Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Amanirenas

Amanirenas (fl. c. 40–10 BCE) was a , or ruling queen, of the Kingdom of in , who co-reigned initially with her husband King Teriteqas and later commanded military campaigns against forces encroaching from . Her most notable achievement came during the Roman-Kushite War of approximately 27–22 BCE, when she and her son Akinidad led Kushite armies in preemptive raids on Roman-held territories in southern , including the sacking of outposts at Syene (modern ) and the destruction of statues of Emperor . , drawing on contemporary accounts, describes her as a "masculine sort of , who was blind in one eye," noting how Kushite forces exploited Roman distractions in Arabia to launch these incursions before facing counterattacks under Gaius Petronius, who advanced into Kushite territory as far as Pselkis but ultimately withdrew following negotiations. The resulting treaty preserved Kushite independence by establishing a demilitarized buffer at Hiere Sycaminos (modern Maharraqa), with forgoing tribute demands—a rare check on imperial expansion into south of the first cataract. This conflict, documented primarily in Roman sources like Strabo's Geography (17.53–54) and Dio Cassius's Roman History (54.5), underscores Amanirenas's strategic acumen in leveraging guerrilla tactics and iron weaponry—hallmarks of Meroitic military innovation—to defend Kush's sovereignty amid its reliance on trade and gold resources. Her leadership exemplified the matrilineal power structures of Kushite royalty, where Kandakes often wielded autonomous authority, contributing to the kingdom's resilience until its gradual decline in the early centuries CE.

Historical Context of Kush and Rome

The Kingdom of Kush and Meroitic Period

Following the sack of Napata by Egyptian pharaoh Psamtik II around 590 BCE, the Kingdom of Kush transferred its capital to Meroë, initiating the Meroitic period that extended until approximately 350 CE. This relocation, undertaken during the reign of King Aspelta circa 591 BCE, positioned Meroë as the primary administrative center while preserving Napata's religious prominence. The transition facilitated Kush's adaptation to external pressures, fostering a phase of cultural innovation, including the development of the Meroitic script around the 3rd century BCE and a blend of indigenous Nubian and Egyptian traditions. Kushite society featured , wherein royal lineage traced through female lines, elevating —queens or queen mothers—to pivotal roles as regents, co-rulers, or sovereigns. These women, titled , often governed alongside or in place of kings, exercising authority over military and administrative affairs, as evidenced by inscriptions and reliefs depicting them in martial attire. Examples include , who ruled circa 170–150 BCE and promoted the cult of , underscoring the kandakes' influence in religious and political spheres during interactions with Ptolemaic . Economically, Meroë's strategic location between the and rivers supported extensive networks, exporting commodities such as from local mines, , ebony, ostrich feathers, and slaves to Ptolemaic , the Mediterranean, and ports via routes. Iron production at , one of Africa's earliest industrial centers, yielded tools, weapons, and goods, bolstering agricultural surplus from farming and . Militarily, Kush leveraged its archer-heavy infantry, armed with composite longbows capable of long-range volleys, augmented by iron spears, swords, and armor smelted in Meroitic furnaces. This prowess, combined with cavalry adoption in later phases, enabled effective defense and expeditions, rooted in prior engagements with powers that honed tactical expertise without yielding to conquest.

Roman Expansion into Egypt

Following the defeat of and at the in 31 BC, —later —annexed in 30 BC, transforming the into a under his personal control. This move secured 's vast agricultural wealth, particularly its grain production, which supplied approximately one-third of 's needs, with an annual surplus estimated at 8 million artabs (roughly 300 million liters) of directed to the capital and legions. 's strategic position as a frontier buffer against southern threats, including nomadic groups and the , further underscored its value, enabling to project power while extracting resources like , , and taxes without risking senatorial oversight through direct imperial prefecture. Under the first prefect, (30–26 BC), Roman forces advanced southward beyond the First Cataract into , establishing garrisons at key sites such as Syene (modern ) and Primis () to counter incursions from Kushite territories and Blemmye tribes. These operations aimed to create a defensive zone, access Nubian mines and trade routes for and , and install client rulers to stabilize the border, reflecting Rome's broader imperial strategy of securing economic lifelines rather than immediate full conquest. Initial Roman policy tolerated limited Kushite influence south of the Dodekaschoinos region (the 12-mile stretch between the First and Second Cataracts) in exchange for nominal , prioritizing resource extraction and raid prevention over aggressive expansion amid post-civil war consolidation. The appointment of as prefect (26–24 BC) shifted focus eastward when ordered an expedition to in 25 BC, deploying around 10,000 troops from Egypt's legions to capture trade ports and spices, bypassing Nabataean intermediaries. This ambitious campaign, plagued by betrayal from Nabataean guide Syllaeus, harsh terrain, disease, and logistical failures, drained southern frontier resources and exposed vulnerabilities, as the absence of forces facilitated opportunistic pressures from Kushite borders. Rome's Nubian objectives—fortifying supply lines, exploiting mineral wealth, and deterring raids—thus framed the region as an extension of Egyptian security imperatives, where imperial ambition met entrenched local powers contesting Nile Valley dominance.

Ascension and Rule

Early Life and Family

Amanirenas, a queen of the Kingdom of Kush, is estimated by scholars to have been born between 60 and 50 BC, during the Meroitic period when the kingdom maintained independence south of Roman-controlled Egypt. Little direct evidence survives regarding her precise origins or upbringing, as Meroitic records are sparse and primarily epigraphic rather than biographical. Her legitimacy derived from Kushite royal traditions, where the title kandake—equivalent to "great woman" or queen consort/mother—signified a high-ranking female role in the matrilineal dynasty. Kushite inheritance emphasized matrilineal descent, enabling kandakes to transmit royal authority through female lines and often exercise sovereign power, including military command, either independently or alongside male kin. Amanirenas likely ascended as around 40 BC, possibly initially as consort to King Teriteqas, who died circa 25 BC amid escalating Roman pressures; she then assumed full regency, bypassing immediate male succession in favor of . This pattern aligned with precedents where queens consolidated power post-husband's death, as seen in later kandakes like her successor , whom some sources identify as her daughter. Contemporary accounts provide scant personal details but note physical traits suggestive of her warrior status; the Greek geographer described the ruling —widely identified as Amanirenas—as a "masculine sort of woman, blind in one eye," attributing the injury plausibly to though unverified by independent Kushite sources. Such portrayals, while potentially colored by Roman-era biases against female rulers, underscore the active role kandakes played in defending dynastic interests from an early stage in their tenure.

Domestic Governance and Economy


Amanirenas exercised authority as queen regnant over the Meroitic Kingdom of Kush, centered at Meroë, where administrative oversight extended to resource management and economic activities that underpinned state stability. The kingdom's economy depended on Nile Valley agriculture, bolstered by irrigation, alongside prolific iron smelting—evidenced by extensive slag heaps—and trade in goods like ivory, gold, and iron tools across Mediterranean, African, and Red Sea networks. These sectors generated surplus wealth, with Meroë's iron industry renowned for high-quality output due to abundant local forests for charcoal and skilled craftsmanship.
Post the 21/20 BC treaty with , Amanirenas' administration facilitated an economic upturn, marked by expanded urban populations at , heightened production of luxury imports and local crafts, and renewed commerce with , sustaining fiscal resilience without territorial concessions. Temples formed a core of the economy, controlling land, labor, and offerings dedicated to deities including and Apedemak, whose priesthoods managed redistributive systems integral to royal patronage. Monumental projects, such as the ongoing of steep-sided pyramids in 's royal necropolis—over 200 built across the Meroitic era—reflected state investment in funerary architecture, symbolizing continuity with Egyptian traditions while asserting Kushite sovereignty. To reinforce legitimacy, Amanirenas promoted the Meroitic cursive script, developed in the late , for official inscriptions and broader administrative use, shifting from hieroglyphs to align with indigenous linguistic identity. She supported Egyptian-influenced religious cults, commissioning temple donations to and , whose worship integrated local Nubian elements and fostered ideological cohesion across the realm. No contemporary records indicate internal revolts or significant disruptions during her circa 40–10 BC reign, suggesting effective governance that maintained elite loyalty and societal order, thereby freeing resources for external military priorities. This domestic equilibrium, secured partly by the Roman peace, contributed to a broader prosperity enduring into subsequent generations.

The Meroitic-Roman War

Kushite Raids on Roman Egypt

![Bronze head from an over-life-sized statue of Augustus, found in the ancient Nubian site of Meroë in Sudan, 27-25 BC]float-right In circa 25 BC, Queen Amanirenas initiated Kushite raids into Roman-controlled southern Egypt, targeting the frontier cities of Aswan, Philae, and Elephantine. These border incursions exploited Roman vulnerabilities during the consolidation of power following the Battle of Actium in 31 BC and the annexation of Egypt in 30 BC, when imperial resources were stretched across multiple fronts. The raids sought to extract tribute, captives for enslavement, and material wealth, while asserting Kushite dominance over disputed territories amid escalating Roman southward pressure, including demands for tribute from Meroë. Amanirenas personally commanded the operations, deploying a force estimated at around troops, including archers renowned for their effectiveness in the arid terrain. Kushite forces employed surprise assaults to overrun garrisons, capturing the targeted settlements and defeating three cohorts in the process. This offensive, possibly coordinated with local Nubian rebels, leveraged mobility and archery superiority to achieve rapid penetrations into Roman-held areas. The raids yielded short-term gains, including the plundering of cities, acquisition of loot such as and , and the enslavement of thousands of inhabitants, along with the seizure of imperial symbols like statues of . These successes temporarily disrupted administration in and demonstrated Kushite military initiative, but the provocation underestimated Rome's logistical capacity to reinforce the province despite ongoing imperial distractions. Ancient geographer records the Kushite advance as extending to key Valley positions, underscoring the scale of the incursion before mobilization.

Petronius' Countercampaign

Publius Petronius, appointed Roman prefect of around 25 BC, swiftly organized a retaliatory expedition against the Kushite incursions, assembling roughly 10,000 and 800 to expel the invaders from . He first recaptured and Syene (modern ), then systematically seized a series of frontier fortresses including Pselchis, (Qasr Ibrim), Abuncis, Phthuris, and Cambysis, establishing Roman control over the Dodekaschoinos region up to the First Cataract. These advances demonstrated Roman logistical superiority and tactical discipline, as Petronius' forces overcame Kushite garrisons through coordinated assaults, though the Kushites initially contested key positions with their numerically superior but less cohesive armies estimated at up to 30,000. Pressing southward, conducted a rapid march deep into Kushite territory, reaching near the Fourth Cataract by 24 BC, where he sacked the city, razed its temples dedicated to Egyptian deities, and looted royal stores, inflicting significant material setbacks on the northern Kushite heartland. The Kushites, led by Queen Amanirenas (referred to by as the "one-eyed ," possibly injured in earlier clashes), abandoned to avoid decisive defeat, retreating toward while employing mobility-based harassment against Roman supply lines through ambushes and raids exploiting the arid terrain's challenges. This withdrawal preserved Kushite core territories around , as , hampered by extended supply chains and the threat of overextension, refrained from advancing further south despite initial successes, highlighting the limits of Roman projection in Nubia's logistical harshness against Kushite guerrilla resilience. Tactical analyses from emphasize ironclad formation discipline prevailing in open engagements, where Kushite and mobility offered advantages but faltered against cohesion, resulting in disproportionate Kushite losses without equivalent casualties detailed. ' campaign thus marked a temporary incursion into , sacking as punitive reprisal but failing to dismantle the kingdom's military capacity, as Amanirenas' forces regrouped in defensible southern strongholds, underscoring the interplay of offensive momentum against Kushite .

Negotiated Peace and Its Terms

In approximately 21 BC, following the inconclusive Roman counteroffensives under Prefect Gaius Petronius, Queen Amanirenas dispatched an embassy directly to , who was then residing on the island of during his eastern campaigns. This diplomatic initiative capitalized on Rome's broader strategic overextension—marked by ongoing Parthian threats, Alpine frontier instabilities, and the recent consolidation of power after the in 31 BC—which rendered a prolonged Nubian commitment logistically burdensome and militarily unrewarding. The Nubian terrain, characterized by cataracts, deserts, and guerrilla-friendly ambush points, further amplified the costs of deeper penetration beyond punitive raids. The resulting formalized a mutual , with withdrawing garrisons from positions south of Hiere Sycaminos (modern Maharra, near the First ), thereby reverting the effective border to the longstanding Ptolemaic demarcation at and . No annual tribute was imposed on , though the kingdom continued to dispatch ceremonial gifts to , signaling nominal deference to imperial authority without economic subjugation—a concession deemed sufficient to deter future raids while avoiding the fiscal and human toll of conquest. This arrangement eschewed full or clientage, prioritizing ' realpolitik focus on defensible frontiers over marginal territorial gains in a resource-poor region. The accord's durability underscores its pragmatism: the First boundary remained stable for over 150 years, undisturbed until Emperor Trajan's brief incursion into around 111 , when Roman forces temporarily advanced to the Second before retracting amid similar logistical constraints. Strabo's contemporary account corroborates the settlement's terms, noting ' decision to forgo demands in exchange for border adherence and symbolic offerings, framing it as a calculated to skirmishes rather than capitulation.

Archaeological and Epigraphic Evidence

The Meroë Head of Augustus

The Head of is a portrait from an over-life-sized statue of the Roman emperor, discovered in 1910 by British archaeologist John Garstang during excavations at the ancient Kushite capital of in modern . It was unearthed buried face-down beneath the steps of a local , indicating intentional placement as part of a ritual act. The artifact, now housed in the , measures approximately 46 cm in height and exemplifies early Imperial with idealized proportions derived from Classical Greek models, featuring a calm gaze and mature features typical of Augustan iconography. Dated to circa 27–25 BCE through stylistic analysis matching the type, the head originates from and was likely transported to as war booty during Kushite raids on the province around 25 BCE. The bronze alloy and casting techniques confirm its Roman manufacture, with original eye inlays of silver and removed, leaving hollow sockets. Deliberate mutilation is evident in the gouged eyes and smashed lower lip, patterns consistent with ancient practices to neutralize the symbolic power of enemy images by "blinding" and "silencing" them, rather than random breakage. This desecration served as , rejecting veneration and asserting Kushite sovereignty following military confrontations. Burial under the steps correlates with post-war negotiations around 21–20 BCE, when sought to affirm independence despite demands for tribute and border adjustments. The act underscores empirical defiance through ritual destruction, transforming a captured of into a foundation for a Kushite sacred structure, without evidence of broader iconoclastic campaigns in the . Metallurgical examinations, including composition and analysis, further validate the head's authenticity and intentional damage prior to interment, distinguishing it from later corrosion.

The Hamadab Stela

The Hamadab Stela (REM 1003), a sandstone monument now in the British Museum (EA 1650), was unearthed at Hamadab south of Meroë and features a relief frieze above forty-five lines of incised cursive Meroitic script. The upper panel depicts Queen Amanirenas and Prince Akinidad facing deities such as Amun, Mut, and the lion-headed war god Apedemak, symbolizing royal piety and divine endorsement. This primary Kushite epigraphic source, dated to circa 20 BCE during Amanirenas' reign (c. 40–10 BCE), offers a self-authored perspective on her rule, contrasting Roman historiographical emphasis on imperial victories. The inscription explicitly identifies Amanirenas by her titles qore (king) and kdke (, queen), alongside Akinidad as pqr (possibly ) and peseto (a title denoting ). As the longest surviving cursive Meroitic text, it likely records religious dedications, including substantial offerings (corrected to 10,876 units in line 26), and political events tied to or enhancement at the entrance where it was positioned. Partial decipherments reveal formulaic elements invoking divine favor, typical of Meroitic to legitimize amid challenges following predecessor Teriteqas. Scholarly interpretations, constrained by Meroitic's undeciphered status, posit that the stela chronicles military campaigns under Amanirenas and Akinidad, potentially including conflicts with and Lower Nubian territories like the Triakontaschoinos, framed as triumphs bolstered by godly support. This portrayal of successes and dedications of spoils diverges sharply from accounts, such as Strabo's, which minimize Kushite agency and exaggerate dominance in the 25–22 BCE . The text's deliberate alterations, like deepened corrections, indicate careful crafting to project unassailable royal power.

Other Material Corroborations

Archaeological investigations at reveal defensive structures, including fortified walls and military installations, constructed or reinforced during the Augustan era, which corroborate the post-treaty border stabilization around 21 BC after the Meroitic- conflict. These findings align with the withdrawal to a defensible , evidenced by associated pottery and armament fragments indicating sustained military preparedness without further southern expansion. Excavations at Talmis (modern Derr area, proximate to Dakka) yield similar material traces of Augustan-period border fortifications, such as towers and administrative outposts, supporting the treaty's terms that delimited Roman control to northern Nubia while permitting Kushite retention of southern territories. Accompanying artifacts, including trade-oriented ceramics, suggest economic interactions resumed without subjugation, affirming the negotiated independence of Meroë. Kushite sites, including Napata's destruction layers from ' 23 BC sack, contain caches of iron arrows, spearheads, and swords consistent with Meroitic metallurgical capabilities, providing tangible verification of the weaponry deployed against Roman forces as described in period accounts. These iron implements, produced via local processes, underscore the technical self-sufficiency that enabled effective resistance.

Legacy and Scholarly Assessment

Impact on Kushite Independence

The peace treaty concluded in 21 BC between Roman prefect Gaius Petronius and Kushite envoys preserved the Kingdom of Kush's sovereignty over its core Meroitic territories south of the First Cataract, preventing any Roman administrative incorporation or permanent garrisons beyond Hiere Sycaminos. This outcome ensured the Meroë heartland remained under Kushite control, facilitating the uninterrupted succession of ruling kandakes, including Amanishakheto, who acceded around 10 BC and oversaw temple constructions and military reforms without external Roman interference. No subsequent Roman annexation efforts targeted Kush until Emperor Trajan's partial campaign in AD 111–117, which recaptured northern Nubian outposts but failed to subdue the southern kingdom. Post-war economic stability reinforced Kushite autonomy, as the cessation of hostilities redirected resources from frontier defenses to internal iron production and networks, sustaining exports of , , and to via established routes. The treaty's mutual non-aggression clause, without imposing tribute on , maintained lucrative bilateral —Kushites supplied while Romans exacted customs duties—averting the fiscal strain of prolonged conflict and enabling for monumental architecture at and . Geographical barriers, including the Nile's First to Sixth Cataracts with their unnavigable rapids and flanking deserts, imposed severe logistical constraints on Roman legions, limiting Petronius' advance in 24 BC to temporary occupations north of the Second Cataract despite initial successes. Roman strategic priorities, strained by simultaneous failures like Aelius Gallus' Arabian expedition in 25 BC and the need to consolidate Egypt's grain supply, further deterred full-scale conquest, prioritizing border security over the costly subjugation of a distant, resource-scarce interior. These factors collectively sustained Kush's de facto independence for over two centuries, underscoring the limits of Roman imperialism in Africa's sudanic zones.

Ancient Accounts and Roman Perspectives

The Greek geographer , drawing on contemporary reports, provides the most detailed ancient account of the conflict in his (17.53–54), describing how the Kushite queen, referred to by her title Kandakē (Latinized as Candace), led raids into around 25 BCE, capturing prisoners and prompting retaliation by the prefect Gaius Petronius. Petronius advanced south, seizing key Kushite strongholds including Dakka, , and , before besieging the fortified cities of Pselchis and Premnis; the Kushites, depicted as a disorganized force reliant on numbers rather than discipline, sued for peace after suffering heavy losses, with envoys appealing directly to on . Strabo emphasizes ' clemency in granting terms that included a south of Philae, the return of captives, and nominal tribute from , framing the outcome as a display of restraint toward "" aggressors rather than unqualified victory. Cassius Dio's Roman History (54.5) corroborates this narrative in briefer form, noting that the Kushites under Candace advanced as far as , ravaging border regions until pursued and defeated them, razing and compelling a after further clashes; Dio attributes the peace to logistical withdrawals amid harsh terrain and climate, without detailing but implying Kushite capitulation. Like , Dio presents the Kushites as impulsive raiders whose incursion invited justified reprisal, omitting any acknowledgment of Kushite diplomatic savvy in negotiating from strength despite territorial losses. These and Greco- sources consistently portray Candace as a formidable yet uncivilized leader of a "" people—aggressive in initiating conflict but ultimately reliant on pleas for mercy—reflecting biases that downplayed Kushite agency to exalt ' strategic forbearance. The accounts concede factual elements like the queen's initiative in raids and the 's establishment of a de facto border at Hiere Sycaminos (Maharraqa), yet frame Kushite actions as irrational plunder rather than calculated resistance to expansion; notably, neither records Kushite claims of , aligning with the absence of overt assertions in contemporaneous Kushite inscriptions, which instead emphasize continuity under the treaty.

Modern Historiography and Debates

Twentieth-century archaeological work, including John Garstang's excavations at from 1909 to 1914 and Peter Shinnie's subsequent campaigns in the 1950s and 1960s, provided material corroboration for the timeline of Amanirenas' conflict with , dating key artifacts like the defaced of to circa 25–22 BCE and uncovering stelae associated with her reign at sites such as Hamadab. These findings aligned the epigraphic record with Roman accounts, establishing the raids and countercampaign as a discrete episode rather than prolonged conquest, though debates persist over the precise sequencing of royal and military engagements due to incomplete stratigraphic data. Scholarly consensus frames the war's outcome as a stalemate driven by mutual logistical exhaustion, rather than a decisive Kushite victory, with Roman forces under Publius Petronius regaining initiative after initial raids on frontier garrisons like Aswan and Elephantine, which involved pillage but not sustained occupation. Popular narratives, often amplified in Afrocentric interpretations, overstate Kushite successes—claiming capture of major cities or humiliation of Rome—yet archaeological and textual evidence indicates transient incursions limited by Kush's archer-heavy but infantry-light forces against Roman legions, culminating in a treaty that preserved Kushite autonomy without territorial gains or tribute reversal. Such exaggerations, critiqued for prioritizing inspirational symbolism over empirical scale, contrast with analyses emphasizing Rome's strategic withdrawal to prioritize internal stability post-Actium. Strabo's description of Amanirenas as "blind in one eye," likely from a battlefield injury during Roman counteroffensives, is generally accepted as literal by historians, supported by Meroitic conventions of royal resilience imagery, though some interpret it as rhetorical emphasis on her martial vigor rather than physiological fact, given the absence of corroborating Kushite iconography. Post-2000 studies on Meroitic highlight kandakes like Amanirenas as active co-regents with ideological and roles, evidenced by burials and stelae depicting , yet empirical constraints: Kushite warfare relied on guerrilla tactics suited to female-led mobilization but faltered against supply lines, balancing narratives of empowerment with the kingdom's resource limits and dependence on trade. This perspective critiques both underestimation of royal women in ancient sources and modern idealizations, favoring causal analysis of matrilineal inheritance enabling queens' leadership amid frequent male mortality in raids.

References

  1. [1]
    Kandake Amanirenas (?-10 B.C.E.) | BlackPast.org
    May 22, 2019 · On the other hand, Kandake Amanirenas had spared her people centuries of domination by successfully resisting complete conquest by Rome. Unlike ...Missing: resistance | Show results with:resistance
  2. [2]
    The One-Eyed African Queen Who Defeated the Roman Empire
    Jul 18, 2023 · Queen Amanirenas, leader of the Kingdom of Kush, waged a terrible war against them from 25 to 22 BC, halting their southward expansion in Africa.
  3. [3]
    The Nubian Queen Who Fought Back Caesar's Army - History.com
    Mar 23, 2022 · Queen Amanirenas commanded soldiers of the ancient Kingdom of Kush and successfully resisted Roman rule. From 25 to 21 B.C. Amanirenas, a queen ...
  4. [4]
    The African Kingdom of Kush that Humbled Rome: Legions in the ...
    Sep 19, 2022 · Beneficial alliance aside, the fact remains, the one-eyed warrior queen Amanirenas and the fierce resistance of her people had humbled the Roman ...
  5. [5]
    Kandake Amanirenas: Rēgīna Nubiae
    Feb 8, 2020 · The details of the attempted Roman conquest of Nubia and the resistance of Amanirena are found in Strabo (17.53–54), Cassius Dio (54.5), and, in ...
  6. [6]
    Meroitic Studies IV: The Great Stela of Prince Akinizaz (Continued)
    king Teriteqas and queen Amanirenas. Upon our stelae on the other hand the prince. Akinizaz follows the queen Amanirenas alone. We have seen that it was at ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] The-Kandake-A-Missing-History.pdf - CBE International
    Oct 3, 2023 · A previous Kandake, named Amanirenas, had even decapitated a statue of Augustus Caesar and buried its head at the foot of a local temple so ...
  8. [8]
    Kushite Civilization – Humanities: Prehistory to the 15th Century
    In c. 590 BCE Napata was sacked by the Egyptian pharaoh Psammeticus II (595–589 BCE) and the capital of Kush was moved to Meroe. The Kingdom of Kush continued ...
  9. [9]
    Meroitic Empire | Research Starters - EBSCO
    ... exports such as iron, tortoise shell, ostrich feathers, slaves, animal skins, gold, and ivory. The rarity of Meroitic manufactures beyond its own frontiers ...
  10. [10]
    The Kingdom of Kush - Institute for the Study of the Ancient World
    The kingdom of Kush was a powerful state in the Nile Valley that existed from around 1000 BC. - 350 AD. This kingdom consisted of two phases, the Naptian and ...Missing: "scholarly | Show results with:"scholarly
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Queenship in Kush: Status, Role and Ideology of Royal Women
    Queenship in Kush was crucial, with royal women's status indicated by titles, epithets, and regalia, and their role as counterpart to male kingship.
  12. [12]
    The Queen Mother in the Kingdom of Kush: Status, Power and Cultic ...
    During the Meroitic period, the role of the Kandake, or Queen Mother, shifted towards a more prominent secular authority, acting as regent and ruling de facto.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] ADVENTURESS
    Apr 4, 2025 · Evidence of ruling queens exists from the Meroitic Period, where they held the title Qore (ruler) and governed as sovereign monarchs. At least ...Missing: "scholarly | Show results with:"scholarly
  14. [14]
    The Meroitic Empire: Trade and Cultural Influences in an Indian ...
    Nov 21, 2014 · The goods included ivory, ebony, rhinoceros horn, leopard and other skins, ostrich feathers, gold and slaves (Arkell 1961; Phillips 1997; see ...
  15. [15]
    In the Land of Kush - Smithsonian Magazine
    This first Kushite kingdom traded in ivory, gold, bronze, ebony and slaves with neighboring states such as Egypt and ancient Punt, along the Red Sea to the ...
  16. [16]
    New insights into Nubian archery
    Cook, S. L. (2012). Archers' looses in Iron Age Sudan: An Asiatic style in an African context. Journal of Conflict Archaeology, 7(3), 165–176.
  17. [17]
    The Southern Frontier of the Meroitic State: The View from Jebel Moya
    Sep 2, 2014 · Many of the known Meroitic period remains are located to the southwest of the mountain slopes. The remains consist of simple stone ...
  18. [18]
    Ancient Egypt - Roman, Byzantine, 30 BCE-642 CE | Britannica
    Henceforth, part of the surplus of the Egyptian grain supply, which was put at 8 million artabs (about 300 million liters) of wheat (one artab was roughly ...
  19. [19]
    (PDF) Feeding an Empire: Why Egyptian grains played a key role in ...
    Augustus used Egypt's grain supply to consolidate his power and ensure political stability. Ancient maritime techniques facilitated long-distance grain trade ...
  20. [20]
    Roman Egypt - The Metropolitan Museum of Art
    Oct 1, 2000 · Its wealth was largely agricultural: Egyptian grain supplied the city of Rome. The country also produced papyrus, glass, and various finely ...Missing: strategic supply<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Snowden Lectures: Stanley Burstein, When Greek was an African ...
    Cornelius Gallus, the new Roman Prefect of Egypt, crossed into Nubia in force, appointed a Roman client ruler for Lower Nubia, and forced local Kushite ...Missing: aims resources pre-
  22. [22]
    Aelius Gallus | Encyclopedia.com
    In 25 b.c., Aelius Gallus led a military expedition to the region the Romans called "Arabia Felix," or modern-day Yemen. His mission was to extend Roman control ...<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Aelius Gallus and Arabia - jstor
    Strabo blames the failure of the expedition on the treachery of Syllaeus. Modern studies of the expedition have focused on a number of issues : Gallus' rank at ...
  24. [24]
    Chronicles of Africa's most powerful Women sovereigns
    Mar 16, 2025 · Amanirenas was the consort of King Teriteqas who died shortly before the Roman invasion. The Queen assumed full control of the kingdom instead of her son, ...Missing: family Akhrur
  25. [25]
    Amanirenas - Team Queens
    Amanirenas was an ancient Nubian Candace, or royal woman, of the Kingdom of Kush. Born around 57BC, she ruled from 40BC to 10BC and was the second queen to rule ...Missing: Akhrur | Show results with:Akhrur
  26. [26]
    Great Warrior Queen of Nubia: Amanirenas - African Heritage
    Jan 21, 2019 · Amanirenas was a great Candace, queen, of the Nubian kingdom, mother to queen Amanishakheto, and grandmother to queen Amanitore.Missing: family Akhrur
  27. [27]
    Amanirenas, The African Queen Who Resisted The Romans
    Jul 27, 2025 · Queen Amanirenas led a force of 30000 soldiers in modern-day Sudan and pushed back a Roman invasion between 25 and 21 B.C.E..
  28. [28]
    Prince Akinidad of Kush and the One Eyed Kandake in the Meroite ...
    In 24 BC Roman forces were sent to fight in Arabia. According to Pliny and Strabo the Meroite-Kushites sacked Aswan and destroyed the Roman statues at Philae.Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  29. [29]
    The Meroitic empire, Queen Amanirenas and the Candaces of Kush
    Jan 3, 2022 · This article provides an overview of the ideology of power of the Meroitic monarchy that enabled the ascendance of famous Candaces of Kush.Missing: economy | Show results with:economy
  30. [30]
    The Candaces of Meroe - World History Encyclopedia
    Mar 19, 2018 · Amanirenas (r. c. 40-10 BCE): Amanirenas is best known as the queen who won favorable terms from Augustus Caesar (r. 27 BCE-14 CE) following the ...
  31. [31]
    The Kingdom of Kush in ancient Nubia, an introduction - Smarthistory
    The first settlers in northern Sudan date back 300,000 years. It is home to the oldest sub-Saharan African kingdom, the kingdom of Kush.
  32. [32]
    The African Kingdom Of Kush That Defeated Rome - World Atlas
    Oct 3, 2023 · ... Amanirenas quickly mustered an army of 30,000 soldiers and launched raids into Egypt. Amanirenas and her army were able to sack a few Roman ...
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    Meroitic period | Discover Sudan! Archaeological and Cultural Tours
    The Meroites sent envoys to Augustus, who was then on Samos, and in 21/20 BC a peace treaty was concluded between Rome and Meroe. The Romans established a ...Missing: 25-22 negotiated
  35. [35]
    statue | British Museum
    Description: Bronze head from an over-life-sized statue of Augustus: the head is broken through the neck but is otherwise in an excellent state of ...Missing: discovery | Show results with:discovery
  36. [36]
    Head of Augustus at Meroë - Smarthistory
    It seems likely that, because of its symbolic importance, the head was cut from the statue by Kushites during a raid on the Roman frontier. It was then placed ...
  37. [37]
    stela | British Museum
    Object Type: stela ; Museum number: EA1650 ; Description: Sandstone stela; forty-five rows of incised cursive Meroitic inscription mentioning Queen Amanirenas and ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] A Remark on the 'Akinidad' Stela REM 1003 (British Museum EA 1650)
    'Hamadab – Insights into Development and Lifestyle of a Meroitic Urban Settlement', in M. H. Zach (ed.), The Kushite. World. Proceedings of the 11th ...
  39. [39]
    THE REPORTS OF WARS IN MEROITIC AND AKSUMITE TEXTS
    Amanirenas and Akinidad (REM 1003) recorded four military campaigns: one against the area of the Triakonta- schoenos in Lower Nubia, one against the ʻRomansʼ, ...
  40. [40]
    The Roman Egyptian-Nubian Frontier during the Reigns of Augustus ...
    Dec 19, 2022 · The Roman Egyptian-Nubian Frontier during the Reigns of Augustus and Amanirenas: Archaeological Evidence from Talmis, Qasr Ibrim, and Meroë.
  41. [41]
    Military of ancient Nubia - Wikipedia
    This allowed the manufacture of iron weapons such as swords, spears and armor in Nubia. The role of the Cavalry was extensive during the Meroitic period due to ...
  42. [42]
    Sudan Archaeology from a Greco-Roman Perspective (Part 2)
    Feb 1, 2016 · It is essential to note that the vast distribution of iron weapons throughout the Meroitic peripheries must have encouraged local autonomy and ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    How did the African Kingdom of Kush halt Rome's Expansion?
    Aug 5, 2024 · One of the most symbolic acts of this campaign was the removal and transport of a bronze statue head of Augustus, which was later buried beneath ...
  44. [44]
    Commerce and Trade in Ancient Africa: Kush | Libertarianism.org
    Feb 26, 2019 · Following the Achaemenid conquest of Egypt in 525 BCE, Napata lost its economic power in the trade of gold to another Kushite city, Meroë.<|control11|><|separator|>
  45. [45]
    War between Rome and Kingdom of Kush - IMPERIUM ROMANUM
    Nov 11, 2022 · The Kushites attacked Roman Egypt. They took advantage of the absence of perfect Gallus, who was on his way to the kingdom of Sheba and defeated the Romans in ...
  46. [46]
  47. [47]
  48. [48]
    Meroë: Africa's Forgotten Empire | Garstang Museum of Archaeology
    Apr 28, 2020 · John Garstang found many monumental structures at Meroë, including several buildings he identified as palaces and temples. The large temple of ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] The Amun Temple at Meroe Revisited
    Garstang excavations there were carried out by Shinnie. In. 1967 Shinnie excavated an area near the south-west corner of the courtyard M 271 focusing on the ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  50. [50]
    Meroitic royal chronology: the conflict with Rome and its aftermath ...
    The Meroitic state experienced significant cultural and political changes from the end of the 1st century BC to the first half of the 1st century AD, ...
  51. [51]
    Amanirenas: the African queen who humiliated Rome
    Feb 18, 2025 · At some point, Amanirenas lost an eye in battle, leading Strabo to derisively call her the “one-eyed queen”. The Roman perhaps saw this as ...
  52. [52]
    Amanirenas the Black Queen Who Defeated the Roman Empire ...
    Feb 27, 2025 · General Gaius Petronius led a successful counteroffensive that resulted in the sacking and burning of Napata in 24 BC. The war ended in a ...
  53. [53]
    7. 100 BCE - 100 CE Roman Empire - the remedial herstory project
    While each side achieved victories and sustained losses over the following three years, the result was basically a stalemate. More significantly, succeeding in ...
  54. [54]
    Queen Amanirenas: The Story of the White Nile Nubi Archeress
    Queen Amanirenas ruled the area between the Nile and the Atbara River between 40-10BC. She was the second Queen of the Kush Kingdom.
  55. [55]
    Gender as Frame of War in Ancient Nubia - Dotawo Journal
    Nevertheless, several experts in Meroitic language and script have recognized the mentioning of prisoners of war in the Hamadab Stela of Amanirenas and Akinidad ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Female Monarchs and Merchant Queens in Africa - OHIO Open Library
    In the human world, the female principle is embodied in women's roles as over- seers and females of privilege, including women leaders of their people or wives ...