Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Disclaimer

A disclaimer is a formal legal statement in which a party explicitly denies or limits responsibility, liability, or endorsement for specific claims, actions, information, or outcomes, serving to protect the issuing entity from potential legal repercussions.^[1]^[2] In broader legal contexts, disclaimers function as a renunciation of rights or interests, such as an heir formally refusing an inheritance to redirect it through intestate succession, or an insurance provider denying coverage under a policy for a particular claim.^[1]^[3] They also appear in commercial settings to negate or restrict warranty obligations, where a seller might disclaim implied guarantees of product fitness to limit buyer remedies to those explicitly stated.^[2]^[4] Disclaimers are ubiquitous in modern business and digital environments, including website footers that limit liability for user-generated content or third-party links, product packaging that warns of risks and disclaims consequential damages, and email signatures that protect confidentiality while disclaiming unintended recipients' reliance on the information.^[5] Common types encompass warranty disclaimers, which exclude certain liabilities in sales contracts; limitation of liability disclaimers, which cap potential damages; third-party disclaimers, which clarify no affiliation with external entities; and affiliate disclaimers, mandated in jurisdictions like the United States to disclose compensated promotions under FTC guidelines.^[6]^[5] The enforceability of a disclaimer hinges on factors such as its clarity, prominence, and jurisdictional rules; vague or buried statements may fail to shield against claims, while conspicuous ones can effectively mitigate risks in areas like intellectual property, consumer protection, and professional services.^[5]^[6] For instance, in advertising, disclaimers provide essential qualifiers to prevent misleading representations, as required by regulatory bodies like the Federal Trade Commission.^[7]

Overview

Definition

A disclaimer is a formal statement renouncing responsibility or liability for a particular claim, act, or outcome, typically intended to prevent misunderstandings or legal obligations on the part of the issuer.^[1] In legal contexts, it functions as a denial of accountability, such as an insurance provider refusing coverage under a policy or an individual rejecting inheritance rights to avoid associated debts.^[3] This declaration aims to delimit the scope of enforceable rights and obligations between parties, often appearing in contracts, advertisements, or public notices to shield the issuer from potential disputes.^[6] For a disclaimer to be enforceable, it must generally be conspicuous—meaning reasonably noticeable to the affected party—unambiguous in its language, and not violative of public policy, which prohibits clauses that undermine fundamental legal protections like those against gross negligence. Common examples include phrases like "This information is provided as-is without warranty of any kind," which limits liability for inaccuracies, or "No liability for errors or omissions," disclaiming responsibility for unintended mistakes in provided materials.^[5] These structures ensure clarity while aligning with jurisdictional standards for validity.^[8]

Historical Development

The term "disclaimer" derives from the Latin disclamare, meaning to renounce or deny a claim, with the verb form entering English around 1400 in a feudal legal sense via Anglo-French disclaimer and Old French desclamer.^[9] The noun usage first appears in legal texts circa 1436, referring to the act of repudiating a claim or interest.^[10] In medieval English common law, disclaimers originated as a means for tenants to renounce feudal obligations, such as rendering services or homage to a lord; doing so in a court of record typically triggered forfeiture of the tenant's estate to the lord, underscoring the hierarchical nature of land tenure.^[11] By the 17th century, English courts began recognizing disclaimers and exculpatory clauses in contracts to limit liability, particularly in bailments and commercial dealings, as trade expanded and parties sought to allocate risks explicitly.^[12] The 19th century marked a surge in disclaimer use amid industrialization, with boilerplate provisions becoming standard in U.S. contracts like those for railroads, where carriers attempted to disclaim liability for passenger injuries or property damage to mitigate exposure in an era of rapid expansion and frequent accidents, though such clauses were often invalidated by courts.^[13] In the mid-20th century, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), first published in 1952 and widely adopted across U.S. states, standardized warranty disclaimers in sales of goods through section 2-316, requiring conspicuous language to exclude implied warranties while promoting uniformity in commercial practice. Post-1970s developments expanded disclaimers under consumer protection frameworks, notably the Magnuson-Moss Warranty—Federal Trade Commission Improvements Act of 1975, which prohibited deceptive warranty practices and required disclaimers to be clearly labeled and understandable to avoid misleading buyers about product coverage.

Legal Applications

Contract Law

In contract law, disclaimers play a crucial role in allocating risks between parties by modifying or excluding implied warranties and limiting liability for certain damages. Under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) § 2-316, which governs the sale of goods in the United States, sellers may disclaim implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, provided the disclaimer is conspicuous and, for merchantability, specifically mentions that term. For instance, an "as-is" sale clause disclaims all implied warranties, shifting the risk of defects entirely to the buyer unless circumstances indicate otherwise. Similarly, UCC § 2-719 allows parties to limit remedies, such as restricting buyers to repair or replacement, or to exclude consequential damages—such as lost profits or indirect losses—unless the limitation is unconscionable. These provisions enable negotiated risk distribution in commercial agreements, overriding default UCC protections to reflect the parties' intent. For a disclaimer to be enforceable, it must typically be conspicuous, meaning it is presented in a way that a reasonable person would notice, such as through bold or larger font, and often results from negotiation to ensure mutual assent. Courts scrutinize disclaimers for procedural fairness, including whether the terms were hidden or imposed on parties with unequal bargaining power. Under UCC § 2-302, a court may refuse to enforce a contract or clause found unconscionable, considering both substantive unfairness (e.g., one-sided terms) and procedural issues (e.g., lack of meaningful choice). The landmark case Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. (350 F.2d 445, D.C. Cir. 1965) exemplified this, where the court invalidated a repossession clause in installment sales contracts as unconscionable due to the buyer's limited education and the seller's exploitative cross-collateralization, drawing on UCC § 2-302 principles even though the code was not yet fully adopted in the jurisdiction. Disclaimers in contracts come in various forms, including express written statements that explicitly negate warranties or liabilities, which must not contradict prior express warranties under UCC § 2-316(1). In contrast, implied modifications can arise from course of performance—a sequence of conduct between parties interpreting the agreement—or course of dealing and usage of trade, as outlined in UCC § 2-316(3)(c) and § 1-303, allowing ongoing behavior to refine or disclaim terms without formal language. Limitations on remedies, such as exclusive rights to repair or caps on damages, are common in these clauses to prevent open-ended liability, but they fail if they leave the aggrieved party without a fair remedy, per UCC § 2-719(2). The scope of disclaimers for indirect or consequential damages is heavily influenced by the foreseeability rule established in Hadley v. Baxendale (9 Exch. 341, 1854), which limits recovery to losses naturally arising from the breach or those contemplated by both parties at contracting. This English common law principle, adopted in U.S. jurisdictions, underpins modern disclaimers by allowing parties to explicitly exclude foreseeable consequential damages in advance, thereby clarifying non-liability for remote harms like business interruptions, provided the exclusion is not unconscionable.

Tort Law

In tort law, disclaimers function primarily as mechanisms to warn potential plaintiffs of inherent dangers and to establish voluntary assumption of risk, thereby serving as a defense against claims of negligence or strict liability arising from non-contractual harms. For example, "use at own risk" signs posted at amusement parks or construction sites can invoke express assumption of risk, barring recovery if the plaintiff proceeds with full knowledge and appreciation of the risk.^[14] This doctrine applies when the plaintiff's conduct demonstrates consent to the specific risk, distinct from mere contributory negligence.^[15] The Restatement (Second) of Torts § 496A defines express assumption of risk as the plaintiff's voluntary consent to relieve the defendant of a duty of care, rendering the defendant not liable for resulting harm if the assumption is proven.^[16] However, disclaimers face significant limitations rooted in public policy, particularly their inability to shield against gross negligence, recklessness, or intentional torts. Courts uniformly hold that exculpatory clauses cannot absolve liability for such egregious conduct, as it would undermine fundamental protections against willful or extreme carelessness.^[17] Broad waivers are also voided when they involve essential services or unequal bargaining power, as illustrated in Tunkl v. Regents of University of California (1963), where the California Supreme Court invalidated a hospital admission form releasing the facility from negligence liability, deeming it contrary to public policy due to the patient's vulnerability and the necessity of medical care.^[18] Common examples include recreational waivers for sports activities, such as those signed before skiing or zip-lining, which courts enforce against ordinary negligence claims if they clearly articulate the assumed risks and are not adhesive.^[19] In product liability contexts, disclaimers via warnings labels aim to mitigate strict liability for failure-to-warn defects, but they do not eliminate manufacturer responsibility for unreasonably dangerous products, as established in Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. (1963), which imposed strict liability in tort independent of contractual warranties or disclaimers.^[20] Since the 1980s, judicial standards for exculpatory clauses have evolved toward greater scrutiny, emphasizing requirements for clarity, conspicuousness, and procedural fairness to prevent unconscionable enforcement in consumer settings.^[21] Courts now routinely invalidate ambiguous or buried provisions, reflecting a policy shift to balance risk allocation with protections for uninformed parties, while upholding well-drafted clauses in voluntary, non-essential activities.^[22]

Intellectual Property Law

In patent law, disclaimers serve to narrow the scope of claims during prosecution, ensuring patentability by distinguishing the invention from prior art. Markush claims, originating from the 1925 Ex parte Markush decision, function as a form of disclaimer by listing alternative elements—often chemical radicals or substituents—within a single claim, thereby limiting the claim to a defined genus rather than a broader, potentially unpatentable range. This technique is particularly useful in chemical and pharmaceutical patents to conserve claim counts and overcome enablement or definiteness rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 112, as the alternatives must share a common structure or function to avoid an improper Markush grouping.^[23] Terminal disclaimers, codified in 35 U.S.C. § 253, allow applicants to disclaim the terminal portion of a patent's term to address non-statutory double patenting rejections, where claims in a later application are obvious variations of those in an earlier patent. By filing such a disclaimer, the applicant agrees that the patent will expire no later than the referenced patent, preventing unjustified extension of monopoly rights while permitting issuance. This practice binds successors in title and applies to both statutory and obviousness-type double patenting, often requiring the disclaimer to run with the land for enforceability.^[24] A seminal case illustrating disclaimer requirements for obvious elements is In re Spina, where the Federal Circuit held that claims must be construed in light of the prosecution history, and applicants cannot claim broader scope than disclaimed during examination to overcome obviousness rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The court emphasized that unambiguous statements or amendments during prosecution create a clear disclaimer, preventing later arguments for equivalents that would recapture disclaimed subject matter. In trademark law, disclaimers under the Lanham Act prevent registration of marks that include unregistrable descriptive or generic components, preserving fair competition by disavowing exclusive rights to those elements. Section 2(e) of the Act (15 U.S.C. § 1052(e)) requires disclaimers for merely descriptive terms, while § 2(f) permits registration of such marks with proof of acquired distinctiveness, often after disclaiming the descriptive portion. For instance, the "Apple" mark for computers is registrable without disclaimer as an arbitrary term unrelated to the goods, avoiding genericism associated with fruit; however, if applied to actual apples, it would be generic and wholly unregistrable, necessitating no partial disclaimer but outright refusal.^[25] In copyright contexts, disclaimers appear in licensing agreements to clarify limitations on use, such as notices stating that reproduction does not constitute guaranteed fair use under 17 U.S.C. § 107, thereby limiting the licensor's liability for third-party infringements. These statements inform users that transformative or limited uses (e.g., criticism or education) may qualify as fair use but do not provide legal assurance, encouraging evaluation of the four statutory factors. Public domain disclaimers, conversely, explicitly declare that a work is free of copyright restrictions—often for pre-1929 U.S. publications—to deter false copyright assertions and facilitate unrestricted reuse.^[26]^[27]

Estate and Probate Law

In estate and probate law, a disclaimer serves as a mechanism for beneficiaries to renounce their interest in inherited property, effectively redirecting assets to alternate recipients as if the disclaimant had predeceased the decedent. This tool is particularly valuable in managing post-mortem asset distribution, allowing for adjustments to an estate plan after the transferor's death without triggering additional taxes or liabilities.^[28] Qualified disclaimers, governed by U.S. Internal Revenue Code § 2518, enable beneficiaries to irrevocably refuse an interest in property in a manner that avoids federal estate, gift, and generation-skipping transfer taxes, provided specific conditions are met. To qualify, the refusal must be unqualified and irrevocable, documented in writing that identifies the disclaimed interest and is signed by the disclaimant or their representative, and delivered within nine months of the date of the transferor's death or the event creating the interest. Such a disclaimer is treated for tax purposes as if the property had never passed to the disclaimant, passing instead to the next eligible beneficiary under the governing instrument or applicable law.^[28]^[29]^[30] The primary purposes of these disclaimers include minimizing estate taxes by facilitating inter-generational wealth transfers, protecting assets from the disclaimant's creditors, and rejecting burdensome or undesirable property, such as real estate with environmental liabilities. Once filed, the disclaimer cannot be revoked, ensuring the redirection is final and binding on the estate administration process.^[30]^[31]^[32] Historically, the concept of disclaiming inheritances traces back to English common law, under which a beneficiary's refusal of a devise was treated as if they had died before the will's execution, preventing the interest from vesting. In the United States, this evolved through state statutes, culminating in the Uniform Disclaimer of Property Interests Act (UDPIA), promulgated in 1994 by the Uniform Law Commission to standardize procedures and promote uniformity in handling disclaimers of testamentary, intestate, and other property interests across jurisdictions.^[33]^[34] Common examples include a child disclaiming their share of a parent's estate to allow it to flow directly to grandchildren, thereby leveraging generation-skipping transfer tax exemptions. Similarly, a surviving spouse might execute a qualified disclaimer of a qualified terminable interest in property (QTIP) election or elective share to redirect assets into a bypass trust, optimizing the overall estate tax posture for the family.^[35]^[36]^[37]

Business and Commercial Uses

Advertising and Marketing

In advertising and marketing, disclaimers serve as essential tools to ensure compliance with truth-in-advertising laws, preventing deceptive practices by clarifying limitations, endorsements, or conditions associated with promotional claims.^[38] In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enforces guidelines under 16 CFR § 255, revised in 2023, which require clear and conspicuous disclosures for endorsements and testimonials to avoid misleading consumers about material connections, such as financial incentives or relationships between endorsers and advertisers.^[39] These disclosures must be presented in a manner that is easily noticeable, such as using "#ad" or "#sponsored" in social media posts, or including fine print statements like "results not typical" for atypical success stories in testimonials, ensuring that consumers are not deceived by implied guarantees.^[38] Common types of disclaimers in advertising include asterisk footnotes that qualify promotional offers, such as specifying terms for "limited time" deals to prevent misunderstandings about availability or pricing.^[40] For health-related claims, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) mandates disclaimers in dietary supplement advertising and labeling, requiring statements like "These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease" to distinguish structure/function claims from unapproved disease-treatment assertions.^[41] These disclaimers must accompany claims to avoid implying unsubstantiated medical benefits, with the FTC overseeing advertising enforcement to ensure substantiation and non-deceptiveness.^[42] Enforcement of disclaimer requirements is illustrated by landmark cases, such as Pom Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co. (2014), where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that false advertising claims under the Lanham Act could challenge implied health benefits in juice labeling, emphasizing the need for accurate disclosures to prevent consumer deception about product composition and efficacy.^[43] In this case, Coca-Cola's pomegranate juice blend was accused of misleadingly suggesting high pomegranate content and associated health advantages without adequate qualifiers, reinforcing that FDA regulations do not preempt broader false advertising suits requiring clear disclaimers.^[44] Globally, variations in disclaimer mandates reflect differing regulatory frameworks, as seen in the European Union's Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (2005/29/EC), which prohibits misleading actions and requires prominent disclaimers to counteract tactics like bait-and-switch advertising, where consumers are lured with one offer but presented with a inferior alternative. Under Article 6 and Annex I of the Directive, advertisers must provide clear, upfront information on product differences or limitations to ensure transparency, with enforcement by national authorities to protect average consumers from unfair practices across member states.^[45]

Product Liability

In product liability law, disclaimers serve to limit manufacturers' responsibility for defects or misuse of goods, but their effectiveness is significantly curtailed when they fail to integrate with adequate warnings and instructions. Under strict liability principles, a product may be deemed defective due to inadequate warnings or instructions if foreseeable risks could have been mitigated by providing reasonable guidance to users, rendering standalone disclaimers insufficient to absolve liability.^[46] Specifically, the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability § 2(c) emphasizes that warnings must address known hazards, and disclaimers cannot substitute for this duty, as courts assess whether the overall communication reduces harm risks.^[47] This integration requirement ensures that manufacturers cannot rely solely on broad liability exclusions without clearly delineating product dangers and safe usage protocols. Warranty disclaimers in product sales further illustrate these limitations, particularly under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Section 2-316 permits sellers to exclude implied warranties of merchantability or fitness with conspicuous language, such as "no warranties, express or implied," provided it is written and specific.^[48] However, such disclaimers may be void as unconscionable in consumer product contexts, where they impose unfair terms on buyers with unequal bargaining power, as governed by UCC § 2-302, which allows courts to refuse enforcement if the clause shocks the conscience or lacks meaningful choice.^[49] For instance, in cases involving household goods, courts have invalidated overly broad exclusions that leave consumers without recourse for foreseeable defects, prioritizing public policy against exploitative contracts. Illustrative case law underscores the need for disclaimers to convey clear risks explicitly. In Ramirez v. Plough, Inc. (1993), the California Supreme Court addressed an over-the-counter children's aspirin product linked to Reye's syndrome, where English-only warnings were deemed inadequate for foreseeable non-English-speaking users in diverse markets, leading to liability despite the manufacturer's general disclaimer.^[50] The ruling highlighted that disclaimers fail when they do not transparently communicate specific hazards, such as syndrome risks in young children, thereby reinforcing that vague or incomplete notices do not shield against failure-to-warn claims. Post-2000 developments have adapted these principles to e-commerce, mandating digital disclaimers that mirror physical product requirements while facing heightened scrutiny. Online sellers must prominently display terms limiting liability for defects, often in checkout interfaces or product descriptions, to comply with evolving consumer protection standards.^[51] In the European Union, the Product Liability Directive (EU 2024/2853), which entered into force on 9 December 2024 and repeals the previous Directive 85/374/EEC, strictly limits disclaimer effectiveness for personal injury claims, prohibiting contractual exclusions of producer liability for defective goods causing death or harm, as Article 15 deems such provisions unenforceable to safeguard victims (applicable to products placed on the market after 9 December 2026). This framework ensures that digital-era disclaimers cannot erode strict liability protections, promoting uniform accountability across borders.^[52]

Software and Technology

In software end-user license agreements (EULAs), disclaimers play a critical role in limiting vendor liability for defects such as bugs or malfunctions. These agreements commonly include "as-is" clauses, which disclaim all implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, allowing software to be provided without guarantees of performance or error-free operation.^[53] Under the Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act (UCITA), enacted in 2000 in states like Virginia and Maryland, such disclaimers are explicitly permitted in mass-market licenses for computer information, including software, provided they are conspicuous and not unconscionable.^[54] UCITA further enables parties to limit remedies for breaches, often capping recoverable damages at the purchase price of the software or the amount paid under the license, thereby protecting vendors from excessive consequential or incidental losses.^[55] In open-source software licensing, disclaimers similarly emphasize no-warranty provisions to encourage widespread adoption while shielding contributors from liability. The GNU General Public License (GPL), a foundational copyleft license, includes explicit notices disclaiming all warranties, stating that the software is provided "AS IS" without any guarantee of suitability or correctness, to the extent permitted by law.^[56] This approach aligns with the GPL's goal of promoting free software distribution without imposing financial risks on developers. The Apache License 2.0, a permissive open-source license, also features comprehensive warranty disclaimers, providing the software "AS IS" and without implied warranties, while requiring contributors to grant explicit patent licenses to users, thereby disclaiming any patent infringement liability from the licensor and ensuring defensive patent protection for adopters.^[57] Online platforms and websites frequently incorporate disclaimers in their terms of service to address liability for user-generated content, leveraging statutory protections to avoid responsibility for third-party material. For instance, terms often state that the platform is "not liable for user content," which is bolstered by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, immunizing interactive computer services from being treated as publishers of information provided by others, thus shielding sites from defamation or other claims arising from user posts.^[58] This provision has enabled the growth of user-driven platforms by allowing disclaimers to reinforce legal non-liability for hosted content. A landmark case affirming the enforceability of such disclaimers in software contexts is ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg (1996), where the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a shrink-wrap license included inside a software package. The court ruled that the license terms, which restricted commercial use of the product database, formed a valid contract because the buyer had notice of the terms upon opening the package and the opportunity to return the product if he disagreed, establishing a precedent for post-sale license acceptance in digital goods.

Media and Entertainment

Literature

In literature, disclaimers serve to clarify the boundary between fictional invention and reality, particularly in novels where characters or events might evoke real-life figures, thereby mitigating risks of defamation claims. A common example appears at the front of many works of fiction: "This is a work of fiction. Names, characters, places, and incidents either are the product of the author's imagination or are used fictitiously. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, events, or locales is entirely coincidental." This statement helps shield authors and publishers from libel suits by asserting that no intentional portrayal of real individuals occurred.^[59]^[60] Historically, the use of such disclaimers evolved from earlier practices in the 18th and 19th centuries, when novelists often prefaced their works with assertions of fictionality to navigate emerging copyright laws and social sensitivities around libel. In 19th-century literature, authors frequently employed anonymity or veiled references—such as partial name redactions (e.g., "Lady C—")—to distance social commentary from identifiable persons, as seen in Victorian novels critiquing class structures without direct accusation. For instance, Jane Austen's anonymous publications, credited only as "By a Lady," allowed her pointed observations on marriage and society in works like Pride and Prejudice (1813) to avoid personal backlash, functioning as an implicit disclaimer against literal interpretations. Modern memoirs build on this tradition by including prefaces that address disputed facts, such as: "This memoir reflects the author's present recollections; some names and details have been changed to protect privacy, and events may have been compressed for narrative clarity." This approach acknowledges the fallibility of memory while protecting against claims of inaccuracy or invasion of privacy.^[61]^[62] The legal foundation for these disclaimers in literary works draws from U.S. Supreme Court precedents establishing protections against libel, notably New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964), which introduced the "actual malice" standard: public figures must prove that defamatory statements were made with knowledge of their falsity or reckless disregard for the truth to succeed in a libel suit. This ruling safeguards authors' First Amendment rights to critique society through fiction or memoir without fear of unwarranted litigation, provided no deliberate falsehoods target individuals. In true crime literature, disclaimers are particularly vital for maintaining source anonymity; authors often state that names and identifying details have been altered to prevent privacy violations, as revealing confidential informants could expose them to harm or legal repercussions, though such measures are recommended rather than strictly mandated by law.^[63]^[64]^[60] With the rise of self-publishing, especially in e-books, disclaimers have become more prevalent in non-fiction works offering advice, such as self-help or instructional texts, to limit liability for readers' application of the content. A typical formulation reads: "The information provided is for educational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice; the author and publisher disclaim any liability for losses or damages resulting from its use." This practice reflects broader digital publishing norms, where authors independently manage legal risks without traditional editorial oversight.^[65]^[66]

Film and Television

In film and television, standard disclaimers such as "based on true events" or "dramatized for entertainment purposes" are commonly used to indicate that narratives inspired by real occurrences have been fictionalized, thereby mitigating potential legal risks like defamation claims from individuals who believe they are portrayed inaccurately.^[67] These notices clarify the creative liberties taken in docudramas or biopics, distinguishing artistic interpretation from factual reporting and protecting producers from liability when events or characters are altered for dramatic effect.^[68] Content warnings related to violence and other mature themes are integrated into the Motion Picture Association (MPA) rating system, which provides descriptive labels to inform audiences about potential disturbing elements, functioning as a form of ethical and regulatory disclaimer.^[69] For instance, PG-13 ratings may include qualifiers like "some violence" or "intense sequences of peril," while R ratings specify "strong bloody violence" to alert viewers to graphic depictions, helping parents and audiences assess suitability without spoiling plot details.^[70] During production, end credits often feature disclaimers disclaiming any real-world endorsements or unintended resemblances, such as "Any similarity to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events is purely coincidental," to shield filmmakers from claims of misrepresentation or unauthorized portrayal.^[71] Actor releases, formal agreements signed by performers, explicitly grant permission for the use of their name, likeness, voice, and performance in the production, often incorporating disclaimers to limit liability for future commercial exploitation.^[72] Legal considerations, particularly right of publicity laws, drive the use of such disclaimers when depicting or imitating celebrities, as seen in the 1988 case Midler v. Ford Motor Co., where the Ninth Circuit ruled that unauthorized imitation of a celebrity's distinctive voice for commercial purposes constitutes misappropriation of identity.^[73] This precedent underscores the need for permissions or clear disclaimers in parodies and satires to avoid implying endorsement or exploiting a person's commercial value without consent.^[74] In recent years, streaming services like Netflix have increasingly adopted detailed content warnings for trigger topics such as sexual assault, self-harm, and intense violence, reflecting heightened sensitivity standards in the 2020s amid growing audience demands for mental health protections.^[75] These warnings, often displayed at the episode or film outset, go beyond traditional ratings by specifying potential emotional impacts, influenced by cultural shifts toward inclusivity and viewer well-being.^[76]

Journalism

In journalism, disclaimers serve as essential tools for maintaining transparency, ethical integrity, and public trust by disclosing potential conflicts of interest, distinguishing factual reporting from opinion, and clarifying the use of sensitive sources or emerging technologies. The Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) Code of Ethics explicitly requires journalists to "avoid conflicts of interest, real or perceived" and to "disclose unavoidable conflicts," emphasizing the need to inform audiences about any financial or personal interests that could influence coverage.^[77] For instance, when news outlets publish sponsored content, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) guidelines mandate clear and conspicuous disclosures, such as labels like "sponsored" or "#ad," to prevent deception and ensure consumers can differentiate between independent journalism and paid promotions.^[78] These standards underscore the profession's commitment to accountability, as failure to disclose can erode credibility and violate ethical norms.^[79] A key application of disclaimers involves separating opinion from factual reporting, which helps audiences navigate content without confusion. Ethical codes, including those from the SPJ, advocate for clear labeling of opinion pieces to preserve the integrity of news sections, often using phrases like "the views expressed are the author's own" at the outset of editorials or columns.^[79] This practice aligns with broader journalistic principles that demand a strict divide between verifiable facts in news articles and subjective analysis in commentary, as articulated in guidelines from organizations like the Associated Press, which require explicit identification of opinion content to avoid misleading readers. Such disclaimers not only comply with ethical expectations but also mitigate legal risks associated with misattribution of bias as fact. Landmark legal precedents have further shaped the use of disclaimers related to source anonymity, particularly in cases involving leaked information. In New York Times Co. v. United States (1971), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against government prior restraint on publishing the Pentagon Papers, affirming journalists' First Amendment rights to report on classified leaks without revealing sources, which bolstered ethical practices for anonymizing informants while requiring contextual explanations in reporting.^[80] The SPJ's position on anonymous sources recommends that journalists explain the reasons for granting anonymity—such as risks to the source—and describe verification efforts, often through disclaimers like "sources spoke on condition of anonymity due to fear of reprisal" to maintain transparency without compromising protection.^[81] This approach balances source safety with audience accountability, a standard reinforced by subsequent ethical guidelines from bodies like the Radio Television Digital News Association.^[82] In the digital era, disclaimers have evolved to address challenges on social media and AI integration, ensuring accuracy amid rapid information dissemination. News organizations and platforms increasingly apply fact-check labels on social media posts, such as Twitter's (now X) community notes or Facebook's third-party fact-checking partnerships, which append disclaimers like "this claim is disputed by fact-checkers" to combat misinformation while citing evidence from independent verifiers like PolitiFact. Following the rise of generative AI tools, post-2023 guidelines from major outlets require explicit notices for AI-assisted content; for example, the Associated Press mandates disclosure whenever AI is used in sourcing, writing, or visuals, stating phrases like "this story includes AI-generated elements" to inform readers and uphold authenticity.^[83] These practices reflect journalism's adaptation to technology while prioritizing verifiable truth.

Other Contexts

Medicine and Healthcare

In medicine and healthcare, disclaimers play a critical role in managing patient expectations and mitigating liability by clearly outlining risks, limitations, and the absence of guarantees in treatments and advice. Informed consent forms, a cornerstone of patient-provider interactions, typically include disclaimers emphasizing that medical interventions carry inherent risks and offer no assurance of cure or specific outcomes. This practice stems from the landmark U.S. case Canterbury v. Spence (1972), which established that physicians have a duty to disclose all material risks—those a reasonable patient would deem significant in deciding on treatment—to enable truly informed consent, thereby shifting from a physician-centered standard to a patient-oriented one.^[84] For instance, forms often state that procedures like surgery may result in complications such as infection or paralysis, with no implied warranty of success, aligning with tort law principles that require full disclosure to avoid claims of negligence or battery.^[84] Direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising for prescription drugs in the United States mandates specific disclaimers to balance promotional claims with risk information, ensuring consumers understand the need for professional oversight. Under FDA regulations at 21 CFR § 202.1, broadcast advertisements must include a "major statement" detailing significant side effects, contraindications, and effectiveness limitations in a clear, conspicuous manner, often accompanied by advisories to "consult your physician" before use.^[85] Additionally, these ads prohibit promotion of off-label uses—applications not approved in the drug's labeling—to prevent misleading implications of unverified benefits, with violations subject to enforcement actions that reinforce the disclaimer of unproven efficacy.^[85] FDA guidance further specifies that such advertisements provide mechanisms like toll-free numbers or websites for full labeling access, underscoring that self-medication without medical advice is inadvisable.^[86] In telemedicine, disclaimers address the constraints of remote care, particularly its role as a supplement rather than a replacement for traditional in-person evaluation. Platforms and providers commonly include statements like "telehealth services are not a substitute for in-person care," highlighting limitations such as the inability to perform physical exams or handle emergencies, influenced by HIPAA requirements for secure electronic health information exchange.^[87] Post-COVID-19 regulations, including the end of temporary HIPAA enforcement discretion in 2023, have solidified these practices, with state medical boards recommending explicit notifications of electronic care's unique risks to maintain compliance and patient safety.^[88] For example, regulatory position statements urge providers to inform patients of potential diagnostic inaccuracies due to technological barriers, ensuring consent reflects awareness of these boundaries.^[89] Globally, organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) emphasize disclaimers in vaccine-related communications to promote transparency about side effects and foster public trust. In its 2020-2021 COVID-19 vaccine safety communication guidelines, WHO advises clear, evidence-based messaging that acknowledges common adverse events—such as pain at the injection site, fever, or fatigue—while stressing their typically mild and transient nature, without over-reassuring to avoid eroding confidence if rare issues arise.^[90] These guidelines recommend tailored, pre-tested disclaimers in public health campaigns, including hotlines for reporting adverse events following immunization (AEFIs), to manage expectations and counter misinformation effectively.^[90]

Finance and Investments

In the realm of finance and investments, disclaimers serve to mitigate regulatory risks and protect investors by clearly delineating uncertainties associated with financial products and advice. Under U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 10b-5, which prohibits fraudulent or misleading statements in connection with the purchase or sale of securities, mutual fund prospectuses and advertisements must incorporate prominent disclaimers stating that past performance is no guarantee of future results. This requirement, reinforced through amendments to Rule 482 under the Securities Act of 1933, ensures that investors are not deceived by historical returns, emphasizing the potential for losses and the need to review full prospectuses for risks, charges, and objectives.^[91] Investment advisory services are governed by the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, which imposes a fiduciary duty on registered advisers to act in clients' best interests, comprising duties of care and loyalty. Advisers frequently include disclaimers clarifying that general publications or communications do not constitute personalized advice, thereby limiting the scope of their fiduciary obligations to formal client relationships. For robo-advisors, which utilize automated algorithms to provide recommendations, terms of service often disclose that advice is not customized to individual circumstances beyond inputted data, while still adhering to the Act's anti-fraud provisions under Section 206. This approach helps manage liability by transparently outlining the non-human, standardized nature of the service.^[92]^[93] In the cryptocurrency and fintech sectors, disclaimers highlight the extreme volatility and potential for total loss, as mandated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Following the 2022 collapse of FTX, which exposed systemic risks in digital asset platforms, CFTC customer advisories stress that virtual currencies involve substantial risks, including hacking, lack of safeguards, and high likelihood of financial loss, urging investors to avoid unregulated schemes. These warnings are integrated into platform disclosures to promote informed decision-making amid the largely unregulated digital asset marketplace.^[94]^[95] Internationally, the European Union's Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II), effective January 2018, requires investment firms to provide retail investors with fair, clear, and non-misleading information, including specific risk warnings about potential losses from financial instruments and services. Under Article 24, firms must deliver appropriate guidance on risks, suitability assessments, and standardized warnings for inappropriate products, ensuring retail clients understand the hazards of complex or high-risk investments. This framework strengthens investor protection by mandating disclosures that align with clients' knowledge and financial situations.^[96]

References

[1]
disclaimer | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
A disclaimer refers to: The refusal to take responsibility for someone else's claim, such as a refusal by an insurance company to grant coverage under an ...
[2]
DISCLAIMER Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Legal Definition ; a denial of responsibility for a thing or act: as ; a · a negation or limitation of the rights under a warranty given by a seller to a buyer ; b.
[3]
Disclaimer - FindLaw Dictionary of Legal Terms
Disclaimer · 1 : a refusal or disavowal of something that one has a right to claim ;specif · 2 : a denial of responsibility for a thing or act: as a : a ...
[4]
DISCLAIMER - The Law Dictionary
The disavowal, denial, or renunciation of an Interest, right, orproperty imputed to a person or alleged to be his. Also the declaration, or theinstrument, by ...
[5]
Disclaimer Definition | Termly's Legal Dictionary
A disclaimer is a statement that limits the liability of a company, website, or individual for the actions taken by a customer.
[6]
Disclaimer: Definition, Types, Examples - Contracts Counsel
Disclaimers are legal texts that offer businesses protection from legal liability, shielding them from claims associated with user and third-party risk.
[7]
Disclaimer | Practical Law - Thomson Reuters
A disclaimer is the less conspicuous fine print element of an advertisement. Disclaimers are often used by advertisers to add information or clarify an offer.
[8]
"Disclaim" and "Disclaimer" - Adams on Contract Drafting
May 23, 2011 · 1. A renunciation of one's legal right or claim; esp., a renunciation of a patent claim, usu. to save the remainder of the application from being rejected.
[9]
Disclaimer Examples - TermsFeed
1. Disclaimer Examples; 1.1. "Views Expressed" Disclaimer; 1.2. "No Responsibility" Disclaimer; 1.3. "Past Performance" Disclaimer; 1.4. "Use at Your Own Risk" ..."Views Expressed" Disclaimer · "Fair Use" Disclaimer · "Investment" Disclaimer
[10]
Disclaimer of Warranty Rules and Legal Requirements - UpCounsel
Rating 5.0 (948) May 8, 2025 · Yes, but the disclaimer must be in writing, conspicuous, and mention “merchantability” for the disclaimer to be enforceable under the UCC.Missing: unambiguous | Show results with:unambiguous
[11]
Disclaimer - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
1400, disclaimen, "renounce, relinquish, or repudiate a legal claim," originally in a feudal sense, from Anglo-French disclaimer (c. 1300), Old French ...
[12]
disclaimer, n.¹ meanings, etymology and more | Oxford English ...
disclaimer is of multiple origins. Partly a borrowing from French. Partly formed within English, by derivation. Etymons: French desclamer, disclaimer; disclaim ...
[13]
Title by Forfeiture - LONANG Institute
Which disclaimer of tenure in any court of record is a forfeiture of the lands to the lord, upon reasons most apparently feudal. And so likewise, if in any ...Missing: English | Show results with:English
[14]
[PDF] Limitations and Exclusions of Liability in Commercial Bailments
In England, an ordinary bailee normally is permitted to limit contractually its liability for negligence.
[15]
[PDF] Tort Law and the Economy in Nineteenth-Century America
company, to avoid liability, must not only explicitly disclaim liability, but ... liability for railroad crossing accidents occasioned by the railroad's failure.
[16]
A Note on Disclaimers in Negligence Law - Hearsay
Mar 16, 2025 · Disclaimers can be written or oral. They can be printed on documents or posted on signs (eg entry to a recreational park or car park).
[17]
assumption of risk | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
Assumption of risk is a common law doctrine that refers to a plaintiff's inability to recover for the tortious actions of a negligent party.
[18]
[PDF] Assumption of Risk As a Defense to Negligence
RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 496A cmt. d ("In theory the distinction between the two is that assumption of risk rests upon the voluntary consent of the ...
[19]
[PDF] Exculpatory Agreements and Liability Waivers In All 50 States
The modern era of exculpatory clauses saw competing economic theories influencing the courts. These included the “efficiency” theory, which hypothesized to ...Missing: evolution 1980s
[20]
Tunkl v. Regents of University of California - Justia Law
This case concerns the validity of a release from liability for future negligence imposed as a condition for admission to a charitable research hospital.Missing: disclaimer | Show results with:disclaimer
[21]
Torts in Sports: Exploring the Boundaries of Assumption of Risk
Nov 14, 2023 · It presumes that individuals who voluntarily participate in sports or recreational activities understand and accept the inherent risks ...
[22]
Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. - Justia Law
While defective products give rise to a strict liability cause of action, express warranties as well as other forms of contractual breaches and negligence ...Missing: warnings | Show results with:warnings
[23]
Assumption of Risk in Consumer Contracts and the Distraction of ...
A. Origins and Evolution. An exculpatory clause consists of a signatory agreeing “in advance of the occasion of her injury to waive the right she would ...
[24]
[PDF] Validity and Enforceability of Exculpatory Clauses in Arkansas ...
2 8 The trial court ruled that the exculpatory clause, even though located on the reverse side of the rental contract, was conspicuous, clear, and unambigu- ...Missing: English | Show results with:English
[25]
2117-Markush Claims - USPTO
A Markush claim contains an “improper Markush grouping” if either: (1) the members of the Markush group do not share a “single structural similarity” or (2) the ...
[26]
35 U.S. Code § 253 - Disclaimer - Law.Cornell.Edu
A patentee, whether of the whole or any sectional interest therein, may, on payment of the fee required by law, make disclaimer of any complete claim.
[27]
How to satisfy a disclaimer requirement - USPTO
May 30, 2024 · A disclaimer is a written statement indicating you don't have exclusive rights to wording or design, required when it's unregistrable, like ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[28]
U.S. Copyright Office Fair Use Index
The goal of the Index is to make the principles and application of fair use more accessible and understandable to the public by presenting a searchable database ...
[29]
LibGuides: Copyright Services: Copyright Term and the Public Domain
Oct 2, 2025 · While a copy of a public domain work gains no new copyright, a curated selection of public domain works may have a new copyright, protecting, ...
[30]
26 U.S. Code § 2518 - Disclaimers - Law.Cornell.Edu
the term “qualified disclaimer” means an irrevocable and unqualified refusal by a person to accept an interest in property but only if ...
[31]
26 CFR 25.2518-1 -- Qualified disclaimers of property; in general.
A qualified disclaimer is an irrevocable and unqualified refusal to accept the ownership of an interest in property.
[32]
Qualified Disclaimer: What it is, How it Works - Investopedia
A qualified disclaimer is a refusal to accept property that meets the provisions set forth in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Tax Reform Act of 1976.
[33]
Disclaiming an Inheritance: How, When, and Why | White Coat Investor
Mar 5, 2025 · #3 Avoid Creditors ... Perhaps the biggest reason why wealthy people might disclaim an inheritance is to avoid having the inherited assets in ...
[34]
Qualified Disclaimers: When Declining an Inheritance Can Be ...
Mar 12, 2025 · The use of a qualified disclaimer can help avoid unanticipated consequences and add flexibility to an estate plan. What is a Qualified ...
[35]
[PDF] The Uniform Disclaimer of Property Interests Act
15. The last two bastions of the common law of disclaimer were Mississippi and New Hampshire, which enacted their first disclaimer statutes in 1994 and 1996, ...
[36]
[PDF] Disclaimers and Federalism - wp0 | Vanderbilt University
Nov 18, 2014 · Alternatively, the disclaimer might affect only private interests, but where the property the beneficiary seeks to disclaim takes a form.
[37]
Using Disclaimers in Estate & Trust Administration
Many estate plans provide that in the event of a qualified disclaimer, the gift falls into trust for the benefit of the surviving spouse. If properly ...
[38]
How Qualified Disclaimers Make Estate Planning More Flexible
Jan 18, 2019 · Qualified disclaimers allow for a “wait-and-see approach” to evaluate estate taxes, family dynamics, and beneficiary wealth at the time of a testator or ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[39]
Marital Disclaimers & the Clayton Election - Kierman Law
May 26, 2022 · With the disclaimer option, the surviving spouse can choose to give any amount or property they wish to the nonmarital share, depending on the ...
[40]
Full Disclosure | Federal Trade Commission
Sep 23, 2014 · If the disclosure of information is necessary to prevent an ad from being deceptive, the disclosure has to be clear and conspicuous.Missing: limited | Show results with:limited
[41]
16 CFR Part 255 | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
16 CFR Part 255 - GUIDES CONCERNING USE OF ENDORSEMENTS AND TESTIMONIALS IN ADVERTISING · § 255.0 Purpose and definitions. · § 255.1 General considerations. · § ...
[42]
FTC's Endorsement Guides: What People Are Asking
Jun 29, 2023 · The disclosures should be straightforward in explaining the financial connection and shouldn't use unclear expressions like “we've partnered ...Missing: 16 CFR § 255
[43]
Advertising guidelines for auto dealers | New York State Attorney ...
Use of one or more footnotes or asterisks ... Failure to disclose the duration of a time-limited offer, including manufacturer's rebate, sale, or special ...
[44]
Structure/Function Claims - FDA
Mar 28, 2024 · If a dietary supplement label includes such a claim, it must state in a "disclaimer" that FDA has not evaluated the claim. The disclaimer must ...Missing: advertising | Show results with:advertising
[45]
Health Products Compliance Guidance - Federal Trade Commission
Dec 20, 2022 · The FTC Act doesn't require pre-market approval of health claims in the advertising of foods, dietary supplements, or other products.
[46]
POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co. | 573 U.S. 102 (2014)
Jun 12, 2014 · The Supreme Court reversed, holding that competitors may bring Lanham Act claims challenging food and beverage labels regulated by the FDCA.Missing: disclaimers | Show results with:disclaimers
[47]
Pom Wonderful, LLC v. The Coca-Cola Company | Oyez
Apr 21, 2014 · Specifically, Pom Wonderful claimed that Coca-Cola violated provisions of the Lanham Act, a federal law prohibiting false advertising, as well ...Missing: disclaimers | Show results with:disclaimers
[48]
C_2021526EN.01000101.xml - EUR-Lex - European Union
Dec 29, 2021 · This Directive shall apply to unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices as laid down in Article 5, before, during and after a commercial transaction in ...
[49]
Torts: Legal Language: Product Defects (Restatement Third)
The rules set forth in this Section establish separate standards of liability for manufacturing defects, design defects, and defects based on inadequate ...
[50]
[PDF] The Products Liability Restatement Warning Obligations
These two informational obliga- tions associated with product sales, that of pro- viding warnings and providing instructions, derive from two policy objectives: ...Missing: disclaimers | Show results with:disclaimers
[51]
2-316. Exclusion or Modification of Warranties. - Law.Cornell.Edu
To exclude or modify the implied warranty of merchantability or any part of it the language must mention merchantability and in case of a writing must be ...
[52]
[PDF] The Application of the Doctrine of Unconscionability to Warranties
Limitation of consequential damages for injury to the person in the case of consumer goods is prima facie unconscionable but limitation of damages where the ...<|separator|>
[53]
Ramirez v. Plough, Inc. (1993) - Justia Law
For example, the labeling for aspirin, and for most other over-the-counter drugs, must contain a general warning on use by pregnant or nursing women (" 'As ...
[54]
PRODUCT LIABILITY AND ONLINE MARKETPLACES
Apr 30, 2024 · This article analyses the challenges that online marketplaces and e-commerce pose to traditional product liability doctrines.A. No Liability For Online... · Iv. Regulatory Models · V. Reforming The Current...
[55]
[PDF] The Uniform Computer Information Transaction Act (UCITA)1 is a ...
Nov 6, 2000 · UCITA allows manufacturers to explicitly disclaim all warranties of merchantability.50 Under the UCITA provisions, many producers could use ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[56]
Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act - Virginia Law
(d) A disclaimer or modification of a warranty or remedy which is effective against the licensee is also effective against third persons to which a warranty ...
[57]
[PDF] Consequential Damages Exclusions Under UCITA, 19 J. Marshall J ...
Because consequential damages can far exceed the price a software company receives for its product, vendors commonly seek to limit or ex- clude ...
[58]
GNU General Public License, version 2
We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and (2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or ...GNU GPL FAQ · Violations of the GNU Licenses · Translations of GPLv2
[59]
Apache License, Version 2.0
Include a copy of the Apache License, typically in a file called LICENSE, in your work, and consider also including a NOTICE file that references the License.
[60]
47 U.S. Code § 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening ...
47 U.S. Code § 230 protects providers/users from liability for restricting access to offensive content and for enabling others to do so.
[61]
Libel in Fiction - Copylaw: Book Publishing Attorney | Literary Lawyer
The words "A Novel" in the subtitle of your book are considered by some attorneys to be the best form of disclaimer. In addition, a full disclaimer should ...<|separator|>
[62]
Book Disclaimers: Tips for the Indie Author - Creative Law Center
A book disclaimer can help shield authors and publishers from potential legal claims, such as defamation, invasion of privacy, and violations of the right of ...
[63]
The Literary Disclaimer: Law, Fiction, and the Real
An amusing, and labyrinthine, journey into the world of the legal disclaimer. My premise is that these disclaimers consistently betray the solemn, real-world ...
[64]
On The Reasons For Censoring Names And Places In Victorian ...
Jan 16, 2015 · It's been said that censoring occurred so that the author could write freely, make things up, and the reader would be free to use their imagination.
[65]
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan | 376 U.S. 254 (1964)
To sustain a claim of defamation or libel, the First Amendment requires that the plaintiff show that the defendant knew that a statement was false or was ...
[66]
New York Times Company v. Sullivan | Oyez
To sustain a claim of defamation or libel, the First Amendment requires that the plaintiff show that the defendant knew that a statement was false or was ...
[67]
6 Copyright Page Disclaimers to Copy and Paste, and Giving Credit
Nov 3, 2023 · Copyright page disclaimers can be an important part of eliminating liability for a book's content for both the author and publisher.
[68]
Legal Disclaimer Examples for Books - Cascadia Author Services
Content contained or made available through this book is not intended to and does not constitute legal advice or investment advice and no attorney-client ...
[69]
Based on true events: docudramas, disclaimers, and defamation
Nov 4, 2022 · Based on true events: docudramas, disclaimers, and defamation. By ... Legal experts point to one scene in particular that may prove that ...
[70]
Rights of Publicity and Privacy in True Crime Stories
Nov 17, 2016 · Retelling their story might constitute an invasion of their privacy, under a theory called “Public Disclosure of Private, Embarrassing Facts”.
[71]
Ratings Guide - MPA Film Ratings
Violence may be graphic in nature. May include varying amounts of blood or gore, torture, dismemberments, decapitations, etc. The injury is usually evident, ...Missing: disclaimers | Show results with:disclaimers
[72]
https://www.studiobinder.com/blog/complete-guide-actor-release-form-template/
[73]
The forgotten reason why so many movies end with a disclaimer that ...
Oct 19, 2021 · It generally reads something akin to 'This is a work of fiction. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead or actual events is purely coincidental.'Missing: endorsements | Show results with:endorsements
[74]
The Complete Guide to Actor Release Forms (FREE Template)
Feb 12, 2023 · We've got an actor release form template you can use, and a handy guide to help you use it. That way, all your hard work making your film won't go to waste.
[75]
Midler v. Ford Motor Co., 849 F.2d 460 (9th Cir. 1988) - Justia Law
This case centers on the protectibility of the voice of a celebrated chanteuse from commercial exploitation without her consent.Missing: disclaimers | Show results with:disclaimers
[76]
Right of Publicity and Parody - Richmond Illustration Inc.
Jan 14, 2014 · Right of publicity is the right of a celebrity to protect the earning power of his/her image. You can't produce a T-shirt with a photo of Elvis ...
[77]
Does Netflix have a responsibility to provide trigger warnings on its ...
Jan 10, 2021 · Caitlin Norman said she was surprised to learn that Netflix doesn't put trigger warnings on its content.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s<|control11|><|separator|>
[78]
Opinion: Trigger warnings are a necessary addition to modern media
Sep 15, 2024 · Trigger warnings represent a simple act of empathy. They are not a burden on creators, but a tool that invites more people into the conversation.
[79]
SPJ's Code of Ethics | Society of Professional Journalists
Sep 6, 2014 · The SPJ Code of Ethics is a statement of abiding principles supported by explanations and position papers that address changing journalistic practices.
[80]
Disclosures 101 for Social Media Influencers
Nov 1, 2019 · Influencers must disclose any financial, employment, personal, or family relationship with a brand, even if not asked, and place the disclosure ...Download The Guide · When To Disclose · How To Disclose
[81]
What the Codes Say: Code provisions by subject
What follows are excerpts from codes of ethics that have been collected by the American Society of News Editors and by the Society of Professional Journalists.General Principles · Truth And Accuracy · Conflicts Of Interest
[82]
New York Times Co. v. United States | 403 U.S. 713 (1971)
New York Times Co. v. United States: The First Amendment overrides the federal government's interest in keeping certain documents, such as the Pentagon ...Missing: disclaimers | Show results with:disclaimers
[83]
SPJ Ethics Committee Position Papers: Anonymous Sources
Few ethical issues in journalism are more entangled with the law than the use of anonymous sources. Keep your promise not to identify a source of ...Missing: disclaimers | Show results with:disclaimers
[84]
Avoiding Conflict of Interest - Radio Television Digital ... - RTDNA
The RTDNA Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct specifically cites the need for avoiding conflicts of interest, whether real or perceived. The act of ...
[85]
Standards around generative AI | The Associated Press
Aug 15, 2023 · We will refrain from transmitting any AI-generated images that are suspected or proven to be false depictions of reality. However, if an AI- ...
[86]
Reuters Journalistic Standards
A Reuters journalist or camera is generally the best source on a witnessed event. In most circumstances, a named source is preferable to an unnamed source.
[87]
Canterbury v. Spence, No. 22099 (D.C. Cir. 1972) - Justia Law
It is well established that the physician must seek and secure his patient's consent before commencing an operation or other course of treatment.[32] It is also ...
[88]
21 CFR 202.1 -- Prescription-drug advertisements. - eCFR
Represents or suggests that a prescription drug is safer or more effective than another drug in some particular when the difference has not been demonstrated ...Missing: consult off-
[89]
Guidance: Consumer-Directed Broadcast Advertisements - FDA
Jul 12, 2018 · This FDA guidance covers disclosure of product information for broadcast ads of prescription drugs, including a brief summary of side effects, ...Missing: off- | Show results with:off-
[90]
HIPAA and Telehealth | HHS.gov
Oct 18, 2023 · OCR has issued guidance on how covered health care providers and health plans can provide audio-only telehealth consistent with the requirements of the HIPAA ...
[91]
The Regulatory Environment of Telemedicine After COVID-19 - PMC
Although HIPAA regulations are unchanged, the Notice of Enforcement Discretion indicated that violations made in good faith would not be prosecuted during COVID ...
[92]
5.1.4: Telemedicine - North Carolina Medical Board
Providers of telemedicine should consider providing a statement identifying any unique limitations of the electronic model by which care is being provided. Such ...
[93]
[PDF] covid-19 vaccine safety communication
See Appendix 5.2 for detailed guidance on managing negative messaging. ... little communication around possible side effects in this newly developed vaccine.
[94]
SEC Amends Mutual Fund Advertising Rules, Proposes New Rules ...
Sep 24, 2003 · Require fund advertisements that contain performance information to include disclosure that past performance does not guarantee future ...
[95]
[PDF] Commission Interpretation Regarding Standard of Conduct for ...
Jun 5, 2019 · Advisers Act.20. An investment adviser's fiduciary duty under the Advisers Act comprises a duty of care and a duty of loyalty.21 This ...
[96]
[PDF] IM Guidance Update - SEC.gov
8 As SEC-registered investment advisers, robo-advisers are subject to all of the requirements of the Advisers Act, including the requirement that they provide ...
[97]
[PDF] 14 Digital Asset Risks to Remember
Some virtual currency platforms may be missing critical system safeguards and customer protections, such as protection against hacks or segregating customer.Missing: cryptocurrency | Show results with:cryptocurrency
[98]
Digital Assets | CFTC
Remember, the digital asset marketplace is largely unregulated and fraud is a significant risk. Avoid websites or advisers that display these common red flags.
[99]
Directive - 2014/65 - EN - mifid ii - EUR-Lex
Summary of each segment: