civilizations.
  21. [21]
    Soil and humanity: Culture, civilization, livelihood and health
    It is important for people to protect the soil, their agriculture and the environment because the collapse of soil leads to the collapse of human culture, ...Soil And Cultures · Agriculture As Soil And... · The Living Soil, Health And...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    History of Agriculture - Food System Primer
    By the beginning of the Common Era, Roman farmers had degraded their soil to the point where they could no longer grow enough food and had to rely on imports ...
  23. [23]
    Worsening land degradation impacts 3.2 billion people worldwide
    Mar 26, 2018 · Worsening land degradation caused by human activities is undermining the well-being of two fifths of humanity, driving species extinctions and intensifying ...
  24. [24]
    Civilizations rise and fall on the quality of their soil - ScienceDaily
    Nov 4, 2013 · Great civilizations have fallen because they failed to prevent the degradation of the soils on which they were founded.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] FACTORS OF SOIL FORMATION
    JENNY, H.: Behavior of potassium and sodium during the process of soil formation, Missouri Agr. Expt. Sta., Research Bull. 162, 1931. 4. JENNY, H ...
  26. [26]
    An evaluation of the state factor model of soil ecosystems
    Aug 6, 2025 · Hans Jenny's conceptual equation describing soil ecosystems as a function of five state factors (time, climate, parent material, topography, and biota) has ...
  27. [27]
    9 - Factors of soil formation: parent material. As exemplified by a ...
    Other examples illustrating the influence of parent material on soil properties could also be cited. Thus, soils derived from carbonate rock may have such ...
  28. [28]
    Calcium-rich parent materials enhance multiple soil functions and ...
    Oct 8, 2025 · Soils from calcium-rich parent materials contained 33% higher organic carbon, 58% higher total nitrogen, and 55% higher total phosphorus than ...
  29. [29]
    The Vital Roles of Parent Material in Driving Soil Substrates and ...
    Jul 6, 2023 · In the current study, parent materials affected soil chemical aspects; thus, soils formed from lacustrine and marine deposits had the highest ...Missing: peer | Show results with:peer
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Factors of soil formation: Climate
    Climate is a key factor in the formation of soils and it also determines the potential for land uses. It controls the rates of chemical reaction and substance ...
  31. [31]
    Soil Formation - Soils 4 Teachers
    Soils develop faster in warm, moist climates and slowest in cold or arid ones. Rainfall is one of the most important climate factors in soil formation.
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    (PDF) Role of Microorganisms in Soil Genesis and Functions
    Microorganisms including bacteria, fungi, cyanobacteria, and lichens are said to be well-known 'soil engineers' actively participate in pedogenesis.<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Microorganisms Promote Soil Phosphorus Bioavailability at the ...
    Thus, it can be concluded that microorganisms promote Bio-P accumulation at the beginning of pedogenesis by regulating PCGs and typical microbial community ...Missing: organisms | Show results with:organisms
  35. [35]
    Pedogenesis - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The biotic factor includes animal and plant organisms of all sizes and their direct and indirect effects on pedogenic processes. Vegetation is part of the ...
  36. [36]
    Five factors of soil formation - University of Minnesota Extension
    Slope and aspect are two topography features that affect soil formation. Slope. Slope refers to steepness (in degrees or percent) from horizontal, which affects ...
  37. [37]
    11.5: Factors Affecting Soil Development - Geosciences LibreTexts
    Feb 19, 2022 · Topography has a significant impact on soil formation as it determines runoff of water, and its orientation affects microclimate which in turn ...Parent Material · Topography · Effect on soil erosion · Effect on deposition and soil...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Pedogenesis–Terrain Links in Zero-Order Watersheds after ...
    Oct 27, 2006 · Soil and watershed development are commonly ex- plained by the interaction of environmental factors, including topography, parent material, ...
  39. [39]
    Soil development – Introduction to Soil Science
    Time. As one might expect, more time since deposition means more time for changes to occur. Therefore, time is a significant factor, with more time ...
  40. [40]
    Soils as relative-age dating tools | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov
    Jun 14, 2017 · In a soil chronosequence, time constitutes the only independent formation factor; the other factors act through time. Time dictates the ...
  41. [41]
    The Human Impact on All Soil-Forming Factors during the ...
    Sep 13, 2021 · Here, we reconsider the five forming factors of soil originally suggested more than a century ago (parent material, time, climate, topography, ...
  42. [42]
    Soil Forming Processes | Soil Genesis and Development, Scenario 3
    ... soils: Additions, losses, transformations, and translocations. ... Horizons or layers, excluding hard bedrock, that are little affected by pedogenic processes ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] SOIL FORMATION AND LANDSCAPE STABILITY - UNLV Geoscience
    Topography also plays an important role in soil development. Topography determines the stability of the land surface and whether deposition or erosion processes.
  44. [44]
    [PDF] soil characteristics related to weathering and pedogenesis across a ...
    Abstract: Our study explores the range of pedogenic development and near-surface weathering on a large (>250,000 ha) geomorphic surface in northern lower ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Pedogenic Thresholds and Soil Process Domains in Basalt-Derived ...
    Pedogenic thresholds occur where soil properties change abruptly and/or nonlinearly with a small increment in environmental forcing; soil process.<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Forest ecosystems create pedogenic patchworks through woody ...
    Jan 1, 2023 · Discrete components of soil-forming factors such as woody debris, trees, canopy gaps, boulders, and creek banks can create pedogenic patches.
  47. [47]
    4.2 - Soil Forming Processes - Soil Profile Development
    Transformations: The chemical weathering of sand and formation of clay minerals, transformation of coarse OM into decay resistant organic compounds (humus).Missing: pedogenic | Show results with:pedogenic
  48. [48]
    Soil Pedogenesis and Geochemistry - U.OSU
    Jan 19, 2023 · Soil genesis or pedogenesis is the study of the origin and formation of soil. Decomposition and pedogenesis are major ecosystem processes.
  49. [49]
    6. Soil Texture
    6.0 Definition of soil texture. Texture indicates the relative content of particles of various sizes, such as sand, silt and clay in the soil.
  50. [50]
    The important role of soil texture on water - Crops and Soils
    Soil texture refers to the feel of soil. Soils are made up of different amounts of sand, silt, and clay. There are 12 soil textural classes according to the ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Basic Soil Properties - USDA
    Soil is a mixture of minerals, organic matter, water, and air, which forms ... Color can tell us about the soil's mineral content. • Soils with a lot ...
  52. [52]
    7. Soil Structure
    Soil structure is defined by the way individual particles of sand, silt, and clay are assembled. Single particles when assembled appear as larger particles.
  53. [53]
    Soil Structure and Compaction Solutions - PhycoTerra
    Oct 4, 2023 · Soil structure is the way sand, clay, silt, and sometimes organic material assemble together. When these particles group together to make larger particles, ...
  54. [54]
    Soil Porosity - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Soil porosity is defined as the measure of empty spaces within soil as a fraction of the total volume, which plays a crucial role in the soil's capacity to ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Porosity and Pore Size Distribution - Water Resources - Science
    A soil's porosity and pore size distribution characterize its pore space, that portion of the soil's volume that is not occupied by or iso-.
  56. [56]
    Soil structure – Introduction to Soil Science
    Soil structure is the shape in which soil particles group together and form aggregates. A soil aggregate, or conglomerate of sand, silt, clay, and sometimes ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Soil Texture and Structure
    • Influence porosity and pore connectivity. • Aeration. • Water storage. • Water movement into and through the soil (infiltration, permeability, and hydraulic ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Soil and Soil Water Relationships - Virginia Cooperative Extension
    Soil texture determination is important because many soil properties are influenced by texture, including drainage, water-holding capacity, aeration, ...
  59. [59]
    How Soil Holds Water - SDSU Extension
    May 8, 2024 · Water retained by the soil between field capacity and saturation and less than wilting point is not considered to be plant available.
  60. [60]
    Understanding Soil Water Content and Thresholds for Irrigation ...
    This fact sheet provides agricultural producers with the basic concepts of soil water and the thresholds utilized for proper interpretation of sensor data.
  61. [61]
    4.1 Darcy's Law – Hydrogeologic Properties of Earth Materials and ...
    Darcy's Law describes how head, hydraulic gradients and hydraulic conductivity are linked to quantify and describe groundwater flow. For example, to compute the ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Using O2 to study the relationships between soil CO2 efflux ... - BG
    Apr 7, 2015 · In previous studies. (Hall et al., 2013; Hall and Silver, 2013), highland soils with a mean bulk soil-air O2 of 19% were found to have over. 6 ...
  63. [63]
    Soil Air - CTAHR
    Soil air is needed by many of the microorganisms that release plant nutrients to the soil. An appropriate balance between soil air and soil water must be ...
  64. [64]
    Soil Aeration – Introduction to Soil Science, Second Edition
    Factors affecting aeration. Based on how the flow of O2 gas works, and our understanding of what organisms use O2 gas, we can predict what factors will affect ...
  65. [65]
    Soil Aeration: Definition, Factors and Importance
    Soil aeration is phenomenon of rapid exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide between the soil pore space and the atmosphere.
  66. [66]
    1. Soils & Plant Nutrients | NC State Extension Publications
    Soil solids are a blend of mineral materials and organic matter. The mineral materials are typically weathered rock of varying sizes called sand, silt, and clay ...<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Illustrated Guide to Soil Taxonomy
    2) Layer has evidence of pedogenesis (e.g., it is not simply mechanically compacted). 3) Layer has structure that does not allow roots to penetrate at ...
  68. [68]
    Soil temperature, microbial biomass and enzyme activity are ... - NIH
    Feb 16, 2023 · The soil microbial biomass can regulate microbial biochemical processes and nutrient cycling and affect soil physical and chemical properties, ...
  69. [69]
    13. Soil Temperature – Rain or Shine - OPEN OKSTATE
    Soil temperature strongly affects the global carbon cycle by influencing the soil respiration rate, which includes respiration of both soil microbes and plant ...Missing: effects | Show results with:effects
  70. [70]
    Impacts of Extreme Heat Stress and Increased Soil Temperature on ...
    Jun 21, 2016 · When soil temperature rises above an optimum threshold, plant water and nutrient uptake can be impeded, causing damage to plant components.
  71. [71]
    Soil pH: What it means - SUNY ESF
    Soil pH is defined as the negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion concentration. The pH scale goes from 0 to 14 with pH 7 as the neutral point.
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Soil pH - Natural Resources Conservation Service
    Soil pH generally refers to the degree of soil acidity or alkalinity. Chemically, it is defined as the log10 hydrogen ions (H+) in the soil solution.
  73. [73]
  74. [74]
    [PDF] HO-240-W, Soil pH - Purdue Extension
    Most nutrients are at their optimal availability to plants when the soil pH is between 6 and 7. Many plants grow best in soils in this pH range. However, there ...
  75. [75]
    Soil pH Range for Optimum Commercial Vegetable Production
    The pH specifically affects nutrient bioavailability by controlling the chemical forms of nutrients. For example, ferrous iron is a bioavailable form of iron ...
  76. [76]
    Effects of soil pH on the growth, soil nutrient composition, and ...
    Apr 16, 2024 · Available potassium (K) decreases with any increase in soil pH, (Liu et al., 2020). The ideal soil pH for plant growth is between 6.5 and 7.5.
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Effect of different soil amendments on soil buffering capacity
    Feb 9, 2022 · The soil pH buffering capacity is generally due to cation exchange reactions. These reac- tions are mainly related to the presence of minerals ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Inherent Factors Affecting Soil pH Soil pH Management
    Soils with high clay and organic matter content are more able to resist a drop or rise in pH (have a greater buffering capacity) than sandy soils. Although clay ...
  79. [79]
    Soil pH and Buffer Index | Oklahoma State University
    The buffer capacity of soils is the capacity of soils to resist change. In relation to soil pH, the soil Buffer Index is a measure of the soil reservoir of ...
  80. [80]
    1.5: Soil Chemistry - Geosciences LibreTexts
    Nov 25, 2021 · As such, the exchange capacity of oxy-hydroxides is very pH dependent with the variation due to protonation of hydroxyl groups at low pH ...<|separator|>
  81. [81]
    A Critical Review on Soil Chemical Processes that Control How Soil ...
    Jun 8, 2019 · Soil pH is considered to be the “master variable” of soil chemistry due to its profound impact on countless chemical reactions involving ...Missing: reactivity | Show results with:reactivity
  82. [82]
    Overview - Nutrient Management Program
    Nov 15, 2023 · Cation Exchange. Soil colloids, clay minerals, and soil organic matter account for the cation exchange properties of soils.
  83. [83]
    Chemistry of soil-type dependent soil matrices and its influence on ...
    At pH below the PZC, the cation exchange occurs simultaneously at layer permanent-charge sites and protonation of edge sites (>A1OH groups), and when the pH ...
  84. [84]
    Biogeochemical Cycles in Plant–Soil Systems - PubMed Central - NIH
    This review explores the mechanisms and dynamics of biogeochemical C, N, P, S, and Si cycles, emphasizing their roles in nutrient/element cycling, plant ...
  85. [85]
    Recent insights in soil nutrient cycling: perspectives from Pinus and ...
    Dec 20, 2024 · This review synthesizes studies focusing on nutrient dynamics in forests of Pinus and Eucalyptus species, highlighting the sensitivity of these ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Nutrients: Nitrogen (N), Sulfur (S), Phosphorus (P), Potassium (K)
    The nutrients are Nitrogen (N), Sulfur (S), Phosphorus (P), and Potassium (K). They are essential for all life and control flora and fauna distribution.
  87. [87]
    1.7: Soil Nutrient Cycling - Geosciences LibreTexts
    Nov 25, 2021 · The total nitrogen is composed of uric acid, protein and NH4+, and the total phosphorus contains orthophosphate compounds (50-75% of the total P) ...
  88. [88]
    Soil-based ecosystem services: a synthesis of nutrient cycling and ...
    Aug 12, 2014 · Some of the prominent nutrient cycling processes include nitrogen fixation, phosphorus acquisition by mycorrhizal fungi and litter decomposition ...Nutrient Cycling · Soil Carbon Sequestration · C:N Stoichiometry Ratios For...
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Cycling and Biogeochemical Transformations of N, P, S, and K
    Sep 20, 2016 · The biogeochemical cycles discussed are for Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sulfur, and Potassium.
  90. [90]
    [PDF] ents The Potassium (K) Cycle - Integrated Pest and Crop Management
    Potassium leaching occurs when soils lack enough negatively charged clay particles to retain strong bonds with positively charged K+ ions.<|control11|><|separator|>
  91. [91]
    The elusive role of soil quality in nutrient cycling: a review - Schröder
    Sep 16, 2016 · The present review disentangles the processes underlying the cycling of nutrients to better understand which soil properties determine the performance of that ...Abstract · Steps involved in nutrient cycling · Synergies and trade-offs...
  92. [92]
    Calculating Cation Exchange Capacity, Base Saturation ... - Ohioline
    Aug 22, 2019 · Cation exchange capacity is defined as a soil's total quantity of negative surface charges. It is measured commonly in commercial soil testing ...
  93. [93]
    Fundamentals of Soil Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC)
    The higher the CEC, the higher the negative charge and the more cations that can be held. CEC is measured in millequivalents per 100 grams of soil (meq/100g).
  94. [94]
    [PDF] Cation Exchange: What it is, how it is measured, and does it matter?
    Jan 20, 2021 · The capacity of soil to hold nutrients for plant use. Specifically, CEC is the amount of negative charges available on clay and humus to hold.
  95. [95]
    Soil-Nutrient Relationships - CTAHR
    In the tropics, many highly weathered soils can have an anion exchange capacity. This means that the soil will attract and retain anions, rather than cations.
  96. [96]
    [PDF] AP42 chapter 9 reference - Index of /
    Contrary to cation exchange, the capacity for retaining anions increases with a decrease in soil pH. Further, anion exchange is much greater in soils high in 1: ...
  97. [97]
    Soil Oxidation-Reduction in Wetlands and Its Impact on Plant ... - NIH
    These changes include the lowering of soil redox potential (Eh) leading to increasing demand for oxygen within the soil profile as well as production of soil ...
  98. [98]
    Chapter 1: Introduction to soil chemistry - CTAHR
    Redox reactions are specifically important in poorly-drained or flooded soils (reducing conditions) and account for the unusually high solubility of Fe and Mn ...
  99. [99]
    Flooded Soils - microbewiki
    Jan 21, 2016 · Changes in redox conditions of flooded soils over time reflects the successive availability of TEA's from the electron tower, and will govern ...
  100. [100]
    [PDF] soil redox potential: importance, field measurements, and observations
    Oxidation-reduction (redox) reactions in soils are mainly con- trolled by ... availability of organic matter, can all lead to changes in Eh values.
  101. [101]
    [PDF] A Primer on Soil Redox Potential - MSU Libraries
    Chemical reactions in soil involve the gain and loss of electrons. Gain of electrons is reduction and loss is oxidation. An acronym for reduction and oxida-.
  102. [102]
    Important soil microbiota's effects on plants and soils - NIH
    Mar 25, 2024 · With 70–90% of the total biomass in the soil, bacteria are the most prevalent microorganisms. Fungi are second only to bacteria in abundance.
  103. [103]
    Soil microbial diversity and composition: Links to soil texture and ...
    This work highlighted the significance of soil texture and texture-associated pores, and resource locality, in regulating microbial diversity and community ...
  104. [104]
    Distinct soil microbial diversity under long-term organic and ...
    Here we report on the structural response of the soil microbiome to more than two decades of different agricultural management in a long-term field experiment ...<|separator|>
  105. [105]
    Soil fauna and soil functions: a jigsaw puzzle - Frontiers
    Next, the “micropredators,” being primarily microfauna, such as nematodes and protozoa, do not produce any physical structures and survive by predation on ...
  106. [106]
    The Role of Soil Bacteria in Crop Nutrition
    Soil bacteria are responsible for cycling carbon, influencing nutrient availability, bolstering plant health, and many other factors. · Soil bacterial ...
  107. [107]
    Understanding Soil Microbes and Nutrient Recycling - Ohioline
    Sep 7, 2010 · The fungi have a large surface area and help in the transport of mineral nutrients and water to the plants. The fungus life cycle is more ...
  108. [108]
    Soil Microorganisms: Their Role in Enhancing Crop Nutrition ... - MDPI
    Soil microorganisms participate in the decomposition of soil organic matter, regulate carbon storage and nutrient cycling, and promote plant nutrient uptake.
  109. [109]
    The soil microbiome: An essential, but neglected, component of ...
    Feb 17, 2023 · Microbial biomass and enzyme activities increase in the absence of tillage. Furthermore, when comparing soil microbiomes between conventionally ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  110. [110]
    Macro Fuana | South Dakota Soil Health Coalition
    Some nematodes consume bacteria and others fungi. Like protozoa, nematodes have a role in nitrogen mineralization, disease control of microbes, and root growth ...
  111. [111]
    [PDF] Using Soil Fauna to Improve Soil Health
    Earthworms play a large role in the health of soil and plant productivity. Their burrowing in the soil creates channels for aeration, root penetration and water ...
  112. [112]
    Conceptualizing soil fauna effects on labile and stabilized soil ...
    Jun 17, 2024 · Other groups of soil fauna, apart from earthworms, ants/termites, and beetles, perform bioturbation as well. However, much less is known about ...
  113. [113]
    Biotic interactions between soil nematodes and earthworms
    Biotic interactions between soil nematodes with live earthworms and dead worm tissue have been studied. Simultaneous enhancement of microbivore nematode ...
  114. [114]
    Effects of Earthworms and Agricultural Plant Species on the Soil ...
    Aug 12, 2019 · The effects of earthworms on soil nematodes may be reduced or enhanced by plants. The combined effects of earthworms and plant species can be ...Soil Nematode Extraction And... · Nematode Abundance And The... · Nematode Community Diversity...<|separator|>
  115. [115]
    What is the Soil Microbiome & Why Is It Important?
    May 7, 2025 · The soil microbiome regulates vital soil functions, including nutrient cycling, soil structure formation, and the suppression of plant diseases.Soil Health And Plant Growth · Soil Type And Organic Matter · Soil Microbiome Faqs
  116. [116]
    Unlocking the Secrets of Soil: Exploring the Microbiome and Its ...
    Apr 22, 2024 · Several studies have shown that monocultures reduce soil microbial diversity and increase host‐specific pathogens, deep tillage alters the ...
  117. [117]
    The Biodegradation of Soil Organic Matter in Soil-Dwelling ...
    Jan 9, 2022 · The formation and turnover of soil organic matter is a continuum of progressively decomposing processes. Biological, physical, and chemical ...
  118. [118]
    Decomposition and transformations along the continuum from litter ...
    Oct 15, 2021 · Plant litter is transformed into soil organic matter through activities of soil fauna and microbes. Decomposition and transformation can follow several ...
  119. [119]
    The soil organic matter decomposition mechanisms in ...
    Dec 11, 2018 · Using time-series spectroscopy and transcriptomics, we examined the ability of two ectomycorrhizal fungi from two independently evolved ...Missing: review | Show results with:review
  120. [120]
    Evaluation of Microbe-Driven Soil Organic Matter Quantity and ...
    Feb 23, 2021 · Our study indicates that thermodynamic theory can act as a proxy for the relationship between OM and soil microbial communities.
  121. [121]
    Unraveling the potential of microbes in decomposition of organic ...
    Oct 15, 2023 · This review focuses on the factors that affect microorganism behavior during the breakdown of organic materials.
  122. [122]
    Source or decomposition of soil organic matter - Frontiers
    Dec 7, 2023 · Needle-derived OM represents the dominant source of SOM with increasing forest age, while understory shrubs and moss also contribute to the OM input in younger ...
  123. [123]
    Soil Biology and Organic Matter
    The soil microorganism, fungi, actinomycetes, and bacteria, differ in their respective abilities to decompose organic matter, tolerate drought and other forms ...
  124. [124]
    [PDF] Temperature and soil organic matter decomposition rates
    Temperature response of chemical protection varies as a function of the type of binding (covalent bonds are effectively irreversible on short time-frames) and ...
  125. [125]
    4.2.1: Natural Factors Affecting Soil Organic Matter
    Mar 22, 2025 · Temperature · Rainfall · Soil Texture · Soil Drainage and Position in the Landscape · Type of Vegetation · Acidic Soil Conditions · Recommended ...
  126. [126]
    [PDF] Inherent Factors Affecting Soil Organic Matter - Marin Carbon Project
    Inherent factors include climate (rainfall, temperature, moisture, aeration) and soil texture. Grass vegetation soils have higher SOM than forest soils.
  127. [127]
    Soil organic matter in cropping systems
    When organic matter levels are higher, other factors may become more important in influencing yield. ... Carbon-to-nitrogen ratios (C:N) influence decomposition ...
  128. [128]
    Soil organic matter priming: The pH effects - Wiley Online Library
    Jun 1, 2024 · In this critical review, we focus on prerequisites and mechanisms of PE depending on pH and assess the global change consequences for PE.
  129. [129]
    [PDF] Soil Organic Matter - Cornell University
    The first two types of organic matter contribute to soil fertility because the breakdown of these fractions results in the release of plant nutrients such as ...
  130. [130]
    [PDF] Soil Organic Matter - UGA
    In addition to improving soil fertility by releasing plant nutrients during decomposition, SOM contributes substantially to soil cation exchange capacity (CEC; ...
  131. [131]
    Activation Energy of Organic Matter Decomposition in Soil and ... - NIH
    Sep 4, 2025 · SOM decomposition is the sum of chemical and biological processes, which involve chemical breakdown and biochemical transformation of organic ...
  132. [132]
    Chapter 3. Natural factors influencing the amount of organic matter
    Natural factors influencing organic matter include climate, soil type, vegetation, soil organisms, temperature, soil moisture, soil texture, and topography.
  133. [133]
    11.6: Soil Forming (Pedogenic) Processes - Geosciences LibreTexts
    May 24, 2024 · Though all soils are created by the various horizon development processes of additions, transformations, translocation and removals, it is the ...
  134. [134]
    Soil Formation and Soil Horizons - WVCA
    The four major processes that change parent material into soil and develop soil horizons are additions, losses, translocations, and transformations.
  135. [135]
    Indiana Soils:Evaluation and Conservation Online Manual
    Parent material and topography are the factors of soil formation present when the soil starts to develop. Climate and plant and animal life then act on these ...
  136. [136]
    4.4 - Soil Horizon Development Over Time
    A thin, dark A horizon begins to form (addition) over the existing C horizon. Profile horizons are A-C. 50 – 500 years: The plants continue to grow, and the A ...
  137. [137]
    Ag 101: Soil Horizons | National FFA Organization
    May 15, 2020 · The O horizon is formed over a process of hundreds of years from organic materials that slowly decompose. The O horizon also serves to absorb ...
  138. [138]
    Indiana Soils:Evaluation and Conservation Online Manual
    In the soils of Indiana, leaching of carbonates and bases and translocation of clay are among the most important processes in the formation of horizons. Iron ...
  139. [139]
    [PDF] Keys to Soil Taxonomy - Natural Resources Conservation Service
    ... pedogenesis (in the form of horizon differentiation) but do not support ... factors. Pedogenically formed root-restrictive layers, such as petrocalcic ...
  140. [140]
    A Brief History of Soil Science
    Aug 27, 2001 · In the 18th century geographers were classifying and mapping soils in Great Britain. By the 19th century geology could no longer be held back by ...
  141. [141]
    Soil classification (IEKO)
    Feb 26, 2019 · The first scientific version of the soil classification system developed by Vasily Dokuchaev was published in 1886. In 1962, Muir assessed the ...
  142. [142]
    Celebrating the 175th anniversary of Vasily Dokuchaev, the father of ...
    Mar 1, 2021 · Using these ideas as a basis, he created the first genetic soil classification. He also proved that living organisms form an integral part of ...
  143. [143]
    [PDF] The National Cooperative Soil Survey of the United States
    ... Soil Survey of Milton Whitney, attempts to correlate crop pro- duction with soil types failed completely because the soil types were classified in terms of.
  144. [144]
    [PDF] The Soil Series in Soil Classifications of the United States
    The first classification system was put together by Milton Whitney in 1909 and had soil series at its second lowest level, with soil type at the lowest level.
  145. [145]
    [PDF] Marbut.pdf - Geological Society of America
    In this work, Marbut and his assistants classified and mapped soils in many parts of the United States, obtaining data which were used in the preparation of ...
  146. [146]
    Introduction: a brief history of soil classification
    An overview of recent developments in soil classification since the nineteen sixties is given in Table 1.Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  147. [147]
    Soil Taxonomy - Natural Resources Conservation Service
    A connotative naming system that enables those users familiar with the nomenclature to remember selected properties of soils. A means for understanding the ...
  148. [148]
    5.1 - USDA Soil Classification System
    The USDA Soil Taxonomy System consists of six levels. These levels, in order from most general to most specific are: Order, Suborder, Great Group, Subgroup, ...
  149. [149]
    World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB) - ISRIC
    WRB is a two-tier system of soil classification, with 32 Major Soil Groups (the “Reference Base”) and over 120 uniquely defined qualifiers for specific soil ...
  150. [150]
    World Reference Base | FAO SOILS PORTAL
    The World Reference Base (WRB) is the international standard for soil classification system endorsed by the International Union of Soil Sciences.
  151. [151]
    [PDF] IUSS Working Group WRB. 2022. World Reference Base for Soil
    Dec 18, 2022 · International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. 4th edition. International Union of Soil Sciences.
  152. [152]
    Comparison of Soil Taxonomy (2022) and WRB (2022) Systems for ...
    The two soil classification systems, ST and WRB, distinguish soil horizons based on the soil characteristics, such as topography, structure, color, and ...
  153. [153]
    Correlation Between USDA Soil Taxonomy and World Reference ...
    The combination of soil characterization and classification provides valuable information and understanding of the physical, chemical, mineralogical and ...
  154. [154]
    The World Reference Base for Soils (WRB) and Soil Taxonomy: an ...
    Jun 11, 2013 · Differences in the ASC 'clear or abrupt textural B horizon' and the WRB 'argic horizon' mean that some RSGs based on WRB textural differences ...
  155. [155]
    Relating soil physical properties to other soil properties and crop ...
    Dec 20, 2022 · While increased soil water retention enhances crop yields, reduced water infiltration capacity of the soil results in anaerobic condition that ...
  156. [156]
    [PDF] Global meta-analysis of the relationship between soil organic matter ...
    Abstract. Resilient, productive soils are necessary to sustainably intensify agriculture to increase yields while minimizing environmental harm.
  157. [157]
    Positive associations of soil organic matter and crop yields across a ...
    Oct 27, 2021 · Higher SOM is associated with greater yields of corn and silage. Crop yields start to level off at around 4% SOM. The yield–SOM relationship ...<|separator|>
  158. [158]
    [PDF] Understanding the Texture of Your Soil for Agricultural Productivity
    Clayey soils would be great for perennials and shrubs like aster and flowering quince; summer crop vegetables like corn, cucumbers, and peppers; fruits like ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  159. [159]
    Types Of Soil Used In Agriculture To Grow Different Plants
    Oct 14, 2022 · There are six most common types of soil for agriculture: sand, clay, silt, chalk, peat, and loam.Soil Types Grouping By... · Loamy Soil · Soil Types Identification...
  160. [160]
    [PDF] Soil, Nutrient, and Water Management Systems Used in U.S. Corn ...
    The use of commercial fertilizers, insecticides, herbi- cides, and fungicides in the United States has increased rapidly in the second half of the 20th century.
  161. [161]
    Conservation agriculture improves soil health and sustains crop ...
    Oct 10, 2024 · Overall, conservation agriculture results in an average 21% increase in soil health and supports similar levels of crop production after long- ...
  162. [162]
    Soil Engineering - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Soil engineering is defined as the branch of engineering that involves the classification and analysis of soil properties, particularly grain size ...
  163. [163]
    [PDF] Soils Support Buildings/Infrastructure
    Soil is directly used to make building materials, such as cement and brick, as well as indirectly used to grow the plants used to make building materials. Page ...
  164. [164]
    Types of Dirt & Uses in Construction | Soil Connect
    Feb 9, 2025 · Discover the essential types of dirt & their uses in construction. Learn how different soils impact building projects & site stability.
  165. [165]
    [PDF] Evaluation of Urban Soils: Suitability for Green Infrastructure ... - EPA
    This report provides a concise, practical, and scientifically-based overview of the typical conditions of urban soils, and offers recommendations for how such ...
  166. [166]
    The ecosystem services of urban soils: A review - ScienceDirect.com
    Aug 1, 2021 · Urban soils are becoming more important in the delivery of a broad range of ecosystem services (ESs), including carbon storage and climate regulation.
  167. [167]
    Urban Soils, Ecosystem Services, and the Application of Green ...
    Jan 27, 2025 · This research supports efforts by states, communities, and municipalities to uncover and leverage the potential for urban soils to support good land management ...
  168. [168]
    Established soil science methods can benefit the construction ...
    We suggest that the methods from soil science would work for many construction materials namely those with earthy or loose consistence and with heterogeneous ...
  169. [169]
    Conservation Tillage Improves Soil Health, Crop Resilience
    Jul 26, 2023 · Conservation tillage is a practice that covers 30% or more of the soil surface with crop residue/straw to reduce soil erosion and disturbance.
  170. [170]
    Reduced soil tilling helps both soils and yields
    Dec 7, 2019 · In contrast, reduced tillage – also known as conservation tillage – promotes healthier soil management, reduces erosion and runoff and improves ...
  171. [171]
    Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and ...
    Jun 4, 2024 · Conservation tillage systems have noteworthy impact on soil properties, for instance, soil water content (SWC), water-filled pore space (WFPS), ...
  172. [172]
    Conservation tillage improves soil health but exacerbates hypoxia
    Aug 28, 2025 · Despite its soil health benefits, conservation tillage may complicate efforts to reduce hypoxic zones to the targeted 5000 km² by 2035. These ...
  173. [173]
    [PDF] Benefits of Crop Rotations - Natural Resources Conservation Service
    Improve crop yields. • Improve the workability of the soil. • Reduce soil crusting. • Increase water available for plants.
  174. [174]
    Crop Rotation & its Benefits for Soil Health - Verdesian Life Sciences
    Jul 15, 2025 · Crop rotation allows plants to receive optimal nutrients from the soil, which can result in a reduction in fertilizer use – especially if ...
  175. [175]
    Do diversified crop rotations influence soil physical health? A meta ...
    We conclude that rotations including diverse crop species and grain legumes, managed under conservation tillage are best for improving soil physical health.
  176. [176]
    Crop Rotation Effects on Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrition - SARE
    Crop roots and residues improve soil fertility by stimulating soil microbial communities and improving soil aggregation. This improved soil physical environment ...
  177. [177]
    10 Ways Cover Crops Enhance Soil Health - SARE
    1. Cover crops feed many types of soil organisms · 2. Cover crops increase the number of earthworms · 3. Cover crops build soil carbon and soil organic matter · 4.
  178. [178]
    Using Cover Crops to Improve Soil and Water Quality - Ohioline
    May 15, 2017 · Cover crops improve soil and water quality. May reduce nutrient and pesticide runoff by 50 percent or more, decrease soil erosion by 90 percent ...<|separator|>
  179. [179]
    The Use of Cover Crops to Manage Soil - Kaspar - 2011 - ACSESS
    Apr 25, 2011 · Cover crops can be utilized to manage nitrogen (N) in agricultural soils by altering N cycling and availability. Soil productivity is linked to ...
  180. [180]
    Sustainable soil use and management: An interdisciplinary and ...
    A 37-year field study showed that organic fertilization increased soil carbon input by 25% to 80%, although levels of carbon retention ranged from only 1.6% for ...
  181. [181]
    Soil Science Research | Department of Agronomy and Horticulture
    Soil management practices that are targeted in different research projects include fertilization strategies (Right Source, Right Rate, Right Time, Right ...<|separator|>
  182. [182]
    [PDF] Controlling Soil Erosion - Natural Resources Conservation Service
    In addition, planting crops on the contour further reduces erosion. Chisel and other forms of mulch tillage leave more crop residue on the soil surface to ...
  183. [183]
    Erosion Control Measures & How They Help - Muller, Inc.
    Jan 17, 2023 · Let's Look at Seven Effective Erosion Control Measures: · 1. Planting Vegetation · 2. The Application of Mulches · 3. Reforestation · 4. Erosion ...
  184. [184]
    Stop Erosion | Northern Virginia Soil and Water Conservation District
    1. Replant Vegetation Suited to Site Conditions · 2. Footpaths with Exposed Soil: Cover with Mulch or Gravel · 3. Terraces · 4. Build Check Dams.
  185. [185]
    Soil Heath - Physical | FAO SOILS PORTAL
    Soil crusting is a local phenomenon at the surface of the soil that results in a thin impermeable layer that, hamper seedling emergence, reduce infiltration and ...Missing: mechanisms | Show results with:mechanisms
  186. [186]
  187. [187]
    [PDF] Global status, processes and trends in soil erosion
    High soil erosion rates will also have significant negative effects over longer time spans: the loss of topsoil will result in a reduction in the soil's ...
  188. [188]
  189. [189]
    Ch 6. Soil Degradation: Erosion, Compaction, and Contamination
    In stockSoils with surface crusts are prone to high rates of runoff and erosion. You can reduce surface crusting by leaving more residue on the surface and by ...
  190. [190]
    Soil Degradation Processes, Causes, and Assessment Approaches
    There are several causes of soil degradation including poor agronomic management resulting in nutrients imbalances, emerging nutrients deficiencies, and ...
  191. [191]
    Soil degradation: An integrated model of the causes and drivers
    We present a novel, integrated framework for soil degradation that bridges biophysical and socio-economic dimensions of soil degradation.
  192. [192]
    A global analysis of soil acidification caused by nitrogen addition
    This study indicates that acidification in global soils is very sensitive to N deposition, which is greatly modified by biotic and abiotic factors.
  193. [193]
    Heterogeneous impact of soil acidification on crop yield reduction ...
    Dec 2, 2024 · Soil acidification leads to crop yield reduction of 13.7 %. Vegetables yield is more sensitive to acidification than cereal and leguminous crops.
  194. [194]
    Soil acidification and the importance of liming agricultural soils with ...
    Jun 24, 2016 · Acidification causes the loss of base cations, an increase in aluminium saturation and a decline in crop yields; severe acidification can cause ...Impacts Of Soil... · Lime Requirement · Liming Materials<|separator|>
  195. [195]
    FAO launches first major global assessment of salt-affected soils in ...
    Dec 11, 2024 · The report estimates the area of salt-affected soils at 1 381 million ha (Mha), or 10.7 percent of the total global land area. It further ...Missing: extent | Show results with:extent
  196. [196]
    Multi‐Scale Soil Salinization Dynamics From Global to Pore Scale: A ...
    Sep 27, 2024 · The data reveals that 3% of global topsoils and 6% of subsoils are impacted by salinity or sodicity. Eighty-five percent of salt-affected ...
  197. [197]
    Global predictions of primary soil salinization under changing ...
    Nov 18, 2021 · This paper sets out to address this long-standing challenge by developing data-driven models capable of predicting primary (naturally-occurring) soil salinity.
  198. [198]
    Heavy Metals in Contaminated Soils: A Review of Sources ...
    Oct 24, 2011 · The presence of toxic metals in soil can severely inhibit the biodegradation of organic contaminants [6]. Heavy metal contamination of soil ...Introduction · Sources of Heavy Metals in... · Remediation of Heavy Metal...
  199. [199]
    Heavy Metal Contamination in Agricultural Soil - MDPI
    When HMs accumulate to toxic levels in agricultural soils, these non-biodegradable elements adversely affect crop health and productivity. The toxicity of HMs ...
  200. [200]
    A Review on Heavy Metals Contamination in Soil: Effects, Sources ...
    Mar 26, 2019 · This review discusses harmful effects, sources of heavy metals, and the remediation technologies for soil contaminated by heavy metals.
  201. [201]
    Nature's laws of declining soil productivity and Conservation ...
    Scholars have found evidence of soil degradation by erosion, nutrient depletion, and salinization as devastating factors among different cultures (Montgomery, ...Nature's Fragile ``living... · Tillage And Soil Degradation · Conservation Agriculture
  202. [202]
    Changes in soil microbial diversity under present land degradation ...
    Soil biological characteristics are drastically altered by land degradation. Degradation may reduce the number of microorganisms in the soil.
  203. [203]
    A review of the impacts of degradation threats on soil properties in ...
    In this paper, we aimed to review the principal degradation threats on important soil properties in the UK, seeking quantitative data where possible.
  204. [204]
    Pesticides and Soil Health - Center for Biological Diversity
    We found that in 71% of cases studied, pesticides kill or harm soil invertebrates like earthworms, ants, beetles and ground-nesting bees.Missing: microbial | Show results with:microbial
  205. [205]
    World of earthworms with pesticides and insecticides - PMC
    The biggest threat to soil health are pesticides and synthetic chemicals including fertilizers. Earthworms are most severely hit by these xenobiotic compounds ...
  206. [206]
    (PDF) Status of the World's Soils - ResearchGate
    Sep 3, 2024 · Intensive agriculture causes land degradation and other environmental problems, such as pollution, soil erosion, fertility loss ...
  207. [207]
    FAO study reveals alarming agricultural land degradation in the ...
    Jun 17, 2025 · Globally, FAO estimates that 1.66 billion hectares are degraded due to human activities, with over 60 percent of this affecting agricultural ...
  208. [208]
    Health - News & stories - UNCCD
    ... global fight against land degradation. According to UNCCD data, 100 million hectares – an area equivalent to the size of Egypt–become degraded every year.
  209. [209]
    Globally increased cropland soil exposure to climate extremes in ...
    May 10, 2025 · Nearly half of global croplands suffer from varying degrees of degradation, mainly due to improper agricultural practices, among which ...
  210. [210]
    Soil Degradation (GH0402) - UNDRR
    Soils with soil organic carbon (SOC) levels below the critical threshold of 10 to 15 g/kg (1.0%-1.5%) are typically considered degraded (Lal, 2015). Land or ...
  211. [211]
    Current Problems Leading to Soil Degradation in Africa: Raising ...
    Feb 14, 2025 · 2 Current Problems Leading to Soil Degradation in Africa. About 46% of Africa's entire arable land area is degraded (Tetteh 2021). If this ...
  212. [212]
    GLADIS | Land & Water
    The Global Land Degradation Information System (GLADIS) is a global tool that contains low resolution information on the status of land and ecosystem resources.Missing: assessment | Show results with:assessment
  213. [213]
    [PDF] FINAL_EN_DDD Factsheet 2025_290525 - UNCCD
    Only recently have global voluntary commitments to restore degraded land by 2030 reached one billion hectares. This includes approximately 600 million hectares ...
  214. [214]
    Global Assessment of Agricultural Productivity Losses from Soil ...
    Aug 31, 2021 · We estimate potential long-term agricultural soil productivity losses caused by soil compaction and water erosion globally and at high spatial resolution.
  215. [215]
    Natural and anthropogenic rates of soil erosion - ScienceDirect
    Soil degradation is thought to have been a major contributor to the decline of civilizations (Lowdermilk, 1953), and soil erosion is currently the major ...
  216. [216]
    Natural Denudation Versus Anthropogenically Accelerated Erosion ...
    Aug 10, 2023 · Our results indicate that long-term, background denudation rates are lower than 10 mm Kyr−1 whereas recent erosion rates due to human activities ...
  217. [217]
    People cause more soil erosion than all natural processes
    Nov 1, 2004 · Human activity causes 10 times more erosion of continental surfaces than all natural processes combined, an analysis by a University of Michigan geologist ...Missing: induced | Show results with:induced
  218. [218]
    An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change ...
    Dec 8, 2017 · The FAO led Global Soil Partnership reports that 75 billion tonnes (Pg) of soil are eroded every year from arable lands worldwide, which equates ...Results · Land Use Changes As Drivers... · Soil Erosion Modelling
  219. [219]
    Agropedogenesis – humankind as the sixth soil-forming factor ... - BG
    Dec 17, 2019 · We show that the factor humankind dominates over the effects of the five natural soil-forming factors and that agropedogenesis is therefore much ...<|separator|>
  220. [220]
    [PDF] Soil erosion modelling: A global review and statistical analysis
    Humans affect natural erosion processes and have induced a rele- vant and observable increase in soil erosion rates across landscapes. (Poesen, 2018). For ...<|separator|>
  221. [221]
    No-till practices in vulnerable areas significantly reduce soil erosion
    Jan 11, 2021 · Completely shifting to no-till would reduce soil loss and sediment yield by more than 70%, says Sanghyun Lee, doctoral student in the Department ...<|separator|>
  222. [222]
    A meta-analysis of conservation tillage management effects on soil ...
    Dec 1, 2024 · The results show that SR was the most effective practice for increasing SOC content (23.7 %), followed by RT + SR (5.5 %) and NT + SR (4.4 %).
  223. [223]
    Comparing No-Till to Conventional Tillage Over 30 years - Soil Health
    Jan 9, 2025 · Outyielded tilled systems, most consistently after 15 continuous years of the practice. · Helped crops become more resilient to weather extremes, ...
  224. [224]
    A Meta‐Analysis on the Effect of Agricultural Conservation Practices ...
    Sep 1, 2018 · The authors' exploratory analysis found no clear tendency for decreased nutrient loss with the implementation of conservation practices; however ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
  225. [225]
    What is the impact of no-till tillage on soil organic matter?
    Apr 22, 2021 · No-tillage (NT) can improve soil properties and crop yield. However, there are contrasting reports on its benefits compared to conventional ...
  226. [226]
    Possibilities and limitations of passive restoration of heavily ...
    Mar 26, 2019 · We conclude that passive restoration should usually be preferred in smaller sites with low abiotic stress and moderate productivity that are recovering from ...
  227. [227]
    Conservation agriculture improves soil health and sustains crop ...
    Oct 10, 2024 · Conservation agriculture results in an average 21% increase in soil health and supports similar levels of crop production after long-term warming.
  228. [228]
    Environmental crisis or 'lie of the land'? The debate on soil ...
    However, it has not resolved the debate on the seriousness of soil degradation, while questions have arisen about the effectiveness of these approaches. In this ...
  229. [229]
    University Research Looks at the Effect of One-time Tillage on No-Till
    Using no-till farming can increase yield, reduce erosion, improve soil quality and reduce cost and time requirements due to fewer field operations. Some caution ...
  230. [230]
    [PDF] A System to Evaluate Prime Farmland Reclamation Success
    Oct 31, 2010 · Reclamation methods included are scraper haul, shovel/truck, cross pit wheel, and wheel beltline, with and without various deep tillage methods.
  231. [231]
    [PDF] Soil disturbance rehabilitation: A desk guide to techniques and ...
    Restoration crews may use heavy equipment in preparing sites following harvest operations to remove undesired and competing vegetation, create planting spaces, ...
  232. [232]
    Elucidating Amendment Resources for Reclaiming Efficacy of Sodic ...
    This study investigated how amendment resources could help improve the chemical properties of sodic soils around the Abaya and Chamo Lakes in the South Ethiopia ...
  233. [233]
    [DOC] SOIL FACTORS AFFECTING RECLAMATION OF ABANDONED ...
    Lime addition is a common method to decrease the heavy metal mobility in soils and their accumulation in the plant as it increases the pH of soil. Plants like ...
  234. [234]
    Soil salinization in agriculture: Mitigation and adaptation strategies ...
    Feb 16, 2024 · Using organic fertilizers offers an effective strategy for preserving soil organic carbon (SOC) levels and preventing soil salinization. ...
  235. [235]
    Cleaner horizons: Exploring advanced technologies for pollution ...
    Mar 28, 2025 · Phytostabilization is an in situ technique of remediating contaminated soils and is considered to be the most effective for the immobilization ...
  236. [236]
    Remediation techniques applied in real soil-contamination events
    We present the evolution and outcomes of the remediation strategies applied in real soil-contamination events where legacies of past metal mining activities or ...
  237. [237]
    [PDF] Soil Reclamation Strategies in Construction Disturbed Soil
    This research examined the effectiveness of different soil amendments and application techniques for improving the quality of soils disrupted by construction.
  238. [238]
    Effectiveness of five soil reclamation and reforestation techniques on ...
    Aug 5, 2025 · Nutrient rich amendments like compost and manure have been shown to significantly improve soil productivity to the point where reclaimed ROWs ...<|separator|>
  239. [239]
    Soil restoration increases soil health across global drylands: A meta ...
    Jun 22, 2023 · 4.5 Study limitations and future research directions. Our study had several limitations that highlight opportunities for future research: 4.5 ...Abstract · INTRODUCTION · MATERIALS AND METHODS · DISCUSSION
  240. [240]
    No-Till Farming Improves Soil Health and Mitigates Climate Change
    Mar 28, 2022 · In fact, no-till farming can reduce soil erosion by more than 80 percent, which has the added benefit of protecting water quality by keeping ...
  241. [241]
    Cover Crops Improve Soil Conditions and Prevent Pollution - SARE
    Non-legume cover crops, including grasses and brassicas, were found to increase soil organic matter levels by 4% to 62%.
  242. [242]
    Cover Crops Can Influence Soil Health, Even Within the First Few ...
    Mar 7, 2022 · In a study examining cover crops' effect on soil health, researchers used data from 78 farms across 9 States, looking at 6 key soil health ...
  243. [243]
    Cover cropping and conservation tillage improve soil health in the ...
    Aug 21, 2021 · There was significant improvement in soil organic C and N and inorganic nutrients with no-till and covers. Soil health improved with ...
  244. [244]
    Contour Farming: Key To Reducing Soil Erosion & Water Loss
    Contour farming can reduce soil erosion by up to 50% compared to traditional up-and-down slope methods.
  245. [245]
    [PDF] A review of the effect of terracing on erosion 97 - ecorisQ
    Collected data indicate that, in the second year, soil loss is reduced with approximately 75% and runoff is reduced approximately 20% compared to areas without ...
  246. [246]
    Advantages and disadvantages of terracing: A comprehensive review
    In some regions, it has been estimated that soil erosion could be reduced by 43%–70%, when the area of terraced land makes up of more than 40% of total mountain ...
  247. [247]
    Evidence for the impacts of agroforestry on ecosystem services and ...
    Mar 17, 2022 · Agroforestry is promoted for its potential for carbon sequestration, soil erosion and runoff control, and improved nutrient and water cycling, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  248. [248]
    The impacts of agroforestry interventions on agricultural productivity ...
    It is widely promoted as a conservation and development tool to sequester carbon, improve soil fertility, and conserve biodiversity on agricultural lands while ...
  249. [249]
    Agroforestry creates carbon sinks whilst enhancing the environment ...
    Agroforestry, relative to conventional agriculture, contributes significantly to carbon sequestration, increases a range of regulating ecosystem services, and ...Agroforestry Creates Carbon... · 2. Material And Methods · 3. Results
  250. [250]
    4.1.4: Discovery of Photosynthesis - Biology LibreTexts
    Jul 28, 2025 · For the proof, he performed an experiment using a willow tree. He started with a willow tree with a mass of 2.27 kg. Over 5 years, it grew to ...
  251. [251]
    Digging Deeper into Helmont's Famous Willow Tree Experiment - jstor
    "By this apparatus I have learned that all things vegetable arise directly and in a material sense from the element of water alone.
  252. [252]
    Early soil knowledge and the birth and development of soil science
    Early soils knowledge was largely based on observations of nature; experiments to test theories were not conducted. Many famous scientists, for example, ...
  253. [253]
    The pre-history of soil science: Jethro Tull, the invention of the seed ...
    Instead, he proposed a mechanistic theory of plant nutrition in which the stirring of the soil with the cultivator could substitute for the processes of ...
  254. [254]
    [PDF] History of Soil Testing Activities in Kansas - K-State Agronomy
    Soil testing in Kansas began with in-field tests in 1925, the first county lab in 1947, and a public service at Kansas State College. There were 60 labs in ...
  255. [255]
    Law of the Minimum - Soil and Environmental Sciences
    Mar 6, 2000 · Justus von Liebig's Law of the Minimum states that yield is proportional to the amount of the most limiting nutrient, whichever nutrient it may be.
  256. [256]
    Justus von Liebig Makes the World | Environmental Humanities
    May 1, 2020 · In contrast, Liebig saw soil fertility as a function of the presence or absence of the minerals required for plant growth, the source of which ...Abstract · World Ecology, Soil, and the... · Gramsci, Liebig, and the... · Conclusion
  257. [257]
    [PDF] History of Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrition - Just Agriculture
    ❖ Lawes and Gilbert (1843) founded the first agricultural experiment station in. Rothamsted and conducted Broadbalk experiment which is continuous growing of.
  258. [258]
    The pre-history of soil science: Jethro Tull, the invention of the seed ...
    Jethro Tull (1674–1741) is popularly regarded as the inventor of the seed drill, widely cited by agricultural historians, soil scientists and school history ...
  259. [259]
    Jethro Tull - ASME
    Jun 25, 2012 · He further theorized that plants surrounded by loose soil would grow better not only during sowing, but in the early stages of growth as well.
  260. [260]
    [PDF] Vasily Vasilyevich Dokuchaev
    created the science of soil - Soil Science. • he was the first to establish that the soil is an independent natural body, qualitatively different from all ...
  261. [261]
    Vasiliy Dokuchaev – A biographical sketch on the occasion of his ...
    Apr 15, 2022 · The Russian pedologist Vasily V. Dokuchaev was the first to study soils of loess origin with mollic/chernic horizons, which met the criteria for ...
  262. [262]
    [PDF] Darwin and Dokuchaev - Michigan State University
    Dokuchaev's soil model became ruling in the late 19th century Russia, and gained popularity elsewhere during and after the 1930s–1940s.
  263. [263]
  264. [264]
    Historical highlights in American soil science — Prehistory to the ...
    Soil Taxonomy, one of the most widely utilized soil classification systems in the world, was developed from the 1950s through the 1970s under the guidance ...
  265. [265]
    microbial communities and their transformative role in soil health ...
    Mar 25, 2025 · Soil microbiomes considerably improve soil mechanical stability by mediating aggregation, organic matter dynamics, and physical reinforcement, ...
  266. [266]
    Editorial for Special Issue “Advances in Soil Microbiome” - PMC - NIH
    Aug 7, 2023 · Updating our models to incorporate microbiome activities in both deep and surface soil is thus critical to a fuller understanding of microbial ...
  267. [267]
    “Microbes Persist” Soil Microbiome Scientific Focus Area
    Our current projects focus on soil moisture as a “master controller” of microbial activity and mortality, since altered precipitation regimes are predicted ...
  268. [268]
    Carbon sequestration and soil responses to soil amendments
    A global meta-analysis has shown that about 13.0 Mg ha−1 on average soil organic carbon has been sequestered through biochar application. Thus, this ...
  269. [269]
    Biochar-amended soil can further sorb atmospheric CO2 for more ...
    Jan 3, 2025 · Our results demonstrate that all biochar increased soil carbon storage and meanwhile further sorb CO 2 for more carbon sequestration.
  270. [270]
    Limited carbon sequestration potential from global ecosystem ...
    Jul 31, 2025 · Recent global-scale studies have suggested that ecosystem restoration could offset a substantial fraction of human carbon emissions since ...
  271. [271]
    AI as a Catalyst for Cross‐Disciplinary Breakthroughs in Soil Carbon ...
    Jul 29, 2025 · It is well-known that clay minerals play an important role in soil organic carbon sequestration particularly through MAOC formation (Churchman ...
  272. [272]
    Technological Advancements in Soil Health Monitoring ... - CropWatch
    Dec 5, 2024 · Technology advances have introduced various tools for soil health monitoring nutrients through digital soil mapping by using remote and adaptable field sensors.
  273. [273]
    How smart soil science can transform farming - Nature
    By targeting three major soil types prevalent in different regions of China, researchers have revolutionized farming methods and boosted crop yields.
  274. [274]
    Three-Decade Soil Study Receives National Recognition By Soil ...
    Jan 22, 2025 · A rare, three-decade long study of forest soil, held at the Bousson Environmental Research Reserve was recently highlighted by Soil Society of America.
  275. [275]
    Barriers and opportunities of soil knowledge to ... - PubMed Central
    The European Union has launched the European Joint Programme for Soil “Towards climate-smart sustainable management of agricultural soils” (EJP SOIL, 2020–2025) ...