Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Background extinction rate

The background extinction rate denotes the long-term average frequency of species extinctions attributable to intrinsic ecological and evolutionary processes, distinct from elevated losses during mass extinction events or recent human-driven perturbations. It is conventionally expressed in units of extinctions per million -years (E/MSY), reflecting the probability that any given will go extinct over a one-year when scaled across the total extant species pool. Empirical estimates derive primarily from fossil records of taxa with robust stratigraphic resolution, such as , cephalopods, and mammals, where completeness of preservation allows quantification of per-lineage extinction probabilities over time. Across diverse metazoan groups, background rates generally fall within 0.1 to 1 E/MSY, though taxon-specific variations exist; for instance, mammals exhibit rates around 1.8 to 2 E/MSY based on direct counts of dated last occurrences adjusted for sampling biases. These figures underscore a historically low baseline, where stochastic events like limited-range or competitive displacement drive isolated losses rather than . The rate's estimation involves separating "normal" turnover from pre-extinction baselines in the fossil sequence, often using statistical models to account for Signor-Lipps effects (under-sampling of rare last appearances) and variations in taxonomic abundance. Debates persist over precise quantification due to incomplete fossilization—estimated at under 1% for most species—and differences in how standing diversity is reconstructed, yet consensus holds that background extinction sustains equilibrium through counterbalance over millions of years. As a , it facilitates causal of contemporary dynamics, revealing orders-of-magnitude deviations where documented, though overreliance on data for modern comparisons introduces ascertainment biases favoring well-studied vertebrates.

Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Core Principles

The background extinction rate denotes the long-term average frequency at which biological disappear from the fossil record during intervals free from mass events, reflecting ongoing natural turnover driven by localized ecological pressures rather than global catastrophes. This rate is quantified as the number of extinctions per million species-years (E/MSY), derived from paleontological data on species durations and origination-extinction balances across geological epochs. Empirical analyses of marine fossils yield estimates of 0.1 to 1 E/MSY, with higher values around 2 E/MSY for mammals, indicating variability tied to taxonomic and environmental factors. Core principles hinge on the stochastic nature of these extinctions, where individual failures accumulate gradually due to biotic competition, predation, , or climatic oscillations insufficient to trigger widespread die-offs. Unlike mass extinctions, background rates embody dynamics in which roughly offsets losses, maintaining over millions of years; compilations, such as those spanning 450 million years, reveal age-dependent declines in extinction probability, with most perishing soon after origination. Statistical modeling from genus-level data further supports a baseline of approximately 0.01 genera per million genera-years, underscoring the rarity of persistence without adaptive success. Methodologically, the rate presupposes incomplete fossil preservation, necessitating corrections for sampling biases via techniques like confidence intervals on per-lineage extinction probabilities, which confirm background events as diffuse and non-synchronous across clades. This framework prioritizes empirical derivation from stratigraphic ranges over theoretical assumptions, revealing taxon-specific patterns—such as elevated rates in vertebrates versus stability in —and serving as a benchmark for detecting anomalous accelerations in extinction .

Distinction from Mass and Background Extinctions

Background extinction refers to the ongoing, relatively low-rate loss of through processes over geological timescales, typically measured as extinctions per million -years (E/MSY). This , estimated at 0.1 to 1 E/MSY across major taxa such as and mammals, reflects a balance between and driven by localized ecological factors including , predation, , and gradual environmental shifts. In contrast, mass extinctions are rare, episodic events characterized by abruptly elevated extinction s that surpass background levels by at least an , often resulting in the loss of 75% or more of within geologically brief intervals of 2 million years or less. The primary quantitative distinction lies in the magnitude and tempo of species loss: background rates equate to roughly 1 to 10 extinctions per year across Earth's estimated 10 million , whereas mass events, such as the "" identified in the record (Ordovician-Silurian, Late Devonian, Permian-Triassic, Triassic-Jurassic, and Cretaceous-Paleogene), exhibit rates exceeding 10 E/MSY and affect broad swaths of simultaneously. For instance, background for mammals is approximated at 2 E/MSY based on durations, implying species persistence for hundreds of thousands to millions of years, while mass extinctions compress such losses into far shorter durations, with selectivity patterns differing qualitatively—background extinctions often target specific vulnerabilities, whereas mass events show less predictability across taxa. Causally, background extinctions arise from intrinsic biotic interactions and extrinsic but non-catastrophic changes, maintaining evolutionary , whereas mass extinctions stem from extraordinary global perturbations like volcanism, impacts, or severe , disrupting ecosystems on continental or planetary scales. Detection in the fossil record further differentiates them: background turnover appears as gradual, steady decline in , while mass extinctions manifest as sharp, synchronous drops in diversity metrics, such as marine genera counts, unexplainable by background variability alone. Although some analyses question a strict bimodal separation, positing in extinction , the in paleontological literature upholds mass extinctions as outliers from prevailing background regimes due to their disproportionate impact on macroevolutionary patterns.

Historical Context

Early Fossil-Based Insights

Pioneering quantitative insights into background extinction rates derived from systematic analyses of the marine fossil record, primarily focusing on family- and genus-level taxa due to preservation biases favoring hard-bodied . In the early 1980s, paleontologists David M. Raup and J. John Sepkoski Jr. utilized Sepkoski's comprehensive compendium of over 7,000 marine genera to compute temporal patterns of extinction intensity. Their 1982 analysis revealed that background extinction rates—defined as the baseline rate excluding episodic mass events—exhibited a secular decline, dropping from approximately 4.6 families per million years in the Early to about 2.0 families per million years in post-Paleozoic intervals. This decline was attributed to potential ecological optimizations or sampling artifacts, though the data underscored a persistent low-level turnover dominating non-catastrophic intervals. These estimates distinguished extinctions as gradual, processes affecting a small fraction of taxa annually, contrasting sharply with mass extinction spikes where rates could surge by factors of 10 or more. Raup and Sepkoski's boundary-crossing , which measured the proportion of lineages failing to persist across stratigraphic stages, provided the first robust statistical framework for isolating signals amid incomplete preservation. For instance, median rates hovered around 0.25–0.4 per million years for genera in post-Ordovician data, implying durations of several million years on average. Such findings challenged earlier qualitative views of uniform extinction constancy, highlighting temporal heterogeneity even in regimes. Limitations inherent to early fossil-based approaches included taxonomic aggregation at higher levels (families over ), which likely inflated perceived rates for lower taxa, and underrepresentation of terrestrial or soft-bodied organisms. Despite these, the work established that over 90% of Phanerozoic extinctions occurred as background events, informing subsequent models of biotic turnover. Raup's contemporaneous contributions, such as the 1975 "law of extinction" positing constant per-species risk regardless of age, reinforced the view of background extinction as a density-independent process akin to a random cull. These insights shifted toward probabilistic modeling, laying groundwork for refined species-level benchmarks in later decades.

Development of Quantitative Frameworks

The quantitative assessment of background extinction rates began to take shape in the mid-20th century but gained rigor in the through systematic compilation and statistical analysis of records, particularly for genera. Early efforts, such as those by in the 1940s and Norman Newell in the 1950s, relied on qualitative syntheses of stratigraphic data to infer typical species durations, estimating mean lifespans of 5-10 million years for many taxa, implying low per-year probabilities on the order of 0.01-0.02. However, these lacked comprehensive datasets and formal metrics, limiting precision to broad averages without accounting for temporal variations or sampling artifacts. A pivotal advancement occurred in 1982 when David M. Raup and J. John Sepkoski Jr. developed a quantitative framework using Sepkoski's database of over 7,000 marine fossil genera spanning the Eon. They calculated per-capita rates as the proportion of genera disappearing per geological stage (typically 5-10 million years long), yielding background rates of approximately 5% per stage or 0.5-1% per million years, distinct from mass pulses exceeding 10-20% per stage. This approach employed on time-series data to identify statistically significant deviations from models of diversity, revealing a secular decline in background rates from ~10% per million years in the to ~2-5% in the , attributed to ecological stabilization rather than methodological bias. Their methodology standardized comparisons across taxa and eras, enabling the separation of stochastic background processes from catastrophic events via chi-square tests and confidence intervals. Refinements in the and introduced normalized metrics like extinctions per million species-years (E/MSY), which divides observed extinctions by and time interval to yield rates around 0.1-1 E/MSY for invertebrates, facilitating cross-era and cross-taxon benchmarks. This metric, building on Raup-Sepkoski's foundation, addressed varying standing diversity by inverting species duration estimates—e.g., a 10-million-year mean lifespan implies ~0.1 E/MSY—and incorporated boundary-crosser analyses to mitigate signor's condition (under-sampling of short-lived taxa). Later frameworks, such as Bayesian models in the , further adjusted for preservation biases and taxonomic lumping, confirming median background rates of 0.023-0.135 E/MSY across diverse datasets while highlighting uncertainties from incomplete records. These developments emphasized empirical sampling over speculative models, underscoring that background rates reflect density-dependent ecological limits rather than constant hazards.

Methodological Approaches

Analysis of Fossil Records

Analysis of fossil records entails compiling stratigraphic occurrences of taxa to infer species durations and timings, enabling estimation of background rates as the average turnover excluding pulses. Large datasets, such as Sepkoski Jr.'s of marine genera—encompassing over 7,000 taxa documented in stages from the to Recent—form the basis for such calculations. This facilitates per-stage intensities, with background rates derived from non-peak intervals, yielding genus-level estimates averaging 3.5% per million years. Species-level proxies from these data, adjusted for higher within-genus turnover, align with rates around 0.1 s per million species-years (E/MSY). The boundary-crosser method standardizes estimates by focusing on taxa spanning interval boundaries, computing extinction rates as the proportion of such taxa vanishing within a stage divided by the prior boundary-crosser count, thus mitigating sampling incompleteness. Applied to Sepkoski's data, this yields Phanerozoic-wide background rates declining from ~10% per million years in the to ~2% in the for genera, reflecting ecological stabilization rather than artifactual bias. Complementary approaches, like gap-filler metrics incorporating single-interval taxa, provide robustness checks but are sensitive to preservation variability. Modern Bayesian frameworks, such as the PyRate software, enhance precision by modeling occurrences as Poisson processes, estimating origination, extinction, and preservation rates while accounting for unobserved lineages. These yield median background rates of 0.023–0.135 E/MSY across simulations calibrated to marine and terrestrial records, with underestimation risks from coarse binning. For better-resolved groups like mammals, counts integrated with standing diversity produce rates up to 1.8 E/MSY, though conservative medians hover near 0.1 E/MSY. Key challenges include the Signor-Lipps effect, where incomplete sampling causes last appearances to precede true , artificially smoothing rates and inflating background estimates during abrupt events. Taxonomic biases toward preservable limit applicability to terrestrial or soft-bodied taxa, necessitating proxies or supplementary molecular data. Despite these, fossil-derived rates provide the empirical benchmark for background , with statistical separation of from background via histograms of stage intensities confirming a bimodal distribution.

Species Duration and Lifespan Metrics

Species duration, also termed species , measures the temporal span from a species' origination to its , typically estimated from the record as the interval between the datum (FAD) and last appearance datum (LAD). These metrics underpin background extinction rate calculations, where the per-species extinction rate λ approximates the inverse of the mean duration D under an waiting-time model, λ ≈ 1/D, assuming steady-state conditions without . Empirical durations are derived from stratigraphic ranges but require corrections for sampling biases, such as the Signor-Lipps effect, which truncates perceived durations due to incomplete preservation near boundaries, leading to underestimation of true longevities if unadjusted. Analyses of North American mammals reveal average durations of 2.3–4.3 million years for larger taxa, with smaller mammals showing shorter persistence owing to higher turnover rates influenced by ecological traits like body size and specialization. Modeling of these durations often employs or Weibull distributions to account for age-dependent probabilities, highlighting time-invariant effects of traits on longevity. In contrast, exhibit longer durations reflective of greater environmental stability and lower turnover; for instance, eastern Pacific molluscan from the Pliocene-Pleistocene show a median duration of 3.5 million years. Benthic on the continental margin demonstrate extended durations, with many persisting for millions of years amid low evolutionary rates, as evidenced by in and .
Taxonomic GroupAverage/Median Duration (million years)Key NotesSource
Large mammals ()2.3–4.3Shorter for small mammals; influenced by body size
Eastern Pacific molluscs (Pliocene-Pleistocene)3.5 ()Range 1.0–7.5; abundance not predictive of
Benthic (Atlantic margin)Multi-million year persistenceLow rates; evolutionary stasis common
These metrics vary systematically across taxa due to factors like geographic range size and niche breadth, with broader-ranging achieving longer durations by buffering against local perturbations. Fossil-based estimates generally yield shorter durations than phylogenetic reconstructions, underscoring the need for integrated approaches to refine background rate benchmarks.

Statistical Modeling Techniques

Statistical modeling techniques for background extinction rates primarily draw from stratigraphic data in the fossil record, treating durations as exponentially distributed waiting times to under a constant-rate assumption, while correcting for sampling incompleteness. The per-capita rate \mu is often estimated as the reciprocal of mean duration, expressed in extinctions per million -years (E/MSY), with background values typically ranging from 0.023 to 0.135 E/MSY across taxonomic compilations excluding mass intervals. These models incorporate biases such as the Signor-Lipps effect, where last occurrences systematically precede true due to uneven sampling, leading to underestimation of durations and overestimation of rates if uncorrected. A foundational approach is the boundary-crosser , which calculates per-capita rates from the proportion of taxa surviving stratigraphic intervals: \hat{\mu}_{pc} = -\ln(S_{az}/S_a), where S_a is the number of taxa entering an interval and S_{az} is the number crossing both boundaries. This metric minimizes preservation biases by focusing on demonstrated survivors, yielding background rates for around 0.25 per million years when averaged over non-pulsed periods. Extensions include gap-filler adjustments to account for Signor-Lipps gaps, estimating true ranges as \log[(t_2 + p)/(t_3 + g + p)], where t_2 and t_3 are observed range endpoints, p is a preservation , and g is the modeled size derived from confidence levels on stratigraphic horizons. Survival analysis treats observed species ranges as right-censored data, modeling the probability of persistence over N intervals as f(N) = e^{-N \hat{\mu}_{pc}}, which allows aggregation across cohorts to infer background turnover independent of interval length. Bayesian frameworks further refine these by incorporating priors on timing, generating posterior distributions for true dates via , particularly useful for age-dependent rates where younger taxa exhibit lower probabilities. Simulations validate these models by testing sensitivity to sampling variation, revealing that fossil-derived estimates converge around 0.1 E/MSY when combining stratigraphic and phylogenetic , though molecular clocks introduce in separating from . Limitations persist, as terrestrial and soft-bodied taxa are underrepresented, potentially inflating marine-centric baselines.

Empirical Estimates and Variations

Rates Across Taxonomic Groups

Background extinction rates, derived primarily from fossil record analyses of species durations, exhibit significant variation across taxonomic groups, reflecting differences in evolutionary longevity, ecological niches, and preservation biases. For mammals, empirical estimates place the rate at approximately 1-2 extinctions per million -years (E/MSY), calculated from stratigraphic ranges and extinction counts in well-documented fossil assemblages. This corresponds to mean species durations of roughly 0.5-1 million years, influenced by factors such as habitat and metabolic rates that shorten terrestrial lifespans relative to taxa. Birds, with a sparser but comparable record to mammals, are estimated to have similar background rates around 1-2 E/MSY, though direct -based quantifications are limited by taphonomic challenges in preserving avian skeletons. Reptiles and amphibians, as fellow terrestrial , show analogous patterns, with rates often extrapolated to 1.8 E/MSY based on shared phylogenetic and ecological traits, despite incomplete preservation for amphibians, which favors hardier taxa. These rates are higher than those for many , underscoring how endothermy and complex life histories may accelerate turnover in durations. Marine , benefiting from superior fossilization in sedimentary records, display lower background rates, typically 0.1-1 E/MSY, with mean species durations extending to 5-10 million years for groups like bivalves and gastropods. For instance, analyses of marine genera yield per- equivalents around 0.1 E/MSY, attributable to broader environmental tolerances and lower pressures in stable oceanic . Planktonic groups such as and dinoflagellates exhibit even higher rates (up to 5-13 E/MSY in some estimates), linked to rapid evolutionary turnover in microfossils, though these are outliers compared to benthic . Terrestrial , less well-represented in fossils, likely align closer to rates due to habitat vulnerabilities, but data remain sparse. These disparities highlight methodological caveats: estimates favor durable, taxa, potentially understating rates for soft-bodied or terrestrial groups, while genus-level proxies (e.g., 0.01 per million genera-years) scale upward for species-level precision. Across phyla, rates cluster between 0.1 and 2 E/MSY for most metazoans, with vertebrates at the higher end, emphasizing taxonomic selectivity in dynamics absent mass events.

Quantitative Benchmarks (e.g., E/MSY)

The metric E/MSY, or extinctions per million species-years, quantifies the background extinction rate by dividing the observed number of extinctions (E) by the product of standing and the duration of the stratigraphic interval in millions of years (MSY). This approach, rooted in fossil record analyses, normalizes for differences in taxonomic richness and time spans to estimate per-species probabilities under non-catastrophic conditions. Estimates vary by taxonomic group, geological epoch, and methodological assumptions, such as whether to use genus-level proxies or account for sampling biases like the Signor-Lipps effect, which undercounts short-lived taxa. Fossil-based studies of , a well-preserved group, yield E/MSY values ranging from 0.023 to 0.135, with authors concluding that typical background rates approximate 0.1 E/MSY after correcting for clade-specific durations and incomplete sampling. For vertebrates, particularly mammals, estimates are higher, with rates around 1.8 E/MSY derived from fossil compilations, often conservatively rounded to 2 E/MSY to encompass uncertainties in diversification dynamics. Broader syntheses, including terrestrial and marine taxa, frequently cite approximately 1 E/MSY as a , reflecting averaged per-species durations of about 1 million years in the absence of mass events.
Study/SourceTaxonomic FocusEstimated E/MSYKey Assumptions/Notes
Harnik et al. (2014)Marine genera (various phyla)0.1 (median 0.023–0.135)Genus-level durations; bias corrections for pull of the recent and sampling completeness.
Ceballos et al. (2015)Mammals/vertebrates2 (conservative from 1.8 median) records; upward adjustment for modern applicability.
Quental & (2010, implied in syntheses)Mammals~1.8Phylogenetic control; higher for post-Cretaceous.
General average (e.g., Smithsonian )Multicellular ~1Long-term per-species lifespan proxy; minimal bias adjustment.
These benchmarks highlight methodological sensitivities: lower values emerge from refined statistical models emphasizing long-term clade persistence, while higher figures align with raw counts from better-resolved vertebrate records, underscoring the need for taxon-specific calibrations rather than universal constants. Discrepancies also arise from debates over whether background rates should exclude pseudo-extinctions (e.g., anagenetic speciation) or incorporate spatial heterogeneity in preservation.

Temporal and Spatial Heterogeneities

Background extinction rates demonstrate temporal variations across geological stages, with extinction fluctuating due to factors such as shifts in taxonomic age distributions and turnover, independent of mass extinction events. Analyses of marine families reveal that rates tend to decline over long timescales as faunas age, with higher background extinction probabilities associated with intervals dominated by young families and lower rates prevailing when older, more established lineages predominate. For instance, stage-level data from the fossil record indicate greater variability in per-taxon extinction metrics compared to origination, often correlating negatively with interval duration and punctuated by elevated-risk phases that define boundaries without reaching mass extinction thresholds. These dynamics challenge the assumption of a uniform background rate, as empirical reconstructions show persistent fluctuations driven by ecological and evolutionary processes rather than sampling artifacts alone. Spatial heterogeneities in background extinction arise from biogeographic factors, including geographic range extent and latitudinal positioning, which modulate risk through stability and dispersal opportunities. Taxa with broader geographic ranges exhibit significantly lower extinction probabilities during background intervals, with analyses of 12,300 benthic genera across 47 time bins showing positive associations in 44 cases, where wider ranges increase odds via reduced vulnerability to localized perturbations. Latitudinal gradients further contribute, as age-dependent —where rates decrease sharply with duration—is stronger in tropical low latitudes (0°–23° N/S) across 21 clades over 450 million years, diminishing toward higher latitudes (>46°), implying higher background turnover in equatorial regions due to intensified or environmental instability. Regional paleogeographic analyses confirm heterogeneity, with background origination and rates varying across provinces such as the Circumtethys (equatorial, higher volatility) versus high-latitude realms (subdued rates), even absent global crises, underscoring the role of provincial environmental gradients in shaping differential . While clade-level differences often exceed latitudinal ones in variance, these spatial patterns reflect causal influences like range size buffering against losses, distinct from preservation biases.

Causal Mechanisms

Natural Ecological and Evolutionary Drivers

Biotic interactions, such as and predation, constitute primary ecological drivers of background extinctions, wherein species fail to sustain viable populations amid resource limitations or heightened selective pressures in stable ecosystems. Fossil records demonstrate diversity-dependent dynamics, where rising intensifies , elevating per-species extinction probabilities and enforcing equilibrium diversity levels, as modeled in Sepkoski's analyses of marine taxa. For instance, post-Paleozoic replacement patterns exhibit "double-wedge" signatures, with incumbent lineages declining as superior competitors emerge, evident in the macroevolutionary of brachiopods by bivalves over millions of years due to filtration efficiencies and niche overlap. Predation similarly imposes ongoing risks, with intensified drilling or crushing on shelled correlating to elevated selectivity, as seen in echinoid assemblages where adaptive failures against predatory escalation contributed to lineage turnover. Herbivory and further mediate ecological extinctions through co-evolutionary escalations, disrupting in herbivores or hosts unable to evolve countermeasures. North American horse fossils reveal dietary shifts driven by abrasive herbivory from grasses, linking vegetation changes to selective extinctions among less adaptable equids during the . These interactions often manifest as density-dependent regulation, where local overcrowding amplifies disease transmission or mate competition, culling marginal populations without abiotic perturbations. Paleontological data underscore that such biotic pressures operate continuously across taxa, shaping origination-extinction balances in non-mass extinction intervals and distinguishing background rates from punctuated crises. Evolutionary drivers underpin these ecological failures, particularly via the dynamics requiring perpetual adaptation to biotic adversaries, lest species succumb to obsolescence. Van Valen's hypothesis posits age-independent extinctions arising from coevolutionary "arms races," wherein lagging innovation in defense, foraging, or reproduction yields to rivals, a pattern corroborated by constant hazard rates in long-ranging marine genera. Genetic and demographic stochasticity in small, isolated populations exacerbates this, with mutational accumulation or drift eroding fitness amid competitive exclusion, though fossil evidence emphasizes interaction-mediated maladaptation over isolated genomic decay. Local interspecific rivalries thus propel evolutionary turnover, with superior dispersers or generalists supplanting specialists, sustaining background rates at approximately 0.1 to 1 extinction per million species-years across geological epochs. Collectively, these drivers ensure species durations averaging 1 to 10 million years, reflecting between innovation and obsolescence in naturally fluctuating biotas.

Biogeographical and Environmental Influences

Biogeographical factors significantly modulate background extinction rates, with geographic size emerging as a primary of vulnerability. Analysis of 12,300 benthic genera spanning the to reveals that wider geographic ranges are positively associated with survivorship in 44 of 47 approximately 10-million-year intervals, even after controlling for and abundance. This pattern underscores how extensive distributions buffer against localized perturbations, reducing risk during non-mass periods across the . Latitudinal gradients further influence extinction selectivity, with stronger age-dependent patterns at lower latitudes. In tropical regions (within 23° latitude), extinction rates decrease with species age in all 21 analyzed clades, reflecting enhanced biotic interactions and environmental filtering that favor established lineages. This selectivity weakens poleward, with fewer clades showing declines at mid- (23°–46°) and high latitudes (>46°), and no consistent temporal trends over 450 million years of background intervals. Island isolation, by contrast, elevates risks through reduced population sizes and genetic variation, rendering insular taxa more susceptible than mainland counterparts in fossil records, though pre-human data remain limited. Environmental drivers, including variability and stability, underpin these biogeographical effects by altering resource availability and competitive dynamics. Gradual climatic shifts, such as or changes, induce reconfiguration, prompting adaptations or extinctions in ill-equipped to track alterations. Stable habitats correlate with lower rates, as evidenced by trends where reduced volatility in continental configurations and sea levels diminished overall background intensities for marine taxa. Productivity gradients, tied to nutrient cycling and energy inputs, similarly affect persistence, with higher-stability environments fostering longer durations.

Modern Comparisons and Debates

Estimated Current Extinction Rates

Estimates of current extinction rates are derived from documented cases cataloged by organizations such as the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and from predictive models incorporating threat data, habitat degradation, and species-area relationships. The records approximately 900 species extinctions since 1500, with rates accelerating to about 3.6 per year in the , primarily affecting vertebrates, island endemics, and certain like mollusks. This documented tally represents roughly 0.5% of the approximately 1.9 million described species, or 0.01% when extrapolating to an estimated total of 8.7 million species on . For well-monitored taxa, such as birds and mammals, extinction rates since 1900 have been calculated at 8 to 100 times the background rate, with 80 bird species and 69 mammal species confirmed extinct, compared to an expected 9 vertebrate extinctions under background conditions of about 2 extinctions per million species-years (E/MSY). Across broader described biodiversity, however, the observed rate approximates background levels of 0.1 to 1 E/MSY, as only 0.04% of known species are listed as extinct despite centuries of human impact. Higher estimates, ranging from 100 to 1,000 times background or over 100 E/MSY globally, stem from models projecting losses among undescribed and threatened populations, often assuming rapid declines from habitat loss and . These projections, which imply hundreds of thousands of extinctions since 1500, have faced scrutiny for overreliance on speculative parameters, incomplete assessments, and failure to account for species resilience or rediscoveries, potentially inflating rates beyond . Taxonomic disparities persist, with elevated rates in groups like amphibians (146 extinctions since 1900) and freshwater gastropods (over one above background), while and many terrestrial rates remain poorly quantified. Uncertainties in species inventories and lagged detection further complicate assessments, underscoring that while anthropogenic influences have demonstrably increased extinctions in vulnerable subsets, global rates do not yet unequivocally signal a mass .

Evidence for Anthropogenic Elevation

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has documented approximately 900 extinctions since 1500 AD, with the majority attributed to human activities such as , , introduction, and . Among vertebrates, 338 extinctions have been recorded over this period, far exceeding expectations under natural background rates. These losses are concentrated in island ecosystems and continental regions affected by rapid land-use changes, where human correlates strongly with mammalian extinctions independent of climatic factors. Quantitative assessments using extinctions per million species-years (E/MSY) indicate current rates for s surpass a of 2 E/MSY by factors of 100 or more. For instance, analyses of IUCN data show modern rates aligning with 100-1,000 times pre-human levels, driven primarily by pressures rather than natural variability. Habitat loss, a dominant driver, has been linked to observed declines and extinctions across taxa, with half-millennium records revealing "extinction debts" where losses lag behind by decades. Empirical evidence from specific cases reinforces this elevation; for example, declines, including the Golden Toad (Bufo periglenes), last observed in 1989, coincide with intensified habitat alteration and emerging diseases potentially exacerbated by human-mediated environmental changes. and land conversion have similarly accelerated plant extinctions, with rates differing by hotspot regions but consistently above baseline expectations. These patterns hold across taxonomic groups, though marine species show lower documented rates (around 0.03 E/MSY since 1500), suggesting uneven anthropogenic impacts.

Controversies Over Acceleration Claims

A 2025 analysis of documented extinctions across , arthropods, and land vertebrates, drawing from 912 extinct over the past 500 years and IUCN assessments of nearly 2 million , found that extinction rates peaked around 100 years ago and have since declined, contradicting claims of ongoing acceleration. This deceleration is attributed to interventions mitigating earlier drivers like introductions on islands, which accounted for most recorded losses since 1500, rather than continental or accelerating extinctions in recent decades. Proponents of , such as in a 2023 PNAS by Ceballos et al., argue that genus-level are rising rapidly, with activities eliminating entire genera at rates hundreds of times above background levels, based on extrapolations from data. However, critics like Wiens and Saban counter that such projections overestimate current risks by conflating past island-specific patterns—driven by non-native predators and competitors—with projected continental threats, yielding no of increasing extinction frequency toward the present day. They note that only 102 genera (0.45% of assessed genera) have gone extinct since 1500, predominantly from isolated ecosystems, with rates now stabilizing due to targeted protections rather than escalating globally. Further debate centers on the comparability of contemporary rates to fossil-derived background estimates, often cited as 0.1–1 extinctions per million species-years (E/MSY). Acceleration claims frequently invoke multipliers of 100–1,000 times , but skeptics highlight methodological inconsistencies, such as overreliance on IUCN "possibly extinct" statuses for understudied , which inflate projections without verified losses. A 2016 review adjusted these to suggest modern rates align closer to 100 times rather than 1,000, questioning whether observed elevations constitute true acceleration or merely a temporary spike from historical colonization events. These discrepancies underscore biases in alarmist narratives, where unverified threat assessments from IUCN—potentially influenced by institutional pressures for funding—project future extinctions as current realities, despite documented trends showing abatement.

Critiques and Skeptical Perspectives

Limitations in Fossil Data Interpretation

The fossil record provides of past but suffers from inherent incompleteness, as only a small fraction of —primarily those with durable hard parts like shells or bones—are preserved, with estimates suggesting less than 1% of all that ever lived are represented in fossils. This preservation disproportionately affects soft-bodied , terrestrial taxa, and those in environments with poor taphonomic conditions, leading to underrepresentation of certain lineages and skewed estimates of background extinction rates, which are typically derived from or vertebrates. Temporal coarseness further complicates rate calculations, as stratigraphic data often span broad intervals (e.g., millions of years), obscuring short-term fluctuations and making it challenging to isolate background from episodic events. A key interpretive limitation is the Signor-Lipps effect, where incomplete sampling causes the last occurrences of to appear earlier than their actual times, artificially extending perceived durations of extinction intervals and potentially inflating background rates by distributing events over longer periods. This stochastic bias arises because rare late-surviving individuals are less likely to be sampled, an issue quantified in studies of mass extinctions but applicable to background dynamics, where it can smear low-level turnovers and hinder precise per-million-year- (E/MSY) estimates. Conversely, the pull of the recent introduces an opposite distortion, as modern and subrecent fossils benefit from denser sampling, better exposure of young sedimentary rocks, and inclusion of extant , creating an apparent uptick in diversity and potentially underestimating historical background rates by comparison. Analyses of marine records indicate this effect is modest for species-level data older than 2.4 million years but grows pronounced in the , affecting cross-era rate benchmarks. Taxonomic and sampling biases exacerbate these issues: background rates are often calculated at the genus level rather than due to , which overestimates true extinctions since genera can persist through events, and marine-focused datasets (e.g., from Database compilations) poorly represent terrestrial or freshwater where background rates may differ. Age-dependent extinction patterns, where older lineages show higher apparent rates due to longer exposure to sampling, require Bayesian corrections but remain contentious, as unadjusted models can bias long-term averages upward. Additionally, geographic unevenness in availability and collection effort— with more from well-studied regions like or —introduces spatial heterogeneity, potentially misrepresenting global background rates derived from compilations. These cumulative limitations underscore that fossil-based background estimates (e.g., 0.1–1 E/MSY across taxa) represent lower bounds or approximations, necessitating caution in direct comparisons to modern observations.

Biases in Contemporary Extinction Assessments

Contemporary extinction assessments often rely on models and indices prone to systematic overestimation. Species-area models, frequently applied to forecast s from habitat loss, invariably predict higher rates than observed, with discrepancies potentially surpassing 160% due to assumptions of immediate and uniform species loss that ignore and dispersal. Similarly, the Index, which tracks vertebrate population trends, incorporates mathematical formulations that amplify apparent declines by aggregating heterogeneous data without adequately accounting for spatial variability and sampling inconsistencies. Subjectivity in assessor judgments introduces further , as variation in individual risk tolerances leads to inconsistent application of criteria like those in the , where precautionary approaches favor higher threat categories even amid data gaps. Cognitive biases, including toward prevailing narratives of crisis and in expert panels, exacerbate this by prioritizing threat over null hypotheses of persistence. Data deficiencies compound these issues: imperfect detection in field surveys underestimates extant populations, inflating perceived extinction debts, while biased sampling—favoring accessible, well-studied taxa and regions—distorts global extrapolations toward elevated rates in monitored hotspots. funding priorities, skewed toward , create incentives for assessments emphasizing acute risks to secure resources, potentially overlooking slower, less dramatic dynamics in understudied and that constitute the bulk of . These biases, rooted in methodological choices and institutional pressures, underscore the need for robust validation against empirical rediscoveries and long-term monitoring to temper projections against background variability. analyses reveal that uncorrected gaps in phylogenetic and geographic coverage further skew risk rankings, often elevating apparent signals over natural fluctuations.

Overestimation Risks in Alarmist Narratives

Alarmist narratives on rates frequently employ species-area relationship (SAR) models to project loss impacts, but these methods systematically overestimate extinctions due to a sampling artifact: the area required to confirm exceeds that needed for initial detection. Quantitative analyses of global forest plots and U.S. ranges demonstrate overestimations exceeding 160%, rendering SAR-derived rates unreliable for assessing current despite destruction's ongoing threat. IUCN Red List assessments, central to many alarmist projections, introduce overestimation risks through ambiguous guidelines that permit assessor bias and inconsistent interpretations. For instance, varying treatments of fenced subpopulations or historical ranges—such as excluding "mainland islands" for species like the while including similar cases in —lead to subjective elevations in threat status, undermining standardization and potentially inflating perceived risks across taxa. Cognitive biases, including premature declarations of (known as Romeo's error or the Lazarus effect), further exacerbate this, as rediscoveries reveal misclassifications, with habitat-loss-affected species particularly prone to such errors. Documented extinctions remain low relative to claims of a sixth mass extinction, with only 882 species (0.04% of ~2 million known) verified extinct since 1500 per IUCN data, concentrated in well-monitored vertebrates rather than a broad crisis. A 2025 analysis of 163,022 species found just 0.45% of assessed genera extinct over five centuries, primarily on islands during historical peaks (1870s–1900s), with rates now decelerating amid conservation, falling short of the 75% threshold defining past mass events and aligning closer to background levels of 0.1–2 extinctions per million species-years. Such discrepancies highlight how alarmist extrapolations from biased, incomplete datasets—favoring birds and mammals while underassessing invertebrates—amplify perceived acceleration beyond empirical fossil and observational evidence.

Broader Implications

Role in Evolutionary Dynamics

Background extinction, occurring at a steady, low rate over geological timescales, plays a pivotal in driving turnover and facilitating adaptive evolution by selectively eliminating less competitive lineages while creating opportunities for . This process ensures that ecosystems do not stagnate, as the removal of maladapted frees ecological niches for more resilient or innovative forms to emerge through . records indicate that during periods of background extinction, which typically range from 0.1 to 1 extinction per million species-years, evolutionary dynamics favor traits enhancing survival, such as improved resource utilization or reproductive efficiency, thereby promoting gradual refinement rather than abrupt disruptions. In contrast to mass extinctions, background rates maintain selective pressure without overwhelming origination, allowing lineages to diversify incrementally. This turnover mechanism underpins long-term equilibrium, where background extinctions are counterbalanced by equivalent rates, sustaining net diversity across evolutionary epochs. Empirical analyses of marine fossils reveal that such low-level extinctions correlate with enhanced origination in vacated niches, fostering adaptive radiations and preventing monopolization by incumbent . For instance, studies of post-extinction recovery phases demonstrate how background processes restore community structure through opportunistic colonization, reinforcing resilience and evolutionary . Without this ongoing cull, phylogenetic could dominate, reducing the potential for novel adaptations to environmental shifts and ultimately constraining macroevolutionary progress. In evolutionary terms, background extinction acts as a filter amplifying fitness differentials, where larger-bodied or specialized taxa face higher vulnerability, thus channeling selection toward versatile generalists capable of founding successful descendant clades. This dynamic has been evidenced in analyses of mammalian and records, showing that background regimes yield higher per-lineage persistence compared to pulsed events, underscoring 's role in sculpting progressive trajectories. Overall, it embodies the in practice, compelling perpetual adaptation amid biotic competition to avert lineage obsolescence.

Informing Conservation Without Exaggeration

Accurate estimates of background extinction rates, typically around 0.1 to 1 per million species-years based on records, provide a critical baseline for evaluating contemporary without inflating perceived threats. This baseline helps identify genuine anthropogenic elevations, such as those from or , enabling to prioritize verifiable causal factors like in biodiversity hotspots, where data show rates exceeding background by factors of 10 to 100 in specific locales. By anchoring policies in this empirical foundation, resources can focus on high-impact actions, such as expansion, which have demonstrably reduced risks for mammals and since the . Critiques of extinction projections highlight how methodological flaws, including assumptions of constant per-species extinction probabilities across diverse taxa, can overestimate rates by 160% or more, potentially diverting funds from effective interventions to speculative narratives. For example, assessments often extrapolate from well-studied vertebrates to underdocumented invertebrates, amplifying and fostering alarmism that erodes public support for sustained . Realistic baselines counteract this by emphasizing observed successes, such as the stabilization or decline in rates for many and groups post-2000, attributable to targeted protections rather than doomsday predictions. Informing with unexaggerated background rates promotes causal , directing efforts toward modifiable drivers like removal and sustainable land use, which have averted projected losses in over 20% of assessed since 1993. This approach avoids the pitfalls of equating current losses—fewer than 1,000 documented vertebrate extinctions since 1900—with mass extinction events, which require orders-of-magnitude higher rates sustained over millennia. Instead, it fosters adaptive strategies, such as monitoring programs that track deviations from background norms, ensuring long-term without reliance on contested multipliers of 100- to 1,000-fold. Such precision has contributed to recoveries, like the rebound of island populations through eradications of introduced predators, demonstrating that calibrated, evidence-driven policies yield tangible results.

References

  1. [1]
    Biodiversity crisis or sixth mass extinction? Does the current ...
    Dec 9, 2021 · ... background extinction rate is therefore 1 E/MSY, meaning one extinction per million species per year, or one extinction per 1,000 species ...
  2. [2]
    Accelerated modern human–induced species losses - Science
    Jun 19, 2015 · In this way, the background extinction rate estimated for mammals was estimated at 1.8 E/MSY, here rounded upward conservatively to 2 E/MSY ...
  3. [3]
    Estimates of the magnitudes of major marine mass extinctions in ...
    Oct 3, 2016 · This paper shows that background extinction definitely preceded mass extinctions; introduces a mathematical method for estimating the amount ...
  4. [4]
    A safe operating space for humanity - Nature
    Sep 23, 2009 · The fossil record shows that the background extinction rate for marine life is 0.1–1 extinctions per million species per year; for mammals ...<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    A 450 million years long latitudinal gradient in age‐dependent ...
    Dec 18, 2019 · We show that extinction rate significantly decreases with age in > 90% of the cases, indicating that most species died out soon after their appearance.Material And Methods · The Ade‐nn Method · Results
  6. [6]
    (PDF) Estimating the Normal Background Rate of Species Extinction.
    Based on these data, typical background loss is 0.01 genera per million genera per year. Molecular phylogenies are available for more taxa and ecosystems, but ...
  7. [7]
    Current extinction rates of reptiles and amphibians - PNAS
    This paper uses a new, highly conservative statistical method to infer the number of extinct amphibian and reptile species across the world.
  8. [8]
    On the continuity of background and mass extinction | Paleobiology
    Mar 3, 2017 · If mass extinctions are outliers, or are separated by a gap from background extinctions, the distinctness of mass extinctions is supported. In ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  9. [9]
    Dynamics of Origination and Extinction in the Marine Fossil Record
    For the data starting after the earliest Ordovician, the median extinction rate is 0.380, and the diversity:extinction regression line is so strong that it ...
  10. [10]
    Introduction: Fifty years of Paleobiology - GeoScienceWorld
    Feb 1, 2025 · Notable among these is Raup's (1975) paper wherein he named the “law of extinction” , Van Valen's law for the empirical observation that species ...Missing: pioneers | Show results with:pioneers
  11. [11]
    Forty years later: The status of the “Big Five” mass extinctions - PMC
    Over 40 years ago, Raup and Sepkoski identified five episodes of elevated extinction in the marine fossil record that were thought to be statistically distinct, ...
  12. [12]
    Mass Extinctions in the Marine Fossil Record - Science
    Background extinction rates appear to have declined since Cambrian time, which is consistent with the prediction that optimization of fitness should increase ...
  13. [13]
    Estimating the normal background rate of species extinction
    Aug 26, 2014 · Median estimates of extinction rates ranged from 0.023 to 0.135 E/MSY. Simulation results suggested over- and under-estimation of extinction ...
  14. [14]
    Cumulative frequency distribution of past species extinctions
    Analysis of Sepkoski's compendium of the time ranges of 30000+ taxa yields a mean duration of 28.4 ma for genera of fossil invertebrates.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  15. [15]
    Estimating the normal background rate of species extinction - PubMed
    Aug 26, 2014 · Fossil data yield direct estimates of extinction rates, but they are temporally coarse, mostly limited to marine hard-bodied taxa, and generally ...
  16. [16]
    Accurate and precise estimates of origination and extinction rates
    May 7, 2014 · The median ratio for the extinction rates is 1.54 for 3T:BC and 1.31 for GF:BC, which translates into median offsets of 0.110 or 0.079 (p < ...Basic Simulation Patterns · Phanerozoic Marine Animal... · Empirical Rate Estimates
  17. [17]
    Dynamics of origination and extinction in the marine fossil record
    Aug 12, 2008 · Again based largely on Sepkoski's data, it has long been believed that there has been a decline through the Phanerozoic in both extinction rates ...
  18. [18]
    Accurate and precise estimates of origination and extinction rates
    Apr 8, 2016 · Paleobiologists have used many different methods for estimating rates of origination and extinction. ... This generalized boundary-crosser (BC) ...
  19. [19]
    Improved estimation of macroevolutionary rates from fossil data ...
    Sep 12, 2019 · The software PyRate implements a Bayesian framework to analyze fossil occurrence data to estimate the rates of preservation, origination, and extinction.
  20. [20]
    An upper bound for the background rate of human extinction - Nature
    Jul 30, 2019 · If so, are the risks greater from natural or anthropogenic sources? Here, we evaluate the natural 'background' extinction rate for Homo sapiens.
  21. [21]
    Estimating times of extinction in the fossil record - PMC
    Apr 4, 2016 · Numerous methods have been developed in the palaeontology literature for estimating the true time of extinction using ages of fossil specimens.
  22. [22]
    Species longevity in North American fossil mammals - PROTHERO
    Jun 20, 2013 · Most of the published datasets yield species duration estimates of approximately 2.3–4.3 Myr for larger mammals, with small mammals tending to ...
  23. [23]
    Abundance does not predict extinction risk in the fossil record of ...
    May 22, 2023 · Species longevity ranged from 1.0 to 7.5 million years in the EEP, with a median value of 3.5 million years. None of our regression analyses ...
  24. [24]
    Species Duration and Evolution: Benthic Foraminifera on the Atlantic ...
    Species Duration and Evolution: Benthic Foraminifera on the Atlantic Continental Margin of North America ... Abundance does not predict extinction risk in the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Estimating extinction with the fossil record - Smithsonian Institution
    Oct 18, 2010 · A single event requires two rates: a 'background' rate of no extinction and a single pulsed rate of (nearly) 100% extinction. Thus, we can ...
  27. [27]
    Questioning the sixth mass extinction - ScienceDirect.com
    Oct 1, 2024 · Some studies showed that recent extinction rates are faster than fossil background rates, but extinction rates can exceed background rates ...
  28. [28]
    Extinction Over Time | Smithsonian National Museum of Natural ...
    Judging from the fossil record, the baseline extinction rate is about one species per every one million species per year. Scientists are racing to catalogue the ...
  29. [29]
    Phanerozoic trends in background extinction - GeoScienceWorld
    Jun 1, 2017 · Changes in the rate of background extinction are analyzed as a function of changing age distributions of families.Missing: across periods
  30. [30]
    Temporal variation in extinction risk and temporal scaling of ...
    Feb 8, 2016 · Origination and extinction patterns are similar, but origination intensity varies less among stages than extinction intensity.
  31. [31]
    Towards quantifying the mass extinction debt of the Anthropocene
    Apr 28, 2021 · The approximate extrapolation above predicts extinction rates of E ∼ 0.3 E MGY−1 over the 100 000 years of the Late Pleistocene, an order of ...
  32. [32]
    The effect of geographic range on extinction risk during background ...
    Wide geographic range is generally thought to buffer taxa against extinction, but the strength of this effect has not been investigated for the great ...
  33. [33]
    Global diversity dynamics in the fossil record are regionally ... - Nature
    May 18, 2022 · We find that origination and extinction rates are regionally heterogenous even during events that manifested globally, highlighting the need for spatially ...<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Estimating spatial variation in origination and extinction in deep time
    Feb 10, 2023 · Three metrics designed to estimate global origination and extinction were applied to the simulated data: (1) raw, (2) boundary-crosser (BC) ( ...
  35. [35]
    Biotic interactions and their consequences for macroevolution
    By extension, biotic interactions must contribute to the macroevolutionary patterns that we observe in the fossil record, but exactly how, when and why are ...
  36. [36]
  37. [37]
  38. [38]
  39. [39]
  40. [40]
    The effect of geographic range on extinction risk during background ...
    Jun 19, 2007 · Our results show that wide geographic range has been significantly and positively associated with survivorship for the great majority of Phanerozoic time.Sign Up For Pnas Alerts · Results · Discussion
  41. [41]
    Do island populations have less genetic variation than mainland ...
    Island populations are much more prone to extinction than mainland populations. The reasons for this remain controversial. If inbreeding and loss of genetic ...Missing: background fossils
  42. [42]
    Background extinction rates | World Biogeography Class Notes
    Background extinction is a natural, ongoing process of species loss occurring gradually over time, measured in extinctions per million species-years (E/MSY).
  43. [43]
    Decreasing Phanerozoic extinction intensity as a consequence of ...
    The decline in background extinction rates of marine animals through geologic time is an established but unexplained feature of the Phanerozoic fossil record.<|control11|><|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Habitat area and climate stability determine geographical variation ...
    The joint roles of area and climate stability strengthen concerns over the potential effects of future climate change and habitat loss on biodiversity. Keywords ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  45. [45]
    The Sixth Mass Extinction: fact, fiction or speculation? - Cowie - 2022
    Jan 10, 2022 · (2015) also showed that the current extinction rate for plants is up to 500 times their background extinction rate. However, this figure is far ...
  46. [46]
    Current extinction rate in European freshwater gastropods greatly ...
    2021/05/21 · We find that extinction rates increased by more than one order of magnitude during the Cretaceous–Paleogene mass extinction, which resulted in the extinction ...
  47. [47]
    The past and future human impact on mammalian diversity - Science
    Here, we apply Bayesian models to the fossil record to estimate how mammalian extinction rates have changed over the past 126,000 years, inferring specific ...
  48. [48]
    Half-millennium evidence suggests that extinction debts of global ...
    Dec 13, 2022 · Species extinctions due to habitat destruction have been widely observed globally and are likely to be exacerbated under rapid climate change in ...
  49. [49]
    Report Recent Anthropogenic Plant Extinctions Differ in Biodiversity ...
    Sep 9, 2019 · If the number of species in the biodiversity hotspots or coldspots (Table S2) is S, the corresponding background extinction rate at 0.1 E ...Results And Discussion · Extinction Rates And Trends · Causes Of Extinction
  50. [50]
    A review of recent and future marine extinctions | Cambridge Prisms
    2023/05/09 · This review 1) provides an overview of modern marine extinctions; 2) addresses key concepts that underlie the current biodiversity crisis in the world's oceans;
  51. [51]
    Unpacking the extinction crisis: rates, patterns and causes of recent ...
    2025/10/15 · Many important studies have analysed recent extinctions, but few have comprehensively examined these patterns and assumptions. To our knowledge, ...
  52. [52]
  53. [53]
    On the Challenge of Comparing Contemporary and Deep-Time ...
    Aug 17, 2016 · Calculating a background rate of extinction from the fossil record. Inferring background extinction from taxonomic longevity in the fossil ...
  54. [54]
  55. [55]
    Stratigraphic signatures of mass extinctions: ecological and ...
    Sep 12, 2018 · To correct for this 'Signor–Lipps effect' [9], the timing and pattern of extinctions have been commonly estimated from stratigraphic data by ...
  56. [56]
    Estimates of the magnitudes of major marine mass extinctions in ...
    Oct 18, 2016 · Also presented here is a method for estimating the magnitude of the Signor-Lipps effect, which is the incorrect assignment of extinctions that ...
  57. [57]
    The Pull of the Recent revisited: negligible species-level effect in a ...
    Aug 24, 2020 · The effect of the Pull of the Recent, although small, is greatest for the youngest fossil record (<2.4 Ma), particularly for species. This ...
  58. [58]
    Estimating Age-Dependent Extinction: Contrasting Evidence from ...
    Nov 10, 2017 · Here, we present a Bayesian framework to estimate extinction rates from the fossil record accounting for age-dependent extinction (ADE).
  59. [59]
    Biases in the total extinction rates of fossil taxa - ScienceDirect.com
    The total extinction rates of fossil taxa are affected by sampling biases which arise because there is more young than old exposed sedimentary rock, and ...Missing: paleontological | Show results with:paleontological
  60. [60]
    Species-area relationships always overestimate extinction rates ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · ... overestimation can be greater than 160%. Although we conclude that extinctions caused by habitat loss require greater loss of habitat than ...
  61. [61]
    Mathematical biases in the calculation of the Living Planet Index ...
    Jun 21, 2024 · In summary, we have shown that there are issues with the calculation of the Living Planet Index that lead to an overestimation of vertebrate ...
  62. [62]
    Clarifying misconceptions of extinction risk assessment with the ...
    Apr 1, 2016 · A number of misconceptions regarding the purpose, application and use of the IUCN Red List categories and criteria have arisen.
  63. [63]
    Cognitive biases can play a role in extinction assessments - Frontiers
    For example, the formation of independent and specific teams to unearth implicit assumptions and weaknesses in assessments, and to question the group thinking ...
  64. [64]
    Imperfect detection biases extinction‐debt assessments
    Apr 8, 2021 · We assessed bias due to reduced sample completeness on: (a) species richness; (b) number of wetlands with species in ED; and, (c) magnitude of ...Missing: contemporary | Show results with:contemporary
  65. [65]
    Biased and missing data weaken the IUCN Red List of species
    Jan 17, 2025 · The sheer scale of this initiative presents challenges in data standards and reporting, especially given that legacy issues may reduce accuracy.
  66. [66]
    Limited and biased global conservation funding means most ... - PNAS
    An analysis of species-based conservation projects over a 25-y period reveals larger and deeper taxonomic biases in funding than previously described.
  67. [67]
    Biases in comparative analyses of extinction risk: mind the gap
    May 28, 2012 · We explore how existing biases influence results of comparative analyses of extinction risk by using subsets of data that attempt to correct for detected ...Introduction · Materials and methods · Results · DiscussionMissing: paleontological | Show results with:paleontological
  68. [68]
    Species–area relationships always overestimate extinction rates ...
    May 18, 2011 · The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment predicts that near-term extinction rates could be as high as 1,000 to 10,000 times background rates (see ...Missing: destruction evidence
  69. [69]
    Ambiguity in guideline definitions introduces assessor bias and ...
    Jul 27, 2015 · Ambiguity in guideline definitions introduces assessor bias and influences consistency in IUCN Red List status assessments. The IUCN Red List ...
  70. [70]
    The Sixth Mass Extinction: fact, fiction or speculation? - PMC
    Arguments surrounding the question of whether current extinction rates are artificially high depend on an assessment of the background rate of extinction.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  71. [71]
    The Role of Extinction in Evolution - Tempo And Mode In ... - NCBI
    It may be that extinction is selective when overall extinction rates are low (so-called background extinction), but not when rates are high. Large body size ...
  72. [72]
    Mass extinctions alter extinction and origination dynamics with ...
    Oct 6, 2021 · Together, these findings suggest that background extinction may indeed differ not only quantitatively but also qualitatively from mass ...
  73. [73]
    Declining Phanerozoic background extinction rates: effect ... - Nature
    Jan 17, 1985 · A decline in the total and per-family extinction rate of marine families 1,2 during the Phanerozoic has been attributed to progressive improvements in the ...
  74. [74]
    Deep drilling reveals massive shifts in evolutionary dynamics after ...
    Sep 30, 2020 · We show that speciation and extinction rates nearly simultaneously decreased in the environmentally dynamic phase after ecosystem formation and stabilized ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  75. [75]
    How the Red Queen Drives Terrestrial Mammals to Extinction
    Most species disappear by the processes of background extinction, yet those processes are poorly understood. Here we analyze the evolutionary dynamics of 19.<|separator|>
  76. [76]
    Are We In a Sixth Extinction - NeuroLogica Blog
    Jan 18, 2022 · Estimating the background extinction rate is tricky, mostly based on surveys of fossils. A 2015 paper puts the estimate at closer to 0.1 ...
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Global biodiversity loss: Exaggerated versus realistic estimates
    Jun 1, 2016 · If we accept a Pleistocene rate of 0.5 species per year, and extend it upward to the present time, we will have a background extinction rate to ...
  78. [78]
  79. [79]
    Methods for calculating species extinction rates overestimate ...
    May 18, 2011 · The most widely used methods for calculating species extinction rates are “fundamentally flawed” and overestimate extinction rates by as much as 160 percent.
  80. [80]
    Mass extinction in poorly known taxa - PNAS
    Jun 8, 2015 · This study estimates that we may already have lost 7% of the species on Earth and that the biodiversity crisis is real.<|control11|><|separator|>
  81. [81]
    There Is No 6th Mass Extinction Event Taking Place, in Fact ...
    Sep 25, 2025 · The data simply don't suggest a 6th mass extinction is taking place, and in fact, extinctions are slowing down, not speeding up.<|separator|>
  82. [82]
    Biodiversity crisis or sixth mass extinction?: Does the current ...
    Dec 9, 2021 · Background extinction is a normal process that depends on ecological and biogeographical factors ... extinction rates by at least an order of ...