Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Acheson process

The Acheson process is an electric resistance furnace method for producing silicon carbide (SiC) crystals via the carbothermal reduction of silica sand with carbon, typically petroleum coke, at temperatures exceeding 2,000°C, invented by American chemist Edward Goodrich Acheson in 1891 during experiments aimed at synthesizing diamond substitutes.^[1]^[2] The process entails arranging the reactant mixture in a resistive core around graphite electrodes within a refractory-lined furnace, where electric current generates intense Joule heating to drive the reaction SiO₂ + 3C → SiC + 2CO, yielding crystalline SiC ingots that form around the core and can be crushed into abrasive grains or further processed.^[3]^[4] Patented in 1896, it enabled commercial-scale production of carborundum—a superior abrasive to emery—and laid the foundation for Acheson's subsequent adaptations for artificial graphite manufacture by overheating the SiC or directly graphitizing carbon artifacts, significantly impacting refractories, metallurgy, and electronics industries despite its energy-intensive batch nature.^[5]^[6] The furnace design, characterized by its elongated, buried configuration and silica brick insulation, remains the dominant technology for lower-grade SiC, though modern variants address inefficiencies like prolonged cycle times of up to 30 days.^[7]^[8]

Invention and Historical Development

Discovery and Initial Experiments

Edward Goodrich Acheson, an inventor who had previously worked at Thomas Edison's Menlo Park laboratory developing conducting carbon materials, began independent experiments in 1891 in Monongahela City, Pennsylvania, aimed at synthesizing artificial diamonds as a durable industrial abrasive.^[5]^[6] His initial attempts involved heating pure carbon to extreme temperatures using an electric arc from a dynamo and arc light carbons placed in an iron bowl, but this process only produced graphite rather than the desired diamond-like crystals.^[5]^[1] Seeking an alternative abrasive, Acheson shifted to mixing clay—containing silica and alumina—with carbon and subjecting the mixture to intense electrical heating in March 1891.^[9] Upon cooling, the residue contained hard, hexagonal crystals capable of scratching glass, which Acheson initially mistook for a novel carbon-alumina compound akin to corundum and named "carborundum" (silicon carbide, SiC).^[5]^[1] These crystals proved far harder than existing abrasives like emery, prompting further refinement of the electric heating method to isolate and characterize the material.^[10] Acheson's observations led to a U.S. patent for the carborundum production method on February 28, 1893 (U.S. Patent No. 492,767), confirming the viability of the process despite its serendipitous origins.^[11] Early tests demonstrated carborundum's superior cutting and grinding properties, surpassing natural abrasives in hardness and uniformity, though initial yields were small-scale and required optimization of furnace design for consistency.^[10]^[1]

Patenting and Early Commercialization

Edward Goodrich Acheson filed a patent application for the production of artificial crystalline carbonaceous materials, known as carborundum (silicon carbide), on May 10, 1892, which was issued as U.S. Patent No. 492,767 on February 28, 1893.^[12] The patent detailed a process involving the electric heating of a mixture of carbonaceous material (such as coke), silica, and a flux like common salt to temperatures sufficient for chemical combination, yielding a hard, crystalline silicon carbide suitable for abrasives and refractories.^[12] Following the patent issuance, Acheson established the Carborundum Company in 1894 in Monongahela City, Pennsylvania, to commercialize the invention, initially focusing on manufacturing grinding wheels, whetstones, knife sharpeners, and powdered abrasives from the silicon carbide product.^[13] With financial backing from Pittsburgh's Mellon National Bank, the company began small-scale production, marking the transition from experimental synthesis to industrial application. By 1895, Acheson relocated operations to Niagara Falls, New York, constructing the first dedicated commercial plant for the Acheson process, which capitalized on abundant, low-cost hydroelectric power from nearby plants to drive the energy-intensive electric furnaces.^[6] This site enabled scalable output, rapidly positioning carborundum as a competitive alternative to natural abrasives like corundum and emery, with production volumes increasing to meet demand in grinding and polishing industries.^[6] Early sales emphasized the material's superior hardness and uniformity, derived directly from the patented electric reduction method.^[12]

Technical Mechanism

Core Chemical Reaction

The Acheson process involves the carbothermal reduction of silica (SiO₂) with excess carbon to produce silicon carbide (SiC), primarily through an overall reaction represented by the equation SiO₂ + 3C → SiC + 2CO.^[4]^[14] This endothermic reaction requires temperatures exceeding 2,200°C, typically reaching 2,500°C in the furnace core, to overcome the high activation energy and drive the formation of crystalline SiC.^[3]^[4] In practice, the reaction does not proceed via a direct solid-solid mechanism but involves gaseous intermediates, with silicon monoxide (SiO) playing a key role. The initial step entails the partial reduction of SiO₂ by carbon to form SiO gas and CO: SiO₂ + C → SiO + CO. This SiO then reacts further with carbon: SiO + 2C → SiC + CO. These gas-phase transport processes dominate SiC formation, particularly in the peripheral zones of the furnace charge, while solid-solid reactions contribute near the central heating elements.^[15]^[7] The overall stoichiometry remains SiO₂ + 3C → SiC + 2CO, but excess carbon (typically a 20-50% surplus) is used to ensure complete silica conversion and minimize unreacted silica impurities.^[4]^[16] The reaction's thermodynamics favor SiC stability above 1,800°C under the reducing conditions provided by the carbon-rich environment, with CO evolution facilitating mass transport and preventing oxidation. Impurities in raw materials, such as iron or aluminum oxides in silica sand or ash in petroleum coke, can influence reaction kinetics and product purity, often leading to the formation of secondary phases like silicides if not controlled.^[15]^[17] Industrial yields approach 80-90% based on silica input, limited by volatilization losses and side reactions producing CO₂ or elemental silicon at extreme temperatures.^[18]

Furnace Design and Operation

The Acheson furnace is an electric resistance furnace configured for batch production of silicon carbide through carbothermal reduction. It consists of a refractory-lined trench, typically 10 to 15 meters long, 3 to 4 meters wide, and 1 to 2 meters deep, with water-cooled copper electrodes embedded at each end. A central core, formed by packing granular petroleum coke or graphite tightly along the length and connecting it to the electrodes, serves as the primary heating element. The furnace charge—a mixture of high-purity quartz silica sand (SiO₂) and petroleum coke or anthracite coal in approximately a 1:2.5 to 1:3 molar ratio—is uniformly packed around this core, filling the trench to a height that ensures thermal efficiency. The ends of the furnace are sealed with refractory walls or sand dams to contain the charge while allowing for an open-atmosphere operation.^[3]^[19] Operation begins with the application of high-amperage alternating current, typically ranging from 20,000 to 50,000 amperes at voltages of 100 to 200 volts, passed through the resistive graphite core. This generates intense Joule heating, raising the core temperature to 2,200–2,500°C within 24 to 48 hours, with heat conduction creating a radial temperature gradient outward to approximately 1,700°C at the reaction periphery. The process relies on this gradient to drive the endothermic reaction SiO₂ + 3C → SiC + 2CO, forming distinct radial zones in the resulting cylindrical ingot: an innermost unreacted graphite core, followed by high-purity α-SiC crystals, β-SiC, lower-grade metallurgical SiC, and outermost unreacted silica and carbon. Power input is controlled via transformer taps to maintain the temperature profile, with the furnace operating in an unsteady-state mode over a total cycle of 7 to 14 days, including a controlled cooling phase to prevent thermal shock and facilitate crystal growth.^[3]^[19]^[20] Post-reaction, the furnace is disassembled, and the ingot is extracted, crushed, and processed to separate SiC crystals by magnetic separation, acid leaching, and classification. The design's simplicity and scalability have sustained its use since 1896, though it is energy-intensive, consuming 8,000 to 12,000 kWh per ton of SiC produced, primarily due to resistive losses and the batch nature requiring frequent rebuilding. Modern variants incorporate improved refractory linings and automated power controls for enhanced uniformity, but the core resistive heating principle remains unchanged.^[3]^[19]

Industrial Production and Economics

Scale of Operations

The Acheson process operates on an industrial scale using large batch furnaces, typically featuring rectangular cross-sections with lengths of about 25 meters and charge capacities of around 100 tonnes of mixed silica and carbon raw materials per run.^[21]^[22] These furnaces are arranged in series within dedicated halls to stagger heating cycles and manage grid power demands, as each requires substantial electrical input—often 10 to 30 megawatts—for resistance heating via a central graphite core.^[23] The batch nature limits throughput, with a single cycle encompassing 24 to 48 hours of ramp-up to 2,000–2,500°C, several days of sustained reaction, and 3 to 5 days of cooling, yielding 20 to 40 tonnes of silicon carbide per furnace after processing losses from the endothermic carbothermal reduction.^[24] Energy efficiency remains a key constraint, with practical consumption ranging from 7,000 to 12,000 kWh per tonne of SiC produced, far exceeding the theoretical minimum of 3,550 kWh/t due to heat losses in open-air designs and incomplete reactions.^[25]^[24] Larger facilities mitigate this by scaling furnace dimensions—e.g., extending lengths to 10 meters or more—which can boost batch output by up to 400% through increased charge volume, though this amplifies power and infrastructure demands.^[26] Globally, the Acheson method dominates bulk SiC production for abrasives and refractories, supporting an estimated annual capacity of 1 million tonnes as of 2017, with major operations in China, Europe, and the United States relying on dozens of furnaces per plant to meet demand.^[18] Output scales with regional energy availability and raw material logistics, but the process's intermittency favors facilities with grid access to high-voltage three-phase power, enabling continuous plant-level production despite individual batch limitations.^[27]

Byproducts and Efficiency

The Acheson process exhibits low conversion efficiency, with only 15% to 18% of the input charge typically transforming into silicon carbide (SiC), compared to a theoretical maximum of approximately 42% based on the stoichiometry of the carbothermal reduction reaction SiO₂ + 3C → SiC + 2CO.^[18] This suboptimal yield stems from incomplete reactions, formation of intermediate compounds, and thermal losses in the open furnace design, where heat dissipates over extended cycle times of 7 to 14 days per batch.^[7] Energy consumption remains a primary inefficiency metric, requiring 7,000 to 7,600 kWh per metric ton of SiC produced, equivalent to about 7.15 MWh/t in modern assessments, due to the resistive heating of the entire charge mass to temperatures exceeding 2,200°C.^[25]^[28] Efforts to improve efficiency, such as optimizing charge composition or furnace insulation, have yielded marginal gains, but the process's batch nature and gaseous transport mechanisms limit overall thermodynamic effectiveness.^[15] Byproducts include substantial unreacted silica and carbon, which form outer furnace zones and contribute to the low yield by diluting the SiC core, alongside gaseous emissions of carbon monoxide (CO) and silicon monoxide (SiO) from the dominant solid-gas reaction pathways.^[15] Volatile impurities, such as salts and vapors from raw material contaminants, are also expelled during operation, necessitating ventilation and contributing to environmental releases unless captured.^[29] Solid residues like pot-scrap—mixtures of partially reacted materials and impurities—accumulate and are often recycled or discarded, with recent innovations processing them into reusable SiC to mitigate waste.^[28] Graphite formation near electrodes represents another byproduct, usable in some contexts but adding to separation costs.

Applications and Technological Impact

Traditional Uses in Abrasives and Refractories

The Acheson process yields silicon carbide (SiC) crystals suitable for abrasive applications due to their exceptional hardness, rated at approximately 9.5 on the Mohs scale and up to 2,800 kg/mm² Vickers hardness, surpassing that of most natural abrasives like corundum.^[30] Initially commercialized in the late 1890s, SiC abrasives were employed in grinding wheels, sandpaper, and polishing compounds for metals, stones, and ceramics, enabling efficient material removal where softer abrasives failed.^[13] By the early 20th century, black SiC variants from the process dominated low- to medium-density grinding tasks, while green SiC offered finer grit for precision finishing, with production efficiencies limited to 15-18% yield from furnace charges.^[18] In refractories, Acheson-derived SiC's high thermal conductivity (up to 490 W/m·K at room temperature), resistance to thermal shock, and stability above 1,600°C made it ideal for furnace linings, kiln furniture, and blast furnace components, where it withstands molten metal corrosion and oxidation better than silica-based refractories.^[31] Traditional implementations included bonded SiC bricks for steelmaking ladles and saggars in ceramic firing, reducing downtime from cracking under cyclic heating; these applications consumed roughly 30% of global SiC output as of recent estimates, reflecting the material's role in high-temperature industrial processes since the 1900s.^[32] Despite lower impact resistance compared to alumina, SiC's chemical inertness in acidic slags extended refractory service life in non-ferrous metallurgy.^[30]

Modern Applications in Electronics and High-Performance Materials

High-purity silicon carbide powders produced via the Acheson process serve as essential precursor materials for growing single-crystal SiC substrates used in advanced power electronics. These powders, typically α-SiC with an average particle size of approximately 300 µm and loose packed density exceeding 1.6 g/cm³, are sourced from customized Acheson furnaces using high-purity silica and carbon feedstocks reacted at 1700–2500°C. This material enables physical vapor transport (PVT) crystal growth for semiconductor wafers in devices such as Schottky diodes, MOSFETs, and power modules operating at high voltages, frequencies, and temperatures. Applications include electric vehicle inverters, wind and solar power converters, and data center power supplies, where SiC's wide bandgap (around 3.2 eV for 4H-SiC variants derived from such precursors) supports efficiency gains over silicon-based alternatives.^[33] Polycrystalline SiC directly from Acheson production finds direct use in electronic components requiring robustness under extreme conditions. Notably, it forms the basis for silicon carbide heating elements that withstand temperatures from 400°C to 1600°C in air or controlled atmospheres, employed in semiconductor fabrication furnaces, high-temperature ovens, and plasma etching systems. These elements leverage SiC's high thermal conductivity (50–100 W/m·K) and electrical resistivity for precise, energy-efficient heating in electronics manufacturing processes. Additionally, Acheson-derived SiC is incorporated into varistors and surge protectors, exploiting its nonlinear voltage-current characteristics for overvoltage protection in power electronics circuits.^[34]^[35] In high-performance materials, Acheson process SiC enhances composites and ceramics for demanding electronic and structural roles. Its exceptional hardness (29 GPa Vickers) and oxidation resistance up to 1500°C in air—or 2400°C in inert gases—enable applications in lightweight armor plating, brake discs for high-speed vehicles, and thermal management substrates in power modules. For instance, SiC-reinforced metal matrix composites improve heat dissipation in LED housings and RF amplifiers, while reaction-bonded SiC ceramics provide wear-resistant nozzles and seals in electronic processing equipment. These uses capitalize on the process's scalability for producing coarse crystalline α-SiC at industrial volumes, though purity levels limit direct semiconductor wafer applications without further refinement.^[3]^[36]

Health Risks and Safety Assessments

Empirical Evidence of Occupational Hazards

Workers in silicon carbide (SiC) production facilities utilizing the Acheson process have exhibited elevated rates of non-malignant respiratory diseases, including asthma, chronic bronchitis, and emphysema, based on cohort studies from the Norwegian industry spanning 1913–2005, where standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) exceeded population norms, particularly among furnace operators exposed to high dust levels during core production phases.^[37] Pulmonary function tests on 171 U.S. SiC manufacturing workers revealed significant declines in forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), correlating with cumulative dust exposure exceeding 100 mg/m³-years, independent of smoking status.^[38] Chest radiographs from these cohorts frequently displayed interstitial changes consistent with pneumoconiosis, with prevalence rates up to 35% in long-term exposed groups, attributed to inhalation of respirable SiC particles and co-contaminants like cristobalite formed at high furnace temperatures.^[39] Histopathological examinations of lung tissues from deceased SiC workers have confirmed silicon carbide pneumoconiosis, characterized by nodular fibrosis and birefringent SiC crystals under polarized light microscopy, as observed in biopsies from individuals with 20–40 years of Acheson furnace proximity exposure.^[40] Inhalation studies in animal models exposed to respirable SiC fractions (median diameter <5 μm) demonstrated macrophage accumulation and mild fibrosis after 6–12 months, mirroring human findings of dust retention in alveolar regions, with one case report detailing 42 years of occupational retention leading to progressive dyspnea.^[41]^[42] Exposure assessments in Norwegian plants quantified airborne SiC fibers (>5 μm length) at 0.1–10 fibers/cm³ during furnace charging and crushing, exceeding background levels and correlating with observed lung function impairments.^[43] Epidemiological data link SiC production to increased lung cancer incidence, with a Norwegian cohort study (n=3,635) reporting SMRs of 1.3–1.7 for lung cancer among workers in high-exposure departments like Acheson furnace operations, adjusted for smoking and silica co-exposure, and supported by IARC classification of occupational exposures as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1).^[44]^[45] Retrospective job-exposure matrices from these facilities indicate peak respirable dust concentrations of 10–50 mg/m³ pre-1970s controls, declining post-ventilation improvements but still associated with excess standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of 1.4 for lung malignancies.^[46] These risks persist despite modern mitigations, as evidenced by ongoing fiber emissions during maintenance, underscoring the fibrogenic and potentially genotoxic properties of SiC particulates over pure silica exposure alone.^[47]^[48]

Risk Mitigation and Comparative Context

Mitigation strategies in Acheson process facilities emphasize engineering controls to minimize airborne dust and fiber emissions, including local exhaust ventilation systems at furnace loading and unloading stations, as well as general dilution ventilation in production halls to maintain concentrations below occupational exposure limits.^[49] The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) enforces a permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 5 mg/m³ for respirable silicon carbide dust and 10 mg/m³ for total dust, while respirable crystalline silica (a byproduct contaminant) is limited to 50 μg/m³ as an 8-hour time-weighted average.^[50] ^[51] Administrative measures include regular air monitoring, job rotation to limit high-exposure tasks, and worker training on hazard recognition, complemented by personal protective equipment such as NIOSH-approved respirators (e.g., half-face masks with P100 filters for dust and fibers), protective helmets, goggles, and coveralls to prevent dermal and ocular irritation.^[49] ^[52] These controls have demonstrably reduced exposures in monitored Norwegian silicon carbide plants, where geometric mean dust levels ranged from 0.1 to 1.46 mg/m³ across jobs, often kept below limits through targeted ventilation and enclosure of processes, though furnace hall entries still require full PPE ensembles.^[53] ^[54] International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluations indicate that while historical exposures without modern controls contributed to elevated lung cancer standardized mortality ratios (up to 1.5–2.0 in cohorts), contemporary adherence to limits via these measures lowers attributable risk, though residual hazards persist from process-generated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide.^[55] ^[56] Comparatively, Acheson process hazards mirror those in silica-intensive sectors like foundries, where respirable crystalline silica from sand molding triggers similar silicosis and lung cancer risks (IARC Group 1 for silica), with exposure levels historically exceeding 0.1 mg/m³ and mitigated analogously through wet suppression, ventilation, and silica PELs.^[57] Foundry studies report comparable dust determinants (e.g., pouring and shakeout tasks) and health outcomes, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, but with added molten metal burns absent in SiC production.^[58] In mining (e.g., industrial sand extraction), exposures can be higher (up to 0.5 mg/m³ pre-controls), yielding silicosis prevalence rates of 5–10% in untreated cohorts versus under 1% in regulated U.S. operations, underscoring that Acheson risks—augmented by fibrous silicon carbide (IARC Group 2B)—are controllable to industry benchmarks but demand vigilant enforcement given the process's inherent high-temperature dust generation.^[59] ^[55]

Current Status and Future Prospects

Ongoing Commercial Relevance

The Acheson process maintains substantial commercial viability for producing industrial-grade silicon carbide (SiC), particularly black and green variants used in abrasives, refractories, and grinding media, where polycrystalline material suffices without requiring monocrystalline purity. As of 2024, major producers like Washington Mills operate Acheson furnaces to synthesize SiC crude by reacting silica sand and petroleum coke at temperatures exceeding 2,000°C, yielding grains suitable for downstream crushing and sizing into abrasives.^[4] Similarly, Fiven employs the process for its scalability in generating consistent, high-volume outputs of synthetic SiC minerals.^[3] Global demand sustains this method's relevance, with the SiC powder market—predominantly Acheson-derived for non-electronic applications—valued at USD 2.8 billion in 2024 and forecasted to reach USD 5.2 billion by 2034, fueled by growth in manufacturing sectors like steel polishing and ceramic processing.^[60] The Acheson segment specifically is projected to expand to USD 12.3 billion by 2034, underscoring its dominance in cost-effective bulk production despite competition from chemical vapor deposition for high-purity electronics-grade SiC.^[61] Energy costs and emissions remain challenges, yet furnace optimizations and byproduct recycling—such as Fraunhofer's RECOSiC technique, which converts Acheson waste into purified SiC—bolster economic and environmental feasibility.^[28] In regions with abundant electricity, such as parts of China and the United States, Acheson facilities continue to operate at multi-tonne scales annually, supporting ancillary markets like silicon carbide grinding media, which grew from USD 765 million in 2024 toward USD 913 million by 2032.^[62] This persistence reflects the process's entrenched efficiency for commoditized SiC, even as semiconductor applications shift toward alternative growth methods, ensuring its role in the broader USD 3.71 billion SiC market in 2024.^[63]

Alternatives and Innovations

While the Acheson process remains the dominant method for producing industrial-grade polycrystalline silicon carbide (SiC) due to its scalability and cost-effectiveness, alternatives have emerged primarily for high-purity, single-crystal SiC required in electronics and advanced materials.^[23]^[22] The physical vapor transport (PVT) method, developed in the mid-20th century and refined since, involves sublimating SiC source material at temperatures above 2,000°C in a vacuum to deposit crystals on a seed substrate, yielding wafers with fewer defects than Acheson-derived material.^[64]^[65] This technique has become standard for semiconductor-grade SiC, enabling larger diameters up to 200 mm by 2024, which improves yield by approximately 80% compared to smaller formats.^[66] Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) offers another pathway, depositing SiC thin films or powders via gas-phase reactions of precursors like methyltrichlorosilane (CH3SiCl3) and hydrogen at 1,000–1,500°C, bypassing the high-energy bulk heating of Acheson furnaces.^[67] CVD is favored for coatings and nanostructures but scales poorly for bulk production, with energy efficiencies varying by reactor design.^[68] The modified Lely process, an evolution from 1950s sublimation techniques, refines Acheson-like starting materials into bulk crystals under inert atmospheres, reducing impurities but requiring precise temperature gradients (typically 2,200–2,500°C).^[36] Innovations focus on sustainability and efficiency to address Acheson's high energy consumption (around 10–15 MWh per ton of SiC) and CO2 emissions. Susteon's catalytic process, commercialized in the 2020s, recycles silicon waste (e.g., from solar panel production) with methane to yield high-purity SiC and hydrogen co-product, potentially cutting costs by 30–50% and enabling decentralized production.^[23]^[20] Waste-derived methods, such as carbothermal reduction of organosilane sludge or rice husks, produce fine-grained SiC powders at lower temperatures (1,400–1,800°C), with feasibility indices indicating viability for regions with agricultural biomass abundance.^[69]^[70] These approaches prioritize empirical reductions in raw material costs and emissions, though scaling remains challenged by purity consistency compared to Acheson outputs.^[71] Integrated facilities, like STMicroelectronics' 2024 200 mm SiC plant in Italy, combine PVT growth with on-site processing to streamline supply chains for power electronics.^[72] Overall, while Acheson persists for abrasives, PVT and sustainable catalysis drive innovations for high-value applications, supported by alliances advancing defect control and workforce training.^[73]

References

[1]
Carborundum: A Diamond in the Rough
Edward Goodrich Acheson accidently discovered the process for synthesizing one of the hardest compounds now known to humanity—silicon carbide ...<|separator|>
[2]
Acheson Process | SpringerLink
Edward G. Acheson in 1892 to describe crystals that he made in an experiment which had the real goal of making a diamond-like crystal from carbon and alundum.
[3]
SiC production process | Fiven
In an Acheson furnace, a mixture of carbon material (usually petroleum coke) and a silica or quartz sand is reacted chemically at high temperatures in the range ...
[4]
SiC Production Process - Silicon Carbide - Washington Mills
Washington Mills employs two different manufacturing methods for producing SiC crude: the traditional Acheson process and large furnace technology. The ...
[5]
Edward Acheson - Lemelson-MIT
In 1893, he received a patent on the substance. Soon after Acheson came up with the process for creating carborandum, many realized that the mass production ...
[6]
Edward G. Acheson - ECS - The Electrochemical Society
Acheson continued to experiment and developed a process to make artificial graphite. The Acheson Graphite Co. was formed in 1899. In 1928, the company ...
[7]
Silicon carbide formation by carbothermal reduction in the Acheson ...
In industry, SiC is produced by Acheson process [40], in which silica sand and carbon reacts in Acheson graphite electric resistance furnace at high temperature ...
[8]
SiC Production - My CMS
The furnace is covered with a plastic film to capture the gases that are formed during the production process. Gases go to the desulphurization plant and them ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[9]
[PDF] IOWNER OF PROPERTY - NPGallery
In March 1891 he conducted the experiments that led to his invention of carborundum.Missing: exact initial
[10]
Edward Goodrich Acheson - National Inventors Hall of Fame®
In the mid 1890s, Acheson discovered that overheating carborundum produced almost pure graphite. This graphite was another major discovery for him, and it ...
[11]
Edward Goodrich Acheson | Carborundum, Silicon Carbide ...
Sep 27, 2025 · Edward Goodrich Acheson was an American inventor who discovered the abrasive Carborundum and perfected a method for making graphite.
[12]
US492767A - Edward g - Google Patents
US949386A 1910-02-15 Method for the production of silicon carbid. US1245383A 1917-11-06 Process of treating aluminous ...
[13]
Edward Goodrich Acheson | Science History Institute
It was actually silicon carbide, which he called carborundum. In 1894 he established the Carborundum Company in Monongahela City, Pennsylvania, to produce ...Missing: founding | Show results with:founding
[14]
[PDF] Synthesis and Characterization of Silicon-Silicon Carbide ...
method of SiC is a carbothermal reduction known as the Acheson process. The general reaction. Pierson (1996) is: SiO2(s) + 3C(s) → SiC(s) +2CO(g). (1). A ...
[15]
Gas transport mechanisms and the behaviour of impurities in the ...
Apr 20, 2019 · The Acheson process still remains the method of choice for the industrial production of silicon carbide. The furnace operates in an unsteady ...
[16]
Study of formation of silicon carbide in the Acheson process - 2002
Dec 13, 2016 · A heat resistance furnace is used in the Acheson process which uses sand and petroleum coke as major raw materials. It is a highly energy ...
[17]
Mechanism of reaction of silica and carbon for producing silicon ...
Dec 4, 2019 · The results show that the only way to produce SiC in this reduction is the reaction of Si, SiO, or SiO 2 at the surface or by diffusion of SiO inside the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[18]
Study of formation of silicon carbide in the Acheson process
Aug 6, 2025 · Formation of silicon carbide in the Acheson process was studied using a mass transfer model which has been developed in this study.<|separator|>
[19]
How is Silicon Carbide Made? - IPS Ceramics
Aug 19, 2021 · The Acheson Furnace. Acheson went on to develop a furnace design which is still the basis of most silicon carbide manufacturing today.Missing: operation | Show results with:operation
[20]
A Novel, Low-Cost Sustainable Process to Produce Silicon Carbide
SiC is conventionally produced via the Acheson process, invented in 1893. The Acheson process reacts petroleum coke and high-purity crystalline silica (quartz ...
[21]
(PDF) Processing of Silicon Carbide-Based Ceramics - ResearchGate
The ordinary Acheson furnaces are lined up side-by-side in a long hall. A typical Acheson furnace has a. rectangular cross-section with a length of about 25 ...
[22]
Manufacture of SiC: Effect of Carbon Precursor - PMC
Mar 1, 2023 · The furnace is an open furnace, usually with a capacity of about 100 tonnes, with a graphite electrode in the centre and a mixture of sand and ...
[23]
A Novel, Low-Cost Sustainable Process to Produce Silicon Carbide
The Acheson process reacts petroleum coke and high-purity crystalline silica (quartz SiO2) in an open-atmosphere 30-kA electrical resistance furnace. This ...Missing: output | Show results with:output
[24]
Temperature measurements in a laboratory scale furnace for ...
The Acheson process is a batch process which requires a long heating and reaction time, and a long time to cool. Because of this, a series of the furnace is ...Missing: size output
[25]
[PDF] Researching of Thermophysical Processes in Acheson Furnace to ...
Acheson furnace is a complicated power-technological and thermo-physical unit in view of mathematical modeling. The main heat source is electric energy during ...
[26]
How Is Silicon Carbide Manufactured at Industrial Scale? - ZHONGBO
May 16, 2025 · - Scaling Acheson furnaces to 10-meter lengths increases batch output by 400%. - Automated charging systems reduce labor costs and contamination ...
[27]
[PDF] 555-Derevyanko.pdf
A thermo-physical model of silicon carbide production process in an Acheson furnace has been successfully de- veloped. The dynamics of the thermal state of the ...
[28]
Energy-efficient and low in emissions - silicon carbide recycling with ...
Jun 1, 2023 · It is produced using the Acheson process, in which quartz sand and petrol coke are heated in a cylindrical furnace to around 2,500 °C. The ...
[29]
USRE11473E - acheson - Google Patents
My invention relates to the production of 1c artificial crystalline carbonaceous materials, and it has for its object to produce an artificial crystalline ...
[30]
Green Silicon Carbide - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
SiC is manufactured in an Acheson resistance heating furnace at a temperature of around 4350 °F. The chemical reaction is. (9.1) SiO 2 + 3 C → SiC + 2 CO .
[31]
Why Choose Silicon Carbide for Kiln Furniture Components?
Feb 8, 2024 · Silicon carbide is perfect for creating kiln furniture because of its hardness and chemical and thermal shock resistance.<|control11|><|separator|>
[32]
Integrating material flow analysis and supply chain resilience ...
Oct 16, 2024 · We find that globally around 1000 kt of SiC is produced each year. The biggest use of SiC is the abrasives industry (40%), followed by ...
[33]
SiC for power electronics | Fiven
Originally used as an abrasive because of its hardness, SiC has since found many different applications such as seal rings, diesel engines, electronic circuitry ...
[34]
Silicon carbide (SiC) - Allwin21 Corp.
Silicon Carbide ( SiC ) Heating Elements are used in applications ranging in temperature from 400oC up to 1600 oC in both air and controlled atmospheres.In ...
[35]
Silicon Carbide Then and Now - Materials Research Furnaces, LLC
SiC has a thermal conductivity 3.5 times better than silicon and can be heavily doped for high conductivity while still maintaining high electric field ...<|separator|>
[36]
Methods to Produce Silicon Carbide and Their Advantages
Aug 1, 2025 · The Acheson process is the most widely utilized method to prepare SiC. This process was invented by Edward Goodrich Acheson to make SiC and ...
[37]
Mortality from non-malignant respiratory diseases among workers in ...
Mar 1, 2011 · Increased mortality from asthma, chronic bronchitis and emphysema has previously been reported among workers in the silicon carbide (SiC) ...Departments And Job Groups · Table 3 · Table 4
[38]
Pulmonary effects of exposures in silicon carbide Manufacturing
Aug 6, 2025 · Chest x rays, smoking histories, and pulmonary function tests were obtained for 171 men employed in the manufacturing of silicon carbide.
[39]
Pathology of silicon carbide pneumoconiosis - PubMed
A recent epidemiological study has revealed a 35% incidence of pulmonary problems. Tissues from three such workers were available for light microscopy.
[40]
Silicon Carbide Induced Pneumoconiosis: A Microscopic and ...
The aim of this paper is to evaluate the morphological pulmonary response to SiC aggression, along with hydroxyproline dosing used as a biochemical marker of ...
[41]
Toxicological investigations on silicon carbide. 1. Inhalation studies
The question of lung damage as a result of exposure to silicon carbide (SiC) was investigated by inhalation experiments to obtain information on the ...
[42]
PULMONARY DUST RETENTION IN A SILICON CARBIDE WORKER
Jun 4, 2010 · This paper reports on pulmonary dust retention in a man who worked 42 years in the vicinity of an Acheson furnace of a silicon carbide plant ...Missing: diseases | Show results with:diseases
[43]
Airborne Fibres in the Norwegian Silicon Carbide Industry
The fibres are an unwanted side-product in SiC production. They represent a probable cause of the observed increased occurrence of lung diseases among SiC ...
[44]
Lung cancer incidence among Norwegian silicon carbide industry ...
Workers in the silicon carbide (SiC) industry have an increased incidence of lung cancer. The specific causal factors of this increase have not previously been ...Materials And Methods · Exposure Assessment And Jem · Discussion
[45]
[PDF] SILICON CARBIDE - IARC Publications
Silicon carbide whiskers often have a diameter < 5 μm and a length > 20 μm and are thus respirable fibres similar to amphibole asbestos. Silicon carbide ...
[46]
Determinants of Exposure to Dust and Dust Constituents in the ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Silicon carbide is produced in Acheson ovens by heating a mixture of petroleum coke and silica sand at a temperature of 2000°C. A total of ...
[47]
Toxicological investigations on the respirable fraction of silicon ...
Increased lung cancer incidence with workers at the production site of crude silicon carbide (SiC) using the Acheson process has been reported.Missing: hazards empirical
[48]
Assessment of Exposure to Quartz, Cristobalite and Silicon Carbide ...
Abstract. The main objective of the present paper is to report on the concentration of silicon carbide (SiC) fibres, crystalline silica and respirable dust.
[49]
Real-Time Measurements and Characterization of Airborne ...
Dec 20, 2017 · SiC is typically produced in open electrical resistance furnaces, through the so-called Acheson furnace process. In an Acheson furnace, energy ...Missing: output | Show results with:output
[50]
https://www.osha.gov/chemicaldata/368
[51]
1988 OSHA PEL Project - Silicon Carbide | NIOSH - CDC
In the final rule, OSHA is establishing a 10-mg/m3 TWA total particulate limit for silicon carbide and retaining the 5-mg/m3 TWA respirable fraction limit. The ...
[52]
[PDF] SILICON CARBIDE HAZARD SUMMARY IDENTIFICATION ... - NJ.gov
HAZARD SUMMARY. * Silicon Carbide can affect you when breathed in. * Silicon Carbide can irritate the eyes and nose on contact.Missing: Acheson | Show results with:Acheson
[53]
Respiratory exposures associated with silicon carbide production
Geometric mean particulate exposures for jobs ranged from 0.1 mg/m3 to 1.46 mg/m3. The particulate contained varying amounts of alpha-quartz, ranging from less ...
[54]
Determinants of Exposure to Dust and Dust Constituents in the ...
Dec 1, 2012 · The aim of this study was to identify important determinants of dust exposure in the Norwegian silicon carbide (SiC) industry and to suggest ...Missing: Acheson | Show results with:Acheson<|separator|>
[55]
Evaluation - Some Nanomaterials and Some Fibres - NCBI Bookshelf
Occupational exposures associated with the Acheson process are carcinogenic to humans (Group 1). Fibrous silicon carbide is possibly carcinogenic to humans ( ...
[56]
Carcinogenicity of fluoro-edenite, silicon carbide fibres and whiskers ...
Oct 30, 2014 · The carcinogenicity of SiC fibres was investigated in two cohorts of Acheson process workers who were exposed to fibrous and non-fibrous SiC, ...
[57]
Characteristics and occupational risk assessment of ... - NIH
Silica-dust is the most common occupational hazard in the foundry industry. Silica-dust is one of the most harmful to human health, and the occupational ...
[58]
[PDF] Foundries - CDC Stacks
This CDC document provides recommendations for controlling occupational safety and health hazards in foundries, as part of NIOSH's criteria for safety ...
[59]
[PDF] INDUSTRIAL SAND AND GRAVEL - AWS
Most countries in the world had some production and consumption of industrial sand and gravel because it is essential to the glass and foundry industries.
[60]
https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/silicon-carbide-powder-market
[61]
Silicon Carbide Market Size, Share, Trends & Forecasts 2034
The acheson process segment is expected to reach USD 12.3 billion by 2034. The acheson process is one of the most common techniques of producing silicon carbide ...
[62]
Silicon Carbide Grinding Media Market Outlook 2025-2032 | Intel ...
Global Silicon Carbide Grinding Media market was valued at USD 765M in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 913M by 2032, at a 2.3% CAGR.
[63]
Silicon Carbide Market Analysis, Outlook, and Strategic Forecast
Global Silicon Carbide Market size was valued at USD 3.35 Billion in 2023 and ... Based on production methods, the market is segmented into acheson process ...
[64]
Advances in SiC Growth Mechanisms and Defects Control ...
Oct 6, 2025 · This review highlighted the most recent advances in SiC device technology, fabrication processes, crystal structures, growth techniques, and the ...
[65]
Silicon Carbide (SiC): industrial production methods and applications
Oct 25, 2023 · The Acheson process, developed by Edward Acheson in 1891, involves the high-temperature reaction of silica (SiO2) and carbon (C) in an electric ...Missing: operation | Show results with:operation<|separator|>
[66]
Ramped + Ready: Silicon Carbide Supply Rises to Meet Innovation ...
Feb 6, 2025 · The most advanced silicon carbide device companies are upgrading their manufacturing to 200mm wafers. The benefits are clear: An ~ 80 ...Missing: processes | Show results with:processes
[67]
What Are The Main Methods of Silicon Carbide Production?
May 30, 2025 · The most common method is the Acheson process, which involves reacting silica sand and carbon in an electric resistance furnace at high ...
[68]
Silicon Carbide: A Versatile Material with Wide-ranging Applications
Electronics: SiC is used in the production of high-power, high-temperature electronic devices, such as Schottky diodes, power MOSFETs, and high-temperature ...
[69]
Sustainable synthesis of silicon carbide from sludge waste ...
Nov 15, 2023 · This study uses organosilane waste, a byproduct of the organosilane industry, to produce SiC particles through an accessible and effective method.Missing: alternatives | Show results with:alternatives
[70]
A Feasibility Index for Silicon Carbide Production from Rice Waste
Jun 17, 2024 · Traditional production methods like the Acheson process are energy-intensive and costly, both in terms of investment and maintenance.
[71]
Analysis of production routes for silicon carbide using air as carbon ...
Jan 9, 2024 · Currently, the majority of SiC is produced via the Acheson process (Fyven 2022; Guichelaar 1996; Mukasyan 2017). In fact, this process was first ...
[72]
https://www.microchipusa.com/industry-news/the-worlds-first-fully-integrated-silicon-carbide-facility-is-here
[73]
Silicon Carbide Innovation Alliance to drive industrial-scale ...
Apr 3, 2024 · The alliance will work to advance U.S. silicon carbide technology and workforce development. Credit: Penn State Materials Research Institute.Missing: processes | Show results with:processes