Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

2012–13 NHL lockout

The 2012–13 NHL lockout was a between the National Hockey League's team owners and the NHL Players' Association that commenced on September 15, 2012, immediately following the expiration of the prior agreement, suspending all league operations and ultimately canceling 510 of the scheduled 1,230 regular-season games while shortening the season to 48 games per team. At its core, the conflict stemmed from owners' demands to restructure the economic model amid rising operational costs and uneven revenue distribution among franchises, including a proposed in ' share of hockey-related revenues from 57% to as low as 43% initially, alongside caps on lengths (seven years for new deals, eight for re-signings), rollback provisions, and tighter free restrictions to enhance competitive and long-term . Negotiations, marked by multiple failed proposals, player lawsuits threatening decertification, and involvement of federal mediators, dragged on for 113 days, inflicting an estimated $2 billion in combined lost revenues and prompting many players to compete in . A tentative deal ratified on January 24, 2013, yielded a 10-year agreement with an opt-out after eight years, standardizing at 50%, and yielding owners greater leverage in future disputes, though it preserved core player mobility elements amid widespread fan backlash over the third major NHL work stoppage in two decades.

Prelude and Background

Financial Context of the NHL Entering 2012

In the years following the 2004–05 lockout and the implementation of the 2005 Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), the National Hockey League (NHL) experienced significant revenue growth, driven by increased attendance, expanded media deals, and rising ticket prices. For the 2010–11 season, the league reported record business performance, with estimated hockey-related revenue (HRR)—the primary metric for and calculations—reaching approximately $2.9 billion by the end of the playoffs. This marked a substantial increase from pre-2005 levels, where league-wide revenues hovered around $1.9 billion annually, reflecting a fueled by post-lockout economic measures like the and . However, HRR disputes between the NHL and the NHL Players' Association (NHLPA) lingered into 2011, delaying escrow refunds and revenue-sharing distributions as the league audited club financials for accuracy. Despite this growth, NHL club owners consistently argued that the league's financial health was precarious, with player compensation consuming about 57% of HRR under the expiring , leading to widespread operating losses. Forbes estimates indicated that around 18 of the 30 teams incurred losses in the 2010–11 season, exacerbated by high fixed costs such as debt service, facility maintenance, and player salaries that did not scale inversely with revenue fluctuations. Small- and mid-market franchises, like the Phoenix Coyotes (reporting a $20.6 million loss) and ($18.7 million loss), were particularly vulnerable, relying heavily on league —which redistributed approximately $100–150 million annually from high-revenue teams to lower ones—but still struggling with local market limitations and outdated venues. In contrast, large-market teams such as the and generated significantly higher revenues (top-10 teams averaging near $150 million pre-sharing in 2010–11), yet owners contended that even these profits were eroded by escalating player costs and the absence of guaranteed cost certainty. This disparity underscored a core tension entering 2012: while aggregate league revenues approached $3.3 billion in recent projections, the structure of expenses—dominated by player salaries averaging over $64 million per team cap hit—created incentives for owners to seek reductions in the players' revenue share to ensure long-term viability, particularly amid economic uncertainties like the lingering effects of the 2008 recession on sponsorships and ticket sales. mitigated some inequities but was criticized by owners as insufficient, with calls for enhanced mechanisms to subsidize unprofitable teams without further burdening profitable ones, setting the stage for expiry disputes. The NHL's average franchise value rose to $240 million by late 2011, up 5% from the prior year, signaling investor confidence in the league's brand but not alleviating operational losses reported across most clubs.

Expiry of the 2005 Collective Bargaining Agreement

The Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) between the National Hockey League (NHL) and the National Hockey League Players' Association (NHLPA), ratified on July 22, 2005, following the cancellation of the 2004–05 season due to a prior lockout, established a framework for labor relations through the 2011–12 season with an extension option that was not exercised. This agreement introduced a hard salary cap, initially set at $39 million per team for the 2005–06 season, alongside a salary floor starting at $21.5 million, designed to provide owners with cost certainty amid uneven revenue distribution across franchises. It also allocated 57% of hockey-related revenue (HRR)—defined to include ticket sales, broadcasting rights, sponsorships, and arena concessions—to player salaries, with the cap and floor adjusted annually based on projected league-wide HRR growth. The CBA's core financial provisions included a 24% salary applied to existing s upon , restrictions on contract lengths and signing bonuses to curb long-term escalation, and revenue-sharing mechanisms to support smaller-market teams, though these were capped to avoid disincentivizing high-revenue franchises. Free agency rules were modified to delay unrestricted free agency until age 27 or seven years of , and entry-level contracts were limited to three years with sliding scale salaries tied to draft position. These elements aimed to balance competitive parity and financial sustainability after pre-2005 luxury spending by large-market owners had strained league economics, but by 2012, owners argued that rising HRR—reaching approximately $3.3 billion in 2011–12—coupled with the fixed player share, eroded profits for many teams despite overall growth. The agreement formally expired at midnight on September 15, 2012, without a successor in place, as preliminary negotiations had failed to bridge gaps over and controls. The NHL had notified the NHLPA as early as November 2011 of its intent not to extend operations beyond expiry without revisions, citing the need for reduced player costs to address competitive imbalances and ensure long-term viability. Upon expiration, all player s became terminable, training camps were shuttered, and exhibition games were canceled, initiating the lockout that halted regular-season preparations scheduled to begin October 11. This marked the second CBA expiry in eight years to trigger a work stoppage, underscoring persistent tensions over allocation in a where HRR had more than doubled since but profit margins varied widely by market.

Core Disputes

Owners' Push for Cost Certainty and Revenue Share Reduction

The National Hockey League owners entered negotiations seeking to reinforce cost certainty through a salary cap system that linked total player compensation to a defined of league-wide hockey-related (HRR), a mechanism established in the 2005 collective bargaining agreement (CBA) following the 2004–05 lockout. This approach aimed to provide financial predictability amid volatile revenues, particularly for smaller-market teams reporting operating losses despite overall league growth; owners argued that unchecked salary escalation had eroded profitability, with HRR tripling since 2005 but many franchises still unprofitable without caps. Commissioner emphasized that cost certainty was non-negotiable, citing the 2004–05 precedent where players conceded a cap only after missing an entire season. Central to the owners' demands was reducing the players' guaranteed share of HRR from 57% under the expiring to as low as 43% in their initial July 13, , proposal, which included an immediate rollback to $58 million and a projected $460 million payroll reduction from 2011–12 levels. Subsequent offers adjusted this target, proposing a 49% player share declining to 47% over time, and by October 16, , a 50–50 split without redefining HRR downward—effectively capping player payouts at around $1.91 billion for the 2012–13 season based on projected revenues. Owners justified the rollback by claiming that post-2005 revenue growth had disproportionately benefited players, with the NHL Players' Association (NHLPA) characterizing the initial demand as a 24% effective pay cut tied to HRR definitions. Owners also advocated modest enhancements to intra-team to bolster competitive balance, proposing an increase in the sharing pool from $150 million to $200 million for 2012–13 (assuming $3.303 billion in league revenues), falling short of the NHLPA's $240–250 million counter-demand. This adjustment aimed to subsidize smaller markets without diluting big-market incentives, though owners resisted broader redistribution that might discourage revenue-generating investments. The push reflected a divide among owners, with large-market teams favoring cap-linked reductions over expansive sharing, prioritizing overall cost control to sustain league viability.

Players' Resistance and Alternative Proposals

The (NHLPA), led by executive director , resisted the owners' push to slash the players' share of hockey-related revenue (HRR) from 57% under the expired collective bargaining agreement to a proposed range of 43–49%, contending that league-wide HRR had risen substantially from $2.2 billion in the 2005–06 season to $3.3 billion by 2011–12, undermining claims of widespread financial distress among franchises. This resistance was framed around the principle that players should not concede a fixed percentage reduction amid revenue growth, particularly as some large-market teams reported profits while smaller ones sought greater among owners—a dynamic the NHLPA viewed as an internal league issue rather than justification for player salary cuts. In mid-August 2012, shortly before the CBA's September 15 expiry, the NHLPA submitted an initial counterproposal for a three-year agreement with an optional fourth year, preserving much of the existing economic structure while offering minor concessions on contract lengths and to address owner concerns over long-term commitments. Following the NHL's offer for an immediate 50/50 HRR split tied to a full 82-game season starting November 2, the NHLPA responded on October 18 with three alternative frameworks, all emphasizing phased transitions over abrupt cuts: (1) a fixed player share of HRR until it naturally declined to 50/50 over three years via revenue fluctuations; (2) players retaining 24% of HRR exceeding a defined , creating a sliding-scale mechanism to cap upside exposure; and (3) an upfront 50/50 split but with a league-imposed maximum on total HRR to prevent escalation beyond sustainable levels. The league rejected these as inadequate for achieving the desired cost certainty, with commissioner stating the proposals left the sides "nowhere close" to resolution. By early December 2012, amid escalating game cancellations, the NHLPA shifted toward longer-term proposals to demonstrate flexibility, including an eight-year on December 7 with an opt-out after six years, alongside demands for a higher "make-whole" provision to honor existing contracts—seeking $590 million over two years compared to the NHL's $211 million offer. These efforts reflected the union's strategy to prioritize player earnings stability and contract security, such as opposing salary recapture clauses and term limits that owners favored to curb future liabilities, while publicly challenging the league's economic narratives through on trends. The resistance ultimately yielded a 50/50 HRR split in the January 2013 tentative agreement, but only after the NHLPA's phased concessions and federal mediation pressured both sides.

Conflicting Perspectives on League Economics

The NHL owners maintained that the league's economic system, established under the 2005 agreement (CBA), was fundamentally broken, citing audited operating losses of $232 million across the three prior seasons despite growth in hockey-related revenues (HRR). They emphasized disparities among franchises, noting that nearly half of the 30 teams reported financial losses in the 2011-12 season, with an independent analysis identifying 13 teams in the red and five incurring losses of $12 million or more. This perspective framed the push for "cost certainty," including a reduction in the players' guaranteed 57% share of HRR to 43-49%, reductions, and term limits, as essential to stabilize small-market teams and prevent further erosion of owner equity. In contrast, the (NHLPA) contested the owners' portrayal of widespread insolvency, highlighting that league-wide HRR had expanded from approximately $1.9 billion in 2005 to $3.3 billion by 2012, reflecting robust overall profitability driven by expanded media deals and attendance. argued that many reported team losses resulted from owners' choices in , arena investments, or related-party transactions rather than core operational deficits, and urged independent audits to verify claims rather than accepting league-provided figures at face value. The union proposed maintaining a higher player share closer to 57%, coupled with reforms to team to bolster weaker markets without direct compensation cuts, viewing the owners' demands as an overreach that ignored players' concessions from the prior lockout and the $3.3 billion in aggregate salary growth over the 2005-12 term. Central to the impasse was the definition and calculation of HRR, which encompassed ticket sales, , sponsorships, and but excluded certain owner-controlled expenses; owners sought to narrow this pool through redefinitions and eliminations (e.g., arena operating costs), effectively lowering the players' effective share, while the NHLPA demanded full and resisted changes that could mask . These conflicting interpretations fueled distrust, with each side accusing the other of opaque —owners decrying inflated player costs, and players questioning valuations that understated health. Ultimately, the dispute underscored a broader between league-wide and franchise-level viability, where owners prioritized systemic resets to avert future failures, and players advocated for -oriented solutions over retroactive reductions.

Negotiation Dynamics

Initial Proposals and Early Talks (June–September 2012)

Negotiations between the National Hockey League (NHL) and the (NHLPA) commenced on June 29, 2012, with an initial 2.5-hour meeting in to discuss the impending expiration of the agreement (CBA) on September 15. The sessions were preliminary, focusing on economic data sharing and league finances, as the NHL emphasized the need for structural changes to address perceived unsustainable player compensation relative to hockey-related revenue (HRR), which had grown significantly since the 2005 CBA. The NHLPA, led by executive director , sought transparency on team financials, questioning the league's claims of widespread losses among franchises, particularly in smaller markets. On July 13, 2012, the NHL presented its first formal proposal, demanding a reduction in the players' share of HRR from 57% under the prior agreement to 46%, alongside redefinitions of HRR to exclude certain revenues and caps on contract lengths at five years for free agents. This offer also included enhanced among teams to support smaller-market clubs, but it required immediate concessions without transitional protections for existing contracts, which the NHL justified by citing league-wide financial pressures and the need for long-term cost certainty. The NHLPA rejected this outright, viewing it as an aggressive rollback that ignored revenue growth driven by player performance and market expansion, and requested audited from teams to verify the owners' economic assertions. The NHLPA submitted its initial counterproposal on August 14, 2012, proposing a three-year CBA with an optional fourth year, under which players would concede revenue gradually—starting with a reduced share in the first year and phasing toward the NHL's targeted split by later years—to preserve current contract values while addressing owner concerns. This approach aimed to bridge the gap without immediate deep cuts, but the NHL dismissed it as insufficient, arguing it deferred rather than resolved core economic imbalances. In response, on August 28, 2012, the NHL issued a second proposal, maintaining the 46% HRR target but offering minor adjustments, such as slightly higher initial player shares, yet still insisting on redefining HRR and limiting long-term deals to enhance competitive balance. Talks deteriorated in early September, with the NHLPA submitting a follow-up offer on August 31 that the league deemed a "step backward," prompting the NHL to suspend formal meetings. Despite requests from the NHLPA for resumed discussions, no substantive sessions occurred before the CBA's expiry on September 15, 2012, as both sides entrenched positions amid disputes over financial transparency and the validity of the owners' loss claims, which the players contested using independent audits showing profitability for many teams. This impasse set the stage for the lockout's onset, with the NHL prioritizing systemic reforms over short-term compromises.

Escalation, Mediation, and Union Tactics (September–December 2012)

Following the implementation of the lockout on September 16, 2012, negotiations intensified but quickly stalled as the NHL and NHLPA maintained entrenched positions on . The league sought to reduce players' share of hockey-related revenues (HRR) from 57% under the expired agreement to approximately 43-49%, including redefinitions of HRR to exclude certain income streams and caps on contract lengths and salaries to achieve cost certainty for owners facing disparate market revenues. The NHLPA, however, proposed retaining near 57% initially, later adjusting to around 54%, while advocating for gradual escalators and rejecting rollbacks that would disproportionately burden players amid league growth. Meetings in late September and October, such as on and when the NHL detailed its proposal, broke down over these gaps, with NHLPA executive director criticizing the owners' demands as unsubstantiated given audited HRR figures showing league profitability. Escalation mounted through sequential game cancellations, signaling the league's resolve to pressure concessions. On October 5, the NHL eliminated the first two weeks of the (through October 25), affecting 303 games initially. Further cancellations followed: November 23 wiped out games through December 14 plus the , and December 11 extended losses through December 30, reaching 526 by December 13—over 60% of the schedule. These actions, coupled with closed training camps on October 4 and halted player services, underscored the owners' leverage from the no-strike clause in the prior , which prevented work stoppages by players. Efforts at third-party mediation emerged in November amid mounting losses. On November 26, the sides agreed to involve federal mediators from the U.S. Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, including Scot Beckenbaugh, who had participated in the 2004-05 lockout resolution. The first session on November 28 lasted six hours but produced no substantive movement, as core economic disputes persisted. Subsequent mediated talks in December, including a two-day session ending December 13, similarly faltered despite procedural facilitation, with the NHL attributing stagnation to the union's unwillingness to bridge the HRR divide below 50%. The NHLPA employed tactics focused on internal cohesion and legal threats to counter owner intransigence. Fehr prioritized unifying over 700 players through frequent updates and rejected interim offers lacking economic viability, arguing that league financial data did not justify demanded cuts given post-2005 revenue growth. By mid-December, facing a potentially lost season, the union escalated with a disclaimer of interest vote: on December 17, players began balloting to authorize executive board dissolution of the union, which passed overwhelmingly on December 21 (712-23), enabling potential antitrust suits against the NHL as individual employees rather than a bargaining unit. Fehr framed this as a protective measure for players' rights, while the NHL dismissed it as a dilatory tactic, filing a lawsuit to preemptively challenge any resulting litigation and threatening contract voids. This maneuver shifted dynamics by exposing owners to treble damages under antitrust law absent collective bargaining immunity.

Final Push and Disclaimer Maneuvers (December 2012–January 2013)

As negotiations stalled in mid-December, the NHL Players' Association (NHLPA) escalated pressure on the league through a disclaimer of interest vote. On December 21, 2012, NHLPA members overwhelmingly approved—by a margin exceeding 95%—authorizing the executive board to file a disclaimer, which would effectively dissolve the union and enable players to pursue antitrust litigation against the NHL, arguing the lockout constituted an illegal restraint of trade absent collective bargaining protections. This maneuver, valid until January 2, 2013, aimed to force concessions by threatening to shift the dispute to federal courts, where players could seek damages and an injunction to end the lockout. The NHL responded cautiously, with Commissioner warning that a would prompt immediate countersuits alleging bad-faith and interference, potentially prolonging the . Despite the vote, no immediate filing occurred, preserving room for talks amid mounting game cancellations, including all contests through January 14 announced on December 20, totaling 625 lost games or about 51% of the schedule. The , however, underscored the union's play, as players had previously considered but deferred decertification—a more permanent dissolution requiring NLRB petition—opting instead for the faster under . Talks briefly reignited on December 28, 2012, when the NHL presented a new comprehensive proposal incorporating movement on , limits, and contributions, building on prior owner-player side discussions from that bypassed lead negotiators. The NHLPA countered on December 30, prompting the league to allow the January 2 deadline to lapse without action, signaling mutual interest in avoiding litigation. Intensified sessions followed on January 4 and 5, facilitated by federal mediators and Scot L. Beckenbaugh, who helped bridge gaps on core issues like the 50-50 hockey-related revenue split and parameters. After a 16-hour marathon extending past 5 a.m. ET on , 2013, the sides reached a tentative agreement on a 10-year deal, averting further cancellations and preserving a compressed 48-game season. The pact, ratified by owners on January 9 and players on January 12, reflected owners' gains in cost certainty while conceding player mobility elements, ending the 113-day lockout.

Lockout Execution

Official Lockout Declaration and Immediate Actions

The collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the National Hockey League (NHL) and the NHL Players' Association (NHLPA) expired at 11:59 p.m. ET on September 15, 2012, after which the NHL imposed a league-wide lockout effective 12:01 a.m. on September 16, 2012. NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman confirmed the lockout, stating that the league's Board of Governors had unanimously authorized the action due to the absence of a new agreement on revenue sharing and contract terms. This marked the third labor stoppage in NHL history and the second lockout under Bettman's tenure, following the 2004–05 season cancellation. Immediate consequences included the cancellation of all remaining preseason games, which were scheduled to commence that weekend across North American venues. were barred from accessing team facilities, practicing, or receiving salaries, while team personnel were prohibited from any contact with locked-out athletes. The NHL further enacted digital measures by scrubbing its official website of all player images, statistics, and references, effectively erasing active roster visibility to underscore the work stoppage. These steps aligned with standard lockout protocols to halt operations and pressure negotiations, as owners sought to enforce cost controls amid disputes over the players' 57% revenue share from the prior . No formal bargaining sessions were planned immediately following the declaration, signaling the league's readiness for a prolonged .

Progressive Game Cancellations and Season Compression

The NHL's lockout, declared on September 15, 2012, led to immediate suspension of all hockey-related activities, including the cancellation of remaining preseason games on September 18, 2012, as no (CBA) was in place. This initial step eliminated exhibition contests intended to prepare teams for the regular season opener on , 2012, depriving players of paid practice time and owners of early revenue. Progressive cancellations of regular-season games escalated the economic pressure on both sides, with announcements timed to coincide with negotiation breakdowns. On October 4, 2012, the league cancelled the first 143 regular-season games scheduled from October 11 to October 24, representing approximately 12 percent of the original 1,230-game slate and resulting in estimated losses of $150 million in ticket revenue. Further cancellations followed on November 22, 2012, eliminating an additional 104 games from November 25 to December 14, bringing the total to 327 lost contests and also scrapping the 2013 NHL All-Star Game planned for January 26-27 in . By December 20, 2012, games through December 30 were axed, pushing cumulative cancellations to 526 matches, or about 43 percent of the season. The final pre-resolution wave came with the December 31, 2012, cancellation of games through January 14, 2013, totaling 625 regular-season games erased—over 50 percent of the schedule—and prompting warnings from Commissioner that the season faced total forfeiture absent a deal. A tentative agreement reached on January 6, 2013, averted complete cancellation, but the lockout's duration necessitated severe season compression to salvage play. The revised 2012-13 schedule featured 48 games per team—41.5 percent fewer than the standard 82—concentrated into 99 days from January 19 to April 28, 2013, with each club facing opponents three times (primarily intra-conference) to minimize travel amid tight timelines. This structure included frequent back-to-back games and up to five contests per week for some teams, increasing physical demands and logistical challenges, such as condensed recovery periods and cross-country flights on consecutive days. The pro-rated salary cap was set at $70.2 million for the shortened campaign, reflecting prorated player salaries and revenues, though the compressed format amplified injury risks and fatigue, as evidenced by elevated player absences early in the season.

Resolution

Tentative Agreement and Key Concessions

On January 6, 2013, the National Hockey League (NHL) and the NHL Players' Association (NHLPA) announced a tentative agreement on a new , ending the 113-day lockout after marathon negotiations facilitated by federal mediator Scott Becker. The deal outlined a 10-year term, extendable to 2022 with a mutual opt-out option after eight years, providing long-term labor stability absent in prior agreements that had expired more frequently. Central to the agreement was a restructured split, shifting to a 50-50 division of hockey-related (HRR) between owners and players, down from the players' prior effective share of approximately 57% under the 2005 . This concession by players addressed owners' demands for greater cost certainty amid uneven league profitability, where some franchises reported operating losses due to escalating costs outpacing HRR growth. In exchange, owners agreed to "make-whole" provisions totaling around $300 million in transitional payments to offset immediate reductions for players, distributed outside the system over the first two seasons. Additional player concessions included caps on lengths—limited to seven years for free agents (eight years for a player's own )—and restrictions on signing bonuses to curb long-term cap circumvention strategies that had inflated costs in prior years. Owners yielded on demands for a complete HRR accounting overhaul and accepted a floor tied to 2011-12 levels, adjusted for the shortened season, ensuring smaller-market teams maintained competitive spending parity. These terms reflected the owners' stronger bargaining position, as the lockout's cancellation of over 40% of the season eroded player leverage from lost wages exceeding $500 million collectively.

Ratification Process and CBA Details

The NHL Board of Governors unanimously ratified the tentative agreement () on January 9, 2013, during a meeting in , with all 30 owners present approving the deal by a 30-0 vote. This step followed the tentative framework agreement reached between the NHL and NHLPA on January 6, 2013, after 113 days of lockout. The NHL Players' Association (NHLPA) then conducted its ratification vote among approximately 700 members, opening the electronic ballot from 8:00 p.m. on January 10 to 8:00 a.m. on January 12, , requiring a for approval. The players ratified the on January 12, , enabling the signing of a (MOU) later that day to implement the terms immediately. The ratified spanned 10 years, covering the 2013–14 through 2022–23 seasons, with a mutual option exercisable after the 2020–21 season (eight years). It fixed players' share of hockey-related revenues (HRR) at 50 percent, down from approximately 57 percent under the prior agreement, incorporating mechanisms like an system where up to 10 percent of player salaries could be withheld if revenues fell short, repayable in future "make-whole" payments totaling $300 million over six years to transition contracts. The for the shortened 2012–13 season was set at a prorated $70.2 million per team, rising to $64.3 million for 2013–14 before projected annual increases tied to HRR growth (capped at 5 percent). was expanded, with the NHL contributing about 605.5 basis points of HRR (roughly $100–120 million annually) redistributed from higher- to lower- teams, prioritizing Canadian clubs and those in the bottom by , subject to incentives like thresholds. Contract provisions included maximum lengths of seven years for new deals and eight years for re-signings of one's own players, with annual salary increases limited to 35 percent over the prior year (or 50 percent in the first year for re-signings) and a "sliding scale" for hits on longer-term contracts to discourage front-loading. Free agency rules advanced unrestricted free agency to age 27 or seven professional years (from 28 or 10 years), while eliminating salary for offer sheets over certain thresholds and restricting signing bonuses to the first two years (counting fully against the ). These terms aimed to enhance competitive by curbing long-term, high-value contracts that had previously strained smaller-market teams.

Aftermath

Immediate Financial and Operational Repercussions

The cancellation of 628 regular-season games out of 1,230 scheduled represented a 51 percent reduction, depriving the league of revenue from tickets, concessions, merchandise, and local broadcasting deals estimated in the low hundreds of millions of dollars. Players collectively lost wages prorated to the shortened schedule, with individuals forgoing pay for the 113-day lockout period and the equivalent of 34 games per team, resulting in an approximate $500–600 million shortfall in total compensation based on prior-season averages. Despite these hits, the NHL recouped about 72 percent of full-season revenue projections through the 48-game slate, driven by 97 percent arena capacity and heightened fan urgency for the compressed format. Operationally, teams faced truncated training camps limited to around 16 days post-agreement on , 2013, with no further preseason exhibitions after early cancellations, compelling accelerated player conditioning and roster finalization. The regular season's January 19 start crammed 48 games into 99 days, featuring a league-high of back-to-back contests (up to 13 per team) and cross-country road swings spanning multiple time zones, which elevated logistical demands on travel, equipment transport, and arena staffing while curtailing practice and recovery periods. Several franchises had furloughed non-essential personnel during the lockout, necessitating swift rehiring and operational ramp-up to handle the intensified pace, though core like rinks and medical support remained intact. This rush contributed to early-season reports of elevated and minor injuries, though empirical data on long-term health effects emerged inconclusive.

Reactions from Stakeholders and the Public

apologized to fans on January 9, 2013, acknowledging the lockout's disruption after it had already canceled over half the season's games. Owners, seeking a larger share from the league's -related (HRR), which had grown to approximately $3.3 billion by , framed the dispute as necessary for financial sustainability across all teams, including smaller-market franchises. To counter perceptions of owner intransigence, the league hired a communications strategist in to portray the lockout as "shared sacrifice" between owners and players, emphasizing that unchecked player contracts threatened league-wide viability. NHL Players' Association (NHLPA) executive director responded to owner proposals by criticizing their timing and substance, noting in October 2012 that the league's "best" offer came four weeks into the lockout, which he viewed as a to pressure players rather than genuine . Fehr maintained that players were willing to accept a reduced revenue share—down from 57% under the prior CBA—but insisted on protections against contract rollbacks and caps on long-term deals that owners deemed excessive, arguing such limits unfairly restricted player mobility and earnings potential. Despite fan backlash, Fehr expressed no regret for the union's stance, prioritizing structural reforms to prevent future owner dominance in bargaining. Fans, bearing the direct cost of canceled games and lost access, voiced intense frustration, with protests organized outside NHL headquarters in on September 15, 2012, the day the lockout began, to demand resumption of play. holders reported disillusionment, citing repeated labor strife— the third in 18 years—as eroding , with some vowing permanent boycotts of games and merchandise. Initiatives like the "Just Drop It" campaign in December 2012 urged fans to skip one game per canceled matchup, amassing thousands of pledges online, while post-lockout surveys indicated 20-30% of fans in markets like considered abstaining from attendance to perceived greed on both sides. Early sentiment leaned toward sympathy for players, viewing owners' demands as excessive given rising HRR, though prolonged stalemate shifted blame toward the NHLPA for rejecting offers. Casual fans showed greater , tuning out intermittently without deep , while die-hards lamented their exclusion from despite the sport's operations.

Long-Term Effects on League Stability and Player Outcomes

The 2012–13 NHL lockout culminated in a 10-year that redefined revenue distribution, setting players' share of hockey-related revenues at 50 percent, down from 57 percent, which owners argued was essential for long-term financial equity across franchises. This adjustment, coupled with enhanced among teams, addressed profitability disparities—13 of 30 teams reportedly lost money in 2011–12—and fostered league-wide stability by curbing escalation in player costs relative to income growth. By 2021–22, league revenues had expanded to $5.4 billion from approximately $3.3 billion pre-lockout levels, reflecting compounded annual growth driven by expanded media deals, arena revenues, and international expansion, without subsequent labor disruptions until CBA expiration negotiations. trends reinforced this stability, with the shortened 2012–13 season achieving a record average of 17,768 fans per game despite 510 cancellations, and subsequent seasons sustaining high —26 of 30 teams at 90 percent or more in 2013–14—indicating resilient and operational . For players, the CBA imposed contract term limits (up to seven years for new deals) and salary arbitration changes, which constrained long-term earning potential for top talents but aligned compensation with league revenues to prevent cost overruns that had strained smaller-market teams. The salary cap rose progressively from $60 million in 2012–13 to $64.3 million in 2013–14 and beyond, enabling aggregate player salaries to increase in absolute terms amid revenue expansion, though the fixed revenue percentage introduced escrow mechanisms that deferred portions of pay to balance actual versus projected income— a provision players criticized for effectively reducing take-home pay in high-revenue years. Career outcomes varied: approximately 200 players competed in European leagues during the 113-day lockout, with studies showing mixed post-return productivity effects, including potential fatigue from mismatched schedules but no widespread career derailments. Older players faced heightened risks of displacement due to cap pressures favoring youth, as noted in contemporary analyses, though empirical data on retirements linked to the lockout remains limited, with concussion-related exits declining post-2011 partly attributable to the compressed season's fewer games. Overall, the agreement preserved player mobility via unrestricted free agency thresholds while tying outcomes to league prosperity, yielding sustained employment for the core roster amid expansion to 32 teams by 2021.

References

  1. [1]
    The hockey lockout of 2012–2013 - Bureau of Labor Statistics
    The hockey lockout of 2012–2013 resulted in the cancellation of 60 percent of regular-season games. Owners were the clear winners, securing a 50–50 split of ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  2. [2]
    Collective Bargaining Agreement | The PA | The Home Of The Players
    The NHL owners have locked out the players three times (1994-95, 2004-05 & 2012-13). The 1994-95 and 2012-13 lockouts resulted in shortened 48-game regular ...
  3. [3]
    NHL Owners, Players Score New CBA Saving the 2012-13 Hockey ...
    Jan 6, 2013 · 1) The tentative agreement is a 10-year deal with a mutual opt-out clause after eight years · 2) Contract term limits at 7 years, and 8 years for ...
  4. [4]
    NHL reports best-ever business for 2010-11, estimates $2.9B in ...
    Apr 13, 2011 · The NHL reports that it's on pace for $2.9 billion in revenue by the end of the 2011 playoffs, a record-breaking season for league-wide ...
  5. [5]
    Why is the NHL considering a lockout in 2012, after the damage ...
    Sep 1, 2012 · Though it's true that league revenues have grown to nearly $3.3 billion from $1.9 billion since the last lockout, not all teams have realized ...
  6. [6]
    Statement from NHL/NHLPA Regarding Resolution of ... - NHLPA.com
    The NHL and the NHLPA have reached a settlement of their dispute over 2010-11 Hockey Related Revenue (HRR). The return of Escrow monies to the Players and ...
  7. [7]
    Payments To NHL Teams, Players Delayed Over Hockey-Related ...
    Revenue-sharing payments to NHL teams and the refunding of player escrow overpayments are "delayed indefinitely" because the league and the NHLPA "haven't ...
  8. [8]
    NHL teams lose money, and the lockout isn't going to change that
    Sep 10, 2012 · The problem in the National Hockey League is that there are, at last count, around 18 teams that Forbes.com claims lost money in 2010-11.
  9. [9]
    Forbes Releases List of 2012 NHL Team Values - Quest Hockey
    Dec 3, 2012 · The three least profitable teams were the Phoenix Coyotes (-$20.6 Million), the Columbus Blue Jackets (-$18.7 Million) and the New York ...
  10. [10]
    Why NHL teams cry poor despite the league's record growth
    Jul 20, 2012 · Before revenue sharing, the NHL's top 10 revenue generating teams are believed to averaged close to $150-million in revenue the 2010-11 season.<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    NHL Lockout 2012: Revenue Sharing Is the Key to Labor Peace
    Oct 29, 2012 · How does the National Hockey League earn a record $3.3 billion in revenue and yet most of its teams lose money? The answer is the lack of a ...Missing: entering | Show results with:entering
  12. [12]
    NHL franchise values, pay scale key factors in lockout
    Nov 29, 2012 · Last year, Forbes had the Leafs at a mere $521 million, so the near doubling of their value shows that a team is worth what someone is willing ...
  13. [13]
    Value of NHL Teams Rises, Profit Declines - The Hollywood Reporter
    Dec 1, 2011 · The average hockey team is now worth $240 million, up 5 percent from last year due to a 5 percent revenue increase during the 2010-2011 season ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] NHL-2005-CBA.pdf - cMaxxSports
    Jul 22, 2005 · This is a collective bargaining agreement between the NHL and NHLPA, covering definitions, recognition, duration, and union security.
  15. [15]
    NHL CBA 101: What is the NHL Salary Cap? - Colligan Hockey
    Jan 31, 2015 · 2005-06. Salary Cap Ceiling: $39.0 million; Salary Cap Floor: $23.0 million ; 2006-07. Salary Cap Ceiling: $44.0 million; Salary Cap Floor: $28.0 ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] An Analysis of the Issues Surrounding the NHL Lockout
    Revenue Sharing. A major issue in the 2012 negotiations revolves around revenue sharing. The league has flourished financially since the 2004-05 lockout.Missing: entering expenses
  17. [17]
    NHL imposes league-wide lockout - ESPN
    Sep 15, 2012 · NHL officially locks out players as CBA expires · Pittsburgh Penguins ... NHL imposes league-wide lockout. Katie StrangSep 15, 2012, 06:05 PM ET.
  18. [18]
    CBA expires, triggering an NHL lockout - Sportsnet
    Sep 15, 2012 · As far back as November, the NHL informed the union it would be unwilling to continue operating past the expiration of the current CBA. But ...
  19. [19]
    Does the NHL's CBA notice mean another lockout? - Sports Illustrated
    May 17, 2012 · Since the last lockout ended, the NHL's revenue has nearly tripled. If, as some believe, the owners will seek a larger share of that revenue ...
  20. [20]
    NHL lockout all but set with no bargaining set - CBS News
    Owners wouldn't make a deal without it, and players sacrificed a full season before finally agreeing to a cost-certainty system for teams. Without such a ...
  21. [21]
    Very little common ground between proposals by NHL owners and ...
    the players' share in revenue would be cut from 57 percent to 43 percent and would include a change to the way the ...
  22. [22]
    CBA Myths Vs. Facts - NHLPA.com
    Sep 14, 2012 · This is a payroll reduction of $460M, or 24%, on 2011/12 numbers. Their second proposal would reduce the player share to 46% of HRR, or “only” ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
  23. [23]
    NHL lockout: How it came to this and what happens next | NHL
    Sep 17, 2012 · Colin Horgan: The deadline for a new NHL collective bargaining agreement passed without agreement and the players are now locked out.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  24. [24]
    NHL lockout 2012: League releases full text of CBA proposal
    Oct 17, 2012 · The NHL has proposed to increase the Revenue Sharing pool for 2012/13 to $200 million (assuming League-wide revenues of $3.303 Billion), ...
  25. [25]
    Breaking it down: Why NHL owners oppose revenue sharing
    Aug 22, 2012 · The NHLPA, alternately, suggests that teams share about $250 million. One of the least publicized aspects of Fehr's remarks last Friday during a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  26. [26]
    NHL lockout: League rejects three counter proposals from players
    Oct 18, 2012 · 1. Players would accept a fixed share of hockey related revenue until the split reached 50-50 in three years. · 2. Players would get 24 percent ...
  27. [27]
    NHL lockout timeline: Let's remember the whole nightmare | SB Nation
    Jan 6, 2013 · The 2012 NHL lockout is over. It took 113 days, we lost 628 games to cancellation, it cost the league countless millions of dollars and left us with burning ...Missing: key facts
  28. [28]
    NHL owners reject NHLPA's proposals: 'We are nowhere close' to ...
    Oct 18, 2012 · NHL owners reject NHLPA's proposals: 'We are nowhere close' to ending the NHL lockout, says Gary Bettman. Published: Oct. 18, 2012, 8:30 p.m..
  29. [29]
    2012 NHL Lockout: NHLPA Makes 'Significant' Proposal To Owners
    Dec 7, 2012 · Donald Fehr met with the media after talks ended, stating that the players offered an eight-year term to the CBA with an opt-out clause after ...
  30. [30]
    The Complete NHL Lockout FAQ, Part 1 - Grantland
    Oct 1, 2012 · Because the owners claimed that the NHL's economic system was broken (the NHL released an audit showing the league had lost $232 million in ...Missing: losses | Show results with:losses
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Evidence from the National Hockey League Lockout - arXiv
    Jun 26, 2025 · The matching results indicate that playing overseas during the 2012-13 NHL lockout did not consistently offer a competitive advantage, which ...
  32. [32]
    Will NHL Players Fall Prey To Predatory Lockout Loans As ... - Forbes
    Sep 12, 2012 · What it comes down to is NHL owners upset at the split of league revenues. Pursuant to the most recently negotiated CBA, players received 57% of ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    NHL, NHLPA Remain Far Apart On Economic Issues After Thursday ...
    Aug 23, 2012 · The owners' initial proposal called for a sharp 24 percent roll back in current salaries in addition to a giving just 43 percent of HRR to the ...
  34. [34]
    Fact-Checking the NHL Lockout - CBA Related - Hockey Forums
    Oct 24, 2012 · Statement: Each of the NHLPA's three recent proposals guaranteed the revenue split eventually reached 50-50. Reality: No, they didn't. There was ...
  35. [35]
    Timeline: The 2012-2013 NHL lockout | Globalnews.ca
    Sep 15, 2012 · Sept. 16: For the second time in eight years, the NHL locks out its players. The contract between the league and the players expired at midnight ...Missing: key facts causes resolution
  36. [36]
    NHL issues proposal to players - ESPN
    Aug 28, 2012 · Bettman stated earlier this month the league intends to lock out the players if no new deal is reached by Sept. 15. "It is a proposal we believe ...Missing: June | Show results with:June
  37. [37]
    NHL players willing to take less in 1st offer to league | CBC Sports
    Aug 15, 2012 · The NHL Players' Association's first proposal, termed an alternative offer by executive director Donald Fehr, in the latest round of ...
  38. [38]
    NHL breaks off talks after union's latest offer - Orange County Register
    Aug 31, 2012 · The NHLPA's latest offer came three days after the NHL made its first counterproposal. After asking the players to cut their share of hockey ...
  39. [39]
    NHL makes second proposal to players' association during labor talks
    The NHL made a second proposal to the players' association during labor negotiations Tuesday in New York, but it's unclear how much it ...
  40. [40]
    A history of the NHL's labor stalemate - USA Today
    Sep 16, 2012 · Sept. 15, 2012: The NHLPA said it requested talks with the league but was turned down. Daly said both sides decided against a meeting because ...
  41. [41]
    A Business Negotiation Case Study: Ending the NHL Lockout - PON
    Jul 29, 2025 · The NHL lockout ended after 113 days with a deal where players conceded short-term salary for long-term pension security, using shuttle ...Missing: June | Show results with:June
  42. [42]
    NHL Lockout, Day 3: Donald Fehr "Puzzled" By League, Owners ...
    Sep 17, 2012 · Donald Fehr yesterday said that he "was puzzled by the owners' bargaining stances." He said, "When you look at their original proposal, it was ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  43. [43]
    NHL cancels season's 1st two weeks - ESPN
    Oct 5, 2012 · The NHL canceled two weeks' worth of regular-season games Thursday as the lockout dragged into its 18th day with no new labor talks scheduled.Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  44. [44]
    NHL lockout ends at 113 days: A daily look back - USA Today
    Sep 25, 2012 · The NHL, which went into effect at 12:01 a.m. on Sept. 16 when the NHL and NHL Players' Association couldn't decide how to divide $3.3 ...
  45. [45]
    Lockout: NHL Announces All Games Through December 30 Have ...
    Dec 11, 2012 · The league wiped out all games through Dec. 30 in its latest round of cancellations. Already, 422 regular-season games had been called off ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  46. [46]
    NHL lockout: No progress after 2nd day with mediator
    Dec 13, 2012 · Games from Dec. 15 through Dec. 30 were the latest to be wiped out, bringing the total to 526 lost to the lockout that started Sept. 16. The ...
  47. [47]
    Federal Mediators Will Oversee Negotiations on Lockout
    Nov 26, 2012 · The NHL and its players association have agreed to mediation in an effort to break the stalemate in negotiations between the two sides.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  48. [48]
    Federal mediators to assist in stalled NHL CBA talks - Sports Illustrated
    Nov 26, 2012 · Beckenbaugh was a mediator during the 2004-05 lockout, a stoppage that caused cancellation of the entire season. Published Nov 26, 2012.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  49. [49]
    NHL, union meet with mediator - ESPN
    Nov 28, 2012 · The NHL and the NHLPA met with a federal mediator Wednesday in an attempt to resolve the lingering labor dispute that has jeopardized the ...
  50. [50]
    NHL Lockout, Day 93: NHLPA Begins Voting On Disclaimer Of Interest
    More than 700 members of the NHLPA began voting yesterday "on whether to give the union's executive board the authority to file a disclaimer of interest, ...
  51. [51]
    NHL Lockout: NHLPA passes disclaimer of interest - CBS Sports
    Dec 21, 2012 · Now the legal battle between the NHL and NHLPA can really begin with the NHLPA players enabling a disclaimer of interest.
  52. [52]
    Donald Fehr disputes that disclaimer vote is a tactic - USA Today
    Dec 19, 2012 · The NHL lawsuit cites those cases and NHL player quotes expressing strong support for the union in bolstering its case that the vote is a tactic ...
  53. [53]
    NHLPA eyes breakup; NHL responds - ESPN
    Dec 14, 2012 · As long as the NHL players continue to negotiate under executive director Donald Fehr as part of the NHLPA, they don't receive that protection.
  54. [54]
    Players overwhelmingly authorize disclaimer move - USA Today
    Dec 21, 2012 · The NHLPA doesn't have to issue a disclaimer immediately and could choose to attempt another round of negotiations before embracing that move.
  55. [55]
    NHL lockout 2012: NHLPA 'overwhelmingly' votes in favor of ...
    Dec 21, 2012 · The NHLPA has overwhelmingly voted in favor of allowing the executive board to file a disclaimer of interest.
  56. [56]
    NHL, players are taking the lockout to court - USA Today
    Dec 14, 2012 · There are two methods of dissolving the union. Players can have a formal vote to decertify or the NHLPA can disclaim interest, which essentially ...Missing: clause | Show results with:clause
  57. [57]
    N.H.L. and Players Union Reach Tentative Agreement to End Lockout
    Jan 6, 2013 · The agreement was reached around 5 a.m. at a Midtown Manhattan hotel after a 16-hour negotiating session. Pending ratification by the ...Missing: December | Show results with:December
  58. [58]
    NHL, players' union reach tentative deal to end lockout | CBC Sports
    Jan 6, 2013 · NHL commissioner Gary Bettman confirmed from New York the two sides had reached a tentative agreement on the framework of a new collective bargaining agreement.
  59. [59]
    NHL lockout all but set with no bargaining planned - MPR News
    Sep 15, 2012 · The NHL says there will be no bargaining with the players' union Saturday, leaving nothing to stop a lockout.
  60. [60]
    NHL Lockout: First Two Weeks of 2012-13 Season Canceled
    National Hockey League owners chose to cancel the first two weeks of the 2012-13 regular season Thursday due to the their ongoing lockout of the players' union.Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  61. [61]
    NHL Lockout 2012: League Cancels 2013 All-Star Game in Columbus
    Jun 5, 2018 · The NHL canceled the 2013 All-Star Game on Friday (via NHL.com), two days after the league rejected the NHLPA's latest CBA proposal.
  62. [62]
    NHL Lockout 2012: Games Cancelled Through December 30th
    Feb 22, 2019 · A total of 526 regular-season games-42.8 percent of the season-were scheduled for October 11 through December 30. It's alright though, folks.
  63. [63]
    NHL Lockout | The Canadian Encyclopedia
    On the basis of the NHL's record-setting $3.3-billion 2011-12 season ... And now faced with the prospect of a compressed season--five games a week ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  64. [64]
    NHL, union have tentative agreement - ESPN
    Jan 6, 2013 · The tentative agreement is a 10-year deal with a mutual opt-out clause after eight years and includes contract term limits at seven years (eight ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  65. [65]
    NHL offers 50-50 split to players - ESPN
    Oct 16, 2012 · The NHL has offered its locked-out players a 50-50 split in hockey-related revenue, league commissioner Gary Bettman said Tuesday.
  66. [66]
    NHL Board of Governors ratifies new CBA - The Washington Post
    Jan 9, 2013 · The NHL's Board of Governors voted unanimously to ratify the new collective bargaining agreement in New York Wednesday.
  67. [67]
    Board ratifies NHL agreement - ESPN
    Jan 9, 2013 · The 30 governors on hand for the league's board of governors meeting voted unanimously to pass, completing one half of ratification.
  68. [68]
    CBA Update: NHLPA Ratification Info By
    Jan 10, 2013 · The ratification voting window will be open for Players for a duration of 36 hours, concluding on Saturday, January 12, 2013 at 8:00 a.m. ET.Missing: results percentage turnout<|control11|><|separator|>
  69. [69]
    Players Vote to Ratify New Collective Bargaining ... - NHLPA.com
    Jan 12, 2013 · TORONTO (January 12, 2013) – The members of the National Hockey League Players' Association (NHLPA) have voted to ratify the new Collective ...Missing: results percentage turnout
  70. [70]
    nhlpa-confirms-ratification-of-cba-awaits-mou - Lohud
    TORONTO (January 12, 2013) – The members of the National Hockey League Players' Association (NHLPA) have voted to ratify the new Collective Bargaining ...
  71. [71]
    Chart: Key changes in the new NHL collective bargaining agreement
    Jan 6, 2013 · 10-year agreement (either side can opt out after eight years). • 50-50 split in revenues. • $70.2 million prorated salary cap this ...
  72. [72]
    NHL labour deal: The nuts & bolts | CBC Sports
    Jan 6, 2013 · Owners and players split revenue 50-50 each season, with the players receiving $300 million US in deferred "make-whole payments" to ease the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  73. [73]
    Sarah Kwak: Key points of the NHL's new CBA deal - Sports Illustrated
    Jan 6, 2013 · The 2013-14 salary cap: For the first full season under the new CBA, the cap for each team will be $64.3 million, what it was for the 2011-12 ...
  74. [74]
    2013 NHL CBA: New Revenue Sharing Program Could Help the ...
    Feb 23, 2019 · Subject to a few conditions, the NHL will take its league-wide Hockey Related Revenue figure (HRR) and multiply it by 0.06055 to determine the ...Missing: key terms
  75. [75]
    Analyzing the Impact of the 2013 NHL CBA to the Comp" by Ryan Lacy
    This paper investigates whether the 2013 National Hockey League (NHL) Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), which hardened the existing salary cap, increased ...
  76. [76]
    Tracking the damage of the 2-month-old NHL lockout - USA Today
    Nov 15, 2012 · They have now technically already lost 19.4% of their 2012-13 pay. But that figure isn't permanently settled. What players would receive in a ...Missing: effects | Show results with:effects
  77. [77]
    A skeptic's 2012-13 review: the lockout - ESPN - Cross Checks Blog
    Jul 15, 2013 · The NHL lost 58.5 percent of its games but made 72 percent of its full-season revenue, not to mention the pure gravy for the 16 playoff teams.Missing: resistance | Show results with:resistance
  78. [78]
    NHL Lockout: What the Cancellation of the Preseason Means for ...
    Jun 4, 2018 · The NHL announced on Thursday that it had cancelled the remaining pre-season games scheduled for October. What does Thursday's news mean for ...
  79. [79]
    Skill, Luck, and the NHL's Shortened Season
    Jan 24, 2013 · ... NHL will play a reduced schedule. Last year, NBA teams played 66 games during the shortened season and the NHL will play 48 games this year ...
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Lockouts and Player Productivity: Evidence from the National ...
    May 12, 2025 · lockout resulted in a significant financial loss to the players since an NHL player's annual salary is often on a million-dollar scale. The ...
  81. [81]
    Gary Bettman apologizes to NHL fans for lockout | CBC Sports
    Jan 9, 2013 · The NHL commissioner Gary Bettman has apologized to hockey fans for the lockout that delayed the start of the season by three months.
  82. [82]
    NHL Locks Out the Fan Base - The Little Rebellion
    Oct 23, 2012 · The HRR that the owners signed away ended up growing to over $3 billion annually in each of the last two years, from $2.2 billion in the year ...Missing: 2012-13 stakeholders public
  83. [83]
    NHL Turning to GOP Spin Doctor to Help Convince Fans Lockout Is ...
    Oct 16, 2012 · The NHL now has a better sense of how to spin the NHL Players Association as the villains in the lockout, or at least how to frame it as “shared ...
  84. [84]
    Video: Donald Fehr speaks on NHLPA response to latest proposal
    Oct 18, 2012 · Fehr also criticized the owners for waiting until four weeks into the lockout to make their best proposal. Fehr said the owners are trying to ...
  85. [85]
    NHL Lockout 2012: NHLPA Head Donald Fehr Does Not 'See Path ...
    Jun 5, 2018 · According to Strang's article, Donald Fehr and the NHLPA didn't agree with the NHL owners' stance on long-term contract limits, rules to avoid ...Missing: reactions | Show results with:reactions
  86. [86]
    Donald Fehr Holds Tight to His Composure and His Principles
    Oct 21, 2012 · Donald Fehr, the leader of the N.H.L. Players' Association, seems unfazed by rising criticism from fans over the lockout, even after owners ...
  87. [87]
    As NHL Lockout Nears, 'Greatest Fans On Earth' Prepare For Battle
    Sep 14, 2012 · ”We have scheduled a protest outside the NHL office in New York City on September 15th to voice fan opinion about a lockout by the league. Since ...
  88. [88]
    NHL season ticketholders react to cancellations - USA Today
    Dec 11, 2012 · NHL season ticketholders react to cancellations. USATODAY. Fans look on in early December as locked-out NHL players participate in a workout.
  89. [89]
    NHL fan boycott: Will you support the Just Drop It initiative's eye-for ...
    Dec 10, 2012 · Even when the lockout ends, the NHL fan anger will linger on. Well, at least among the fans that care. Hockey fans, apathy be thy name.Missing: protests | Show results with:protests
  90. [90]
    Habs, businesses excited at return of NHL as some fans threaten to ...
    Jan 6, 2013 · That said, many fans say they plan to prove a point and will boycott at least some NHL games. Nearly 22,000 people have joined a protest ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  91. [91]
    The social media effect - ESPN
    Sep 10, 2012 · ... NHL CBA negotiations as another lockout closes in. And so far, public opinion has been strongly favoring the players, writes Craig Custance.
  92. [92]
    It's not the casual fan Bettman and Fehr should be worried about ...
    Nov 9, 2012 · There is a percentage of mostly silent hockey fans not all that bothered by the lockout. They are the ones who follow the league intermittently ...Missing: reactions | Show results with:reactions
  93. [93]
    Five groups deserving of sympathy during NHL lockout - USA Today
    Oct 7, 2012 · Fans pay the tab for the NHL to exist, but they have no seat at the bargaining table. NHL officials and players say they feel sorry for the fans ...Missing: 2012-13 reactions stakeholders public
  94. [94]
    The Bettman Legacy: From lockout pain to leaguewide prosperity
    May 15, 2023 · A look back. Before and after the lockout that canceled the 2004-05 season: League Revenue. 2003-04: $2.1 billion 2021-22: $5.4 billion (new ...<|separator|>
  95. [95]
    NHL Sets New Average Attendance Record During Lockout ...
    Apr 29, 2013 · NHL teams averaged 17,768 fans per game during the lockout-shortened '12-13 regular season, breaking the previous league record set during ...
  96. [96]
    Has the NHL Officially Won Back Its Fans After the Lockout?
    Jun 1, 2018 · According to ESPN, 26 of the 30 NHL teams had an average attendance of 90 percent or more this year, with 21 teams playing to 97 percent ...Missing: trends | Show results with:trends
  97. [97]
    The Evolution of the NHL Salary Cap: A Historical Overview
    May 1, 2024 · It has since risen each year as league revenues grew. Key ... 2012-13: $60.0 million (lockout season). 2013-14: $64.3 million. 2014 ...
  98. [98]
    Lockouts and Player Productivity - Qi Ge, Michael J. Lopez, 2016
    May 11, 2016 · This article examines the effect of playing abroad during the 2012-2013 National Hockey League (NHL) lockout on postlockout player productivity.
  99. [99]
    NHL lockout: If season lost, some players' NHL careers will be over
    Dec 11, 2012 · "Depending on the salary cap, there will be players maybe pushed out. Older players may be pushed out for younger players. There is no question ...Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
  100. [100]
    The financial toll of career-ending concussions in professional hockey
    There was an apparent decline in concussion-induced retirements after 2011, possibly related to the 2012–2013 NHL lockout and shortened season, increased ...Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes