Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Atlas I

Atlas I was an American expendable launch vehicle developed by in the late 1980s as a commercial variant of the earlier rocket family, featuring an Atlas booster stage paired with a upper stage and designed primarily for medium-lift satellite deployments to () and geosynchronous transfer orbit (). Introduced in amid growing demand for reliable commercial space access, Atlas I incorporated structural enhancements to the Atlas core, digital guidance systems, and optional fairings of 11 or 14 feet in diameter to accommodate diverse satellite configurations, with a total vehicle height ranging from 138 to 144 feet and a liftoff mass of approximately 360,000 pounds. The booster stage was powered by a Rocketdyne MA-5 engine cluster delivering about 439,000 pounds of thrust using kerosene and , while the upper stage employed two RL10A engines producing around 33,000 pounds of thrust with and oxygen, enabling capacities of up to 5,900 kg to and 2,340 kg to . The vehicle conducted its on July 25, 1990, successfully deploying the Combined Release and Radiation Effects Satellite (CRRES) for from Cape Canaveral's Launch Complex 36B, marking the start of a program that ultimately included 11 launches through 1997, with eight successes and three failures, including the Yuri 3H mission in 1991. Notable missions encompassed geostationary weather satellites like GOES-8 (1994) and GOES-10 (1997, the final flight), the Italian BeppoSAX X-ray observatory (1996), and U.S. Navy UHF , demonstrating its versatility for both scientific and military payloads. Production was initially planned for 18 vehicles but scaled back to 11 due to the parallel development of the more advanced family, leading to Atlas I's retirement after the GOES-10 launch on April 25, 1997.

Development

Origins

The Atlas I launch vehicle originated as a commercial adaptation of the earlier Atlas G configuration, which had been developed for military applications. In the late 1980s, General Dynamics rebranded and upgraded the Atlas G to meet growing commercial demands for satellite deployment, incorporating inertial guidance enhancements such as Honeywell's Inertial Navigation Unit mounted on the Centaur upper stage to improve accuracy and reliability for non-military payloads. These upgrades replaced older analog systems with digital components, enabling precise orbital insertions for medium-lift missions. This development was spurred by the grounding of the Space Shuttle program following the 1986 Challenger disaster, which created a significant backlog of satellite launches and prompted a U.S. policy shift toward revitalizing expendable launch vehicles (ELVs). The disaster halted shuttle operations for over two years, leading the Department of Defense and commercial operators to seek alternatives to the previously phased-out ELVs like Atlas, thereby increasing demand for reliable, ICBM-derived boosters adapted for space access. Initial planning in the late 1980s focused on leveraging the Atlas family's proven stage-and-a-half design—originally rooted in intercontinental ballistic missile technology—to support geosynchronous transfer orbits for telecommunications and meteorological satellites. To support production, made a substantial private investment of $100 million in , committing to manufacture 18 vehicles and positioning the company to capture emerging commercial launch contracts. The adopted "," where "I" denotes the numeral for one, marking it as the inaugural model in a new commercial series that would evolve into the family. This strategic reorientation transformed surplus military hardware into a viable option for the burgeoning private space sector.

Production and Upgrades

The was produced by ' Space Systems Division, with manufacturing spanning from 1987 to 1997, planned for a total of 18 vehicles but ultimately limited to 11 due to the parallel development of the more advanced family, built primarily for commercial satellite deployments. In June 1987, the company announced the program and committed $100 million in corporate funds to procure long-lead items, marking one of the earliest major private investments in U.S. commercial space launch capabilities. Derived briefly from the Atlas G baseline used in earlier and missions, the incorporated targeted upgrades to enhance reliability and market appeal. Key modifications included improved systems for better guidance and control, as well as structural reinforcements to the booster stage to support heavier payloads and larger enclosures. These enhancements featured an upgraded inertial navigation unit (INU) that managed attitude control, tank pressures, and propellant management, alongside reinforced tankage to handle increased loads without compromising the lightweight "balloon" tank design. To accommodate payloads, integrated flexible options such as 11-foot and 14-foot composite fairings, allowing for varied sizes and shapes while maintaining compatibility with geosynchronous transfer orbits. Assembly of the first vehicle was completed in 1989 at facilities in , , achieving full operational readiness by 1990 ahead of its inaugural flight. Production costs were estimated at around $100 million upfront for the fleet, with per-launch expenses ranging from $50 million to $60 million in 1990s dollars, reflecting the vehicle's positioning as a cost-competitive option for medium-lift missions.

Design

First Stage

The first stage of the Atlas I rocket employed the Rocketdyne MA-5 propulsion system, which integrated two LR-89-7 booster engines and a single LR-105-7 sustainer engine, all powered by (refined petroleum) fuel and (LOX) oxidizer. This "stage-and-a-half" configuration allowed the boosters to provide initial high-thrust ascent, with the sustainer continuing propulsion after their separation. The booster engines operated from a shared, fuel-rich that drove a single assembly, optimizing efficiency and reducing complexity in the feed system. Attitude control during the boost phase was managed by two LR-101 vernier engines, mounted on the aft skirt, which provided roll, , and yaw corrections using the same / propellants. These verniers ignited shortly after liftoff and operated throughout the first stage flight to maintain vehicle stability, particularly after booster jettison. Structurally, the first stage featured the characteristic Atlas balloon-tank design, with thin-walled tanks pressurized by to withstand launch loads without internal framing. The stage measured approximately 22 meters in length and 3.05 meters in diameter, contributing the majority of the vehicle's overall height of about 44 meters when integrated with upper stages and . In operation, the two booster engines ignited at liftoff, delivering a combined sea-level thrust of around 1,682 (each producing approximately 841 at and 941 in ), with a burn duration of roughly 155 seconds until booster engine cutoff (BECO). At BECO, occurring about 2 minutes into flight at an altitude of around 50 kilometers, the booster section—including engines, skirts, and external tanks—was jettisoned to reduce mass, exposing the sustainer engine nozzle for continued operation. The LR-105-7 sustainer then fired alone for an additional period, providing 269 at and 374 in , with a total first-stage burn time of approximately 266 seconds until sustainer engine cutoff (SECO), at which point the stage was fully expended. This sequence set up upper-stage insertion.

Centaur Upper Stage

The upper stage served as the second stage of the Atlas I launch vehicle, providing cryogenic propulsion for orbital insertion and transfer maneuvers. It was powered by two RL-10A-3A engines, each delivering 73.4 kN of vacuum thrust using (LH2) and (LOX) propellants in an expander cycle configuration. This high propulsion system, with a vacuum performance of approximately 444 seconds, enabled efficient velocity increments following first stage separation. A key feature of the Centaur was its reignitable engines, allowing multiple burns separated by coast periods to achieve complex trajectories such as geosynchronous transfer orbits (GTO). Total burn time could reach up to approximately 600 seconds across burns, varying by mission profile to optimize payload delivery. To manage cryogenic boil-off during ascent and reduce mass in vacuum, the LH2 tank incorporated jettisonable insulation panels that were separated after atmospheric exit, minimizing structural weight for subsequent operations.) The stage featured a pressurized monocoque structure for its propellant tanks, providing lightweight integrity under internal pressure without internal load-bearing members. Overall length measured 9.15 meters, with a diameter of 3.05 meters to integrate seamlessly with the Atlas first stage. Guidance and control were handled by an Inertial Navigation Unit (INU), a digital system inherited from the earlier Atlas G configuration, which computed attitude and trajectory updates using strapdown inertial sensors and shared with the booster.

Star 48B Third Stage

The Star 48B served as an optional third stage for the Atlas I launch vehicle, providing a solid-propellant kick motor to achieve final velocity boosts for missions demanding higher delta-v than upper stage could deliver alone, such as insertions into geosynchronous transfer orbits () or interplanetary trajectories. Developed by , the stage utilized a high-energy HTPB-based solid propellant and featured a case for structural integrity. Its total mass was 2,041 kg, comprising 1,814 kg of propellant, with physical dimensions of 2.04 m in length and 1.24 m in diameter. The motor produced an average of 66 during a nominal burn time of 87 seconds, enabling efficient short-duration impulses for deployment. Although fully compatible with the Atlas I configuration and qualified for integration atop the Centaur, the Star 48B was never employed in operational flights, as the mission profiles selected for the vehicle's eleven launches from 1990 to 1997 did not require its additional performance capabilities.

Payload Fairing

The Atlas I featured two payload fairing variants to protect satellites during launch: the Medium fairing, measuring 3.3 m in and 8.4 m in , and the Large fairing, measuring 4.2 m in and 11.8 m in . These fairings utilized composite or aluminum to ensure lightweight yet robust against aerodynamic loads, heating, and acoustic environments during ascent. Fairing separation occurred via pyrotechnic actuators at approximately 100 km altitude, when and had sufficiently decreased, typically employing a V-band with springs for clean jettison. The Large fairing variant supported higher payload masses to geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO), accommodating up to 2,375 kg for volume-constrained missions, compared to the Medium fairing's capacity. Jettison masses ranged from approximately 500 to 800 kg depending on fairing size, with an aerodynamic ogive shape designed to reduce drag and optimize vehicle performance during the initial flight phases.

Specifications

Dimensions and Mass

The launch vehicle had a total height of 43.9 m and a maximum of 3.05 m. Its gross liftoff mass was 164,300 kg. The vehicle's staging configuration consisted of 2.5 stages, comprising a first stage, a upper stage, and an optional Star 48B solid-propellant third stage. Propellant types included and (LOX) for the first stage, and (LH2) and LOX for the upper stage. Detailed mass breakdowns for the stages are as follows:
StageDry Mass (kg)Propellant Mass (kg)
First Stage~6,100~117,000
Upper Stage~2,100~13,800
These values reflect the expendable nature of the vehicle, with the first stage providing initial boost and the enabling orbital insertion. The dimensions are covered separately.

Performance Metrics

The launch vehicle was capable of delivering a of 5,900 kg to at an altitude of 185 km and 28.5° inclination. With the large fairing configuration, it achieved a geosynchronous capacity of 2,250 kg to a 167 km × 35,788 km at 28.5° inclination. These capacities highlighted its suitability for a range of commercial and scientific missions requiring medium-lift performance to primary orbital regimes. At liftoff, the Atlas I generated approximately 1,950 kN of total from its first-stage MA-5 system, comprising two booster engines, one sustainer , and vernier engines, all fueled by and . The two-stage configuration provided a delta-v capability of approximately 9-10 km/s, sufficient for direct orbital insertion without additional staging. performance varied by stage and conditions: the first-stage boosters delivered around 250 s at , the sustainer achieved approximately 311 s in , and the Centaur upper stage reached 444 s with its engines. This propulsion profile enabled efficient velocity increments for diverse trajectories. The vehicle's design supported mission flexibility, including direct ascent to or multi-burn profiles for delivery, allowing adaptation to specific requirements and orbital parameters.

Operational History

Launch Sites and Procedures

The rocket conducted all launches from Launch Complex 36B at , a dedicated facility originally developed for the program in the 1960s. This site featured a fixed launch pedestal and service tower for vertical vehicle assembly directly at the pad, with no transport involved, distinguishing it from later Atlas variants. The complex supported unmanned operations only, relying on from the blockhouse approximately 1,400 feet away to minimize personnel risk during propellant handling and ignition. Vertical integration began with the erection of the booster stage on the launch mount, followed by mating of upper stage and using the service tower's cranes and access platforms. Procedures were adapted from the earlier Atlas G configuration, incorporating guidance upgrades while maintaining the core sequence for with commercial payloads. Commercial customer interfaces emphasized coordinated payload integration timelines, with customer representatives participating in final checkouts via dedicated links to ensure with the vehicle's bus. Pre-launch preparations followed a standardized sequence, beginning with RP-1 (refined ) loading into the Atlas booster tanks approximately 24 hours prior to liftoff to allow for stabilization and leak checks. (LOX) for the booster and both LOX and (LH2) for the Centaur stage were loaded several hours before launch, with continuous topping off of the cryogenic propellants to counteract boil-off until T-minus 4 minutes. and telemetry oversight were provided by facilities, including radar tracking from downrange sites like and , optical cameras at the pad, and command destruct systems integrated into the flight termination system for real-time anomaly response. A total of 11 Atlas I launches occurred between 1990 and 1997, all from LC-36B, establishing a reliable operational cadence for medium-lift missions before the vehicle's retirement.

Mission Timeline

The Atlas I conducted a total of 11 launches from July 25, 1990, to April 25, 1997, with 8 successes and 3 failures, yielding a 73% success rate; the primary issues stemmed from upper stage reliability problems. These missions carried a mix of commercial communications satellites, such as the series, and government payloads including NASA's CRRES scientific satellite, NOAA's GOES weather satellites, U.S. military UHF Follow-On communications satellites, and the Italian-Dutch BeppoSAX observatory. The inaugural flight on July 25, 1990, successfully deployed the Combined Release and Radiation Effects Satellite (CRRES), a joint NASA-U.S. Air Force mission to study the ionosphere and magnetosphere from a geosynchronous transfer orbit. The second launch, on April 18, 1991, carrying the Japanese Yuri 3H (also known as BS-3H) communications satellite, ended in failure when a Centaur RL-10 engine turbopump malfunctioned at T+361 seconds due to a plug of solid nitrogen formed from leaked atmospheric nitrogen mixing with liquid hydrogen in a supply line, leading to range safety destruction of the vehicle. On March 14, 1992, an Atlas I successfully orbited the , positioned at 125° W to provide services across the . The subsequent mission on August 22, 1992, with the Galaxy 1R replacement satellite, failed similarly to Yuri 3H, as the same blockage prevented a engine from igniting, resulting in vehicle tumbling and termination shortly after upper stage burn initiation. The March 25, 1993, launch of the UHF Follow-On F1 (UFO F1) military communications satellite experienced a partial failure due to a sustainer engine turbine fault, which caused insufficient thrust and placed the payload into an unintended low orbit of approximately 1,560 km × 1,900 km, rendering it unusable for its geosynchronous mission. Recovery followed with the successful deployment of UHF F2 (USA-95) on September 3, 1993, a U.S. Navy satellite stationed in geosynchronous orbit at 72° E for secure ultra-high-frequency communications. Subsequent successes included the April 13, 1994, launch of GOES-8 (originally GOES-I), NOAA's first Geostationary Observational Environmental Satellite of the upgraded series, which entered at 75° W to provide continuous weather imaging and data relay for . On June 24, 1994, UHF F3 (USA-104) was successfully placed into at 14.38° W, enhancing global military voice and data networks. The May 23, 1995, mission orbited GOES-9 (originally GOES-J) into at 135° W, serving as an operational with advanced sounder and imager instruments until its decommissioning in 2007. On April 30, 1996, the BeppoSAX satellite, a collaboration between the and the Netherlands Agency for Aerospace Programs, was launched into to survey cosmic X-ray sources, marking the 100th flight and operating successfully until 2002. The final Atlas I launch on April 25, 1997, successfully deployed GOES-10 (originally GOES-K) into geosynchronous orbit at 105.7° W, providing essential meteorological data as NOAA's primary West Coast satellite until 2006.

Retirement

Final Flights

The final three flights of the Atlas I occurred in the mid-1990s, marking the conclusion of its operational phase with successful deployments. On May 23, 1995, Atlas I AC-72 launched the GOES-9 weather satellite from Cape Canaveral's Space Launch Complex 36B, placing it into geosynchronous orbit. This was followed by the April 30, 1996, launch of the BeppoSAX X-ray observatory on AC-78 from the same site, achieving a low Earth orbit of approximately 590 km. The program's last mission took place on April 25, 1997, when AC-79 carried GOES-10 to geosynchronous orbit, also from SLC-36B, successfully concluding the vehicle's flight manifest. By the time of these final missions, had achieved an overall success rate of 8 out of 11 launches, benefiting from reliability enhancements to upper stage implemented after early program s, including full failures in 1991 (Yuri 3H) and 1992 (Galaxy 1R) due to frozen plugs in Centaur engine valves from liquid hydrogen mixing with atmospheric , and a partial in 1993 (UHF F1) from Atlas sustainer engine issues. Key improvements included refinements to the gaseous purge , which addressed boil-off and structural integrity issues during ground operations and ascent, contributing to the flawless execution of the concluding flights. These fixes, along with updated and insulation, elevated 's performance in the later Atlas variants, ensuring no anomalies in the 1995–1997 period. The retirement of Atlas I was driven by a combination of operational and market factors, including its low launch cadence of just 11 missions over seven years, which limited . Intensifying competition from the European and the American Delta II, both offering comparable payload capacities at potentially lower costs for medium-lift missions, eroded its market share. Additionally, the transition to the family, featuring stretched propellant stages for enhanced performance under the U.S. Air Force's Medium Launch Vehicle II contract, rendered the original configuration obsolete. No new orders for Atlas I were placed after 1994, as commercial and government customers shifted to more capable successors amid a stabilizing post-Cold War launch market. The existing inventory of vehicles was fully expended by the GOES-10 launch, with no surplus remaining for future use. Economic pressures further hastened the phase-out, as Atlas I's per-launch costs—estimated at around $100 million in late-1990s dollars—proved uncompetitive in an evolving industry favoring higher-volume production and reduced pricing from rivals.

Successors and Legacy

The Atlas I served as the direct predecessor to the series, which entered service in 1991 and operated until 2004, featuring stretched propellant tanks for increased capacity and uprated Rocketdyne MA-5A engines that boosted performance over the Atlas I's baseline configuration. These enhancements allowed the Atlas II to deliver significantly higher payloads, such as up to 8,200 kg to geosynchronous transfer orbit in its advanced variants, building on the Atlas I's foundational design while addressing demands for heavier commercial satellites. The played a pivotal role in the commercial space boom by enabling reliable launches of geostationary satellites, including the Hughes Galaxy 5 in 1992 and the NOAA GOES-K weather satellite in 1997, as a commercial-oriented variant of the family that supported both commercial and government missions. Its operations supported the rapid expansion of satellite-based services for television broadcasting and during a period when demand for dedicated launch capacity surged. As the final Atlas variant to employ a three-engine first stage with vernier thrusters for precise control, the Atlas I's guidance and upgrades directly informed the evolution toward the Atlas III and , which shifted to single-engine boosters like the for greater efficiency while retaining core structural principles from upper stage. This transition emphasized modularity and reliability in the Atlas family, influencing modern U.S. medium-lift vehicles. Following the 1986 Space Shuttle Challenger disaster and the ensuing 32-month hiatus in crewed launches, the Atlas I contributed to restoring U.S. expendable launch vehicle reliability by providing assured access to orbit for critical national and commercial payloads, helping bridge the gap until Shuttle operations resumed in 1988. The Atlas I program concluded in 1997 with no subsequent revivals, achieving an overall success rate of approximately 73% across 11 flights (8 full successes, with one partial) and delivering roughly 20 metric tons of payload to orbit in successful missions. Its legacy endures in the proven Centaur upper stage technology, which continues to enable high-precision insertions in contemporary launch systems.

References

  1. [1]
    Atlas I - GlobalSecurity.org
    Jul 21, 2011 · Atlas I is an improved version of the Atlas/Centaur vehicle flown previously for NASA. Basic vehicle structure was strengthened to incorporate a ...
  2. [2]
    Atlas I
    Atlas I is an American orbital launch vehicle derived from Atlas G, with digital guidance. It was retired in 1997, with 11 launches.
  3. [3]
    CRRES Press Kit ATLAS I (ATLAS/CENTAUR) LAUNCH VEHICLE
    The Atlas I is a derivative of Atlas/Centaur, 143 feet high, with an Atlas booster and Centaur upper stage. It can place 13,000 pounds into low-Earth orbit.
  4. [4]
    Space Launchers - Atlas
    Atlas I: (1990) Commercial Atlas with upgraded core and Centaur upper stage. ... Guidance: Honeywell's Inertial Navigation Unit mounted on Centaur's ...Missing: rebranding | Show results with:rebranding
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Space Shuttle Case Studies: Challenger and Columbia
    Jun 15, 2014 · ... space through the shuttle that it planned to phase out of expendable launch vehicles (ELV's) such as the Atlas,. Titan, and Delta rockets. In ...
  6. [6]
    Atlas - GlobalSecurity.org
    Jul 21, 2011 · Space. Atlas · Atlas Variants; Atlas Pictures; Atlas References · Atlas I ... The Atlas/Centaur launch vehicle, originally developed by General ...
  7. [7]
    Lockheed Martin (General Dynamics) SLV-3/SB-1/SB-2 Atlas
    Jan 18, 2008 · Some sources use the number '1' to indicate this version but formal sources (i.e. Lockheed Martin) use the Roman numeral. The Atlas I was ...Missing: naming convention
  8. [8]
    General Dynamics Plans to Build 18 Atlas Rockets
    Jun 16, 1987 · Nearly 500 Atlas and Centaur rockets built by the company in the past were earmarked for sale to the military and to government agencies.
  9. [9]
    General Dynamics Corp. plans to build 18 Atlas-Centaur rockets...
    Jun 15, 1987 · Lovelace said that of the 18 Atlas-Centaurs now planned for construction, launch openings are available in 1989, 1991 and 1992. Two firm ...
  10. [10]
    Atlas I Successfully Launches GOES-K – ILS
    The Atlas I rocket successfully launched GOES-K on April 25, 1997, at 1:49 a.m. EDT from Cape Canaveral. It was the last launch of the Atlas I configuration.
  11. [11]
    Atlas MA-5
    Burn time: 174 s. Diameter: 4.90 m (16.00 ft). Span: 4.90 m (16.00 ft). No Engines: 2. Country: USA. Engines: LR89-7. Launch Vehicles: Atlas Agena D, Atlas ...Missing: dimensions | Show results with:dimensions
  12. [12]
    Rocket Propulsion Evolution:5 - Atlas Missile
    Jan 1, 2021 · MA-1, produced in 1957 and 1958, consisted of two XLR89-1 booster engines, an LR105-3 sustainer, and two LR101 vernier engines. The two booster ...
  13. [13]
    LR-89 (Atlas Booster) Engine - heroicrelics.org
    The entire Atlas missile engine system consisted of two LR-89 (booster) engines and one LR-105 (sustainer) engine. The exact configuration of the the engine ...
  14. [14]
    LR-101 Vernier Engine - heroicrelics.org
    The primary purpose of the LR-101 vernier engines was to provide roll control after the booster engines had been jettisoned. They also contributed to thrust and ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Atlas-centaur flight performance for surveyor mission A
    The first-stage Atlas vehicle was 65 feet long. It was powered by a standard Rocketdyne MA-5 propulsion system consisting of two booster engines with 328 600 ...
  16. [16]
    RL-10A-3A
    Used on Centaur stage atop Atlas G, Atlas I, Atlas II, Titan 4. First flight 1984. Number: 134 . Thrust: 73.40 kN (16,501 lbf). ... Engine: 141 kg (310 lb).Missing: upper length structure guidance
  17. [17]
    [PDF] History of the US Air Force Space and Missile Systems Center (SMC ...
    Aug 20, 2012 · ... optional third stage used a Star-48B solid rocket motor deployed ... Atlas I, a modification, was launched during 1990-1997. See. Fact ...
  18. [18]
    Star-48 - Gunter's Space Page
    Star-48. Home · Engines · USA. Solid fuel engine for upper stage applications ... Thiokol, 2114.0, 114.2, 1999.8, 0.946, Solid ? ? 286.6, 5647.51 ? 1.24 ? Star-48 ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Launch Vehicle Options for Small Satellite Systems
    The Atlas I throw weight to. GTO with the medium fairing is 2340 kg (5150 ... the large fairing, the throw weight to this orbit is. 2250 kg (4950 pounds) ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  20. [20]
    [PDF] PAYLOAD ACOUSTIC ATTENUATION VIA ... - Vibrationdata
    Typically, fairings are constructed with a solid metal ... ONE-THIRD OCTAVE BAND SPL ATLAS I, II, & IIA PAYLOAD QUALIFICATION TEST LEVELS ... Composite Fairing, ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] ATLAS Mission Planner's Guide for the ATLAS Launch Vehicle ...
    (en Atlas is located far frm the spacecraft. the. 3.2.5 THERMAL sawk is highy attenuated by the time it readies the. Wthln Fairing - Ihe payload fairing protAec ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] NASA HISTORICAL DATA BOOK Volume VII
    7 in series: The NASA history series. Includes bibliographical references and indexes. Contents: v. 1 NASA resources, 1958–1968 / Jane Van. Nimmen and Leonard C ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] 272 ELECTRIC PROPULSION OPTIONS FOR 10 KW CLASS ...
    The payload capability of each vehicle to this orbit is 3600 kg, 4500 kg,. 4600 kg, and 5100 kg, for the DELTA 11 6920, ATLAS I, DELTA 11 7920, and ATLAS II, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  24. [24]
    [PDF] U.S. Expendable Liquid Rocket Propulsion Technology Trends
    May 5, 2000 · A new third stage design incorporated the STAR-48B solid rocket motor ... Atlas I (R-1). The U.S. Air Force awarded McDonnell Douglas the MLV ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] RL10 Engine Ability to Transition from Atlas to Shuttle/Centaur ...
    Each Centaur RL10A-3-3A engine at space vacuum conditions produced a rated thrust of 16,500 pounds and a. 444.4 ± 2.5 sec nominal specific impulse at a nominal ...
  26. [26]
    LAUNCH COMPLEX 36 FACT SHEET - Spaceline
    Launch Complex 36 was constructed in support of the Atlas-Centaur rocket program. It was originally envisioned as a single blockhouse, single launch pad ...
  27. [27]
    Atlas Launch Report | Mission Status Center - Spaceflight Now
    T+plus 24 minutes. The second burn of the Centaur upper stage is complete, boosting the UHF F10 spacecraft into the intended transfer orbit. The stage will now ...
  28. [28]
    Atlas Launch Report | Mission Status Center - Spaceflight Now
    The Atlas liquid oxygen tank is the largest tank to be filled today. The propellant for the first stage -- the RP-1 kerosene -- was loaded aboard the rocket ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] ATLAS-CENTAUR AC-12 FLIGHT PERFORMANCE FOR ...
    This report presents an evaluation of the Atlas-Centaur launch vehicle ... The Atlas-Centaur launch vehicle receives dynamic loading from several sources.
  30. [30]
    45th Space Wing Launches Atlas V Carrying 3rd X-37B Orbital Test ...
    Dec 11, 2012 · The wing also provided its vast network of radar, telemetry, optical and communications instrumentation to facilitate a safe launch on the ...
  31. [31]
    Combined Release and Radiation Effects Satellite (CRRES)
    Status: Completed ; Mission Category: Historical Missions ; Launch Date: July 25, 1990 ; Launch Location: Cape Canaveral, FL.
  32. [32]
    Launch failures: an Atlas Groundhog Day - The Space Review
    Mar 9, 2009 · But of even greater significance than the two failures was that the first failure investigation had itself failed: a remarkable situation, and ...
  33. [33]
    Atlas 1 rocket fails on launch, multi-million-dollar satellite destroyed
    Aug 22, 1992 · The Atlas first stage burned out and was jettisoned on schedule 275 seconds after launch. But only one of the two second-stage engines then ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] UHF Follow-On - Archived 3/2005 - Forecast International
    Mar 3, 2004 · The much delayed launch of the first UFO satellite on March 25, 1993, ended in failure when the Atlas booster left the satellite in a useless ...
  35. [35]
    Atlas Launch Report | UHF Follow-On Satellite - Spaceflight Now
    Nov 21, 1999 · * Did not reach intended orbit because of Atlas 1 first stage malfunction. Source: Spaceflight Now research. The arrays are folded against the ...Missing: F1 | Show results with:F1
  36. [36]
  37. [37]
    Satellite: GOES-9 - WMO OSCAR
    Mar 20, 2021 · The EOL date should be understood as the date of completion of the re-location activity. Launch, 23 May 1995, EOL, 22 May 2003. Last update ...
  38. [38]
    BeppoSAX - HEASARC - NASA
    Sep 24, 2020 · It was launched on April 30 1996 from Cape Canaveral and operated for 6 years. It was the first X-ray mission with a scientific payload covering ...
  39. [39]
    GOES History GOES-R Series - GOES-R satellites
    In October 2015, NOAA celebrated the 40th anniversary of the launch of the first GOES satellite. ... GOES-9, May 23, 1995, Decommissioned 2007. GOES-K, GOES-10 ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] atlas and titan space operations at cape canaveral 1993 — 2006
    Apr 20, 1998 · ATLAS I/CENTAUR and ATLAS II/CENTAUR Military Space Operations ... table and 15,000-pound Star 48B solid-fueled third stage atop the booster's ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] 19880009164.pdf - NASA Technical Reports Server
    Under NASA's auspices, several improvements have recently been made to the TGA to adapt it for potential Space Station use.
  42. [42]
    Atlas
    Atlas I American orbital launch vehicle. The Atlas I launch vehicle was derived from the Atlas G, and included the same basic vehicle components (Atlas ...
  43. [43]
  44. [44]
    Cost, Price, and the Whole Darn Thing
    Development cost for Atlas I/II series. The originally estimated launch price in 1999 was $100 million. The originally estimated launch price in 1999 was $110 ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Delta II, Atlas II, and Atlas III - Los Angeles Air Force Base
    Development and production of the Atlas II, an improved version of the. Atlas/Centaur launch vehicle, began in June 1988. The Atlas II would be able to launch.Missing: successors legacy
  46. [46]
    Atlas IIAS
    Thrust (vac): 185.012 kN (41,592 lbf). Isp: 449 sec. Burn time: 392 sec. Diameter: 3.05 m (10.00 ft). Span: 3.05 m (10.00 ft). Length ...<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    Atlas I | Galaxy 5 - Next Spaceflight
    Atlas I launched with Galaxy 5 from SLC-36B, Cape Canaveral SFS, Florida, USA on Saturday Mar 14, 1992 at 00:00 UTC.
  48. [48]
    Overview of the Development of Dynamic Environments for Atlas V ...
    Figure 1 shows the evolution of the Atlas launch vehicles, with the changes between each configuration. The Atlas III introduced the RD Am- ross RD-180 booster ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  49. [49]
    Return to Flight...Challenger Accident - NASA
    ... expendable launch vehicle for payloads originally scheduled for a shuttle launch from Vandenberg). This decision reduced overall schedule pressure on a four ...
  50. [50]
    Recovery in Space | Air & Space Forces Magazine
    The plan that the Air Force forged in 1986 for a comeback there from the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster has been put into action and is paying off. This is ...