Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Fricative

A fricative, also known as a spirant, is a type of sound in characterized by the of turbulent through a narrow in the vocal tract, resulting in audible or hissing . This distinguishes fricatives from other consonants like stops, where is completely blocked, or , where the is wider and less turbulent. Fricatives are classified primarily by their place of articulation—the location in the vocal tract where the constriction occurs—and by voicing, which determines whether the vocal cords vibrate during production (voiced) or not (voiceless). Common places of articulation for fricatives include labiodental (involving the lower lip and upper teeth), dental (tongue against or between the teeth), alveolar (tongue at the alveolar ridge behind the upper teeth), post-alveolar (tongue slightly behind the alveolar ridge), and glottal (at the ). Across languages, fricatives can occur at up to 11 pulmonic places of articulation, from bilabial to glottal, though not all combinations with voicing are phonemically distinct in every language. In English, there are nine fricative phonemes, forming pairs of voiceless and voiced counterparts at most places of articulation, except for the glottal /h/, which is voiceless. These include: Fricatives play a key role in phonological contrasts, such as minimal pairs in English (e.g., vs. zip distinguishing /s/ and /z/), and their acoustic properties, like spectral , are crucial for and analysis.

Definition and Articulation

Definition

In , fricatives are consonants produced by directing airflow through a narrow in the vocal tract, generating turbulent known as frication, without the complete characteristic of stops or the smooth airflow of . This relies on the articulators—such as the , , or teeth—approximating closely enough to create but not obstructing the airstream entirely, resulting in a continuous, hissing or buzzing sound. Fricatives are defined primarily by this severe but incomplete constriction, which divides the vocal tract into front and rear cavities that shape the resulting noise, and they form one of the major categories of manners in the (IPA). The term "fricative" derives from the Latin fricare ("to rub"), reflecting the frictional turbulence produced; it was first attested in phonetic contexts in the mid-19th century, with Henry Sweet providing a systematic description in his foundational work A Handbook of Phonetics (1877). Representative examples include the /f/, articulated by pressing the lower lip against the upper teeth to force air through a narrow gap, creating a diffuse noise, as in English "fan." Another common instance is the voiceless alveolar /s/, formed by raising the tip toward the alveolar ridge to channel airflow into a tight stream, producing a high-pitched hiss, as in English "see." Fricatives may also be distinguished by voicing, where the vocal folds vibrate to add periodic pulsing to the .

Articulatory Mechanism

Fricatives are produced through a partial closure of the vocal tract at a specific place of articulation, where two articulators come close enough to create a narrow channel—typically 1-3 mm in width—through which pulmonic airflow is forced, generating turbulent airflow known as frication. This constriction prevents complete occlusion, distinguishing fricatives from stops, while the degree of narrowing ensures sufficient air velocity to induce turbulence rather than laminar flow. The active , such as the lower lip in labiodental fricatives like or the in coronal fricatives, approaches a passive articulator, including the upper teeth for and [θ] or the alveolar ridge for . In labiodental , the lower lip everts slightly to form a tight seal against the upper incisors, creating a short constricted passage anterior to the teeth. For interdental [θ], the tip or positions between the teeth, forming a smooth, open channel without groove. In alveolar , the raises to the alveolar ridge, often with a central groove directing toward the incisors. Variations in stricture degree and shape influence the pattern; for instance, postalveolar [ʃ] involves a domed or flat with a grooved that channels air against the , enhancing intensity compared to the smoother stricture in [θ]. These divide the vocal tract into anterior and posterior cavities, with the anterior cavity's length and shape varying by place: short for ( grooved near teeth) and longer for [ʃ] ( along the ). Aerodynamically, the narrowing accelerates airflow, increasing the (a dimensionless measure of inertial to viscous forces, typically exceeding 1800 for onset), while the Bernoulli effect causes a across the , further promoting and unstable flow leading to . In voiced fricatives like , this process balances with glottal , requiring precise control of subglottal and intraoral pressures to sustain both frication and voicing.

Classification

By Place and Voicing

Fricatives are classified by , which specifies the point of constriction in the vocal tract generating the turbulent airflow, and by voicing, which differentiates sounds based on vocal fold activity. The International Phonetic Alphabet () recognizes eleven primary places for fricatives: bilabial, labiodental, dental, alveolar, postalveolar, retroflex, palatal, velar, uvular, pharyngeal, and glottal. Each place typically supports voiceless and voiced variants, though their presence varies across languages. Voicing in fricatives is determined by the state of the : voiceless fricatives, such as /f/ or /s/, are produced with open vocal folds, yielding aperiodic noise from the alone, while voiced fricatives, such as /v/ or /z/, involve vocal fold , which modulates the with a periodic component and reduces overall intensity due to increased supraglottal pressure. This contrast is phonemic in many languages, enabling distinctions like English "" /fæn/ versus "" /væn/. The following table summarizes common fricatives by place and voicing, with representative IPA symbols and examples from languages where they occur phonemically or allophonically.
Place of ArticulationVoiceless SymbolVoiced SymbolExamples
Bilabialɸβɸ: "fuji" [ɸɯdʒi]; β: "lava" [ˈlaβa] "wash"
Labiodentalfvf: English "fin" [fɪn]; v: English "" [væn]
Dentalθðθ: English "thin" [θɪn]; ð: English "this" [ðɪs]
Alveolarszs: English "sin" [sɪn]; z: English "zoo" [zu]
Postalveolarʃʒʃ: English "ship" [ʃɪp]; ʒ: English "measure" [ˈmɛʒɚ]
Retroflexʂʐʂ: "shī" [ʂɨ]; ʐ: "rén" [ʐən]
Palatalçʝç: "ich" [ɪç]; ʝ: "yo" [ʝo] (in some dialects)
Velarxɣx: "" [xota]; ɣ: "goed" [ɣut]
Uvularχʁχ: "Bach" [bax]; ʁ: "rue" [ʁy]
Pharyngealħʕħ: "ḥāʾ" [ħa]; ʕ: "ʿayn" [ʕajn]
Glottalhɦh: English "hat" [hæt]; ɦ: "havěť" [ɦavɛcɲ]
In numerous languages, the voicing distinction in fricatives is not maintained in all positions, leading to neutralization patterns. A prevalent example is word-final devoicing of obstruents, including fricatives, where underlying voiced forms surface as voiceless, collapsing the contrast; this occurs in (e.g., "Maus" [maʊs] "" versus "Mäuse" [ˈmɔɪzə] "mice") and , affecting perceptual and phonological systems. Such neutralizations are phonological rules that simplify contrasts in specific contexts, often at word boundaries.

Sibilants and Non-Sibilants

Sibilants represent a of characterized by high-intensity turbulent resulting from a narrow in the vocal tract, typically producing concentrated high-frequency noise. These sounds, such as the alveolar /s/ and /z/ or the postalveolar /ʃ/ and /ʒ/, are distinguished from non-sibilant fricatives like the labiodental /f/ and /v/, the dental /θ/ and /ð/, or the velar /x/ and /ɣ/ by their acoustic prominence and articulatory precision. The production of sibilants involves specific tongue configurations, including grooving of the blade to channel airflow narrowly toward the teeth or alveolar , often with laminal (blade) contact that enhances . For instance, in /s/, the forms a groove, creating a smaller resonating anterior to the , which amplifies high-frequency energy above 4-7 kHz. In contrast, non-sibilant fricatives feature broader constrictions without such grooving, leading to more diffuse airflow and lower-intensity noise; the palatal /ç/ in "ich", for example, relies on a flat approximation to the without directed channeling. Perceptually, sibilants exhibit a sharp, hissing quality due to their spectral concentration, making them more salient and easier to distinguish from vowels or other consonants, whereas non-sibilants convey a breathier or raspier from their wider spectral distribution and reduced . This distinction arises from the sibilants' higher acoustic energy, often 10-20 louder in the relevant bands compared to non-sibilants. Cross-linguistically, are far more stable and prevalent in phonological inventories than non-sibilants, appearing in approximately 83-92% of , with /s/ present in 86% of those with any sibilant; if a language has only one fricative, it is typically a sibilant like /s/ in 84% of cases. Non-sibilants, such as /θ/ or /ç/, occur in fewer languages (e.g., /θ/ in about 5-6% globally) and are often less stable diachronically, prone to merger or loss, while sibilants maintain robust contrasts due to their perceptual salience.

Lateral and Specialized Variants

Lateral fricatives are consonants produced by obstructing the central airflow in the vocal tract while allowing air to escape laterally along the sides of the tongue, generating turbulent friction at the point of constriction. The voiceless alveolar lateral fricative, represented in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) as /ɬ/, involves raising the tongue blade to the alveolar ridge to block the center, with friction occurring primarily on the lateral margins. Its voiced counterpart, /ɮ/, adds vocal fold vibration while maintaining the lateral airflow and central blockage. These sounds appear in languages such as Welsh, where /ɬ/ is realized in words like Llanelli (a place name pronounced with initial lateral friction). Lateral fricatives are typologically rare, occurring in fewer than 10% of the world's languages and concentrated in regions like Africa and the Americas rather than Europe. Pseudo-fricatives refer to sounds that exhibit fricative-like turbulence but arise from vowel-like or transitional articulations rather than a dedicated consonantal , often lacking the full narrowing required for true fricatives. A prominent example is the glottal fricative /h/, which is produced as a voiceless version of the adjacent with minimal glottal resistance, creating breathy without a supraglottal narrowing. These variants are distinguished from central fricatives by their dependence on vocalic formants for spectral energy, resembling devoiced vowels more than obstructed airflow. Aspirated fricatives involve a fricative combined with post-release glottal spreading, resulting in audible breathy distinct from plain voiceless fricatives. For instance, the aspirated alveolar fricative [sʰ] appears in languages like Burmese and , where it contrasts with unaspirated /s/ through extended voicing offset and turbulent glottal airflow. In some dialects, such as certain varieties of Thai or historical forms in , aspirated fricatives emerge from cluster simplifications, like stop-plus-fricative sequences, and are phonemically stable but phonetically marked by longer durations. These sounds are typologically uncommon, attested in only a handful of languages worldwide, often undergoing diachronic shifts toward affrication or deaspiration. Nasalized fricatives occur when nasal airflow coarticulates with a fricative constriction, lowering formant resonances and introducing nasal murmur into the friction noise. In Brazilian Portuguese, the labiodental fricative /v/ nasalizes to [ṽ] in contexts following nasal vowels, as in vinho ('wine') /ˈvĩɲu/, where velum lowering allows nasal escape alongside oral friction. This co-occurrence alters the sound's timbre without fully converting it to a nasal stop, and it is phonetically verified through aerodynamic measures showing dual oral-nasal flow. Certain IPA symbols exhibit dual usage for fricatives and approximants, reflecting continuum articulations where constriction degree varies by language. For example, /β/ denotes the in strict realizations (e.g., narrow approximation in ), but a diacritic-lowered [β̞] specifies the approximant in wider forms like Spanish abuelo. Similarly, /ð/ represents the in languages like English this, while a raised version [ð̝] or contextual width indicates approximant-like realizations without full . This ambiguity arises because no language maintains a phonemic contrast between the fricative and approximant at these places, allowing the base symbol to cover both via diacritics for precision. Overall, lateral and specialized fricative variants like aspirated, nasalized, and pseudo-forms are less common than central fricatives, typically confined to specific families or dialects due to their articulatory complexity and rarity in phonological inventories.

Acoustic Properties

Friction Noise Generation

Fricative consonants are characterized acoustically by turbulent generated at a narrow in the vocal tract, where the air builds up behind the stricture and is released through a restricted . This causes a significant increase in and a corresponding drop in static , in accordance with , which promotes the separation of the from the tract walls and the formation of eddies within the flow. These eddies contribute to the aperiodic that defines fricatives, distinguishing them from more laminar flows in vowels or . The primary noise sources in fricatives arise from instabilities in the shear layers at the edges of the constriction, leading to vortex shedding and the amplification of turbulent eddies downstream. Vortex shedding occurs as alternating vortices are released from the shear layer, generating pressure fluctuations that radiate as sound, while shear layer instabilities, such as Kelvin-Helmholtz waves, cause the jet to roll up into coherent structures that further promote turbulence. These mechanisms are particularly prominent in the high-velocity jet exiting the constriction, where the interaction between the jet and downstream obstacles or cavity walls enhances noise production through dipole sources. The of the vocal tract plays a crucial role in amplifying the noise, with downstream cavities acting as resonators that selectively boost certain components of the turbulent . For instance, in sibilant fricatives, the front cavity formed between the constriction and the or teeth resonates at higher frequencies, intensifying the noise output and contributing to the characteristic peaks observed in sounds like or [ʃ]. This coupling between the noise and tract cavities increases the overall intensity and shapes the acoustic output without altering the underlying . The onset of turbulent essential for fricative occurs via a from laminar to turbulent regimes at the , governed by the (Re), a dimensionless measure of inertial versus viscous forces in the . This typically happens at a critical Re of approximately 1000–2000 for fricative strictures, beyond which instabilities dominate and sustained ensues; below this , the remains laminar and insufficient for audible . Unlike stop consonants, where arises transiently from a brief pressure release and plosive burst, fricatives maintain a prolonged that sustains the turbulent jet and produces continuous over the duration of the segment.

Spectral Characteristics

The spectral profile of fricative is characterized by resulting from turbulent airflow at the , often featuring prominent peaks that reflect resonances in the vocal tract. fricatives, such as /s/ and /ʃ/, exhibit concentrated high-frequency energy with peaks typically in the 4–8 kHz range for /s/ and 2–4 kHz for /ʃ/, due to the smaller front size. In contrast, non-sibilant fricatives like /f/ display a more diffuse spectrum with lower overall energy concentration, often lacking distinct high-frequency peaks and showing flatter distribution below 4 kHz. These spectral peaks function as formant-like resonances, primarily determined by the length and shape of the front downstream from the . For instance, posterior constrictions, such as in velar fricatives (/x/), result in a longer front and thus lower resonance frequencies, often with a reduced F1 equivalent around 1–2 kHz, compared to anterior places like alveolars. Place-dependent variations further shift these profiles; alveolar /s/ maintains higher peaks than labiodental /f/, reflecting differences in cavity geometry and airflow dynamics. Voicing modifies the fricative spectrum by superimposing periodic low-frequency energy from vocal fold vibration, typically below 500–700 Hz, which reduces the relative intensity of the aperiodic noise component in voiced variants like /z/ and /v/. This dual-source nature contrasts with the purely aperiodic noise of voiceless fricatives. Measurement of these characteristics commonly employs spectrograms, which visualize aperiodic energy as diffuse, unstructured bands across frequencies, distinct from the harmonic, vertically striated patterns of vowels. Advanced techniques, such as spectral moments (e.g., center of gravity), quantify peak locations and energy distribution for precise analysis.

Distribution and Typology

Common Occurrences

Fricative consonants are ubiquitous in the phonological inventories of the world's languages, with surveys indicating that they occur in approximately 91% of documented languages. More recent databases like PHOIBLE confirm fricatives in about 92% of over 3,000 language inventories. Among these, the voiceless alveolar /s/ stands out as the most frequent, present in 84% of the 317 languages sampled in the UCLA Phonological Segment Inventory Database (UPSID). Other commonly occurring fricatives include the voiceless postalveolar /ʃ/ (46%), the voiceless labiodental /f/ (42%), the voiced alveolar /z/ (30%), the voiceless velar /x/ (24%), and the voiced labiodental /v/ (21%). These segments often form core contrasts within fricative systems, reflecting their stability across diverse linguistic families. In phonological systems, fricatives frequently serve as phonemic contrasts, enabling distinctions in meaning; for instance, the voicing contrast between /s/ and /z/ is phonemic in English, as in the sip versus zip. In other languages, certain fricatives function as allophones of other consonants, such as the /x/ realizing the /k/ in postvocalic or word-final positions in (e.g., Bach [baχ]). Typologically, most languages possess between 1 and 4 fricatives in their inventories, though tend to average around 4, incorporating both and non-sibilant types for richer oppositional roles. Geographically, labiodental fricatives like /f/ and /v/ are particularly prevalent in and , where they appear in over 70% of sampled inventories, often linked to historical and cultural factors influencing . By contrast, uvular fricatives such as /χ/ or /ʁ/ are more typical in North African like and in Western European languages like , where /ʁ/ serves as the primary rhotic. These patterns highlight how fricative distributions correlate with areal , with labiodentals rarer in and parts of . In child language development, exhibit high perceptual salience due to their intense high-frequency noise, allowing infants to distinguish them from other as early as 6 months of age, which facilitates early phonological . This salience contributes to their relatively prompt into early lexicons, though precise mastery may occur later, around 3-4 years in many languages. Overall, the prevalence of 3-5 fricatives in typical inventories underscores their role in marking grammatical and lexical distinctions across human languages.

Rare and Language-Specific Patterns

Pharyngeal fricatives, such as the voiceless /ħ/ and voiced /ʕ/, represent a rare for fricatives, primarily occurring in like where they contrast phonemically and contribute to systems. These sounds are produced with constriction in the , and their voiced variant /ʕ/ is particularly uncommon cross-linguistically due to challenges in maintaining voicing amid turbulent airflow. Glottal fricatives /h/ and /ɦ/ are more widespread but still exhibit restricted distribution; /h/ appears in over half of the world's languages, often as a voiceless counterpart to vowels, while the voiced /ɦ/ is rarer, attested in only about 59 languages including , , and certain dialects, where it patterns as an rather than a . Ejective fricatives, involving with egressive pulmonic airflow, are typologically rare and largely confined to North American indigenous languages; for instance, features ejective alveolar /sʼ/, and several like include ejective sibilants such as /sʼ/ and uvular /χʼ/ as part of their glottalized series. Implosive fricatives, which would combine ingressive glottalic airflow with frication, are virtually unattested due to aerodynamic constraints that prevent sustained turbulence during ; implosion typically applies only to stops or affricates. Bilabial fricatives /ɸ/ and /β/ are typological rarities, absent from most inventories owing to the difficulty of generating sufficient friction at the without labiodental adjustment; exemplifies their with the voiceless /ɸ/ realized before /u/ as an allophone of /h/. Lateral fricatives like the voiceless alveolar /ɬ/ appear in specific families, including such as Welsh, where it contrasts with /l/, and like , which also feature a glottalized variant /ɬʼ/, highlighting their role in areal phonological patterns of the and . Fricatives often arise diachronically through spirantization, a process weakening stops into fricatives; in , intervocalic voiced stops like /b/ develop into fricatives [β] (e.g., Latin "lupus" > "lobo" [ˈloβo]), a change driven by articulatory ease and common in Indo-European branches. Consonant inventories exhibit systematic gaps for fricatives, with no documented languages relying solely on fricatives as obstruents, as their presence universally implies stops—an implicational universal reflecting the marked status of frication relative to . Furthermore, non-sibilant fricatives correlate strongly with presence, as sibilants like /s/ and /ʃ/ dominate inventories (occurring in ~90% of languages), while rarer types such as pharyngeals or bilabials typically co-occur only in expanded systems.

References

  1. [1]
    Describing Consonants: Manner of articulation
    Fricatives are made by forming a nearly complete obstruction of the vocal tract. The opening through which the air escapes is very small, and as a result a ...
  2. [2]
    2.6 Classifying Consonants – Essential of Linguistics
    Sounds with this kind of turbulence are called fricatives. English has labiodental fricatives [f] and [v], dental fricatives made with the tongue between the ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  3. [3]
    Chapter 11.4: Consonants - ALIC – Analyzing Language in Context
    Fricative: /f/ /v/ ~ /θ/ /ð/ ~ /s/ /z/ ~ /ʃ/ /ʒ/ ~ /h/ (The first of each pair is voiceless, the second voiced). Fricatives are made by creating a restriction ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  4. [4]
    Phonetics of Fricatives | Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics
    Oct 23, 2024 · This turbulence is also known as friction or frication noise, hence the term “fricative.” The severe constriction essentially divides the vocal ...
  5. [5]
    Representations of fricatives in subcortical model responses
    Fricatives are obstruent sound contrasts made by constricting airflow in the vocal tract, which produces turbulence across the constriction or a site downstream ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Measuring Consonants (Chapter 11) - The Cambridge Handbook of ...
    11.3.1 Fricatives. Fricative consonants are articulated by forming a very narrow opening between an active and a passive articulator. When a stream of air ...
  7. [7]
    Fricative - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    From Latin fricat- ("to rub"), fricative means "characterized by friction" (adj., 1854) and refers to a fricative consonant (noun, 1863).
  8. [8]
    A handbook of phonetics : Sweet, Henry, 1845-1912 - Internet Archive
    Jun 7, 2008 · A Handbook of Phonetics. Book digitized by Google from the library of Harvard University and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb.Missing: fricative | Show results with:fricative
  9. [9]
  10. [10]
    [PDF] The Mechanism of Speech Production
    Common constrictions for producing fricative consonants are those formed by the tongue behind the teeth (dental: /T,D/), the upper teeth on the lower lip (labio ...
  11. [11]
    Full IPA Chart | International Phonetic Association
    Download the IPA chart. You can download PDF files of the Chart in various fonts, or PNG image files at various resolutions below.IPA: pulmonic consonants · IPA Fonts · Vowels · Non-pulmonic consonants
  12. [12]
    None
    ### Summary of Fricative Articulation (Section 1)
  13. [13]
    2.6 Classifying Consonants – Essentials of Linguistics
    English has labiodental fricatives [f] and [v], dental fricatives made with the tongue between the teeth, [θ] and [ð], alveolar fricatives [s] and [z], post- ...
  14. [14]
    IPA: Labials
    [ɸ]: the voiceless bilabial fricative, symbolized by the Greek letter phi. Examples: Japanese: [ɸɯdʒi] Fuji ([ɸ] in Japanese is an allophone of a phoneme ...
  15. [15]
    Chapter Absence of Common Consonants - WALS Online
    There are also bilabial fricatives, written in phonetic transcription with the symbols /ɸ, ß/, but these are less common than the stops /p, b/ and the nasal /m/ ...
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    Non English Consonants: Part III – Introducing the IPA
    Linguistic Term: Voiceless palatal fricative. Examples (from Wikipedia):. Danish Standard pjaske [ˈpçæskə] “splash”. German nicht [nɪçt] “not ...
  18. [18]
    Voiceless palatal fricative - Wikipedia
    Palatal ; Sicilian · ciumi ; Spanish · Chilean · mujer ; Turkish · zihin ; Uzbek · maktab ...
  19. [19]
    Voiceless uvular fricative - Wikipedia
    Fricative trill ; Arabic · خضراء ḵaḍrāʾ ; Dutch, Standard Northern · acht ; Dutch · Belgian · brood ; English · Scouse · clock ...Features · Occurrence · Fricative trill
  20. [20]
    Voiced uvular fricative - Wikipedia
    It is also present in most Turkic languages, except for Turkish, and in Caucasian languages. It may also occur as ɣ.Features · Occurrence · Notes
  21. [21]
    Final Devoicing before it happens: A large-scale study of word-final ...
    Aug 22, 2023 · Final Devoicing is a phonological neutralisation pattern: [+voice] and [ – voice] obstruents do not contrast in domain-final position. The ...
  22. [22]
    Incomplete neutralization of the voicing contrast in word-final ...
    The present investigation examined incomplete neutralization of the voicing contrast in word-final stops and fricatives in Russian. The main goal of the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Chapter Voicing in Plosives and Fricatives - WALS Online
    Fricatives are the kinds of sounds usually associated with letters such as f, s; v, z, in which the air passes through a narrow constriction that causes the air ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] sibilant fricatives in the speech of a single speaker
    Fricatives are traditionally cross-classified as 'sibilants' or 'non-sibilants'. The precise definition and use of these terms is disputed, as will be ...
  25. [25]
    Evaluating the spectral distinction between sibilant fricatives through ...
    The sibilant fricative consonants /s/ and /ʃ/ are produced with high-intensity and spectrally distinct aperiodic energy that is sensitive to the shape, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  26. [26]
    [PDF] An analysis of vocal tract shaping in English sibilant fricatives using ...
    This shaping of fricatives (e.g. the grooving of the tongue for sibi- lant fricatives) has shown to be crucial in yielding their acoustic properties necessary ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Speech Perception in Phonology - MIT
    The greater distinctness of such sibilant fricatives from non-fricatives can explain their cross- linguistic prevalence: in Maddieson's (1984) survey, 83 ...
  28. [28]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of the cross-linguistic notes on sibilant inventories from Kokkelmans (2021), consolidating all information from the provided segments into a dense, comprehensive response. To handle the volume and complexity of the data, I will use a combination of narrative text and tables in CSV format where appropriate (e.g., for inventories, frequency, and stability comparisons). The response retains all details while ensuring clarity and avoiding redundancy.
  29. [29]
    LING520: Lecture Notes 2 - Penn Linguistics
    Sep 16, 2013 · Places of articulation: which active articulator is responsible, and what part of the upper vocal tract is involved -- bilabial, labiodental, ...
  30. [30]
    Fricative | The Daily Omnivore
    Nov 7, 2012 · Many languages also have pseudo-fricatives (unvoiced vowels, e.g. 'voiceless glottal transition,' as in 'hat'). Fricatives are produced by ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] A panchronic study of aspirated fricatives, with new evidence from ...
    Jul 4, 2011 · Abstract: Aspirated fricatives are typologically uncommon sounds, only found in a handful of languages. This paper studies the diachronic ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Phonetics of Aspirated and Tense Fricatives in Jinghpaw and Burmese
    Building upon characteristics of aspirated fricatives in Korean, this paper examines the phonetics of aspirated fricatives in Jinghpaw and Burmese. Our results.
  33. [33]
    A panchronic study of aspirated fricatives, with new evidence from ...
    Aspirated fricatives are typologically uncommon sounds, only found in a handful of languages. This paper studies the diachronic pathways leading to the ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  34. [34]
    [PDF] The Aeroacoustics of Nasalized Fricatives by Ryan Keith Shosted
    Fricatives require high pressure behind the suprala- ryngeal constriction as a precondition for high particle velocity.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] IPA, Handbook of the International Phonetic Association
    An unshaded gap, such as the velar lateral fricative, may indicate that the sound in question can be produced, but has not been found in languages. It is ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] The Acoustics of Fricative Consonants - DSpace@MIT
    Mar 21, 1985 · The acoustic mechanism of fricative consonants was studied in the context of three domains: speech, mechanical models. and theoretical models. ...
  37. [37]
    Aeroacoustic production of low-frequency unvoiced speech sounds
    A theoretical approach to describing unvoiced speech sound production is outlined using the essentials of aerodynamics and aeroacoustics.
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Noise Sources and Area Functions for the Synthesis of Fricative ...
    Abstract. In this study, we characterize the noise sources and the critical parts of vocal tract ... striction, Recrit = 1800 is the critical Reynolds number, ν ...
  39. [39]
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Spectral features of fricatives and stops
    Fricatives have energy over a wide range, while stops have a closure and noise burst. Voiced stops have a voice bar during closure. [s] and [S] have stronger ...
  41. [41]
    Identifying sounds in spectrograms
    [s] has a higher average frequency than [ʃ] does; and both are higher than [f] or [θ]. Voiced fricatives show aspects of both regular vocal fold vibrations and ...
  42. [42]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  43. [43]
  44. [44]
    Segment Inventories - Mielke - 2009 - Compass Hub - Wiley
    Mar 17, 2009 · Maddieson (1984:12) reports that a typical consonant inventory has between 5 and 11 stops and affricates, 1–4 fricatives, 2–4 nasals, 2 liquids, ...
  45. [45]
    Human sound systems are shaped by post-Neolithic changes in bite ...
    Mar 15, 2019 · 6 Languages spoken in Greenland, southern Africa (Khoisan), and Australia that have gained labiodentals through language contact. (A) West ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Effects of the distribution of acoustic cues on infants' perception of ...
    First, [ç-ʂ] are about 10 times less frequent than, for instance, [∫-s] (in Maddieson, 1984's UPSID, [ʂ]: 21 languages; [ç]: 9 languages; an additional 2 ...<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic regularities related to perceptually ...
    Mar 5, 2024 · Our findings suggest that infants' early phonotactic sensitivities extend to regularities involving perceptually low-salient phoneme contrasts at 9 months.
  48. [48]
    A typology of consonant-inventory gaps
    ### Summary of Fricative-Related Consonant-Inventory Gaps
  49. [49]
    [PDF] voicing of glottal consonants and non-modal vowels
    Apr 8, 2021 · ... [ɦ] is reported for only six languages: Basaá, Lizu,. Shanghainese Wu, Lili Wu, Lower Xumi, and Upper Xumi. Languages with both /h, ɦ/ and /V̤ ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Chapter Glottalized Consonants - WALS Online
    Tlingit (Na-Dene; Alaska) is among the relatively few languages with ejective fricatives, as in the word /s'aaw/ 'crab'. The second group of glottalized ...
  51. [51]
    Is it possible for a sound other than a plosive to be implosive?
    Aug 12, 2017 · Implosives other than stops (including affricated stops) are not attested, and there is theoretical reason to believe that they could not exist.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] A typological study of lateral fricatives:A final course assignment for ...
    Mar 25, 2019 · Lateral fricatives are not very common in the world's languages, yet are not extremely uncommon. They are found in languages from various ...
  53. [53]
  54. [54]
    The Complexity Approach to Phonological Treatment: How to Select ...
    For example, one observation is that “if a language has fricatives, then it will also have stops.” This is based on the observed patterns that languages can ...Missing: typology | Show results with:typology