Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Assistive technology

Assistive technology encompasses assistive products, along with the systems and services associated with them, designed to maintain or improve functioning for individuals facing limitations in cognition, communication, hearing, mobility, self-care, or vision, thereby supporting health, well-being, inclusion, and societal participation. These range from simple, low-cost devices such as white canes, glasses, and crutches to advanced systems including prosthetic limbs, hearing aids, speech-to-text software, and powered mobility aids like wheelchairs. Defined in frameworks like the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), assistive technology includes any equipment or technology adapted or specially designed to compensate for impairments and enhance functional capabilities. Globally, more than 2.5 billion people—over one-third of the world's population—require at least one form of assistive technology, a figure projected to rise to 3.5 billion by 2050 due to aging populations and increasing disability prevalence. Access disparities are stark, with only 3% of needs met in some low-income countries compared to 90% in certain high-income ones; for instance, while 80 million people need wheelchairs for mobility, just 5-35% obtain them. Empirical studies confirm that effective assistive technology facilitates activities like education, employment, and self-care, reducing secondary health complications and healthcare costs—for example, hearing aids can mitigate language development delays in children and address the US$980 billion annual economic burden of untreated hearing loss. Despite these benefits, challenges persist, including high non-use rates of provided devices due to inadequate fitting, training, or user involvement in selection processes, as documented in multiple reviews of assistive technology outcomes. Barriers such as cost, limited availability in developing regions, and insufficient professional training further hinder equitable deployment, underscoring the need for integrated service delivery models to maximize causal impacts on independence and participation. Historical developments, from ancient mobility aids to 20th-century innovations like transistor-based hearing aids in 1948, illustrate a progression toward more reliable and accessible solutions, though systemic access gaps remain a defining limitation.

Fundamentals

Definition and Core Principles

Assistive technology encompasses assistive products, systems, and services designed to maintain or enhance an individual's functional capabilities in areas such as cognition, communication, hearing, mobility, self-care, and vision. This includes any item, equipment, or product system—whether commercially available, modified, or customized—that increases, maintains, or improves the abilities of persons with disabilities to perform tasks that might otherwise be challenging or impossible due to impairments. For instance, as of 2024, the World Health Organization estimates that over 1 billion people worldwide require assistive products to participate fully in society, underscoring the scale of need driven by aging populations and rising chronic conditions. Core principles of assistive technology emphasize user-centered design, prioritizing the involvement of end-users in the development process to ensure devices align with real-world needs and capabilities rather than assumptions by designers or institutions. Usability and adaptability form foundational tenets, requiring technologies to be intuitive, reliable under varied conditions, and customizable to individual impairments, thereby minimizing learning curves and maximizing independence—evidenced by studies showing that poorly adapted devices lead to 30-50% abandonment rates among users. Accessibility must integrate seamlessly with environmental factors, such as compatibility with existing infrastructure, while durability ensures longevity against physical wear, particularly for mobility aids subjected to daily stress. These principles are grounded in empirical outcomes, with effective assistive technology demonstrably reducing dependency on caregivers by up to 40% in targeted applications like communication aids, as measured in longitudinal user trials. Affordability and evidence-based validation further guide development, favoring solutions scalable via peer-reviewed data over unproven innovations, to avoid resource misallocation in resource-constrained settings.

Design Considerations and User-Centered Engineering

User-centered engineering in assistive technology emphasizes iterative involvement of end-users with disabilities in the design process to ensure devices align with individual capabilities, environments, and daily tasks, thereby reducing abandonment rates that can exceed 30% in mismatched technologies. This approach draws from human factors engineering, prioritizing empirical validation through prototypes tested in real-world settings rather than assumptions about universal needs. Evidence from service delivery models indicates that active user participation in selection and customization correlates with higher satisfaction and sustained use, as users identify mismatches in functionality or usability that designers might overlook. Core design considerations include comprehensive user assessment, encompassing physical anthropometry, cognitive load, and environmental factors like terrain or lighting, to tailor devices ergonomically and prevent secondary injuries such as repetitive strain. Safety protocols mandate fail-safes, such as redundant controls in powered mobility aids and biocompatible materials resistant to wear, with reliability tested via accelerated life-cycle simulations to withstand daily cycles equivalent to years of use. Modularity enables customization—e.g., interchangeable components for varying grip strengths—while standards like ISO 9241-210 guide human-centered processes, ensuring equitable access without segregating users. Empirical studies confirm that ergonomically optimized designs, informed by posture analysis and task simulation, lower injury risks by up to 50% in handling equipment compared to non-ergonomic alternatives. Challenges arise from balancing innovation with proven efficacy; over-engineered features can increase cognitive demands, leading to underutilization, as seen in assistive systems where user training gaps result in 20-40% non-adoption. Cost-effectiveness requires prioritizing durable, low-maintenance materials without compromising adaptability, with lifecycle analyses showing that user-validated prototypes yield 15-25% higher long-term value through reduced replacements. Integration of feedback loops, including post-deployment evaluations, refines designs causally linked to improved participation outcomes, such as enhanced social engagement documented in longitudinal trials. This evidence-based methodology counters biases in academic sourcing by grounding decisions in measurable user performance metrics over ideological preferences.

Mobility and Physical Impairment Technologies

Wheelchairs, Walkers, and Transfer Aids

Wheelchairs enable independent mobility for individuals with lower limb impairments or weakness by providing a seated frame with wheels for propulsion. The earliest self-propelled wheelchair was invented in 1655 by Stephen Farfler, a German clockmaker with paraplegia, featuring a three-wheeled hand-cranked design. Modern designs distinguish between manual wheelchairs, propelled by user or caregiver via hand rims, and powered wheelchairs, driven by electric motors and batteries for those with limited upper body strength. Manual types include standard steel or aluminum frames for general use, lightweight models for easier transport, and specialized sports variants for athletic activities. Powered models offer enhanced independence but cost significantly more, with prices ranging from USD 15,000 to 20,000 compared to USD 100-300 for basic manual ones. Globally, over 65 million people use wheelchairs, comprising about 1% of populations in developed countries, with manual wheelchair markets valued at USD 2.9 billion in 2022 and projected to grow at 7.4% CAGR through 2030. Evidence from clinician perspectives indicates manual wheelchairs improve daily function but require adequate upper body strength, while powered options expand access for severe impairments, though user adoption varies by need and environment. Walkers provide ambulatory support for those with balance deficits, lower extremity weakness, or post-surgical recovery by offering a stable frame to bear partial weight and prevent falls. Common types include standard four-legged walkers lifted with each step, two-wheeled versions for easier forward gliding, and four-wheeled rollators with brakes and seats for greater versatility and reduced effort. Biomechanical studies confirm walkers enhance postural stability and gait efficiency, particularly when fully grounded, outperforming wheeled variants in certain balance perturbation scenarios. They decrease fall risk and pain while boosting confidence and mobility in older adults, though improper height or use can increase injury potential. Transfer aids facilitate safe movement between surfaces like beds, chairs, or wheelchairs for individuals with limited mobility, minimizing physical strain on users and caregivers. Devices include slide boards for bridging gaps, sit-to-stand lifts that simulate natural rising mechanics, and slider sheets for lateral repositioning. Systematic reviews show these tools reduce caregiver physical and emotional burden by enabling independent or assisted transfers, promoting dignity and preventing injuries like back strains. Usage aligns with patient handling protocols in clinical settings, where hydraulic or mechanical lifts handle heavier loads, but home adaptations prioritize portable, low-tech options for feasibility.

Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Exoskeleons

Prosthetics are artificial devices designed to replace missing or non-functional limbs or body parts, enabling users with amputations or congenital limb deficiencies to restore functionality and mobility. Modern lower-limb prosthetics often incorporate advanced materials such as carbon fiber and lightweight metals to reduce weight while enhancing durability and energy return during gait. Upper-limb prosthetics, including myoelectric models, utilize sensors to detect residual muscle signals, allowing intuitive control via electrical impulses from the user's remaining muscles. As of 2023, bionic prosthetics integrate neural interfaces to provide sensory feedback, mimicking natural touch through brain-computer connections that transmit tactile data from embedded sensors. Clinical outcomes show that targeted muscle reinnervation surgery combined with these prosthetics improves control precision and reduces phantom limb pain in up to 80% of users. Orthotics consist of external braces or supports that align, stabilize, or correct musculoskeletal deformities to improve gait and prevent further injury in individuals with mobility impairments such as cerebral palsy or muscular dystrophy. Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are among the most common, providing medial-lateral stability and dorsiflexion assistance during swing phase, with studies demonstrating reduced energy expenditure by 10-20% in ambulatory children with spastic diplegia. Knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFOs) extend support to the knee joint, locking it for stance stability while permitting swing-phase flexion, particularly beneficial for partial paralysis where reciprocal gait is targeted. Custom-fabricated from thermoplastics or composites, orthotics are prescribed based on biomechanical assessments, with evidence from rehabilitation trials indicating sustained improvements in walking speed and balance when paired with physical therapy. Hip-knee-ankle-foot orthoses (HKAFOs) address more proximal weaknesses, though their bulk limits prolonged use, prompting research into lighter, dynamic variants for enhanced user compliance. Exoskeletons are powered, wearable robotic frameworks that augment human strength, endurance, and gait for rehabilitation or daily assistance, primarily targeting spinal cord injury (SCI) or stroke survivors with lower-limb paralysis. FDA-approved devices like ReWalk and Ekso, cleared for clinical use since 2014 and 2016 respectively, enable upright walking through motorized hip and knee joints controlled by body-weight sensors and inertial measurement units. A 2021 systematic review of lower-limb exoskeletons reported average improvements in gait speed of 0.1-0.3 m/s and step length by 10-15 cm in non-ambulatory users during supervised sessions, though real-world endurance remains limited to 1-2 hours due to battery constraints. Recent integrations of AI algorithms, as in 2025 studies on soft exosuits, adapt torque assistance in real-time to user intent via electromyography, yielding 15-25% gains in walking economy for stroke patients post-training. Pilot trials of hip exoskeleton assistive (HEXA) robots in 2024 demonstrated superior balance recovery compared to conventional therapy, with intervention groups achieving 20% faster 10-meter walk times after 12 weeks. Despite efficacy in controlled settings, challenges persist in affordability, with costs exceeding $100,000 per unit, and the need for larger randomized trials to confirm long-term functional independence.

Adaptive Seating and Positioning Systems

Adaptive seating and positioning systems are specialized devices designed to support optimal body alignment, stability, and function for individuals with neuromotor impairments, such as or injuries, by accommodating atypical postures and movement patterns. These systems counteract the effects of , , or contractures through customizable components that distribute pressure evenly, promote active participation, and prevent secondary complications like pressure ulcers or skeletal deformities. Unlike standard seating, adaptive systems emphasize user-centered engineering, incorporating adjustable elements to align with biomechanical needs during prolonged sitting. Common types include configured systems, which use modular, adjustable parts like contoured cushions, lateral trunk supports, and harnesses for fine-tuned positioning, and molded systems, which are foam-formed to the user's exact contours for rigid support in severe cases. Dynamic seating variants allow controlled movement in anterior-posterior or lateral directions via spring-loaded or elastic components, enabling users to self-correct posture while absorbing forces from involuntary motions. Tilt-in-space mechanisms, often integrated into wheelchairs, redistribute weight to reduce shear forces on the skin, while active seating options, such as those with footplates and armrests for weight-bearing, facilitate upright engagement in activities. For pediatric users, corner chairs or floor seating provide low-level support to encourage head control and reaching, progressing to wheelchair-integrated systems as needs evolve. Clinical evidence indicates that adaptive seating improves postural control and sitting stability, with studies on children with severe cerebral palsy showing enhanced outcomes when systems include trunk and hip supports. A 2023 systematic review found limited but positive evidence for better sitting ability and reduced postural sway in users of these systems, though high-quality randomized trials remain scarce due to ethical and methodological challenges in disability research. Dynamic components specifically mitigate equipment damage and injury risk by dissipating extensor thrusts, as demonstrated in interventions yielding increased time in optimal positions. Custom-contoured seating in wheelchairs provides immediate benefits in alignment and comfort, correlating with higher user satisfaction and functional independence, though long-term prevention of deformities requires integrated 24-hour posture management. In population studies of children with cerebral palsy, adaptive seating enabled 99% to achieve supported sitting, underscoring its role in maximizing participation despite variable evidence quality. These systems are most effective when prescribed based on comprehensive assessments, including pressure mapping and kinematic analysis, to match individual biomechanics rather than generic fits. For adults with asymmetries, such as in cerebral palsy cohorts, positioning aids in sitting reduce pelvic obliquity and enhance stability, facilitating transfers and daily activities. Integration with power wheelchairs, via features like powered seat elevation, further supports safe transfers by aligning heights, minimizing fall risks documented in clinical guidelines. Despite benefits, adoption barriers include cost and limited access, with evidence emphasizing the need for multidisciplinary input from therapists and engineers to optimize causal pathways from support to functional gains.

Sensory Impairment Technologies

Devices for Visual Impairments

Devices for visual impairments include mobility aids, reading and information access tools, and computer interfaces designed to provide non-visual feedback through auditory, tactile, or haptic means, enabling greater independence for users with low vision or blindness. These technologies often integrate sensors, artificial intelligence, and output mechanisms to substitute for absent visual input, with efficacy varying by user needs and environmental context. Traditional mechanical devices like the long white cane detect ground-level obstacles via tactile feedback, while electronic variants incorporate ultrasonic or laser sensors for elevated hazard detection up to head height. Electronic travel aids (ETAs) represent an advancement over canes by using wearable sensors, such as ultrasonic rangefinders or cameras, to deliver auditory or vibratory alerts about obstacles, with systems like the WeWALK smart cane integrating GPS for navigation since its 2019 release. GPS-enabled devices, including smartphone apps like BlindSquare, provide turn-by-turn directions via speech output, leveraging satellite data for outdoor orientation, though indoor accuracy remains limited without supplementary beacons. Recent wearable ETAs, such as AI-powered vests or glasses, employ computer vision for real-time object recognition and path planning, with studies showing improved obstacle avoidance in controlled tests but variable real-world adoption due to cost and training requirements. For reading printed materials, optical character recognition (OCR) devices scan text and convert it to synthetic speech or Braille output, with portable units like the OrCam MyEye 2 (launched 2019) using attached cameras to identify and vocalize words in real time, achieving over 90% accuracy on clear print in lab conditions. Standalone scanners, such as the Eye-Pal SOLO, process documents via flatbed integration and speech synthesis, supporting multiple languages and formats for users without smartphone access. Software-based OCR, including apps like Seeing AI (Microsoft, 2017 onward), combines mobile cameras with cloud processing for scene description and text extraction, though performance degrades with poor lighting or handwriting. Braille access devices employ refreshable displays with piezoelectric actuators to raise dots dynamically, allowing digital text rendering; single-line models like the BrailleNote Touch (40 cells, introduced 2015) pair with notetaking functions, while multi-line prototypes since 2020 aim to simulate page views for complex tasks like mathematics. Advancements in electromagnetic mechanisms have reduced power consumption and increased portability, with displays now supporting Bluetooth connectivity to smartphones for on-the-go use. Usage remains niche, with Braille literacy correlating to higher employment rates among blind adults per longitudinal studies. Computer access relies on screen readers, which vocalize interface elements via text-to-speech; NVDA, an open-source option since 2007, holds 69.9% primary usage among surveyed users as of 2024, favored for cost-free compatibility with Windows. , a commercial leader since 1995, commands 37.2% adoption with advanced scripting for web navigation, though multiple-reader use exceeds 50% for cross-platform needs. For low-vision users, magnification software like ZoomText enlarges screens up to 60x with high-contrast enhancements, while tactile keyboards such as the large-print model incorporate raised keys and audio feedback for precise input. Emerging AI integrations, including smart glasses with real-time captioning and facial recognition, promise broader environmental awareness, but peer-reviewed evaluations highlight challenges like battery life (typically 2-4 hours) and over-reliance risks without human training. Overall, device effectiveness hinges on user-centered design, with systematic reviews emphasizing multimodal outputs to match diverse impairment levels over singular solutions.

Devices for Hearing Impairments

Hearing impairments, affecting approximately 30 million people aged 12 or older in the United States with bilateral hearing loss, are addressed by a range of assistive devices that amplify sound, transmit vibrations directly to the inner ear, or enhance signal clarity in noisy environments. These technologies primarily target sensorineural, conductive, or mixed hearing losses, with efficacy varying by loss severity and device type. Hearing aids remain the most common solution for mild to moderate losses, while surgical implants serve profound cases. Hearing aids function by capturing sound via a microphone, processing it through digital or analog circuitry, and delivering amplified signals to the ear canal via a speaker. Digital models, predominant since the late 1990s, allow programmable adjustments for different environments, improving speech intelligibility in noise. Common styles include behind-the-ear (BTE), in-the-ear (ITE), and receiver-in-canal (RIC) designs, selected based on ear anatomy and cosmetic preferences. Clinical studies demonstrate their effectiveness in reducing listening fatigue and enhancing perception, particularly when fitted bilaterally, though benefits diminish in severe losses due to cochlear damage. For severe to profound sensorineural deafness, cochlear implants bypass damaged hair cells by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve directly. First conceptualized in the mid-20th century and refined through the 1970s-1980s, these devices consist of an external processor and internal electrode array surgically inserted into the cochlea. Post-implantation mapping and rehabilitation yield open-set speech recognition in many recipients, with children implanted early showing near-normal language development. Complications occur in under 5% of cases, including minor infections or vertigo, and major issues like device failure or meningitis, though rates have declined with advanced surgical techniques. Bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA), such as those using osseointegrated titanium implants, transmit sound vibrations through the skull to the cochlea, ideal for conductive or single-sided deafness where traditional aids fail. Approved for clinical use since the 1980s, BAHA systems like the Cochlear Baha provide superior sound localization compared to non-surgical bone conduction headbands. Implantation involves a percutaneous abutment, with skin complications minimized in modern soft tissue preservation techniques. Assistive listening devices complement personal aids in challenging acoustic settings. Frequency-modulated (FM) or digital modulation (DM) systems use a transmitter on the speaker and receiver on the user, reducing background noise by up to 15-20 dB and improving signal-to-noise ratios. Hearing loop systems employ electromagnetic induction to deliver audio directly to telecoil-equipped hearing aids or implants, commonly installed in public venues for unobtrusive access. Infrared systems offer similar benefits in controlled spaces like theaters, though less immune to interference than loops. These technologies enhance group communication efficacy, with evidence showing sustained improvements in comprehension for users with mild to severe impairments.

Communication and Cognitive Aids

Augmentative and Alternative Communication Systems

Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems encompass strategies and tools designed to supplement or replace verbal speech for individuals with severe expressive language impairments, arising from conditions such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), cerebral palsy, or aphasia. These systems enable communication through non-spoken means, including unaided methods like gestures and manual signs, as well as aided approaches ranging from low-technology options to sophisticated electronic devices. AAC interventions target receptive and expressive communication, with aided systems classified into low-tech (e.g., picture exchange communication systems [PECS], communication boards with symbols or letters) and high-tech categories (e.g., speech-generating devices [SGDs] that produce synthesized or digitized speech). Low-tech aided AAC, such as PECS introduced in the 1980s, involves exchanging pictures or symbols for desired items or actions to build requesting and labeling skills. High-tech systems, including tablet-based apps with text-to-speech functionality or eye-gaze interfaces, allow users to select vocabulary via switches, scanning, or direct pointing, outputting messages in auditory or visual formats. Input methods vary by user motor abilities, incorporating joysticks, head pointers, sip-and-puff switches, or brain-computer interfaces for those with minimal movement. Early AAC development traces to the 1920s with manual boards, evolving through 1950s symbol-based systems and 1970s electronic prototypes featuring basic speech synthesis, such as the precursor to modern SGDs. By the 2010s, integration with mobile devices expanded access, with apps enabling core vocabulary programming—prioritizing high-frequency words like pronouns and verbs for efficient message construction. Peer-reviewed evidence indicates AAC enhances communication functions beyond requests, including social interactions, in children with ASD, with high-tech SGDs showing superior gains in social communication compared to low-tech alternatives. Systematic reviews confirm improvements in vocabulary and expressive skills without impeding natural speech development, countering outdated concerns. Implementation requires user-centered assessment of cognitive, motor, and sensory capabilities, often involving speech-language pathologists for customization and training. Challenges include device portability, battery life, and barriers, though advancements in AI-driven and multilingual support continue to broaden efficacy. Longitudinal studies demonstrate sustained benefits, such as increased initiations and reduced frustration in daily interactions for users with complex disabilities.

Tools for Cognitive and Memory Support

Cognitive assistive technologies, also known as assistive technology for cognition (ATC), include hardware, software, and applications that compensate for impairments in memory, attention, executive function, and problem-solving, enabling greater independence in daily activities for individuals with conditions such as dementia, traumatic brain injury (TBI), or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). These tools function as external "prosthetics" by offloading cognitive demands, such as scheduling or medication adherence, onto reliable systems that provide cues or automate routines. Evidence from clinical studies indicates that such interventions can improve task completion and reduce caregiver burden, with acceptance rates high among users when tailored to individual needs. Low- and mid-level technologies often involve simple, accessible aids like electronic pill dispensers with auditory alarms, which have been shown to enhance medication compliance in dementia patients by up to 20-30% in controlled trials, or wearable pagers that deliver customizable reminders via vibration or text for time management in ADHD. Digital calendars and smartphone apps, such as those integrating GPS tracking to prevent wandering in memory-impaired individuals, further support spatial orientation and routine adherence; for instance, apps like Google Calendar with voice integration allow voice-activated scheduling, reducing cognitive load for users with executive dysfunction. Smart home devices, including voice assistants like Amazon Echo or Google Home, provide real-time prompts for tasks—e.g., "remind me to eat lunch at noon"—and have demonstrated efficacy in maintaining daily structure for older adults with mild cognitive impairment, with user studies reporting improved self-efficacy. Advanced and emerging tools include cognitive prosthetics, such as wearable devices that monitor and cue executive functions, and experimental neural implants designed to stimulate hippocampal activity for memory encoding and retrieval. A 2024 study by Wake Forest University Institute for Regenerative Medicine tested a brain-computer interface implant in epilepsy patients with memory deficits, achieving a 15-20% improvement in recall accuracy during word-list tasks by decoding neural signals and providing targeted electrical stimulation. Similarly, a October 2024 University of Southern California development integrated implantable prostheses with predictive algorithms to counteract memory loss, targeting over 6.9 million Americans affected by Alzheimer's-related decline, though long-term efficacy and ethical considerations remain under evaluation in ongoing trials. These high-tech options prioritize evidence from peer-reviewed trials but require customization to avoid over-reliance, as unsupported generalization of benefits across populations can occur without rigorous validation. Implementation of these tools emphasizes user-centered assessment, often involving occupational therapists to match devices to specific deficits—e.g., visual cues for prospective memory in TBI versus auditory alerts for ADHD-related inattention—while integrating training to foster sustained use. Longitudinal data from dementia care reviews underscore that combined low- and high-tech approaches yield the most robust outcomes, with technologies like AI-enhanced wearables (e.g., MemPal prototypes) showing promise in proactive memory support by analyzing behavioral patterns for preemptive reminders. Despite variability in individual response, meta-analyses confirm that ATC reduces institutionalization risks by bolstering functional autonomy, provided accessibility barriers like cost and digital literacy are addressed.

Educational Software and Learning Aids

Educational software and learning aids constitute a subset of assistive technologies tailored to support students with disabilities in accessing curricula, compensating for challenges in processing, input, or output during learning activities. These tools, often digital applications, leverage features like alternative sensory modalities or adaptive interfaces to promote independence and skill development, particularly for individuals with learning disabilities, dyslexia, or cognitive impairments. Text-to-speech (TTS) software converts digital text into synthesized audio, enabling students with reading difficulties, such as dyslexia, to listen to content while following visually, which has demonstrated gains in reading vocabulary and comprehension in interventions lasting 10 weeks. A 2022 study found TTS contributed to significant academic achievement improvements for students with dyslexia, though meta-analyses indicate mixed evidence on overall comprehension enhancement due to variability in implementation and user profiles. For writing impairments, speech recognition software transcribes spoken words into text, reducing motor and cognitive demands; research shows it can increase text production with fewer errors, aid spelling, and indirectly boost reading comprehension among students with special educational needs. Word prediction tools, which suggest likely words during composition, enhance typing efficiency and fluency for those with physical or learning disabilities by minimizing keystrokes and supporting word selection, with studies confirming benefits in output length and accuracy. Mathematical learning aids include specialized software like equation editors that accept input via speech, handwriting recognition, or typing, facilitating problem-solving for students with dyscalculia or fine motor issues; tools such as EquatIO enable accessible digital math notation and graphing. Additional supports encompass concept mapping applications for organizing ideas and time management apps for executive function deficits, which collectively allow alignment of numbers, computation, and visual representation without manual transcription barriers. Empirical evaluations underscore that while these aids improve access and specific outcomes—like a reported 17% increase with speech-to-text —their depends on individualized , , and into , as unsupported deployment may yield limited generalization.

Daily Living and Environmental Controls

Eating and Feeding Assistance

Assistive technologies for eating and feeding assistance encompass adaptive utensils, modified dishware, and robotic systems tailored to support individuals with motor impairments, such as those arising from conditions like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), cerebral palsy, stroke, or spinal cord injuries, by enhancing grip stability, reducing spillage, and enabling semi-autonomous feeding. These devices address challenges in self-feeding by compensating for tremors, weakness, or limited dexterity, thereby promoting nutritional intake and social participation during meals while minimizing caregiver dependency. Empirical studies indicate that such aids improve user satisfaction and independence, particularly in low-tech options like modified cutlery, though adoption varies based on individual impairment severity and training needs. Adaptive utensils form the foundation of manual feeding aids, featuring modifications such as built-up handles, weighted designs, and bendable or swivel components to accommodate reduced hand strength or coordination. Built-up handles, often foam-padded or enlarged to diameters exceeding standard 1 cm grips, require up to 30% less wrist extension and finger flexion range of motion, easing use for those with arthritis or post-stroke hemiparesis, as demonstrated in kinematic analyses of hand function. Weighted utensils, typically adding 1-2 ounces via stainless steel or silicone additions, counteract tremors—common in Parkinson's disease—by increasing inertial stability, with user trials reporting reduced utensil deviation by 20-40% during transport. Other variants include rocker knives with curved blades for one-handed cutting, swivel spoons that self-level to prevent spills, and angled forks designed by occupational therapists to minimize elbow elevation, all of which have been validated in pediatric and adult rehabilitation settings for conditions like cerebral palsy. Complementary dishware adaptations include non-slip plates with suction bases or rubber undersides, scoop-edged designs with raised rims to contain food, and divided compartments to separate items, reducing the physical effort needed to scoop or prevent items from sliding during consumption. Plate guards, high-walled barriers attached via clips, further minimize spillage for users with involuntary movements, with clinical observations in dysphagia management showing decreased food waste by 15-25% in assisted feeding scenarios. These low-cost, passive aids—often available since the mid-20th century in occupational therapy protocols—prioritize accessibility over complexity, though their efficacy depends on pairing with user-specific assessments to avoid compensatory postures that could exacerbate joint strain. Robotic feeding systems represent advanced interventions for severe impairments precluding manual utensil use, employing motorized arms or spoons controlled via switches, joysticks, or voice commands to deliver bites autonomously. The Mealtime Partner, introduced in the early 2000s, uses a tilting spoon and compartmentalized bowl activated by single switches, enabling selection among multiple food types and accommodating users with quadriplegia; pilot studies report mealtime durations reduced by 50% compared to full manual assistance. The Obi device, commercialized around 2021, features a teachable robotic arm that learns user-preferred bite sizes and paths via initial demonstrations, suitable for ages 5 and older with upper-limb limitations from ALS or arthrogryposis, with field tests indicating 80-90% success in solid food delivery without caregiver intervention. Systematic reviews of such systems highlight their potential to restore dignity in dining but note limitations like high costs (often $5,000-10,000), dependency on precise programming, and challenges with variable food textures, with ongoing research focusing on sensor integration for adaptive grasping. Despite these advances, robotic adoption remains low outside specialized settings, as evidenced by under 1% penetration in home care for motor-disabled populations per assistive technology surveys.

Home Automation and Personal Emergency Systems

Home automation systems in assistive technology enable individuals with disabilities to control environmental features such as lighting, temperature, appliances, and security through alternative interfaces, including voice commands, gesture recognition, or switch activation, thereby promoting independence without reliance on physical mobility or manual dexterity. These systems often integrate mainstream smart devices like voice assistants (e.g., Amazon Echo or Google Home) with customized adaptations, allowing users with motor impairments to operate doors, blinds, or thermostats remotely. Implementation of such technologies has been shown to enhance daily functioning; for instance, a 2025 study of tailored smart home interventions reported significant improvements in occupational performance and quality of life among participants with disabilities, as measured by standardized assessments like the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Early developments in assistive home automation trace back to the mid-20th century with rudimentary switch-based controls, evolving by the 1970s into more integrated systems using early computing for environmental control units (ECUs) tailored for those with severe physical limitations, such as spinal cord injuries. Modern iterations leverage Internet of Things (IoT) connectivity and predictive algorithms to anticipate user needs, such as automatically adjusting lighting based on detected occupancy or time of day, which a 2025 analysis highlighted as particularly beneficial for predictive assistance in smart environments. Efficacy studies indicate that these systems reduce caregiver burden and institutionalization risks; the ASSIST intervention, deploying smart home technologies for independence, demonstrated immediate functional gains but noted barriers like high setup costs and technical reliability issues. Social impact evaluations further quantify benefits, estimating that widespread adoption could yield substantial independence gains, with one 2024 model calculating positive net social returns through reduced healthcare dependencies. Personal emergency response systems (PERS), wearable or home-based devices that connect users to emergency services via a button press or automated detection, serve as critical safeguards for those with mobility, cognitive, or age-related impairments prone to falls or medical events. These systems typically include pendants, wristbands, or base units linked to 24/7 monitoring centers, with advanced models incorporating GPS tracking, fall detection sensors, and two-way communication; a 2016 review affirmed their effectiveness in fulfilling safety monitoring needs for homebound clients, reducing response times to emergencies. Market data reflects growing adoption, with the global PERS sector valued at approximately USD 7.38 billion as of recent estimates and projected to reach USD 11.7 billion by 2032 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.8%, driven by aging populations and IoT enhancements like AI-driven false alarm reduction. Recent integrations of GNSS and IoT have further revolutionized PERS by enabling location-accurate alerts and proactive health monitoring, potentially mitigating billions in fall-related healthcare costs annually through supported aging in place. For individuals with intellectual disabilities, PERS facilitate community living by providing reassurance without constant supervision, though accessibility challenges persist in ensuring device usability across diverse impairment types.

Accessibility Software and Computer Interfaces

Accessibility software encompasses programs and interface modifications that enable individuals with sensory, motor, cognitive, or other disabilities to operate computers and digital devices effectively. These tools interpret, augment, or replace standard input and output methods, such as converting visual content to audio or allowing control via non-manual means. Examples include screen readers for visual impairments, voice recognition for motor limitations, and built-in operating system features that adjust keyboard behaviors or provide magnification. For visual impairments, screen readers are foundational, converting on-screen text and elements into synthesized speech or Braille output via refreshable displays. The earliest screen reader emerged in 1986, developed by Jim Thatcher for IBM, marking the start of software-based access to graphical user interfaces. Prominent examples include JAWS, which achieved market dominance in the 1990s and 2000s through its compatibility with Windows applications, and the open-source NVDA, released in 2006, which supports multiple languages and costs nothing, broadening access for low-income users. Apple's VoiceOver, integrated into macOS since 2005, provides gesture-based navigation on touchscreens and is activated via system settings for seamless screen interpretation. Screen magnification software, such as ZoomText, enlarges content up to 60 times with enhancements like color inversion, aiding low-vision users since its initial release in the 1980s. Motor impairments benefit from alternative input methods that bypass traditional keyboards and mice. Voice recognition software, like Dragon NaturallySpeaking (now Nuance Dragon), introduced in 1997, transcribes speech to text with up to 99% accuracy after training, enabling dictation and command control for those with limited hand mobility. On-screen keyboards, accessible via Windows' built-in On-Screen Keyboard or macOS's Accessibility Keyboard, allow typing through mouse clicks, dwell selection, or scanning modes. Switch access interfaces connect external switches to computers, permitting control via minimal physical actions like head movements or breaths, often paired with software like those in Windows' Ease of Access Center. Eye-gaze systems track pupil movement for pointer control, with accuracy improving to sub-millimeter levels in recent models, though they require calibration and stable head positioning. Hearing impairments are addressed through real-time captioning software that generates text from audio, such as , which integrates with video calls for live transcription. Operating systems incorporate features like Windows' Live Captions, introduced in in 2021, converting speech to on-screen text across apps. Cognitive aids include in dictation tools and simplified interfaces that reduce visual clutter, with macOS offering for window-specific magnification and filter options like to minimize distractions. Built-in OS features reduce reliance on third-party software. Windows provides Narrator for basic screen reading since Windows 2000, Magnifier for zoom since XP, and Sticky Keys to modify keyboard repeat rates, configurable via Ease of Access settings. macOS includes VoiceOver for full auditory navigation and Switch Control for alternative inputs, accessible from System Settings since OS X 10.10 in 2014. These tools comply with standards like Section 508 but vary in depth; for instance, macOS VoiceOver supports rotor gestures for efficient list navigation, while Windows relies more on third-party options like NVDA for advanced scripting.

Domain-Specific Applications

In Education and Occupational Therapy

Assistive technology in education supports students with disabilities by enhancing access to learning materials and participation in classroom activities, often through devices like screen readers, text-to-speech software, and adaptive keyboards. A 2010 study in public schools found that assistive technology provided by multidisciplinary teams significantly improved achievement of Individualized Education Program (IEP) goals compared to other interventions alone, with students using AT showing greater progress in functional skills. For students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), assistive technology interventions have demonstrated effectiveness in supporting developmental domains such as communication and social skills across various settings, based on reviews of multiple studies. However, empirical evidence remains mixed; while some programs report improvements in reading, writing, and spelling, others show no significant gains, highlighting the need for tailored implementation. In occupational therapy, assistive technology integrates into interventions to promote occupational performance and independence in daily activities, encompassing devices from low-tech adaptive utensils to high-tech environmental controls. Occupational therapists assess and recommend assistive technology as part of their scope, focusing on how it enables engagement in self-care, work, and leisure, with the American Occupational Therapy Association emphasizing its role in evidence-based practice since at least 2016 updates. A 2024 global survey of occupational therapists revealed widespread provision of digital assistive technology, influenced by factors like client needs and practitioner training, though barriers such as insufficient education persist. Studies indicate that assistive technology outcomes in therapy correlate with improved occupational participation, particularly for conditions like multiple sclerosis, where acceptability and usability enhance functional benefits. Examples in educational settings include Braille displays for visually impaired students, which facilitate tactile reading of digital content, and eye-gaze systems for those with motor impairments to control computers. In occupational therapy, tools like sip-and-puff interfaces or head wands enable individuals with severe physical limitations to perform tasks such as writing or accessing devices, supporting rehabilitation goals. Effectiveness in both domains depends on coordinated assessment; for instance, a 2023 review for adolescents with learning disabilities synthesized evidence showing meta-analytic support for assistive technology in skill acquisition, though real-world application requires addressing barriers like training gaps. Peer-reviewed literature underscores that while assistive technology yields positive outcomes in controlled studies, systemic implementation challenges, including funding and therapist expertise, can limit broader impacts.

In Employment, Sports, and Recreation

Assistive technologies enable individuals with disabilities to participate in employment by providing accommodations that address functional limitations, such as screen readers for visual impairments, voice recognition software for motor challenges, and ergonomic keyboards for repetitive strain issues. A meta-analysis of studies found that users of assistive technology had higher odds of employment compared to non-users, with an odds ratio indicating significant positive association. However, only about 10% of workers with disabilities received any accommodations between 2012 and 2021, and equipment-based aids like specialized devices were provided to just 3-4%. Remote work technologies, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, have further expanded access by allowing voice-activated interfaces and adaptive software to facilitate job performance from home. In sports, assistive devices such as carbon fiber racing wheelchairs and performance-optimized prosthetics enhance speed and maneuverability for Paralympic athletes. These wheelchairs, often featuring lightweight frames and rubber-coated camber tubes for stability, are customized for disciplines like basketball, rugby, and track racing. Prosthetics incorporate advanced materials and biomechanical designs to mimic natural movement, as seen in events at the 2021 Tokyo Paralympics where such technologies contributed to record performances. For power wheelchair users, adaptive sports include power soccer and hockey, where modified vehicles allow propulsion and control via switches or joysticks. Recreational applications of assistive technology promote leisure participation through adapted equipment like all-terrain wheelchairs for outdoor activities and switch-adapted video games for cognitive engagement. Devices such as accessible gardening tools with extended handles and wheelchair-compatible tents enable hobbies like horticulture and camping. Handcycles and adaptive kayaks provide options for physical recreation, supporting independence in non-competitive settings. These tools, while increasing accessibility, often require customization to match individual needs, with ongoing advancements in materials improving durability and usability.

Historical Development

Pre-20th Century Origins

Assistive technologies trace their roots to ancient civilizations, where rudimentary devices addressed physical impairments through mechanical adaptations. The oldest known prostheses date to ancient Egypt around 950 BCE, including artificial toes crafted from wood and leather, such as the Greville Chester toe discovered on a mummified noblewoman, which enabled functional gait restoration by mimicking joint movement. Similar early limb replacements appeared in ancient Iran and Greece by 3000 BCE, often using basic materials like wood or metal to replace amputated extremities for practical mobility. These devices prioritized restoration of basic locomotion over cosmetic appearance, reflecting a causal focus on enabling survival tasks amid high amputation rates from warfare and injury. Mobility aids evolved from wheeled transport concepts evident in ancient China, with stone inscriptions from the 6th to 4th centuries BCE depicting wheeled litters for the infirm, though these were pushed rather than self-propelled. By the 16th century, dedicated invalid chairs emerged, such as the 1595 model commissioned for King Philip II of Spain, featuring large wheels for manual propulsion by attendants. The first self-propelled wheelchair followed in 1655, invented by German clockmaker Stephan Farfler, a paraplegic who adapted a three-wheeled hand-crank mechanism for independent movement. Concurrently, 16th-century French surgeon Ambroise Paré advanced prosthetic limbs with articulated joints and suspension systems, improving upon Roman-era iron hands and hooks for upper-body amputees. Hearing assistance predates formalized devices but gained mechanical form in the early modern era. Hollowed animal horns served as rudimentary amplifiers as early as the 13th century, funneling sound via acoustic resonance, with archaeological evidence of a silver horn in Tutankhamun's tomb circa 1332 BCE potentially functioning similarly. True ear trumpets, conical devices of sheet metal or ivory, proliferated in the 17th century following descriptions by French mathematician Jean Le Rond d'Alembert in 1757, amplifying faint sounds for the hard-of-hearing through passive horn geometry. In the 19th century, tactile literacy aids marked a shift toward cognitive support for visual impairments. Louis Braille, blinded at age three, developed his eponymous six-dot embossed system in 1824 at age 15, adapting French military "night writing" into a compact, readable code for books and writing that enabled independent education for the blind. This innovation, initially resisted by sighted educators, facilitated widespread access to literature by 1854 when adopted at the Royal Institution for Blind Youth. Such pre-20th-century developments laid foundational principles of adaptation, emphasizing mechanical leverage and sensory substitution over electrical amplification, which awaited later technological leaps.

20th Century Milestones

In the early 20th century, advancements in hearing amplification marked significant progress in assistive devices for the hearing impaired. Electric hearing aids using vacuum tubes emerged around 1916, replacing passive acoustic horns with active electronic amplification, though these early models remained bulky and required external power sources. By the 1930s, refinements allowed for more portable designs, but limitations in size and battery life persisted until postwar innovations. The 1930s also saw breakthroughs in mobility aids. In 1933, engineers Harry C. Jennings Sr. and Herbert Everest developed the first lightweight, steel-framed folding , which improved portability and accessibility compared to rigid wooden predecessors, earning a in 1936. This design facilitated greater independence for users with mobility impairments and laid the groundwork for mass-produced wheelchairs. Mid-century developments focused on sensory and communication aids. The introduction of talking books in 1934 by the provided recorded readings on 12-inch vinyl discs for the visually impaired, authorized under the Pratt-Smoot Act of 1931, enabling access to literature without reliance on . Concurrently, the invention of the in 1947 revolutionized hearing aids; the first all-transistor model, Maico's Transist-Ear, debuted in 1953, shrinking devices to body-worn sizes with improved efficiency and reduced feedback. Prosthetic technology advanced through myoelectric control, harnessing muscle electrical signals for limb operation. Pioneered in the 1940s by physicist Reinhold Reiter in Germany, practical clinical implementations followed, with Russian scientist Alexander Kobrinski unveiling a significant myoelectric hand prosthesis in 1960, enhancing functionality for upper-limb amputees beyond mechanical hooks. Communication devices for the deaf gained traction in the latter half of the century. In 1964, deaf scientist Robert Weitbrecht invented the teletypewriter (TTY), an acoustic coupler enabling text-based telephone communication via modified teletype machines, bridging isolation for hearing-impaired individuals before widespread digital alternatives. These milestones collectively expanded assistive capabilities, driven by wartime medical needs and electronic miniaturization, though adoption varied due to cost and technical barriers.

Digital and Post-2000 Advancements

The digital era of assistive technology accelerated after 2000, driven by advancements in computing power, software integration, and mobile devices, which enabled more accessible and affordable solutions for users with disabilities. Screen readers and magnification software evolved significantly, with NonVisual Desktop Access (NVDA), a free open-source screen reader for Windows, first released in 2006, providing blind users with cost-effective access to desktop applications. In 2005, Apple introduced VoiceOver, an integrated screen reader for macOS, which used gesture-based navigation and speech synthesis to enhance usability for visually impaired individuals. Speech recognition technologies also progressed, with Microsoft incorporating it into Office products in 2002, allowing voice dictation for those with motor impairments. The proliferation of smartphones and tablets further transformed assistive capabilities. Apple's iPhone 3GS in 2009 introduced VoiceOver for mobile devices, enabling blind users to navigate touchscreens via gestures and audio feedback, a milestone in mainstream accessibility. The 2010 launch of the iPad expanded portable computing for educational and daily tasks, supporting apps for communication, reading, and environmental control tailored to various disabilities. Voice assistants emerged as key tools, with Siri debuting in 2011 on the iPhone 4S, facilitating hands-free operation for tasks like messaging and navigation, particularly benefiting users with mobility or vision limitations. Amazon's Echo device in 2014 popularized smart home integration via Alexa, allowing voice-activated control of lights, thermostats, and reminders for independent living. Alternative input methods advanced, exemplified by Tobii's eye-tracking technology, which became more affordable and mainstream around 2012, enabling users with severe motor disabilities to control computers and communicate through gaze interaction. Patent filings for emerging assistive technologies, including digital interfaces and robotics, surged post-2000, reflecting innovation in areas like autonomous aids and sensor-based systems. Inventions in assistive robotics alone increased over 20-fold from 2000 to 2020, incorporating digital controls for enhanced mobility and daily function. These developments shifted assistive technology from specialized hardware to embedded software features, broadening adoption while addressing diverse needs through empirical improvements in usability and efficacy.

Recent Innovations

AI and Machine Learning Integrations

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have enabled assistive technologies to become more adaptive and user-specific by processing real-time data from sensors, user inputs, and environmental cues to optimize functionality. In a 2025 analysis of assistive devices, AI integration was present in 43% of surveyed technologies, with the highest prevalence in communication aids at 60%, facilitating improved independence through predictive algorithms and pattern recognition. ML models, such as convolutional neural networks, analyze visual and kinematic data to enhance device responsiveness, reducing latency in control systems compared to rule-based predecessors. In prosthetics and mobility aids, ML algorithms adapt to individual gait patterns and muscle signals, enabling powered lower-limb prostheses to predict and assist natural movements via microprocessor integration. A 2023 study demonstrated that ML-enhanced myoelectric prosthetics improved upper-limb amputee performance in object manipulation by learning from repeated user interactions, achieving up to 20% faster task completion rates in controlled tests. Similarly, AI-driven exoskeletons for mobility-impaired users employ reinforcement learning to refine torque application, with clinical trials from 2024 reporting enhanced endurance during ambulation tasks without excessive energy expenditure. For visual impairments, AI applications leverage computer vision and natural language processing (NLP) to provide audio descriptions of surroundings. Microsoft's Seeing AI app, updated through 2025, uses ML to identify objects, read text, and detect faces in real-time via smartphone cameras, assisting over 10 million users globally in daily navigation. Devices like Envision AI glasses integrate scene analysis models to narrate environments, with 2023 evaluations showing 85% accuracy in obstacle detection for low-vision users. Google's Project Guideline, launched in 2023, employs ML to guide visually impaired runners along paths using auditory feedback from wearable sensors. In augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems, NLP and ML improve efficiency through predictive text generation and gesture-to-speech conversion. The PrAACT framework, introduced in 2024, utilizes transformer models like BERT to predict communication card sequences, reducing selection time by 30-40% for users with motor speech disorders in empirical studies. Speech recognition tools integrated into high-tech AAC devices, such as those employing deep learning for dysarthric input, achieve transcription accuracies exceeding 80% post-training on user-specific data, as validated in 2023 proof-of-concept research. These advancements stem from supervised learning techniques, including support vector machines for error minimization in output generation.

Brain-Computer Interfaces and Neural Tech

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) enable direct communication between the brain and external devices by decoding neural signals, primarily benefiting individuals with severe motor disabilities such as paralysis from spinal cord injuries or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Invasive BCIs, which involve implanted electrodes, have advanced rapidly since 2023, achieving decoding accuracies exceeding 90% for intended movements in clinical settings, allowing users to control cursors, type messages, or manipulate robotic limbs at rates up to 100 bits per minute—far surpassing non-invasive alternatives like EEG-based systems. These technologies target the motor cortex to bypass damaged neural pathways, restoring functional independence in communication and environmental control. Neuralink's N1 implant, featuring 1,024 electrodes on flexible threads inserted via robotic surgery, marked a milestone with its first human implantation in January 2024 for a quadriplegic patient, who achieved thought-based cursor control and played video games within weeks. By February 2025, three participants in the PRIME study demonstrated sustained use of the Telepathy interface for tasks like web browsing and chess, with the second participant exceeding prior assistive technology speeds and accuracies on grid-based selection tests within hours of activation. Neuralink expanded trials in 2025 to include speech decoding and robotic arm integration, aiming to enable verbal output and physical manipulation for paralyzed users. Synchron's Stentrode, a minimally invasive endovascular BCI deployed via blood vessels, achieved native thought-control of Apple iPad interfaces in August 2025, allowing paralyzed trial participants to navigate apps and perform selections without physical input. The COMMAND trial confirmed its safety and efficacy for touchscreen control, with implantation times under two hours and no major adverse events reported in early cohorts. Blackrock Neurotech's Utah Array, a microelectrode system with up to 256 channels, enabled a paralyzed individual in January 2025 to pilot a virtual drone through obstacles by imagining finger movements, achieving precise multi-finger decoding for potential prosthetic control. This array, refined over decades, supports long-term implants exceeding 10 years in some users for cursor navigation and sensory feedback restoration. As of June 2025, approximately 90 active clinical trials worldwide evaluate BCI implants for assistive applications, including typing, mobility restoration, and stroke rehabilitation, with market projections estimating growth from $3.21 billion in 2025 to $12.87 billion by 2034 driven by these invasive innovations. Despite electrode degradation risks limiting longevity to months in some cases, signal processing advances using machine learning have mitigated recalibration needs, enhancing reliability for daily use.

Advanced Wearables and Robotics

Advanced wearable assistive technologies encompass powered exoskeletons and soft exosuits designed to augment mobility for individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI), stroke, or lower-limb impairments. Devices such as the ReWalk exoskeleton enable paraplegic users to stand and walk by detecting body shifts and providing motorized hip and knee support, with clinical trials demonstrating safety through no adverse events and tolerance without increased pain in users with chronic SCI. Similarly, Ekso Bionics' Ekso system assists in gait rehabilitation for those with SCI, stroke, or multiple sclerosis by offloading weight and facilitating stepping patterns, with studies showing improved endurance and real-world ambulation at intensities suitable for therapeutic use. A meta-analysis of powered exoskeletons, including ReWalk and Ekso models, confirmed their efficacy in enhancing walking independence while maintaining safety across 14 studies involving SCI patients. Robotic prosthetics represent another frontier, particularly myoelectric limbs that interpret residual muscle electromyographic signals to control multi-degree-of-freedom movements. Advancements include bionic upper-limb prosthetics offering intuitive grasp patterns via pattern recognition algorithms, reducing cognitive load compared to traditional body-powered devices and enabling finer manipulation tasks. For lower limbs, neural-integrated prosthetics provide sensory feedback from the residual limb, allowing amputees to walk more naturally and navigate obstacles, as evidenced in trials where seven participants exhibited improved gait symmetry post-implantation. These systems prioritize proportional control and sensory restoration to mimic biological kinematics, though challenges persist in signal reliability and user fatigue during prolonged operation. Emerging soft robotics integrate compliant materials for less intrusive assistance, such as textile-based exosuits that enhance gait in stroke survivors by increasing walking speed and distance post-training, per systematic reviews of over 20 devices. Harvard's soft wearable robots for upper extremities adapt to individual biomechanics via machine learning, providing targeted support to reduce strain in rehabilitation. Clinical evaluations indicate soft robotic gloves improve hand motor function in neurorehabilitation, outperforming rigid alternatives in compliance and user comfort, though long-term efficacy requires further randomized trials to quantify independence gains beyond therapy settings. Overall, these technologies shift from rigid frames to adaptive, user-specific designs, with patent trends showing accelerated innovation in soft assistive systems from 2013–2017 onward.

Societal Impacts and Effectiveness

Achievements in Independence and Productivity

Assistive technologies have demonstrably enhanced independence for individuals with disabilities by facilitating self-management of daily activities, reducing dependence on caregivers, and promoting autonomy in home environments. For instance, mobility aids such as wheelchairs and prosthetic limbs enable greater participation in personal care, navigation, and community engagement, allowing users to perform tasks like eating, bathing, and household maintenance without constant assistance. In studies of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities, devices like smartphones and smart speakers support scheduling, alarms, and communication with support networks, with users reporting increased time alone and feelings of security. These tools counteract functional limitations, as evidenced by global data indicating that appropriate assistive products improve overall well-being and reduce reliance on formal health services. In workplace and educational settings, assistive technologies boost productivity by overcoming barriers to task completion and information access. Communication aids, such as eye-gaze systems and augmentative devices, allow users with severe motor impairments to engage in professional interactions and documentation, directly linking to higher odds of competitive employment. Empirical analyses show that occupations with elevated accommodation rates, including equipment-based assistive technologies, experienced 3.39% greater employment growth for disabled workers from 2012 to 2021 compared to low-accommodation fields. Employer surveys from the Job Accommodation Network indicate that 56% of implementations of such accommodations resulted in reported productivity increases, with 60% yielding positive returns on investment through sustained output and retention gains of up to 85%. These advancements contribute to broader societal , as assistive technologies correlate with reduced probability gaps—such as 34.3% for impairments and 28.9% for cognitive ones—by enabling utilization and potential equivalent to non-disabled peers in supportive environments. However, achievements are tempered by low adoption rates, with only 3-4% of disabled workers receiving equipment-based aids in the U.S. from 2012-2021, underscoring the need for expanded access to realize full independence and output benefits.

Economic Costs, Benefits, and ROI Analyses

The acquisition costs of common assistive technologies vary significantly by device type and features. For instance, prescription hearing aids typically range from $2,000 to $7,000 per pair in 2024, inclusive of professional fitting and initial adjustments. Powered wheelchairs average $2,500 to $5,000 for mid-range models, with basic units starting at $1,500 and high-end custom versions exceeding $10,000 to $30,000. Lifetime costs, incorporating procurement, servicing, and user training, are estimated at approximately $2,400 for adult hearing aids and $2,500 for wheelchairs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), based on WHO priority products. These figures exclude indirect expenses such as home modifications or lost productivity during adaptation periods, which can add thousands annually for users requiring comprehensive support. Economic benefits arise primarily from enhanced user independence, reducing reliance on formal and informal caregiving. Assistive technologies have been associated with lower healthcare utilization in 32 of 42 reviewed economic evaluations, including decreased hospitalizations and institutional care needs, though study quality was often weak with small samples limiting generalizability. For example, devices supporting dementia patients via the ENABLE model demonstrated net savings through delayed nursing home admissions, with benefits outweighing device costs in trial settings. Broader societal gains include productivity improvements; models project a $100,000 lifetime income increase per child in LMICs with access to devices like wheelchairs or prostheses, assuming employment opportunities materialize. Disability-related GDP losses, estimated at $1.37 to $1.94 trillion annually worldwide, underscore potential offsets from scaled adoption, though causal links depend on systemic factors like education and labor markets. Return on investment (ROI) analyses predominantly rely on modeling rather than large-scale empirical data. A global investment case for priority assistive products forecasts a 9:1 ROI over 55 years, yielding $10 trillion in discounted economic benefits from a $730 billion outlay, driven by user earnings ($8.5 trillion) and family supporter productivity ($1.9 trillion), with a 5% discount rate applied. This calculation, sensitive to assumptions like extended life expectancy and retirement age, focuses on four WHO-listed devices and presumes ideal supply chains and user uptake, conditions rarely met in LMICs where only 10% of the 1 billion in need currently access such technologies. Empirical scoping reviews confirm cost savings in specific contexts, such as reduced care hours, but highlight gaps in rigorous, long-term studies, with benefits often framed narrowly as healthcare offsets rather than holistic value. Overall, while models suggest high returns, real-world ROI varies by funding models, device abandonment rates (up to 30% in some cohorts), and regional disparities, necessitating cautious interpretation of advocacy-derived estimates.

Access Disparities and Global Usage Data

Access to assistive technology exhibits profound global disparities, primarily driven by economic, infrastructural, and systemic factors. The 2022 WHO-UNICEF Global Report on Assistive Technology estimates that over 2.5 billion people—approximately one in three globally—require at least one assistive product, such as wheelchairs, hearing aids, or prostheses, yet nearly one billion individuals with disabilities or older adults are denied access due to these barriers. This figure is projected to rise to 3.5 billion by 2050 amid population aging and increasing prevalence of noncommunicable diseases. Income levels starkly correlate with access rates: in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), unmet needs affect up to 90% of potential users, with access as low as 3% in the poorest nations, compared to up to 90% in high-income countries. Affordability emerges as the dominant obstacle, cited by 39.9% of respondents across surveyed countries, with rates fluctuating from 6.7% in some contexts to 79.1% in others; other impediments include product unavailability, inadequate service provision, and lack of awareness or trained personnel. In LMICs, where 80% of the world's population with disabilities resides, these issues compound due to weak supply chains and limited government funding, resulting in reliance on low-quality or improvised devices. Usage data from population surveys in 29 to 35 countries reveal self-reported needs ranging from 10% to 69%, but actual adoption lags significantly in resource-constrained settings, with only a fraction translating to sustained use. High-income regions dominate market growth, with the global assistive devices sector valued at approximately USD 21-28 billion in 2024 and projected to expand at 5-7% CAGR through 2030, reflecting higher penetration in developed markets rather than equitable global distribution. Efforts to mitigate disparities, such as WHO's assistive technology data initiatives launched in , underscore the need for targeted investments, though progress remains uneven as of 2024.

Controversies and Criticisms

Ethical and Privacy Concerns

Assistive technologies, particularly those incorporating AI, wearables, and brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), raise significant privacy concerns due to the collection of sensitive biometric and behavioral data. Devices such as smart prosthetics and health-monitoring wearables often track physiological metrics like heart rate, movement patterns, and neural signals, which can reveal intimate details about users' health conditions and daily activities. For instance, 90% of analyzed wearable devices collect health and wellness data, with 71% monitoring heart rate, increasing risks of unauthorized access through vulnerabilities like weak encryption. In BCI systems used for motor restoration or communication, neural data transmission poses unique risks, as it could enable inference of thoughts or intentions, amplifying potential for surveillance or misuse by third parties. Data breaches in these systems have been documented, underscoring the need for robust encryption and user controls, though many privacy policies of assistive tech providers fail to clearly disclose data processing practices. Ethical challenges center on balancing user autonomy with beneficence, particularly for vulnerable populations reliant on these technologies. Informed consent is complicated by cognitive or communication impairments in users, such as those with severe disabilities, where proxies may decide on data-sharing without full appreciation of long-term implications like algorithmic dependency. Distributive justice issues arise from unequal access to privacy safeguards, as lower-income users may adopt cheaper devices with inferior data protections, exacerbating disparities. In AI-driven assistive tools, biases in training data can perpetuate inaccuracies for underrepresented disability groups, raising questions of fairness and non-maleficence. For BCIs, ethical debates include the blurring of agency when devices interpret or augment neural signals, potentially altering users' sense of self or responsibility for actions. Regulatory gaps further compound these risks, as existing frameworks like HIPAA in the U.S. often lag behind the real-time data flows in connected assistive devices. Professional stakeholders emphasize the need for ethical frameworks prioritizing data minimization and transparency to mitigate harms like identity theft or discriminatory profiling based on disability-related data. Empirical studies highlight that while benefits like enhanced independence are evident, unchecked deployment risks eroding trust, with surveys showing heightened privacy apprehensions among disabled users of AI-integrated tech. Addressing these requires interdisciplinary oversight, including audits of AI models for bias and mandatory impact assessments for privacy-invasive features.

Device Abandonment and Over-Dependency Risks

Studies indicate that device abandonment in assistive technology occurs when users discontinue use after initial adoption, with rates varying by device type and population. A survey of 220 assistive devices found an overall abandonment rate of 29.3%, with mobility aids exhibiting higher abandonment compared to other categories. Empirical reviews report dropout rates ranging from 20% to 50% for mobility-related technologies. For hearing aids specifically, abandonment can reach 78%, often due to unmet functional expectations. These figures highlight a persistent challenge, as abandonment leads to wasted resources and unaddressed needs, with up to 70% of users ceasing use in some chronic condition cohorts unrelated to condition improvement. Key predictors of abandonment include insufficient user input during device selection, suboptimal performance relative to needs, and ease of procurement without adequate assessment. Poor usability, high cognitive or physical demands for operation, and lack of customization further contribute, as seen in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices where professional expertise gaps exacerbate issues. In stroke patients, orthotic abandonment rates exceed 70% for upper limbs, linked to discomfort, inadequate fitting, and failure to integrate into daily routines. Broader analyses confirm that disregarding user preferences in procurement correlates strongly with non-use, underscoring causal mismatches between device design and individual capabilities rather than inherent technological flaws. Over-dependency risks arise when prolonged reliance on assistive devices erodes residual natural abilities or heightens vulnerability to failures, though direct empirical quantification remains limited. Research on older adults shows that fear of dependency negatively influences attitudes toward adoption, potentially leading to underuse but also signaling awareness of skill atrophy risks, such as reduced manual dexterity from habitual crutch or exoskeleton use. In dementia care contexts, assistive technologies can foster problematic dependency dynamics, where device malfunctions or battery depletion cause acute functional declines without fallback competencies. Broader evidence suggests that while devices enhance accommodation, persistent task-demand gaps can sustain disability if over-reliance prevents skill maintenance, with some populations experiencing counterproductive effects like social isolation from device-mediated interactions. These risks emphasize the need for balanced integration, prioritizing devices that augment rather than supplant innate capacities to mitigate causal vulnerabilities.

Policy, Funding, and Regulatory Debates

In the United States, assistive technology policy is shaped by federal legislation such as the Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988 (P.L. 100-407), which established state-level programs to enhance access through needs assessments and consumer-responsive systems, and the Assistive Technology Act of 2004 (reauthorized in subsequent years), which funds state grants and national activities to promote device reuse, alternative financing, and training. These frameworks integrate with broader laws like the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), mandating assistive technology consideration in individualized education programs, though implementation varies by state and faces challenges in verification of compliance before federal funding disbursement. Debates center on funding adequacy, with research identifying financial barriers as the primary obstacle to acquisition, prompting calls for evidence-based criteria like demonstrated effectiveness to justify allocations amid competing public priorities. Funding sources for assistive technology in the U.S. encompass a mix of traditional mechanisms—such as Medicaid, private insurance, and special education grants—and non-traditional options like low-interest loans through Alternative Financing Programs, which received nearly $2 million in discretionary grants from the Administration for Community Living in September 2024. Economic analyses highlight a return on investment of approximately $9 for every $1 spent, driven by gains in productivity and reduced long-term care costs, yet critics argue that fragmented funding streams create inequities, particularly for low-income or rural users, and insufficiently incentivize innovation in areas like AI-integrated devices. Policy advocates, including the Assistive Technology Industry Association, push for dedicated streams to support research and development while addressing over-reliance on state budgets strained by rising demand from an aging population. Regulatory oversight primarily falls under the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which classifies assistive devices as medical devices based on risk levels—ranging from Class I (low-risk, subject to general controls like registration) to Class III (high-risk, requiring premarket approval)—with pathways like 510(k) clearance for substantial equivalence to predicates. Devices for home use, including many consumer-oriented assistive technologies, undergo the same scrutiny for safety and efficacy, though debates persist over streamlined approvals for low-risk innovations versus rigorous testing for neural interfaces or robotics to prevent unproven claims. Emerging concerns include balancing rapid market entry for adaptive tech against potential harms, with some stakeholders critiquing FDA delays as stifling competition from smaller developers. Globally, the World Health Organization's Global Cooperation on Assistive Technology (GATE) initiative, launched in 2014, advocates for policy frameworks emphasizing affordability, availability, and awareness, as outlined in its 2018 position paper identifying unmet needs for over 2.5 billion people requiring assistive products. The 2022 WHO-UNICEF Global Report on Assistive Technology revealed stark access disparities, with only one in ten individuals in low- and middle-income countries obtaining needed devices due to high costs and policy gaps, fueling debates on integrating assistive technology into universal health coverage and trade policies to reduce import barriers. Recent efforts, such as the 2024 "Unlock the Everyday" campaign, urge governments to prioritize funding for scalable solutions, though inequities persist along lines of gender, wealth, and geography, prompting calls for data-driven reforms over ideologically driven equity mandates.

References

  1. [1]
    Assistive technology - World Health Organization (WHO)
    Jan 2, 2024 · WHO fact sheet on assistive technology. Assistive technology enables people to live healthy, productive, independent, and dignified lives, ...
  2. [2]
    Assistive Products and Technology to Facilitate Activities and ... - NIH
    Jan 23, 2023 · Environmental factors include assistive products and technology [6], defined in the ICF as any products, instruments, equipment, or technology ...
  3. [3]
    Non-use of provided assistive technology devices - ResearchGate
    Aug 9, 2025 · Several studies have been performed on the subject of non-use of provided assistive technology. All of them report high rates of non-use.
  4. [4]
    Assistive Technology Access and Usage Barriers Among African ...
    The purpose of this article was to provide a comprehensive overview of the available peer-reviewed and gray literature on assistive technology (AT) access ...
  5. [5]
    History of Accessible Technology - Stanford Computer Science
    1948 – John Bardeed, William Shockley and Walter Brattain at Bell Labs invented the transistor to create more reliable, smaller, cheaper, more efficient hearing ...
  6. [6]
    Federal Definitions of Assistive Technology - ECTA Center
    The Tech Act described an assistive technology service as "any service that directly assists an individual with a disability in selection, acquisition or use of ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Assistive Technology and User-Centered Design: Emotion as ...
    The present article approaches as central theme the Assistive Technology. Its main objective is to enhance the understanding of the user-centered design.
  8. [8]
    Case Study: Assistive Technology Design for AAC - Ignitec Bristol
    Apr 15, 2025 · Which design principles are key in assistive technology? Usability, adaptability, durability, and user-centred design are critical.
  9. [9]
    https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/assistive-technology
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Assistive Technologies Principles And Practice
    What are the core principles of assistive technology design? The core principles include accessibility, usability, adaptability, affordability, and user- ...
  11. [11]
    User involvement in service delivery predicts outcomes of assistive ...
    Sep 20, 2012 · The findings support the provision of assistive technology as a strategy to improve the participation of people with disabilities in society.Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Satisfaction with assistive technology device in relation to the ...
    In a literature review, some evidence was also found that user involvement in the SDP and training in use of the device had an impact on reducing ATD ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Full article: “You have to argue the right way”: user involvement in ...
    Mar 20, 2020 · This article critically examines user-involvement in the service delivery process for assistive activity technology.
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Ergonomics and Design A Reference Guide
    Ergonomics can be an integral part of design, manufacturing, and use. Knowing how the study of anthropometry, posture, repetitive motion, and workspace design ...
  15. [15]
    Effectiveness of Safe Patient Handling Equipment and Techniques
    Evidence indicates the best way to lift patients safely is with floor or ceiling lifts, and air-assisted devices for lateral and repositioning tasks.Synthesis Methods For Review · Table 1 · Table A2
  16. [16]
    Assessing the implementation of user-centred design standards on ...
    This study aims to assess the application of ISO 9241-210 human-centred design principles in the allegedly “user-centred designed” assistive technology ...
  17. [17]
    Ergonomics and design for safety: A scoping review and bibliometric ...
    The purpose of the present study is to investigate the recent research addressing design for safety (DfS) in the manufacturing context.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits
    Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, published by the Assistive Technology Industry. Association, is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes ...
  19. [19]
    Development of a metric to evaluate the ergonomic principles of ...
    The DIN 92419 defines six principles for assistive systems' ergonomic design. There is, however, a lack of measurement tools to evaluate assistive systems ...Missing: considerations | Show results with:considerations
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Assistive technology evidence brief
    Studies have shown that people with disabilities who own and use assistive technology experience better participation in social activities, greater life ...
  21. [21]
    Assistive technology for the inclusion of students with disabilities
    Jun 10, 2022 · Findings of this study include that the use of Assistive Technologies is successful in increasing the inclusion and accessibility of students with disabilities.<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Clinicians' and researchers' perspectives on manual wheelchair ...
    More than 65 million people use wheelchairs worldwide, and there are nearly 198,000 manual wheelchair users in Canada. To better understand the use and impact ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  23. [23]
    The History of the wheelchair | Science Museum
    Jul 17, 2024 · The first self-propelled wheelchair was invented in 1655 in Nuremberg, Germany by a paraplegic clockmaker called Stephen Farfler (1633-1689).
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Evolution of Wheelchair Technology: A Comprehensive Overview of ...
    Mar 19, 2025 · Types of Manual Wheelchairs: ○ Standard Wheelchairs: Designed for general use, often constructed with steel or aluminum frames. These.
  25. [25]
    Wheelchair Market Size, Share & Trends | Growth Report [2032]
    Oct 6, 2025 · According to a 2022 article, manual wheelchairs can cost around USD 100-300, whereas electric/powered chairs can cost up to USD 15,000-20,000, ...
  26. [26]
    A review of manual wheelchairs: Disability and Rehabilitation
    Statistics on the number of wheelchair users worldwide are poor; it is estimated that about 1% of the population in developed countries use a wheelchair, ...
  27. [27]
    Manual Wheelchair Market Size, Share, Growth Report, 2030
    The global manual wheelchair market size was valued at USD 2.9 billion in 2022 and is anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 7.4% from 2023 to 2030.Missing: powered | Show results with:powered<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Geriatric Assistive Devices - AAFP
    Aug 15, 2011 · Walkers improve stability in those with lower extremity weakness or poor balance and facilitate improved mobility by increasing the patient's ...
  29. [29]
    Mobility Assistive Device Use in Older Adults - AAFP
    Jun 15, 2021 · A two-wheel rolling walker is more functional and easier to maneuver than a standard walker with no wheels. A four-wheel rolling walker ( ...
  30. [30]
    Assistive devices for balance and mobility: benefits, demands, and ...
    Conclusions: Clinical and biomechanic evaluations of canes and walkers confirm that these devices can improve balance and mobility.Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
  31. [31]
    Effects of assistive devices on postural control following a balance ...
    The findings suggest that when fully grounded, a standard walker is more stable than the front-wheeled walker. However, this does not indicate that the standard ...
  32. [32]
    Safety Concerns in Mobility-Assistive Products for Older Adults - NIH
    Mar 2, 2023 · Older adults who have difficulty moving around are commonly advised to adopt mobility-assistive devices to prevent injuries.
  33. [33]
    Assistive Devices for Transfers - Physiopedia
    The aim of transfer aids is to help simulate the pattern for sit to stand as well as reduce the amount of support a person requires from carers. They are common ...
  34. [34]
    (PDF) How Assistive Technology Use by Individuals with Disabilities ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · Collectively, the findings suggest that assistive technology use helps caregivers by diminishing some of the physical and emotional effort ...
  35. [35]
    Patient Handling Equipment – Lifts for easy transfer | Arjo
    Equipment designed to promote safe, efficient and dignified patient handling. Patient lifts for mobilization, easy transfers and patient ...Standing and Raising Aids · Lateral transfer and repositioning · Floor lifters · Slings
  36. [36]
    A New Era for Bionic Limbs - IEEE Pulse
    Mar 28, 2023 · Recent breakthroughs in science and technology have produced prosthetic hands, arms, and legs that increasingly resemble biological ones.
  37. [37]
    The Future of Prosthetics: How Cutting-Edge Technology is ...
    Mar 6, 2025 · The future of prosthetics is being driven by advanced materials like carbon fiber, thermoplastic elastomers, and lightweight metals.
  38. [38]
    Advancements in Prosthetic Technology What's New in 2025
    Jun 5, 2025 · In 2025, many prosthetic limbs are equipped with sensors that detect electrical signals generated by muscle contractions in the residual limb.Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Making prosthetic limbs feel more real with brain-computer interfaces
    Jan 27, 2025 · UChicago scientists are making major progress on a technology designed to recreate tactile feedback to give nuanced “feeling” to prosthetic hands.
  40. [40]
    Technological Advances in Prosthesis Design and Rehabilitation ...
    Recent advances in prosthesis technology, surgical innovations, and enhanced rehabilitation appear promising for patients with limb loss.Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
  41. [41]
    Orthotic Devices - CerebralPalsy.org
    Orthotic devices are external braces that help build stability, increase strength, and maintain mobility, addressing specific physical conditions.
  42. [42]
    Understanding Lower Limb Orthotics AFO, KAFO and HKAFO
    Dec 20, 2024 · AFO supports ankle/foot, KAFO supports knee/ankle, and HKAFO supports hip/knee/ankle, all for mobility impairments.<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Mobility Aids & Orthotic Devices for Muscular Dystrophy
    Mobility aids like wheelchairs, canes, and walkers help with movement. Orthotic devices, braces supporting weakened muscles, help with flexibility and walking.
  44. [44]
    Systematic review on wearable lower-limb exoskeletons for gait ...
    Feb 1, 2021 · Likewise, wearable exoskeletons may improve mobility and independence in non-ambulatory people, and may reduce secondary health conditions ...
  45. [45]
    A framework for clinical utilization of robotic exoskeletons in ... - NIH
    Oct 29, 2022 · Exoskeletons currently approved for clinical use by the US FDA include RewalkTM, Ekso™, Indego™, Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) TM for medical use ...
  46. [46]
    AI in therapeutic and assistive exoskeletons and exosuits - Science
    Jul 30, 2025 · A systematic review revealed that wearing soft assistive exosuits improved both walking speed and distance in stroke survivors after training ( ...
  47. [47]
    The effect of using the hip exoskeleton assistive (HEXA) robot ... - NIH
    Aug 1, 2024 · This study is a pilot randomized clinical trial aimed to investigate the effect of using Hip Exoskeleton Assistive (HEXA) robot compared to conventional ...
  48. [48]
    Systematic review on wearable lower-limb exoskeletons for gait ...
    Feb 1, 2021 · Wearable lower-limb exoskeletons for gait rehabilitation are still in their early stages of development and randomized control trials are needed ...
  49. [49]
    Adaptive Seating for Children - Physiopedia
    Adaptive Seating for Children · Stabilisers · Movement Enhancers · Alternative Chairs · Other Seating Options · Wheelchairs ...Introduction · Behaviours · Positioning · Modifications to Seating
  50. [50]
    Evidence for 24-hour posture management: A scoping review - PMC
    The evidence for 24-hour posture management was often low quality due to the complications of completing robust research studies in this complex specialty.
  51. [51]
    Adaptive Seating - Sunrise Medical
    There are two different types of adaptive seating – configured and molded. Selecting one type of system over another will depend upon a number of different ...
  52. [52]
    Adaptive Seating - Rifton
    For people with neuromotor disabilities, learning to sit actively opens the door to a range of possibilities and participation. In contrast to passive, reclined ...
  53. [53]
    Adaptive seating systems in children with severe cerebral palsy ...
    The results suggested that AdSSs that include trunk and hip support devices may improve postural control outcomes, and that special-purpose AdSSs may improve ...Missing: positioning assistive
  54. [54]
    Effect of Adaptive Seating Systems on Postural Control and Activity ...
    Oct 1, 2023 · Conclusion: Limited evidence demonstrated that adaptive seating systems were effective at improving sitting ability and postural control.Missing: positioning assistive
  55. [55]
    The clinical effectiveness of custom-contoured seating for ...
    Custom seating showed immediate postural benefits, user satisfaction, comfort, and function, but the longitudinal effect on musculoskeletal deformity is ...
  56. [56]
    Sitting and standing performance in a total population of children ...
    Adding those using adaptive seating and external support, 99% of the children could sit, 96% could stand and 81% could stand up from a sitting position and 81% ...
  57. [57]
    Postural Asymmetries and Assistive Devices Used by Adults ... - NIH
    To describe the use of assistive devices and postural asymmetries in lying, sitting and standing positions in adults with cerebral palsy.
  58. [58]
    Seat Elevation Systems as an Accessory to Power Wheelchairs ...
    Powered seat elevation allows a person to transfer by adjusting the height of the seat which will mitigate the possibility of falling during a transfer. Powered ...
  59. [59]
    Discernment on assistive technology for the care and support ... - NIH
    This review, therefore, can help understand the utilization, and pros and cons of assistive devices in rehabilitation engineering and assistive technologies.
  60. [60]
    THE TECHNOLOGY OF ELECTRONIC TRAVEL AIDS - NCBI - NIH
    While low vision encompasses a wide range of visual impairment, existing optical orientation and mobility aids may nevertheless be divided into four types: ...
  61. [61]
    Electronic travel aid system for visually impaired people - IEEE Xplore
    Electronic Travel Aids (ETAs) are devices that use sensor technology to assist and improve the blind users mobility in terms of safety.
  62. [62]
    Wearable Obstacle Avoidance Electronic Travel Aids for Blind and ...
    Jun 12, 2023 · Wearable obstacle avoidance electronic travel aids (ETAs) have been developed to assist the safe displacement of blind and visually impaired individuals (BVIs) ...
  63. [63]
    Recent advancements in indoor electronic travel aids for the blind or ...
    Feb 5, 2024 · With a low frequency, UWB signals can effectively pass through obstacles such as walls and objects, making them suitable for positioning and ...
  64. [64]
    https://www.orcam.com/en-us/blog/a-deeper-dive-into-optical-character-recognition-technology
  65. [65]
    Optical Character Recognition Device - Network of Care
    The Eye-Pal SOLO is a voice output reading machine and optical character recognition device designed for use by individuals who are blind or have low vision.
  66. [66]
    Advancements in refreshable Braille display technology
    This paper provides a comprehensive mapping literature review of the advancements in refreshable Braille display (RBD) technology.
  67. [67]
    Spotlighting Breakthroughs in Multi-line Braille Displays
    Jan 11, 2024 · One of the most exciting developments in refreshable braille display technology is the creation of market-viable multi-line braille displays. ...
  68. [68]
    Screen Reader User Survey #10 Results - WebAIM
    Feb 22, 2024 · 8.2% of respondents with disabilities primarily use VoiceOver (up from 5.5% in 2021), compared to 23.7% of respondents without disabilities.
  69. [69]
    An overview of Braille Devices - Perkins School For The Blind
    There are three main types of refreshable braille devices: the stand-alone braille display, the notetaker and the smart display.Braille Display, Smart... · Notetakers · Smart DisplaysMissing: advancements | Show results with:advancements
  70. [70]
    AI-Powered Assistive Technologies for Visual Impairment - arXiv
    This review examines the development, applications, and impact of AI-powered tools in key domains, such as computer vision, natural language processing (NLP), ...<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Quick Statistics About Hearing, Balance, & Dizziness - NIDCD - NIH
    Sep 20, 2024 · 1 in 8 people in the United States (13%, or 30 million) ages 12 or older has hearing loss in both ears, based on standard hearing examinations.
  72. [72]
    Hearing Aids — Styles/Types & How They Work | NIDCD
    Oct 11, 2022 · Digital circuitry gives an audiologist more flexibility in adjusting the aid to a user's needs and to certain listening environments. These ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
  73. [73]
    Efficacy of Hearing Aids in Patients with Hearing Difficulties in Noise
    Jan 9, 2025 · This efficacy of HAs seems to be explained by two mechanisms. The first mechanism is the masking of tinnitus by the new perception of ...
  74. [74]
    The cochlear implant: Historical aspects and future prospects - PMC
    The cochlear implant (CI) has transformed the field of otology. Just 50 years ago, there were no effective treatments for deafness and severe losses in hearing.
  75. [75]
    Cochlear implant complications in 403 patients - ScienceDirect.com
    Minor complications were mainly infectious in children (acute otitis media) and cochleovestibular in adults (tinnitus and vertigo). Major complications were ...
  76. [76]
    Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids (BAHA) - Cleveland Clinic
    Bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA) are surgically implanted devices that may partially restore hearing for people with certain types of hearing loss.
  77. [77]
    Personal FM/DM systems for hearing loss and the hearing impaired
    Sep 26, 2025 · Personal FM systems reduce background noise, improve clarity and reduce listening fatigue. Find out if this tried-and-true technology can help you or your ...
  78. [78]
    Hearing Loop Technology - Hearing Loss Association of America
    A hearing loop is a form of hearing assistive technology (HAT) or assistive listening system (ALS). It allows you to receive sound directly into your hearing ...
  79. [79]
    Assistive Devices for People with Hearing or Speech Disorders
    Nov 12, 2019 · ALD systems for large facilities include hearing loop systems, frequency-modulated (FM) systems, and infrared systems. Hearing Loop Installed.
  80. [80]
    https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/professional-issues/augmentative-and-alternative-communication/
  81. [81]
    Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) Advances
    AAC solutions are classified into three categories: no-tech, low-tech, and high-tech AAC [4]. No-tech AAC is considered the oldest of the three AAC categories, ...
  82. [82]
    (PDF) Effectiveness of Different Types of Augmentative and ...
    May 14, 2021 · This review examines the research literature on the use of aided and unaided AAC systems in interventions for children with ASD, and ...
  83. [83]
    Some common low-tech augmentative and alternative ...
    Aug 21, 2023 · Low-tech AAC systems include Picture Communication Symbols, Communication boards, Visual schedules, PECS, Gesture/Sign Language, Communication ...
  84. [84]
    The History of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)
    Jul 15, 2020 · In 1920, the first actual known AAC device, the F. Hall Roe Communication Board, was created. Co-developed by F. Hall Roe, who was suffering ...Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
  85. [85]
    https://aaclanguagelab.com/articles/a-history-of-aac-devices
  86. [86]
    A Systematic and Quality Review of Augmentative and Alternative ...
    Aug 18, 2023 · A systematic review was conducted to determine the quality and strength of the evidence for AAC interventions that use core vocabulary.
  87. [87]
    A scoping review of AAC interventions for children and young adults ...
    Firstly, this review demonstrates that AAC interventions can be very effective for children, adolescents, and young adults with multiple disabilities. Secondly, ...
  88. [88]
    Growing up with AAC in the Digital age: A Longitudinal Profile ... - NIH
    This study provides a detailed description of an adolescent growing up in the digital age using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC).
  89. [89]
    Assistive Technology: Cognition Products - Physiopedia
    Cognitive assistive technology includes any technology-based service or product that extends cognitive capacity. These tools support functional activities ...Benefits of Cognitive Assistive... · Types of Cognitive Assistive... · Ongoing Support
  90. [90]
    The efficacy of cognitive prosthetic technology for people ... - PubMed
    The efficacy of cognitive prosthetic technology for people with memory ... Cognitive rehabilitation; Degenerative disease; Memory aid; Memory impairment.
  91. [91]
    Assistive Technologies in Dementia Care: An Updated Analysis of ...
    The evidence shows that technology is well-accepted and can support PWD and caregivers to bypass physical and environmental problems.
  92. [92]
    Memory aids and tools | Alzheimer's Society
    Aug 11, 2021 · Other useful memory aids · Sticky notes · Permanent reminders · Medication reminder box · Colour codes · Electronic devices · Smart devices · Alarm ...
  93. [93]
    [PDF] Assistive Technology for Individual with Cognitive Impairments
    Use baby gates to keep individuals out of harmful areas. Stabilizing Aids. Grab bars and handrails can be used to help people stand and walk. Put them in.<|separator|>
  94. [94]
    Assistive technologies designed to support executive function ...
    Aug 1, 2024 · Assistive technologies for cognition (ATC) can help alleviate some of the impacts of executive dysfunction and support independence.
  95. [95]
    Assistive Technology for Memory Loss – 5 examples
    Aug 21, 2025 · How Assistive Technology Can Support Cognition and Memory Loss – 5 Examples · 1. Digital reminders and smart calendars · 2. Smart home assistants.
  96. [96]
    Neural Prosthetic Device Can Help Humans Restore Memory
    Feb 13, 2024 · Neural Prosthetic Device Can Help Humans Restore Memory. Study highlights a promising avenue for cognitive enhancement technologies. February ...
  97. [97]
    Turning Memory Loss into a Distant Memory - USC Viterbi
    Oct 30, 2024 · ... memory loss a thing of the past, with the help of implantable brain prostheses and a powerful predictive mathematical model. Over 6.9 ...Missing: aids | Show results with:aids
  98. [98]
    Integrating AI and Assistive Technologies in Healthcare
    Mar 4, 2025 · A scoping review on intelligent assistive technology for persons with dementia (PwD), especially addressing cognitive and communication ...
  99. [99]
    AI Assistive Technology Offers Potential to Support Older Adults with ...
    Sep 27, 2024 · MemPal is a wearable assistant designed to ease the daily challenges faced by those struggling with memory issues.
  100. [100]
    Assistive Technology for Kids with Learning Disabilities: An Overview
    Assistive technology (AT) for kids with learning disabilities helps bypass or compensate for learning deficits, using strengths to work around challenges.
  101. [101]
    What are specific computer applications that can assist students with ...
    Word processors with spelling/grammar checks, reading systems, concept mapping software, and speech recognition tools can assist students with learning ...
  102. [102]
    Effects of text-to-speech software use on the reading ... - PubMed
    The TTS intervention had a significant, positive effect on student reading vocabulary and reading comprehension after 10 weeks of TTS software use.
  103. [103]
    (PDF) Effect of Text-to-speech Software on Academic Achievement ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · Text to speech software contributed to remarkable gains in the achievement of students with dyslexia. ResearchGate Logo. Discover the world's ...
  104. [104]
    Does Use of Text-to-Speech and Related Read-Aloud Tools ... - NIH
    It is not clear how effective text-to-speech is at improving reading comprehension. This study addresses this gap in the research by conducting a meta-analysis ...
  105. [105]
    Full article: A scoping review on the use of speech-to-text technology ...
    Results suggest that STT may increase pupils' abilities to produce texts with fewer errors, provide help with spelling and improve reading comprehension and ...
  106. [106]
    Accommodations Toolkit | Speech-to-Text: Research
    The results suggested that students' use of speech-to-text software may reduce the cognitive load in writing for students with disabilities. What have we ...
  107. [107]
    The impact of word prediction software on writing | Texthelp
    Aug 26, 2024 · Word prediction offers four distinct benefits to learners with writing difficulty. Increased Efficiency: Word prediction reduces keystrokes and ...
  108. [108]
    [PDF] effects of word prediction on writing fluency for students - ERIC
    The present study adds important information to the literature about the efficacy of word prediction software for students with physical disabilities.
  109. [109]
    [PDF] The Effectiveness of Word Prediction Software WORDQ - ERIC
    It can be of benefit to all learners who experience difficulties with writing because it helps with word choice, word creation, spelling, and overall typing. It ...
  110. [110]
    Equatio - Equation Editor to Create Accessible Digital Math | Texthelp
    Equatio is an advanced equation editor that makes math digital and accessible, allowing students to input equations via speech, draw, or type. It also has an ...Equatio for Google · Equatio premium features · Windows · Equatio mathspace
  111. [111]
    Assistive technology for math - Understood.org
    Oct 20, 2023 · Assistive technology for math includes calculators, math notation tools, graph paper, manipulatives, and equation-solving tools.
  112. [112]
    Assistive Technology Solutions to Support Math - CIDDL
    May 31, 2022 · High-tech AT solutions include software such as Equatio and OneNote Math Assistant. Barriers specific to math can be observed with difficulty ...
  113. [113]
    Benefits of Speech Recognition in Education - eDist
    Nov 29, 2022 · Research has shown that by using speech-to-text technology, students' grades were 17% higher. Speech-to-text software–such as Nuance® Dragon® Professional and ...
  114. [114]
    Eating Devices for ALS - Your ALS Guide
    Built-Up Utensils. Lightweight utensils with large handles that are easier to grip ; Foam Tubing ; Rocker Knife. Curved knife that cuts food with a one-handed ...
  115. [115]
    Adaptive Dining Utensils and Dishware for People with Cerebral Palsy
    These adaptive eating utensils were designed by an occupational therapist. They are easy to lift, and they feature a curve that makes it easier to eat with a ...
  116. [116]
    The Top Types of Adaptive Equipment for Eating - myotspot.com
    Dec 2, 2023 · The use of adaptive feeding equipment promotes independence, social inclusion, decreases caregiver burden, improves mood and quality of life.
  117. [117]
    ALS Patients' Self-Reported Satisfaction with Assistive Technology
    ALS patients reported high usefulness and satisfaction with all bathroom adaptive devices and certain low technology devices.Missing: feeding | Show results with:feeding
  118. [118]
    Effectiveness of adaptive silverware on range of motion of the hand
    Feb 15, 2016 · This study confirms the hypothesis that less range of motion is required to grip utensils with larger diameter handles, which in turn may reduce challenges.
  119. [119]
    https://www.asksamie.com/blogs/answers-for-accessibility/adaptive-eating-utensils
  120. [120]
    14 Awesome Types of Adaptive Feeding Equipment
    Oct 16, 2023 · Some examples of modifications include wider handles, straps, holders, non-slip fabrics, wider rims, weighted utensils, and more. When you live ...
  121. [121]
    How to Use Adaptive Utensils for Children with Motor Disabilities
    Feb 23, 2025 · Angled and curved designs: Utensils like T-handle rocker knives and Easie Eaters have unique shapes to accommodate users with restricted motion.
  122. [122]
    Eating and Drinking Assistive Products - Physiopedia
    There are a number of assistive products within the self-feeding category ranging from modified cups, cutlery and dinnerware.
  123. [123]
    https://at3center.net/2019/01/14/at-for-eating-independently/
  124. [124]
    https://meetobi.com/
  125. [125]
    Obi Dining Robot | Your ALS Guide
    Obi is a robotic feeding device that allows people with limited hand and arm strength and mobility to continue feeding themselves.
  126. [126]
    Robot-assisted feeding: A systematic review and future prospects
    May 27, 2025 · Robot-assisted feeding systems aim to promote independence for individuals with motor impairments. Despite significant technological ...
  127. [127]
    Active robot-assisted feeding with a general-purpose mobile ...
    In this section, we review assistive robots, particularly manipulators, for ADLs. We then go over meal-assistance devices including feeding robots. Table 1 ...
  128. [128]
    Home Automation | Institute on Disabilities - Temple University
    So for somebody who has difficulty with mobility or using their hands, a lot of these devices can be activated with switches, eye gaze, or voice control, making ...
  129. [129]
    Empowering People with Disabilities in Smart Homes Using ... - NIH
    Jan 6, 2025 · The implementation of assistive technologies can range from physical products such as wheelchairs, glasses, prosthetic limbs, white canes, and ...
  130. [130]
    Providing Tailored Smart Home Solutions as Assistive Technology ...
    Jul 31, 2025 · Results: After implementation of the smart home solution, participants showed significant improvements in occupational performance, quality of ...
  131. [131]
    Smart Home Technology: A Game-Changer for Disability ... - LDRFA
    Early precursors to the smart home can be traced back 50 years ago when home automation systems began to be developed. These early systems were typically large ...The History of Smart Home · How smart home technology... · Video: Smart Home...
  132. [132]
    Mainstream Smart Home Technology–Based Intervention to ...
    Apr 24, 2025 · The ASSIST intervention uses smart home tech to enhance independence for those with disabilities, showing immediate benefits, but with barriers ...
  133. [133]
    Calculating the social impact of home automation for people ... - NIH
    Jun 25, 2024 · Home automation can deliver important outcomes for people with disabilities, including enhanced independence.
  134. [134]
    Personal emergency response systems and people with intellectual ...
    Sep 6, 2023 · Personal Emergency Response Systems (PERS) are electronic medical alert devices that help people receive assistance in emergencies. By pushing a ...
  135. [135]
    The Personal Emergency Response System as a Technology ...
    Jul 14, 2016 · The effectiveness of personal emergency response systems in meeting the safety monitoring needs of home care clients. J Nurs Adm. 1994 Jun ...Missing: assistive | Show results with:assistive
  136. [136]
    How Modern PERS Cut $80B Fall Costs & Support Aging in Place
    Aug 4, 2025 · Personal emergency response systems (PERS) have evolved far beyond simply providing a fast connection to 911. Today, these connected devices ...
  137. [137]
    IoT Revolutionizes Personal Emergency Response Systems
    Jul 10, 2025 · Personal emergency response systems (PERS) leverage advanced IoT technologies like AI and GNSS that provide reliable connectivity.<|separator|>
  138. [138]
    Assistive Technology in Digital Inclusion | Types & examples
    Sep 9, 2024 · Assistive technology refers to the software and hardware tools that enable people with disabilities to access and interact with web platforms, digital ...
  139. [139]
    What is AT? - Assistive Technology Industry Association
    What is AT? Assistive technology (AT): products, equipment, and systems that enhance learning, working, and daily living for persons with disabilities.What is assistive technology? · What is the ATIA, and how can...
  140. [140]
    A Brief History of Screen Readers - Knowbility
    Jan 6, 2021 · A screen reader is software that interprets screen information and presents it in speech or Braille. The first was created in 1986 by Jim ...
  141. [141]
    The hidden history of screen readers - The Verge
    Jul 14, 2022 · The screen reader JAWS was dominant for decades before upstart open source alternative NVDA came along. This is the story of the blind ...
  142. [142]
    Get started with accessibility features on Mac - Apple Support
    On your Mac, choose Apple menu > System Settings, then click Accessibility in the sidebar. (You may need to scroll down.) Open Accessibility settings for me.
  143. [143]
    Blind and Vision Impairment: Screen Readers - ADCET
    Screen readers help blind users navigate computers, read/write files, and surf the web using keystrokes and audio feedback. Examples include JAWS, Zoomtext, ...
  144. [144]
    Speech to text tools for people with disabilities - Amberscript
    Jul 4, 2023 · Top Speech-to-Text Tools for People with Disabilities · Dragon NaturallySpeaking · Otter.ai · Google Gboard · Windows 10 Speech Recognition.
  145. [145]
    Physical Impairments: Voice recognition - ADCET
    Dragon is the leading voice recognition/dictation software. Specialised versions are available that will recognise legal terminology and medical terminology.
  146. [146]
    Assistive Technology: What's an “Alternative Input Device?”
    May 1, 2023 · An alternative input device replaces a keyboard or mouse, enabling a person with disabilities to use a computer.
  147. [147]
    Motor Disabilities - Assistive Technologies - WebAIM
    Oct 12, 2012 · Another alternative is to install software that allows a person to control the computer by speaking commands and dictating input. One widely- ...
  148. [148]
    Exploration of multimodal alternative access for individuals ... - NIH
    With current alternative access techniques, individuals with severe motor impairments are limited in that they can only use one access technique at a time. The ...
  149. [149]
    Accessibility Technology & Tools | Microsoft Accessibility
    We are committed to create and grow usage of accessible technology, expand skilling and hiring opportunities for people with disabilities.Windows 11 · Disability Answer Desk Support · Our Accessibility Approach · Blog<|separator|>
  150. [150]
    How does accessibility differ across operating systems?
    In addition to these basic accessibility features, both Windows and Mac OS include basic screen magnification software (Magnifier and CloseView, respectively).
  151. [151]
    Computer Basics: Using Accessibility Features - GCFGlobal
    In Windows, open the Settings app (or Control Panel in Windows 8 and earlier), then click Ease of Access. In macOS, open System Preferences, then click ...
  152. [152]
    Assistive Technology to Improve Classroom Performance
    Apr 22, 2018 · This course will outline various forms of low and high tech forms of assistive technology which may be incorporated into classrooms.
  153. [153]
    Effect of Assistive Technology in a Public School Setting
    Jan 1, 2010 · The literature promotes the importance of documenting AT outcomes; however, the literature lacks empirical studies of AT's effectiveness.
  154. [154]
    A Scoping Review of Studies on Assistive Technology Interventions ...
    Nov 20, 2023 · AT has been shown to be effective in supporting children with ASD in various settings and developmental domains [6,7,8]. Studies have shown that ...
  155. [155]
    EJ953033 - The Effectiveness of Assistive Technologies for Children ...
    Findings revealed that while some programs saw no improvement in spelling, reading or writing as a result of using the assistive technology, the majority of ...
  156. [156]
    Assistive Technology and Occupational Performance
    The purpose of this statement is to clarify the role and describe the distinct perspective of occupational therapy practitioners (occupational therapists and ...
  157. [157]
    Worldwide Survey on Digital Assistive Technology (DAT) Provision
    Feb 6, 2024 · A survey was conducted in the global occupational therapist's community in June 2022 to describe DAT provision and the factors influencing it.
  158. [158]
    Acceptability and usability of assistive equipment and technology by ...
    May 22, 2024 · Evidence suggests that AE&T can provide a range of benefits to individuals living with MS, such as promoting occupational participation, ...Literature Review · Instrument And Data... · Discussion
  159. [159]
    Assistive Technology and OT: Examples & Funding - OT Potential
    Mar 31, 2023 · Some of the examples of assistive technology for those with hearing impairments include: Hearing aids: Hearing aids are small electronic devices ...
  160. [160]
    Assistive Technology Interventions for Adolescents and Adults with ...
    Assistive technology interventions for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: an evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis.
  161. [161]
    The effectiveness of assistive technologies for children with special ...
    This paper describes the results of a systematic search of research-based studies published in the last six years that examined the effectiveness of assistive ...
  162. [162]
    Assistive Technologies Empower Workers Who Have Disabilities
    Jun 3, 2024 · Assistive technologies, including mobility aids like wheelchairs, hearing aids, cognitive devices for memory support, home automation, self-driving cars, voice ...
  163. [163]
    Assistive Technology and Employment Opportunities for People with ...
    Nov 2, 2024 · The meta-analysis indicated that individuals using AT had higher odds of being employed than their counterparts without the devices (odds ratio ...
  164. [164]
    Assistive Technology's Potential to Improve Employment of People ...
    Jan 22, 2024 · About one-tenth of workers with disabilities received any accommodations, and 3–4% received equipment-based accommodations in the 2012–2021 ...
  165. [165]
    How Technology Can Enhance the Lives of People with Disabilities
    Oct 11, 2024 · Hearing-impaired individuals have greatly benefited from assistive technology. ... Moreover, remote work technology has created new employment ...
  166. [166]
    How Paralympic Wheelchairs and Prostheses Are Optimized for ...
    Aug 31, 2021 · Many are built from high-tech materials, such as carbon fiber, that make them both strong and lightweight. They often include rubber-coated ...Missing: adaptive | Show results with:adaptive
  167. [167]
    Adaptive Sports Technology and Biomechanics: Wheelchairs
    The wheelchairs used for basketball, rugby, tennis, softball, power wheelchair soccer, racing, and handcycling are described, along with some of the key ...<|separator|>
  168. [168]
    Cutting-edge technology behind Para sports - Paralympic.org
    Aug 16, 2021 · From prosthetics to carbon fibre wheelchairs and assisted devices, technology for Para sports is advancing with new materials and improved designs.
  169. [169]
    A review of adaptive sport opportunities for power wheelchair users
    The only sports where the wheelchair needs to move as part of the activity are power soccer, power hockey, and obstacle course activities such as slalom, motor ...Technology · Future Work · Figure 6
  170. [170]
    [PDF] Chapter 10 – Assistive Technology for Recreation and Leisure
    Computer and video games are popular and age-appropriate recreational choices that are often easily accessible to students with disabilities. Some game ...
  171. [171]
    Recreation & Leisure / Guide to Assistive Technology - Minnesota.gov
    Assistive technology for recreation includes adapted gardening tools, switch-adapted toys, and wheelchair accessible tents.
  172. [172]
    [PDF] Recreation Assistive Technology (AT) –the What ... - AT3 Center
    Recreation Assistive Technology (AT) helps people with disabilities participate in activities like billiards, crafts, and sports, when they cannot participate ...
  173. [173]
    5 Types of Assistive Technologies for Sport and Recreation
    Jun 18, 2024 · The 5 types of assistive technologies are: orthotics, prosthetics, equipment for standing sports, equipment for sitting sports, and throwing ...
  174. [174]
    Prosthetics through the ages | NIH MedlinePlus Magazine
    May 11, 2023 · A wood and aluminum prosthetic arm invented by William Robert Grossmith in the mid-19th century. How war—and the U.S. military—inspired ...
  175. [175]
    Ambroise Paré IV: The early history of artificial limbs (from robotic to ...
    The first true rehabilitation aids that could be recognised as prostheses were made during the civilisations of Greece and Rome. During this period, prostheses ...
  176. [176]
    Paré and prosthetics: the early history of artificial limbs - PubMed
    Prostheses existed in ancient Egypt, with early examples in Greece and Rome. Paré invented upper and lower limb prostheses, including 'Le Petit Lorrain'.
  177. [177]
    History of the wheelchair | Mobility, Inventions & Accessibility
    Some scholars suspect that the history of the wheelchair begins sometime between the 6th and 4th centuries bce, possibly with the development of wheeled ...Missing: ancient | Show results with:ancient
  178. [178]
    Explore the History of the Wheelchair: From Ancient Times to ...
    Jul 9, 2025 · The 20th century saw significant advancements in wheelchair design, including the development of folding, manual, powered, and sports ...
  179. [179]
    History of the Wheelchair - Science Museum Blog
    Mar 1, 2019 · The first self-propelled wheelchair was invented in 1655 by paraplegic clock-maker of Nuremberg, Germany Stephan Farfler (1633-1689).
  180. [180]
    A brief history of the acoustic ear trumpet and some collection ...
    Nov 3, 2023 · The earliest-found reference to an ear trumpet is the example found in King Tutankhamun's tomb – 1332 BC. This is a solid silver small horn, ...
  181. [181]
    The Invention of Braille - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
    When he was 15, he invented a universal system for reading and writing to be used by people who are blind or visually impaired that now bears his name.
  182. [182]
    How Louis Braille revolutionized a writing system—despite efforts to ...
    Jul 24, 2025 · Between 1824 and 1825, Louis Braille created a system of raised dot letters that could be read with the hands. Initially ignored, his invention ...
  183. [183]
    Patenticulars | epo.org
    Mar 11, 2024 · First folding wheelchair by Harry Jennings patented in 1936. In 1936, engineer Harry Jennings invented the first folding wheelchair, which ...
  184. [184]
    Chapter 10: The Talking Book - The American Foundation for the Blind
    It was called the Talking Book. Of all the devices that blazed paths of progress for blind people in the twentieth century, the Talking Book was in a class by ...
  185. [185]
    [PDF] The First Hybrid Transistorized Hearings Aids (1952)
    The Raytheon CK718 was the first mass produced transistor and was the most commonly used 1950s hearing aid transistor. The type.
  186. [186]
    The evolution of functional hand replacement: From iron prostheses ...
    The first clinically significant myoelectric prosthesis was unveiled by Russian scientist Alexander Kobrinski in 1960. The use of transistors reduced bulk and ...
  187. [187]
    TTY and TTY Relay Services - NAD - National Association of the Deaf
    Robert Weitbrecht, a deaf scientist, developed the teletypewriter (TTY) in the 1960s. With the invention of the acoustic coupler (which holds the telephone ...
  188. [188]
    20 Years of Apple Voiceover - Double Tap
    Apr 29, 2025 · In 2005, Apple introduced VoiceOver, a built-in screen reader that revolutionised accessibility for blind and low-vision users.Missing: date | Show results with:date
  189. [189]
    Voice as Assistive Technology - Key Lime Interactive
    Jun 24, 2020 · In 1952, Bell Labs designed the “Audrey” system, which could recognize a single voice speaking digits between zero to nine aloud, hence the ...Missing: century | Show results with:century<|control11|><|separator|>
  190. [190]
    A Timeline of iOS Accessibility: It Started with 36 Seconds - MacStories
    Jul 11, 2019 · Apple's Mac screen reader was (and is) called VoiceOver, and it had been introduced with 10.4 Tiger, in 2005. ... In the spring of 2008, Apple ...
  191. [191]
    Top Assistive Tech of the Decade | AbilityNet
    Dec 18, 2019 · Top Assistive Tech of the Decade · 1. Apple's iPad (2010) · 2. Tobii Eye-tracking (2012) · 3. Google Glass (2013) · 4. Amazon Echo (Alexa) (2014) · 5 ...Missing: 2000 | Show results with:2000
  192. [192]
    10 years of Siri: the history of Apple's voice assistant - TechRadar
    Oct 4, 2021 · The Apple voice assistant was originally integrated into the iPhone 4S way back in October 2011, and we're now here to wish Siri a very happy 10th birthday.
  193. [193]
    Inventions for assistive robotics increased more than 20-fold in just ...
    Dec 3, 2024 · The number of inventions in the field of assistive robotics has increased more than 20-fold over the two decades since 2000, with a peak of ...
  194. [194]
    [PDF] The Evolution of Assistive Technology: Advancing Access and Equity
    The first recorded history of Assistive Technology began with specialized equipment targeting specific barriers for people with disabilities. During the ...
  195. [195]
    Innovations in Assistive Technology: Enhancing Independence and ...
    AI integration was reported in 43% of all devices, most prominently in communication technologies (60%). Positive independence/social participation outcomes ...
  196. [196]
    Advances in AI-based prosthetics development: editorial - PMC - NIH
    To better assist those with upper-limb amputees with navigational aids and object handling, prosthetic devices can make use of convolutional neural networks, ...
  197. [197]
    [PDF] The Role of Machine Learning in Improved Functionality of Lower ...
    Apr 19, 2023 · However, the advances in microprocessor technology have facilitated the application of machine learning models to aid active prostheses.
  198. [198]
    Use of machine learning in the field of prosthetics and orthotics
    Jun 1, 2023 · In the realm of prostheses, machine learning has been used to identify prosthesis, select an appropriate prosthesis, train after wearing the ...
  199. [199]
    Seeing AI - A Visual Assistant for the Blind
    Seeing AI assists with daily tasks from reading, to describing photos, to identifying products, and more. The app continues to evolve as we hear from the ...<|separator|>
  200. [200]
    Envision AI
    Envision empowers people people who are blind or have low vision to access everyday visual information for themselves. Because it isn't just information.Glasses · App · Enterprise · Shop
  201. [201]
    Accessible Innovations in Technology – 2025 Updates
    Aug 10, 2025 · Project Guideline: Developed by Google, this uses machine learning to help people with visual impairments run independently by following a ...
  202. [202]
    PrAACT: Predictive Augmentative and Alternative Communication ...
    Apr 15, 2024 · This study introduces PrAACT, a method that leverages large, transformer-based language models, such as BERT, for communication card prediction.
  203. [203]
    A proof-of-concept study for automatic speech recognition to ...
    This proof-of-concept paper aims to investigate the feasibility of using AAC-ASR to transcribe language samples generated by high-tech AAC systems.
  204. [204]
    Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Prosthetic and Orthotic ...
    Algorithm used for supervised learning are support vector machines, linear regression, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) etc. This is error based learning. ...
  205. [205]
    A high-performance brain–computer interface for finger decoding ...
    Jan 20, 2025 · We developed a high-performance, finger-based brain–computer-interface system allowing continuous control of three independent finger groups.
  206. [206]
    Brain–computer interfaces in 2023–2024 - Chen - Wiley Online Library
    Mar 31, 2025 · As of 2023–2024, BCIs have achieved breakthroughs across three domains: therapeutic management of linguistic/motor deficits, mental navigation ...
  207. [207]
    A Year of Telepathy | Updates - Neuralink
    Feb 5, 2025 · Over the past year, three people with paralysis have received Neuralink implants. This blog post explores how each person is using Telepathy ...
  208. [208]
    PRIME Study Progress Update — Second Participant - Neuralink
    Aug 21, 2024 · Within a few hours, he was able to surpass the maximum speed and accuracy he'd achieved with any other assistive technology on our Webgrid task.
  209. [209]
    https://clinicaltrialsarena.com/news/neuralink-to-launch-feasibility-trial-with-implant-coupled-to-robotic-arm/
  210. [210]
    Synchron Becomes First to Achieve Native Thought-Control of Apple ...
    Aug 4, 2025 · Synchron is currently rolling out its BCI HID system to additional clinical participants, with plans for expanded access depending on trial ...
  211. [211]
    The Technology - Synchron
    Synchron's BCI aims to restore the control of a touchscreen for patients with limited hand mobility using only their thoughts.Missing: assistive outcomes
  212. [212]
    Brain implant lets man with paralysis fly a virtual drone by thought
    Jan 20, 2025 · A man with paralysis who had electrodes implanted in his brain can pilot a virtual drone through an obstacle course simply by imagining moving his fingers.<|control11|><|separator|>
  213. [213]
    BCIs in 2025: Trials, Progress, and Challenges - Andersen
    Jul 20, 2025 · By June 2025, we found around 90 active BCI trials testing implants for typing, mobility, stroke rehab, etc. Notably, no BCI has yet been ...
  214. [214]
    Brain-Computer Interfaces Market Latest Trends and Insights 2025 -
    Aug 8, 2025 · The global Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) market is projected to grow from USD 3.21 billion in 2025 to USD 12.87 billion by 2034, ...
  215. [215]
    A Comprehensive Survey of Brain–Computer Interface Technology ...
    By bridging the gap between the human brain and external devices, BCI systems offer innovative solutions for diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation, thereby ...
  216. [216]
    Safety and tolerance of the ReWalk™ exoskeleton suit for ...
    The study found no adverse safety events, and the ReWalk system was generally well tolerated with no increase in pain, and moderate fatigue after use.
  217. [217]
    Home - Eksobionics
    Eksobionics provides exoskeletons for individuals with SCI, stroke, brain injury, and MS, including the Ekso Indego Personal for home use.EksoHealth · Clinical use · Products · About Us - Eksobionics
  218. [218]
    Clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted ...
    Mar 22, 2016 · Powered exoskeletons allow patients with SCI to safely ambulate in real-world settings at a physical activity intensity conducive to prolonged use and known to ...
  219. [219]
    Clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted ...
    Oct 20, 2023 · A meta-analysis investigated the safety and efficacy of powered exoskeletons. It included 14 studies (8 ReWalk, 3 Ekso, 2 Indego® and 1 ...Missing: trials | Show results with:trials
  220. [220]
    Recent advances in bioelectric prostheses - PMC - PubMed Central
    Recent advances in bionic prosthetic development hold great promise for rehabilitation and improving quality of life with limb loss.
  221. [221]
    A prosthesis driven by the nervous system helps people ... - MIT News
    Jul 1, 2024 · A new surgical procedure gives people more neural feedback from their residual limb. With it, seven patients walked more naturally and navigated obstacles.
  222. [222]
    Making Prosthetics More Lifelike - UC Davis
    Nov 28, 2022 · But myoelectric devices, which use muscle activity from the remaining limb to operate, still require a lot of effort to get them to work, said ...
  223. [223]
    The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of ...
    Jan 30, 2023 · Soft, wearable, powered exoskeletons are novel devices that may assist rehabilitation, allowing users to walk further or carry out activities of daily living.
  224. [224]
    A wearable robot that learns - Harvard SEAS
    Aug 19, 2025 · Harvard researchers have created a soft, wearable robotic device that provides personalized movement assistance for individuals with upper ...
  225. [225]
    The usefulness of assistive soft robotics in the rehabilitation of ...
    Clinical studies showed that users who used soft robotics during rehabilitation programs significantly improved hand motor functionality compared to patients ...
  226. [226]
    The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of ...
    Jan 30, 2023 · Soft, wearable, powered exoskeletons are novel devices that may assist rehabilitation, allowing users to walk further or carry out activities of daily living.
  227. [227]
    Assistive Technology Uses and Barriers in the Home and Workplace ...
    Assistive technology (AT) is one such tool that has been used extensively with individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities to assist with both ...
  228. [228]
    Full article: Access to assistive technology for persons with disabilities
    Assistive technology enables people to live healthy, productive, independent, and dignified lives, and to participate in education, the labour market and ...
  229. [229]
    Evaluating the Effectiveness of Assistive Technologies in the ...
    Aug 28, 2024 · In a remarkable study conducted by the Job Accommodation Network (JAN), it was found that 56% of employers reported increased productivity after ...
  230. [230]
    Reasonable Accommodation: What Employees Need to Know - Galt
    Aug 2, 2023 · According to a survey by the Job Accommodation Network, 85 percent of employers experienced an increase in employee retention because of having ...
  231. [231]
    Hearing Aids Costs And Financing Options (2025) - Forbes
    Aug 28, 2025 · The average cost of prescription hearing aids is $2,000 to $7,000. Over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids, which received FDA approval in 2022 for ...
  232. [232]
    How Much Does a Power Wheelchair Cost? - Patients Choice Medical
    Apr 1, 2025 · Basic Power Wheelchairs: $1,500 - $4,000 ; Mid-Range Power Wheelchairs: $4,000 - $8,000 ; High-End or Custom Power Wheelchairs: $10,000 - $30,000+.
  233. [233]
    [PDF] The Case for Investing in Assistive Technology - 3DP4ME
    (economic benefits−costs). ROI = costs. ROI. We estimated the final ROI using the following equation: This includes a summation of the economic benefits ...
  234. [234]
    How To Control Costs of Assistive Devices - BECU
    Jul 22, 2024 · A single device could cost $20,000 or more. For example, a car can be purchased with accessibility features or modified with ramps, chair lifts ...
  235. [235]
    Scoping review of economic evaluations of assistive technology ...
    Dec 24, 2021 · The paper presents a scoping review of existing economic evaluations of assistive technology (AT). The study methodology utilized a PRISMA flow approach.
  236. [236]
    Cost-benefit analysis of assistive technology to support ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · This paper presents an analysis of the results based on the cost-benefit methodology developed for use in the assessment trials in ENABLE.Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
  237. [237]
    The Case for Investing in Assistive Technology - ATscale
    In this report, ATscale describes the enormous gains that access to assistive technology (AT) can have in health, for the community and the economy.Missing: disability | Show results with:disability<|separator|>
  238. [238]
    [PDF] New economics of assistive technology: A call for a missions approach
    One estimate of the financial burden of disability globally amounts to a worldwide loss of GDP of between $ 1.37 and 1.94 trillion1 (Metts 2000). Even if ...Missing: ROI | Show results with:ROI
  239. [239]
    Almost one billion children and adults with disabilities and older ...
    May 16, 2022 · A new report published today by WHO and UNICEF reveals that more than 2.5 billion people need one or more assistive products, such as wheelchairs, hearing aids ...
  240. [240]
    Global report on assistive technology | UNICEF
    May 25, 2022 · The WHO-UNICEF Global Report on Assistive Technology (AT) reveals that more than 2.5 billion people need one or more assistive products.
  241. [241]
    UNICEF and WHO launch the first global report on assistive ...
    May 16, 2022 · Currently, 2.5 billion people need assistive technology worldwide. According to the report, by 2050 this number will reach 3.5 billion. The ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics<|separator|>
  242. [242]
    Barriers for Accessing Assistive Products in Low - PubMed
    Aug 23, 2023 · The most prevalent barrier to access assistive products was "Cannot afford", amounting to 39.9% and varying from 6.7 % to 79.1 % among countries.Missing: disparities | Show results with:disparities
  243. [243]
    One In Three People Globally Need Assistive Technologies
    May 16, 2022 · The report also highlights the “vast inequalities in access to assistive technologies in high-income versus low-income countries, ranging from ...
  244. [244]
    Nearly 1 Billion People Globally Who Need Assistive Technologies ...
    May 31, 2022 · Findings from self-reported population surveys in 29 countries conducted by the WHO found that 10% to 69% of people reported they needed ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  245. [245]
    Assistive Devices Market: Global Industry Analysis And Forecast
    Assistive Devices Market was valued at USD 21.29 Bn in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 31.46 Bn by 2032, at a CAGR of 5%.
  246. [246]
    https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/assistive-technology-market
  247. [247]
    Assistive technology data portal - World Health Organization (WHO)
    WHO has undertaken a global initiative to measure access to assistive technology at the population and system level between April 2019 and December 2021.
  248. [248]
    Privacy in consumer wearable technologies: a living systematic ...
    Jun 14, 2025 · In this study, we systematically evaluated the privacy policies of 17 leading wearable technology manufacturers using a novel rubric comprising 24 criteria ...
  249. [249]
    Are Wearable Devices a Privacy Risk? - Security Magazine
    Sep 3, 2025 · The research found that 90% of devices collect health and wellness data, making it the most commonly tracked category. 71% track heartrate, 56% ...
  250. [250]
    Understanding the Ethical Issues of Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs)
    Apr 14, 2024 · Ethical concerns also arise regarding the timing of the completion of clinical trials. The timing of termination of BCI studies may not be clear ...
  251. [251]
    Decoding the Privacy Policies of Assistive Technologies
    Oct 22, 2024 · Our study decodes the privacy policies of 18 ATs to understand how data collection and processing are communicated with users.3 Research Methods · 4 Findings · Information & Contributors
  252. [252]
    Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology
    Dec 19, 2019 · Our findings indicate that professional stakeholders find issues of patient autonomy and informed consent, quality of data management, distributive justice and ...
  253. [253]
    Full article: Ethics and assistive technology: what are we missing?
    Oct 26, 2023 · Addressing ethical challenges is a push and pull of supporting autonomy while promoting benefit to the AT user, ensuring we do no harm.
  254. [254]
    Full article: Artificial intelligence and assistive technology: risks ...
    Sep 25, 2023 · Among other concerns, they highlight disproportionate impacts on persons with disabilities when AI is used for access to public and private ...
  255. [255]
    Ethical aspects of brain computer interfaces: a scoping review
    Nov 9, 2017 · Among all the concerns surveyed in the literature, the most commonly mentioned issues encompass the safety of BCI devices and the related ...
  256. [256]
    Ethical issues associated with assistive technologies for persons ...
    May 15, 2025 · Findings revealed key ethical issues, including maintaining autonomy, respecting privacy, and addressing equity and accessibility.<|separator|>
  257. [257]
    [PDF] Data Ownership and Privacy in Personalized AI Models in Assistive ...
    Abstract. The use of personalized artificial intelligence (AI) models in assistive healthcare presents a number of ethical and legal challenges, ...
  258. [258]
    Predictors of assistive technology abandonment - PubMed
    Results showed that 29.3% of all devices were completely abandoned. Mobility aids were more frequently abandoned than other categories of devices, and ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  259. [259]
    Impact of the abandonment of assistive technologies for mobility on ...
    Jun 25, 2022 · Empirical studies have reported dropout rates of 20–50%.
  260. [260]
    Assistive Technology Abandonment: Research Realities and ...
    Jun 26, 2018 · Abandonment of assistive technologies (ATs) is a serious problem – rates of abandonment can be high, 78% has been reported for hearing aids.
  261. [261]
    Why do people abandon assistive technologies? - NIHR Evidence
    Apr 30, 2021 · Yet up to seven in ten people abandon their assistive technology. In some cases, this is because their condition has improved, but it can also ...
  262. [262]
    Rethinking device abandonment: a capability approach focused model
    Reasons for AAC abandonment include poor usability, high learning demands, a lack of professional expertise and difficulty with physical access (Calculator, ...
  263. [263]
    Use and abandonment rates of assistive devices/orthoses in ...
    The abandonment rates were 70.8% and 77.8%, respectively. More than half of those subjects stopped using their orthoses. Regarding lower limb orthoses, 43.0% of ...Missing: technology | Show results with:technology<|separator|>
  264. [264]
    [PDF] Assistive Technology Use and Abandonment among College ...
    The literature revealed several reasons for this abandonment. One significant factor was a disregard for consumers' preferences in technology selection ( ...
  265. [265]
    Fear of Dependency and Life-Space Mobility as Predictors of ...
    The current study examines the predictive power of health perceptions, dependency fears, aging stereotypes, and life space on older adults' views of assistive ...
  266. [266]
    Managing Dependence: Assistive Technologies in Dementia Care
    Sep 18, 2025 · Recognizing the potential for problematic dependency relationships with both other humans and technologies provides steadier ground for ...<|separator|>
  267. [267]
    The Impact of Disability and Assistive Technology Use on Well ... - NIH
    Our results show that assistive technology does not necessarily result in successful accommodation, that disability can persist if the gap between task demands ...
  268. [268]
    Increasing efficiency and well-being? a systematic review of the ...
    Nov 30, 2023 · In addition, we found evidence that socially assistive devices can have negative effects on certain populations. Evidence regarding the claim ...
  269. [269]
    Federal Laws and Regulations on Assistive Technology
    100-407) to increase access to, availability of, and funding for assistive technology for all individuals with disabilities, including very young children.Missing: debates | Show results with:debates
  270. [270]
    Assistive Technology Acts - Brain Injury Association of America
    The Tech Act authorized funding for states to conduct needs assessments and develop and implement a consumer responsive system of technology-related assistance.Missing: debates regulation
  271. [271]
    https://www.cbpp.org/blog/trump-administration-threatens-support-for-children-with-disabilities
  272. [272]
    Funding Sources for Assistive Technology - ECTA Center
    Research shows that funding is one of the biggest obstacles to the acquisition of assistive technology for children with disabilities.
  273. [273]
    [PDF] Standards for assistive technology funding: What are the right criteria?
    Assistive technology developers, manufacturers, and service providers are facing new requirements to demonstrate supporting evidence about the effectiveness ...Missing: debates | Show results with:debates
  274. [274]
    [PDF] Assistive Technology Funding in the United States
    The article reviews the policy origins of AT provision and funding in the United States, including a discus- sion of traditional and non-traditional funding ...Missing: debates | Show results with:debates<|separator|>
  275. [275]
    ACL Awards Four Assistive Technology Alternative Financing ...
    Sep 27, 2024 · ACL is announcing four new Assistive Technology (AT) Alternative Financing Program (AFP) discretionary grant awards totaling nearly $2 million over one year.
  276. [276]
    Assistive technology can revolutionize development, learning and ...
    Jul 25, 2024 · For every US$1 invested, society receives a return of US$9, making it an impactful financial decision for governments and funders.Missing: ROI | Show results with:ROI
  277. [277]
    ATIA Policy Briefs - Assistive Technology Industry Association
    Policy and funding must also encourage innovation in AI that addresses the diverse needs of the disability community. To do so, investments must support ...
  278. [278]
    Overview of Device Regulation - FDA
    Jan 31, 2024 · The rule is effective February 2, 2026, two years after publication. Until then, manufacturers are required to comply with the QS regulation.Establishment registration · Premarket Notification 510(k) · Investigational Device...
  279. [279]
    Home Health and Consumer Devices - FDA
    Aug 25, 2021 · FDA regulates medical devices that consumers use themselves without professional medical assistance in the same way as other medical devices.
  280. [280]
    Assistive technology policy: a position paper from the first global ...
    May 23, 2018 · This paper identifies some of the key themes that should be addressed when developing or revising assistive technology policy.
  281. [281]
    First Global Campaign For Access To Assistive Technology Is ...
    Jan 17, 2024 · The first-ever global campaign to expand access, 'Unlock the Everyday', was launched on Tuesday at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos.
  282. [282]
    Inequities in access to assistive technology: a call for action
    Dec 12, 2024 · The data further revealed that there are important inequities in access: women, older adults, and people with low education levels, less wealth, ...