Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Biomass

Biomass encompasses the organic material originating from living or recently deceased , including , , and microorganisms, which serves as a renewable energy source when converted into heat, electricity, or fuels through processes such as direct , , or thermochemical conversion. In ecological terms, it quantifies the total mass of living biological in a specific area or community, reflecting the productivity and structure of ecosystems. Primarily sourced from wood and wood residues, agricultural crops and residues, animal , and municipal , biomass constitutes a versatile feedstock for production. Globally, derived from biomass accounts for approximately 10% of supply, making it the dominant form of excluding traditional uses like wood burning for cooking in developing regions, with modern applications including generation and production that supplied over 2% of transport fuels in 2023. Key types include solid biomass like woody materials and pellets, liquid biofuels such as from corn or , and gaseous fuels from digestion of organic waste. While promoted as renewable due to the potential for carbon cycling through plant regrowth, empirical analyses indicate that biomass combustion often emits more CO2 per unit of energy than —up to 65% higher in some power plant operations—due to inefficiencies and the time lag in reabsorption by new growth, challenging claims of short-term carbon neutrality. Sustainable sourcing mitigates risks like and , but large-scale expansion has been linked to land competition and elevated emissions in regions reliant on whole-tree harvesting.

Fundamentals

Definition and Scope

Biomass consists of organic material originating from living or recently deceased organisms, chiefly and animals, serving as a for production and industrial applications. This includes substances rich in carbon, , oxygen, and other elements derived through biological processes like . In ecological contexts, biomass quantifies the total mass of living organisms in a given area or volume, but in energy and resource utilization, it emphasizes harvestable matter excluding geological deposits like fuels. The scope of biomass encompasses diverse feedstocks: woody materials from forests and trees; herbaceous plants and agricultural residues such as crop stalks, husks, and ; aquatic biomass like ; and organic fractions of municipal and industrial wastes. Primary categories distinguish between purpose-grown energy crops (e.g., switchgrass, ) and byproducts from existing land uses, which together form the basis for systems including direct combustion, conversion, and biochemical feedstocks. Materials must be biodegradable and non-fossilized to qualify, with often excluded due to its millennial-scale formation rendering it effectively non-renewable. Biomass qualifies as renewable owing to its capacity for replenishment via biological growth cycles, contrasting with finite resources, though hinges on rates of production exceeding consumption to maintain carbon neutrality. Its utilization spans heat generation, via turbines, and liquid/gaseous fuels, contributing approximately 5% of global supply as of recent assessments, predominantly from solid biomass . Scope excludes synthetic organics or long-buried carbon, focusing on recent biogenic sources to align with frameworks.

Classification and Types

Biomass is classified primarily by its biological origin and source, encompassing woody, herbaceous, and categories, with distinctions between virgin materials, residues, and wastes. Woody biomass derives from trees, shrubs, and operations, characterized by high lignocellulosic content including , , and , which provide structural support and energy potential. Examples include logs, branches, , wood chips, and black liquor byproduct from and mills. This category dominates traditional biomass use due to its abundance and established supply chains from sustainable practices. Herbaceous biomass originates from non-woody plants such as grasses, agricultural crops, and their residues, featuring higher proportions relative to compared to woody types. Key examples encompass crop residues like , wheat straw, rice husks, and from ; dedicated energy crops including switchgrass, , and bred for high biomass yield; and or crops such as corn grain and soybeans used for feedstocks. These sources leverage agricultural systems, with residues representing underutilized byproducts that avoid competition with production when sourced sustainably. Aquatic biomass includes microalgae, macroalgae, and seaweed cultivated in aqueous environments, prized for rapid growth rates—up to 100 times higher productivity per acre than terrestrial crops—and minimal land requirements. Algae, in particular, can be engineered for oil-rich compositions suitable for biodiesel, though harvesting and processing challenges limit commercial scale as of 2024. Waste-derived biomass further subdivides into animal manure, sewage sludge, biogenic municipal solid waste (e.g., paper, food scraps, yard trimmings), and industrial organic wastes, often converted via anaerobic digestion to biogas or combusted for energy recovery. In the United States, these accounted for approximately 8% of biomass energy consumption in 2023, primarily through landfill methane capture and wastewater treatment. Such classifications inform conversion technologies, as woody and lignocellulosic types suit thermochemical processes like combustion or pyrolysis, while herbaceous and waste materials favor biochemical routes such as fermentation.

Historical Development

Pre-Modern Utilization

The utilization of biomass for energy predates recorded history, with evidence indicating that early hominins harnessed fire to burn wood and other organic materials as far back as 1.5 million to 230,000 years ago, enabling cooking, warmth, and protection. Charcoal production via the slow pyrolysis of wood emerged as one of the earliest processed biofuels, with archaeological traces found in Paleolithic cave paintings dating to approximately 30,000 years before present. These practices relied on readily available plant matter and animal residues, forming the foundational energy source for human societies through the Neolithic period, where dried dung and crop residues supplemented wood for fuel in agrarian communities. In ancient civilizations, biomass dominated needs, with wood and serving as primary fuels for heating, cooking, and across , , , and . Mesopotamian societies collected and processed animal dung into fuel cakes during dry seasons, preserving for while providing a combustible alternative to scarce timber. Greek city-states heavily depended on wood for domestic and industrial uses, contributing to widespread by the Classical period (circa 500–300 BCE), as expanding populations strained woodland resources. Roman energy systems integrated biomass extensively, employing wood and for public hypocausts, metal , brick firing, and cremations; by the 1st century CE, urban centers like consumed vast quantities—estimated at millions of cubic meters annually—to sustain aqueducts, forges, and households, often importing fuel from distant provinces to mitigate local shortages. Medieval Europe continued this reliance on biomass, with wood accounting for over 90% of energy consumption until the late , supplemented by in northern regions and dung in rural households. Charcoal kilns proliferated to meet demands for iron production, as seen in the bloomeries of 12th–15th century and , where and woods were systematically coppiced for , though led to fuel crises in densely populated areas like 14th-century . In Asia, Chinese dynasties from the period (206 BCE–220 CE) onward utilized crop residues, , and animal for household energy, with early of dung producing for lighting in limited elite applications by the 2nd century BCE. These pre-modern systems, while efficient for localized needs, were constrained by logistical challenges, such as transport inefficiencies and risks, underscoring biomass's role as a renewable yet finite in pre-industrial economies.

Industrial Era Advancements

During the Industrial Era, spanning roughly from the late 18th to early 20th centuries, biomass utilization transitioned from predominantly traditional heating and small-scale applications to more systematic , driven by demands for fuels, chemicals, and materials in , , and early engines, even as began to supplant in many sectors. Advancements focused on gains in thermochemical conversion, enabling higher yields and byproducts, though pressures often limited scalability without sustainable practices. Charcoal production, essential for iron smelting before widespread coke adoption, benefited from refined kiln designs and management techniques. By 1850, blast furnaces achieved annual outputs of 725 to 1,000 tons of pig iron, requiring only 150 to 250 bushels of charcoal per ton— a reduction from earlier inefficiencies due to better stacking, airflow control, and collier expertise in pit-burning or mound methods. These improvements supported peak charcoal-dependent iron production in regions like the United States and Europe, where forests supplied vast quantities, though overreliance led to regional wood shortages by the mid-19th century. Destructive distillation of wood, involving in retorts to decompose biomass under heat without oxygen, emerged as a cornerstone for extracting liquid and gaseous products. This process yielded (wood alcohol), acetic acid, , and residues, serving as primary industrial sources until synthetic alternatives arose in the . Commercial operations scaled in the , particularly for chemical manufacturing and solvents, with yields enhanced by closed-system retorts that captured volatiles more effectively than open . Gasification of wood advanced concurrently, converting biomass into combustible syngas (producer gas) via partial oxidation in generators. Early patents, such as Robert Gardner's 1788 design for wood-derived gas to power engines, laid groundwork for stationary applications in factories and mills by the mid-19th century. John Barber's 1791 patent further refined air-blown for , enabling cleaner-burning alternatives to direct wood in industrial settings like and textiles, though soon overshadowed wood variants due to abundance. Liquid biofuel development marked another milestone, with ethanol production via fermentation scaled for motive power. Samuel Morey's 1826 internal combustion engine, demonstrated on a boat using ethanol from biomass, highlighted its potential as a high-octane fuel. Nicolaus Otto's 1860 four-stroke engine operated on ethyl alcohol, and Rudolf Diesel's 1890s prototype ran on peanut oil, proving vegetable oils' viability for compression-ignition engines before petroleum standardization. Biogas innovations complemented this, as Humphry Davy's 1808 isolation of methane from cow manure spurred anaerobic digestion; the world's first such plant, built in 1859 in Bombay, India, processed sewage for gas lighting and fuel. These technologies, while not displacing fossil fuels, provided resilient options amid resource constraints and laid empirical foundations for later biomass engineering.

Post-1970s Expansion

The 1973 Arab oil embargo, which caused global oil prices to quadruple and triggered energy shortages in many countries, catalyzed renewed governmental interest in biomass as a domestic alternative to imported fossil fuels. This crisis prompted the to establish research programs under the (later the Department of Energy), allocating funds for biomass conversion technologies such as and to enhance . Similarly, launched the Proálcool program in 1975, promoting production from , which expanded to supply over 20% of the nation's vehicle fuel by the early through state subsidies and mandated blending. In the and , biomass utilization grew through policy incentives and technological improvements, particularly in via from wood waste in the . The U.S. passed the of 1978, encouraging utilities to purchase power from qualifying biomass facilities, leading to the construction of dozens of small-scale using agricultural residues and . By the early 2000s, global production had begun accelerating, with output rising from near-zero commercial levels in the 1970s to approximately 16 billion gallons annually by 2007, driven by U.S. corn-based mandates and European initiatives from . The 2000s marked a of rapid scaling, fueled by targets and carbon reduction goals; capacity expanded at an average of 8 gigawatts per year from 2016 to 2021, reaching a global total of about 140 gigawatts by 2021, primarily from biomass . In 2020, biomass generated 685 terawatt-hours of worldwide, accounting for roughly 2% of total , with biomass comprising 69% of that output. However, has varied regionally: U.S. biomass power peaked in 2014 before stabilizing due to competition from cheaper , while saw surges, such as sevenfold increases in woody biomass capacity in and from 2013 to 2023, often subsidized under policies. Advances in conversion efficiency, such as integrated biorefineries combining heat, power, and liquid fuels, supported this expansion, though sustainability concerns over feedstock sourcing and net emissions have tempered projections, with the forecasting bioenergy's electricity share to reach 7.5% by mid-century under ambitious scenarios.

Biochemical Foundations

Molecular Composition

Lignocellulosic biomass, the predominant form derived from , consists primarily of three polymeric macromolecules: , , and , which together account for 65-75% of by weight, with composition varying by species, tissue type, and growth conditions. Cellulose typically comprises 30-50% of dry biomass, hemicellulose 20-40%, and lignin 15-25%. These proportions differ across feedstocks; for instance, hardwoods exhibit higher cellulose (40-50%) and lignin (20-30%) content compared to herbaceous grasses (cellulose 25-40%, lignin 10-20%). Minor constituents include extractives (5-10%, such as resins, , and waxes), proteins (1-5% in leaves and agricultural residues), (<5%), and ash (inorganic minerals, 1-15%, higher in grasses). Cellulose is a crystalline homopolymer of β-D-glucose units (empirical formula (C₆H₁₀O₅)ₙ) connected via β-1,4-glycosidic linkages, forming long linear chains (degree of polymerization 7,000-15,000) stabilized by intra- and inter-chain hydrogen bonds into microfibrils that confer structural rigidity. This ordered structure renders cellulose recalcitrant to hydrolysis, requiring pretreatment for deconstruction into fermentable sugars. Hemicellulose, in contrast, forms an amorphous matrix of branched heteropolysaccharides with backbones of β-1,4-linked xylans or mannans, incorporating pentoses (e.g., D-xylose, L-arabinose) and hexoses (e.g., D-mannose, D-galactose), as well as uronic acids for cross-linking to cellulose and lignin via ester and hydrogen bonds. Its lower molecular weight (degree of polymerization 80-200) and heterogeneity facilitate easier hydrolysis than cellulose. Lignin is an amorphous, cross-linked polyphenolic polymer synthesized from three monolignols—p-coumaryl, coniferyl, and sinapyl alcohols—via oxidative coupling, yielding a heterogeneous network of phenylpropane (C₆-C₃) units rich in ether (β-O-4) and carbon-carbon bonds. This complexity, with aromatic rings and variable methoxylation (e.g., guaiacyl units predominant in softwoods), embeds within the polysaccharide matrix, imparting hydrophobicity, mechanical strength, and resistance to microbial degradation, which poses challenges for biomass conversion. At the elemental level, biomass is dominated by carbon (45-50%), oxygen (40-45%), and hydrogen (5-6%), with trace nitrogen (0.1-2%), sulfur (<0.5%), and minerals (e.g., Si, Ca, K in ash). Non-lignocellulosic biomass, such as algal or animal-derived, features higher protein (up to 50% in microalgae) and lipid (10-30%) content, with polysaccharides like starch or chitin, but these represent smaller fractions of total biomass resources.

Energy Storage Mechanisms

Biomass primarily stores energy in the form of chemical bonds within organic macromolecules synthesized through photosynthesis, where solar energy drives the fixation of carbon dioxide into glucose molecules via the Calvin cycle. This glucose serves as the foundational unit for energy-dense polymers, with carbohydrates comprising the dominant storage form in most plant tissues, accounting for 50-75% of dry biomass weight in lignocellulosic materials. The energy yield per gram of carbohydrates is approximately 17-18 MJ/kg upon combustion, reflecting the oxidation potential of C-C and C-H bonds formed during biosynthesis. Carbohydrates function as both storage and structural components, with starch representing the mobilizable energy reserve. Starch, a polymer of α-D-glucose linked by α-1,4 and α-1,6 glycosidic bonds (forming amylose and amylopectin), accumulates in plastids such as chloroplasts and amyloplasts, enabling rapid hydrolysis to glucose for metabolic use during non-photosynthetic periods. In contrast, cellulose—a β-1,4-linked glucose polymer—forms rigid microfibrils in cell walls, providing structural integrity while sequestering energy that can be accessed through enzymatic or thermochemical breakdown, though its crystalline structure reduces digestibility compared to starch. Hemicelluloses, heterogeneous polysaccharides branching from cellulose, contribute additional stored energy but are more easily hydrolyzed due to their amorphous nature. Lipids, particularly triglycerides in seeds and fruits of oil-rich biomass (e.g., soybeans or algae), offer a higher energy density storage mechanism, yielding about 37-39 MJ/kg—roughly double that of carbohydrates—due to their reduced state and hydrophobic C-H chains derived from acetyl-CoA pathways. These accumulate under nutrient stress, serving as compact reserves for reproduction or dormancy, though they constitute less than 10% of total biomass in non-specialized feedstocks like wood or grasses. Lignin, a polyphenolic network, provides minimal direct energy storage (lower oxidation potential) but enhances overall biomass durability by cross-linking with carbohydrates, influencing conversion efficiency in bioenergy applications.

Sourcing and Supply Chains

Primary Feedstocks

Primary feedstocks for biomass consist of organic materials harvested from plants and animals, serving as inputs for bioenergy and biomaterial production. These primarily include woody biomass from forests and wood processing, agricultural residues from crop harvesting, and dedicated energy crops grown for high biomass yield. Additional sources encompass organic fractions of municipal solid waste, animal manures, and algae. Woody biomass, derived from trees, logging residues, thinnings, and mill byproducts like bark and sawdust, forms the largest category for solid biomass fuels and heat generation. In the United States, wood and wood waste contributed 2.1% of total annual energy consumption in 2023, equivalent to bark, sawdust, wood chips, scrap, and paper mill residues. Globally, forestry residues and wood processing wastes supply a significant portion of biomass for power and heating, integrated into multi-product supply chains from pulp mills and sawmills. Agricultural residues, including corn stover, wheat straw, rice husks, and sugarcane bagasse, arise as byproducts of food and fiber production, offering a low-cost, abundant resource after accounting for soil nutrient retention needs. In the U.S., over 500 million tons of crop residues are produced annually, with potential for bioenergy conversion while leaving sufficient material for erosion control and soil health. These residues support biochemical processes like ethanol production, though sustainable removal rates typically limit harvest to 20-50% of total output depending on crop type and regional practices. Dedicated energy crops such as switchgrass, miscanthus, poplar, and willow are perennial plants bred for rapid growth and high energy content, suitable for marginal lands to minimize competition with food production. These crops currently represent less than 0.1% of global biomass supply but hold scalability potential through improved yields and breeding. For instance, miscanthus can produce 5-15 dry tons per acre annually in temperate regions, supporting cellulosic biofuel pathways. Other primary feedstocks include biogenic municipal solid waste, comprising yard trimmings, food scraps, and paper, as well as animal manures from livestock operations, which are processed via anaerobic digestion for biogas. Wet waste streams and algae cultivation provide niche but emerging supplies, with algae offering high productivity per unit area—up to 10 times that of terrestrial crops—though commercialization remains limited by harvesting costs.
Feedstock CategoryKey ExamplesApproximate Global Role
Woody BiomassLogging residues, mill scrapsDominant for solid fuels; integrated in forestry chains
Agricultural ResiduesCorn stover, wheat strawByproduct-based; >500M tons/year U.S. potential
Energy CropsSwitchgrass, <0.1% current supply; high yield potential
Waste and ManureMSW organics, livestock wasteSupports ; variable by region

Harvesting and Preprocessing

Biomass harvesting methods depend on the feedstock type and aim to minimize costs while maximizing recoverable material. For woody biomass, such as residues and thinnings, harvesting typically integrates with conventional timber operations using one-pass systems, where feller-bunchers fell trees and skidders transport both merchantable timber and energy wood simultaneously to roadside piles. This approach recovers 20-50% more biomass than separate two-pass methods, which first remove higher-value products and return for residues, though two-pass systems allow better sorting but increase fuel use by up to 30%. In agricultural settings, residues like are collected post-grain harvest using modified combine harvesters equipped with collectors, achieving sustainable removal rates of 2-4 dry tons per acre without excessive soil nutrient depletion. Dedicated energy crops, such as switchgrass, are mowed with harvesters or baled using round balers in a single annual cut, typically in October to November, yielding 5-12 dry tons per acre under optimal fertilization and establishment. Preprocessing follows harvesting to enhance storage, transport, and conversion suitability by addressing high moisture (often 30-60% wet basis) and low bulk density (50-200 kg/m³). Initial steps include field drying via windrowing for 1-2 weeks to reduce moisture to 15-25%, preventing microbial degradation that can lose 10-20% of dry matter in storage. Size reduction through chipping, grinding, or milling follows, targeting particle sizes of 1-10 mm for improved flowability and reactor feeding, with hammer mills achieving throughputs of 10-50 tons per hour but consuming 20-50 kWh per ton. Densification via pelletizing or briquetting then compresses material to densities over 600 kg/m³, reducing transport volumes by 70-80% and enabling rail shipment economics, though requiring energy inputs of 10-30 kWh per ton and binders for low-lignin herbaceous feeds. These processes must balance and quality preservation; for instance, excessive grinding increases risks and fines that bind equipment, while inadequate drying promotes in piles exceeding 5 meters high. Guidelines emphasize leaving 20-30% of residues on-site to maintain and nutrients, with nutrient replacement via fertilization to sustain long-term yields.

Conversion Processes

Thermochemical Methods

Thermochemical conversion processes apply heat, often in controlled atmospheres with limited or no oxygen, to break down biomass into gaseous, liquid, and solid products suitable for energy or chemical applications. These methods leverage the chemical bonds in biomass components—cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin—to produce syngas, bio-oils, char, or heat, typically operating at temperatures from 200°C to over 1000°C depending on the process. Unlike biochemical routes, thermochemical approaches do not rely on microbial activity and can handle diverse feedstocks including lignocellulosic materials and wastes, though they require energy input for heating and may generate emissions requiring mitigation. Combustion involves the complete oxidation of biomass in excess air at temperatures exceeding 800°C, primarily generating for in boilers to drive turbines for or provide direct . Electrical efficiencies in modern fluidized-bed range from 25% to 40%, with combined heat and power systems achieving up to 85% overall by recovering . Products include CO₂, H₂O, and ash, but challenges persist with alkali metals causing and slagging, necessitating pretreatment like . As of 2018, U.S. Department of Energy assessments identified as the most mature thermochemical technology, contributing over 60 GW of global capacity, though net carbon benefits depend on sustainable sourcing to avoid lifecycle emissions exceeding alternatives. Gasification partially oxidizes biomass at 750–1100°C with limited oxygen or steam, yielding composed mainly of , H₂, CH₄, and CO₂, which can be cleaned and used in gas engines, turbines, or for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis into liquids. Cold gas efficiencies typically reach 50–70%, with higher values in (IGCC) systems; for instance, pilot plants achieve syngas yields of 1–2 Nm³/kg dry biomass at pressures of 0.98–2.94 atm. The process minimizes tar formation through high temperatures and catalysts, but scale-up faces issues like feedstock variability affecting gas quality. Recent demonstrations, such as those reviewed in 2025, highlight advancements in entrained-flow gasifiers handling up to 1000°C for cleaner from agricultural residues. Pyrolysis thermally decomposes biomass in an oxygen-free environment at 400–600°C, producing bio-oil (40–75 wt% in fast variants), biochar (15–25 wt%), and non-condensable gases (10–30 wt%). Fast at heating rates of 10–1000°C/s and vapor residence times under 2 seconds maximizes liquids, with bio-oil densities around 16–19 /kg but high oxygen content (35–40%) causing instability and acidity, often requiring upgrading via hydrodeoxygenation. Slow at lower heating rates (0.1–1°C/s) favors char production for amendment or . Yields vary by feedstock; for example, wood chips at 500°C yield 60% bio-oil, per IEA Bioenergy data. Catalysts like zeolites improve product quality, as explored in 2021–2025 studies addressing tar and issues. , a mild pretreatment at 200–300°C under inert conditions, densifies biomass by removing volatiles ( and ), yielding a coal-like with 20–30% higher (18–24 MJ/kg) and improved grindability. Mass yields are 70–80%, enhancing suitability for co-firing in , where it reduces emissions by up to 90% compared to raw biomass. extends thermochemical methods to wet feedstocks, processing at 250–400°C and 5–20 MPa to produce biocrude with 35–45 MJ/kg heating value, though high-pressure requirements limit commercialization. Advances since 2020 integrate these with for hybrid systems, improving overall conversion efficiencies to 60–80% in lab-scale tests, per peer-reviewed analyses.

Biochemical and Biological Methods

Biochemical conversion of biomass primarily involves the use of s and microorganisms to transform lignocellulosic feedstocks into fermentable sugars and biofuels, contrasting with thermochemical approaches by operating at milder temperatures and leveraging biological catalysts. This process typically begins with pretreatment to disrupt the rigid structure of , , and , enhancing accessibility for subsequent steps. Enzymatic follows, where cocktails—comprising endoglucanases, exoglucanases, and β-glucosidases—depolymerize into glucose monomers, with yields often limited by inhibition and enzyme recyclability challenges. then converts these sugars into products like via yeasts such as or advanced strains engineered for C5/C6 sugar utilization, achieving titers up to 100 g/L in optimized industrial processes. Biological methods extend beyond enzymatic to encompass microbial consortia-driven processes, including , where and sequentially hydrolyze, acidify, acetogenize, and methanogenize in oxygen-free environments to produce comprising 50-70% . This method suits wet biomass like or food waste, with global installed capacity exceeding 18,000 as of 2020, recovering energy equivalent to displacing fossil fuels while generating as fertilizer. Co-digestion with lignocellulosic additives improves nutrient balance and volatile solids reduction by 20-50%, mitigating inhibition from compounds like or sulfides. Emerging biological routes, such as microbial electrolysis cells or consolidated bioprocessing with fungi like , integrate and in single steps, potentially reducing costs by eliminating separate production. Photobiological processes, though less commercialized, utilize or to directly convert biomass-derived CO2 and into or , with yields reaching 10-20 mL/L/h under optimized conditions but constrained by penetration and oxygen sensitivity. Overall, these methods' efficacy hinges on feedstock composition—lignocellulose yielding 200-400 L per dry ton—and inhibitor management, as untreated biomass recalcitrance can limit to under 50% without or alkaline pretreatments. Advances in enzyme engineering, such as fusions, have boosted activity by factors of 2-5 since 2010, per benchmarks.

Primary Applications

Bioenergy Production

Bioenergy production from biomass primarily generates and through thermochemical conversion processes, such as direct and , which account for the majority of modern output excluding traditional biomass uses like open-fire cooking. In 2023, modern supplied approximately 21 exajoules (EJ) globally, representing about 4.5% of total final and over half of excluding traditional biomass. This sector relies on feedstocks like wood residues, agricultural wastes, and energy crops, combusted or gasified to produce for turbines or for engines, with combined and power (CHP) systems enhancing overall efficiency by capturing . Worldwide, biomass contributed around 600 terawatt-hours (TWh) to in 2023, with installed power capacity estimated at 83.8 gigawatts electrical (GWe) across nearly 5,000 plants as of early 2024. Direct combustion remains the dominant method, involving the burning of biomass in grate or fluidized-bed boilers to generate that drives turbines for , often in dedicated or co-firing setups with to reduce emissions and leverage existing . Efficiencies for -only production typically range from 20% to 40%, influenced by factors like content (ideally below 50% for optimal ) and system design, though CHP configurations can achieve up to 80-90% total energy utilization by recovering heat for industrial or applications. In the United States, biomass accounted for about 5% of total energy consumption in 2023, with direct powering facilities that process wood pellets, chips, and , often subsidized to compete with fuels. Co-firing, which blends 5-20% biomass with , has expanded in regions like and , enabling incremental adoption without full plant retrofits, though it requires preprocessing to match particle size and heating value. Gasification technologies advance bioenergy production by partially oxidizing biomass at high temperatures (800-1,000°C) in low-oxygen environments to yield syngas (primarily CO and H2), which fuels internal combustion engines, gas turbines, or fuel cells for electricity generation with potentially higher efficiencies (25-35%) and lower emissions than direct combustion due to cleaner gas cleanup. Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) systems, though less common for pure biomass, integrate syngas production with steam cycles for outputs exceeding 40% efficiency in pilot scales, addressing issues like tar formation through advanced catalysts and filtration. As of 2023, gasification-based plants represent a smaller but growing share, particularly in small-scale (under 10 MWe) decentralized units using agricultural residues, with global potential limited by high capital costs (often $2,000-4,000 per kWe) and feedstock logistics. Projections from the International Energy Agency indicate modern bioenergy for power and heat could nearly double to 39 EJ by 2030 under current policies, driven by industry and building sectors, though scalability depends on sustainable sourcing to avoid competition with food production. Empirical critiques highlight that while gasification reduces particulate emissions, full lifecycle assessments often reveal net carbon benefits only if biomass regrows rapidly, challenging assumptions of inherent carbon neutrality in policy frameworks.

Biofuels and Transportation

Biofuels, produced from biomass feedstocks such as crops, agricultural residues, and materials, are liquid or gaseous fuels used primarily in transportation to displace petroleum-based and . The two dominant types are bioethanol, fermented from starches or sugars in feedstocks like corn and , which is blended into for spark-ignition engines, and , derived via of vegetable oils or animal fats, which substitutes for in compression-ignition engines. In 2022, biofuels accounted for over 3.5% of global transport energy demand, with annual growth averaging nearly 6% since 2010, driven mainly by policy mandates in regions like the , , and the . Global production reached approximately 200 billion liters annually by 2023, with consuming the vast majority. Bioethanol blends, such as E10 (10% ) and (up to 85% ethanol) for flex-fuel vehicles, improve combustion efficiency in gasoline engines by increasing octane ratings, though they reduce by 3-4% per volume compared to pure , potentially lowering fuel economy by 1-3% in conventional vehicles. Biodiesel blends like B20 (20% ) offer better for diesel engines, reducing wear, but can increase (NOx) emissions by 2-10% in some configurations while cutting and . Tailpipe emissions data from U.S. Department of Energy tests show reducing lifecycle (GHG) emissions by up to 74% relative to petroleum diesel when using soy-based feedstocks, though actual benefits vary with engine tuning and blend levels. Biogas, upgraded to biomethane from of biomass waste, serves as a drop-in for natural gas vehicles, with over 30 million such vehicles worldwide by 2023, primarily in and . Despite promotional claims of carbon neutrality—assuming biomass regrowth offsets combustion CO2—lifecycle analyses reveal significant caveats, including emissions from feedstock , , and , which can exceed those of fossil fuels in high-intensity crop-based systems. The U.S. EPA notes that certain biofuels, particularly first-generation types from food crops, may emit more GHGs than conventional fuels on an energy-equivalent basis due to use, losses, and indirect land-use changes (ILUC) like elsewhere to replace displaced food production. A 2017 analysis by the government highlighted ILUC effects potentially adding 10-100 grams of CO2-equivalent per megajoule for from corn or wheat, undermining net reductions. Advanced biofuels from or wastes show greater potential for 50-90% GHG savings, but comprise less than 5% of production as of 2023 due to higher costs and technological hurdles. The projects biofuels demand rising 11% by 2024, yet warns that scaling without addressing ILUC and efficiency losses risks minimal net decarbonization in . Transportation biofuel markets were valued at USD 101.9 billion in 2024, with a projected of 10.7% through 2034, fueled by blending mandates like the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard requiring 15 billion gallons of conventional s annually and the EU's Directive targeting 14% renewables in by 2030. Brazil leads in ethanol, supplying over 25% of its demand, while the U.S. produces 15 billion gallons of corn ethanol yearly, though this has drawn for diverting 40% of corn crops to fuel amid concerns. Empirical critiques emphasize that biofuels' integration into existing enables short-term emission cuts of 20-50% versus baselines in optimized scenarios, but systemic biases in academic and policy modeling—often underestimating ILUC by excluding market feedbacks—have overstated benefits, as evidenced by revised EU estimates reducing credited savings by 50% post-2010. Second- and third-generation pathways, such as algal or cellulosic biofuels, promise higher yields (up to 10 times per versus corn) and lower emissions but remain commercially marginal, with global output under 1 billion liters in 2023.

Industrial Materials and Biotechnology

Biomass serves as a renewable feedstock for industrial materials, including , composites, and fibers, often processed through biotechnological methods that leverage microbial and enzymatic to convert lignocellulosic components like and into usable monomers. These processes aim to displace petroleum-derived materials, with global production of bio-based chemicals reaching an estimated 50 million tonnes annually as of recent assessments, though scalability remains constrained by feedstock availability and processing costs. In bioplastics production, starch-rich biomass such as corn or is hydrolyzed to glucose, which bacteria like ferment into ; this is then polymerized into (PLA), a used in packaging and textiles. PLA accounts for about 20% of bioplastics capacity, with production processes requiring inputs comparable to routes but offering potential reductions of up to 60% when sourced from biomass, contingent on efficient pretreatment to minimize inhibition. Lignocellulosic biomass, including agricultural residues, yields bio-based polyethylene and polyamides via dehydration to or fermentation to , though yields are typically 70-90% of theoretical maxima due to microbial stress from inhibitors like . Biotechnology advances enable direct conversion of biomass to high-value materials, such as succinic acid from engineered Escherichia coli or Basfia succiniciproducens fermenting glucose from pretreated corn stover, yielding up to 120 g/L titers under optimized anaerobic conditions for use in polybutylene succinate resins. Enzymatic cocktails from fungi like Trichoderma reesei break down biomass polysaccharides, facilitating production of biofibers from wheat straw or rice husks, which exhibit tensile strengths of 500-800 MPa suitable for composites in automotive parts. Recent developments include biomass-derived liquid crystal polymers, with Sumitomo Chemical achieving mass production of monomers from plant oils in 2025, targeting electronics applications. Challenges persist in , as biotechnological routes often incur 20-50% higher costs than alternatives due to dilute product streams and purification demands, with only 2-5% of current chemicals derived from biomass despite pilot-scale successes in furfural-based resins from corncobs. valorization via biotech yields for adhesives, but low conversion efficiencies (under 50%) limit adoption without of microbes for inhibitor tolerance. Empirical data indicate that while biomass-derived carbons from support advanced materials like electrodes with capacitances exceeding 300 F/g, full lifecycle analyses reveal variable environmental benefits depending on impacts.

Environmental Impacts

Carbon Cycle Dynamics

In the carbon cycle, biomass—organic material derived from and other organisms—serves as a dynamic , sequestering atmospheric CO2 through and storing it in living tissues, dead , and soils, with terrestrial holding approximately 450-550 gigatons of carbon globally. Harvesting biomass for use disrupts this by removing stored carbon, which is then released rapidly as CO2 upon or , while subsequent regrowth via replanting or natural reabsorbs CO2 at a slower rate, typically over years to decades depending on , conditions, and practices. This temporal mismatch creates a "carbon debt," where net atmospheric CO2 concentrations rise initially, contributing to short-term before potential payback through enhanced elsewhere. Empirical analyses of biomass harvesting reveal significant variability in duration and magnitude. For residues like branches and tops left after , payback times can be as short as 1-10 years when displacing fuels, as these materials would otherwise and release CO2 without energy yield. However, using whole-tree or wood from mature stands incurs debts lasting 44-104 years or more, as the foregone from intact s—often 2-6 tons of carbon per hectare annually—exceeds regrowth rates, with losses from disturbance adding 10-20% to total emissions. Lifecycle assessments accounting for emissions, such as and processing, further indicate that biomass from primary s rarely achieves parity with displacement within policy-relevant timelines like 20-40 years. These dynamics challenge assumptions of inherent carbon neutrality in biomass systems, as regrowth may not fully offset releases if harvesting exceeds sustainable yields or shifts land from high-sequestration uses like old-growth preservation. In regions like the U.S. Southeast, where wood pellet production relies on thinnings and residues, studies estimate net emissions reductions only after 20-50 years under optimistic scenarios, but economic incentives can drive intensified harvesting that amplifies upfront debts. Globally, biomass energy's flux remains minor compared to emissions (about 1-2% of CO2), yet scaling it without rigorous accounting risks amplifying cycle perturbations, particularly in tropical or forests where losses compound carbon release. Causal analysis underscores that while biomass recycles biogenic carbon unlike geologic stores, the cycle's sensitivity to harvest intensity and timing necessitates site-specific verification over blanket neutrality claims.

Air Quality and Pollution Effects

Combustion of biomass for energy production emits particulate matter (PM), including fine PM2.5 and ultrafine particles, nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and black carbon, with emission profiles varying by fuel type, combustion technology, and efficiency. These pollutants arise primarily from incomplete combustion processes inherent to organic materials, leading to higher PM yields compared to natural gas but potentially lower sulfur oxides (SOx) in low-sulfur biomass like wood residues. Utility-scale biomass power plants, even with pollution controls, release tens to hundreds of tons annually of PM, NOx, CO, and hazardous air pollutants such as formaldehyde and benzene, often exceeding permits in real-world operations due to variable fuel quality and combustion instability. PM2.5 and from biomass burning penetrate respiratory tracts and systemic circulation, contributing to , , and elevated risks of exacerbations, , , and premature mortality. In , biomass is linked to at least 40,000 premature deaths per year, predominantly from respiratory and cardiovascular impacts, with carbonaceous PM2.5 components showing stronger associations with morbidity than some traffic-related pollutants. Agricultural residue burning, a common biomass practice, further degrades regional air quality by releasing and PM that form and secondary aerosols, exacerbating in areas like where events spike PM2.5 levels by factors of 10 or more above baselines. Relative to fossil fuels, biomass often produces elevated and emissions per unit energy, particularly in residential and small-scale systems lacking advanced , though may dominate SOx without ; empirical assessments indicate biomass facilities can impose higher localized burdens due to dispersed sources and less stringent controls in some jurisdictions. 's light-absorbing properties also amplify short-term , compounding air quality degradation with climate effects independent of CO2 dynamics. Mitigation via electrostatic precipitators or reduces but does not eliminate these emissions, as evidenced by persistent exceedances in monitored facilities.

Land Use and Biodiversity Consequences

Large-scale biomass production for energy and materials necessitates extensive land allocation, often resulting in direct and indirect changes (LUC). Empirical assessments indicate that fulfilling ambitious bioenergy targets, such as those in net-zero emission scenarios, could require up to 140 million hectares of cropland by 2050, equivalent to approximately 3% of global . In the United States, biofuel policies have empirically driven domestic LUC, with estimates of 0.38 to 0.66 million acres converted per billion gallons of additional production, primarily through cropland expansion into marginal or areas. Globally, replacing significant portions of demand with biomass-derived biofuels would demand 15-42% of terrestrial net , underscoring the scale of land competition with systems and habitats. Such expansions frequently occur on fertile lands rather than solely degraded areas, as economic incentives favor high-yield sites, leading to indirect LUC where displaced encroaches on forests or savannas. Deforestation linked to biofuel plantations remains a concern, particularly in tropical regions. For instance, industrial palm oil expansion—often tied to biodiesel—contributed to an average of 32,406 hectares of annually in from 2018 to 2022, though rates have declined from peaks a decade earlier due to regulatory efforts. Broader analyses reveal that biofuel-driven cropland expansion accounts for a portion of the 5 million hectares of annual global forest loss, with challenges in precise attribution stemming from intertwined commodity markets but confirmed causal links in regions like and . These LUC emissions from soil carbon release and vegetation clearing can offset purported climate benefits for decades, as initial carbon debts from conversion exceed regrowth in many cases. Biodiversity consequences are predominantly negative, with bioenergy crop monocultures simplifying ecosystems and reducing heterogeneity. A global synthesis of local impacts found and abundance 37% and 49% lower, respectively, in first-generation croplands (e.g., soy, corn, oil ) compared to primary sites. Conversion of forests or grasslands to such plantations has been associated with up to 20% declines in overall metrics, including pollinators, , and organisms, due to , pesticide use, and reduced structural diversity. While some second-generation lignocellulosic crops (e.g., switchgrass, ) may support higher than annual food crops on existing —increasing metrics by up to 75% relative to intensive row crops—their large-scale deployment still risks net losses if sourced from uncleared natural areas, as broadly drives global erosion. assumptions in optimistic models often overlook these realities, where yield pressures favor biodiverse hotspots.

Economic and Policy Dimensions

Cost Structures and Viability

The cost structure of biomass energy systems is dominated by feedstock acquisition, which typically accounts for 20-50% of the (LCOE), encompassing harvesting, densification, and transportation due to biomass's low and dispersed supply. Harvesting costs vary by source, with woody residues from or like often cheaper than purpose-grown energy crops, but transportation expenses escalate rapidly with distance—economic sourcing is generally limited to within 50-100 miles of facilities to avoid prohibitive outlays of $10-30 per dry ton per 50 miles. for biomass-fired power plants average $2,730 per kW globally, lower than many fossil alternatives but offset by higher fixed operations and maintenance (O&M) at 2-6% of installed capacity annually, plus variable O&M around $0.005/kWh, reflecting fuel handling and ash needs. In 2023, the global weighted-average unsubsidized LCOE for newly commissioned stood at $0.072/kWh, with regional variations from $0.062/kWh in (leveraging low-cost agricultural residues) to $0.107/kWh in , influenced by higher feedstock and labor expenses. U.S.-specific estimates from the project a capacity-weighted LCOE of $132/MWh ($0.132/kWh) for entering service around 2030, comprising levelized of $67/MWh, fixed O&M of $46/MWh, and variable costs (including ) of $38/MWh, assuming a dispatchable near 72%. This positions biomass as less competitive than onshore wind ($0.026/kWh) or solar PV ($0.019/kWh) but potentially viable against combined-cycle ($0.038/kWh) in scenarios with abundant feedstocks or co-firing configurations. Economic viability hinges on localized factors like waste availability and scale, but empirical analyses reveal structural challenges: high costs limit , with purpose-grown crops raising food price risks and residues insufficient for large deployment without subsidies. While 97% of 2023's new biomass capacity (4 GW globally) undercut LCOE averages in their markets, overall deployment remains niche—comprising under 5% of U.S. —due to LCOE premiums over unsubsidized intermittent renewables and dependency on incentives to offset logistics inefficiencies. Advances in densification or preprocessing could mitigate burdens, yet without such innovations, biomass struggles for broad competitiveness absent mandates or credits.

Subsidies, Incentives, and Market Distortions

Governments worldwide have provided extensive subsidies to biomass energy production, including tax credits, feed-in tariffs, production mandates, and direct grants, totaling nearly $250 billion across major economies from 2002 to 2024. In the United States, the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), established under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and expanded in 2007, mandates blending biofuels derived from biomass into transportation fuels, effectively subsidizing production through volume targets that reached 22.68 billion gallons of advanced biofuels and biomass-based diesel by 2023. Federal tax credits, such as the Biomass Crop Assistance Program, reimburse up to 50% of establishment costs for biomass feedstocks and provide annual payments, while the Investment Tax Credit and Production Tax Credit supported $166 million in loan subsidies for biomass facilities in fiscal year 2022. In the , biomass incentives include feed-in premiums and guarantees of origin, with approving a €7.9 billion package in 2025 for biomass deployment, subject to EU state aid rules to mitigate cross-border market distortions. The UK's , a major biomass importer, received £869 million in subsidies in 2024, exceeding £2 million daily, primarily through Contracts for Difference mechanisms that guarantee above-market prices for biomass-generated . Globally, these supports encompass guarantees and grants, such as the U.S. of Energy's $20 million allocation in 2023 for tribal biomass combined heat and power systems. Such subsidies distort markets by artificially reducing biomass costs, encouraging inefficient allocation of resources toward biomass over unsubsidized alternatives like or emerging low-carbon technologies. Economic analyses indicate that biofuel mandates and subsidies elevate and prices by diverting biomass feedstocks—such as corn and soybeans—from food markets, with U.S. ethanol subsidies alone contributing to a 10-15% rise in corn prices during peak mandate periods. In the , biomass incentives have spurred primary harvesting for energy, creating dependencies and price volatility that disadvantage non-subsidized industries like wood processing. These interventions also fail to internalize full lifecycle emissions and land-use costs, leading to net economic inefficiencies where subsidized biomass achieves carbon abatement at costs 2-5 times higher per ton of CO2 than or in comparable analyses. Critics, including fiscal policy analyses, argue that biomass subsidies perpetuate dependency on volatile feedstock supplies and crowd out private investment in higher-efficiency renewables, with U.S. biofuels supports totaling billions annually yet yielding marginal gains amid persistent import reliance. Empirical reviews highlight how mandates enforce production regardless of marginal cost-effectiveness, fostering overcapacity—such as idled U.S. plants during low feedstock price periods—and exacerbating taxpayer burdens without proportional reductions in use. While proponents cite incentives for , evidence from subsidy phase-outs in select regions shows minimal long-term industry contraction, suggesting many facilities operate viably only under ongoing government support.

Controversies and Empirical Critiques

Carbon Neutrality Assumptions

The carbon neutrality assumption for biomass energy posits that emissions from combustion are offset by carbon dioxide absorption during plant regrowth, resulting in no net atmospheric increase over the full cycle. This view relies on a steady-state model where harvested biomass is replaced by equivalent growth, treating biogenic CO2 as distinct from fossil-derived emissions. However, empirical analyses reveal this simplification overlooks temporal dynamics, ecosystem disruptions, and auxiliary emissions, leading to temporary but substantial net increases in atmospheric CO2. A core critique is the "carbon debt" incurred upon harvest and combustion, where upfront CO2 releases exceed immediate , creating a repaid only after regrowth maturity. Lifecycle assessments indicate payback periods ranging from 44 to 104 years for forest-derived biomass, depending on feedstock type and management practices; during this interval, biomass often yields higher emissions per unit energy than . For whole-tree harvesting, stocks decline due to reduced root systems and litter decomposition, with losses up to 20-30% in s, further extending effective payback times beyond a century. Studies modeling dynamic carbon fluxes confirm that substituting fuels with wood pellets or residues elevates net emissions for 40-100 years, undermining short-term goals. Full lifecycle accounting exacerbates the issue, as harvesting, chipping, transport, and processing rely on machinery, adding 10-20% emissions not captured in simplistic neutrality claims. Peer-reviewed evaluations, including those rejecting automatic biogenic neutrality, emphasize that assumptions hold only under idealized conditions of residue use without primary disturbance—conditions rarely met in . The (IPCC) explicitly cautions against presuming carbon neutrality for biomass, noting dependence on sustainable sourcing and rapid replacement, which empirical data from managed forests frequently contradict. Consequently, policies granting biomass emissions credits equivalent to zero, as in some frameworks, risk inflating perceived decarbonization while deferring actual neutrality.

Sustainability and Long-Term Viability Debates

Critics of biomass energy sustainability argue that intensive harvesting can exceed natural replenishment rates, leading to long-term resource depletion, while proponents contend that managed practices, such as leaving sufficient residues on site, maintain ecosystem balance. Empirical analyses reveal that whole-tree harvesting or residue removal amplifies nutrient export from forests, with studies in boreal regions showing negative nutrient balances exacerbated by rising biomass demand, potentially reducing tree growth and increasing vulnerability to pests. For instance, logging residue extraction has been linked to decreased soil fertility through cation removal and gradual acidification, undermining forest productivity unless compensated by fertilization, which itself carries environmental costs. Water demands pose another viability challenge, as biomass feedstocks like crops require substantial , with average blue footprints in reaching 3.3 cubic meters per gigajoule for bioethanol production—40 to 60 times higher than for fossil fuels. Projections indicate that scaling agricultural biomass to meet targets could markedly elevate global consumption by 2050, straining aquifers in regions like the Midwest and intensifying in water-stressed areas. Such pressures highlight causal risks to long-term viability, where unchecked expansion competes with agricultural and ecological needs, potentially depleting freshwater resources faster than sustainable recharge. Land use conflicts further fuel debates, as large-scale biomass cultivation risks expansion, , and indirect land-use changes that drive and . In , achieving renewable energy directives may necessitate over 100% of annual wood harvests for biomass, raising questions about scalability without compromising food security or carbon stocks in existing forests. Critics emphasize that finite limits indefinite expansion, with empirical reviews underscoring trade-offs, such as reduced and impaired nutrient cycling, that could erode viability over decades if harvesting guidelines remain lax. Proponents counter that second-generation feedstocks from wastes or marginal lands mitigate these issues, though evidence of consistent long-term yields under climate variability remains sparse.

References

  1. [1]
    Biomass explained - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)
    Jul 30, 2024 · Biomass is renewable organic material that comes from plants and animals. Biomass can be burned directly for heat or converted to liquid and gaseous fuels ...
  2. [2]
    Biomass Energy Basics - NREL
    Aug 27, 2025 · Biomass is an abundant, domestic resource that includes that can be sourced from agricultural residues, forestry byproducts, and municipal waste ...Missing: biology | Show results with:biology
  3. [3]
    Biomass | Definition, Types, & Facts - Britannica
    Sep 26, 2025 · Biomass, the weight or total quantity of living organisms of one animal or plant species (species biomass) or of all the species in a community (community ...
  4. [4]
    Bioenergy - IEA
    Bioenergy is produced from organic material, known as biomass, which contains carbon absorbed by plants through photosynthesis. When this biomass is used to ...
  5. [5]
    Bioenergy Basics | Department of Energy
    There are three ways to harvest the energy stored in biomass to produce biopower: burning, bacterial decay, and conversion to a gas or liquid fuel.Biomass: A Renewable Energy... · Biofuels: Energy For... · Biopower: Energy For Heat...<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Is Biomass Really Renewable? - State of the Planet
    Aug 18, 2011 · Today's biomass-burning power plants actually produce more global warming CO2 than fossil fuel plants: 65 percent more CO2 per megawatt hour ...
  7. [7]
    Biomass and the environment - U.S. Energy Information ... - EIA
    Apr 17, 2024 · Biomass and biofuels are alternative energy sources to fossil fuels. Burning fossil fuels and biomass releases carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), a greenhouse gas.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  8. [8]
    Biomass energy production and its impacts on the ecological footprint
    Nov 15, 2020 · Biomass energy production can lead to issues such as land degradation, land competition, resource depletion, deforestation, food security, and ...
  9. [9]
    Carbon Emissions from Burning Biomass for Energy
    Biomass burning power plants emit 150% the CO 2 of coal, and 300 – 400% the CO 2 of natural gas, per unit energy produced.
  10. [10]
    Biomass - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Biomass is defined as organic material derived from living or recently living organisms, primarily sourced from plants and animals, and it serves as a renewable ...
  11. [11]
    A review on biomass: importance, chemistry, classification, and ...
    The present articles reviews the different sources of biomass available, along with their chemical composition and properties.
  12. [12]
    The History of Biomass as a Renewable Energy Source
    There is a lot of evidence that supports the claims that we utilized biomass as an energy supply between 230,000 and 1.5 million years ago. The 19th-century ...
  13. [13]
    A Short History of Biofuels - Lee Enterprises Consulting
    Jul 1, 2020 · ... charcoal (and wood) as the ancient fuels of choice. The word ... manure, consisting principally of the litter and dung of cattle… In ...
  14. [14]
    The History of Power: How Energy Use Has Evolved Over Time
    Mar 17, 2025 · Burning biomass – wood, straw and dried dung – was our major source of heat and light for many, many millennia. Even once agriculture ...Missing: utilization | Show results with:utilization
  15. [15]
    NOTES ON THE MESOPOTAMIAN ENERGY ECONOMY - Joffe - 2025
    Feb 20, 2025 · Ethnographical and historical evidence for dung collection and processing into fuel is ample. Manure is collected during the summer, usually by ...Missing: pre- modern
  16. [16]
    Energy in Ancient Greece | Research Starters - EBSCO
    Ancient Greeks relied heavily on biomass, primarily wood, for fuel, which led to significant deforestation over time.Missing: Rome China medieval
  17. [17]
    Ancient Rome Sustainability% - PlantsPeoplePlanet
    Roman industry across Europe used timber not only as a domestic fuel but as a fuel for cremations, heating public baths, smelting metal, bricks, pottery, ...
  18. [18]
    History of energy in Ancient Rome | Research Starters - EBSCO
    Summary: Rome depended for its energy on human and animal muscular strength, hydropower, wood and charcoal (biomass), and wind energy. Romans refined many of ...Missing: China | Show results with:China
  19. [19]
    Energy – A Historical Perspective and Transition – Dynamic Planet
    In our early days, we would burn wood or animal dung – biomass. In the graph below, you can see that until ~1850, most of the world's energy came from biomass.
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Biomass Energy – Past, Present, and Future Prospects: A Review
    Oct 10, 2025 · From ancient civilizations relying on wood and charcoal to modern ... animal dung, and crop residues for basic household energy needs ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
  21. [21]
    A brief history of biofuels: from ancient history to today
    Apr 10, 2016 · Biofuels and bioenergy are as old as civilization itself. Solid biofuels like wood, dung and charcoal have been used ever since man discovered fire.
  22. [22]
    How have the world's energy sources changed over the last two ...
    Dec 1, 2021 · By the turn of the 20th century, around half of the world's energy came from coal; and half still came from biomass. Throughout the 1900s, the ...
  23. [23]
    Historic Charcoal Production in the US and Forest Depletion
    By 1850 annual output of a furnace averaged 725 - 1000 tons annually and the charcoal necessary to produce one ton of pig iron decreased to 150 - 250 bushels ( ...
  24. [24]
    Charcoal production - Iron Allentown Wiki
    Oct 20, 2020 · In the nineteenth century, when iron production was at its peak, the demand for charcoal as fuel for furnaces directly impacted forests. As a ...
  25. [25]
    Destructive Distillation - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Until about the last 70 years, the “destructive distillation of wood” was a principal source of methanol (“wood alcohol”) and a host of other chemicals, ...
  26. [26]
    THE TECHNOLOGY OF WOOD DISTILLATION
    The first edition of " The Technology of Wood Distillation," which appeared in 1903, was exhausted in 1907, and the preparation of a second edition became ...
  27. [27]
    Gasifier History
    Aug 19, 2014 · The first patents with regard to gasification were issued for Robert Gardner and John Barber in the year 1788 and 1791. Robert Gardner suggested ...
  28. [28]
    The History of Biomass: The Big Picture | Impactful Ninja
    The modern biomass industry began in the 1800s and saw growth in part due to World War II and fluctuations in the petroleum industry. 1808: Sir Humphrey Davy ...How Has Biomass Developed... · How Has The Biomass Market... · How Biomass Will Likely...
  29. [29]
    The Oil Shocks of the 1970s - Energy History - Yale University
    The 1973-74 “energy crisis” is a key moment in US political, cultural, and economic history, and a central chapter in the history of the global oil economy.<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    [PDF] A History of the Energy Research and Development Administration
    Then the 1970s brought rising fuel prices and a renewed interest in solar energy. It soon emerged as one of the leading candidates for solving the energy crisis ...
  31. [31]
    Environmental sustainability of biofuels: a review - Journals
    Nov 25, 2020 · During the oil crisis in the 1970s, many countries showed renewed interest in production of commercial biofuels; however, only Brazil started to ...
  32. [32]
    Feeding the zombie plant: The struggle over biomass in the United ...
    Biomass in the U.S. emerged as an important source of energy after the 1970s ... biomass energy development in the United States since the 1970s. Energy ...
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    Bioenergy Power Generation – Analysis - IEA
    Nov 4, 2021 · Bioenergy capacity has expanded an average of 8 GW per year in the last five years, stimulated by national support policies such as feed-in- ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] GLOBAL BIOENERGY STATISTICS REPORT
    In 2020, 685 TWh of electricity was generated from biomass globally. 69% of all biopower generated was from solid biomass sources followed by 17% from municipal ...
  36. [36]
    Increases in electricity generation from biomass stop after a decade ...
    Apr 12, 2019 · Expansion in electricity generation from biomass and waste has ended in recent years, after growing from 2004 through 2014, and in 2018 was 2% below its peak.<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Woody biomass capacity grew more than sevenfold in the last ...
    Sep 25, 2024 · Woody biomass capacity grew more than sevenfold in the last decade in Japan and South Korea, despite doubts of profitability and sustainability.
  38. [38]
    [PDF] ExCo72 - Electricity from Biomass: from small to large scale
    Apr 9, 2015 · According to the IEA Bioenergy Roadmap, the world bioenergy electricity supply should grow more than tenfold, from a share of 1.5% today to 7.5% ...
  39. [39]
    How conflicting narratives have shaped woody biomass energy ...
    This article provides an historical analysis of arguments for and against using forests for fuel since the 1970s energy crises.
  40. [40]
    Recent advancements in lignocellulose biomass-based carbon fiber
    For example, lignocellulose (15–25%), hemicellulose (20–40%), and cellulose (30–50%) make up the majority of the dry matter weight of biomass [9,10]. Through ...
  41. [41]
    Biomass Compositional Analysis Laboratory Procedures - NREL
    Apr 24, 2025 · These procedures help scientists and analysts understand more about the chemical composition of raw biomass feedstocks and process intermediates for conversion ...
  42. [42]
    Chemical composition • Learning Content - Freie Universität Berlin
    The main components of biomass are cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin: Cellulose or carbohydrate is the principal constituent of wood and other biomass ...
  43. [43]
    3.2 Biomass | EGEE 439: Alternative Fuels from Biomass Sources
    As already mentioned, most biomass is at least partially composed of three components: cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. The figures below show a diagram of ...
  44. [44]
    An overview of the chemical composition of biomass - ScienceDirect
    The elements in biomass are commonly C, O, H, N, Ca, K, Si, Mg, Al, S, Fe, P, Cl, Na, Mn, and Ti. It was identified that the chemical distinctions among the ...
  45. [45]
    The Molecular Composition of Cells - The Cell - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Lipids. Lipids have three major roles in cells. First, they provide an important form of energy storage. Second, and of great importance in cell biology ...
  46. [46]
    1.3.2. Biomass | netl.doe.gov
    The chemical composition of biomass varies substantially, because of the broad range of materials involved, but the main components are moisture, carbohydrates ...
  47. [47]
    16.8: Polysaccharides - Chemistry LibreTexts
    Oct 16, 2024 · Starch is a storage form of energy in plants. It contains two polymers composed of glucose units: amylose (linear) and amylopectin ...
  48. [48]
    Summary - The Cell - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Because fats are more reduced than carbohydrates, they provide a more efficient form of energy storage. Photosynthesis. The energy required for the synthesis of ...
  49. [49]
    Lipid Metabolism in Plants - PMC - NIH
    Jul 9, 2020 · In addition, lipids are stored in the form of chemical energy in seeds. Furthermore, they act as a signal molecule to regulate cell ...
  50. [50]
    Biomass Resources - Department of Energy
    Biomass feedstocks include dedicated energy crops, agricultural crop residues, forestry residues, algae, wood processing residues, municipal waste, and wet ...
  51. [51]
    Biomass - Energy Kids: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)
    Biomass is renewable organic material that comes from plants and animals. Biomass was the largest source of total annual US energy consumption until the mid- ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Review of feedstock supply for bioenergy in IEA Bioenergy
    The three primary feedstock sources (agriculture, forestry, and post-consumer waste) are each classified and incorporated into this framework, which categorizes ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Crop Residue Removal for Biomass Energy Production: Effects on ...
    In light of the renewed interested in domestic production of biofuels and other biomass energy, can the more than 500 million tons of crop residue produced each ...
  54. [54]
    5 Feedstocks for Biomass Energy Production - ASME
    Apr 25, 2024 · Wood, corn, even dung can heat homes and power industry. Discover energy from biomass.
  55. [55]
    8 Types of Biomass - gb&d magazine
    Nov 15, 2024 · Examples of biomass include: dedicated energy crops, crop residues, forestry residues, wood processing residues, algae and aquatic plants, ...Missing: global | Show results with:global
  56. [56]
    Biomass Harvesting Systems - Southern Research Station
    The one-pass method involved felling and skidding the energywood at the same time as the other products. The feller-buncher piled the energywood separately ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Comparisons of two methods of harvesting biomass for energy
    Two-pass method​​ The two-pass harvesting system used three feller- bunchers and two skidders for the first pass to remove the energy wood. The energy wood was ...
  58. [58]
    Five Harvesting Technologies are Making Biofuels More ...
    Mar 17, 2015 · Its purpose is to save the time and money required to harvest corn stover feedstock for biofuel production, ultimately helping make biofuel from ...<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Biomass Yield Potential, Feedstock Quality, and Nutrient Removal of ...
    harvest and nitrogen rate effects on biomass yields and nutrient composition. ... Harvest Management of Switchgrass for Biomass Feedstock and Forage. Production.
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Analyzing Potential Failures and Effects in a Pilot-Scale Biomass ...
    May 21, 2024 · Predominant among these preprocessing techniques are drying, separation, and size reduction. Biomass preprocessing encom- passes additional ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Biomass Size Reduction, Drying and Densification
    Apr 5, 2023 · Preprocessing technologies developed can be used by biomass processors and designers for producing biofuels, chemicals, and bioproducts. Helps ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Best Management Practices - South Carolina Forestry Commission
    Biomass harvesting may be conducted at the same time as conventional logging, as an intermediate treatment, or as a stand-alone practice. Biomass may be ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] 1 Introduction to Thermochemical Processing of Biomass into Fuels ...
    1.1 Introduction. Thermochemical processing of biomass uses heat and catalysts to transform plant polymers into fuels, chemicals, or electric power.
  64. [64]
    A concise review on waste biomass valorization through ...
    This review aims to provide a systematic discussion on the recent thermochemical technologies employed for converting waste biomass generated from different ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] thermochemical conversion r&d - Department of Energy
    Feb 28, 2018 · This project has made major achievements since the 2015 Peer Review, including completing state-of-technology assessments to quantify R&D cost ...
  66. [66]
    4 Thermochemical Conversion of Coal and Biomass
    This chapter reviews the thermochemical conversion of coal, biomass, and combined coal and biomass to liquid transportation fuels.<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    3.3 Gasification | EGEE 439: Alternative Fuels from Biomass Sources
    Gasification typically takes place at temperatures from 750-1100°C. It will break apart biomass (or any carbon material), and usually, an oxidizing agent is ...
  68. [68]
    Cutting-edge biomass gasification technologies for renewable ...
    Jan 1, 2025 · Biomass gasification typically occurs within temperatures fluctuating from 500 to 1000 °C and pressures around 0.98 to 2.94 atmospheres, with or ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Thermochemical Biomass Gasification
    Jul 21, 2009 · Abstract: A review was conducted on the use of thermochemical biomass gasification for producing biofuels, biopower and chemicals.
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Biomass Pyrolysis - IEA Bioenergy
    Carefully controlled pyrolysis reaction temperature of around 500°C and vapour phase temperature of 400-450°C.The effect of temperature on yields and product.
  71. [71]
    Comparative study of the combustion, pyrolysis and gasification ...
    Jul 6, 2023 · Pyrolysis is a high temperature process (250–600 °C) under inert conditions that allows biomass to be converted into three fractions: bio-liquid ...
  72. [72]
    Comprehensive Review of Biomass Pyrolysis: Conventional ... - MDPI
    This process involves heating the biomass to temperatures ranging from 300 to 1400 °C at high HRs of 10 to 1000 °C/s, with a very short HVRT of 0.1 to 12 s and ...2.1. Slow Pyrolysis · 3. Reactors Type And Design · 5. Yield And Composition Of...
  73. [73]
    Thermochemical conversion of biomass: Potential future prospects
    The thermochemical conversion of biomass is potentially vital to meeting global demand for sustainable transport fuels so besides combustion; torrefaction, ...
  74. [74]
    Recent advances in thermochemical conversion of biomass into ...
    Pyrolysis and hydrothermal processes of biomass conversion into renewable biofuels are resulted into the production of biocrude with high oxygen content.
  75. [75]
    Recent advances in thermochemical conversion of biomass ...
    May 19, 2025 · Recent advances in thermochemical conversion of biomass feedstock and organic solid waste for biofuel production. January 2025. DOI:10.1016 ...
  76. [76]
    [PDF] Biochemical Conversion
    Biochemical conversion uses biocatalysts, such as enzymes, in addition to heat and other chemicals, to convert the carbohydrate portion of the biomass ( ...
  77. [77]
    Enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass - ScienceDirect.com
    Oct 23, 2014 · Biomass hydrolysis. Lignocellulose can be hydrolytically broken down into simple sugars either enzymatically by (hemi)cellulolytic enzymes or ...
  78. [78]
    Bioethanol Production by Enzymatic Hydrolysis from Different ... - NIH
    Feb 1, 2021 · This review investigates the very recent enzymatic hydrolysis pathways in bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass.
  79. [79]
    A Review of Biochemical Process of Anaerobic Digestion
    In anaerobic digestion, organic materials are degraded by bacteria, in the absence of oxygen, converting it into a methane and carbon dioxide mixture. The ...
  80. [80]
    A review on anaerobic digestion with focus on the role of biomass co ...
    Anaerobic co-digestion enhances digestion and energy generation by increasing availability of nutrients for microbes and organic load while reducing inhibitory ...
  81. [81]
    Microbial pathways for advanced biofuel production - PubMed Central
    This review surveys the range of natural and engineered microbial systems for advanced biofuels production and summarises some of the techno-economic challenges
  82. [82]
    Biofuel and biochemical production through biomass transformation ...
    Sep 15, 2024 · Biochemical conversion technologies include anaerobic digestion, alcoholic fermentation and photobiological hydrogen production. Physical, ...
  83. [83]
    Constraints and advances in high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis of ...
    Mar 23, 2020 · Water is a key factor in the enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass polysaccharides, as it functions as a reactant in the cleavage of glycosidic bonds ...
  84. [84]
    [PDF] Biochemical Deconstruction and Conversion of Biomass to Fuels ...
    Process Design and. Economics for the Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Hydrocarbon Fuels and. Coproducts: 2018 Biochemical Design Case Update: ...
  85. [85]
    Bioenergy – Analysis - IEA
    Sep 26, 2023 · While traditional use of biomass is phased out in the NZE Scenario, modern bioenergy use more than doubles to 2050, due to its ability to be ...
  86. [86]
  87. [87]
    Publications - Biomass to Power 2024/2025 - Ecoprog
    In early 2024, there were about 4,971 active biomass power plants worldwide, reaching an installed electrical capacity of 83.8 GWel. In our forecast, we expect ...
  88. [88]
    Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and ...
    Net conversion efficiencies range from 20% to 40%, even if higher values may be obtained when the biomass is co-combusted in coal-fired power plants.
  89. [89]
    Biomass for Electricity Generation | WBDG
    The efficiency of a direct combustion or biomass gasification system is influenced by a number of factors, including biomass moisture content, combustion air ...
  90. [90]
  91. [91]
    8.1 Commercial Power Production based on Gasification | netl.doe.gov
    Gasifying a fraction of biomass with coal can generate electricity with a lower carbon dioxide emission impact as biomass is considered nearly carbon neutral. ...
  92. [92]
    The review of power generation from integrated biomass gasification ...
    Mar 15, 2024 · This study examines the power generation process from syngas derived from biomass gasification using syngas generators, gas and steam turbines, and combined ...
  93. [93]
    Small-scale biomass gasification systems for power generation ...
    Biomass gasification to provide gas fuels for power generation is considered as one of the best ways for substituting fossil fuels.
  94. [94]
    The future of bioenergy - PMC - NIH
    Energy from biomass can make significant contributions to reducing carbon emissions, especially from difficult‐to‐decarbonize sectors like aviation, heavy ...2. Long‐term Prospects For... · 4. Avoiding Bioenergy... · 4.1. Policies To Get The...
  95. [95]
    Biofuels - Energy System - IEA
    Biofuel demand is expected to increase by 11% to 2024, with two-thirds of growth occurring in emerging economies. Argentina, India and Indonesia all accelerated ...<|separator|>
  96. [96]
  97. [97]
    Ethanol Vehicle Emissions - Alternative Fuels Data Center
    When blended with gasoline for use as a vehicle fuel, ethanol can offer some emissions benefits depending on vehicle type, engine calibration, and blend level.<|separator|>
  98. [98]
    Biodiesel Vehicle Emissions - Alternative Fuels Data Center
    Biodiesel offers considerable GHG benefits, with 100% biodiesel emissions 74% lower than petroleum diesel, according to life cycle analysis.
  99. [99]
    Renewable fuels – Renewables 2024 – Analysis - IEA
    Solid bioenergy (+2.6 EJ by 2030) alone provides over half of global renewable fuel growth during 2024-2030, with most of the new demand coming from the ...
  100. [100]
    Biofuels and the Environment | US EPA
    Jan 17, 2025 · Depending on the feedstock and production process, biofuels can emit even more GHGs than some fossil fuels on an energy -equivalent basis.
  101. [101]
    In-depth: The challenge of using biofuels to cut transport emissions
    Jul 19, 2017 · But the report cautions that the use of biofuels can in some cases result in problems, such as knock-on emissions due to land-use change, ...
  102. [102]
    Transportation Biofuel Market Size | Analysis Report, 2025-2034
    The global transportation biofuel market was valued at USD 101.9 billion in 2024 and is estimated to grow at a CAGR of 10.7% from 2025 to 2034.
  103. [103]
    [PDF] Countries' Report – update 2024 - IEA Bioenergy
    Liquid biofuels are on the rise, particularly as transport fuel. In Brazil and Sweden, the use of liquid biofuels is already equivalent to 15-16% of the ...
  104. [104]
    A closer look at the flawed studies behind policies used to promote ...
    Feb 5, 2015 · The main problem with existing studies is that they fail to correctly account for the carbon dioxide absorbed from the atmosphere when corn, ...
  105. [105]
    [PDF] 11th Edition - Global Bioenergy Statistics Report 2024
    Transport. In 2022, road transport energy consumption was 90.6 EJ (up 3.4% from 2021). Biofuels were the largest renewable source, providing 3.94 EJ. By 2023, ...
  106. [106]
    [PDF] Chemicals from Biomass: A Market Assessment of Bioproducts with ...
    Furfural has a broad spectrum of industrial applications, such as the production of plastics, pharmaceuticals, agro-chemical products, and non-petroleum-derived ...
  107. [107]
    [PDF] Bio-Based Chemicals - A 2020 Update - IEA Bioenergy
    “Biorefinery is the sustainable processing of biomass into a spectrum of marketable products (food, feed, materials, chemicals) and energy (fuels, power, heat)” ...
  108. [108]
    Bioplastics for a circular economy | Nature Reviews Materials
    Jan 20, 2022 · Biomass extraction can also yield non-synthetic natural polymers, such as starch, natural rubber and proteins. Note that, although the term ' ...
  109. [109]
    Recent advances in bio-based production of top platform chemical ...
    May 29, 2024 · Therefore, bio-based SA manufacturing can reduce > 60% of GHG emissions compared to fossil-based SA production [11, 15]. However, COVID-19 ...
  110. [110]
    The Truth About Bioplastics - State of the Planet - Columbia University
    Dec 13, 2017 · Both the sugars and the lignin from the biomass are then used as building blocks for bioplastics and other bioproducts. At Michigan State ...
  111. [111]
    [PDF] Biofibers from agricultural byproducts for industrial applications
    Nov 20, 2004 · Biomass such as agricultural crops and residues, forest resources and residues, animal and municipal wastes is the largest source for cellulose.
  112. [112]
    Sumitomo Chemical Establishes Mass Production Technology for ...
    Jun 12, 2025 · Sumitomo Chemical has successfully established mass production technology for liquid crystal polymer (LCP) using a monomer derived from biomass materials.
  113. [113]
    Biomass in the manufacture of industrial products—the use of ... - NIH
    It is the aim of this mini-review to describe the scope of the possibilities to generate current functionalized chemical materials using amino acids from ...
  114. [114]
    [PDF] Biomass‐Derived Carbon and Their Composites for Supercapacitor ...
    Jan 9, 2025 · ABSTRACT. Biomass‐derived carbons are eco‐friendly and sustainable materials, making them ideal for supercapacitors due to their high.
  115. [115]
    Importance of biomass in the global carbon cycle - AGU Journals
    Sep 23, 2009 · The purpose of this paper is to offer the scientific rationale, from the perspective of the carbon cycle, for accurate measurement of biomass density and ...
  116. [116]
    Goodbye to carbon neutral: Getting biomass footprints right
    Most guidance for carbon footprinting, and most published carbon footprints or LCAs, presume that biomass heating fuels are carbon neutral.Goodbye To Carbon Neutral... · 1. Carbon Footprints Of... · 4. The Fix: Add A Footprint...
  117. [117]
    [PDF] Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study
    Massachu- setts Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study: Report to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Energy. Resources. Walker, T. (Ed.).<|separator|>
  118. [118]
    Carbon Debt Payback Time for a Biomass Fired CHP Plant—A Case ...
    Mar 31, 2018 · The carbon debt has a payback time of one year after conversion, and furthermore, the results show that GHG emissions are reduced to 50% relative to continued ...
  119. [119]
    Carbon, climate, and economic breakeven times for biofuel from ...
    Woody biomass harvested from old-growth forests results in a significant “carbon debt” when used as a feedstock for transportation fuel.
  120. [120]
    Economic factors influence net carbon emissions of forest bioenergy ...
    Feb 17, 2023 · We show that potential forest carbon debt from bioenergy expansion, measured as a near-term decrease in forest carbon sequestration relative to a baseline, ...
  121. [121]
    Why Biomass Fuels Are Principally Not Carbon Neutral - MDPI
    Overall, based on this finding, the earlier assumption of “carbon-neutral biomass fuels” is disapproved of in a long-term evaluation and—as a coarse rule of ...Why Biomass Fuels Are... · 3. Results · 4. Discussion
  122. [122]
    Carbon neutrality of forest biomass for bioenergy: a scoping review
    Mar 5, 2023 · This concept asserts that biomass is naturally carbon neutral because its combustion returns C to the atmosphere that was recently absorbed ...Results · Substitution Carbon... · Life Cycle Carbon Neutrality
  123. [123]
    [PDF] The biomass burning contribution to climate–carbon-cycle feedback
    May 28, 2018 · these records to derive an empirical estimate of the biomass burning contribution to the carbon cycle feedback is further compromised by the ...
  124. [124]
    Pollutants from the combustion of solid biomass fuels - ScienceDirect
    This review considers the pollutants formed by the combustion of solid biomass fuels. The availability and potential use of solid biofuels is first ...
  125. [125]
    Pollutant Emissions and Oxidative Potentials of Particles from the ...
    Aug 5, 2024 · The present laboratory-based study evaluated pollution emissions from pelletized biomass burning, including CH4 (methane), NMHC (nonmethane ...
  126. [126]
    Mitigation approaches and techniques for combustion power plants ...
    Dec 10, 2023 · Combustion power plant pollution mitigation technologies are reviewed. · The pollutants investigated are PM, NOx, SOx, and COx. · The new advances ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
  127. [127]
    Air Pollution from Biomass Energy - Partnership for Policy Integrity
    Utility-scale biomass plants emit tens to hundreds of tons of particulates, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and and hazardous air pollutants each year.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  128. [128]
    Black Carbon as an Additional Indicator of the Adverse Health ...
    Conclusion: BCP is a valuable additional air quality indicator to evaluate the health risks of air quality dominated by primary combustion particles.
  129. [129]
    Health impacts of biomass burning aerosols: Relation to oxidative ...
    Jul 24, 2024 · This review focuses on the crucial roles of oxidative stress and inflammation in mediating health effects, triggered by exposure to biomass-burning aerosols.
  130. [130]
    Air Quality and Climate Impacts of Biomass Use as an Energy Source
    Furthermore, biomass energy production releases pollutants such as nitrogen oxides and particulate matter, contributing to air quality degradation [72] . Life- ...<|separator|>
  131. [131]
    Health impacts of anthropogenic biomass burning in the developed ...
    We conclude that emissions from current biomass combustion products negatively affect respiratory and, possibly, cardiovascular health in Europe.<|control11|><|separator|>
  132. [132]
    [PDF] Review of agricultural biomass burning and its impact on air quality ...
    May 18, 2024 · Stubble burning results in harmful levels of various pollutants such as methane. (CH4), sulfur oxides (SOx), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon ...
  133. [133]
    New Peer-Reviewed Research Finds Bioenergy Causes ...
    Dec 8, 2023 · Using biomass and wood pellets for energy production may be far costlier for public health and air pollution than previously thought, according to newly ...Missing: combustion NOx SOx
  134. [134]
    The role of bioenergy in the energy transition, and implications on ...
    Total land use for bioenergy crops in the NZE scenario would amount to 140 million hectares in 2050, i.e. 3% of global agricultural area.
  135. [135]
    A review of domestic land use change attributable to U.S. biofuel ...
    Empirical approaches reporting national-scale estimates fall within this range, reporting 0.38–0.66 million acres per billion-gallon increase. Empirical studies ...
  136. [136]
    [PDF] Land and Net Primary Production Requirements of Biofuels
    Switchgrass, oil palm, and sugarcane have the highest net energy per land area. Meeting global oil demands requires 15-42% of global terrestrial NPP or 66-71% ...
  137. [137]
    Biomass and Land Use in a Decarbonizing US Economy
    May 1, 2025 · This paper discusses the role of biomass and biofuels in US decarbonization and the need to prevent land use change to ensure real climate benefits.
  138. [138]
    Trase: Indonesian palm oil exports and deforestation | SEI
    Oct 8, 2024 · In 2018–2022, deforestation for industrial palm oil was 32,406 hectares per year – only 18% of its peak a decade earlier, in 2008–2012.
  139. [139]
    Drivers of Deforestation - Our World in Data
    The world loses 5 million hectares of forest to deforestation each year. What activities are driving this? By: Hannah Ritchie.
  140. [140]
    Land use change to bioenergy: A meta-analysis of soil carbon and ...
    A systematic review and meta-analysis were used to assess the current state of knowledge and quantify the effects of land use change (LUC) to second generation ...
  141. [141]
    The impacts of biofuel crops on local biodiversity: a global synthesis
    Jul 24, 2021 · Local species richness and abundance were 37% and 49% lower at sites planted with first-generation biofuel crops than in sites with primary vegetation.
  142. [142]
    Effects of bioenergy on biodiversity arising from land‐use change ...
    The conversion of forests to bioenergy crops has caused a 20% decline in biodiversity in some locations [71] . Furthermore, biomass energy production releases ...<|separator|>
  143. [143]
    Biodiversity in agricultural land: better in bioenergy crops - Botany One
    Nov 26, 2021 · We found that biodiversity increases 75% under land-use change from food-based agricultural land to non-food bioenergy crops, with bird ...
  144. [144]
    Contrasting effects of bioenergy crops on biodiversity - PMC
    Sep 22, 2023 · Agriculture is driving biodiversity loss, and future bioenergy cropping systems have the potential to ameliorate or exacerbate these effects.
  145. [145]
    Land-use change from food to energy: meta-analysis unravels ...
    Nov 11, 2021 · We focus on the impact of LUC to non-food bioenergy crops on agricultural landscapes, where large-scale bioenergy planting may be required.
  146. [146]
    [PDF] Renewable power generation costs in 2023 - IRENA
    The global average cost of electricity from utility-scale solar PV fell to USD 0.044 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) and onshore wind to USD 0.033/kWh. Low-cost ...<|separator|>
  147. [147]
    [PDF] Biomass Energy Overview
    Typical Costs: • Biomass heating plants have installed costs that typically average between. $500 to $1500 per kW-thermal of installed heating rate capacity.<|separator|>
  148. [148]
    Cost Factors in Harvesting and Transporting Woody Biomass
    Sep 5, 2019 · Harvesting and transportation costs for woody biomass in its different forms vary due to tract size, tree species, volumes removed, distance to the wood-using/ ...
  149. [149]
    [PDF] Levelized Costs of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy ...
    This paper presents average values of levelized costs for new generation resources as represented in the National. Energy Modeling System (NEMS) for our Annual ...
  150. [150]
    [PDF] Literature review on social and economic sustainability of bioenergy ...
    One impact of bioenergy development that has been widely reported on is the potential relation between biomass production for energy and food pricing and ...
  151. [151]
    Biomass feedstock supply chain network design with biomass ...
    Their study shows that a reduction in transportation costs indeed leads to increased feasibility of reasonably-priced biomass feedstock. For other renewable ...
  152. [152]
  153. [153]
    Biodiesel Laws and Incentives in Federal
    Qualified feedstock producers are eligible for a reimbursement of 50% of the cost of establishing a biomass feedstock crop, as well as annual payments for up to ...
  154. [154]
    U.S. Energy Information Administration - EIA - EIA
    Aug 1, 2023 · The subsidy cost of the loans issued in FY 2022 was $166 million. Because this type of cost is assessed at the time the loan is issued, we did ...
  155. [155]
    Germany can move forward with 7.9-billion-euro biomass package
    Sep 19, 2025 · The EU must approve financial support measures from individual member states to deal with market distortion risks. The European Commission ...Missing: incentives | Show results with:incentives
  156. [156]
    Drax biomass subsidies in 2024 - Ember
    Apr 3, 2025 · Drax's annual report shows that the company earned £869 million in public subsidies in 2024, more than £2 million per day.
  157. [157]
    [PDF] Implementation of bioenergy in the United States – 2024 update
    In. 2023, the office expanded funding to $20 million for tribal energy infrastructure, including biomass- fueled CHP systems, aiming to enhance energy ...
  158. [158]
    Federal Subsidies for Biofuels and Biomass Energy
    Dec 1, 2017 · Biofuels and biomass subsidies have also distorted energy markets, raised fuel and food prices, picked winners and losers, and worked at cross- ...
  159. [159]
    [PDF] Environmentally and Economically Damaging Subsidies
    Subsidies distort relative prices and shift the allocation of resources away from more productive sectors in the economy. Subsidies can also exacerbate pre- ...
  160. [160]
    How Do Subsidies Affect Biofuel Production? → Question
    Mar 27, 2025 · The economic distortions caused by biofuel subsidies extend beyond just food prices. These subsidies can create artificial demand for certain ...
  161. [161]
    What's the problem with Bioenergy? - Fern.org
    ... market distortion caused by biomass incentives. These industries (including wood panels, chemicals and furniture producers) don't need subsidies to operate ...
  162. [162]
    Sustainable Biomass Program: Certifying the Unsustainable
    Jul 30, 2025 · The biomass industry is propped up by public incentives that distort markets and divert funds from genuinely clean energy solutions. Mandate ...
  163. [163]
    The impact of subsidies and carbon pricing on the wood biomass ...
    Nov 1, 2014 · This study examines how subsidies for wood-fired heat and power plants and wood with coal co-fired power plants influence the use of wood biomass for energy.
  164. [164]
    (PDF) Subsidies: The Distorted Economics of Biofuels - ResearchGate
    This paper discusses the economics of biofuels and provides an overview of current policy measures to support their production and consumption. It ...
  165. [165]
    [PDF] BIP Europe 2024 | Task Force 1 1
    Mandates can create market distortions and force the fulfilment of the quota by inefficient production or solutions not at the lowest price. • A mandate should ...
  166. [166]
    Special report 29/2023: The EU's support for sustainable biofuels in ...
    Dec 13, 2023 · 42 While biofuels use should increase energy independence, the biomass used for biofuels should avoid distortions in raw materials markets ...
  167. [167]
    Goodbye to carbon neutral: Getting biomass footprints right
    However, it is recognised increasingly that this is incorrect: biomass fuels are not always carbon neutral. Indeed, they can in some cases be far more carbon ...
  168. [168]
    [PDF] Carbon Neutrality and Bioenergy: A Zero-Sum Game?
    Abstract. Biomass, a renewable energy source, has been viewed as “carbon neutral”—that is, its use as energy is presumed not to release net carbon dioxide.Missing: truly | Show results with:truly<|control11|><|separator|>
  169. [169]
    [PDF] Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study Executive Summary
    Forest biomass generally emits more greenhouse gases than fossil fuels per unit of energy produced. We define these excess emissions as the biomass carbon debt.
  170. [170]
    On the science of carbon debt | PBL Netherlands Environmental ...
    Oct 25, 2024 · Simple examples are used to show how supplying and using biomass from forests can lead to very high emissions (a 'carbon debt'), negligible net ...
  171. [171]
    Assessing Carbon Emission Impacts of Forest-Based Bioenergy in ...
    Feb 17, 2025 · We develop a comprehensive framework for assessing the dynamic lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions for bioenergy projects using pine pulpwood feedstocks from ...
  172. [172]
    Carbon debt and payback time – Lost in the forest? - ScienceDirect
    The payback time of apparently comparable forest bioenergy supply scenarios vary by up to 200 years allowing amble room for confusion and dispute.
  173. [173]
    What the IPCC Really Says on Forest Biomass & Climate Change
    Nov 9, 2021 · According to the IPCC, it is inaccurate to “automatically consider or assume biomass used for energy [is] 'carbon neutral,' even in cases where ...Missing: truly | Show results with:truly
  174. [174]
    Burning Forest Biomass Is Not an Effective Climate Mitigation ...
    Jul 30, 2025 · Second, that “sustainably harvested” biomass is carbon neutral, a framework that assigns removals from regrowth elsewhere in the forest ...
  175. [175]
    Understanding the sustainability debate on forest biomass for ...
    Feb 17, 2021 · A discourse analysis to critically evaluate the debate around the utilisation of forest biomass for European renewable energy.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  176. [176]
    Increasing biomass demand enlarges negative forest nutrient ...
    Mar 27, 2018 · Deficiency in nutrients causes elevated tree mortality and lower resistance to pests as well a decrease in biomass productivity and soil ...
  177. [177]
    Sustainable forest biomass: a review of current residue harvesting ...
    Apr 14, 2021 · Forest biomass harvesting can decrease soil fertility by depleting site nutrient capital, by preferentially removing cations and gradually ...
  178. [178]
    Biomass to biofuel: Impacts and mitigation of environmental, health ...
    This paper bridges existing gaps by providing a holistic review of the impacts and mitigation strategies associated with biofuel production.
  179. [179]
    The effects of logging residue extraction for energy on ecosystem ...
    Mar 1, 2018 · We review logging residue extraction (LRE) impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services. LRE increases biomass and nutrient removal, and soil and forest ...