Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Scarcity

Scarcity is the fundamental economic condition characterized by the insufficiency of resources to meet unlimited human wants, requiring choices among alternative uses of limited means.^[1]^[2] This principle underpins economics, as articulated by Lionel Robbins in defining the discipline as the study of human behavior in relation to multiple ends and scarce means with alternative applications.^[1]^[3] Empirically, scarcity manifests in finite supplies of land, labor, capital, and natural resources relative to expanding demands driven by population growth and technological aspirations.^[4]^[5] While innovations have alleviated pressures in specific sectors, such as agriculture yielding higher outputs per acre, relative scarcities persist as new wants emerge, evidenced by ongoing price signals for commodities like energy and rare earth elements.^[5] Defining characteristics include opportunity costs—the forgone benefits of alternatives not chosen—and trade-offs that shape production possibilities, compelling societies to prioritize via markets, governments, or customs.^[6] Notable implications extend to social dynamics, where resource constraints have historically spurred conflict, as meta-analyses link both scarcity and abundance to elevated risks of violence in resource-dependent regions.^[7] Controversies arise in claims of impending post-scarcity through technology, yet causal analysis reveals that human ingenuity addresses manifestations of scarcity without negating its core reality, as wants adapt and multiply.^[5]

Definition and Core Principles

Fundamental Definition in Economics

In economics, scarcity refers to the perennial condition in which human wants for goods and services surpass the finite resources available to satisfy them, forcing choices among alternative uses of those resources. This arises from the finitude of productive factors—land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship—relative to the expansive scope of human desires, which empirical observation shows expand with technological and income advancements, such as the historical rise in consumption of automobiles from under 1% of U.S. households in 1900 to over 90% by 1960.^[8]^[9] The concept underscores that no society, regardless of wealth, can fulfill all preferences simultaneously; even in affluent economies like the United States in 2023, where GDP per capita exceeded $76,000, constraints persist in allocating resources toward competing ends, such as healthcare versus defense spending. Scarcity implies inherent trade-offs, where pursuing one objective precludes others, generating opportunity costs—the value of the next-best forgone alternative.^[10]^[11] Lionel Robbins crystallized this in his 1932 formulation, defining economics as "the science which studies human behaviour as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses," highlighting scarcity not merely as shortage but as the relational tension between unlimited ends and means capable of multiple applications. This scarcity-driven framework rejects notions of abundance without cost, grounding economic analysis in the reality of constrained provisioning rather than idealized plenty.^[1]

Relative Scarcity vs. Absolute Scarcity

Absolute scarcity refers to the inherent physical finiteness of a resource that cannot be increased through human effort, substitution, or technological advancement, such as the total stock of certain non-renewable minerals like helium or the fixed surface area of Earth.^[12] In contrast, relative scarcity describes a condition where a resource's availability is insufficient relative to prevailing human wants, production needs, or alternative uses at a given time, but this can be mitigated by innovation, efficiency improvements, or shifts in demand.^[13] Mainstream economic theory, as formalized by Lionel Robbins in 1932, emphasizes relative scarcity, defining economics as the study of human behavior amid scarce means with alternative uses relative to unlimited ends.^[14] The distinction originates in debates between Malthusian pessimism and optimistic views of human ingenuity. Thomas Malthus posited absolute scarcity through population growth outpacing food production, leading to inevitable checks like famine, as outlined in his 1798 Essay on the Principle of Population.^[14] Conversely, economists like Robbins and Julian Simon argued for relative scarcity, where apparent limits are relational and surmountable; Simon demonstrated this empirically by showing long-term declines in real commodity prices from 1800 to 1990, attributing them to human knowledge as the "ultimate resource" that expands effective supply.^[15] For instance, while oil reserves appeared absolutely scarce in the 1970s due to OPEC embargoes, technological advances like hydraulic fracturing increased recoverable supplies by over 50% globally between 2000 and 2020, illustrating relative scarcity's responsiveness to market signals and innovation.^[16] In practice, absolute scarcity applies narrowly to thermodynamic constraints, such as entropy in energy systems, where low-entropy resources like fossil fuels degrade irreversibly upon use.^[17] Relative scarcity dominates economic analysis because human wants evolve and resources prove substitutable; for example, copper's relative scarcity in wiring has been alleviated by aluminum and fiber optics, preventing price spikes despite steady demand growth since the 19th century.^[18] Claims of impending absolute scarcity, as in Paul Ehrlich's 1968 predictions of mass starvation by the 1980s, have repeatedly failed against evidence of yield doublings in agriculture via the Green Revolution, which boosted global cereal production from 1.8 billion tons in 1961 to 2.8 billion tons by 2020.^[19]^[16] This relative framework underpins market mechanisms, where prices signal scarcity to incentivize conservation or discovery, as opposed to absolute views that may justify interventionist policies prone to misallocation.^[13] Empirical data supports relative scarcity's prevalence: the U.S. Geological Survey reports proven global oil reserves rose from 1 trillion barrels in 1980 to 1.7 trillion by 2020, despite consumption tripling, due to exploration and extraction efficiencies rather than geological expansion.^[15] Thus, while absolute scarcity sets ultimate boundaries, economic scarcity is predominantly relative, shaped by human action and knowledge accumulation.^[14]

Historical Development

Early Concepts: Malthus and Population Limits

Thomas Robert Malthus introduced foundational ideas on resource scarcity in his 1798 work, An Essay on the Principle of Population, arguing that human population growth, when unchecked, proceeds at a geometric rate—doubling approximately every 25 years—while food production advances only at an arithmetic rate.^[20]^[21] This disparity, Malthus contended, inevitably generates pressures on subsistence resources, as population outpaces the means of support, leading to widespread poverty and hardship unless restrained.^[22] Malthus identified two primary mechanisms to balance population with available resources: positive checks, such as famine, disease, and warfare, which increase mortality and enforce scarcity through misery; and preventive checks, primarily moral restraint like delayed marriage and celibacy, which reduce birth rates voluntarily.^[20]^[21] He dismissed optimistic views of indefinite progress, asserting that without such checks, exponential population expansion would exhaust finite agricultural output, rendering resources perpetually scarce relative to human needs.^[22]^[23] These concepts framed scarcity not merely as a static shortage but as a dynamic outcome of unchecked demographic expansion overwhelming linear resource increments, influencing subsequent debates on sustainability and influencing figures like Charles Darwin in understanding natural selection amid competitive limits.^[24]^[25] Malthus's analysis, grounded in observations of historical famines and agricultural yields, underscored causal links between population dynamics and resource constraints, predating formal economic models of scarcity.^[20]^[22]

Formalization in Neoclassical Economics

In neoclassical economics, scarcity is formalized as the foundational constraint arising from the disparity between unlimited human wants and limited resources with alternative uses, compelling rational agents to make choices under trade-offs. This conceptualization emerged prominently during the marginal revolution of the 1870s, when economists William Stanley Jevons, Carl Menger, and Léon Walras shifted focus from classical labor theories of value to subjective marginal utility, where the value of additional units of a good diminishes due to relative scarcity against insatiable desires.^[26] Their analyses implied that economic value and prices reflect scarcity signals, as agents allocate resources to maximize utility subject to endowment constraints.^[27] Lionel Robbins provided an explicit definitional formalization in his 1932 monograph An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, stating that "economics is the science which studies human behaviour as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses."^[28] Robbins emphasized scarcity's relational nature—resources are scarce not absolutely but relative to competing ends—distinguishing economics from other sciences by its focus on optimization amid such constraints, thereby excluding welfare judgments or institutional specifics.^[28] This definition underpinned neoclassical microeconomic theory, where scarcity manifests in opportunity costs, calculated as the value of forgone alternatives in production or consumption decisions.^[29] Neoclassical models operationalize scarcity through mathematical constraints, such as budget sets in consumer choice theory (e.g., \sum p_i x_i \leq m, where prices p_i, quantities x_i, and income m limit feasible bundles) and production possibility frontiers depicting trade-offs between goods due to fixed factors like land, labor, and capital.^[27] In general equilibrium frameworks, pioneered by Walras and refined by Arrow and Debreu in the 1950s, scarcity is embedded in initial endowments and competitive markets that clear via price adjustments, ensuring Pareto-efficient allocations under assumptions of perfect information and no externalities.^[27] These formalisms treat scarcity as universal and apolitical, driving efficiency through decentralized decision-making rather than central planning.^[30]

Post-War Challenges: Simon and the Ultimate Resource

In the decades following World War II, rapid population growth and industrialization intensified debates over resource scarcity, with pessimists like Paul Ehrlich warning in his 1968 book The Population Bomb of imminent global famines due to overpopulation outstripping food supplies by the 1980s.^[31] Economist Julian Simon challenged these Malthusian projections, arguing that human intelligence and innovation serve as the "ultimate resource" to counteract scarcity pressures. In his 1981 book The Ultimate Resource, Simon contended that natural resources are not fixed or finite in an ultimate sense, as human adaptability enables substitution, technological progress, and expanded supplies in response to apparent shortages.^[32] He emphasized that population growth, far from exacerbating depletion, generates more inventive minds to solve resource problems, historically leading to lower real prices and greater abundance rather than exhaustion.^[33] Simon's thesis directly confronted post-war scarcity narratives, including the 1972 Club of Rome report Limits to Growth, which used computer models to predict economic collapse by the mid-21st century from resource depletion and pollution.^[15] He critiqued such deterministic models for neglecting empirical trends and human agency, pointing to data showing long-term declines in commodity prices adjusted for inflation, as innovation outpaces consumption. For instance, Simon documented how 19th- and 20th-century advancements in agriculture, energy, and materials had increased per capita resource availability despite population doubling.^[16] His analysis extended to post-war evidence, such as the Green Revolution's yield boosts in the 1960s–1970s, which averted predicted food crises through hybrid seeds and fertilizers, underscoring how market signals and ingenuity respond to scarcity.^[34] A pivotal empirical test of Simon's views came in the 1980 Simon-Ehrlich wager, where Simon bet $1,000 that real prices of five metals—copper, chromium, nickel, tin, and tungsten—selected by Ehrlich, would not rise (inflation-adjusted) from 1980 to 1990, anticipating innovation would keep them stable or falling. Ehrlich, expecting scarcity to drive increases amid population pressures, accepted the challenge. The bet settled on September 29, 1990, with all five metals' prices declining in real terms, yielding Simon a profit of $576.07 after costs, as verified by The Wall Street Journal commodity data.^[35]^[31] This outcome refuted Ehrlich's short-term scarcity forecasts and bolstered Simon's broader claim that resource trends favor abundance when accounting for human capital. Simon's framework influenced post-war policy discussions by shifting focus from zero-sum resource rationing to incentives for discovery and efficiency. He argued that freedom and property rights amplify the ultimate resource's effects, enabling entrepreneurs to invent alternatives like synthetic materials or recycling technologies that historically reduced reliance on virgin ores.^[36] Long-term data post-wager, excluding wartime distortions, supports this: analyses of 1900–2019 commodity prices indicate Simon's position would prevail in approximately 70% of decade-long bets, reflecting sustained innovation-driven abundance.^[37] Critics, including some ecologists, attributed Simon's 1980–1990 win partly to luck from fluctuating markets, but his emphasis on human-driven trends over static models has held against repeated doomsday predictions unmet by events like the averted 1970s oil crisis collapses.^[38]

Classification of Goods

Scarce Goods and Resource Allocation

Scarce goods, often termed economic goods, are those resources or products for which the demand exceeds supply at a zero price, compelling societies to ration their use among alternative ends.^[39] This condition arises because human wants are unlimited while productive resources—such as land, labor, capital, and time—remain finite, rendering all goods subject to trade-offs in consumption or production.^[40] Unlike free goods, which exist in superabundant quantities without cost (e.g., sunlight in most contexts), scarce goods demand explicit choices about distribution to avoid waste or conflict.^[41] Resource allocation addresses this scarcity by assigning limited inputs to competing outputs, a core function of economic systems that determines efficiency in meeting societal needs.^[42] In market-based economies, prices emerge as the primary mechanism, signaling relative scarcity and directing goods to users with the highest marginal valuation, as measured by willingness to pay; for instance, rising oil prices in response to supply disruptions, such as the 1973 OPEC embargo that quadrupled crude costs from about $3 to $12 per barrel, incentivized conservation and shifted demand toward alternatives.^[43] This price rationing reveals information about scarcity dispersed across millions of actors, outperforming centralized planning by aggregating knowledge without requiring omniscience from any single authority.^[44] Non-price methods, such as government rationing, queues, lotteries, or first-come-first-served distribution, allocate scarce goods through administrative rules rather than voluntary exchange, often applied in wartime or emergencies.^[45] For example, during the 2020-2022 global supply chain disruptions exacerbated by COVID-19 lockdowns, some regions rationed semiconductors—critical for electronics—via export controls and priority lists, leading to shortages in consumer goods like automobiles where production fell by up to 10 million units annually in affected markets.^[46] These approaches can ensure equitable access in theory but frequently distort incentives, fostering black markets, underproduction, or misallocation favoring political influence over consumer preference; historical cases, including Soviet-era bread queues where wait times exceeded hours despite subsidies, illustrate how suppressing prices obscures scarcity signals and erodes supply responses.^[47] Efficient allocation of scarce goods hinges on aligning use with productive potential, often requiring secure property rights to internalize externalities and spur investment; without them, resources like fisheries suffer "tragedy of the commons" depletion, as seen in North Atlantic cod stocks collapsing by over 90% from the 1960s to 1990s due to open-access overfishing.^[2] Empirical evidence from privatization experiments, such as New Zealand's 1980s reforms converting state assets to private ownership, demonstrates improved resource utilization, with agricultural output rising 50-100% post-reform through better stewardship.^[48] Ultimately, recognizing scarcity in goods compels ongoing evaluation of allocation methods, prioritizing those that harness decentralized decision-making to expand effective supply over time.^[49]

Non-Scarce Goods and Free Goods

Non-scarce goods, commonly termed free goods in economic theory, are those available in quantities exceeding all possible demands without requiring the allocation of limited resources, thereby incurring zero opportunity cost and commanding no price.^[50] Unlike scarce economic goods, which necessitate choices among alternative uses due to finite supply, free goods impose no such trade-offs, as their abundance allows unlimited consumption by individuals without reducing availability for others.^[51] Prominent examples include sunlight, which provides energy without depletion from use, and ambient air in natural settings, where atmospheric supply dwarfs human respiratory needs absent technological extraction costs.^[52] These goods arise typically from natural processes independent of human production, bypassing the scarcity inherent in manufactured items that demand labor, capital, or materials.^[53] Their non-rivalrous nature—consumption by one party does not preclude others—eliminates rivalry, a core driver of scarcity in rivalrous goods like food or land.^[54] In practice, free goods remain exceptional, as escalating human demands or environmental alterations can induce scarcity; for instance, air transitions from free to economic when pollution necessitates purification devices, incurring costs as of 2023 urban air quality standards in major cities like Beijing showed particulate levels requiring filtration for safe use.^[53] Similarly, seawater, once dismissed as free due to oceanic vastness, faces effective scarcity in desalination processes amid freshwater shortages, with global desalination capacity reaching 100 million cubic meters per day by 2022 to meet localized demands.^[50] This highlights that free status depends on contextual abundance relative to wants, not absolute infinity, aligning with first-principles observation that human valuation can render even vast supplies scarce if extraction or quality enhancement involves rivalrous inputs.^[52] Theoretical treatments, such as those in neoclassical frameworks, exclude free goods from core economic analysis precisely because they evade price signals and resource rationing, underscoring scarcity's role as the discipline's foundational assumption.^[54] Empirical rarity persists, with no large-scale post-scarcity analogs in physical domains as of 2025, though digital replicas like open-source code copies exhibit near-zero marginal reproduction costs, blurring lines but retaining scarcity in origination efforts.^[55]

Economic Implications and Mechanisms

Role of Markets and Prices in Addressing Scarcity

In market economies, prices emerge from the voluntary exchanges between buyers and sellers, serving as decentralized signals of resource scarcity. When supply falls short of demand for a good, its price rises, reflecting the heightened relative scarcity and guiding allocation toward uses where the resource generates the greatest value. This mechanism rations limited supplies to consumers willing to pay the most, ensuring efficient distribution without coercive intervention. Higher prices simultaneously incentivize producers to expand output through increased investment, technological innovation, or resource exploration, while prompting consumers to reduce usage or switch to substitutes, thereby mitigating shortages over time.^[56] Economist Friedrich Hayek argued that prices aggregate fragmented knowledge dispersed among millions of individuals, coordinating economic activity more effectively than any central authority could achieve. For example, an unexpected increase in tin prices alerts distant miners to ramp up extraction, manufacturers to recycle scrap or redesign products, and households to conserve without requiring detailed communication of the underlying disruption, such as a mine closure.^[57] ^[58] This process leverages local incentives and information, fostering adaptation to scarcity signals in real time. Empirical studies affirm the superiority of price mechanisms over non-price rationing, such as quotas, in managing scarce resources. In urban water conservation efforts, pricing strategies have proven more cost-effective than mandatory restrictions, as they elicit voluntary reductions in consumption aligned with marginal costs and user valuations.^[59] Similarly, market pricing in electricity reserves incorporates scarcity adjustments, providing accurate incentives for generation capacity and demand response during peak shortages, avoiding the inefficiencies of suppressed prices that underinvest in supply.^[60] These outcomes demonstrate how prices not only allocate but also dynamically expand effective resource availability through behavioral and innovative responses.

Property Rights and Incentives for Efficiency

Well-defined property rights over scarce resources create incentives for owners to allocate them efficiently by internalizing the costs and benefits of use, thereby mitigating overuse associated with communal access. In the absence of such rights, individuals tend to exploit resources without bearing full marginal costs, leading to depletion faster than sustainable rates—a dynamic formalized in Garrett Hardin's 1968 analysis of the "tragedy of the commons," where shared pastures result in overgrazing because each herder gains privately from adding livestock but shares the depletion costs collectively. Private ownership counters this by imposing personal accountability: owners weigh present consumption against future value, fostering conservation and investment in maintenance or improvement.^[61] The Coase theorem, articulated by Ronald Coase in 1960, further elucidates this mechanism, positing that if property rights are clearly assigned and transaction costs are low, parties can bargain to achieve the economically efficient outcome regardless of initial rights allocation, as mutual gains from trade resolve externalities like pollution or resource rivalry. For instance, a factory emitting smoke onto adjacent farmland would negotiate compensation or mitigation with the landowner, channeling resources toward their highest-valued use rather than litigation or arbitrary regulation. Empirical applications, such as U.S. transferable pollution permits under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, demonstrate reduced emissions at lower abatement costs through such rights-based trading, with sulfur dioxide outputs falling 50% by 2010 while gross domestic product rose. Privatization of fisheries provides stark empirical evidence of efficiency gains from property rights. Individual transferable quotas (ITQs), assigning exclusive harvest shares, have curbed overfishing in Iceland's cod fishery since 1975, stabilizing stocks and increasing yields; biomass levels recovered, with annual catches averaging 300,000 tons sustainably by the 1990s compared to pre-ITQ volatility. Similarly, New Zealand's 1986 ITQ system across 23 species ended race-to-fish excesses, boosting economic rents by an estimated NZ$100 million annually through reduced capacity and bycatch. In land contexts, formal titling in Peru under Hernando de Soto's documented reforms from the 1990s unlocked "dead capital" by enabling collateralized loans, spurring agricultural investment and productivity gains of up to 20% in titled plots versus untitled ones. These incentives extend to innovation: secure rights encourage long-term stewardship, as owners profit from enhancements like irrigation or selective breeding, which communal systems often disincentivize due to free-rider problems. However, efficacy depends on enforcement; weak institutions, as in some post-Soviet privatizations, can lead to elite capture rather than broad efficiency.^[62] Overall, empirical patterns affirm that robust, alienable property rights systematically outperform open access in sustaining scarce resources amid population pressures.^[63]

Innovation Driven by Scarcity Signals

Scarcity generates price signals in competitive markets, where elevated costs for limited resources incentivize entrepreneurs to pursue innovations that either enhance supply efficiency, develop substitutes, or reduce consumption requirements, thereby capturing profits from resolving the imbalance. This process aligns with the economic insight that prices aggregate dispersed knowledge about relative scarcities, directing human ingenuity toward productive ends without central planning.^[64]^[65] Empirical analyses indicate that such signals have historically prompted technological advancements to offset resource constraints, with innovations often compensating for biophysical limits through endogenous technical change rather than exogenous windfalls. For instance, a study examining resource use and economic growth found that induced innovations, spurred by scarcity-driven price hikes, mitigate diminishing returns and input substitution challenges, enabling sustained development despite apparent natural limits.^[66]^[67] Historical precedents illustrate this dynamic vividly: in 17th- and 18th-century Britain, timber shortages for fuel and shipbuilding—exacerbated by naval demands and deforestation—elevated wood prices, prompting a shift to coal mining; this scarcity, in turn, necessitated inventions like Thomas Newcomen's atmospheric engine in 1712 and James Watt's improved steam engine in 1769 to address flooding in deep coal shafts, laying foundational technology for the Industrial Revolution. Similarly, labor shortages in the antebellum American South, due to factors including soil exhaustion and migration, correlated with increased adoption of agricultural machinery, as econometric evidence from historical data shows labor scarcity positively influencing mechanization rates and productivity gains.^[68]^[69] In more recent contexts, scarcity signals have accelerated sector-specific breakthroughs, such as in materials processing: copper shortages in the mid-20th century, driven by post-war demand surges, led to innovations in aluminum substitution and recycling technologies within manufacturing industries. Research bridging scarcity and innovation literatures further substantiates that technologists respond to acute resource pressures by prioritizing substitute development, particularly when market prices clearly reflect the pinch, rather than relying on abundant alternatives.^[70] These patterns underscore a causal link where undistorted price signals—not subsidies or mandates—most effectively harness scarcity as a catalyst for creative problem-solving, though interventions like price controls can blunt these incentives and delay resolutions.^[71]

Empirical Evidence and Trends

Historical Trends in Resource Availability

Despite exponential global population growth—from approximately 1 billion in 1800 to over 8 billion by 2022—empirical measures of resource availability indicate a long-term trend toward greater abundance rather than depletion.^[16] This counterintuitive outcome stems from technological innovations, expanded exploration, and substitution effects that have outpaced demand pressures, leading to declines in real (inflation-adjusted) commodity prices over extended periods.^[72] Economic indicators of scarcity, such as rising user costs or exhaustibility rents, show no systematic increase; instead, data reveal stable or falling trends in scarcity signals since the 19th century.^[5] Commodity price indices provide concrete evidence of this pattern. Real prices of nonrenewable resources, including metals and energy, have exhibited cyclical fluctuations but no secular upward trajectory from 1900 onward, with long-term averages remaining below early 20th-century peaks when adjusted for economic output or wages.^[73] For instance, wage-adjusted prices of raw materials have declined over multi-decade spans, as documented in analyses spanning the industrial era, reflecting supply responses to demand via efficiency gains and new discoveries.^[74] Agricultural commodities, often cited in scarcity debates, have followed suit: real global food prices fell by over 70% from the late 19th century to the mid-20th century, enabled by mechanization, fertilizers, and high-yield varieties that boosted per capita output despite population pressures.^[75] Modern extensions of these trends, such as the Simon Abundance Index—which calculates abundance as the inverse of time-prices (hours of labor needed to acquire a unit of resource) relative to population growth—quantify the acceleration. From 1980 to 2024, the index rose to 618.4, signifying resources became 518% more abundant, with all tracked commodities contributing to the gain through price drops averaging 64.7% against global hourly incomes by 2017.^[76]^[77] These patterns hold across diverse resource classes, underscoring that human capital has acted as the "ultimate resource" in alleviating historical scarcities, rather than fixed endowments dictating outcomes.^[15]

Modern Metrics: Simon Abundance Index and Beyond

The Simon Abundance Index (SAI), developed by economists Gale Pooley and Marian Tupy, extends Julian Simon's thesis that human population growth correlates with increased resource abundance through innovation rather than depletion.^[15] The index calculates resource availability by dividing the percentage change in global population by the percentage change in the "time-price" of commodities, where time-price is the nominal price of a resource divided by average global hourly income.^[78] A SAI value greater than 100 indicates growing abundance per capita; for instance, between 1980 and 2017, the SAI for 50 basic commodities—including metals, energy sources, food staples, and fertilizers—reached 479.6, signifying that resources became 379.6 percent more abundant despite a 72 percent population increase.^[79] Annual updates from Human Progress demonstrate sustained trends: the SAI rose to 509 percent more abundant by 2024 compared to 1980, reflecting a 0.93 percent decline in time-prices for every 1 percent population growth across the dataset.^[78] By 2025, the index stood at 618.4, indicating resources were 518.4 percent more plentiful than in 1980, driven by technological advances like hydraulic fracturing for energy and precision agriculture for food.^[76] This metric prioritizes affordability to the average worker over physical stock levels, aligning with Simon's emphasis on human ingenuity as the "ultimate resource" that converts scarcity signals into efficiency gains.^[80] Critics, including some economists, argue the SAI overlooks demand-side factors such as rising incomes spurring consumption of higher-quality resources, potentially overstating uniform abundance effects across commodities or regions.^[81] Nonetheless, empirical correlations hold in peer-reviewed analyses of historical price data, supporting Simon's 1980 wager against scarcity predictions, where resource prices fell relative to wages.^[15] Beyond the SAI, complementary metrics include resource productivity ratios, such as GDP per unit of material input, which the World Bank tracks to show decoupling of economic growth from raw material use; from 1990 to 2020, global material productivity rose 1.5 percent annually in high-income countries. The Inclusive Wealth Index, developed by economists like Partha Dasgupta, extends abundance assessment by valuing natural, human, and produced capital stocks; UN reports using this framework from 1990 to 2018 found per capita inclusive wealth increasing in most nations, countering raw resource depletion narratives through human capital accumulation. These approaches, while broader than SAI's price focus, reinforce empirical evidence of innovation mitigating scarcity, though they require adjustments for externalities like environmental costs not fully captured in market prices.^[82]

Case Studies of Apparent Scarcities Overcome

The Green Revolution, initiated in the mid-20th century, addressed widespread predictions of food scarcity amid rapid population growth in developing countries. High-yielding varieties of wheat and rice, developed by Norman Borlaug and others through selective breeding and supported by chemical fertilizers, irrigation, and pesticides, dramatically increased agricultural output. Between 1960 and 1990, cereal production in developing nations rose by over 150%, outpacing population growth and averting famine projections from figures like Paul Ehrlich.^[83] This period saw global food availability per person increase by 11% from 1961 to 1990, while the number of undernourished people declined relative to population trends.^[84] Innovations such as semi-dwarf wheat varieties enabled higher yields without lodging, with India's wheat production surging from 12 million tons in 1965 to 20 million tons by 1970.^[85] The shale revolution in the United States, driven by hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling advancements since the late 2000s, overcame forecasts of impending peak oil and natural gas shortages. U.S. crude oil production climbed from 5.5 million barrels per day in 2008 to over 12 million by 2019, transforming the country from a net importer to the world's top producer.^[86] This surge lowered global energy prices, with the shale boom estimated to save U.S. consumers $203 billion annually in natural gas and oil costs by 2018, equivalent to $2,500 per family of four.^[87] Natural gas prices fell by about 75% from 2008 peaks, reducing scarcity pressures and enabling exports that stabilized global supplies.^[88] These technological shifts invalidated earlier Malthusian concerns about finite reserves, as extraction efficiency from tight formations expanded effective resource bases. Aluminum, once scarcer and more expensive than gold in the 19th century due to costly extraction from bauxite, became abundant following the independent invention of the electrolytic Hall-Héroult process by Charles Martin Hall and Paul Héroult in 1886. Prior to this, aluminum production was limited to small quantities via chemical reduction, with prices exceeding $500 per pound in the 1850s.^[89] The process, using electrolysis of alumina in molten cryolite, enabled commercial-scale output, dropping prices to under $0.30 per pound by 1900—a reduction by a factor of over 200.^[90] Global production escalated from negligible amounts to millions of tons annually by the early 20th century, facilitating widespread use in industry and averting material constraints in applications like aircraft and packaging.^[91] These cases illustrate how human ingenuity, responding to price signals of scarcity, expands resource availability beyond geological limits, as evidenced by Julian Simon's wager where commodity prices fell despite population growth from 1980 to 1990.^[80] Empirical trends show no systemic exhaustion of major resources when measured by affordability, with innovations substituting and enhancing supply.^[15]

Psychological Dimensions

Scarcity Mindset and Cognitive Effects

The scarcity mindset arises when individuals perceive a lack of critical resources—such as time, money, or social connections—leading to heightened focus on immediate deficits at the expense of broader cognitive capacity. This state, often termed "tunneling," directs mental resources toward the pressing shortage, thereby imposing a "bandwidth tax" that diminishes overall executive functioning, including decision-making, impulse control, and long-term planning.^[92] Empirical investigations, such as those involving low-income sugarcane farmers in India, demonstrate that cognitive performance drops significantly during periods of acute financial strain; pre-harvest IQ-equivalent scores fell by 13-14 points compared to post-harvest abundance, equivalent to losing a full night of sleep or long-term effects of chronic alcoholism. Similar patterns emerged in U.S. shopping mall experiments, where priming poverty reduced cognitive test scores by about 14 points among low-income participants. These effects stem from scarcity's capture of attentional resources, reducing available mental bandwidth for non-urgent tasks and fostering short-term biases. For instance, resource-constrained individuals exhibit greater susceptibility to present bias, prioritizing immediate gains over future benefits, as scarcity amplifies the psychological weight of current needs.^[93] Neuroscientific evidence links perceived scarcity to altered executive functions, including weakened inhibitory control and working memory, with functional MRI studies showing reduced prefrontal cortex activation under scarcity cues.^[94] In laboratory settings, financial scarcity primes have been shown to impair fluid intelligence and arithmetic performance, particularly among those already facing economic pressures, though effects vary by baseline resource levels.^[95] However, the evidentiary strength of scarcity's cognitive impacts has faced scrutiny in meta-analytic reviews. A 2021 audit of over 200 scarcity-related findings revealed that while some core effects, like reduced cognitive bandwidth, show moderate replicability, others—such as tunneling's influence on prosocial behavior—exhibit low statistical power and replication failures, urging caution against overstating universal applicability.^[96] Critics argue that initial high-profile studies may overestimate causality due to priming artifacts or failure to distinguish chronic poverty's structural confounders from transient mindset shifts, with longitudinal data indicating that alleviating scarcity via cash transfers yields only short-term cognitive gains in some populations.^[97]^[98] Despite these limitations, consistent evidence from diverse contexts underscores scarcity's role in perpetuating cycles of impaired judgment and resource misallocation.^[99]

Behavioral Responses to Perceived vs. Actual Scarcity

Perceived scarcity refers to the subjective sense of resource limitation, often independent of objective availability, while actual scarcity involves verifiable shortages in supply relative to demand. Psychological research indicates that perceived scarcity induces a "scarcity mindset," characterized by heightened focus on immediate needs at the expense of broader considerations, reducing cognitive bandwidth for long-term planning and decision-making.^[100]^[92] This mindset, as detailed in experimental studies, leads to tunneling—narrow attentional focus that impairs executive functioning, such as increased switching costs in tasks requiring cognitive flexibility.^[101] In contrast, responses to actual scarcity tend to incorporate adaptive mechanisms shaped by real constraints, such as deliberate resource allocation or innovation, though acute actual shortages can still trigger perceptual amplification. Empirical evidence from consumer behavior shows perceived scarcity prompting impulsive actions like panic buying and hoarding, even when supplies remain adequate overall; for instance, during the early COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, toilet paper hoarding in the United States and Australia stemmed primarily from perceived rather than actual shortages, with surveys linking it to anxiety and anticipated regret rather than verified depletion.^[102]^[103] Such behaviors create self-reinforcing cycles, temporarily exacerbating local scarcities through overconsumption.^[104] Behavioral differences manifest in risk propensity and social interactions: perceived scarcity elevates risk-taking to secure short-term gains, as demonstrated in lab experiments where participants exposed to scarcity cues exhibited higher gambling tendencies in real-stakes scenarios.^[105] It also diminishes prosocial tendencies, with neuroimaging revealing reduced empathic neural responses to others' distress under induced scarcity conditions.^[106] Actual scarcity, however, may foster sustained cooperation or efficiency in resource use, as historical cases of genuine famines prompted communal rationing systems rather than widespread panic, though data distinguishing the two remains limited by the interplay of perception in real-world events.^[107] These patterns underscore how perceived scarcity often drives maladaptive, emotionally charged responses, prioritizing urgency over rationality, whereas actual scarcity signals can align behaviors with objective needs when not distorted by fear.^[108]

Debates and Criticisms

Malthusian Pessimism vs. Cornucopian Optimism

Malthusian pessimism posits that population growth outpaces resource production, leading to inevitable crises. In his 1798 work An Essay on the Principle of Population, Thomas Malthus argued that population increases geometrically while food supply grows arithmetically, resulting in positive checks such as famine, disease, and war to maintain equilibrium.^[22] This view influenced neo-Malthusians like Paul Ehrlich, who in 1968 predicted mass starvation by the 1980s due to overpopulation straining global resources.^[109] Cornucopian optimism counters that human innovation expands resource availability beyond fixed limits. Economist Julian Simon, in The Ultimate Resource (1981), asserted that population growth generates more minds to solve scarcity problems, viewing people as the ultimate resource driving technological progress.^[16] Cornucopians emphasize substitution, efficiency gains, and market signals fostering abundance, rejecting static resource models.^[110] The debate crystallized in the 1980 Simon-Ehrlich wager, where Ehrlich selected five metals expecting price rises from scarcity by 1990, while Simon predicted stability or decline due to ingenuity. Simon prevailed as inflation-adjusted prices fell, with Ehrlich paying $576.07; extended analyses show Simon winning 69.9% of similar bets from 1900–2019 excluding war years.^[111]^[35]^[37] Empirical trends support cornucopians: despite population doubling since 1960, food production rose faster, commodity prices declined in real terms, and the Simon Abundance Index indicates a 64.7% drop in time-prices for resources from 1980–2017 relative to global hourly income.^[112]^[15] These outcomes reflect innovation overcoming predicted traps, as seen post-Industrial Revolution when per-capita income surged amid population growth, falsifying unchecked Malthusian dynamics in modern eras.^[16]

Critiques of Interventionist Responses to Scarcity

Critiques of interventionist policies, such as price controls, subsidies, and regulations aimed at mitigating scarcity, center on their distortion of market price signals, which naturally coordinate production, allocation, and innovation in response to resource constraints.^[113] Economists like Friedrich Hayek argued that prices aggregate dispersed knowledge about scarcity across individuals, enabling efficient resource use without central direction; interventions suppress these signals, leading to misallocation and unintended shortages.^[113] Ludwig von Mises contended that partial interventions, such as those addressing scarcity through mandates or caps, are inherently unstable, either escalating to full control or collapsing due to economic contradictions.^[114] Price controls, often imposed to curb inflation or ensure access during perceived shortages, exemplify these failures by capping prices below market-clearing levels, discouraging supply while demand remains high. In the United States, President Richard Nixon's 1971-1974 wage and price controls resulted in widespread shortages of goods like meat and gasoline, as producers lacked incentives to expand output amid fixed prices.^[115] Similarly, Venezuela's price controls on essentials from the early 2000s onward contributed to chronic empty shelves and hyperinflation exceeding 1,000,000% annually by 2018, as suppliers withheld goods or shifted to black markets rather than incur losses.^[116] Empirical analyses confirm that such controls reduce quantity supplied by preventing price adjustments that signal scarcity, exacerbating rather than alleviating shortages.^[117] In housing markets, rent controls—intended to address affordability scarcity—have been shown through rigorous studies to diminish overall supply and quality. A 2019 National Bureau of Economic Research paper on San Francisco's 1994-2012 rent control expansion found it reduced rental housing supply by 15% via conversions to owner-occupied units and discouraged new construction, as landlords faced capped returns on investment.^[118] Brookings Institution research from 2018 further documented negative externalities, with rent-controlled units lowering nearby property values by up to 4% due to reduced maintenance and mobility, trapping tenants in suboptimal housing while inflating uncontrolled rents elsewhere.^[119] A 2024 review of empirical literature affirmed that rent controls consistently curb housing mobility and investment, worsening long-term scarcity for non-beneficiaries.^[120] Subsidies, deployed to boost supply of scarce resources like energy or agriculture, often fail by artificially lowering costs, encouraging overuse and inefficient allocation without addressing underlying scarcities. In energy sectors, government subsidies totaling over $20 billion annually in the U.S. by 2010 distorted markets by rewarding production volume over cost minimization, delaying innovation and leading to overcapacity in subsidized fuels like corn ethanol.^[121] Critics note that such policies ignore opportunity costs, as subsidized resources crowd out unsubsidized alternatives, perpetuating dependency rather than fostering adaptive responses to scarcity signals.^[121] Empirical evidence from environmental subsidies highlights frequent design flaws, where political allocation favors incumbents over efficient outcomes, resulting in minimal scarcity relief.^[122] These interventions, while motivated by egalitarian aims, systematically undermine the incentives that drive scarcity resolution through voluntary exchange and entrepreneurship, as evidenced by repeated historical patterns of shortages and reduced innovation.^[123] Mainstream economic consensus, drawn from peer-reviewed studies rather than advocacy-driven reports, underscores that market distortions from interventions often amplify scarcity over time, particularly when sources overlook long-run supply effects in favor of short-term relief.^[124]

Post-Scarcity Ideals and Their Feasibility

Post-scarcity ideals envision a societal condition in which advanced technologies, such as automation, artificial intelligence, and molecular manufacturing, render essential goods and services so abundant and inexpensive that they approximate universality without reliance on markets or labor scarcity.^[125] These concepts trace roots to early 20th-century economists like John Maynard Keynes, who in 1930 forecasted that technological progress would solve the "economic problem" of scarcity within a century, reducing workweeks to 15 hours.^[126] Proponents, including futurists and effective accelerationists, argue that exponential improvements in computing power—following Moore's Law, which has doubled transistor density roughly every two years since 1965—and AI-driven efficiencies could extend this to physical production, potentially achieving near-zero marginal costs for basics like food, housing, and energy.^[127] Empirical trends show partial post-scarcity in immaterial domains, such as digital information, where replication costs approach zero due to widespread internet access and storage declines; global data storage capacity, for instance, grew from 0.5 zettabytes in 2005 to over 100 zettabytes by 2023.^[128] However, extending this to physical resources faces insurmountable barriers rooted in thermodynamics. The first and second laws dictate that useful energy degrades into entropy, necessitating continuous low-entropy inputs from finite planetary sources like rare earth metals or sunlight, which cannot be infinitely scaled without ecological collapse or energy costs that preserve relative scarcity.^[129] ^[17] Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen's bioeconomic framework, developed in the 1970s, underscores that economic processes inherently transform high-quality resources into waste, rendering absolute abundance incompatible with physical reality.^[130] Critics further highlight incentive structures and human psychology as infeasible for sustaining such ideals. Historical attempts to preempt scarcity through central planning, as in Soviet-style communism, resulted in misallocation and chronic shortages, contradicting claims of feasibility via coordination alone.^[131] Even assuming technological mastery, unlimited human desires—for status, land, or novel experiences—perpetuate scarcity in non-material realms, as evidenced by persistent inequality in access to prime real estate or personal time despite rising global wealth.^[132] Longitudinal data on automation's impact, such as the U.S. manufacturing sector's output doubling from 1987 to 2017 amid stable employment levels, indicate efficiency gains but no elimination of labor markets or price signals, suggesting post-scarcity remains speculative rather than empirically viable.^[133] Overall, while technologies may alleviate specific scarcities, first-principles limits from physics and economics imply that full post-scarcity ideals overstate human control over natural constraints, with no verifiable trajectory toward realization.^[134]

References

[1]
Scarce Means with Alternative Uses: Robbins' Definition of ...
Feb 9, 2012 · Lionel Robbins defined economics as “the science which studies human behaviour as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses”
[2]
What Is Scarcity? - Investopedia
Jun 9, 2025 · In economics, scarcity is a shortage in the supply of a resource that forces up its price, reducing its distribution to the consumers ...What Is Scarcity? · Natural Resource Scarcity · Scarcity and the Market
[3]
Scarcity: Definition, Important Characteristics and Criticism
Robbins describes this problem as the problem of economising scarce means. In other words, it is the choice of making of an economic activity.
[4]
https://www.tutor2u.net/economics/reference/what-is-the-fundamental-economic-problem
[5]
[PDF] Economics of Natural Resource Scarcity: The State of the Debate
Empirical evidence does not indicate a significant increase in the scarcity of natural resource commodities. Indeed, the historical evidence is that ...
[6]
Basic Economic Concepts: Scarcity - AP Micro Study Guide - Fiveable
It is the fundamental economic problem of having to choose between alternative uses of limited resources. In other words, scarcity forces us to make trade ...
[7]
Natural resources and conflict: A meta-analysis of the empirical ...
Our results show that both resource scarcity and abundance are associated with a higher probability of conflict.
[8]
https://www2.harpercollege.edu/mhealy/eco212i/lectures/5es/5es.htm
[9]
https://old.ntinow.edu/Resources/MdaIsV/7S9133/definition_of-scarcity__in_economics.pdf
[10]
Scarcity
inc'); get_header('Scarcity'); ?> <p>A condition where there is less of something available than at least some people would like to have if they could have them ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[11]
[PDF] Scarcity and Choice
Scarcity. • Economists' Definition: Someone or something faces a constraint. • People, firms, and countries all face constraints on.
[12]
What is scarcity and how can it impact your supply chain? - Sage
Sep 9, 2024 · Absolute scarcity vs. relative scarcity. Absolute scarcity occurs when a resource is physically limited and cannot be replaced. For example ...What is scarcity? · The scarcity principle · Types of scarcity · Causes of scarcity
[13]
Scarcity: Definition, Basics and Examples in Business - NetSuite
Feb 5, 2023 · The key difference between absolute scarcity and relative scarcity is the relationship between supply and demand. Resources that are relatively ...What Is Scarcity? · Scarcity in Business · Causes of Scarcity · Types of Scarcity
[14]
[PDF] Robbins versus Malthus' view of scarcity: absolute and relative ...
Absolute and relative scarcity can be contrasted through Malthus and Robbins' accounts, respectively. I believe that Malthus' account is the most representative ...
[15]
The Simon Abundance Index: A New Way to Measure Availability of ...
Dec 4, 2018 · In economics, in contrast, scarcity “is a relative rather than an absolute concept—water is scarcer in the desert and less scarce in the ...
[16]
Julian Simon Was Right: A Half-Century of Population Growth ...
Feb 16, 2018 · Julian Simon (1932–1998), who years ago explained and predicted the happy confluence of growing population, increasing wealth, and falling commodity prices.
[17]
Beyond Relative Scarcity in Environmental Economics
Dec 7, 2024 · Absolute scarcity represents a fundamental shift in how we understand resource limitations in our world. Unlike relative scarcity, which ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[18]
MINE Absolute & Relative Scarcity
Mainstream Economics focuses on relative scarcity which defines a good as scarce in relation to other scarce goods.
[19]
The Simon-Ehrlich Bet: Teaching Relative Vs. Absolute Scarcity
May 1, 2013 · They have a Malthusian economic worldview. We describe a pedagogical model using “The Bet” between Paul Ehrlich and Julian Simon as its focus.
[20]
An Essay on the Principle of Population [1798, 1st ed.]
In this work Malthus argues that there is a disparity between the rate of growth of population (which increases geometrically) and the rate of growth of ...Missing: geometric | Show results with:geometric
[21]
T. Robert Malthus's Principle of Population Explained - faculty.rsu.edu
"Population, when unchecked, increases at a geometrical ratio. Subsistence increases only in an arithmetical ratio.
[22]
Thomas Robert Malthus - Econlib
Noting that while food production tends to increase arithmetically, population tends to increase naturally at a (faster) geometric rate, Malthus argued that ...Missing: ratio original
[23]
Introduction to Malthus, IPAT and Overpopulation | GEOG 430
Malthus suggested that population pressures lead to resource overuse, famine and misery, in particular, because exponential population growth outstrips food ...
[24]
T. Robert Malthus on Evolution - faculty.rsu.edu
Malthus's basic insight: Nature scatters its seeds in abundance, but it is relatively sparse in the sustenance it provides. Therefore life must continuously ...Missing: key arguments
[25]
The Ecology of Human Populations: Thomas Malthus
Malthus argued that population growth doomed any efforts to improve the lot of the poor. Extra money would allow the poor to have more children.Missing: key | Show results with:key
[26]
Marginalist (or Neoclassical) Economics
Sep 1, 2017 · A first proper wave of marginalism occurred in 1871–77; it focused mainly on marginal utility as a measure of scarcity and formalized a theory ...
[27]
Neoclassical Economics
Dec 18, 2016 · According to the neoclassical perspective, the central economic problem is the organization and allocation of scarce resources. This implies ...
[28]
[PDF] An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science
Economics, we have seen, is concerned with that aspect of behaviour which arises from the scarcity of means to achieve given ends. It follows that Economics is ...
[29]
Lionel Robbins' Scarcity Definition of Economics
Sep 8, 2020 · Thus, Robbins argues, the job of an economist is to study how humans deploy the scarce means available to them. The economist studies the ...
[30]
[PDF] Scarcity | Berkeley Geography
If, according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, scarcity means “the quality or state of being scarce; especially: want of provisions for the support of life,” ...
[31]
A Bet, Five Metals And The Future Of The Planet - NPR
copper, chromium, nickel, tin and tungsten — over a decade. And ...
[32]
The Ultimate Resource - Project MUSE
In this provocative book, Julian Lincoln Simon argues that natural resources are not finite in any meaningful way, and that using such resources now will not ...
[33]
The Ultimate Resource Argues in Favor of Population Growth - EBSCO
Simon contends that more people can drive economic prosperity and innovation, asserting that human adaptability allows societies to overcome resource ...
[34]
Julian Simon: The Ultimate Resource is The Human Mind
Feb 13, 2021 · The key, Simon argues, is freedom. When free minds are blessed with ... One can summarize Simon's conclusion as “more people are blessings, not ...
[35]
Who would have won the Simon-Ehrlich bet over different decades ...
Jan 5, 2025 · Simon bet that prices would fall or stay constant between 1980 and1990; Ehrlich bet that they would increase. Simon won the bet.
[36]
The Ultimate Resource 2 by Julian Simon - FEE.org
The second part of the book explores the effect of population growth on resources and living standards. Simon's analysis, which considers population growth ...
[37]
Luck or insight? The Simon–Ehrlich bet re‐examined
Jun 29, 2020 · We review data from 1900–2019 and find that, if war years are excluded, Simon would have won the bet 69.9 per cent of the time.Missing: details | Show results with:details
[38]
On the Ehrlich–Simon bet: Both were unskilled and Simon was lucky
Simon won because he was lucky. Resource prices reflect the relative scarcity of different resource types, not their absolute scarcity. Given the basis upon ...
[39]
Understanding Economics and Scarcity | Microeconomics
Scarce goods are those for which the demand would be greater than the supply if their price were zero. Because of this shortage, economic goods have a positive ...
[40]
Scarcity - Econlib
In economics, scarcity refers to limitations–limited goods or services, limited time, or limited abilities to achieve the desired ends.
[41]
scarce good - AmosWEB is Economics: Encyclonomic WEB*pedia
A scarce good is more specifically a good with limited availability relative to desired use. Scarcity is the general problem underlying the study of economics ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[42]
https://www.tutor2u.net/economics/reference/ib-economics-resource-allocation
[43]
Economics Is Scarce Resources Allocation - Forbes
Aug 15, 2016 · Economics is the study of the allocation of scarce resources. We have infinite desires and wants and only some limited amount of resources to satisfy them.
[44]
Scarcity (article) | Basic Economic Concepts - Khan Academy
What is scarcity in microeconomics? Scarcity refers to the idea that resources are limited, and that we need to make choices about how to allocate them.
[45]
Allocation in Economics | Definition, Strategies & Examples - Lesson
Scarce resources can be allocated by letting someone decide who gets them, which is deferring to authority. Authority figures are usually the deciders. The ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[46]
https://www.tutor2u.net/economics/reference/what-is-rationing-in-economics
[47]
What are the examples to the terminology "allocation of scarce ...
Feb 14, 2022 · 'Allocation of scarce resources' means that scarce resources should be distributed among alternative uses.
[48]
[PDF] Resources: Allocation, Competition and Productivity - EconEdLink
The result is that scarce resources are not just simply allocated, but they are allocated in ways that push back the limits of scarcity by increasing the value ...
[49]
Allocating scarce resources - FutureLearn
A discussion on methods for allocating scarce resources. Explore the main challenges in economics regarding scarcity, and the role of logistics.
[50]
Definition of a free good - Economics Help
May 3, 2017 · A free good is a good with zero opportunity cost. This means it can be consumed in as much quantity as needed without reducing its availability to others.
[51]
https://www.tutor2u.net/economics/reference/what-are-free-goods
[52]
Economics goods and free goods
Free goods are items that are abundant in supply and do not require the use of scarce resources to produce. They are available in such large quantities that ...
[53]
Free Goods VS Economic Goods | Tigernix Business Blog
Jun 5, 2023 · Free goods are freely available and not priced, while economic goods have a price, are scarce, and require human labor to produce.
[54]
Economic goods and free goods | Learn Economics
A free good is one that does not require scarce resources for its production, and hence has a marginal cost of zero.<|separator|>
[55]
https://www.tutor2u.net/economics/reference/differences-between-economic-goods-and-free-goods
[56]
[PDF] Markets and Commodities
Here, price signals are translated into adaptations by rational and creative people in the market, providing abundance under conditions of scarcity. It is this ...
[57]
Hayek on Decentralized Information in Markets
Jan 28, 2025 · He points out that the operation of prices in a market offers a way of coordinating actions. One example focuses on the price of tin.
[58]
Friedrich Hayek and the Price System - Federal Reserve Board
Nov 1, 2019 · Hayek emphasized that the signals transmitted by the various individual prices in the economy could, together, serve as a useful means of ...
[59]
[PDF] Comparing Price and Non-Price Approaches to Urban Water ...
The analysis emphasizes the emerging theoretical and empirical evidence that using prices to manage water demand is more cost-effective than implementing non- ...
[60]
[PDF] Electricity Scarcity Pricing Through Operating Reserves
Suppressed prices in real-time markets provide inadequate incentives for both gen- eration investment and active participation by demand bidding.
[61]
Lesson 4: Property Rights - Foundation For Teaching Economics
Property rights provide incentives for the owners of resources to weigh the values of present uses against the value of conserving the resources for future use.
[62]
Welfare effects of natural resource privatization: a dynamic analysis
Dec 5, 2019 · Privatization results in an efficiency improvement, as private resource users have an incentive to restrict harvesting effort, and as ...
[63]
3 Reasons Property Rights Are Essential for Healthy Ecosystems
Sep 28, 2016 · Giving people the legal right to own, use and sell land, water and other goods can actually lead to more sustainable resource use.
[64]
Price Signal - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
4.4 Price Signals Drive Innovation and DER Technology Adoption. These price signals provide the price to beat for innovators—not only for new products ...
[65]
Economist Friedrich Hayek Argued That Prices Can Serve As ...
Jun 4, 2025 · He argued that prices aggregate dispersed information—knowledge scattered among individuals—into a single signal that guides economic decisions.
[66]
How effective are innovations as a remedy for resource scarcity?
Aug 1, 2005 · The paper aims to substantiate the importance of endogenous innovations when evaluating the compatibility of natural resource use and economic development.
[67]
[PDF] How effective are innovations as a remedy for resource scarcity?
It explains that technological change has the potential to compensate for natural resource scarcity, diminishing returns to capital, poor input substitution, ...
[68]
Opinion | Scarcity, Mother of Invention - The New York Times
Aug 10, 2006 · The steam engine in turn became the primary new source of power for the Industrial Revolution. All of which came about because of a shortage of ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
[69]
[PDF] When Does Labor Scarcity Encourage Innovation? | MIT Economics
This paper studies whether labor scarcity encourages technological advances, that is, technology adoption or innovation, for example, as.
[70]
Overcoming Scarcities Through Innovation: What Do Technologists ...
In this study, I seek to build a bridge between scarcity and innovation literatures to study when technologists decide to develop technological substitutes.
[71]
Resource Scarcity | BA 850: Sustainability-Driven Innovation
If a government subsidizes the price of gasoline, it weakens the price signals which balance supply, demand, and price. This can lead to severe ...
[72]
(PDF) Policy Analysis The Simon Abundance Index A New Way to ...
Jan 28, 2020 · We find that, in terms of global average hourly income, commodity prices fell by 64.7 percent between 1980 and 2017. Second, the price ...
[73]
Economic indicators of resource scarcity: A critical essay
The theoretical arguments of the conceptual and empirical literature on economic indicators of long run resource scarcity are logically flawed.Missing: term | Show results with:term
[74]
Julian Simon: Irreplaceable Economist, Irreplaceable Man
Simon almost single-handedly punctured Malthusian worries about population growth and natural resource scarcity in works like The Ultimate Resource.
[75]
[PDF] Trends In Nonrenewable Natural-Resource Commodity Prices
This paper is an attempt to reconcile the theoretical predic tions of an increase in prices over time with the empirical find ings of falling real prices. A ...
[76]
The Simon Abundance Index 2025 - Human Progress
Apr 22, 2025 · In 2024, the SAI stood at 618.4, indicating that resources have become 518.4 percent more abundant over the past 44 years.
[77]
Population Growth Leads to Abundant Resources - Cato Institute
Dec 28, 2018 · The Earth became 379.6 percent more plentiful between 1980 and 2017, a compounded annual growth rate of 4.32 percent.
[78]
The Simon Abundance Index 2024 - Human Progress
Apr 22, 2024 · In 2023, the SAI stood at 609.4, indicating that resources have become 509.4 percent more abundant over the past 43 years. All 50 commodities ...
[79]
[PDF] The Simon Abundance Index - Cato Institute
Dec 4, 2018 · We find that the time-price of commodities declined by 0.934 percent for every 1 percent increase in the world's population over the same time ...
[80]
Julian Simon Was Right: Ingenuity Leads to Abundance
Apr 22, 2024 · "The Simon Abundance Index (SAI) quantifies and measures the relationship between resources and population," notes the 2024 edition of the index ...
[81]
Is the Simon abundance index any good? | Department of Economics
Dec 14, 2021 · The Simon Abundance Index is an attempt to capture this idea and measure the change in abundance (in an economic sense) of resources over time.
[82]
[PDF] The Ultimate Resource is Peaking - Center For Global Development
Julian Simon argued that more people were associated with more prosperity: human talents were the “ultimate resource” and the force behind rising living ...
[83]
Green Revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead - PNAS
Between 1960 and 1990, food supply in developing countries increased 12–13% (25). Estimates suggest that, without the CGIAR and national program crop germplasm ...
[84]
Lessons from the Green Revolution: Do We Need New Technology ...
The total food available per person in the world rose by 11 percent over those two decades, while the estimated number of hungry people fell from 942 million to ...
[85]
Viewpoint: The Green Revolution saved 1-2 billion lives globally ...
Aug 25, 2025 · Innovations over the past 60 years have improved food production, which all started with the initial successes of the Green Revolution in the ...
[86]
The Shale Gas and Tight Oil Boom | Council on Foreign Relations
The boom in production of oil and natural gas from shale formations became a significant factor after 2008. Greater availability of domestic energy resources ...
[87]
[PDF] The Economic Impacts of the Shale Revolution
For consumers, lower energy prices are a clear economic benefit. Without the shale revolution, natural gas prices—and likely oil prices—would be far higher, ...
[88]
[PDF] The Value of U.S. Energy Innovation and Policies Supporting the ...
By lowering energy prices, we estimate that the shale revolution saves U.S. consumers $203 billion annually, or $2,500 for a family of four.
[89]
Hall Process Production and Commercialization of Aluminum
Charles Martin Hall succeeded in producing aluminum metal by passing an electric current through a solution of aluminum oxide in molten cryolite.
[90]
Paul Héroult and Charles Hall – Turning a Rarity into a Commodity
Jun 1, 2013 · The Hall-Héroult process reduced the price of aluminium by a factor of 200 and transformed the rarity into a commodity.
[91]
Aluminum: Common Metal, Uncommon Past | Science History Institute
Dec 3, 2007 · ... Hall-Héroult process becomes inevitable. Bunsen could have successfully used electrolysis to produce aluminum over 40 years earlier; after ...Early History · To Electrolysis And Back... · Charles Martin HallMissing: overcome | Show results with:overcome
[92]
The psychology of scarcity
Feb 1, 2014 · This deprivation can lead to a life absorbed by preoccupations that impose ongoing cognitive deficits and reinforce self-defeating actions.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[93]
[PDF] 2 Poverty and Cognitive Function - MIT Economics
Being forced to make constant trade- offs with limited resources can act as a “load” on cognitive function (Mullainathan and Shafir 2013). Fur- ther, poverty ...
[94]
the impact of perceived scarcity on executive functioning and its ...
Jun 12, 2023 · Existing empirical studies have found that scarcity can lead to a decrease in executive functions such as inhibitory control and memory (Mani et ...
[95]
Financial-Scarcity-Related Cues' Impact on the Cognitive ...
Sep 24, 2024 · Prior research suggested that financial-scarcity-related cues disproportionately impede the cognitive performance of the poor, ...Methods · Analytic Strategy · Results
[96]
Empirical audit and review and an assessment of evidentiary value ...
Oct 28, 2021 · Over the past decade, behavioral scientists have investigated how scarcity, or a lack of resources, changes how people think and behave, and how ...<|separator|>
[97]
Does alleviating poverty increase cognitive performance? Short ...
These results suggest that positive financial shocks can enhance the cognitive performance of the poor, at least in the short-term. However, none of these ...
[98]
Poverty and economic decision making: a review of scarcity theory
Mar 9, 2021 · Scarcity theory assumes that cognitive load underlies the negative effect of poverty on cognitive capacity and executive control. Fig. 1. figure ...
[99]
The Cognitive Burden of Poverty: a Mechanism of Socioeconomic ...
The cognitive burden of poverty consumes the mental bandwidth needed for computationally intensive operations such as executive functioning.
[100]
Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much - Behavioral Scientist
Sep 12, 2013 · The scarcity mindset, in contrast, is a contextual outcome, more open to remedies. Rather than a personal trait, it is the outcome of ...
[101]
the impact of perceived scarcity on executive functioning and its ...
Jun 13, 2023 · Existing empirical studies have found that scarcity can lead to a decrease in executive functions such as inhibitory control and memory (Mani et ...Missing: mindset | Show results with:mindset
[102]
Why did all the toilet paper disappear? Distinguishing between ...
Perceived scarcity was the strongest predictor of panic buying. ... Panic buying and hoarding may be evolutionarily adaptive responses to scarcity and ...
[103]
The panic buying behavior of consumers during the COVID-19 ...
This research examines how psychological factors such as uncertainty, perceptions of severity, perceptions of scarcity, and anxiety affected the panic ...
[104]
Buying to Cope With Scarcity During Public Emergencies - Frontiers
Jan 26, 2022 · This research explored the effect of scarcity on panic buying and the role of perceived control and panic in this effect through big data, an online survey and ...
[105]
Experiencing Scarcity Increases Risk Taking: The Journal of ...
Oct 13, 2020 · Experiments in this research provide evidence that perceived scarcity increases risk-taking propensity and risk-taking behavior in the real world.<|control11|><|separator|>
[106]
Scarcity mindset reduces empathic responses to others' pain
Behavioral and neural evidence suggests that inducing a scarcity mindset significantly dampens the ability to empathize with others' pain.
[107]
Why scarcity can both increase and decrease prosocial behaviour: A ...
A scarcity mindset alters cognitive processes by increasing attentional tunnelling and cognitive load, which, in turn, influence social behaviours.
[108]
https://oxfordre.com/psychology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore-9780190236557-e-41
[109]
Julian Simon and Paul Ehrlich's Second Bet | The Daily Economy
Mar 11, 2021 · "It is easy to remember Simon as a cheerful optimist whose view can be summarized as 'more people, more innovations, more value created, ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[110]
In Defense of “Cornucopianism” and a More Populous Planet
Feb 22, 2023 · Cornucopians, led by economist Julian Simon and military strategist Herman Kahn, argued that anxiety over limited natural resources is ...
[111]
Luck or Insight? The Simon-Ehrlich Bet Re-Examined
He claimed that as population increased, resource prices would actually decline. Simon admitted that temporary price spikes would occur, but predicted greater ...Missing: outcome evidence
[112]
How the World Survived the Population Bomb: Lessons From 50 ...
World food production increased faster than world population in every decade since the 1960s, resource prices fell during most of the period, and poverty ...
[113]
"The Use of Knowledge in Society" - Econlib
Feb 5, 2018 · by Friedrich A. Hayek. What is the problem we wish to solve when we try to construct a rational economic order? On certain familiar assumptions ...
[114]
[PDF] A Critique of Interventionism - Mises Institute
... scarcity and inability to find a supply must appear as the far greater evil. In this sense it may be said that limited intervention is illogical and unsuitable,.
[115]
Why Price Controls Should Stay in the History Books
Mar 24, 2022 · Prices allocate scarce resources. Price controls distort those signals, leading to the inefficient allocation of goods and services.
[116]
Why Price Controls Fail: Lessons from History - Adept Economics
Sep 15, 2025 · A more recent example comes from Venezuela, where price controls on essentials such as milk, cooking oil, and toilet paper have created severe ...
[117]
[PDF] The Economics of Price Controls
In this report we first lay out the economic theory of price controls, describing how price ceilings lead to shortages by forcing prices below market levels.<|separator|>
[118]
[PDF] The Effects of Rent Control Expansion on Tenants, Landlords, and ...
Leveraging new data tracking individuals' migration, we find rent control increased renters' probabilities of staying at their addresses by nearly 20%.
[119]
What does economic evidence tell us about the effects of rent control?
Oct 18, 2018 · Rent controlled properties create substantial negative externalities on the nearby housing market, lowering the amenity value of these ...
[120]
Rent controls do far more harm than good, comprehensive review ...
Aug 16, 2024 · The finding that rent controls reduce the supply and quality of rental housing, reduce housing construction, reduce mobility among private ...<|separator|>
[121]
Subsidies Are the Problem, Not the Solution, for Innovation in Energy
They are not rewarded when they maximize consumer value; nor are they punished when they take unnecessary risks or fail to minimize costs. Government actors ...
[122]
Why Are Environmental Subsidies Sometimes Ineffective? → Question
Apr 26, 2025 · Environmental subsidies fail sometimes due to poor design, political interference, market distortions, conflicting policies, ...
[123]
Can Government Intervention Work? - Econlib
Apr 3, 2023 · According to Mises, government intervention does not work because it causes unintended or otherwise undesirable consequences according to the ...
[124]
Rent control effects through the lens of empirical research
This study reviews a large empirical literature investigating the impact of rent controls on various socioeconomic and demographic aspects.
[125]
A utopian strand of economic thought is making a surprising comeback
Mar 11, 2024 · Post-scarcity gives us a positive vision of the future and shows how it all fits together into a coherent program.” But will we still need to ...
[126]
A Roadmap to a Post-Scarcity Society - Lorenzo Pieri
Oct 29, 2021 · Summary. A post-scarcity society can be defined as a society in which all the basic needs of the population are met and provided for free.
[127]
Living in a Post-Scarcity Society: How Automation, AI, and Universal ...
Mar 28, 2023 · A post-scarcity society is a hypothetical economic model in which the production and distribution of goods and services are so efficient and ...
[128]
Economic Scarcity versus Abundance in Digital Transformation
The economy of abundance stands in stark contrast to the economy of scarcity. Its rules, outcomes and the flow of monetary value are all radically different.
[129]
Macroeconomic dynamics in a finite world based on thermodynamic ...
Oct 21, 2023 · This paper presents a conceptual model describing the medium and long term co-evolution of natural and socio-economic subsystems of Earth.
[130]
A survey of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen's contribution to ecological ...
Georgescu-Roegen's claim that the entropy law formed the `taproot' of economic scarcity stemmed from a simple series of observations. The economic process is a ...<|separator|>
[131]
Empiric evidence of abundance and post-scarcity either transition to it?
Aug 16, 2018 · How to recognise then an empirical evidence that we move to abundance and post-scarcity (sounds like promise of communists in old times actually)?.
[132]
The Post-Scarcity Paradox: Will Abundance Enabled by AI and ...
Feb 4, 2025 · This paper explores the "post-scarcity paradox," the concern that such abundance may lead to an existential vacuum and loss of meaning.
[133]
New Technologies Won't Reduce Scarcity, but Here's Something ...
Jun 1, 2018 · Recent technological advances, such as 3D printing and artificial intelligence, will end widespread scarcity.
[134]
Thermodynamic Roots of Economics
Nov 7, 2010 · The first and second laws of thermodynamics should also be called the first and second laws of economics. Why? Because without them there would be no scarcity.Missing: post- ideals criticisms