Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Bilabial click

The bilabial click is a rare type of , a non-pulmonic produced via a velaric in which the form the anterior closure while the back of the seals against the to create a vacuum, followed by the sequential release of the closures starting with the to produce a sharp, smacking noise akin to a . It is represented by the symbol ʘ in the International Phonetic Alphabet (). This consonant occurs almost exclusively as a phoneme in the Southern ( of , such as Nǀuu, where it contrasts with other types like dental, alveolar, palatal, and lateral clicks, contributing to large inventories of phonemes, up to 115 in Taa. These highly endangered languages include Nǀuu, which as of 2024 has only one fluent speaker. Unlike more common clicks, the bilabial variety is highly uncommon globally, appearing in only a handful of endangered languages and absent from other click-using families like Khoe-Kwadi, Sandawe, or Hadza. In these contexts, bilabial clicks can vary phonetically by accompaniment (e.g., tenuis, aspirated, nasalized, or voiced), and they exhibit reduction in casual speech, particularly phrase-finally, where articulatory effort diminishes without fully altering the core closure mechanism. Beyond phonemic use, bilabial clicks appear interjectionally in many unrelated languages worldwide to mimic kissing, disapproval, or encouragement, though without contrastive function. Their production demands precise coordination of multiple articulators, making them challenging for non-native speakers, and they highlight the deep historical roots of linguistic diversity in the region.

Phonetics

Articulation and Production

The is a non-pulmonic articulated using a velaric ingressive , in which air is rarefied within an enclosed oral cavity bounded by closures at the and the velum, without involvement of the lungs. This process begins with the tight closure of both to form the anterior seal, while the dorsum of the simultaneously raises to contact the , creating the posterior closure and isolating a pocket of air in the front portion of the mouth. The body then lowers, expanding the volume of this enclosed space and generating through , as no external air can enter due to the dual seals. The production culminates in the abrupt release of the anterior lip closure, allowing atmospheric air to rush inward into the low-pressure , which produces the characteristic sharp, smacking sound. This ingressive airflow is directed toward the lips, distinguishing the bilabial from other click types where the anterior release involves tongue-tip or side contact with the teeth or , resulting in smaller chambers and higher-velocity air rushes confined to the front of the mouth. Following the release, the posterior velar closure is typically opened, often in coordination with an accompanying pulmonic such as a velar or uvular stop, though the itself relies solely on the velaric mechanism. Variants of the bilabial click differ primarily in the and phonatory settings during the hold and release phases, while maintaining the core velaric ingressive . The tenuis form involves no additional or voicing, yielding a simple voiceless pop from the lip separation alone. In the voiced variant, concurrent vocal fold vibration introduces pulmonic egressive through the or around the during the phase, creating a murmured unique to the larger bilabial chamber that allows sustained voicing without disrupting the . The nasal variant lowers the velum to permit nasal ingressive alongside the oral , resulting in a more diffused inward current through both the lips and nose upon release. Glottalized forms incorporate a glottal to build additional supraglottal , modifying the accompanying release but preserving the bilabial ingressive burst as the primary acoustic event. Acoustically, the bilabial click features an ingressive that manifests as a transient, noisy release burst with low-frequency emphasis due to the lip aperture's properties and broader path, producing a smack-like with diffuse rather than the concentrated frication of dental or alveolar clicks.

Phonetic Features

The bilabial click is classified as a , a subtype of non-pulmonic produced with an ingressive distinct from the pulmonic egressive used in the majority of the world's speech sounds. Specifically, it employs a velaric ingressive , where air is drawn into the oral cavity by creating a partial through the lowering of the body after forming closures at both the front and back of the mouth. The for the influx (the forward closure and release that produces the click sound) is bilabial, involving the closure of both lips to form a pocket, while the outflux (the rear closure and release) is typically velar, though uvular realizations occur in certain languages. In terms of , the bilabial click is fundamentally , functioning as a stop consonant due to the complete oral and abrupt release that generates the characteristic popping sound from the influx. However, variant realizations can include or manners in some dialects, where the release may involve turbulent airflow or a combined stop- sequence, particularly in languages with complex inventories. Voicing possibilities for bilabial clicks parallel those of other click types and include a range of contrasts. The basic tenuis variant is voiceless and unaspirated, with no vocal fold during the . Aspirated forms feature a post-release burst of voiceless , while voiced variants involve vocal fold throughout or during the hold phase. Nasal variants incorporate nasal , often with a velar nasal component at the outflux, and glottalized forms combine the click with a or ejective-like for added constriction. As a , the bilabial click belongs to the major class of obstruents. Secondary articulations, such as , are attested in some systems, where the tongue root is retracted to add a pharyngeal quality to the rear closure, enhancing contrast in languages with extensive click series.

Notation and Transcription

IPA Symbols

The primary symbol in the International Phonetic Alphabet () for the bilabial click is ʘ, a dedicated Latin letter representing the ingressive with bilabial anterior closure and typically velar or uvular posterior closure. This symbol denotes the tenuis (voiceless unaspirated) variant as the default form. Variants of the bilabial click are transcribed by combining ʘ with symbols or diacritics for the posterior articulation and manner. The voiced variant is represented as ɡʘ or ᶢʘ (or with the voiced diacritic ʘ̬), indicating a voiced velar posterior release. The nasal variant uses ŋʘ (or the nasalization diacritic ʘ̃), reflecting a velar nasal posterior. Aspirated forms are notated as ʘʰ, with h indicating aspiration following the posterior release. Glottalized variants appear as ʘˀ, employing the superscript glottal stop for glottalization or ejective-like closure. The adoption of ʘ in the IPA evolved from earlier ad hoc notations, such as p! or circled letters, used in pre-1989 transcriptions of click languages. The 1989 IPA revisions introduced ʘ as the standard for bilabial clicks, with the 2005 revision of the IPA chart further standardizing its use in official charts by refining symbol rendering and confirming its precedence over legacy symbols. When the posterior articulation differs from the default velar, the appropriate symbol precedes ʘ; for instance, kʘ denotes a velar tenuis bilabial click, while qʘ indicates uvular. This compounding follows IPA guidelines for non-pulmonic consonants to specify the efflux mechanism precisely.

Other Notations

In early linguistic documentation of , Wilhelm Bleek developed a system in 1862 using vertical strokes to represent various click types. This system was expanded by Lucy Lloyd in , who introduced the symbol ʘ specifically for the bilabial click. Such notations, including the use of an ! to indicate clicks in general, were common in 19th- and early 20th-century works, with bilabial variants sometimes specified as p! or b! to denote the labial combined with the click release. Khoisanist conventions, developed primarily in the mid-20th century by scholars studying southern languages, typically represent the bilabial click as o or ō. These symbols are often modified with superscripts to specify accompaniments, such as oͤ for the nasal variant or oʰ for the aspirated one. In practical orthographies for languages with bilabial clicks, such as Juǀ'hoan, the bilabial click is written as o, which maps to the equivalent ʘ. Non- transcription systems for clicks, including those for the bilabial variant, faced criticisms for their ambiguity and inconsistency across publications, particularly in distinguishing accompaniments and places of articulation. This led to a concerted push toward in the 1980s, resulting in the adoption of dedicated symbols at the 1989 Convention.

Occurrence in Languages

Languages Featuring Bilabial Clicks

Bilabial clicks occur primarily in the of , with prominent examples in Taa (!Xóõ), Nǀuu, and the related ǂʼAmkoe language (also known as ǂHoan or Gǁqun). These languages employ bilabial clicks as phonemes within a comprehensive inventory that typically includes dental, alveolar, palatal, and lateral clicks as well, though the bilabial variant remains the least common among them. In contrast, other such as those in the Kx'a family (e.g., Juǀ'hoan or ǃKung) and Khoe-Kwadi feature robust click systems but lack the bilabial click, relying instead on the four standard places of articulation. Outside the family, bilabial clicks are exceedingly rare, with possible but highly debated attestations reported in the isolate languages Hadza and Sandawe of ; however, most analyses confirm that these languages utilize only dental, alveolar, and lateral clicks. There are no verified instances of bilabial clicks in , which have borrowed clicks from Khoisan substrates but typically exclude the bilabial type, nor in . Languages featuring bilabial clicks are spoken by fewer than 3,000 people in total, predominantly elderly speakers in , , and , with severe endangerment affecting all communities as of 2025 due to assimilation pressures and declining intergenerational transmission. For instance, Taa has approximately 2,500 speakers, ǂʼAmkoe has around 50 speakers (moribund), and Nǀuu has only 1 fluent speaker remaining.

Examples and Minimal Pairs

Bilabial clicks appear in the phonologies of , where they function as phonemes contrasting with other consonants, including pulmonic bilabial stops like . This contrast is phonemic, as evidenced by near-minimal pairs in which the click and stop differentiate lexical items, though documentation of exact pairs for the bilabial click is limited due to the rarity of the sound. For instance, in Taa (!Xóõ), the [kʘ] contrasts with in environments where the anterior closure is bilabial, contributing to distinct word meanings (Nakagawa 2006). Representative examples from Taa (!Xóõ) include [ʘoa] 'eye' and [ʘq'um] 'to close the mouth', where the bilabial click serves as the initial consonant in the root (March n.d.). These transcriptions use the IPA symbol ʘ for the basic bilabial click release, often accompanied by a velar or uvular closure notated as [kʘ] or [qʘ]. Orthographic representations in practical writing systems for these languages vary; for example, Taa dictionaries employ diacritics or special characters like ◎ for bilabial clicks in some older notations, while modern descriptions favor for precision (Traill 1994). Bilabial clicks frequently occur root-initially in nouns and verbs, integrating into morphological processes such as for . In Taa, click roots like those in [ʘoa] form the base for related forms, and the sound's ingressive aids in perceptual distinctiveness. Non-speakers often misperceive bilabial clicks as lip smacks or kissing sounds due to their labial closure and release, which lacks the tongue involvement of other clicks (Ladefoged & Maddieson 1996). Below are additional examples from , with phonetic transcriptions and glosses:
  • Taa (!Xóõ): [ʘàa] (root-initial click in nominal) (Nakagawa 2006).
  • ǂKhomani (Tuu): [ʘōā] 'eye' (comparable to Taa form, with orthographic ◎ for click) (Collins & Gruber 2014).
  • Taa (!Xóõ): [ŋʘù] 'to suck' (nasalized variant, root in verb morphology) (Traill 1994).
These examples highlight the click's role in core vocabulary, often in 5-10% of roots in click-heavy languages like Taa, where morphology builds on click onsets for derivation without altering the click type (Miller 2003).

Historical and Linguistic Origins

Evolutionary Development

The bilabial click is hypothesized to have originated in the proto-languages of the Khoisan families, particularly within the Tuu (Southern Khoisan) branch, where it is reconstructed as *ʘ in Proto-Kx'a based on comparative evidence from modern languages like Nǀuu and ǂHoan. This reconstruction indicates that the bilabial click was part of an ancient inventory of click consonants, likely emerging through phonetic innovations in the velaric ingressive airstream mechanism that distinguish clicks from pulmonic sounds. Such developments are supported by systematic comparisons across Tuu languages, revealing shared patterns in click articulation and phonotactics that point to a common ancestral system. Contact with neighboring non-click languages, particularly Bantu expansions, has influenced the evolutionary trajectory of clicks, leading to their loss or replacement in certain Khoisan dialects. In Khoe languages, for instance, clicks have undergone reduction due to prolonged interaction with Bantu-speaking groups like Tswana, resulting in substitutions with non-click consonants and varying retention rates across communities. This convergence is evident in eastern Kalahari Khoe varieties, where click loss correlates with sociolinguistic pressures and language shift, as documented in fieldwork showing progressive erosion since the mid-20th century. The modern documentation of bilabial clicks began in the with linguists' descriptions of , including Wilhelm Bleek's 1858 account of sounds in South African languages, though specific notation for the bilabial variant (ʘ) appeared in his later work around 1875. Fuller phonetic analysis and systematic fieldwork emerged post-1950s, driven by researchers like Anthony Traill, whose studies in the 1970s and 1980s provided acoustic and articulatory details of bilabial clicks in such as !Xóõ.

Comparative Analysis

Bilabial clicks represent the rarest type among click consonants, occurring in only a few known click systems, in contrast to the more prevalent dental (ǀ), alveolar (ǃ), and palatal (ǂ) clicks, which form the core inventory in most . This scarcity is attributed in part to their lower perceptual salience compared to other clicks; the bilabial closure produces a subtler acoustic burst, making it less distinct in noisy environments or for perceptual processing, as evidenced by cross-linguistic studies on click . While distinct in their velaric ingressive , bilabial clicks share superficial articulatory and auditory analogies with non-click sounds, such as labial implosives (e.g., in languages like Fula and ), where both involve bilabial closure paired with inward airflow, though implosives rely on glottalic ingressivity rather than lingual suction. They also evoke the "smack" or kiss-like sounds familiar in English , such as representations of lip-popping in casual speech or animal calls, highlighting a cross-linguistic perceptual overlap despite fundamental differences. Typologically, clicks occur in only about 1% of the world's languages, with bilabial clicks even rarer, documented in fewer than 20 languages—primarily in the Tuu family (e.g., Taa and Gǀui), Hadza, and ǂ'Amkoe—based on inventories in databases like PHOIBLE (which logs 18 click languages overall out of over 2,000) and UPSID. This extreme infrequency underscores their status as one of the most marked types globally, confined largely to southern isolates and small families. The integration of bilabial clicks into phonological systems challenges established sonority hierarchies, which typically scale sounds based on pulmonic airflow and acoustic intensity (e.g., vowels > glides > liquids > obstruents), as clicks' non-pulmonic, ingressive nature produces high-amplitude bursts that invert expected patterns of sonority rise and fall in syllable structure.

References

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
    [PDF] PHONETIC REDUCTION OF CLICKS – EVIDENCE FROM NǀUU
    Twenty target words occurred in phrase-initial position, ex- cept for the bilabial click, for which we were only able to find 16 phrase-initial target words ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] FACTS AND MISINTERPRETATIONS IN PHONETIC ACCOUNTS ...
    Aug 21, 2011 · Southern Khoisan is unique in its use of the fifth, bilabial click /ʘ/. Sandawe and Hadza use only /|/, /ǁ/, and /!/.
  4. [4]
    Chapter Presence of Uncommon Consonants - WALS Online
    Clicks are sometimes regarded as particularly exotic speech sounds, but their production is not especially unusual. The mechanism for making clicks is ...
  5. [5]
    Clicks, concurrency and Khoisan* | Phonology | Cambridge Core
    May 20, 2014 · [⊙] is a bilabial click: the anterior closure is made with the lips ... One may have different views on this, according to where one prefers to ...
  6. [6]
    Acoustic features of Hadza clicks - AIP Publishing
    Oct 1, 2021 · Clicks have two components: an attack and an extinction transient. Bilabial clicks have a noisy release, sometimes whisteled.Missing: properties | Show results with:properties
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Handbook_of_the_IPA.pdf
    Voiced uvular nasal. 120. 0274. E2E4. 0. Lower-case 0. Close-mid back rounded vowel. 307. 006F. E269. 0. Bull's eye. Bilabial click. 176. 0298. E2AA e. Barred 0.
  8. [8]
    Differences in airstream and posterior place of articulation among ...
    Jul 10, 2009 · We have also documented a variant production of the bilabial click by Speaker HK that involves contact between the lower lip and the upper teeth ...
  9. [9]
    Non-Pulmonic Consonants – Introducing the IPA
    voiceless click, k͜! k! ! aspirated click, k͜!ʰ, k͜!ʰ !ʰ. voiced click, ɡ͡! ɡ! !̬. nasal click, ŋ͡! ŋ! !̃. glottalized nasal click, ŋ͡!ʔ, ŋ!ʔ !̃ʔ. In my experience ...Missing: tenuis | Show results with:tenuis
  10. [10]
    Full IPA Chart | International Phonetic Association
    ### Summary of Click Consonants (Bilabial Clicks) from IPA Chart
  11. [11]
    IPA Online - Consonants (non-pulmonic) - Newcastle University
    ʘ (Bilabial click). Often referred to as "kissing sound", remember unrounded lips and sucking movement. Clicks, Voiced implosives, Ejectives. ʘ, Bilabial, ɓ ...
  12. [12]
    The IPA Chart - UCLA Phonetics Lab Archive
    Clicks. Voiced implosives. Ejectives ; ʘ. Bilabial. ǀ. Dental. ǃ. (Post)alveolar. ǂ. Palatoalveolar. ǁ. Aveolar lateral. ɓ. Bilabial. ɗ. Dental/alveolar. ʄ.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] A CRITICAL INVESTIGATION OF CLICK SYMBOLISM
    Miss L.C. Lloyd (1911) (see Lloyd and Bleek 1911) adds_the bilabial'c1ick, 9,:of her invention. A_1abio-dental click symbol is designed in the strokes pattern, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
    Journal of the International Phonetic Association: Volume 18 - Issue 2
    Select The symbols for clicks. The symbols for clicks · Oswin Köhler, Peter Ladefoged, Jan Snyman, Anthony Traill, Rainer Vossen. Published online by Cambridge ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] CLICKS IN XHOSA AND NAMA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
    Jan 12, 2010 · Bleek (1862:12) notes that only the Bantu languages adjacent to the Khoisan languages have clicks; the other Bantu languages do not. The Nguni ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Clicks, Concurrency and Khoisan - Edinburgh Research Explorer
    [т] is a BILABIAL click: the anterior closure is made with the lips, and the cavity is made by closing the tongue body against the front of the soft palate ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Khoe-San names (African click languages) - anzsi
    Names of peoples and languages. Language family. Term. Use. Ju !Xun (Used to be !Xu). Ju|'hoansi. Ju|'hoan !Kung. The language and the people. The language and ...Missing: bilabial | Show results with:bilabial
  19. [19]
    An introduction to the “Khoisan” languages
    Oct 4, 2025 · The ǂʼAmkoe language is one of the 3 languages spoken today that use the bilabial click consonant, that is, a consonant that sounds like ...
  20. [20]
    LING 165 - Laura March
    Non-technical Description, Example. ʘ, Bilabial click, Like the kissing sound, but made by just pulling the lips apart rather than pursing them, ʘoa 'eye' in ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Juǀ'hoan [nkh-juh],
    Jan 17, 2011 · ʔāè; this may be simply a phonetic variant of the original form with the complex preglottalized nasalized click. Quoted as ʔ āē (Western dialect) ...
  22. [22]
    Clicks, concurrency and Khoisan - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · Xóõ, where treating clicks as phonemes concurrent with phonemic accompaniments allows the inventory size to be radically reduced, so solving ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Lexicostatistical Studies in Khoisan I: The Ju-ǂHoan Relationship1
    Ju-ǂHoan: Despite the lack of phonetic similarity, both forms can be reconciled by means of recurrent correspondences. Examples of the ǂHoan labial click ...
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    Chapter 9 Click Loss in Khoe-Kwadi
    ### Summary of Click Loss in Khoe-Kwadi Languages Due to Contact and Historical Development
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
    Bilabial: Meaning & Examples - StudySmarter
    Nov 29, 2022 · There are ten distinct bilabial consonants in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). ... Bilabial Click and Implosive. The bilabial click [ʘ] ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] The origin of click consonants - Christian Bentz
    May 31, 2017 · → Test correlation for click families? ▻ Clicks only evolved independently in Khoisan, but all. Khoisan languages have clicks → pointless to ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Xóõ click perception by English, Isizulu, and Sesotho listeners
    Bilabial clicks are partic- ularly rare, being used only in certain southern Khoisan languages [8-10].
  30. [30]
    PHOIBLE 2.0 -
    PHOIBLE is a repository of cross-linguistic phonological inventory data, which have been extracted from source documents and tertiary databases.Inventories · Contributors · FAQ · Disclaimer<|control11|><|separator|>
  31. [31]
    Temperature shapes language sonority: Revalidation from a large ...
    Dec 5, 2023 · It is worth noting that Parker's final hierarchy does not involve click consonants. Although clicks can be acoustically loud, almost louder ...